My “Ask Me Anything” on VOAT

Kevin MacDonald

I did an “Ask me anything” at VOAT on May 5th. It’s a bit like speed dating because it’s all done quickly and without a lot of deliberation. This is a somewhat edited version, including some comments on some of my replies and my comments. Sorry I didn’t get around to all the questions. People can continue the discussion here. Lots of good points from the questioners.

[–] brigbother: Hello Dr. MacDonald: How can we foster honest conversations about Jewish behavior without causing people to immediately be turned off?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: It’s very difficult. People’s eyes tend to glaze over when the subject is broached. And the problem is that it takes a real commitment to get into it. You can’t give a decent argument on this very complicated subject with sound bites. It takes some serious reading. Dealing with Jewish issues is often the last hurdle for many in the Alt Right. In a way, it’s not necessary to talk about Jews to get at the core issue of White identity, but I do think that without talking about Jews you really can’t understand how we got to where we are now.

[–] brigbother: Thank you. I have definitely been subjected to the glazed eyes treatment when I’ve brought it up with people. You are right, it takes serious study to understand the JQ. My problem is that people are eager to change the subject and forget about it. Any tips on inspiring people’s curiosity so that they do seek out serious reading?

[–] smokratez: Tell people that you like what the Jews are doing. How you admire their closed borders. How they build a wall. That they are serious about trying to abolish miscegenation. That they oppose diversity and multiculturalism. I say that all I want for my country is what Jews have in Israel, and I mean it.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Good point by smokratez: I would also suggest getting on social media and following people who post intelligently about Jews. I follow a lot of people on Twitter who make good points about Jews.

[–] KroggRache: Thank you for your invaluable work! I have just gotten The Culture of Critique but haven’t read it yet, although I’ve heard excerpts and its reputation certainly proceeds it. Sorry for the length of post but one question that is on my mind stems from seeing and predicting the results of the Jewish lobby. They’re trying to engineer the destruction of the European whites; Inciting us to be social justice warriors, to join the LGBT, experiment with our sexuality, discourage us from having kids, instilling "white guilt", make it hard for us to find work, to get a home, more expensive to raise kids, etc. Essentially those whites that will not have kids are the liberal ones, the obedient ones, the ‘tolerant’ ones. The remaining whites may become the Jewish nightmare; the ones most aware of and most resentful of the Jewish tricks, and they’re consciously trying to have as many kids as possible and raise them into the so called alt-right movement. Perhaps the Jews are engineering their own doom by inevitably causing us whites to become their super-enemy. This is my question: In the future when we fight the Jewish power, how do we avoid pushing Jews too hard so that they themselves will not end up becoming our super-enemies?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I do think that there is selection going on whereby Whites with more traditional values are having a disproportionate share of children, or at least a disproportionate percentage of middle class White children. (The White working class is having huge problems. They have suffered the most from globalism and immigration, and the loss of traditional family supports has had a very negative impact on marriage and family life. ) It was very heartening to visit with people because they are highly socially networked and very family oriented. I had never been to an Alt Right meeting where there were children and wives, etc. We need more of that. The fact that so many educated, urban-dwelling Whites have plugged into the liberal zeitgeist is disastrous. But I am an optimist and I do think things will eventually turn around. But in any case, we have to keep fighting.

[–] KroggRache: Yes, I know what you mean. I had the honor and pleasure of getting into an online community that over the course of several months have grown into a couple hundred users. We’re like a tightly knit family with shared goals, some of which involves getting together, hopefully some of us end up living within a close proximity, and we can build foundations of real community, and through our diverse skill sets can become less dependent on mainstream means of survival, most of which are poison to our race anyways.

[–] TheDeadHand: What do you think the future of America is for whites? I know you don’t have a crystal ball but what is your best guess as to what sort of life my grandchildren will have as white people in America? Is it still too soon to tell? If so what is the most practical thing we can do on an individual level to make sure our children and grandchildren have a bright future? Hope this question isn’t too broad. Thank you for your time.

Also if anyone would like to join our discord server at then you’re more than welcome to. We promote ethnonationalism and traditional family values, as well as discussing politics and other such things.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Of course, I am deeply worried about our future. I see a future when Whites will be a despised, persecuted minority unless things are turned around. I also see a highly racialized world where voting patterns and associational patterns more and more determined by race. I commend you for having a site dedicated to ethnonationalism and traditional family values, and I mentioned TrueCascadia previously. We have to each make decisions to make our personal, family lives adaptive (e.g., by having children) but also think what we can do for the movement. Everyone can do something. We have to think about how we can make a contribution to the wider movement.

[–] bhendri123: We definitely need to have children. 3 is a good middle class amount to have. If you have well off 4 or 5 is a good number

[–] GayGuyShitlord: Make a lot of money, invest it well, start your own businesses. The Western world is going the way of Latin America, where the (mostly white) elites and upper middle class, all of whom inherit their wealth and status, can have a great life while occasionally brushing with the masses of poor people and their violence and misery. But if you’re white and middle class or lower? Don’t be in that position.

[–] Ajaxofbarbaria: Thank you
for the link. My life just got a whole lot brighter after the interview: D

[–] JohnRivers: Why is Europe even more degenerate now than it was pre-WW2 — despite there being so many fewer Jews in Europe? Is it just a matter of the American Media being that powerful and influential globally — and Jews having such a disproportionate influence on American Media?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: In general, yes. Western culture goes beyond national borders to affect all Western countries, with the US in the lead. This is true of media culture emanating from Hollywood and New York, but also academic culture and the arts. Also, throughout the West, the cultural revolution has been top-down, emanating from elites in the media, academia, business and politics. These people control the narrative, at least prior to the internet and social media, and they have strong connections throughout the West. People naturally look up to them. This is why the Trump victory seemed so implausible — it was a hostile takeover — and why a Le Pen victory would be amazing. And this means that small numbers of people can have a huge effect on the culture. In a nutshell, this is how Jewish influence works.

[–] iownyou: Europe even more degenerate now than it was pre-WW2. We’re getting there, but our society is nowhere near Weimar Germany levels. When was the last time you saw child prostitutes in the streets?

[–] 1936today: I promise if the US had a trash economy to the extent that Wiemar did, there would be just as many, if not more, child prostitutes.

[–] Disemboweled: Considering
that even scholarly work focusing on jewis influence such as yours is derided as anti-semitic, and that the ADL, instead of offering a serious rebuttal prefers to brand you as "neo-nazi’s favorite academic", what is the likelihood of
there ever being a healthy dialogue in the west about the Jewish Question?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Glad you phrased that the way you did. The ADL and the SPLC, etc. resort to labels without any serious attempt to rebut my arguments and the things I cite (hundreds of Jewish sources, e.g.). I suppose what could happen is that my work is somehow mentioned by a person prominent in the media, but I rather doubt this would happen. And even if it did, it would not provoke a real dialog. In short, not optimistic.

