A Tenth White American Voice

Recently (it’s now January, 2023) I wrote a couple of articles that provide the backdrop for what’s here: “The American Political System and White Discourse”; and “Nine American White Voices.”  The thrust of the two was the suggestion that a possible underpinning for American White racial advocacy is this country’s political and cultural heritage, with the emphasis on “possible.”  I’m not contending that this frame of reference should be the way American White advocates look at racial concerns; rather, that it is a way.   It happens to be my outlook, but it needn’t be anyone else’s.  Personally, I’ve found White advocacy to be too strident, alpha-male-dominated, European-referenced, collectivist, authoritarian, and fringy-right-wing.   I’ve gone so far as to argue for gay and lesbian involvement in the movement (“The White Racial Movement and Gays.”)

In the week following the “American Political System and White Discourse” posts, I identified nine people I believe deserve consideration in this country’s racial dialogue and debate: philosopher, essayist, and lecturer Ralph Waldo Emerson; novelist and short story writer Ernest Hemingway; Civil War combatant William T. Anderson; film director Sam Peckinpah; poet Emily Dickinson; artist and art educator Robert Henri; U.S. Congresswoman Jeannette Rankin; comic book illustrator Steve Ditko; and country singer Hank Williams.  The “Nine White American Voices” article was given over to brief references—quotes, descriptions, accounts, lyrics in Williams’ case—to the nine.

What I didn’t note in that article and should have, and I’m doing it here, is to point out that I didn’t just pick the nine names out of a hat, as it were.  At some point in the last decade, these nine individuals jumped out at me.  I gave them time and attention.  They had an impact on my thinking and, really, my total being—and that includes Hank Williams’ lyrics to “I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry.”  I decided that each of them was a White American voice: I couldn’t envision their expressions coming from a Black, Hispanic, Asian, or Jewish person, or from a European.  All nine were inside me, part of the physically-felt internal referent I drew upon, when I produced the 59 articles I have written for this publication over the last few years.  To understand me and what I have written is to take into account, or at least sense, that someone like comics illustrator Steve Ditko has had a major impact on me and someone like Anthony Ludovici hasn’t.

With that as the context, I’ll cite a “tenth White American voice” here: Samuel Francis Smith.  Just now I had to look up Smith’s name; I didn’t know it before.  In 1831 while a student at the Andover Theological Seminary in Andover, Massachusetts, he wrote the lyrics to “America” (“My Country ‘Tis of Thee”) to the melody of “God Save the Queen.”  Doing so, he contrasted the British monarchy with the young American republic.   I remember singing the song in elementary school, and I took its words to heart.  I still take them to heart, including, and I’m not religious, the references to God:

My country ’tis of thee
Sweet land of liberty
Of thee I sing
Land where my fathers died
Land of the pilgrim’s pride
From every mountainside
Let freedom ring

My native country, thee
Land of the noble free
Thy name I love
I love thy rocks and rills
Thy woods and templed hills
My heart with rapture fills
Like that above

Let music swell the breeze
And ring from all the trees
Sweet freedom’s song
Let mortal tongues awake
Let all that breathe partake
Let rocks their silence break
The sound prolong

Our Father God to Thee
Author of liberty
To Thee I sing
My country ’tis of Thee
Sweet land of liberty
For all eternity
Let freedom ring

All to say, White nationalism and Alain de Benoist don’t have the favorable ring for me that they do for others.  I identify with and care about all White people, but I am first and foremost a White American who loves my country and what it stands for.


18 replies
  1. todd hupp
    todd hupp says:

    The turning point for white America was in the 1960s/early 1970s

    1.1965 immigration act removing NW European preference.
    2.affirmative action vs merit
    3.government financing of higher education

    The USA as a white European – derived country and culture is Gone With The Wind per the now banned American classic novel and film.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      People forget, the whole sentence from the book was “An entire civilisation, gone with the wind.”
      Maybe if they’d kept the first part, it would have caused more of the American masses to think a little bit more about that war, and whether destroying an entire civilisation and wiping out hundreds of thousands of young men was worth it just so the area could be ruled from DC.

      ‘Gone With The Wind’ sounds like some sort of poetic phrase that could mean anything.

      I see the producer and production company that made that film was Jewish, but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence . . .

