Introduction to Two Treatises on Jews and Freemasonry: Édouard Drumont and Nicolae Paulescu

Jewish Freemasonry: Two Treatises by Éduard Frumont & Nicholae Paulescu
with an Introduction by Alexander Jacob


Introduction  — Alexander Jacob

I. “The Freemasons” (Jewish France, Book VI, Chapter 1) — Édouard Drumont

II. “Freemasonry,” from The Hospital, the Qur’an, the Talmud, the Kahal, and Freemasonry, Ch. V – Nicolae Paulescu


Freemasonry and its goals have been the subject of innumerable studies seeking to investigate, or expose, this secretive and powerful organisation.  The Jesuit priest Abbé Augustin Barruel’s magisterial work Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire du Jacobinisme (1798), for instance, attempted to uncover the anti-Christian character of  Freemasonry by detailing the conspiratorial role played by the Enlightenment philosophes and the Freemasons and the Illuminati in the genesis and conduct  of the French Revolution.  The aims of the Revolution, according to Barruel, were primarily anti-Christian, anti-monarchical and Anarchical.  Barruel did not focus on the Jews in this work though his curiosity was aroused when he received a letter in 1806 from a certain  Giovanni-Battista Simonini who claimed to have infiltrated the Piedmont Jewish community and learnt from them about the Jewish origins of both  the Freemasons and the Illuminati.[1]

The two extracts presented in this edition shed more light on the Jewish origins and ambitions of the Freemasonic organization. More importantly, both authors place an emphasis on the remarkable contrast between the Jewish character of the Masonic ethos and the social doctrines of  the Catholic Church which it seeks to replace as the prime mover of politics in the West.  Whereas the Catholic Church has an avowed commitment to Christian charity and social harmony, Freemasonry is marked by a contempt of poverty and a singular desire to establish the supremacy of Israel in the world.

Édouard Drumont: “The Freemasons”

Of the two authors presented here, Édouard Drumont (1844–1917) was indeed one of the first to insist that the entire Masonic enterprise was Jewish  in origin even though he based his conviction on Masonic texts that had been available in France from the late eighteenth century. [2] Drumont was a French journalist who wrote many works on the Jews including La France juive: Essai d’histoire contemporain, 2 volumes (1886), Testament d’un antisémite (1891), Les Juifs et l’affaire Dreyfus (1899), La Tyrannie maçonnique (1899), Les Juifs contre la France (1899) and Le Peuple juif (1900).  Drumont also ran a newspaper La libre parole, which was markedly anti-Semitic. In 1899 he founded the ‘Ligue antisémitique de France’ and argued for the exclusion of Jews from society.

The last book of Drumont’s Jewish France contains three chapters devoted to the three Judeocentric groups portrayed to be persecuting Catholic France, the first chapter on the Freemasons, the second on the Protestants and the third on the Jews.  Drumont begins his chapter on Freemasonry by pointing out the peculiarly Jewish nature of Freemasonry.  Freemasonry is not a variety of Freethought since freethinkers like Lord Byron and Delacroix at least “do not attack our citizenship rights, our human rights, and our rights as Frenchmen. “ Rather, it is an essentially Jewish institution and imbued with a specially Jewish character.

The Jewish origin and constitution of the Masonic organization are evident from the various rituals it employs in its meetings and particularly in the dramatic  reenactments of Old Testament scenes depicting the revenge taken by Jews on their oppressors, such as that of Judith on Holofernes.  These rituals are all intended to impress on the candidates and members the principal goal of Masonry, which is to reunite the tribes of  Israel as a nation after their dispersal at the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, a destruction that must also be avenged.  The particular focus of the Masonic revenge is Christianity since the great crime of the Christ in the view of the Jews is his usurpation of the supremacy of Jehovah.  The essence of Masonry therefore is, as Drumont puts it, “Sympathy and tenderness for Jerusalem and its representatives; hatred for Christ and Christians: all of Masonry is contained in this.”

The means whereby Masonry seeks to overthrow the Europeans is always a

politics of dissolution: whether it is a matter of financial companies or of secret societies, they are able to give an appearance of order and seriousness to appetites, to collective bad instincts.

The growing influence of Masonry on European politics has resulted in a steady dissolution of traditional European society.  Thus Republicanism is, in the nineteenth century, the culmination of the French Revolution with Napoleon and Bismarck contributing to the process of Jewish bourgeois supremacy.

In their enormous and far-sighted political task, the Jewish Masons have been aided through the centuries by ambitious mediocrities from among the European peoples who were the hosts of the Jews during the diaspora.  The second part of Drumont’s essay on Freemasonry includes several detailed examples of public figures in French Republican life who have duped the public through various nefarious dealings that have been disguised by the false honors that have been bestowed upon them by the Third Republic. [3] The entire Republican ethos is indeed marked not by a desire to liberate the oppressed French populace but rather by a hatred of society.  In fact, one particularly odious characteristic of Freemasonry is its contempt and hatred for the poor, which is in marked contrast to  the importance of charity in the Catholic Church.  And if the Masons seem occasionally to tolerate the social status quo, it is only because they wish to focus their mind more sharply on their inveterate religious enemy, the Christian Church:

Thus, many in Masonry are pseudo-scholars, pseudo-orators, they hate society with a hatred that is not at all the courageous revolt of Spartacus, the bitter anger of Vindex, but like  a venomous envy that smells of the[4] ante-chamber and the office; they do not intend to destroy the social edifice completely because they hope to make a place there through more or less correct procedures, but they attack the Church because it can give them only noble instructions, counsels of respect and devotion that they do not want.

Nicolae Paulescu: Freemasonry

The Jewish nature of Freemasonry and its hatred of Christianity are reinforced in the work of Nicolae Paulescu (1869–1931). His chapter on Masonry in his work Philosophic Physiology: The Hospital, the Koran, the Talmud, the Kahal and Freemasonry pivots on the same contrast between the Christian concept of charity — exemplified in Paulescu’s own medical profession by ‘the hospital’ included in the title — and the sheer avarice for material possession and political domination of the Jews who conduct the Masonic organizations.

Paulescu was a Romanian physiologist and professor of medicine, as  well as a political activist.   In 1897 Paulescu graduated with a Doctor of Medicine degree from a medical school in Paris. He was appointed assistant surgeon at the Notre-Dame du Perpetuel-Secours Hospital but in 1900 he returned to Romania, where he remained until his death as Head of the Physiology Department of the University of Bucharest Medical School, as well as Professor of Clinical Medicine at the St Vincent de Paul Hospital in Bucharest. He is well-known for his work in extracting insulin for the treatment of diabetes and petitioned the Nobel Prize committee to object to the award given to two Canadian scientists. From Wikipedia:

Professor Ian Murray was particularly active in working to correct “the historical wrong” against Paulescu. Murray was a professor of physiology at the Anderson College of Medicine in Glasgow, Scotland, the head of the department of Metabolic Diseases at a leading Glasgow hospital, vice-president of the British Association of Diabetes, and a founding member of the International Diabetes Federation. In an article for a 1971 issue of the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Murray wrote:

Insufficient recognition has been given to Paulesco, the distinguished Roumanian scientist, who at the time when the Toronto team were commencing their research had already succeeded in extracting the antidiabetic hormone of the pancreas and proving its efficacy in reducing the hyperglycaemia in diabetic dogs.

