No Country for White Children
I’ve recently enjoyed an exchange of emails with a very intelligent and articulate former White Nationalist who is now dedicated to anti-natalism, the philosophy expounded by the Jewish South African philosopher David Benatar. Summed up, anti-natalism argues that life entails suffering, sometimes terrible amounts of it, and therefore that non-existence is always better than living and dying. Benatar’s 2006 Oxford-published book Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence is the influential key text of this growing movement. In the course of the book, Benatar advances the idea that humans should accept that procreation is inherently immoral because it involves creating sentient beings who will suffer and die. The text is thus a moral injunction against having children, and Benatar’s ideal scenario is one in which a barren mankind goes voluntarily extinct. In the course of the email exchange on these ideas, I raised a number of concerns with my correspondent about the logic, theory, and growth of anti-natalism, one of them being that, given the already problematic propensity among Whites to attach themselves to abstract moral concerns, and social fads based on guilt, there was likely to be a practical ethnic disparity in the adoption of anti-natalism at group level. In other words, I argued that anti-natalism, regardless of its philosophical merits or lack thereof (and quite apart from any consideration of Benatar’s intentions or ethnic origins), could contribute to the Culture of Sterility already prevalent in the West by providing yet more philosophical-cultural support for the demographic decline of Whites everywhere.
The minutiae of our broader debate of Benatar’s logic, and our shared rumination on existence and Being, isn’t worth covering here but, as our exchange narrowed in focus, two issues emerged which have relevance for this website. The first was whether life on earth was really a prize worth winning for Whites. The second was whether it was good to bring White children into an increasingly hostile world. My correspondent remains firmly in the camp that argues that life is most definitely not worth it, while I argued against Benatar and made the more optimistic case. This was a novel position for me given my longstanding appreciation of the deep pessimism of Schopenhauer and my general tendency to the “Black Pill” side of things. In this instance, however, I argued that, when it came to life, the game was indeed worth the candle. In fact, I believe that we should not only play the game of life, regardless of suffering, but play to win. I cannot say that I have arrived at this position rationally or logically. I can only say that the drive to life is firmly implanted in me, something that Benatar has argued is simply a trick of Nature. And yet, trick or not, I am a product of this earth, and not something alien to it and subjected to its whims. I am here. I exist. And I believe my best existence can be achieved with those most like me and especially, following in the thought of Frank Salter’s On Genetic Interests, those related to me. In a sense I am on a boat in rough seas—I need those who will reliably grab an oar alongside me, rather than throw me overboard.
My own attitudes to anti-natalism aside, my correspondent is correct in highlighting the increasingly difficult, and almost impossible, position of White children. Despair in this regard is always within touching distance. Just this morning it was brought to my attention that the ADL has extended its considerable tentacles across the Atlantic, and will now be involved in a three-year project in England to provide “lessons and activities to schools and pupils to talk about difference and diversity, celebrate inclusion, and understand discrimination and its effects.” The project is part of a deal with Chelsea Football Club, owned by Russian-Jewish oligarch Roman Abramovich, and will involve significant funding flowing from Chelsea to the ADL. In summary then, English fans are paying not only to see millionaires kick a ball for 90 minutes, but also for their children to be told they’re bigots by a gang of American Jews. That’s quite a deal. The interest of a body of New York Jews in English children is strange to say the least, especially when the ADL currently operates no such scheme in Israel where segregated education is still largely ongoing and, in the words of Israel’s own state comptroller, “racism and discrimination” are still prevalent in Israeli schools.
‘A Twig to be Straightened’: Jewish ‘Anti-Bias’ Research on White Children
I first wrote about the ADL’s strange and obsessive “interest” in White children in 2014, noting at that time their development of “Anti-Bias Lesson Plans and Resources for K-12 Educators.” The ADL program fit neatly into the broader history of Freudian attempts to portray anti-Semitism as a virulent mental pathology that careful education strategies could ‘inoculate’ against. That this process of “inoculation” has targeted White children and no others is an open secret. Although the idea that anti-Jewish attitudes are a form of disease with roots in childhood goes back to Freud, it has been prominent in Jewish activism for over a century and remains current today. Take, for example, the closing remarks from Abraham Foxman’s Jews and Money: The Story of a Stereotype, where parents and teachers are urged to “try to help the next generation grow up freer from the infection of intolerance. [emphasis added]” The goal, as Mr. Foxman himself once articulated, is to “make America as user-friendly to Jews as possible.” Theodore Isaac Rubin’s equally self-interested diatribe, Anti-Semitism: A Disease of the Mind, describes anti-Jewish feeling as a “contagious, malignant disease,” and concludes by stating, “extremely active application of insight and education is necessary to check the disease. Checkmate and eradication is [sic] extremely difficult and probably only possible if applied to the very young before roots of the disease take hold. [emphasis added]” To Rubin, and his like-minded co-ethnics at the ADL, the solution to the problem of anti-Jewish feeling is one of “prophylaxis” and “approaches to children.” The ADL-sponsored tome Anti-Semitism in America (1979), concluded that “It is apparent that the schools are the most appropriate and potentially effective agent to carry out the instructional strategy just outlined.”[1]
The 1979 ADL study was itself following in the footsteps of a series of social engineering experiments carried out on White children over several decades by scores of Jewish psychiatrists and sociologists. Research into the racial attitudes of White children in America began as early as 1929, in Bruno Lasker’s Race Attitudes in Children (New York: H. Holt & Company). Lasker was a Hamburg-born Jew who moved first to England before arriving in the United States in 1914 where he established himself as a pro-immigration social worker. Lasker’s work was furthered in the 1930s by Eugene and Ruth Horowitz[2], whose work was highly influential on probably the most high-profile “child racism” test of the twentieth century — the “doll tests” of Black psychiatrists Kenneth and Mamie Clark that helped end segregation via Brown v. Board of Education. The “doll tests” didn’t just have a Jewish academic heritage; the research of the Clarks was funded by the Julius Rosenwald Fund, and the pair were closely connected to the Northside Center for Child Development which had a “mostly Jewish Board of Directors.”[3]
Research into the putative racism of White children was furthered in the 1960s by Donald Mosher,[4] but it was in the 1970s that an intensification took place, partly as a result of its blending with discoveries of the importance of television in shaping attitudes, and other social behavior ‘modification’ techniques. In 1972, for example, Bradley Greenberg was allowed access to 300 White children from Michigan to see if consistently watching Blacks on television could improve their attitude to “diversity.”[5] The development of Sesame Street, “a program that exposes young children to a variety of attractive black and Hispanic models,”[6] at the start of the decade owed much to the interventions and analyses of Jewish sociologists like Greenberg, as well as Gerry Bogatz,[7] Gerald Gorn,[8] Marvin Goldberg,[9] and Gordon Cantor.[10]
In a glowing walk down memory lane in Tablet, it’s made explicit that “idealistic urban Jews were integral to Sesame Street’s origins. … Its genesis was a 1966 dinner at Joan Ganz Cooney’s apartment, attended by Carnegie Corporation VP Lloyd Morrisett and NYC Channel 13’s program manager Louis Freedman.” As with many social experiments at the time, there was a blend of Jewish activism, government backing, and the financial support of Big Capital. In the case of Sesame Street,
The Carnegie Corporation, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Ford Foundation donated most of the seed money for the launch of Children’s Television Workshop (today called Sesame Workshop). Harvard Ed School professor Gerald Lesser, one of the few people conducting research on kids and TV at the time, became the chair of CTW’s advisory board. He worked with the startup team and offered guidelines. … The show was racially and culturally diverse from the get-go.