  2. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    Glad you’re back in the saddle again, by the way. You’ve sounded so lonesome you could cry at least once. Know your command of your craft is certainly appreciated here. If nothing else, I recommend your biography that was solicted by the National Alliance when William Pierce, Ph.D. (physics) was undoubtedly aware that he was terminally ill but remained at his post. I especially appreciate both your pieces in that book on Timothy McVeigh and, recently, the Derek Chauvin ineffective probably conflicted defense.

  3. Ron Chapman
    Ron Chapman says:

    G’day Robert,
    Thanks for your thoughts.
    Arguably the current denigration and attempted ‘cancellation’ of whites and especially of anyone exhibiting so-called toxic white male masculinity, is just the fruit of the latest deadly Ashkenazi program aimed at enslaving and destroying white goyem by fostering division and ignorance among USans and all goyem,

    To divide, rule and enslave goyem, the Talmudists always seek to foster endless anger, aggression and division.
    The problem seems to be that almost everyone of good will has been ‘sleeping at the wheel’ while deluded followers of Antonio Gramsci and cultural Marxist Bolsheviks expelled from the Soviet Union have been busy in a long successful Marxist march through the institutions. The cultural Marxists have largely managed to divide and rule Anglo-USans and European gentiles using Imbecilic racism and Wokeism that has almost destroyed the vestiges of the moral teachings of Christ Jesus that manifested Anglo-European culture.

    Fortunately Trump and his global supporters are successfully resisting that demonic assault.
    Arguably, to successfully rout the Talmudists we need to resist the temptation to elevate unimportant differences like race, colour and creed and view everyone as our brothers and sisters and hence ONE with us in unity with the Creator. The resultant harmonious, loving energetic vibes (frequencies) will manifest the world we want.
    Peace and Blessings,

    • W. Poe White
      W. Poe White says:

      “we need to resist the temptation to elevate unimportant differences like race, colour and creed”

      I strongly disagree with the notion that racial difference is unimportant. On the contrary, racial difference is innate, ineradicable without genocide and needs to be acknowledged and respected if there is to be genuine peace. Separate ethnoracial communities, societies and polities are vitally needed – and this will always remain so.

      This does not mean that one race should or inevitably must dominate or exterminate another race, let alone try to conquer the world for their race alone.

      There is a deep need for the races and ethnicities of the world to find a way to lastingly coexist in peace as this is the only way to avert civilizational and ecological catastrophe. Total wars involving artificially intelligent drone swarms and other robots, biotech-weapons and nanotech-weapons would be hellish and destructive beyond anything that has ever been seen before. Likewise, such technologies would enable the creation of totalitarian dystopias more nightmarish than any tyranny which has ever existed.

      What the world needs is not an impossible unity through imposed uniformity but the acceptance of limits to power and expansion. Humanity needs to outgrow adolescent Faustian/Promethean dreams of endless progress and ever-greater instrumental powers to shape the world. We need to come back down to Earth.

  4. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    Though this post was intended for Dr. MacDonald it is just as well it gets posted here. It is taken from a chapter entitled A Secret to Power by the late Dr. Willard Cantelon in his book The Day the Dollar Dies 1973 Logos International. Enjoy!

    ONE STILL, cold winter night I stood high on the south bank of the Potomac, gazing across the river at the city of Washington, which sparkled in a covering of new fallen snow.

    For a third of a century, America had been the land of my adoption, and for several years Washington had been my home. To me, she was the very heart of the nation, and my own heart was part of her.

    If Paris to many spelled pleasure and Rome to others represented religion, then surely Washington was a symbol of power. Was there any place in the world where her voice was not heard and her influence not felt?

    In my early years in America, however, I had given little thought or consideration to America’s place in world affairs. I was too occupied with the wonder and excitement of discovering America itself.

    During a single decade, I drove over half a million miles in America, and traveled still more in the air and on the water. The sheer size of this country was staggering. I once added the territories of two dozen nations and compared their size to that of U.S.A. To my amazement, I found that the territories of

    England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, Germany, Switzerland, France,
    Belgium, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, Cuba, Ceylon, and Japan

    all combined covered less than one half of the U.S.A. In fact, one could place all of these in America twice over and still have 114,740 square miles to spare.

    A Multi-Race Population

    As America’s population grew, so did the variety of nationalities within her borders. By the time her population reached 200 million, the races within America represented almost every land on earth.

    Negroes 22,000,000
    English 19,060,000
    Germans 19,961,000
    Irish 13,282,000
    Spanish 9,230,000
    Italians 7,239,000
    Polish 4,021,000
    Russians 2,152,000

    To these, one must add the Latins, the Orientals, and others making up the balance of the nation’s population.