In a recent private communication Professor Tiselius, head of the Nobel Institute [and a recipient of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1948], has expressed his personal opinion that Paulesco was equally worthy of the award in 1923.

Paulescu was also involved in Romanian political movements and influenced Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the leader of the Iron Guard. In 1922, he partnered with Codreanu’s anti-Semitic friend, Prof. A.C. Cuza, to create a political group called the National Christian Union. In 1925, Paulescu joined Cuza’s later organization, the National Christian Defense League as well.

Nicolae Paulescu’s sociological writings include Philosophical Physiology: Instincts Social — Passions and Conflicts — Moral Remedies (1910), which advocated the regeneration of the population through Christian education.  Paulescu’s most famous book was the second volume of “philosophical physiology” which was entitled Philosophical Physiology: Hospital, Quran, Talmud, Cahal, Franc-Masonry (1913).  He later wrote more works on the Jewish Problem, including Philosophical Physiology: The Synagogue and the Church to the Pacification of Mankind, 2 vols, 1923; The Judeo-Masonic Plot against the Romanian People, 1924; The Degeneration of the Jewish Race, 1928, Jewish Debauchery, 1928; and Interpretation of Revelation, the future fate of the Jews, 1941.

In The Hospital, the Koran, the Talmud, the Kahal and Freemasonry, Paulescu first explains the duties of doctors and relates hospitals to the notion of Christian charity: “Hospitals are an inspiration of Christian charity.”  He then considers the two other religions that claim to cure the illnesses of mankind, Islam and Judaism, both of which he considers as opposed to Christian morality. Islam and Judaism are both characterised by a cruel desire for possessions and dominion but the Muslim Arabs are superior to the Jews in that they possess a real valor whereas the Jews “manifest themselves only through cowardice.”

Paulescu begins his study of Judaism with the principal legal text of the Jews, the Talmud, which uses usury, fraud and perjury to rob and enslave the Gentiles.  The development of the Jewish political ambition is accomplished through the “Kahal,” the Jewish governing body typical of Jewish communities well into the twentieth century. The Kahal conceives of the Jewish nation as one based on “the Talmudic dogma of the chosen people, a doctrine according to which the Jews must not merge with other nations, because God has promised them to possess the whole earth and to rule the world.” He demonstrates the financial and social depredations wrought by Jewish immigration into European lands and discusses Freemasonry too within the context of the resolute war that the Jews have been conducting against Christianity through the ages by means of the various religious heresies and political revolutions that they have fostered in Europe.

Paulescu’s section on Freemasonry, which constitutes the final chapter of his book, relies considerably on Drumont’s work but it is rather more comprehensive than it.  Paulescu here reveals the hatred that informs all of the Jewish involvement in European intellectual and political history.  The source of this hatred is evident most clearly in the Talmud but its enduring effects are manifest in the various Jewish-sponsored heretical movements that have sought to distort Christianity and Catholicism through the ages, beginning with the Ebionites in the first century A.D. and passing through Protestantism to Freemasonry.  The purported goal of the Freemasons to rebuild the Temple of Solomon is, according to Paulescu,  only a watchword that indicates the ambition of Israel to dominate the world.  Regarding the organization of Freemasonry, Paulescu points out that, in spite of its proclaimed philanthropy, the secretive nature of the  whole is a clear indication of its suspect character: “And to think that no one wonders why this society is hidden, when it has purposes  as sublime as the search for the truth.

More carefully than Drumont, Paulescu — relying on the work of Paul Copin-Albancell’s Le drame maçonnique: le pouvoir occulte contre la France  (“The Masonic Drama: The Occult Power against France” ( 1908) — details the hierarchy within the Masonic organization where the lower degrees of Masons are mostly blindfolded followers of an uppermost elite that  is constituted of Jews alone. And the bizarre rituals that mark a Mason’s progress through the organization are all marked by sentiments of hatred and revenge for those responsible for the destruction of the Temple.  Among the various targets of the Masons’ hatred, the chief are undoubtedly the Christians.  Quoting Copin-Albancelli, Paulescu points out that Masons are instructed to the effect that “Freemasonry has one enemy – Christianity, and Catholicism in particular — that you need to hate and fight.”[5]

Further, Masonry constantly spawns various sub-groups that carry out its agenda,  as Copin-Albancelli had noted:

Examples of such tentacles are the Freethinking (Libre-Pensée) Leagues, those of human and civil rights, those of education, houses of schools, studying clubs, library societies, of conferences, of Popular Universities … even of unions.[6]

During the times of the French Revolution, the Masons were aided particularly by the Masonic sub-group that called itself the “Jacobins.”  Of the political effects that resulted from these several organizations, the French Revolution aimed simultaneously at emancipating the Jews and at persecuting the Christians.  Among the Catholics, the chief targets of the Masons are the Jesuits, whom they fear above all Christian orders.  The monasteries of the Jesuits were attacked in Portugal, Spain, France and Austria and the campaign against Jesuitry continued with constant vilifications of Jesuits among  the public so that the common people gradually came to believe that the term Jesuit could be used as a synonym for scoundrel.

According to Paulescu, The Jewish support of the revolutionaries was intended to bolster the third estate of the bourgeoisie, which at first supported Napoleon in spite of his imperialistic ambitions.  When the Masons found that Napoleon’s tyranny was becoming dangerous to their plans, they worked to bring him down.  All through this period they benefited from their gradual emancipation in several European states.  But their ultimate aim of total revolution was not manifest until the Revolution of 1848, which sought to impose bourgeois capitalist Liberalism as a major political movement that would lead to the institution of a socialist republic.  The latter goal was achieved after the Paris Commune of 1871 when the Third Republic was established, and French society was henceforth marked by the separation of Church and State.

The real aims of all Masonic republics were to destroy monarchies, abolish Christianity from the education of the public, and to convert the people into a proletariat that could easily be made to serve the ambitions of Judah.  Based on Bernard Lazare’s work L’Antisémitisme, son histoire et ses causes (Anti-Semitism: Its History and Its Causes) (1894), the religious subversion of the Masons is related by Paulescu also to the  Kulturkampf that Bismarck conducted against the Roman Catholic Church between 1872 and 1878 and to the Jules Ferry laws of 1882 that mandated secular education in France.

At the same time, Paulescu claims that “Jewish Socialism” works towards the dispossession of private property by a state that is essentially Jewish in its composition  and interests.  These false socialist movements were crystallized in the doctrines of the Jew Karl Marx. And they were bolstered in their subversive agenda by the Anarchists, who constituted the more murderous and iconoclastic elements of the several revolutions that sprang up in Europe from 1848 onwards.

Paulescu then goes on to examine the subversive socialist role of Masonry in various European countries such as their support of the Templars in Romania and the Young Turks in Turkey.  In France, they focused on the destruction of Christianity in the nation by eliminating it from public education and the military establishment.  This anti-clericalism was especially strong in the regime of the Jew Léon Gambetta, President of the Council of Ministers[7] between 1881 and 1882, who declared “Le cléricalisme, voilà l’ennem” (Clericalism is the  enemy).  Thus the attacks on the clergy were regularized and Christian education was replaced by a secular education which was made free and compulsory in the nation.  This in turn fostered atheistic doctrines, such as those of Darwin, and a general contempt for the Christian Church.  Even  the Latin language was deposed as a language of learning since it had been the language of the Church.