These efforts to modify the behavior of White children via television were closely related to earlier Jewish efforts, in the 1950s and 1960s, to modify White racial attitudes. The most notable academics in the field of altering public opinion and White ingroup attitudes including Joseph Klapper, Bernard Berelson, Fritz Heider, Leo Bogart, Elihu Katz, Marie Jahoda, Joseph Gittler, Morris Rosenberg, Ernest Dichter, Walter Weiss, Nathan Glazer, Bernard J. Fine, Bruno Bettelheim, Wallace Mandell, Hertha Hertzog, Dororthy Blumenstock, Stanley Schachter, David Caplovitz, Walter Lippmann, Sol Ginsburg, Harry Alpert, Leon Festinger, Michael Gurevitch, Edward Shils, Eugene Gaier, Joseph Goldsen, Julius Schreiber, Daniel Levinson, Herbert Blumer, I. M. A. Myers, Irving Janis, Miriam Reimann, Edward Sapir, Solomon Asch, Gerald Wieder, Paul Lazarsfeld, and Morris Janowitz.
Someone once said that “when everyone thinks the same, conspiracy is unnecessary.” This is essentially the dynamic at work in this field of research, which was dominated by people from the same ethno-religious background, all of them bringing more or less the same anxieties, assumptions and enmities to their chosen field. The result was a very uniform approach among Jewish psychiatrists and sociologists to the “problem” of the White population, especially White children.
Following in the footsteps of many co-ethnics, in 1976 Irwin and Phylis Katz and their colleague Shirley Cohen moved away from the usefulness of television and into the testing of other “modification” techniques that specifically targeted White children. In one experiment, after gathering 80 White kindergarteners and fourth graders, attitudes to Blacks and the disabled were measured by, for example, confronting the youngsters with a Black man moving around a room in a wheelchair and observing their reactions.[11] Two years after this stunning leap forward for science, Phylis Katz returned to experimenting on White children with colleague Sue Rosenberg Zalk, in a project designed to achieve a “modification” of White children’s attitudes to race.[12] Katz justified the focus on children because, in White adults, “attitudes are relatively intransigent and much more difficult to change.” For Katz, to paraphrase the title of one of her essays, White children were a problematic and warped twig that emerged from a rotten tree and had to be “straightened.”[13]
Today, the same trend is very much in evidence. One of the more influential texts in the field is Louise Derman-Sparks’s 2011 What If All the Kids Are White? Anti-bias Multicultural Education with Young Children and Families. Derman-Sparks, who opened her speech to a multicultural conference in Berlin in 2010 with the statement that Germany’s shift to multiculturalism “has been especially moving and inspiring to me … as a Jewish woman,” adorns the cover of her book with the images of 14 White children gathered together above the distasteful title as if they’re criminal mugshots. The expressed intention of the book is to “pique the interest of Whites to examine themselves,” and it opens with reference to “many authors” who have published texts since the 1990s on how Whites perpetuate racism. The cited “many authors” includes Paul Kivel the Jewish author of Uprooting Racism: How White People Can Work for Racial Justice and founder of the (far from subtle) “Challenging Christian Hegemony Project.” Other examples of these “many authors” include Paula Rothenberg and her 2004 White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Other Side of Racism, Shirley Steinberg and her 2000 White Reign: Deploying Whiteness in America, and Tim Wise and his 2004 White Like Me. Although not mentioned by Derman-Sparks, one of the most influential academic texts in this field in recent years is developmental psychologist Lawrence Hirschfeld’s 1998 MIT-published Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child’s Construction of Human Kinds.
Derman-Sparks’s text is one of those truly vulgar texts that maintains a cheery air even as it portrays the innocent as sinister. How else are we to react to the ethnic paranoia inherent in complaints that White children aged between 3 and 4 in one class were perceived as “avoiding dark colors in their artwork”[14] and thus demonstrated a deep-seated racism imbibed from their parents since infancy? The revelation that these White children preferred to draw paintings with bright, cheerful colors was apparently so devastating that a team of anti-bias “educators” was brought in. Derman-Sparks lauds the team for “brainstorming” techniques to adapt the children’s behavior, including providing them with excesses of black and brown paper, providing them with black and brown toys, and creating “relaxation” spaces that were dark. When the children, who weren’t much older than toddlers, complained that the dark spaces were scaring them, they were told that darkness “wasn’t scary” and were made to simply endure it. The ideology behind this mental saturation in darkness was that “White children’s learning to be “White” is part of the maintenance of systemic racism.”[15] The goal therefore, in all cases, is to prevent White children from adopting their natural racial identity. Derman-Sparks stresses her ambition to create not just generations of Whites who tolerate multiculturalism, but who become active warriors for “social justice.”
Getting the ADL Out of Schools
All of which is to say that Jewish activism in this area is intended to pervert the in-born natural affinity of White children for their own kind. Even Hirschfeld (1998) admits that
race is one of the earliest-emerging social dimensions to which children attend and this pattern of development appears to be stable across diverse cultures. Furthermore racial thinking clearly develops into a theory-like knowledge structure, representing a coherent body of explanatory knowledge sustaining inferences about category members that go far beyond the range of direct experience.[16]
The aforementioned ‘anti-bias training,’ which has been developed over the course of the past century, is designed to overcome the natural instincts of White children and to deprive them of the knowledge structures, explanatory knowledge, and inferences that are essential to the protection of their interests. When these aspects of their development are done away with, and when they are instead brainwashed into becoming “social justice warriors” on behalf of foreign groups, White children are essentially turned upon themselves and their own people.
A promising sign in recent times, however, has been the backlash against the ADL’s involvement in education, which is in turn part of a broader realization of the harmful nature of Critical Race Theory and its encroachment at all levels of the education system. In July, the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation initiated a “Get ADL Out of Schools” campaign after the ADL began state-wide measures that dictated that schools should “notify ADL when any incident of bias, bullying, discrimination or harassment occurs”—presumably so they could refer the offending youth to their “Center on Extremism” as soon as possible. The campaign is led in part by Stuart H. Hurlbert, Professor of Biology Emeritus, San Diego State University, who argues that “the Anti-Defamation League has inserted itself into American politics in a variety of ways over the decades primarily in the guise of a non-partisan, civil rights organization.” As part of his gathering of information revealing the true nature of the ADL, Hurlbert very helpfully directs readers to Kevin MacDonald’s work “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881–1965: A Historical Review.”
In August, California’s Newport-Mesa Unified School District voted to continue its relationship with the ADL, but “with modifications.” The school district was the victim of an ADL shakedown in March 2019, after it was revealed that some drunken students from Newport Harbor High School arranged cups in the shape of a swastika at an off-campus party. After the prank was made viral by a malcontent, the ADL swooped on the instance of “abhorrent anti-Semitic activity” and shamed the nervous school board into accepting a rapidly escalating series of contracts for anti-bias training for staff and students.
The minutes of the school boards meetings are publicly available, and contain the actual contracts with the ADL which run to the value of some $96,650 over a two-year period for anti-bias and pro-immigration training sessions. The shakedown started to come apart in August, when board members began to question the transparency and cost of their agreements with the ADL, as well as the content of ADL training courses. In response to parents objecting to the school district’s relationship with the ADL on the grounds that it was “bringing critical race theory into the classroom,” the school district “reviewed the proposed contract and recommended eliminating second-level anti-bias courses for school employees.” Unfortunately, the most damaging aspect of ADL ‘training”—their lessons for children—remain in place (at a cost of $27,800), prompting Anti-Defamation League Regional Director Peter Levi to gloat, “We have long believed education is the best antidote to hate and bias.”
