Manny Friedman: Jews “own a whole freaking country”; and yes, that includes the media

Kevin MacDonald


Well, it turns out after all that Jews do control the media—and a whole lot besides. So says Manny Friedman, writing in the Times of Israel (Yes, Jews DO control the media).  Of course, we at TOO have known this for quite a while, but it’s nice to hear it from a Jew, even though it’s in a Jewish publication and intended to be part of a Jews-only dialog. The thing is, it’s okay for someone like Friedman to say it (or Joel Stein, writing in the LATimes and linked by Friedman). But it’s definitely not okay for someone like me. In fact, Friedman is typical of Jewish writers who inhabit a completely Jewish universe when they talk about anything relating to Jews. Friedman is well aware that non-Jews who talk about such issues should prepare for a wall-to-wall, no-holds barred, 24/7 campaign against them:

The funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!” Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else! Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

I don’t see any “funny parts” to this, and I rather doubt that “irony’ is the right word here. How about “ethnic strategizing,” as in “Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the ethnic strategizing of this?”

Advertisement

And what does being a “bigot” have to do with anything? The working philosophy of the ADL is that bigots are non-Jews who think Jews control the media or anything else. And underlying that philosophy is the idea that public awareness of Jewish control would be bad for the Jews.   But the reality is that these “bigots” are often people who (correctly) think that Jews use their control to influence many other aspects of culture in ways that are not in the interests of non-Jews: that the Israel Lobby has virtually made the US into a client state subservient to the interests of Israel, including the Iraq war and a looming war with Iran; or that Jews use their control of the media to undermine public Christianity and traditional Western sexual mores, and to promote ideologies like multiculturalism that are quite opposed to the interests and attitudes of White Americans; or that Jews are predominant among what Pat Buchanan calls the “casino capitalists.” Buchanan, although avoiding the ethnic angle, only mentions Robert Rubin, Alan Greenspan and Goldman Sachs when discussing post-1995 financial scandals. (Here’s a list of TOO articles on Jewish financial malfeasance; surely there must have been a way to get Larry Summers on the list.) This new predatory elite has exported American jobs, engaged in fraud, and repeatedly obtained lucrative bailouts when things get bad.

Fortunes are lost and made overnight. Names appear on the list of richest Americans no one has ever heard of. Cheating and corner-cutting are constantly being unearthed. Broker- and banker-gamblers in their 30s amass and flaunt nine-figure fortunes.

When WASPs were the dominant elite in America, their many Jewish critics never had any compunctions about calling them by name and probably loved using what Andrew Fraser calls the “subtly, perhaps deservedly derogatory acronym” of ‘WASP’. But our new Jewish elite cannot tell its name despite the fact that they “own a whole freaking country”— a rather large and powerful country in which the vast majority of the population are not Jews. Friedman says the reason for Jewish angst about discussions of Jewish power is

because they’re afraid of being responsible. It means that they’re suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world.

Right. Jews understand that there are huge conflicts of interest over the construction of culture, whether it’s foreign policy, the sexualization of culture, immigration, multiculturalism, or the role of Christianity in the public square. Quite simply, Jews have different attitudes and perceived interests, and they have been pushing in different directions than White Americans for the entire last century.  Massive amounts of money, propaganda, and organizational effort have gone into this effort. This effort has been transformative. Abe Foxman (quoted in the Stein article) would love to have Americans believe that there are a lot of executives in Hollywood who just happen to be Jewish and that’s the end of it. But it’s far more than that. Jews have fundamentally different attitudes and perceived interests when it comes to the construction of culture. It wouldn’t matter that Jews are an elite if they had the same attitudes and perceived interests as the traditional people and culture of America. But they don’t. And they haven’t, ever since they arrived en masse a century ago. Indeed, in general Jews have an atavistic hostility toward the traditional culture of the Christian West. Jewish organizations do everything in their power to prevent an honest discussion of Jewish power. And that is completely understandable. Do they really want to advertise to White America that Jews have had a preponderant role in making Whites a minority, in promoting the ideal of multiculturalism, in making America a client state of Israel, in the sexualization of culture and in legalizing and promoting pornography, in banning Christianity from the public square, in obliterating traditional American conservatism in the Republican Party, and in predatory financial practices that are destroying the  American economy …? Likely not. But one can bet that to the extent that there will be any discussion of Jewish power, it will be more or less exclusively within the confines of the Jewish community. So when non-Jews write about what went wrong, the vast majority don’t seem to notice the 800-lb gorilla in the room. They ignore the fact that Jewishness has anything to do with it. Here’s a recent WND article titled “Who Stole Our Culture?” that fails to come to grips with the powerful ethnic component of the correct answer, despite their emphasis on the central role of the notoriously Jewish Frankfurt School. Friedman publishes his article in an Israeli newspaper (which is completely ignored by the MSM in the US) and links to Joel Stein (whose article sank like a rock and certainly did not ignite a national discussion on the consequences of Jewish media domination). Neither Friedman nor Stein would dream of  linking to The Occidental Observer or anything remotely similar to back up their claims. Yet our discussions are far more extensive, nuanced and well-sourced than anything put out by Friedman or Stein. Non-Jews should have a robust role in the discussion of all these issues. Here’s Steven Walt criticizing Peter Beinart’s The Crisis of Zionism (in an otherwise favorable review) for addressing only Jews in the discussion of American attitudes toward Israel:

I think it is unfortunate that Beinart chose to direct his book almost entirely toward the American Jewish community. That is his privilege, and it’s possible that the best way to get a smarter U.S. policy would be to convince American Jewry to embrace a different approach. Yet Beinart’s focus also reinforces the idea that U.S. Middle East policy — and especially its policy towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — is a subject that is only of legitimate concern to Jewish-Americans (and Arab-Americans) and can only be legitimately discussed by these groups. In fact, U.S. Middle East policy affects all of us in countless ways and it ought to be a subject that anyone can discuss openly and calmly without inviting the usual accusations of bigotry or bias. I’m sure Beinart would agree, yet his book as written sends a subtly different message.

Right. We all have a right and even a duty to discuss these subjects because they affect our vital interests. But, like Walt and John Mearsheimer when their book on the Israel Lobby came out, doing so invites the worst sort of hostility from Jewish critics—ridiculous accusations that it was  shoddy scholarship and a throwback to the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It is a compelling measure of Jewish power that Jews are able to so effectively suppress discussion of Jewish power. The power of no other group is off limits for public discussion. I can’t resist quoting Joe Sobran’s 1996 classic:

The full story of [Pat Buchanan’s 1996 presidential] campaign is impossible to tell as long as it’s taboo to discuss Jewish interests as freely as we discuss those of the Christian Right. Talking about American politics without mentioning the Jews is a little like talking about the NBA without mentioning the Chicago Bulls [then the dominant team]. Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible. They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. Jewish control of the major media in the media age makes the enforced silence both paradoxical and paralyzing. Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.  (Joe Sobran (1995). “The Jewish establishment.” Sobran’s (September):4–5).

The reality is that Jews cannot afford to have these issues discussed openly and honestly because doing so would not only threaten their power. It would create a huge backlash, since Jewish power has been so deeply antithetical to the interests of Whites in America and elsewhere.   So they sit on an ever more explosive powder keg. Shoring up their defenses, but unable to go back even if they wanted to (which they don’t). Pouncing mercilessly on anyone who gets off the reservation. With 100,000,000 non-Whites in America who are rapidly increasing as a percentage of the population, there are simply too many facts on the ground at this point to go  into a low-key retreat. The external controls keeping the non-Jews in line are certainly very powerful. As Cooper Sterling’s recent article shows (and as Friendman acknowledges), individuals who cross the lines imposed by the SPLC (a Jewish organization in all but name) or the ADL face dire economic and social consequences. However, Jewish control goes far beyond the ability to punish behavior and attitudes they don’t like. Ultimately the whole edifice depends on massive self-censorship by non-Jews. Jews also need to use their position in the media to continue the incessant propaganda that reinforces the current dispensation— that diversity is a strength and is good for everyone, that all humans are essentially the same so that importing millions of Africans, Asians, and non-Whites from Latin America would have no effects on the fundamental character and institutions of the West, that  Jews are powerless and that they are morally and intellectually superior victims of irrational hatreds, that Israel is an embattled democracy with a strong allegiance to the same values Americans hold dear, etc. Implicitly at least, Jews realize that they need to use their media power to make these messages into psychological reflexes so that all White people, including especially respectable, well-educated White people, will feel shame and guilt for even thinking politically incorrect thoughts. In this, of course, they have been incredibly successful. We never see the end of guilt-ridden, self-flaggelating, ethnomasochistic Whites who look up to the New York Times for moral enlightenment. (Here’s a NYTimes “news article” from yesterday intended to induce guilt for opposing massive non-White immigration to Greece: “Greek Far Right Hangs a Target on Immigrants.” Wall-to-wall. 24/7. It’s a long story why Whites are so susceptible to such manipulations.  But yes, it matters who runs the media. This is a short list of  things that could possibly challenge the dominance of the current system:

  • Victory by a European nationalist party, such as Greece’s Golden Dawn (the focus of the NYTimes article), Hungary’s Jobbik, or France’s National Front. If one European country manages to have a nationalist revolution and manages to withstand the severe pressures that would be immediately arrayed against it, there would be a transformative effect on the rest of the White world.
  • The effect on the rest of the White world will be especially powerful as the costs of multiculturalism inexorably rise throughout the West and Western economies suffer from the effects of our predatory financial elite. There is a palpable anger in White America and throughout the White diaspora. It is unfocused or maladaptively focused (e.g., Christian Zionism). And it is without effective leadership. But it is a powerful force waiting to be harnessed.
  • The rise of new media, able to avoid the stifling conformity to the culture of Western suicide being preached by the mainstream media throughout the West. Our word is getting out, even though it is to a relatively tiny audience, many of whom are already converted. If our media becomes obviously influential and a threat to the current regime, there will be powerful attempts to destroy it.
  • But those on our side are increasingly intellectually confident and possessed of an intense moral fervor about the legitimacy of our cause. In the long run, such people are the worst enemies of the current zeitgeist. As recent research on opinion change shows, a small, confident, morally self-assured minority can dramatically alter the opinions of the majority. This has been the secret of Jewish success in influencing the culture of the West. But the ugliness of Israel and the towering hypocrisy of American Jews on everything related to Israel are pretty much impossible to hide at this point. The emperor clearly has no clothes.

Manny Friedman may be the Moritz Goldstein of 21st-century America.  A century ago, Goldstein, a Zionist intellectual, famously commented that Jews should contemplate the implications of the fact that the German cultural heritage was now largely in Jewish hands. As recounted in Chapter 8 of Separation and Its Discontents (p. 250), the reaction was self-deception (or lying):

The unexpected frankness with which a Jew who eschewed self-delusion thus broke a taboo which otherwise had only been violated by anti-Semites with malicious tendencies, illuminated with lightning clarity the prevailing socio-political tensions. And perhaps more illuminating was the embittered reaction of most of the Jewish participants . . . who repudiated the thesis as such, declared the ventilation of the question to be improper, and tried with all their might to efface the divisions thus exposed. (Gershom Scholem. On the social psychology of the Jews in Germany: 1900–1933. In Jews and Germans from 1860 to 1933: The Problematic Symbiosis, ed. D. Bronsen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag. 1979, 30.)

Goldstein was a Zionist, and his essay was greeted with hostility by liberal Jewish organizations who assailed the “excessive nationalism” and “racial semitism” of the Zionists (see Field 1981, 248). As Field (1981, 248) points out, another aspect of Jewish self-deception revealed by this incident was that these liberal Jewish critics never confronted the central problem raised by Goldstein when he noted that anti-Semites such as Houston Stewart Chamberlain were “the best spirits, clever, truth-loving men who, however, as soon as they speak of Jews, fall into a blind, almost rabid hatred.” The credibility of the anti-Semites, not Moritz Goldstein, was the fundamental problem for German Jews.

Indeed,. The best spirits, clever, truth-loving men. With credibility. It ain’t over ’til it’s over.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

298 Comments to "Manny Friedman: Jews “own a whole freaking country”; and yes, that includes the media"

  1. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    July 28, 2012 - 8:13 pm | Permalink

    Jews are made up of two primary branches.

    Ashkenaz (Turko-Mongrel-Huns) and Esau (Mixed race now including Mediterranean and Arab genetics)

    The only reason “Jews” are said to be white is because many of the Ashkenaz have been inbreeding with whites for the last 400 years which taints these studies conclusions. On the Esau side, because Esau was the older brother of Jacob (Whites), they have some white genetics which also confuses the findings. This is why Arabs look much like “Jews” and whites; Arabs being of Ishmael who’s the half brother of Esau and Jacob’s father Isaac.

    Esau Jews, otherwise known as Sephardic- have for the last 2000 years been intermixing just like the Esau Jews have been mixing with the non Semitic Ashkenaz beginning about 800 AD.

    All of these reasons show that most of these “scientific” genetic studies are almost meaningless today when trying to construct proof as to who was related to who thousands of years ago . These studies are not taking samples from homogeneous peoples (like for example whites in Sweden)- they are taking samples from modern day Ashkenaz, many of whom now look white and have some Esau and thus Arab in them. It is a situation that allows these so called Jews to make almost any claim they want.

    Look as the Esau “Jews” (Sephardic). These Jews love to make “scientific” genetic studies and then claim they are indeed Israel/Judah because they share some genes with the Arabs from the area who they have been living next to for 2000 years intermixing with. This is not proof of being Israel-Judah. Far from it!

    This is not science! One needs a control sample from an untainted original source to make the scientific claims such as the “Jews” like to claim conserning their “right” to Palistine.

    On the other hand, when scientists took a genetic sample of King Tut and showed that he was a 80% match to the British peoples and a 50% match to the Germanic peoples- this had scientific and even biblical relevance.

    Many people have lived in and occupied the land of Palestine. I would not be trying to make determinations of who has rights to the ME land base on these studies unless they actually have an ancient genetic control sample. The only way the “Jews” can rightly make a genetic claim to the land of Palestine or Israel is if they can show a match between a control sample from the body of Jacob or one of the 12/13 tribes that made up the united Kingdom long ago. So far, the only ones that have any scientific genetic evidence to back up this claim are western European peoples by way of King Tut’s genetics; this because the mixed multitude of Egyptians with the Israelites were the ones who were separated into making those 12/13 tribes; something neither the Ashkenaz or Esau “Jews” can claim.

  2. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 26, 2012 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Yes, and Semites are Caucasians, generally, whether they are Jews or Arabs, or from some other ancient tribe of Semitic origin. The Ashkenazis, specifically, are a mixed breed of both Semitic and European origins, as attested by modern DNA analysis. Many such Jews, however, do not consider themselves Whites– which they delimit, racially, to gentiles of purely European extraction (except, to some, the Iberians, whom they oddly consider to be “of color”– while nonetheless considering swarthy Sicilians and Cretans to be Whites!?!). Some explicitly state that they do not consider themselves to be Whites, even though they are seemingly as white as I am. Regardless, it is wholly safe to say that, when the late Susan Sontag, forty-five years ago already, wrote that “[t]he white race is the cancer of human history,” she was in no way making a confession, holy or otherwise, nor intending to implicate her own ilk in that calumny, whether or not the Jews are considered to be a race, a people, or some other such collective designation!

  3. Edward's Gravatar Edward
    July 26, 2012 - 8:25 pm | Permalink

    @Mimir’s Well:
    JAMS – JEWISH AMERICAN MANDARINS

  4. Duane's Gravatar Duane
    July 26, 2012 - 7:10 am | Permalink

    anti-GENTILISM is the problem. There is NO-SUCH-THING as “antisemitism”. There is only the natural reaction of normal People to antiGENTILISM, which Jews CALL “antisemitism”. Humanity did not sit around the campfire and just DECIDE to hate Jews, before they even knew what a Jew was, and then wait thousands of years for Jews to appear, so Humanity could pick on them for absolutely no reason. Jews codified hatred of all NON-Jews in their belief system, and then went on to EARN the animosity of the “GOYIM”. JEWS are the cause of mythical “antisemitism”

  5. Duane's Gravatar Duane
    July 26, 2012 - 7:07 am | Permalink

    Remember “MASTERBLASTER” from “Beyond Thunderdome”? THAT is the Israeli/USA relationship. Israel openly brags in their “bible” about doing the exact same thing to Egypt (Joseph) and Babylon (Esther). It is their parasitic behavior. Pick out a huge power, attach yourself to it and squeeze all NON-Tribal Members out of authority through TV”SURVIVOR” tactics. They BRAG about …. read the bible, don’t WAVE it.

  6. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    July 26, 2012 - 5:46 am | Permalink

    I will not disagree on your basic premise that Jews control the main stream media, but I have to say I find it a bit odd that you refer to Jew an “non-white”. The vast majority of Jew are Caucasians

  7. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 24, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    No wonder they don’t like the New Testament
    John 8 44-45

  8. jamesm's Gravatar jamesm
    July 22, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    @fender: I hate to say it but this is the system you’ve allowed them to build, when it was the blacks under attack, you laughed, when they outsourced the jobs you said nothing, it wasn’t your job, when they built all of those prisons, white cops happily filled them with blacks, when they started all of those wars in the 3rd world, you cheerfully shouted ” kill ‘em all”. Now that you’ve helped them to subdue the rest of the planet, they are turning their attentions to you. Why do you think all the immigrants are seeking out the traditionally white countries, because they stole all the money hiding behind your weapons of war. Racism is your Achilles heel, and it is why you will loose to them, they are much better at hatred than you are, it is not only a family value, but a religious commandment to them…………..Get right white people, your natural allies are the Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, and Asians, we know the enemy, and we know that it is not you, but you continue on calling people niggers, and spic, and chinks, antagonizing us and bringing the rest of the world harm, cheerfully, and they laugh at you, because we are all Goyim to them…..The best you can hope for is to be house niggers to them because you resemble them the most, but you will only be as beasts on two legs so that they won’t have to be served by donkeys. Fix this, only you can, but so far your Achilles heel is exposed, and they play on it like a fiddle. ……Peace, blessings and education, from a fellow American, a black one

  9. Annabelle's Gravatar Annabelle
    July 20, 2012 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    In ancient times for hundreds of years there were stories about Jews making a pact with the devil.

    I have personally seen a rabbi and a Jewish woman for one brief split second turn into something that was not human.

    I know the secret of the Jews, it is the other that lives within every Jew.

  10. Lindsay Ross's Gravatar Lindsay Ross
    July 18, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    excellent article

  11. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 18, 2012 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    @Anon:

    Yes, it’d be much more accurate to say that Jews have strangled a whole freakin country. “Control” implies leadership, but the jews aren’t leaders, they’re executioners. That’s the role they play in history: the executioners of nations.

  12. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 18, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:

    If he gets out of his present predicament– a big if!– Mr. Zimmerman would have plenty of potential legal targets, including the New Black Panther Party and NBC News (although, I do seem to recall that “Today” is actually produced by NBC’s entertainment division, not by NBC News itself!?!). As for “false light” as a fertile legal ground for a tort claim, there are two issues: (a) Was George Zimmerman already a public figure when that notorious story ran on “Today”?; and, (b) Was the edited tape a “false light” upon a true fact [sic], or essentially a lie per se, by its redacting the question to which Zimmerman’s statement (“He looks black…”) was actually a reply, unbeknownst to NBC’s viewership? I think that editing job would more properly be seen as a defamation of George Zimmerman, per se, whether or not he was viewed, at that point, as a public figure; but, I would want to research the case law on that exact issue, before giving any such opinion as a quasi-legal one, on my part. If Zimmerman does escape the lynch mobsters, I would certainly expect him to sue NBC (which is now a part of Comcast), and related parties; and, I would expect them to settle with him, out of court, to avoid a potentially huge punitive-damage award. Che sara, sara!

  13. GoodAmerican's Gravatar GoodAmerican
    July 18, 2012 - 2:30 pm | Permalink

    @Anon:

    Yep, and they are the ones dismantling it all, with impunity.

    Peace

  14. July 18, 2012 - 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Was it “Jews” who drafted the Articles of Confederation, the U.S. Constitution, or wrote the Declaration of Independence? I think not. Was it “Jews” who created the most successful country on the face of the Earth, from at least 1776 to 1913? I think not. Therefore, since it wasn’t “Jews” who accomplished these great cultural feats, DO NOT TALK of “Jewish “supremacy”.

  15. Bohemianh's Gravatar Bohemianh
    July 18, 2012 - 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Good work! thumbs up!

  16. GoodAmerican's Gravatar GoodAmerican
    July 18, 2012 - 12:57 pm | Permalink

    @Doug:
    I second that condemnation.

