Despite a decade-long career as a pro-White thought criminal, I know precious little about Eugene Terreblanche, the South African political figure (“White supremacist” per the MSM) who was beaten to death by two Blacks recently. To the media, he was an evil figure for opposing ceding power to Blacks in South Africa. They use the word “supremacist” at every opportunity in describing him.
Recently, on a chatboard where I spar with liberals and conservatives alike on the issue of race, a poster mockingly offered me condolences on the murder of Terreblanche. ”You and your white-hooded buddies must be in mourning”, she said.
I responded with a post about Amy Biehl, the White Californian and Stanford student who traveled to South Africa as an anti-apartheid crusader. Biehl, as it happens, met the same fate as Terreblanche: she was brutally killed by Blacks.
Yet Biehl was at the opposite end of the spectrum, politically. She’d gone to South Africa to “help” Blacks. They returned the favor by beating her to death. Her father, in an act of thoroughgoing racial groveling typical of today’s White male, forgave her killers and shook their hands.
My point: whether a White person’s intentions toward Blacks are “good” or “bad”, it doesn’t matter. Whites end up dead either route. Whites imagine that Blacks distinguish between “good” and “bad” Whites, and that while a figure like Eugene Terreblanche might suffer a violent fate, a figure like Amy Biehl would be protected. Thus, to earn their protective coating, Whites strive to be politically correct, sensitive toward Blacks, and so forth. But Blacks aren’t thinking it through like this. And the more Whites capitulate to Blacks, the more Blacks seem emboldened to lash out.
Christopher Donovan is the pen name of an attorney and former journalist. Email him.
Facing the Future as a Minority
Was the Immigration Act of 1924 Illiberal?
Here was part of Eugene Terreblanche’s problem: He wanted to create all–White homelands, but then allow Negroes in to serve as guest workers>/i>. Gee, that’s how they got into the situation they’re in now, isn’t it?
It isn’t an all–White homeland if nigs are allowed in for any reason. We’re going to have to be willing to do the hard, dirty, and dangerous work ourselves.
http://celebrifi.com/gossip/White-supremacist-leader-killed-in-South-Africa-2127597.html
From the article above:
Despite a decade-long career as a pro-White thought criminal, I know precious little about Eugene Terreblanche, the South African political figure (”White supremacist” per the MSM) who was beaten to death by two Blacks recently.
Beaten and hacked to death with a machete, according to newspaper accounts.
Let’s not help the MSM gloss over the true horror of the crime.
[...]
Recently, on a chatboard where I spar with liberals and conservatives alike on the issue of race, a poster mockingly offered me condolences on the murder of Terreblanche. “You and your white-hooded buddies must be in mourning”, she said.
There’s that Puritan moral sadism again. KM differentiates between the opportunistic sociopathy of a Morris Dees and Puritan moralism, but on some levels it is a distinction without a difference. The sociopath, or psychopath, to use the alternative terminology, is incapable of feeling empathy with his victim and uses and exploits him solely as a means to satisfy his own egotistical wants. The Puritan moral sadist, by contrast, is capable of feeling empathy, but extends it only to ingroup members. To those outgroup members he regards as “evil”, he is as remorseless and exploitative as any true psychopath. It is as though the same sadistic energies are present in equal amount in both personality types, but take a different pathway to the surface.
The singular point difference between the two would appear to be that the true psychopath operates within an ingroup without really being a part of it. He may seem normal, but he’s only out for himself. By contrast, psychopaths of the Puritan moralist variety (or of the Jewish communist variety as cited by KM here)must use the framework of group conflict to dispose of their sadistic energies. The woman quoted above, who makes a joke out of a man being hacked and beaten to death, is of the latter type.
Biehl’s father’s pathological morality exemplified by his shaking the hands of his daughters’ killers was an act of sickening cowardice perhaps only nearly equalled by L.A. Riot victim Reginald Denny’s public tearful forgiveness (a la Oprah) of the thug who caved his head in with a cinderblock and left him for dead. Earning your “I’m not a racist, honest” cub-scout merit badge over one’s own daughters’ dead body or one’s own flattened cranium must be the height of pop-multicultural madness.
Yet this malady affects the whole of our nations, not just pathetic individuals. Another Wichita Horror, another racial-on-white crime statistic just leads to more cries from the offended side for more handouts, more set-asides, more spoils for the offenders. When will it end?