More and more objections are being raised, however. Back in June, in Alabama, the Mountain Brook School Board severed ties with the ADL after a parent-led protest against Critical Race Theory being pushed into schools via the ADL’s “No Place for Hate” program. In a familiar pattern, Mountain Brook’s involvement with the ADL began with a teenage prank involving swastikas. A Jewish parent, Elizabeth Goldstein, then claimed that Mountain Brook needed ADL training, providing as supporting evidence the undoubtedly truthful statement: “As a child, as a Jewish child growing up in Mountain Brook, [when I was in second grade] a girl told me she could not play with me because I killed Jesus.”
The shakedown began, but on July 8 Mountain Brook Schools issued a statement in response to parent pressure, announcing that “Mountain Brook Schools will not be using “No Place for Hate” and will no longer be using the services of the Anti-Defamation League.” The ADL, rather than gracefully bowing out of the affair, attacked Mountain Brook Schools in an open letter, accusing the city of “many issues of antisemitism and hatred over the past several years.” Sinister motives were implied to lie behind the Board’s
intentional and unexplained distancing from ADL. … In response to a serious 2020 antisemitic incident involving its students … the Mountain Brook Diversity Committee invited ADL to give a presentation on our educational resources in July 2020. This meeting resulted in the Diversity Committee choosing to use ADL’s No Place for Hate® education framework and A World of Difference Institute® programs for its goal of making MBS students globally responsible and conscious citizens by helping to foster a more welcoming and inclusive school community. … The treatment of ADL as a partner of the district and a resource to the community has been both disrespectful and lacking transparency and communication. We are leaving Mountain Brook Schools with no indication that the issues of antisemitism in the community are being addressed. Indeed, they feel worse. … Mountain Brook Schools’ failure to consider implementing anti-bias education in schools could serve to allow antisemitism and other forms of hatred to fester in the school community.
The ADL could have just cut to the chase and said “A world where bigoted White children aren’t put through our Brainwashing Seminar® and Anti-Identity Institute® (and all for the bargain price of less than $100,000!) is a world in which we’re deeply terrified.”
*****
We’ve come full circle. Is the ADL looking across the Atlantic because it’s being rebuffed in America? I doubt it. The group is international in origin and intent. It is simply expanding its modus operandi in accordance with its ideology—an ideology in respect to “child racism” in the West that has been a century in the making. This ideology dictates that the “twigs” must be snapped off from the White tree and reshaped. This ideology hasn’t required a conspiracy, only a tremendous similarity in thought and action over one hundred years. Defeating this pattern will require a similar uniformity of thought. White parents coming together to expel brainwashers is a great place to start.
[1] Quinley, Harold E. & Glock, Charles Y. Anti-Semitism in America (Michigan: The Free Press, 1979), 202.
[2] Horowitz, Eugene L., and Ruth E. Horowitz. “Development of Social Attitudes in Children.” Sociometry 1, no. 3/4 (1938): 301–38.
[3] Markowitz, Gerald E. and Rosner, David, Children, Race, and Power: Kenneth and Mamie Clark’s Northside Center (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996).
[4] Mosher, Donald L., and Alvin Scodel. “Relationships between Ethnocentrism in Children and the Ethnocentrism and Authoritarian Rearing Practices of Their Mothers.” Child Development 31, no. 2 (1960): 369–76.
[5] Greenberg, B. S. (1972) ‘Children’s Reactions to TV Blacks’, Journalism Quarterly, 49(1), pp. 5–14.
[6] Katz, Phyllis A.; Zalk, Sue R. (1978). Modification of children’s racial attitudes.. , 14(5), 447–461.
[7] Bogatz, G. A., & Ball, S. The second year of Sesame Street: A continuing evaluation. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1971.
[8] Gorn, Gerald J., Marvin E. Goldberg, and Rabindra N. Kanungo. “The Role of Educational Television in Changing the Intergroup Attitudes of Children.” Child Development 47, no. 1 (1976): 277–80.
[9] Marvin E. Goldberg & Gerald J. Gorn (1979) Television’s impact on preferences for non‐white playmates: Canadian “Sesame Street” inserts, Journal of Broadcasting, 23:1, 27-32.
[10] Gordon N. Cantor. “White Boys’ Ratings of Pictures of Whites and Blacks as Related to Amount of Familiarization.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 39, no. 2 (December 1974); Cantor, Gordon N. “Effects of Familiarization on Children’s Ratings of Pictures of Whites and Blacks.” Child Development 43, no. 4 (1972): 1219–29.
[11] Katz, P. A., Katz, I., & Cohen, S. (1976). White children’s attitudes toward Blacks and the physically handicapped: A developmental study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(1), 20–24.
[12] Katz, Phyllis A.; Zalk, Sue R. (1978). Modification of children’s racial attitudes.. , 14(5), 447–461.
[13] Katz, P. A. ‘Attitude change in children: Can the twig be straightened?’ In P. A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism. New York: Pergamon Press,1976.
[14] Derman-Sparks, 25.
[15] Ibid,. 31.
[16] Hirschfeld, L.A. Race in the Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child’s Construction of Human Kinds (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998), 83.
Homeschooling is safe schooling.
Here, hear the “Objectivist Ethics” by jewess Ayn Rand [Alice Rosenbaum].
“It is only the concept of LIFE that makes the concept of value possible. It is only to a living organism that things can be good or bad.”
https://soundcloud.com/aynrandinstitute/objectivist-ethics
[A printed version should be available]
Jews take all sides of all arguments, spy versus spy 24/7.
Six Jews, seven opinions.
You will find that some Jews say sensible things (e.g. Jonathan Sacks on the western birthrate or Murray Rothbard on fractional reserve banking); and others do not. So what?
It only matters if and when powerful Jews (or anyone else) do and say things harmful to western civilization.
We can also choose among Gentiles: Plato or Aristotle; F W Nietzsche or G K Chesterton; J S Mill or J F Stephen; &c.
The current problem of the White birth-strike while Africans and Arabs multiply is a problem for Zionists not a benefit for Israel.
Of course there are Jews who say sensible thing, just as there are Blacks, Tasmanians, and Aardvarks who do the same. But if one were to point out the general trajectory of, let say, Jewish opinion skewed toward the Left, the first thing one would hear is a loud squeal from some Marxist Jewish yenta “Not all Jews think that way,” or “My friend, Moishie Lipschitz is Jewish, and he doesn’t think that way.” For a group such as leftist Jews who foster “the collective”, they are the first ones to squeal when someone points out their group as having a general bias. Your point about the White birth strike not being beneficial to Zionists is so true. Jews (especially here in New York), even those who are lukewarm to Zionism, grow up in a relatively insular environment. We are not talking about Hasidim here. So they can push this fear under the rug somewhat. In Israel, the Ashkenaz (who run things) see Palestinians popping out little poopers by the dozens, with Sephardics & Hasids not far behind (two groups Ashkenaz elites cannot stomach) while they only have one or two children at the most -if they do at all. When was the last time you have seen a Jewish (Ashkenaz) construction worker? Here, they totally rely on the goyim (of all races) and in Israel, they rely somewhat on the Palestinians, but more likely Sephardics and guest workers (and they really do not want schvartzers as guest workers). They know they’re screwed (especially in Israel) and like the white children in the experiment, have a fear of the dark. But that dark, is going to bite them as well as us in the very near future (if not at present).
