Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign

Given the Parkland shootings, I thought it appropriate to rerun this article, originally posted on January 1, 2013. See also Andrew Joyce’s article, “Jews and gun control: A reprise.” 

In Cooper Sterling’s TOO article (“Guns, profiling and White males“), he notes

The Left’s irrational obsession with gun control goes beyond the latest mass shooting. It is endemic among the cosmopolitan literati, who loathe Middle America, to dwell on the risks associated with firearms while disregarding or minimizing the benefits of firearm ownership. …

Anyone monitoring the national scene since Newtown is witnessing an emotional antipathy toward the last trace of political leverage among an identifiable demographic: an overwhelmingly White male gun culture. What the MSM and gun control advocates ultimately detest is the gun culture in America, which is too White, too male, and too conservative. …

The tradition of gun ownership is as old as the Republic. It reflects the pre-1965 demographic of America as an overwhelmingly White—and more civilized—nation. As a native Midwesterner, guns were rampant in our neighborhoods where few homes didn’t have some sort of firearm. We came of age hunting with our fathers, uncles and cousins, acquiring rifles and shotguns in our mid-teens.

An article from The Forward notes that the Jewish community has taken the lead in gun control and that part of it is hostility toward the  gun culture of White America that is especially apparent in rural White America. Jews “instinctively recoil” from this culture (“After Newtown Jews lead renewed push on guns“).

Jewish organizations pride themselves on gun control stances that date back to the early days of the debate, following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and of President Kennedy. Most played a supportive role in passing legislation then limiting access to weapons, and have since reaffirmed their commitment to reducing the availability of guns.
One reason for broad Jewish support of gun control, Mariaschin said, has to do with the community’s sense of security, “which perhaps leads us to feel that the possession of assault weapons is completely unneeded.”
Rabbi Eric Yoffie, former head of the Reform movement, listed in a recent Haaretz article several reasons for Jews siding with supporters of gun control: the community’s affiliation with the Democratic Party; the fact that Jews are urban people and detached from the culture of hunting or gun ownership, and suspicion toward the NRA, which is “associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews and from which they instinctively recoil.”

Although Jews certainly attacked and eventually overcame the elite WASP culture of pre-1965 America (e.g., by displacing WASPs at elite universities), another critical point of conflict between Jewish organizations and the main Jewish intellectual movements has been with rural America. This conflict can be most clearly seen among the New York Intellectuals, a group that is discussed in Chapter 6 of The Culture of Critique. 

The New York Intellectuals were attacking populism in favor of themselves as an intellectual elite. The New York Intellectuals associated rural America with

nativism, anti-Semitism, nationalism, and fascism as well as with anti-intellectualism and provincialism; the urban was associated antithetically with ethnic and cultural tolerance, with internationalism, and with advanced ideas. . . . The New York Intellectuals simply began with the assumption that the rural—with which they associated much of American tradition and most of the territory beyond New York—had little to contribute to a cosmopolitan culture. . . . By interpreting cultural and political issues through the urban-rural lens, writers could even mask assertions of superiority and expressions of anti-democratic sentiments as the judgments of an objective expertise. (Cooney 1986, 267–268; italics in text)

The last line bears repeating. The New York Intellectuals were engaged in a profoundly anti-democratic enterprise given that they rejected and felt superior to the culture of the majority of Americans. The battle between this urbanized intellectual and political establishment and rural America was joined on a wide range of issues. Particularly important was the issue of immigration. In this case and in the entire range of what became mainstream liberal politics, the New York Intellectuals had the enthusiastic support of all of the mainstream Jewish organizations. (Review of Eric Kaufmann’s  The Rise and Fall of Anglo America“)

The gun culture of traditional America, especially rural America has been particularly loathed by Jewish intellectuals. There is also a deep fear of Christian culture that is most vibrant in rural America.  For example, Israeli patriot Elliott Abrams  acknowledges that the mainstream Jewish community in America “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.” According to Abrams, because of this vision, Jews have taken the lead in secularizing America.  In fact, the key role of Jewish organizations in shaping the Constitutional law on Church/State relations is well known. And it’s not much of a mystery who’s behind the war on Christmas.

