Aboriginal Worship and the Flight from Whiteness in Australia

Anti-White activism in Australia is becoming increasingly strident

Results from the 2021 Australian Census revealed an astonishing 25 per cent jump in the nation’s Aboriginal population over the preceding five years. This confirmed the trend of the 2016 census showing a 19 per cent surge in the Aboriginal population. Over the last decade the self-identifying “Aboriginal” percentage of the population of Australia has increased from 2.5 to 3.2 per cent. This massive increase in Aboriginal self-identification is not the result of a sudden surge in Aboriginal fertility, but is the culmination of the establishment of an intellectual, political and economic climate that encourages White Australians to shed their racial identity. Like other Western societies buffeted by waves of non-White immigration and anti-White intellectual and political activism, Australia is now a nation where White people are actively discriminated against, and where significant social and financial advantages accrue to non-White people.

Commentators in the leftist media lauded the leap in Aboriginal self-identification, claiming the statistics show Australians finally feel safe to identify as Aboriginal. In truth, the growing embrace of Aboriginal identity and flight from Whiteness is symptomatic of the anti-White trajectory of Australian society as a whole. Commentator Andrew Bolt sees the dramatic increase in the number of White Australians calling themselves Black as evidence of Australia’s “toxic anti-white racism.”

It’s now so embarrassing to be white that another 90,000 Australians have decided to call themselves black instead. … Or let’s put it more kindly: it’s now so chic to be black that these 90,000 Australians have called themselves Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander for the first time in the last census. The 2021 Census is dramatic evidence of the new anti-White racism — and of the growing fraud that comes from lavishing privileges on people claiming to be Aboriginal, with few questions asked. … The 2016 Census found at least 40,000 people who claimed to be Aboriginal or Islander but had likewise chosen not to in the previous survey.

Still, who can blame them from seizing any excuse — however remote or imagined — to stop being white? Check woke bookshops that stock white-hostile titles such as White Fragility, or Back to Black. Or consult the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, which last year published an insanely racist paper calling “whiteness… a malignant, parasitic like condition” that “renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable.” So it’s no surprise that the biggest rises in people now claiming to be Aboriginal are in our wokest states. In Victoria, the rise was a spectacular 37 per cent in five years. NSW was second with 29 per cent. In contrast, the Northern Territory – with the biggest proportion of Aborigines – the rise was just 5 per cent.

Back in 2009 Bolt wrote two columns pointing out that individuals with tiny amounts of Aboriginal ancestry (or none) were taking advantage of a raft of government scholarships and affirmative action job vacancies by choosing to identify exclusively as Aborigines. Bolt claimed these people were choosing to identify as Black to leverage their career and social advancement.

For pointing out this this rather obvious fact, and that this increasing Aboriginal self-identification had been encouraged by the multitude of financial and professional incentives available to those identifying as Aboriginal, Bolt was hauled into court and found guilty of violating Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act (the enactment of which was a direct result of Jewish activism). In September 2010 nine of the “Aboriginal” people Bolt identified in his articles commenced legal proceedings against him and his employer the Herald-Sun. The complainants, represented gratis in the Federal Court by the Jewish barristers Ron Merkel and Herman Borenstein, sought an apology, legal costs and a gag on republishing the articles and blogs and “other relief as the court deems fit.” In the trial Merkel argued in reference to Bolt’s articles that “this kind of thinking led to the Nuremberg race laws and that Bolt had adopted a eugenic approach to Aboriginality.”

In his ruling for the complainants in 2011 the presiding judge Mordy Bromberg (also Jewish) declared that: “I am satisfied that fair-skinned Aboriginal people (or some of them) were reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated by the imputations conveyed by the newspaper articles. … Even if I had been satisfied that Section 18C conduct was capable of being fair comment, I would not have been satisfied that it was said or done by Mr Bolt reasonably and in good faith.” Thus “good faith” as interpreted by a judge is now the criteria for acceptable speech about race in Australia — with this to be determined by the likes of Justice Bromberg who is a prominent member of the Australian Jewish community. This point was not lost on Bolt at the time, who noted that “And which judge becomes relevant, doesn’t it? Or are we not allowed to suggest that, either?”

Today, the increasingly anti-White tenor of Australian society, and proliferating government programs designed to redress Aboriginal social dysfunction (currently costing taxpayers around $33 billion annually, or some $55,000 per “Aborigine”) are fueling a population boom, with those with negligible amounts of Aboriginal ancestry (or none) self-identifying as indigenous to access ever-expanding indigenous welfare programs, scholarships and career opportunities. The practice of White Australians self-identifying as Aboriginal has become so widespread that Sydney’s Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council recently made a complaint to a government anti-corruption body about the number of Sydney University students identifying as Aboriginal by using just statutory declarations rather than producing “a confirmation of identity letter from a Local Aboriginal Land Council or other Indigenous community-controlled organisation, showing they meet the Commonwealth three-part identity test: that they are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, identify as such, and their identity is accepted by a community in which they live or previously lived.”

Bruce Pascoe: Poster Child for the Benefits of Fleeing Whiteness 

The remarkable professional and financial benefits that can accrue to White Australians willing to discard their racial identity to become Aboriginal is illustrated by the spectacular rise of “historian” Bruce Pascoe. Before his rise to fame, Pascoe was the obscure author of works such as the 1988 novel Fox, about a “fugitive searching for his Aboriginality.” Critics at the time suggested it would have been a better book had Pascoe not been White: “Pascoe is, after all, imagining the psyche of an Aboriginal person. … He writes as a humane, informed liberal, but as a white man as well.” Around this time Pascoe started identifying as Aboriginal, even though two Aboriginal groups call him a fraud and his genealogy shows all his ancestors are of English descent. But now as an Aborigine, Pascoe has enjoyed wild career and financial success: hailed as an “elder,” promoted as an “Aboriginal historian” by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, given grants for Aboriginal enterprises and made a professor of “Indigenous Agriculture” by the University of Melbourne. “Indigenous Agriculture” is a fake discipline invented by Pascoe using so-called evidence to claim Aborigines were farmers in his widely acclaimed and promoted 2014 book Dark Emu.

Fake Aborigine, bad historian, and all-round grifter Bruce Pascoe

In Dark Emu Pascoe contends that, rather than being Stone Age nomadic hunter-gatherers as long assumed, Australia’s Aborigines had settled towns and practiced agriculture. Pascoe based his ahistorical thesis on dubious sources and legitimate sources taken out of context. In their critical analysis of Dark Emu, the academics Peter Sutton and Keryn Walshe demolish Dark Emu noting the book is poorly researched, not fully sourced, and, when it is sourced, Pascoe does “not cite the relevant extract from a source in its correct context, thus skewing the interpretation.”[1] They also note Pascoe’s tendency to generalize from local examples to incorrectly claim that particular technologies were used across the whole Australian continent. They and anthropologist Ian Keen conclude that Pascoe’s thesis is a vast exaggeration: that Aborigines were fundamentally Stone Age hunter-gatherers who practiced some rudimentary forms of agriculture on an insignificant scale.[2] Sutton and Walshe also chastised Pascoe for his implicit acceptance of the (now verboten) anthropological notion that settled agricultural societies are superior to those of nomadic hunter-gatherers. Even some Aboriginal activists like Hannah McGlade criticized Dark Emu, insisting the book is “misleading and offensive to Aboriginal people and culture” and “is not very truthful or accurate.”[3]

Lying to schoolchildren

These criticisms have not prevented Pascoe’s work from being showered with awards, aggressively promoted by the leftist media (prompting sales of over 250,000 copies) and cited as a valid historical source in textbooks used in Australian schools. One such textbook, citing Pascoe, falsely claims, for example, that Aborigines “actively managed the land in complex ways and so were not nomadic hunters-gatherers.”[4] Another textbook tells students:

Over 30,000 years ago, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were baking bread in Australia. They developed this skill alongside their ability to harvest seeds and grains. Historian Bruce Pascoe says this makes them the world’s oldest bakers – they were baking 15,000 years before the next known bakers, the ancient Egyptians. How do we know this? One way is through the research of historians like Pascoe. Pascoe has written a lot about how they developed farm practices around Australia. These practices enabled them to settle in specific regions, and rely less on hunting and foraging. They were able to manage the land to create food for their communities.[5]

Such dishonesty is symptomatic of how Aboriginal history is taught in Australian schools. Students are fed a romanticized view devoid of any criticisms. Because the culture of Australia’s Aborigines was the most primitive in the world – they remained Stone Age hunter-gatherers right up until contact with Europeans – the focus, in recent years, has been to stress the opposite: how “sophisticated” and “complex” Aboriginal societies and culture were (and supposedly remain) today.

A sampling of school history textbooks reveals that, while offering abundant criticisms of Europeans and European culture, authors flatly refuse to offer any criticisms whatever of Aboriginal culture and society. Instead, Aborigines are lavished with unwarranted praise for the supposed complexity and sophistication of their culture. “First Nations Peoples of Australia” (always capitalized) were, it is insisted, “highly skilled in dealing with environmental challenges,” were “advanced cultures with considerable populations,” had “complex political, social and legal structures,” were “well fed, fitter and probably healthier than their European counterparts,” and developed “sophisticated farming and food-production methods.” They were also the world’s first astronomers: “They used the stars to create complex seasonal calendars, which included details on the position of the stars and constellations.”[6] Unfortunately for those students interested in learning about the exact nature of these “complex” structures, such concepts are declared “sacred” and, consequently, “They can only be shared with the initiated, and cannot be described in a textbook.”[7]

While the early British leaders of the Australian colonies receive scant praise and abundant moral censure, the same textbooks laud the “great Genghis Khan” as “a brilliant, merciless leader who built a vast empire, slaughtering millions in his quest to rule the world.” The Mongol leader’s “determination to succeed combined with a charismatic personality, intelligence, courage and ruthlessness” saw him “lead his ferocious Mongol army on the largest military expansion in history.” The Mongols are commended for having “fostered cultural development in the arts, ensured peace among their peoples, respected different cultures and religions, and improved trade.”

