The Carlson-Cooper Podcast: A Major Step Forward
This clever rhetorical formulation, familiar to various strands of right-wing propaganda, flatters listeners for their willingness to reject all they’ve learned from mainstream experts, making them feel brave and savvy for imbibing absurdities. Cooper proceeded, in a soft-spoken, faux-reasonable way, to lay out an alternative history in which Hitler tried mightily to avoid war with Western Europe, Churchill was a “psychopath” propped up by Zionist interests, and millions of people in concentration camps “ended up dead” because the overwhelmed Nazis didn’t have the resources to care for them. Elon Musk promoted the conversation as “very interesting” on his platform X, though he later deleted the tweet.”
I don’t have the background to comment on Hitler’s attempts to avoid a war or the beginnings of concentration camps, but of course we do know that Churchill’s profligacy and chronic indebtedness was funded by wealthy Jews who desperately wanted war with Hitler, as the articles by Horus and other accounts clearly show. The relevant passage in the interview is very brief but Goldberg fastened upon it and, at least to my hearing, Cooper seems uncomfortable discussing it. Needless to say, Goldberg does not attempt a rebuttal for any of these points or give any citations to people who could.
On Carlson’s website the interview is titled “The Fall of Europe” and subtitled: “Darryl Cooper: The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe.”
The offending material starts with a comment on Jewish involvement in Bolshevism based on Churchill’s famous article from 1920 advocating that Jews embrace Zionism rather than Bolshevism but noting that many Jews got caught up in it, and Cooper agrees. Here are the relevant parts of Churchill’s article:
International Jews
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort [i.e., Jews who are nationalists in the nations they reside in] rise the schemes of the international Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all. of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus—Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown. a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
Terrorist Jews.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very, great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff. And the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek, all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing,
So Churchill was aware of the evils of Bolshevism and the intensive Jewish involvement in it but cooperated with the Jews financing his lifestyle in order to destroy Hitler whose crimes paled in comparison with those of the Bolsheviks, at the very least in the 1930s. Needless to say, Goldberg and her ilk never refer to Jewish domination of the Soviet Union in the decades after the Revolution.
The following machine translation has been edited to try to make sense out of a mess (Tucker needs to hire an editor), but you get the idea.
Darryl Cooper: Churchill wrote a kind of infamous now article called Zionism Versus Bolshevism. And he [Churchill] basically makes the case — which was which was true to a large extent that all of Eastern Europe — that the Pale of Settlement, which is where the vast majority of Jews lived other than the United States, which is where a lot of them had had traveled to that area had become so engulfed by a revolutionary spirit that all of the young Ashkenazi Jews who were over there were getting swept up into it. It was the 60s here on steroids, right? [Perhaps suggesting Jews were deeply involved in the 1960s counter-cultural revolution throughout the West — which they were.] And in a much more serious and destructive way. And this is 1920. So shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution.
Basically, the point of his paper is he says, these people who over there they’re all going one direction or the other. They’re going to be Bolsheviks. They’re going to be Zionists. We want them to be Zionists, you know? And so we need to support this. And so that was early on. There was an ideological component of it. But then as time goes on, you know, you read stories about Churchill going bankrupt and needing money. Getting bailed out by people who shared his interests, you know, in terms of Zionism, but also, his hostility. Just, just. You know, I think his hostility, to put it this way, I think his hostility to Germany was real. I don’t think that he necessarily had to be bribed to have that feeling. But, you know, I think he was, to an extent, put in place by people, the financiers, by a media complex that wanted to make sure that he was the guy who, you know, who was representing Britain in that conflict for, for the, for a reason. And you know, Churchill’s a… Again, it’s so hard. Because like, you know, especially in a short interview like this where you have this guy. Who? I mean, he’s an Abraham Lincoln-, George Washington-, Martin Luther King-like type figure in the sort of Western consciousness, right?
Tucker [00:57:09] Yes.