And by successfully changing immigration policy, Jews have reduced the political power of the rural White subculture of America to the point that even though roughly 7 in 10 White males voted Republican (and ~60% of White females), Obama and the Democrats won the recent election. Even if the current push for gun control fails, we can expect that Jewish organizations will continue the push to disarm White males.

Jewish organizations are not at all against guns when they are in the hands of the police and other authorities. The ADL (see the ADL’s Law Enforcement Agency  Resource Network) and the SPLC (Law Enforcement Training and Law Enforcement Resources) have made strong alliances with law enforcement in America.

Further, it has often been observed that Jewish organizations have historically favored a strong central government rather than states’ rights. For example, Jacques Berlinerblau, writing in The Chronicle of Higher Education (see here), notes that “Jewish voters …  prefer cities and federal governments to backwaters and volatile statehouses. … All things equal, Jews like strong central governments, not a pastiche of local decision makers catering to majorities.”

Although Jewish organizations would not phrase it this way, the net result is that the thrust of Jewish activism has been to favor a strong central government with a monopoly on lethal force. Given Jewish hostility to the traditional people and culture of White America, this is a very foreboding combination as we head into the era of a non-White majority America.

35 replies
  1. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    I think for politeness they say globalists. We all know whom they’re talking about.

    We are in deep trouble because our fatally weakened condition is not widely appreciated, and will only become fully apparent when something breaks. By then the globalists hope that both our will and means to resist will have been so sapped that we complacent masses will find ourselves unarmed and unorganised, naked, easy prey in the face of our enemies.

  2. Slim Chance
    Slim Chance says:

    It’s not as if Jews are big fans of the traditional culture of Latino, black, or even Asian America. Latinos and blacks do not sit around perusing the New York Review of Books. They like to drink, are fine with guns, and are enthusiastic sexists and homophobes. Whup her when she need it — judge will not let you explain, complains Sonny Boy Williamson. When I call for my baby, man, and she don’t come, all the doctors in Hot Springs sure can’t help her none, brags Robert Johnson (king of the Delta blues), while the rapper’s agenda for Diane Feinstein is “Back That Thing Up.” (The Horror!) As for Asians, I seem to recall photos of Korean shopkeepers with rifles defending their inner city shops from rioters. Trump won the white vote 60-40 while “people of color” are for the most part fine with guns and masculinity. It’s basically Jews versus everyone else on this issue and most social issues, only the Jews dangle free taxpayer money to get the ethnics to vote Democrat, and once elected the Democrat pols follow the Jewish preference on gun control, gay marriage, immigration, etc. An alternative to white nationalism is a populist party a la Watson or Long that would make prudent alliances with non-white groups on key agenda items such as gun rights, abortion, and even immigration. To make this work one would have to match the Dems willingness to hand out free money, but without a bunch of wars fought for Israel there should be plenty available. “NO! Not one dime for those no good n— ” says Grandpa
    Bumpkin to the congregation of useful idiots. He adds “Israel is our one dependable ally in the region! Long Live the Free Market!”

    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      Slim Chance, a fine idea but there’s only a very slim chance it could happen as the Jews are masters at the divide and conquer game which they have implemented in N. America for the past 60 plus years. The blacks and hispanics, and most anyone else who isn’t White have been conditioned to see us as the enemy who must be destroyed.

  3. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    Just remind Jews that Jewish teachers in many parts of Israel hang around with guns all the time. This is one more chutzpah for Jews, but in the era of information chutzpah is becoming extremely difficult to sustain.