Genghis Khan is granted the epithet of “great” despite the fact his “troops killed many and used the most brutal tortures imaginable,” and the “more resistance they encountered from an opponent, the more horrible the treatment the opponent received from the Mongol army.” In fact, we are told:

Genghis Khan’s cruelty was unprecedented. At the battle of Kalka River in 1223, the Mongol army defeated the Russian forces, wiping out 90 per cent of the soldiers. Mstislav of Kiev and his army retreated and surrendered in return for their safe treatment. Once they surrendered, however, the Mongol army slaughtered the Russian force. They executed Mstislav of Kiev and buried the remaining noble prisoners alive under a victory platform, enjoying a victory feast on top of them as the nobles suffocated beneath them.[8]

None of this prevents Genghis Khan and the Mongols (as a non-White group) from receiving vastly more acclaim (and less moral censure) than the European explorers, founders and leaders of the Australian nation. When the British arrived in Australia in the late eighteenth century these benighted fools purportedly “failed to recognise that the First Nations Peoples of Australia were advanced cultures who actively managed the land.” Aborigines are also (laughably) said to have been more socially progressive than the British. One textbook informs students that “British Women in the colonial period were treated as second-class citizens. … Women were expected to obey their husbands and to bear children. In contrast, the women of the First Nations of Australia held equal status and power in their communities from the distant past until today.”[9]

In reality, Aboriginal societies were, prior to and after contact with Europeans, extremely abusive to women and children and generally violent. In 1995, paleopathologist Stephen Webb published his analysis of 4,500 individuals’ bones from mainland Australia going back 50,000 years. These bone collections were at the time being handed over to Aboriginal communities for re-burial, which stopped any follow-up studies.

He found highly disproportionate rates of injuries and fractures to women’s skulls, with the injuries suggesting deliberate attack and often attacks from behind, perhaps from domestic squabbles. In the tropics, for example, female head injury frequency was about 20–33%, versus 6.5–26% for males. The most extreme results were on the south coast, from Swanport and Adelaide, with female cranial trauma rates as high as 40–44%—two to four times the rate of male cranial trauma. In desert and south coast areas, 5–6% of female skulls had three separate head injuries, and 11–12% had two injuries.[10]

The high rate of injuries to female heads was very different from the results from studies of other peoples. These findings, according to anthropologist Peter Sutton, confirm that serious armed assaults were common in Australia over thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans.[11]

From 1788, Europeans arriving in Australia were shocked at the extreme physical violence Aboriginal men inflicted on their women. Watkin Tench, a British marine officer who arrived on the First Fleet, noticed a young woman’s head “covered by contusions, and mangled by scars.” She had a spear wound above her left knee caused by a man who dragged her home to rape her. Tench wrote: “They are in all respects treated with savage barbarity; condemned not only to carry the children, but all other burthens. They meet in return for submission only with blows, kicks and every other mark of brutality.”[12] Tench observed that when an Aboriginal man “is provoked by a woman, he either spears her, or knocks her down on the spot; on this occasion he always strikes on the head, using indiscriminately a hatchet, a club, or any other weapon, which may chance to be in his hand.” British soldier William Collins recounted how “We have seen some of these unfortunate beings with more scars upon their shorn heads, cut in every direction, than could be well distinguished or counted.”[13]

In 1802 an explorer in the Blue Mountains in New South Wales wrote how, for a trivial reason, an Aboriginal “took his club and struck his wife’s head such a blow that she fell to the ground unconscious. After dinner … he got infuriated and again struck his wife on the head with his club, and left her on the ground nearly dying.”[14] In 1825, the French explorer Louis-Antoine de Bougainville observed that “that young girls are brutally kidnapped from their families, violently dragged to isolated spots and are ravished after being subjected to a good deal of cruelty.”[15]

George Robinson observed in the 1830s that Aboriginal men in Tasmania “courted” their women by stabbing them with sharp sticks and cutting them with knives prior to rape.[16] A contemporaneous account by an ex-convict named Lingard noted that: “I scarcely ever saw a married woman, but she had got six or seven cuts in her head, given by her husband with a tomahawk, several inches in length and very deep.”[17] Explorer Edward John Eyre similarly observed that “women are often sadly ill-treated by their husbands and friends. … They are frequently beaten about the head, with waddies [clubs], in the most dreadful manner, or speared in the limbs for the most trivial offences. … Few women will be found, upon examination, to be free from frightful scars upon their head, or the marks of spear wounds about the body. I have seen a young woman, who, from the number of these marks, appeared to have been riddled with spear wounds.”[18]

None of these accounts are included in any of the history textbooks currently used in Australian schools. Also conspicuously absent is one of the best primary sources we have for understanding Aboriginal social and cultural practices around the time of European colonization: the account of William Buckley, who lived for over three decades with an Aboriginal tribe around Port Phillip Bay in present-day Victoria in the early nineteenth century. Buckley witnessed constant raids, ambushes and massacres and noted how, in night raids, the Aboriginal tribes he encountered “destroyed without mercy men, women and children.” Buckley also described the practice of cannibalism between the warring tribes of the area, including the practice of eating flesh from the legs of slain warriors which “was greedily devoured by these savages.” Buckley says in one tribal battle he lost his brother-in-law and the man’s wife, along with their blind son, who was then roasted and eaten. He mentions their practice of mortuary cannibalism for love, relating that “they eat also the flesh of their own children to whom they have been much attached should they die a natural death.”

They have a brutal aversion to children who happen to be deformed at their birth. I saw the brains of one dashed out at a blow, and a boy belonging to the same woman made to eat the mangled remains. The act of cannibalism was accounted for in this way. The woman at particular seasons of the moon, was out of her senses; the moon—as they thought—having affected the child also; and certainly it had a very singular appearance. This caused the husband to deny his being the father, and the reason given for making the boy eat the child was, that some evil would befall him of he had not done so.[19]

Such accounts are assiduously hidden from Australian schoolchildren, and Jewish anti-White activists like the late Colin Tatz flared up indignantly when anyone dared to publicly reference Buckley’s detailed eyewitness description of Aboriginal cannibalism. Tatz falsely insisted that “we do not have a single eyewitness account of Aboriginal cannibalism” and when the Australian politician Pauline Hanson referred to the Aboriginal practice of cannibalism, he equated it with “the blood libel against the Jews,” angrily claiming “the Hanson vilification about cannibalism is not of the same magnitude or consequence, but it is very much in the same genre.”[20]

Noting that extreme violence against women and children in Aboriginal communities has a venerable history, and is currently at “catastrophic levels,” Stephanie Jarrett notes that: “It is important to acknowledge [the] link between today’s Aboriginal violence and violent, pre-contact tradition, because until policymakers are honest in their assessment of the causes, Aboriginal people can never be liberated from violence. … Deep cultural change is necessary, away from traditional norms and practices of violence.”[21] Aboriginal woman Bess Price, in her forward to Jarrett’s book pointed out that “my own body is scarred by domestic violence” and noted that “Aboriginal people have to acknowledge the truth. We can’t blame all of our problems on the white man.”[22]

The “Genocide” Charge

Unlike Price, the authors of all the textbooks currently used in Australian schools are content to blame all Aboriginal problems on Europeans whom they charge with “genocide.” Students are informed in one text book that while previous generations of historians (i.e., the rational ones who weren’t slaves to today’s regnant anti-White ideology) used words like “settled, settlement and settler” to describe the arrival of Europeans in Australia, modern (woke) historians much prefer “words such as colonist and invader.” These modern historians, we are informed, also “use the word genocide to describe the experience of First Nations Peoples of Australia.”[23]

Today’s anti-White historians (and the activist authors of school textbooks) straddle a muddy line between contradictory narratives: on the one hand we are told that British settlers sneakily (and immorally) “stole” the land of the indigenous peoples, while, at the same time, the British arrival in Australia is characterized as an “invasion.” Yet if we accept the “invasion” thesis, then it follows that Australian territory was conquered in a war (and not stolen) by the British — just as warring Aboriginal tribes conquered each other’s territory.

Brainwashed self-hating Whites enthusiastically pushing Jewish activist narratives

There has even been a proposal by the current Labor government to include an exhibit for Aboriginal victims of the “Frontier Wars” at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. By thereby formalizing the notion of a war between Aborigines and Europeans, Aboriginal activists are inadvertently undermining the long-cherished notion of “stolen land” and its propagandistic utility. The Australian War Memorial Act 1980, under which the memorial operates, is clear that the memorial is dedicated only to those who “died in active service in war or in warlike operations by members of the defence force,” which “includes any naval or military force of the crown.” It is certainly not to remember victims of crimes, reprisals and acts of self-defense by Whites, who were primarily pastoralists. Andrew Bolt makes the point that if the memorial is “so keen to honour Aborigines who died fighting for their tribes, then why include only those who died fighting whites? Why not include the many more who died in wars with other Aboriginal tribes?” He notes how:

Tribal warfare was relentless. William Buckley recalled a corroboree with another tribe ended in a fight that killed 20 people. Shortly afterwards, two boys of his tribe were killed. Then three women and an unspecified number of “boys” died in a war with five other tribes. Much later Buckley’s tribe lost at least two women and a man in another battle, but that night ambushed the enemy camp and killed three of theirs. The other tribe then fled, leaving its wounded “to be beaten to death by boomerangs”, with the bodies then “mutilated in a shocking manner” and cooked. And on it went. Multiply the experience of this one tribe by the 500 others. As historian Geoffrey Blainey has noted, the death rates in tribal wars were in some areas clearly worse than what Europeans suffered in their world wars.