I think TJ’s point is more of how Jews manage to take seemingly contrary positions, but somehow manage to acomplish their twin interests of advancing themselves and hurting us, whilst doing so.
Obviously libertarianism & communism is the obvious one, both invented, promoted & funded by Jewish guru types, with the odd gentiles dragging along so the thing ain’t too obvious. But theirs other too.
You could say this is clever, & *in a way* it is, but actually it’s just anti-reality anti-truth BS coming from different directions.
If they can spin a complicated yarn out of far leftist ideas to attract pseudo-intellectuals, it’s no surprise they can do this with rightist beliefs. That’s if you think extremist economic liberaty-ism is of the right, which no one actually did until our friends got involved.
Again, all of this is in the protocols. Nohing is new, whites are such an enlightened race that we don’t react to the plan for our extermination when presented with the blueprint, bulprits & murder weapons in advance, but await & chill a century until it’s in full progress.
When Jews call us goyim.. . . .
” Again, all of this is in the protocols. Nohing is new, whites are such an enlightened race that we don’t react to the plan for our extermination when presented with the blueprint, bulprits & murder weapons in advance, but await & chill a century until it’s in full progress.”
USA Whites are primarily descendants of rural cultures that are historicly nonpolitical by tradition and predominantly Christian by tradition . Whites typically have a low level of political intelligence ( voting enthusiasms are mostly irrelevant to any intelligence metric ) because of their persistent legacy tradition of a nonpolitical rural way-of-life and their predominant Christian religion of anti-intellectualism . Most Whites know nothing about “The Protocols” and most of them believe any claim of a genocide against them is conspiracy theory . Most of Christianity has capitulated to the chosenhite jewmasterss and public schools are ultimately “owned” by the jewmasterss .
It will be miraculous if a remnant of Whites somehow survive the genocidal forces of extermination arrayed against them by their jewmasterss .
Quite brilliant, Dr. Joyce, and most amusing as well. I appreciate the significant effort that you put into your essays and feel grateful that we have you on our side, so to speak. Do you have any suggestions as to how we might counter the anti-white onslaught?
The Occidental Observer is a high-brow publication, similar to Harper’s Magazine in its early days, and yet I get notifications from zealous and besotted anti-Semites who see the hand of Jews in virtually every unfortunate circumstance.
An excellent analysis, one that once again leads us to conclude: “It’s the Jews.” Pretty much everything you look at that has been harmful to us Whites originates with Jews. It’s really all encompassing.
And just by chance, in working on my own latest TOO essay, I had cause to revisit an old skit from the Jon Stewart (Liebowitz) Show called “White in America — the Children.”
SEASON 14 • 05/07/2009
Larry Wilmore enlists the help of Robin Thicke to give white kids hope in their minority future.
https://www.cc.com/video/iknvhd/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-white-in-america-the-children
“a very intelligent and articulate former White Nationalist who is now dedicated to anti-natalism”
Eh? How intelligent can he be? Not a true believer either, else he’d have cut short his own possible suffering.
My reaction exactly.
Until the nitwit–and no, Dr Joyce, he is NOT super-smart–puts an end to his wretched existence, he is nothing more than a poseur and a damned liar.
This is not that hard.
Thanks in large part to the Jewess , Charlene Barshefsky , US Trade Negotiator with China , White children have far fewer job opportunities than in times past :
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-59610019
I am an Armenian American woman and am happy that this article discusses the sins of the ADL.
Regarding the ADL, I want you to know how unprincipled it is in general because it’s not just the things above that make the ADL a terrible organization.
The ADL is a hypocritical, selfish, and destructive organization that asks us to commemorate the Holocaust while at the same time it engaged with Turkey and Israel (when the two were friendlier) to deny the factuality of the Christian Armenian Genocide of 1915 to 1923 carried out by Turkey.
The ADL (and other Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Committee and AIPAC) also successfully lobbied Congress for many years to defeat resolutions recognizing the Armenian Genocide. This is chutzpah times 1000.
In Massachusetts, many cities cut ties with the ADL when this was made public in the period from 2007 to 2008. Even many Jews were shocked and disgusted by the ADL’s stance.
Only after decades of pressure did the ADL belatedly acknowledge (but only half-heartedly) the Armenian Genocide.
There are hundreds of articles about this on the web.
The ADL has also engaged in domestic spying against various political and even minority groups. Most Americans are unaware of this.
For example:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-04-09-mn-20991-story.html
https://www.irmep.org/ADLespionage.asp
Thank you for letting me have my say.
The FBI publicly proclaimed that they use the ADLs guidelines and opinion on individuals and organizations. From that to action. The two top floors of the FBI, part of the Deep State are totally controlled by the New World Order, WEF, Bilderberg, etc. They are completely separate from Executive, Legislative, or any other national controlling entity.
Needs supporting evidence.
(Mod.Note: “Marx”, way too many words to read. “Poupon” at least 60% or submit as short book or something, anything but a “comment”)
—-
This is as conclusive as any correlation study or investigation where the amount and quality of evidence, its relation to each other, and its mutually supported tenets and comments. There is every reason to belief that the Federal Government control is in the hands of the Trans-world Elite, New World Order, World Economic Forum, etc, all different names for the same players. Just as TOO and other sites have shown, Jews either control or have a strong hand in management of all major economic, political, social, etc, institutions in the non-Soviet/China World. Characteristically, the American Democratic Party is a solely owned and controlled extension of the well chronicled amalgam of supra-wealthy and powerful international organizations and people.
Leftist Parties today are not the same as earlier epochs. They do not represent the bottom of the economic pyramid, the disadvantaged, dispossessed, etc. That hologram is for the low IQ/low info voter, and the cloistered, protected, and incubated elites of academia, industry, entertainment, and other industries and fields. An additional component to the authoritarian, centralized, control-oriented state apparatus is that of POWER-at any cost, by any means. Appeals to idealism, humanity, and general welfare and improvement are covers and dodges for the “suckers”, and deniers of concrete observation and logical reasoning.
Now, the FBI exists as an agency of The State, which Nietzsche characterized: “State is the name of the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly it lies; and this lie slips from its mouth: “I, the state, am the people.” Since the FBI (and CIA) are empowered to act directly on anybody or anything, it quite naturally follows that the description and analysis of the Democratic Party applies to the FBI. In fact, this is more than inferred if one looks at FBI actions in the last few decades. Examples below:
The Democratic Party is the center of propensity toward centralization, command, and control of the all aspects of a country or civilization. It is the party of government involved in all things, through which all must flow, be inspected and passed or denied. The model is Soviet Bolshevism, carrying the mantle and cloak of collective concern for benefit of the largest sectors of the population. Truly sewage, nicely gift wrapped.
In this era, such a constellation of supporting ideas and advocacies are referenced as “Marxist/Communist”, due to this title derived from assignation of Karl Marx, and later adopted to doctrine and action by V. I. Lenin and cohorts. One could say it is Fascism with a certain degree of accuracy, but linguistically that word carries very negative connotations due to mass manipulation of post WWII propaganda through media. In other words, phenomena is very often, is not what is said or described.
So, there is continuity of the FBI, independent of elections outcome, dominant political party revolving carousel. All must realize that Democratic Party = permanent personnel in the bureaucracy = Fifth Columnist controlled by the aforementioned Elites. The FBI leadership is controlled and loyal to this cabal/cartel/force. The agents and field workers are not continuous, or contiguous with the diktats of these nomenklatura and apparatchiks.