By positing a world constituted of matter and energy alone the Masonic-Marxist revolutions succeeded in repudiating the notions of the soul and of God on which Christian civilization had been based. As Drumont had already pointed out, whereas Christianity stresses love and charity, Masonry has a distinctive contempt for, and hatred of, poverty.  Thus, Paulescu is arguing that by steadily obliterating the Christian doctrines of compassion and charity and enlarging the worldly possessions and power of the Jews, Masonry has finally accomplished in post-Revolutionary Europe what the Talmud has striven to achieve from the very first centuries of the Christian era.

[1] See, for example, C. Oberhauser, ‘Simonini’s Letter or the Roots of the Alleged Jewish-Masonic World Conspiracy’, Jews in Central Europe, 2012, pp. 10-17.

[2] For instance, in pointing to the Judaic character of the Masonic rituals, he quotes from  The Most mysterious mysteries of the high ranks of Masonry revealed or the true Rosicrucian, which was published in 1766.

[3] He cites particularly the example of the shallow Charles Cousin (1822–1894), who was the administrator of the Northern Railway and president of the Council of the Grand Orient of France until 1885.

[4] The Gaulish leader who led a revolt against the Roman Emperor Nero in 68 A.D. He was defeated by the military legate Lucius Rufus and committed suicide.

[5] CherryAlbancelli, The drama maçonnique, I. p. 3132.

[6] Ibid., II, 195.

[7] Léon Gambetta was thus the Prime Minister.

49 replies
  1. SS
    SS says:

    Amazing. I had an old, used copy of Dogma and Morals. Thought it was quite the treasure trove of interesting information. Threw it out when I realized it was all about Jews and building their temple for them. Sometimes wish I had hung on to it.

  2. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    I think it is important to make the connection between Paulescu’s political views and his being barred from receiving the well-deserved Nobel Prize for the discovery of what is now known as “insulin.” Do not count on wikipedia to admit this.
    Paulescu discovered the pancreas-secreted substance and published his results in a prestigious and widely read French scientific journal in 1922. He called it “pancreatine.” His nomination for the Nobel Prize encountered strong opposition from lobbies that complained that the expected notoriety the Nobel would give Paulescu — a known “anti-semite”– a dangerous platform to publicize his views. It was decided to bestow the Nobel on two Canadian researchers that had in effect duplicated his experiment in 1923. Pancreatine was to be called “insulin” (in reference to the Langerhans isles). Thus, any search for “insulin” would not yield any reference to Paulescu. The lobby won despite protests from some fellow scientists.
    I wonder if there are any busts of Paulescu in front of/near the Faculty of Medicine in Bucharest. No, I do not wonder. Elie Wiesel had a grand “tolerance” institute built there.

      • ariadna
        ariadna says:


        The article linked above is in Romanian and too long to translate in toto. The paragraph below, which I have translated for you, seems to be ample proof that he was not given the Nobel Prize because of his anti-semitism, insofar as shows that the Wiesenthal Center admits it:

        “The decision of 2003 of the Parisian authorities to inaugurate a bust of the professor in front of the Hospital Hôtel Dieu has been met with protests from Jewish organizations.
        From the letter sent by the Simon Wiesenthal Center to the French Minister of Health and to the Romanian ambassador in Paris:
        “If in 1923 the Nobel Committee evaluated the entire person of the laureate (ed. note: “person” is also a term used in Jung’s psychology), then Hôtel Dieu must act in the same way in 2003 and to conclude that the brutal inhumanithy of Paulescu cancels any of his scientifiic merits.”

        “Decizia din 2003 a autorităţilor pariziene de-a inaugura bustul profesorului în faţa spitalului Hôtel Dieu a fost întâmpinată cu proteste din partea organizaţiilor evreieşti. Din scrisoarea trimisă de Centrul „Simon Wiesenthal“ ministrului francez al sănătăţii şi ambasadorului României la Paris: „Dacă în 1923, Comitetul Nobel a judecat întreaga persoană a laureatului (n.r.: în original „persona“, care este şi un termen din psihologia lui Jung), atunci la fel trebuie să procedeze şi Hôtel Dieu în 2003 şi să concluzioneze că brutala inumanitate a lui Paulescu îi anulează orice merit ştiinţific.“


        Keep in mind that the article linked above was published in 2021 in Romania, a country often described as the “most anti-semitic” in Europe that is under an arduous process of ‘re-education’ with the help of Elie Wiesel Center and several NGOs, so the authors walked on eggshells in describing the odd affair of the Nobel Prize.
        I apologize for the error of calling it “pancreatina” as I
        wrongly remembered. Apparently he called it “pancreina.”

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          I apologize for the error of calling it “pancreatina” as I
          wrongly remembered. Apparently he called it “pancreina.”

          As pancreatin is such a widely used digestive supplement, your error is both negligible and very understandable. The information you provided, on the other hand, is of real significance, not least for its highly limited accessibility. Thank you.

          • Hans Frank
            Hans Frank says:

            Gandhi never received the Peace Prize for breaking up the bankers stranglehold on India. I think I see a pattern.

    • Birhan Dargey
      Birhan Dargey says:

      Nobel of Literature to Bob Dylan…so insulting to other more deserving world writers.

  3. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    Finally, thank you very much for this.

    In America Charles Finney who was a freemason quit the lodge and then became one of its greatest foes establishing the anti-freemason movement in America. He came to see and learn of its dangers and did what he could to put an end to it in America. Unfortunately, they have returned with a vengeance. The vigilant citizen . com has huge information along with Henry y Makow who wrote the book on it. As for my own education it all started in my youth in a small town on Vancouver Island. I noticed a door on main street with their compass and square above it on the mantel and thought how strange? When I moved away to the mainland again to a small town I again saw the same door well almost the same door on the main street? So their copying each other are they as I walked on only to see yet again in another town an actual building guess where in the city center? So looky here they set up shop on main street everywhere? Then came the pyramid on the American dollar bill and then guess who? Mr. Hour of Power Schuller and his confession upon arriving in California looking up the freemasons to help him financially get started? and his connection to all things positive thinking with Norma Vincent Peale a 33rd degree? And well as they say the rest is history.

    about 70 AD. I really wish that people understand that what came later is far, far more important and significant. the earthquake that finally leveled the city of Jerusalem on May 30, 363 AD is the event to be paid attention to. Why? the very next morning they were about to rebuild their temple. All the costly wood and materials were accumulated and ready and the people were rejoicing. Alas at the 3rd hour of the night an earthquake destroyed it all! That was the judgment of God, and a judgment that is set to occur again I’m afraid except this time it will be global leveling this time every city of mankind on the earth. It is written in the Book of Revelation!

