Wasting Wales: Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru Have a Virtuous Vision of National Negation
Right behind your eyes. That’s where you’ll find the most complex thing in the known universe. And right before your eyes is where you’ll presently find the second-most complex thing in the known universe. What are those things? Well, the most complex thing in the known universe is the human brain. And the most second-complex thing is language, as created and processed by the human brain. A single, simple sentence like this is, in some ways, much more complex than a star. A longer text, like a short story or novel, is more complex than a galaxy or even an entire universe of non-biological phenomena.
Geniuses of language
That gap in complexity is why human beings have made so much progress in astronomy and physics and so little progress in linguistics. Of course, physics has attracted geniuses for centuries and linguistics hasn’t, but that’s because physics is a much simpler science. A genius can make progress in physics but not in linguistics in rather the way that a good athlete can swim across the Mississippi but not across the Atlantic. Problems in physics are river-crossings; problems in linguistics are ocean-crossings. How did language evolve? How is it encoded in our genes and instantiated in the brain? Those are much tougher questions than, say: How does the sun shine? When it comes to language, we human beings are like spiders spinning webs or bees building hives. We can do amazing things with words, but we don’t know how. Like spiders and bees, we do it by instinct. We speak, we listen; we write, we read. But how? What’s going on in that warm, wet, sticky mass behind our eyes and between our ears?
Over Sea, Under Stone: a wonderwork of verbal magic
You can ask that question of the simplest conversation or simplest text, but it becomes even more compelling when you ask it of great literature. We don’t have geniuses of linguistics, but we do have geniuses of language. Obvious names spring to mind: Dante, Shakespeare, Goethe. Here’s a less obvious name: Susan Cooper (born 1935), an English-American writer most famous for a five-book series of children’s fantasy called The Dark Is Rising (1965—77). Perhaps I’m wrong to bring her into the illustrious company of that male triumvirate. I’m not sure that she is a genius, but I am sure that she is more than simply an excellent writer. Like the late Rosemary Sutcliff (1920—92), another female writer of children’s fiction, Cooper is a verbal magician or alphabetic alchemist, able to conjure reality with words, to turn the dross of black ink on white paper into the gold of stories that glow and glisten in your mind for life. Two of the most powerful books I’ve read in recent years have been Sutcliff’s The Eagle of the Ninth (1954), set in Roman Britain, and Cooper’s Over Sea, Under Stone (1965), set in modern Britain but incorporating themes and characters from Arthurian legend and Celtic myth.
The might of Mystic Wales
As someone once said, reading is like dreaming with your eyes open. And reading those two books was like dreaming in full color with sound and scent and sensation all thrown in. Which was a pleasant surprise, because I first read those books as a child and returning to childhood favorites is often a disappointment. Not in this case. But one of Cooper’s books did once cause me big disappointment. It wasn’t that the book was weak — quite the opposite. The book was in fact too strong for the reality that it drew upon. When I read Cooper’s The Grey King (1975) I was initiated into Mystic Wales, because the book is set in Wales and draws on the special power of Arthurian legend and the unique beauty and mystery of Celtic mythology. For example, one of the chief characters is Bran Davies, an albino boy with golden eyes who is named after a Celtic crow-god and who owns a white dog that can literally see the wind. Bran has a mysterious father, is far older than he first appears, and takes part in a quest for a golden harp amid wild mountains and dark lakes.
Pwyll Pendeuic Dyuet a oed yn arglwyd ar seith cantref Dyuet. A threigylgweith yd oed yn Arberth, prif lys idaw, a dyuot yn y uryt ac yn y uedwl uynet y hela. Sef kyueir o’y gyuoeth a uynnei y hela, Glynn Cuch. Ac ef a gychwynnwys y nos honno o Arberth, ac a doeth hyt ym Penn Llwyn Diarwya, ac yno y bu y nos honno. A thrannoeth yn ieuengtit y dyd kyuodi a oruc, a dyuot y Lynn Cuch i ellwng e gwn dan y coet. A chanu y gorn a dechreu dygyuor yr hela, a cherdet yn ol y cwn, ac ymgolli a’y gydymdeithon. Ac ual y byd yn ymwarandaw a llef yr erchwys, ef a glywei llef erchwys arall, ac nit oedynt unllef, a hynny yn dyuot yn erbyn y erchwys ef. Ac ef a welei lannerch yn y coet o uaes guastat; ac ual yd oed y erchwys ef yn ymgael ac ystlys y llannerch, ef a welei carw o ulaen yr erchwys arall. A pharth a pherued y llannerch, llyma yr erchwys a oed yn y ol yn ymordiwes ac ef, ac yn y uwrw y’r llawr.
