The Liberal/Left Tries to Shame/Guilt Everyone Associated with President Trump

Note: I wrote this a while ago—before the recent moral panic about Presidents Putin and Trump. But I thought I would post it because we should think about this phenomenon of trying to lay guilt trips (as it was termed in the 1960s) on anyone associated with Trump. It’s all part of the Civil War II scenario—polarization out of control; hatred and inability to communicate across the political divide. Turbulent times ahead.

*   *   *

Recently there’s been an upsurge in the left engaging in public displays of shaming and shunning public figures associated with the President Trump. Maxine “Impeach 45” Waters famously wants Trump allies to be shamed wherever they go—gas stations, department stores, and even their homes.

And the trend is catching on. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Scott Pruitt were unceremoniously asked to leave restaurants. Kirstjen Nielsen (at her home) and Mitch McConnell and his wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao got similar treatment. Jared and Ivanka have resorted to working out in a darkened gym to avoid the harassment. And then there’s the woman who confronted Steve Bannon in a bookstore, calling him a “piece of trash.” Right now it’s everyone from Kellyanne Conway to Stephen Miller facing hecklers wherever they go.

Sometimes it edges into violence. Breitbart tabulated 304 incidents of harassment or violence against Trump supporters since the election, all basically ignored by the media. Most of the victims are non-celebrities, like the teenager who was attacked by a Latino adult throwing soda at him and stealing his MAGA hat. Most pathetically, a woman who thanked Eric Trump for raising $16 million for St. Jude Hospital was subjected to “unreal hate” on social media. The trend is clear.

Put all that together, and it’s a powerful array against Trump. We’ll see what the polls say, but there’s no doubt that many pro-Trump voters will be troubled by accusations of treason and appeasing Russia in a way they wouldn’t about hostility toward Trump’s policies on immigration. As usual, this media furor is couched as a moral imperative. And although the public (especially Whites) are getting less and less susceptible to moralistic rhetoric, I suspect that this is not so much the case with accusations of disgraceful, treasonous behavior by the president.

But let’s get beyond the “low-IQ” rabble-rousing Maxine and her minions. The most interesting case of shunning has been the treatment that Alan Dershowitz got from his now-former friends on Martha’s Vineyard. It’s more interesting for at least two reasons—Dershowitz’s card-carrying liberalism and the fact that the shunning is occurring within a very elite, very Jewish and therefore very intellectual American sub-culture. Definitely not the hoi polloi.

One of them, an academic at a distinguished university, has told people that he would not attend any dinner or party to which I was invited. He and others have demanded “trigger warnings” so that they can be assured of having “safe spaces” in which they will not encounter me or my ideas. Others have said they will discontinue contributions to organizations that sponsor my talks. (Dershowitz in The Hill)

Obviously, the professor fits right in to the contemporary academic culture of the left where it’s incumbent on everyone to do all they can to prevent hurt feelings. Recently a high-end girls high school in London abolished teacher comments to prevent students from feeling bad about themselves. This is the culture of  the left.

Dershowitz denounces Rep. Waters, but his main point is that the shunners were unprincipled—that they were fine with any procedure that would nail Trump, whether it passed legal muster or not. “It is enough that what I have said about the Constitution might help Trump.”

This is a revealing comment on today’s political scene. Liberals are forever screaming about Trump doing away with the rule of law and embracing authoritarianism. One is tempted to find a bit of projection in these exclamations. Liberals never seem to feel the need to provide examples of Trump’s authoritarianism, but they never seem to notice their own authoritarianism and how quick they are to resort to harassment and violence when elections fail to give them what they want. Would Obama’s executive order on DACA—after his many declarations that such a move would be unconstitutional—be a good example of what they have in mind? Needless to say, Obama’s DACA executive order has now been enshrined as a moral touchstone, revered by all liberals and many conservatives as well. Process be damned if it meets the moral standards of the New York Times. If it reflects “who we are” according to the post-1965 liberal consensus.

Trump was actually thinking about rewriting the entire immigration system by executive order but was discouraged from doing so by staffers concerned about process issues. I think he should try it and let the courts deal with the uproar, just as Obama did. The fact is that Trump’s immigration agenda has been largely stymied by a Congress that remains in thrall to the activist anti-White left and big businesses wanting cheap labor. Doing an end-run around Congress may be the only possible way out. And the upside for the left would be that they would at last have an example of Trump legislating without Congressional input.