Our people, so obviously hamstrung with the on-pain-of-death desire to obey such an externally-imposed death-wish morality like this must Darwinistically appear to other races like a wounded gazelle to a pride of lions. They will seize the moment and act accordingly.
CD is quite right.
Any study of history will tell you that, in the long run, Whites always but always end up as the losers when having any dealings whatsoever with blacks, no matter what the dealing may be or the asymmetric strength or weakness of the Whites concerned.
It seems to be an iron law of nature, rather in the manner in which two subspecies of any non-human mammal can never co-exist in the same physical territory.You see the ‘stronger’ subspecies always drives out the ‘weaker’.Methinks that Whites have flattered themselves too long that they are the ‘stronger’ subspecies, when any objective study of actual case-histories tells us otherwise.
Just my two cents’ on the matter.
“Puritan moral sadism”
There’s a better term for it from Family Systems Theory.
It’s called simply – “Bonding with your Abuser.”
And that is ALL this is.
Whatever you call it it’s still disgusting.
Far from being respected as an example of praciticing the virtues it should be exposed and mocked for what it is, Compulsive/Obsessive Moralizing!
What is so striking is that victims who survive, or relatives of homicide victims, always exonerate the minority, in one case adopting the black rapist/murderer of a blue-eyed blonde co-ed and fighting for his early release from prison. With suitable weeping and muttering over this lost lamb of Jesus.
Just as with the so-called whites who eagerly, at higher levels, work, consciously, with the Hive to destroy the White race, these creatures are split off the evolutionary path from the ascending White going onwards and upwards to their destiny as the true Supermen.
We could fill the pages of this blog with lists of names of white men, women and children, who have been beaten, stomped, raped (Yes, White MEN have been RAPED on the STREETS of America by mulattos and other minorities), torture murdered, and so on.
Australian journalist Paul Sheehan of the Sydney Morning Herald took partial notice of it in 1995, The Race War of Black Against White One can also peruse New Nation News for a daily refresher on just what is happening on the streets of the good old USA.
Two posts by the redoubtable Patrick Cleburne over at Vdare.
Facebook censors Terre Blanche Page?
Terre Blanche Today – Rest Of Us Tomorrow?
Amy Biehl reminds me of an incident in one of Cornelius Ryan’s books. The Russian armies were closing in on Berlin. In the spirit of socialist solidarity, a German lesbian Marxist rushed out to greet the invading Soviet troops, only to be raped by them. Her mental universe just couldn’t grasp that in ethnic conflict a common ideology with the “other” serves as no protection. As Sam Francis once noted, if you are in a race war and refuse to recognize that fact, you will lose
We are paying for the sins of our fathers; this is not rocket science. Yes, it was the sin of extreme arrogance for them to think they could march into a place like Africa, bully and train negroes for centuries to do the manual and domestic labour they thought they were too damn good for, and then sleep peacefully at night believing this beautiful summer could not possibly end. How very stupid.
The negroes’ rage is justified. White people do not belong in Africa and never did.
BM: “The negroes’ rage is justified. White people do not belong in Africa and never did.”
Reality check: Who (and how many) was there when they first came? Nomadic hunters, I presume. The Whites built up SA from scratch to become a wealthy, well-functioning Western state, attracting millions of immigrants from neighboring countries.
Barkingmad: “The negroes’ rage is justified. White people do not belong in Africa and never did.”
Please – show me a case of “black rage”, and I’ll show you an uppity porch monkey who needs a watermelon mashed in his/her face. Being a responsible Black person interested in one’s own ethne and its genetic interests is one thing; blaming Africa’s self-created problems on Whitey is quite another.
By the way, the available scientific evidence suggests that the human race in general ultimately originated in Africa. Your thesis therefore amounts to the idea that when the ancestors of modern Whites and Asians left Africa for northern climes, they and their descendants lost all right of return even though the hominids who stayed behind seem to have gotten lost behind the door when mother nature passed out the brainpower for evolutionary purposes.
Regarding misplaced intergroup solidarity: when my wife was in junior high school, she and some schoolmates witnessed a “civil rights” demonstration/riot out in the street. One of her schoolmates, a poor little fellow whose mother had married a Black man, was joyfully inspired to run outside and express his solidarity with the (all-Black) demonstrators. She and others tried to stop him, but he could not be restrained.
“Peace!”, the boy shouted as he ran up to join his brothas and sistas-in-arms.
“Piece a’yo ass!”, one of them responded. Then they all beat the living crap out of him.
