The Rotherham Pathology
The horrifying scandal in Rotherham (previous versions covered copiously for TOO by Tobias Langdon) continues to unfold. A report commissioned by the city council stated that at least 1400 children were sexually abused over 16 years.
It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated. There were examples of children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators. This abuse is not confined to the past but continues to this day. … One young person told us that ‘gang rape’ was a usual part of growing up in the area of Rotherham in which she lived. …
Within social care, the scale and seriousness of the problem was underplayed by senior managers. At an operational level, the Police gave no priority to CSE, regarding many child victims with contempt and failing to act on their abuse as a crime. Further stark evidence came in 2002, 2003 and 2006 with three reports known to the Police and the Council, which could not have been clearer in their description of the situation in Rotherham. The first of these reports was effectively suppressed because some senior officers disbelieved the data it contained. This had led to suggestions of cover- up. The other two reports set out the links between child sexual exploitation and drugs, guns and criminality in the Borough. These reports were ignored and no action was taken to deal with the issues that were identified in them.
The authorities knew about it but did not act because of fear of being labeled “racists”:
By far the majority of perpetrators were described as ‘Asian’ by victims, yet throughout the entire period, councillors did not engage directly with the Pakistani-heritage community to discuss how best they could jointly address the issue. Some councillors seemed to think it was a one-off problem, which they hoped would go away. Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.
And, this collective attempt to remove the ethnic element continues. As James Delingpole notes, the BBC’s report didn’t mention ethnicity until 20 paragraphs in. Delingpole continues:
And even then, the embarrassing fact slips out only with the most blushing mealy-mouthedness:
By far the majority of perpetrators of abuse were described as “Asian” by victims. [Another BBC report stated “The inquiry team noted fears among council staff of being labelled ‘racist’ if they focused on victims’ descriptions of the majority of abusers as ‘Asian’ men.” Majority?? Perhaps 51% It would be much closer to the truth to say they were all Asian.]
Well hang on, a second. What this phrase seems to be hinting at is the possibility that the men involved weren’t “Asian” (note to US readers: Asian is UK PC-speak for Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, not orientals) but that the victims mistakenly took them to be so. Is that actually the case or not? …
[It happened] because the kind of politically correct, left-leaning and basically rather thick people that local authorities like Rotherham Council tend to have working for them are so paralysed by modish concerns about cultural sensitivity that they have made an obscene judgement call: better to allow at least 1400 kids to be hideously abused than to be thought guilty of the far greater crimes of being thought a bit racist or accidentally offending someone.
(And this isn’t an incident confined to Rotherham by the way. The same thing happened recently in Oxford, again involving men with decidedly un-Anglo-Saxon names, again over a long period of time because all the relevant authorities were scared of sounding the alarm in case they came across as racist)
When I told a friend about this, his immediate reaction was that White people deserve to go extinct if they allow this sort of thing to happen. Allowing industrial scale rape of your children by ethnic outsiders is simply inconceivable in a healthy society.
It’s hard to disagree with that. This is a pathology so extreme that it should really be considered a collective psychosis. And of course we see the same thing throughout the West — at its worst among northern Europeans.
In attempting to explain this, I have discussed the tendency of Europeans to form moral ingroups rather than kinship-based groups which are the norm in the rest of the world — a component of European individualism. It’s a very adaptive mechanism, resulting in high-trust societies relatively free of the corruption, nepotism and ethnically based strife so common in many parts of the world.
But when the reins of the culture have been captured by hostile elites that have decreed that multiculturalism is a moral imperative and massively incentivized their creation, it can lead to extremely maladaptive consequences as we see here.
These consequences are exacerbated in bureaucratic contexts where conformity to microcultural norms set by the higher-ups and avoiding doing anything that might threaten one’s career become paramount. One can only guess at what was going through the mind of Shaun Wright, police commissioner of Rotherham and Labour councillor in charge of children’s services at Rotherham Council from 2005 to 2010.
Some selected tweets from the #Rotherham thread:
This man warned Britain about #Rotherham and was prosecuted for “thought crimes” twice. pic.twitter.com/MKsXjI5L5Y — Kyle Rogers (@kyle_rogers76) August 27, 2014
Should have listened to the “racists” #Rotherham — Kyle Rogers (@kyle_rogers76) August 27, 2014
Staggered that NONE of the MEDIA (Cowards) have mentioned that #NickGriffin #BNP exposed the #Rotherham #Abuse many years ago! — Nick Green (@nickgreenphotog) August 27, 2014
#Rotherham #Police forced one father to deliver his 13year old daughter to a gang of muslim rapists with the threat of arrest for racism. — Sean Moran #WR (@BadboyBNP) August 27, 2014
BBC avoiding all mention of race or ethnicity; Mirror avoiding all mention of Labour #rotherham pic.twitter.com/LjzepLz6AI — Tent101 (@Tent101) August 27, 2014
“I would get raped once a week, every week” says #Rotherham woman, who was aged 12-15 #r4today — BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) August 27, 2014
Someone should ask 1400 kids in #Rotherham if they drew strength from diversity, and if their lives were enriched by multiculturalism — Whitey McPrivilege (@yankeebrit77) August 26, 2014
..that similar abuse did not take place in their own community and therefore concentrated mainly on young white girls.” #rotherham p91 — Samira Ahmed (@SamiraAhmedUK) August 26, 2014
So…were these Pakistani child molesters moderate peaceful Muslims, extremists or not ‘true’ Muslims? I get confused #Rotherham — Anne (@AnnaKarenina92) August 26, 2014
Disbelieved, suppressed or ignored. #Rotherham Council sacrificing white girls for Muslim votes. Could only be #Labour. — Sarah Wardlaw (@sarah_wardlaw) August 26, 2014
UKIP members stripped of foster children by SCUMBAG #Rotherham social workers that ignored massive child rape epidemic — Kyle Rogers (@kyle_rogers76) August 27, 2014
Comments are closed.