[–] Disemboweled: The lack of discussion in this regard leads to a hardening of positions and, consequently, the attraction towards anti-Semitism itself and all associated conspiracy theories. Surely if Jews are, as you theorized, mainly motivated by self-preservation they would realize the perilous position that this complete non-admission of guilt has put them in. Or is it self-deception?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I agree that the obvious lack of honesty from the organized Jewish community and Jewish academics on issues related to anti-Semitism and Jewish influence results in non-Jews becoming more radicalized. People don’t see any possibility of rational dialog.

[–] Kekfashy: Thanks for the AMA, Dr. MacDonald. Do you think that it is possible to stop White Genocide without a violent culmination?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: The longer this dispossession continues, the more cataclysmic the results will be. I do think civil war is a possibility long term. It’s interesting that Marine Le Pen said that a result of the election will be a lot of anger, and I think that’s true no matter who wins. Le Pen’s voters really do think (rightly) that what is happening to France is an absolute disaster. They likely think of it as what Mike Anton calls “Flight 93 election” — an election that would result in the end of everything if they lose. What do they do when they lose hope of winning an election? And the antifa there have already showed their violence when the far left guy didn’t make it to the second round. It may get really ugly.

[–] romainvicta: In CoC you argue that Jews have gotten themselves into positions of power that can widely influence the greater population as a form of hyper-tribal instinct and survival. At this point, do you think they are looking for total hegemony over the gentiles or is the decadence of non-Jewish culture as a result of their influence simply a result of, well, the Jews in power themselves? Since people in charge exert their views and influences over the others.

Also, in your opinion, do you think that Trump is controlled by the tribe? Do Jews have as big of an influence, if not bigger, in politics today than during the Civil Rights era all across the western world as to directly affect the presidencies and top leadership of our countries?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: The thesis of CofC is that Jewish intellectuals have been the backbone of the intellectual left and have mounted an assault on traditional values, etc. I wouldn’t phrase it as a master plan but it is certainly true that Jews on the left wanted to destroy what Abby Hoffman called the WASP power elite and assume a position of power (see: Jewish intellectuals also tended to take skeptical, hostile views of traditional Christian morality–see the current article on The Occidental Observer — as John Murray Cuddihy pointed out in The Ordeal of Civility. Jewish power must always make allowance to attract cooperating non-Jews because Jews are such a small minority, so, for example, neocons have promoted non-Jews who are on page with their ideas, and the same goes for Hollywood, etc. These people have great careers. The anti-White revolution is highly incentivized.

I worry about Trump — especially the apparent demotion of Bannon and the rise of Ivanka/Jared. I am trying to wrap my head around it and write something on it soon, but it’s pretty hard without insider knowledge. There certainly are a lot of Jews in the administration and, with perhaps the exception of Steve Miller, they do not have a history of values supporting a rollback on immigration, economic nationalism, non-interventionist foreign policy that we liked Trump for originally. Unlike many on the Alt Right, I have not given up though. Trump is under unbelievable pressure from all sides, including the courts and especially the media, trying to de-legitimize his presidency. In such a situation, it’s very difficult to go for radical changes. Perhaps if he can generate more political capital (e.g., if the health care bill is a success–which I doubt), things could change.

[–] DennisDale1: After Jews, what group has the most successful group evolutionary strategy?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: That’s a tough one, partly because there are lots of different types of strategies. Historically, Jews were deeply concerned about keeping their gene pool separate, and other groups have done that. The Middle East is full of them. Recently though in writing about ancient Rome I had the idea that they had a strategy that was open to incorporating new peoples. They were not genetically exclusive but rather gradually absorbed other peoples and allowed them upward mobility–an exogamous group strategy if you will, sort of like if the EU became a White superstate so that there was gradual mixture among the various European groups. This probably made sense when they were dealing with closely related groups (like the different Italian groups) because it allowed them to expand militarily far beyond what would have been possible if they had kept everyone else out. But when they got too far afield, it really became a mishmash and not really an evolutionary strategy any longer.

[–] ScionOfJustice: The Jews constantly do the same thing in every country. How much of their behavior do you associate with their genetics? What is the best way to get other people to "wake-up" to race realism & notice the problems the JQ brings to any society they inhabit? How can we bring down the Jew/ What is their biggest weakness?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I have argued that there is a genetic basis to ethnocentrism and this is a big part of what makes Jews do what they do. But a lot has to do with their culture–e.g., their lachrymose view of history as being persecuted by Christians and before that the Romans. Of course, they never try to understand how their own behavior was involved in all this, or at least they don’t publicly acknowledge it. This quote from John Murray Cuddihy is really about Jewish culture:

From Solomon Maimon to Normon Podhoretz, from Rachel Varnhagen to Cynthia Ozick, from Marx and Lassalle to Erving Goffman and Harold Garfinkel, from Herzl and Freud to Harold Laski and Lionel Trilling, from Moses Mendelssohn to J. Robert Oppenheimer and Ayn Rand, Gertrude Stein, and Reich I and II (Wilhelm and Charles), one dominating structure of an identical predicament and a shared fate imposes itself upon the consciousness and behavior of the Jewish intellectual in Galut [exile]: with the advent of Jewish Emancipation, when ghetto walls crumble and the shtetlach [small Jewish towns] begin to dissolve, Jewry—like some wide-eyed anthropologist—enters upon a strange world, to explore a strange people observing a strange halakah (code). They examine this world in dismay, with wonder, anger, and punitive objectivity. This wonder, this anger, and the vindictive objectivity of the marginal nonmember are recidivist; they continue unabated into our own time because Jewish Emancipation continues into our own time. (John Murray, Cuddihy, The Ordeal of Civility, 1974, 68)

Besides reading scholarly books about race realism and the Jewish issues, I would suggest reading sites like American Renaissance, Alt Right, The Occidental Observer, Occidental Dissent, and getting on social media. The people I follow on Twitter emphasize the hatred and crimes against Whites, the power of the Israel Lobby, etc.

Re Jewish weakness: They’re a tough group and have often been through difficult times in their history. I don’t see a big weakness now, although the policies they have been pursuing in the West are leading to more and more tensions that will likely prove cataclysmic in the end. If people understand the role of Jews in bringing all this about, there could be very dire consequences for Jews. It wouldn’t be the first time that Jewish behavior resulted in very serious problems for Jews.

[–] brett_stevens: To what degree do you think Jewish identity was shaped by the mixed-race origins of the Jewish people?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I rather doubt that’s important. I don’t know of data showing that in general mixed-race people are more ethnocentric. In the case of Judaism, I ascribe it to their Middle Eastern origins ("ethnocentrism central") but also their religious ideology and the fact that less ethnocentric Jews were likely excluded (or excluded themselves) over the centuries. We see that now, of course, with many Jews opting out, especially in the diaspora in the West.