All currently-used history textbooks in Australian schools charge Europeans with “genocide” against the Aborigines. As I have previously discussed, the origins of this “genocide” charge can be traced to a coterie of Jewish academics and intellectuals including, most prominently, Latrobe University historian Tony Barta and the late Sydney University genocide studies professor and “anti-racism” crusader Colin Tatz. In collaboration with Winton Higgins, Anna Haebich, and A. Dirk Moses, these Jewish intellectual activists succeeded in ensuring that “genocide is now in the vocabulary of Australian politics.” The word “genocide” was first used regarding Australia’s Aborigines by Barta at an academic conference in 1984 in a presentation entitled “After the Holocaust: Consciousness of Genocide in Australia” where he proclaimed that “genocide had indeed occurred here.”[24] For Barta, a laudable focus on “the Holocaust” had “inhibited consciousness of the violent past that had enabled us to meet on ground named after the colonial secretary, Lord Sydney. The question was equally suppressed where I had settled with my family, the city named after Lord Melbourne.”[25]

The policies of the British administrators of the Australian colonies of the late-eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and those of Australian state and federal governments in the twentieth century, cannot, by any objective standard, be regarded as “genocidal” as the term was defined by Raphael Lemkin, the Polish-Jewish jurist who coined it in 1944. The problem for anti-White activists has been that Lemkin’s definition, subsequently adopted by the UN, relies heavily on “intent to destroy,” which has proved problematic in an Australian context where, “without being able to prove intent on behalf of the colonial administration, the case for genocide is weak.”[26] Barta, therefore, simply redefined “genocide” to make it encompass the totality of European colonial societies like Australia. His redefinition was “a way of obviating the centrality of state policy and premeditation” embedded in Lemkin’s ‘hegemonic intentionalist’ definition of genocide.”[27]

Barta’s redefinition of genocide enabled him to conclude that “Australia — not alone among the nations of the colonized world — is a nation founded on genocide.” He advocates this message “be the credo taught to every generation of schoolchildren—the key recognition of Australia as a nation founded on genocide.”[28] And, as mentioned, the intellectual activism of Barta and others has succeeded in embedding this ahistorical notion in school curricula and textbooks where White Australian children are encouraged to loathe their race, their ancestors and to disregard their incredible achievements. The Sydney Jewish Museum is proudly playing its part in training Australian teachers “not only about the Holocaust” but also about “the Australian genocide.”[29]

Recalling how he was inspired by Barta’s genocide thesis, the late Jewish academic and activist Colin Tatz claimed it “set my wheels going about seeing not parallels or analogies but echoes of the Holocaust here — at the very least making me realize that genocide doesn’t have to be a sharp annihilatory episode confined to 1939 to 1945.”[30] For Tatz, Barta’s presentation was an “inspirational moment and one that became central to my life thereafter.”[31] Embracing and weaponizing the utterly bogus notion of the “Stolen Generations,” Tatz claimed that as a result of “the public’s first knowledge of the wholesale removal of Aboriginal children, the dreaded ‘g’ word is firmly with us,” affirming that the “purpose of my university and public courses” is “to keep it here.”[32] According to Tatz, White people who rejected his “genocide” label exhibited psychological disturbances manifested in “paroxysms, ranging from upset to extreme angst to even more extreme anger, when the (literal) spectres of genocide appear as facets of their proudly democratic histories.”[33]

Inevitably, Barta and Tatz likened rejection of, or even ambivalence toward, their assertion that “Australia is a nation built on genocide” to “Holocaust denial.” Here they were joined by fellow Jewish academic and leading proponent of the “Stolen Generations” myth, Professor Robert Manne. Former editor in chief of The Australian, Chris Mitchell, noted Manne’s penchant for “manipulation of the idea of the Holocaust for political advantage, particularly in the Stolen Generations debate,” observing “this Holocaust tactic, like the related use of the word ‘denier,’ is a simple trick to undermine an opponent’s moral position when a polemicist has little intellectual case.”[34] In levelling the “genocide” charge against White Australians, these Jewish activists seek to exert the kind of psychological leverage used so effectively against Germans, who, as Tatz noted, are “weighed down by the Schuldfrage (guilt question)” to such an extent that “guilt, remorse, shame permeate today’s Germany.”[35]

In addition to this genocide charge, other important parts of the psychological leverage exerted against White Australians are the (now ubiquitous) ceremonial practices known as “Welcome to Country” and “Acknowledgement of Country.” Replacing Christian prayer, these solemn genuflections to the sanctity of Aboriginal people and their culture now feature at the commencement of all public events. Welcome to Country was invented out of whole cloth by the Aboriginal actors Richard Walley and Ernie Dingo in 1976. Despite the lack of any real evidence, some Aboriginal activists allege (relying on Aboriginal oral tradition) that the practice can be traced back thousands of years. We are supposed to take such claims seriously despite the fact that such hearsay evidence is considered unreliable and is therefore inadmissible as evidence in all Australian courts.

Regardless of origin, “Welcome to Country” and “Acknowledgement of Country” have exploded in observance and become a potent symbol of the new secular religion of Aboriginal worship and enforced White penitence. Some jurisdictions, such as New South Wales, have made Welcome to Country (or, failing that, Acknowledgement of Country) mandatory at all government-run events. It was first introduced into the Federal Parliament in 2008 and now forms a regular element of Australian political process. The Acknowledgement of Country is touted by activists as a way “any person can show awareness and respect for Aboriginal culture and heritage and the ongoing relationship the traditional custodians have with the land. … It is a demonstration of respect dedicated to the traditional custodians of the land (or sea) where the event, meeting, school function or conference takes place.” In reality, the practice is about political correctness, virtue-signaling and fostering a culture of White abasement.

The new civic religion of Aboriginal worship has infiltrated corporate Australia via compulsory diversity training — pushed under the threat of people’s livelihoods. It is manifested in scrupulous and ubiquitous observance of Welcome to Country and Acknowledgment of Country (all QANTAS passengers are now subjected to it when landing at any Australian airport), and in the fetish for featuring Blacks of all kinds in advertising (in a nation with a still negligible Black population). It is also expressed in the prominent use of Aboriginal art in corporate headquarters and websites.

It is hardly surprising that, in response to such practices, the diffusion of bogus anti-White historical narratives in Australian schools, and the raft of financial and professional incentives available to Aboriginal people today, we are seeing a sharp increase in the number of White Australians identifying as Black. The spectacular professional rise of individuals like Bruce Pascoe only demonstrates the rich rewards that can flow from shedding one’s White identity in contemporary Australia.

 Brenton Sanderson is the author of Battle Lines: Essays on Western Culture, Jewish Influence and Anti-Semitism, banned by Amazon, but available here.

[1] Sutton, Peter; Walshe, Keryn (2021). Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

[2] Keen, Ian (2021). “Foragers or Farmers: Dark Emu and the Controversy over Aboriginal Agriculture”. Anthropological Forum. 31: 106–128.

[3] Taylor, Paige (23 June 2021). “Darker issues at play over Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu”. The Australian.

[4] Adcock, M., DeFanti, A. Eggleston, T., Osbourne, D. Polatidis, D., Keith Pratt, A., Ritchie, L., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 9 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 20.

[5] Adcock, M., DeFanti, A., Casey, J., Driscoll, B., Eggleston, Frigo, N., Middlebrook, Y., Polatidis, D., Keith T., Keith Pratt, A., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 7 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 7, 6.

[6] Ibid., 20.

[7] Lawless, B., Green, D., O’Brien, P., Shephard, N., Van Weringh, I., Fricker, A., Good Humanities 9 (Matilda Education: Fitzroy, Victoria, 2021), 9, 62.

[8] Lawless, B., O’Leary, D., Van Noorden, P. Good Humanities (Matilda Education: Fitzroy Victoria, 2021), 106.

[9] Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, Op cit., 9, 90.

[10] Tony Thomas, “The long history of Aboriginal violence – Part II,” Quadrant Online, May 7, 2013. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/bennelong-papers/2013/05/the-long-bloody-history-of-aboriginal-violence/

[11] Ibid.

[12] Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 10.

[13] Peter Sutton, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, 2009), 100.

[14] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 13.

[15] Joan Kimm, A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 76.

[16] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12.

[17] Ibid., 12.

[18] Stephanie Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence (Victoria: Ballan, 2013), 123.

[19] William Buckley, The Life and Adventures of William Buckley: Thirty-Two Years a Wanderer Amongst the Aborigines of the Then Unexplored Country Round Port Phillip, Now the Province of Victoria (Hobart: Archibald MacDougall, 1852), 66-7.

[20] Raphael Israeli, The Blood Libel and Its Derivatives: The Scourge of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 2017), 4.

[21] Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.

[22] Ibid., 291.

[23] Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, op cit., 61.

[24] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 251.

[25] Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 161.

[26] A. Francis Johnson, Australian Fiction as Archival Salvage: Making and Unmaking the Postcolonial Novel (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016), 198.

[27] A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.

[28] Ibid., 238; 174.

[29] George Newhouse, “Standing up for the Aboriginal community,” The Australian Jewish News, October 26, 2017. https://www.jewishnews.net.au/standing-up-for-the-aboriginal-community/70424

[30] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 251-52.

[31] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 499.

[32] Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi.

[33] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii; xvi.

[34] Chris Mitchell, “A critic untroubled by facts who seeks to silence dissent,” The Australian, September 17, 2011.

[35] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

64 replies
  1. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    Australia has caught the disease from the USA, like most other countries.
    It is a pity that the USA is taking so long to break up, which is inevitable.
    At the moment the USA is causing trouble in Europe, just as they have caused a lot of trouble since 1776 all over the World. The real and fake Jew side of my family told me what really happened. The real and fake Jews detest Americans but the family would never tell me what very abusive things they call the Americans. We used to call the English “cabbages”.
    At the end of WW2 the Communists made some very sensible suggestions to the American President (the shopkeeper) about World development.The Americans would develop the Americas and the Europeans would stay in Africa. I forget the rest.
    The trouble making Americans wanted to grab the British Empire and Western, and now Eastern, Europe instead.
    I believe that before the USA breaks up it will destroy Australia, Canada and the rest of the White Mans’ World.

  2. Alec
    Alec says:

    This reminds me of how the West is also shedding its Christian identity, not just its White identity.

    We see this internally and in the West’s relations with other countries.

    For example, in the last century Turkey exterminated nearly all its indigenous Christians.

    Turks came from the east and are not indigenous at all. Many people don’t know that.

    The remaining Christians in Turkey are repressed.

    Yet what does the de-Christianized West say and do about its anti-Christian Turkish so-called “ally”?

    Basically nothing.

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      “This reminds me of how the West is also shedding its Christian identity, not just its White identity” – True. Some have posited that belief in Christianity itself results in the shedding of White identity. This may be true in our day when massive amounts of Christians have succumbed to the same prevailing beliefs of racial ‘equality’ and multicultural dogma. But this wasn’t always the case.

      European Christians for centuries saw no conflict between their Christian faith and a healthy racialism. They knew that human racial groups were very much different, and they would have thought of today’s ‘diversity’ cult as strange indeed.