    Wealth in Few Hands

    In America, one could count 100,000 men whose combined fortunes amounted to $250 billion. Some statisticians had estimated the average annual income in America at $5,000; in Latin America, $720; in Asia, $215; in China, $157. At the conclusion of World War II, the contrast between the wealth of America and the poverty of other nations stood in sharp contrast.

    ln 1945, Americans found themselves possessing:

    7O% of the free world’s gold
    5O% of the productive power
    65% of the world’s telephones,
    . radios, and automobiles

    All of this wealth was in the hands of 6.5 % of the world’s people, but it was not destined to remain this way for long.

    Postwar Europe

    At the close of World War II, I had walked in silence down the streets of London and Coventry beholding the skeletons of the buildings bombed in the blitzkriegs. In Rotterdam I gazed with awe at the endless acres of rubble. The proud Dutch city had been literally pulverized by the merciless assaults of the Luftwaffe. With Colonel Garr I drove across France. The factories in many cities were idle. The spirit of the people seemed as shattered as their towns and villages. In Stuttgart, I looked from the window of a bombed ruined abode, gazing incredulously at the once-beautiful city of Wtirttemberg, now 7O% in ruins. In Berlin, I walked on what had been called the Victory Parade. I did not hear the click of the heel, nor see the Elite Guard of Hitler strutting in their proud goose step. The Victory Parade seemed lonely and empty. Berlin was 90% in ruins.

    European Bankruptcy

    During the many weeks we spent in Berlin, we learned firsthand some of the sorrows of war. Frau Kleist told us how she traded her treasured piano for a sack of potatoes to keep from starving and burned her furniture to keep from freezing.

    In Frankfurt, Amandus Frotcher, the industrialist builder,told how he offered his valuable rings for a quarter pound of margarine.

    A Picture Reversed

    In a few short years, the contrast between America’s prosperity and Europe’s postwar poverty vanished. Out of the war ruins of European cities, skyscrapers and modern buildings arose almost overnight.

    The autobahns and expressways of Europe, once so devoid of cars, became congested with traffic; and hotels in the holiday seasons invariably hung out signs reading, “No Vacancy.”

    The four-word plea, “Take me to America,” once familiar on almost every European’s lips began to vanish.

    There was no mistake. Europe along with other nations was growing richer and America poorer.

    Following 1949, America’s gold vanished from Fort Knox and the sub-basement of the New York City bank at the rate of $672 million a year for l0 years.

    At one point in the postwar period, America had 26 billion in gold and Europeans had 10. Then the picture changed to just the reverse. Americans found themselves with approximately l0 billion and the Europeans with over 20 billion. In 1950, America owned 42% of the Free
    World’s gold and monetary reserves. By 1971, these reserves had diminished to 8%. Millions of Americans were asking, Why? Where was America heading? What was her future? pgs 6-9

  5. W. Poe White
    W. Poe White says:

    “a possible underpinning for American White racial advocacy is this country’s political and cultural heritage”

    This is the approach I would choose. The accomplishment of the American founders is not something to be tossed aside lightly. It addressed real shortcomings with the old order back in Europe. The idea of a constitutionally-limited central federal government binding a federation of semi-autonomous states with a unified central military and foreign policy and common currency is still highly viable.

    The US Constitution had two fatal shortcomings:

    (1) The Constitution failed to limit US citizenship to people of White race. Only the ethnoracial group of White Americans should be allowed to participate in the political system. A separate permanent guest resident status would exist for certain non-Whites such as Amerindians or Blacks who would then have their own separate semi-autonomous communities under American protection similar to South African apartheid. A limited presence of non-Whites in White communities would be tolerable. A suitable policy for dealing with mischlings would be needed analogous to the NSDAP Nuremberg laws. Constitutional rights of freedom of speech etc. would be rights of ethnoracial Americans only. Guests must behave as guests.

    (2) The Constitution failed to specify that the national currency must be a debt-free public currency issued by the central government without middleman participation by a private banking cartel. Private bankers now issue the currency of the land as debt owed to themselves. This currency is created largely through the issuing of loans. Why do we need private bankers to create fiat money out of thin air when the government can do this on its own? Take the (((banksters))) out of the loop and deprive the enemy of its single greatest weapon against us, i.e. the Money Power.