[–] JohnRivers: Which country will be the proverbial Canary In the Coalmine — the one whose collapse will be a lesson to all other White Countries that Diversity is destroying us? Many say it will be Sweden or Germany or France. I worry that it will be America. Our demographics seem much farther gone than even the worst European nations.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I agree with dingomeat below that South Africa may be a huge wake-up call for Whites. The advertised harmonious future didn’t materialize, and Whites, especially farmers, are being slaughtered, and we hear Black politicians threatening what amounts to genocide. Why should we think it’s going to be different elsewhere? Re Europe vs America, Europe’s Muslim problem is qualitatively different than the US. They have larger, more concentrated populations, and they are very aggressive and hostile to the West, its peoples and its cultures. They are building parallel societies. I would think France would be the first to blow up.

[–] dingomeat: If Haiti wasn’t enough for you, then look to Rhodesia. If Rhodesia wasn’t enough for you, then you can watch South Africa in real time.

[–] ViaAlpina: Thank you for doing the AMA Dr. MacDonald. What are the Jewish elite’s plans for dealing with the rise of China as a world spanning superpower? Do you think they will attempt to infiltrate the elite through intermarriage? E.g. Maxima Chan Zuckerberg. Failing this, will they use Western economic and military dominance to contain Chinese ambitions?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: All of those strategies will be used to some extent, but as long as they have outsize influence in the West, using that influence and taking advantage of Western military and economic strength are the most likely way of containing China. Europeans are far more open to Jewish influence because we are relatively individualistic and because liberal values are deeply entrenched. Other countries will be far more difficult.

[–] 1Sorry_SOB: Without naming names obviously, have you received encouragement though the years from any surprising sources?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: The biggest encouragement has been that no one has written a critique of my academic work on Jews that amounts to anything. They simply ignore it. After all the uproar at CSULB, however, it was great to make many new friends and acquaintances from many countries who appreciate my work. I enjoy going to conferences and talking with people about my work. Come to think of it, one surprise is that a few Jews have been friendly. I just talked with a couple Jewish college students yesterday, and I have a Jewish writer writing for TOO. Some Jews get it. They realize not only that we are being dispossessed but they acknowledge the role of the Jewish community in bringing this about.

[–] 1Sorry_SOB: “After all
the uproar at CSULB” I recall that, it must have been very unpleasant.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: It was unpleasant but I got pretty inured to it. I really didn’t respect the people who were going after me. They had zero intellectual integrity.

[–] dingomeat: Well, don’t be surprised when they network amongst each other within your organization.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: In fact the people who led the charge against me at CSULB were almost all Jewish faculty. And of course many non-Jews went along, happy to signal their virtue and make friends within the power structure. No one spoke out in my favor.

[–] JohnRivers: The Cochran theory about Ashkenazi intelligence ( postulates that the elevated Ashkenazi IQ arose over the last 1000+ years in Europe due to being confined to white collar professions and smarter Jews outbreeding dumber Jews. But I’ve wondered why they were chosen for such professions if they didn’t already give indications that they had the aptitude for it. Nobody would put Somalis in charge of their bookkeeping, for example. I’m curious if you believe the Cochran theory or not, and when you think Ashkenazi acquired their elevated IQs. Thx.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I have commented on the Cochran/Harpending theory here. Obviously, I have a lot of reservations. Some Jewish groups were practicing eugenics long before the medieval period in Europe, and there is evidence from much earlier periods (e.g., the late Roman empire) and among Sephardic Jews for economic domination, involvement in "white collar" professions, business, trading, etc. They became very adept at this niche. A recent article of mine summarizes events in Eastern Europe that I also think relevant for selection among Jews for intelligence, business acumen and for a certain ruthlessness in pursuing success in business.

[–] SDifference: Also relevant is their IQ used to poll at like 85 or something, so why the increase? Actual increase? Better metrics?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Better metrics probably the most important. Tests done early in the century sometimes didn’t take account of language difficulties.

[–] SaveTheChiIdren: Do you think Jews are engineering transgender degeneracy. Would you label trannies as mentally ill?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I haven’t seen explicit connections between Jews and transgenderism. A possibility is that people on the left are naturally competing with each other for intellectual leadership, so people get more radical over time and look for new victim groups. Once gay marriage was legalized, they were looking for a new frontier. My main thought on transgenderism, after reading some of the work of Paul R. McHugh, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, is that there shouldn’t be interventions for children. People should make these decisions as adults; there are a lot of things that puberty can change, and I worry that transgender activists are getting more and more children to think they are really the opposite sex. After the surge prenatally, boys don’t have a lot of testosterone during childhood. Puberty may get a lot these children back on track. But I do think at least some transgender people are deranged. It’s likely seen by many as a way to be trendy and fit in with a leftie social circle for people who are basically inadequate and unsuccessful in their normal lives.

[–] orteil: As far as connections between Jews and transgenderism go, Marcus Hirschfeld, Jewish sexologist, is credited as having created the first advocacy group for transgenderism (he also coined the word "transvestite"). Stanley H. Biber was a Jewish physician who was considered a pioneer of sex reassignement surgery, and even had a South Park cameo for that reason.

And obviously the largely Jewish-controlled media constantly promotes transgenderism, whether it’s through "celebrities" like Caitlyn Jenner or Dana International (Israeli singer), National Geographic’s "Gender Revolution" issue, Time Magazine’s recent "Beyond He or She" issue, TV shows like Orange is the New Black or Transparent (which have been covered on TOO), ads, certainly academia… The news about Facebook adding 56 gender options to their site wasn’t that surprising either considered who owns the site.

The whole idea of sex and gender being "fluid" and a "social construct" is very reminiscent of the way Jewish sociologists have argued about race, which is something you’ve covered extensively, or Marxist ideas about class. It’s also consistent with the sort of sexual degeneracy they’ve been known to promote.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Good point. Andrew Joyce has a terrific 2-part article on this on TOO.

[–] Czakal: Apart from your own, what books would you most recommend reading?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Everyone on the Alt Right should be familiar with the ideas of other Alt Right writers–Jared Taylor, Raymond Wolters on Black/White differences in education, Tom Sunic, Frank Salter on ethnic genetic interests and the costs of multiculturalism, Ricardo Duchesne on the uniqueness of the West. Andrew Joyce and Guillaume Durocher are coming out with books on their work, some of which has appeared on The Occidental Observer. I am sure there are others… We have academically oriented articles in The Occidental Quarterly on all the topics important for the Alt Right, and I am making a point of including my longer essays there. They will eventually be a book on the Western culture.

[–] The-Chronic: Dr. MacDonald, thank you for taking the time to do this AMA. I have a few questions: What was the most eye-opening fact you found while writing the Culture of Critique series? What are some of your concrete recommendations for building a White ethnic identity, given that we don’t have the advantage of claiming we’re a religion and not a tribe? Do you have specific ideas for strategies we can employ to promote White interests?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Culture of Critique was sort of an accident. As I was reading for my first book, I came across a lot of material showing hostility toward the people and culture of the West, so I gradually compiled this. I guess the biggest surprise once I saw how common and important this was, was to realize the role of Jews and the organized Jewish community in shaping immigration policy in the US and other Western countries.

