The Ministry of Liberty: How an Open-Borders Cult Will Ride Brexit into the European Parliament
All good-thinking leftists in Britain simultaneously love non-White immigration and hate Nigel Farage. This is entirely logical, because Farage is the hate-filled bigot who exploited White racism and xenophobia to win the Brexit Referendum back in 2016.
As part of his successful campaign, Farage unveiled a “vile anti-immigration poster” called “Breaking Point,” which showed a caravan of dark-skinned refugees pouring into Europe. The poster was truly horrific: rather than portray refugees as weeping women and traumatized children, it resorted to brazen and unblushing realism. The refugees were portrayed as overwhelmingly young and healthy men of prime crime-committing and rape-gang-forming age. Appalled leftists promptly reported the poster to the police, claiming that “it incite[d] racial hatred and breache[d] UK race laws.”
Breaking Point: Nigel Farage’s infamous hate-poster
But although Farage’s campaign was successful and 17·4 million Brits voted for Brexit, the traditional rules of British democracy immediately re-asserted themselves. The elite in Britain do not want Brexit and have been thwarting it with bureaucratic delay and legalistic legerdemain ever since. For example, John Bercow, the arrogant and obnoxious Jewish Speaker of the House of Commons, has been working hard to “kill off Brexit” using fast talking and arcane parliamentary procedures. The same rules of elite control apply on mass immigration: it was never voted for and the majority of British Whites have always opposed it. But the elite wanted it and so it happened regardless. Brexit was, in part, a vote against mass immigration and the destruction of Britain’s White Christian traditions and history. That’s why the elite hate Brexit and want to stop it.
Hot to Trot
But it looks as though the elite are soon going to be badly stung again. Nigel Farage’s new Brexit Party has a jaw-dropping lead in opinion polls for the European elections on May 23rd. If the polls are right, the hate-filled bigot Farage and his allies will ride another wave of racism and xenophobia to victory, crushing both Labour and the Conservatives en route.
But here’s a funny thing. Three of the candidates for Farage’s party, Claire Fox, James Heartfield and Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, don’t simply believe in mass immigration. They support completely open borders, without controls of any kind on an influx of unlimited numbers of people from any and all countries on earth. This is because Fox, Heartfield and Cuthbert are part of a “weird [Trotskyist] sect” once called the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP).
Trots on top: the Hungarian Jew Frank Furedi and his Irish-Catholic disciple Claire Fox
Under the guidance of their Hungarian-Jewish guru, a sociologist called Frank Furedi, the RCP and its later mutations have campaigned tirelessly for the greatest possible liberty of the greatest possible number. But their passionate belief in liberty and human possibility has had a very strange effect on their psychology. All members of Furedi’s Cult — let’s call it “FuCu” — believe in exactly the same things and express their opinions in exactly the same way. In effect, FuCu is a political hive buzzing on a single note dictated by the bee-keeper Frank Furedi. And FuCu have always buzzed loudly in support of open borders. During the so-called migrant crisis of 2015, Furedi’s disciples issued a simple message of “Let them in: We shouldn’t demonise or infantilise African migrants. We should welcome them.” FuCu went on:
We shouldn’t pity these migrants; we should admire them, for using guile, gumption and perseverance to come here. They’re precisely the kind of people sluggish Europe needs more of, an antidote to our students who can’t even clap without having a mental breakdown and our new generation who think that being told to ‘get on your bike’ to look for a job is tantamount to abuse. Let’s relax the borders and let them in to try their luck in our countries and see how they fare. If we do that, we’ll put the traffickers out of business, end the deaths in the Mediterranean, and, more importantly, do our part to enable the aspirations of human beings who have committed no crime other than wanting to realise their potential in our towns, our cities, alongside us. (Let Them In, Spiked Online, 21st April 2015)
That article ran in Spiked Online, an internet magazine where FuCu argue tirelessly in favour of both unlimited immigration and unlimited free speech. Of course, mass immigration by clannish and highly illiberal Muslims and other non-Whites is very bad for free speech, but this contradiction doesn’t bother FuCu. Trotskyists don’t believe in logic or objective reality but in whatever advances the cause of Trotskyism and their own power. After the Charlie Hebdo massacre, FuCu argued that the real problem was the attitudes of White liberals, not the illiberalism of Muslims. We must be strong in asserting Enlightenment Values, you see, and then Muslims will put down their machine-guns and pick up libertarian treatises by John Stuart Mill and Voltaire.