Now he’s an immigration attorney. (Some people never learn.)
“The negroes’ rage is justified. White people do not belong in Africa and never did.”
I thought we all came out of Africa? /sarc
Hey! Mark 9:11 and Eurodele 12:02. We don’t need to use words like nigs and porch monkey to make our point. Let’s keep the debate civil.
I agree with BOMFOG. Keep it civil. No need for those words on this list. Kevin M
Matthias says:
Biehl’s father’s pathological morality exemplified by his shaking the hands of his daughters’ killers was an act of sickening cowardice perhaps only nearly equalled by L.A. Riot victim Reginald Denny’s public tearful forgiveness (a la Oprah) of the thug who caved his head in with a cinderblock and left him for dead. Earning your “I’m not a racist, honest” cub-scout merit badge over one’s own daughters’ dead body or one’s own flattened cranium must be the height of pop-multicultural madness.
Such masochism is only the Puritan moral sadism turned inwards upon oneself. What can that be but the true spirit of Christianity? :-D PB Express’ idea of this being “identification with the abuser” applies. The original abuser was the Jew Jesus, who (we are told) recommended such a course of action. For a while this idea remained free-floating, a weapon in search of a target. Apostle Paul had the genius to see that, in the Roman world, only the Gentile had the idealism and hopeless naïvete to try to make himself comply. When he turns his sadism upon himself and becomes a masochist, the Puritan moral sadist is identifying with his precious Semitic God, Jesus. He’s trying to make him come back to life in his own flesh. It should go without saying that the Jews did not adopt this insane philosophy for themselves, of course. It was strictly for export. It was the perfect weapon of abuse; the latest refinement of interracial warfare.
I believe a white homeland will exist in the US in my life time it will be shielded by modern technology. I also hope in our plight we find a planet sustainable to live and leave this planet of Apes behind.. We must shake the soicial Marxist/Global Judeo-Christo Capitolism..
Whites (and everyone else) having “right of return” to Afrika? Well, okay, but let’s get the people who run things to agree that we do have such a right.
Can anyone here, just one of you, see that the patronizing manner in which you view negroes is no different from the way the zhids view white people? Why is it correct for us to have looked down on the jungle folk but incorrect for the tribesters to see us as a bunch of cattle whose only possible purpose on earth is to scrub their g.d. floors?
Yes, the blacks did get left behind evolution-wise. And this means what. That they were ripe for the picking? “Mo tea, suh?” They are now telling Whitey to pour his own fkg tea and so they should. Even if the tribesters were not there to agitate for this rebellion, it would have occurred sooner or later.
3 decades ago, right after I had moved into an apartment owned by a tribalist, he showed up at my door and told me that henceforth I’d be cleaning his home, 4X/month, for a grand total of $10.00 per month. Having just moved in, what was I to do? After about a year of obediently cleaning his filthy place (and being sniggered at) I stopped the cleaning and he evicted me from my place, even tho my rent was always paid on time. So, I think I know why the blacks in Rhodesia & SA hate Whitey.
BOMFOG said:
April 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM
Hey! Mark 9:11 and Eurodele 12:02. We don’t need to use words like nigs and porch monkey to make our point. Let’s keep the debate civil.
The debate has been civil for far too long. That’s why we’ve been losing.
BOMFOG pretty obvious mark and others are SPLC/ADL/FBi/whatever.. provocateurs..
BM: “Why is it correct for us to have looked down on the jungle folk but incorrect for the tribesters to see us as a bunch of cattle whose only possible purpose on earth is to scrub their g.d. floors?”
Well, BM, there are at least two good answers to that.
1. Western civilization (ours, not “the tribesters’”). Whites have a history of running things considerably better than the Africans, or the Jews, ever did, everywhere we go. That’s a simple fact, and until we see the day that history has been completely rewritten, it will bear no rational contradiction.
2. Two standard deviations of IQ. That’s how much the average White has over the average African. In today’s overcrowded high-tech world, every IQ point is precious.
What I and many others find especially irksome is the negative correlation between IQ and fecundity. Those of limited mental capacity and susceptible to congenital frontal lobe disinhibition over-reproduce wherever they go, and when they fill up their own squalid corners of creation and turn their “homes” into pigsties, they always come for ours. So as far as I’m concerned, until they get the @#$% out of our home, they have none to rightfully call their own.