    Peace

  17. GoodAmerican's Gravatar GoodAmerican
    July 18, 2012 - 12:47 pm | Permalink

    “Jews use their control to influence (which includes being able to lie at will) many other aspects of culture in ways that are not in the interests of non-Jews”…. This is lovingly known to them as “Social Engineering”
    Peace, truth, justice, freedom and prosperity for US all, in-spite of those who would have it otherwise.

  18. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    July 18, 2012 - 12:36 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: The Jews don’t want to call attention to any irrefutable accounts of their plunder, pillage and privilege.

  19. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 18, 2012 - 10:39 am | Permalink

    @Luke:
    Good points, Luke. Like you, I hope for the best and prepare for the worst. The prepper community is all implicitly white and we all know who and what they fear. We should be reaching out to them. We need allies and numbers.

  20. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 18, 2012 - 10:21 am | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: Being a wee bit of a ‘prepper’ minded sort of guy, I find that I am constantly thinking about such questions as ‘where am I vulnerable, where am I exposed’ in case the long predicted SHTF and CW2 or complete collapse of the nation does occur.

    Electronic gadgets appear to me to be a weak spot, and the more we are addicted to them or the more we rely upon them – the more painful it will be if we lose the ability to use them.

    Here is an example: Has anyone considered what life would be like if we could no longer find batteries for our wristwatches? Remember those older wind-up, mechanical watches? Wouldn’t it be a good idea to have a couple of those around, as backups? Or, lately, I’ve seen some really affordable Solar watches at the local stores – no batteries to replace, simply leave it in the window sill and let the sun keep it charged up. People today take ‘time’ for granted, but as you can see – without preparation, we could find ourselves unable to know the exact time of day or night – and this could have negative consequences for our survival.

    So, my advice is for everyone to try not to get addicted to every new electronic toy or gadget that hits the market. Try to think of ways to reduce your dependency on electronics to a bare minimum.

    Starting with that TV, which is your worst enemy. Especially if you have kids in house.

  21. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 18, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Thank you very much. And yes, I understand that much of the justification for this treaty on genocide may be faulty in a philosophic sense, along with much of our thinking on the law in general, but my main concern is, given that this is in fact the law that we live under, is this the right way to view it (in terms of how it might be enforced, assuming the right conditions).

    It sounds like describing what is happening to White countries could rightly be described, in a legal sense, given the existing laws, as genocide. I think this takes a while to sink in for most people, even pro-Whites. While I obviously don’t expect the UN to ride in to our rescue, I believe it provides an excellent talking point, and gives us a certain moral and legal high ground. It also tends to throw the other side for a loop.

    It is also a way to frame the issue so that Whites realize just how massive and corrupt this program of genocide is, and that calling it that is not hyperbole.

  22. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 18, 2012 - 9:28 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: I am also a lawyer though I don’t practice right now as I am home with my children. Do you think that GZ has a cause of action against NBC for invasion of privacy under the “false light” theory based on their tampering with the 911 tape?

  23. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 18, 2012 - 9:05 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    [For the record, Jason, I was a lawyer, for many years; but, I have been a non-lawyer, now, for almost as many years (i.e., I chose to quit the Bar, altogether, long ago).]

    The Law of Genocide, as your own quoted passage shows, assumes race to be real, not a meaningless social construct; although, genocide still would be a meaningful concept, otherwise, were race universally abjured as such. That is, “a people” still could be readily defined, absent the term or, even, absent the entire concept of race, in the broader genetic sense, per se.

    I am personally down on the entire notion of human rights, because it implies, and applies, a universalism that I believe to be simply a myth. I do not believe in Natural Law, nor God-given law, nor any such thing. I believe that the law is simply a human invention, and is circumscribed by the bounds of the group membership in which any given law, or set of laws, or particular construct of laws, is agreed upon by any specific group, in keeping with its own particular values and extant legal system. That said, I am down on genocide, too!

    It seems undeniable, to me, that the project of turning all European-derived nation-states into multi-racial, multi-lingual, and multicultural “universalist” entities meets both the legal and common-sense understandings of an act, or program, of genocide, as that concept has been recognized, for decades now, under international law.

    In fact, I believe that programs of mass immigration, whether formal (e.g., our own statutory and regulatory immigration laws) or informal (e.g., the de facto invasion of the United States by illegal aliens from the Third World, especially from Latin America, and, most especially, from Mexico), are, by definition, a form of genocide, in that mass immigration, as a matter of course, destroys the ethnic and cultural unity of a genuine nation-state (i.e., a state defined by its people, rather than merely by its government). So, as with genocide itself, I also am down on mass immigration, per se– both here and there, and both now and then, wherever “there” and whenever “then” may be!

  24. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 18, 2012 - 7:37 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    D.K., I believe you are a lawyer? I am curious if you have any familiarity with the concept of genocide under international law. As you may know, a point that Bob Whitaker and others have made, is that the very term genocide implies the existence of races. The term was created in the 1940s and specifically means the killing of a race (or group of people). If someone says race doesn’t exist, they are saying genocide is impossible.

    A second point is that what constitutes genocide is truly broad and subjective. The UN Treaty on Genocide 1948, refers to “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. This seems open to a lot of interpretation. One of the acts that constitutes genocide is, “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part”. Again, that seems open to a lot of interpretation.

    Lemkin, who created the term genocide and helped draft the law, wrote the following:

    Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups

    The upshot of all this is, of course, is could we consider, from a legal standpoint, that what is happening to White countries, only White countries and virtually every White country, a form of genocide? That is, if there are coordinated efforts by groups to bring about the things Lemkin mentioned, such as the destruction of the essential foundations of national life and the disintegration of language and cultural groups, national feelings and religion in a targeted manner, wouldn’t this put those doing it, if we take the law seriously, in danger of being guilty of genocide?

    To make it more objective, if this UN Treaty on Genocide was in effect, and we saw almost every African country being subjected to mass non-African immigration so that there would be no majority African countries in 50 years, along with coordinated attempts to weaken all their nations and cultures, destroy their religious traditions, and take away the sovereignty of black Africans specifically, couldn’t that be called genocide?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Genocide_as_a_crime

  25. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 18, 2012 - 2:16 am | Permalink

    @TyronRobertParsons:
    If you allow me to show my “Marxist-hypocritical-pharisaical-Jewish-legalistic” attitude once again, I would like to point to the fact that your deliberatedly misspelled behavier is to be sure correctly spelled in American English as behavior, but in British English ( and therefore also in Canadian and Australian English ) as BEHAVIOUR.
    It is my “pharisaical” nature that impells me to state this fact.

    May the non-existent, impotent “Lord” Jahweh, who sitteth on his throne on a cloud in the sky, high above the circle ( “chug” ) of the flat earth, bless you!

  26. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    One is no longer allowed to be better. Kids turn out well or in jail by luck, people have decent lives by luck, who are we to discriminate and make judgements? It is roughly akin to the white privilege augment.
    Before you know it there will be demands to have pet companions covered by insurance because these idiots love their pets as much as I love my children. who am I to tell them who to love? Any glance at facebook shows women who talk about their pets as their children, and refer to themselves as Mom. I am a pet lover, always have been, but this is really sick.

  27. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    What we are watching happen before our eyes is the normalization of pedophilia. It is following them same trajectory as homosexuality. Slow and steady, under the radar, only a retrograde old Christian would object. This is also the flip side of working mothers. There are limits in the hours in the day, and if you work all day, and ask your kids to make sacrifices for your job, then who wants to be mean and actually discipline a child. For the record, I object to the promotion and normalization of homosexuality. What people do in private is not something I am interested in. When they demand the right to guide my children, that is a different story.

  28. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 17, 2012 - 9:51 pm | Permalink

    Moscow received a lot of flak from the European Court for Human Rights for banning gay pride parades for the next 100 years. Although I’m not anti-gay myself I clearly see that homosexuals are used by pawns for marxists and anti-Whites. Unfortunately most gays just aren’t smart enough to see that; White homosexuals would in no way benefit from multiracial communities. Non-White gays would beat and attack White gays simply because of their skin color. Race is the ultimate dividing line in societies.

  29. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 17, 2012 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    What a disturbing story, I am shocked by the nonchalant attitude many parents display toward the sexualization of their own children. Of course, a lot of good parents are outraged by it. It used to be that the edgier people in society took their cues from their social betters (yes I said “betters”), but nowadays, a subset of “single moms” and other marginal parents seem to think it is almost “cool” when their little girls start acting like demanding divas, and dress like MTV strumpets. They cannot see the bad consequences for their daughter’s lives – or they assume Uncle Sam will always be there to bail them out.

    The PC, anti-White and anti-normal agenda of children’s books today comes as close to evil as anything I can think of. To encourage children to think that the gay guy down the street is really cool, is so dangerous and so irresponsible that in a better society there would be congressional investigations.

  30. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 9:17 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    If you are not familiar with books for kids ( I cannot call it literature) you would clearly see how subtle and early the brainwashing begins. For at least the last fifteen years most books for kids have a sub-text which promotes homosexuality. It is often a neighbor who is gay but is so much cooler and more understanding than your parents. This is never mentioned in the review or book cover. I sometimes fear we are going to have to become like the Amish or Mennonites and automatically distrust anything produced by popular culture. Here is a nice new horror:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2174651/Girls-young-SIX-want-sexy-shocking-study-finds.html

  31. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 17, 2012 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    The Harry Potter books and movies do have anti-racist and other Politically Correct subtext. However, most likely anything that was offered to them would have all that anyway, so if they have other things of value, that is worth noting.

  32. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    July 17, 2012 - 8:45 pm | Permalink

    @ Everyone

    Now just try and tell me Franklin Ryckaert isn’t showing his typical panzy- tight as- Pharisaical Jewish side as he desires to “correct everyone’s spelling mistakes” and believe it or not, he does this so everyone might measure up to his lofty intellectual perch- the one that exists only in his puffed up mind.
    Only hypocritical Jewish legalistic behavior trumpets such preposterous notions as Franklin Ryckaert does here again.
    If you choose to remain silent on Franklin’s obvious Jewish tendencies, I do understand, but as a White European man I believe it my duty to expose his Marxist Jew behavier and this by intentionally spelling behavior incorrectly so I might illustrate the point concerning truth and implied content trumping silly spelling errors such as Franklin himself is guilty of constantly.

  33. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 7:11 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:
    I confess to having mixed feelings about the Harry Potter books. I certainly agree that they promote multiculturalism, but they have led so many boys to enjoy reading that I am inclined to cut them some slack.

    Your larger point, of course, is right. There is certainly no white identity in the book. It is curious to me that experts on children’s books will all agree that children must have characters with which they can identify – see their own people in a good and noble light, except for white children, who must learn to see all others in that light. The self-contradiction in their positions cannot be sustained much longer.

  34. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    July 17, 2012 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    “If a white kid picks up any popular book these day, what are the chances he will find a character to identify with?”

    I figure the most popular young adult/children’s books these days are the Harry Potter novels. And it’s been that way for a decade.

    I think they have sold hundreds of millions of copies, breaking different kinds of records.

    (That’s not even including the amazingly successful Harry Potter movies.)

    The stories are very much anti “racism” and pro-multiculturalism/pro-feminism, etc.

  35. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 3:49 pm | Permalink

    @henry baxley:
    It is not quite as bad as that. We rarely risk our lives by speaking out, simply our comfort. But, it is bad and getting worse. To some extent I expect to spend the rest of my life telling people that we do not have to put up with this stuff. It was possible to live a better and freer life in the past and we can do it again. We just have to get off our duffs and demand it. All of the forces arrayed against us do it with smoke and mirrors.

  36. henry baxley's Gravatar henry baxley
    July 17, 2012 - 3:20 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Yes and as Henry Baxley said, if I controll your information, I don’t need a gun.
    This is why the US doesn’t have “spring” like the Arabs. Thus proving they have more freedom than we do, sure we can protest and say anything as long as its PC

  37. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    I am probably the least technologically adept person on this site. However, I have heard that when you connect to Amazon to download a book, they can delete a book. A hard copy is always a good idea.

    http://www.legalzoom.com/intellectual-property-rights/copyrights/can-amazon-legally-delete-books

  38. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 17, 2012 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Does anyone know if the Kindle could be wiped in a crackdown? I wonder if I should start collecting paper copies of my favorite nationalist books.

  39. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 10:57 am | Permalink

    @Luke:
    Indeed, as Ray Bradbury said “You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.” Our opponents seem to be doing a very good job of this. If a white kid picks up any popular book these day, what are the chances he will find a character to identify with? A good exception is The Hunger Games, it may open a few minds.

  40. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 17, 2012 - 10:06 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Here’s another little secret from my years as a kid, growing up in the rural South. I had a make-shift tree house, which was really only a few boards that I’d hauled up the tree and the nailed across a fork in the tree to make myself a stable, solid seat to sit on. I also lugged a gallon plastic jug up there that I kept full of water and had it tied to a branch. On occasions when I had my ‘chores’ caught up, and being adept even at that young age of the concept of ‘out of sight means out of mind’, I’d sneak out of the house and scurry up to the top of that tree and take my place at my seat and pull out my paperback and bury myself in my reading.

    Since I was pretty well hidden by all the leaves and foliage, my Mom – who was a very good approximation of Tom Sawyer’s Aunt Polly, wouldn’t catch me appearing to be idle and dream up another list of chores to fill in my ‘free time’.

    When I think back and remember those experiences, and realize that I used to go to extraordinary lengths to ‘sneak around’ so I could spend time with my books and then compare that to today’s kids, sneaking around to smoke dope or get involved in promiscuity, I always give myself a good laugh.

    Times sure were simpler and more innocent in those days, and I hope that Whites can one day return to them.

  41. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 17, 2012 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    As kid, I remember how I never felt fully dressed – unless I had my paperback book stuffed into my back pocket.

    I knew there was something I liked about you, even when we disagree. I am grateful to Trenchant for all the wonderful links he provides, but I, too, prefer books. I have come to see our role as akin to the monasteries, where knowledge and the classics were preserved. I have taken to haunting used book stores and thrift shops to buy nearly any book written before 1950, the earlier the better, before they disappear. There is real danger in relying on cyberspace where texts can be altered without trace.

  42. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 17, 2012 - 9:13 am | Permalink

    @Richard: Yes thank you I did mean the Jews.

  43. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 17, 2012 - 7:42 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I can’t speak for everyone, but I have NEVER had any desire to buy or read a book online or on my computer, or on any electronic device like a Kindle. The glare from the screen and the strain it puts on your eyeballs is simply too uncomfortable, and I doubt that it’s healthy over the long term.

    Hence, I prefer to purchase a copy of the actual book and read it the old fashioned way. Plus, the convenience of being able to tote the book around wherever you may go, where you might have a few minutes of free time and be able to squeeze in some reading – really makes it worthwhile to ‘own’ your personal copy of a book.

    As kid, I remember how I never felt fully dressed – unless I had my paperback book stuffed into my back pocket. Too bad today’s kids seldom read – and instead are addicted to the one-eyed, hostile enemy controlled monster.

    Note to ourselves: When we get our White Ethnostate established, even with our people in full control of our news and entertainment media – we need to consider a return to the old days of allowing no more than 3 TV networks and it wouldn’t be a bad idea to make them sign off at 1am each day. This would help ensure that only the highest quality, pro-white, healthy programming was aired – and it would help reduce this unhealthy addiction so many of our people have with watching TV 24/7 and perhaps stimulate their interest in reading books again.

  44. Csaba's Gravatar Csaba
    July 17, 2012 - 6:40 am | Permalink

    A good article, but unfortunately the suggestion at the end about “challenge the dominance of the current system” is naive enough. Hungary’s Jobbik is part of an old dialectic tactic. The natural feelings against Jewish domonance are canalised by the Jewis elite. The Jobbik has several important leaders with jewish origin. Recently was forced to “coming out” a representative of the party in the European Parlament, Szegedi Csanad. He “learned from the news”, that his maternal grandmother is a survivor of Auschwitz and his maternal grandfather was an orthodox Jew too… Szegedi not long ago was bidding for the leadership of his party and the party officials defended him after the unmasking. Jobbik went to parlament on the artficially fabricated wawe of popularity its ather Member of Europen Parlament, Morvai Krisztina. She is probably Jewish, had two Jewish husbands, has Jewish Children, and befor her patriotic turn was a well known liberal lawier. Her sudden antisemitic awakening got a full-scale attack from Hungary’s Jewish press, which ensured her victory in the European Parlament election and the succcess of Jobbik in national election. If the Jewish elite against something, doesn’t advertise it by 24 hour attacs…
    The most fanios slogan of Morvai was: “We will take our country back!” Did you hear it in the US from someone else? The same Patriotic Lady-tipe from the same illuminati toolkit, except antisemitism, wich was applied specifically to Hungary.

  45. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    July 17, 2012 - 12:25 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Thanks for the clarification, Franklin.

    I think it’s great that you care about this site.

    (Also, I admire your honesty in admitting that you made up another screen name.)

    I guess my (relatively small) concern about your comment to “JustaWhiteMom” (here@Franklin Ryckaert:) is that it seemed like maybe you were singling her out for something that we all do.

    But now I see that you weren’t really doing that.

  46. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 16, 2012 - 10:55 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:
    TOO is supposed to be an intellectual website. The quality of its articles and most of its comments meet that standard. Alas, from time to time some commentators make egregious spelling mistakes. I think not only the contents but also the form of an intellectual website should be of high quality. From now on I will try to correct spelling mistakes when I see them, but of course I invite anyone to correct me if I make such mistakes myself!

    PS, I tried to do that a short time ago under the pseudonym of Spelling Prig but that caused such a storm of protest that I”ll henceforth do it under my own name.

  47. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 16, 2012 - 10:49 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:Those that view the free, “pirated” versions of The Culture of Critique and Separation and Its Discontents may never have ever intended purchasing the hardcopy versions of same. Opportunity losses are not real, nor legible.

  48. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 16, 2012 - 8:51 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    I explained “Fair Use” vis-a-vis copyrighted materials in one of my own earlier replies to Trenchant. The profit motive of a copyright infringer is only relevant as to the damages for which he would be held liable, not as to the breach per se. It is the right of a copyright holder to decide when and how to publish, or to refrain from publishing at all, his copyrighted work. If you cut out an article from the newspaper, and then mail that off to a friend, that is not a copyright violation, any more than lending him a book that you bought would be. If you photocopy that same story, however, and then mail those copies out to all of your business’ customers, that is a copyright violation, for you are essentially republishing the work without the copyright holder’s permission. The fact that most copyright breaches go unnoticed by their respective copyright holders, let alone unpunished, does not change the nature of those breaches; nor does a lack of profit motive, or actual profit to the breacher. (You may run a Ponzi scheme without making any money, not even to recover your own costs, by paying out to your older clients literally everything that you take in from your new clients; but, you are still guilty of committing a financial fraud! A wholly pointless one, but nonetheless….)

  49. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    July 16, 2012 - 6:26 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Hi Franklin

    I think pretty much everyone misspells words once in a while, even people with PhD’s.

    (I think “JustaWhiteMom” was referring to the Jews as hypocritical, not Luke. I’m mentioning that just in case you misunderstood her comment.)

  50. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 16, 2012 - 5:07 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    But you don’t need a PhD to spell correctly : hypocricy > hypocrisy.

  51. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 16, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: Thanks you’re a sweetheart. I don’t have a PhD like most on this site, but I know hypocricy when I see it.

  52. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 16, 2012 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    @tombarnes: I haven’t been following vdare for that long but I sense that their position on the JQ is hardening.

  53. tombarnes's Gravatar tombarnes
    July 16, 2012 - 11:30 am | Permalink

    Sailer has a posting that would apply here, about a David Brooks(a Tribal member in good standing) column in the NYT concerning the New Elite.

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/07/david-brooks-almost-goes-there.html

    Brooks would say it is the New Elite that lacks the noblesse oblige of the old elite. They do not have stewardship concerns since they cannot admit to themselves that they are the New Elite. They are concerned only about how to be successful and dare not admit they are now, the New Elite, for it would conflict with their image of an oppressed minority.

    I would say they grow up being told “The world hates you and wants to kill you” and then a few years later they are told,”You are superior to all.” No wonder these New Elites are are ‘brats’ as Brooks calls them. Psychologically, a very potent, energizing combination for anyone’s head, much less the most verbally adept, demographic cohort in the world.

  54. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 16, 2012 - 8:52 am | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: I think I just fell in love with JustaWhiteMom.

    Dang shame, she is already taken.

  55. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 16, 2012 - 8:33 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: What about the laws that govern ‘fair use’? And, when someone shares an article with a friend or acquaintance and is careful to provide the full link, along with giving credit to the author and including the copyright message-how is this any different than someone taking a pair of scissors, cutting an article out of a magazine or newspaper and sharing that with a friend or acquaintance?