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      The Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God) is a symbol showing an eye often surrounded by rays of light or a glory and usually enclosed by a triangle. It is sometimes interpreted as representing the eye of God watching over humankind (or divine providence). – Wikipedia…The Eye of Providence a Jewish creation?…Ein Gedi is an oasis on the western shore of the Dead Sea, the lowest point on earth, some 400 m. below sea level. The synagogue at Ein Gedi dates from the Roman-Byzantine period, but it underwent several changes in the course of its use. In the mid 5th century, the synagogue underwent a further change, but its trapezoidal shape was preserved. The floor of the western aisle, through which one entered the prayer hall, included five inscriptions. These include an Aramaic inscription mentioning the local community as well as private donors who contributed toward the construction and maintenance of the synagogue. One inscription also includes a warning and a curse: Warnings to those who commit sins causing dissension in the community, passing malicious information to the gentiles, or revealing the secrets of the town. The one whose eyes roam over the entire earth and sees what is concealed will uproot this person and his seed from under the sun and all the people will say, Amen. Selah. Archaeology in Israel: Ein Gedi – Jewish Virtual Library A Project of AICE

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        @ Gary

        Can’t find it anymore but through some links of another website came across this picture of the ‘Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God)’ in the floor of one of the sub basements of one of the destroyed Towers in Manhattan!?!?!?!?! Now if that didn’t set off alarms bells for me and should for everyone reading these important vital comments here!!!!!

        You know many years ago there was a saying I came across from who i don’t remember but the words that there is something so diabolical going on that it repels the mind that it could even be possible grabs my attention quite often now!

        thank you very much for your comments.


      • SS
        SS says:

        I have always noticed in old movies when some (usually elite) character mentions “Providence”, it seems to have some “nudge, wink” hidden meaning. I thought it might mean, “Jews”. Same with the term “the Fates”, as in “if the Fates allow”. Nudge, nudge. Wink.

  4. Terrance
    Terrance says:

    The excerpt below from this article is strange because as far as I know the origin of the Jesuit order was essentially Jewish, and Jesuits remain a liberal Catholic order today.
    Why would Jewish Masonry want to destroy an essentially Jewish Catholic order?

    “Among the Catholics, the chief targets of the Masons are the Jesuits, whom they fear above all Christian orders. The monasteries of the Jesuits were attacked in Portugal, Spain, France and Austria and the campaign against Jesuitry continued with constant vilifications of Jesuits among the public so that the common people gradually came to believe that the term Jesuit could be used as a synonym for scoundrel”

  5. Frederick Ford
    Frederick Ford says:

    Jewish control over the West is astounding, especially in Northern Europe which is the heartland of the colorful race or true “White Race”. The Jew’s rule over these lands has mainly been possible through their strong group cohesion which many Northern Europeans lack because of the individuality movements during the 1950-60s.

    The lack of group cohesion among White People is due to two ideas. The first is that White people should be held morally responsible, on all grounds, to atone for their discriminatory & colonial “sins” which means that said White People should not form into a cohesive group because that is what caused the widespread discrimination & hate that was oh so terrible for those who fell victim to it.

    The second idea is that White People as a race do not exist, or at least aren’t truly different from Non-White people meaning that separating themselves from Non-Whites is stupid & irrational and so anyone who thinks otherwise is an arrogant and borderline criminal person who must be jailed if they publicly express such irrational sentiments.

    Both of these ideas are purely false and stem from the subjective viewpoints of White People by Non-WHites & Jews alike. These false ideas of morality and racial constitution are disproven by these two articles linked below.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” The Jew’s rule over these lands has mainly been possible through their strong group cohesion which many Northern Europeans lack because of the individuality movements during the 1950-60s.”

      Individualism per se is not the problem .

      Individualism is primarily an intellectual subject that was first identified about two hundred years ago in 1827 ( re: Merriam-Webster definition ) and it remains egregiously inadequately taught and unsurprisingly poorly understood among the Christianized West to this day . Furthermore , intellectualism is closely associated with a vitally important Westernworld analytic philosophy tradition .

      Prof KMac does as good a job as anyone has , in the past 200 years , in providing some perspective on western “Individualism”.

      Individualism is typically misconstrued by Christianized Nordics/Whites
      as an [anti-organizational] ideology
      because they typically conflate it with their
      [ anti-jewish collectivism ].
      To be sure , the anti-organizationism of
      Nordic/White individualism
      is a result of it being conflated with
      Nordic/White [ anti-jewish collectivism ];
      where a [ jewish collective ] is
      a form of organization
      which holds that individuals
      Do NOT Have any
      a priori supreme “unalienable rights”
      to life , liberty , property ,
      nor to the pursuit of happiness .

      Clearly ,
      with regard to the official nonexistence of
      those “unalienable rights” of individuals in organizations implicitly based on
      jewish collectivist ideology ,
      the ultimate survival strategy is
      for an individual to secure a leadership position in a high office of an organization ;
      and jews apparently understand the ramifications of that strategy better than Nordics/Whites since
      jews ultimately dominate
      ALL Westernworld public organizations .

      Obviously , Christianity per se is the problem since it is anti-philosophy , from the beginning , where analytic philosophy is
      a major indispensable underpinning of
      our high standard of living
      modern technologized Western Civilization ;
      which is in turn indispensable for
      the potential survival of humanity
      beyond the

      {{ Solar TOTAL Extinction Event }}.

      To wit :

      Beware lest any man spoil you
      through philosophy and vain deceit ,
      after the tradition of men ,
      after the rudiments of the world ,
      and not after Christ .

      ( verbatim quote from :
      The Christian NT / KJV / Book of Colossians /
      chapter 2 verse 8 )

  6. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    That’s Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. In good condition, the sell for ~$2 hundred on e-bay. I picked-up a copy at a used bookstore in a town where apparently nobody reads much, and they’d recently opened a GOODWILL INDUSTRIES bookstore that was failing until becoming a more-typical thrift store, gift shop. I gave the book to a neighbor who sounds like he was asking the question Masons ask when noticing Masonic symbolism on juelerye: “I see you have your tools close at hand” or something to that effect. My father and my wife’s father were both sold humiliating ritual induction with such a pitch appealing to their desire to provide an estate for their offspring, and both promoted soon and shortly before retirement meaning bigger numbers on pension checks for life. It helps to own the money system and control what my dad called the inflation tax toward taking title to others’ real property. Hopefully my neighbor’s not starry-eyed over this business. In Washington, D.C., everybody (who’s anybody) meaning ostensibly an insider and it helped become a super-grade civil servant or general. Cartels (Fr.) meaning combines of independent enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices. Another neighbor, a lonely guy half-Roma WW2 camp-follower, half-God-knows-what, having worked as a UN Observer in among other places, the Six-day war, is proud of his photos and bagpipe music and it is the closest thing to an identity he holds onto of being an inductee into the Black Watch.
    Our family tradition included mealtime thanksgiving and reverence for creation including cognitive, evolutionary, verifiable appreciation of that process without superstition, essentially John Derbyshire’s brilliant show & tell including its antithesis at

  7. Oera Linda
    Oera Linda says:

    Wonderful easy reading as usual.

    But there is no conspiracy people, just walk on. Interesting that Simonini, Barruel and others are figures in The Prague Cemetry of Umberto Eco. And to paraphrase Andrew Joyce, then out of nothing came an Austrian painter, who began to dislike them…

    A week or so ago a read an article about the Polish town of Soldau where in this July month 8000 burnt victims of the German Nazi’s where excavated. This spits in the face of the evidence that Jewish (“Russian”) bosheviks commited similar crimes in Katyn in 1940, even admitted by the Russians themselves.

    These are parasites and maniacs, not interested in Truth but only in the powers that be.

