The Hidden Messages in Schindler’s List

Amon Göeth, Psychopathic Counterpart of the Gaza Snipers

To document the importance of subliminal messages in movies, let’s turn to one of the most memorable movies ever: Schindler’s List, a fiction by Jewish director Steven Spielberg. Our intention is to show how Jewish owned Hollywood hides and falsifies facts to sully White culture. [1] As noted by Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review:

Even many of those who readily acknowledge the tremendous influence of American film and television seem not to fully comprehend the formidable scope of the power behind Hollywood, or the outlook and agenda of those who wield that power… Hollywood, together with the rest of the Jewish-Zionist dominated US media, sensationalizes and distorts current events, systematically falsifies history, promotes debased “entertainment” and perverse cultural standards, and makes possible the Jewish-Zionist hold on American political life.[2]

As explained below in more detail, invariably, this movie and many others such as Sophie’s Choice, The Zone of Interest, and Nuremberg are basically deterrents to racial consciousness and national sovereignty, by showing how they can lead to genocide and unimaginable sadism and cruelty, when combined with ideologies of superiority, dehumanization, and state power. This is vividly illustrated by psychopath Amon Göeth, one of the main characters of Schindler’s List, who, paradoxically,  shot Jews the same way Gaza snipers are documented to routinely and deliberately shoot Palestinians.[3]

What happens in this fiction pales in comparison to the reality of the inhumane, unflinching, and stark violence of the IDF soldiers and settlers of the West Bank: The scorched-earth Palantir-AI-guided pulverisation of hospitals, schools, bridges, business, and residential buildings; the deliberate assassination of doctors and journalists; the starvation of Palestinians, who are dehumanized by labelling them as “animals”; the sex parties of the IDF soldiers, the mocking of Palestinians, the looting of their homes, and the blocking and stealing of international aid; the public humiliation of the aid flotilla activists by the minister of National security, Itamar Ben-Gvir; the rape and torture of adults and minors of both sexes; the mass graves of people buried alive; the lust for blood by God’s “chosen people,” who have convinced themselves of their superiority over their brothers, the Arab Semites; and their lust for revenge on Amalek, the archetypical enemy of the Jewish race, turns into farce the main Talmudic message of Schindler’s List: “Whoever saves one life, saves the world entire.”

Never Again”: The Magic Wand of Democracy.

Before examining the truth of the most gruesome scene of Schindler’s List, the balcony scene, let’s first examine the hidden messages of the movie:

Deterrent to Racial Consciousness

By portraying Germans, and by association Whites, as the embodiment of absolute evil, this systematic stigmatization serves to neutralize with guilt the racial consciousness of the whole White race, and by extension, its instinct for self-preservation. Left defenceless, Whites are then incapable of defending themselves against their own replacement by extra-Europeans, and ultimately, Jewish-global governance and a world with no borders.

DeepSeek on the Great Replacement

What Jews fear most of all,” writes author F. Britton in his book Behind Communism, “is a resurgence of racial consciousness among the vast white majority of the Western world. They remember that the very moment the German people regained their racial consciousness, they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.[4]

The Jewish Interest in Multiethnic Immigration and Multiculturalism

Indeed, Jews know by experience that racial consciousness is the best survival strategy. Their position in our societies is a testament to that. Israel and the Jewish diaspora are in fact emboldened by a powerful sense of destiny and identity based on racial consciousness. As such, Jews see themselves as a collective group that thrives on its racial homogeneity, unity, solidarity, and “what’s good for the Jews,” something they expressly forbid Whites from doing precisely because they don’t want their main racial competitor to snap out of its torpor and resist its replacement and disappearance.

Moses, the First “Führer” in History: Jewish Racial Consciousness and Supremacism

Deterrent to National Sovereignty

Racial consciousness leads to patriotism and cultural, social, economic, and financial sovereignty. This was the sin that led to Hitler’s demise. According to Churchill’s “appalling admission,” writes Jean-Jacques Stormay in his book Reflections on Nationalism, “The unforgivable crime of Germany before the Second World War was her attempt to detach her economic power from the world trading system and to become financially sovereign.”[5]

The Jewish-led Anglo-American bankers of the City, Wall Street, and their central bank satellites[6] —those who started the First and Second World Wars, [7] and most wars since [8]—could not tolerate that Germany, which was previously in their thrall, had become a powerful sovereign nation, racially conscious and patriotic, with an autarkic vocation, and an independent trading system.

