Lying about Judeo-Bolshevism

A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism
Paul Hanebrink
Harvard University Press, 2018.

The writing and discussion of Jewish historiography in contemporary mainstream academia requires a sublime choreography. It’s basically a series of evasions resembling dances, in which facts are presented and parried, and flamboyant narratives are advanced which everyone knows to be false but which emerge repetitively and shamelessly. My attention was first drawn to Paul Hanebrink’s A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism by Christopher Browning’s recent glowing review, titled “The Fake Threat of Jewish Communism,” in the New York Review of Books. Browning is an establishment historian with a record of legally assisting Jews — for the right price. As well as receiving over $30,000 from Deborah Lipstadt to testify against David Irving, Browning has testified against a significant number of European ex-soldiers at war crimes trials. Although his most notable work, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (1992), contains the less than remarkable thesis that war turns ordinary men into killers, Browning’s dedication to the Jewish narrative has led to his becoming a true guru of Jewish victimology. Having received awards and funds from organizations including Yad Vashem and the USC Shoah Foundation Center and copious promotion in mainstream media and academia, Browning’s certificate of praise in the field is potentially career-making. Evidently, he has chosen to bestow his magic touch on Paul Hanebrink. In this essay I want to explore the approach of both Browning’s review and Hanebrink’s text as exercises in the manufacture of duplicitous histories.

I had to look twice at Browning’s headline. My first thought was: “Really? You really want to take this subject matter on? You really think you can ‘debunk’ the facticity of Jewish Communism?” Such an endeavor would unquestionably require abundant chutzpah, but it is clear from the very beginning of the review that this will be an effort of evasion rather than outright debate. As Browning states in the opening paragraph, “Hanebrink’s approach is not to repeat what he considers an error of the interwar era—the futile attempt to refute a myth on the basis of historical facts and statistical data.” Although this evasion is predictable, it’s quite remarkable to see a more or less open admission from two allegedly masterful historians that they don’t possess facts sufficient to dispel the very “myth” they set out to challenge. To describe any such presentation of facts as a “futile attempt” seems intellectually flaccid; a concession of the weakness of one’s case.

But what is really presented here, of course, is the standard structure of Jewish historiography: avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry. Taking a page from the ADL playbook, Browning mewls coyly that “a small kernel of truth underpinned the stereotype of the Jewish Bolshevik,” but insists, regarding Communism, that “the Jew as “the face of the revolution” was a “culturally constructed” perception.” We therefore arrive at the familiar position where facts don’t matter and everything Jews don’t like is triumphantly declared a mere construct.

Christopher Browning: Virulent Philosemite

Browning’s review is littered with cliché, which in turn betrays an interpretation of anti-Semitism heavily influenced by a fellow useful philosemite, the late Gavin Langmuir. I profiled Langmuir’s research at length four years ago, during which I wrote:

Langmuir’s work mimicked Jewish productions by essentially absolving medieval Jewish populations of any responsibility in provoking negative reactions from their Christian host populations, and by ascribing to Christian/Western society a deep-seated psychological malfunction shot through with fantasy, repression, and sadism. Despite his actually very limited expertise in medieval legal history, Langmuir saw fit to quickly make grand pronouncements on the nature and origins of anti-Jewish feeling across Europe and over the course of centuries. His works, often with pitifully thin evidence of wider reading, portrayed anti-Semitism as “a primarily Western phenomenon.”[1] He arrogantly claimed to have been able to “define Christianity and categorize its manifestations, including Catholicism, objectively.”[2] He bluntly confessed in his books that “I shall not discuss pagan attitudes to Jews in antiquity.”[3] He dismissively described attempts to come to rational, interest-based, theories of inter-group conflict between Jews and non-Jews as “misguided pseudoscientific efforts of racial theorists,” and even argued that attempts to come to “common sense” explanations of anti-Semitism would prove “disastrous.[4] Anti-Semitism was instead “both in its origin and in its recent most horrible manifestation … the hostility aroused by irrational thinking about Jews.”[5]

Browning fully subscribes to Langmuir’s line of thought, commenting on Hanebrink’s text:

The Jew of the Middle Ages, an infidel, became the Jew of the twentieth century, a political subversive. With emancipated Jews being the most visible beneficiaries of the modern commercial and industrial economy by the end of the nineteenth century, the medieval epithet of Jewish usury had already been replaced with that of rapacious Jewish capitalism, and after 1914 the image of the Jew as an economic threat was only intensified by accusations of Jewish war profiteering and black marketeering. The Jew as a clannish outsider in medieval Christendom was easily transformed into the Jew as an unassimilable minority and alien internal threat.

The factors in common in Langmuir and Browning are the total need for there to be a psychological and cultural connection between anti-Jewish attitudes in the Middle Ages and the present. This is explained in the assertions of both historians as essentially religious/irrational in origin, and these assertions are in turn supported by a frequent scattering of persuasive keywords that act as incantations that charm the reader into certain ways of seeing. Note Browning’s insistence upon the position of Jew as spiritual infidel, and the clear evasion of the very real phenomenon of Jewish usury, which is reduced in Browning’s estimation to a mere “epithet.” Jewish economic competition in the modern period is caricatured as an irrational “image,” and Jewish war profiteering is simply an “accusation.” Epithets, images, accusations, and the passive and innocent Jew. In sociological-psychological terms this is classic Freud and Frankfurt School, and in historiography it is classic Langmuir.

As with Langmuir’s sophistry, such assertions require a significant amount of either duplicity or cognitive dissonance, or perhaps both. The number of texts covering historical Jewish black-market activity alone is astonishing. We know from one Stanford-published history, for example, that in France in 1941, 90% of black market traders in one province were Jews.[6] Similarly, in Mark Roodhouse’s Oxford-published Black Market Britain: 1939–1955, it is remarked that Jews were massively over-represented in prosecutions for black-market activity in London during the 1940s.[7] The biggest war profiteer in the trade of illicit food in war-time Britain was the Jew Sidney Seymour, born Skylinsky, who received the heaviest sentence of the period for a black market offence after evading food regulations and stockpiling black-market food at his synagogue.[8] These are just two small examples plucked randomly from the available histories, but the point here is that, for Browning as with Langmuir, it is the supposedly irrational “accusation” and not the “futile” facts that matter.

Browning continues with the predictable explanation for the very real Jewish dominance on the Left:

Even before the crisis of 1918–1919, which combined the experiences of defeat and revolution for many Europeans, Jews were invariably disproportionately represented in liberal and socialist parties because they were not welcome to participate in conservative and Catholic political parties. The tendency to stigmatize anything to the left of conservative as Jewish was already evident in 1912, when the electoral victory in Germany of the liberal democrats, Social Democrats, and Catholics—who also made up the “Weimar Coalition” of 1919 that was largely responsible for drafting the Weimar Constitution, so despised by German conservatives—was dubbed the “Jew election.” [emphasis added]

We’re again in very familiar territory: when you feel you can’t avoid a fact (“Jews were invariably disproportionately represented”), and you can’t downplay it, then explain it by way of prejudice (“they were not welcome”). The problem with snapshots of history like this, as I’ve explained many times before, is what I’ve come to term a “cropped timeline explanation” — something that is extremely common in all Jewish and philosemitic historiography concerning anti-Semitism. When faced with an uncomfortable and unavoidable fact involving Jewish behavior (Leftism, usury, financial crime, pornography, etc.) one starts with assumptions of anti-Jewish prejudice and works from there. Jews are on the Left? It must be because they were excluded from the Right. Problems begin to arise when the question is asked why Jews were excluded or viewed as socially or culturally oppositional in the first place. Here, “irrational prejudice” is the last resort, but beyond it, when faced with further interrogation of that idea and the even deeper historical context, nothing is there. One is confronted with blank stares, rhetorical dead ends, and a factual wasteland.

By now I was already getting the sense that Browning was drowning in his own review, under the sheer weight of his own evasions and contortions. The questions, for any reader, were surely multiplying. Were Jews over-represented in Communism or not? If yes, how is the idea of Jewish leftism a myth? If the ‘myth’ can’t be debunked with facts, how can it be debunked by a work of academic sophistry that labels it a cultural construct? The contortions only worsen. Browning continues:

From the beginning of World War I, tsarist Russia had treated its Jewish subjects as unreliable and potentially disloyal. Its military forcibly displaced some 500,000 to one million Jews from combat zones. The very approach of the Russian army thus also instigated the flight of many other Jews from the eastern regions of the Austro-Hungarian Empire to the presumed safety of cities like Vienna and Budapest. The Russian Revolution erupted amid already existing fears about Jewish loyalty and floods of displaced Jews, and intensified those fears. The “panic” over Judeo-Bolshevism, Hanebrink argues, “flourished in ground that had been prepared by wartime paranoia about Jewish loyalty.”

This is another excellent example of the employment of cropped timeline explanations. Browning implies that concerns about Jewish leftism were grounded in a “paranoia” about Jewish loyalty but doesn’t feel the need to contextualize this “paranoia” with any historical considerations concerning the period prior to 1914. Anyone even remotely familiar with the literature, and honest in their conclusions, would assert that Russian Jewry was a ticking time bomb of radicalism, bitterly hostile to Russia, and enjoying the rabid support of Jews worldwide. Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp noted in World War I and the Jews (2017) that Jews across Europe regarded the outbreak of war as “a holy war against a barbaric, evil, and rapacious enemy, the enemy of freedom and culture, and the traditional enemy of the Jews, a modern Amalek who committed atrocities against the Jews both in Russia and in occupied Galicia.”[9] Rozenblit and Karp write that “for Jews in particular, the destruction of this enemy was of primary importance.”[10] This all fits extremely well with Kevin MacDonald’s explanation of Jewish leftism as rooted in the Jewish self-concept as victim, the extreme hostility of Jews to non-Jewish power structures, their view of leftism as providing the means and power to topple traditional elites, and an excellent way of facilitating the consolidation of their position as a hostile elite. None of this features in Browning’s commentary of course because, by his estimation, the Russian elite was merely paranoid to think that Jews were potentially dangerous.

Paul Hanebrink

At this point, I temporarily abandoned Browning and sought out Hanebrink’s text. Content aside, to me the most obvious drawback of any such project would be stark unoriginality, the monograph acting essentially as a quasi-plagiarism of the woeful The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation (2011) by André Gerrits of Leiden University.[11] Poor Gerrits doesn’t even get a mention from the crafty Hanebrink, who managed to get the ever-philosemitic Harvard University Press [with a Board that is more than 40% Jewish] to publish his rather light piece of work, perhaps at least partially on the sales pitch that it was novel. Muddying the waters still further, reviews of the work of Gerrits prefigure the Browning review in their multifarious contortions. Thus, we are treated to a review of Gerrits by Eliezer Ben-Rafael of Tel-Aviv University, who asserts that Gerrits tackles “the myth of Jewish Communism” by presenting “the fascinating stories of Jewish Communism and Jewish Communists.” If debunking ideas with proof of their veracity wasn’t enough, it’s explained in one banal revelation that the myth combines “anti-Semitism and anti-Communism,” and has a link to reality in the fact that “in effect, many Jews were prominently involved in Communism not only in Russia, but also in the Hungarian and Bavarian revolutions of 1917 and, after the Second World War, in Czechoslovakia, Romania, Lithuania, Poland, and Bulgaria.”[12] Jewish Communism is thus clearly a myth because Jews were prominently involved in Communist revolutions in several countries over several decades. Right.

Paul Hanebrink’s text is political activism as much as corrupt historiography. In common with much philosemitic history, it postures as “history with a warning.” As such, the book opens not with World War I or even the Jews of Tsarist Russia, but with Charlottesville. Hanebrink is concerned by the concept of Judeo-Bolshevism because he believes it never died and that it is undergoing a resurgence not only on the Far Right but in the mainstream. Hanebrink is not alone. British Jewish historian Mark Mazower greeted Hanebrink’s book in November 2018 by writing in the Financial Times: “Paul Hanebrink’s book is a timely reminder of the intellectual tradition deployed by Republican politicians in the US when they join the loose coalition of conspiracy theorists across the Atlantic gleefully demonising George Soros.” Days earlier, another glowing review had appeared in the New York Times, authored by Jewish academic Samuel Moyn. Titled “The Alt-Right’s Favorite Meme is 100 Years Old,” Moyn’s piece argued that “The wider discourse around cultural Marxism today resembles nothing so much as a version of the Judeobolshevik myth updated for a new age.” On February 16th 2019, Jacobin published a brief and turgid piece by a couple of Swedish leftists on “The Return of Judeo-Bolshevism.” As well as being welcomed with open arms by Jewish academics and Marxist webzines, the book has also been greeted with enthusiasm by Britain’s Socialist Workers Party, essentially the remnants of the old British Communist Party. That the book is clearly a boon to Jews and Bolsheviks should presumably have no bearing on our estimation of its objective approach to the concept of Judeo-Bolshevism. But in a field rife with political activism, it certainly raises red flags.