One obvious take on this is that it reflects the continuing polarization of U.S. politics. As Enoch Powell noted long ago, there will be blood. Civil War even.

We can’t talk to each other anymore. Trump haters don’t think of the people they hate as misinformed (although they love to think they are intellectually inferior). Mainly, they think of Trumpsters as morally depraved. After all, if a person is morally culpable, there is the implication that that person is blameworthy. Excuses like having different, sincerely held beliefs, no matter how well-founded, don’t have to be considered. Immorality implies malicious intentions.

A good example is the main spokesman for the Dershowitz shunners, Walter Teller, a prominent Los Angeles entertainment lawyer and longtime Vineyard resident. Teller emailed Dershowitz thusly:

“You defended and gave cover to this president who relentlessly disrupts and destroys all that we value and causes massive and lasting damage to our political system, our courts, our standing in the world, the environment and more. In all of that you are complicit.”

“All that we value.” Legal principles like due process for the president be damned. He demands particular outcomes based on his moral sentiments—no regard to how they are brought about. It’s the same with Roe v. Wade—a classic case pitting liberals who could care less about what is actually in the Constitution and only care about getting the right outcome (which they could try to achieve legislatively at state or federal level) vs. conservatives who think the Constitution ought to mean something.

Actually, as noted in the previously linked article, even liberal legal scholars agree: “Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the ruling ‘heavy-handed judicial activism.’ Laurence Tribe wrote ‘behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found.’ Former Harry Blackmun clerk Edward Lazarus wrote ‘[A]s a matter of constitutional interpretation, even most liberal jurisprudes — if you administer truth serum — will tell you it is basically indefensible.’” Outcome based reasoning based on moral sentiments at its finest.

The West is saturated with the rhetoric of the moral imperatives of the left. Apart from sociopaths, we care that other people like us. This is likely especially true of white people because in Western, individualist societies, people are less prone to ingroups based on extended kinship but far more prone to forming ingroups based on reputation or moral standing. For our hunter-gatherer ancestors, exclusion from the group because of a reputation as immoral or untrustworthy was the ultimate kiss of death. So we want to be “good people” by fitting into the current moral zeitgeist and of course that zeitgeist is now completely dominated by the left. And if we develop a reputation as immoral, we feel not just shame, but guilt—the feeling that even if no one is watching, we feel bad about ourselves. Our internal censor is activated.

It’s been a very effective strategy. Our political rhetoric—whether it’s going to war in Iraq (or WWI or WWII or the Civil War) or demanding civil rights for Blacks—is saturated with moral rationales. And, overwhelmingly, it works. Absent moral indignation, one wonders if the left has any arguments at all for complete transformation of the West that they are trying to impose.

The problem is that far too many White people think they are in a competition to be the most virtuous person around — to the point that pointing out “virtue signaling” has become a standard tactic on the Alt Right. When I was still teaching at a university, the competition for sainthood among White academics was a sight to behold. I vividly recall a middle-aged White professor at a faculty meeting intoning on the need to hire more non-White faculty—while not volunteering to vacate his position to speed up this process. After all, if a person is morally culpable, there is the implication that that person is blameworthy. Excuses like having different, sincerely held beliefs, no matter how well-founded, don’t have to be considered. Immorality implies malicious intentions.

Cost-free virtue signaling is a sickness of White people who are already plugged into the system—particularly baby boomers who have benefited from the golden age of the American economy since the 1950s. Younger Whites, especially White men, who aspire to such positions are realizing that the system is stacked against them: Party identification among Millennials shows a steep upward trend Around half of white men (and white women) in this age group believe that discrimination against Whites is as significant as discrimination against other groups.

Moralistic arguments have been very effective. As someone with considerable experience in the academic world, I can attest to feeling like a wayward heretic back in seventeenth-century Massachusetts when I was confronted by academic thought police, egged on to a fever pitch by a visit from the $PLC’s Heidi Beirich. It’s the moral fervor of these people that stands out. The academic world has become a Puritan congregation of stifling thought control, enforced by moralistic condemnations that a seventeenth-century Puritan minister could scarcely surpass. In my experience, this thought control is far worse in the East coast colleges and universities founded by the Puritans than elsewhere in academia—a fitting reminder of the continuing presence of Puritan moralism in American life. Unfortunately, academia is a top-down institution, so this utopian moralism filters down from elite East Coast universities to the rest of academia.