Darryl Cooper [00:57:10] And so people have so many assumptions in built-in triggers, like when it comes to this guy, that it’s hard to talk about it because you’re always thinking about the triggers that you’re setting off and your listeners. And I don’t say that in a way of like, I don’t want to offend anybody. No, no, I understand it’s that it’s, you know, you know, that things are going to be misunderstood. And so this is why I do 30, our podcast.
Tucker [00:57:31] Well, it’s just it’s interesting because I, you know, as a follower of your work, I don’t see you as hostile to the West. I see you actually as a product of the West and as a defender, really of the West for its values. You know, in your approach, in your open mindedness, rigor, you know, belief in accuracy and honesty and those are Western notions. And yet Churchill has been positioned and has been and really is accepted as like the defender of the West over the last 100 years.
Darryl Cooper [00:58:02] Yeah.
Tucker [00:58:03] And so maybe that’s and I wonder why that is. I don’t I mean, people can certainly take issue with any factual claims you’re making. I assume they’re all right. They’re consistent with what I think I know to be true. But why do you think Churchill has been presented in a way, in the way that he has?
In other words, Tucker has long known this about the roots of World War II, Jewish involvement in it, and Churchill’s role in producing this disaster.
Darryl Cooper [00:58:22] Well, it’s it has to do with what you said earlier, right? Neville Chamberlain versus Churchill has been the binary model that has served as the chief rhetorical device for every conflict we’ve wanted to get into since then. Yes. You know, the entire Cold War. And then even after the Cold War, in the global war on terror is if you appease them, you’re Neville Chamberlain. Hitler’s the, rather, Churchill’s the one who saw all along where this was headed and was trying to warn people this, you know, Cassandra. And finally, because nobody listened to him, the war ended up breaking out and we were forced to, like, go stamp out this threat. And now it’s a….much bigger threat than it ever would have been if we just …
Tucker [00:59:05] Put a listing, say, if we had strangled it in its
Darryl Cooper [00:59:07] Crib and it’s justified every conflict, you know, really, since the Second World War, everybody’s the new Hitler, right? It’s you know, it really did become the founding myth of the of the global order that we’re all living in now. Right?
* * *
Toward the end of their conversation, Carlson and Cooper discussed how the “postwar European order” has enabled mass immigration, which has, in Carlson’s telling, destroyed Western Europe. “So why not have a Nuremberg trial for the people who did that?” asked Carlson. “I don’t understand. I mean, that’s such a crime.”“Well,” Cooper responded, “we have to win first.”
Goldberg’s column ends there. For the Michelle Goldbergs of the world, the worst thing that could happen would be for people to realize that Western cultures and peoples are in the process of suicide and that Jews are influential advocates of this process. Here’s the relevant transcript edited for clarity because the machine transcription is a mess:
Tucker Carlson: “I just can’t get over the fact that the West won and is completely destroyed in less than a century. … Somehow the United States and Western Europe won. That’s the conventional understanding. And both now look like they lost a World War. So, like, what the hell was that? Like, there’s something very, very heavy.
Darryl Cooper [02:08:46] Yeah. I mean, it’s all the things that we have been talking about. [Presumably a reference to Jewish involvement in Bolshevism, Hitler’s campaign against Bolshevism, the Jewish-financed campaign against Hitler and its ensuing media-and academic-manufactured mythology, as well as the 1960s counter-cultural revolution, massive non-White immigration, and multiculturalism.] And probably some things that, you know, we only talk about privately, but we can see the results of it. I mean.
“We only talk about privately. A revealing statement. It’s pretty clearly a reference to the disastrous consequences that await anyone who dares to question the consensus and an oblique reference to Jewish power that is so instrumental in suppressing ideas that they don’t like, especially any ideas that seriously discuss Jewish power.
Tucker [02:08:58] Yeah. So that’s that’s the real question. If they were trying to achieve that destruction that you’re talking about, if they if they were trying, they couldn’t have done it more directly or more effectively, you know. And so, there are trends in forces. There are things that drive people, you know, like incentives to drive people that they’re not aware of. There’s a lot of things going on.
So no clear reference to Jewish influence, but he’s certainly right about incentives that are so attractive to so many non-Jews, particularly politicians and others with aspirations to power, that smooth the way for traitorous behavior by so many White people. I have argued that the Jewish motive is quite clear: They feel safer in a multicultural, non-White majority country as an antidote to what happened in White, Christian Germany beginning in 1933.