The increase in apologetic propaganda activity in relation to Judeo-Bolshevism is no accident. Clearly Jews have been disturbed by the exponential growth in discussion of cultural Marxism over the last ten years. Although “cultural Marxism” is a different label from “Judeo-Bolshevism,” the curious will not need to investigate the former for long before they are confronted with the multitude of facts relating to the latter. Discussion and awareness of cultural Marxism is growing, and when cultural Marxism is discussed by figures like Tucker Carlson and (much as I dislike him) Jordan Peterson, millions are set on a path that features such landmarks as the Frankfurt School, the massacres of Béla Kun, and the Holodomor. Not everyone will reach those landmarks, but many will, and this is deeply concerning to those seeking to maintain control of the narrative. And so, it is entirely predictable that the establishment machine would stagger into motion, producing material intended to distance Jews from Marxism, and especially from any idea that there have been strong historic links between the two.

In his introduction, Hanebrink castigates nationalists in the United States and Europe for accusing “Jewish Communists” of promoting homosexuality and multiculturalism in their lands, even though Jews are demonstrably leading the migrant-refugee industry and have written openly of their leading role in promoting homosexuality. Even very recently, when the leader of the Washington DC Marxist-Antifa grouping was unmasked by the Daily Caller, there was little surprise at the fact he was a Jew named Joseph Alcoff. Alcoff, whose mother is the “Whiteness Studies” academic activist Linda Alcoff [who once wrote a piece titled “The Whiteness Question” before deleting it — it’s saved here]. Clearly an unhinged fanatic, Joseph Alcoff was arrested a few weeks ago after attacking a couple of Hispanic marines while screaming hysterically that they were “Nazis” and “White supremacists.”

Joseph Alcoff: Judeo-Bolshevik

The fact that people might be concerned with Jewish Communism today because Jewish Communists like Alcoff are still actively pursuing their agenda doesn’t feature in Hanebrink’s account. Instead, Jewish Communism is presented as more or less a delusion, both past and present. The problem with Hanebrink’s thesis is that it is nowhere proven, or even attempted to be proven, and yet is shot through with claims to total victory over the “myth.” On the fifth page Hanebrink writes:

Again and again, scholars, political liberals, and members of the Jewish community have debunked the claim that “Jews were responsible for Communism.” They have convincingly and authoritatively exposed the “myth of Judeo-Bolshevism” as an ideological construct.

But Hanebrink doesn’t offer a footnote citing any of these supposedly ubiquitous, convincing, and authoritative texts. This is because they don’t exist. The real myth here is therefore “the myth that Jewish Communism has been debunked,” and this is the myth that Hanebrink bases his entire approach on. He continues: “Given this history, the purpose of studying the Judeo-Bolshevik myth must be not to determine how true it is. [p.5]” Yes, he actually wrote that! I actually had to read this sentence three times before reassuring myself this was in fact a sentence published by what remains, for the time being, one of the most respected academic publishing institutions on the planet.

Like Browning, Hanebrink has a very uncomfortable time dealing with statistics. As well as demonstrating an apparent need to place the word ‘overrepresented’ in scare quotes, even when mentioning actual over-representations [p.140], he nervously mentions that between 20 and 40 percent of the Polish Communist Party was Jewish before declaring this a “dry statistic” [p.21] and quickly moving on. Unfortunately, he moves on to the equally awkward instance of trying to combat the idea of Judeo-Bolshevism by arguing pedantically that in 1917 “Jews made up 50 percent of the leadership of the Mensheviks [p.22];” a fact that probably brought little comfort to the Tsar. Hanebrink’s analysis is also woefully superficial. For example, he writes [p.25], that as Jews “turned to Communism, all broke with the Jewish milieu of their grandfathers.” Such a statement sits uneasily alongside statistics that effectively argue for the creation and presence of a new Jewish milieu within Communism, and, as MacDonald shows, continuing strong Jewish identifications among Jewish communists and other leftists. Faced with repeated over-representations of Jews, Hanebrink parries thusly [p.25]: “Useful generalizations are hard to come by.” Are they?

The lack of any discussion of Jewish ethnicity, anywhere in the text, is one of its most glaring failings, and yet it is one, predictably, that Hanebrink again tries to present as a positive. Right at the outset of the book [p.5] he asserts that a consideration of Jewish ethnicity among Communists “requires historians to impose rigid ethnic categories on men and women whose sense of themselves was always more complex and multifaceted.” No, it doesn’t. Most historians are aware of an array of ways of “being Jewish” that don’t require rigid categories but do require an assessment of ethnic identification, ethnic association, and behavior. What Hanebrink is really doing here is providing a kind of multiculturalist excuse for avoiding the explosive topic of Jewish ethnicity in Communism – something that should surely be at the heart of any thesis dealing with conceptions of Judeo-Bolshevism. “I don’t want to label these people” is in this instance the admission: “If I label these people my thesis is doomed.”

An excellent example of evasion along these lines is Hanebrink’s discussion of Béla Kun. Hanebrink argues [p.25] that there was “nothing meaningful at all” about Kun’s Jewish background while elsewhere [p.16] noting that of the 47 people’s commissars gathered by Kun for the 1919 Hungarian Soviet regime, 30 were fellow Jews. Clearly feeling that his own arguments are unconvincing, Hanebrink follows up his earlier surrender on the issue of facts with [p.25]: “Truly understanding the hopes, fears and motivations of any particular Jewish revolutionary in all their irreducible complexity is ultimately a task best undertaken by a biographer.” This is merely yet another capitulation on the issue of Jewish ethnic identity — a subject Hanebrink is simply unprepared and unwilling to address. He even transposes this reluctance into areas that border on the ridiculous. Take, for example, the following [p.25]:

These men and women gravitated toward Bolshevism for the same reasons that so many other Jews in the Russian Empire and across Europe embraced Zionism or assimilationist nationalism: to slip the bonds of traditional communities, to embrace the social and cultural opportunities that modernity offered, or to feel themselves part of the sweep of history.

It’s simply remarkable that an apparently serious scholar could discuss support for Zionism without mentioning Jewish identity, ethnicity, or perceptions of Jewish interests. Jews embraced Zionism, in Hanebrink’s quaint reading, to be “part of the sweep of history.” This is characteristic of the book’s total failure to critically approach the issue of Jewish identity.

Linked to this approach is Hanebrink’s insistence on the strictest possible meaning of Judeo-Bolshevism. As mentioned above, he presents the fact that Jews made up 50 percent of the leadership of the Mensheviks as an argument against the idea of Judeo-Bolshevism — because the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks were fierce rivals. This is nothing more than gross pedantry, because Hanebrink surely must be aware that the term Judeo-Bolshevism was a catch-all term for subversive Jewish leftism, and especially Jewish Communism as a whole, and it ignores the massive Jewish attraction to Bolshevism and their rise to the status of a [hostile] elite after the success of the Bolshevik Revolution. Strangely, throughout the book Hanebrink veers without explanation from strict interpretations like this to more wide-ranging interpretations. For example, he broadly describes the Judeo-Bolshevik elsewhere [p.8] as “an ethno-ideological zealot, a destructive border crosser intent on mobilizing local Jews and other discontented groups to overturn the social and moral order.” This is actually an excellent definition of a Judeo-Bolshevik, but it should be obvious that Jewish Mensheviks can easily fit into it, along with Jewish socialists and liberals. The reality, of course, is that Jews were reliable supporters and partisans for Communism during World War II, a period that witnessed the peak of propaganda against Judeo-Bolshevism. Rather than being a controversial opinion, this is one of the findings of Jewish historian Dov Levin in his Baltic Jews Under the Soviets, 1940–1946 (1994) and The Lesser of Two Evils: Eastern European Jewry Under Soviet Rule, 1939–1941 (1995), as well as a host of histories by other academics. And after World War II, Jews dominated communist governments throughout Eastern Europe.

Perhaps the only remotely valuable element of the book is the sixth chapter, which concerns the shift from Western understandings of Judeo-Bolshevism to the Western trope of “Judeo-Christian” civilization. Hanebrink correctly conceives of the latter as a modern sociological construct designed to place (primarily) American Jews within a “universalist rubric” [p.224] and, later, to promote the pro-Zionist image of a “transatlantic community of values” united against Islam [p.281]. This is itself part of the broader twentieth-century development in which the Jewish Question disappeared from mainstream Western discourse, only to be replaced with the ‘Whiteness’ Question and, most recently, the Islamic Question. I regard this development as one of the most crucial of the twentieth century, and as still requiring full explanation, documentation, and analysis. It goes without saying that Hanebrink doesn’t come close to offering any of these, but I’m so opposed to the terminology of an imagined Jewish-Christian civilization, and wholly presumed shared Jewish-Christian interests, that anything bursting that bubble is bound to win my nod of approval. This is though, in the final analysis, slim reward for a truly terrible piece of work.

Paul Hanebrink’s A Specter Haunting Europe is, ultimately, an extremely strange book, but all too typical of contemporary writing on Jewish history. It is thick on promises and thin in substance. It is characterized by glaring omissions and a deeply insincere analysis accompanied by a cloying philosemitism. Interestingly, the text lacks any semblance of intellectual confidence, and one feels that Hanebrink, who is presumably not himself Jewish, is surely aware of what he is creating: a blatant pro-Jewish apologetic. The reasons why a White academic might want to produce something like this are not difficult to surmise. As with Christopher Browning, such endeavors are massively incentivized. Despite being unoriginal, low on facts, and poor in analysis, Hanebrink, associate professor of history at Rutgers, has written a book published by a prestigious academic publisher (perhaps the most prestigious) and has been lavishly praised in the major organs of the mainstream media. The message from our latter-day commissars is clear: “Sell out and we’ll make you a star.”

[1] G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.

[2] Ibid, 13.

[3] Ibid, 275.

[4] Ibid, 19 & 67.

[5] Ibid, 265.

[6] Michael Murras, Vichy France and the Jews (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1981), p.183.

[7] Mark Roodhouse, Black Market Britain, 1939-1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 159.

[8] Ibid, p. 234.

[9] Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp, World War I and the Jews: Conflict and Transformation in Europe, the Middle East and America (New York: Berghahn, ), p.36.

[10] Ibid, p.37.

[11] André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation (Brussels: PIE Peter Lang, 2009).

[12] Eliezer Ben-Rafael, “André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation,” International Sociology Review of Books, Volume: 26 issue: 2, pp, 260-263, p.260.

64 replies
  1. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.
    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with God was then “null and void”.
    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.
    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.
    The only common thread between Christianity and judaism is the Ten Commandments, nothing more.
    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.
    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.
    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.
    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ. Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder. As always is the case, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way). It makes absolutely no sense at all. Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.
    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.

    • Karen Berger
      Karen Berger says:

      Jews insist that it was the Romans who killed Jesus Christ. True, it was the Romans who drove in the nails. But, it was the Jews who delivered Jesus into the hands of the Romans. When it was pointed out, at the trial of Adolph Eichmann, that Eichmann had never killed a single Jew the prosecution insisted that he was as guilty as those who did the actual killing as he had taken part in their transportation and delivery. The Jews condemn themselves out of their own mouths. Jews and Christians are miles apart in the area of theology and apologetics. Christianity is a religion of repentance and faith. Jews will not repent of the deeds of their forefathers. Matthew 27:25 And all the people (Jews) answered and said “His blood be on us and on our children!” The Jews will not repent and scapegoat the Romans for their murderous deeds.

    • Ron Nehlen
      Ron Nehlen says:

      A YouTube channel that goes by the name of The Believer, which is an apparent Muslim one, sears Zionist and states that they too are awaiting the second arrival (Advent) of Yeshua they call the son of Mary. This is not what I have been taught about Islam. They thought him to be a prophet, but not one they were waiting for. The Believer channel also states that the Jews that inhabit the land of Israel are white European Jews who proselytized and are not blood lineage Jews. I have always believed Jews and Jesus to be like their cousins the Arabs. And so as to this article the Jews have an agenda to deceive many especially Christians.

      • Johnny Rottenborough
        Johnny Rottenborough says:

        Ron Nehlen—The YouTube channel is actually correct in saying that Muslims await the return of Jesus. A hadith states: ‘The Hour [of the Last Judgment] will not be established until the son of Mary descends amongst you as a just ruler, he will break the cross, kill the pigs, and abolish the jizya tax.’