    I seriously doubt that anyone could prove any criminal or profit-motive oriented attempt in such instances as I described. In fact, an argument could be made that both the author and the newspaper or website are both getting some benefit from such activities, since there is a monetary value associated with ‘publicity’ and ‘free advertising’. It serves to attract more readers, right?

  56. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    July 16, 2012 - 8:22 am | Permalink

    @Bilal: Allow me to issue a few common-sense and tactically based words of extreme caution with regards to this idea that White racial realists/White Nationalists should ally themselves with the Muslim world and then together do ‘battle with the jews’.

    Let’s be realistic and examine the present battlefield conditions, okay? The moral, eternal enemies of every White man, woman, and child – are today, at the present time, sitting astride what was once our nation and our ethnic homelands. The coup de tat has taken place, and now we see the jews busily working day and night to resurrect their beloved USSR and to impose a technologically updated and even more sinister and tyrannical Police State apparatus upon America than their ethnic ancestors managed to do to the old USSR. This a fact that cannot be denied or shunted aside, when Whites are sitting at our conference table and trying to brainstorm our defense strategy and when our leaders try to decide which are the most effective tactics that we should add to our battle plan.

    It is also a fact that, due to jewish power and jewish control of our mainstream media – those ‘Muslims’, i.e., those Arabs – who, on paper, might seem to share a common enemy with us and therefore might seem to be a useful ally -well, friends, these Muslims and Arabs have been effectively demonized and the idea has been successfully planted into the sponge-like brains of millions of Americans, and especially our embarrassingly gullible fellow White Americans that Muslims and anyone who is associated with them – are, in the words of successive jewish commissars serving as Homeland Security Honcho – ‘potential terrorists’ and ‘potential domestic enemies of the state’. Again, this is a fact of reality and it cannot be denied.

    Granted, this is simply the old classic jewish technique of assigning ‘Guilt by Association’, and those of us who are jew savvy – are sharp enough to recognize the technique when we see the enemy deploying it. But, this tactic, in this particular situation, and on this particular battlefield is very much like a deadly booby-trap that the enemy has laid in our path. Our enemy would like nothing better than to be able to lure White Nationalists into that booby-trap, and to snooker us into placing our foot into the jaws of that trap. Because, once the jewish commissar over at the DHS can hold up a scrap of ‘evidence’ that they say proves that White Nationalists and White race realists are alligned with, and in bed with, those ‘evil and heavily demonized Muslims’, then we have helped our enemy have their long sought after wet dream.

    The virulently anti-White, hostile aliens who have hijacked our nation have been watching the slow, but steady growth of White Nationalism and White racial awakening – and they are very apprehensive and fearful of it. Hence, I think it is a safe bet to make that our enemy desperately wants to find some way whereby they can criminalize White Nationalism and White racial activism. This is what I am convinced is driving the panicked and obsessive efforts of Joe Lieberman and his fellow jews at the ADL to find some way, some pretext, some filmsy excuse to censor and heavily regulate the Internet – they want to be able to classify websites like TOO, Stromfront, VNN, and even the milk-toast site AmRen – as being guilty of ‘domestic terrorism’. Or, accuse them of ‘inciting racial tensions’ or some of the other kooky phrases they’ve used in other White nations where they’ve been pushing these anti-free speech laws. So, with these concepts in our minds – it should be a fairly simple exercise in tactical thinking to see what a massively stupid idea it would be – at the present time and under the present battlefield conditions – to form any direct alliances with Muslims or Arab Nationalists.

    One other major negative that would go along with any such alliance is the question of immigration into White European nations. I have some serious reservations about the idea that Muslims who are currently inside our White native homelands are going to be all that interested in heading back to their own nations, at least not voluntarily. And, this poses a clear and unmistakable existential threat to the ability of White Europeans to maintain their unchallenged and unquestioned dominance over their historic homelands – since fast breeding Muslims would soon overwhelm and eventually outnumber the Whites, who tend to lose any breeding contest that they stupidly allow their race to be drawn into.

    My final words are words of extreme caution. These supposedly ‘White’ advocates who are banging a drum to try to work up ethusiasm for a White Nationalist-Muslim alliance could be simply naive and very poor battlefield tacticians. Or, they could be working for the enemy and trying to help lure our foot into this very dangerous booby-trap. Either way, this idea has far more short-term negative consequences associated with it than it has positive rewards. I strongly advise all thinking White Nationalists and White race realists to be very cautious towards, and suspicious of, those who push this deadly goblet of what very well could be filled with jewish hemlock.

  57. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 15, 2012 - 3:30 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    The Bible itself has been in the public domain since the advent of copyright law. The Gideons choose to give away copies for proselytizing purposes. If they decided to do likewise with one of Dr. MacDonald’s books, which they had reprinted themselves, rather than bought copies of, I seriously doubt that the good professor would sit idly by, and console himself with the fact that it was thereby reaching a larger audience than it otherwise might….

  58. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 15, 2012 - 6:38 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: Separation and Its Discontents is likewise open to predation, with a PDF floating around the ether. Flip side of the coin is the increase in eye-balling; the Gideons seem to be surviving, notwithstanding their hotel bedside-draw campaign.

  59. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 15, 2012 - 6:00 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    I certainly was not threatening to file suit. I merely was pointing out the state of the law. As I say, much, if not most, of what is posted on line is in obvious violation of copyright laws. People seem mostly oblivious to the fact that they are not, as a matter of law, free simply to repost articles, pictures, recordings and videos that they like, and that the fact that they are generally not directly profiting from doing so is not a defense to their doing so– although, it would doubtless mitigate the damages for which they were liable, if they ever were brought to the bar over their conduct. I doubt that either this site’s own host or his publisher is overly pleased that any of his several books is available to be downloaded for free, rather than bought through the stream of commerce, from which they derive their earnings from their hard work and risk-taking, respectively!?!

  60. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 15, 2012 - 12:31 am | Permalink

    @D. K.: Shocking and reproachable that it be, The Culture of Critique is available in its entirety via torrents or file-sharing. Mr. Meadows, in the scheme of things…

  61. nowswimback's Gravatar nowswimback
    July 14, 2012 - 11:44 pm | Permalink

    They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised.

    That is very much true and proof that they know that their intentions are malevolent, even if they manage to convince themselves otherwise. They wouldn’t be so sensitive about people knowing about their control the media for instance, unless they were up to no good.

  62. nowswimback's Gravatar nowswimback
    July 14, 2012 - 11:43 pm | Permalink

    “They themselves behave as if their success were a guilty secret, and they panic, and resort to accusations, as soon as the subject is raised. ”

    That is very much true and proof that even they know that their intentions are malevolent, even if they manage to convince themselves otherwise. They wouldn’t be so sensitive about people knowing that Jews control the media, for instance, unless they were up to no good.

  63. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 14, 2012 - 10:02 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    No, Trenchant, even “Fair Use” is limited to excerpts which, combined, do not provide the essence of the whole– i.e., samples or highlights. Using a work in its entirety, without permission, is a per se violation of the copyright– and, that is true even when the person thusly using it is essentially promoting the author’s work, with attribution, and receiving no recompense from anyone for doing so. Much, if not most, of what one finds on the Internet– including pictures and, of course, videos– is technically in violation of national and international copyright laws.

  64. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 14, 2012 - 8:16 pm | Permalink

    @Marcus: Just so. Those guys were merely having lovers’ spats with their dear old sugar daddies.

  65. JohnnyBGood's Gravatar JohnnyBGood
    July 14, 2012 - 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Testing – my posts keep disappearing.

  66. Doogy Hauser's Gravatar Doogy Hauser
    July 14, 2012 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    @Paul Hausser:

    There already is such a triple N network.

  67. Star Base 12's Gravatar Star Base 12
    July 14, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Caleb: “Szilard, Oppenheimer, Teller…hey, those are **Jewish**names!”

    I’ve wondered about those three surnames. Are the people who bear them always Jews?

  68. Thora's Gravatar Thora
    July 14, 2012 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Jews are white collared Gypsies. Gypsies are blue collared Jews. Both groups share the same essence, namely, a sardonic contempt of the golden rule. Jews and Gypsies do not treat others the way they want to be treated, hence their status as pariah in the lands they inhabit. It is really as simple as that; if one’s manners are unlikeable one is not liked.

  69. VonBluvens's Gravatar VonBluvens
    July 14, 2012 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    PH: “I have been saying for quite sometime that we need a three NNN news network.”

    There’s already a three NNN news site in the pro-white blogosphere.

  70. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    July 14, 2012 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I was hoping that the mass proliferation of download clients and other legal or illegal ways around directly paying the moguls would deflate their empire, but it seems that 3-D has revived the box office in a big way. A few years ago I remember reading that Oliver Stone and Sean Penn were risking a huge backlash with some of their comments but it never materialized.

  71. briton's Gravatar briton
    July 14, 2012 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Kevin MacDonald wrote: “Jewish organizations do everything in their power to prevent an honest discussion of Jewish power. And that is completely understandable. Do they really want to advertise to White America that Jews have had a preponderant role in making Whites a minority, in promoting the ideal of multiculturalism, in making America a client state of Israel, in the sexualization of culture and in legalizing and promoting pornography, in banning Christianity from the public square, in obliterating traditional American conservatism in the Republican Party, and in predatory financial practices that are destroying the American economy …?”

    Correct. When guys like Hannity and O’Reilly begin to understand that their hated liberalism is really Judaism in disguise, a few cracks may then begin to appear in the Jewish monolith. Till that time, we’ll all just be whistling Dixie. But that time may never come because mainstream conservatives (such as the buffoons on WND) believe in the virtual identity of Judaism and Christianity – when the two religions are in fact completely at odds with one another. Mainstream conservatives are certainly aware that many Jews are liberal in the most destructive sense. But they see the connection as purely accidental. The real problem for them lies in liberalism emanating from cultural Marxism – totally unaware of course of the essential Jewish connection. And so it goes.

  72. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 14, 2012 - 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Caleb’s vast expanse of falsehood and filth presents such a target-rich environment that it seems almost an injustice to its totality to focus on this or that bit of it. Still, why let an opportunity for setting things straight pass?

    As many here already know, the money Hollywood makes benefits the parasite’s host not at all! About 65 percent of it gets immediately distributed to the hostile elite that runs the place and to its employees, very few of whom are whites. The rest goes to Washington, DC, which they also own and which they run in part as an outlet for redirecting the taxes extorted from us into their own pockets.

    By way of example, let me trespass for a moment on Trenchant’s turf by posting a link to a comment that makes painfully clear that the people the government ought to be protecting us from are instead being subsidized to destroy us from within as well as from without.

  73. July 14, 2012 - 5:14 pm | Permalink

    We have no friends so it seems…
    http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/07/senate-including-rand-paul-vote-to.html
    Friday, July 13, 2012
    The Senate (Including Rand Paul) Vote to Extend $9 Billion in Loan Guarantees for the Benefit of Israel

  74. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 14, 2012 - 4:06 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Ping: Its great to hear that Jason. I am busy with two little ones but I am going to try to check in as often as I can!

  75. Jason Ping's Gravatar Jason Ping
    July 14, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    This is a magnificent analysis; perfect and concise.

  76. Jason Ping's Gravatar Jason Ping
    July 14, 2012 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Justawhitemom,
    I lOVE your posts! I hope that you stick around here because I really enjoy reading your posts.

  77. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 14, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb: Now that you have conceded the moral legitimacy of white nationalism, go tell your Jew friends that we may be old-fashioned, dentally challenged trailer trash but we’re not altogether immoral and perhaps we have a point about the white homeland thing. Maybe you all might want to rethink your genocidal anti-white policies lest we leave you to the tender mercies of your non-white pets when we sort out this mess you have created.

  78. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 14, 2012 - 2:42 pm | Permalink

    @Incitatus: Indeed, as things get worse, the media will appear ever more absurd in its attempts to paper over the disastrous effects of mass immigration. Whites will begin to whisper to each other about how incredible the media has become and the anti-whites will not be able to stop this without spying on the people and disappearing dissidents. I’d be willing to be that the Trayvon Martin affair has done a great deal to advance our cause.

  79. John's Gravatar John
    July 14, 2012 - 2:40 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb: I was going to invite you to leave you Jew troll but your presence here helps to demonstrate to newcomers what this site and its articles are all about; Jews lie and are not to be trusted. So y’all come back soon, y’hear? You make the statement that Jews”“write endlessly about the evils of Western Civilization” of which they in fact are a vital part.” Are you sure you didn’t mean “viral” instead of “vital” because that would have been a lot more accurate. Dr. McDonald authored a book that addresses this (read the article). But, this is how you Jews operate, make a totally unsubstantiated and incorrect statement and expect the unwashed masses’ heads to be going up and down in agreement. Well, not. Fact is, Jews were too busy getting kicked out of every country in Europe at least once and usually more to make any contributions whatsoever to the scientific, artistic, cultural or intellectual development of what is demonstrably, the world’s greatest and most envied civilization. Jews did not write classical music, build all those magnificent cathedrals during the middle ages, paint with the old masters, invent anything noteworthy in Europe let alone in the entire history of the world and you have the audacity to come in here and try a stunt like this. Jews were so despised in England that the Edict of Expulsion kicked them out altogether from 1290 until Cromwell lifted it in 1656. What a coincidence, it was during this period that the large body of English common law and governance that so influenced the founding fathers here in the US was developed. Speaking of the founding fathers, there were no Jew signatories to the Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights and no Jews participated in the framing of the aforementioned documents. I could go on like this all day if I so desired but won’t. My main point is, if you’re going to make an idiotic and blanket statement about Jew’s contributions anywhere or at any time, you’d better be prepared to back it up with some facts. And don’t try cherry picking the historical record and trying to hold up the “good Jew’s” behavior as representative of all Jews as you did earlier. In case you haven’t figured it out yet, I’ll give you a hand; we’re wise to your tricks. @Caleb:

  80. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    July 14, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    “. . .To believe that Jews are biologically different from everyone else, it is necessary to pre-suppose they have hit on some trick to speed up evolution and do an end run around Mendelian genetics. Now, that’s ignorance. . .”

    From the jewish publication Forward:

    In the Book of Kings, Solomon is depicted as an international businessman of sorts who sent ships from the port of Etzion-Geber, near modern day Eilat, to trade precious metals and other goods with various parts of the world, including Africa. Solomon also famously received a visit from the Queen of Sheba, who is thought to be from what is presently Ethiopia.

    Now, a new scientific paper offers a genetic timeline that could support these biblical tales. The paper builds on two studies published last summer that were the first to use genome-wide analyses to trace the history of the Jewish people through DNA.

    It demonstrated that there was a biological basis for Jewishness,” said Dr. Harry Ostrer, director of the human genetics program at the New York University School of Medicine, who led one of the studies.

    http://forward.com/articles/140721/genes-tell-tale-of-jewish-ties-to-africa/

  81. Incitatus's Gravatar Incitatus
    July 14, 2012 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    “The other thing that I think will give us a little bit of momentum in the coming years is the inevitable decline of the United States. Right now we are still rich and powerful enough that…”

    JustaWhiteMom has a good point there. The sentiment or zeitgeist, if you will, will be completely different when we face even one half of the dire straits the poor people of the Weimar Republic did.

  82. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    July 14, 2012 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    “. . .devises state-of-the-art technology. . .”

    Invented by jews?

  83. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 14, 2012 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Poor Caleb. Once again Pierre de Craon has shown how important his contribution is to this site. Many have replied to Calab, with sound arguments but only Pierre gets under his skin. Really makes you crazy when one of us shows any verbal dexterity, doesn’t it Caleb? Combined with an excellent mind, ample experience with the Tribe and unapologetic devotion to the Cross, Pierre demonstrates the best way to fight them. Reduces them in no time to bathroom blather and claims that the money Hollywood brings into the country justifies spreading filth to the world. Bravo Pierre!

  84. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 14, 2012 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    ‘Hollywood’s products may not appeal to everyone”

    Least of all anyone with taste.

    “but it is an exemplary business model. ”

    A typical statement from the judaic, pants-peddling mindset: make mass-produced junk for the mob to lap up. “We make crap, but our crap makes money.” The complete antithesis of every legitimate artistic endeavor. Now do you understand why Wagner hated your tribe and its effect on Germany?

    When the N*zis took power and kicked the Jews out of their mansions they noticed something peculiar: a lot of rich Jewish artists had filled their homes with great works from European artists. Their trick was to make crap art that appealed to the basest of Germans, get rich from it, and then buy the works of the masters and surround themselves with them. Beautiful. Just beautiful.

  85. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 14, 2012 - 11:18 am | Permalink

    Snow White, I will answer your questions [Moms come in all colors, all wanting the same for their children].

    If you want to exclude yourself from mainstream America, retreating a la Branch Davidians or the Aryan Nation to some whites-only “reservation” in the badlands of Idaho or the Arizona desert, I wouldn’t stop you. But the next voice you hear will be speaking Mandarin Chinese, telling the local sheriff to evict you from the Territory of New Tien Shan.

    At that point you can, using the laughable armaments you will doubtless have stockpiled, offer resistance and be slaughtered or you can take the place in modern society that always goes to the uneducated and ignorant. Or you can leave the USA for some other place in which to set up your “reservation” but it’s not 1846 any more. Empty land has gotten scarce.

    To believe that Jews are biologically different from everyone else, it is necessary to pre-suppose they have hit on some trick to speed up evolution and do an end run around Mendelian genetics. Now, that’s ignorance.

  86. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 14, 2012 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    @Caleb: I don’t know what the hell you mean by “pseudo-scientific racial theories but such wacko notions like politics being ‘in the blood.'”

    I have never said that politics is “in the blood.” However, I will say that it is very clear from the twin studies that many behavioral characteristics are subject to genetic influence. You just call it “pseudo-science” because (1) you don’t like it, and (2) you can’t disprove it. This is typical Jewish obfuscation.

    Nor do I know what you mean by the idea that “an ethnic group can speed up the evolution process a thousand times.” However, I will say that I suspect ethnocentrism is common among your kind after years in the Diaspora, because non-ethnocentric Jews would have been absorbed by the host Gentile socieities.

    Why don’t you stop making sarcastic, straw-man arguments and actually try to have a reasoned debate. Oh, I forgot, because you are a wily Jew who knows better than to live by the universalism and individualism that you foist on others.

  87. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 14, 2012 - 10:25 am | Permalink

    @Caleb: When you say WhiteOne, are you referring to me?

    My point is that the Steinlight ADMITS that Jews (1) are very powerful, and (2) have historically used that power to promote massive non-white immigration. He refers to whites who object to their own dispossession, or demographic transformation as you call it, as a “thoughtless mob.” If that is not ethnic hatred, I do not know what is. He makes very clear in his article that Jews should look out for themselves, saying “If we are not for ourselves, who will be.” Yet, whites who put their ethnic interests first are a “thoughtless mob.”

    Jews claim that “diversity is our strength” yet see no problem with massive Jewish domination of the media. When Jews dominate they say that is just the cream rising to the top. When whites succeed, that is “unearned white privilege.” The essence of K-Macs work is that you are a bunch of self-righteous hypocrites who are willing to sabotage an entire civilization to secure your own well-being, while using guilt to convince the heirs of that civilization that they deserve to be obliterated.

    The bottom line is this, Caleb. Jews have been instrumental in setting in motion demographic trends that will result in white extinction. To secure our existence, we will need an all-white homeland without paranoid Jews trying to holocaust-proof our society by subverting our identity and self-confidence. Do you deny that we need an all-white homeland in order to continue to exist? If you don’t but still oppose a white homeland, you are essentially advocating white genocide. Do you think it was racist for the United States to establish reservations for Native Americans to continue their heritage and culture? If not, why are white Americans not entitled to the same?

    If you do not answer any of the questions I have posed here, you should be banned because you are simply a troll who is not interested in good-faith dialogue.

  88. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 14, 2012 - 9:24 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    Caleb – you need to demonstrate your good will before I will put myself out in such a way. You need to demonstrate you are going to make an honest attempt to understand what I explain to you and then provide your response.
    You can do that by reading the few hundred word review of MacDonald’s work and providing your feedback to that.

    Why are you not doing this?

    OK…I know why you aren’t doing it. It’s because you are badly motivated and a troll. So then, we have to ask why I am bothering to interact with you? It’s because you are the sort of troll that serves our purposes. You are behaving in precisely the way that visitors to this site have already experienced Jewish behaviour to be.
    So don’t think anyone has to win a point with you Caleb…we want you here because just by your behaviour you are confirming and reinforcing what the problem is.

  89. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 14, 2012 - 7:45 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    I don’t see what the issue is here Caleb. The only purpose that would be served by my explaining KM’s position in my own words, would be if you already understood the position and wanted to test the extent I understood it.
    But you have already admitted you haven’t even read his position. In that situation the honest and right course of action is to seek to provide you with the best short and well written summary that I can. It’s exactly right to seek a piece of work that I consider better than I could do. That’s integrity in a situation like this, because it demonstrates I mean well. I mean for you to understand clearly and be in the best position possible to provide a clear criticism or feedback.