However, this shaming technique only works when there is a moral consensus. In the academic world, the consensus is stifling, so that a professor who professes race realism and White interests would find himself completely isolated. What has terrified the entire political spectrum from the loony left to the neoconservative right is that Trump has managed to defy that moral consensus. He got elected despite repeated MSM caricatures as a Nazi

The moral condemnations continue to rain down on him from the mainstream media and in the continual well-funded anti-Trump protests and marches—especially over immigration which is portrayed as the moral imperative of our age (“No Human Is Illegal,” “Abolish ICE!”).

But the moral consensus on immigration isn’t there and likely never existed in the first place. One of Trump’s great contributions is that he has made the issue front and center and trampled on the moral sensibilities of the left.

Trump would be well advised to highlight the “Abolish ICE” statements that are increasingly common among Democrats and the lack of concern Democrats have had about the many victims of crime by illegals. Only around 25% of Americans support abolishing ICE, with 54% opposed, the rest undecided. And 43% of Democrats want to abolish ICE, while only 34 percent say it should keep it. Given these numbers, one could easily imagine Abolish-ICE becoming a majority viewpoint among Democrats. Trump would definitely run on that.

24 replies
  1. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    “…He got elected despite repeated MSM caricatures as a Nazi…”

    What about…;
    “..He got elected [because of] repeated MSM caricatures as a Nazi…”?

    Jews are definitely experts at one thing: ‘Lying’…, and ‘its’ little brother; ‘projecting false impressions’.

    As pointed out in the above essay,
    notwithstanding the partisan nature of (((induced opinion))) on the subject,
    generally speaking,
    the majority of US citizens want the border locked down tight.

    Nevertheless, because Jews still proxy-control or own the majority of information dissemination vehicles in the West, unlike in the Pre-Trump era when subtle but unified lies were enough to project the boundaries that speech was to remain within and thereby served to keep the Goyem pacified,
    because the majority of citizens of the USA,
    including not just the White ones btw,
    have seen through the lies of the Jews’ News,
    the Jews have resorted to literally shouting out their condemnation of Trump to make up for the lost numbers who actually support them.

    It is as if the Jews understand that the Jews News is still being continually run in all the usual places (i.e. shops, universities, car radios, free printed material, etc…) but that fewer people are actually paying attention.
    So to get that attention back, (((the cheer leaders))) have resorted to frenzied shouting in order to attempt to catch the attention of any people within ear shot.

    Another technique used by the (((Dwindling Left))) is the forming of associations that espouse Retarded Jew inspired Leftist thought and awarding literally HUGE trophies or plaques in recognition of outstanding service in the cause of Goyem Cattle Herding.
    The Dr. Joyce sighted conference is just such an example.
    Yet throughout all the (((hoopla))), in general, the MSM subscription numbers continue to plummet,
    Jews are increasingly resorting to consolidation and down sizing of what remains and,
    correspondingly (((they))) are ramping up both their investments in on-line media and the attempted censorship of those who refuse to be bought out.

    What actually remains in the camp that still listens to the Lying Jews are Retarded, Third World, John Hagee like Christians and other Retarded Remnants of what was once a Legion of Retards under Jewish influence.

    As for Jews exercising the so called Samson Option…, well that would be their last mistake.
    If they did that, the entire world would turn against them with a vengeance.
    As it is now, the World would be contented with exile and isolation as opposed to extermination.

    • Polynik3s
      Polynik3s says:

      Please understand that you are watching a staged wrestling match. Trump is a Zionist candidate. They have more than one puppet to chose from. Hillary could not sell another war, this time with Iran. The Neocons are still in control and will likely be until a military coup.
      You are watching professional wrestling. The Jews were Bolsheviks and Capitalists. They use the dialectic and claim the resulting product. They win when you think binarily with your reptile brain. Trump just got hit over the head with a chair! When will the referee quit favoring the liberals! You and it appears Mr. MacDonald have been suckered. Please research Trump and Roy Cohen, Sheldon Adelson, Netanyahu, Chabad extremists planning to blow up the temple mount, Chabad exremist Jared Kushner, Felix Sader, and laundering Russian Jewish Mafia money.
      You have been exposed to limited hangout information until you visit YouTube channels for Know More News and Ryan Dawson at Anti-Neocon Report. The Neocons are still in control and always a step ahead of most of the “red-pilled”.

