Where would Britain be without its communities of colour? For one thing, journalists would have much less to write about. The obscure northern town of Rotherham has achieved world-wide infamy thanks to its hard-working Pakistani rape-gangs. The southern city of London isn’t obscure, but it had fusty associations with stale pale males like Charles Dickens and stale pale institutions like parliamentary democracy.
Vibrancy and violence
Mass immigration has changed all that: in the twenty-first century, London vibrates with murders, gang-rapes and acid-attacks. A Black Londoner called Theodore Johnson has just hit the headlines after being convicted of killing his third “partner.” That’s some achievement, particularly at the age of sixty-four, but Johnson isn’t as remarkable as the Black Londoner Delroy Easton Grant, a serial rapist who specialized in attacking elderly women.
Black enrichers, White victim
These high-achievers originally came here from the small island of Jamaica, which has supplied many more murderers and rapists to Britain since our traitorous elite allowed mass immigration to begin after the Second World War. As the twentieth century closed, Tony Blair and his Jewish immigration minister Barbara Roche began to source our violent criminals from the entire Third World, with entirely predictable consequences. Blair and Roche are now long out of office, but their treachery goes on giving. At the end of December, a London newspaper wrung its hands and listed “the names of the young people we lost to violence in 2017.” A feast for phoneticians then followed:
Djodjo Nsaka (19), Quamari Serunkuma-Barnes (15), David Adegbite (19), Abdifatah Sheikhey (19), Karim Samms (16), Abdullahi Tarabi (19), Jordon Wright (19), Mahamed Hassan (17), Elijah Dornelly (17), Joao Ricardo Gomes (18), Abdirahman Mohamed (17), Osman Sharif (16), Mahad Ali (18), Joshua Bwalya (16), Soban Khan (18), Daniel Namanga (19), Jermaine Goupall (15), Abdul Mayanja (19), Corey Junior Davis (14), Saif Abdul Magid (18), Aren Mali (17), Michael Jonas (17), Kacem Mokrane (18), Jason Isaacs (18) (London youth violence: These are the names of the 24 teenage boys killed in stabbings and shootings in 2017, Get West London News, 29th December 2017)
But London’s “yoots” didn’t rest on their laurels after that busy 2017: they saw in the New Year with “Four fatal stabbings in one night,” as the Guardian’s hand-wringing headline put it. In the article that followed the Black female crime-expert Temi Mwale told us that “young Londoners inhabit an environment akin to a war zone, where the threat of serious violence is constant, leading to high levels of fear and anxiety.” She then offered her solutions: she wants to spray lots more fatuous jargon and spend lots more White taxpayers’ money. Okay, Britain has already spent many billions of pounds trying in vain to cure non-White pathologies, but Temi has finally found the key to ending that failure. The money has to be spent “holistically” and with “cultural competence”:
Young black boys are still over-policed and under protected. They urgently need culturally competent services that work with them holistically, addressing their sense of identity in a society that is hostile towards them. … We need a public health approach that works with communities holistically. We need to invest in the infrastructure so that young people can live in environments where they thrive, not fight for survival. Grassroots community work is what will restore hope and provide a sense of purpose to a generation that has been failed by our society. … There is no quick-fix solution. But long-term investment in long-term interventions that deal with the root causes of violence, such as unaddressed trauma, would be a step in the right direction.
Violence affects us all. While not everyone will or should work on the frontline, we can all play a role. As many of you make new year resolutions, I urge you to commit something to this struggle. We need your time, resources, skills and networks to empower those of us in the position to create change to make a bigger impact. Too many people have accepted children killing children as a tragic yet normal feature of life in London. I cannot. (Four fatal stabbings in one night – and Sadiq Khan’s slick words ring hollow, The Guardian, 2nd January 2018)
Laughing lawyer: Temi Mwale
Temi Mwale has a degree in law and is described at the Guardian as “the founding director of The 4Front Project, a youth-led social enterprise to empower young people and communities to live free from violence.” In other words, she’s a budding Batmanghelidjh: like the Iranian psychotherapist Camila Batmanghelidjh before her, she’s identified a lucrative role for herself offering fatuous and futile solutions to non-White pathologies. In “the past three months” alone, she’s jetted off to Chicago, New York and Los Angeles to study “arts-based therapeutic services and social enterprises addressing trauma.” With her exotic name, her lawyer’s cunning and her confident deployment of liberal jargon, she can look forward to lots more trips and lots more funding.
Paralysed by political correctness
But will The 4Front Project absorb millions and then collapse amid farce and financial scandal, as Camila’s “Kids Company” did in 2015? It’s a distinct possibility. What’s certain is that The 4Front Project will not solve the problem of non-White violence in Britain. That would involve admitting the truth and liberalism is based on denying the truth. At the beginning of 2017, the Guardian began a hand-wringing series called “Beyond the Blade,” which purports to offer “the truth about knife crime in Britain.”