    Others here are suggesting you are badly motivated but I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. So…I provided a few hundred excellent summary of KM’s book. Much better than I could write it. I did this because you are not in a position to judge my personal grasp because you have no knowledge by your own admission.
    Now…can you please read the summary, and provide the feedback. What you have said so far is – and don’t take offense – stupid. You have argued that KM did not provide sources for his argument, presumably because it is not in the summary. But if you want the references you obviously need to read the book and get them there, and not expect to find them in a summary.

  90. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 14, 2012 - 6:18 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Mickey, do you really expect fair play from the most treacherous people on earth? Chances are that he will : 1) Ignore you totally, 2) Ridicule you ( “Jewish humour”! ), 3) Give an evasive answer, 4) Accuse you of “anti-Semitism”. Anything but an honest debate. He is no Gilad Atzmon ( one of the rare exceptions ).

  91. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 14, 2012 - 5:43 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    Caleb – did you read the review of MacDonald’s book, or not? You asked for it, but then don’t seem to have anything to say.

    I was very clear that the article in JPost was about ‘toxic people’. I merely pointed to the parallel in that the thrust of antisemitism was that Jews were a toxic peoples. Note the ‘s’ at the end of that sentence.
    I’ve provided you with a lot of knowledge that you explicitly asked for. I’m now waiting for your considered response. You asked what harmful Jewish behaviour I meant…and now you have your answer. What say you?

  92. Spelling Prig's Gravatar Spelling Prig
    July 14, 2012 - 4:08 am | Permalink

    @Jay Swift:
    pograms > pogroms

    The Russian word pogrom ( “mob attacks on Jews” ) comes from the verb gromit, meaning : to destroy, to wreak havoc, to demolish violently. The mistake to write it as pogram is fairly common, undoubtedly influenced by the word program.

    Another common mistake ( not yours ) I’d like to mention is ad nauseum instead of ad nauseam. Here there is less excuse for the mistake, since the English word is the same as in Latin : nausea.

  93. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 14, 2012 - 3:57 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    But they could just keep the process going here in the US and Europe. They get nothing extra monetarily by destroying us. In fact, they take a huge gamble. They could have continued to leech off an all White Europe and US for centuries.

    If you own a plantation, if you are smart, you don’t destroy it. You keep it running.

  94. Paul's Gravatar Paul
    July 14, 2012 - 3:26 am | Permalink

    The piece by “Manny Friedman” was originally published on the same website under the name Elad Nehorai, identified as a writer in Crown Heights, with a photo of the author. The same day the photo was removed and the name changed. You can see the original next to the replacement page on the rather lowbrow incogman.com website.

  95. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    July 14, 2012 - 3:12 am | Permalink

    If you are not talking about freedom, you are wasting time.

  96. Jay Swift's Gravatar Jay Swift
    July 14, 2012 - 1:13 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    They are none too smart. If they were smart, they might perceive their Samson Option as the single, most likely reason the entire State of Israel may one day be vaporized.

    Jews are forever bragging of Israel’s nuclear capability, and its willingness to use it. Therefore, if I were a head-of-state about to lock horns militarily with Israel, I would annihilate them, razing Israel to the ground, at the outset.

  97. Jay Swift's Gravatar Jay Swift
    July 14, 2012 - 1:00 am | Permalink

    @Jim:
    “Part of the key to jewish success is their confidence, their cockiness. This confidence eventually leads them to believe there will never be any more pograms against them, ….”

    Yet, the MAIN reason Jews have been so successful has never changed: organized criminal activity. The Jewish diaspora, if it is anything, is an international criminal syndicate. It always has been.

  98. Jay Swift's Gravatar Jay Swift
    July 14, 2012 - 12:53 am | Permalink

    @Fenria

    I do not believe the elitist Jews are at all concerned with the non-whites. Once their task is finished, so are they.

  99. Jason Ping's Gravatar Jason Ping
    July 14, 2012 - 12:00 am | Permalink

    What a fantastic thread. KM, I’m sure it’s been a very rough ride, but the truth will always vindicate. No way would white Christians have EVER approved feminism or abortion or gay marriage or massive third world immigration or affirmative action or any of the other nation wrecking movements forced on us by a very sick tribe of scumbags that we actually thought were our friends. Our mistake. it’s payback time now.

  100. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 13, 2012 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.: Under the rubric of Fair Use, surely.

  101. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 13, 2012 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    They get plenty of money from nation-wrecking. Through their economic scams they steal a nation’s wealth and then open the floodgates to the barbarans, at which point they jump ship. This is what they’ve done for the past 50 years in the US and Europe: wreck the economics and then open the immigration floodgates. Immigration- demographic and racial destruction- was their final move. Now they’re getting ready to head over to East Asia for new blood.

  102. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 13, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: By the way Caleb, what do you say about Israel rounding up African “infiltrators” and sending them back whence they came?

  103. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 13, 2012 - 9:13 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: If you read the article you will see that this Jew cares ONLY about whether changing demography is good for the Jews. All he cares about is how changing demography affects Jewish power. The sick thing is that he recognizes that these immigrants may turn against Jews because they may view Jews as the most privileged whites! He basically ADMITS that these third-world immigrants will envy whites and therefore be hostile to us, but he only cares insofar as Jews may be mistaken for whites. If that is not a psychopathic disregard for the welfare of MY INNOCENT WHITE CHILDREN, then I don’t know what is! That is why we can’t stand you. You took it upon yourselves to diversify our country and destroy our culture for YOUR benefit.

    You Jews claim that the Germans hated you because they were envious of your success. That’s fair enough, but then why do you not admit that blacks hate us for the same reason. Oh no white success can’t possibly be the result of our talent and character, it must be because we are oppressing the poor blacks and browns. When your Jewsmedia tells them this, they believe it. That is why blacks murder us at a rate of 1600 a year and rape our women by the tens of thousands. You tell the whole world that whites enjoy unfair “white privilege” but you Jews are just more fortunate because of your own ingenuity. Do you not see the outrageous hypocrisy of this?

  104. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 13, 2012 - 8:58 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb: If you don’t understand KM’s work, maybe you will understand the words of a fellow Jew. It is all right here in this article:

    http://www.cis.org/articles/2001/back1301.html

  105. Bilal's Gravatar Bilal
    July 13, 2012 - 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Interesting map of Zionist military and agricultural training camps in Germany 1936 ( kind of shakes up the whole official story )

    http://www.codoh.com/library/document/1676#ftn7

    I dont know if dr. macdonald has looked at the 1930s zionist activities in Hitlers germany.

  106. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    July 13, 2012 - 7:56 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: Never heard that about their brokering white Christians to Turkish masters. I do know there was a large community in Savannah, GA, which was a center of the slave trade in the ante-bellum South.

    When your “holy” books declare everyone else is an unter-mensch, then treating them as chattel is morally acceptable and inevitably follows.

  107. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Jason, Jason, you keep thinking like a white man. Yes, Jews are clever but never wise. You act as though they were only motivated by economic well being and good sense. These are not philosopher kings or benevolent dictators, they are an aggressive people, constantly elbowing for an advantage, driven by often ugly emotions like envy, resentment, hubris and greed. I am not at all sure they can help themselves. Remember that in Judaism hatred is a virtue. There is endless effort put in to nursing and maintaining that hatred, beginning in nursery school. Our real problem is that we are nearly incapable of understanding them – truly an alien people.

  108. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    That is precisely the point. This is a people who define themselves as in exile. They do not know what it is to love a country as we do. What they love is a country with lots of kind, generous people who can be manipulated for their own purposes.
    John Adams said “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” The Jews saw a contract that they could work with and we have been paying the price ever since.
    That is what they love about America.

  109. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 6:57 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Which just means, that they are not as super smart as we think. Gypsies do something similar, but in a lower rent fashion. They exploit, they cheat. Yes, they survive, but they are always in danger of a being expunged. What I’m challenging is the idea that Jews truly know what the hell they are doing, long term. Modern Jews at least (and more the Leftist ones) let their hatred of Whites and White culture overwhelm any rational judgement.

  110. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 6:52 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    I don’t see that there is money to be made in nation-wrecking. I believe they have done it, but I don’t see how it is advantageous to them, in real life. You don’t get any money from nation-wrecking, you get money by maintaining cash cows.

    It would have been in Jew’s self interest to maintain strong, healthy, wealthy White societies in America and Europe from what I can see. Yes, they might exploit them, but they need something alive to exploit.

  111. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 13, 2012 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    It also is patently illegal to reprint such an article, without the copyright holder’s consent– even if one cites the actual author, and the original source! F.Y.I.

  112. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 13, 2012 - 6:42 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    They’ve been doing this for centuries. If nation-wrecking harmed Jews then they would have died out long ago. Nation-wrecking only harms those who belong to the nation that was destroyed. The Jews simply abandon ship when things get bad and take their wealth to some other unlucky country.

  113. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Well that makes sense, but then I still say Jews are fools, and hurting their own children’s future by destroying the countries that are the source of their power. Although, if all you ever wanted to do was hang out in a tiny NYC apartment, maybe it’s hard to see what you are losing.

  114. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 13, 2012 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    “…antisemitism is the oldest hate…”
    Yes, but a justified hate against the oldest Mafia
    People don’t hate without a cause, they hate what harms them.
    You Jews see it as your sacred duty to harm the whole world, and then complain about “irrational” hatred. But you refuse to understand that the cause lies in your own criminal behaviour. As incurable psychopaths you cannot understand even the most elementary moral rule of not harming your neighbour. You are unfit for any form of coexistence. You do not want to coexist, you want to parasitize and then destroy. Small wonder you are hated everywhere.

  115. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 13, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    “Hate is an emotion not a philosophy and antisemitism is the oldest hate.”

    There it is, the shallow moralizing of the jew in all its semitic glory. “Stop hating us!” wails the jew, as he sends your children off to die in the dunes of Iraq while he pillages your economy and replaces your culture with his plastic Hollywood culture, mass-produced for easy consumption by the unthinking mob.

  116. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    July 13, 2012 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Jewish intellectual movements like Marxist and Freudian thought were widely accepted by whites, including a young Kevin MacDonald . There was no hatred, Jews’ assertions were accepted at face value. Funny how Jews keep coming up with these things that are not in their interests.

  117. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 5:40 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Once again, you think entirely too much of yourself. We don’t hate you. We simply don’t like you, your influence, or your entirely disproportionate power. You are rude, crude, and intrusive – why else are you here? You simply can’t stand the idea that anyone, anywhere, is not under your thumb, saying only what has been dictated by the chosen. Be gone.

  118. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    July 13, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink
  119. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Or Caleb….this piece in JPost about ‘toxic people’. I suppose we could say that the thrust of antisemitism is that, to european extracted societes, the Jewish have been a toxic peoples. I mean, look at us after a few decades of Jewish predominance. We are a nothing people…not even a people. We are soon to be dispossessed.
    It has worked out much worse than the antisemites feared. They only thought the Jewish wanted to dominate. Not even they realized we were to be totally dispossessed and destroyed.
    http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=277198

  120. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Or Caleb….this piece in JPost about ‘toxic people’. I suppose we could say that the thrust of antisemitism is that, to european extracted societes, the Jewish have been a toxic peoples. I mean, look at us after a few decades of Jewish predominance. We are a nothing people…not even a people. We are soon to be dispossessed.
    It has worked out much worse than the antisemites feared. They only thought the Jewish wanted to dominate. Not even they realized we were to be totally dispossessed and destroyed.

  121. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Sorry about that. I suppse I thought caleb has fewer excuses not to read it if he is provided with the text directly. Probably a bad idea on reflection.

  122. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink
  123. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 13, 2012 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Why not simply provide a link?

  124. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 3:56 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    Caleb – Sure ok. In fact I can do better…I paste a review of culture of critique that macdonald praised:

    “This is a great review of The Culture of Critique. It shows a deep understanding of the issues and arguments” – Kevin MacDonald

    The Culture of Critique reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck

    In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th century intellectual movements – largely established and led by Jews – have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.

    The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald’s massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.

    The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald’s most profound charge against Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty – that while claiming to be working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others.

    Celebrating Diversity
    Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.

    Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald’s view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.

    Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

    He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal of diluting a society’s homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept. Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for the country but because it is good for the Jews.

    Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate anyway. His reason? “I’d rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the Republican convention.” This man apparently distrusts white gentiles and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good for the country.

    Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next century whites will become a minority, he writes, “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.” He is apparently prepared to displace the people and culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews. This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and influence.

    In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, “We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible…” – just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement of European culture also irreversible.

    Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof. MacDonald reports that he and his followers – with the notable exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict – were all Jews with strong Jewish identities: “Jewish identification and the pursuit of perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the ‘invisible subject’ of American anthropology.”

    By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention programs.

    The entire “civil rights” movement can be seen as a natural consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement. Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew. Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.

    Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the “civil rights” transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the American Jewish Congress who claims that “many of these [civil rights] laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters.”

    While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial equivalence, it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald’s words, “American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality). Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic [Third-World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed to Western culture.”

    The role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof. MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.

    Authoritarian Personalities
    In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W. Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of the institute’s activities: “Research would be able here to transform itself directly into propaganda,” he wrote. (Italics in the original.)

    Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality was particularly influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the American Jewish Committee heavily funded its promotion and because Jewish academics took up its message so enthusiastically.

    The book’s purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion to family – and race – loyalty are signs of a dangerous and defective “authoritarian personality.” Because drawing distinctions between different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties – even close family ties! – are “prejudice.” As Christopher Lasch has written, the book leads to the conclusion that prejudice “could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy – by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.”

    But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof. MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even described Jewish group identity – only that of gentiles: “behavior that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles.”

    For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which “Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in early childhood are the anti-Semite’s irrevocable inheritance.”

    In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof. MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: “Certainly many of the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism.”

    Of the interest here, however, is the movement’s success in branding ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he came later, the French-Jewish “deconstructionist” Jacques Derrida was in the same tradition when he wrote:

    “The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the metaphysics of native land and native tongue… The idea is to disarm the bombs… of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants…”

    As Prof. MacDonald puts it, “Viewed at its most abstract level, a fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of psychopathology.” Needless to say, this project has been successful; anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a mentally unhinged “hate-monger,” and whenever whites defend their group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The irony has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: “The ideology that ethnocentrism was a form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group that over its long history had arguably been the most ethnocentric group among all the cultures of the world.”

    Immigration
    Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote open immigration. It brings about the “diversity” Jews find comforting and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover, whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of every political persuasion have favored high immigration.

    This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort. Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot, was of the view that “there is only one way to World Peace, and that is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom houses…” He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of Jewish intermarriage.

    Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes to America “huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”

    Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish Committee was urging Congress to believe that “Americanism is the spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to people of all races, all religions, all nationalities.” Of course, there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish Congress argued in hearings on immigration that “our national experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in the diversity of our peoples.” This, too, was at a time when U.S. immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white majority.

    It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in 1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish groups from the beginning.

    Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian Jews led the effort to dismantle the “white Australia” policy, one reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish Democrat: “The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian.” Like Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.

    Jews and the Left
    It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail. Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation, Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose ground to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries. However, in Prof. MacDonald’s view, Jewish commitment to leftist causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism, especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that Jewish particularism will be exempt: “At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a strong personal identity as Jews.”

    Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet Union seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state anti-Semitism, tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities to individual Jews, and preached a “classless” society in which Jewishness would presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover, since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.

    Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached both atheism and the solidarity of the world’s working people, they took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in 1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He writes that despite the official view that all men were to be brothers, “very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire soviet era.”

    Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof. MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: “The Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and human community in history… The disappearance of the Jewish people would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man into a wild beast.” This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position incompatible with “unity and human community.”

    Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from Communism only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And just as Jews had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic pre-Revolutionary Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an anti-Semitic Soviet Union. A similar pattern can be found in the imposed Communist governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely dominated by Jews. The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist Party, for example, spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too maintained a strong Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many stopped being Polish and emigrated to Israel.

    Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun’s short-lived 1919 Communist government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that at the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated with Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He argues that in the United States as well, the hard core among Communists and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was mainly Jewish. Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist world-view was fully compatible with strong identification as Jews. Prof. MacDonald quotes from a study of American leftists:

    “Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for granted.” Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and unexamined than their commitment to the left.

    Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number, the Soviet Union’s severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the 1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for many when he explained, “If I must choose between the Jewish cause and a ‘progressive’ anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew.” According to Prof. MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial identification from the “respectable” right.

    Objections
    There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald’s thesis. The first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a “light unto the nations” or a “chosen people.” This is echoed today in the Jewish self image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time what passes for “social justice” has the effect of undermining the traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be wrongs?

    Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that “the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves.” In other words, many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to become less white may also have convinced himself that America benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can more effectively convince others.

    Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the 1967 war: “I had not known how Jewish I was.” This is an arresting statement from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof. MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying,”most Jews claim to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy camouflage.” Always to think in terms of “friends or foe” is no insignificant matter.

    Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: “Surface declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading.” He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as “anti-Semitic” if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who has said “they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no such interests…”

    Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in fact, “the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda.” Prof. MacDonald also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and resigned.

    But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a difficult test: “The best evidence that individuals have really ceased to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews are only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish interests.”

    This standard may seem unduly harsh – until it is applied to white gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action, anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial identity.

    Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: “a fundamental motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived as anti-Semitic.” He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet Heinrich Heine as “using his skill, reputation and popularity to undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order.”

    In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile relations on Jews: “They may have become so odious and so hostile to mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle.”

    Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald’s view, the explanation lies in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of Jews. He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews – at 115, a full standard deviation above the white gentile average – and to “their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal promotion, and achieve public acclaim…” He also believes Jews have worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary for survival: “Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive groups outcompete individual strategies.” He notes that there has never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.

    Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still decisive. As he puts it, “Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies.” This, of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that American Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American intellect. Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the effect that “what has happened since World War II is that the American sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is anything else… The literate American mind has come in some measure to think Jewishly.”

    Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people, ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there has been something more than natural change.

    Originally appeared in American Renaissance, June 1999, issue 54 entitled ‘Cherchez le Juif.’ Stanley Hornbeck is the pen name of a Washington, DC area businessman. Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger (1998) $65.00, 379 pp

  125. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 13, 2012 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    If a low-IQ Jew cannot understand Prof. MacDonald’s books, then what is he doing on this intellectual website?

    If he still wants to serve the Jewish cause, he could join the IDF. They are in urgent need of primitive brutes.

  126. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Just can’t stay out of the gutter for long can you?

  127. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 13, 2012 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    Mick, I’ve tried to read the **oevre** of Prof. MacD. but frankly, I don’t understand it. Could you just summarize it for me?

    Alice, I’m straight but you are really getting me excited with this talk about “corrections”.

  128. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 2:58 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: C’mon, Mickey, you’re setting the bar awfully high, don’t you think? Why not just apologize for everything you can think of, and then ask, hat in hand, if you’ve omitted something?

  129. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    The sad truth is that it is such a novelty, on these pages, to be accused of something I am actually guilty of, that it seemed refreshing. As a mother and teacher, who has had all too frequent occasion to administer corrections, my first thought is truly, ouch, thanks for the correction.

  130. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 2:39 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    they get called spelling n*zis elsewhere, but I guess we’ll have to call them spelling bolsheviks :O)

  131. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 2:34 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    “Mick, what specific “harmful behaviour”, peculiar to Jews, are you referring to? ”

    Caleb – what is the purpose of visiting the site if you don’t read any of the body of work in KM’s books and also many articles.
    It appears you are assuming we are mistaken without bothering to read and learn. Perhaps it is also true that you are assuming all the positives about the Jewish people without reading much about that as well.
    How about we proceed by you telling me an alleged harmful behaviour…properly summarizing the case for it…and then provide your crticism or other feedback if you have any.

  132. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 2:23 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    Thank you Pierre, who am I to argue with gallantry?

  133. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 1:52 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: Of course you can take it. Many can’t, however, and no one should have to without due cause. Recall, too, that the Founder of our religion called upon each of us, when struck, to offer his or her own other cheek—not to stand by and watch in silence while someone else’s cheek was getting walloped!

  134. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I can take it, I’m a big girl and since I think faster than I type, and I can’t spell to save my life, I am well used to correction. We all need a little correction from time to time, it is good for the soul.

  135. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I’d go a good deal farther, Alice. Mechanical spelling errors ought to be passed over in silence by ladies and gentlemen in a forum such as this, unless they are clearly linkable to corresponding errors in someone’s exercise of or capacity for thought or are cited in just retaliation for gratuitous insult. Dubbing oneself a prig, in presumptive (and feigned?) self-mockery, hardly excuses the impropriety and lack of fraternal cordiality in behaving like one.