      • RoyAlbrecht
        RoyAlbrecht says:

        The confusion has become so plentiful that even I, someone who prides himself on being able to see through (((their))) lies, is having trouble seeing.
        I made an extensive comment here some months ago that I am not able to find or that may not have been posted by the mods. [Mod. note: I don’t recall ever NOT approving your comments, Roy]

        In it I too postulated that Trump might actually not only stab America in the back,
        but by extension,
        all defacto colonies of America as well…,
        including South Korea.

        Since the Jews stole nuke-technology from America and then sold it to Russia,
        and Jews:
        1) Were largely behind the Communism in Russia and by extension, China and North Korea,
        2) Have made huge inroads into China while selling out the USA and Europe,
        3) Are mostly interested in killing off Aryan Man no matter where he lives…,
        Trump may just be the tool Jews use to turn South Korea over to North Korea in a reverse take over of the peninsula.

        The West is on the cusp of realizing that Jews are in fact behind everything bad that we as Whites face, so why wouldn’t Jews then destroy the West and give it to the East…, where they have secured safe place for themselves?
        If Israel is secretly dealing with the MSM’s “…villains of the day…”, by Israel teaming up with the “…Kings of the East…” Jews might actually be able to take over the West in a very bloody WW3 battle.

  2. Pat Kittle
    Pat Kittle says:

    The more the (((Left))) gets what (((it))) wants, the more demanding, intolerant, & violent (((it))) becomes.

    (((It))) never was about kumbaya.

  3. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    “a middle-aged White professor at a faculty meeting intoning on the need to hire more non-White faculty—while not volunteering to vacate his position to speed up this process.”
    And so it goes. Noel Ignatiev is another example. I’m waiting for him to declare he will help “abolish Whiteness” by offing himself. Yes, I know he’s not “White” but he would never admit that, otherwise the useful idiots of globalism might catch on. They believe that their slogans are truer than the simplest of arguments poking holes in their reasoning, particularly about race. When I refer these SJWs, irrespective of colour, to Mohammad Ali’s 1971 interview with Michael Parkinson, they only see a Black man “outsmart” a White man. They do not see Parkinson’s illogical argument, and they do not see Ali as “racist”.
    In other words they are, a the old saw goes, too dumb to pound sand.

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      Mr. Ali was not black- he was mixed with lots of White genes, accounting for his intelligence.

    • T
      T says:

      Curmudgeon writes: ‘They [SJWs] do not see Parkinson’s illogical argument, and they do not see Ali as “racist”.’

      What they and much of the larger audience also don’t see is that persons such as Parkinson hate racially mixed persons such as M Ali (irrespective of the person’s race ultimately) for his ideological defiance on the subject of race and would likely have no qualms in the wholesale slaughtering of similar such persons, black or not, should a Russian Civil War type scenario play out in the future within the Anglosphere. Indeed, I wouldn’t be surprised that Mr Parkinson had to fight off the momentary urge to physically strangle Ali during the course of the interview itself. At the time of the interview (early 70’s) as well as today persons such as Ali then and Farakhan today, not to mention Aztlan Hispanic types, are useful as hammers to deconstruct the larger Euro society in the US so the radical liberal/leftist type keep mum then and now (relatively speaking). In time most every identifieable racial group that resist their destruction will be turned upon by tptb as they indeed hate just about everyone.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        I think that you give Parkinson too much credit. I have seen him interview a number of people, and concluded that he was merely a reader of interview questions with an inability to understand answers that didn’t go according to his script. In other words, a useful idiot.

  4. Polynik3s
    Polynik3s says:

    I am new to this site. I generally follow Adam Green of Know More News and Ryan Dawson of the Anti-Neocon Report. I am surprised that Trump is in good favor among the respected Kevin McDonald and the commenters.
    Does this forum wish to throw off the shackles of the Zionist and their Neocons? Trump is a Jewish mafia president. Sheldon Adelson, Wilbur Ross, son-in-law Jared Kushner and Bibi,… Is this site limited hangout?Like a sophisticated man’s Alex Jones?
    Who is Trump? Paraphrasing author James Perloff:

    Trump is also a Rothchild puppet. He was selected to bring war to the Middle East. The Rothschild bet on Trump is that he can deceive Americans for a third time (or was it the 124th time?) into war. Trump can deceive and get the Red-blooded, Bluepilled Middle America vote. These goyim are under the Lucifarian Zionist Spell.