Tucker around 2:05: So when can just tie a bow in [your] World War Two project? … I think it’s like it’s central to the society we live in, the myths upon which it’s built. I think it’s also the cause of like the destruction of Western civilization and these lies.
Absolutely right.
I should also mention a tidbit from an Alex Berenson blog — Berenson being the Covid dissident who was on Tucker’s Fox News show several times. Berenson:
And just weeks ago, when I heard that Tucker said on a podcast that my “indispensable quality is bravery,” I was genuinely thrilled. Which is why it hurt to hear Tucker playing footsie on his incredibly popular podcast this week with Darryl Cooper, a historian who is a Nazi apologist and — at best — walks to the edge of Holocaust denial.
To take a recent example, Cooper posted on X that the Nazi occupation of Paris was “infinitely preferable” to the (admittedly idiotic and offensive) opening ceremony of the Olympics in July. The Nazi occupation of Paris led to over 70,000 French Jews being sent to gas chambers. (Cooper later deleted the post.)
So Cooper is definitely on page with the idea that World War II has led to the disastrous consequences we see in the contemporary West in terms of cultural degradation and, on the basis of the above, on being colonized by the Third World. Of course, Berenson (and the rest of the critics) never bother to consider the consequences to the people and culture of the West as a result of the World War II mythos being so entrenched in the West, much less give any serious analysis of the Jewish role in establishing and maintaining it.
This interview is a big step forward in bringing these ideas into the mainstream. One wonders if Carlson did it in hopes of influencing the looming election in which immigration and multiculturalism are definitely on the minds of a great many voters. (Carlson is doing a 16-date cross-country tour in September, including a show with J.D. Vance on September 21.) Perhaps he understands that there is not much time left and that we have to make a stand against the onslaught we are facing. And a necessary part of taking a stand would be to change the public’s attitudes on the origins of World War II and on Jewish power and influence.
Of course, there will be consequences, but in retrospect, Tucker getting fired from Fox News is definitely a big positive. He never could have said anything like this on Fox. It’s not clear what the powers that be can do to Carlson, but for the ADL and the rest of establishment media figures, this is Armageddon — a battle they can’t afford to lose. They will pull out all the stops to prevent it from becoming mainstream in conservative circles.
But some people are just too big to completely bury and his alliance with Elon Musk and Musk’s ownership of X is a big plus. Any conservative who is remotely paying attention realizes that the formidable power of the Jewish community is firmly aligned with the Democrats as it has been for decades.
We’ll see. It will be a nice test of Jewish power. Believe me, they won’t take this lying down.
Here’s Goldberg’s screed:
Tucker Carlson and the Heterodoxy-to-Holocaust Denial Pipeline
This week Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News star who now hosts one of America’s top podcasts, had an apologist for Adolf Hitler on his show. Darryl Cooper, who runs a history podcast and newsletter called Martyr Made, considers Winston Churchill, not Hitler, the chief villain of World War II. In a social media post that he’s since deleted, Cooper argued that a Paris occupied by the Nazis was “infinitely preferable in virtually every way” to the city on display during the opening ceremony of the recent summer Olympics, where a drag queen performance infuriated the right. On his show, Carlson introduced Cooper to listeners as “the most important popular historian working in the United States today.”
Over the course of a wide-ranging two-hour conversation, Cooper presented the mainstream history of World War II as a mythology shrouded in taboos intended to prop up a corrupt liberal political order. The idea that Nazi Germany represented the epitome of evil, argued Cooper, is such a “core part of the state religion” that we have “emotional triggers” preventing us from examining the past dispassionately.
This clever rhetorical formulation, familiar to various strands of right-wing propaganda, flatters listeners for their willingness to reject all they’ve learned from mainstream experts, making them feel brave and savvy for imbibing absurdities. Cooper proceeded, in a soft-spoken, faux-reasonable way, to lay out an alternative history in which Hitler tried mightily to avoid war with Western Europe, Churchill was a “psychopath” propped up by Zionist interests, and millions of people in concentration camps “ended up dead” because the overwhelmed Nazis didn’t have the resources to care for them. Elon Musk promoted the conversation as “very interesting” on his platform X, though he later deleted the tweet.