Don’t get me wrong; there are some decent Black people out there. I’ve known and worked with some of them. But one cannot fight statistical reality, so I was eventually forced to realize that the good ones are the exceptions. I finally had to wake up and smell the coffee … the stinking diversity-and-multiculturalism stew cooked up for us by the idiots “who run things” in our country and elsewhere.
You know the drill … I moved to the Big City, got caught in a race riot or two, had a few Black/Latino-on-White hate crimes committed with impunity in my immediate vicinity, “flunked” a few too many civil service exams on which I had perfect scores, had my White girlfriend’s butt pinched a few too many times by a few too many wannabe Black pimps in the narrow darkened hallways of restaurants and nightclubs, and when I’d do something about it, have law enforcement land on me like fresh pigeon crap for committing a “bias crime”. And so on.
So you see, I have no more patience for “black rage”, whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean, or for anyone who condones it, or for the strain of PC which says that as a White person, I must always watch my speech around our precious minority citizens (and noncitizens) even as they execrate us, suck our blood, and under the evil auspices of their Jewish sugar-daddies, tear down our country around our bleeding ears.
Regarding your abuse by a Jewish landlord, I sympathize with you. I know exactly what that kind of thing feels like. But that’s between you and the Tribe; it has nothing to do with other minorities, except insofar as other minorities are being used as weapons against you and other Whites by people just like your landlord. In particular, it doesn’t justify Black rage, or Black-on-White hate crime, or Black welfare parasitism, or Blacks breeding as irresponsibly as animals, or even Blacks making a total mess of Africa.
It seems that some here have objected to my use of the term “porch monkey”. You know, I don’t usually like to use that kind of racially-loaded language. It tends to sound irrational to those who are fooling themselves about that which it accurately describes, and it tends to activate any latent hypocrisy simmering in the hearts of one’s audience. But as we all grow up to learn, asymmetric self-control is pointless and can even be counterproductive. Those who expect self-control of others need to cultivate it for themselves.
So anyway, could I ask everyone for a small favor? The next time you feel a pornographic, self-hating urge to condone “black rage”, could you please exercise a little self-control of your own and go elsewhere to do it? After all, if I want to hear about the supposed righteousness of “black rage”, there are any of a number of other web sites to which I can go for that purpose without having to worry about being finked on by lurking ADL/SPLC sewer rats or chastised by those who live in fear of them.
Thanks.
You are welcome.
“My point: whether a White person’s intentions toward Blacks are “good” or “bad”, it doesn’t matter. Whites end up dead either route.”
Not to make light of the grim truth of this statement, but a certain cartoon seems particularly appropriate – http://www.meh.ro/2010/01/08/around-blacks-never-relax/
Yes, there are many crimes committed every year by Blacks against Whites in the USA, but in the grand scheme it isn’t all that much. The main fact of the matter is that tens of millions of Blacks (and still growing) are dragging the USA down in every way: culturally, economically, demographically, educationally, and so on…not to mention the long term implications of slow motion race-mixing, sullying the White gene pool with primitive Congoid genes which are literally tens of thousands of years behind European ones in an evolutionary sense.
You know that many East Asians laugh at us Whites endlessly for allowing a huge and growing population of Blacks to live amongst us for so long – they obviously should’ve been (humanely) sent back to Africa soon after 1865 or so.
OK – but you must also consider the large black-on-black violence in South Africa. I do not want to downplay the racial part of it, but it seems like you get easily killed and raped anyway in S.A., no matter if Black or White.
I thought the comments about the selective morality of the left about whites, or even better, rightist whites being murdered is an important point to make. Their alleged humanity never extends to those they disagree with.
And the point about civil language is important also. If you just want to cuss people of whom you expect nothing anyway, why bother to post anything? If you want to change your fellows, then good language will go a good ways to impressing them. They can focus on your ideas rather than reacting to venom.
eurodele says:
April 7, 2010 at 4:29 PM
Shiva: “If you want to change your fellows, then good language will go a good ways to impressing them. They can focus on your ideas rather than reacting to venom.”
Unfortunately, this assumes (1) an understanding of English; (2) an ability to focus on ideas; (3) respect for social norms and a desire to get along with others. None of these assumptions applies to the kind of Black I was talking about when I equated “black rage” with being a “porch monkey”. (No matter how unfortunate the language, the equation is semantically correct, i.e., consistent with the definitions of “black rage” and “porch monkey”.)