The Mabinogion: sample lines in Welsh and cover of an English translation
Alas, it was a disappointment to visit the real Wales after experiencing the Mystic Wales conjured by the word-magic of Cooper and other story-tellers. In the real Wales, there are exhaust-spewing cars, not fire-breathing dragons. In the real Wales, there are fat women eating fish’n’chips, not beautiful maidens created from flowers like Blodeuwedd in The Mabinogion (12th century).
Real Wales can’t live up to Mystic Wales, and nor can real Welsh people. The Welsh rock-band Super Furry Animals have experienced the disappointment in reverse: they said in one interview that their Welshness made audiences in Europe expect them to be druids with mist in their beards. The fantasy of Wales has become more powerful than the reality, but that’s another tribute to the magic of language and of the stories created in Welsh and other branches of the Celtic family. And in one way, real Wales isn’t a disappointment. Not when you visit an area where Welsh is a living language, still flowering after centuries of withering wind blown in from England. Welsh is a special and seductive language, as strange and subtle as the stories that have used it in collections like The Mabinogion.
Deeper, richer, stranger
And many millions more people have experienced the magic of Welsh than have ever spoken it, because it was one of the linguistic ingredients mixed by J.R.R. Tolkien into his mighty epic Lord of the Rings (1954—55). Welsh and Finnish were the bases of Elvish, the language (or languages) of Tolkien’s immortal Elves, who are tall and beautiful warriors, poets and artisans, lovers of flowers and gems and moonlight, haters of evil and ugliness and cruelty. Like Susan Cooper, Tolkien drew on Celtic mythology to create his stories. But although he was undoubtedly the greater scholar, I think she is the better writer, more adept at word-magic and better able to conjure on paper the beauty of the Light and the foulness of the Dark. Compare the verses that lie at the heart of both writers’ most famous stories. Here are Tolkien’s:
Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. (The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1, ch. 2)
And here are Cooper’s:
When the Dark comes rising, six shall turn it back,
Three from the circle, three from the track;
Wood, bronze, iron; water, fire, stone;
Five will return, and one go alone. (The Dark Is Rising, ch. 3)
Tolkien’s verses can still make the hair rise on the back of my neck decades after I first began reading and re-reading Lord of the Rings. But I think Cooper’s are deeper, richer, and stranger, saying more with fewer words. Either way, it’s clear that Tolkien and Cooper are both lovers of the Light and the haters of the Dark. In Christian terms, they serve God and reject Satan, which is why I am sure that Tolkien would have hated what is happening in the real Wales that so inspired him. And I hope that Susan Cooper, who is still alive as I write this in mid-November 2022, does hate what is happening in Wales too, if she knows about it.
Labour is hostile to ordinary Whites
Yes, the Dark is certainly rising in 21st-century Wales. Or rather, it’s rising faster, because Wales has been ruled for decades by traitors who hate the Welsh people and the Welsh language, despite all their posturing and protestations to the contrary. I call them traitors because they are themselves Welsh and work under the banners of Llafur Cymru, Welsh Labour, and Plaid Cymru, the Party of Wales. I’ve often quoted the words of Maurice Glasman, a Jewish Labour peer who saw from the inside how his party had betrayed the group that inspired its own name. Here again is what Glasman admitted in 2011: “In many ways [Labour] viewed working-class voters as an obstacle to progress. Their commitment to various civil rights, anti-racism, meant that often working-class voters … were seen as racist, resistant to change, homophobic and generally reactionary. So in many ways you had a terrible situation where a Labour government was hostile to the English working class.”
In other words, Labour hates ordinary Whites. And what’s true of Labour in England is also true of Labour in Wales: Llafur Cymru hates the White Welsh working-class and is working hard to destroy its future. Like leftists around the world, Welsh leftists have recruited and trained mercenaries against those whom their party was founded to serve and protect. That is, Welsh leftists are using non-White outsiders to wage war on the White Welsh. And they’ve set out their vision of a totalitarian future Wales, where their own power is secure, their non-White servants rewarded with permanent privilege, and their White enemies degraded and stripped of power. They want something utterly contradictory: Cymru Wrth-hiliol, or “An Anti-Racist Wales.” That’s the title of Welsh Labour’s “Race Equality Action Plan for Wales.”
Crumbs of creation
And it’s an ominous title, especially for those familiar with Critical Race Theory (CRT), the branch of cultural Marxism dedicated to waging war on Whiteness. CRT preaches the eternal villainy of Whites and the eternal virtue of Blacks and other non-Whites. One of its leading theologians is the high-status, wealthy, low-IQ Ibram X. Kendi (born 1982), who teaches that every crumb of creation participates in the struggle between wicked Whiteness and virtuous Blackness. For Kendi, you are inescapably racist if you aren’t actively anti-racist. And that’s what the title of Welsh Labour’s Race-Equality Plan refers to: a permanent war on racism. In the ominous words of the traitorous Siân Gwenllian, deputy leader of the supposedly Wales-loving Plaid Cymru: “We are absolutely committed to celebrating diversity and will move to eliminate inequality in all its forms.” Welsh Labour and Plaid Cymru have a virtuous vision of an Anti-Racist Wales where nothing escapes the baleful gaze of anti-racist commissars, who will monitor and interfere in all aspects of life and culture. A more honest title for the Plan would be “An Anti-Welsh Wales,” because the Plan is intended to lay waste to the ancient White nation of Wales, raise non-Whites far above ordinary Welsh Whites, and ensure the power of leftists in perpetuity.