    The American Constitutional semi-democratic federal republic is a real civilizational advance over what had existed in Europe. It represents a limited but very real genuinely progressive advance within the European White Western civilizational tradition. Its shortcomings are remediable. So I’ll use my White American voice to oppose tossing it on the ash heap of history.

    “I’ve found White advocacy to be too strident, alpha-male-dominated, European-referenced, collectivist, authoritarian, and fringy-right-wing.”

    I agree, except that we will need our alpha-males (as well as some women) taking leadership roles. It is the natural pattern for there to be more men than women in leadership positions. We want those men to be strong in spirit and strong in mind. We need as many of our men as possible to be strong physically as well. The spiritual/mental is downstream from the physical.

    White advocates typically are insufficiently critical of historical European civilizations. We cannot return to past forms. We face a novel situation today with a world population approaching Malthusian saturation level and with the development of such powerful technologies as computers, AI, robotics, nanotechnology and biotechnology. We will NOT find ready-made answers in any former tradition to the challenges posed by global over-population and dangerously over-powerful technologies with which humanity might all too easily permanently devastate itself and its planetary ecological home. Not only the White race but the entire human species faces these existential threats.

    Collectivist solidarity must be tempered by individualist courage, wisdom and integrity. Including the courage to disagree with peers and with authority! Authority needs to be balanced with the need for debate and honest disagreement. Also, we must recognize that we White people are not monolithic. Some internal diversity must and should remain.

    Hierarchic authority is a social technology for mobilizing a population of individuals by coordinating their actions to accomplish goals that can only be accomplished collectively. The classic example is an army with its hierarchy of ranks and order of battle. Hierarchic authority is principally needed in times of emergency such as war. Today all White peoples are in an undeclared war which our side mostly remains oblivious to. So martial law type hierarchic authority is appropriate for us until we are out of danger.

    The sound solution to the question of authority versus individualism is neither extreme authoritarianism nor extreme libertarianism but a Golden Mean balance between the need for authority and the need for individual freedom. In times of emergency we should lean more to the side of authority; in times of peace and safety more to the side of individual freedom.

  6. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    (((Survivor))) puts Indian politician who calls an invasion an invasion under moral blackmail arguing that “telling the truth is Nazi” (true!). The British people can be proud of this “Holocaust-educator”, honored as “Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire”, who is so keen to finally make the British (even much more) un-British. This corresponds to her specific Jewish habit of saying “Thank you!” to the host people. https://news.sky.com/story/holocaust-survivor-says-home-secretarys-words-and-actions-are-similar-to-those-of-nazi-germany-12786451

    #NUKEDAVOS says:


    Here is the list of millionaire criminals from the EUSSR. Brussels must be empty:

    Ursula von der leyen (known as the hyena), former highly incompetent German ‘defence’ minister under Merkel dictatorship (pregnant women driving tanks). Mock president of the EUSSR because she’s the ultimate puppet . Albert Bourla (pfizer CEO) personal whore. She took bribes from Pfizer for the covid deathvax, her husband owns a firm in business with Pfizer, major conflicts of interests, corruption, mass murder, yet still in place.
    ec-president-vdl@ec.europa.eu +32-229-560 70

    Roberta Metsola President of the EUSSR (MOCK) ‘Parliament’. The EUSSR parliament is a useless and powerless body whose main function is to make the cattle believe the EUSSR is some kind of democracy. All decisions are taken by the commission without any real scrutiny. The EUSSR mock parliament is a taxpayer funded financial abyss.

    Valdis Dombrovskis Executive Vice-President for an Economy that Works for People (LOL)
    cab-dombrovskis-contact@ec.europa.eu +32-229-55446

    Janez Lenarčič Commissioner for Crisis Management, +32-229-50400 cab-lenarcic-contact@ec.europa.eu (the EUSSR like it model the USSR creates false jobs such as this in order to maintain a gigantic, expensive and useless bureaucracy).