  8. Jez Turner
    Jez Turner says:

    While so many mainstream translations today are incredibly ‘clunky’ to read, (eg Manfredi’s bestselling historical novels on Alexander the Great, Ancient Rome etc), Alexander Jacob’s translations flow like sparkling champagne. As for Freemasonry, the novelist and authority on the occult, Dennis Wheatley, ( The Devil Rides Out), regarded all leftism / liberalism as a manifestation of Satanism. His ‘Warning to Posterity’ – buried in a time capsule under the patio of his former New Forest home – makes interesting reading. His Duke de Richleau novels provide an easy, but erudite introduction to the milieu in France where civilized Frenchmen heroically struggled against the overwhelming forces arrayed against them by the Jews. The first book in the Richleau series ‘The Prisoner in the Mask’ (published in 1957) has valuable insights into Grand Orient Freemasonry, the Dreyfus affair, Jewish power and the valiant efforts of Charles Maurras and his followers.

  9. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    This is a great piece. Thank you so much Alexander. Keep up the good work.

    It’s fascinating that much of what you have quoted from the book is in so many ways, currently going on in our country, and also in every other white country in the world.

  10. Gary
    Gary says:

    “I know your suffering and your poverty (but you are rich ) and the blasphemy of those who call themselves Jews of the Judeans, when they are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” Revelation 2:9 Aramaic Bible in Plain English…Out of all the verses it might be that only the Aramaic verse here provides for Judeans?…Dec. 2009 Randy, Apparently both the King James Bible and Shakespeare used the term “Iewe” for Judean This is the pertinent part of Freedman’s letter: Shakespeare never saw the word “Jew” as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word “Jew” in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his “Merchant of Venice”, V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: “what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?”. In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” in the Gospel of John reference to the inscription on the Cross, – “Iudaeorum”. It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written. This translation by St. Jerome is referred to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. Jesus is referred as a so-called “Jew” for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first referred to as a so-called “Jew” in the revised 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word “Jew” in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century “Jew” is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin “Iudaeus” found in St. Jerome’s Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt. – Jesus was NOT a Jew –Benjamin Freedman (Excerpts by Henry Makow)…09/01/2013 ‘Lost Tribe’s’ Return to Israel Fulfilling Prophecy? TEL AVIV – A “lost tribe” has come home to Israel and the return could be part of biblical prophecy. CBN News was at Ben Gurion Airport when more than 50 members of the Bnei Menashe tribe made history. The group was just the first of a long-awaited migration. Nearly 2,000 tribe members live in Israel, but five years ago the government stopped their return. “I feel like I’m home,” one tribe member said. Another told CBN New they were, “excited, overwhelmed. And unexplainably, you know, feeling in my heart. I feel like crying. I’m emotional, total loss for words.” A recent decision now permits all the Bnei Menashe, about 7,000, to return. “The ten tribes may have been lost to us for many centuries, but they were never lost in terms of their identity,” Michael Freund, with Shavai Israel, told CBN News. Freund worked for years to help bring about this moment. He said he believes the Bnei Menashe return fulfills of biblical prophecy. “The prophet Isaiah says ‘al tera qui ka ani,’ which means ‘fear not for I am with you, God says,” Freund explained. “‘Me israch avi zerecha,’” which translates ‘from the east I will bring your descendants.’” “These are the descendants of Israel and they are coming back from the east,” he said. “It is as if the headline of today was written by Isaiah the prophet 25 or 2,600 years ago. It’s a phenomenal thing.” The Assyrian Empire exiled the tribe of Manassah almost 3,000 years ago. Although they settled in northeast India, tribe members kept their Jewish roots for more than 2,000 years. Several Christian organizations helped bring them home. “In fact, the Hebrew prophets said when God gathered His Jewish people back from all the ends of the earth in the last days that there would be Gentiles helping and bringing them back,” David Parsons, with the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, told CBN News. “He said, ‘I’ll beckon to the Gentiles.’ And so we have this invitation from God Himself to be involved in this Aliya,” he said. Another 300 tribe members are scheduled to arrive in January, with thousands more yet to come. –CBN News…Have a google to see how many other tribes have since been returned to Israel as in accordance with Revelation 2:9 Aramaic version?

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      June 23, 2013 Earlier we described the U.S. policies that caused the Vietnam disaster. Few people recall that, until 1954, Vietnam had an emperor, even during French colonization. The last was Bao Dai, whom the United States insisted step down in favor of “democracy.” The emperor himself stated: “If your country had given me one-thousandth of the sum they spent to depose me, I could have won that war.” Bao Dai was a friend of Hilaire du Berrier, who wrote: “When the throne was destroyed, fragmentation resulted because only the man on the throne was above the regional, racial, and religious hatreds dividing the national family.” I believe this comment embodies a universal principle concerning monarchies…Perloff replies: I thank you, Marcos, as I thank all the posters, for adding balance and perspective to this issue. I have read the Bible several times, am very aware of the passage in Samuel, and expected to hear about it. It was not so much a matter of ignorance, as it was limitations on both space and my specific objectives. My main objective was to help offset the antipathy toward monarchies that the Illuminati successfully bred in order to overthrow the powers that stood in their way. Rebellion against authority is VERY unbiblical and emulated Satan’s own rebellion against God. After the Tower of Babel, God dispersed the world’s peoples into different languages and nations. Lucifer (the Illuminati) has attempted to reverse the process.and set up a satanic world government, which necessitated destroying nationhood. This in turn required destroying nations’ rulers and nobility, and replacing them with socialism and “democracy,” which are designed to make the people think they hold power–but in fact made them like an army consisting only of privates, or a chess contestant holding nothing but pawns. How well the Illuminati understood these principles, as expressed in the Protocols! In 1798, scholar John Robison published a book entitled Proofs a Conspiracy against All the Religions and Governments of Europe, Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Free Masons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies. Unfortunately, his prophetic warnings went unheeded. In Samuel’s day, monarchy was certainly a step down from Israel’s original theocracy. But I believe it was a step up from today’s delusional democracy, controlled from behind the scenes by the Illuminati. Of course, I do not deny the sins of monarchs (who sometimes deeply compromised with the Illuminati), or the exquisite value of the Bill of Rights, which is now also being targeted for destruction…Tracy said (June 26, 2013): Not to belabor the point, but I will just reiterate what respondent Marcos said. And reference those same scriptures! The Bible indicates that monarchy is NOT God’s preferred form of government. What he indicates he wants is tough for most of us to understand, because we almost never see it. God wanted to have a prophet who was faithful to him, and upheld his ideas and precepts and passed them on to the population. When and if there was a problem, a group of 12 judges were there to help administer justice. No King. No premier, prelate, president, etc. The cultures of the day worshiped their monarchs as semi-divine beings.( see Nebuchadnezzar, the pharaohs, etc) The God of the Bible did NOT go for this. Also remember, Israel’s kings, with just a few exceptions ( David being one) were mostly a bunch of losers. Sorry, they were. All this was to show us something about life, and how it was to be lived on Earth. The lesson was basically ‘ leave government to God. Respect and love each other, and handle your affairs, public and private with maturity, love and respect for others.’ Looking forward to the day we actually finally achieve this. I respect Perloff’s statements, I just disagree with them. Why the Illuminati Hated Monarchies by James Perloff (

      • Tim Folke
        Tim Folke says:

        Your comments have interesting material. However, and with all due respect, if you wish others to read them you would do well in making shorter paragraphs.