Man with a Plan: the physically degenerate Mark Drakeford, so-called First Minister of Wales
Naturally enough, the Plan has a foreword by the traitorous Mark Drakeford (born 1954), the leader of Welsh Labour and so-called First Minister of Wales. He’s someone whose flaccid, unhealthy features remind me strongly of a passage in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Winston Smith, the protagonist of the novel, is sitting in a canteen at the Ministry of Truth and musing on the physiological effects of IngSoc, the totalitarian leftism that controls the British Isles:
He looked round the canteen again. Nearly everyone was ugly, and would still have been ugly even if dressed otherwise than in the uniform blue overalls. On the far side of the room, sitting at a table alone, a small, curiously beetle-like man was drinking a cup of coffee, his little eyes darting suspicious glances from side to side. How easy it was, thought Winston, if you did not look about you, to believe that the physical type set up by the Party as an ideal — tall muscular youths and deep-bosomed maidens, blond-haired, vital, sunburnt, carefree — existed and even predominated. Actually, so far as he could judge, the majority of people in Airstrip One were small, dark, and ill-favoured. It was curious how that beetle-like type proliferated in the Ministries: little dumpy men, growing stout very early in life, with short legs, swift scuttling movements, and fat inscrutable faces with very small eyes. It was the type that seemed to flourish best under the dominion of the Party. (Nineteen Eighty-Four, Book 1, ch. 4)
That passage reminds me of Mark Drakeford, although he’s more like an amphibian than a beetle. He’s the type that flourishes best under Welsh leftism, an intellectual and ethical non-entity devoted to the service of leftism, the pursuit of power, and the destruction of his own nation. Not being a masochist, I haven’t read the entire 142 pages and 50,000 words of the Race-Equality Plan overseen by Drakeford. In fact, I’ve found it difficult to read as much as one page and fifty words. But I can confidently say that every last bit of the Plan oozes repulsively with what Sam Francis called the managerial state and Bruce Charlton has so aptly called “The Cancer of Bureaucracy”:
Everyone in modernizing ‘Western’ societies (roughly the USA, UK, Western and Central Europe) will, no doubt, have noticed that there has been a long-term, progressive growth and spread of bureaucracy. Except during major war; this has not been a matter of pendulum swings, with sometimes less and sometimes more bureaucracy, but instead of relentless overall expansion — albeit sometimes faster and at other times slower.
The bureaucratic takeover applies to science, medicine, education, law, police, the media — indeed to almost all social functions. Such unrelenting growth implies either that 1. Bureaucracy is vital to societal functioning and the more bureaucracy we have the better for us; or that 2. Bureaucracy is parasitic and its growth is uncontrollable. Since the first alternative has become obviously absurd, I am assuming the second alternative is correct: that bureaucracy is like a cancer of modernizing societies — i.e., its expansion is malignant and its effect is first parasitic, then eventually fatal. (“The Cancer of Bureaucracy,” Charlton’s Notions, 31st October 2013)
Welsh Labour’s “Race Equality Action Plan” will feed the cancer of bureaucracy in Wales, but will not bring about “race equality” there. Equality is an impossible objective and the Plan isn’t intended to pursue it in any case. Instead, the Plan will pursue inequality: it will further increase the privilege of non-Whites, further encourage their grievances, further incite them to harm Whites, further hasten the transfer of wealth from productive Whites to unproductive non-Whites, and further advance the cause of leftists around the world. Leftists want to wreck Western civilization and rule the ruins. In this case, Welsh Labour want to lay waste to Wales.
An Anti-Welsh Wales: the cover of Welsh Labour’s Race-Equality Action Plan
Not white, not Welsh, warmly welcomed by Welsh Labour: typical images from the Race Equality Plan
And they’ve proclaimed that aim by saying that they want Wales to become “an Anti-Racist Nation.” The concept of an anti-racist nation is as absurd as the concept of a square circle. The word “nation” comes ultimately from the Latin verb nasci, meaning “to be born.” That is, a nation is formed by birth and blood, by the natural process of unification that takes place among people who have a common ancestry, history, language, and culture. Nationhood is a question of ethnography, not geography. For example, down the centuries Jews were a supreme example of a nation without a homeland. They wandered and settled, were uprooted and expelled, but they never lost their sense of racial, religious and cultural separateness, and they never ceased to be a nation.