  4. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Parkland too will likely fade away in the welter of constant, ever crazy, onrushing news events. I suspect that major “gun control” is now a mute point, as just about anybody with a healthy instinct for self-preservation now realizes the gravity of the current national breakdown, and the potential consequences being unarmed. The current state of racially motivated street crime & domestic terrorism, as well as the fragmentation of the artificial, make-believe, interracial political house-of-cards is not lost on sentient people, of whatever ethnic persuasion, and especially Whites. In fact, the wobbly, fiat Zogbuck is the only glue still holding this disaster-in-the-making together.

    The libtard kosher media will bleat and badger about ‘guns’ as usual, but their hysterical message resonates less and less with fewer and fewer duped people. In fact, we are past the point of no return in this (((induced))) historical process, because many people now know and sense it, and are obviously preparing for the inescapable political, social, and racial denouement.

  5. Mark Hunter
    Mark Hunter says:

    “We came of age hunting with our fathers, uncles and cousins, acquiring rifles and shotguns in our mid-teens.” We are now hard of hearing but what the hell.

    Gun “culture” is for the musically disinclined. Guns should be used ONLY as a last resort – in self defense when life or limb is threatened, or in war. Sport use of guns should be in very controlled conditions, while wearing earplugs and earmuffs, and even those precautions will only partially protect your hearing. And consideration of your neighbors’ hearing must be important to you too.

    Support the 2nd Amendment, criticize the ADL and B’nai B’rith, but don’t call damaging children’s hearing some sort of “culture.”

    I don’t know much about Schopenhauer but I think he had it right when in 1819 he wrote: “I have long held the opinion that the amount of noise that anyone can bear undisturbed stands in inverse proportion to his mental capacity …” LOL

    • Allen
      Allen says:

      I guess you don’t know too much about guns. “Considering your neighbors hearing?” Unless you live in Texas, and on a multi acre complex, you can’t be discharging a firearm anywhere near another dwelling. It’s usually inside a firing range that is well vented, and soundproofed, or out on a private range that is usually well distant from the nearest dwelling.

      Now, with that said, I positioned myself somewhere in the middle. I have no problem with guns. However, when you start getting into full automatic weapons, AR-15, high capacity weapons, etc….Unless you’re in the military or law enforcement, the general public should not have, and there no real argument to possess such weapons.

      Using the excuse of “enjoyment,” or pleasure, to use/possess such weapons I would suggest you make an appointment with a psychiatrists; really, needing a weapon for enjoyment that has the potential to kill a mass amount of people in seconds is normal thoughts or behavior?

      Last, stop blaming the president for Douglas High School shooting. Blame your politicians. Especially the ones that accept NRA campaign donations. Florida has guns stores on every corner like 711 stores. No safeguards. The idiots that want to blame the president must have for forgotten about Sandy Hook! 20 students where killed…Did anyone blame the president then? Let’s give the idiots their way; well I guess if you’re going to blame the president then if that one would have done his job then maybe Douglas High could’ve been prevented?

    • Mark Hunter
      Mark Hunter says:

      I fully support the 2nd Amendment. Kevin MacDonald’s article is by and large correct, I was merely objecting to the quote about “gun culture.” Guns aren’t for pleasure they’re for self-defense, revolution or war. Shouldn’t be, should be.

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      Noise-no one else in the ‘hood seems bothered. My next door neighbor knows how I hate noise, yet installed wooden “wind chimes” that make me want to scream. I am going to offer to buy them for $20.

      Today- Sunday afternoon- being serenaded by the mexican down the street.
      And now next door. I spend most of my spare time thinking about the noise, over the last 30 years. The potential allies don’t seem to be bothered, they “think” that offenders have noise-making rights in the daytime- the noise would have to be literally unbearable before even thinking about calling the cops. When cops are called [only by me] they say “It’s not loud enough to cite.”
      I say “go talk [scare] them anyway”- they have and it has helped. . .

  6. Vehmgericht
    Vehmgericht says:

    The Swiss seem to combine the right to own guns with the reciprocal duty to ward and wield them wisely. The recurrence of school shootouts in the USA surely indicates a problem. If it is not addressed the call for restrictions will simply mount and perhaps the British ‘solution’ will be imposed: total prohibition.

