Cofnas out at Cambridge

And so it continues. After agreeing to a debate at a Counter-Currents conference where we would have had equal time to present our views and rebut each other, you backed out. And if they weren’t an ideal audience for you, it would have been filmed and placed online for all the world to see and judge for themselves in perpetuity. A C-C crowd would have been civilized and respectful.
Yes, I am an ethnic activist but I admit it proudly after coming to my positions after spending years reading Jewish history; until then I was a Reagon Republican. On the other hand, you never acknowledge that you are a Jewish ethnic activist—like a long line of Jewish ethnic activists who attack anyone who criticizes Jews by making up attributions of psychopathology without knowing anything about their psychological makeup and without acknowledging that their ethnic commitments have anything to do with it—as discussed in Culture of Critique. Many of them have been and are in prominent academic positions. Indeed they dominate the academic discussion of anti-Semitism.
Please give an example where I claim that “If X is evidence for his theory, not-X is evidence, too!” Your example is my claim that your race realism “is said to be part of the group evolutionary strategy.” But I phrase it tentatively: “quite possibly.” And as I have repeatedly written, in order to understand Jewish influence, one has to figure out where the great bulk of Jewish power—in the media, in campaign donations, lobbying, academic writing, etc.—are directed. Cofnas’s theory apparently relies on something like the idea that if you can find one Jew who is out of step with the Jewish community, there is no sense in trying to say that the mainstream Jewish community has any influence. For example, there are some Jews who are immigration patriots and oppose the demographic transformation of the U.S. But that’s not where the power and money of the Jewish community are mainly directed. Check out the ADL for example, or my chapter on immigration in Culture of Critique. Same with the Israel Lobby: Some Jews oppose it, like Jewish Voice for Peace and Mondoweiss; and, as Mearsheimer and Walt note, what the Israel Lobby wants may ultimately be bad for Jews and Israel, so some Jews may oppose the Lobby for Jewish reasons. But in fact, the power of the Jewish community is directed in support of Israel no matter how genocidal it is and no matter how they treat the Palestinians (the phrase “open air prison” describing Gaza and the West Bank to a great extent comes to mind, and no matter how much the behavior of Israel contravenes the Enlightenment values of the West and apologetic accounts of Jewish ethics. Indeed, as in all of Israel’s wars, there has been a huge upsurge of Jewish identity since Oct. 7, including among a lot of Jews who had little, if any, commitment to Judaism prior to the war. Your claim that Jews are not particularly ethnocentric is transparently ridiculous.
Similarly, the power of Jewish academics has been vastly more directed against race realism than in favor of it and, in my opinion, Jewish academics were the main force against the race realism that was dominant in America in the 1920s–Chapter 2 of Culture of Critique. While I think your work opposing my research is garbage, I commend your work in race realism. But as noted, it’s quite possible to accept race realism for Jewish-motivated reasons; but such attitudes do not reflect the mainstream views of the Jewish community. And I commend your commitment to free speech, but the ADL is now leading the battle for internet censorship (just ask Elon Musk), and for entirely Jewish reasons.