Blanking the blonde: a Black teacher turns her face away from a passive White girl towards active Black children
In other words, a true nation has to be “racist”: it has to discriminate between racial insiders and outsiders, between those who belong and those who don’t. If a nation ceases to discriminate between insiders and outsiders — that is, if it ceases to be “racist” — it also ceases to be a nation. But that national negation is what Welsh Labour want to happen in Wales. They want to destroy the true nation of Wales and replace it with a pseudo-nation of privileged non-Whites and parasitized Whites, all overseen by power-hungry leftists like Mark Drakeford. Leftists like Drakeford understand perfectly that the quickest way to destroy a White nation is to open its borders to non-Whites who aren’t and never will be part of the nation. That’s why those non-Whites don’t care about the most precious parts of nationhood, like language and tradition. This story from Scotland also applies to Wales, because non-White immigration will be just as bad for the Welsh language as it is for Gaelic:
Funding for Gaelic “discriminates against Muslims”
A former SNP [Scottish National Party] Holyrood candidate has claimed “anti-Muslim racism” is seeping into Scottish education because language policies treat ethnic minorities as inferior to white Scots. Nighet Riaz, an academic at the University of the West of Scotland, said Gaelic was promoted and given millions of pounds in ring-fenced public funding while the traditional languages of non-white groups were sidelined in schools. She said that there was a lack of Urdu teachers, with schools unable to meet the needs of large Pakistani communities, particularly in Glasgow.
Dr Riaz was a regional list candidate for the SNP at the 2016 Holyrood election, endorsed by Alex Salmond, the former party leader, and Robin Sturgeon, Nicola Sturgeon’s father, but was not elected. She is an SNP equalities officer for Pollokshields and the first minister’s Glasgow Southside constituency.
She said the SNP narrative of Scotland being a “more tolerant, welcoming nation” clashed with the experiences of ethnic minority communities and described lack of provision for Urdu as “a form of anti-Muslim racism being played out by the state”.
She added: “The reality is that no new funding is being diverted to minority languages other than Gaelic which is ring-fenced by the Gaelic School Capital Fund and protected by legislation, as it is seen as the ‘Scottish’ language. We cannot ignore that Gaelic is spoken by white Scots, whilst Urdu is spoken predominantly by brown Muslims. This suggests that ethnic minorities, Muslims in particular, are not considered equally Scottish as white ‘native’ Scots.”
According to the most recent census Urdu is the fourth-most commonly-spoken language in Scottish homes, after English, Scots and Polish, while Punjabi is the fifth most common. Gaelic is eighth. (Funding for Gaelic “discriminates against Muslims,” The Times of London, 6th October 2018)
Not White, not Scottish: the anti-Gaelic Muslim invader Nighet Riaz
You can’t blame Nighet Riaz for not caring about Gaelic. She’s not Scottish, has no roots in Scotland, and plainly feels nothing for Scotland’s unique history and traditions. All that interests her is the promotion of her own non-White group and its culture. She was stupid, of course, to make her disdain for Gaelic so obvious, but you can be sure that what she said openly is thought privately by countless other non-Whites. As for me, I’m not Scottish either, but I am White and I recognize the immense importance of Scotland in Western history. It is a small nation that has made an outsize contribution to Western civilization.
Hungry cats and rats
But even if Scotland were small and obscure, I would still be saddened to see that Scots Gaelic is the eighth-most commonly spoken language in its only homeland. Urdu and Punjabi shouldn’t be spoken by large numbers of people in Scotland, because speakers of those languages have homelands of their own. Their presence in Scotland harms ordinary Whites there and increases the power of the leftists in the so-called Scottish National Party or SNP. Urdu and Punjabi are bad for Gaelic in Scotland just as they are for Welsh in Wales. They’re invasive languages, like hungry cats and rats introduced to a small island with a unique — and very tasty — flora and fauna. Over the years I’ve studied all of these languages, and I know that, alphabets aside, the Celtic languages are more difficult and more unusual than the Indian ones. They’re also much more fragile. Native speakers of Gaelic and Welsh are numbered in thousands and grow fewer by the year; native speakers of Urdu and Punjabi are numbered in millions and grow more numerous by the minute.
Nicola Sturgeon (right), the Giftzwerg or poison-dwarf of Scottish politics, takes part in minority-worship
But the Scottish National Party wants more and more speakers of Urdu and Punjabi to enter Scotland and have children there. The party is led by the power-hungry poison-dwarf Nicola Sturgeon (born 1970), a dedicated high-priestess in the cult of minority-worship. For example, Sturgeon became “the only serving prime minister or first minister in the UK to have led a [Gay] Pride event” when she marched at the head of “Scotland’s largest ever LGBT event” in 2018. She was wearing a rainbow “Choose Love” T-shirt, a slogan that’s as insincere as it is saccharine and smarmy. But next to Sturgeon marched another female poison-dwarf in a T-shirt bearing words that were much more honest. They ran like this: “WHY BE RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC OR TRANSPHOBIC WHEN YOU CAN JUST BE QUIET?” The threat is obvious and the message is clear. Evil folk have a simple choice under leftism: either keep their mouths shut or spew their vile hate and be crushed.