As you suggest, it’s a bit unnatural for us to be highly tribal (we tend toward individualism), but I do think that being on social media by Alt Right personalities and reading Alt Right literature will certainly point toward greater White identity. Social media is filled with reports of hatred toward Whites, crimes committed against Whites because they are White, reports of Jewish activism against the West, data on academic failure of Blacks, etc. I think plugging into this will definitely get people to thinking what the world will be like with Whites as a minority. Our biggest problem is being shut out of the big media, but we have a high profile on social media—my favorite is Twitter. Indeed, without social media, we would be nowhere. Since the Trump campaign we have gotten quite a bit of visibility even in the mainstream media, but there is pretty much always a hostile tone and accentuating the negative (Nazi salutes, etc.). But events continue to go as we predict. We don’t see improvement in academic performance of Blacks, e.g., and we see high rates of sexual assault and other crimes, poor academic performance and rates of labor participation among many immigrant groups. We continue to see high-profile examples of Jewish activism against White interests, such as Jewish organizations advocating generous immigration and refugee policies. White anxiety wasn’t the only issue that Trump capitalized on, but it was important for many Whites, and these trends will increase in the future. Imagine France in 5 years if Macron wins. More crime, more disorder, less of a feeling of being in what we thought of as France. But the longer it takes, the more cataclysmic it will be when the conflict occurs. Civil war is definitely a possibility.

[–] 1Sorry_SOB: As you suggest, it’s a bit unnatural for us to be highly tribal (we tend toward individualism), but I do think that being on social media by Alt Right personalities and reading Alt Right literature will certainly point toward greater White identity.

Revert to a normal state of mind. I think we should try act like our positions are natural rather than ALT.

[–] thealtright: Given that we don’t have the advantage of claiming we’re a religion, we certainly could and should incorporate our own natural indigenous European pagan religion into our identity as a whole in a way don’t currently do as a large group any more.

[–] 1Sorry_SOB: If it’s too forced the opposition will throw that back in our face. Like Kwanzaa. We should just say, "we’re a people if you don’t get it too bad."

[–] nationalsocialism: I’ve read your book, The Culture of Critique, and I’m curious if you think the Holocaust happened and if so, to the same extent as it’s described? If it’s a simple yes, could you expound at least upon how you think the Holocaust affects the present day? Thanks.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Whatever the truth about the Holocaust (and I decided a long time ago not to go there), the important thing is the cultural influence of the Holocaust, and I have written about that, saying, e.g., that we are in "the culture of the Holocaust" (p. xli and following pages: ). It’s a huge influence on our culture and is often used to attain Jewish political goals, e.g., diversity and immigration as mandated by the Holocaust, Israel.

[–] 1Sorry_SOB: A pleasure to talk to you Kevin! I have been reading you for years. Thanks for joining us today. 2 questions: Why do you think there is not more scholarly study of gentile/Jewish relations (similar to yours) from a revisionist gentile perspective? What is your take on the Sassoon family and the Opium Trade in China? Jewish historians almost celebrate it. The only critical histories I’ve read have been from a bit dodgy white nationalist web sites.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Well, scholarly work on Jews is very difficult. I have been very gratified by seeing scholars like Andrew Joyce, who has a PhD in history, write very informed essays on Jewish history. But he writes under a pseudonym, for obvious reasons. It’s a losing proposition for a young academic. I don’t know much about the Sassoon story but I have read enough to know they were involved in the opium trade and encouraged imperialistic practices toward China. I would like to see a good, non-apologetic account. There are similar accounts relating to the Oppenheimer family, the Boer war, and the diamond trade in South Africa.

[–] 1WinfieldBlue: What is your general view of Jordan B Peterson?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I have seen him in videos and am impressed. Anyone who stands up to the left on campus these days is very brave, and he seems to be very sensible in his views. I wish there were more like him.

[–] EllenPaosEgo: Were you inspired at all by The International Jew by Henry Ford?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I learned a lot from it and wrote a lengthy summary/review. This was first rate journalism that only rarely got off the rails. For example, it was very interesting to see how Jewish department stores influenced editorial content in newspapers by refusing to advertise in ones they didn’t like. They had a lot of clout even in the early twentieth century.

[–] This-Is-My-Truth: A tactic they’re employing to good effect more than a century later on platforms such as YouTube. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

[–] LeopoldXXII: When did you decide that you should publish your findings rather than stay silent and avoid persecution? Our societies need more men and women who display as much courage and fortitude as yourself.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Thanks. What started out as a purely intellectual puzzle (group selection in humans) became much more than that. I was very excited about what I was finding and just decided to let it happen. Never regretted it. Academic parties are pretty boring anyway.

[–] JohnRivers: Who counts as White? For example, Richard Spencer seems to include Non-European Near Eastern Caucasians if their people have a history of Christianity (such as Georgians or Lebanese Christians) but excludes Ashkenazi even though, genetically, Ashkenazi are a hybrid Near Eastern and European ppl and therefore genetically closer to us than Persians, Arabs, Georgians and other Near Eastern races. I tend to think of Race primarily in terms of Genetics, but someone like Spencer seems to think of it primarily in terms of Narrative and Story – and the spread of Christianity brought several non-European Caucasian groups into a shared story with us. I’m just curious what your definition of White is. Thx.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I am not really familiar with Richard Spencer’s writing on that. I take a genetic perspective best argued in Frank Salter’s On Genetic Interests, which I think is a must-read. (I forgot to mention that one earlier as an important book for the Alt Right.) Race is a fuzzy concept and there will be people who are at the borders, but there is a very strong argument for a biological basis for race.

[–] HammerZeit: Jews in the US seem to be out-marrying at a high rate. Two questions: a) will we see the importance of Israel fade as the memory of the holocaust recedes? and b) Will we look back at the post-war years as a brief blip in the ongoing assimilation and ultimate disappearance of Jews as a distinct group? I have four 1/4 Jewish nieces and nephews and their Jewishness is a dim memory.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Many Jews are intermarrying, but only in the diaspora and only in the West. One major reason for the establishment of Israel among early Zionists was to prevent intermarriage and of course they have succeeded. The Jewish community in the West will be made up increasingly of Orthodox or very conservative Jews. They have a high birthrate and many of them, like Jared Kushner, are very successful and talented, and some of these people do leave their communities and outmarry, and they tend to become more secular. These less ethnocentric Jews will be pulled away from the community, like your nieces, but the community will not disappear, even in the West, and I suspect that it will continue to be led by Jews who are not intermarried or the children of intermarried Jews. And it’s doubtful that it will become less powerful, although they will have to deal with large groups of immigrants how are not sympatico with Jews. This could be a problem, as in the UK where the Labour Party has become quite anti-Israel, and there are similar stirring among the Democrats in the US.