Granted, there exist black people who do not necessarily deserve to be referred to as “niggers”, “coons”, or “porch monkeys”. However, I wasn’t referring to those people. I was explicitly referring to blacks who give themselves over to “black rage”, i.e., violent, unreasoning hatred of Whites in general for having “caused” all of the problems faced by Blacks in general (you know … not enough free money, being subjected to the annoying complaints of White crime victims, AIDS, black-on-black genocide in Africa, the occasional unavailability of interracial sex on demand, etc.).
Personally, while I strongly favor verbal civility under most circumstances, I don’t have a great deal of respect for Whites who would rather protect the sensibilities of those given to “black rage” than call a spade a spade while supposedly engaging in objective discourse about the abusive and antisocial tendencies of Blacks. Obviously, Whites who bellyache about White-on-Black verbal incivility would do themselves more justice by concentrating on the more lethal forms of incivility practiced against Whites in the name of “black rage”. Beyond a certain point – a point which probably came a long time ago – excessive prissiness and verbal pussyfooting merely tells your abusers that you are cowed, weak, and ripe for the final harvest.
Let’s face it: any Black person who is reasonable enough to deserve punctilious consideration already knows that he or she was not the target of (my previous usage of) “porch monkey”. As for those who do not understand this … well, they’re another story. So please, enough already about the “porch monkey” gaffe. It’s time to swallow the White guilt and move on.
(Whoops – that apparently should have been addressed to “Amy D”.)
Oh my poor Eurodele! No one ever said that acknowledging the basis of black rage was a justification for our sitting around and letting them slaughter us, or to continue permitting our Rulers to use these enraged blacks as a battering ram against us.
If people as a group are seriously angry with another group you don’t have to look too far or deep to see why. This applies to us, our enemies and everybody.
The sins of the father are indeed visited on the children for generations. That’s the Way It Is. Once again, my dear, you can take care of your own interests while at the same time doing a bit of self-reflection. As grownups have done since Day 1.
Well, Barkingmad, it’s like this.
I’ve done a certain amount of self-reflective soul searching in my life, even going back several generations. As I did so, two salient facts emerged.
(1) I have never committed, nor condoned, any crime against any Negro, let alone a crime worthy of “black rage”.
(2) The same applies to my known ancestors, none of whom seems to have owned slaves or condoned the capture, importation, or ownership of Black slaves in the US or Europe.
Most of the Whites I know can say much the same. Moreover, while it may once have been true that some of those guilty of abusing Negroes were White, as many or more of them, especially commercial slave-traders, were Africans, Jews, and other Middle Easterners. It is therefore far from clear that Whites need accept any blame whatsoever from Negroes afflicted with “black rage”.
But then where are you getting your “sins of the fathers” routine? I mean, if your ancestors owned Black slaves, then maybe you, speaking just for yourself and others of your accursed lineage, owe Negroes everywhere an abject apology. Maybe you’d even like to be made a scapegoat for the race crimes of the Jews. (After all, some people have a deep inner need to apologize to somebody, anybody, for anything at all, and maybe you’re such a person.) However, others need not share your attitude.
So, as you resign yourself to your intergenerational guilt and bend eagerly over the barrel for Jamal, Leroy, and Rastus, could you please leave the rest of us out of it? I, for one, would greatly appreciate it. (Thanks.)
I was referring specifically to the behaviour of Rhodesian & S.A. white people. They behaved like pigs, marching in to a tropical country, an area that they/we are not even biologically suited to, declaring the land theirs, and proceeding to turn the natives into servants, servants who had to care for sunburnt little whiteys for a few cents and then go home and care for their own children, too. This is shit. I don’t know about you, but I can take care of my own and don’t need to take advantage of a desperate, conquered people.
The blacks have a group identity and apparently think that we do, also, which is why they blame all of us living today for our ancestors’ cruelty. I agree, we should inform them that we whites are not the only ones responsible for slavery and patronizing attitudes.
Who said anything about “accept[ing] any blame…from Negroes?” Not me. I don’t. I tried to tell you that. None of us is to blame. But what harm does it do to take a cool look at the behaviour of our ancestors? And don’t play that little game about my ancestors VS yours. I thought we were here because we had a group identity.
Barkingmad: “And don’t play that little game about my ancestors VS yours. I thought we were here because we had a group identity.”
But don’t you think that our group identity should work for us rather than against us?