To paraphrase J. J. Stormay: “those whom official history and the conventions of language oblige us to call the ‘Allies’ did not intervene to ‘liberate’ Europe from Hitler’s ‘barbarism.’” They intervened, for the benefit of the Jewish-led bankers, “to cut up traditional Europe which had become all the more dangerous for them because it was in the process of becoming itself again—thanks to the nationalism adopted by its traditional nations, which had finally become sovereign, complementary, and no longer conflicting”; akin to the BRIC countries such as Russia, China, and Iran, which are trying to free themselves from the Jewish-led Western banking hegemony.[9]

Hitler’s goal was a “Europe of sovereign Nations” based on race and similar to the Roman Empire at its peak of power during the Pax Romana (27 BCE—180 CE). According to Belgian politician Léon Degrelle, one of Hitler’s most brilliant soldiers,[10] the Führer wanted a pan-European union with freedom of movement within it, but restricted to the people who are part of the European gene pool.

To paraphrase American evolutionary psychologist, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, such a race realist point of view would have stressed the genetic interests of Europeans first. It would have constituted a group evolutionary strategy to the extent that it had the political will to keep other races out. It would have turned Europe into a superpower as powerful if not more than any of its competitors.[11]

The problem, of course, comes from the fact that such a national-raced-based-policy was completely contrary to the interests of the Jewish-led Big Money class, as is the case today, more than ever. So, of course, it had to be stopped just like all present sovereign countries, which are not subservient to the Epstein class.

Many countries since have been destroyed by this “money machine” and many more, such as Russia, China, and Iran, are threatened with destruction if they cannot find a way out of the banker’s crosshairs.

The Balcony Scene

After this brief review of the hidden messages of Schindler’s List, let’s take a look at one of its most emblematic scenes: the balcony scene. In this striking portrait of alleged German cruelty, writes former US Navy pilot Benton Bradberry in his book, The Myth of German Villainy,

The Nazi commandant of the concentration camp (supposedly the Plaszow camp outside of Krakow, not far from Auschwitz) is standing shirtless on the balcony of his house with a hunting rifle over his bare shoulders. The rifle is equipped with a telescopic sight. In the movie, the house is located on a hill above the camp so that he can look down on the throngs of prisoners milling around in the compound below. He lifts the rifle to his shoulder and through the telescope begins casually scanning from one prisoner to another. The image through the telescope now fills the movie screen. The crosshairs of the scope stop on a randomly selected prisoner. He pulls the trigger and the prisoner drops to the ground, dead. The screen then cuts back to the Nazi commandant to show bored insouciance as he actuates the bolt of his rifle and casually raises it back to his shoulder. He fires again, and again a prisoner drops to the ground, dead. Bored with his “target practice,” he turns his attention to the beautiful, sexy, naked woman lying on a bed just inside the house from the balcony. The woman is purportedly one of his Jewish housemaids selected from the camp who also apparently serves as his sex slave. His face expresses disdainful, though lackadaisical, cynicism.[12]

As Benton Bradberry points out, the purpose of this gruesome scene, as well as the presence of the naked Jewish maid, is to make the officer look like a totally depraved psychopath.

What is false: This scene is entirely fictional. The real camp in Płaszów was completely out of sight from the commander’s balcony. Thus, even if he had wanted to, he could not shoot into the camp from the top of his balcony in order to amplify the cruelty of the character. Moreover, the commander Amon Göeth did have two Jewish maids chosen from among the prisoners in the camp, but they were not beautiful and sexy like the ones in the film, and there is no indication that he had improper relations with them. This sex story was added to the film only to spice it up.[13]

What is true: Major Göeth was indeed a godless, cruel, and bloodthirsty psychopath of the kind that’s found everywhere, especially in times of war, in an environment handmade for such monsters.[14]