[–] JohnRivers: If you look at income stats, you see that Asians, like Jews, also out-perform Whites in America. But while East Asians have mostly excelled in Engineering and technical fields, many South Asians – despite being more recent immigrants than East Asians – are already excelling in highly verbal fields like Politics and cultural industries. This new South Asian Elite seem to have a cognitive profile quite similar to American Jews – and have a quite insular culture, South Asians have the lowest out-marriage rate in America.

Are we importing a new South Asian overclass?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I take it you mean from India? Possibly. Immigration from highly talented groups poses different problems than the mass of low-IQ immigrants, but we already know that from the history of Jewish immigration.

[–] Disemboweled: What do you think of the right-wing divide between civic and ethnic nationalism? Surely your research into jewish subversion of western society precludes the possibility of a successful civic nationalist State in which White identity can thrive, seeing how hostile elements tend to shape policy to their advantage.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Civic nationalism is weak tea and not a solution for our problems. It’s really the same old "proposition nation" idea promoted by Jewish intellectuals for decades. I can’t see how to restrict immigration within this intellectual framework in a way that would preserve a White majority. And within such a "nation" there is no real intellectual foundation for White identity. I can understand it as a halfway house (and maybe that’s what Steve Bannon was getting at). But ultimately we have to identify with our people in a racial sense or in the long run it will indeed be genocide.

[–] Disemboweled: Thanks. Just an additional thought – if, as you stated in one of your books, national socialism evolved as an evolutionary strategy for the gentiles in response to the jews and, considering what you just said about the need for a polity based on white identity in response to Jewish subversion and mass immigration, does this leave national socialism as the ideal political paradigm for our survival or are others preferable? Seems like pluralism is no dissociable from democracy at this point.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Some form of national socialism would be a viable way of going forward. Ideally, I would like society to be more individualistic ultimately — such a society would feel more natural to us and really unleash our potential and creativity. Perhaps we need a period of very strong collectivist White identity but then revert to more individualism later after a viable ethnostate is established, with the understanding that individualism that hurts the collective must be reined in.

[–] ScionOfJustice: Do you think the Jews are trying to cause a race war in the Americas or Europe?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I think the official view is that things will work out just fine if White people would lose any sense of racial identification and adopt a "citizen of the world," cosmopolitan perspective (noticeably absent from Israel). They are not trying to start a race war, but the policies pursued by the organized Jewish community and their co-ethnics in the media and elsewhere are in fact going to lead to a race war. The only way to avoid such a war would be for Whites to just surrender. That seems to be what Macron is saying–Le Pen will cause a civil war and we can avoid that by just accepting the transformations that are occurring.

[–] NeoFuturist: What do you base an idea like inborn, pathological altruism on when Europeans (or more accurately our governments) have historically been anything but that until recent post-war decades? We have waged more war and conquest than any other people on this planet to devastating effects to ourselves and others. It just seems to me that this suicidal altruism that you think we possess didn’t exist until the 1960s or so.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: You may be right, but there were already signs of it in some subcultures in Britain–see, e.g., here:
Or here: It’s a very complex story that I am trying to write a book on. Briefly, I do think there are different tendencies among different European subcultures and that the more altruistic-tending groups have been coming to the fore since the 17th century or so, destroying the older aristocratic culture in favor of egalitarianism and moral universalism. I still have a ways to go in nailing this down to my satisfaction.

[–] Disemboweled: Without resorting to absolutist statements, the influence of Jews in the media and Hollywood alike is disproportionate compared to any other group. Considering this, coupled with the fact of the Jewish Lobby and generally pro-Jewish interest groups’ ability to shape domestic and foreign policy, how much credence do you lend to the ZOG (Zionist Occupied Government) conspiracy theories?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I don’t use the ZOG thing but rather try to look at particular areas of influence, such as the media and the Israel Lobby. Terms like ZOG are the sorts of things they would like to see us use because they go too far and are too unspecific.

[–] abvoat: Is there any way Jews can be successfully integrated into western civilization or has their evolutionary path made them biologically unassailable?

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: What I wish is that Jews would change their ways—make a cultural shift. I have often said that it wouldn’t matter that Jews are an elite if they weren’t hostile to the traditional people and culture of the West. I don’t see this as being impossible but I certainly don’t see it happening apart from a few Jews.

[–] bhendri123: Lana Lokteff Longer and Brittany Pettibone are 2 very beautiful women. Lauren Southern is also. Can we use female beauty to lure into thr movement? Always it’s not the car but the beautiful woman by the car that sells the car.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Agreed. I think it’s very important to have well-spoken women who have positions of visibility in the movement.

[–] AlterSchwede1: Dr MacDonald, have you considered getting on Gab? Thanks.

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: Not yet. I enjoy Twitter and don’t feel my free speech is inhibited. Of course, that could change. I don’t want to spread myself too thin.

[–] MrPong: Hello Dr. MacDonald. Is it accurate to equate Judaism / Jewish survival strategy, to a form of supremacism?

Supremacism is the worldview that a particular age, race, species, ethnicity, religion, gender, social class, ideology, nation, or culture is superior to other variations of that trait, and advocates those who identify with it to dominate, control, and subjugate those who do not.[1]  As in god chosen people and non jews are beasts/Every Jew will get 2800 Gentile slaves

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I do think there is a strong strain of supremacism, so defined, among many Jews. There is a sense that Jews are more intelligent and ought to be an elite that determines where the culture should go. That became apparent to me in writing about the Frankfurt School and its offshoots–a sense that intellectuals should lead and a great disdain for American culture of the 1950s that did not give them the power they thought they deserved.

[–] bhendri123: Do you prefer the let 1,000 flowers bloom approach here rather then infighting? Some white women will have a lot of white babies, some wealthier Whites can donate money, some can make speeches or write articles. Some use humor like Ramzpaul, some use.intellect like you. Rich guys like Robert Mercer who supported Trump and Breitbart may come to donate to our cause? Is turning more Breitbart like in your view because of Tucker Carlson??

[–] DrKevinMacDonald: I hate the infighting and have generally stayed away from it. We have to have lots of voices — including ones that I personally find distasteful. Everyone should ask what he or she can do to help out. We can all think of something.

I do think Tucker Carlson is a breath of fresh air. He really emphasizes diversity issues and typically does a great job of skewering the politically correct.

Sorry, but it’s been 2-1/2 hours. I’m beat and am going to have to call it quits. Thanks. Interesting and enjoyable.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

27 Comments to "My “Ask Me Anything” on VOAT"

  1. Robert tate's Gravatar Robert tate
    May 15, 2017 - 8:32 am | Permalink

    As I predicted trump would cave in to Jewish pressure.just like thatcher used fear of immigration to get elected, then presided over the most Jewish government in British history. She did nothing to stem immigration and was very pro Israel .or remember de gaule who came back to save French Algeria, he then handed Algeria over to the f.l.n despite military victory.a million Europeans had to flee algeria to avoid massacres.mass Algerian immigration into France continued seems to me that only a government born of the ruins of a collapsed system can be of any consequence.for instance the vichy regime built on the collapse of the french fourth Republic.anyone elected through the system will be part of that status.unfortunately the vichy regime has been discredited due to deportations carried out under German pressure.

    • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
      May 16, 2017 - 6:33 am | Permalink

      While Margaret Thatcher had her faults, supporting large undifferentiated amounts of immigration was not one of them. She touted “Judeo-Christian” values and ethos, which was the Protestant strain of Christianity, a basic traditional and objective standard.

      She did liaison with CONSERVATIVE Jewish thinkers, like Peter Bauer, and others. The list is very short. I followed Thatcher, and admired her works and efforts. She was upright, honest, patriot, capable, and true to her word.

      These links from a quick check on Google negate your comments on her immigration policies. You must be thinking of the traitor/liar/putana Tony Blair.

      You are wrong on content, your syntax, punctuation is, well, sloppy and sub-literate. You have conflated DeGaulle’s foreign war with Thatcher’s domestic policy, and show no bridge, relationship, or any adducing evidence.

      You should not trash such a leader as Thatcher with throwaways and meager provocations of a gossamer nature.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        May 16, 2017 - 12:06 pm | Permalink

        You are wrong on content, your syntax, punctuation is, well, sloppy and sub-literate.

        The above is a run-on sentence of the “comma splice” variety.

        Also, the word “and” should be placed between “syntax” and “punctuation”.

        “Is” should be changed to “are”.

        So if I were your teacher, I would correct your sentence as follows:

        “You are wrong on content; your syntax and punctuation are, well, sloppy and sub-literate.”


        “You are wrong on content. Your syntax and punctuation are, well, sloppy and sub-literate”.


        • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
          May 16, 2017 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

          I yield to the higher authority of structure and form, gladly.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          May 16, 2017 - 12:51 pm | Permalink

          Bravo, dear Barkingmad! People who live in glass houses …

          The offending sentence aside, however, there is a good deal to be said for the gentleman’s defense of Mrs. Thatcher from the hyperbolic denunciation of Mr. Tate.

          • Robert tate's Gravatar Robert tate
            May 16, 2017 - 4:03 pm | Permalink

            Thatcher introduced economic policies which seriously benefited the Jewish the process she decimated the industrial base of this country.she famously said there is no such thing as society.but there is such a thing as Jewish society ,with strong communal bonds .the Jews thrive on the atomisation of European society.
            Her professed hatred of Germany ,was tailored to appeal to her Jewish constituency.nor did she stop family reunion for migrants. The individual
            Who insulted me ,is obviously not very intelligent if he can not see that her patriotism was a smokescreen for Jewish intrests .not surprisingly the Israeli press and Netanyahu praised her as a friend of the Jewish people .

          • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
            May 18, 2017 - 7:33 am | Permalink

            Thanks, Pierre! However, while I own up to not understanding politicians and the system all that well, Mrs. Thatcher kind of rubs me the wrong way. She was a little too libertarian for me in some respects, as Robert Tate implies.

            However, about her saying there’s no such thing as society, I think she was responding to lazy people’s desires to have the government solve all their problems for them. So in that sense, and that sense alone, she was right – “society” doesn’t exist. Here’s the full quote:

            I think we’ve been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it’s the government’s job to cope with it: ‘I have a problem, I’ll get a grant.’ ‘I’m homeless, the government must house me.’ They’re casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society.

            There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It’s our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbour. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There’s no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation.

            Not bad, but speaking the truth once in a while does not make a politician a friend of ours. Maggie was not the deep thinker that her fans think she was. JMO.

          • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
            May 18, 2017 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

            I agree with everything you have written above, Barkingmad. Maggie was, as you say, neither a friend of our cause not a heroine of the related cause of patriotic restoration of historical English nationhood (I leave to UK dwellers the thorny local matter of how best to handle Scots and Welsh nationhood aspirations). But surely her gut-level scorn of the entitlement mind-set marked her as implicitly or subliminally receptive to a positive attitude toward whiteness and Christianity—and that alone counts for something, especially as her successors at Downing Street have lowered the bar so drastically that a baby ant would have difficulty crawling under it.

            Taken all in all, there is at least something to be said about Mrs. Thatcher that isn’t utterly appalling, and that was why I used the word “hyperbolic” to characterize the characterization of her by Mr. Tate, whose follow-up comment sadly makes plain that he regards any degree of disagreement with him as equivalent to an insult.

  2. May 15, 2017 - 10:51 am | Permalink

    From the J. M. Cuddihy quote:
    “Solomon Maimon … Normon Podhoretz, … Rachel Varnhagen … Cynthia Ozick, … Marx and Lassalle … Erving Goffman … Harold Garfinkel, … Herzl and Freud … Harold Laski and Lionel Trilling, … Moses Mendelssohn … J. Robert Oppenheimer and Ayn Rand, Gertrude Stein …”
    Ayn Rand doesnt fit on the list. She explicitly pilloried several of the people on it: Marx, Freud, Laski, Oppenheimer, Gertrude Stein, and her ideas were opposed to Lassalle and perhaps the others, I don’t know enough about them to say. She liked Aristotle to O. Henry, Marylin Monroe to Mickey Spillane. In turn most Jews – those into Jewish culture – hate Ayn Rand.

  3. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    May 15, 2017 - 3:27 pm | Permalink
  4. Gregory Christainsen's Gravatar Gregory Christainsen
    May 16, 2017 - 9:09 am | Permalink

    My daughter and I visited Williams College (Massachusetts), at which she will enroll this fall. Our tour guide was a black girl from Ghana. She is studying French at Williams and will study abroad in Toulouse (France) during the next academic year. I asked her why she chose to study in Toulouse and not Paris. She said, “Paris is not French anymore!”

  5. WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
    May 17, 2017 - 7:53 am | Permalink

    This person in the first link is a fascinating study subject I just came across professor! Feel free to delete the comment so you can study this subject without their knowledge they are being observed. Isn’t it the most intriguing thing ever haha?!!!! Talk about getting an insight into their minds/culture from their perspective. I wonder if the poster is legit. The fascinating thing is they are completely unaware of the ethnic component, their peoples ethnic component, in all the problems they are faced with. Talk about an absolute mind bend. I don’t participate on that forum, was actually just looking for JK Rowling stuff, as I am fascinated by this woman who hates White culture, yet chooses to herself dress up like an Aryan ideal. Fascinating how on a unconscious level she can not deny her own biological predisposition to White standards. Note the second link offers an interesting critique on her books.

  6. WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
    May 17, 2017 - 7:55 am | Permalink

    One question, why are you not covering Alison Chabloz on here?!
    (Mod. Note: Why are you not writing an article and submitting it to the editor for publication here?)

    • PPight1931's Gravatar PPight1931
      May 17, 2017 - 10:52 am | Permalink

      Another good reason presumably is that her case either is, or appears likely soon to be, sub judice.

