Jewish Control of US Presidents #1: Woodrow Wilson

As many now note, and as certain Jewish organizations have themselves boasted, the current Biden administration is stocked with Jews at the highest levels. Significant numbers of the most powerful cabinet positions are filled by Jews, as well as various department leadership positions, the White House Chief of Staff, and throughout the administrative structure.

Here we will not attempt to assert whether this means the current President Biden is himself controlled by Jews. We will look back in history to present evidence that a select sampling of US Presidents had fallen under the control of certain Jewish individuals and groups. This will prove significant, since these Presidential administrations enacted some of the policies that led to ruinous wars that changed the fate of humanity and brought on immense national debt, devastating poverty, and unemployment for US workers, slavish support for the Jewish ethnostate of Israel to the deep detriment of the US, and large increases in profits and power for Jews.

Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921)

Our first examination will consider Woodrow Wilson, who served two terms from the crucial year of 1913, through the period of US entry into World War I, the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, and a post-war period until 1921. In his first term, Wilson signed the Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Acts on December 23, 1913. In his second term, Wilson approved US entry into World War I, causing the defeat of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey in alliance with Ireland and other nations, at a time when Germany and Britain were considering peace terms and the end of the war. Through the Treaty of Versailles and the Paris Agreements, which Wilson attended along with his Jewish advisors, this led ultimately to World War II and thus to the fulfillment of the Balfour Declaration, culminating in the disastrous establishment of the new Jewish nation of Israel in the midst of Arab, Muslim and some Christian lands. The horrors of these developments begun during the Wilson administration still afflict the US and the world today.

Jewish Blackmail of the President

Wilson’s trajectory to the Presidency involved the intervention of wealthy powerful Jews. He had recently resigned as President of Princeton University when he ran for governor of New Jersey in 1910. Soon a scandal emerged when it was claimed that Wilson was having an intimate affair with the wife of one of the Princeton professors. Wilson himself was of course married, and if the scandal reached the newspapers—the press was almost the only form of media at the time—then Wilson would have faced joblessness and the prospect of withdrawing from the Governor’s race.

Benjamin Freedman was a young Jew at the time who acted as liaison between the Senate Finance Committee led by a Jew, Henry Morgenthau Sr. and the Secretary of the Treasury Rollo Wells. Freedman later renounced his Jewish identity and spent most of his life speaking out against the cabal of Jewish bankers he once worked among. In 1974 Freedman gave a speech to Marine cadets. Some of his statements regarding Wilson and Jewish bankers follow:

So, we had a President in Washington, Mr. Taft. Mr. Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., the bankers in New York who are the arm in the United States of the Rothschild International worldwide plutocracy—Mr. Schiff, with two young men, went down to see Mr. Taft. … Jacob Schiff came back to New York (He was at that time head of The American Jewish Committee)… They ganged up in New York, to get rid of Taft [likely because Taft opposed abrogating a trade agreement with Russia promoted by the American Jewish community  and aimed at benefiting Russian Jews; here, p. 195]. I was a protégé of Mr. Bernard Baruch… So the stage was set to get rid of the Republican Party and the Republican President and put in their own party and their own President. But it was very difficult… Mr. Baruch was picked out as the leg man. He was a smart man! … Mr. Jacob Schiff and the Jews (use that word as I told you, with reservations) put up the money to launch this Party, and they looked around for a man to put up as President. … they got Woodrow Wilson… They trotted Theodore Roosevelt out of the political “moth-balls” (He was then an editor of a magazine). They told him, “You are the indispensable man. You are the only man who can save the United States.” And with his ego they formed the “Bull Moose Party” and Mr. Jacob H. Schiff and the Jews throughout the world—they got plenty of money from England—they formed the Bull Moose Party. And in that way they split the Republican vote between Roosevelt and Taft, and Mr. Wilson walked in with a minority of the popular vote. …

You find in politics, every time they pick a candidate, and put him out in front, they have the goods on him. You know he had been sleeping with the wife of the professor who lived next door to him at Princeton, whose name was Peck. And they used to call Wilson, at Princeton, “Peck’s bad boy.” When she got a divorce and moved to Washington, she married a man who had a son. And that son borrowed $40,000 from the bank, without asking them. He didn’t know how to pay it back, and the pressure on him was getting very, very hot. So this woman heard of Samuel Untermeyer (of the big firm, Googenheim, Untermeyer and Marshall) a prominent Democrat; and supplied much money to the party. She went to him with a big package of letters… So, they cooked this up and she got the idea of blackmailing him (Wilson). She got Samuel Untermeyer to go to see him, as a lawyer. He was a big contributor to the Party and he knew Wilson, and he went there. To make a long story short, Wilson didn’t have the money; Untermeyer provided it, and the boy paid the money back.

Now, Mr. Untermeyer told President Wilson, “I’ll advance that money if you will do one favor for me. The next opening on the Supreme Court, I want to name the man.” He said, “We’ve never had a Jew on the Supreme Court. I think there ought to be a Jew on the Supreme Court.” So Wilson said, “It’s a deal!” and they paid the $40,000. When a vacancy appeared on the Supreme Court, Mr. Untermeyer recommended Mr. Brandeis. Mr. Brandeis was the number one Zionist in the United States; the head of them all, and he became very friendly with Wilson.

We will return to Freedman’s transcript regarding the US entry into World War I. We must first clarify and corroborate this account of Wilson’s apparent blackmail by Jewish bankers, especially Samuel Untermeyer as contact with Wilson.