Examples and Evidence:
https://thefederalist.com/2018/08/03/fbi-agents-got-another-doj-lawyer-in-wray-they-deserve-better/
“Since officially becoming the Federal Bureau of Investigation 83 years ago, the FBI has had a total of eight Directors. Only two of them had ever served as FBI agents (other agents have taken the top job but only briefly to keep the seat warm as “Acting Director”).
For the last 17 years, the FBI has been controlled by Directors who never served a single day as an FBI agent – Robert S. Mueller, III, followed by Comey, and now Wray.
All three were senior government lawyers from the DOJ before their appointments as FBI Director, and as lawyers in charge of the FBI, they set the top-to-bottom tone for an organization that is spending more time defending itself than celebrating its victories.
You would think Director Wray would’ve read the memo on that particular point, but apparently he has not, and is showing his true colors as a lawyer from the DOJ in what is one of the signature challenges of his tenure – managing the fallout from the DOJ Inspector General’s Report on the Hillary Clinton e-mail and private server investigation.”
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/four-retired-fbi-agents-warn-america-about-marxist-infiltration-of-the-fbi-tickets-199454974197
4 retired FBI agents warn Americans about Marxism and subversion
“Four retired FBI agents are stepping forward to brief you in these four one-hour town-hall format TV tapings hosted by WVW-TV’s Brannon Howse and Mike Lindell’s Lindell-TV. These four men have distinguished careers that included working some of the most high profile cases in America and the world. These men will explain how change agents infiltrated the Department of Justice and then the FBI to turn the agency from political neutrality into an agency that is furthering values, philosophies, ideologies and worldview agendas that are contrary to America’s Constitutional Republic. These men took an oath to defend America and the U.S. Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic and they know that their oath did not include an expiration date. These men could quietly enjoy their retirement years but instead they are stepping forward onto the public stage to warn Americans of the threats facing our nation and the institutions that have sustained and protected our national peace, prosperity and security. Today’s Democratic Party has resurrected the battle cries of radical revolutionaries of the 1960’s and 1970’s who sought to topple the United States Government and replace it with communism.
To all Americans who believe in our system of government and support capitalism, In Their Own Words will be exceedingly informative and will cause you great concern for the way a once great political party has been taken over by avowed Socialists and Communists. Their words and actions reveal their true intentions. To the Millenniums who are caught up in the Socialist Movement, be aware of who you are listening to and following. This book is a must-read for you. It should be no surprise that the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA) totally supports Bernie Sanders for President. If you didn’t know that already, this book will remind you that the CPUSA believes that “defeating Trump and the right in 2020 means moving the electorate to the left”. The CPUSA also believes that the most effective force to defeat the President is the campaign of Bernie Sanders. The CPUSA believes America needs a revolutionary transformation to socialism and then communism-and views the Democratic Party as the best path to get there. This book adds a clear lens from which to view what is happening in America today.”
(Cecil Moses, FBI Senior Executive Service, Retired)
In Their Own Words” is a chilling account of how our society is swerving far left into a socialist form of Government, where liberty and due process give way to socialist agendas. Corrupting the Department of Justice and the FBI is a step in the process. The authors have done a masterful job of plotting this dangerous course. We stand in the Abyss.
(Danny O. Coulson, Deputy Assistant Director, FBI, Retired).
“In Their Own Words” does a superb case of linking the violent communist/socialist philosophy that people like Bernie Sanders and others are today giving legitimacy. I was a Bombing Coordinator in the FBI’s Washington, D.C. Field Office when the Weather Underground was tied to the U.S. Capitol bombing. Many Americans compartmentalize these past and present violent acts as singular events- not thinking they are part of a long- term strategy driven by a philosophical belief that is evangelized by some Democratic Party politicians and media pushing communism/socialism forward with no end in sight. In Their Own Words shows these violent events are part of a larger movement stemming from the revolutionary violence of the 1960’s and 1970’s. I saw these same people racing down Pennsylvania Avenue back then, bent on the destruction of government buildings. The only thing that stopped them was a line of DC policemen who exhibited remarkable bravery and restraint- the same policemen who some politicians and media personalities now hold up as targets of hate, derision, and racism. It wasn’t true then and it’s not true now.”
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/is-the-fbi-now-an-arm-of-the-democratic-party/
“…it looks a lot like the FBI is now being directed by Democratic politicians outside the bureau — a frightening prospect in a nation that is built on the idea of equal application of the law to all citizens. If the director of the FBI can be suborned by political leftists, what does that say about the rest of our government?”
https://www.trevorloudon.com/2021/07/antifa-blm-the-fbi-collaborators-in-a-communist-revolution-against-the-united-states/
Antifa-BLM & the FBI: Collaborators in a Communist Revolution Against the United States
“1) That Antifa-BLM and much of the federal government are merely separate units under the same “command and control” structure. 2) By means of the stolen election of November 3, 2020, that “command and control” structure orchestrated a “color revolution” – a coup – against the United States of America. 3) Instrumental to the execution of that coup, if not the leader of it, was the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). 4) As a result, an unelected CCP-puppet regime resides in the White House – which we’ll refer to as the Biden-Harris Junta. At first the above premises will seem, well, the territory of “tin foil hat” delusions, or at least “conspiracy theories.” That is part of the diabolical genius of what they’ve done – Americans have enjoyed the luxury of living in a Constitutional Republic – and the idea that a Communist-led coup could succeed here seems ludicrous. They are counting on that; it is an integral element of their plan. Conversely, awakening Americans to what has actually happened is integral to “undo the coup” and restoring our Constitutional Republic. For the sake of our country, please just put any preconceptions aside for a few moments, read on with an open mind, and peruse the material at the embedded links, and then draw your own conclusions: Barack Hussein Obama, July 2, 2008: We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. What if B. Hussein Obama wasn’t referring to an American-style “national security force” that (on paper at least) is required to adhere to legal and Constitutional boundaries but instead, as a trained Marxist (he is) he was alluding to a Communist-style “national security force?” For well over a year, Antifa and Black Lives Matter – each of which has Communist roots – have been rampaging across this land; intimidating and assaulting innocent people, pillaging property and committing arson. Some innocent people have died at their hands. All the while, “law enforcement” in Democrat controlled areas – presumably following orders – stood-down, giving the de facto domestic terrorists free-rein. Worse yet, law enforcement in many venues no longer “serves and protects” the law-abiding public, but the bad guys. Many folks who reasonably tried to defend themselves and their property from the Antifa-BLM hordes – often with no alternative, since the police would not act – had “law enforcement” arrest and then prosecute them, while still leaving Antifa-BLM free to rampage! Thus, law enforcement was actually providing backup to Antifa-BLM by preventing armed resistance (self-defense) on the part everyday citizens, further empowering Antifa-BLM. Law enforcement and the “justice system” – in Democrat-run cities and at the federal level – have not been acting as if they are adversaries of the Antifa-BLM lawbreakers, but as if they were collaborators, allies. As we will see, they are!” [continued]
Whether you call it a Communist or Communist-like takeover is a semantic insignificance. Therefore, a component agency in a governmental bureaucracy, as a subset of the entire structure, is very highly improbable (if not impossible), to be disconnected or apart from its parent and controlling authority.
The goal of socialism is communism.
— Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
ADL is plugged in to ZOG in all circuits. ADL and the FBI are kissing cousins.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/speeches/the-fbi-and-the-adl-working-toward-a-world-without-hate
From Occupation to “Occupy”: The Israelification of American Domestic Security
https://www.ihrc.org.uk/news/articles/9974-from-occupation-to-qoccupyq-the-israelification-of-american-domestic-security/
I really could not finish the rest of this article, for it revealed the entire ceding of American law enforcement to the International Jew. It was sickening. America is terminable. We need to break up this turd called the USA into three separate entities, one for the Indo-Europeans, one for the Blacks, and one for the Browns, aka Latinos, Hispanics. No one I have read has put forth a thoughtful proposal based on reality and actuality.
@ ‘Poupon Marx’ —- You seem to have a lot of important material, but no easy way to get it online. If you like, I can put it on my site, where it would be accessible and (barring censorship) Google-able. Email me if you think it’s possible.
The ADL has reasons to blot out the memory of the Armenian (and Greek) genocide. Quote from London Times June 11, 1911, from their own correspondent:
“It’s a well-known fact that the Salonika Committee was formed under Masonic auspices with the help of the Jews and Donmehs, or crypto-Jews of Turkey, whose headquarters are at Salonika, and whose organization took, even under Abdul Hamid, a Masonic form. Jews like Emmanuel Carasso, Salem, Sassun, Fardjii, Mesalh, and Donmehs or crypto-Jews, like Djavid Bey and the Baldji family, took an influential part both in the organization of the Committee and in the deliberations of its central body in Salonika. These facts, which are known to every Government in Europe, are also known throughout Turkey and the Balkans, where an increasing tendency is noticeable to saddle the Jews and Donmehs with responsibility for the sanguinary blunders which the Cimmittee has made. To apportion responsibility justly is at present impossible. It appears unquestionable that the Jews supplied the brains for the Committee movement, and it is equally certain that, if and when the movement ends in disaster, they will be made to incur the odium for events like the Adena massacres, the beatings of Bulgarian peasants last autumn, and the present Albanian operations, which have shed so sorry a light upon the Young Turkish regime.”
The report led to a long debate in London Times, where the Jewish council in England accused the paper of anti-semitism. The Ottoman Empire controlled Palestine, and needed to fall, for the Jews to get it. Exactly why they needed to genocide the Armenians is unclear, but they seemed to think that they were the Amalekites. Quote from “The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” 1939:
“Since the Armenians are concidered decendants of the Amalekites, they are called among the Jews of the Orient also Timeh (Thou shalt blot out, Deut 25:19, referring to the Amalekites.)
Christopher Jon Bjerknes book “The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians” reveals all of it.
From the Amalekites to the Russian peasants, the Jews never forget who they’ve slaughtered. Being annihilated by Jews seems to engender some sort of blood hatred towards the wretched people killrd forever from these ‘people’.
Something for America to consider. The last two empires Jews managed to wrest control of, the Ottoman & Russian empires, they went on an instant spree of bloody mayhem.
100 years later, they control another empire, the US.
What will happen next, I wonder?
The jews are the bipedal version the parasitic fungus that takes over ant’s brains to make them slaves to its purpose, then kills them. Counter-eradication is the only effective response.
Just like a science fiction movie, a parasitic worm, commonly found, lodges in the brain of a mammalian host, and alters behavior of that animal.
Who is the virtual T. Gondii among us?
Its a selection process, like the rest of life. The good whites struggle, have children & continue the river of our people. The bad or weak whites do not & die out.
The difference between a domestic animal & a wild one is struggle.
As long as the barbaric rites and customs of the Semitic interlopers are maintained , genetic excision is normal and abortion for the Goyim treated likewise.
Genuine question: Ask the man you’re corresponding with why he hasn’t killed himself yet.
‘Anti-natalism’ is a proxy for himself. The only reason he hasn’t become ‘an hero’ is because he anticipates more enjoyment in his life than suffering, for now at least. He is a low rent egoist & as such his primary purpose is fornication.
Men need a great truth to live by that is bigger than themselves & that is held to be sacred. For the purpose of this post it doesn’t matter what that great truth is so long as it fits that criteria & as a result acts as a touchstone that shows a man good from evil & what to live, fight, struggle, suffer & die for. Without a great truth to live by a man has no reason to do any of these things & he will fall back on whatever remains in his existence that is powerful enough to motivate him. For most men this consists of a simple desire for pleasure & aversion to pain that comes to act as a substitute for a worldview. This imitation of a value system is seen anywhere that good is equated with peace/pleasure/easing of struggle & evil is equated with conflict/suffering/increasing struggle. Once you get an eye for it its amazing how ubiquitous it is. (This doesn’t mean that peace/pleasure are automatically bad, only that they aren’t automatically good.)
But a man with such puerile values is nothing but a semi sentient flesh puppet controlled by whoever can bring enough carrot/pleasure Vs stick/suffering to bear on the feckless idiot. Even the mere implication of pleasure/pain is enough to control many, like your friend for instance.
So your friend, like the rest of us, grew up in a cultural & philosophical desert with no great purpose & nothing to do but complain, consume & fornicate. Some of us have passed through this desert at some personal cost & have emerged with a great truth after years of struggle & in spite of our overlords. Others, like your friend, have not emerged & perhaps never will. The difference is in a man’s nature. If there is anything in him of value it will emerge, if not then he will die a bugman because thats all he ever was.
That said, there is some hope for your friend. He had the good instinct to side with his blood, it was only when the prospect of the overwhelming struggle that actually entailed became apparent to him that his other character deficiencies made themselves known & he went & hid under a philosophical rock. In the end there is no escape from our natures, he will find what strength he has or he will die. This is as it should be.
Its not necessary to baby talk the buffoon or try & convince him to think about puppies & moonbeams all the time. Just ask him why he hasn’t killed himself yet. Ask him why he thinks suffering is evil & why pleasure is good. You can ask yourself while you’re at it. It can take years to answer these questions but in struggling to do so he will ‘find himself’ & whatever he is, the outcome will be genuinely good but not necessarily pleasant. Man or bugman, its better that he realises what he is sooner rather than later & acts accordingly.
Kill or cure, he will man-up & fight or we will step over his corpse in the struggle.
There is a significant difference between a philosophy that emphasizes that damage that humans cause on this planet and the the despair that leads to suicide but those strains do sometimes meet. Presumably, the anti-natalists are taking a page from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation,” but they do miss the mark, as you so eloquently argued. Idealism is the province of the young; pragmatism is the crucible of the aged. The idealist may embrace a philosophy that negates humanity; the pragmatist may see a world in which the procreation of the white species is indicated.
Sorry Veronica but pragmatism is wholly based on idealism- hard core mysticism [German Idealism]
The fabricators lied big time. Pragmatism is more mind-over-matter, magical thinking. The public was kept in the dark.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pragmatism+and+german+idealism&t=brave&ia=web
I’m sorry, sir, but I don’t quite understand your reply and I found the references you included to be rather turgid. Rather than elucidating any definition of idealism or pragmatism or of how such concepts may intersect, the authors instead succeeded only in making the concepts murky and unintelligible.
This lack of purpose is what has created the drug epidemics in the West among whites. If single mothers don’t wreck the boy’s life, nor the degenerate culture/peer pressure, the LACK of any meaning or purpose or even point to existence creates an *attack of nihilism* in young white boys, that you never really recover from, I know this personally. It’s real, I see it all around me every day.
It’s brutal.
Lot’s of things are hard to imagine or understand, but what boggles my mind most is how decent, well meaning secularists & atheists starting in the 19th century could ever have convinced themselves that withdrawing religion from the peasants was a good idea. It just seems like the most sadistically evil thing one cld imagine.