    Johannes Hahn Commissioner for Budget and Administration cab-hahn-contact@ec.europa.eu +32-229-86472

    Kadri Simson Commissioner for Energy +32-229-50520 cab-simson-contact@ec.europa.eu

    Mairead McGuinness Commissioner for Financial Services. cab- mcguinness -contact@ec.europa.eu mairead-mcguinness-contact@ec.europa.eu +32-229-53200

    Mariya Gabriel Commissioner for Innovation, Research, Culture, +32-229-55960

    Nicolas Schmit Commissioner for Jobs and Social Rights, +32-229-50090 CAB-SCHMIT-ARCHIVES@ec.europa.eu

    Paolo Gentiloni Commissioner for Economy +32-229-50250 cab-gentiloni-contact@ec.europa.eu

    Vera Jourová Vice-President for Values and Transparency (LOL)

    Christine Lagarde, President, European Central Bank: zero banking experience, famously charged with corruption when ‘finance’ minister in France, rewarded as a result with the job of IMF director and now director of the EUSSR central bank christine.lagarde@weforum.org

    Jiří Šedivý Chief Executive, “European Defence Agency” (LOL).

    Miroslav Lajčák Special Representative of the European Union for the Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue and Western (they really have a BS job for everything paid for by taxpayer money)

    Virginijus Sinkevicius, Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries WEF official ‘young global’ prostitute’ cab-sinkevicius-contact@ec.europa.eu +32-229-50270


  8. Strange World
    Strange World says:


    With posts like this, I can literally hear the Jews quipping in the background, “Look at these Goy illusionists, debating whether they’d rather have an ‘ethno-state’ or an ’empire,’ even though we’re siccing so many Third Worlders on them that even their toilets aren’t uninhabited!”

    • W. Poe White
      W. Poe White says:

      So what’s your point? That we should just stop discussing these issues because we can’t take power the day after tomorrow? It may not be much but it’s better than nothing to still be able to read about history and current events and discuss them freely on a few small corners of the internet.

      Since we have disagreements about some issues, such as being pro or anti-imperialist, we can at least discuss them. Some day, if we ever do get somewhere politically, we might be the clearer-minded about our policies then for partaking in these discussions now while we’re “in the wilderness.”

      I keep attending to the unfolding nightmare because I can’t ignore it and because, maybe, must maybe, someday we’ll get a chance to turn things around.

      Jews, no matter how grim things look to them, never, never, never give up. Here’s one instance where we should do as they do. Do we have it in us?

  9. Ron Chapman
    Ron Chapman says:

    W. Poe White
    January 15, 2023 at 2:49 pm
    G’day W Poe White,
    Thank you for your views, You say:
    ‘I strongly disagree with the notion that racial difference is unimportant. On the contrary, racial difference is innate, ineradicable without genocide and needs to be acknowledged and respected if there is to be genuine peace. Separate ethnoracial communities, societies and polities are vitally needed – and this will always remain so.’

    Arguably every ensouled human being is indwelt by a fragment of Creator consciousness and hence all are ONE despite the fact that everyone is gifted with a unique personality as well as mind, soul, reasoning ability and free will. Moreover, the cosmos and everything in it is created by intelligent energies coming from the mind of the Creator and hence we need to respect and nurture everyone and everything where possible. We may defend ourselves and nature even to the point of eliminating dangers where necessary but that needs to be done without harbouring hatred of the other. Why? Because hatred and the fear which precipitates it are low frequency energies which drag down our personal vibrations to levels we wish to avoid. They also contribute to reducing planetary energetic frequencies which fuel conflict, warfare and destruction.

    The reason that Talmudists, WOKEists and their ilk come across as deadshits is because they embrace hatred and aggression and seek to enslave and destroy everyone and misuse everything.

    Racial differences are superficial in that, at most, they signify differences in DNA. Arguably DNA is a blueprint for physical characteristics but not one’s soul and spirit. DNA is also an antenna capable of picking up energetic signals and hence it is a mechanism that picks up and reacts to mental as well as environmental changes.

    The reason that our world, and especially Western societies, have been spiritually and culturally declining is that we have allowed Talmudists to poison our hearts, minds and societies with destructive ideologies that have corrupted Christ Jesus’ message that salvation lies in learning to love our neighbour (everyone and everything) AS self (we need to learn to love ourselves so that we are capable of loving others) FOR the love of God (ALL that IS).

    The Talmudists’ myriad divide and rule mind controlling ideologies (money, racism, religiosity, nationalism, capitalism, Socialism, Communism, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, Feminism, cultural Marxism and all the rest, have poisoned our minds and hearts and undermined the natural instinct to love and care for our world and everything in it.

    The moment you start wanting to separate yourself from others and the world you lower your personal energetic frequency and objective thinking ability. THAT begins a process of thinking you need to destroy everyone and everything with which you disagree. That is how the Talmudists have covertly dominated, enslaved and ruled our world for thousands of years. This planet would already be a heaven on Earth if most of the population had been able to see through the demonic lies and subterfuges of the Talmudists.