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Simon Elliot: “and the white masses either don’t care about any of these issues or they’re willingly, even willfully, working with our enemies.”

      Sadly you are right. The people recognise that the dominant culture (set by the left-wing component of their population) is anti-white, anti-self, and, recognising this, they willingly go along with it as you say.

      I used to think that if only the people in Britain (for example) knew that the future was that whites would become a minority, that they would wake up and vote for parties that would stop this and reverse it. I thought that as soon as the non-white future became apparent, they would vote differently, and all that was stopping them was the bias of the TV hiding their multicultural future from them. But now I think differently, as the multiculturalism has arrived and is now in our faces all the time, and STILL the people vote for the same open-border political parties. (White ppl are a minority in London, school kids on TV surrounding Michelle Obama in London were all African, 90% of TV ads show African males and white females).

      This is actually unique in all human history – voluntarily inviting over and submitting willingly to hostile foreign cultures and despising one’s own; being anti-self. ALL other instances of conquering in history involved the stronger conquering the weaker. The current Western submission is the only time that the strong have invited the weak over to their territory to conquer them. This is why we cannot learn from history. There are unique and new factors going on that never happened before (vast wealth, democracy). We need an explanation that examines our animal behaviour side, rather than explain it in terms of individual politicians or banks or plotting groups.

      The only party to support repatriation in Britain is the BNP and they have virtually no presence at all. The only other Party that would do something to at least limit immigration is UKIP and at their peak of popularity only about 1 in 7 voted for them (about 15% of the total although perhaps 20% of the indigenous). This means that 80% of the indigenous people do not mind enough about becoming multiracial to vote against it. We have free and fair elections (fair enough for it to work as intended). Voters can see on TV all the time diversity being rubbed in their faces. Nothing is hidden, the people are not being deceived, they can see clearly what is happening.

      In white working class Gorton at the last election the ppl voted for Mohammed Afzhal Khan (LAB Party – the welfare bribery party).

      The only task left is to work out what is going on in terms of animal behaviour terms, which is the perspective of K MacDonald. People have instincts to favour their own peoplel and culture (look at the way the young men in the last War rushed to sign up to settle border disputes about which they knew nothing) but they also have instincts to follow the current culture. Now that culture is anti-self they are following it.

      The self-destruction is self-inflicted and voluntary – the 15% left want it to happen, 20% strongly object, and 65% do not care either way. Basically, the 65% do not care enough about their heritage or culture to make them vote to preserve it, and prefer to vote for free-stuff bribery. In Manchester the white people are fiercely loyal to local football teams (where the players are Africans, and arabs own the football clubs) and never notice or object as one by one their local council destroys their historical buildings. They do have strong tribal feelings, but are able to disconnect them from their own country and people and are able to transfer them to sport.

      Certainly the 15% of whites who are lefties and who hate on the basis that they hate anything better or superior – these people need separating out and geographically separating. A large proportion of the remaining white people are not worth saving as they do not value their people or culture, and value bribes and free-stuff more highly. But as for the 20% who do care, perhaps one day the 20% from all European nations will geographically migrate to live in whatever white country is left.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        The PTB are altering brain chemistry, energy levels, and aggression.

        “. . .Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. But in his day this was an unattainable ideal: … In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. . .”

        [And prescription drugs. . .]

        Bertrand Russell
        Impact of Science on Society [1953]

      • Simon Elliot
        Simon Elliot says:

        The really disturbing thing is that our people having been turned inside out, psychologically speaking, in such a short space of time. It testifies just how powerful culture can be, at least when it comes to the weak minded and easily manipulated among us. I’m not trying to endorse a blank slate view at all, far from it, but the fact that the psy-op against our people has been so successful should give even the staunchest genetic determinist pause for thought. Any self-respecting white person with a sense of perspective and rational perception of the world would reject the post-war liberal progressive egalitarian value system in a second. They wouldn’t value the lives of dumb, ugly, rapey Africans or inbred, unibrowed camel fuckers from the middle east. Christ, why would they? It’s absolutely beyond me. How can anyone look at these parasites and feel anything but the most intense disgust?

  2. Sophie Johnson
    Sophie Johnson says:

    Dr Joyce, thank you enormously for cocking a snook at the ‘Judeo-Christian’ proposition! It upsets me that I hear this decidedly whacky proposition, time and again, from conventional, decent, committed Christians. The birth of Christ as a Jew is the inevitable defence of it, of course. But what a silly defence! The core Christian belief is that Jesus Christ is/was the son of God. So if Jesus was born a Jew, then that entails that God is a Jew. And that would be a real hoot, surely. (Imagine if Martin Luther, or worse, King Henry VIII, had ever heard the ‘Judeo-Christian’ claim! Heads would surely have rolled.)

    • Tarrasik
      Tarrasik says:

      Christ was not a Jew. He never claimed to be a Jew or called them his people. He always referred to them as ‘the Jews’.

      Pilate: “Are you the king of the Jews?”

      Jesus: “Are you asking this on your own initiative, or did others say that about me?… My kingdom does not belong to this world. If my kingdom belonged to this world, my servants would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews.” (John 18:34)

      This is actually quite important. Nazis regarded the Jesus/Jewish connection as deeply dangerous to the German people. Much historical tolerance for Jews has been based on the belief that Jesus descended from Jews. Because of this, Nazi theologians tried to redefine Jesus as an Aryan.

      An Aryan Jesus would do the following:

      – Remove the religious basis for special tolerance towards Jews.
      – Remove the Jewish middleman from European religion.
      – Jesus would become part of the European tribe, so to speak.
      – Christianity would transition to a Greek religion. Jesus is the LOGOS, the mind of God.
      – Jehovah would inevitably be redefined as the Devil, the mankiller.

      That’s why there is a huge desire within the secular Jewish community to keep Jesus within the Jewish fold. They don’t like the guy but they have too much to lose. It goes all the way back to Saint Paul, the original promoter of the idea that Jesus was a Jew and that Jews were a significant part of salvation. He was originally a Jewish assassin (real name Saul). His job was to hunt and kill Christians. He never met Jesus. None of his epistles evidence that he read the Gospels. Yet, like the Jewish conversos, he had a miraculous conversion to Christianity and somehow became the supreme figure defining Christianity. His writings served as a Jewish gate-keeper over the centuries, reinforcing the view that Jews have a special place in the Heavenly Father’s plans. Much of the ‘Jewiness’ of Christianity comes from Paul.

      The Jewish author Hannah Arendt wrote a tome called The Aryan Jesus to discredit the idea. She’s full of outrage that Nazis dared to call Jesus an Aryan, but presents little evidence to rebut their case. Frankly, Jews have no right to claim Jesus as their own. No one has the right to define someone else’s religion. It would be like Europeans claiming that Chief Sitting Bull was actually a Presbyterian minister from Scotland.


      Here are just a few of the more compelling Biblical points.

      1) Jewish elders called Jesus a Samaritan.

      “The Jews (elders) replied to him, “Surely we are right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon, aren’t we?” (John 7:20). Jesus denied the demon part, but said nothing about the Samaritan part. “I don’t have a demon. On the contrary, I honor my Father, and you dishonor me.” In fact, Jesus’ parable of the Good Samaritan portrays Samaritans as exceptionally righteous.

      Jewish elders maintained very careful genealogical records. Josephus wrote “And this is our practice, not only in Judea; but wheresoever any body of men of our nation do live: and even there an exact catalog of our priests marriages is kept: I mean at Egypt and at Babylon; or in any other place of the rest of the habitable earth, whithersoever our priests are scattered. For they send to Jerusalem the ancient names of their parents in writing, as well as those of their remoter ancestors: and signify who are the witnesses also.” (Contra Apion, book 1, section 7)

      2) The genealogies in Mark and Luke purport to show Jesus’ lineage but end at Joseph, his stepfather. The Bible says that Jesus was born of a Virgin, therefore Joseph’s descent from Abraham and David is irrelevant. We don’t have Mary’s genealogy, but Jesus was raised in Galilee, a known Gentile area outside of Judea.

      3) Jesus acknowledges Abraham as the father of the Jewish people. “I know you are Abraham’s descendants” (John 8:37). But he never accepts Abraham as HIS father. Instead he says “Truly, truly I tell you, before there was an Abraham, I am.” (John 8:58). Therefore Jesus could not be descended from Abraham. He’s not even an Israelite because their tribe started with Abraham.

      A Gentile Jesus has truly mind boggling ramifications. It questions the true nature of Jehovah and reveals the specter of dualism. Is Jehovah really God? Or is he actually the devil as Jesus claimed in John 8:44. Is the Heavenly Father a different being from Jehovah?

      Jehovah repeatedly accuses the Israelites of sacrificing their children. He tests Abraham’s willingness to kill Isaac then stops him at the last minute. It makes no sense that he would kill his OWN son. Maybe Jesus wasn’t the son of Jehovah.

      Compare the Passover and the Crucifixion. They are THE key events for Judaism and Christianity.

      During Passover, Jehovah walked through Egypt and killed the Egyptian firstborn. It was a gigantic human sacrifice to appease Jehovah. He then saved the Israelites.

      During the Crucifixion, Jehovah’s agents killed Jesus, the Firstborn of the Heavenly Father. It was a gigantic sacrifice (to appease Jehovah?). The intent was clearly to protect the followers of Jehovah who felt Jesus was an existential threat.

      However, the result was a little different. Jesus predicted the destruction of Jerusalem, saying “And when you see Jerusalem being encircled by armies, then recognize that its destruction has come near. Then let those in Judea flee into the mountains; and those in its midst, let them go out… For these are days of vengeance when all things that have been written are to be fulfilled.” (Luke 21:21 )

      Who’s vengeance? Maybe the Heavenly Father decided to take action against Jehovah for killing his son?

      • Franklin Ryckaert
        Franklin Ryckaert says:

        In Nazareth Jesus entered the synagogue and read from scripture to the congregation :

        “…And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and AS HIS CUSTOM WAS, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read…” Luke 4 : 23.

        A non-Jew was not allowed to enter a synagogue and read to the congregation. THEREFORE JESUS WAS A JEW.

  3. Conglomerate
    Conglomerate says:

    I bought the book as soon as it came out and while reading it constantly thought Mr. Joyce should write a review about it. I’m pleasantly surprised to see my wishes have come true.

    The thing that most annoyed me about Hanebrinks book was that he put an excessive focus on Eastern Europe; in particular on Hungary and Romania. This may be explained by his lazy nature, as he had already written a book about the politics of Hungary of the first half of the 20th century.
    I would have preferred to see him try to explain away the activities of communist Jews in America, which would undoubtedly have been a much tougher task of Talmudic Reasoning.

    Mr Joyce I recommend you read Richard B. Spence “Wall Street and the Russian Revolution: 1905-1925”. This book, written by a mainstream historian, is by far the best book documenting the plots and actions of international Jewry and international goy capitalism in bringing about the end of the Russian Empire. This book is well worth a review of yours, Mr Joyce.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Re Jewry ‘bringing about the end of the Russian Empire’ , I wonder why ‘patriotic’ Putin never mentions their role in this. I assume that as an admirer of Stalin he supports the Bolsheviks so he is reluctant to criticise any group that helped them.

  4. william chandler
    william chandler says:

    PROsemitism ——- what is it?
    If there is an “antisemitism” you must ask: “What is PROsemitism?”
    PROsemitism must be a supporter of “semitism”, which really means Judaism (though most Moslems are SEMITIC and most JEWS are NOT). So what are you supporting if you are a PROsemite? Well first of all we must define Judaism:
    Judaism is neither a race or a religion, it is Xenophobic Tribalism.
    A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples.
    1. The organization, culture, or beliefs of a tribe.
    2. A strong feeling of identity with and loyalty to one’s tribe or group.
    So right off the get-go you hate all NON-Jews, NON-members of YOUR group(TRIBE).
    You “bundle together” for support and safety, the very definition of Fascism
    THAT means, that if I am not one of the TRIBE, you do not like me.
    Since Jews BRAND all NON-Jews “gentile” automatically denigrating them, to be PROsemitic one must by definition be ANTI-GENTILE.
    They hate all NON-Jews so fundamentally, that they have to SPECIFICALLY name “RIGHTEOUS GENTILES”.
    Those are NON-Jewish HUMANS that went so far out of their way to help/save Jews that the Jews were FORCED to ACKNOWLEDGE the humanity of that specific ‘gentile”. You see, PROsemites do not acknowledge the EQUALITY of spirituality and humanity of “gentiles”
    What the Jewish Rabbis think of JESUS “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry as well. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again VERY SLOWLY so the “christianzionists” can follow: “ISLAM, on the other hand, is NOT considered idolatry.” ………..