Wilson was exchanging what appear to be love letters with Mary Hulbert Peck for eight years starting during his presidency of Princeton in 1907, spanning his brief term as governor of New Jersey, and part of his first term as U.S. President until 1915. For seven of those years, Wilson was married to Ellen Axton Wilson, who died in August 1914. To summarize the impact of this scandal when it spread through the newspapers during this time: “But for a presidential candidate to have acknowledged any serious intentions toward her, a divorcee and already a cause of gossip, would have been, by post-Victorian standards, social and political suicide.” Untermeyer would know to exploit this blackmail on Wilson when he approached the President on Mary Hulbert’s behalf (She had divorced her husband Peck as early as 1912). The $40,000 that Untermeyer requested from Wilson in 1910 is worth $1.25 million today. Untermeyer paid it to Mary on Wilson’s behalf, owning Wilson thereafter.

Louis Brandeis: First Jew on the Supreme Court

Wilson nominated Louis Brandeis to the Supreme Court on January 28, 1916. So controversial was this nomination that the confirmation process endured an unprecedented four months, and included the first public hearing the Senate Judiciary Committee ever held. Conservative Republicans especially opposed Brandeis’ nomination, and were of course denounced as “anti-Semitic.”  Many years later Brandeis’ replacement on the Supreme Court, William Douglas, writing in the New York Times, said of him, “He was dangerous because he was incorruptible,” and “a militant crusader for social justice.”

When the Senate committee conducting the confirmation hearing requested letters of endorsement from Attorney General Thomas Watt Gregory, who announced that none were available, Wilson stepped in to give his own endorsement. Wilson wrote of Brandeis: “I knew him to be singularly qualified by learning, by gifts, and by character for the position.” Wilson further gushed:

…he is exceptionally qualified. I cannot speak too highly of his impartial, impersonal, orderly, and constructive mind, his rare analytical powers, his deep human sympathy, his profound acquaintance with the historical roots of our institutions and insight into their spirit, or of the many evidences he has given of being imbued to the very heart with our American ideals of justice and equality of opportunity; of his knowledge of modern economic conditions and of the way they bear upon the masses of the people, or of his genius in getting persons to unite in common and harmonious action and look with frank and kindly eyes into each other’s minds, who had before been heated antagonists. This friend of justice and of men will ornament the high court of which we are all justly proud. I am glad to have had the opportunity to pay him this tribute of admiration and of confidence…

The eventual approval of Brandeis’ nomination fulfilled Wilson’s promise to his creditor Untermeyer to place a Jew on the Supreme Court.

Brandeis was a strong supporter of Wilson during his first campaign and provided the candidate with economic talking points such as “regulated competition.” After the election, Wilson told Brandeis, “You were yourself a great part of the victory.” “Brandeis also served as Wilson’s chief economic adviser from 1912 until 1916.” This “friend of justice and of men” went on to be “instrumental in shaping the new Federal Reserve Act.” We will see what an immense disaster the Fed has been to the American people, and what a siphon of wealth and power to Jewish bankers. In all Brandeis served on the Supreme Court for twenty-three years, pushing the “progressive” agenda and even helped design the U.S. position on the creation of the new nation of Czechoslovakia, which became a grave threat to Germany and almost became the first flash point for World War II.

On top of all else, Brandeis was an avid supporter of the early Zionist movement in the US. He was elected President of The Provisional Executive Committee for Zionist Affairs in New York, and advocated for a “Jewish homeland” in his book The Jewish Problem: How to Solve It. The book contains the transcript of a speech Brandeis gave to a group of Reform Rabbis in 1915, and states the essence of his Zionist views:

The Zionists seek to establish this home in Palestine because they are convinced that the undying longing of Jews for Palestine is a fact of deepest significance; that it is a manifestation in the struggle for existence by an ancient people which has established its right to live, a people whose three thousand years of civilization has produced a faith, culture and individuality which enable it to contribute largely in the future, as it has in the past, to the advance of civilization; and that it is not a right merely but a duty of the Jewish nationality to survive and develop. They believe that only in Palestine can Jewish life be fully protected from the forces of disintegration; that there alone can the Jewish spirit reach its full and natural development; and that by securing for those Jews who wish to settle there the opportunity to do so, not only those Jews, but all other Jews will be benefited, and that the long perplexing Jewish Problem will, at last, find solution.

How well Brandeis’s vision has contributed “to the advance of civilization” and the “full and natural development” of “the Jewish spirit,” much less to the idea that “all other Jews will be benefited” and even “”the long perplexing Jewish Problem will… find solution” can be known by examining this account by If Americans Knew, “A Synopsis of the Israel/Palestine Conflict.” In short, the Zionist state has been a disaster for the Middle East region, the United States, in some sense the world, and even the majority of the Jewish people in Israel and elsewhere. It has inflicted the greatest disaster upon the Palestinian people, something Brandeis takes not into account. The only use of the word “Palestinian” in his work is:

In the Jewish colonies of Palestine there are no Jewish criminals; because everyone, old and young alike, is led to feel the glory of his race and his obligation to carry forward its ideals. The new Palestinian Jewry produces instead of criminals, great scientists… discoverer(s)… craftsmen… founder(s)…

Unfortunately for Brandeis’ vision, Israel is especially known as a den of thieves and crooks. This examination, “Israel, A Refuge for Swindlers” provides the evidence.