    Hillary is incapable of selling another war. Her Libyan ISIS mercenary war was a success for Rothschild. Then Hillary’s ISIS mercenaries were picked up and flown to Syria where they failed miserably, thanks to freedom fighters from Iran and Russia. With the failure of Zionist ISIS, this next war will require USA military troops.

    Rothschild chose Trump through its agent Sheldon Adelson. Trump is to create another war for the Greater Israel Project. After that, Trump will be set up as the fall guy for the inevitable collapse of the US Petrodollar. He may even be assassinated.

    The next President of the US will be a Democrat Zionist with the ability to focus it’s New World Order Terror on the USAs domestic policies.

    That is the gist of it…

    Rothschild Trump, War, Dollar Collapse, End of Trump, Rothschild Democrat, Orwellian Domestic Programs.

    • Marcus A. Boechat
      Marcus A. Boechat says:

      What you say may well be true, It sounds about right,nevertheless the founding stock of America and others of European stock would do well to insist upon the dismantling of the 1965 immigration law reverting back to Eurocentric immigration or perhaps better yet, end all immigration as we did in the 1920’s, returning all illegals to their country of origin. We forget that blacks are against immigration because they are most negatively affected by it. they are allies in this fight. ending immigration of non Europeans is ultimately more important than any other issue for without success in this one realm our civilization and culture will be lost

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      As I see it, Trump is “in good favor” only relative to the Democtrats, RINOs and other groups hell bent on continuing the insane economic and immigration policies of the last 50 years.

  5. Walter Lewkowski
    Walter Lewkowski says:

    Can’t really feel sorry for Alan Dershowitz.
    Yes his pro-Trump arguments are valid and somewhat courageous, but ineffective.
    Better Dershowitz should attack the anti-Trumpers with the zeal as he attacked Norman Finkelstein when Finkelstein opposed Dershowitz’s beloved Israel and The Holocaust Industry.

  6. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    @ PIERRE, et al:

    Your reply was certainly dead on; as always. The question poses itself of who could possibly be more detrimental to US interests than AIPAC & Co., and its two-faced, disgusting, in-your-face methodology ?

    Browder, of course; with his Jewish mendacious, knee-deep activism in every aspect of Russo-phobia: the ante war demonization of the manufactured enemy.

    When I searched for this multiply censored video I found another, subsequent one, discussing the former. This discussion was with Alex Krainer, a Serbo-Croatian funds manager in Monaco. No vehemence, objective, personally acquainted with Browder and exceedingly analytical with perfect command of English and logic. It’s 3 hrs duration should deter no one sincerely interested in geo-politics and [[[ their machinations ]]]

    Krainer speaks of his own book on the subject, also rejected by Amazon, through [[[ undue ]]] B lawyer threats and tribal connections; though available on pdf.

    One of the best videos, going well beyond the initial fiasco; indeed covering the greatest percentage of the topics on TOO. On review, my initial description was correct, except for the spelling of Madoff.


    Nekrasov’s video on the real Browder was cancelled by the EU Commission and many other EU and UK venues; likewise under threats by his lawyers. Only the news organizations’ Newseum, was brave enough not to cancel.

    Our several Canadian friends will probably already know, that the Magnistky Act was also passed by Parliament, pushed by B personally in Parliament, where he got a rave reception. This goes to the credit of the former Conservative government under Harper, pushed by Canada’s Solicitor General.
    [[[ Kotler ]]]. Bloody fascinating – enjoy already !

    The Magnitsky Act. Behind the Scenes.

  7. T
    T says:

    Per the title of this excellent article regarding ‘shame’ (not to mention the other points made as to social isolation as a weapon and ‘trigger warnings’, etc) it is all quite illustrative that as time has gone by that the ‘convergance’ of Capitalism and Marxism which constitutes the ideology of Multi-Culturalism can readily be seen to have all the earmarks of a gigantic cult. In the decades following the Korean War, and the finding upon their release that that American POWs had not fared to well in resisting Communist indoctrination, a tremendous amount of research was conducted on the techniques of ‘brain washing’ (aka mind control or thought reform) so as to develop methods to succesfully resist such tactics in the future. Provided with this information prior to Vietnam the US troops taken prisoner by N Vietnam did indeed do much better at resisting indoctrination and were less succesfully ‘turned’ than in the previous war. As to the research findings much valuable information was found out in regards to the mechanics of the formation and workings of cults.