In fact, it offers more evasion and obfuscation. Crime has biological roots and Blacks excel at violence for the same reasons as they fail at physics and mathematics. The explanation lies in their genetics and their evolutionary history. They are biologically different from Whites and they do not belong in a White society. But liberals refuse to admit this, preferring to deny reality and allow non-White pathologies to continue.
That reality-denial has horrific consequences. When the Labour MP Ann Cryer was trying to combat “large-scale paedophile abuse” by Muslim men in her northern constituency, she naturally sought the help of Britain’s foremost progressive and feminist newspaper. She failed to get that help: “I couldn’t get The Guardian interested. Its reporters seemed paralysed by political correctness.”
That was in the 1990s, but the Guardian is still ignoring horrific crimes committed against vulnerable women and girls. Knife-crime is by no means the only non-White pathology flourishing in twenty-first century London:
In 1999 I witnessed a gang rape in Sierra Leone. I was forced to watch a group of rebel soldiers taking it in turns to rape a young girl in front of an audience of jeering men. It was the height of the civil conflict and rape had become a devastating weapon of war. When I moved to Britain I believed I had escaped such horrific sexual violence. As my Dispatches investigation tomorrow night [21st June 2009] shows, I was mistaken. Gang rape is happening here – and what I have found most disturbing as an African is that a disproportionate number of these attacks are being carried out by black or mixed-race young men.
Towards the end of last year , police and child welfare experts working on Channel 4’s Street Weapons Commission told us of their concerns about gang rape. Then two big cases hit the headlines. In December, nine schoolboys, some as young as 13 at the time of the attack, were convicted of raping a 14-year-old girl. She was dragged between tower blocks in Hackney where she was threatened with a knife, hit and raped during an ordeal that lasted an hour and a half – some of which was filmed on mobile phones. In January, three men were convicted of gang raping a 16-year-old with learning disabilities for two hours before dousing her with caustic soda in an effort to get rid of the evidence.
How prevalent is this crime and why it is happening in Britain? Despite the seriousness of the crime, I was amazed to discover that no national statistics exist: gang rape is simply not recorded as a separate crime category. So over a period of several months we set about collating our own. We approached the Crown Prosecution Service, the Association of Chief Police Officers, all 50 police forces, crown courts, barristers and rape referral centres to try to establish the numbers.
One of the few police forces to have begun recording the figures of reported gang rape is the [London] Metropolitan Police. In 2008 alone, they received reports of 85 gang rapes. Using the Met’s definition of gang rape – those involving three or more perpetrators – we began to look at the number of convictions. We tracked down 29 cases, from January 2006 to March 2009, in which a total of 92 young people were convicted of involvement in gang rape. One fact stood out. Of those convicted, 66 were black or mixed race, 13 were white and the remainder were from other countries including Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. (Gang rape: Is it a race issue?, The Independent, 20th June 2009)
“Is gang-rape a race issue?” asked the Black journalist Sorious Samura back in 2009. The answer was as obvious then as it is now: yes, it is definitely a race issue. But that “issue” is never going to afflict East European nations like Hungary and Poland, because they are refusing to allow non-Whites to enter their territory in large numbers. Israel, on the other hand, was “infiltrated” by many thousands of African Blacks at the beginning of the decade. Horrific crimes inevitably followed: in 2012, for example, an “83-year-old woman was raped and beaten for hours in the courtyard of her apartment building near the central bus station in south Tel Aviv by a young Eritrean migrant.”
The response of the Israeli government was swift and highly effective. It ended the influx by putting up a border-fence and strengthening enforcement of its already tough laws against illegal immigration. Now it has a new and even tougher law that will allow it to deport Blacks against their will. The Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is speaking softly while carrying a big stick: “The infiltrators have a clear choice – cooperate with us and leave voluntarily, respectably, humanely and legally, or we will have to use other tools at our disposal, which are also according to law. I hope that they will choose to cooperate with us.”
And Israel doesn’t have to bother about crime committed by non-White goyim who have immigrated legally, because they’ve found a highly effective way to avoid such crime. As the Jewish Chronicle has said: “changing the country’s immigration laws and opening an avenue for large numbers of non-Jews to move to Israel … remains a political taboo.” There is no nonsense about “ethnic enrichment” in Israel, because Israel’s attitude to immigration is governed by reality, not by fatuous liberal fantasies. Blacks and other non-Whites are biologically different. They do not belong in White societies and their presence here is something to deplore, not to celebrate.