    • Angusry
      Angusry says:

      Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
      Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
      The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
      The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
      The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
      Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
      Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
      Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
      There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
      The Second Amendment was given to the People, like all the other rights in the Bill or Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
      The 2nd Amendment clearly guarantees the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
      Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
      Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”?

      Of course not. …………. That is assumed.
      “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” — Thomas Jefferson

      It is implicit in the nature of all kinds of armies —- be they militia or regulars, volunteer, conscripted, or mercenary — to be armed.
      They are all “armed forces”.
      They all “bear arms”.
      They all carry guns.
      That is what they do.
      It certainly no more requires an amendment to the Constitution to state that “the Militia” has the RKBA , than a specific statement that the army Congress is empowered to raise may be manned by armed troops.

      “The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals … it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government … it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen’s protection against the government.” Ayn Rand

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        You don’t go far enough. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. That means the people, unless incarcerated where they lose rights, have a right to keep and bear arms. This includes criminals and all of the others currently banned, as those are infringements.
        Gun registration, if free, is not an infringement. Having to pay to register could be an infringement for those who do not have the ability to pay for the registration.
        It could also be argued that “arms” includes all weaponry produced by arms manufacturers.

        The question is why are these “shooters” shooting?
        This Jew has an interesting take on the recent Florida shooting:

        The witness video is also available.

        • AL
          AL says:

          No interesting take! No infringement. Bottom line, proper gun control. Again, I’m from MA. We’re not a liberal gun state like FL. We don’t have gun stores on every corner like 711 stores. When you apply for a license you will get a full background check, including criminal history. any violence, A&B, Domestic, etc…automatic knockout, mental illness, knockout, etc…it’s not easy to get a license in MA. You must pass a gun safety course prior to applying and provide the certificate. Once you do, no high capacity rounds mag. (ill. auto arrest), etc…I can go on, and on. .Bottom line, guns don’t kill people, people kill people, however, you don’t make it easy for them. It’s time FL started to wake up, and tightened up their gun control laws

          • Sam J.
            Sam J. says:

            Instead of telling people what to do in Florida maybe you should stay out of Florida and mind your own business in MA. As to MA maybe you can tell me why in the Boston bombing the picture of the person and his book bag shown by the FBI as being the one that blew up is different from the one they later showed ad the one that blew up? You take care of that in MS and then get back to the people in Florida and what your proscription is for them.

          • AL
            AL says:

            Mmmm, I will have to think hard about this one. You really got me on this one. I knew what you said a the beginning, but then you lost me regarding taking care if it in MS “(Mississippi), ” then tell the people of Florida what my “proscriptions,” or did you mean prescriptions? Like I said, you Floridians really confuse me.

          • Sam J.
            Sam J. says:

            That was garbled up. Should read

            “…You take care of that in MA and then get back to the people in Florida about your proscription for them…”

            proscription is correct.

            proscription (prō-skrĭpˈshən)
            The act of proscribing; prohibition.
            The condition of having been proscribed; outlawry.

          • Curmudgeon
            Curmudgeon says:

            Gun control, if background checks, criminal records checks, etc. lead to not being able to purchase a gun, is an infringement. The militia of the 2nd Amendment is not the Reserves. Militias are voluntary and raised by “the people”. I know Americans get annoyed when I point out that I speak English not American. It is not a slight, just an observation. I invite you to look up the definition of “infringe” in either the Oxford and/or Cambridge dictionary (preferably both due to subtle differences) and compare that to the Merriam-Webster dictionary. You will see that the obsolete Webster definition is closer to the Oxford – Cambridge definitions than the current Webster definition.
            I’m off on a tangent, I know, but I raise this issue because Webster started his project to create “American” in 1806. Your articles of Confederation and Constitution were crafted by people who spoke English. Again, I am not criticizing, only pointing out that reading documents written before Webster need to be seen in the context of “English” as opposed to “American”. There are differences, some subtle, some not. However, even subtle differences can a largely different understanding.
            When J.B. Campbell started the “militia movement” back in the 80s, it scared the hell out of the Government, because people were actually exercising their Constitutional right to protect themselves from the Government.
            I gave up my guns, voluntarily, years ago as I wasn’t hunting and saw no need for them for security. These days, I still don’t hunt, but I’m less sure on the security need.