      Even the old guard of White Nationalists (e.g., George Lincoln Rockwell and others) saw no contradiction between a robust Christian faith and a robust racialism. This is because there isn’t any (see my article here on TOO: “Is Christianity Compatible with White Racialism?”).

  3. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    Now in Brazil, one of these corrupt criminals
    (presumably through fraud) is also in power.

    I’m just listening to the only album by a visionary
    video artist who died at an early age, recorded in
    Hamburg in 1983. Two years before his death he
    stayed in Israel for a while, what might he have
    been looking for there? Not really “inspiration”?
    He would have been 68 the day after tomorrow.


    • Bob
      Bob says:

      I can’t wait for him to bash on Transsexuals some more ☺️ what else does Brazil even have to offer us? Coffee? Sepultura? ☺️

  4. Raeto West
    Raeto West says:

    Fascinating to consider this as yet another aspect of Jewish parasitism. An early comparison is with the taking-over of Christianity by Jews – what beliefs early Christians has is not known, but by the time Jews had worked on them the achievements of Rome were overridden. Not assessed rationally, but just cast aside in favor of Jew worship (and disintegration of civilization). Similarly when they invented Islam; Mohammed the crazed rapist was inserted in place of Arabs. It’s impressive how they find a feeble group to secretly ally with, in the expectation of benefit to themselves.

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      “An early comparison is with the taking-over of Christianity by Jews – what beliefs early Christians has is not known, but by the time Jews had worked on them the achievements of Rome were overridden” – Christianity was not ‘taken over’ by Jews. It was not gentiles who ‘invented’ Christianity and somehow at a later time ‘taken over’ by Jews. It was Jewish from the outset in that Jesus and His disciples were all Jews. The early Jewish Christians rightly viewed their new-found faith as an extension of new covenant predicted in Jeremiah 31:31-34. Jesus and His disciples stood in stark contrast to the religion of the Pharisees and Sadducees.

      Christianity eventually evolved into reaching out to gentiles which comported with a host of passages in the Old Testament that foreshadowed many gentiles coming to know the true God (Isaiah 56:8). Jesus Himself spoke of this in John 10:16 and it became progressively evident that gentiles were part of God’s plan.

      While it’s common for some to claim that Paul ‘invented’ Christianity, this theory does not hold weight once one closely examines the actual words of his letters, including the weak arguments of those who espouse it (see the scholarly refutation by Craig Evans, “Who Created Christianity?” as well as David Wenham’s book, “Did St. Paul Get Jesus Right?”).

      “what beliefs early Christians has is not known” – Not true. In fact, not only do we know what the early Christians believed, we even know many of the controversies that they debated or were troubled by. This doesn’t mean we know EVERYTHING, but to suggest that we can’t really know what the early Christians believed stems either from ignorance or intellectual dishonesty.

      Entire books have been written identifying and examining the various controversies and beliefs held by the very early Christians. Moreover, the New Testament itself tells us what the early church believed, including specifically naming certain false teachers and what they believed.

      • Raeto West
        Raeto West says:

        “Entire books have been written” – you have to laugh. Whole libraries repeat the same stuff. Incidentally I heard a talk including KMac who said the Old Testament is an important document on the Jewish self-centered mindset. I don’t think he wrote that, which is a pity.
        A essential part of understanding Jews is seeing the same pattern in different places. Most people still can’t do this. I’m tempted to say especially Americans.

  5. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    Similar analysis has emerged about the red tribes of what we call North America. Incessant warfare, torture of enemy tribesmen and women, sex and work slavery, mass brutality and cruelty, vicious superstitions… I don’t know about cannabilism, would not be surprised.

    Every. Single. Time. Wherever Jews are allowed to run rampant, they attack the host society and people, parasitize them, and ultimately destroy them. Unless

    • Captainchaos
      Captainchaos says:

      What do you think should be done with the Jews? My preference is just to call their Zionist bluff and put them all in Israel, assuming Madagascar is no longer an option.

      PS. Ever heard of a Dutch gentleman and former member of the SS by the name of Willem Sasson? Adolf Eichmann readily confessed his involvement in the mass extermination of the Jews to Sasson in tape-recorded interviews in 1956. The two had plans to collaborate on a book to be published after Eichmann’s death. Holocaust denial is retarded.

      • RockaBoatus
        RockaBoatus says:

        “Holocaust denial is retarded” – Who knows if what Willem Sasson said was the truth? Where are the tapes today? I have not heard of this before, but I’m tempted to ask: Why wouldn’t Jews play Adolf Eichmann’s tapes and confessions before all the world if in fact they existed?

        More than that, I don’t know of any ‘Holocaust Denier’ who would deny that Jews were sometimes rounded up and killed by German soldiers at the order of their officials. These kinds of things happen in any war. But that’s not the same as declaring that six million Jews were gassed to death by executive order of Adolf Hitler or any other German superior. The Red Cross at the end of the war certainly did not come up with a figure even remotely close to six million.

        If Holocaust Denial is so “retarded,” I urge you to refute the detailed works of Germar Rudolf, Arthur Butz, and a host of other serious investigators.

        • Strange World
          Strange World says:

          Apart from the fact that it makes absolutely no logical sense that an alleged “mass murderer”, who is in anonymity, out of sheer naivety gives his consent to “protocol” his crimes (which he naturally tries to cover up) on audio tapes, of all things, which then get into the hands of the Jews through whatever channels for financial gain by the “interviewer”, and a little later are brought against the alleged “mass murderer” as “evidence”.

          The whole affair stinks from start to finish of all-to vile deceitfulness and betrayal out of self-interest. All this should make us highly skeptical and suspicious. Anyone familiar with the typical “modus operandi” of the Jews to set up their opponents by fabricated lies and falsifications knows exactly why.

        • Captainchaos
          Captainchaos says:

          What’s there to refute? That bullets don’t kill? That carbon monoxide isn’t a lethal gas?

          Means, motive, opportunity and a confession.

      • Strange World
        Strange World says:

        “Adolf Eichmann readily confessed his involvement in the mass extermination of the Jews to Sasson in tape-recorded interviews in 1956. The two had plans to collaborate on a book to be published after Eichmann’s death. Holocaust denial is retarded.”

        I see, “Captainchaos”. Isn’t chaos the opposite principle of (natural and organic) order, thus the Jewish principle par excellence? Which expert of the matter uses the Jewish name “Sasson” instead of the Germanic Sassen? Is that a just a careless but telltale (((Freudian))) slip of a tongue? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sasson

        “Sassen had aided certain members of the Dutch resistance during the war”, confesses even the heavily Jew-infiltrated (https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/) Bolshevikipedia. In other words: relying on such an unreliable single “key witness” is not just retarded, it is even super-retarded.

        Your so-called “Eichmann Interview” (most likely recorded by a Jewish voice impersonator) stands in one continuity with “Conversations with an Executioner” and other countless “fantastic” post-war machinations.,, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversations_with_an_Executioner

        • Captainchaos
          Captainchaos says:

          Eichmann confessed to everything at his trial. With a confession from the accused in hand – whether that confession was legitimate or otherwise – what would be the point of fabricating the tape? Why bother?

          • Strange World
            Strange World says:

            The main “trick” that the Jews have developed to perfection is to throw dirt at their enemies, convinced that some of it will always stick. Then they shout out loud, “Look, everyone, at the dirt that sticks to him! He is a Nazi and wants to wash himself clean of his sins!”

            But he has previously “forbidden” everything in the circle of his victims to find out who really caused the dirt. Like sneaky murderers shouting, “Stop the thief, he has my knife in his back!” And so they still peddle their endlessly lamenting victim story, the eternal wandering Jews with their Schtetl tales as they once did in Galicia.

            It does not even occur to them at all that they are getting on the nerves of the entire world and that they are making themselves unpopular, because this need to make themselves unpopular is written in their pedigree. Everyone just thinks, “Oh no, not him again…” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKkO1fUI7aU

        • Carolyn Yeager
          Carolyn Yeager says:

          “Isn’t chaos the opposite principle of (natural and organic) order, thus the Jewish principle par excellence?”

          Yes, the best known phrase for Jews during Hitler’s time is “the ferment of decomposition.” It was first used by German historian Theodor Mommsen (1817-1903) in his monumental “The History of Rome.” But along with it, the number one, most generally agreed on top German characteristic is ORDER. All Germans want, seek, can’t live without, will always create ‘order’ around us. No German or Nat. Socialist would name themselves “Chaos,” I don’t think. Highly unlikely, anyway.
          And thanks for bringing up the spelling. Yes, this Captainchaos smells to high heavens; I thought so from the beginning. He always responds innocently though. He’s smarter than the usual Hasbara goons.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        You mean the Adolf Eichmann the Jews kidnapped from South America?
        Can you imagine what they did to him?
        Yet a book, to be published after his death, no doubt with proceeds contracted to go to Eichmann’s kin, this is the tale you hang your hat on to prove “Holocaust denial is retarded”?

        It seems there’s three types of people. Jews who cannot accept the Shoah didn’t happen, because their entire identity is based on it, and Jew-haters who can’t accept it never happened either, because they base their entire identity on it.

        The third group is the other 99% of humankind who when they hear the ridiculous story are insulted by how stupid the whole thing is.
        Coming to this site to promote your mass Jew-death fantasy is pretty ballsy, lets see if you can back up your arguments.
        I for one won’t be holding my breath.

        • Captainchaos
          Captainchaos says:

          There once was a small town called Lidice in Czechoslovakia. It no longer exists. After the assassination of Heydrich by Czech partisans a tenuous link was found between the people of that town and those partisans. On Hitler’s orders the town was to be razed to the ground and its inhabitants liquidated. Every man including teenage boys were executed by the SS including some women who refused to leave the sides of there sons and husbands. A handful of the children allowed to live were deemed racially fit for Germanization and sold for money to German families. The rest were sent to concentration camps and never heard from again. Those remaining children were reputed to have been gassed at Chelmno.

          These are not the actions of morally normal men but perhaps the most vile psychopathic murders that have ever lived. Before you go calling for the gates of hell to be opened you should at least know what lies on the other side.

    • Bob
      Bob says:

      It’s true the Indians here on the east coast were terrible cannibals ☺️ they managed to have sex with my family too in between stealing stuff ( golden goblets) they probably did steal it ☺️ you can meet a bunch in the western mountains. Asheville and Cherokee. They probably were cooler than modern people are.