Some on the right found Carlson’s turn toward Holocaust skepticism surprising. “Didn’t expect Tucker Carlson to become an outlet for Nazi apologetics, but here we are,” Erick Erickson, the conservative radio host, wrote on X. But Carlson’s trajectory was entirely predictable. Nazi sympathy is the natural endpoint of a politics based on glib contrarianism, right-wing transgression and ethnic grievance.
Until quite recently, American conservatives mostly maintained antibodies against Irving-style disinformation. Right-wing thought leaders generally shared the same broad historical understanding of World War II as the rest of society, felt patriotic pride at America’s role in it and viewed Hitler as metaphysically wicked. Rather than recognizing the way right-wing politics, taken to extremes, could shade into National Socialism, they would hurl Nazi comparisons at the left, as the conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg did in his 2008 book “Liberal Fascism.”
Goldberg’s approach was dishonest, but it was representative of a broad antifascist consensus in American politics. Cooper is, in fact, correct that abhorrence of Nazism has helped structure Western societies. If we could agree on nothing else, we could agree that part of the job of liberal democracy was to erect bulwarks against the emergence of Hitler-like figures.
For parts of the contemporary right, however, the social consensuses undergirding liberalism are artificial and even tyrannical. After all, the “Matrix”-derived metaphor of being “red-pilled” implies a realization that all you’ve been told about the nature of reality is a lie, and thus everything is up for grabs. And once you discard all epistemological and moral guardrails, it’s easy to descend into barbarous nonsense.
Candace Owens, another anti-woke right-wing celebrity who has lately become Hitler-curious, has also come to question received wisdom about the shape of the earth. “I’m not a flat-earther,” she said in July. “I’m not a round-earther. Actually, what I am is I am somebody who has left the cult of science.”
Obviously, not every red-pilled conservative ends up arguing, as Owens did, that Hitler gets a bad rap. But the weakening of the intellectual quarantine around Nazism — and the MAGA right’s fetish for ideas their enemies see as dangerous — makes it easier for influential conservatives to surrender to fascist impulses. When they do, they pay no penalty in political relevance, because there’s no conservative establishment capable of disciplining its ideologues.
Carlson has just embarked on a national tour with special guests at each stop. In addition to Alex Jones, he’s scheduled to appear with the vice-presidential nominee JD Vance and Donald Trump Jr.
Ultimately, Holocaust denial isn’t really about history at all, but about what’s permissible in the present and imaginable in the future. If Hitler is no longer widely understood as the negation of our deepest values, America will be softened up for Donald Trump’s most authoritarian plans, including imprisoning masses of undocumented immigrants in vast detention camps.
Toward the end of their conversation, Carlson and Cooper discussed how the “postwar European order” has enabled mass immigration, which has, in Carlson’s telling, destroyed Western Europe. “So why not have a Nuremberg trial for the people who did that?” asked Carlson. “I don’t understand. I mean, that’s such a crime.”
“Well,” Cooper responded, “we have to win first.”
Cooper is clearly more based than that interview lets on judging by his Twitter post preferring National Socialist control of Paris compared to the current 2024 tranny Olympics version. But still, that conversation is a great first step for normies to start questioning the WW2 orthodoxy.
If you want to know more about last two weeks before the outbreak of the war, I would recommend the book
“1939: The war that had many fathers” by Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof
https://youtu.be/3x2gm2IglNA?si=QojyzZwVVTkqKM6w
Who is Darryl Cooper? I’ve never heard of him before. I’ve just read the transcript in the above article, and later I will watch some of Carlson’s interview with him.
If Cooper says that the Jews were behind the Bolsheviks in Russia and the communists in the West, then good for him. He’s right. If he says that the Jews continue to subvert the West, then he’s right again. More people should know this, to counter the influence of these subversive degenerates.