Some might say they did kind of keep up the pretence, still observing the rituals etc, but that was just half the time, the other half was spend activity eradicating it.
I’m talking 1800-1914 here, this wasn’t the Jews, this was us that did it to ourselves. Jews are too pathetic an enemy to be any more of a parasitic pest to healthy organisms, it’s only when the nations start to rot that they get infested with the plague of Jewery.
We need to keep this in mind, they are like the wizard of Oz behind the curtain, there is a historically proved logical reason they are constantly paranoid, they simply aren’t as powerful as they appear.
The problem lies not in our stars, or with the Jews, but in us.
How to raise boys with a sense of meaning in purpose and shield them from the degenerate culture? Practical advice please.
” The problem lies not in our stars, or with the Jews, but in us.”
Exactly .
Whites have no adequate social/political/economic defenses against their jewmasterss genocidal campaign to eliminate the White race ;
where Christianity offers only the eternal hope of a fantasy of salvation/( resurrection to eternal life ) after death .
What stars ? Has any intelligent person admitted a belief in Astrology ?
Have you been reading a Readers Digest annotation of Shakespeare ?
Wow, great post. What great truth did you discover? How to wholeheartedly believe in it?
I’ve been reading Max Dimont’s “Jews, God and History” lately and it seems to me that creating and spreading insane ideas is the whole purpose of Jewish culture. Dimont writes:
“All civilizations we know about left a record of their history in material things. We know them through tablets or ruins dug up by archaeologists. But we know of the Jews in ancient times mostly from the ideas they taught and the impact which these ideas had upon other people and their civilizations. There are few Jewish tablets to tell of battles and few Jewish ruins to tell of former splendor. The paradox is that these people who left only monuments behind as a record of their existence have vanished with time, whereas the Jews, who left ideas, have survived.”
When looking closer at the collapse of these civilizations – Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome – you find strong indications that it was these “ideas” that caused the collapse. The Bible tells of the Jewish corruption of the pharaoh, and the Egyptian tablets tell about the “lepers from across the river” (“Hibiru”- Hebrews) who colluded with the Hyksos and the Sea People, who seized power over Egypt during 15th dynasty. When the Egyptians resumed control the lepers were enslaved and then expulsed.
When Babylon fell to the Persians in 500 BC, there’s lots of indications that king Cyrus was corrupted by them, hence their celebrations of him. Historian David Astle in the book “The Babylonian Woe” has written about Cyrus victory over the “cheap” king Croesus of Lydia:
“Croesus had offended the international money powers by seizure of their treasure held by their agents Sadyettes, and by the total assumption of monetary issue by the state. example had to be made of him to deter other princes from similar action, and the eager and ambitious Cyrus was obviously the one chosen for this purpose. (…) The special concessions made by Cyrus to the Hebrew almost on entry into the city of Babylon, would certainty suggest that he had received their substantial assistance.”
Babylon was, as Dimont writes, for a long time the real home of the Hebrews, and is it a coincidence that Babylon during this era was turned into a filthy Las Vegas, where the temples became brothels (as Herodotos described) and the whole civilization finally died out? Talmud was written here, during that time, which is another indication.
In all the ancient wars between the Persians, the Greeks and the Romans you find indications that Jewish “thinkers” whispered “advice” and spread “ideas”, which led to wars, poverty, death and psychotic insanity. Christianity and Islam being the main brain viruses. (According to the book “”Hagarism” by Crone and Cook, it seem likely that Islam was created by Jews to enlist their bastard half brothers, the “Ishmaelites” (the Arabs) to kick out the Byzantines from Jerusalem.)
Same sort of indications can be found all over the Greek and Roman history.
It’s a people of insane thinkers and merchants, selling vice, and leading Europeans over the cliff. Oppose to what Dimont writes, the Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Roman people didn’t “die” – their civilizations was destroyed by Jewish “thinkers” – but the people behind those civilizations – the Europeans – always built new civilizations, carrying on the traditions from before. It’s those ideas and ideals that Jews attach themselves to, and corrupt and subvert.
Fascinating post! Thanks.
“Croesus had offended the international money powers by seizure of their treasure held by their agents Sadyettes, and by the total assumption of monetary issue by the state. example had to be made of him to deter other princes from similar action”
Isn’t this pretty much what happened to Hitler’s Germany?
Excellent post.
Confirms my view that they are simply the agents of Satan on earth. Everything big, beautiful, inspiring to the world, they destroy, with the USA simply being the latest.
I just pray the Chinese, who will dominate the earth for at least the next few hundred years, understand this.
…” it seems to me that creating and spreading insane ideas is the whole purpose of Jewish culture.”
Almost a bullseye .
The whole purpose of Torah Jews ( a Talmudic Jew whom is contextually at a given moment in accord with the Torah or portions of it ) is to attain ownership/control of worldly resources including also and especially dominion over people . To wit ___
…” let them have dominion … over all the earth ”
( verbatim quote , except ellipses , from :
The Jewish Holy Torah / KJV / Book of Genesis / 1:26 )
where “them” de facto means [ Jews ] ;
and it hypotheticly means [ mankind ] .
The root origin of the foundation of Judaism is associated with the ancient historic Tower of Babel slaveworker named Abraham whom , along with his merry band of followers and in accord with the [ Torah/KJV/Book of Genesis/11:1-9 ] allegory of their phenomenally successful subversion , of the Tower project , by their injections of language confusions into the workplace vernacular . That is the historic biblical documented and empirically based realistic ( in contradistinction from dogmatic religious ) origin of Jews “creating and spreading insane ideas” as their primary modus operandi for initiating the eventual conquest of a nonJewish culture .
All of human existence involves struggle and conflict; that doesn’t mean life isn’t worth having. I came out of a hellish childhood, one full of violence and abuse, and was conscripted to be the eldercare provider for my family’s old people one generation removed from having enslaved servants. I sometimes asked myself if it was a life worth living. I would then think back to one perfect, beautiful Christmas, one that brought me great joy, and I would think to myself: “If that is all I get, those few moments of beauty to remember and cling to, is it enough to redeem the rest of my existence?”
And the answer was “YES.”
And today things are vastly better for me in terms of my quality of life.
The biggest problem we face as a nation in the modern world full of struggle and conflict is that our leaders have taken every step forward in a manner that is playing to lose. There is no future awaiting us. To survive, any future government must be proactively and aggressively pro-white. Today, it is the opposite of that, guaranteeing our doom.
What’s the answer? Find ways, big and small, to resist, push back, sabotage and destabilize. Rock the boat. Become militant. Skirt around the edges of the law when possible. No law or norm or even the U.S. Constitution was intended as a compact for national suicide. Resist in every conceivable manner that comes your way — without any direct face-to-face confrontation with the powers that be (because they’ll come lop your head off).
But, resist.
A very beautiful and inspiring comment Dorothy.
Ok, so where’s the conversation with Benatar? 🤔
Interesting article. In the SunShine State (FL.) little kids are driven to their regional Holycause museum. Florida is not unique: Australian Premier Mark McGowan buys into antiW indoctrination
WA Premier Mark McGowan says US white supremacists are targeting remote communities — Puppet Masters — Sott.net
Stop funding them. Why are European males paying for the birthing, feeding and clothing of African, Asian and Semite children?