  136. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 1:27 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I confess to the decidedly unchristian thought ‘better the Asians than us’.

    I do think that we have underestimated the effect that we have had on them. Openness can be a two way street. This article, among others, shows the extent to which the elite Jews have lost control of their lesser brethren. Every Jew with a college degree now fancies himself an intellectual worthy of an audience. Just watch Cspan and all the pleas to ask a question not make a speech. Inevitably some foolish Jew with a high opinion of himself will assume that this rule, too, does not apply to him. Look at poor Calab and his pitiful attempts to argue.

    As long as you can manage what you call the easy stuff, I will be content.

  137. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    @Spelling Prig: Guilty again! Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I do believe that some of you are enjoying it a little too much.

  138. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 12:11 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    That’s right, dance, bob, weave and sneer. Vital part? Vital to what? I have no desire to be near any Hebrew. All I want is for Jews to occupy their proportionate share of the world and stop demanding control of it all. Curious that only Jews in all the world are given permission to be so blatantly misogynist. If you can’t play or debate fairly why don’t you return to the Jewish quarter where such tactics are acceptable even praise worthy?

  139. July 13, 2012 - 11:18 am | Permalink

    @Felix:

    Well said. Add millions of Whites slaughtered by Huns, Turks, Mongols, Arabs, North Africans. White plights, White genocide, White slavery.

    How the Jews ran castration factories to enslave thousands of Whites and ship them to 3rd world as late as Ottoman Empire.

  140. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 13, 2012 - 11:13 am | Permalink

    Man, the Ignorance Index in this bit of cyberspace is through the roof!

    Those Orthodox Jewish men who say they fear “contamination” fear it from ALL women, Jewish **and** gentile. How does this affect you, Sweet Alice? Have you a secret desire to cozy up to some hunky Hebrew?

    Some no-name, or fake name, **schnorrer** writes a few words in a journal of limited circulation and the Nutty Professor treats it like it’s **ex Cathedra Judaicus**. If all you know of Jewish people comes from David Duke and **Stormfront** it’s not surprising you think Jews “write endlessly about the evils of Western Civilization” of which they in fact are a vital part.

    Mick, what specific “harmful behaviour”, peculiar to Jews, are you referring to?

  141. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 11:04 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: The kidding-around stuff is easy, Alice. Thinking remains as hard as ever, alas.

    I think, by the way, that the disagreement between you and JS is happily more apparent than real. Yes, I too think that the Jews consider us the barbarian hoards and, at least for the nonce, draw little or no distinction between our barbarity and that of the blacks and Hispanics. Yet I think that one day—probably sooner rather than later—all but the richest will see what fools they’ve been (I’m not saying they’ll admit they were wrong, of course). The latter will simply enclose themselves within West Bank–style fortresses, complete with all the modern conveniences, and pay guys to shoot anyone who gets through the barbed wire, over the minefield, and underneath the electrified fence. They are as happy as pigs in merde living like this in their Middle East storefront; why shouldn’t it work here, too? The government certainly won’t say them nay!

    As for the Far East, who really knows what will happen there? I count less on Asian intelligence to fend the enemy off for a while than on the keenly honed racial consciousness of the East Asians especially. I have for the moment forgotten the name of the Jewish program for intermarrying with the Chinese, but it has yet to come up trumps for the Jews. My suspicion is that the youngest of this blog’s denizens will be dead or retired before Tribal goals are realized in that part of the world. With any luck they will do themselves in from an excess of hubris long before then, as they have often enough done in the past.

  142. Spelling Prig's Gravatar Spelling Prig
    July 13, 2012 - 10:50 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    Alice, it is hordes instead of hoards
    ( like borders instead of boarders, remember? )

  143. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 10:48 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    None of which answers the questions I raised. Why is it perfectly acceptable for Jews to self-segregate, write endlessly about the evils of Christians and Western Civilization, and demand entre into every aspect of our society? It was you who raised Rodney Dangerfield as an example, not I.

    Why is it acceptable for Orthodox Jews to react as if they are in danger of contamination if a woman sits next to them on a bus, but gentiles cannot have any space from which Jews can be excluded?

  144. Solly's Gravatar Solly
    July 13, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    To Caleb July 12 4:24 pm You’re hilarious! “Ted Hall (Holtzberg) didn’t give away any secrets…Klaus Fuchs did.” Does it make any difference if you die from a bee sting or a hornet sting? Also – you forgot Itzhak Fermi, Isidore Compton, Morris Lawrence, and Moshe Bohr. Not to mention madame Curie.

  145. ethnonationalism's Gravatar ethnonationalism
    July 13, 2012 - 10:39 am | Permalink

    It is great how the right-wing in Hungary managed to show everyone the Jewish nature of the left.

    Here is some right-wing graffiti on the Socialist Party billboards during the election campaign 2010.

  146. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 13, 2012 - 10:34 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Ah Caleb, a story about elusive “good Jews”. But shouldn’t those “noble” Hebes not have been denied entry on the Titanic in the first place? Kinda, “Aryan ships for Aryans only”?

    As for those Sephardics who disappeared into oblivion, now you talk about a humane final solution!

  147. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 10:29 am | Permalink

    @Caleb:

    Caleb – you seem to consistently offer stories about individual people in defense of arguments about behaviour of organized Jewry. What is to be learned from these examples?

    No one here denies historical anti-semitism but the argument made here and elsewhere is that the antisemitism was the reaction to harmful Jewish behaviour. What is your response to this specific allegation?

  148. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 13, 2012 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    @”Alice Teller”: I can fairly assure you that Isidor Straus and Ben Guggenheim both of whom went down on the Titanic after giving up their places on a lifeboat to female passengers weren’t the Rodney Dangerfield type. The accounts state that Guggenheim returned to his stateroom and put on evening dress to await death.

    The philanthropy of department store magnate Straus was almost too sweeping to believe, from giving away coal in winter to the destitute to supplying pasteurized milk to New York’s slum children of all backgrounds, he was there when there was need at a time when no government “safety net” existed.

    Whether these two ever were actually refused accommodation at resort hotels in Saratoga or anywhere is unknown. But they could have been as was Joseph Seligman, intimate of President Grant, in the famous 1877 incident.

    Hotel owner Hilton explained later that it was only the “upstart” German Jews he wanted to keep out. He had nothing at all against the original Jewish settlers in America, the Sephardics from Holland, so he said. That was decent of him as by that time there was no trace of these original settlers or their descendants. There were so few of them and they had blended so easily into the American social elite, mainly in the South, that they were no longer distinguishable as a distinct group.

  149. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 9:23 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I am delighted to see that you are feeling well enough to keep us all on our toes!

  150. Paul Hausser's Gravatar Paul Hausser
    July 13, 2012 - 9:11 am | Permalink

    One of the best of KMac’s articles.

    This one hits all the relevant major points. Worth making several dozen copies and handing them out to a select receptive individuals. Indeed I will.

    I have been saying for quite sometime that we need a three NNN news network.

    Nationalist News Network!

    That is really really key to changing the game. We have to beat the jews at their own game. That would just kill the bastards.

  151. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 9:06 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: I am saddened to learn that the UK edition of Bambi differs from the Disney release for sale here in the States. In my copy Bambi is a buck, not a doe. If deconstruction of the film’s content and message has gone that far in Blighty, perhaps it’s time to petition your local MP to raise the matter at Question Time.

  152. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 13, 2012 - 9:04 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    With respect you really do not understand the Jewish mindset. They believe that they are already living in the midst of barbarian hoards, and what is more they always have. It is the source of their strength and unity. Very few Jews have any desire to drive from Maine to California, don’t you know that flyover country is filled with unreconstructed white folks who are so ignorant and violent that they do not understand who rightly rules the world? They hate us because they know that we are superior, both morally and intellectually. Far better to deal with undifferentiated brown hoards who can be bought off with simple toys.

    As for a takeover in Asia, it will never happen. Asian do not suffer from our delusions regarding equality, but they do place very high value on harmony, a word the Jews have never mastered. One absolute truth is that for all their so called brilliance, Jews have never been able to live in harmony with their neighbors at any time or place in history.

  153. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 13, 2012 - 8:55 am | Permalink

    @Felix: Ask most how many Americans died in WW2 and most don’t know. Ask how many Jews were killed in the holocaust and a Pavlovian response of 6 million will come forth. Forget if this number is even true it is a perfect example of brainwashing.

  154. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 13, 2012 - 8:44 am | Permalink

    @Joanne Dee: Anyone who hates Ron Paul on this site has to be a shill. Cutting aid to Israel and auditing the Fed are reasons enough why they fear him. When Gene MCcarthy ran against the Vietnam war( USSR position) the media couldn’t stop giving you pictures of young supporters. Notice the difference with anti war supports today. Most Americans are against these immoral wars but the media ignores or denigrates them

  155. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 13, 2012 - 8:30 am | Permalink

    @Mary Landers: As one commentator said recently Obama is driving us off the cliff at 100mph and Romney would be at 80mph

  156. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 7:59 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Well then they are fools. Being surrounded by 6 billion brutish humans is not a stable situation and that is the world they would create. Can a Jew drive safely around Africa or the Middle East? At one time, a Jew could drive just as safe as he pleased from Maine to California, and be treated fine wherever he went. But what about in 30 years?

    The Southwest will be a dangerous Mestizo homeland. Entire cities like Detroit will be uninhabitable. Now, I am sure some Jews think they will be just fine in that world, but they are fools. They were not thinking of what was good for their offspring 100 years from now. Because if Whites continue to fall as fast as they have been, civilizations will eventually fall. It will be a very dark future for Jew and non-Jew.

    I don’t doubt most of them think they will survive and do well in this horrid future, but they are fools.

  157. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 13, 2012 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    Too bad that the future “Rulers of the World” couldn’t defeat such a small country like Lebanon in 2006. And their threat to attack Iran has been just that : a threat, and that for many years now. They have lost control over Russia and a country like Venezuela isn’t that friendly towards Israel and Jews.

    I think we shouldn’t worry that the Jews will ever reach their nefarious goal but rather that they will keep trying.

  158. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    For the ‘core’ Jews it’s not about comfort and temporary advantage, but which will be the last race standing.

    The West …and the great race that made it…is being sent the way of the developing world, which are all multiethnic and highly dysgenic. Jews live in the third world quite happily and with great prosperity. They practise eugenics while encouraging dysgenics around them.

    Longer term the idea is not that future generations will have a world that is safe, but a world in which they are uncontested and faced with melting pot humanity reeking with violence, inhumanity and only getting worse. In such a world that uncontested people will be driven to make terrible choices, and will find that they are able to manufacture the will, justification, scientific ability and ruthlessness to actually make the terrible choice…and not feel too bad about it afterward.
    That’s the future. Those are the stakes.

  159. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 6:35 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: @Jason Speaks:

    Here is what I was looking for before but couldn’t think of: Even if the Jews do take a gamble and manage to get a position of control over Asian societies, why in the world chance it and destroy their power base in the White world? It wasn’t in their actual self interest to destroy the White world. It was, to use the old phrase, bad for business. Any businessman knows you don’t destroy your own cash cow.

    So, what motivates them? It can only be, at least for the activist Jews, that their hatred of Whites is greater than their concern for their own grandchildren. Or, as I also suspect, while clever, they Jews lack the wisdom to truly envision how dangerous their course of action is. Otherwise, how could it not be better for them to have kept White societies fairly healthy and under their control?

  160. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    July 13, 2012 - 6:31 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    Dude, you’ve got to read between the lines of those cartoons. There’s no way that nose isn’t phallic…and on the face..what does that say? And bambi isn’t even human yet we are forced to be drawn to her feminine charms. Sick.

  161. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 6:27 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I am justly rebuked. No more guilt-by-association smears toward Dumbo from me henceforth.

    On an only slightly related matter and speaking as one who has literally never watched a program on MSNBC, I have of late gotten the distinct impression while surfing the channel guide that that particular sewage outlet is fixated on “exposing” the horrors done by Walt Disney to kosher Hollywood especially and these here United States more generally. Surely there are still several thousand touching Holohoax fables the network’s watchers have not yet been exposed to! Shouldn’t they be given priority over endlessly repeated complaints about this admittedly dreadful goy whose notorious program for worldwide Jewish enslavement—elliptically laid out in such Riefenstahl-inspired films as Pinocchio and Bambi—was in fact nipped in the bud?

  162. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 13, 2012 - 6:12 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller: I wouldn’t quarrel with a syllable of what you write, Alice.

  163. me2's Gravatar me2
    July 13, 2012 - 5:35 am | Permalink

    Someone mentioned the possibility that Jared Taylor’s wife, Evelyn Rich, is a jew. Don Black of Stormfront (who is a good friend of Jared Taylor) disputes that, saying her mother is English. On the other hand, the surname Rich, isn’t exactly a white gentile name. My educated guess is she may be at least a part-jew via her dad.

  164. Deutschland's Gravatar Deutschland
    July 13, 2012 - 4:01 am | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sCioKnpHdY

    Lord Rothschild confronted

  165. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    July 13, 2012 - 3:13 am | Permalink

    People are missing the point. If you play basketball since childhood, chances are, you will be good at basketball. If you play soccer everyday, chances are you will be good at soccer. If you play chess, you’ll be a good chess player. The point is Judasim is based on freemasonry. Jews are thought that they are the light onto the nations. In other words, they are thought that they are to rule over other peoples of the earthsince childhood and they spend all their time and energy devising ways to do just that. That is why they are good at it and why we are getting our butts kicked.. they are succesful not because they are so much smarter, but because they have been doing it for much longer than anyone else.. Holding all the cards helps to win the game as well. In order to overcome them, not only we must be good as them, we must be 10 X better!!

  166. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    July 13, 2012 - 3:02 am | Permalink

    @fender: But the guilt schtick won’t work with the Asians. (It already doesn’t work with the smarter whites.) Tens of millions died under Mao. Is any Chinaman with even half a brain going to care about a mere six million, an already grossly exagerated number?

  167. Felix's Gravatar Felix
    July 13, 2012 - 2:59 am | Permalink

    @Fenria: Smart whites also (like Latinos and blacks) no longer give a s___ about the “holocaust” though are smart enough to play along if they must. Smart whites have likely read a great deal of history and soon realized that genocide has been fairly common through at least the last 100 years and probably before; that there was nothing any more tragic about the holocaust than there was about any other genocide.

    When family members, and especially kids, bring up the “holocaust,” use it as a teachable moment. Ask them if they know how many tens of millions of innocents died under Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, the Hutus and the Tutsis and the Armenians under the Turks. Ask them if they know about all the Christian clergy targeted by Stalin. Ask them if they know about all the gypsies killed in the camps. Ask them if they know how Poles and other Slavs were targeted by Hitler for extermination.

    When you raise these facts, most won’t immediately dismiss the tragedy of the “holocaust,” but most will quickly realize that though it was tragic, history is full of genocides, and why should one weep tears for one group and not another?

  168. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    July 13, 2012 - 2:16 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: July 12, 2012- 9:28 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    @Heather Blue:

    In respectful furtherance of the points you both make, I would merely add that Mr. or Ms. Damon should briefly turn away from the realm of principled supposition and turn toward daily life in order to calculate just how many Jewish people of his acquaintance actually take a stand, even in the smallest ways, against the daily outrages their Tribal cousins perpetrate against us, their hand-picked foes. I have known Jews who have been easy to work with and others who have been very good (i.e., quiet) neighbors, but I have known only one in my entire life to whom I would have confided my innermost thoughts—and I was young and foolish then! One of the marks of a mature adult is that he reads no more into the evidence his senses provide than that evidence is equipped to bear.

    Most white Christians and post-Christians I have known reflexively look for the best in their fellow man. As a rule they teach their children to do likewise. It is a characteristic to be proud of, but our enemies view it as a weakness and use it to manipulate and control the large majority of us. As I wrote long ago on a forgotten thread, the principled and virtuous person will always be at a disadvantage in any contest with the unprincipled and exploitative one. The aim should be, not to abandon principle to level the playing field, but to accept the handicap with grace and sangfroid—and then fight to win.

    The so-called West, it is said over and over again, won its three-generation-long struggle with Communist Russia. Yet if that were really so, would all of the West’s nations now be Communist states in all but name, and would they be ruled (usually but not always from behind the scenes) by the first cousins of the Bolsheviks who destroyed a once mighty empire and murdered well over a hundred million people? This is the Tribe’s idea of victory, but God help us, it has, to my stupefaction at least, become the idea of the great mass of our fellow whites, too.

    Remarkable and indeed noble societies were built all over Europe by people who took “be you therefore as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves” as their watchword. That those societies later succumbed to baseness and surrendered honor and fraternal solicitude for easy wealth demonstrates little but the persistence of human weakness and fallibility. Whether we and our fellows here and in Europe will learn from our ancestors’ flaws and errors is a matter on which the jury is still out. But this I know: I would rather be sneered at as a weak and fallible white Christian than looked up to for being his clever, money- and sex-obsessed, and ultimately soulless enemy.

    Pierre, that is an excellent post. I guess one of our flaws is that good people hate to see other people as bad. We had rather think everybody is pretty decent especially since Jews pass themselves off as having a privileged god-connection. That’s enough to stand our hair on end with fear we might offend God, the Father of Jesus.

  169. caroline R's Gravatar caroline R
    July 13, 2012 - 2:08 am | Permalink

    THank you again Prof, for your amazing honesty and insight. You are a hero because you have the courage and strength to tell the truth. God bless you.

  170. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    July 13, 2012 - 1:54 am | Permalink

    ” Not that the Jews are all-powerful, let alone all bad. But they are successful, and therefore powerful enough: and their power is unique in being off-limits to normal criticism even when it’s highly visible.
    A contradiction ; if a power is “off- limits to normal criticism ” then said power would be more “all powerful” and “all bad” than not .

  171. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    July 13, 2012 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    The take over of Asia may be done quite differently with out the use of multi-culti and guilt, at least not in the same way. With chinese orchestras playing mumbo jumbo rap tunes and young chinese girls giving gangstah hand signals and having bi-racial future rap artists. etc etc.

    That is , If much of the take over has not happened already.
    I would think that some infiltration/conquer would have occurred in the years during and after the communist red china revolution. Communism is a jewish thing as you would probably agree.

  172. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 13, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon: Given the site’s policy on the use of ad hominem, I’m loathe to make any connection between wattylersrevolt and Dumbo.

  173. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 13, 2012 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    I hear your point but there is something about this proposed Jewish takeover of Asia that doesn’t seem probable to me, although I can’t quite put it into words.

    One element is this: There has been a substantial Anti-White element within Whites for quite some time. Think of the abolitionists, people like John Brown who were willing to kill fellow Whites for the sake of another race. Think of all the White Liberals you run into, that gush at the thought of embracing The Other (the non-White, the non-Normal). Think of even the Evangelicals that thrill to the idea of adopting Asian babies. This plays an important role in our problems. The Asians don’t seem to have these traits.

    Maybe some of that openness have allowed us to be more creative, but there is definitely a downside. The New England Yankee Whites have seemed to hate their White brothers and sisters with almost as much zeal as Jews at times (but not as much to be sure).

  174. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    July 13, 2012 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    Asians are definitely more conformist to authority, and conformist in general, than are whites. So that if Jews can conquer/worm in to the establishment of Asian society, through their proven array of methods, then I would think that Asia will be a cake walk in terms of ” own a whole freakin’ country” .
    And they may already be well already on their way.
    But , I think the Judaic supremacy will not last much (relatively) longer .

  175. Mary Landers's Gravatar Mary Landers
    July 13, 2012 - 12:00 am | Permalink

    I agree that Ron Paul would NOT be for white race replacement. And that is why they marginalized him and called him a kook. Obama and Romney both get huge money from the Tribe. But having said that, I would still prefer Romney over Obama. Obama is despicable.

  176. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 12, 2012 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Well Asians have trillions of dollars. But beyond that, I don’t think there is any historical evidence of Jews being able to mesh themselves into an Asian society in the long run. What you are proposing presupposes an almost supernatural ability which Jews most certainly do not possess.

    Jews had a special adaptation for taking advantage of White Gentile societies, not every human population that exists. The truth is, Jews were treated rather well in European societies for most of the last 2,000 years. They were tolerated, albeit at times in ghettos. Contrary to the Anti-White narrative, Europeans did not show a zeal for harming and certainly not wiping out Jews. Whites far more lenient toward Jews than any other non-White group. They looked a little too much like us and had similar religious history.

    Whites have not been done in by mere corruption that accompanies bribery and such. They had a set of traits that Jews evolved to take advantage of, whether the Jews themselves are aware of it or not.