    According to the SPLC & ADL an organization is a “HATE GROUP” if it has
    “beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people”.
    Jews have HATED Egypt for 3,500 years.
    Jews have HATED Babylon for 2,500 years.
    Jews have HATED CHRIST and his followers for 2,000 years.

    David Ben-Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel, described Zionist aims in 1948: “A Christian state should be established [in Lebanon], with its southern border on the Litani river. We will make an alliance with it. When we smash the Arab Legion’s strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo… And in this fashion, we will end the war and settle our forefathers’ account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram “………….. read that again
    “and settle our forefathers’ account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram”
    They are STILL HATING and planning deadly attacks after 3,500+ YEARS .
    How do you think they feel about JESUS CHRIST whom they have HATED for 2,000 years.
    Israel’s MOTTOES:
    (1) NEVER forgive & NEVER forget.
    (2) By Way of Deception you will Do War.
    Their ONLY(monotheistic) “god” is a WAR god
    PROsemitism is antiGENTILEism and Gentiles are ALL NON-jews.

  5. william chandler
    william chandler says:

    Why do Western Nations support the ORIGINAL nazis?

    They worship a Tribal WAR GOD …..
    They invented genocide 3,000 years ago and codified it into their most fundamental roots.
    They instigated the Roman pogroms against the first Christians.
    They instigated Muslims to attack peaceful Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land which lead to the Crusades..
    Donmah/Turkish Jews instigated the Armenian holocaust.
    Jewish Bolsheviks engineered the Ukrainian HOLOMODOR, a HOLOCAUST of 60millions of Christians..
    Dump the YOKE of “WWII guilt” ……. Jews are conducting TWO genocides RIGHT NOW
    Jews instigate and aggravate the genocidal muslum invasion of Christian Europe to clear population so Israel can steal MORE land for “GREATER” Israel…..
    We are witnessing the SECOND, slow motion, Israeli SHOAH of the People of Palestine..
    They brag about the First SHOAH the Canaanites/Amorites/Philistines/Midianites/PALESTINIANS who were in PALESTINE long before ABRAHAM passed through from Babylon/Ur ……Israel’s “claim” to Palestine is based entirely on War Crimes and GENOCIDE.

    For 70+ years scorn and guilt has been used to destroy Western Christianity by the very people who ORIGINATED genocide.
    “The Holocaust is the Holy Grail of white guilt.”
    The Jews BRAG about and self document their “holocausting” others and then “PLACE A YOKE” on Gentiles for supposedly doing the same to them.
    Everything they claim the nazis did is an EXACT COPY of their own self-recorded acts/history..
    Deuteronomy 7:16, 20:16 “And thou shalt consume all the peoples which the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee; thine eye shall not pity them…thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

    Numbers c.5 v.2-4 (Being “put out of camp was a Death Sentence0.
    Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
    KILL ALL DISSIDENTS:(Hitler COPIED Moses ordering anyone who questioned him be murdered)
    Exodus c.32 v.27
    Numbers c.11 v.1-2
    Numbers c.16 all
    Numbers c.21 v.5-6
    Numbers v.26 v.10
    KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
    Numbers v25 v.4-8
    Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
    SEXUALLY ENSLAVE any females “who have not KNOWN a man”
    a very brief selection, many more in THEIR book.
    Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
    Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
    Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
    Numbers c.31 all Midianites
    Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
    Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
    Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
    Numbers c.21 v.25
    Numbers c.32 v.39
    Numbers c.33 v.53
    (just to name a FEW)
    Numbers c.33 v.31-34
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
    Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
    Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
    Nazis SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GENETICS”.
    TODAY Israel states that it is creating “A PURE Jewish State”
    YESTERDAY the Nazis were creating “A PURE German State”
    Israel a SOCIALIST state.
    Nazis a SOCIALIST state.
    And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:21)

    • Ron Nehlen
      Ron Nehlen says:

      You list all these verses with intent to show what? Jewish hatred for all? Or is there something deeper? What is your viewpoint of God then? The OT is a book of history, prophecies, and laws, which were the promise, covenant, or oath from Yaweh (God) to a people who bacame known as Israelites or Jews because from Abram he had faith to believe and died without seeing the promise fufilled through Yeshua (Jesus). The OT is hard to read because of all of the verses you mentioned. A YouTube Channel called The Believer, which I believe is a Muslim man states that the Zionist changed Torah from what was originally in it. Schofield’s Bible has done great damage as well I am told. The Muslim Believer says they await the arrival of the son of Mary, I assume to mean Jesus. Just currious what your thoughts are. I myself profess to be a born again Christian with 4 years of studies in a local Bible college, but never finished with a degree. I am.on a quest in life to continually learn and dispell the errors I have been taught through my 46 years with Truth. The more I have learned about the Zionist movement the more I realize how much I have been lied to.

      • fellow believer
        fellow believer says:

        Look up Patrick Comparet ( long dead) and listen to all his sermons. He will teach you who the JEWS really are and who we really are. Zionism has filled the Christian churches since 1967. The original Hebrews were white people.

        • Tarrasik
          Tarrasik says:

          No, Whites were never Hebrews. Nor were they devotees of Jehovah, the desert god of chaos.

          Nothing is quite as disturbing as hearing a white man utter the words ‘praise Jehovah’. Jesus stated that the Jewish god, Jehovah, is the Father of Lies.

          • fellow believer
            fellow believer says:

            In respect everyone is on their journey. Men can only share their experience and values in which they have percieved their experience and learn from each other. In this light I say this.
            I turned away from organized religion when young after seeing ‘Marxism’ running rampart throughout the churches. I tried as best as I was able to arry myself as a Christian – understanding base values are the basis of perception.
            Over the last 4-5 years I have come to an understanding which has put the Jews – as they call themselves now into context.
            I would urge you if interested to study Bertrand Comparet’s sermons.
            Hebrews were depicted as straight nosed white people – in all the carvings and pictures that conquerers of the Hebrews left us. They moved north after several captivities and settled through Europe becoming the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Scandanavian etc peoples.
            The Jews had nothing to do with the writings of the old or new testement. The word Jew was coined by the Romans to describe all those living in Judah 300 bc. Already it was a mixed multitude which had returned from Babylon and then in 124BC Edomites were invited to practice Babylonian Talmudism which made the Hebrews a minority. When ‘Yeshua’ ‘Jesus’ said ‘ You Jews who are not Jews your father is the devil’ this is what he meant. They were a different race. Herod – at the time of Jesus – was an Edomite for instance.
            Our Father’s name is ‘Yahweh’ as found in the old testement. Do not commit Adultury means do not mix your blood. The people claiming Israel today are imposters. Most organized Churches are totally corrupted with this Jew worship. Keep thinking.

  6. william chandler
    william chandler says:

    antiGENTILISM is the problem. Cavemen did not sit around their caves:
    GROK: “HEY, me hate Jews.”
    HORG: “What a Jew?”
    GROK: “Me not know …. but me hate”
    HORG: ” We wait for Jew to come so we be mean to him”
    Then non-Jews sat for tens of thousands of years waiting, waiting, waiting, for a Jew to come along, so we could all be mean for no reason. Sorry, what happened was Jews created a social system of Xenophobic Tribalism (look it up) wherein THEY hate all NON-Jews, and this hate of all non-Tribe members has, naturally, caused People to not like them.
    anti-semitic … that’s what they called Jesus of Nazareth in the Galilee …
    JUDAS ISCARIOT was a JEW beloved by the Temple Priests.
    Judaism is neither a race or a religion, it is Xenophobic Tribalism.
    A person unduly fearful or contemptuous of that which is foreign, especially of strangers or foreign peoples.
    1. The organization, culture, or beliefs of a tribe.
    2. A strong feeling of identity with and loyalty to one’s tribe or group.
    Quick summation? They are the enemy of anyone who is not a TRIBAL MEMBER …… and only “tolerate” Gentiles.

    Jews HATE Christianity even more then they hate most Gentiles — The Jewish Rabbis hold ISLAM in esteem while spitting on Jesus “As for Christianity, there is a dispute among Halachic authorities, but the vast majority consider it idolatry as well. Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” Read that last bit again: “Islam, on the other hand, is not considered idolatry.” The Rabbis despise Christianity.
    The World should insist Israel live by the standards Israel demands of others. Be judged as Ye judge others. If Israel wants to be recognized, Israel must recognize the EQUALITY and HUMANITY of ALL People. Quit calling NON-Jews SHISKA, GOYIM, GENTILE. If Israel wants Hamas to ‘repudiate’ their charter, Israel must REPUDIATE their manual of hate, the TORAH, which openly proclaims that all ‘gentiles’ should be ‘Hewers of wood, and bearers of water’ …….. for Israel.
    Israel must recognize the Native People’s RIGHT to a Palestinian state.
    Israel REFUSES to sign the Non Proliferation Treaty or open It’s NUKES to inspection, Israel should have the exact same sanctions that were put on Iran.

    • Steve
      Steve says:

      You obviously have never met an Israeli, and it’s unlikey you have met many Jews either. You simply are acquainted with only a characterature of us. I live in Israel and know Israelis to be widely traveled and open to all sorts of international cultural influences. Very few secular Jews have even ever seen a page of the Talmud. Thirdly, the Land’s true sons have returned home. We don’t owe the squatters who settled in our absence anything. If we do, be sure to carve out some sovereign states out of present day America for the natives you disenfranchised in your own midst. Lastly, it is the God of the Bible who is bringing back the scattered exiles from the distant quarters of the earth to which he sent us…just as every one of His prophets said he would—without exception. You are obviously either ignorant of Him, or in rebellion against Him.

  7. tom sunic
    tom sunic says:

    The term “Judeo-Bolshevism” is a literal translation of the German compound noun “Judeo-Bolschewismus,” a word very common and popular in the description of communists in Weimar Germany and later on in NS Germany. It had a rather descriptive meaning, not a heavily loaded and derogatory one which it acquired after WWII. In his recent and well-publicized book in Germany, Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein: “Jüdischer Bolschewismus; Mythos und Realität” (2002) seems to have found a smart and politically correct way of addressing this explosive subject in self-censored Germany. In his descriptive and often aloof style he puts many of his words under quotation marks, thus securing himself and elegant retreat in case of a media firestorm. The term Judeo-Bolshevism was also in standard usage in NS Germany by the “Institut zur Erforschung der Judenfrage” ( Institute for the Research of the Jewish Question ) with loads of authors and books on the prominent role of communists of Jewish origin in the SU and E. Europe prior to WWII. Rudolf Kommoss’ heavily footnoted book “Juden hinter Stalin” (1938, 1944) ( Jews Behind Stalin) was high acclaimed by NS scholars in NS Germany. However, in view of the fact that great many high-level communists of Jewish origin also perished in communist purges, 1933-55, the question that needs to be raised is whether Jewish activists and intellectuals had embraced the communist doctrine ( Bolshevism) as a secular follow-up on their Jewishness, or as a complete rejection of their erstwhile Jewishness. To some extent this theme of causal relationship was well covered by KMD and a Russian- American Jew Yuri Slezkine.

    • kikz
      kikz says:

      @toms sunic you answered your own question… “( Jews Behind Stalin) was high acclaimed by NS scholars in NS Germany. However, in view of the fact that great many high-level communists of Jewish origin also perished in communist purges, 1933-55, the question that needs to be raised is whether Jewish activists and intellectuals had embraced the communist doctrine ( Bolshevism) as a secular follow-up on their Jewishness, or as a complete rejection of their erstwhile Jewishness.”

      neither………………commie purges always include the liquidation of assets in service to tactical/strategic goals: as collateral damage, as internal competition for ‘office’, or simply as, discovered traitor/burned asset. sooner/later the left always eats its own.

  8. Simon Elliot
    Simon Elliot says:

    Of course all this information, having been buried for so long, is absolutely crucial to the awakening of our people, but the fact remains that you simply can’t sell this stuff to the public. You see, the anti-Semitic hurdle in front of us is reinforced by over 70 years worth of propaganda and indoctrination. The Holocaust, Schindler’s List, the Boy in the Striped Pajamas, Ann Frank and god knows how many books, films, TV shows, documentaries, websites and internet forums. You can’t get over this hurdle, and the Jews know you can’t. You tell people that 9 million Germans were killed *after* the war, many of them in Jewish run “hell camps” behind the Iron Curtain, and they’ll look at you like you’ve got two heads. It completely inverts the victimhood narrative they’ve been spoon fed all their lives. They can’t conceive of Jews being anything other than the eternally downtrodden victim. Not to mention that being in possession of such highly esoteric knowledge is a massive red flag to the normies. To them it sounds cultish and it frightens them away, they don’t want anything to do with us. Don’t you think it’s a bit obvious when Barbara Spectre or that Rabbi allow themselves to be recorded admitting that Jews are behind open borders, mass immigration, pop culture degeneracy and all the rest of it? It’s like they’re baiting us, goading us into attacking them, because they know that once you’ve gone down that road of attacking Jews for being behind whatever subversive phenomenon, you’re finished.