Rabbi Stephen Wise, Influencer

This essay would not be complete—and indeed cannot be complete short of an entire book—on the Jewish control over President Wilson, without at least a brief mention of Rabbi Stephen Wise. The Holocaust Encyclopedia entry for Wise states it reasonably well:

Unlike most Reform rabbis and congregants at the time, Wise became a Zionist, committed to the establishment of a Jewish state. He attributed this to his first encounter with Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, at the second Zionist Congress in 1898. During that meeting Wise was elected to the Zionist General Action Committee. In 1914, he served as deputy to Louis Brandeis when Brandeis became head of the American Zionist movement. Both men were instrumental in obtaining President Woodrow Wilson’s support for the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which committed Great Britain to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. Wise founded the American Jewish Congress in 1920, became president of the Zionist Organization of America in 1936, and continued to play a key role in the US Jewish community for the rest of his life.

Along with Brandeis, Wise was “instrumental” with Wilson in supporting the Balfour Declaration, which not only obligated Great Britain in giving Palestine to Zionist Jews, but tacitly also committed Zionist Jews in America to manipulating the “isolationist” U.S. population into enthusiastically joining the Great War against Germany. A central role in this mass brain-washing in favor of Jewish war objectives was the Jew Edward Bernays.

The Federal Reserve Central Bank Courtesy of Jewish Bankers

As we have seen, Brandeis was an advocate for the creation of the Federal Reserve private central bank which Wilson signed into law on December 23, 1913. It may be the single most ruinous and destructive law ever signed by any U.S. President. Many other Jews were also influential in getting Wilson to establish the Federal Reserve, as we saw in the TOO essay “Obscuring the Jewish Issue In Alt Media: Example #2—Banking Dynasties.” Of them all, Paul Warburg was the premier architect of the Federal Reserve plan.

Here we will look at the iconic work of Eustace Mullins, Secrets of the Federal Reserve to identify the Jews around Wilson who imposed this immense debt-generating scam upon the people of the U.S. First, there is indication that Wilson’s acceptance of the plan helped win him the Presidency:

Senator LaFollette remarks in his memoirs that his speech against the Money Trust later cost him the Presidency of the United States, just as Woodrow Wilson’s early support of the Aldrich Plan had brought him into consideration for that office. (p 16)

Because the American public was largely opposed to this “Money Trust,” the House established the Pujo Committee aimed at investigating the  power of Wall St. bankers.

The man who single-handedly carried on these hearings [was] Samuel Untermeyer. He was one of the principal contributors to Woodrow Wilson’s Presidential campaign fund…

We’ve already seen how Untermeyer (who seems to also have been instrumental in promoting the Zionist Scofield Bible that has been influential among American Evangelicals) blackmailed a vulnerable Wilson earlier in his career.

The international banking houses of Eugene Meyer, Lazard Freres, J. & W. Seligman, Ladenburg Thalmann, Speyer Brothers, M. M. Warburg, and the Rothschild Brothers did not arouse Samuel Untermeyer’s curiosity, although it was well known in the New York financial world that all of these family banking houses either had branches or controlled subsidiary houses in Wall Street. When Jacob Schiff appeared before the Pujo Committee, Mr. Untermeyer’s adroit questioning allowed Mr. Schiff to talk for many minutes without revealing any information about the operations of the banking house of Kuhn Loeb Company, of which he was senior partner, and which Senator Robert L. Owen had identified as the representative of the European Rothschilds in the United States. (p 17)

Virtually all of these names mentioned are Jews.

Congressional testimony showed that in the firm of Kuhn Loeb Company, Felix Warburg was supporting Taft, Paul Warburg and Jacob Schiff were supporting Wilson. The result was that a Democratic Congress and a Democratic President were elected in 1912 to get the central bank legislation passed. … Col. Garrison, an agent of Brown Brothers bankers, later Brown Brothers Harriman, wrote in his book, “Paul Warburg is the man who got the Federal Reserve Act together after the Aldrich Plan aroused such nationwide resentment and opposition. The mastermind of both plans was Baron Alfred Rothschild of London.” (p 18)

(The Aldrich Plan of 1912 was named after Sen. Nelson W. Aldrich of Rhode Island. It would have established a banking cartel but did not pass. The Glass Act of 1913 eventually created the Fed.)

Not only were all of these bankers Jews, all of them—the Warburgs, Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb and Rothschild—had intermarried in various ways and were members of the same extended family (see “Obscuring the Jewish Issue…” referenced above). It cannot be doubted that they were working collectively to get their man Wilson elected.

The “unprecedented speed” with which the Federal Reserve Act had been passed by Congress during what became known as the “Christmas massacre” had one unforeseen aspect. Woodrow Wilson was taken unawares, as he, like many others, had been assured the bill would not come up for a vote until after Christmas. Now he refused to sign it, because he objected to the provisions for the election of Class B Directors. … Bernard Baruch, a principal contributor to Wilson’s campaign fund, was stunned when he was informed that Wilson refused to sign the bill. He hurried to the White House and assured Wilson that this was a minor matter, which could be fixed up later through “administrative processes”. The important thing was to get the Federal Reserve Act signed into law at once. With this reassurance, Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913. History proved that on that day the Constitution ceased to be the governing covenant of the  American people, and our liberties were handed over to a small group of international bankers. (pp 28-9)

The “international bankers” were almost all Jews. Bernard Baruch was a Jew of immense power and influence over Wilson and much else at the time. He will re-appear in our accounts of US entry into WWI.