  7. WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
    May 17, 2017 - 9:29 am | Permalink

    Go into a Zara store after 5pm on a weekday and see if you can reason with that level of me-ism. You can’t. Like you so eloquently opened my eyes to, Whites are “a growing mass of individuals who are intellectually incompetent, irresponsible as parents, prone to requiring public assistance, and prone to criminal behavior, psychiatric disorders, and substance abuse.” I simply can’t work out the contradiction that is Whites. I am from Australia. Grew up with WW2 stories etched into my brain from my blue eyed Grandmother about evil Nazis and Japanese, then confronted with the notion we were under a White only policy at the time, yet fighting against the concept of a White nation elsewhere. Nothing makes sense. I just thought as the trial is coming up soon it might be relevant and your last chance to report on in case the verdict ends up as jail time. I’m not writing an article because in a way I despise earlier generations of Whites for denying me the opportunities they had in a peaceful White Australia as much as I despise Jewish people for colonizing us. I gain satisfaction seeing their descendants embracing their suicide- they have never lived outside their White bubbles and know the violence and disorganization that dominates a non-White society. It is poetic revenge for denying me the best life I could have had. Once I am dead, I will be gone forever. Maybe I wanted more than to be perpetually unsatisfied in life. I only advocate White rights because unlike most posters here I was born with brown eyes and hair, to one parent with brown hair/eyes, the other green eyes and red hair, and unfortunately idolize the blue eyed White Aryan ideal, probably because I have never known it. All my immediate family are blue eyes light hair except me and my siblings and one parent. Do you know how much of a mind bend that is? In a country that was as White as Australia in the late 80s/early 90s. I feel if I was born into the so called ‘master race’ my life would have been a whole lot easier and more fulfilling. In short I just wanted to be beautiful, loved and appreciated. But it seems that was too much to ask. Instead I get to watch blue eyed blonde Jewish movie stars live what could have been my life for me. I have also lived in a non-White country, devoid of a White presence, and am aware of the reality of what that brings. They can’t even get basic amenities right. A topic that fascinates me is the obsession with blonde hair in the modern world, go into any Western city and you are confronted with masses of women in their office attire sporting bleached blonde hair. What is that all about? It seems to be them on a unconscious level projecting their idea of what ideal beauty is onto the world, despite all the MSM programming about non-White being beautiful. Their ideal perception is the White Aryan. It’s an unconscious bias towards White ethnic identity that these SJWs such as Rowling perpetuate without even knowing it. It is primal. After all, what was behind most of Europes achievements if it was not for the appreciation of White beauty? Men didn’t fight in wars to protect legal documents, they fought to protect their beautiful wives. In a conclusion to the mind bend, one of my siblings marries blue eyed woman and produces a textbook blue eyed blonde norse looking White baby whom I can just see is going to grow up never knowing what it is like to experience negative feedback from anyone, and who will always be saturated with attention from the majority non-White peers all around them. And who, as a consequence, will never feel dissatisfaction in life and therefore most likely never search for the deeper meaning behind things or know of the existence of this site. It truly is a strange world. And so explains why proponents of WN are never blue eyed blonde ideals. Circle completed. I’m not writing an article because unfortunately all the negative feedback I have received throughout my whole life as a brown eyed/haired forgetful looking White guy in a White society has turned me into a nut.

    • Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
      May 18, 2017 - 6:27 am | Permalink


      Although, I don’t in most cases consider David Lane a good role model, he did write something that addresses your concerns.

      Who is White?

      Those of you who have over the years or decades either observed or participated in the resistance to the murder of the White race know that provocateurs have attacked the racial purity of professed leaders to impugn their motives. In my opinion part of the reason this has successfully worked for the enemy is a mind set grown from an alien religion. A basic tenet of Judeo-Christianity and part of its fatal allure is that it allows inferior men to claim superior status without corresponding effort. A Judeo-Christian with an IQ of 90 and a dismal life history can get baptized, repeat a few ritualistic words and presto, suddenly proclaim divine status superior to that of a man a million times his superior in intellect and character. The “blue-eyed blond” syndrome is typical of this mentality. And I say this advisedly since I appear Nordic, tall, slender, blue-eyed blond. Yet I can only guess at the purity of my ancestry. My father of record sold my mother to his buddies and to strangers for booze money, so the Gods alone know all. What I do know is this. I look White. I fight for White. I recognize the achievements of the White race. I want to preserve our kind. I am horrified that the beauty of the White Aryan woman may soon perish from the earth forever. I suffer for each White child tormented in America’s inter-racial nightmare. I see beauty in a Celtic princess with brown or red hair and green eyes. I see beauty in the statuesque Nordic Goddess with blue eyes and golden hair. I see beauty in the freckle-faced Irish lass. I see heroism in Robert Jay Mathews and Richard Scutari with their dark hair and eyes of green or brown as well as in Frank DeSilva, a fair skinned Bruders with a French Portuguese name. Theirs is far greater nobility than 99% of those “Nordic Ideals,” I might add.

      For those who boast of their “purity,” you have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents and so on. Go back 500 years or so and you have a million ancestors. A few more generations and everyone who ever trod the lands of Europe is your ancestor, including Huns, Mongols and Moors. There are no 100% pure Aryans as per 10,000 years ago. But we still do exist as a distinct and unique biological entity. The cultures and civilizations we create are beyond comparison. The beauty of our women, blondes, brunettes, redheads, green-eyed, blue-eyed, brown-eyed, is the desire of all men and the envy of all women. So, we do not want to be derailed by gossip or speculation on who may be 1/16th Indian or have some Italian, Spanish or Portuguese blood. We are not going to debate over whether the collective remaining White gene pool is 95% or 97% pure Aryan.

      Surely it would be a tragedy if the various divisions of our race lose their distinctive traits and beauty. And after we have secured the existence of our people and a future for ALL our children, hopefully we can take steps to preserve this diversity. But for now, we are going to accept the facts and circumstances as they exist. We are going to work together for the holy cause and we will not tolerate provocateurs, divisions or dissension. If someone looks White, acts White, fights White, then until their actions prove otherwise, they are our Folk. On the other hand, regardless of pedigree or appearance, those who oppose, criticize, hinder or fail to support our cause are no friends of ours.

      David Lane (1938-2007)

      • WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
        May 18, 2017 - 4:16 pm | Permalink

        LOL sounds like a ‘melting pot’ theory to White identity. Again, my mind has changed drastically after reading the angry harry article. I think the gynocentrism of our society, all societies, explains a lot about why they fail. We are all beholden to how WOMEN feel about us. If they don’t like a man they won’t mate with him, and it is entirely up to the woman to select the mate. And we see how this is dangerous to society when an ideology like feminism is put out there by Jews and allows women to indulge in a me-ist life without any concern for her wider society or men, or children. And you end up with one generation of women being responsible for completely annihilating their own race, culture and society, because they were stupid enough to believe the feminist falsehoods. And the irony is, every old boomer ‘feminist’ spinster I know today is an UNHAPPY TRAGIC MESS because they never had kids, never got married, and consequently have NO ONE except their Jew created characters of the Talmudvision screen. We end up with the dysfunctional White society described above because of WHITES decisions and actions in going along with the Jewish ideology, every bit as much as because Jews exist in our society in the first place. By taking the responsibility for our own predicament off Whites and pretending it is all Jews fault is not only wrong, it is missing the whole much more interesting dynamic behind WHY Whites have ended up this way. Anyway we will be extinct soon, and want to be extinct, or we wouldn’t have made the decisions we have, so I could hardly care less about our future or any definition of White.