    If you don’t believe me, think about what our world would be like if we stopped embracing the Talmudists’ money meme as being essential to life. Once humanity realises that worthless electronic fiat currency dispensed by banks via the Talmudists’ fractional reserve system is the root cause of scarcity, poverty and want and hence of the societal dystopia and warfare ridden world in which we live, abundance, harmony and social equality for all will be possible.

    No one will need to fret about mental illness like WOKEism IF the individuals exhibiting that condition gain no financial benefits or political or legal power as a result of their insane ideas.

    Peace and Blessings,

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      There’s truth in what you say, but nationalism has positives you aren’t appreciating in your comment. Most any political position one can take has positives and negatives. There’s an amazing defence of nationalism as a source of pride for all mankind, enabling each individual to feel part of something special, enabling a “chorus of superlatives of nationalities.” The diversity of man is the glory of God, as is the diversity within Creation.

      The US was an ideal place, still is somewhat, due to 1. Christianity 2. WASP / northwest European identity. Only whites could be citizens here. Even after blacks and Amerindians were given citizenship, they weren’t integrated until more recently, still have remnants of segregated communities.

      I assume diverse Byzantium worked well until the Crusades. So, some sort of Christian empire might be possible. However, the US has always been very focused on race, until the Jews lost in he Soviet Union and took over in the US to make the US into an ideological state. Race is what Americans valued, sometimes more than Christ.

      We might be moving towards a Latin North and South American Christian empire, run by Jews. The US definitely wants more income from somewhere, to stay ahead of China, militarily. It’s a battle for the world: Jews vs. Chinese vs. Muslims. Whites and Christians are not in the competition.

    • W. Poe White
      W. Poe White says:

      Ron Chapman,

      I wrote a response to your comment but it did not appear directly under your comment. It appeared on Jan 19 as an independent comment a few comments below your comment to which it was a response.

  10. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    I’m an Earthling, but I believe Aristotle was correct that a king should be of his own people. So, I value nationalism. Whites are collapsing, need some sort of homeland. I want a world full of nations with pride, but whites need pride also.

    If you look at how slaves were subjugated, they weren’t allowed guns and an education. They sang clever songs supposedly in ways the masters couldn’t detect. Slaves had their national identity, pagan religion, every memory of their origin removed, forgotten, to the extent possible. And slaves were bred and raped.

    We’re being made into slaves. So, it doesn’t matter where one lives, nations need to rule nations. Whites should be in charge of whites. It’s very sad to see Amerindians who have forgotten their history and blacks who know nothing about theirs. Both groups are mixed, also. So, they’re just here, making a new start in a sense. It’d be better to have nations with pride, nations that care for their own people.

    Aristotle Politics 1.1259b paraphrase: a king should be superior but of the same race as his subjects.

    Like in Ukraine, whites are not on top in the US. A Hindu saying, no reference currently, is that a person should first have a king who will protect his property, then that subject should develop his property. Whites need an elite that will protect our property and rights.

  11. W. Poe White
    W. Poe White says:

    “Arguably every ensouled human being is indwelt by a fragment of Creator consciousness and hence all are ONE…. Racial differences are superficial in that, at most, they signify differences in DNA. Arguably DNA is a blueprint for physical characteristics but not one’s soul and spirit.”

    I am a philosophical materialist with an entirely naturalistic worldview. I don’t believe in incorporeal minds/spirits existing apart from physical substance. In particular, no such entity as God could exist. Nor human souls existing apart from brains. Every thought, perception, sensation or emotion that occurs in our minds is the deterministic product of physical (brain) events unfolding according to blind physical causality. There are no minds apart from matter directing matter from the outside. No such thing as a creator is possible.

    Differences in DNA are fundamental in producing differences in people. Nor are these differences superficial. Aside from whatever metaphysics you may believe in, it is apparent just from everyday experience that there are non-trivial differences among the races of the human species. These are palpable and obvious. They are also empirically demonstrable. For example, heritable IQ differences between races are well established.

    “hatred of the other… The moment you start wanting to separate yourself from others… THAT begins a process of thinking you need to destroy everyone and everything with which you disagree.”