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
The Protocols of the Ruffle-Crested Kikes of Zion (Where-in the Author of the Protocols is Identified)
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/Protocols_of_the_Ruffle_Crested_Kikes_of_Zion.pdf
On this site alone it has been pointed out at least a dozen times prior to today that the alleged quotation from Cicero is nothing of the sort. The quote, a fictional statement placed in the character Cicero’s mouth, derives from “A Pillar of Iron” (1965), a moderately successful popular novel about the last years of Republican Rome. The novel was written by the Englishwoman Taylor Caldwell (1900–1985).
In light of the Establishment’s unsleeping and inflexible hostility towards white advocacy and all those deemed “guilty” of it, it cannot be noted often enough that taking care to ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of a citation is essential.
Thanks for the clarification. Nonetheless, the quote, from wherever it originates, is relevant to the times we are living in.
The Protocols link is a great read. Don’t miss the opportunity to read it. The link to the website at the end is great also. I’m still exploring all the information there.
Thank you so much Andrew, as always. This one is, ‘a classic.’ And yes, as another commentator said, we are very lucky to have you on our side.
One thing I’m going to do when I get over there, if possible, is have a beer with Schopenhauer, that would be great.
There is a long history of Jewish abuse of children, even there own; Abraham and Isaac. “You shall eat the flesh of your sons, and you will eat the flesh of you daughters.” Leviticus 26:29. “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.” Proverbs 22:15.
And then of course there is the blood libels. Jeffery Epstein. The torture of Christian children at the infamous Pitesti prison which was under the direction of the Jew Boris Grumberg and I believe also the Jewess Communist Ana Parkur. Children were tortured in the Soviet Gulags, under the direction of Jews such as Naftaly Frankel and Matvey Berman.
Virginia was a step in the right direction and because of it, some woke up. When parents there spoke out loudly against CRT, attorney general Merrick Garland (Garfinkle) petitioned the White House and FBI to label them ‘domestic terrorists.’ A father’s 15 year old daughter was raped and sodomized by a “transgender student,” in the girls room. And when her father lashed out at the school board, he was arrested and a Soros paid D.A. sought jail time for the anguished father. The Jews were sending a message; ‘keep your mouth shut, or they’ll be consequences.
David Coleman, the head developer of the Common Core educational program, financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Soros, literally teaches our children that 2+2=5, or 6, or whatever you they want it to be whenever you want it to be. Coleman works out of an office in Manhattan and has never taught a day of school in his whole life. The Jewish Magazine; Forward, wrote a piece on him titled: “The Most Influential Education Figure You’ve Never Heard Of.”
I made the horrible mistake when I was a kid of going to a predominantly Jewish college being so naïve at the time. From empirical evidence, the Jews are vicious monsters too much, even children. Nothing escapes there their fangs, their venom.
Philosophers have always reasoned themselves into absurdities. Berkeley made a perfectly good case for the non existence of a world external to our minds. Hume argued that it is not even likely that the Sun will rise tomorrow. Anti-natalism is in that tradition.
Only white people have the mind set to take the anti-natalist argument seriously. So the only people that would become extinct would be white people. Would the world then become less cruel? I suspect the opposite, since white people are the movers and shakers when it comes to caring for animals, the environment, human rights, and so on. It is immoral for white people to have fewer children, not more..
True enough, but at least these philosophers only philosophiesed. Sure, they could argue themselves into absurdity, but it would take a Jew to declare that the point was to change the world, (as if these philosophers weren’t doing that)and draw up an insane thuggish political program that had a 100% record of causing carnage and human misery wherever it was rolled out.
Some Christains teach that your intellect is not your friend, all thoughts are lies, etc, I get where they coming from, though I came to Christianity through reason, basically through the absurdity of fashionable atheist arguments. The more exposed to atheists, the more Christain I became.
Good for you . Given the demographic decline in White Christian adherents and the increase in African conversions , you may expect Heaven to resemble Detroit. Long time , Eternity.
The “no conspiracy is required” theme of this article cuts to the chase of the Jewish Question, why it matters, and what authentic Europeans need to understand about it. Too often the discussion never gets out of the conspiracy theory level – the reality of the JQ is simultaneously more simple, and more horrible. And yes, they are indeed coming for the children. Which way, Western Man?
The anti-white Woke next to the establishment are going to great lengths to humiliate and dispossess the white race.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1bfNubm3F1Tz/
In the light of current health policies, how timely that the topic of anti-natalism be raised.
On the bright side, the ADL’s behavior, at least in the Mountain Brook example, may provide very counter-productive. White conservatives can be very Judeo-philic. Those in Mountain Brook may be rethinking their drink after their encounter with the ADL.
Thank you so much Andrew for another brilliant and enlightening article. You are a bright light in a dark “relaxation” space.
Like some of your other great pieces have proven to be (“Windrush”, “Secure Tolerance” and the “Jewish Involvement in Migrant Organisations” articles all spring to mind), this will be a useful tool in helping to break the spell that has been cast over our people in my country.
When will Andrew publish his book on the JQ? He has so done much valuable and detailed work in this area, it would be such a boon to have it all in one place for digestion and dissemination.
This is one of the few articles posted in TOO that has actually made me furious. I usually do not have high level emotional responses to the content here (although I agree with about 95% of content). My anger stems from the attitudes and sense of urgency of these Jewish psychologists and sociologists to get at the White children. It’s like the child molester saying that he/she/it needs to molest all the children in order to make the world safe for molesters.
I hate reading these articles due to how enraged they make me at these subversive rats but they do contain such vital information that I persist. Thanks for your work in putting them together.
We all feel like that, which just means we are in greater awe for those like Andrew who dedicate his life to the cause.
He’s also a brilliant speaker, though how much I’m biased by the beautiful Irish sounds, I can’t say.
A more fitting acronym for the ‘ADL’, should embody the hateful nature of this org: A.G.L – Anti-Gentile League and other variations that land a blow. Speak the reality and plant seedlings of criticism when and whenever the opportunity arises; sparking a debate.
How snidey or insidious are the A.G.L by targeting one of the last bastions of a indigenous working class sports fan base in Great Britain. I think I’ll buy a season ticket and wave a Free Palestine flag in the audience
I caught a little of our Prince William of Windsor said in a speech regarding the projected population increase in African when a white commentator on GB News said he should get his own house in order first. The commentator was stating this for the benefit of his African colleague.
Long-awaited article Dr.Joyce! Thanks for mapping the nexus and circuitry of malicious and race-hating propagandists.
Have a care for the Trivium to be completed once in a while – the constant stuffing pate’ de foie gras style is now beyond redundant and speeding past damaging.
In other words, I don’t think I’m alone in recognising that someone whose religious texts, among the begats and bloodlettings, exhort his tribe to be fruitful and multiply and take the world for its own is going to be promoting anything beneficial to those not forming part of said Tribe.
“We’ve over-analysed this.”
“…Mountain Brook’s involvement with the ADL began with a teenage prank involving swastikas. A Jewish parent, Elizabeth Goldstein, then claimed that Mountain Brook needed ADL training…”
I wouldn’t be surprized if it appeared that that “teenage prank” was organized by the ADL itself. Painting swastikas on synagogues and Jewish tombstones is a typical Jewish “hate hoax” to achieve their goals.
It’s a good essay, Andrew, but I’m disappointed that it has almost nothing to do with the email exchange we had about Benatar’s philosophy. It almost seems to be an attempt to poison Benatar’s name by mentioning him at the outset of an essay which is primarily about the subversive activities of Jewish activists. Indeed, this essay could have be written without mentioning me or Benatar at all.
Please reply to my last email, sent to you on 12th December. Thanks.