        • Gary
          Gary says:

          Hi Tim. Sorry for the long comments. I will shorten the comments. Aren’t Masonic Lodges since the 14th Amendment also legally bound privately incorporated businesses? Getting rid of the Earthy Monarchs is in whose best interest?…To understand the meaning of this “missing” 13th Amendment, we must understand its historical context — the era surrounding the American Revolution. We tend to regard the notion of “Democracy” as benign, harmless, and politically unremarkable. But at the time of the American Revolution, King George III and the other monarchies of Europe saw Democracy as an unnatural, ungodly ideological threat, every bit as dangerously radical as Communism was once regarded by modern Western nations. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia spawned other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided an example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow their European monarchies. Even though the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War in 1783, the simple fact of our existence threatened the monarchies. The United States stood as a heroic role model for other nations, that inspired them to also struggle against oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Polish national uprising (1794) were in part encouraged by the American Revolution. – The Missing 13th Amendment David M. Dodge…In the Middle Ages they afforded a powerful support to the Crown, and since that period they have exerted themselves to the utmost to limit the royal prerogative. It is true that lawyers mainly contributed to the overthrow of the French monarchy in 1789. In all free governments, of whatsoever form they may be, members of the legal profession will be found at the head of all parties. If I were asked where I place the American aristocracy, I should reply without hesitation that it is not composed of the rich, who are united together by no common tie, but that it occupies the judicial bench and the bar. Chapter XVI: Causes Mitigating Tyranny In The United States – Part I Alexis de Tocqueville 1831…And Canada is not a demoncracy. Canada is a Constitutional Monarch. The first time democracy is ever used I believe is in the charter of so called rights and so called freedoms? Which in the end legally cemented for a lawyer oligarch…May 24, 2013 Canada’s constitution and Charter of Rights, was welcomed by a generation of lawyers and scholars, but created a “human rights industry” that threatens some of the very rights it was meant to defend, while fuelling judicial activism and putting critical national decisions in the hands of appointed judges. Kelly McParland: Pierre Trudeau’s disastrous record is finally laid out for all to see – The National Post

          • Gary
            Gary says:

            The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion [] in part provide…Introduction Of the Protocols themselves little need be said in the way of introduction. The book in which they are embodied was first published in the year 1897 by Philip Stepanov for private circulation among his intimate friends. The first time Nilus published them was in 1901 in a book called The Great Within the Small and reprinted in 1905. A copy of this is in the British Museum bearing the date of its reception, August 10, 1906. All copies that were known to exist in Russia were destroyed in the Kerensky regime, and under his successors the possession of a copy by anyone in Soviet land was a crime sufficient to ensure the owner’s of being shot on sight. The fact is in itself sufficient proof of the genuineness of the Protocols. The Jewish journals, of course, say that they are a forgery, leaving it to be understood that Professor Nilus, who embodied them in a work of his own, had concocted them for his own purposes. PROTOCOL No. 20…3. Our rule, in which the king will enjoy the legal fiction that everything in his State belongs to him (which may easily be translated into fact), will be enabled to resort to the lawful confiscation of all sums of every kind for the regulation of their circulation in the State. From this follows that taxation will best be covered by a progressive tax on property. In this manner the dues will be paid without straitening or ruining anybody in the form of a percentage of the amount of property. The rich must be aware that it is their duty to place a part of their superfluities at the disposal of the State since the State guarantees them security of possession of the rest of their property and the right of honest gains, I say honest, for the control over property will do away with robbery on a legal basis. – The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion…October 25, 2017 Alexander Kerensky played a prominent role in the Russian Revolution…He was a lawyer, graduated in 1905. Now this is vitally important for two reasons. Firstly, he discovered in a precise legal way exactly what the faults of the system were. And in a more emotional way he discovered what the people wanted done about it. Not only that, but he also knew how to speak to them. And hence the rather emotional and probably over-emotional style of his some of his speeches. Interview: grandson of Alexander Kerensky, Russia’s last leader before the Bolshevik revolution – The Conversation…And then Kerensky ends up in the USA until its death?

        • Gary
          Gary says:

          Sorry this is so long. Even if I put this all in my own words, in the end would be a long drawn out challenge? Tsar Nicholas II. Saint Nicholas the Passion-Bearer…April 2018 The West considered that once its values of parliamentary democracy, republicanism or constitutional monarchy were introduced into Russia, it would become just another bourgeois Western country.” Let us recall that it was Tsar Nicholas who for the first time in world history had urged disarmament at The Hague in 1899, because he could see that Western Europe was a powder keg, waiting to explode. He was a moral and spiritual leader, the only world leader then who did not have narrow, national interests at heart and was not re-arming at huge cost. Instead, as the Anointed of God, he had at heart the universal interests of all Orthodox Christendom, to bring to Christ all God-created mankind. Why else make sacrifices for Serbia? To have survived, he must have been incredibly strong-willed, as, among others, the French President Émile Loubet remarked. Everything You Know About The Last Russian Tsar Is a Massive Lie. Here’s The Truth Fr. Andrew Phillips – Russian Insider…All the myths about Gregory Rasputin were invented from 1910 on by those jealous of the Tsar – without much need for imagination, because they attributed to him what they themselves did, that is, they were talking about themselves and their own deeply-held and practised vices. They were jealous because they wanted the power of the Tsar and therefore wanted to discredit the legitimate holders of that power, the Tsar and his family, including his ill heir and his healer, and the Orthodox Christian society that he ruled over, which they so hated. If Gregory was innocent, then they, the ideologues of the anti-Christian Western world, therefore most of the Russian aristocracy and the State Duma, most of the generals and even some clergy, most of the journalists and most of the people, as well as the Western-founded Soviet State, are guilty of slandering him, murdering him and are also guilty of the murder of the canonized Imperial Family. Guilty too are all who believed in the lies without question and all who continue to believe in these money-making (money is always a motive for evil) lies and myths and even spread them. After all, these are the people who three months after the murder, on Kerensky’s Masonic orders, dug up Gregory Rasputin’s corpse and on 11 March 1917 incinerated it. That he had the ability to heal the Tsarevich Alexei, who could have become the greatest, most merciful and wisest of all Russian Tsars, is a fact of history. Rasputin Was A Great And Good Man, Cruelly Murdered and Slandered by Evil British Spies Fr. Andrew Phillips – Russian Insider…And what does Russia have now? A lawyer, granted a longer term through other lawyers, while looking to push democracy. Isn’t this also what even NATO would want for Ukraine?…February 28, 2012 Mr. Putin therefore demands that the opposition employ “democratic” – and here he means state-sanctioned – means for change. To encourage this kind of lawful dispute resolution, he proposes expanding the rights of public organizations to sue government officials and publicizing court proceedings. He also argues that the Russian state should act in a law-based manner. The Russian government almost collapsed in the 1990s, he argues, by yielding to “the temptation of illusions” and a lawless “fortune favors the brave” attitude. But since his rise to power in 2000, adherence to clear rules of the game has helped secure Russia’s stable development in a “democratic, constitutional manner.” Adherence to the law, he argues, must continue or Russia’s democratic development will be put at risk. Vladimir Putin and the Law William Partlett – Brookings

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:


          Over the years, many have made the same request of this commenter and of all too many others. No offender has ever paid the slightest attention. One is left to wonder whether enticing other TOO habitués to read these off-putting, oppressively large blocks of type is even one of such a commenter’s aims.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            What would you suggest?