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      @Karl Haemers I have asked this of some friends, and I mean no malice, harm, etc., here in asking this. Why didn’t the French or the British wipe out the Indigenous? Was it because the lawyers, and the lawyers already had much practice as we seen with The Christ, wanted to keep the Indigenous so they could later legally exploit them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRwSjDcnCmI? Like in Canada, we are seeing today with the lawyer oligarch legal nurtured for great divide between the White and Indigenous https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LB7tcuWsz-E&list=UUqllQgX8LahInKffjRHkaYw&index=18 wherein the lawyer oligarch steal billions upon billions upon billions of tax dollars in what they deem to be legal fees, etc…Between 2007 and 2015, the Government of Canada provided about $72 million to support the TRC’s work About the Truth and Reconciliation Commission [a so called government website and they use the word about] https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1450124405592/1529106060525, The Government of Canada dedicated $53.8 million to the Inquiry, and provided terms of reference and a timeline of two years, September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018, to complete its important work. Government of Canada – National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls https://www.canada.ca/en/indigenous-northern-affairs/news/2018/06/government-of-canada–national-inquiry-into-missing-and-murdered-indigenous-women-and-girls.html. Please also keep in mind that many Indigenous men and women do not pay taxes, while also claiming any and all CanadaRA taxable benefits that other tax paying Canadians may receive.

      We know that the French wooed the Indigenous women to also gain access to the land? Today the Metis claim a major stake in also not paying any income tax, etc…KPR said: “Rather than looking at the Native population as a band of thieves, I believe we would be much better served to instead recognize that the Federal Government is treating us today in much the same way it treated the Indians of past centuries.”

      Here here! Like the late Russell Means said in 2008, “All public policies in America now were born and bred on an Indian Reservation. The American people don’t even realize they’re living on one giant Indian reservation.” Today’s health policy of HMO’s in which a person can only go to State-picked doctors was first done through the public health service on Indian reservations. Next is Federal farmland policies have favored corporate takeover and plowed under family owned farms for 40 years, just as Indians were driven of their lands http://www.henrymakow.com/canadas-indian-problem.html.

      Did the lawyer oligarch remove words such as win, lose, conquer, etc., from sports, society, whatever, due to the removal of such words later helping the lawyer oligarch condition with their corrupt treasonous agenda in dividing the White and Indigenous mankind? How many times today do we hear that the Indigenous were conquered…Frank Coutelle: I know more about the law and the history out here than the people themselves. Let me tell you, I feel for them. They’re a proud people. But they’re also a conquered people. That means their future is dictated by the nation that conquered them. Rightly or wrongly, that’s the way it works, down through history https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dfmkymTr4c?

      In the act of conquering God fearing Genghis Khan killed many. I watched a documentary wherein Khan wiped out, while leaving their library untouched, the whole of a Monk Tribe, the Monk’s who captured and put Khan on display, to the extent that archaeologists today cannot find any trace DNA of the existence of these Monks. How many Tibetans have been slaughtered since the Chinese occupation? In the name of conquering, it is not like killing did not take place in the past?

      Dave Dodge here talks about the games Indigenous and the English would play. The Indigenous had a game where they would capture the English. In the end some of the English did not want to return back to England…Native American Land doesn’t hold that the crown had anything. John Marshall [lawyer] who was an obedient servant [to the crown] created title in the crown…In other words they, the crown, had the underlying claim. Normally the underlying claim would be aboriginal rights…Didn’t Native Americans really have the first title? No! Under Native American Law the Indians were more in touch with reality because they understood the land was here before we were and it will be here long after we’re gone. How can you own something like that? You can’t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmlP4n_4Zb4.

      We’ve created a completely new Indian society and we’re the new leaders of it. It’s a done deal. – Wendy Grant-John, government Indian and “chief” of the Musqueam Tribal Council, April 2006 http://www.henrymakow.com/the-fallacy-of-indigeonous.html.

      Where is all this money coming from…20 years after Ipperwash crisis, First Nation accepts $95M offer https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/ipperwash-1.3233013 and what are the lawyers stealing in self-determined legal fees, etc., in these already legally determined settlements from any legal hearings?

      The behavior of the oppressed is a prescribed behavior, following as it does the guidelines of the oppressor…How can the oppressed, as divided unauthentic beings, participate in the pedagogy of their liberation?- Paulo Freire

  6. John D. Alder
    John D. Alder says:

    Australia would be better off if genocide was carried out because there would be no noxious creatures and cretins called aborigines for weak Whites to adore. Where and when does the jew induced stupor dissipate? Excellent yet shocking article. I had no idea things were that bad in Australia.

    • Bob
      Bob says:

      I really love their movies too 😟 the Scottish ones are my relatives. They should be locked up…lol ☺️

  7. What’s uo Skip
    What’s uo Skip says:

    The visceral pain which I feel every time the absurd acknowledgement of country script is trotted out is hard to describe. We are lucky in Australia that our cities are not yet overrun by Africans, although they are being ridiculously over-represented in advertising and a vanguard is more and more evident, but the demoralisation effect on my beautiful Australian people of the puerile ‘paying of repects to elders past, present and emerging’ at most public events is incalculable.

    • What’s up Skip
      What’s up Skip says:

      Username misspelt above. It was Sonny’s catchphrase when talking to his pet kangaroo in the classic sixties children’s show ‘Skippy’.

  8. Servenet
    Servenet says:

    It is the same everywhere, of course, that is, in all (formerly) White nations. Though Whites may be the majority in these Western countries they are on track to slide into minority status and then, presumably, into oblivion. But apart from the “numbers” Whites are dead-men-walking in their (former) countries. They not only have lost cultural, social, and political hegemony over their states/regions, they slurp down the horrific insults offered to them from every quarter, as per this article, for example. A Christian social, political order is mentioned sort of in passing above and yet I, as an Evangelical, am informed from the Scriptures themselves that the madness we witness all around us that we have seen beginning from our childhoods to the ubiquitousness of anti-White raging of today is the result fundamentally from all these Western nations essentially eschewing the Christian Faith replacing it with Darwinism and all its concomitant doctrines and inferential notions, summed up as atheism. How else do you explain to your intellectual satisfaction the shocking nature of the mental illness expressed in all the writings, expressions, and policies of our institutions and essentially consented to by half the populations of Whites in their own “places”? It is the only one that ultimately makes sense. That is that the ruin that confronts us is divinely appointed as clearly threatened in Scripture…and now is upon us –

    “The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.”

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      Well said, and absolutely the truth. It has become apparent that with all the abundance, wealth, materialism, entertainment, and a seemingly endless supply of empty pursuits that take us away from the things that are really important in life, Americans are experiencing what happens when they abandon God.

      We are especially culpable because there are so many opportunities to learn of Him. The greater the knowledge the greater the accountability and even condemnation if we refuse to abide by it.

      This, of course, means nothing to atheists and secularists, but among those who have ‘eyes to see’ and ‘ears to hear,’ there is a deeper understanding of why we are in our current predicament.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” the ruin that confronts us is divinely appointed as clearly threatened in Scripture…and now is upon us –”

      No doubt ;

      since Christianity is a sheeple oriented religion of self-enslavement to their chosenhite jewmasterss . To wit ___

      ” Servants obey in all things
      your masters
      according to the flesh ;
      not with eye service ,
      as men pleasers ,
      but in singleness of heart ,
      fearing God :”

      ( verbatim quote from :
      Christian NT / KJV / Colossians / 3:22 )

  9. Colleen
    Colleen says:

    Good article. The practice now of identifying “country” (without using the definite article) amuses me. Its proof that aborigines couldn’t learn to speak English properly even after more than 200 years. Too dumb, but they can’t see it as acknowledgement of their own stupidity.
    The sudden rise in the aboriginal population is certainly the result of being able to cash in on the welfare programmes available. Some people have no pride at all. The current push to give aborigines their own parliamentary house at government level is a shocking indicator how far things have gone. If it succeeds, it will of course be another Senate composed of these blond-haired, blue-eyed, communist mulattos. Aussies are pretty stupid on social issues, but I doubt that would get past a referendum.

    • JM
      JM says:

      Great comment on a well documented essay.

      A large number of these “Aborigines” far more resemble members of a wretched (licenced) Lumpenproletariat (sub-class often criminally inclined) than Aborigines, the real members of which I still have respect for like I did 75 years’ ago as a child (notwithstanding the “strange” customs, some of which most certainly have survival advantage). They aren’t to blame for any of this. Their name is used.

      The lumpens recently tried to burn down Old Parliament House in the capital, Canberra and nothing at all came of it. This was around the time that the pretty tame, highly (State) provoked ‘invasion’ of the US Congress occurred resulting in the criminalisation of the proud citizens involved. The other related one at the same place occurred in the early 1980’s when angry Trade Unionists broke into the same building, smashing down it’s highly reinforced doors. This incident is now a ‘proud’ part of our Museum of Australian Democracy and the video is available on YouTube.

      Whispers In The Corridors – Smashing Down the Doors

      Protestors set fire to Old Parliament House in Canberra | 7NEWS

      The Jews who have helped sabotage Australia using the Aborigines (a conspiracy organised by their Elders, though not involving all Jews) are political agitators (morphed from dishonest carpet salesmen) hiding behind dispassionate scholarship and legal/judicial norms.

      On the sad stupidity that so often surrounds the synthesized “Aboriginal Question”:
      How do I not laugh at this?

  10. Ron Chapman
    Ron Chapman says:

    Steve Evans, ‘Keneally hopes to see republic’, CT. 24/9/22, p. 8, quoted Thomas Keneally, the first chairman of the Australian Republican Movement, saying he wants a referendum on a constitutional Voice for Aboriginal people; and if a referendum on a republic follows, he thinks it should include a direct election in a popular vote.

    Currently it isn’t possible to give Aboriginals a constitutional Voice as Australia lacks a constitution. Australian governments falsely claim legitimacy by alleging their authority derives from the British monarchy and a defunct colonial constitution that, when applicable, was merely part of an imperial British statute that could be amended at any time by Westminster parliaments.

    Australians need to develop a real Constitution that is duly considered, debated and approved in a proper Constitutional Convention process by all Australians. That Constitution should include proper provisions in relation to all Australians including Aboriginals.