Jews Push Wilson and Nation Into War

We refer again to the speech by Freedman to the Marine cadets:

…when Germany was winning the war, the Jews were very happy, because they didn’t want Russia to come out the winner, with France and England, because they thought it would be tougher for the Jews in Russia. So, they were all pro-German. What happened? When the Germans trotted out the submarines… General Haig, in London, warned the English, “We have less than two week’s food supply for the whole nation of 55,000,000 people.”… So, England was offered a Peace Treaty by Germany… It was on the desk of the British War Cabinet, ready to be signed…. What happened? The Khazar Jews in New York, Washington, led by Brandeis, made this promise through Fleischman & Sockloff in London. They went to the British War Cabinet and they said, “You don’t have to make peace—which is tantamount to surrender. We can show you how you can win the war, if, when you defeat Germany, and carve up the Ottoman Empire (or Turkey) you will give us Palestine. And they made that deal. It was all written [i.e., The Balfour Declaration]. … How they got the promise of Palestine, by promising to use their influence to get U.S. into the war. That’s how they are going to turn against the United States; the same way they turned against Germany; after everything Germany did for them, since 1822. They made the deal to bring the United States into the war, which meant certain defeat for Germany; which was triumphant, then; offering a peace that was tantamount to surrender.

Now, the United States got into World War I. How did they get in? They didn’t know how to get us in, because the Germans leaned backwards. They said, “We are going to do nothing on land, on the sea, or in the air, to provoke or justify a declaration of war by the United States, because we’ll be licked! Now, we’ve won the war!” Which they had. The Russian armies were in retreat; in France, the army had revolted, and wouldn’t fight. There was no more fight left in the allies. So, what happened? They couldn’t get us in if the Germans didn’t give us provocation or justification. So, what did they do? …A message was sent to Washington, that the S.S. Sussex, a ferry from Dover to Calais, had been torpedoed in the Channel and 38 Americans lost their lives!

Congress declared war against Germany… they came out with the secret that the Sussex was not sunk and no Americans lives were lost. And we were in the war! Now that is how the Jews got us into World War I, and that started everything because Wilson was elected.

Researcher and revisionist Thomas Dalton Ph.D provides a good account. Wilson ran on a campaign slogan of “He kept us out of war.” Little more than a month into his second term, on April 2, 1917, Wilson famously and stridently called on Congress to join the war with a formal Declaration. Only a few days later, both houses of Congress voted overwhelmingly to declare war. Only a few in Congress opposed the vote. One was George Norris (R-Neb.), who later said “We are going into war upon the command of gold.” This gold was owned by the Jewish bankers on Wall Street, and they wanted more through war.

Jewish “Financier” and “Statesman” Bernard Baruch

One of the Jews Freedman was discussing was Bernard Baruch. This Jewish “financier” raked in a fortune gaming the New York Stock Exchange. By 1916 Wilson appointed Baruch to the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense. When the US entered World War I as we’ve seen, Wilson appointed Baruch chairman of the War Industries Board. Anthony Sutton writes:

By March 1918 President Wilson acting without Congressional authority, had endowed Baruch with more power than any other individual had been granted in the history of the United States. The War Industries Board, with Baruch as its chairman, became responsible for building all factories and for the supply of all raw material, all products, and all transportation, and all its final decisions rested with chairman Bernard Baruch. In brief, Baruch became economic dictator of the United States…

In almost 180 pages including appendices, Sutton uses the word “Jew” not once. This essay is not intended as another entry in the “Obscuring the Jewish Issue…” series, so we will turn to other sources. Jewish Virtual Library includes Baruch among its “Jewish Heroes & Heroines of America: 150 True Stories of American Jewish Heroism” series. Wikipedia of course in its “Early Life” section is unequivocal, and places Baruch’s entry among “American people of German-Jewish descent,” “Jewish American philanthropists,” and “Jewish American government officials” categories. This Jewish “hero” and “philanthropist” influenced Wilson to sign the devastating Federal Reserve Act when Wilson was reluctant, and further influenced Wilson to push the US into the ruinous World War I when the war could have ended amicably. Baruch got Wilson to appoint him to the most powerful position in the nation, Chairman of the War Industries Board, where he could funnel money to his Jewish banker and industrialist cronies.

Henry Ford’s The International Jew  (TIJ) noted

the large degree of Jewish influence on Woodrow Wilson: “They formed a solid ring around him.” Commenting on the special access to Wilson held by the Jewish journalist David Lawrence, TIJ states, “There was a time when he communicated to the country through no one but a Jew” (12/04/1920). TIJ provides examples of Jews who were involved in corruption during W.W.I, attributing the crimes to the immense power of Jewish financier Bernard Baruch who controlled the War Industries Board.

Conclusion

The size of this essay already precludes an examination of the Jews who accompanied Wilson to the Treaty of Versailles and Paris Peace Conference events following WWI. That deserves an essay all its own, since the outcome was the establishment of the League of Nations leading to the United Nations, and a set up for World War II with all its enormous devastation, leading to the creation of the nation of Israel, with its attendant world horrors. Here we must conclude from our historical sources that Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the Unites States 1913–21, was under the control of powerful Jews through blackmail, indebtedness, intimidation, bribery, egotistic appeals and ideological subversion. Wilson had significant health challenges especially during his Presidency as we saw in his letters to Mary Peck, and Jews exploited his weaknesses to use him as a pawn in their international schemes of power and money.

We will close with a quote from Wilson in his book of speeches The New Freedom published in 1913:

Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

And if they are compromised by blackmail, susceptible to bribery for money and position, weak against ideological and racial intimidation, and in debt, they had better not say it is Jewish power. For our solvency and survival against this “power somewhere,” it is better that we do speak in condemnation of it.

31 replies
    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      What caused the confusion between the two expressions of gratitude to one author when it was apparently authored by another ?

      Reply
  1. Elizabeth Finnegan
    Elizabeth Finnegan says:

    Dear Doctor McDonald, wow that was really an informative work! Thank you so much for taking the time to do that. Do you have a call in radio show as I would love to ask you questions. Sincerely Elizabeth California

    Reply
    • Harald E Brandt
      Harald E Brandt says:

      Elizabeth, please note that the author is Karl Haemers. The article was first erroneously launched January 21, with the wrong author, then retracted and relaunched January 23 with corrections.