Satanic inspiration and intent
Nicola Sturgeon does not believe in free speech and free enquiry, only in power for herself and punishment for her enemies. As a leftist, she has the same enemies as Labour in England and Wales: the ordinary Whites of her nation. The Scottish National Party should really be called the Scottish Negation Party, because like Llafur Cymru in Wales it is dedicated to the destruction of the nation over which it presently rules. The concept of negation is the key to understanding leftists like Nicola Sturgeon and Mark Drakeford. They can’t create: they can only destroy. The German writer Goethe, whom I named above as one of a triumvirate of White geniuses, may have best captured the psychology of leftism in a famous speech by Mephistopheles in Faust (1775 onward). Indeed, Goethe may have captured the literally Satanic inspiration and intent of poison-dwarfs like Sturgeon and cancerous bureaucrats like Drakeford:
Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint!
Unde das mit Recht; denn alles was entsteht
ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht;
Drum besser wär’s daß nichts entstünde.
So ist denn alles was ihr Sünde,
Zerstörung, kurz das Böse nennt,
Mein eigentliches Element. (Faust: Eine Tragödie, Part 1)
I am the spirit that negates!
And rightly so, for all that comes to be
Deserves to perish wretchedly;
’Twere better nothing would begin.
Thus everything that your terms, sin,
Destruction, evil represent —
That is my proper element. (Faust, translation by Walter Kaufmann)
Another possible Englishing of Mephistopheles’ opening line is “I am the spirit that ever denies!” Both translations provide key insights into leftism. It is the ideology that ever negates Truth, Beauty and Goodness, that ever denies reality and pursues ugliness, evil and lies. When I say that Welsh Labour and the SNP are hell-bent on the destruction of Wales and Scotland, I mean literally that: Hell is where their lies and lunacies will take these ancient White nations. The anti-woke writer Irish Savant has chronicled the same national negation in Ireland, whose traitorous leftists are eagerly importing Somalis and Syrians to destroy a third Celtic homeland.
And if small White nations like Wales, Scotland and Ireland are led to destruction, the rest of the White West would inevitably follow. However, just as Susan Cooper and J.R.R. Tolkien prophesied in their books, that will not happen. The Dark is indeed rising, but the Dark will be thrown back. Leftism will not triumph and the West will not perish. The struggle will be hard and long, just as it was for the Servants of Light described by Cooper and the Company of the Ring described by Tolkien, but it will end in victory. The malevolent and mendacious word-magic of leftism — “Race Does Not Exist,” “Choose Love,” “An Anti-Racist Wales” — will not hold back reality for much longer. As the Roman poet Virgil, another genius of language, said long ago: Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret — “You can drive Nature out with a pitch-fork, but she’ll be back.” And Nature is not a poison-dwarf like Nicola Sturgeon, but a giantess of joy.
Wonderful Writing, Mr. Langdon, Sir.
What I like about Tobias Langdon is that he is one of the few authors to explore the hidden motivations of these innumerable White traitors and not just their political and financial ones.
He is also one of the few authors to highlight envy and sexual jealousy as the main drivers of the non-white invaders criminality.
It is obvious when you see this Drakeford that he has spent his whole life blaming attractive white women who have reject him. From there to take revenge on the whole race…
we find the same flabby and repulsive physiognomy in the servile shabbat goy Mitch McConnell, although the latter is a conservative but it is the same.
Note that we often find this kind of individuals married to non-white or Jewish women…
Unless they’re homosexual.
I hesitated to talk about it, because it’s so obvious but yes.
In France, old and decrepit homosexuals are rushing to take in fake refugees and many are paying the price. Just last week an old pederast was stabbed 30 times by his colored guest, but the medias are quick to bury these cases because there are so many of them.
Drakefords son is a convicted pedophile… which says it all really.. particularly if one views this as an ‘inherited’ ahem malady…
As many psychiatrists have posited..
Underneath almost every white man on the Left is an incel who wants revenge.
“I call them traitors because they are themselves Welsh and work under the banners of Llafur Cymru, Welsh Labour, and Plaid Cymru, the Party of Wales. I’ve often quoted the words of Maurice Glasman, a Jewish Labour peer who saw from the inside how his party had betrayed the group that inspired its own name. …2011: “In many ways [Labour] viewed working-class voters as an obstacle to progress. Their commitment to various civil rights, anti-racism, meant that often working-class voters … were seen as racist, resistant to change, homophobic and generally reactionary….””…Llafur Cymru hates the White Welsh working-class and is working hard to destroy its future. …Welsh leftists are using non-White outsiders to wage war on the White Welsh. And they’ve set out their vision of a totalitarian future Wales, where their own power is secure, their non-White servants rewarded with permanent privilege, and their White enemies degraded and stripped of power. They want something utterly contradictory: Cymru Wrth-hiliol, or “An Anti-Racist Wales.” That’s the title of Welsh Labour’s “Race Equality Action Plan for Wales. …And it’s an ominous title, especially for those familiar with Critical Race Theory (CRT)…the eternal villainy of Whites and the eternal virtue of Blacks and other non-Whites….”