  7. Floda
    Floda says:

    When I read that a ‘drill’ was planned for the Florida school on the day the shooting actually happened my bullshyte antenna took hold yet again.

    There were multiple drills at all three airports from which departed the allegedly hijacked Airliners which are said to have been the on 911. On the day of the London underground railway attacks, a private contractor announced that he had, for the very first time ever, convinced London’s rail authority to conduct a drill simulating exactly what happened on the day around 50 commuters were killed by bomb wielding Muslims.

    A few years ago I saw a quite large old guy with very a Germanic surname telling a Town meeting the Sandy Hook school was closed and bereft of pupils FOUR years before the alleged massacre of 20 children. The man’s credentials? He was a school safety inspector and before that, a life long policeman.

    This is not to suggest no kids were murdered in Florida, it is my opinion that our enemy will stop at nothing to disarm Whites in America. Stop at nothing means murdering however many it takes to achieve their goal. Using doped out WHITE misfits to carry out their murders seems to be their favorite method.

    In Australia back in 1996, a 26 year old ‘surfer looking’ moron, (IQ 59)
    is said to have murdered 35 tourists and wounded 23 at Port Arthur, a historic British penal colony on a remote windswept peninsula way down in southern Tasmania, our island state below eastern Australia.

    It happened on a Sunday and began early in the morning, within minutes TV Helicopters were there and the entire country sat transfixed as the hunt for the crazed shooter began. He was ‘caught’ the next day. Shortly afterwards massive cracks appeared in the narrative. That Sunday the only two armed cops stationed nearby were lured to a drug exchange which turned out to be hoax. That took them out of the way for four hours. Reports of another shooter wearing a blonde wig to look like the Surfer patsy. Many other anomalies, including a Book later written by the senior Tasmanian Policeman indicating he was himself suspicious that not all was kosher.

    The effect? Australia, before this event just behind the US in firearms per capita, was entirely disarmed. Our media is just as venal as America’s so no discussion let alone an investigation. The Patsy? His name is Martin Bryant, imprisoned for life in Tasmania, but he was never tried before a court of law. Because, as they say, ‘everyone knows he did it’.

    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      @ Floda:
      Exactly! Cum grano salis, especially as “Laskarina” says,
      “Parkland is one of the wealthiest Jewish communities in FL, run by Chabad – the international Jewish crime syndicate.
      The school has an intensive “JROTC” program which is in reality training for the IDF – or like the American Jew land thieves in Stolenland. Nearly all students participate. They even had a military ball instead of a prom. It was a “drill” which is really just another Jew hoax. The average home in Parkland FL is nearly a million dollars. Stories about this were posted on the internet days earlier than the ‘event’.”

    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      Sheriff Israel has let it be known that CCTV footage will not be released. You’ll just have to trust the story.

  8. john
    john says:

    From the book “Master of Discourse” by Israel Shamir:

    “This totalitarianism was predicted by George Orwell, an avid reader of the Protocols, and it was lauded by Leo Strauss, a guiding light of the Neocons. Strauss endorsed a society with dictatorial powers of elites; a follower of Hobbes, he distrusted the people. Though his views were formed before the WWII, after the war he frequently referred to the Holocaust as a phenomenon that is liable to come back unless the society is firmly kept in check. I called the supporters of this paradigm by the name ‘Mammonites’, mammon-worshippers. The Iraqi war, and the War on Terror in general, is a joint product of Zionists and Mammonites, while these two groups often coincide, as is the case with the leading Neocons. That is why our struggle is with Zionists and Mammonites; this is not only a laudable campaign of support of the peoples of the Middle East, but first of all the decisive battle for preservation of democracy and freedom in the US and Europe, for a chance of better life for our children, for creation of a more egalitarian and more spiritual society, against the Dark ages we are being led to.”