      Reply
  2. Bill
    Bill says:

    What do you guys have to say about the growing number of people pushing the narrative that it’s not the Jews, rather, it’s the Jesuits that have been and still are behind the events that have led to the problems the west faces today?

    And any sources you might have that can put that theory to rest would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Reply
    • Mr. Roman
      Mr. Roman says:

      @Bill

      Today’s Jesuits have been infiltrated and subverted by Marxists and liberal leftists, and they are essentially a fifth colony in the Catholic Church, as well as heretics. Thus, they use their power to destroy the Catholic Church from within instead. They have long since lost their power and ability to influence and govern nations. In fact, Jesuits don’t have this international power over clearly secular governments. They are, at best, complicit and sell-outs to the globalists and woke elite. Some argue that the Jesuits, not Jews, rule the world and the United States, including Hollywood, and that they use Jews to deceive the uninformed or that the Jesuits are the evil that runs everything. It sounds fantastical and unhistorical. Use common sense and logic, and you can draw the right conclusion.

      Reply
      • Al Ross
        Al Ross says:

        Four members of RC orders ( Franciscan , Dominican , Benedictine and Jesuit ) meet and debate which one is held in highest esteem by their deity .

        They pray fervently together for an answer and suddenly a note flutters down from on high .

        “Dear Faithful , all orders are held in equally high esteem by me.”

        Signed ,

        Almighty God , SJ

        Reply
    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      … any sources you might have that can put that theory to rest would be appreciated.

      An excellent starter source would be the evidence of your eyes, ears, and other senses, all of which declare the theory groundless. After that, you might consider reading these documents.

      The link (above) to the 1890 documents from the official Vatican journal “La Civiltà Cattolica” was included in a more detailed reply I wrote yesterday, a reply that the site’s moderator has deemed unfit for you and others to read. Perhaps I was guilty, inter alia, of failing to use enough of the insulting gutter language that never seems to stir the censor to disapproval.

      Reply
  3. Peter
    Peter says:

    Thank you, Mr. Haemers. I clicked on the link for Benjamin Freedman’s “speech to Marine Cadets.” Benjamin Freedman is introduced to his audience by Col. Curtis Bean Dall, who it turns out was FDR’s son-in-law. I found that very interesting, not expecting a connection between someone in the Roosevelt family and Benjamin Freedman. But the false history website Wikipedia explains it well and, as I would expect, smears the Colonel. Apparently, he did not abide by FDR’s lies. The Wikipedia article claims his wife and mother-in-law (Eleanor Roosevelt) “loathed Dall.” That suggests to me that he was an honest and upright man.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Bean_Dall

    Reply
    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Peter, check my last comment under the previous essay.

      There you will find the BITCHUTE tape including his complete speech at the Willard.

      Better still, BITCHUTE includes Freedman’s interview in NYC by ZUNDEL. It includes facts and interrelations I never ran across in ca. 50 years of dragnetting. Regrettably at low volume, but understandable.

      Reply
  4. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    The dummdreist Frauenzimmer who pleaded in Davos in the silent presence of the ugly Judenknecht (if he is not a Jew himself) Stelter to introduce the same Jewish muzzling laws in America as in the EUssR is, how could it be otherwise, also a tight friend of the Jews (if she is not a Jew herself). The only appropriate response to that Tussi’s sheer nonsense asks: “Who said that Jews leaving or staying in a country is the seismograph of its health?” https://twitter.com/ReneKhaiat/status/1092514108505837568

    https://www.dict.cc/?s=dummdreist
    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dummdreist
    https://www.dict.cc/?s=Frauenzimmer
    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Frauenzimmer
    https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Frauenzimmer
    https://www.dict.cc/?s=Tussi
    https://de.zxc.wiki/wiki/Thusnelda

    Reply
  5. Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins says:

    Something that is often overlooked concerning Rabbi Stephen Wise is that while at the Free Synagogue of New York he was very supportive of eugenics.

    Reply
  6. Birhan Dargey
    Birhan Dargey says:

    Jewish control over America is legendary, I was reading excerpts from a Alexanders Hamilton bio. So it seems that Hamilton was the secret agent for The Rothchild/Jewish Banking families in early America. This is not new, once we review the War of 1812, The Andrew Jackson assassination attempt, Lincoln’s execution ,JFK murder , Nixon’s Watergate, etc. The jews had been doing what they did in Europe for thousand of years before, and they are in their way to destroy America. Our elections have become a public sham, circuses. America could be the perfect allegory for what they did to Jesus Christ, persecution, torture, murder..etc.Some jewish fanatical rabbis are now so uppity that they claim there is NO God that JEWS are GOD/s themselves..the divine INcarnation of divinity on earth…that’s what Christ claimed and they kill him for “blasphemy”.. The most shameful aspect is their deep disregard for the LEGAL/moral order their nauseating impunity. BUT again all the goyim Americans can do is rant, protests, whining, and then what?? Goyim dying and paying for jewish wars, frauds,…This is what leads me to a assert that such people can NOT be the chosen people of God, the jews are EVIL doers, liars, cheats, criminals mas killers of the Palestinians (children)..BUT I become hopeless because IF God is JUST (good, compassionate, a loving god) then ..why does he let the jews go UNpunished?? WHY????