    I pretty much gave up with the alt right, white nationalist movement, whatever you want to call it, years ago. It’s had half a century to make an impact, but it never has, and no wonder. Look at all the exposition that’s required for our people to wake up. White genocide, demographic replacement, liberal progressivism, white guilt, SJWs, Holocaustianity, the list is endless. It’s an absolutely relentless assault on the psyche of our people, and they’d never understand the complex, multifaceted intricacies of what’s happening in a million years. All we can do is talk about it amongst ourselves, preaching to the converted, in a never ending discussion which takes us nowhere and accomplishes nothing. I don’t believe we will turn this around. I’m sorry, but I just don’t see it. Every avenue has been closed off to us, and the white masses either don’t care about any of these issues or they’re willingly, even wilfully, working with our enemies. There’s not going to be any big race war, Turner Diaries style. The people aren’t going to overthrow the treacherous, back-stabbing politicians and prance around in the streets with their heads on pikes. I agree that’s what should have happened by now, but it’s not going to. The corrupt, evil bastards who run this world are so unaccountable to the public, so well insulated from the wrath of the people, that the only thing that’ll defeat them will be if the system collapses from within, like the Soviet Union did, and bloody hell, look how long it took for that to happen! But it’s not going to happen, and you know it’s not. What’s going to happen is what’s already been happening for the last 50 odd years. Bit by bit, day by day, our world will unravel a little bit more. It’ll be death by a thousand cuts. Why would all this suddenly change when there’s no reason for it to change? What our enemies are doing works, and has been working for decades. There’s no reason for them to change the formula. Our people, the few of them that are aware of the endless nightmare we find ourselves in, are resorting to suicide because there truly is no escape from this pit of despair. Our enemies are holding all the cards, and have dealt an absolute masterstroke against us. We’re hopelessly, irredeemably fucked.

    • Achilles Wannabe
      Achilles Wannabe says:

      I am a baby boomer dumb goy and even I have woke. Sometimes I like to think I am a harbinger of what is coming. But reading you, it is very difficult to think so.
      I suppose I agree. We will probably die the death of a thousand cuts. Ain’t it a bitch.

    • Rob Bottom
      Rob Bottom says:

      Simon Elliot, huh? You sure you’re not Jewish? Because those are fantastically common names in the Jewish community, as is the subversive and demoralizing nature of your comment.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      “You tell people that 9 million Germans were killed *after* the war,”
      There is a current BBC TV documentary “Inside Europe 10 years in Turmoil” in which we see the clip of Merkel going over to Russia to sit with Putin as part of the celebrations that ‘Nazis were defeated’ in the War, and to watch the Russian military parade.
      What an incredible achievement for the enemy-within communists in Germany to be able to arrange this continuing humiliation and punishment of the white German race, including celebrating the annihilation of the 6th army in Russia, and to STILL be able to persuade the German ppl to vote for their anti-German communist-loving leaders.

    • PaleoAtlantid
      PaleoAtlantid says:

      Your analysis is correct if we believe historical events follow a linear sequential pattern, as they have for the past 50+ years, but very occasionally the movement of history can respond in a discontinuous manner.
      Anyway, we must continue fighting in whatever way is suitable to our personal situation, if only for the sake of our sanity.

    • RoyAlbrecht
      RoyAlbrecht says:

      “… [1.] I pretty much gave up with the alt right, white nationalist movement,…
      It’s had half a century to make an impact, but it never has,…
      [2.] Look at all the exposition that’s required for our people to wake up. White genocide, demographic replacement, liberal progressivism, white guilt, SJWs, Holocaustianity, the list is endless.

      [3] It’s an absolutely relentless assault on the psyche of our people,…
      and they’d never understand the complex, multifaceted intricacies of what’s happening in a million years.

      [4.] All we can do is talk about it amongst ourselves, preaching to the converted, in a never ending discussion which takes us nowhere and accomplishes nothing.

      [5.] I don’t believe we will turn this around….
      Every avenue has been closed off to us, and the white masses either don’t care about any of these issues or they’re willingly, even wilfully, working with our enemies.

      [6.] There’s not going to be any big race war, Turner Diaries style. The people aren’t going to overthrow the treacherous, back-stabbing politicians and prance around in the streets with their heads on pikes. I agree that’s what should have happened by now, but it’s not going to. The corrupt, evil bastards who run this world are so unaccountable to the public, so well insulated from the wrath of the people, that the only thing that’ll defeat them will be if the system collapses from within, like the Soviet Union did, and bloody hell, look how long it took for that to happen! But it’s not going to happen, and you know it’s not. What’s going to happen is what’s already been happening for the last 50 odd years. Bit by bit, day by day, our world will unravel a little bit more. It’ll be death by a thousand cuts. Why would all this suddenly change when there’s no reason for it to change? What our enemies are doing works, and has been working for decades. There’s no reason for them to change the formula. Our people, the few of them that are aware of the endless nightmare we find ourselves in, are resorting to suicide because there truly is no escape from this pit of despair. Our enemies are holding all the cards, and have dealt an absolute masterstroke against us. We’re hopelessly, irredeemably fucked…”

      Quite a mouthful…, too bad nine tenths of it is incorrect by any measure of common sense.
      White Nationalists, let’s call them that for simplicity sake, have finally broken the ice and are making HUGE inroads;

      [1.] The Frontal Wave of White Nationalism (the theorists and thinkers, like those at TOO) is the R&D Frontal Scout Squadron or, “…Space Force…”, of the Global Populist Movement that is presently sweeping the White World.
      Without W.N.s formulating the language and pointing out the (((patters))), leaders like Orban and Trump would have taken another 50+ years to arrive.
      [2.] French Yellow Vests, US Populism, East Block intransigence, the AfD and Italian, Swedish, Danish & Brexit style Significant-Minority Parties, etc…, all have their roots in the seeds planted by White Nationalists over half a century ago.
      Those seed have now gone from being sturdy saplings to full grown young trees in their own right that are shedding new seeds at a rate the Jews are no longer able to eradicate.
      Those new seeds are finding the most unlikely and undetectable niches to sprout in.
      [3.] That’s down right comical! The parties elected above, were elected regardless of the Fever Pitch Screaming Lies and Patent Absurdities the Jews are pumping out with a Megaphone in an attempt to “…distract the public…” from the plainly obvious insanity (((they))) are hopelessly trying to foist upon us.
      Jewish money is becoming more worthless by the day and Jew Stream Media is dying at double digit rates…, hence (((their))) frantic rush to shut down the internet as a tool for truth disseminators (That’s us folks!..,
      Take Pride that WE ARE the leaders whom “…others…”, [Quasi-leaders above that are putting a PC face to our ideas] are following !), The Don Trump Jr. and James Edwards interview are good examples of our successes…, And you do not even have an inkling to which Asian Leaders Our People are Talking to!
      [4.] By “…talking…” [outlining the branches of (((the problems))) ] amongst ourselves, we have caught the attention of powerful people who are in positions to finally reach the masses and kick start REAL CHANGE !
      [5.] Not only are you overestimating the fortitude [or lack thereof] of the Hired Zombie-Retards, Childless Liberal Freaks, and Quasi-Human Third World Excrement that Jews employ as foot soldiers for their Suicidal Psychotic Fantasies,
      you may be completely missing the reason that Trump is trying to “…negotiate a truce…” with erstwhile Jewish Enemies:
      It gives Trump the pretext to go to war at a later date if the (((“…adversaries…”))) refuse to OBAY.
      This is a sure sign of the desperation time-crunch on the part of Jews.
      [6.] And this is the crux of your delirium my (((friend))).
      Since every defeatist thing you summed up in part six ([6.]) of your propaganda hit piece was basically dealt with by me in points [1. thru 5.],
      it is the exact reason that WE (at TOO.., et. al.) need to take the next Quantum Leap in the (((Battle Against (((“…Souron…”)))
      and pass the torch of redundant problem identification and dissemination (except in the most egregious cases) to our newly sprouted underlings amongst the masses.
      By leaning more toward Debating Solutions and less toward Problem Identification we will not only find Meaningfully Perplexing Subjects to EXPLORE, we will be fertilizing the soil that will be gobbled up by an exponentially larger crop of up and coming W.N. saplings.

      Solutions [or at least hints pointing towards them] lie in the “…most inferior…” life forms on the planet.
      It will be our job to make these patterns of behaviour CLEARLY SELF-EVIDENT by any measure of Aryan Thinking.

      • Simon Elliot
        Simon Elliot says:

        The election of Donald Trump changes nothing. He wouldn’t have gotten anywhere near the Presidency if he wasn’t kosher, and you know it. Heads of state don’t make any important decisions, lobby groups do, and Trump is in bed with the Jews the same as all who came before him. Brexit will not be the nail in the coffin of third world immigration. It doesn’t matter whether the decisions are made in Brussels or in our own parliament, because the outcomes will still be the same. Unless all the political parties in this country are scrapped, every single traitor hanged and a new populist party formed, free of enemy infiltrators and forever on guard against them, then nothing will change.

    • Sophie Johnson
      Sophie Johnson says:

      Dear Simon Elliot, you are in a despairing frame of mind! I nod and sympathise, but not all the way. The Jews, of course, have a stranglehold on us, as you so eloquently point out. Yet I must say, there are a few hopeful spots. I’ll begin with a boast:

      It is possible to dint the holohoax. All one needs is a calm frame of mind and the opportune circumstance. E.g.: Four of us met up for a Sunday pub lunch. After the initial pleasantries, conversation stalled somewhat. That was my cue. ‘I’ve come upon a startling piece of information…’ I began. ‘Do you know that there is not one scrap of forensic evidence that there ever were gas chambers …’

      Eyes narrowed suspiciously, and there was some discomforted glancing around for listeners. A quietly hostile ‘How do you know?’ followed. I had handy Raul Hilberg’s admission to that exact effect. That impressed them. I was able to slip in also that the Red Cross had access to all German concentration camps, and never once reported gassings. Then a fortunate question: ‘Where do you get this sort of stuff from?’ So I played my trump card: Gerard Menuhin’s book. (‘Menuhin’ is a magical name!) My copy of his Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil is doing the rounds now. One of my friends has bought her own.

      Then there are the fortunate events, like the unlovely chorus of Jewesses screeching ‘antisemitism’ at Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party. And the all-Jew-owned British press and TV stations are blatantly bent on sabotaging Brexit, the people’s democratic choice. I am hearing quite a few ‘Jews really are …’ diagnoses, sotto voce, of course. That’s all good.

      I agree with you about the Alt Right, though. The British scene is a farce – utterly raddled with saboteurs interspersed by fools and dotards. But we have the singer Alison Chabloz who is determined to go through the courts all the way to protest her conviction by shabbos goy judges, despite the vicious attacks on her by ‘nationalists’ like the ridiculous Michelle Renouf, Peter Rushton and Richard Edmonds. And we have the Occidental Observer and the magnificent Andrew Joyce et al., Fredrick Toben and his Adelaide Institute Newsletter, and several online talk shows in the States. And, of course, we have the brilliant Germar Rudolf and Codoh, his publishing house, Carlo Mattogno, all the legacy of the great Ernst Zundel – and more. That is much, much more than we have ever had since WWII. This scene can only get better. So cheer up!

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        Sophie Johnson – good post, and good tactics that you use, ie from the point of view of presenting the evidence, as this way you sound reasonable rather than sounding conspiratorial. Another good tactic in my opinion is to mention the phrase ‘anti-white’ as once this seed has been planted, later on the person will keep recalling it as he sees it confirmed by events again and again.

        “And the all-Jew-owned British press and TV stations are blatantly bent on sabotaging Brexit, ”
        This is the only point that might not be accurate. The left control the media and are more powerful than the Jews, although of course the left love the Holocaust as it helps them to portray whites as the villains. If the Jews were top dogs in the media, the media would side with the Israelis in the Israeli/Palestine land dispute. As it is, they strongly side with the Palestinians on mainstream TV. At the same time the left dare not be ‘anti-semitic’. It is like two powers or groups who sometimes agree (eg on borders for the West) and sometimes disagree (Israel/Palestine)

        • TJ
          TJ says:

          The left control the media and are more powerful than the Jews. . .