    Keneally says Australia has a head of state who lives 17,000 kilometres off-shore and says there’s something slightly wrong with Australians directly electing a president.

    I disagree. Australia does not have a foreign head of state. If it did every Australian swearing or affirming allegiance to that head of state would be committing treason. Moreover, the implication that there is anything wrong with Australians electing a head of state implicitly supports the current illegal situation in which the leader of a party controlling the House of Representatives has de facto head of state powers.

    Australian governments pretend to owe allegiance to the British monarch, paying lip service to that monarch as our head of state while the party ruling the House of Representatives covertly exercises all executive authority as ScoMos’ recent activities evidenced. That deception is foisted upon the Australian electorate by giving lip service to a non-existent allegiance to the British monarchy.

    The real situation is evidenced by the fact that Australia’s parliaments and judiciaries including the High Court tacitly accept that our constitution isn’t relevant in that the appointment of Governors-General is entirely a matter for elected Australian governments.

    That is why our federal judiciary and parliament accepted as legal ScoMo’s secretly appointing himself to control multiple Commonwealth departments of state (effectively accruing personal dictatorial powers) without informing the parliament or the Australian electorate or ministers whose responsibilities he was usurping.

    Governor-General Hurley’s pretended ignorance of what Scomo did was part of that charade.

    Holding a referendum adopting the wording of a defunct colonial constitution and labelling it a republic with a president appointed by prime ministers is not intended to change anything and won’t.

    Currently cabals of insider elites decide our fate behind closed doors. The removal of the elected Whitlam government in 1975 illustrates the way in which insider elites control Australia’s governance. Recently released correspondence evidenced that QEII had no say in what Kerr and our covert political controllers did on that occasion.

    It is time that Australians claimed their heritage and demanded that federal and state governments be properly constituted pursuant to a lawful Constitution agreed to by all Australians.
    To cease being a ‘Banana Republic’ Australians need to create a proper Constitutional Convention process NOW!
    Australia’s ‘Aboriginal Industry’ has sucked a $33 billion annual subsidy out of Australian budgets for many years. Obviously that money is improving the bank balances of white and aboriginal activists and bureaucrats rather than the lives and welfare of aboriginal communities in the NT, WA and country Queensland and NSW, where most aboriginals live.

    The Triodity of Trump, Putin and Xi and their global Alliance supporters are currently eliminating the last globalist vestiges of the Khazarian Mafia and their hidden satanic controllers. When that is done, all Talmudic anti-White political machinations in Australia will be terminated and aboriginals will cease getting special treatment.
    See eg: https://rumble.com/v1prqty-australiaone-party-canberra-event-part-2.html (See: 1 hr.10minutes 50 seconds).

    • JM
      JM says:

      @Ron Chapman

      “Keneally says Australia has a head of state who lives 17,000 kilometres off-shore…”

      One thing we can be sure of with Keneally is that even if the British Monarch was on the Moon, he’d stay silent were that same monarch the head of the Roman Catholic Church in England, rather than of the Church of England. The Republicanism is conditional and bogus.

      The destabilisation of Whitlam Labour Government was a CIA/State Department job, nothing to do with Elizabeth R. The evidence for this is manifold.

      BTW Keneally is the well rewarded author of Schindler’s Ark, later adapted into Spielberg’s Schindler’s List,

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        I tried to read Schindler’s List once, not Schindler’s Arc, I’d never heard of that.
        Ay, Dios mio, it was unreadable. Total garbage.
        Just if anyone is thinking of giving it a go, avoid it like the plague.

  11. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    It is becoming increasingly obvious that Westernworld Nordics ( also known as Whites ) have been successfully psychologicly neutered ,

    by their globalist ILLuminati jewmasterss
    whom virtually OWN/CONTROL ALL Western economies ,

    and consequently rendered palpably incapable of acknowledging and much more incapable of defending their Nordic racial survival interests against the worldwide Fabian socialist ( aka British collectivists ) mostly soft ( yet still only ) genocidal existential threats against Nordics ;

    where the Christianization of by far most Nordics apparently is not sufficient to “save” them from eventual extinction by their chosenhite jewmasterss .

  12. RockaBoatus
    RockaBoatus says:

    The lies written about Aboriginals and their ‘advanced’ culture, including their alleged superiority over European cultures is typical of the court historians and ‘researchers’ of our day. They seek academic respectability rather academic responsibility. They are willing to lie, obfuscate, and write half-truths in order to be liked and invited to upper-class dinner parties. They are quislings who live in fear of what others might say or think of them.

    I’ve seen this sort of thing when I was studying WW2, the Austrian Corporal, and in trying to get an accurate understanding of what happened during this period. Had I read only the ‘respected’ historians instead of widening my studies to include great men such as Harry Elmer Barnes, David Hoggan, John Wear, and others, I would not have arrived at the truth.

    • JM
      JM says:


      “They (academics) are willing to lie, obfuscate, and write half-truths in order to be liked and invited to upper-class dinner parties.”

      Try…”working”…(not that what you say isn’t also true)…an Australian case…

      Professor Peter Ridd says universities no longer value the truth

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Folks write that glue-sniffing Abos had a superior culture to the Europeans?
      I’d like to see such studies, they sound good for a giggle.

  13. Anne C
    Anne C says:

    Irish Savant has just re-posted a piece called “The (not very) Noble Savage”:

    Sav is less academic than Sanderson, but he puts an entertaining spin on a sometimes gruesome topic. From the introduction to his post:
    “…there’s no doubt that one of the staples of our delusional post-colonial romantic self-flagellation is the myth of the Noble Savage. Coined originally I think by Rousseau in the eighteenth century, it’s characterised by misty-eyed fantasies about early men and women, living in Bambi-like harmony with nature while selflessly looking out for each other. But then the (White) colonialists came along to spoil everything, with their pesky hospitals, colleges, literature and so on…”

  14. Strange World
    Strange World says:


    “Germany is the pawn of an America”, claim two Hungarians with German surnames. This nonsensical assertion even contains two errors. It should correctly read: The goofy puppets, which represent nowadays unjustly in fake-government of “Germany”, are the pawns of the Jews.

    But what evil do we have to learn about these two people from Bolshewikipedia? They seem to be – according to common judeo-determined (“official”) dogma – the most blatant racists and anti-Semites imaginable! But that’s not because of the gentleman’s big nose or the lady’s squint.


    Mr. Orban is friends with them and they wear highest Hungarian awards despite their statements. The only question left to be answered now is why he instead expelled the harmless Judeophile “racist” Jared Taylor from his country and banned him from performing?

  15. Bob
    Bob says:

    Im willing to try and create more white children…. irregardless if I can pay for them either. A person with no morality can easily make dozens of offspring. Much like the homosexual is highly promiscuous… perhaps I’ll name the first one Freddie 😁

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      As in Freddie Mercury?
      You’d really think the homosexual community(as if such a thing even exists) would be a bit more pissed at Anthony Fouci for offing Fred with AZT.
      Has there been a more loved and respected faggot? Of course there has, I just mean in the modern era.
      Magic Johnston got AIDS round about the same time, he was put on AZT and had the good sense to chuck that poison in the bin. He’s alive today.
      Freddie was a massively innovative part of Queen who were a genuine group, so humanity lost 20-30 years of what could have been some great music.
      It wasn’t like John Lennon getting blown-away by some Mk-Ultra freak, The Beatles were about as real as the Beach Boys or Take That, so we didn’t really lose anything with John’s death.
      Although as a mason, he did have some interesting things to say about Jews, but probably great music is more valuable than things we all know now anyway.

  16. Ron Chapman
    Ron Chapman says:

    November 1, 2022 at 10:06 am

    G’day RockaBoatus,
    You say:
    Christianity was not ‘taken over’ by Jews. It was not gentiles who ‘invented’ Christianity and somehow at a later time ‘taken over’ by Jews. It was Jewish from the outset in that Jesus and His disciples were all Jews. The early Jewish Christians rightly viewed their new-found faith as an extension of new covenant predicted in Jeremiah 31:31-34. Jesus and His disciples stood in stark contrast to the religion of the Pharisees and Sadducees.

    I disagree. Christ Jesus was not an Israelite, a Hebrew, a Judahite or a Benjamite and he certainly was not a Jew. Today’s Talmudists (Khazars/Ashkenazis) only started calling themselves Jews around 1775 AD. Jesus’ mother was of Sumarian extraction and his father’s seed was provided by The Gabriel who was Christ Michael (CM) Aton’s executor of his Nebadon Universe while CM was here overshadowing Jesus during his incarnation.

    Incidentally the Pharisees weren’t Judahites, they were Indumeans who had taken over the Judahites’ tribal Temple religion and were exploiting the Judahite, Gallileans and local tribal peoples. Similarly, Jesus’ family and many of his followers were not Judahites. Initially most were Gallileans.
    The reason that ‘Jesus and His disciples stood in stark contrast to the religion of the Pharisees and Sadducees’ was because the GOOD NEWS Jesus preached was totally the opposite of the barbaric, genocidal, atheistic Talmud and Torah ideology being pushed upon Temple worshippers in Jerusalem by the Pharisees.

    The Talmud is an atheistic ideology. Today about 75% of Jews are atheists and those who don’t worship a vindictive, jealous, genocidal entity that is no god at all.

    Christ Jesus taught that ensouled human beings are indwelt by a fragment of Creator consciousness and that once an individual human chooses to live a moral life his/her soul fuses with that indwelling Creator spirit fragment and the individual becomes an eternal spirit being.

    The process requires myriad incarnations before individuation occurs and myriad incarnations thereafter until the individual reaches the stage of conscious self direction. Then, further myriad incarnations occur as the individual journeys through the cosmos to meet with the Creator on Paradise Island. Thereafter the individual returns to the Creation to assist with its administration and management. Eternity is a veryyy looong time…

    This means that we are NOT our physical bodies (meat suits) which are mortal. No amount of chemical infusions or technological manipulations can make physical matter eternal. That is presumably why the physical human body is constantly shedding cells and replacing them as we live each physical life.

    Jesus didn’t incarnate to create a religion and didn’t. He came to reveal divine truths lost over millennia and corrupted by Pharisees and others.

    Not satisfied with forcing the Romans to crucify Jesus, the Pharisees influenced Roman emperors to establish the Christian religion to corrupt and destroy Jesus’ message.