What is false: What the millions of viewers who saw Schindler’s List do not know is that this was not a generalized behavior, typical of all National Socialists and all Germans, as the film implies. Jews, moreover, were not the only victims.[15]

What is true: While the IDF rarely punishes soldiers for war crimes against Palestinians, with data indicating near-total impunity,[16] the SS had an internal security police force whose mission was to prosecute German camp personnel involved in corruption or brutality. Hundreds of delinquents were arrested, tried, and punished by the Germans with sentences ranging from prison to execution. In September 1944, Göeth, for example, was arrested and imprisoned for bribery and murder of prisoners by the SS HaupAmt Gericht, the central office of SS justice. Göeth’s arrest (he was executed after the war in 1946) came after an investigation by German military judge Georg Konrad Morgen and officers of the Reich Security Office. [17], [18]

Ultimately, the existence of this internal security police is just another one of those oddities surrounding the Holocaust—and the image of the Holocaust presented to us by Hollywood and the media—that makes us wonder what really happened during that tragic period.

Jews and other minorities were indeed persecuted and locked up in concentration camps and many were expelled from the country when the war started in 1939. No one denies that atrocities were committed during this period of intense turmoil; families were separated, the elderly and the sick died in troves unable to resist the hardships of war.

The major claims made by historical revisionists are:

  • There was no genocide of the Jews; the final solution was a territorial solution;
  • Gas chambers were not used to kill Jews, but to kill lice and to save lives as the deadly typhus disease, which caused most of the deaths in the camps, is transmitted by lice; Zyklon B is in fact an insecticidal gas;
  • 6 million Jews did not die during the war;
  • The official narrative of the Second World War is false; the Germans were the good guys.

The examination of these matters is beyond the scope of this article, but curious minds, concerned by the present state of the world, should look into the matter for the sake of justice and progress as one of the main obstacles to the death of the Jewish globalist utopia and the birth of a peaceful multipolar world is the official narrative of the Holocaust and WW2.

I invite my readers to look into the many convincing contradictory articles, books, and movies on the matter. Here are a few references:

Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024 (5th edition).

Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust, Myth & Reality, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024.

Holocaust Encyclopedia, Uncensored and Unrestrained, 2025. Sponsored by the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (www.CODOH.com).

For a contradictory version of WW2:

Adolf Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told, 2026.

Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 2nd revised and updated edition, Money Tree Publishing, 2023.

Articles of Interest from Pierre Simon:

A Racial War That Dares Not Say Its Name

The Saddest Story Never Told. The Real Cause of WW2

Was Fascism the Height of Abomination?

Why Were Hitler and the Germans Antisemites?

“Never Again”: The Magic Wand of Democracy

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World


[1] Lisa Klug, “Who Said Jews Run Hollywood?” The Times of Israel, 2016.

[2] Mark Weber, Hollywood’s Agenda, and the Power Behind It, Institute for Historical Review, Feb. 6, 2013.

[3] Caitlin Johnstone, “Israeli Snipers Routinely, Deliberately Shoot Palestinian Kids in the Head,” Global Research, October 10, 2024; Hoda Osman and Emma Graham-Harrison, ‘The Gaza family torn apart by IDF snipers from Chicago and Munich,” The Guardian, Tuesday 9, Sep 2025.

[4] Frank L. Britton, Behind Communism, River Crest Publishing, 2021 (first published in 1952), pp 116-118.

[5] Churchill’s quote is from Écrits de Paris, no 613, September, 1999, p. 40.

[6] Alex Krainer, “The Banks Are Driving Forever Wars,” YouTube, May 15, 2026.

[7] Thomas Dalton, PhD, The Jewish hands in the World Wars, Castle Hill Publishers, 2019.

[8] For a good explanation on how bankers start all wars see this interview of German economist Richard Werner on the YouTube Tucker Carlson channel: “Every Major War Begins Under False Pretenses & the Central Banks Are Behind It. Economist Explains,” May 22, 2026.

[9] Jean-Jacques Stormay, Réflections sur le Nationalisme : En relisant ‘Doctrines du nationalisme’ de Jacques Ploncard d’Assac, Reconquista Press, 2019, pp. 76-77.