Whites need to lead the way
This need for guidance by Whites also applies to identity politics, in FuCu’s opinion. Yes, Western society is riven by racial antagonism, censorship and tribal thinking. But this is not because millions of tribalistic and censorship-friendly non-Whites have flooded across the borders. Not at all! It’s because Whites have not asserted Enlightenment Values loudly enough. Non-Whites are longing to embrace free speech and merit-based competition, if only they knew it. Alas, we Whites haven’t told them what they really want, so they demand censorship and special treatment instead. If you want to understand FuCu’s ideas, the Polish philosopher Leszek Kołakowski summarized them perfectly in his magisterial Main Currents of Marxism (1978): “The cultural atmosphere of Russia in those years [of the Revolution] had an adolescent quality, common to all periods of revolution: the belief that life is just beginning, that the future is unlimited, and that mankind is no longer bound by the shackles of history.”
Kołakowski also explains why FuCu, who are still convinced admirers of the totalitarian Lenin and Trotsky, argue so loudly in favour of unlimited freedom, which is not something that Lenin and Trotsky ever granted to those over whom they won power. In accordance with orthodox Leninism, FuCu support anything that disrupts and disturbs the current system:
Lenin laid the foundation for the tactics which were soon to become binding on Communist parties: the right course was to support any movement tending to overthrow the system at any point, for any reasons and in the interests of any class: liberation in colonial countries, national or peasant movements, bourgeois national uprisings against the big imperialists. This was a generalization of the tactics he had been preaching in Russia for years: to support all claims and all movements against the Tsarist autocracy, so as to exploit their sources of energy and seize power at the critical moment. The victory of the Marxist party was the final aim … (Main Currents of Marxism, Vol. II, pp. 471-2)
Communist parties need to act like that because they can’t win power by truly democratic means. In the 1980s, FuCu ran a conference called “Preparing for Power.” They were about to stand for election as the Revolutionary Communist Party, you see, and were confident that the British people would be eager to embrace an openly Trotskyist party. Of course, they received almost no votes in the parliamentary elections that followed and thereby learned a valuable lesson: “Do not seek power under your true colours.”
The Furedi Cult is again preparing for power
Decades on, it looks as though three members of FuCu are going to follow that principle to victory in the European elections. The convinced Trotskyists Claire Fox, James Heartfield and Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, all of whom support open borders and unlimited non-White immigration, will be sent to the European Parliament by ordinary British Whites who oppose mass immigration and want Britain to stop turning into a Third-World country. Anti-Farage leftists like Nick Cohen are now writing exposés of Fox et al, pointing out that they have supported IRA bombing campaigns and opposed controls on child pornography.
I don’t think those exposés will stop Fox et al winning seats in the European parliament. But Cohen isn’t exposing FuCu as supporters of unlimited immigration. After all, Cohen and other leftists believe in that themselves. Does Nigel Farage believe in it? I don’t think so, which makes it difficult to understand why he’s allowed FuCu to practise entryism on his Brexit Party. Furedi and his hive don’t condemn the European Union for allowing so many Muslims and other non-Whites into Europe. Instead, they condemn the EU for creating “Fortress Europe,” which is a lying propaganda term used by the far left to demand open borders.
An open-borders Trotskyist cult
Claire Fox and her comrades in FuCu are not what they pretend to be. They claim to support unlimited freedom while really pursuing unlimited power for themselves. Another great writer who helps us to understand FuCu and its ideology is George Orwell. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, he satirized the way leftist organizations proclaim one thing in their names while pursuing the exact opposite by their deeds: “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.”
I therefore christen FuCu the Ministry of Liberty. It claims to believe in the maximum possible freedom. In fact, it believes in the maximum possible disruption, because it hopes to win power through chaos. I don’t think it will win the power it seeks, but I trust Frank Furedi as far as I could throw The Collected Works of Lenin (all forty-five volumes of them). Fortunately, I think Farage is much cleverer than Furedi. Then again, I don’t trust Farage either. The sight of an open-borders Trotskyist cult entering the European parliament with the votes of anti-immigration Whites is going to be an interesting one. Watch this space.
Something seems to be not quite right about Farage. In 2017, UKIP backed a weird Jewish rabbi (Shneur Odze) for mayor of Manchester. Odze was described as Farage’s ‘confidant’. I still don’t understand what that was all about, though I’ve repeatedly tried to find out.
I’ve suspected Nigale Farage of being a controlled opposition agent for a very long time.
Farage first caught my attention some time around the year 2000 or so. Youtube videos were popping up with him making lots of self-righteous, indignation speeches from the floor of the Parliament and as I watched more and more of these speeches, they eventually triggered my racial survival radar.