However, if he likes Hitler and Nazi Germany, then he is wrong. Hitler also wanted to destroy us. He was a war-monger, just as much as are the US Neocons today. Any doubt about that is contradicted by Operation Barbarossa and what followed from that. Hitler wasn’t bringing freedom to the Russian people. It was not a war of liberation. It was a war of conquest. I don’t like it when Whites get killed.
This interview might have the unfortunate consequence of helping our enemies to marginalize Carlson. The Jews hate him, because he exposes the truth on many topics, censored by the Media. They are looking for any excuse to destroy him. This interview might make it easier for them.
Hitler wasn’t a war monger. Per documents I’ve read, Hitler pleaded for peace with Britain many times before any engagement.
Hard to say at this remove where the truth lies. Bolshevism was the great bogey for Nat Socs. Hitler believed, quite accurately, that Germans were the most noble Europeans and he wanted that people to have room to live. No doubt he planned to relocate others within the former Russian Empire. Was his invasion of the USSR, as he claimed, a pre-emptive strike? Sukarov, in “Icebreaker” claims it was, based on the disposition of troops and the nature of their materiel in Russia’s Western Military District. Millions of prisoners were taken in a few months and most of them probably died from starvation but the continent was blockaded so food was scarce and PoWs were down the priority list. In an existential conflict there are often no “good” solutions. Churchill is often blamed for starving millions in Bengal at around the same time. But he also had to choose who was to starve. Eisenhower and de Gaulle effectively starved a million or so German soldiers in the Rhine meadows camps in 1945 and that was after the blockade was lifted.
Hitler may have seen the political entity of the USA as the ultimate enemy but that would have been because it was the redoubt of world Jewry, which had declared war on Germany within weeks of the Nat Soc ascension to power. He had always preached conciliation with the Anglo-Saxons.
I found an article Darryl Cooper wrote for the Jewish TabletMag about 2020 election: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/maga-darryl-cooper.
“He [Hitler] was a war-monger,”, this is overly simplistic. Communism was continuing to move westward & Operation Barbarossa was a preemptive strike. Read bottom of page 280 in “Stalin’s War” 2021 Sean McMeekin. Hitler most definitely did not want a conflict with the West. It was Britain/France that declared war & attacked Germany – here are 3 minimum proofs:
1-Britain bombed Germany first & multiple times before Germany responded.
2-At Dunkirk Germany could have taken them all as POWs, instead Hitler let the allies go.
3-May 10, 1941 Rudolf Hess solo flight to UK on a mission of peace failed because Churchill refused any peace offers. Churchill imprisoned Hess for the rest of his life, he died in 1987.
Churchill refused all of Hitler’s peace offers. The British people along with the people of the Allies were lied to.
There is some truth to what you say. I would have you read Suvorov’s Ice Breaker. I would also have you read the Gemlich letter. I would have you listen to David Irving on Churchill and Hitler in 1940. International socialism was a real threat to the German People. Operation Barbarossa had many negative aspects. I agree that racially speaking the Rus are our brothers and Hitler had it wrong. The results were put best by Ferdinand Celine who said western civilization died at Stalingrad. No, Hitler was not a war monger. What would you have done to counter Stalin’s aggressions? Hope for the best? And why did Front line Russian soldiers have maps of Germany in 1941 and amphibious tanks? Why were there so many Russian soldiers so near to Germany in 41?
What’s always missing from the conversation is sovereign currency, usury and central banking. Germany created their own much better system and therefore had to be destroyed. It really is that simple.
You are quite right. Bad people produce funny money and the game is over for the rest of us.
Gerbils, you nailed it with the German financial system which was designed to benefit the people, whereas we have a system that benefits the 1%. International bankers freaked out witnessing Germany’s amazing financial system benefiting the people at the expensive of pushing the international bankers out.
https://sharetext.me/vhcqalhdsz
We can “think” about it for as long as we want. But reality means being willing to deal with it by virtue of your armor and defensive ammunition. For reasons we have long understood, of course, the Nazi movement was a pure spawn of action. These people uncompromisingly put into practice what they raved about.