    Reply
  7. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    Incredible logic: “Weiner, not
    Wiener, like Heinz isn’t Hienz!”
    https://youtu.be/YqBZaOPdn5A

    More hotdoggy-stylish Tainment,
    Cereal-cerebral celeb-celebration.
    https://youtu.be/xcQE7Xj6VJU

    It’s now or never, it’s all about the
    sausage, because “everything has
    an end, only the sausage has two”.
    https://www.thelocal.de/20220610/german-phrase-of-the-day-alles-hat-ein-ende-nur-die-wurst-hat-zwei

    https://www.dict.cc/?s=Es+geht+um+die+Wurst
    Every now and then, a delicious sexy cheese sandwich.
    But not without side dish of chocolate from Negerland.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=582FrJaDMOk

    Kikebart: “Gibs me High 5! We
    R all equal, da cute animals, da
    good Negers & da evil Whiteys!
    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/01/23/lancet-urges-shift-away-from-human-centered-health-care-all-life-is-equal/

    Waukesha’s greeting. Woke is Nazi, says
    not Nick, but John Nolte (German name).
    https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2023/01/23/nolte-woke-nazis-want-aretha-franklin-natural-woman-censored/

    Reply
  8. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    This is the kind of essay that keeps binging me back to a blog like this thank you very much. I have printed this off as it is an excellent addition to the work of Dr. Willard Cantelon. For some interesting history on the Federal Reserve take note:

    “To what extent did international bankers exercise ownership or control over America’s Federal Reserve System?

    The public in general assumed that the stock in the Federal Reserve System was owned by America’s private banks, but apparently this was not voting stock. For years I observed those who were genuinely concerned over this very grave question. The men concerned were often the most astute business men and lawmakers of our land, some as prominent as Wright Patman, Chairman of Banking and
    Currency. ln l94l Congressman Patman wrote concerning this question to Marriner S. Eccles, Chairman of the Board of Governors for the Federal Reserve Bank. On April 18th of that same year Congressman Patman received a reply from Eccles which read,

    This so-called stock ownership, however, is more in the nature of enforced subscription to the capital of the Federal Reserve Bank than an ownership in the usual sense.

    More than a quarter of a century later, Mr. Patman was still trying to get an answer, from the chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, then William McChesney Martin:

    The stock, or that word “stock” is a misnomer, is it not?

    Mr. Martin’s answer:

    If you were talking about stock in terms of proprietorship ownership-yes.

    Mr. Patman continued,

    Then the word “stock” is a misnomer. It is not correct at all. It is just an involuntary assessment that has been made on the banks as long as they are members. Therefore, the statement that the banks own the Federal Reserve System is not a correct statement, is it?

    Mr. Martin:

    The banks do not own the Federal Reserve System.

    As I pondered the words of Wright Patman and the statements of many other prominent lawmakers on Capitol Hill through the years, it seemed that a great number of prominent senators and congressmen had expressed their concern that the financial power of America was held not in the hands of its local bankers or its lawmakers, but rather in the hands of a few international bankers who exercise their control over not only America but also western Europe.

    Is there, in truth, a small group of international bankers controlling the world’s financial destiny, even as Mayor Hylan of New York declared?

    Who was responsible for the formation of the Federal Reserve? None other than the scion of Hamburg’s famed banking House of Warburg-Paul Warburg. Regarding Mr. Warburg, Professor E. R. A. Seligman, himself of the international banking family and head of the Department
    of Economics at Columbia University, said,

    The Federal Reserve Act is the work of Mr. Warburg more than of any other man.

    The Honorable Louis McFadden, Chairman of Banking and Currency Committee, seemed to reach the same conclusion. On March 4,1933, he said to Congress, We know from assertions made here by the Honorable John Garner, Vice-President of United States, Paul Warburg did come here from Hamburg, Germany, for one purpose-to take over the treasury of United States as the international bankers have done with the treasuries of Europe.

    Regarding the so-called group of international bankers, Mr. McFadden said further on June 10, 1932,

    It controls everything here, and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.

    Paul Warburg had a son named James P. Warburg. OnFebruary 17, 1950, he stood before the U.S. Senate and declared,

    We shall have world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.
    pgs 60-63 The Day the Dollar Dies Dr. Willard Cantelon Logos International 1973

    What surprises in all of this though is the work of that Professor from Chicago who said they are the hope of the world!!! Lets continue shall we:

    The House of Warburg, the House of Rothschild, the few other powerful banking houses became known as “the international bankers.” They are described best by Dr. Carroll Quigley who taught at Princeton and Harvard. He did research in the archives of France, Italy, and England and authored several widely read books. When Dr. Quigley decided to write Tragedy and Hope (Macmillan, 1966), he knew he would be exposing one of the best-kept secrets in the world. Regarding the international bankers, Dr. Quigley states,

    They remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways:

    (1) they were cosmopolitan and international;
    (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts;
    (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods;
    (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of inflation;
    {5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of flnancial influence in political life.

    These bankers came to be called the international bankers. In quoting Dr. Quigley, W. Cleon Skousen comments on page 4 of his book entitled The Naked Capitalist,

    Dr. Quigley makes it clear throughout his book that, by and large, he warmly supports the goals and the purposes of the network. If that be the case, why should he want to expose a world-wide conspiracy and disclose many of its most secret operations? Obviously disclosing the existence of a mammoth power network which is trying to take over the world could not help but arouse the vigorous resistance of the people who are its intended victims, so why did Dr. Quigley write this book?