            Read Tim Folke’s comment, and heed its counsel. That’s what I suggest!

            Are you familiar with the Enter key on your keyboard? Hitting it twice after completing two or three closely related sentences produces a paragraph, which the creation of a visible space on the page makes readily perceptible to the average reader.

            Think of a paragraph as something like a bite-size piece of food, but in this simile, it is food for the mind rather than the body. Trying to chew or swallow an overly large piece of food can lead to choking or serious indigestion or both—I suspect that this is not news to you—and overly large paragraph pieces produce the same dyspeptic effect on the mind.

            Since the size of the type available to commenters is pretty small, paragraphing serves the additional desirable end of dramatically increasing the physical readability of your comment. In most societies, conduct of this sort was once widely referred to as courtesy, and courtesy, like thrift, is something that parents once encouraged their children to cultivate, though both attributes are now understood to be relics of racism and white supremacism.

            I suppose I ought to admit at this point that I take it that you DO want others to read your comments. Or do you have another end entirely in view, one that is not served by readability?

            Of course, as an alternative, you might just ignore Tim Folke’s polite suggestion and my extended gloss on it. You might instead simply keep posting interminably lengthy, unparagraphed comments, comments that are virtually impossible to comfortably read—as long as KM’s Moderators are prepared to tolerate them.

  11. Larry
    Larry says:

    After years of looking into this murky subject I have come to some, at the most, tenuous conclusions. Freemasonry’s origins are not in Judaism. It was originally a vehicle for the preservation of “the wisdom religion” or the Aryan belief system which ran from the vedas to Egyptian to Hellenic concepts of spirit and how it manifests itself in matter. During the the 16th century it was infiltrated by a Jesuit (Marranos) creation called the Illuminati. Thereafter it’s belief system became based in Jewish mysticism and was used as a vehicle for “the Jewish revolutionary spirit”. There was a conflict during this takeover between lodges who stayed dedicated to the Egyptian ethos and the forces of infiltration. This conflict is exemplified in Mozarts golden flute opera and one of the movers against this takeover was cagliostro who is of course calumniated against now in the popular mind as a con man and charlatan. One of the warning signs of lack of real knowledge amongst these authors is their presentation of freemasonry, at least during this time, as monolithic in its principles. There was in fact a deep resistance to the takeover which resulted in today’s freemasonry which is definitely Jewish mysticism and could really be compared to the israel loving evangelicals who are so valuable to todays Zionism.

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      [Annie] Besant would get involved with the secret society known as Freemasonry. In 1902 she established the international order called Co-Freemasonry and then set up lodges all over the world with Theosophic underpinnings. Theosophy, Freemasonry and Marxism are all connected with the New Age Movement…There are many different views on the origins of Freemasonry. I will present the one that I feel is the most evidenced and well documented…Modern speculative Freemasonry wasn’t officially established until 1717 in London with the founding of the first grand lodge. Prior to that there were masonic lodges in the late 16th century. You first have operative masonry involving those who worked with stone and who were part of a stone guild that built cathedrals and buildings in the middle ages. Around the 17th Century these operative masons started accepting people into their craft who were not simply stone workers. Soon masonry was not simply limited to stone workers. They then later developed into modern speculative Freemasonry of today which involves secret handshakes, codes, symbolism, mythology, and legendary. The earliest documentation of the word Freemason is in the Calendar of the Corners Rolls of the City of London. This is dated 1300-1370 A.D…”…It developed in Britain out of the building trades and fraternities, whose history goes back some 600 years in England…””I do insist, however, that our present-day speculative Freemasonry is directly descended from the operative masonry who beginning we can travel back to the earliest record of organization among masons in 1356.”- Harry Carr, ‘600 years of Craft Ritual’. [1968]. p 200 – Aquarius: The Age of Evil (Full Movie)

      • milano
        milano says:

        Yes!!!! This is correct thank you very much Gary!!!

        Let us not forget the real aim of this organization is to see a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. They even have a super secret word that only the upper echelon is allowed to say and use among themselves which denotes “here is the builder.” Rejecting what Christ Jesus said about Himself:

        “The Queen of the South will rise at the judgment with this generation and condemn it; for she came from the ends of the earth to listen to Solomon’s wisdom, and now something greater than Solomon is here.”
        Matthew 12:42

        they desire a replacement more to their liking.

        What I don’t get though is ‘jahbulon’ this the name of their god? This is blatant idolatry coming from Britain one of the most if not the most highly educated people on the face of the earth? jahbulon if used by the ancient Hebrews would have been capital punishment.

        And look what arrives in the fields of England? Crop Circles a form of Divine Communication with that computer disk of computer charterers being the most serious this one sentence especially!!!

        “Much pain but still time.”

        Yikes, I say to that and wow add to all of this climate change which is the work of God we surely have the beginnings of St. Matthew 24 and 25 now coming into view.


        By the Gary you I’m sure would find the book Climate Change the Work of God by a Gerry Fox highly valuable to your historical discoveries.

        • Gary
          Gary says:

          If in the West a legal Talmudic jurisprudence legally controls gentiles…”Our” government under Presidents Reagan, Bush Sr. and Jr. and Clinton, has provided, under the euphemism of education (for example, House Joint Resolution 173 and Public Law 102-14), a groundwork for the establishment of Talmudic “courts of justice” to be administered by disciples of Shneur Zalman’s Chabad successor, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Maimonides ruled that it is a rabbinic court — or a court appointed by rabbinic authority—that enforces obedience and passes judgment on gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. U.S. Government Lays the Groundwork for Talmudic Courts – Judaism discovered…has jurisprudence, only in the legal sense, due to the Canadian Bill of Rights and the United States Declaration of Independence providing for the supremacy of God and the Lawful rule of the land, shifted to Israel?…August 5, 2010 Linda said (May 11, 2010): The post conciliar Catholic Church is entirely subverted and the Vatican works bilaterally with the Sanhedrin to promote the Noachide Law mandated for goyim nations by the Talmud. For the Communist Revolution to succeed in America it is essential to shift the jurisprudence from a Constitutional jurisprudence to a Talmudic jurisprudence. Senate Confirms 2nd Jewish Lesbian to Court by Henry Makow Ph.D…I found a link to the Supreme Court of Israel in another article written for the site of Henry Makow Ph.D. and I googled and found much about Masonic symbolism within this legal realm…For a moment lets go back to the top of the 30 steps, as we know there are 33 degrees in Free Masonry but the last three are the ones of higher learning and preparations to enter the Illuminati. So as we move from the top of the stairs towards the Pyramid we see a great library with three tiers to those three levels of higher learner. It is also important in this building to note that the 33rd level ends at the base of the Pyramid. The first tier is “only” for Lawyers; the second tier is “only” for setting Judges. The highest and third tier is “only” for retired judges. And directly above that third tier is the Pyramid with the all seeing eye. – FreeMasonry Watch

      • Larry
        Larry says:

        The theosophy of besant is totally different than the original theosophy of Blavatsky. If you do not know of this massive split within theosophy than you have no idea what theosophy is. Blavatsky utterly eviscerated both Judaism and jesuitism the deepest way.

