General
The Free Press versus Darryl Cooper
/14 Comments/in General/by HorusCooper blasted a hole in their walls and they fired back with frowns and weary sighing. Being termed the ‘barbarian right’ by a twerp like Sohrab Amari just doesn’t matter. Being likened to a Nazi by Niall Ferguson is more funny than frightening. Cooper laughed at them and pressed on, becoming more radical and incisive in the months since. His enemies were organised by the grand dame of the most boring section of Substack, Bari Weiss, who deemed the articles by Andrew Roberts and Victor Davis Hanson so vital to the cause of anti-fascism that she paywalled them. Baron Roberts likes to boast about how much wonga he makes as an unctuary to the saviour, but we can assume that all the audiences he’s ever had amount to a lot less than Cooper’s on that one day.
“Andrew Roberts, responding to Aaron McLean’s suggestion that ‘the Second World War, its contemporary understanding, and Churchill’s iconic status form a kind of founding mythology for our current world’, said, ‘Yes. Absolutely. Thank God it does’.”
That world is ending, though.

Elon Musk’s Suggestion Box
/1 Comment/in General/by Ann CoulterThe federal Hatch Act bars most employees of the CIA and other spy agencies from engaging in partisan political activity, but the status of contractors is murkier.

I’m getting a little impatient waiting for Elon Musk to get to the two behemoths of government waste, fraud and abuse, so I’m dropping these in the suggestion box: Please hurry up and zero-out the CIA and TSA.
I attribute the continued existence of these pestilences to Hollywood movies, the imaginary place where CIA agents are competent, and the fact that no one in a position to decide the TSA’s fate flies commercial. The president and members of Congress should all be required to fly out of JFK at least once.
To give the devil his due, the CIA is finally on the cusp of determining whether the Ayatollah Khomeini poses a threat, and what posture the U.S. should take toward the shah. The agency expects to have a report on the president’s desk by the end of the week.
In case you’ve forgotten, just months before Khomeini’s Iranian Revolution overthrew the shah, this multibillion-dollar spy agency concluded that “Iran is not in a revolutionary or even a pre-revolutionary situation” and that “the shah is expected to remain actively in power over the next 10 years.”
Similarly, about a year before the Soviet Union imploded, the CIA reported that the USSR was in good shape and, indeed, “the Soviet economy significantly improved last year.”
The CIA analysts whose job it was to monitor India’s progress on a nuclear program found out India had successfully detonated nuclear blasts the day after it happened, when they woke up and read about it in The Washington Post.
What good are we getting out of the CIA? Its defenders claim that we never hear of all the dastardly plots it foiled. So why don’t they tell us? Sorry, that’s “classified.”
The agency sure missed a few big ones. It didn’t see 9/11 coming, much less the next dozen terrorist attacks on U.S. soil committed with foreign assistance.
The CIA’s most successful mission was against its own country, meddling in the 2020 presidential campaign by publicizing that not-at-all-political letter, organized by CIA acting director Michael Morell [and Anthony Blinken] and signed by “51 intelligence officers,” warning Americans that Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian disinformation.”
USAID was bad, but it cost only $40 billion in U.S. taxpayer money every year to make the world a gayer, Blacker, more transgender and matriarchal place. The CIA burns through nearly 2 1/2 times that much money every year, and we’d be better served if the agency literally burned the money.
Want to be popular? Abolish the TSA. Mostly a full employment program for “body positive” gals who didn’t work out at Target, TSA is doing something that doesn’t need to be done and failing at it.
The 9/11 attacks were a sucker punch that can never be repeated. Now, passengers know that hijackings don’t always end with a safe landing in Cuba. They aren’t going to sit quietly while vastly outnumbered terrorists try to turn the plane into a missile.
As the TSA itself admits, it is guarding against a threat that doesn’t exist. In classified legal filings from 2013, the agency acknowledged that terrorists “are not known to be actively plotting against civil aviation targets or airports” and “there have been no attempted domestic hijackings of any kind in the 12 years since 9/11.”
The only protection we ever needed was hardened cockpit doors and the knowledge that there are lunatics in the world who would use a commercial flight for a kamikaze attack. (Another great defensive measure would be to stop letting those lunatics come into our country.)