    Quigley’s answer appears in a number of places, but it is especially forceful and clear on pages 979-980. He says,

    in effect, that now it is too late for the little people to turn back the tide. In a spirit of kindness, he is therefore urging them not to fight a power that is already established. All through his book, Dr. Quigley assures us that we can trust these benevolent well-meaning men who are secretly operating behind the scenes. They, he declares, are the hope of the world. All who resist them represent tragedy, hence the title of his book. Dr. Quigley states,

    I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years in the early 1960’s to examine its papers and its secret records. I have no aversion to it, nor to most of its aims, and have for much of my life beenclose to it, and to many of its instruments.

    According to W. Cleon Skousen,

    Dr. Quigley expresses the utmost contempt for members of the American middle class, who think they can preserve what he calls their “petty bourgeois” property rights and constitutional privileges.

    After pondering these writings, I asked myself how far back one could trace this organized plan for control of world finance. On July 4,1856, Benjamin Disraeli declared before the British House of Commons,

    The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.\

    Some of the strongest words that came to my attention were those of Curtis B. Dall, written in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on April 1968, as an introduction to H. S. Kenan’s book on the Federal Reserve Bank. In reference to the international bankers, Mr. Dall writes,

    They are driving toward complete control of the world’s long-range monetary policy and principal world markets for their own profit. They foment foreign wars to aid this objective.

    It did not take a brilliant mathematician long to prove with simple arithmetic that war debts allowed to continue would soon burden the people of the world with such indebtedness that it would take most of the earning power of the masses simply to pay the compounding interest. Was it possible, I asked myself repeatedly, that men could so crave power that they would be willing to sacrifice millions of lives to the god of war in order to achieve their goals?

    If it were true, were they so deluded or deceived that they justified the mass slaughter of the innocent as a so called stepping-stone to a better world they were seeking to build? Regardless of the questions, or their answers, here was one certain fact: the world was swiftly moving toward centralized government and universal control. The Ceneral Assembly of the United Nations frequently echoed with accusations and dissension. But there was one power that seemed even stronger than man’s endless legislation. It was the power of money. Whoever controlled it, controlled man’s destiny. The path toward world control seemed to be indeed a divided highway. On one
    side, there were the shadowy personalities representing the high priests of finance, who visualized the wealth of the world in few hands-their hands. On the other side of the road, there were a number of men, honest and sincere, who pointed out that the total commitment to a world government was man’s only hope of escaping a nuclear holocaust. Or famine from exploding population, or poison from pollution. Cantelon pgs 64-65

    Interesting is not or horrifying but there it is. The hope of the world? Wow and yet Paul Warburg who saw the insanity of the roaring twenties said something which i will never forget indeed memorized it the day I came across it. He said:

    “The world lives in a fools paradise based upon fictitious wealth, rash promises and mad illusions. We must beware of booms based upon false prosperity which has its roots in inflated credits and prices.”

    Alas the roaring twenties and Warburgs contempt for the political class for allowing it to happen was huge. He really had nothing but contempt calling those in power incompetent fools!

    As I look about me today and see the price of real estate and how the renovation market works i always come back to this quote by Warburg. It really is just false prosperity based upon greed mostly is it not?

    Reply
  9. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    Just to clarify something I’m no expert on these things but my interest in learning about all of this is huge and why is mostly centered around the Biblical because in the Book of Revelation 13 we are told “here is the mind that has wisdom” meaning or referring to a time when economics will have nothing to do with money exchanging hands but with a number system and lo and behold the one man who took me there was none other than Dr. Willard Cantelon over 40 years ago now. He made some astonishing claims and was at all of the important meetings and lived in Washington: Here is something to chew on about why a Quigley would say what he said about these bankers:

    Checks Obsolete

    Members of the Federal Reserve warned that the nations’ banks could strangle on the 22 billion checks the Americans wrote each year, pointing out that in a hundred months the number of checks would double. They urged the adoption of a computer system which would automatically transfer funds between bank accounts. A person’s pay would automatically be credited to his bank account by his employer, without the writing of a check. And the regular payments which the worker owed-car payments, rent, etc. -would automatically be sent to his creditors’ accounts when due. George Mitchell of the Federal Reserve declared it was most urgent to reform the checking system before the economy smothered under a pile of paper.

    I did not know George Mitchell personally, but I did know many honest and sincere bankers who shared his sentiments. There was Carlos Verheek of the Kredietbank of Belgium, and Banker Keller of Germany.

    Mountains of Paper

    As I sat with Banker Keller in his Stuttgart office, I heard him heave a weary sigh. “We are being buried under paper,” he said sadly. From the doorway of his office I could see the lines of people standing impatiently before the bank tellers.

    I knew that back home our government was spending $350,000 a minute. The welfare program alone was costing the taxpayers more than a bllion dollars a month’ In a four year period, the federal budget had increased 84% and in five years the money supply 47%.

    ln America, I had talked with my banker friends’ Without exception, every banker realized we were coming to the end of an old regime and the dawn of a new era’ Our early an-cestors had used shells, iron, cotton’ or cattle as a medium of exchange. Then gold’ Now, the paper currencies were were becoming as antiquated as all of the other obsolete systems that man had used. A new system was about to dawn over the western world and it would be a number system’ made possible by the birth of the computer in 1946. pgs 66-67

    Dr. Cantelon thesis of his book is about that new number system which guess what is evolving into the QR Code which I’d imagine would make the bankers extremely happy. Lets just get everyone coded with a number in either his right hand or forehead and voila we could solve all of the worlds problems. The ultimate Big Brother Social Insurance system scenario which guess what the Bible warned us is coming? I look with trepidation at the QR Code and wonder too myself is that perhaps what St. John saw 2000 years ago?

    Hmmm? Is Armageddon at the door?