          The room is starting to spin. . .I’m losing control of my consciousness.

    • Ron Nehlen
      Ron Nehlen says:

      What do you mean 9 million Germans were killed in Jewish run hell camps AFTER the war? I just recently learned of the Jewish economic war that they waged against Germany that led up to the WWII and that there were never 6 million Jews killed because there were not that many in Europe let alone on the planet at that time. I have read newspaper articles of that, but where do you get that 9 million Germans died after WWII?

      • Johnny Rottenborough
        Johnny Rottenborough says:

        Ron Nehlen—See James Bacque’s ‘Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans after World War II’. His estimate is that almost a million died.

    • Olorin
      Olorin says:

      >I pretty much gave up with the alt right, white nationalist movement,
      >whatever you want to call it, years ago. It’s had half a century to make
      >an impact, but it never has,

      I understand. I gave up on God, Christianity, and evolution, which have had far more than 50 years to make an impact. And what do I see but things going the wrong way!? Must be the fault of God, Christianity, and evolution, right? I mean, if they haven’t worked in the ways that, in my head, they must work, might as well abandon them!

      Hmmm, but for what? Hmmmm……..what’s better than my ancestors’ Logos?

      >Our enemies are holding all the cards, and have dealt
      >an absolute masterstroke against us. We’re hopelessly,
      >irredeemably fucked.

      Well there you go. Why not go the whole way and convert to Judaism? You already believe in its superiority, so that’s a hefty start. Sure, maybe you’d be abandoning your own ancestors, but what the heck! Jews are their superiors, by your own formulation, and the fact that you’re here, because your ancestors survived to make that possible, doesn’t matter at all! They were just bit players in the pageant of world Jewry!

      > there truly is no escape from this pit of despair.

      Actually, there is. But till you stop believing more in others’ ancestors than your own, you are not going to see it.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Simon Elliot: “and the white masses either don’t care about any of these issues or they’re willingly, even willfully, working with our enemies.”
      See reply further up (in the wrong place)

    • Angry White Man
      Angry White Man says:

      Stick your black pill up your arse, bud!

      jewish power is built on idiocy: brutal, criminal, merciless idiocy, but idiocy. Our people, White Europeans can be reached and can become aware of the truth. I’ve woken up many individuals these topics.

      These filthy, lying, jews are not infallible and all powerful, as they are going to painfully discover in due course… Not a threat obviously, simply a cold, hard fact.

  9. SS
    SS says:

    (((One side))) makes you larger
    And )))one side((( makes you small
    And the things your teacher taught you
    Won’t explain anything at all
    Go as Hanebrink when he’s ten feet tall

  10. John King
    John King says:

    Very good discussion. One factual mistake: The British Socialist Workers Party is not “essentially the remnants of the old British Communist Party”. In fact, the SWP traces its origins back to the late 1940s and early 1950s when Igael Gluckstein (Tony Cliff) moved from Palestine to England and began organizing politically some of the earliest forms of British Trotskyism in the form of the International Socialists. In the 1950s, the Trotskyist moment consisted of three major currents: the first led by Cliff, the second by Ted Grant, the third by Gerry Healy. Both Cliff and Grant were Jewish and both used pseudonyms that Julie Birchall noted were reminiscent of British pop crooners of the time (think Cliff Richard, for example). The third, Healy, was Northern Irish. Healy’s group more or less ceased to exist in the mid-80s, following the revelations that Healy was a major sexual predator. The SWP (it changed its name from the IS in the mid-70s) exploded about five years ago following revelations that someone named Martin Smith (perhaps not his real name) was a sexual predator.

  11. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    What a great article.

    One takeaway from this is that the success of Victimology has destroyed both effective communication and leadership development.

    How can you communicate effectively when you’re too busy lying?

    How can you develop as a leader if, as a victim, you’re always right?

    Victimology is the mask of Jewish Supremacy.

    If you’re a tiny outgroup minority motivated by the acquisition of power and the control of people and their social-institutions you won’t get far telling your enemy your true intention. You have to first perfect the art of infiltration and subversion until you have your hands on the levers of power.

    Once you do and have now become a hostile elite who can see the host population waking up to what you’ve done you have to began your next phase, demonization and deflection. Or demonization as deflection. That’s where we are now.

    But there are consequences. Things are happening so fast and as they move along one thing is become increasingly more obvious, though adept at infiltration and subversion and certainly hell bend on destruction, Jewish Supremacy is proving daily more and more incompetent when it comes to the exhausting task and unrewarding responsibility of social-management.

    This is a good thing. For us.

    Jewish Supremacy wants three things.

    1. To be placed above criticism.
    2. To be loved unconditionally.
    3. To be blindly obeyed.

    These are insane demands and the insanity is getting easier to see.
    We live at a time when we have more precise knowledge about ourselves (that’s quantity and quality of knowledge, not information) then ever before, and with the Internet, and not just the Internet, instant access to it. And they’re making these three demands?

    I would offer that as absolutely incontrovertible evidence that they are out of their minds.

    Exactly how hard is it for them to see that life is dynamic, not static and we’re imperfect, not perfect? And so the best thing to keep us going is to dedicate ourselves to learning, change and growth and a willingness to expose our ideas to a process of continuous feedback and correction.

    Oh, but wait, that’s already been put in motion by WESTERN CIVILIZATION!!!!!!!

    You know, White men!

  12. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Hey folks, please excuse the mistakes. I write extempore and don’t edit my comments. Like you can’t tell. Still, out of respect, I thought I’d offer an explanation.

  13. Tom
    Tom says:

    Russia has attempted to assimilate the Jews. In my opinion, this was a mistake that many other countries have experienced before. Furthermore, Russia was the only country in Europe that was not indebted to the Rothschilds, which made them very unpopular with the mammon worshippers (see also: Stephen Mitford Goodson – The History of Central Banks and the Enslavement of Mankind).
    From my point of view there are 2 kinds of Jews:
    Some followed Jesus Christ and founded Christianity and became Christians. The others had Jesus Christ killed and pursue their Talmudist claim to world domination through their descendants. Of course, Jews cannot be lumped together, but the problem in Judaism is, in my opinion, their ideology of choice, which is lifted from the very beginning and their Talmud/kabbalistic upbringing which is a unifying bond of the different currents within Judaism and which is strengthened and consolidated by the Jewish organizations and community administrations, i.e. Kahal. Thus it is necessary to differentiate between a) the individual degree of their actual identification with the Talmudist ideology and b) between the individual degree of their actual commitment to the objectively reprehensible objective of Talmudism/Kabbalism.

  14. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    “Given this history, the purpose of studying the Judeo-Bolshevik myth must be not to determine how true it is. [p.5]”

    As most will be aware, the same self-defeating admission is made by so-called holocaust historians vis-a-vis revisionists. Jewish power and influence isn’t worth much in the age of the internet. It is merely self-insulating. I say go right ahead, it makes you lazy and your arguments weak while the rest of us get on with examining the evidence! You think you can invert the truth through pseudo-academic consensus, or with your artless propaganda? Spare us and resort to the iron-fisted censorship and criminalization that is your embarrassing hallmark and be done with it. The poor, deluded fools! The truth will always be there and it never loses its lustre. Thank you for yet another brilliant riposte!

  15. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “has testified against a significant number of European ex-soldiers at war crimes trials”
    Can anyone explain why the 90 year old German camp guards were willing to go along with the narrative when put on trial for ‘war crimes’?

  16. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “or to feel themselves part of the sweep of history.”
    This is probably the most ridiculous excuse in the list of excuses to absolve the Jews from any blame for anything, anytime, anywhere in history. Apparently, there nothing that anyone from this race ever did wrong, ever, to provoke the hostility of other races, and any opposition to them is always 100% irrational.

    I once said on Breitbart that the Jews helped the Bolsheviks to bring communism to Russia and a Jew replied ‘Do you blame us?’

    This sums up their attitude that even when they start conflict and war, they are still fully justified and therefore blameless.

    It is ‘racist’ to criticise them. But they need to realise that this magic word to win all arguments when used, is rapidly losing its power

  17. Peter
    Peter says:

    Thank you for this article Dr. Joyce. I hope Hanebrink, Browning and other propagandists of their kind read it. I hope a time comes when Harvard University Press’ reputation will be affected for publishing trash.

  18. bruno
    bruno says:

    This is truly a fascinating excellent work. If one were still residing in the Workers’ Paradise weeks of labour would have been evolved to promote this author’s efforts. In brief, this would have been translated and distributed amongst friends in East Germany, the Baltic States, Poland, Byelorussia and other regions. It would have been given to comrades in parliaments, journalists, authors and others not in love with Zydokomuna. This scrumptious food for thought treat would have been appreciated and deemed a marvelous dessert for an ocean of decent souls. It’s great.

    Imagine if this could be given to, say, just a few hundred thousand of the intelligentsia within most of EuroMan’s communities (from what’s left of Paris to those within the far-reaching Euro homes). Perhaps a few within Europe’s mainstream media will be able to refer to this marvelous communique, even if they have to utilize weak disclaimers.

    Most of my sea of friends have expired, as they were older than me. However, this will be mailed out.

    Further, it is my hope that others also forward this work on reality. Some might even consider adding comment(s) pertaining to the Deep State and all of Washington’s unnecessary chosen wars. The loss of trillions of dollars and an uncountable number of lives speaks for itself.

    To really appreciate the author of this article a suggestion might be to investigate those who migrated from Ukraine to a chosen southern country. They returned to Kiev and secured over $5 billion from their brethren within the Deep State. Today’s turmoil in Ukraine could escalate into major confrontation. Consider reading about Uke Prez Billionaire Poroshenko. He addressed the Knesset. Forget about checking out Wilki info. Some infer that Wilki seems to have questionable reference to Billionaire Poroshenko’s ethno background (as if it was “cleaned up”). It’s apparently no secret that Poroshenko’s Jewish father, Alexander Valtsman, from Odessa, changed the family name. Billionaire Poroshenko has denied he’s of Hebrew heritage. Most indicate Poroshenko is the link to the Deep State providing $$$ billions. During his run for Prez crowds yelled “anti-semitic” slurs at Poroshenko (who controlled Ukraine’s Channel 5 TV).

    In the days of our fathers and their grandfathers the intelligentsia on farms and in academia wondered about the zydowski dilemma and their mentality of personal group profit-gain. If we adjudicate by books diplomatically composed, from all over the world, we see that in this new century countless thousands of the intelligentsia ponder if a carcinoma will metastasize or be surgically removed; Will EuroMan’s progeny expire or survive?

  19. Elizaveth
    Elizaveth says:

    The weakest link is the media and the ones that run it. What’s needed is a reversal of the mind control of the masses.

  20. Al Ross
    Al Ross says:

    London University’s Prof. Orlando Figes, a Jew, in his history of the Russian Revolution , “A People’s Tragedy”, made scant mention of the role of his racial cognates, except to remark , “Most Jews were not Revolutionaries but most Revolutionaries were Jews’.

  21. Steve
    Steve says:

    As I read the posts to this conversation, Jesus’ observation about “the blind leading the blind…and both fall into a pit” keeps coming to mind. You folks are bickering over a tree here, a tree there, and missing the forest that stands in plain sight before you. The God of the Bible, Yahweh, is fulfilling His covenantal promises to the descendants of Israel, as spelled out by every single prophet of the Bible, without exception, to restore them to the land he gave to them
    and their posterity as an everlasting possession (Genesis 12, 13, 15, etc.). Over the last 100 years, nearly all of the nations on earth, except the USA, have seen their Jewish populations transferred to Israel by turmoil sent by God Himself in order to fulfill His word. This will happen to America as well. Sadly, in that day, all of you will be looking to the Rothschilds or other “Jewish” conspiracy theories for an explanation as to why this is happening, when it is actually the Sovereign of history orchestrating all of this. You may ask, why would God keep his covenantal promises with “those people?” The answer is because a Sovereign Yahweh can do whatever he wants. He doesn’t need peon humans to approve his plans. He isn’t campaigning to win a popularity contest with the Alt Right, either. Through all of this God is showing the nations (or “Gentiles”) that he is faithful to keep his everlasting promises. The voices who raise the question of “who killed Jesus” are the most pathetic. Obviously they played hooky on the first lesson of Christianity 101, which teaches that YOU KILLED CHRIST. HE WAS BORN TO DIE THE WAY HE DIED, BY WHOSE HANDS HE DIED. Anyone who believes otherwise has obviously never had a personal encounter with Christ, which means that person has far more important matters to mind than alleged Jewish conspiracies, the USS Liberty, and all the other marginal issues that you folks endlessly obsess about. You should seek Yahweh while he can still be found…so on the day they give up the ghost, they are not awoken to the rude reality that they spent too much of their energies and time drinking the Koolaid of conspiracy theories rather than seeking to know the living God. Yes, there really is a Jewish conspiracy: the Jewish God will have his way on earth. You are free to rebell against his way and be run over by it, or to join it and be saved by it.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Yahweh, the “God of Israel”, like all other gods of humanity, is nothing but an illusory group projection. If you believe in the idea of the OT that once all Jews from the diaspora will return to Israel and act upon that belief, then of course that is what will happen. That is called a “self-fulfilling prophesy”. It doesn’t prove that Yahweh really exists and that he is keeping his promises.