The fact that we Whites are losing our countries to ravenous swarms of parasitic non-Whites can already be attributed to a negative form of “White identity” … the kind which says that we’re all guilty of the race crimes of filthy rich Whites (Jews, Arabs, etc.) whom we questionably include among our “ancestors” even though they never did a thing for us (their profits from slavery almost always went exclusively to their own personal descendants as opposed to other White families, about whom they seem not to have given a damn).
If that’s what you mean by “White identity”, then we’ve reached an ideological parting of the ways. To me, the true identity of the White race – the ones we should all want to emulate – are its best and most generous exemplars, not its worst and greediest abusers. The latter crowd and their moral liabilities are not my problem; just as I don’t want to emulate their behavior, I don’t want to belatedly shoulder their guilt for them.
But just to play the devil’s advocate regarding Whites in Africa, I’ll review a couple of well-known facts. First, what the White South Africans and Rhodesians did was not that different from what the American colonials did; the American pioneers marched into an unfamiliar area, declared the land theirs, and proceeded to abuse the natives. (Admittedly, many of the American Indians were simply killed and/or herded onto reservations rather than used as servants, but this can hardly be considered creditable.)
Secondly, it would be very hard to make a case that it is inherently more demeaning for an African Black to clean a white person’s home for a small wage than to be raped and slaughtered in a genocidal tribal raid by some homicidal warlord or witch doctor, perhaps the most common fate suffered by Africans prior to the advent of the White man. By all accounts, Blacks were safer and their standard of living was higher under White rule than it was initially or is today, which implies that at least to some extent, the Whites of Africa were “good shepherds”. A good shepherd hardly owes an apology to his flock, even if some of its members become disgruntled and yield to “baa-baa rage” (as one might call it).
To me and many others, an Africa run into the ground by venal incompetent Blacks is nothing but a waste; those who stupidly and persistently abuse something of value don’t deserve to keep it. On the other hand, if they do deserve to keep it, then they are quickly running out of time to prove it to the world by emulating the good stewardship of their former White masters.
Cleaning a white man’s home & his kids’ bums plus a whole lot more for tiny wages OR rape & slaughter? They never saw it as an either/or situation. The whites marched in and did what they wanted; they didn’t hold a referendum asking the natives which they’d prefer. However, generations later, at least the Rhodesian black people look back on white rule as the good ol’ days. But they have to hit bottom before they see it that way, don’t they, and I guess South Africa isn’t there yet.
As to North America, where whites did the same thing, more or less, to the abos: if all the nonwhites and nongentiles would agree to leave Europe, I’d go back there even if it meant living in a hut and scratching the ground with a stick, and I mean it. Whites, like everybody else, run away from their problems to some wondrous new land, and havoc ensues.
Most people just say that migration is a fact of life – and indeed it is. But I see it as more, as avoiding serious issues in your homeland and immorally not giving a hoot about whose land you are barging in to. Dzhus could just as soon claim that since they entered North America and Europe, they cleaned up all the “injustice” and we whites ought to be grateful. It’s all a case of whose side your’re on.
I don’t see how having group identity means seeing only the nice things. How about all the dreadful mistakes, too?
What do you mean by referring to Jews & Arabs as whites? The blacks may not make a distinction but some Asians of my acquaintance sure do.
“What do you mean by referring to Jews & Arabs as whites?”
That’s not what I meant. What I meant was that these other groups have committed their own share of race crimes … and not just against Blacks. In fact, I’m told that they still practice certain forms of slavery. (Maybe that will help you a bit with your White guilt.)
It has occurred to me that blacks, with the rare exception, simply cannot live successfully in a modern type of society. They need to go back to their paleo- or neolithic style of life. They were not cut out for civilization, neither white nor asian nor semitic. And there’s nothing wrong with that. It was wrong of white people to try to get them to live like whites. It was a mistake, eurodele. A big, bad mistake.
i just heard a little BBC news snippet about his murder:
“white supremacist Eugene Terreblanche was killed on his farm last week”
- killed not murdered and no indication of who did it.. really at this point i would MSM would be celebrating, apparently they still trying to hide the truth.
“police were on hand to prevent clashes between his [as noted earlier white supremacist] supporters and local black people’ – as if the whites were going to descend on the town and start a black pogram….
Barkingmad: “It has occurred to me that blacks, with the rare exception, simply cannot live successfully in a modern type of society. They need to go back to their paleo- or neolithic style of life. They were not cut out for civilization, neither white nor asian nor semitic. And there’s nothing wrong with that. It was wrong of white people to try to get them to live like whites. It was a mistake, eurodele. A big, bad mistake.”