This is Labor Party “reformist” social engineering laid bare, initially inspired by the Fabian Socialists but today, like political whores, totally subordinate to the dictates and needs of (((those))) who largely constitute The Money Power. Remember this same political trend were the ones who – against all their “sacred promises” voted for war credits in one nation after another as a necessary condition to the start of the First Imperialist Slaughter and resulting carnage of our people. Today these parties are populated by physical and social freaks like that thing pictured who is their “leader” in Wales, something repeated in the whole of the Anglosphere, like the physical and linguistic freak who “rules” New Zealand and in Australia with its mediocre ineffectual half-man, all at the head of the stinking corpse that constitute the “Empire parties of reform”.
They started their trajectory by selling out (largely to Wall Street parasites) the hugely nationally important and highly efficient state enterprises and now, when these “progressive reforms” have been exhausted, moved on to gleefully engineering the extinction of their “own kind” (used loosely).
Truly “they “gassed” the wrong people”.
“The Dark is indeed rising, but the Dark will be thrown back. Leftism will not triumph and the West will not perish.” I fear you are overly optimistic. The self induced genocide of the western nations is the elephant in the room that even the most ardent opponents of the left are afraid to speak of. The last time I was in the UK no one was willing to discuss the muslim issue except for one Turkish woman who recognized the evil that has befallen the UK.
Please tell us more re. the Turkish woman’s observation?
Tobias, Sterling and thought-provoking work: priceless in fact. I am buoyed by yours words of optimism towards the end, as E Michael Jones states: ‘The cunning of nature’; in this case The cunning of truth overcomes lies.
Thanks to one of the quirks of truth emerging through the fog of untruths we can salute a Jew, Maurice Glasman for stating the actual mentality of the Labour Party leadership and its apparatchiks.
One question illustrate the dishonesty of leftist liars is to ask them if they were to buy a house next to a mosque or to buy a house next door to church (naturally in an area with indigenous ethnic integrity); exact same houses for sale with alike amenities?
All Western countries are ruled by traitors. What makes it harder to accept in the case of Wales is that that nation has fought to maintain its existence and not be absorbed by England. The usual English complaint is that many Welsh or Scottish nationalists who keep criticizing the English are really traitors who support the third-world invasion. And this is wrongly used as an argument to dismiss Welsh and Scottish nationalism. In fact, nationalists who betray the White race are phony nationalists. They do not defend the existence of their own nation. We have the same problem with phony Labor, phony conservatives, phony environmentalists, phony church leaders… All they care about is facilitating the race replacement agenda.
I think it’s harder to believe in Welsh nationalism today than it was fifty years ago, but nationalism is even more necessary than it used to be. Defending Wales against London should go together with resisting to Jewish power and the open borders policy.
• “non-White immigration will be just as bad for the Welsh language as it is for Gaelic”
In my own case, my grandparents had Breton as their mother-tongue, but they used French to raise their children. I’ve learned enough Breton to read a few books, but I never took it to the next step of speaking Breton. I’ve read a theory that a community of 35.000 speakers would be enough to save the language. I like the idea, but in the last five years, my hometown has seen an African invasion, coming on top of the older Turkish invasion. So, I think I’ll wait until they have gone back to Africa before I start working on my Breton again. Also, we would need massive support from the local administration, but the Parisians who relocate in Brittany may not be interested in linguistic revival.
• “Welsh leftists are using non-White outsiders to wage war on the White Welsh.”
In Brittany, there is no equivalent to the SNP and Plaid Cymru. The best known autonomist party in the last decades was a small structure called UDB, and they are now on board with the race replacement agenda. During WW2, Breton right-wing nationalists had some success in defending their cause, but they were later accused of having Nazi sympathies. In the 1960s, a bunch of leftist students founded the UDB. They were in line with the growing leftism of the 1960s. In the 1970s, there was a traditional music revival in Brittany. Traditional songs were collected and given new musical arrangements, in connection with similar developments in Scotland and Ireland. This was probably facilitated by the example of the (((folk singer))) Bob Dylan. What really gave an impetus to the Breton music revival is that a small amount of it was finally allowed on the (((French TV and radio))). It all started in 1972, when the musician Alan Stivell was allowed to perform at the Olympia theater in Paris. Along his career, he has done a lot of good for Breton music, the Breton language, and political freedom in general, but his mother came from the USSR and she was probably Jewish. That would explain how he made it to the Olympia.