  22. michael
    michael says:

    Thank you.

    Weighty and illuminating in what it reveals.

    How falsification and lies build a mountain of rubbish.

  23. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    The notion of Judeo-Bolshevism is as problematic as the notion of Judeo-Christianity.

    While Karl Marx and many early communists were ethnically Jewish, they were not happy Jews nor were they secret supremacists pushing a radical agenda for crypto-Jewish-hegemony. One could argue that their Jewish genetics(especially intelligence, personality, and temperament) shaped their attitudes, perspective, and worldview — after all, the political grows out of the personal — , but there’s no doubt that men like Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky were sincerely committed to World Revolution premised on the Brotherhood of Man.
    Now, on the subconscious level, were they driven by tribal-megalomaniacal energies going back to ancient times? Perhaps, but it can’t be ascertained one way or another, only speculated. While it’s true that Jewish historical experience on both the personal and social front shaped the Marxian worldview, this can be said of any group. After all, every people interpreted and practiced Christianity in their own way: Italian Catholicism, German Lutheranism, Southern Baptism, Negro Church, etc. And when communism spread around the world, it was ‘nationalized’ differently in every nation. Owing to variances of history, demographics, culture, and tradition, Cuban communism was distinct from Romanian communism that was distinct from North Korean communism. Then, it should hardly surprise us that Marxism was indelibly stamped with the Will of Jewish Personality because ethnic Jews played such a prominent role in the formation of radical communism. Likewise, Ayn Rand’s theories of individualism were far more radical and prophetic than those of relatively restrained Anglo tradition or pragmatic American tradition. Rand may have considered herself secular and godless, but she had one powerful Jewish personality. Marx and Jews didn’t invent socialism or communism but gave it a distinct ethno-charge that, for awhile, achieved critical mass to alter the rotation of the world in a new direction.

    Karl Marx and many early communists were secular Jews or Anti-Jews(just like Nietzsche was Anti-Christ), and many had negative feelings toward Jewish religion(as a drag on Jewish progress) and Jewish bourgeoisie(as a driver of inequality and injustice, thereby instigating more anti-Jewish sentiments among the pauperized goyim). Later, the Chinese communists would feel much the same way about their own culture. Maoists attacked Confucianism as a dead weight around China’s neck that prevented progress; they also attacked capitalism as the tool of collaborators and imperialists(as Chinese capitalists had profited from business with European, American, and Japanese aggressors). People like Marx, in rejecting both ancient Jewish tradition and modern Jewish capital, hoped to find a new path which would lead to the resolution of all contradictions, be they class or tribal conflicts. A world in which all classes would merge into one, a world in which Jews and Gentiles would just be comrades committed to equal work, equal leisure, and equal commitment to arts and culture.
    Tremendous changes were afoot in a world turned upside down by the Industrial Revolution as Karl Marx noted in THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. The reason for Marx’s emphasis on economics owed to the realization that the material dynamics behind capitalism was fueling the greatest revolution in human history REGARDLESS of ideas or arguments for or against it. The rapid transformation of the world from the late 18th century to the 19th century owed little to ideas. After all, there had been ideas as radical or even more so all throughout history since the beginning of time. Besides, the politically less radical UK and Germany(which was ruled by the Kaiser and reactionary ministers) underwent far greater material revolutions than France where radical ideas and movements were more commonplace. If ideas alone can change the world, the Ancient Greeks, who were so rich in ideas, would have changed everything. But they didn’t because they lacked the materialist dynamics that could take on a life of its own. Today, some people worry about A.I. superseding mankind and taking over the world, but in the 19th century, hyper-economic forces took on life and logic of their own and could not be stopped. Once the industrial revolution took off due to a confluence of cultural, legal, and material factors, humanity was confronted with a power much bigger than philosophy, religion, politics, tradition, and privilege. It was as if capitalism had unleashed the Beast driven by market forces of greed and profit. As Karl Marx saw it, NOTHING could stop this Beast. No idea, no plea, no movement, and no amount of moral condemnation could stop it. Indeed, Marxism was meant less as a manual for action against capitalism than as a preparation for the day when the Capitalist Beast will collapse from its own contradictions. The most that Marxists could do is ready themselves for the eventual day when the Beast has collapsed from its own weight and can be finished off by radicals who’d been waiting patiently with sharpened spears. It’s like the story of Cyclops in THE ODYSSEY. As the one-eyed giant is too big and strong, the men have no chance of defeating it. So, they just wait for the gluttonous and self-indulgent giant to gorge on food and wine to the point of becoming incapacitated, and it is then they strike.

    Marx understood the power of the Beast of Capital. As the material world changed, traditions and conventions faded, and it led to both spiritual malaise and visionary renewal, and this is what Friedrich Nietzsche became the prophet of, indeed the rare non-Jewish one. And as the new order allowed more individual choices unloosed from old restraints, sexual temptation was bound to be a key factor in capitalism for its profit potential. (Capitalists would seek to commoditize sexuality, anarchists would seek to weaponize sexuality, and communists would seek to re-moralize sexuality in terms of men and women as comrades.) Anyway, with so much of the Old Way fading fast but without new truths to replace them, the era from mid-19th century to Fin-de-Siecle was bound to be a time of prophets, visionary artists, and radicals. Jews played a prominent role in this period because (1) they’ve long had a prophetic mindset and tradition and (2) freed from the confines of Rabbinical Messianism, modern Jews could apply their prophetic outlook on the secular world. Incidentally, we are living in similar times today as (1) there is exponential growth in technology that has taken on a life of its own (2) old credos have lost their authority while new ones offer little more than empty idolatry of holy Holocaust Jews, Magic Negroes, and ‘rainbow’ Homos (3) calamitous times are afoot due to demographic upheavals. There is also the great contradiction between the conceit of ‘liberal democracy’ and the reality of rule by tribal oligarchy of Jewish Supremacists.

    • Andrea Ostrov Letania
      Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

      Karl Marx believed that money is to Jews what alcohol is to the Irish. Jews take to money like leeches to blood. Marx lamented how Jews practiced the Shylock Doctrine wherever possible to make profits on the backs of long-suffering humanity. He was convinced that the only way to resolve the Jewish Question was to rid the world of capital. A kind of Economic Prohibition. Jews, more than any other people, had become intoxicated with capital as the result of their experience as financiers, middlemen, and money changers.
      But the end of capital could not be brought about by any leader or movement. The power of capitalism and the beast it unleashed were too powerful. Such a force could only be brought down by its own internal contradictions, and then and only then, the radicals would pounce on the Beast and finish it off. But, in some ways, Marx saw capitalism as the biggest blessing for mankind. No pain, no gain. As merciless, greedy, and ravenous as capitalism was, no force had been as powerful and effective in transforming the world from rural backwardness & aristocratic privilege to urban awareness & mass consciousness. And once the ownership class were eventually destroyed by the contradictions of capitalism, all the property, infrastructure, and wealth they’d built and accumulated would fall into the hands of the workers. Capitalism was like the greatest forest fire of all time. It led to much destruction but cleared the deadwood and provided fertilizer so that new trees could grow, hopefully by feeding on the nutrients equally.

      The early communists were both Jewish in ethnicity and anti-Jewish in agenda. But this could be said of early Christians as well. All early Christians were Jewish, and then, for a long stretch, the majority of Christians remained Jews(or heretical Jews). The term ‘Judeo-Christian’ might indeed be applicable to this period because the movement was so heavily dominated by heretical Jews and had yet to completely sever ties to Jewish tradition(much in the way that Freudianism had trouble recruiting anyone but eccentric Jews to the field). Early Christians were both Jewish and anti-Jewish in espousing a new faith that grew out of Judaism but also railed against it. But then, Jesus Himself had been rather ambiguous, sometimes portraying Himself as a reverent bearer of tradition, at other times intimating that His mission is to change everything.
      As Christianity is a universal faith, once its flames spread and caught on with the gentiles, it naturally came to be dominated and defined by gentile converts & their children than by the descendants of the Jewish early Christians.
      Same was true of communism. Given its universal character, communism was bound to attract many more non-Jews than Jews in the long run: China, Vietnam, Cuba, Angola, and etc. Especially when Israel allied with the US and communist Jews began to feel stirrings of Zionist pride(or were suspected of such), the hammer came down hard on many communist elites of Jewish background… though, all in all, your average Jew in the USSR or Eastern Europe was probably better off than your average goy, not least due to higher IQ, adeptness at economic bootlegging, and connections to rich Jews in the West(however tenuous). American Jews did a lot of favors for Soviet Jews though, in fact, your average Jew in the USSR was better off than your average goy Soviet.

      In the early years of Christianity, Jewish Christians were persecuted by Jews and disdained by pagans. But eventually, they managed to capture the imagination of pagan Rome, and then the movement took on a life of its own. It is somewhat analogous to what happened later with communism as it passed from Jews to Goyim. While it’s important for us to remember the horrors of communism and the Jewish role in it, we also need to ask why Jewish-created worldviews had such a messianic impact on humanity. Kevin MacDonald has written about the Jewish Culture of Critique, but he has yet to fully discuss something that is more important: the Culture of Prophetique. According to MacDonald and his admirers, Jews are the Eternal subversives who deconstruct and undermine the social order, especially that of the goyim. But no idea or movement can gain such momentum and power as communism did for a time just by being anti-something or counter-something. It has to be FOR something too. And this is where the Jewish Power of Prophecy comes into play. Communism presented the final prophetic formula that would unite science, sociology, economics, morality, history, spirituality, and creativity all in one. It envisioned a new world of justice, equality, and brotherhood of man, and this inspired many people(mostly goyim) around the world. We must give the Jewish Devil his due in the sheer ability to think big and convert masses of mankind.

      • Andrea Ostrov Letania
        Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

        Why do Jews control so many goyim? Why are Jews the hands while goyim are the clay? It’s because Jews have had the chutzpah and audacity to think big, to imagine the one and only God. Jewish Prophets reached beyond the scope of most men and sought to peer into the mind of the all-knowing Deity. It is this bigness of vision and thought that has made Jewish Thought so paradigmatic in world history. In the 20th century, who was the most influential author? Franz Kafka. Who was the most admired film-director with cult-like following? Stanley Kubrick who made 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Jews use the Culture of Critique to clear the way to fulfill the far more important Culture of Prophetique. Unless goyim learn to think ‘bigly’, their minds will always be the clay in Jewish hands. Even when Jews think up utterly crazy and stupid shit(like Homomania or Diversity Is Our Strenght or DIOS), they gain such mass following because they do it with such energy, drive, vision, and determination. Like many people, I think Ayn Rand was nuts, but THE FOUNTAINHEAD is something more than a dry theory on individualism. It is individualism as far-seeing and far-reaching heroic mythology. Western Civilization produced many great warriors, scientists, philosophers, artists, leaders, inventors, and etc, but no prophets… with the possible exceptions of Martin Luther, Ludwig van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Carl Jung, Martin Heidegger, and Adolf Hitler, all Germans by the way. The reason why the world burned to the ground from fires emanating from Central Europe was due to the friction of Jewish prophetic power and Germano-Aryan prophetic power. History couldn’t take that much heat. Upon losing World War II, Germans have suppressed their romantic passion and now await national death. They have lost the power of will. Jews still have prophetic power, but all their wealth and privilege have turned them decadent and degenerate, and their current vision for the world is ‘worship the holy homo and franny tranny’ and ‘worship the mandingo with mega-dong’. Anyways, those with prophetic power will rule over those without. Prophets claim to see the world and history from a higher perspective. As such, they can look further into the distance for meaning and truth, past and future. People who lack the prophetic vision just follow those with the vision. As Jews have verbal ability, they use terminology to define the world to buttress their preferences and prejudices. So, terms such as ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, ‘homophobia’, and ‘xenophobia’, as defined by Jewish Academia(in the role of modern rabbis) and Jewish Media(in the role of modern calls to prayer), set the ‘terms of service’ for those who are unwilling or incapable of thinking for themselves. Those who don’t think or think small will always be owned by those who think big. Just like the big fish eats the small fish, big brains own the smaller brains. Romans knew how to conquer with swords and shields, but it was the Jewish mind that conquered the universe with visions of the one and only all-knowing God.