You call for saviors, but are not even willing or able to shout your displeasure in the face of your local politicians. Where are they all, the heroes? Have they gone into hiding? Have they allowed themselves to be intimidated? Are they calculating whether heroism is predictable?
We recognize a pattern here: promises are kept because kept promises are the only expression of honour. No dignity without honor! One man one word. What does that mean? It means that keeping my promise is more important than anything else in the world.
This Jewish female who insensibly attacked cooper and..cucker tarlson …is a toady smarmy condescending lock step conformist to a tidal wave of onerous oblivious stochastic Jewish lies We endlessly admire and always..without fail..respect Prof KM ..s. erudition..scholarship..balance and gentlemanliness..we have here and elsewhere pointed out that cucker tarlson is a red bracelet kabalist .we continue to hear in spite of his wanting to be..trendy..edgy. and on the side that might be winning.. that cucker tarlson is actually a quieter or poorly hidden Zionist! We among millions of other Americans will never forget how arrogant cucker tarlson was to those veterans questioning 9–11.. however..we surmise that in the overall it is good that normie Americans ..cuckservative maga -straga folk..go back and really research pre WW2…we did…and non incedentally..Winston Churchill (whose mother was aJew..like Putin s mother was a Jew….shelemova. )…Churchill ..starved 5, million benghals pre WW2…in simplistic American English….what goes around comes around ..yeah..hey there new readers of fabulous riveting TOO.. throw off the gentrified lies of The Jews. ..research” Judea declares war on Germany..””…Wilhelm Reich..Freud the homosexual Jew sadist… Berlin pre we 2 “…..nothing happens by accident…swindlers list. … successfully brainwashed so many boomers..not all..but young people who have no money no future no decent livelihoods by reason of deleterious Jewish controligarch manipulations and Talmudic bolshevist influences… vile Jewish controls..Jewish micromanagement of a plethora of degeneracy..look at all this under an acerbic microscope of pure truth..without emotion… without politically correct virtue signalling stupidification…the root of all The world and especially America s triage..downfall..collapse..is The Jews**. Poste script…open borders..”die..” Tikkun olam…kol nidre jews…..The Jews and the CCP…Jews and porn..Jews and hyperinflation..Jews and Jon pollard..The Jews and AI ……even just that is a good research start for intelligent young people who want answers .leading to solutions….”Fabulous article by Prof KM….
What I find most fascinating about this post at Occidental is that just a few days ago, a churchian site posted a ‘noted historian’ who panned this interview by Tucker on what basis? Cooper’s lack of his ‘credentials’ as a historian!
In other words, if you don’t meet the ‘standards’ of DaRulingHierarchy, you’re not a credible source for any edification on a subject. The points raised are ignored.
The argument, in essence, could have been used to discredit Jesus for not having graduated from Pharisee school – which those servants of Satan did continuously.
So what’s new, eh?
All I can say, Crush, is, “I wish I’d said that.” Very witty and very, very apt.
Ha, this Michelle Goldberg is a chewess ! ( Mixture of east-asian and Jew ).
We will see more and more or them. A reminder for those cretins in our ranks who think that east Asians will be our saviors.
Thanks for this Kevin. We’re gettin’ there.
Kevin, you know what you forgot to mention, and it’s something that proves that Tucker is doing his best to get the Jewish problem into the mass vernacular; the Congressman Thomas Massie interview he did recently where Massie spills the beans on the power of AIPAC on the US Congress. Massie tells us that every single member of Congress, at least the Republicans, has their own AIPAC lobbyist!
Here is a link to an episode of The Hill, where Massie’s interview with Tucker is condensed. Surprisingly, the commentators do a decent job of discussing the effects of AIPAC influence. Definitely worth the nine minutes. Massie’s wife died a few weeks after his interview with Tucker – I kid you not. I searched the net but can’t find a cause of death. Massie supposedly ‘laughed off’ the conspiracy theories.
https://youtu.be/2ieJkvkPU9M
The Goldberg piece is straight out of the Talmud. She just inverts reality which is of course Jewish modus operandi.