[10] Léon Degrelle, Hitler pour mille ans, La Table Ronde, 1969.

[11] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, Individualism and Western Liberal Tradition. Evolutionary Origins, History and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publishing Edition, 2019, pp. 88-89.

[12] Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, 2nd revised and updated edition, Money Tree Publishing, 2023, p. 2.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Amon Göeth—Pure Evil, May 24, 2025.

[15] Categories of Prisoners, Memorial and Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau.

[16] Dan Sabbagh, “Israel closes down or leaves unresolved 88% of cases of alleged war crimes or abuse – report,” The Guardian, Aug 2, 2025.

[17] K. Prenger, A Judge in Auschwitz – Konrad Morgen’s Crusade Against SS Corruption & ‘Illegal’ Murder, Pen & Sword Books, 2021.

[18] Konrad Morgen, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

32 replies
  1. Bushmeat
    Bushmeat says:

    The fact this trash was shown in public schools is a terminal indictment of the public school system. There is no fixing this it has to come down.

  2. Dreidel
    Dreidel says:

    Schindler’s Fist is the porno spoof.
    Saving Ryan’s Privates is another Spielbergstein spoof.
    Israel flags everywhere at the 250 celebration?

  3. Salacia
    Salacia says:

    Spielberg is also rumored to be a pedophile, like many others in Hollywood (sometimes called Pedowood).

    Open-minded readers can search for the article about Spielberg and the movie Poltergeist on Vigilant Citizen, a very insightful site describing the occult symbolism among the ‘elite’.

    Not to mention that Spielberg and Lucas pretty much destroyed movies as an art form for adults, with the invention of blockbuster and juvenile Star Wars. Plus Jaws led to senseless slaughtering of sharks.

    • Bush Meat
      Bush Meat says:

      Jews have a fear of nature and open spaces. There are a few exceptions but most have never camped or hiked in the wilderness.

      • Alex
        Alex says:

        This is a huge difference between the Jewish and Gentile minds. To the Jew, the natural world is the enemy, a distraction, not as real as whatever cockmamie “heaven” they’ve decided they’re going to. What’s real is their Talmud, money, wordplay and banking and all forms of symbol manipulation and connivance. The natural world is foreign to them.

        The average Gentile grows up, ideally, in a house with a big lawn and a tree house and they wrestle with the dog and make mud pies and learn all the birds and the bugs and go hiking in Scouts and go to the beach and do as much as possible out in the natural world.

        Our ancestors lived in a world that was alive. The closest living example of this kind of world is the Japanese Shinto religion, where trees and rocks and even places all have their own spirit, you thank the tree for its wood and the fish for its flesh and you are part of this world, as much as the trees and the crickets and the wolf and the bird migrating overhead, etc.

        Why do you think “My Friend Totoro” is such a popular film among us? It’s our race-memory speaking to us.

        To the Jew the world is books, and how much money you can make, and if you get a scratch it’s “Come over to my house we have 13 kinds of antiseptics”.

        This is the kind of difference you’d expect to see in a natural species and in a parasite species.

        • crier de paon
          crier de paon says:

          Very different countryside vision in the Torah before they became the urban people par excellence. Love of books is quite compatible with a love of nature among Gentiles, however, army officers and explorers included. Some even take a book to read on the beach, in the garden or even in the tent. Otherwise Alex is spot-on, and Jewish writers back him up.

          • Alex
            Alex says:

            I’m not deriding the love of books, far from it. I grew up loving books, we had the “Life Nature Library” and tons of books about nature and animals, books like Rascal (about a kid who raises a racoon) and Owls In The Family by Farley Mowat and so on.

            But I’m saying that we Gentiles use books to not only entertain ourselves and to increase our love of Nature, but to inspire each other to be better. Jews, on the other hand, study the Talmud to become polished in the skills of deception and connivance, and dirty dealing. Nature is strange and frightening to them.

  4. Karen Crockett
    Karen Crockett says:

    As a white person I didn’t feel that this film sullied the white race. Its “hero” was a white German. That Spielberg has had a lifelong Holocaust obsession is clear from his biography and is reflected in more than one of his movies, such as ET with the stormtrooper hunting of the terrified alien “other”. The Jewishness of Hollywood is well-known, and Jews have written about, not entirely favorably.