  177. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 12, 2012 - 11:33 pm | Permalink

    @Snoutsmack:

    The letter to Medvedev won’t do anything. We can send all the letters we want to whoever we want but they won’t make any difference unless they’re backed up by heaps of money and political power.

    The problem is that Eastern Europe always looked to Western Europe as a kind of big brother, and if they see Western Europeans bringing in Africans and Arabs in the name of “freedom” and “human rights” then they just might do the same. If the Slavs tolerated being executed by the millions by the jews then there’s a good chance they’re going to tolerate being flooded with third worlders as well. Slavs are not a proactive people, they’re a grin-and-bear-it people.

  178. July 12, 2012 - 10:56 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Well, the anti-Whites certainly are CUNTS: http://snoutslap.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/anti-whites-are-cunts/

  179. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    July 12, 2012 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @Alfred:

    Can anyone confirm if Jared Taylor’s wife is Jewish? Any surname, DNA, genealogy proof?

  180. bumfuzzle's Gravatar bumfuzzle
    July 12, 2012 - 10:22 pm | Permalink

    Kmac, the original article was written by Elad Nehorai.

    “Manny Friedman” is the typical name change game, see the bottom of the article where it says ‘This article was written under an assumed name.’

    Here’s the original:
    http://i49.tinypic.com/148euer.jpg

  181. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 12, 2012 - 10:13 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:
    I find nothing to disagree with and much to consider. I do reserve the right to judge every person I meet as an individual, but not to do it blind. My primary goal is to join you in pointing out that it is possible to answer these charges without resorting to hateful, vile rhetoric. We cannot say often enough that not liking Jews does not mean we are heating up the ovens. It is a tactic still widely used and most people do not know how to respond. We mothers tend to be repetitious in order to get the message through.

  182. July 12, 2012 - 10:03 pm | Permalink

    @Bilal:

    Peace!

    The Judaic inspired and directed propagandized amongst those who are called White Nationalists is prevalent all over the internet. Stormfront has its usual trolls stirring up the goyim to focus their hate, not on the GUILTY, but upon a religion and its adherents.

    Look at the President of Iran, the ONLY world leader who spoke out in condemnation of the “West” imprisoning those who question the official dogma of the Holocaust. Germar Rudolf was taken from his wife and little boys by Jackbooted thugs of the Federal government, right in front of his family! Imagine the trauma that will stay with those two youngsters, their daddy taken away by men with guns. Right here in the good ole USA. This is the book that was the cause of his arrest:
    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/trr/

    Now some Muslims are truly guilty of wrong-doing, great wrong-doing, in England so-called Muslims went around a neighborhood shouting, “WHITES OUT THIS IS A MUSLIM NEIGHBORHOOD” now the Prophet of Islam, himself, was a White man. You had the Mumbai massacre, where the Pakistani architects were radioing, cell phoning to their killers: “SHOOT THE WHITES” nice huh?

    I do not blame the Qur’an for the racist anti-white violence and hatred that comes from non-whites from the 3rd World, it is of the same type as non-Whites from the 3rd World who are “Christian” such as Mexicans, El Salvdorans, et al we have African-American CHRISTIANS who slaughter whites on a daily basis. I would suggest that 99% of the non-white butchers of white men, women, and children in the USA are CHRISTIAN. That said, I think you make a good point, religious Muslims, of any color, can and should make an alliance with the Good Whites, of any religion or none, (parenthetically jews are NOT white) to end the reign of terror that the Judaics have waged against humanity for all these years. Palestine still is under attack and nothing is done. White homelands are being DESTROYED and its founding race ELIMINATED, and nothing is done. As with the National Socialists in the 1930s when Muslims and Christians bonded together in a Holy Cause, so today, likewise do Christians and Muslims and other Whites need to do the same. Dr David Duke, alone, of WNs leaders sees that.

    The lies which well-meaning zeal have heaped ’round this man are disgraceful…Such a man is what we call an original man…the words he utters are as no other man’s words…he was one of those who cannot but be in earnest…(who taught) that we must submit to God. That our whole strength lies in resigned submission to Him (God)….Not by flattering our appetites; no, by awakening the Heroic that slumbers in every heart, can any Religion gain followers… ‘If this be Islam,’ says Goethe, ‘do we not all live in Islam?’

    (Carlyle,”On Heroes and Hero Worship,” May 8, 1840)

  183. uh's Gravatar uh
    July 12, 2012 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    Someday:

    Agreed. Nothing less than climate change, famine, and a return to cousin-f***ing can reverse matters … for Anglos.

    Italians will be fine.

  184. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 12, 2012 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @Barbara: “Suggest we begin pointing out that so and so is German, English, Irish, European, etc. There still are European ethnic organizations promoting culture”

    Excellent strategy.

  185. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 12, 2012 - 9:37 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant: This comment of yours would have been ever so much more effective had you thought to include a link to that great song from Dumbo: “I done seen about everything / When I see an elephant fly.”

    Now I’m trying to picture Dumbo soaring through the clouds with wattylersrevolt holding on to his tail for dear life. Try as I will, however, I just can’t manage it.

  186. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 12, 2012 - 9:28 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:
    @Heather Blue:

    In respectful furtherance of the points you both make, I would merely add that Mr. or Ms. Damon should briefly turn away from the realm of principled supposition and turn toward daily life in order to calculate just how many Jewish people of his acquaintance actually take a stand, even in the smallest ways, against the daily outrages their Tribal cousins perpetrate against us, their hand-picked foes. I have known Jews who have been easy to work with and others who have been very good (i.e., quiet) neighbors, but I have known only one in my entire life to whom I would have confided my innermost thoughts—and I was young and foolish then! One of the marks of a mature adult is that he reads no more into the evidence his senses provide than that evidence is equipped to bear.

    Most white Christians and post-Christians I have known reflexively look for the best in their fellow man. As a rule they teach their children to do likewise. It is a characteristic to be proud of, but our enemies view it as a weakness and use it to manipulate and control the large majority of us. As I wrote long ago on a forgotten thread, the principled and virtuous person will always be at a disadvantage in any contest with the unprincipled and exploitative one. The aim should be, not to abandon principle to level the playing field, but to accept the handicap with grace and sangfroid—and then fight to win.

    The so-called West, it is said over and over again, won its three-generation-long struggle with Communist Russia. Yet if that were really so, would all of the West’s nations now be Communist states in all but name, and would they be ruled (usually but not always from behind the scenes) by the first cousins of the Bolsheviks who destroyed a once mighty empire and murdered well over a hundred million people? This is the Tribe’s idea of victory, but God help us, it has, to my stupefaction at least, become the idea of the great mass of our fellow whites, too.

    Remarkable and indeed noble societies were built all over Europe by people who took “be you therefore as wise as serpents and as harmless as doves” as their watchword. That those societies later succumbed to baseness and surrendered honor and fraternal solicitude for easy wealth demonstrates little but the persistence of human weakness and fallibility. Whether we and our fellows here and in Europe will learn from our ancestors’ flaws and errors is a matter on which the jury is still out. But this I know: I would rather be sneered at as a weak and fallible white Christian than looked up to for being his clever, money- and sex-obsessed, and ultimately soulless enemy.

  187. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 12, 2012 - 8:37 pm | Permalink

    @wattylersrevolt: “That’s right Ron Paul will use the power of the State to force race-replacement on Native Born White Americans.”

    Substantiate this claim, please.

  188. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 12, 2012 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Ron Paul has no plans to replace white Americans. It is utter nonsense. You really meant Obama and Romney, right? Because they sure will. All the Establishment people do. We’ve been dealing with them since Johnson. It is extremely unfortunate that so much false information is spread about a man who wants to set us free. He is a threat to the Establishment which is why they constantly attack him. Anyone the Establishment attacks should be seen as a sign that he’s our man.

  189. Mary Landers's Gravatar Mary Landers
    July 12, 2012 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    I hate to have to harp on this, but it really does seem to take quite a bit of intelligence to be able to SEE what has happened. Most people have full and busy lives and are too preoccupied with work and family and problems to actually dig in and figure out what is going on the world. Clearly, this is WHY the Hebrews have been able to get over on us for so long. I thought for sure that the bailouts would bring out the pitchforks, but no, an idiot I know said, “Oh, we have to save the banks or the country will go down.” People totally buy into the MSM. Sure, some of us knew full well that the Jews were raiding the Treasury to pay off their bad bets, but most people will NOT take any action whatsoever until they are impacted personally. Here in California, whites are sensitized because we’ve become a minority in the state and we often face abuse from blacks and browns. But when I try to explain this to friends in the midwest, it falls on deaf ears. They don’t think it’s really a problem until it’s a problem for THEM. In a nutshell, that’s the MAIN problem with whites; we just don’t stick together like the other races do. But we’ve been taught and brainwashed NOT to stick together, and our despicable masters have done a very good job.

  190. wattylersrevolt's Gravatar wattylersrevolt
    July 12, 2012 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    Normans

    Of course, Native Born White Americans won’t be around when the peace and prosperity breaks out because Dear leader Ron Paul will forcefully race-replace them-us. That’s right Ron Paul will use the power of the State to force race-replacement on Native Born White Americans..this is what you call waging a vicious race war of agression on behalf of China against Native Born White Americans. Ron Paul is an obvious race-traitor and you would vote for him. So you are, in the end, a shill..for China.

    • norman S's Gravatar norman S
      July 12, 2012 - 7:56 pm | Permalink

      force race-replacement on Native Born White Americans. If you believe this you are not a shill you are insane

  191. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 12, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    @Someday: Hubris leads to nemesis.

  192. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 12, 2012 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    @J M Damon: In The Holocaust Industry, Finkelstein does not dispute the veracity of the official narrative, without which none of the financial shake-downs he well describes would have been possible. Compare the treatment of David Cole with that of Finkelstein. Arthur Butz’ classic work is the place to start for revisionism. It’s easy to find on the net.

  193. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 12, 2012 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

    @Walter:

    All of their so-called intelligence (whatever amount it is) is mostly – or perhaps completely with some of them – allocated to deception. They spend 24/7 scheming.

    Many of their inventions/creations (excluding medicine) – based in or highly capability of being used for deception or to decay society. Maybe I’m wrong but have they invented anything close to aircraft, refrigeration, automobile, submarine, telephone? They’re good at financial instruments (deception), Hollywood (deception), gambling – do they get credit for this? (decay), porn (decay), etc. We’re now finding out that some of Einstein’s work was done by previous German physicists. I have read where they are not good at things like architecture.

  194. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    July 12, 2012 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:

    You wrote:

    “It’s over.”

    That’s just not true.

    Big thanks to Dr. MacDonald for this very important article.

  195. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    July 12, 2012 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    @J M Damon: Be careful about stereotyping Jews: they are not all Zionists and “Holocaust” swindlers. They may not be all Zionists, but they are all Jews.

    Jews complain about each other all the time, but if push comes to shove they stick together.

    We seem to feel somewhat obligated to having the Jews around, as if it’s a given. Since our culture is so rich and advanced it seems chintzy to not share our bounty with those who don’t have a high culture. I don’t think we can afford to have this attitude toward the Jews. They will wipe us out.

    Jews want more than what will sustain them. Their greed is
    insatiable, their egotism unparalleled. We can get along with any race in the world except the Jews. People can not live with the Jews on their terms.

  196. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 12, 2012 - 6:06 pm | Permalink

    @Someday:
    Since you yourself are a Jew, you should add : “And Jews control also the opposition against themselves.”
    That’s why you try to discourage us with your : “It’s over.”

  197. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    July 12, 2012 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Jews dominate mass culture. Jews dominate politics and set the bounds of debate. What most whites think is determined by Jews. Jews have alliances with white elites and with 100 million unwhite immigrants. A breakthrough for nationalism in the US or a European country would require a sudden change in the nature of white people, or an external event of truly cataclysmic proportions. It’s over.

  198. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 12, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @J M Damon:
    I think that we are all recognize that there is little one can say that is true of all of anyone. Never the less, to say that something is a stereotype does not prove that it is not substantially true. What is retaliation? Is it immoral to want a world that is not dominated by a tiny minority? Is it plausible to believe that this tiny minority has gained as much control of our legal, political, cultural and academic worlds entirely honestly and on merit alone? These are perfectly legitimate questions.

  199. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 12, 2012 - 5:41 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:
    I hope you will reconsider. It seems to me that your background in law should do us all some good. (Quite shameless, aren’t I?) No need to be an expert in the Talmud, merely familiar with the mindset. I guess what we really need is pop version of the two philosophies of law and their innate incompatibility. We need more contributors with expertise in law and economics. Can’t hurt to ask?????

  200. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 12, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Thank you, Alice! As a generalist by nature, training and inclination, alike, I do not feel myself expert enough on any given subject to be an essayist here– least of all on the Talmud! I am quite sure that I have read a good account of the rise of the Jewish law firm, and the decline of the old-line “white shoe” law firm, either here or at someplace else on line, within just the last few years!?!

  201. J M Damon's Gravatar J M Damon
    July 12, 2012 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for insightful article and commentaries.
    Be careful about stereotyping Jews: they are not all Zionists and “Holocaust” swindlers.
    Many of the harshest critics of Jewish ruthlessness have been Jews.
    Abba Iban gave us the term “Shoa Business” while Norman Finkelstein gave us “Holocaust Industry” and Joseph Friedman was the insider who revealed how the Zionists brought the US into World War I.
    Don’t allow the Zionists to manipulate you into retaliating against all Jews, as they manipulated Hitler.
    As Napoleon would say: “That was worse than a crime, it was a blunder.”

  202. July 12, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @Barbara: I suggest that the “Europeans” controlling the world were merely the muscle for Jewish business interests such as the British and Dutch East India Companies.

    Plus ça change…

  203. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 12, 2012 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Landers:
    You have put your finger on a central issue. One of the most effective tactics used by the members of the CoC is to use their remarkable verbal skills to alter academic language from that which does its best to clarify to that which obfuscates. It is all a part of the reign of the expert. Make any issue so confusing that one must hire a Jewish expert to understand it. There was a time in America when the best lawyers considered it a failure to end up it court because it was proof of their inability to make all issues clear to all involved. Now court is the goal.

    Sadly, even our best and brightest were afflicted with this malady. Dr.MacDonald does a wonderful job of speaking both languages, but I agree that a popularized version of his work as well as Cuddihy’s Ordeal of Civility would help a lot. In the mean time, question the underlying, unspoken assumptions. Ask if they make sense.

  204. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 12, 2012 - 4:48 pm | Permalink

    You can’t hide the secrets of nature.

    The unhidden secret of Caleb’s nature is that, like all the rest of his tribe, he lies, steals, cheats, and then pats himself on the back for his brilliance and derring-do whilst loudly proclaiming the evil of a world where anyone would accuse him of even wanting to hurt a fly.

    He and they are utterly transparent. The only question for us, their hated victims, is whether he and they are contemptible or beneath contempt. Caleb in particular is clearly one of those Jews desperately in need of disinfection whom Cuddihy was thinking of when he wrote of “the ordeal of civility.”

  205. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 12, 2012 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Did it ever occur to you that there is nothing immoral about a hotel which caters to people who prefer not to be exposed to people like Rodney Dangerfield? You have behaved in classic form. You begin with a claim of superiority combined with a sarcastic sneer followed by mockery of something you do not understand, winding up with the inevitable whine. Please explain when and where Jews got the notion that they have a right to be everywhere, controlling or at least influencing everything and everyone.

    The clear demonstration of just how distorted your values are is to offer reception at the White House as evidence of respectability or even acceptability. Politics is and always was a filthy business.

  206. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    July 12, 2012 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    @Mary Landers

    No one needs to have a high IQ to understand what’s going on. Blacks and Hispanics, both see some of it. A simple explanation with some details is all that’s necessary, at first.

    I have been printing some of the articles written here and elsewhere, telling everyone to pass them around. For me, this has been the best way to break through.

    Before they read any of the articles, I tell them that everything is the truth and can be verified.

    When I get the “they are nice people,” I say, “some are nice people, but some are not.”

    I work on conservatives first, because there are many that don’t know. Liberals with their coconut shells are difficult to crack.

  207. Barbara's Gravatar Barbara
    July 12, 2012 - 3:36 pm | Permalink

    “We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely different from every group in the world.”

    I hate to burst Mr. Friedman’s (assumed name) bubble, but Europeans were first to control, not only the United States, but much of the world. And, White Europeans, also, are unique in their capabilities. They can and have done everything Jews have. We just haven’t been discriminatory like they have.

    Europeans’ problem is naiveté, too trusting. Or, should I say liberals are too naïve. (Appears Muslims will be taking over, soon.) Brilliant Europeans created and built this country. Without that successful European foundation, would Jews be where they are today? They haven’t been anywhere else, have they? They are opportunists, stealthy, and sly.

    If we look at the country list of Nobel Laureates, we see the U.S. has 300 minus known Jews and Obama. UK 115, Germany 102, Netherlands 19, France 64, Sweden 30, Switzerland 26, Denmark 14.

    Since 1966, Israel’s first Nobel Laureate, Israel received 10 and the US received 203, minus known Jews and Obama. There probably are more; however, the remainder don’t have Jewish sounding names.

    We know that Jews show job preference to their own; but a Jewish poster admits it. It’s clear how they obtained control of the media. Of course, that kind of discrimination is against the law. (They need to look in the mirror when they call us ‘racist.’) We know there are Europeans with equally high IQ’s, and higher, who can do the job more responsibly for the country’s welfare.

    In fact, a Cambridge University study done on Western European countries, excluding immigrants in those countries, showed Germans and Dutch have IQ’s of 109, pretty much the same as Ashkenazi Jews. (Higher than Chinese and Japanese, by the way.) Lynn shows Ashkenazi Jews at 110. There are about 51 million Germans living in the US. Not sure of Dutch. As for the other Western European countries studied, most IQ’s were over 100. Notice how this study was not in the mainstream media. Of course, Jewish IQ’s made headlines on Jewish websites, additionally inflating their self-promoted superiority.

    Although, the study is mentioned, frequently, on the internet, I can no longer find it posted, for those interested.

    Jews only control the country as long as everyone buys into it. We don’t have to see movies, buy into the TV ads, use their financial services, buy their products. So, stop being brainwashed.

    Suggest we begin pointing out that so and so is German, English, Irish, European, etc. There still are European ethnic organizations promoting culture. One, German-American Heritage Foundation of the USA. Some, strictly for Europeans, are called White supremacists, racist, by SPLC, but it’s OK for Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims to have zillions promoting their own interests.

    The Jewish population is declining, as well. Their low birthrate and intermarrying is taking a toll; therefore, they won’t be on top forever, either.

  208. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 12, 2012 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    @Telemaco:
    If you read that article carefully, it appears that minister is a Japanese ultra-nationalist, perhaps even “racist”. Not uncommon in Japan. It would be very difficult for the Jews to infiltrate, manipulate and ultimately destroy a people that is so strongly ethnocentric and so little burdened by any feelings of “guilt” towards the Jews. Hopefully at least some parts of the world will remain Judenrein.

  209. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 12, 2012 - 2:26 pm | Permalink

    @wattylersrevolt: Ron Paul wants to audit the Fed, stop the wars, and repeal the Patriot Act. If you don’t see this as positive you are a shill. As I said OWS has been co opted but I was there at Zuccotti park and most then were sincere. T party also has been co opted but still has some good ideas

  210. wattylersrevolt's Gravatar wattylersrevolt
    July 12, 2012 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Mary Landers

    You need to get over your IQ test score fetish..it is completely irrelevant to the race-replacement issue.

  211. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    July 12, 2012 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Well my longtime Chinese-Singapore friend said to me when the J topic came up; “We’ve always looked up to the Jews”. So I don’t think there will be a problem considering Asians have always had an Imperial style mentality.

    Also it seems strange that there would be a left-right style paradigm in the WN movement regarding the Jewish question. Doesn’t that legitimize the notion that Judaic ideology may have nothing to do with the loss of white homelands/anti-white sentiment? Really, this group should be known as Judeo-White Nationals just so everyone is clear where loyalties lie.

  212. Telemaco's Gravatar Telemaco
    July 12, 2012 - 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Economics minister, he said he wanted to turn Japan into a country where “rich Jews” would want to live.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/mar/23/japan.usa

  213. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 12, 2012 - 1:40 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    The jews have billions of dollars at their disposal; it won’t be hard for them to buy off Asian politicians who will be willing to open the flood gates to jewish immigration into their nations.

    Greed is universal, and the jews always seek out the greediest politicians who are willing to sell their souls for cash. Naturally everyday Asians will be angered that their elites are being bought off by jews and intermarrying with jews, but there won’t be anything they can do about it.