So, the cultural dominance of Paris was relaxed a little in the 1970s, but not enough to allow Breton to be taught in schools. Most Breton speakers are now dead, the music revival ended a long time ago, and you no longer see any criticism of (((French centralism))) in the newspapers. The Bretons may already be a minority among Whites in Brittany, and it seems the last members of the UDB are okay with race replacement. The defense of national identity should not have been left to a bunch of leftists, but I think the leftism of 1960s and 1970s was closely linked to Jewish influence. Conservatives were artificially sidelined by the media and the political power, not just in Brittany, but in the whole Western world.
I think we need more clarity on the subject of leftism, and maybe a more precise vocabulary. I like what Jonathan Bowden said in a 2008 speech :
“Now Marxists on the whole form two camps in my mind, politically and ideologically. In all Marxist groups you get the rather weak, pacifistic, loving, humanistic people. The vicar’s daughter who believes human nature isn’t . . . right. If only we could be nicer to each other, if only we could spread more love. You get these people always in ultra left and communist groups, and next to them on the podium, next to them in the auditorium, [are] your utterly nihilistic, ruthless, virtually criminal types who want to use the structure of power when they get it to crush those underneath them, don’t give a damn about ideology, and are actually amongst the most misanthropic people you could ever meet. And you have these extremes of the innocent lovey and the sort of sadistic amoralist in the same group.”
Bowden was talking about the far-left, which is only a minority, but very influential. The question is: How come they defend Jewish anti-White ideologies on every issue except Palestine? There is a theory that loony liberalism is a natural trait linked to our genetic tendency to individualism, but it doesn’t explain why leftists are so easily manipulated. I think most left-wing voters are not social justice warriors, they are conformists who watch too much TV. But there are also smart psychopaths who get to the highest positions in politics and other institutions by following the Jewish agenda, without being natural conformists, and without being real leftists at all. Is Mark Drakeford one of them? Without the Jewish-led anti-White movement, he would have no interest in replacing his countrymen with third-worlders.
“Bowden was talking about the far-left, which is only a minority, but very influential. The question is: How come they defend Jewish anti-White ideologies on every issue except Palestine? There is a theory that loony liberalism is a natural trait linked to our genetic tendency to individualism, but it doesn’t explain why leftists are so easily manipulated.”
The Far Left has always had a high proportion of Jews in its various parties and sects. These were pre-adapted to the modern age of the globalist agendas. You might call them sleepers. With globalisation, much of the West was de-industrialised, leading to a rapid decline in any working class (gentile, socially conservative) component of these parties. I’m not sure how this process worked itself out in France, though clearly the French working class today are a shadow of their former self. But I do know that the PCF, the French Communist Party (under Georges Marchais) was very influential (in the 60’s and 70’s) and controlled many French cities and towns where they implemented their restrictive immigration policies. This critique of the PCF was written by some subversive rats in a “British” leftist sect in 1981:
“On this issue their (JM: the PCF) policy is virtually identical to that of the French government: no more immigration, encouragement of immigrants already in France to go back where they came from, more or less equal treatment for those who despite this still choose to stay. When Lionel Stoléru, the French Minister of Labour, declared on a visit to Metz in October that “there is no question of admitting a single new foreigner into France”(Républicain Lorrain, 15 October 1980), he expressed a sentiment the PCF echoes, only they accuse him of not being tough enough, of allowing illegal immigration to continue!
Two PCF councillors from the Paris suburb of Ivry-sue-Seine, interviewed in Le Monde of 4 November, were asked “You want a reduction in the number of immigrants. So you and Mr. Stoléru are in the same battle”. They replied “He talks, but there are no measures”. As if to confirm that this was not just the opinion of two low-ranking officials in a sensitive area, the next day the Political Bureau of the PCF repeated his view in an official declaration on “The Housing of Immigrant Workers” which was published in full in L’Humanité, the Party’s official daily paper, on 6 November: “These workers have been called to France by employers and a government greedy for profits. Today, the government states that immigration must be stopped otherwise new French and immigrant workers will be thrown out of work. This is in their mutual interest. But M. Giscard d’Estaing’s government and his Minister Stoléru do not do what they say. They contribute to the organised illegal entry of workers with no social rights with the aim of depressing the rights of French workers. We insist that these practices be ended and that the traffickers who engage in them be repressed.”…and so on @ https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/1980s/1981/no-918-february-1981/communist-partys-racist-policy/
*Since this article was written the British press has reported yet further escalation in the PCF anti-immigrant campaign. Paul Mercieca, PCF mayor of Vitry-sur-Seine (Val de Marne department), in a bid to prevent some African immigrants being transferred to his town from a nearby non-PCF controlled area, went so far as to arrange for the vandalisation of the hostel set aside to receive them. (see The Times, 29 and 30 December 1980).