    Excerpted below is just some of what was found regarding the matter found at the linked site. I’ve added some of my own comments in parenthesis.

    The induction of guilt and/or shame is a powerful control device…The group has the prerogative to decide who has the right to exist and who does not.

    Dr. Robert J. Lifton’s Eight Criteria for Thought Reform

    Milieu Control. This involves the control of information and communication both within the environment and, ultimately, within the individual, resulting in a significant degree of isolation from society at large. (Yep, print media, radio and TV are already largley controlled. Efforts are now under way to do the same to the internet.)

    Mystical Manipulation. There is manipulation of experiences that appear spontaneous but in fact were planned and orchestrated by the group or its leaders in order to demonstrate divine authority or spiritual advancement or some special gift or talent that will then allow the leader to reinterpret events, scripture, and experiences as he or she wishes. (Hmmmm…The Summer of Love (1967), Woodstock (1969), the Manifestations of 1968 in Europe, the entire 1960’s ultimately as it is presented here in the states . Peace bro!;-))

    Demand for Purity. The world is viewed as black and white and the members are constantly exhorted to conform to the ideology of the group and strive for perfection. The induction of guilt and/or shame is a powerful control device used here. (Very much so,no question.)

    Confession. Sins, as defined by the group, are to be confessed either to a personal monitor or publicly to the group. There is no confidentiality; members’ “sins,” “attitudes,” and “faults” are discussed and exploited by the leaders. (ie the ‘me too’ movement of late and those accused)

    Sacred Science. The group’s doctrine or ideology is considered to be the ultimate Truth, beyond all questioning or dispute. Truth is not to be found outside the group. The leader, as the spokesperson for God or for all humanity, is likewise above criticism.

    Loading the Language. The group interprets or uses words and phrases in new ways so that often the outside world does not understand. This jargon consists of thought-terminating clichés, which serve to alter members’ thought processes to conform to the group’s way of thinking. (Definitely, “hate”, “race”, “tolerance”, are among a few of the perfectly legitimate words twisted by these folks.)

    Doctrine over person. Member’s personal experiences are subordinated to the sacred science and any contrary experiences must be denied or reinterpreted to fit the ideology of the group. (Yes, a persons personal experiences with other groups must not get in the way of ‘unity thru diversity’.)

    Dispensing of existence. The group has the prerogative to decide who has the right to exist and who does not. This is usually not literal but means that those in the outside world are not saved, unenlightened, unconscious and they must be converted to the group’s ideology. If they do not join the group or are critical of the group, then they must be rejected by the members. Thus, the outside world loses all credibility. In conjunction, should any member leave the group, he or she must be rejected also. (Lifton, 1989) (Curiously it says this “dispensing of existance” is “usually” not literal….but it does seem to be that it is what is planned -God forbid!- for Europeans who have been slated to dissappear, not to mention almost every other identifieable human group besides ultimately.)

    And what they are attempting to do with the social isolation mentioned in regards to Mr Derschowitz and the others for having been perceived to be ‘out of line’. In the Communist state, it was not just naked force that maintained control. Again, from the same linked site:

    Once stripped of your usual support network, your confidence in your own perception erodes.

    As your sense of powerlessness increases, your good judgment and understanding of the world are diminished. (ordinary view of reality is destabilized)

    As group attacks your previous worldview, it causes you distress and inner confusion; yet you are not allowed to speak about this confusion or object to it—leadership suppresses questions and counters resistance.

  8. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    All of us could use a moment of levity. No, this is not a link to a video of feeding-time-at-the-zoo, though difficult to differentiate. The visual is so deliciously absurd, that one tends to ignore the telling lyrics. Do both – for the same low price – at 95% off list !

    • RoyAlbrecht
      RoyAlbrecht says:

      Is that “…levi-ty…” or “…Co-hen-medy…”?

      Three things about this video.