  214. Mary Landers's Gravatar Mary Landers
    July 12, 2012 - 12:28 pm | Permalink

    KM probably has an IQ of 150-160. Mine is just a little under that. Some of the comments here are brilliant (from time to time) and I’d guess that a number of the readers here have high IQ’s. In fact, my heart just sank as it occurred to me that to understand the impact of Jewish influence as it has been exercised in the USA…might require a higher than average IQ. I’m reading CofC again, and I find that I sometimes have to read paragraphs a few times to fully comprehend the meaning. This is yet another reason for backing off of Taylor-
    it takes considerable brainpower to understand HOW the Jewish groups have conquered and ruined our culture. I feel that I have a good handle on it now, but when I try to talk about it or introduce the topic, I get great resistance because people have been so deeply programmed and lack the intellect to dig themselves out. Try to explain PC/cultural marxism before the average person falls asleep in front of you. They can’t SEE it so it doesn’t make sense to them. That’s why it takes a rape or a robbery or a murder or loss of work due to affirmative action or some specific TRIGGER to get people to make the connection. For instance, I can think of two friends that I’ve tried to inform, and they replied, “Oh we shouldn’t blame anyone!” and “But Jews are nice people!”
    I guarantee that if every American citizen were to read and understand CofC, pograms would begin immediately, but 95% of American citizens would not be ABLE get through the book.

  215. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 12, 2012 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

    While Caleb grows teary-eyed about Jews, their comic genius, and their sufferings (“Oy, no hotel rooms to be had here! Will the hate never end!”) at the hands of white Christians who spotted them for the thieves and degenerates they were, perhaps dwellers in a world where one is not surrounded by funhouse mirrors ought to have a look at the help “our side” consistently fails to get from Steve Sailer, who never seems to miss an opportunity to ignore or paper over the obvious.

    My yet-to-be-stated point, if it isn’t already transparent to everyone, is to get folks to stop talking about Jared Taylor for five minutes, since whatever his faults he does the white loyalist good; whereas whatever little good Sailer does, his faults—among which are an insistence on seeing the obvious and pretending it’s a revelation and an evidently indefeasible inability, not simply to name the responsible party when it is Tribal, but to refrain from covering it up however much effort is required to do so—far outweigh that good.

    Here’s example no. 607. In this blog post, where at least for once he isn’t referring readers to yet another off-site column of his, he dangles what he terms “a Cold War story” before our eyes. In common with his rather more interesting source, Sailer thinks it not at all noteworthy that Ted Hall, an unpunished spy who betrayed the Manhattan Project’s secrets to the Soviets, was born Ted Holtzberg. Sailer also reprints his source’s suggestion that it was odd that no one in the government ever investigated Hall’s older brother, Edward, an extraordinarily important figure (both as a senior Air Force officer and in civilian life) in the U.S. ballistic missile program (he was a prime theorist and developer of solid fuel rockets, of whose details the Russkies coincidentally learned about an hour after Hall’s superiors did), from whom Ted acquired his enthusiasm for Marxism and Bolshevism. Ed Hall was such a pillar of America’s technological achievement that even Wikipedia fails to note his ideology or his true name and family history. Please take note of these facts, all who think that Tribal control dates only from the seventies or eighties!

    Aside from Caleb and his ilk, of course, virtually everyone hereabouts is rightly concerned that Jews own the “whole freaking country.” I suppose it’s arguable that Jared Taylor doesn’t share that concern, but it’s yet to be demonstrated to my satisfaction that he’s an obstacle to our education. Steve Sailer, on the other hand, in the piece I link to and many others besides, seems to have his very own funhouse mirror always at the ready to deflect our gaze elsewhere.

    To put the question in the age-old Jewish form, which of these guys has been good—or at least better—for the goys?

    • Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
      July 12, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

      No fool like an old fool, eh Crayon? And a bit of graphomania thrown in. My old English composition teacher used to tell us if you can’t say it in ten sentences, it’s unsayable.

      Old? Who else would think it’s still 1950? So, if your brother was a spy, that means you are, too? A bit…oriental, isn’t it?

      Ted Hall was a twenty year old lab rat at the Manhattan Project. Soviet intelligence cynically used his youth and idealism to turn him into their spy but how many secrets was he in a position to give them? Anyway, they got all they needed from Klaus Fuchs.

      If Pakistan can build an A-bomb without any help, how necessary were whatever secrets the Soviets stole for their Bomb project. You can’t hide the secrets of nature. Who was it that got the USA the atomic bomb in the first place? Szilard, Oppenheimer, Teller…hey, those are **Jewish**names!

  216. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    July 12, 2012 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre: Now that is clever.!

  217. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    July 12, 2012 - 10:47 am | Permalink

    @Dane Wise:

    Valley Girl Razib is shocked when David Sloan Wilson comes to the defense of Kevin MacDonald:
    http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/2361?in=38:21&out=47:19

  218. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 12, 2012 - 10:33 am | Permalink

    Critiq, These all are funny guys. [I can’t quite get used to women doing stand-up. It just ain’t natural.] But who writes their material? You left out Danny Thomas who did a stand-up routine with long, long stories instead of the more common one-liners. He was by descent Lebanese Christian.

    There is ethnic succession in show business just like boxing or horse racing. In its modern form, stand-up comedy was devised in the working class Jewish resort hotels of the Catskills though it might be the bastard child of the blackface minstrel shows with the Interlocutor trading banter with the two End Men.

    This “borscht belt” was made necessary by open discrimination on the part of the older hotels in places like Saratoga [try to find a Rodney Dangerfield there!] where even men who had dined at the White House were denied accommodation. Could it be this was what “Manny Friedman” was remembering?

  219. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 12, 2012 - 10:23 am | Permalink

    @Critiquist: You forgot Dave Chappelle whose use of the N word got him fired. If you remember he turned down a 50 million dollar contract while in South Africa. He refused rather than sell out his convictions. If this is true it puts most whites to shame.

  220. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    July 12, 2012 - 10:22 am | Permalink

    Hollywood liberal Woody Allen loves racist Israel-but is a bit worried about the religious fundamentalism:
    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/07/woody-allen-expresses-typical-american-jewish-attitudes-on-israel-loves-it-but-has-never-been-there.html

    “…I don’t believe in organized religions. Most of them exploit people, and I think these clubs have nothing to do with God. Today I feel Jewish mainly when people attack me because of my being Jewish.”

    About Israel, on the other hand, he has only good things to say. In practice, when Allen starts talking about Israel it’s hard to stop him. So hard that even his assertive, energetic publicist merited only a dismissive wave of the hand, indicating that she should wait until he was finished gushing about his love.

    “I support Israel and I’ve supported it since the day it was founded. Israel’s neighbors have treated it badly, cruelly, instead of embracing it and making it part of the Middle East family of nations. Over the years Israel has responded to these attacks in various ways, some of which I approved of and some less so. I understand that Israelis have been through hard times, I don’t expect Israel to react perfectly every time and that doesn’t change the fact that it’s a wonderful, marvelous country. I’m just worried about the rise of fundamentalism in Israel, which I think damages its interests. I also have questions about your leadership, which doesn’t always act in Israel’s best interests. But even my criticism of Israel comes from a place of love…”

  221. don's Gravatar don
    July 12, 2012 - 10:02 am | Permalink

    Haven’t the nationalists won in Austria?

  222. wattylersrevolt's Gravatar wattylersrevolt
    July 12, 2012 - 9:48 am | Permalink

    normans
    Why all the enthusiasm for Ron Paul? Ron Paul is an over-the-top-race-replacement enthusiast and corporate whore. The Tea Partiers were pinheads from day one.

    OWS advocates in its manifesto a massive foreign nonwhite scab labor subsidy to the Corporations…go read it. OWS is the mortal enemy of the Native Born White Majority from…day one if its inception.

  223. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    July 12, 2012 - 7:34 am | Permalink

    @Floda: Jorg Haider was popularising a form of far-right that would damaged the jewish power and zionism greatly.

  224. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    July 12, 2012 - 7:32 am | Permalink

    @White European Jew

    The parallel, matching acronym is “WEJ” which will please some and distress others.

    A much better acronym, surely more accurate, would be TIC – Talmundic International Cabalist… ;- )

    – Cheers!

  225. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    July 12, 2012 - 6:36 am | Permalink

    @Alfred: Thanks for Amren’s review of The Culture of Critique.

  226. Bilal's Gravatar Bilal
    July 12, 2012 - 6:23 am | Permalink

    @Floda:

    The only possible hope White europeans have of regaining their self government is through an alliance of Europe and the Muslim world against Zionism in all its cultural, economic, and political forms.

    Its indeed .somewhat amusing to hear white nationalists echo Jewish funeded Islamaphobia talking points, whether on this blog, or in the european far right.If u internalize the value system of your colonial masters so much, (zion), how can you ever free yourself of their thought control ?

    Happily Dr Duke and Michael Collins Piper recognize the natural alliance between white nationalism and arab nationalism, even on the immigration question (why wouldnt they oppose the brain drain internally, or the wage depression in the diaspora ?).

    I hope Dr. MacDonald considers the Islamaphobia issue in more detail from a strategic and tactical viewpoint.

  227. Critiquist's Gravatar Critiquist
    July 12, 2012 - 5:37 am | Permalink

    @Caleb you said:
    Don’t forget comedy–writing AND performing [all the best stand up comics are Jews].

    ALL the best stand up comics are Jews? Really?

    Bill Engvall?
    Jay Leno?
    Bob Newhart?
    Johnny Carson?
    Steve Martin?
    George Wallace?
    Bill Cosby?
    Bob Hope?
    Louis CK?
    Freddy Prinze?
    George Carlin?
    Chris Rock?
    David Spade?
    Richard Pryor?
    Dick Gregory?
    Carrot Top?
    Jeff Foxworthy?
    Ellen DeGeneres?
    Daniel Tosh?
    Phyllis Diller?
    Redd Foxx?
    Flip Wilson?
    Rich Little?
    Martin Lawrence?
    Sam Kinison?
    Chevy Chase?
    Robin Williams?
    Dennis Miller?
    Patrice O’Neal?
    Paula Poundstone?
    The Wayans Brothers?
    Jonathan Winters?

    Where did you get the idea that all the great stand up comedians are Jewish? Maybe you meant to say all the great stand up comedians are FUNNY!

  228. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 12, 2012 - 4:33 am | Permalink

    @Walter:

    …the readers of TOO, if you include KMacD and the other writers as readers, must have an average IQ of 160.

    Your estimate is far too high. This is a website by and for intellectuals, not geniuses. The average IQ of intellectuals is 140, that of geniuses 160.

    For further information go to Estimated IQs of some of the Greatest Geniuses, introduction, Table I for the meaning of average IQs.
    I can recommend this website for interested readers anyway.

  229. Globo's Gravatar Globo
    July 12, 2012 - 3:56 am | Permalink

    FYI – the author is Elad Nehorai, who blogs at HuffPo; he’s a Hasid from Brooklyn.

    For the first couple days (I saw it early) the article had his true name on it – then, undoubtedly when La Kosher Nostra came down on him for saying things in front of the goyim, he became “Manny Friedman.”

  230. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    July 12, 2012 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    @ Professor Kevin MacDonald.

    This has been one of your best conceptual essays for a long time (IMHO). A truly enjoyable read, which I have archived (off the web) for secure reference.

    Well rounded, covering much ground and time, and very well conceived.

    Congratulations, and thank you.

    Best wishes,
    Angelsächsischen

    *************************************************************

    PS. Can you please consider modifying your website so that readers can manually hide/show entire blocks of comments authored by specific monikers. That way, I and others can get to focus only on those contributing something of real value and maturity.

  231. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    July 12, 2012 - 3:18 am | Permalink

    @ Professor Kevin MacDonald.

    This has been one of your best conceptual essays for a long time (IMHO). A truly enjoyable read, which I have archived (off the web) for secure reference.

    Well rounded, covering much ground and time, and very well conceived.

    Congratulations, and thank you.

    Best wishes,
    Angelsächsischen

    _____________________________________________________________

    PS. Can you please consider modifying your website so that readers can manually hide/show entire blocks of comments authored by specific monikers. That way, I and others can get to focus only on those contributing something of real value and maturity.

  232. Floda's Gravatar Floda
    July 12, 2012 - 3:15 am | Permalink

    Dr Mac Donald mention Hungary, France and Greece in that these European countries have significant pro white political parties with perhaps a chance of forming government. I remind readers also Austria recently had a charismatic leader of a hated (by our Jewish friends) Far Right party in the elegant Jorg Haider.

    Had him until he was assassinated. The Jewish press naturally claimed it was a motor vehicle accident. He was in a 30MPH Zone in a VW Phaeton sedan, the most advanced and crash-worthy VW sedan ever built. Right after his death a photo of the car was posted on the internet showing the vehicle had rolled multiple times over a hundred yards finishing up on its wheels.

    However the perfectly round hole directly above the drivers seat to me immediately said, ‘missile from drone or manned aircraft using the ‘deadeye’ guidance technology we all saw in the first gulf war’.

    The hole was simply too perfectly round to have been formed in a violent multiple rollover car crash. It would explain why the sensible Herr Haider was speeding, suggestions were he was doing 90MPH in a 30MPH Zone and the extensive damage to the car.

    The same fate lurks in waiting for any ‘charismatic leader’ the vicious tribe’s ‘Murder Inc’ agency sees as a threat. Go back further and ‘lone nut’ whack jobs were done on Pym Fortuyin (Holland) who spoke up against mass immigration into Holland saying ‘Holland is full’. He was tipped to win, but our friends saw to it that he got a clean shot to the head instead.

    Sweden’s Foreign minister, Anna Lindh spoke against Israel and its vile treatment of Palestinians and then, wouldn’t you just know it, a lone nut (a Serb) wielding a large carving knife literally gutted the poor woman as she was in a shopping mall. She was tipped to become the next Swedish PM. There are many, many more examples, too many to list here. The enemy never sleeps.

  233. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 12, 2012 - 2:03 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    Yes, and genocide is worse than discrimination. And guess what, genocide is worse than slavery. Genocide is at the zenith of evil (or nadir). However, we must first get it in the public mind that such a thing is even happening, that it’s not hyperbole. The public thinks of genocide only as lining people up and shooting them. But it can and does happen fairly “nonviolently”.

    If all of Africa was to become majority White or Asian in 50 years, we would be hearing about an African genocide, even if it was being done nonviolently. And rightly so. And yet every single White country is on track to lose its majority White status this century – most before midcentury. And this is happening only to White countries.

    It’s imperative to call the public’s attention to the fact of White Genocide. Everything else follows from that.

  234. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 12, 2012 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    Well if their plan is take over Asian societies, they are taking an awful gamble. They have no history of successfully running Asian countries. The Asian mentality is different from the White. The traits they exploited among Whites (too much openness, gullibility, trusting the Other more than your own, moral universalism) simply don’t exist in Asians.

    If they intend to destroy every single White country and hope they can somehow jump over in the next few generations to running Asian societies, they are dumber than I thought.

  235. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    July 12, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    Very hopeful, Dr. Mac.

    People are getting fed up. Regardless what we do or how much we bend we get clobbered. That’s getting old. But I still think people are not aware that Jews have us slated for genocide. Most Whites don’t know genocide is the real issue instead of our so-called racial bigotry and hatred. Nor do they know that obtaining “fairness and equality” for other races is a laugh. When have Jews ever had good intentions? People don’t know what the real problem is or who the perpetrators are. All words like fairness, equality, racial justice and every other argument the Jews throw at us are spelled exactly the same – G-E-N-O-C-I-D-E!

    J. “You are a racist. And an anti-Semite.”
    Us. “Is that worse than genocide?”
    J. “Hate is just terrible.”
    Us. “Ours or yours? White genocide isn’t terrible?”
    J. “You committed a hate crime?”
    Us. “What? Waving a Confederate flag? Did we forget how pure genocide of white people is?

    I should think eradicating an entire race of people is the worse crime of all.

  236. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 12, 2012 - 1:09 am | Permalink

    @Fenria:

    “The funniest thing about jews is the total disconnect they have in realizing that their own existence is completely dependent upon the continued existence of white, western culture.”

    Not true. The East Asians have a massive, high-IQ populace that the jews are going to look to for breeding opportunities when they’re done destroying Whites. You can be sure that China, Japan, and Korea are the tribe’s next targets. There are already a lot of Asian-Jewish hybrids running around, and Israel has no problem selling American secrets to China.

  237. Walter's Gravatar Walter
    July 12, 2012 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    @Alfred: Some one is opening up the circus cages at night and letting the lions and tigers out to eat up the children. The MSM is not letting the people know. Jared Taylor is letting the people know that this is happening. He won’t let them know that the Jews own the circus and are letting the cats out.

    Should we stop Jared Taylor?

    Non-Whites in America is the #1 problem in America. The source and end cause of that problem are the Jews and their design for America.
    <P.
    Jared Taylor is doing a good job of getting people to see the #1 problem. He is useless when it comes to a solution to the problem. But since most Americans do not even see the #1 problem we need Taylor and American Renaissance to inform Americans.

    Logic will take them to the Jewish cause.

  238. Dane Wise's Gravatar Dane Wise
    July 12, 2012 - 12:49 am | Permalink

    That’s a really great point. Hell, they have millions of useful idiots built in to the evangelical movement. Blacks have no love of Jews, and browns don’t either. And the muslims would love to exterminate every last jew on earth. Yet, the stupid Jews make ethnic war on white Christians. You know what it is? It just hit me. On some level, down deep, they KNOW Jesus was the Messiah and that they screwed up, and they take that anger out on us. Otherwise, their devilish plots to ruin our nation make no sense whatsoever.

  239. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 12, 2012 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    @Fenria:

    The Jews have been a bunch of morons. They have allowed their hatred for whites to eclipse what is in their own long-term self-interest. I know many think this is part of a grand conspiracy in which Jews end up running the world from Israel, but I think it’s just another sad iteration oftheir stupid inability to get along with the larger society in which they live.

    They’ve been doing the same stupid thing for 2000 years. They are master exploiters, very clever, but not particularly wise.

  240. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    July 12, 2012 - 12:40 am | Permalink

    The funniest thing about jews is the total disconnect they have in realizing that their own existence is completely dependent upon the continued existence of white, western culture. All of these non whites they’re flooding Europe, the US, Canada, and Aus with hate them. And these non whites don’t feel the conditioned knee jerk reaction that we do to silence and censor their hatred. They don’t subject themselves to guilt.

    I remember one of my junior high history classes in an inner city Los Angeles school as one of the only white students in the class, when it got around to “holocaust time”, that part of the year when every school has to do it’s duty bound month of forcing the students to prostrate themselves before the specter of the holocaust, not a single black or Latino cared. Asians emotionlessly did the work assigned, but blacks and Latinos not only did not participate in the required mental and emotional flagellation, they grew bored, tired of the lesson, and went back to chatting with each other and ducking in and out of the classroom.

    The jews had better watch out how much they dilute our population and our culture. We’re the only friends they’ve got. Without us, their holocaust narrative and industry doesn’t buy them very much.

  241. Walter's Gravatar Walter
    July 12, 2012 - 12:11 am | Permalink

    Remember that the average IQ of Jews is 115 and therefore half the Jews have an IQ less than 115.

    By comparison the readers of TOO, if you include KMacD and the other writers as readers, must have an average IQ of 160. So half of us have an IQ under 160. That is why the Jews do not seem so damn smart to us. Ruthless yes, smart no.
    @Joanne Dee:

  242. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    July 12, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    Everyone talks about Diversity as a great goal. We should be pointing out, at every turn, the lack of diversity in the media, especially behind the scenes. Use their own language against them. We should ask, why aren’t their more Latinos, Arabs and Asians in executive roles in the media and Hollywood. MAKE them answer that. And the more diversity they actually had, the less cohesive and effective they would be.

    I notice Anti-White strongholds tend to except themselves from the burdens of affirmative action. Make them carry the same burden or at least make it clear to everyone the double standard exists.

  243. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 11, 2012 - 11:40 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Your attempt at etymology has indeed no Sinn ( sense).

    The name Franklin comes from Middle English Frankeleyn, meaning “freeman” or “a landowner of free but not noble birth”.

    There is no connection between -lin and German Sinn. Sorry, but for serious etymology you need more that cheap chutzpah.

  244. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 11, 2012 - 11:16 pm | Permalink

    Is that Franklin, **Franco**, meaning free and -lin as in **Sinn**, meaning sense, thus “making no sense”?

    You are quite funny yourself, but in a different, self-parodying way. Like David Duke as played on the Broadway stage by Stepin Fetchit.