Then perhaps the mistake of the White South Africans and Rhodesians was to permit limited integration rather than putting all of the indigenous Negroes directly on reservations, free to pursue their stone-age lifestyle without maintaining a chokehold on the civilized world by sitting obliviously atop a rich bundle of nonrenewable resources that they will never be capable of extracting or using on their own.
But again we have a problem: Blacks have a well-established natural tendency to overpopulate and then genocide each other over territory. On a reservation, there is even less territory to overpopulate, and over which to fight, than there was originally, leading to increased privation and heightened conflict.
Therefore, given the need of high-tech society for mineral and agricultural resources, it always comes down to a choice among the following alternatives.
Should prehistoric indigenous peoples be
(1) exterminated;
(2) left in place as resource-rich areas are exploited, and thereby integrated with Whites and/or Asians;
(3) wholly confined to overcrowded reservations where they are left to their own stone-age devices, resulting in “moral outrage” sneakily subsidized by the very financial interests which profit the most from the resources thereby made accessible; or
(4) permitted to obliviously lock up the wherewithal of high-tech civilization as they jabber and jab each other with spears over what will always be a limited supply of bananas, no matter how large the available territory?
You seem to have ruled out alternatives 1 and 2, leaving 3 and 4. Unfortunately, it is still not clear that either one of these alternatives is both “humane” and realistic.
None of that stuff is actually doable, so why even present your version of choices?
95% of white people even do not even know how to conduct their lives in a sane and sensible manner, ie, how to eat healthily, how to behave, how to take care of children humanely, etc. etc. Why would I even want to consider what to do with noncivilized nonwhites? Let us all clean up our own house first.
Hope you agree.
“None of that stuff is actually doable, so why even present your version of choices?”
Because in principle, choice 3 can be modified in such a way that it is better than 4. For example, we can assign relative values to human lifestyles in light of global long-range utility; determine “fair populations” by relative value of lifestyle; assign aborigines to reservations whose land areas can support the populations thereby determined under their existing lifestyles; administer involuntary contraceptives to prevent the rapid overpopulation of these reservations, preferably without worrying about the liberal sensibilities of moralists who fail to understand the critical connection between rights and responsibilities; and where necessary, shift the reservations to appropriate locations as known resources are exhausted and new ones are discovered.
Sadly, this (probably optimal) solution stands to be heavily opposed by the disingenuous predatory know-nothings currently in charge of things or maneuvering to get there, and the moral and intellectual weaklings thereby manipulated.
“Let us all clean up our own house first. Hope you agree.”
Yes, I agree. But before we can do that, we must decide which people own which houses, given that at this point in time, nearly all of the houses have multiple tenants.
Behind all of it, in the end, is the innate sadism and racism of the “Jewish community” at large. They have created these situations, and weak, paid off, White lackeys have gone along to help put the whole artificial edifice in place. Sure, it’s falling apart. But a lot more terrible things are going to happen to Whites before things turn around. That it means many Jews are going to suffer a not undeserved round of punishment down the line matters little right now. Aware Whites must never forget, and those waking up must realize, that Whites are dealing with an enemy that is genetically programmed toward hate, racism, perversion, hypocrisy, a group possessing a super-sized portion of the worst traits of human beings. All that with some brainpower, unlike the majority of blacks. Considering the Jewish worship of Fraud Freud, one must conclude that it is the Jews themselves whose drives are all sexually based, which is why they were demonstrating projection through the old perv Freud. We’re dealing with greedy, racist, sadistic, hypocritical sexual perverts. But that’s old news anyway, as most aware whites know that behavior like Marv Albert’s is the norm for the self chosenites. Think Marv would have gotten his TV job back if he were white? The Jews are happy, dance, sing, rub one out every time they hear stories like Biehl’s or Terreblanche’s.
The problems that Whites are having with non-whites all point straight back at Jewish manipulation. Why look any other way? The self-deception and self-delusion of the Jews combined with their inborn hypocrisy will never allow them to see their true selves, and this combined with their arrogance is why Jewish rule always collapses. But expect much more horror to befall whites before the current Semitic System heaves and bellows before its final collapse. Whites do need to keep in mind all the monsters have done over the last century. That’s a long list.
I nearly cried when I researched the story of Amy Biehl and how her father shaked their hands. I mean… How can you do that? It’s just so… sickening and humiliating. Sigh.