    In particular, Jesus did not come to sacrifice himself to redeem or “save” anyone because he couldn’t. Each ensouled human being must ‘save’ self. WHY? Because EVERY ensouled HUman (Higher Universal man) is gifted by the Creator with an indwelling spark of Creator consciousness AND a unique personality together with intellect and free will which makes him or her an only begotten (ie unique) son or daughter of God. As a consequence, every Human is a sovereign individual responsible for his/her own thoughts, decisions, actions, culpable inaction, evolvement and destiny. Accordingly every HUman must personally learn through trial and error (“sin”) about life, the universe and everything and gradually evolve spiritually to ‘save’ self, ie to become like God. THAT is the purpose of Creation. HUmans are immaterial eternal spirits and hence they have eternity in which to reincarnate and complete this process. THAT was Jesus’ GOOD NEWS!

    Spirits are eternal. They are NOT the mortal physical bodies (meat suits) that they inhabit.

    Once the Pharisees had arranged for Roman Emperors to establish a false religion in an effort to eliminate divine truths taught by Jesus they distorted his teachings by excluding the Gospel of Thomas and many other books from the Bible. But their biggest coup was getting the Torah included in the Bible as the “Old Testament” (OT). The OT was completely antithetical to Jesus’ teachings and so it completely compromised his teaching and created the basis for perpetuating the colossal LIE that Christian truth somehow arose out of Pharisaic bullshit. That perfidious accomplishment has enabled Pharisees and neo-Pharisees to pretend that despite having crucified Jesus they never-the-less happen to be the font of “Judeo-Christian” morality and values and hence the source of the civilisation that Jesus’ divine teaching caused to manifest in Europe.

    In particular, the Pharisees were not satisfied with forcing the Romans to crucify Jesus and inserting the Torah into the Bible and calling it ‘The Old Testament’. They sought to ensure that virtually all references to Jesus’ GOOD NEWS such as reincarnation and the fact that EVERY ensouled human being is indwelt by a fragment of Creator consciousness, was deliberately omitted from Christian religious teaching and deleted from the Bible.

    Pharisees and neo-Pharisees have censored and distorted successive iterations of Jesus’ teachings and the Bible narratives for two millenia, starting with the Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus (St Paul), who denigrated females, subjugating them to males. Subsequently Pharisees and neo-Pharisees (ie the Khazars who adopted the Pharisees’ Talmudic ideology and pseudo religious rites in the 8th century AD in an attempt to ward off the Rus and the Byzantine empire that sought to stop continuance of the Khazars’ barbarous and murderous attacks on their neighbours) continued to manipulate Ecumenical Councils.

    The elimination of the fact that every ensouled human being is a higher universal man (HUman) because s/he is indwelt by a fragment of the Creator’s spirit consciousness; and is hence sovereign and eternal, was as crucial as their elimination of the truth about reincarnation. Why? Because it led to the infantilization of Christian religious believers via the false doctrine that Christ Jesus was the ONLY begotten son of God and that he sacrificed himself for the salvation of ALL of humanity. He didn’t and couldn’t. Jesus’ message was that every HUman is gifted by the Creator with a fragment of Creator consciousness AND a unique personality and free will and that, as a consequence, every ensouled human being is a sovereign individual responsible for his/her own thinking, evolvement and destiny. Each HUman must learn about life the universe and everything and evolve spiritually to ‘save’ self, i.e. progress through the cosmos. Moreover, HUmans are eternal spirits and have eternity in which to reincarnate and complete this process.

    The Christian religion doesn’t tell adherents this truth because Emperor Justinian eliminated virtually all references to Jesus’ teaching about reincarnation from the Bible and Christian doctrine. This was finally achieved during the Fifth Ecumenical Council in 553 AD. At that time Emperor Justinian arrested Pope Vigilius for Believing in Reincarnation and had the Council declare:

    If anyone asserts the fabulous preexistence of souls, and shall assert the monstrous restoration which follows from it: let him be anathema. (The Anathemas against Origen), attached to the decrees of the Fifth Ecumenical Council, A.D. 554, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 2d ser., 14: 318). See eg: Pope [Vigilius] Arrested for Believing in Reincarnation – https://reluctant-messenger.com/reincarnation-pope.htm

    Eradication of the doctrine of Reincarnation, ie knowledge that the evolvement of life and MIND is based on the reincarnation process (which is essential to enable spirit beings incarnating into physicality to avail themselves of a sufficient number of physical incarnations to adequately explore and understand the immensity of life, the universe and everything) is the method used by the Pharisees and neo-Pharisees, ie Talmudists who call themselves Jews but are not, to convince gentiles (ie all who DO NOT accept Talmudism) that they are merely physical creatures having one, only, lifetime which has no meaning, destiny or purpose.

    Concomitantly this LIE, reinforced by the Talmudists’ funding and coercion of scientists to accept and promulgate false science about life, the universe and everything as typified by falsely promulgated Darwinian evolutionary theories about the Origin of Species, has made it easy for Talmudists and the Christian religious puppets they control, to instil fear of death into congregations. The truth is scientifically explained by Bruce Lipton. See eg: Bruce Lipton – Fear vs Love State and Stress’s Effects on Your Body – http://abundanthope.net/pages/Other_Spiritual_Pieces_68/Bruce-Lipton—Fear-vs-Love-State-and-Stress-s-Effects-on-Your-Body.shtml

    This process of inserting LIES into Christian teaching and the Bible has made it feasible for Talmudists and materialists generally, to distort human consciousness and science by having scientists, academics, educators and commentators as well as the MSM, promulgate false and ridiculous ideas including the idea that consciousness arises from random chemical reactions. This also enables Talmudists et al to contend that people on this small planet on the edge of this local universe are the most, and probably the only, consciously intelligent beings in the Cosmos. LOL. Anyone still believing that shtick is gonna get a big surprise very soon.

    As regards Christians going to “Heaven”, be aware that the Creation is a veryyy BIG material manifestation which, to all intents and purposes, appears to be growing indefinitely. Accordingly there are myriad places to go and innumerable things to do therein. No one sits around on clouds doing nothing with “Jesus”.

    Once individuals “get it” sufficiently to progress through the cosmos to meet with the Creator they then return to the Creation to assist with its administration and governance. In fact many evolved spirit individuals are here NOW to assist this planet and her inhabitants to cast off her demonic controllers and to enable those who seek to serve others more than themselves to safely navigate through 4d into 5d.

    NONE of thie information in Jesus’ message was acceptable to the Pharisees whose Talmudic ideology was essentially an oppressive societal control mechanism, as it still is. That is why they forced the Romans to crucify Jesus and then sought to eliminate his message by creating the Christian religion to distort and corrupt it. The Khazarian (Ashkenazi) neo-Pharisees have continued to use and embellish the Talmudic enslavement mechanism. The only reason that Jesus’ message persists in the hearts and minds of HUmans is that it is the truth.

    Those seeking greater knowledge about the cosmos and this planet can find a lot of information in the Urantia Book. See eg: https://www.urantia.org/urantia-book-standardized/paper-53-lucifer-rebellion

    Hatonn also elaborates on thse matters in the Phoenix Journals: http://en.christ-michael.net/the-phoenix-journals/

    To understand why our subconscious mind controls our life see eg: https://www.theclearingnw.com/blog/biology-belief-change-your-reality-bruce-lipton


    • Raeto West
      Raeto West says:

      @Ron Chapman – Christianity has been part of the world for two thousand years or so, and needs to be examined carefully. It’s a terrible shame that the mixture of historical guesswork, propaganda, philosophy, opinion etc is so difficult to sort out. History is in the same sort of situation. And of course this suits many people, who want it to continue. In my view you’d do better to concentrate on your main points, and put the subsidiary stuff in reserve. Well, it’s up to you…

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” gradually evolve spiritually to ‘save’ self, ie to become like God. THAT is the purpose of Creation.”

      THAT is where mankind keeps falling off the cliff when an inordinate accumulation of god-like powers of creation becomes more important than allowing humanity to have genuine FUN ( as previously defined herein various TOO commentaries ) and thereby fulfill their purpose-for-being ( also known as “raison d’etre” ) which has been scientificly discovered and assiduously confirmed or proven to be true .

  17. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    As most people come here to read my comments perhaps some will remember the times I pointed out that the adoption of this dumb word ‘genocide’ was a mistake that would come back to haunt us.
    Here’s it’s creator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin

    Did anyone expect anything else? I’ve made this same point 3 or 4 times here over the years, mostly without really being all that interested in the genocide concept, why would I be? I knew where and whence it came, a mid 20th century Jewish linguistic invention.
    You don’t need to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out this was never ever going to be in our interests.
    So I didn’t take any interest in all the moaners claiming their folks were genocided to claim however much cash the UN throws at you if you can get the Jews to agree to your tale.
    The UN ten steps to genocide or whatever it is was more interesting as we native Brits seemed to be at number six on the scale. You could even say seven depending on your position on the vaxx.

  18. Ron Chapman
    Ron Chapman says:

    November 1, 2022 at 9:09 pm
    G’day JM,
    You correctly say that:
    ‘The destabilisation of Whitlam Labour Government was a CIA/State Department job, nothing to do with Elizabeth R. The evidence for this is manifold.’

    THAT is my justification for saying:
    ‘The removal of the elected Whitlam government in 1975 illustrates the way in which insider elites control Australia’s governance. Recently released correspondence evidenced that QEII had no say in what Kerr and our covert political controllers did on that occasion.’

  19. Gary
    Gary says:

    All the energy needed to read this. Just wow! In the end what does this all amount to? A lawyer oligarch further raping and pillaging across this blessed Earth…As Harold Laski is fond of putting it, in every revolution the lawyers lead the way to the guillotine or the firing squad https://freedom-school.com/woe_unto_you_lawyers.pdf? Anything old is lawyer legally subverted and anything new is lawyer legally nurtured for…”What happened was that corporations come into court, and corporate lawyers are very clever, and they say, “Oh, you can’t deprive a person of life, liberty or property? We are a person – a corporation is a person” – and the Supreme Court goes along with that and then with strokes of the pen over the next 30 years judges applied those rights to capital and property, while stripping them from people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SuUzmqBewg. Since we don’t have an environmental, healthy, fiscal, etc., economy the lawyer oligarch vampirize their non-essential energy to what can then be the next great divide loop, and here we have their the great Indigenous divide…It’s a planned economy, it’s a phony. If they want to create prosperity they just print dollars, or put digits into the economy. And now you have prosperity. You don’t have real prosperity. You don’t have real manufacturing. You just have money being injected in. Its an infusion of credit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdtdidL2MQo.