I remember one particular series of Farage speeches where he was babbling about how the immigration policies of the elites were posing a risk due to the fact that they were causing a rise of European Nationalism and Farage appeared to think that this wasn’t good news. Up to that point, I had a vague sense that Farage was a pro-White minded politician – but noticed how he worked very hard to cloak his language and use various codewords to deliver his message. So, when I heard him whining and bleating about the rise of European Nationalism – I immediately asked myself, how could this not be a positive development that would benefit the long term interests of White Europeans? If Farage was a legitimate pro-White, pro-native British politician – he should be cheering this rise of Nationalism and working to encourage more of it.
This was when I began to have suspicions about this guy. I do not trust him. I think he’s controlled opposition. This says it all:
“Three of the candidates for Farage’s party, Claire Fox, James Heartfield and Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, don’t simply believe in mass immigration. They support completely open borders, without controls of any kind on an influx of unlimited numbers of people from any and all countries on earth. This is because Fox, Heartfield and Cuthbert are part of a “weird [Trotskyist] sect” once called the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP).”
I see parallels between Donald Trump and what Nigel Farage is doing with the BREXIT Party., In each case, the globalist-White Genocide scheming elites hand picked a stooge to become the face of a fake Nationalist movement – and those stooges (Trump & Farage) are given scripted speeches that sing all kinds of intoxicating Nationalist and Populist talking points, even going so far as to break a few of the rules of Political Correctness so as to make these stooges seem more believable and credible. But, if they manage to snooker enough voters to get into office – then, they immediately begin to fill their administrations with people who have well known and widely advertised positions that oppose every bit of the rhetoric that the stooge used to win the election.
Trump is ready to add another GOP establishment RINO and never Trumper to his administration in this new ‘Immigration Czar’ position. Ken Cuccinelli – who caught the president’s attention during the 2016 presidential primaries, when he led the effort to strip Mr. Trump of delegates on behalf of an opponent, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a person close to the president said. Oh, and when this RINO ran for Governor of Virginia – he flat refused to touch the subject of immigration and avoided it deliberately. But, now the jews media is claiming he is an ‘immigration hard-liner’?
They are lying, once again.
Your comment reminds me of a video that’s still up by Gilad Aztmon called The Cognitive Elite of Jewish History. About how they have to control both sides of every argument. I guess like they’ve had to control both sides of every war since way back.
Jewish Supremacy Inc. Let’s call it JSI, or Jessica, as in JEwiSh Supremacy Inc’s Control of America (in an effort to replace the six paranthesis; if you guys can think of anything better, by all means…) which would have to include Great Britain, etc. has always had two ways of doing things and is always suffering from internal conflict as a result.
We tend to think of her as clear-headed, focused and totally competent. While we’re helpless. Neither is true.
She knows she’s only good at plunder, and no good at managing the consequences of her plunder (a fact we should never forget and always use to our advantage). Which is beginning to bite her on the ass in a big way. And Jessica’s got a big backside, so it’s a man-sized bite.
One side of her, forgive the pun, knows that she’s out of control and is destroying a valuable commodity (Whites). And that’s how they look at us, and not just us, but their proxies too. We’re all just commodities for Jessica.
Of course Farage is controlled. But I also think he’s sincere and doing the best he can in an impossible situation. I think he, like many, genuinely loves Britain and is terrified at the thought of losing her.
But he also knows that Jessica is good cop/bad cop schizo, and he’s doing his level best with what’s in front of him.
It’s not an enviable position. But it’s certainly understandable how one can be backed into it. I mean, aren’t we all?
Someone should bring this to the attention of Richard Littlejohn (I can’t, as I’m ashamed to say I’ve been banned from the comments section), who implies in his Daily Mail article today that Claire Fox is a good egg.
The MEP voting system has Britain (in this case) divided into regions, each region having a number of seats. The d’Hondt system gives each party a closed list for each region, with candidates in effect from 1st down to the number of seats. I supose they could have more in case of deaths, drop-outs etc.
I couldn’t find the Hungarian Jew Furedi on the published list of Brexit people (just checked; no, maybe he’s joined Jew killers in Israel) but Claire Fox is top candidate for the northwest region (Liverpool etc). Her, or nominally her, think-tank, almost certainly Jewish funded, is of course lightweight Jew-naive rubbish.
I don’t know any revisionist type who’s reviewed any of these people anywhere online, in any of the parties. Typical of course of the laziness of people. At least the next candidate after Fox look OK, a Danish dentist.