        In the 19th and 20th century, Jewish capitalists had an ambiguous relation to communism. On the one hand, they saw it as a threat, as did all capitalists. But they also saw it as a useful weapon against the much loathed Russians. But then, foreign policy is always a game of ‘enemy of your enemy is your friend’. FDR allied with Stalin against Hitler. Nixon met with Mao to use China against USSR.

        Also, with the fading of religious faith, many young idealistic Jews decided to join the messianic movement of communism as their ticket into the modern world. Judaism no longer had much meaning for them, and Christianity was too much the faith of the enemy; furthermore, Christianity was also fading in the modern world. But many Jews loathed communism and radicalism as threat to tradition or bourgeois privilege, something Western European Jews had plenty of. Though Jews were more likely to take part in radical politics, there were powerful Jewish forces that did everything to oppose it or lent it support only selectively against certain enemies — but then, it was the right-wing German government in World War I that sent Lenin back into Russia to stir up trouble. (Jewish Radical and Jewish Capital in the 20th Century didn’t fully go head-to-head for two reasons. They had to work together to defeat Tsarist Russia, contain Nazi Germany, and topple WASP elites in the US and UK. Also, the rise of Zionism served as a quasi-fascist compromise between Jewish Capital and Jewish Radical as both agreed on the Jewish National Project. Eventually, with the fading of communism and bourgeois culture[of respectability] altogether, there was the Convergence of Jewish radical energies and Jewish capital excesses in the worship of the Holy Homo and Magic Mandingo.)

        Similarly, many Jews have long had ambiguous feelings about Jesus, St Paul, and Christianity. In some ways, Jews regard Jesus and St Paul as traitors, renegade Jews, and heretics. Jesus and St Paul took the sacred Jewish fire and passed it to the filthy goyim who, once empowered by the Faith, came to persecute Jews as Christ-Killers. Jews have regarded Jesus and Paul like Zeus regarded Prometheus who stole fire from the gods and passed them to humans. Prometheus was ‘crucified’ too, albeit with an eagle than with a cross. And yet, Jews also feel immense pride in Jesus and Paul because those two Jews changed the world. Romans conquered tiny Judea, but a simple Man from Judea and a handful of His followers managed to conquer the souls of all Romans and beyond. That is tremendous prophetic power. Europeans were unable to produce their own prophets. In contrast, Arabs produced their own in the figure of Muhammad who, taking inspiration from Judaism and Christianity, came up with his own vision as the basis of a New Book. In contrast, European Christians came to worship a ‘Jew on a stick’, being unable or unwilling to come up with their own prophecy.

        • Andrea Ostrov Letania
          Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

          Whatever one thinks of Marx, Freud, Rand, and Leo Strauss, they thought bigly. Sure, there was the element of Jewish networking to promote Jewish thinkers, but that alone wouldn’t have done it. Suppose the media expend lots of resources to promote Mexican or Polish-American thinkers. How many bold or exciting Mexican or Polish-American thinkers are there? Neocons were a bunch of a**holes, but one reason why William Buckley caved to them and why Paleo-Cons were swept aside was because Neocons thought bigly. Crazy but bigly. Jewish Mind has more Forward Thinking. In contrast, the goy Buckley-Mind saw history in terms of pleading, “Stop, please oh please” and goy Fukuyama-mind saw history as, “Gee, I think it stopped, didn’t it?”
          For Jews, history is a ongoing process of propheticism, and that is why they rule. It has something to do with higher IQ among Jews, but there is another factor. Jews have greater intellectual drive and will. After all, reason and logic alone are neutral and objective. They don’t necessarily favor one side or one vision. To be prophetic, one has to tap into the energy source of the mind. It’s been said East Asians have IQs comparable to white Europeans, and some East Asians are as smart as Jews. And given East Asian success in academics, one might expect them to produce the next batch of Big Thinkers, but where are the Asian Marxs, Freuds, Rands, Friedmans, Strausses, and etc? Though East Asians have proven themselves adept at learning and mastering established knowledge, they’ve been lackluster in coming up with new visions and revelations. Francis Fukuyama is maybe the most renowned Asian-American scholar, and the guy certainly has an encyclopedic knowledge about lots of things, but his main contribution to the discourse has been “It’s all over, and Liberal Democracy won, and that’s that.” It’s like the Tokugawa Dynasty calling for an end to all further progress and change in the conviction that it has reached the ‘end of history’ for Japan. As for white people, they’ve been highly talented in innovation, creativity, adventure, analysis, and enterprise, but they seem to lack the prophetic will(and the only people who somewhat had it, the Germans from Martin Luther to Adolf Hitler, totally immolated themselves).

          Also, white people, with special roots in Greco-Roman and Germanic consciousness, tend to favor the actions of the body. Greeks and Romans erected countless tributes to physical health and beauty. They became masters of warfare and conquest. Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar were tireless conquerors. British were renowned for science and philosophy but also reveled in adventure, war, and conquest. They had a powerful martial culture. And the cowboy came to epitomize the American frontier spirit of the pioneer. White people developed a tremendous heritage in knowledge and thought, but their conquering spirit was expended on physical conflict, conquest, and domination. Indeed, body was for conquest, and the mind was for reflection and analysis. In contrast, Jews learned to conquer with the mind. As a race of rabbis and merchants, Jews didn’t have much chance to play warrior, conqueror, and adventurer, unlike the fighting-and-dominating goy aristocratic classes of Europe. So, the conquering energies had to be expended within the cerebral and spiritual space of mind and soul. Surrounded by much bigger physical powers since ancient times, Jews knew they had no chance against them in one-on-one combat. But through the power of mind and will, Jews could imagine and own for themselves the greatest conception of God and then imagine peering through His eyes and hearing from His lips the prophecy of what must be. Thus, Jews developed the nuclear mind. In physics, we learn of different kinds of energy. Simple physical energy, more potent chemical energy, and ultimately nuclear energy. Mind works the same way. Most people use ‘physical’ energies for mundane thinking. Their minds don’t function beyond ‘what I want now’. The more advanced minds could be said to exercise ‘chemical’ energy. More sophisticated and educated, they use complex methodology and abstract concepts to solve problems or spark new ideas. And then, there are minds that have the combination of intellect, knowledge, will-to-power, and bigness of vision that can drop the bomb that changes history itself. Such men are rare, but a good number have been Jews in ancient and modern times. And the Arab Muhammad, who dropped a nuclear bomb of his own, was inspired by Jewish prophecy. Indeed, one could argue that even Germanic prophetic will was, in some ways, a reaction to the emergence of Jewish Will in the 19th century. No Jews, no Hitler. And Richard Wagner’s great opera of DIE NIBELUNGEN was a Teutonic counter-prophecy against the Jewish Will to take over the world. Jews have atomic minds, and that’s why their ideas blow away the competition. It’s not necessarily because Jews are correct or sane but because they think bigly & boldly and also minutely & incisively. After all, the devil is in the details if you want to split hairs or split atoms. Einstein pondered everything from the biggest galaxies to the tiniest atoms.

          In the end, those who conquer souls win over those who conquer bodies and lands. Alexander the Great conquered vast territories and spread Hellenic culture, but when his armies departed, it was as if they’d never been there. And Hellenic cultural influences, though beautiful and enticing, didn’t inspire souls and faded away into nothingness. Same with the Mongols, among the greatest conquerors of all time. When they were on your land, you bowed and trembled in fear before them. But once they were gone, they left nothing but bitter memories that they were a bunch of a**holes. But consider the tremors of Islam that still reverberate in the lands it conquered. Why? Because Islam conquered souls that felt grateful for having been redeemed by the True Faith. And Christianity also had a long great run as a conqueror of souls in Europe and then around the world. This drive to conquer souls arose from Judaism that birthed Christianity and Islam, and it had to do with the prophetic will and the nuclear mindset. Just like no physical or chemical energy can match nuclear energy, no ‘physical’ mind or ‘chemical’ mind can match the ‘nuclear’ mind. Jews have the power to set off nuclear explosions of the mind that paradigmatically alter the landscape. Marxism was one of those nuclear explosions of the mind that changed the world.

          Ultimately, communism was a double-edged sword for Jews in USSR. Initially, Jews had much to gain as many of them were in elite positions and as the New Order outlawed discrimination on basis of religion and ethnicity. Also, communism destroyed 50,000 Churches and wiped out much of the Orthodox clergy that was regarded by Jews as ‘antisemitism central’ and bastion of reaction.
          But then, communism also put brakes and obstacles to Jewish success just as Marx had intended. Without accumulation of capital and all the things it could buy(such as media, entertainment, vice industries, whore politicians, real estate, and etc.), there was a limit to what Jews could do.
          As communism was egalitarian, it prevented any group from rising way above all the others and accumulating limitless wealth. Also, the egalitarian ethos eventually led to massive ‘affirmative action’ policies that came to favor non-Jews over smarter Jews. Furthermore, the humanist-moralist element of communism made it difficult for Jews to use vice industry, gambling, advertising, drugs, and pornography to corrupt and control the goy masses with cults of vanity, hedonism, narcissism, and degeneracy. So, in the long run, it was a net loss for Jews under communism. It was with mastery of capitalism(especially in the US) that Jewish Power came to inherit the world. And it is this power of Tribal-Capital and ‘testicular fortitude’ in Prophecy that keep Jews far ahead in the field of dreams.

          • steve
            steve says:

            Andrea Ostrov Letania, very well written…and yes, I am Jewish. Is this an excerpt from a book or article, or the fruit of your own pen? If the former, please cite, as I would love to acquire this book/article. If from your own pen, I commend you. You should write an extended book or article on this, as you are a gifted writer. Thank you, too, for your candor with regard to the reason why we Jews embraced Marxism and Bolshevism…largely to neutralize the antisemitic Orthodox church. Obviously, something other than some innate evil and misanthropy that our foes attribute to us motivated us to embrace this extremism. Our enemies picked a fight, as you point out, with a people with a formidable intellect, and therefore, the collateral (and real) damage has been immense for both sides. Unfortunately, too many of my fellow Jews brought that same worldview to the United States, the first truly philo-judaic society in history, which was largely because of the kind of Christianity that took root on American soil. What else can I say? I am a Jewish conservative who laments the war on Western Civilization, which sprouted as a result of the meeting in antiquity between the Jews, the Greeks, and the Romans. Unfortunately, barring another “Great Awakening,” I fear all is lost.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        In all my 80 years I must have missed the one and only time that Communism was not imposed from above by a minute group of certifiable psychopaths, through the most murderous, varied and well-financed methods.

        A former acquaintance was a member of the militarized arm of the East German STASI, deployed to guard the fenced luxury bungalow compound outside of North Berlin, housing their Leadership.

        Their fat wives, usually with cow faces, were chauffeured downtown in one of the forty western Volvo luxury sedans from their car pool, outfitted with the most expensive sound systems. They might pick up a sweater or two, each for a month’s wages, before dropping by Ostrowski’s for lunch.

        Before returning home, they would drop by the Intourist Shop near Friedrichstrasse RR station to pick up western cigarettes, whiskey, chocolate, nylons, toiletries and other delicacies unavailable to the masses who were forbidden to hold the required foreign exchange; under penalty.

        Putin was a senior Officer of the KGB, stationed in Dresden. During that time, they were searching for that super swine Schalck-Golodkowski and his five [[[cohorts]]] for major economic crimes. They were subsequently put in charge of Koko, [ Commercial Coordination ] to gather, by hook and by crook, as much foreign exchange as possible for their Regime since their Ost-Mark was a joke, unofficially trading for 16-1.

        After their more than deserved collapse, the masses raided his villa, stuffed with foreign exchange, minks, nylons, cigarettes, cases of whiskey and delicacies. The swine and Frau bought a villa in the Bavarian spa-town of Bad Toelz; with impunity from the not blameless West Germans. [ Like all over the world ].

        This was Realkommunismus, not the whitewashed version represented here and of course wholeheartedly admired with supreme approbation by Steve [ Ellis ? ], whom I recall having correctly identified here many months ago. Given his below admission.

        Some 110 million, were they still alive, would agree with me !

  24. milan
    milan says:

    The real truth of the matter is the unfortunate belief and teaching that countries such as Russia and Germany were seen as the Gog and Magog of Ezekiel 38 and 39. This is an interpretation that must be repudiated and immediately. It is totally false claim with no basis in truth whatsoever. The author Gerry Fox has done a masterful job in giving us the real truth surrounding this prophecy and it needs telling.

Comments are closed.