Being part English, it pains me to say that we must remember the disastrous Balfour declaration and how the English completely screwed up the Middle East by never recognizing Palestinian statehood and always caved to Zionist interests, never mind the insanely stupid move of putting the Jews back in Israel. How many have died in the endless wars that have come out of this? What about the over 50 million dead by the time Stalin died in ‘54? Most of his henchman, such as Yagoda, Kaganovich, and Berman, and there’s many more, were of course Jews. Then of course you have Trotsky and Lenin. Yet somehow, it’s that white, German guy Hitler who is the epitome of evil.
I do hope that Trump wins this election IF, there’s an election. With people like Elon, and Bobby K junior on his team, I do think he’ll do his upmost to at least begin to clean house and make some big changes. I know that some of you will vehemently disagree with that but we’ll just have to wait and see.
I missed that one. Thanks.
You got it!
and this by Anthony Lawson (RIP) 13 years ago
• AIPAC 101 — What Every American Should Know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqM2EXFdOnM
Ms. Goldberg is concerned that the jig is up concerning the grift that she and her co-ethnics have been running for years. She’ll have to move to her homeland, Israel, and no longer be able to live off the fat of the gentile land anymore.
Satan engineered the fake jew as a disease organism. It functions like a disease, infiltrating, attacking and killing its host. They will kill themselves off as well if they kill the host, but they are not meant to survive. It is simply a fanatic suicide cult. All that go along with this will die off. The fake jew can’t stop itself from fulfilling its purpose. They are the AntiChrist of the Book. They must destroy all they infect. They have been made to fail and self destruct by design. You waste your time trying to talk to them. They must be dealt with like a virus.
In all of my years of dealing with them Dr. Doom, I tend to agree with you.
“If Hitler is no longer widely understood as the negation of our deepest values, America will be softened up for Donald Trump’s most authoritarian plans, including imprisoning masses of undocumented immigrants in vast detention camps.” Thanks to Michelle Goldberg for pointing out what needs to be done to achieve the removal of illegals!
I am surpissed by TCarlson sucess and his longevity in the Global Media. NO other Newsman had managed to survive astutely in the MSM global media. BUT My best advice for TC just STAY away from Revionists History..no matter how truthful/right/correct you think you are..History if better left to Historians..scholars..TC must focus on the PRESENT news/vents/politcis of the current inmediate present evolving History.
My interest in Darryl Cooper quickly became guarded and short-lived when he followed up with this …
• My response to the mob – Darryl Cooper
https://subscribe.martyrmade.com/p/my-response-to-the-mob
He then doubled down on his backtrack with this …
• To the Perplexed (w/audio) – My final word on Churchill & Hitler – Darryl Cooper
https://subscribe.martyrmade.com/p/to-the-perplexed-waudio
Looks like it was the ‘nahtsies’ that might have done Katyn after all (sarc) – stripped and made to kneel down waiting for the bullet in the back of the neck.
I don’t know Cooper but I want to know his historical analysis on 911.
@ Julius Skoolafish I listened to Cooper’s podcast “My response to the mob”, and it sounds to me that no matter how much attention he pays to “the other side”, he brings it back to the uniqueness of jewish suffering.
The key is in his final pronouncement at the end of the cast, that what happened to the jews remains “incomprehensible”.
The starvation, by the jewish controlled USSR, of 4 to six million Ukrainians was not incomprehensible. The firebombing of German civilians, beginning in 1940, well before the events of Babi Yar and Kiev, which Cooper describes at great length, were not incomprehensible.
If one allows only the killing of jews to be considered beyond human understanding, then it follows that one values jewish lives more highly than those of non-jews. I don’t know if Cooper is aware of the logical conclusion to be drawn here, but his manner of discourse does sound talmudic to me.