    A Facebook friend recently posted about the Mohawk Mothers injunction also against McGill University https://easterndoor.com/2022/10/28/mothers-force-royal-vic-dig-halt/. What are the chances that those intellectual reprobates of con-humans serving their lawyer oligarch truly care about anything Indigenous across this Earth, while taking into consideration it was some legal order that permitted for anything and everything surrounding Indigenous injustice, oppression, chaos and confusion? And do not kid yourself for one moment, there are many Indigenous men and women, at least here in Ontario, who do know what is taking place through the Indigenous Elite and do want to work with the White mankind as against this lawyer oligarch means of oppression. Anyway, I replied to my FB friend…Legal injunctions take place all the time. All the time. Unfortunately, when some of those legal injunctions end those want their costs. Depending on the developer. Also, it is now winter those will not be doing much developing. It takes nothing to meet the legal threshold of an injunction, including what possible prejudice could there be with winter? To be honest I am personally getting tired of all these land claims, etc., that are making lawyers rich. I have not even seen any evidence of bodies from the residential schools. Have you? In a recent article Trudeau made sure to put alleged in front of anything to do with the residential schools. The lawyers are using the Indigenous to keep further divided other Canadian Nationalists while they, the lawyers pillage the tax paying kitty, and I cannot see this going on for much longer. One last thing, the privately incorporated united nations means nothing within the Dominion of Canada. Just more corrupt treasonous legal showboating.

    I also posted, including this…Clynt King – GPR operator at Brantford Dig Clynt King11/29/13 I just found your blog. Once in awhile, I do a google search on my name to see what is out there. My name is on your blog site. A few years ago, I was seriously mislead, misquoted and misused by Kevin and his followers. they convinced me that I had been given approval to do some ground penetrating radar work at a former residential school. I explained the limitations of the device in great detail, they recorded everything I said on video cameras. I told them exactly what it could, and could not, reveal below the ground surface. It is apparent that they ignored all of what I told them. One thing I want to point out, no media outlet has ever contacted me directly to ask me about what he said about me. If they did, I would have stated that the radar unit did not reveal any mass graves and Kevin’s statements about the radar findings were false stopkevinannett.weebly.com/testimonials.html, about how the oligarch of lawyers have been also legally pillaging from the residential schools while there has not even been any proper investigation into anything.

    My FB friend posted the legal transcripts and low and behold lawyers further legally pillaging and I only need to post two paragraphs to prove my point…Judge Gregory Moore’s decision in favour of the Mohawk Mothers injunction halting work pending an investigation October 27, 2022

    12. The plaintiffs have a right to bring these concerns to Court and to be listened to and heard. They are exercising these rights at the beginning of an era of reconciliation in Canada, which the Truth and Reconciliation Commission defines as an ongoing process of establishing and maintaining respectful relationships.

    15. Although these issues are raised in the adversarial court process, the parties are mindful of opportunities to speak out of court to settle their differences on an amicable basis. Indeed, article 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires that parties consider private prevention and resolution processes before referring their disputes to the court.

    And there we have it, paragraph 15 and more lawyer oligarch created for legal work, while tax dollars used to pay off the Indigenous Elite? Whatever happened to a good old fashioned investigation and then closure through conviction all before Justice? No tax dollars being used as payout, off, due to some legal fictitious threshold to be met, or whatever?

    Not too long ago I spoke with an Elder located in central Ontario Canada. I informed him about what the lawyer oligarch truly had in mind. It is not about helping the Indigenous men and women it is about legally building upon egos, like some others wink wink, nudge nudge, to the extent that the rest of a Canadian Nationalist mankind become fed up and could careless about any Canadian Nationalistic Indigenous concerns [listen up to 6 minutes] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz6uigtIhZU, while the the lawyer oligarch pimps in their massive immigration. This Elder informed me that he was surprised to hear me say this. This Elder informed me that not too long ago from the date of me contacting this Elder by telephone some Muslims showed up to access their community prayer house. The Muslim men and women were asked to wait until he returned with an Elder. When the Elder did return the Muslims were already inside praying.

  20. Eric Galati
    Eric Galati says:

    Dear Mister Sanderson,
    Thank for this most interesting essay of yours. I am always grateful when I can learn whatever I can concerning The Antipodes, Australia and New Zealand. I PASTE herein an electronic mail message REPLY from one of my best friends in life who is from Western Australia. God bless, Eric Galati

    Where did you retrieve this
    ‘ magnificent ‘ piece of “precise factual narrative” on Australian “Aborigines” from? It is so accurately written and pin points the real Truth about our Indigenous.

    The vast majority of Australian Aborigines are nothing more than 24×7 boozed up, glue sniffing, stealing, bashing, and raping of elderly women (80’s 90’s invading their homes), Neanderthals.

    IQ levels are very low.

    It’s when The Australian Labor Party comes into power we have deja vu leadership.of boot licking and kowtowing to the poor over indulged “Boongs”. They have, and have had as long as I was a child been given Privileges, over and above the average citizen
    “Jo Blow”!

    I lived as a child in a very Aboriginal township. Rape, heads smashed open with tomahawks was rampant then in the late 50s.

    I see my Senator of the Party I am a part of “Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party” gets a mention. She certainly keeps the “Bastards Honourest” and calls it out for what it is. Her followers are growing in number, as Australians have had a gut full of all the “Tripe” that goes on with all the other falsehoods

    Yes, and it’s true, all of a sudden everyone is part Aboriginal for the perks which flows on Abos coat tails. You have to laugh at this one…😂🤣😭..Solariums and Tanning Parlours are doing a booming trade. An ABC TV presenter Stan Grant, if he gets any darker he’ll be transported to the depths of the African jungles.!!!!

    Andrew Bolt is from Australian Sky News, so if you want Australian Truth tune into this crowd. Or there is 82 year old TV Journo Alan Jones, he’s always forcing the hand in the name of truth and accountability of our dodgy politicians.

    The world over, operates under the code of “Copy Cat”.

    We just ignore the “Abo Mantra” and treat them as you would any other. There are some good human beings amongst them, and they are in essence, totally void of booze and glue, and are extremely shy people and don’t make eye contact when talking to them, unless they have some educative breeding. Language is very undecyphable and simplistic, but the “paracitic” fringe dwellers have mouths likes sewers. Everything is “F” and “C” really nothing in between. Regional communities of Aboriginals living in the outback, are more embracing.

    Anyway dear friend, you have elections (?) coming up, so will the white House Entertainment Stage comprised of Idiots, Liars and Lunatics (who have provided the World ‘a laugh a day’😂🤣🥴🤥) have a stage prop and scenery change? For you dear and decent Americans, I hope so.

    Keep me posted.

    Love Anna🥰🫂💞

  21. Steven
    Steven says:

    Jews have been active in Australia for a long time.

    Adolphus Peter Elkin – Australian Anthropologist
    An anglican clergyman and professor of anthropology, he was the chief proponent of the assimilation of Indigenous Australian Aboriginies into White Australian society.

    Yeah, Every Fucking Time.

    Adolphus Peter Elkin (1891-1979), Anglican clergyman and professor of anthropology, was born on 27 March 1891 at West Maitland, New South Wales, second son of Reuben Elkin, a salesman from England, and his native-born wife Ellen Wilhelmina, née Bower, a seamstress of German stock. Reuben came from a family of Jewish intellectuals who had emigrated to New Zealand; his father was a rabbi at Auckland.

    Having resigned his living in 1925, Elkin studied the Australian Aborigines under (Sir) Grafton Elliot Smith at University College, London (Ph.D., 1927). In 1927 A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, foundation professor of anthropology in Sydney, helped Elkin to secure a Rockefeller grant to undertake field-work in the Kimberley, Western Australia.

    Following a large meeting held in Sydney in 1934 t*o protest against the death sentence passed on an Aborigine in the Northern Territory, Elkin and the A.P.N.R. were partly responsible for gaining a reprieve; it was followed by an appeal and the eventual release of Tuckiar, whom they believed had not received a fair trial when charged with the murder of a White man.*

  22. Eric Galati
    Eric Galati says:

    Dear Mister Sandford & Everyone,
    My friend followed up with an anthropological chart,that I do not comprehend, but what was of great interest was a film on YOU TUBE uploaded by a Mister Thomas Pagnotta.https://human-intelligence.org/australian-aborigines/ My COMMENT has been taken down immediately, as in automatically, why I can only imagine. Herein I PASTE my COMMENT to Mister Pagnotta, who must be afraid of something I have hit upon:

    Dear Mister Pagnotta,
    Thank you for this most concise yet fulfilling documentary film. Are you the narrator; if so well done. Who made this film? The director?
    I am curious: from 1869-1969 the government took thousands of Aboriginal children away from their families with the pretext being to save the Aboriginal race. I wonder, given my experience in a certain area of criminology, if any of these innocents were in any way actually used for experiments, human trafficking or organised sexual abuse, namely pederasty and pedophilia. If this seems farfetched, well just please cross refer to my friend Misses Randy Engle -Vignone, known by her married name as an authoress , historian and investigative researcher, Misses Randy Engel, and proceed to her web site, “Renew America”, wherein she reveals the experiments of birth control for population control executed on Puerto Rico with the support of the32nd United States President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and The 6th Archbishop Of New York, Francis Joseph Cardinal Spellman. I cannot help but cross-refer to case of Doctor Daniel Carleton Gajdusek whom I encountered in The Son Of Sam Case I have been involved in.
    Furthermore, what’s interesting is how European Australians today are exploiting the remuneration and retribution of what happened to the Aboriginal population of Australia by pretending to be racially Aboriginal to take advantage of Social Benefits and similar programs. Read the essay by Mister Brendan Sanderson, “Aboriginal Worship And The Flight From Whiteness In Australia “in “The Occidental Observer” of October 31st, 2022. Once again I am very grateful for your film. God Bless, Eric Galati

Comments are closed.