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      Spielberg has a major obsession with MONEY and The Holocaust Industry is a very profitable one. He sniffs out where the money is.

      As this EXCELLENT article points out, The Official Story on the “Holocaust” is largely fiction. It’s an agreed-upon set of things with those who control our media doing their damnedest to ram it down our throats.

      • crier de paon
        crier de paon says:

        The best exposure of the Holocaust money-racket was written by a Jew – Norman Finkelstein. The most glaring example is the Israel “reparations” pressure on Germany and other European countries. As for the Holocaust, it all depends on what the word “means” and what actually occurred (it wasn’t fun for the Jews), but there have been and are other “genocides” or political mass-killings for which there has been neither retribution nor reparation, including of course the continuing horrors in the Middle East. In the UK some Jews got very cross when it was suggested that the “Holocaust” center, planned as their reproach and warning built next to the English Parliament, would include the Khmer Rouge and other state-terrorists along with the Nazis.

        • Alex
          Alex says:

          That being said, keep in mind that Finkelstein is still a Jew. Still OK with Zionism. He’s of the category of more subtly-minded parasites, like the anti-Zionist ultra-Orthodox sects who still consider we goyim to be animals to be used up, but just consider the “Israel” project to be harmful to the Jews overall. They’d rather it quiet ‘way down or go away, so they can get back to insinuating their tentacles into every country’s banking, media, etc. quietly.

          I’d not be surprised at all if Finkelstein was taking all those book royalties and speaker’s fees and rolling a good part of them into Friends Of The IDF or some shit.

          • crier de paon
            crier de paon says:

            @ Alex
            I wouldn’t be surprised if you have read little by or about Finkelstein, your suggestion that he funds the same IDF that he has attacked to personal disadvantage sadly typical of a bigoted brain that puts the conclusion before the evidence. See e.g. Mathew Abraham, “Norman Finkelstein’s Beyond Chutzpah”, Logos, 2025, vol.24, 1-2, online.
            Fully rounded views based on wide research may be unfamiliar and unwelcome to some readers of this blogsite, but I would suggest the following for an informed picture of Tinsel Town and its “Bad Influence”:
            1.Neal Gabler, “An Empire of Their Own” (1989)
            2.Michael Medved, “Hollywood vs. America” (1993)
            3.Peter Novick, “The Holocaust in American Life” (2000)
            4.Tim Stanley, “Citizen Hollywood” (2014)
            5.Allan Ryskind, “Hollywood Traitors” (2015)
            6.Tony Shaw & Giora Goodman, “Hollywood & Israel” (2022)
            7.Whitney Webb, “One Nation under Blackmail, Vol.2” (2022)
            8.Wikipedia, “USC Shoah Foundation” online
            9.Joseph Fahim, “How Israel lost Hollywood,” Middle East Eye, October 10,2025 online
            10.Jessica Steinberg, “‘Blatant Discrimination’,” The Times of Israel, September 25,2025 online
            The previous shift in sympathy from Marx and Russia to Herzl and Israel, and the recent “blaxploitation” turning on “Zionist Colonialism”, are reflected in the above studies, and to some extent the cinematic symbiosis of cultural, social and moral decline.
            Watching car-crashes, burning buildings and mass shooting may be fun in blockbuster-movies or cyber-games, but not in real life, in the West Bank or the West Bloomfield township.

    • Frank
      Frank says:

      The wicked Germans brutalized these poor, innocent people because they were … Germans.
      Schindler is a model for you, you all alone against these German (European) barbarians, need to stand up to them bc your neighbors would put them all in camps.
      You are a good person when you do this, and everyone else is BAD.
      Of course, in 1920’s Germany, everybody saw who was tricking out German women, who was pushing art and filth into the culture- That why they voted in Hitler.
      It’s not even that clever, but it works

  5. Joe Webb
    Joe Webb says:

    On a “funnier” note, Jew subversion of American culture includes sit-coms. Jew characters are always great people, even in “The Nanny” the main Jew female plays a filthy and cunning bitch, starting with the subversion of “nanny” the loving caregiver of our culture. Other characters are White and complicit in satirizing Whites, particularly blondes