There are many problems with tolerating Jews and neo Jews into positions of arbitrary extreme historical positions of power..while academics often heartlessly argue that starving 5million benghals is supposedly..”nesecery, to permit others to survive , ramifications, issues of. retribution..or as war mongering neocon jewdevils opt to say..”blowback “irrevocably occurs.We don’t think that alcoholic Jew faggot Churchill needed to starve those 5million people.*That said ,we have followed TOO for decades…we are often riveted by the gorgeous literary truthfulness of many commenters on TOO. The weaponization of food as a Jewdevil tool for political control is from mllenia.. recently Kissinger ,now supposedly in Hell,like the elder Rothschild.,Ginsburg,and deeply vile wojcicki,….talmudically…said “..we must maintain control over the food supply-….(paraphrase)..”..We concur with fine commenters here.that ..even if Zionist –kabalist cucker tarlson finally brings the JQ out to the mainstream..that is certain undeniable progress in this era of extreme isreali –jewish censorship..
https://sharetext.me/lt3mrxiaso
Cooper made a misstep by making Winston Churchill the great devil of the war. Churchill blundered. FDR was evil.
Carlson prompted Cooper to talk about Churchill, and there are certainly criticisms to be made — Churchill was indeed a war criminal — but what Cooper said was not well considered.
Churchill’s great blunder was that he still thought in terms of maintaining a “balance of power” on the European power — as if this would suffice for maintaining British dominance. Cooper mentioned that extra-European powers picked up the pieces, but did not identify Churchill’s blunder as what allowed it.
If Cooper had identified Churchill’s blunder then it would have been obvious that making him the main devil was a mistake. FDR and his crew used financial pressure to force Britain into war, from three different motives: Jewish anti-German agitation, Soviet infiltration of FDR’s government, and the prospect that a European war would bring economic recovery in the USA, making FDR look good — which it did. Financial pressure was mentioned by Hamilton Fish in his book, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin.
What they discussed has been my focus since 2003, when I wrote six radio programs for the National Alliance about the agitation against Iraq and criticized the Hitler and Chamberlain analogies. I believe that I was the first to point out that these analogies are used to cause wars, and that the relevant history deserves revision so as to disable such propaganda. It was nice to hear my idea finally hitting the big time 21 years later.
I was disgusted that Cooper turned down Andrew Roberts’ challenge to a debate about what he said. But I understand why he does not want to debate. Cooper is playing the game of hinting instead of saying all that he wants to convey. In a debate he would have to make it all explicit.
Ultimately this will require disputing the Holocaust, because that is the foundation of Andrew Roberts’ justification for Churchill’s actions.
Balance of power in continental Europe, that is.
I see many accusations from eminent personages complaining that Darryl Cooper “denied the Holocaust.”
I listened very carefully and heard no such thing. Cooper talked about inadequate provision for Soviet POWs on the Eastern Front, which is a fact completely separate from what “the Holocaust,” as defined by authorities like Yehuda Bauer and Deborah Lipstadt, denotes.
One may say that Cooper’s complete omission of any mention of “the Holocaust” seems striking and significant. This would be a reasonable statement, but instead they wail that Cooper has “denied” the Holocaust, which is false.
Having read just about all of this thought-provoking TOO posting about the Tucker Carlson interview of Darryl Cooper, revisiting as the two have some third-rail aspects of WW II (really, the sequel to WW I), I’m really surprised at not having seen any reference (if I missed it, my apologies) to Pat Buchanan’s seminal (one of many) opus, Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World.
Although published in 2008, his “Churchill . . . ” was in the mix of PB’s many sins that got him suspended and then fired by MSNBC as the lonely conservative voice of sanity on — of all things — the Rachel Maddow Show in 2011!!! That book, Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025, was just too much for the Ziocons to countenance. But just how prophetic the book’s prediction will prove to be, we’ll find out next January, the time the next denizen of the White House should be inaugurated. Another interesting (to say the very least) aspect of the latter book is the chapter that really blew the fuse for the powers that be behind MSNBC was “The End of White America.” I smell the collective hand of ADL, AIPAC, JINSA. etc. behind PB’s firing. (BTW, I believe it was a closely related third-rail issue, The Great Replacement, that got TC fired by Rupert Murdoch from FNC.)
Isn’t it high time for TC to interview PB, who is not only his learned elder spiritual brother, but one who is eminently versed to fill in TC’s certain still lingering blind spots, including how to navigate the treacherous shoals of Scylla and Charybdis.