We libertardians don’t like either mill or voltaire, btw we dislike smith and rand too.
Good one on the trotsky, imagine sutton was a libertardian.
I preferred [Alias] Smith & Jones….. 😉
“The Hate Poster!”
They hate it because it tells the truth.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, because it’s worth repeating. Their real enemy is Reality. They hate Whites because not only do Whites have a stronger desire to live in it, but we’re better able to admit when we’re not living in it very well.
And it’s exactly this quality about us, this drive toward reality that, for all of our many faults, makes it possible for us to build the kind of civilization that they and their proxies want to live in.
In any event, the 24/7 smear campaign is to make sure no one talks seriously in public about our replacement and the consequences of that replacement on our children.
The word narcissist gets thrown around a lot. But it can be useful. So, I’d like to use it in this comment. Because these people are narcissists par excellence.
Narcissists look at their targets with Disgust, Disdain, Contempt, and Envy.
Not surprisingly, they’re extremely resistant to exposure, and dead set on making sure their targets never wise up and fight back.
So the non-stop slander is to induce the sense of learned helplessness in their target.
They have to remove our freedom of speech and assembly, even online, because they instinctively know that we’ll start to feel better about ourselves in general, and about our chances of taking the power back in particular (or at least die trying, ie; going out with a fight), the second we know we’re being heard by people who care and can identify with what we’re going through.
When you know you’re being heard it changes you. It makes you want to fight for your life.
“I therefore christen FuCu the Ministry of Liberty. It claims to believe in the maximum possible freedom. In fact, it believes in the maximum possible” . . *slavery.* This would be my choice of Orwellian contradiction. One cannot overemphasize the focus that all ‘FuCu’ commissars have on grasping the Power of a czar so they can Rule.
Just in case reactionary forces can’t be contained institutionally, Ezra Levant’s everyman plays the lower classes like a fiddle. All bases covered.
As a matter of interest, the editor of ‘Spiked Online’, Brendan O’Neill, is another member of the Revolutionary Communist Party. He wrote in his ‘Daily Telegraph’ blog in February 2011: “My attitude towards immigration is probably enough to make many Telegraph readers wince (it can be summed up in two words: ‘open door’).”
Democracy is a venereally diseased whore [ quite without Putin’s alleged help ]: the entire power lies in the hands of those who decide the nominations behind soundproof doors. Right down to Municipal Elections; as I have observed more than once.
Little wonder, that many institutions and parties profess a certain program, then work on the opposite. In 1917, refugees from the Bolsheviks settled in dozens of preferred capitals in the west. The largest collective organization of nobility and bourgeoisie in Paris. I forget, when exactly, they found out, that their entire enterprise was run by the Bolsheviks: while at all times funding their own destruction.
Not a single,” new ” perfidy without its own antecedents: some reaching back millennia. If in need, check the catalogue.
“But Cohen isn’t exposing FuCu as supporters of unlimited immigration. After all, Cohen and other leftists believe in that themselves. Does Nigel Farage believe in it? I don’t think so, which makes it difficult to understand why he’s allowed FuCu to practise entryism on his Brexit Party.”
I don’t find it all that difficult to understand. The Brexit Party’s a single-issue party–and that single issue is Brexit. Farage is openly courting Britons of all political persuasions who are opposed to the EU, including the Lexit community. He’s even won the endorsement of George Galloway, for crying out loud!
First, leave the damn EU and get sovereign control over your state and borders back. Then you all can argue over immigration policy until you’re blue in the face. But without national sovereignty, policy differences on immigration don’t amount to much, do they?
The people who control Europe are always puppets of the Americans (Yankees) who are puppets of the East Europeans who call themselves Jews. In 1945 Stalin suggested that the Russians and Americans leave Europe. A neutral Europe should develop Africa.The USA should develop N&S America.There were three other suggestions which I forget. The Americans told their puppets in Europe to ask them to stay and started the cold war which cost humanity (wasted) 5 trillion USD.
UKIP only moved towards criticizing immigration relatively recently. Before that, they were little different from the GOP. UKIP received massive positive media coverage when the BNP was doing well. They were clearly being supported by the establishment to take support from the BNP.
We have a problem in the English speaking world. In continental Europe, nationalist parties are now major players in almost every country. These parties, even if they use more moderate rhetoric than some of us would like, are at their core, ethnic nationalists. In the Anglo-Sphere, we have these civic nationalist type parties that are ideologically confused.