    I can’t go extensively here because I am only acquainted with Frazier, and a couple others., which is pretty clever and even satirizes a “Lilith’ as cold bitch, per Jewish folklore, but is 100% Jew in staff/credits. Then there is Seinfeld which even includes a bit on the “blacks and Jews” spoken of course by a White character. Seinfeld does satirize jews too, but only to humanize them, sell them to Whites as OK and harmless. Barney Miller (miller always a Jew name) is marinated in jew propaganda. Miller is the character….Jew of course…and Whites are all the characters the show ridicules. Of course it is liberal propaganda from top to bottom. Barney Miller is set in a police station in New York City. The whores are always white and just lovable. No black whores, no black criminals, etc. One of the detectives is a charming black. Guns are White genocider horrors. The there is the old All in the Family with Archie Bunker, the personification of White male bigotry, but inasmuch as this is comedy, Archie somehow can be smart and funny. Meathead, his son in law, is the liberal foil to Archie. Meathead in real life is a jew and , poor bastard, had his son just murder him a year or so ago.

    Another staple of sitcoms is names. Whenever you need a doctor, he has a Jew name, etc. Somebody more familiar with judaized Hollywood could go on. Sitcoms today are completely judaized with sexual filth/subversion. The earlier sitcoms just mentioned, like Cheers had a lot of sex but it was milquetoast compared to today’s sitcoms I think, which I have only glanced at.

    Porn has always been a Jewish sideline in its war on whites. They need to be sequestered , like in Madagascar, where they can enslave blacks again.

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      Ahh, Miller, why is it such a Jewish name?

      Because not long ago czars and kings would set up things where Jews were the only ones allowed to mill grain, and the peasants had to go to them to get their grain turned into flour.

      In Russia, Jews were the only ones allowed to have licenses to distill alcohol. The peasants would brew their sort of grain-wine, then only the Jews were allowed to distill it into vodka.

      I’ve looked for it, a sort of autobiography I read years ago, about a Jew with this sort of setup, owned land and things and saw the peasants as animals – dangerous ones. He was scared to death of them! It was a very clear look into the Jewish mentality.

      • crier de paon
        crier de paon says:

        There are the international Jewish Farmers Network and the Shamayim animal-welfare organisation. Jews are not well-known for their dogs, but at least they do not prefer them to babies like so many western white couples today. And there is of course the slaughter of cattle without stunning like that of their (and our) Muslim enemies. It’s never simple.

      • Bush Meat
        Bush Meat says:

        That funny. Jews are the only ones allowed to grow weed too despite being legalized you are not allowed to grow it without a license.

        • Alex
          Alex says:

          Hahaha I live in the SF Bay Area, and there are dispensaries around. I don’t use the wacky weed myself, but I should look into who owns the dispensaries. Hint: Probably the same people who own the liquor stores.

    • Joe Webb
      Joe Webb says:

      screwy movies department: just watched a 1960 cowboy and Indian lavishly funded movie with, of …the Whitest of White movie stars, Audry Hepburn who plays an Indian and is 100% viewed by her family as as an Indian indeed. The credulous Americans are beyond belief except that 1960 was the high water mark of sewage about Civil Rights and like the present day, one can be anything one wants, nigger, the opposite sex, freak of anything imaginable , White, any sex freak imaginable. Whatever.

      So that was 1960 nigger-luv conquers all, Injuns R us, and Hepburn and Burt Lancaster as the stars eating shit for fame and more fortune. All actors of course are whores , and damned good ones often, both actors and whores. There goes my fandom for Audry Hepburn.

      Jews Rule! Uhhhh not for long it looks like.

      • crier de paon
        crier de paon says:

        Hepburn’s parents were fascists, incidentally. Like Disney up to a point – his cartoons entertained children in the Auschwitz family-camp, incidentally.
        Mel Gibson has thrown a couple of spanners into the “works”.
        Revisit Marlon Brando’s CNN interview with Larry King 30 years ago where his balanced comments led to a tearful apology after being excoriated as “Godfather of Hate”.