    Reply
  10. Lazar Owens
    Lazar Owens says:

    It’s not the Jesuits.
    It’s not the boomers.
    It’s not the Chinese.
    It’s not the negroes.
    It’s not white women.

    It’s THE JEWS.

    Reply
    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      It is indeed.

      It’s a pity that this has to be spelled out so clearly after all this time and with all the evidence available to anyone with eyes to see.

      Reply
      • charles frey
        charles frey says:

        01 Germany paid off its Versailles-imposed debts on OCTOBER 3, 2010; some 90 years later !!! [ no typo ]

        02 After the mere, but significant ‘corroboration ‘ by INSIDER Freedman, of previously scholarly documented facts – a typically might makes right NYC style mugging of the German people by the professional oy veyers.

        03 It may be a coincidence, but I perceive it as a sense of irony/humor on the part of the BITCHUTE individual in charge of listing its offers, to juxtapose the FREEDMAN WILLARD SPEECH and HIS INTERVIEW BY ZUNDEL, with that of the ISRAELI US AMBASSADOR’S ADDRESS TO THE UN seeking international legislation against. antisemitism.

        04 Said Ambassador before the UN still speaks of 6 millions, despite international agreement on 3 millions – itself a fraction of the Holodomor and an insignificant proportion of the generally agreed upon 110 miilions slaughtered by the Bolsheyid’s ideology.

        05 During his address, this Israeli refers to five accompanying Holocaust sawaiffers present, AS WELL AS THE CEO OF ” PFIZER “.

        Reply
  11. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    My heart has been provoked by all of this and let me just say I cry about the Christian Church and the unbelievable nonsense that filled her with Schofield. Yikes and more yikes and what wasn’t mentioned is the legitimacy that was given to it because why? Well, just ask yourself who published that nonsense? That should just about seal the deal as to why a blog like this looks down upon the Church of Christ. Wow, what we are up against is truly formidable. Ah, but I understand why the Dust Bowl of the thirties as being the work of God. It’s no coincidence to me that it happened the way it did. There is a pattern to climate change isn’t there?

    The word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, if a country sins against me by being unfaithful and I stretch out my hand against it to cut off its food supply and send famine upon it and kill its people and their animals, even if these three men—Noah, Daniel and Job—were in it, they could save only themselves by their righteousness, declares the Sovereign Lord.” (Ezekiel 14:12–14)

    There is your blood thirsty God of the Old Testament and given the words from the New Testament Christ will tread the wine-press of the wrath of Almighty God one last and final time! Bankers take note!!!

    Reply
  12. Victory Close
    Victory Close says:

    At the time, the Versailles Conference was referred to by journalists as the “Kosher Conference” due to the large number of Jews present. They were lenders of the two warring sides – I’m sure they were looking to get repaid (with interest, no less)

    Reply
  13. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    the Versailles Conference? And what of the name Colonel Edward House? For a Texas cotton farmer he did what no cotton farmer has ever done or will ever do yes? The day I ran across his quote about Social Security everything feel into place. In fact, I find one sentence in particular to be quite telling, almost a direct quote to what is found in the book of Revelation 13:

    “He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell…

    {‘FORCED TO REGISTER OR SUFFER NOT BEING ABLE TO WORK AND EARN A LIVING.’ Col. House}
    unless he had the mark, which is the number of his name.” {Rev. 13:16} {Emphasis mine}

    His name is Colonel Edward House, a Jewish American who was originally a cotton farmer from Houston, Texas who turned politician becoming an American diplomat and finally a presidential advisor to President Woodrow Wilson as well as banking. He had enormous influence over American foreign policy and was one of the main architects overseeing the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and the United Nations and most significantly the Federal Reserve. In his novel called PHILIP DRU: ADMINISTRATOR: A STORY OF TOMORROW 1920-1935 {how prophetic a title} this is what the author fully says:

    “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.

    By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.

    They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. 

    They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
    After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” 

    Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”1

    So, there you have it and I hope the reader understands what is being said here! Essentially, a private banking cartel has created a financial system, literally a plutocracy, whereby a coming king will be able to exert total and complete control over the entire world.

    As for the cough, cough Colonel sic? as a presidential advisor i wish I could find again a quote from one of Wilson’s military men who was incensed after having had a discussion with Wilson he was reprimanded by the Colonel. No one apparently was allowed to speak or discuss anything with the President without first going through him?

    Reply
  14. W. Poe White
    W. Poe White says:

    Good article. I hope you write more in this vein, Karl. It is useful to have these suppressed historical facts laid out in articles like this for easy reference. I saved and printed out this article for my files to refer to later.

    Reply
  15. Susan
    Susan says:

    Thanks for this great article with many fascinating details. An incalculable amount of damage was caused by Wilson’s desire to cover his derriere.

    On presidents and Jews, I recently ordered (not yet received) a book called “Herbert Hoover and the Jews: The Origins of the “Jewish Vote” and Bipartisan Support for Israel” by Rafael Medoff ( who founded an institute for holocaust studies) and Sonja Schoepf Wentling. It will of course have much pro-Jewish bias but I am hoping it will reveal information I hadn’t read before.

    Eustace Mullins was hounded by the FBI, the ADL and his local government.. Maybe that’s why he hid nuggets of information in some of his less famous books. One example is the one entitled something like “My Life in Christ.” (Sorry, I couldn’t find the exact title in a quick search.) I was skimming through “The Rape of Justice” recently and was overjoyed to find his account of how the Jews got Brown vs. Board of Education passed. Honestly, nothing has caused more havoc and grief in my life than school desegregation and Section 8 housing. So my everlasting thanks for go Eustace Mullins.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.