Some time after this the PCF became a thoroughly Globalist outfit.
“Since then, the PCF’s ideology has been marked by significant ideological evolution on some topics but consistency on other issues. Some of the most marked changes have come on individual rights and immigration. After having vilified homosexuality and feminism as “the rubbish of capitalism” in the 1970s, the PCF has evolved towards tolerance and now full support for both gay rights and feminism. In the 1980s, the PCF supported reducing the age of consent for homosexual relationships and opposed attempts to repenalize homosexuality. In 1998, the PCF voted in favour of the civil solidarity pact (PACS), civil unions including homosexual couples. The PCF currently supports both same-sex marriage and same-sex adoption. On 12 February 2013, PCF deputies voted in favour of same-sex marriage and adoption rights in the National Assembly. However, one PCF deputy, Patrice Carvalho, voted against. The PCF also supports feminist movements and supports policies to further promote gender equality and parity.
On the issue of immigration, the PCF’s positions have also evolved significantly since the 1980s. In the 1981 presidential election, Georges Marchais ran a controversial campaign on immigration which was harshly criticized by anti-racism organizations at the time. In 1980, the PCF’s leadership had voted in favour of limiting immigration. The same year, Marchais supported the PCF mayor of Vitry-sur-Seine who had destroyed a home for Malian migrant workers; the PCF claimed that the right-wing government was trying to push immigrants into ghettos in Communist working-class cities. The Libération newspaper also alleged that PCF municipal administrations had been working to limit the number of immigrants in housing projects. Today, however, the PCF supports the regularization of illegal immigrants.
One consistency in the PCF’s ideology has been its staunch opposition to capitalism, which must be “overcome” because, according to the PCF, the capitalist system is “exhausted” and “on the verge of collapse”. The PCF has interpreted the current course of globalization as a confirmation of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s view on the future evolution of capitalism. The party feels that the financial crisis of 2007-2008 and the Great Recession have further justified its calls to overcome capitalism. However, the PCF has remained somewhat vague on how capitalism will be ‘overcome’ and what will replace it, placing heavy emphasis on utopic models or values.
The same could be said for lreland… one of the main problems are ‘British’ leftist Women…because just as the Victorian ‘Church’ ladies wept for picaninnies in Africa..whilst the four year old white Urchin with rickets was choking on soot as he climbed up their parlour chimney ..
The modern Brit feminist/leftist overlooks the industrial scale rape and murder of young British women and girls…
lt’s a form of mental illness.. a disease of the soul…
I share the author’s hatred of Mark Drakeford, who made the following statement when someone suggested some extreme control measure during the Covid lockdown – I can’t recall what exactly. His reflex response was pure strategic bureaucracy: he turned to ask himself ‘what extra power could be locked up here?’ Of course couched in boilerplate language of care and reasonableness.
“..it could only ever be a temporary measure, and there are other things that we can do and should do, and we’ll work hard with our 3rd sector organisations or local authorities in Wales. As I say, people need to be safe and to feel safe, and that’s absolutely the sort of society that we wish to create here in Wales.”
I’m not sure you need to say these people are basically anti-white. What they seek is manageable things to manage: chronic illness, low-level crime, disfunction, poverty, equality. These are the resources of a post-industrial post-growth age with an endless credit line. Black migration is a bottomless mine for them.
These articles always infuriate me but they are well worth a read. I too believe we’ll eventually win back our nations.
You might want to research the possibility that the UN is actively working to turn Wales into the world’s first sanctuary country. Yes you read that right. Sanctuary country.
ZOG is hellbent on destroying the West/White race.
In light of the ongoing riots between Hindus and Muslims in the English Midlands (whites are an insignificant minority in many of these places) I was discussing the issue with a large apolitical white family from Leicester. They said that their son just like his older siblings and cousins applied for a job for the local council, but was turned down because he did not speak an Asian language! Institutional racism against whites?? Apparently not as this new policy “encourages diversity”. The whole extended family, fed up of the chaos and anti-white violence is planning on leaving for pastures new (white flight). And yes, they feel betrayed by Labour, but do not have much confidence in the Rishi Sinai led Conservative Party either.
It is obvious from the physiognomy of the regulation-ridden, pen-pushing, blithering bureaucratic moral morons such as Mark Drakeford, Nicola Sturgeon et al that they really are not capable achieving or creating much in life and are only there as pliant puppets to enforce the ‘progressive policies’ (destruction of the social fabric) ordered by their powerful secret Jewish masters. Just compare these puppets to Rosemary Sutcliffe (life-long invalid, but no seeker after victimhood status), Tolkien (National Front member for several years) and Susan Cooper (someone who thanks to this article I am now aware of ) and you will easily see what I mean. As always Tobias Langdon gets 5 stars from me.