      1) All male couples and group dancing…, not a female in sight. The Islamics do the same thing btw.
      In the West, we can hardly imagine a dance with another man and without a female in the hall.
      I knew this sort of thing takes place, but never gave it a second thought.
      My questions go to the pros and cons of each “…dancing modality…”;
      Semitic vs. Aryan?.
      2) The rabbis are quite nimble and quick on their feet. I can attest to speed with which these the more “…orthodox…”
      (as opposed to the ones who only dress orthodoxly but have a plethora of slovenly habits and look more like morbidly obese sows)
      rabbis move.
      I used to follow (((them))) around from bank to bank in Zurich just to see where they were off to in such a hurry.
      Being more or less a triathlete at the time, I often had trouble keeping up with these little buggers and they more than once lost me in the twists and turns of the hilly terrain of the city streets.
      3) Shïte Islamics in Pakistan told me of Sunni Mullahs coming into the region wearing huge white turbans along with their traditional/religious garb.
      Yet underneath this large head gear were large lumps of gold which they brought undetected through customs
      (in the days before X-ray machines and metal detectors)
      and used to secure plots of land and other local commodities, loyalties (bribery) and assassinations of opponents.

      Amazing how piously tolerant and sensitively White customs officials behave towards their “…devout…” Jewish murderers.
      A good disguise goes a long way if (((one))) pre-conditions the mental responses of (((their))) erstwhile victims/slaves in advance.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Ca. six years ago, there was a flurry of such customs irregularities involving diamond merchants of NYC’s 47th Street, even including de facto customs inspection immune rabbis.

        Purportedly they were bringing to and fro huge amounts of cash from tax-exempt Jewish charities. But also hundreds of thousands in ” valueless rhinestones “, that were actually diamonds: well beyond a busy inspector to differentiate. I.e. money laundering and tax evasion, which only alchemist Browder could turn on its head for you.

        Inspectors feed families in mortgaged homes. Who can be blamed for not prosecuting in an in any case rigged judicial system. Remember MP Member of the House of Lords [[[ Janner ]]] and his officially Crown Prosecution Service-countenanced 25 years of reported pedophilia.

        One case involving a mentally challenged 15 year old boy, borrowed from a group home and taken to the Holiday Inn in Edinburgh where the police found semen-drenched Kleenex and Vaseline for anal sex in their just vacated room.

        Not to be noticed as absent from home during this triste, he sent wife and young daughter out of town. Years later this owl-faced daughter was ordained as a rabbi: to round out this not atypical biography.

        This swine too, emulating others in the pen, masqueraded as the typical human rights activist, like Browder, Talmudically ” healing the world “. May he eternally burn in hell: and then some: after dying too late but just days before his 25 year delayed trial.

        But, I digress: or is that even possible ?

        • RoyAlbrecht
          RoyAlbrecht says:

          “…But, I digress: or is that even possible ?”

          This is a main problem when dealing with the JQ..:

          All pot hole pitted roads of disorder, chaos and death lead to the Jews
          yet since most people lack the conviction or the depth of vision with respect to how willfully [how bad of an adverb can you think of here] maliciously a Jew can be,
          they often second guess themselves and thereby concede moral territory to the Jews.

          The Jews have the advantage in this battle because not only do they;

          1) Know there is a battle being waged against Whites,
          2) Know that this battle against Whites is being waged on a sub-conscious and psychological level,
          3) Know that most Whites can not even begin to imagine the level of depravity that Jews have BEEN TAUGHT THROUGH TALMUDIC DOGMA to descend to in this battle and finally,
          4) Know that whenever a White man gets close to the truth behind the JQ, (((they))) can always deploy one of the many mind-tricks (((they))) have preconditioned most Whites to retreat in response to.

          My advice is:
          ATTACK FIRST and tend to the wounded after the war has been won.

  9. Tate
    Tate says:

    Unfortunately Sarah huckabee is the daughter of Mike huckabee, a Christian zionist who is encouraging the construction of Jewish settlements. Trump is in an unholy alliance with Israel and the Jewish lobby

  10. JJ
    JJ says:

    Marcus A Boechat. “Blacks are allies” ….please don’t make me laugh. “They are most negatively affected by immigration” – how ? All of their problems and the burdens they create for us can’t be attributed to anything else but their own inherent failings in civilised societies.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      They may not be the most affected by immigration, but there is no doubt that the unskilled jobs being done by illegals from the south and others from the 3rd world were previously done by blacks. Other simple changes, such as self serve gas bars have also created a massive negative effect on blacks.

Comments are closed.