  9. david garner
    david garner says:

    usually like most of TOO…’re right about the Jewish politics but really.. that.any crazed maniac can go out and buy an assault rifle…that has nothing to do with home protection or anything else is a lunatic position….none of the northern European cultures you so often praise allow this….the gun thing is the very ugly part of the white culture…nowhere on the planet is any of this tolerated…except here….maybe why the USA leads the western world in violence and murder….in more civilized parts of the world even most of the police don’t carry guns…we’re about 100 years behind in having a safe environment for its citizens…call America what it is: a culture steeped in ignorance and violence alone in the modern world

    • Al
      Al says:

      I guess you really don’t gather your facts. Yes, murder rate is up, however, most of the murders are not committed by whites. Most are gang violence, non-white culture many illegals. The mass shootings get all the attention, but the murder rate in Chicago alone none whites succeeds the death rate every day. Again, I’m against possessing automatic weapons, etc. Funny how outsiders state how far behind our country is and how bad it is, but I have a simple answer for them; leave. If it’s that bad why do you stay? If all these other countries are so much better why don’t you go? Why are they sneaking in to the US? No one is forcing you to stay, you can go. I know other countries know any attack on the US would be difficult as there probably 3 guns to every household. Anyway, that’s not the point. White, black, Jewish, catholic, etc. guns are everyone’s culture. But then again Jewish catholic European, etc are all considered white people anyway.

    • Sam J.
      Sam J. says:

      “…USA leads the western world in violence and murder…”

      Not if you take out Black and Hispanic violence and murder. Are you suggesting, since they are the problem. we get rid of them? It appears that’s what you’re suggesting. While were at it it would be good to get rid of the Jews. The only known way to deal with the Jews that anyone has come up with for thousands of years that works 100% is to deport the Jews. Get rid of them and let them have no say so in your society. The goods news is this has been shown to work 100% of the time with great gains in health, wealth and prosperity for the population that does it.

        • Sam J.
          Sam J. says:

          That’s a good question. Why is so much hatred directed towards Whites by Jews and Blacks and why are other races primarily for their race first?

  10. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    Let’s not let it go unnoticed that there are at least two first person statements on camera by students that say there were more than one shooter. One was very well acquainted with the, supposed shooter, saw and talked to him while shooting was just going on in another building. He was not armed at the time. She and the other witness unequivocally stated there was more than one shooter.

    If the Jews unarm us they will murder us like they did the Russians. We desperately need to get rid of the Jews and completely sever them from our country before they find a way to kill us all. We’ve been more than patient with the Jews and have tried most any way you can think of to deal with them but it seems the only thing that works is to get rid of them and refuse to have anything to do with them. I don;t think we should beat around the bush about this we should forthrightly state that they are a plague that has been thrown out of every single country they’ve ever been to in all of their history and that it;s time for them to go before they cause any more harm t our country. We should get together the best minds we can find and intensely study how to get rid of them.

  11. Egbert Souse
    Egbert Souse says:

    Jews don’t just “hold a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts” — they hold this dark vision about EVERY country they’ve ever occupied!

    Thus they demonstrate that wherever they are, they are an anti-democratic and parasitic fifth column, in enmity with all others who aren’t in their ‘in-group’.

  12. Christine
    Christine says:

    The latest school shooting in Florida is another spectacle to enrage the people and bring them to hysteria so that they will demand gun control. It is like a bullfight. The Matador keeps on wounding and enraging the bull. This is what is happening to us, we are in a continued state of agitation. (Germany in the 1920’s and 30’s)
    A larger issue I think is the theft of people’s energy. It is spring in Florida and nature here is so beautiful. To celebrate this beauty and live in reciprocity with it we must have some kind of internal peace. This is exactly what is under constant attack, our inner being.

Comments are closed.