Every year, Homeland Security agents posing as passengers try to get mock weapons and explosives through TSA screening, and every year, 80% to 95% of the handguns, hacksaws, sticks of dynamite, surface-to-air missiles and other banned items get through. (Luckily, the government took quick action to remedy this catastrophe: It now hides the results. Yes, the TSA’s pass/fail rate is “classified” information.)
TSA screening accomplishes nothing except to waste 400 million hours of Americans’ time every year. Four hundred million hours. Over 20 years, that’s 8 billion hours of the government irritating us that could have been spent enjoyably or productively, at the beach, playing with children, curing cancer or colonizing the moon.
Here’s an idea I came up with in less than 400 million hours: Let the airlines do their own screening. They don’t want their planes crashing into buildings, but they also don’t want to annoy the crap out of their customers. (Except Delta, where “Annoying the Crap Out of Customers” is their motto.) The vast majority of passengers are already known to them. More than 80% of flyers are in frequent flyer programs.
I recognize that good policies can have negative consequences that spill over into innocent lives. With that in mind, we’ll have to make sure any grandmothers who still want to be anally probed for no reason whatsoever can be accommodated, but that’s precisely the kind of thing the free market can deliver.
COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER
Is The UK Heading For Civil War? Professor Predicts Mass Unrest Within Five Years due To Open Borders, Social Fracture, Eroding Legitimacy
/13 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldIs The UK Heading For Civil War? Professor Predicts Mass Unrest Within Five Years due To Open Borders, Social Fracture, Eroding Legitimacy
-
- Professor David Betz, a top academic and government advisor, warns the UK is “explosively configured” for civil war within five years.
-
- Betz cites the “destruction of legitimacy” caused by open borders, grooming gang scandals, and a politicized judiciary.
-
- The UK’s shift toward a heterogenous society, combined with economic decline and cultural displacement, fuels nativist sentiment.
-
- Betz argues that “asymmetric multiculturalism” alienates the white majority, creating fertile ground for revolt.
-
- The UK’s historical stability is eroding, with mass immigration and societal malaise pushing the nation toward unprecedented unrest.
The destruction of legitimacy: how the UK lost its way
The United Kingdom, once a bastion of stability and constitutional governance, now teeters on the brink of civil war, according to a dire warning from Professor David Betz, a leading academic and government advisor. In a recent podcast appearance with journalist Louise Perry, Betz, who teaches at King’s College London and has advised the UK Ministry of Defence and GCHQ, declared that British society is “explosively configured” for mass unrest. He predicts a national eruption within five years, driven by the government’s failure to secure borders, protect citizens, maintain freedom of speech and sustain social cohesion. This alarming forecast comes as the UK grapples with the fallout of open border policies, a two-tier justice system, and a growing sense of cultural and economic dispossession among its citizens.
Betz’s grim assessment centers on what he calls the “destruction of legitimacy” within British institutions. He traces this erosion back to the political establishment’s attempts to subvert the 2016 Brexit vote, which fractured the social contract between the government and the people. “If you want to create domestic turmoil in a society, then what the British government has been doing is almost textbook exactly what you would do,” Betz said. The professor argues that successive governments have exacerbated tensions by failing to address critical issues, such as the grooming gang scandals that disproportionately affected working-class communities and the unchecked influx of migrants that has transformed the nation’s demographic landscape.
The UK’s open border policies, Betz contends, have not only strained public services but also fueled a sense of betrayal among citizens who feel their concerns are ignored or dismissed as “hate speech.” This dismissal, coupled with a highly politicized judiciary that appears to favor certain groups over others, has deepened the divide between the ruling class and the populace. “We now live in a deeply fractured nation,” Betz said, “one that has much less connection to those aspects of its history which previously made it content and well governed.”
The powder keg of asymmetric multiculturalism
Betz’s analysis highlights the dangers of what he terms “asymmetric multiculturalism,” a phenomenon in which ethnic pride and group solidarity are celebrated for all groups except the white majority. For whites, such expressions are often labeled as supremacist or racist, creating a double standard that alienates a significant portion of the population. “This provides an argument for revolt on the part of the white majority (or large minority) that is rooted in stirring language of justice,” Betz explained. This dynamic, combined with long-term economic decline and the government’s inability to provide basic stability, has created a volatile environment ripe for conflict.