  6. Frank
    Frank says:

    People shouldn’t look in to the Holly, anymore than they should read the Morgenthau Report.
    The Holly is done, it’s well over eighty yrs ao, nobody cares.
    What they ARE afraid of, is what people should be talking, Gaza, Epstein / Maxwell, Lebanon, Iran, etc.
    They ARE really, really concerned with the images coming out of their conflict zones, and their usual BS excuses ain’t cuttin’ it no more.
    .
    People see they’re animals

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      I’m in my 60s and yeah, people my age and older are pretty much hopeless. We grew up on movies like “Exodus” and all kinds of propaganda, and are terminally Jew-dazed.

      I have great hope for the younger people though. They’re the ones who will get sent, or their children sent, to die for “Israel”. They’re the ones who will be living in favelas and then in rubble, as The Chosen Ones Gaza-ize the US. They know. They Notice, as the saying goes.

  7. Monika Schaefer
    Monika Schaefer says:

    All the students at my daughter’s high school were escorted over to the local movie theatre for a special screening, during school hours, to watch Schindler’s List. I watched it too, at that time through the eyes of a holocaust believer still. It was very heavy and very impactful for me, so I can only imagine how deeply it affected all those young impressionable minds. The devastating effects of Hollywood on our people can hardly be stated strongly enough.

    Jürgen Neumann talked about the anti-German propaganda in the movies on two of my “Flipside” broadcasts on RBN, the first one focussed on the Star Wars series, and the second one the anti-White propaganda in movies in general. https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/the-flipside-with-monika-november-1-2025/ and https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/the-flipside-with-monika-november-8-2025/

  8. Karen Crockett
    Karen Crockett says:

    Mummy’s boy Jerry Seinfeld makes Jews funny, depicting hypochondria, tastelessness, ungainly demeanor. Those who hate them and/or share the Nazi view that they are all “animals” can only see conspiratorial propaganda, but have no realistic answer to the JQ as they see it – Madagascar again!
    This article and its familiar references read like the discovery of revisionism by a naive newcomer, unfamiliar with the primary evidence that Hitler and NS leaders regarded the Jews as poisonous bacilli or deadly vermin, who required liquidation, and to some extent got it when the war provided a pretext, opportunity and cover. For evidence, just read the documentation carefully in David Irving’s 740-page “Goebbels”.

    • Alex
      Alex says:

      David Irving is a treasure, and his company, David Irving Books, is still around, as is he. The books are not cheap but I think are worth it.

      • crier de paon
        crier de paon says:

        Irving is very ill, needing full-time nursing care.
        The organised boycott of his books following the Lipstadt fiasco was disgraceful, and did not help his health or his livelihood. His books, and still more his website, were not totally flawless, but he did not deserve this vengeful maltreatment, far worse than that inflicted on Rev Dr Stephen Sizer.

    • Frank
      Frank says:

      at any point in history, the story is the same- People allow jews back in, they then finally are forced to remember why they were expelled in the first place.
      Not just Christians, or Romans, but everywhere, at all times
      .
      The Holly is designed to make this cycle seem like an anomaly, contrary to the truth.
      .
      see Muzzy’s massacring jews during the farcical ‘Golden Age of jews’ – You can’t make this up

      1066 Granada massacre

  9. Alex
    Alex says:

    You harm your credibility right from the start by incorrectly citing his name as “Anton” Goeth. It was Amon Goeth and that’s fairly widely known.

  10. Alex
    Alex says:

    Goeth was not, actually, the “spitting image” of any Gaza sniper. You should say he, *allegedly*, acted in the same way Gaza snipers are documented to. Goeth was tall, fit, and quite Caucasian looking. Your standard Gaza sniper is incel-looking, probably curly-haired with a receding chin, perhaps a long nose giving an appearance simultaneously immature and doleful, with a streak of viciousness around the eyes. Fine examples of Ashkenazi inbreeding.

  11. Henry Herskovitz
    Henry Herskovitz says:

    As David Duke says, “In a divided land, the most unified group wields the greatest power”

Comments are closed.