        ‘You may not be beautiful, but get over it’

  8. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    May 17, 2017 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    I think one of the keys to exposing Jews quickly is to focus on their blatant hypocrisy. I post a ton on Facebook, commenting on the endless streams of articles and try to include Jewish sources and Jewish quotes. Even low IQ people can grasp a logical argument against blatant hypocrisy.

    We have a huge opportunity right now on social media as most Trump supporters are obviously concerned about alt-right issues. Unlike attempting to talk to
    strangers, replying to Pro-Trump supporters is much easier. Filling in few blanks for them has been working, if you know what to point out. Like Dr. MacDonald said, it is
    too complex to explain in a sound byte but taking one issue at a time
    (ie – a Trump supporter comments about the wall- I ask them why all
    our politicians support a wall for
    Israel and have no problem with the
    justification Israel gives for having
    it, then ask why these same
    politicians would deny the same to
    their own people, or worse vilify the idea). Direct quotes, especially from Israeli/Jew sources are the best so make sure to include the references.

    Just some suggestions here based on what I do and what I have had some success with.

    • WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
      May 18, 2017 - 4:01 pm | Permalink

      Like I said, go into a Zara store after 5pm on a week day. I went into one the other day with a female family member as she wanted to have a look around and I could not believe the scary way women were looking at clothes and items like machines of consumption. The whole atmosphere was toxic, shallow and essentially so overwhelmingly ME-IST that it was then I realized our society was headed for extinction. It’s a social thing. It has EVERYTHING to do with White men allowing White women to control them, be it now with feminism, or in the past where we were literal slaves to white women who stayed home all day doing nothing. Gynocentrism is the achilled heel of ALL civilizations. Again you advocates who think your going to affect one iota of change in White society by talking about Jews, have as usual got it all wrong. You never examine WHY White society allowed the Jews to take over. The Jews took over at the precise time WHITE WOMEN changed the social fabric of society, and WHITE MEN went along with it. It is the FAILURE to acknowledge this, that is the achilles heel of MacDonalds CofC. Read this article to gain some understanding on why Whites are NEVER going to make a comeback, because we have embraced a female dominated social fabric that has proven to be UNSUCCESSFUL AS AN EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY ANYWHERE CIVILIZATION HAS EXISTED.

      • WhiteAbyss's Gravatar WhiteAbyss
        May 18, 2017 - 8:53 pm | Permalink

        This female dominated social strategy, that we got from the Jews, probably explains why the Jews have failed in every civilization they have existed in, except this time they are taking us with them.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 19, 2017 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

        I believe that from a crisis of sheer survival and refusal to be extinguished, “Whites” will be compelled to found their own republic, autocephalous territory.

        Along with a new Constitution, laws will have to be written and implemented: women will not be allowed to rise to any level above the lowest economic position unless they produce a minimum of 3 children with a traditional family, with the husband and father as head of household. This must be absolute.

        The reasons are obvious and manifest.

        • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
          May 20, 2017 - 8:18 am | Permalink

          Settle down, Poupon. Husbands and fathers as heads of households have done monumental damage long before there was any feminist movement to supposedly drive them crazy.

          Alcoholism, not to mention binge drinking, is a problem only of white people (mainly men) and aboriginals It is one of the primary reasons women originally wanted financial independence. Not to mention, with households weakened by a liquor-loving man in charge, feminism as an entire ideology ultimately began to look mighty good. You can blame jewish booze distributors all you like, but no one has ever forced anyone to love and overindulge in alcohol or to use it to “relieve stress”. Anyone with at least a room-temperature IQ can see that doesn’t work.

  9. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    May 18, 2017 - 12:30 pm | Permalink

    @Barkingmad…The type of criticism of Margaret Thatcher is found commonly from people that use an idealized perfect candidate as a template, one that only exists in an imaginary world. Whether it is Hitler, Marx, Reagan, FDR, etc, etc., any compromises, deals, or coalitions is automatically blared as a “sellout”, “puppet”, etc, etc, etc. It is infantile. In the real world, a leader of a country needs to make deals and accommodations, unless of course he is a sociopath like Castro, Stalin, and Maduro of Venezoouela. But for most leaders, mass murder, terror, and morbidity are not options.

    So the criterion for judgement and evaluation must rest on the CUMULATIVE and totality of the accomplishments. Using these standards, Thatcher is decidedly in the positive. I know her story quite well. It is constructive to discern what Britstain was like when she took over. I have a first hand knowledge-the benefit of extensive travel and a pair of eyes and ears.

    It seems, BM,and Mr. Crayon, that you are wise enough to have made that determination as well.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      May 19, 2017 - 7:45 am | Permalink

      Thanks for your comments, Poupon. Of course it is correct what you say about expecting perfection of our leaders or else considering them sellouts. Realpolitik, anyone?

      The issue is – elected politicians are not, and can’t be, our leaders anymore. We are past the point of elections having any meaning. The system by which we choose our leaders (democratic elections) is too corrupted, rotten to the core. Maybe you still see elections as bringing improvements. I think that sense of hope went south at the latest inauguration.

      While we’re yakking about Maggie Thatcher – well, I know he was a brutal, nasty dictator, but still I had to admire, to some degree, her open support of Pinochet. What gumption that took. People forget what a communist the replaced politician was (Allende). But then “the people” wanted him, i.e., democratic election, so what can you do.

      Just my opinion, as they say

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 19, 2017 - 11:25 am | Permalink

        I agree totally. The International Oligarchs decide everything. Elections provide the ruse and hallucination that the will of the people is enacted.

        At this point I believe a Pinochet is necessary to save the West and to provide a redesign and reset of governance. Pinochet did not go far enough; the cucarachas have returned.

    • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
      May 20, 2017 - 10:09 am | Permalink

      “Venezoouela”? “Britstain”? And closer to home, “Crayon”?

      Really? Time to put aside childish things, n’est-ce pas?

      A wisecrack of Dave Barry’s comes unbidden to mind: “You can only be young once. But you can always be immature.” And immaturity, sad to say, is not an endangered species hereabouts.

      • Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
        May 20, 2017 - 4:45 pm | Permalink

        (Mod. Note: Sorry “Poupon”, gratuitous below the belt nastiness posing as “humor” doesn’t qualify for “approval”; especially when directed against regular and long-time TOO supporters.)

Comments are closed.