The professor’s warning is particularly striking given the UK’s historical reputation as a stable, functioning democracy. Unlike nations with a history of violent revolution or civil strife, Britain has traditionally resolved its disputes through peaceful, constitutional means. However, Betz argues that the current combination of social, cultural, and economic pressures has pushed the nation into uncharted territory. “The danger area,” he said, “is in the middle – societies that are becoming more heterogenous and in which a previously dominant social majority fears that it is losing its place.”
When Elon Musk suggested last year that civil war in the UK was “inevitable,” the reaction from politicians and pundits was one of derision. Yet, Betz’s sobering analysis lends credence to Musk’s prediction, painting a picture of a nation unraveling under the weight of its own contradictions. The UK’s historical stability, once a source of pride, now feels like a distant memory as mass immigration, cultural displacement, and economic stagnation erode the foundations of society.
Betz’s warning is not the rant of a fringe conspiracy theorist but the measured assessment of a respected academic and government advisor. His credentials lend gravity to his prediction, forcing even skeptics to confront the possibility that the UK is headed for a catastrophic breakdown. As the nation’s leaders continue to prioritize ideological agendas over the needs of their citizens, the risk of widespread unrest grows ever more real. …
Who the hell was running the country during Joe’s obvious dementia?
/12 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldTrump DOJ Urged To Investigate Whether Biden’s Staff Exploited His Mental State To Push ‘Far-Left’ Policies

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is urging the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate whether former President Joe Biden’s staff exploited his mental decline to implement far-left policies, according to a letter obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Biden’s executive actions — including last-minute clemency grants to violent criminals and sentence commutations for death row inmates — are “legally void” if he did not give his knowing approval, Bailey wrote Tuesday in a letter to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
There are “profound reasons to suspect that Biden’s staff and political allies exploited his mental decline,” which was evident before he dropped out of the 2024 presidential race, Bailey noted. …
“Who has been running the country for the last few years?” Bailey wrote. “I fear that Mr. Biden, while he held the office of President, did so in name only and was a mere puppet for far-left, unelected staffers. The people deserve to know the truth.”
Tucker: “Every other group in the world has the right to its own homeland except white people.”
/3 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldJUST IN: Tucker Carlson says it makes no sense that White people can’t have a homeland to themselves.
“Every other group in the world has the right to its own homeland except white people.” pic.twitter.com/fnieomyDBq
— BRICS News (@BRICSinfo) March 4, 2025
Zelensky’s Behavior in the White House & the West’s Schism
/6 Comments/in General/by Alexander DuginThe behavior of Volodymyr Zelensky during his meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump is indicative of a growing divide within the collective West, splitting it into two opposing poles: those who seek an end to the Ukrainian conflict and those who wish to prolong it, said Russian philosopher, political scientist, and sociologist Alexander Dugin.
“They simply kicked him (Zelensky – ed.) out of the White House. But this signifies something far greater than mere inappropriate behavior… This is a profound schism within the West. After Zelensky’s visit to the Oval Office in Washington, the collective West as a unified entity simply no longer exists,” Dugin said during his program Alexander Dugin’s Escalation on Radio Sputnik.
According to Dugin, the West has now split into two factions: Trump and his camp, who advocate ending the Ukrainian conflict, and the globalists, who seek to continue the war against Russia using Ukraine as their proxy.
“The West is fracturing before our very eyes… Gradually, globalist Europe, along with Ukraine and the Democrats in the U.S., is shaping a separate world order — one that is increasingly being rejected not only by America but also, step by step, by Europe itself,” Dugin added.
Earlier on Monday, Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov also noted that the collective West has begun to lose its cohesiveness, experiencing fragmentation and nuanced divergences in the positions of various countries and political blocs.
The meeting between Trump and Zelensky took place in Washington on Friday and devolved into a heated exchange. According to Fox News, Trump “threw Zelensky out” following a conflict in which the American leader felt disrespected. As a result, a planned deal on rare-earth metals between Washington and Kiev was canceled. Subsequently, several European leaders made statements in support of Zelensky.
(Translated from the Russian)