The Noble Global Majority: Valorizing the Vibrantly Virtuous over the Vapidly Villainous

 It couldn’t be simpler: I rule the world and everyone else must obey me. How do I know this? Well, consider the undeniable fact that you are a single individual. The world’s population is therefore divided into two groups: you, numbering one, and those who are not you, numbering more than eight billion. Obviously, I’m in the second group, because I’m not you. Extending this logic, we discover that everyone on Earth is in a minority of one except me, because I’m always “not you” and I’m always in the majority of eight billion plus. This means I’m the only person who can speak for and represent that majority, because I’m always in it and everyone else is in a minority of one. The core democratic principle of majority rule therefore mandates that I rule the world and that everyone else must obey me. Q.E.D.

Brilliant Black thinkers

If you’ve spotted any flaws in my logic, you can’t be at the leading edge of leftist thought. My proof of personal pantocratism — “rule over all” — is merely a reductio ad suprem(e)um[1] of an ever-more popular idea in leftism, that of the Global Majority. Wikipedia defines this as “a collective term for people of Indigenous, African, Asian, or Latin American descent.” In other words, it means everyone who isn’t White.[2] And who coined this wise and wonderful term? It was a decolonializing scholar-of-color called Rosemary Campbell-Stephens, a brilliant Black thinker whose website tells us that she “has spent 40 years honing her craft in education and leadership,” that she is “a sought-after speaker and consultant,” and that she triumphantly oversaw an “Investing in Diversity leadership programme” that was “focussed on bringing a liberatory, unapologetically Black leadership framework, changing the heart as well as the face of leadership in London schools.” Her website also includes the following extravagant encomia from other Brilliant Black thinkers:

Brilliant Black Thinkers Rosemary Campbell-Stephens, April Warren-Grice, Grace Haynes and Future Cain (clockwise from top left)

It is such a pleasure to work with Rosemary Campbell-Stephens, we are enthralled with her professionalism, energy, commitment, and enthusiasm for what we are doing in Hackney around the anti-racist agenda, and our commitment to eradicating systemic racism, and, making anti-racism a foundation of our practice. As a council, we have adopted the global majority narrative and Rosemary has helped to bring this to life with her experience, depth of knowledge, and with key pieces of delivery over the year; such as the Hackney anti-racist praxis conference, Global Majority Master-Class and the stories untold, desert island disc evening. At all of these events, Rosemary’s delivery has been phenomenal.  Her candid style, humor, and connection with the audience were remarkable and uplifting. — Deborah Barnett, Anti-Racist Strategic Lead Children’s & Education Directorate, Hackney Council

When Rosemary speaks, the world grows silent. Her insight on liberation is unmatched as we all sit at the edge of our seats listening to her personal and professional anecdotes highlighting transformational leadership. Her stories inspire and provide a blueprint for change. Learning with and from her is an absolute joy and delight. — Dr April Grise [sic: should be April Warren-Grice], University of Pittsburgh School of Education

Narratives matter. Language matters, Representation matters. Facts matter. Once I had the pleasure of sharing intellect and community with Rosemary, my mind was opened up to more truths. Understanding that I am part of the Global Majority and that I am not a minority but I am part of 85% of the world population. This truth changed my mindset, had me view things in a more expansive manner to impact who I am, and how I lead on this lifelong equity journey. Rosemary’s work allowed me to see and feel that I belong in a world that is me. — Future Cain, Founder and CEO of Future of SEL (USA)

Coventry City Council is on a journey to become a truly diverse and anti-racist organisation — and Rosemary has helped that work. Her development session on ‘From Ethnic Minority to Global Majority’ was fantastic and was really popular with people across the workforce. Her passion and enthusiasm inspired many, with colleagues’ feedback including: “As a white person who aims to be an ally and who is learning always about her own racism/white frailty, I learned so much.” I would highly recommend Rosemary and her work and I hope to welcome her back to Coventry one day to help further support us on our journey. — Grace Haynes, Head of People & Culture, Coventry City Council

Racial literacy is, of course, a huge part of this work and ensuring that Early Years Educators have the correct language that can define a part of the identities of these children that my work is primarily concerned with empowering is essential. The teachings of Rosemary Campbell-Stephens and more specifically her coining of the term ‘Global Majority’ has ensured that the way in which I speak about those children as a powerful and self-determining group means that the long established and misguided language put upon us by governmental bodies which has historically seen us categorised as ‘ethnic minorities’ is a myth that is now instantly dispelled. — Liz Pemberton, Director, The Black Nursery Manager Training & Consultancy

I’m sure that Rosemary would praise April and the other Brilliant Black women just as much as they’ve praised her, because they are all plainly part of the New Girls’ Network. Unlike the despicable and antiquated “old boys’ network,” which allowed useless White men to promote each other and monopolize power without merit, the New Girls’ Network is uplifting truly meritorious Women of Color like Rosemary, April, Grace and Future. Yes, these women understand how democracy really works. That’s why they’re so keen on the term “Global Majority.” Democracy means “majority rule,” therefore Blacks like Rosemary and April are entitled to rule over Whites in the West, because they are members of the Global Majority and Whites are not.

If you don’t accept this logic, you’re both racist and anti-democratic. Well, if the cap fits, I’ll have to wear it, because I don’t accept the logic. I don’t think that non-Whites are entitled even to live in White nations, let alone wield power within them. I regard the term “Global Majority” as an absurdity. The groups crammed into the concept — Chinese, Blacks, Arabs, Maoris, Amerindians, Andamese Islanders, Eskimos et al — have nothing in common except that they’re “Not White.” They’re being defined against Whites in a blatant erasure of their rich diversity and differences. You could just as easily — and absurdly — define the “Global Majority” as those who are “Not Chinese” or “Not Black” or “Not Arab.”