    This straw man blood libel is groundless nonsense. Speaking for myself, I don’t hate “the other.” Still less, do I wish to destroy the other simply because we are different and disagree in our values. Only people with a maniacal drive to achieve unity no matter how great the price might think like this. I am happy to accept the obvious diversity of humanity but am observant enough to realize that different types of people need their own separate societies if they are both to get what they need to feel at home in the world. If well-meaning (or not so well-meaning) people insist on integrating peoples with different values, spirits and natural behavioral patterns into the same societies then the result will be alienation, conflict, oppression and tragedy.

    Why the mania to place all eggs in one basket? Why the obsession with unity? Why the determination to force all of humanity into the same integrated melting pot? Can’t separate societies coexist in peace? Can’t we accept that other people have values different from our own, and even in contradiction to our own? Granted, for this coexistence to happen the different societies must forego expansionist geopolitics. But this would still be true if everyone in the world were racially nearly identical.

    You misdiagnose the cause of today’s ominously waxing pathological chaos. It is not caused by hatred of the other. Nor by lack of receptivity to some sort of cosmic spiritual energy. You are right about one thing: the Jews (“Talmudists”) are indeed heavily responsible for the sorry state of the world today. But divisions among humanity are not a product of mere folly and illusion. They are real, substantial, inevitable and ineradicable.

    Any genuine lasting world peace that might be attained must take these natural ineradicable differences into account by allowing for separate autonomous societies.

    Beyond the pathological influence of Jewish power, there are two other interlinked factors portending mounting world disasters. Namely, overpopulation and dangerously powerful technologies such as computers, artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, genetic engineering and nanotechnology (what I call the “Faustian” technologies). An overpopulated world with polities fighting wars for control over increasingly scarce resources using hyper-powerful Faustian technology is a scenario replete with potential for horror. High-tech totalitarian dystopias likewise pose horrific possibilities of oppression more deep that was ever feasible without Faustian technology. Among the greatest horrors would be those arising out of Transhumanism. Transhumanism poses a potent existential threat to humanity.

    A global state (world unity, a New World Order) might preclude geopolitical struggles for resources among separate nations but it would certainly not preclude the possibility of a hellish Faustian totalitarian dystopia.

    I am pessimistic about the prospects for avoiding future apocalyptic disasters. But if they were to be avoided, it would be because enough people around the world were willing to accept limits to growth, expansion, power and technological progress. We would have to be content to remain the human animals we are, living natural human lives as people have done from time immemorial. We would have to relinquish Transhumanism. And we would need to accept our ineradicable human racial and cultural diversity and the resulting permanent need for separate societies.

    What we would need is a dominant mentality of acceptance of the disciplined embrace of limits motivated by a love of being what we have always been, namely one of the related but distinctly different racial flavors of that conscious, language-possessing and culture-producing primate Homo sapiens. Also, by love of the natural Earth as our indispensable, unique and irreplaceable planetary home upon which our existence utterly depends.

    • Ron Chapman
      Ron Chapman says:

      G’day W Poe White,

      Thank you for your response.
      As I am a spiritualist and you say you are a materialist it’s difficult for us to have a meeting of minds on these matters.
      For me, if spirits, minds and souls don’t exist and thoughts, perceptions, sensations and emotions are caused by blind physical causality, any philosophical discussion or discussion of human motivation is meaningless.

      I mentioned ‘unity’ as a goal not as a current reality.
      My thesis about divisions among humanity is that those real and substantial divisions are not inevitable and ineradicable but rather due to aeons of ideological and societal manipulation by
      a demonic group of mentally diseased individuals who have been attempting with considerable and increasing success to control the rest of humanity and this planet.

      The solution to the problems the Khazarian Mafia have imposed on us will commence with the implementation of genuine national (i.e. localised non-globalist) sociopolitical empowerment and self governance by cohesive ethnic and cultural groups globally. The key mechanism will be devolution of governance authority and revenue raising to local and regional communities within nations, based on real community voting arrangements restricted to adults of sound mind and heart. At genuine community levels such arrangements are possible. A major tool of KM domination and control has been centralisation which accretes funding, power and control to small, elite cabals who cease to be amenable to majority interests.

      That situation will take place once fundamental KM control mechanisms like Central Bank controlled fiat currency creation and its usurious fractional reserve system distribution by privately owned banks is eliminated. When that happens it will soon precipitate abundance for everyone and the poverty, scarcity and want that system creates will disappear. Over time, THAT will punch holes in what you perceive to be the inevitable and ineradicable divisions in human societies.
      Peace and Blessings,

Comments are closed.