  245. Dane Wise's Gravatar Dane Wise
    July 11, 2012 - 11:11 pm | Permalink

    Wolves run in packs. They are predatory. They take care of their own,etc.
    I understand what you’re saying though. I like wolves too.
    I meant the fact that Kevin had studied animal group systems and looked at the hard science behind such systems probably made it applicable to cohesive Jewish groups.
    The biggest thing about CofC, however, is the obvious truthfulness of the observations. That’s why the book is so compelling. It’s not so much that I didn’t already know and feel that something was terribly wrong, but that I didn’t have the language or the training to articulate it.
    This is another reason why people should lay off Taylor. Taylor’s knowledge is centered on entirely different aspects, crime and race, etc., so that maybe he simply isn’t conversant with the impact of Jewish groups.
    The comment above defending Jews by mentioning that Jews have done good(comedy) as well as bad would carry more weight if the ADL and the SPLC and the Hebrew Immigrant Society(and all of the rest of the ZILLIONS of jewish groups) would RETRACT their demands for open borders in the USA, especially now that the damage is known to all. Back off or face certain persecution in the future. Don’t tell us you weren’t warned.

  246. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 11, 2012 - 10:50 pm | Permalink

    @Dane Wise:
    I think you better had to compare Jewish behaviour with that of hyenas instead of wolves.

    Wolves in Germanic culture are admired for their courage, hence the element “wolf” in many Germanic names. Some examples : Adolph, a contraction of Old High Germanic adal + wulf, meaning “noble wolf”. Wolfgang, wolf + gang, meanig “having the gait of a wolf”. Wolbert, wolf + brecht, meaning “shining wolf”. Wolfger, wolf + ger, meaning “(courageous like a) wolf ( with his) spear”. Wolfhard, wolf + hard, meaning “hard like a wolf”.

    Is is from the wolves that man bred his companion the faithful dog, a “civilized” animal, while the hyenas remained for ever “wild” and treacherous, a fitting comparison with Jews.

  247. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 11, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    @Caleb:
    Only a Jew with typical Jewish chutzpah can think he can protect typical Jewish swindle with typical Jewish “humour”. No Gentile who is Jew-wise falls for such a cheap trick anymore. It’s about time you understand that your game is over.

  248. Caleb's Gravatar Caleb
    July 11, 2012 - 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Don’t forget comedy–writing AND performing [all the best stand up comics are Jews]. From Groucho Marx to Marvin Marx, head writer on the original “Honeymooners” series, from jack Benny to Jerry Seinfeld, Jews have dominated this field.

    Obviously a plot to steal the whole country while it’s been rendered helpless with laughter.

  249. Dane Wise's Gravatar Dane Wise
    July 11, 2012 - 9:41 pm | Permalink

    The reason there has been no refutation of CofC is because it CANNOT BE REFUTED. Hell, KM for the most part, quotes JEWISH references for his points! Effing brilliant. How are they going to dispute what their own scholar/gurus have already opined? I think it’s funny as hell. Go to Amazon and look at the silly criticisms. The book has 4.5 stars, and GLOWING reviews for the most part, but a few at the end rail “antisemite” and such, but are unable to produce even the TINIEST logical flaw or mistake in Kevin’s work. It also seems rather appropriate that Kevin first studied wolves, because I suspect that may of the qualities he saw in the wolves gave him insight into the predatory nature of the Hebrews.

  250. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    July 11, 2012 - 9:33 pm | Permalink

    @White European Jew: I kind of like that. Pronounced “wedge,” I presume? Also alludes to their divide and conquer tactics…

  251. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    July 11, 2012 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    @arthurdecco: If you have ever been in the military you know how they get you to conform. If you want to make rank you must conform to group think, at least in public. Trust me, there is no current military leader, that is zero, zilch, nada, that is trying to stop the “diversity is our strength” mantra. Not one.

  252. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    July 11, 2012 - 9:08 pm | Permalink

    @Tom:

    It always ends badly for the Jews. The unfortunate thing is that the Jews are generally able wreck the host nation before they are driven out or under.

    I think the Jews are going to find it harder, and harder & much more costly to get elected to political office in the future. For example, you may see one Jew in the US Senate representing New York, rather than 16 or whatever the current number is in the Senate.

    Friends won’t let friends vote for Jews.

  253. July 11, 2012 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article (and Duke’s featured video). Merits reposting elsewhere. Cheers!

  254. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    July 11, 2012 - 8:29 pm | Permalink

    @BOMFOG: The guy’s picture looks like a sephardi-mizrahi jew, not European.

  255. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 11, 2012 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    “White European Jew
    July 11, 2012 – 4:51 pm | Permalink
    @Mimir’s Well: The parallel, matching acronym is “WEJ” which will please some and distress others. It stands for “White European Jew” and is for use whenever the hateful acronym “WASP” is cast in our faces which, by the way, is used to describe both Andrew Fraser and Kevin MacDonald as well as most of the readers here in a totally negative sense.”

    Actually, the term Wej and Swej was used when I was growing up in NYC. It stands for Jew and Jews (backwards).

  256. July 11, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article.

  257. BOMFOG's Gravatar BOMFOG
    July 11, 2012 - 6:54 pm | Permalink

    Professor McDonald:

    Did you not notice at the bottom of the piece where it says that “Manny Friedman” is a pen name? So even Jews cannot speak openly about Jewish power.

    This article was written under an assumed name.

  258. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 11, 2012 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    @Alfred:
    Perhaps in such desperate circumstances our guide should be “is it good for whites” rather than “is it bad for Jews” or universal values such as freedom of speech?

  259. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 11, 2012 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:
    I like that one D.K. When can we hope for an article on the Talmudist effect on our legal system? You can start with the attack on the White shoe law firms back in the twenties. Please?

  260. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    July 11, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    You have made some great points. One of the factors which is under-estimated is the number of people who have good reason to resent the brainwashing they have been subjected to. It is a minor irritant as long as you have a decent income to support your family – many are no longer in that pleasant position. Think of all those men who have repeatedly seen affirmative action babies promoted above them. Now the incompetence of those people adds insult to injury. Any Jewish history will explain that antisemitism is most dangerous in financial downfalls because people seek a scapegoat, in fact, tolerance is simply exhausted. There are a lot of very angry, smart, if ill educated, kids out there who have swallowed all of this nonsense and followed all the rules since nursery school – all to find themselves without job prospects and loaded with debt. Easy money allowed many to enjoy a prolonged adolescence, well into their thirties. That is not such a diverting lifestyle if you are broke. All these kids have parents and grandparents who can provide no answers that sound plausible any more.

    You are a very welcome voice here. We need more women. I hope we hear much more from you.

  261. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    July 11, 2012 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    @Mimir’s Well: “Some marine…figured that the only way in which to get jews to fight and die in the war being fought in their interest was to to start calling the marines Junior Enlisted Warriors, that is JEWs! Such as, “We need more JEWs up here to repel the enemy,” or “I need two JEWs to volunteer for a patrol!” Needless to say, the powers that be put an end to that. ”

    What an elegant way to point a finger at those responsible, Mimir’s Well. That was one smart Marine.

    But how did the powers-that-be manage to put an end to that? I can see them cutting out the over-the-air stuff but how the hell could they stifle the muttered exchanges and private agreements-between-like-thinking-soldiers?

    I’m honestly looking for a straight answer on this. If we can identify the tools and stratagems “they” use to control us we can better formulate a defense.

  262. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    July 11, 2012 - 5:44 pm | Permalink

    “Without the Self-Chosen, no Asian, no Latino, no African would be a problem today for any of the fast disappearing White homelands.”
    Now there’s a real mantra!
    No misdirection like the other poor attempts. I’d also add that a few white college ‘idealists’ are hardly the menace some make them out to be. The game is always ‘divide and conquer’.

  263. July 11, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @Alfred:

    I’ve never found things like the Ripper case very interesting. But I remember reading a compelling account, on the web, of how both the lead inspector and the Scotland Yard Commissioner (Chief of Police) wrote memoirs of the ripper case. Both claimed that the ripper was a Jew and that he was captured and put in an asylum, and a year later killed himself by bashing his head, repeatedly, against a wall.

    Because Masonry is a front group for Jews (and thus run by them) and almost all police at the time were Masons, they were ordered to capture him to put an end to the killings, but not to prosecute or report the truth to the press.

  264. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 11, 2012 - 5:29 pm | Permalink

    @Joanne Dee:

    “And, don’t be foolish enough to think they won’t do anything to keep that power. It will be anything and everything. They will trump all the maniacs that came before them.”

    Good point. The Jews made “antisemitism” punishable by death in the USSR and you can be sure they want to make that global. If White racial consciousness increases you can be sure that laws, restrictions, and regulations against Whites will also increase. I can forsee mandatory miscegenation laws being implemented in places like England, France, Sweden, and Norway in order to stop “racism” and “hate.” I can also forsee trials without due process or jury, as in the USSR, with jews throwing all Whites in prison who refuse to obey draconian anti-White laws.

    The ultimate jewish goal is total, absolute control of everything worldwide. All finance, all media, all thought, all government must be in their hands, and their hands only. They will stop at nothing to attain this. They believe that they are the ultimate good and that everyone else is evil, and so therefore, they are allowed to oppress, rob, and kill anyone who stands up to them. Like Voltaire said:

    ”They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race…”

    The Slavs and Baltics experienced jewish bloodlust, mania, hatred, hysteria and delusions of grandeur first-hand in the gulags, special camps, and mass executions. It was only due to the Germans that the jews didn’t get to slaughter the rest of Europe, but they’re doing it now with immigration.

  265. July 11, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom:
    As to Jared Taylor. YOU CANNOT SAY: “WELL DONE” to those who fraternize and assist THE ENEMY OF OUR RACE.
    Without the Self-Chosen, no Asian, no Latino, no African would be a problem today for any of the fast disappearing White homelands.

    Jared Taylor desecrated on AR in a vandalizing of positively semitic proportions, Stanley Hornbeck’s review of CoC. You may read the ORIGINAL, version here:
    http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html

    NO criticism of the Hive is allowed to penetrate the Semitic Moderator at AR. Thus angry Whites are led down a blind alley. Even any attempt to link to the TRASHED, SEMITICALLY re-engineered version of the Hornbeck review is BLOCKED by the moderators at AR.

    In fact note that often the AR front page has more anti-Islam articles than what we face in America, namely Christian hordes, Mexicans, blacks, Guatemalans and so forth.

    Again that is the misdirection of Whites anger, to serve the purpose of the Hive.

    It is believed by observers that Mr Taylor’s wife is Jewish.

    While we believe in FREEDOM OF SPEECH, unlike our opponents, Mr Taylor has also demonstrated that, like his Jewish friends, he does not.

  266. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 11, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    @Alfred:
    Golda Meir also made a statement to that effect. It seems the “Samson Option” is deeply entrenched in the Jewish psyche, their ultimate “revenge” on the world.

  267. July 11, 2012 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    @James O’Meara:
    Excellent observations. Some years ago a top detective with Scotland Yard made it clear that it was the Jew, IIRC, named Kosminski who was, in fact, Jack the Ripper, and the witness who identified Kosminski refused to testify as it was against the rule of the Jew to cause another Jew to face the White Man’s law. Most interesting do check that out.

  268. July 11, 2012 - 5:05 pm | Permalink

    I would ask Kevin M. if he thinks this is significant, in light of the warnings given in the past, e.g.

    “What would serve the Jew-hating world better as repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a nuclear winter? Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?”
    –Professor David Perlmutter, writing in the Los Angeles Times, April 7, 2002

    “We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…We have the capability to take the world down with us, and I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”
    –Martin Van Creveld, Israeli Historian

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/israel-deploys-nuclear-weapons-on-german-submarines-a-836671.html
    Secret Cooperation
    Israel Deploys Nuclear Weapons on German Submarines

  269. Eric Hale's Gravatar Eric Hale
    July 11, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Great article. People really are waking up. I see it every single day, hear it every week. I just steer them in the right direction.

    ‘Murrcuh. It ain’t over till its over.

  270. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    July 11, 2012 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

    I agree with everything prof. MacDonald says in this article. Only his term “conflict of interest” seems too polite to me. Rather it is a struggle of life or death. The Jews want our destruction, and we don’t want to be destroyed.

  271. White European Jew's Gravatar White European Jew
    July 11, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    @Mimir’s Well: The parallel, matching acronym is “WEJ” which will please some and distress others. It stands for “White European Jew” and is for use whenever the hateful acronym “WASP” is cast in our faces which, by the way, is used to describe both Andrew Fraser and Kevin MacDonald as well as most of the readers here in a totally negative sense.

  272. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 11, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    It appears that the name Manny Friedman is also a pseudonym. Surprised?

  273. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    July 11, 2012 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    Fake “Jews” is my label of choice because it had the power of ultimate truth behind it.

  274. July 11, 2012 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    @Joanne Dee:

    It’s a well-known [well, some of us know it] technique, the Mason’s call it The Revelation of the Method. You commit a great crime, then openly boast about it, and no one lifts a finger to punish you. Then, your power is redoubled, as your “victims” are now accessories after the fact.

    Remember the writing on the wall in the Jack the Ripper case?

    “The Juwes (sic) Are the Men that will Not be Blamed for Nothing.”

  275. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    July 11, 2012 - 4:33 pm | Permalink

    The people on here might be a minority but they lack cohesion and ethnocentricty. The fault line seems to be religion.

  276. TyronRobertParsons's Gravatar TyronRobertParsons
    July 11, 2012 - 4:31 pm | Permalink

    Kevin MacDonald

    Excellent peice.One that needs to be spread far and wide because it has the power to convert a large percentage of the unconverted.

  277. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 11, 2012 - 4:31 pm | Permalink

    @JustaWhiteMom: I meant to say “American identity” not (oxymoronic?) “multicultural identity.”

    Also KM is right about the moral fervor. My conviction grows every day. There really is no answer to the argument that whites deserve self-determination, unless anti-whites are prepared to resort to blatantly anti-white hate speech and state that we deserve it because of the alleged crimes of our ancestors. Of course, that would be self-defeating because one of the pillars of liberalism is that all should be judged as individuals. I think anti-white hate speech incites hatred of whites but it also has the unintended and undesired effect of waking up our people.

  278. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 11, 2012 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

    And another thing apropos of the discussion of amren. I can’t remember exactly how I found it, but I do remember how I felt when I found it. I literally felt like I could finally breathe again after the years of PC thought control from higher ed and media. I also felt like I was engaging in some sort of guilty pleasure. I’m sure I’m not the first to point out that the extreme Jewish taboo surrounding race will increasingly create a certain curiosity about it. There is not a damned thing they can do about this. The more paranoid and repressive they get about it, the more curious people will become. I think that for me the most persuasive thing about KM and DD is the utter lack of any Jewish response. Why are there no comments following Duke’s videos that show why he is wrong? Why have no Jews refuted KM’s books?

  279. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    July 11, 2012 - 4:14 pm | Permalink

    The other thing that I think will give us a little bit of momentum in the coming years is the inevitable decline of the United States. Right now we are still rich and powerful enough that young people will not want to give up their multicultural identity. As we keep going down the tubes, white youth willl begin to think about their potential and how it is being wasted under the multiculti regime. I think they will start thinking more radically.

  280. thm's Gravatar thm
    July 11, 2012 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Dr David Duke’s latest video, just out, does an effective job at calling attention to “unmentionable”, taboo truths and facts:

    Real Racism and the ZioMedia

  281. Jim's Gravatar Jim
    July 11, 2012 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Friedman also gives us a glimpse of the root causes of the recurring jewish downfall, albeit unintentionally.

    Part of the key to jewish success is their confidence, their cockiness. This confidence eventually leads them to believe there will never be any more pograms against them, that the most recent persecution against them [defense, in the eyes of the persecutors] was the last.

    Of course, they (we) aren’t even remotely there yet, as the media’s restrictions against anything that’s even remotely jewish critical proves. The spectre of Hitler is still around every corner for many jews. 50 years ago, however, no jew would dare say publicly what Friedman did. Everything’s heading in that direction.

    The time will arrive, and maybe in the not-so-distant future, when many more jews openly brag about their control over all other groups. And then, the process will start all over again.

    The truly intelligent , insightful jews, such as Rabbi Dovid Weiss or Philip Weiss, recognize this and try to reign in their people’s compulsive power/control lust. They know that it’s in the long term interest of jewishness. They know that the brains without the brawn will ultimately end in disaster. But their efforts are largely fruitless. As Friedman points out, it’s a drive that jews are born with, an impulse that’s not easily dissuaded.

  282. Rob's Gravatar Rob
    July 11, 2012 - 3:39 pm | Permalink

    The name of the Stein author appears to be Joel Stein, not Dan Stein. Little difference, of course. Joel, Daniel, Bejamin, Ephraim, Shlomo, etc….

  283. Dane Wise's Gravatar Dane Wise
    July 11, 2012 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    This is a GREAT article Kevin, with a huge amount of info and very powerful, persuasive, and compelling arguments.

    Ramz’s video is great too. We have the right to exist and the right to self determination.

    You’re right Kevin, we DO have morality on our side.

  284. July 11, 2012 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    even though it’s in a Jewish publication and intended to be part of a Jews-only dialog

    It’s funny the amount of truth about Jewish Power that is hidden right in plain sight. One can visit the “Judaica” section of any book store or library and read, from the pens of Jews, all of the same info that WNs and other truth-tellers write.

    For example, Slezkine’s, The Jewish Century says exactly the same things as The Protocols or Ford’s International Jew. The only differences being that The Jewish Century was written by a Jew, claims that Jewish hegemony is good, and announces it as a fait accompli. Whereas the other two books were written by goyim, warn against Jewish Power, and were prophetic for haven written about what was going to happen.

  285. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    July 11, 2012 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    @Mimir’s Well:

    PREAs : Permanently Resident Enemy Aliens

  286. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    July 11, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    I wondered if Manny Friedman understands (and God bless him for his enthusiasm that this whole mess of Jewish power can turn out to be a good thing)- but that the end game of the Jewish rise to the top can never be sustained because the principle of sedation necessarily needs a host to feed off of. It just becomes what we now see in Israel-very ugly indeed. Is the world to become one big concentration camp?

  287. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    July 11, 2012 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Grow up.

  288. norman S's Gravatar norman S
    July 11, 2012 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    A perfect example of the growing anger was {is} the OWS movement. It was anger at the rampant Crony Capitalism and Tarp swindle but the elite infiltrated and was behind changing the image to anarchy. To a lesser extent the Tea Party also was viewed as a threat and was almost completely co opted. Perhaps the latest example was Ron Paul’s campaign and the way it was ignored or misrepresented in the media. The huge young crowds were never shown and many state elections were stolen. See U tube “Ron Paul called a vicious anti semite”, The good news is people are waking up

  289. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    July 11, 2012 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    @fender: Ha! I like it! Perhaps a bit crude for the uninititated, but very nice!

  290. fender's Gravatar fender
    July 11, 2012 - 2:52 pm | Permalink

    @Mimir’s Well:

    “We need to come up with a suitable acronym for the jews, as they did to us, ala “WASPs.”

    How about Circumcised Unscrupulous Near-eastern Troublemakers?

  291. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 11, 2012 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    And, don’t be foolish enough to think they won’t do anything to keep that power. It will be anything and everything. They will trump all the maniacs that came before them.

  292. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 11, 2012 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

    “Those who bind my hands behind my back today, will feel them around their necks tomorrow.” Author unknown

  293. Mimir's Well's Gravatar Mimir's Well
    July 11, 2012 - 2:30 pm | Permalink

    We need to come up with a suitable acronym for the jews, as they did to us, ala “WASPs.” It should have some humor in it to make it more palatable to the uninitiated, but still come across with a message. When in Iraq a few years ago, we recieved a lecture in regards to our behavior. Some marine, perhaps a TOO reader, figured that the only way in which to get jews to fight and die in the war being fought in their interest was to to start calling the marines Junior Enlisted Warriors, that is JEWs! Such as, “We need more JEWs up here to repel the enemy,” or “I need two JEWs to volunteer for a patrol!” Needless to say, the powers that be put an end to that.

  294. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    July 11, 2012 - 2:19 pm | Permalink

    I often question their so-called intelligence. Very often. In addition to the tribe making the same mistakes over and over and over, they flaunt with maniacal glee their “ownership” of a country that is in pitiful decline, no thanks to them. They are so full of themselves, so freaking full of themselves, they flaunt this stupidty for the world to see. Yes, Jews, the world knows and I personally “thank you” for destroying my country, the land of my ancestors, and the rest of the Western World while you were at it. Oh, by the way, who’s going to rescue you next time when the rot you’ve created catches up with you? There will be no Allied rescue next time that is a guarantee.

4 Trackbacks to "Manny Friedman: Jews “own a whole freaking country”; and yes, that includes the media"

  1. on July 30, 2012 at 11:01 am
  2. on July 14, 2012 at 3:12 pm
  3. on July 12, 2012 at 2:51 pm
  4. on July 11, 2012 at 8:58 pm

Comments are closed.