        • Gary
          Gary says:

          The theosophy of besant is totally different than the original theosophy of Blavatsky. If you do not know of this massive split within theosophy than you have no idea what theosophy is…Did Besant have a choice? I wonder who got it right?…August 29, 1889 It is, therefore, the more to be regretted that at such a crisis in the history of one who might yet exert so vast an influence for good, her guide, philosopher, and friend should be one the record of whose public life is of such a character as Madame Blavatsky’s. Mrs. Besant’s declared adhesion to the Theosophist movement will no doubt attract considerable attention, and possibly increase the number of Madame Blavatsky’s English disciples. Mrs. Besant’s New Teacher, Madame Blavatsky Her Indian Record. by Rev. Henry S. Lunn, M.D., September 5, 1889 Dear Sir, — In your last week’s issue a direct appeal is made to me, expressing a hope that I will investigate, and if possible disprove, certain accusations made against my friend, Madame Blavatsky. Mrs. Besant and Madame Blavatsky Mrs. Besant’s Reply, October 31, 1889 We have already accused Madame Blavatsky of forgery and fraud, and we now accuse her of building up a society on the credit obtained by a gigantic falsehood. In falsehood and fraud Madame Blavatsky began her career as a Theosophist, and in falsehood and fraud she seems determined to continue and end it. Mrs. Besant and Madame Blavatsky Professor Patterson’s Reply, November 28, 1889 Dear Sir, — My attention has been called to a letter from Professor Patterson in your issue of October 31. My note — to which it is a reply — was called forth by your direct challenge to myself to investigate the evidence against my friend, Madame Blavatsky, and I had no intention of provoking a prolonged correspondence. Mrs. Besant and Madame Blavatsky To the Editor of The Methodist Times. by Annie Besant – Published by The Blavatsky Archives Online. Online Edition copyright 2000.

  12. Hello Readers
    Hello Readers says:

    Some quotes from Schwartz-Bostunitsch’s books:

    “National Socialism is applied racial science.” (Rudolf Heß)

    “The customs of this most wicked people have already become so strong that they have spread to all countries; the conquered have imposed their laws on the conquerors.” (Seneca)

    “The world war was not lost by Luther alone, as Pope Benedict XV deigned to say to Emil Ludwig (Cohn), the world war was lost by the entire white race to the Chandalas. The white man armed the colored man, trained him militarily, and made him shoot at white men, who until then had been a kind of untouchable gods to the colored man. In doing so, he showed him future possibilities of a certain kind. This was, in terms of racial politics, the main fault of the Entente as far as its methods of warfare were concerned. Thus the white man showed the colored man very clearly that he no longer respects himself and therefore cannot lay any great claim to be respected by the colored man! We must not close our eyes to this truth, but bravely take a stand on it; especially because the main danger for us is not the colored man per se, but that yeast which for a long, long time has been fermenting and rising the leaven of the colored man’s struggle for annihilation against the white man – Jewry, the patriotless, the conscienceless, the immoral Jewry, but enviably united in its folkish blood confession. If I consciously attach the title ‘conscienceless’ to Judaism, then this expression shall, however, neither represent an insult nor a denigration of Judaism, but merely record the fact that the Jewish language of the Bible does not know the word and thus the term ‘conscience’ at all.”

    “In the novel ‘The Road to Zion’ Kurt Münzer puts the following words into the mouth of his ‘hero’ Felix Marcuse, which are usually quoted inaccurately and are brought here verbatim because they reflect the vividness of the Ezraic principles in modern Judaism: ‘Not only we Jews are so degenerated and at the end of a sucked out, used up culture. All races of Europe – perhaps we have infected them – we have corrupted their blood. In general, everything today is Judaized. Our senses are alive in everyone, our spirit rules the world. We are the masters. For what is power today is the child of our spirit. We may be hated, we may be chased away, our enemies may just triumph over our physical weakness. We can no longer be driven out. We have eaten our way into the peoples, penetrated the races, defiled, broken the strength, made everything mellow, rotten and decayed with our stale culture. Our spirit can no longer be eradicated.'”

  13. Hello Readers
    Hello Readers says:

    To expose what pathetically alienated products of Jewish
    influence figures like Anglin are, who daily degrade women
    (thus also their mothers and sisters) without decency as
    “front hole”, without gaining the knowledge thereby to soil
    themselves, already a simple comparison demonstrates:
    Imagine if Hitler had stood in “front” of a sculpture of a
    beautiful Aryan woman and said, “Just a front hole!”

    In his book “Jude und Weib” (Jew and Woman), Schwartz-
    Bostunitsch excellently highlights where the hatred of the
    sexes for each other and the alienation began, which des-
    troyed the natural union and connection between man
    and woman and degraded them to mere “objects” of
    need satisfaction: from Judaism to Christianity to Islam.

  14. Hello Readers
    Hello Readers says:

    In the end, all the paltry labels like “ethnoplura-
    lism” are a (last?) Aryan attempt to circumvent
    the Jewish exterminationism called “humanism.”

    The Jew thinks of himself first and fore-
    most. If we claim the same basic right,
    he hypocritically asks, “Are you a racist?”

    He knows that we will keep our mouths shut af-
    terwards, because he has made sure that racists
    (who can only ever be the hated Whites) lose
    their livelihood in the Jewish-dominated world.
    With relish he tastes our collective cowardice.

  15. Hello Readers
    Hello Readers says:

    “According to “ethnographer” (((Benjamin R. Teitel-
    baum))), the term ethnopluralism (German: Ethnoplu-
    ralismus) was first coined by German sociologist Hen-
    ning Eichberg in a 1973 essay that was written in op-
    position to both Western and European eurocentrism.”

    Didn’t I tell you? Immediately follows the Jewish urge to wea-
    ken the white power of survival. These satans have put the noo-
    se around our necks, and they will not let up until we all perish.
    Perish, however, in Jew fashion, means that our residual genetics
    are inexorably disappearing into the growing Negro gene pool…

  16. charles frey
    charles frey says:

    Years ago the UK made a law, that all Judges, parliamentarians and appointed officials disclose their membership in Freemasonry, PRIOR to their election/appointment.

    Could one of the many English commenters hereabouts tell us the current status of said law ???

    • Gary
      Gary says:

      Friday, September 30, 2016 The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has squashed an attempt to require the city’s Metropolitan Police Department (Met) officers to publicly declare their Masonic membership, pointing out that such a register would be illegal. Earlier stabs at this pointless exercise in Europe were eliminated in 2009 in the wake of a successful suit brought in the European Court of Human Rights by Italian Masons fighting a similar regulation. UGLE threatened a similar action and the Home Office scrapped its registration requirement of Masons in police departments and the judiciary six years ago. London Mayor Stops Plan to Register City’s Freemason Police Officers – INDEPENDENT…Sadiq Khan is also a lawyer specializing in human rights.

      • charles frey
        charles frey says:

        I’m certain not to be the only one here to have benefited from your effort.

        If one purports to be a force for public good, why in hell all the infantile secrecy mongering ???

        Thanks !

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        I stand with Charles. This is very useful, very telling information to have—and not a little bit unsettling, too. Thank you.

Comments are closed.