Global = Noble

But I’m wasting my time criticizing the concept for being absurd and illogical, because it was never created to embody truth and reflect reality. No, it was created by a self-aggrandizing Black narcissist as both a weapon against Whites and a tool of self-promotion. And I think the concept has been taken up eagerly by other self-aggrandizing non-White narcissists to attack Whites and promote themselves in the same way. In the past, non-Whites demanded privileges and preferences as minorities within White nations. In the future, they will demand power within White nations as members of the non-White majority outside White nations. For them, that will be true democracy in action, rule by the majority. But when leftists speak of “democracy,” they always mean rule by the moral majority, not by the numerical majority as such. That is, they mean the rule of the vibrantly virtuous over the vapidly villainous.

Who are the vibrantly virtuous? Non-Whites in general and Black women like Rosemary Campbell-Stephens in particular. And who are the vapidly villainous? Whites in general and stale pale males in particularly. When non-White narcissists like Rosemary Campbell-Stephens speak of the “Global Majority,” they also implicitly mean the Noble Majority. Yes, of course they want to intimidate us Whites with a sense of how outnumbered we are, but the gross fact of a non-White majority on Earth is sanctified by its non-Whiteness, not by its mere size. This is why the concept of the Global Majority has posed a largely unrecognized threat to the White and Jewish leftists who also support it.

The Noble Global Majority does not support Israel and Jews (image from Boston Globe)

However, the threat became much clearer to Jews, at least, after the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. As they watched their non-White “natural allies” repeatedly fill the streets of London, New York and Paris in support of Palestinians, not Israelis, many powerful and influential Jews realized that the Mud Flood — mass migration by non-Whites into the West — may not be so good for Jews after all. That lesson was reinforced in September 2026 by the Green Party, which has “adopted a motion formally establishing it as an anti-Zionist party” and stating unequivocally that “Zionism is racism.” You see, the Green party no longer centers itself on ecology and animal welfare, but on Palestine, anti-Zionism and “anti-racism.” Like the Labour and Conservative parties long before, it’s been parasitized and diverted to serve interests never intended by those who founded it.

From Airhead to Inbred

However, unlike Labour and the Tories, the Green party hasn’t been parasitized to serve Jewish interests. OK, its current leader is an anti-White Jewish homosexual called Zack Polanski, but he may not be leader for much longer, because his Muslim deputy Mothin Ali is after his job. The name of the party once symbolized the green of plants, forests and the natural world. It now increasingly symbolizes the green of Islam. Foremost in their support for that anti-Zionist motion were the melanin-enriched Muslims of the Global Majority Greens (GMG). The GMG aren’t always secure in their spelling and syntax, but they definitely know that they want power to punish Whitey:

We are the self-identified African, Caribbean, Asian, Latino, Arab, Indigenous, Gyspy [sic], Roma, Traveller and other marginalised people in the Green Party of England and Wales. We represent and campaign affects [sic] our people and communities on an international, national and local scale. (Global Majority Greens at Action Network)

Welcome to Global Majority Greens. We are a subgroup within the Green Party of England and Wales (GPEW). We aim to advance the rights of People of the Global Majority in the UK.

∙ Our communities represent the global majority.

∙ Our communities have rich historical, intersectional and cultural differences.

∙ Our communities have a legacy of innovation, contribution, and vibrancy both here in the UK and abroad.

∙ The Global Majority Greens increases awareness and shares information about issues facing People of the Global Majority in the Green Party of England and Wales, and in society as a whole. (Global Majority Greens website, September 2026)

From Airhead to Inbred: the Green leaders Rachel Millward, Zack Polanski and Mothin Ali

If you look above at the photo of the three Green “co-leaders,” you’ll see that one is plainly a member of the Global Majority and that one just as plainly isn’t. But what about the third? The squat, inbred-looking Mothin Ali, on the right, is plainly a member of the Global Majority. The attractive-but-airheaded White woman Rachel Millward, on the left, just as plainly isn’t. But what about Zack Polanski, the ugly Jewish homosexual in the middle? We have to confront a very disturbing question: Are Jews like Polanski part of the “Global Majority”? At one time, the answer appeared to be yes, because anti-fascists back in 2007 used a chant that ran like this: “We are Muslim, black and Jew, there are many more of us than you!” Obviously, the chant was directed at Whites as a whole, not merely at White racists, and was implicitly invoking the concept of the Global Majority.

What Jews think of Muslims and what Muslims think of leftists

Back then, Jews were firmly in the Global Majority alongside their Muslim and Black “natural allies” against White Britain. But are Jews still there today? I’m sure Jews like Polanski want to be, but I’m equally sure that Muslims like Mothin Ali have decided that they aren’t. The Global Majority Greens support Palestinians, not Israelis, and were delighted when the party’s conference voted this year to adopt that motion of “Zionism is racism.” After the vote, the Movement for Progressive Judaism immediately struck back, proclaiming that: “The motion is antisemitic in its formulation and intention. By adopting it, the Green party has made antisemitism party policy and become a racist party.”

Jewish labor, Jewish reward: a Black woman condemns Zionists as filthy and disgusting (“blood clart” is Jamaican English for “blood-cloth, menstrual rag, unclean object”)

So the Greens say that the Zionists are racist and the Zionists say that the Greens are racist. Alas for the Zionists, an accusation of “Racism!” is infinitely more potent when delivered by melanin-enriched Muslims than by stale, pale Ashkenazim. It’s now plain that Jews are suffering from Black-and-Brown blowback. That isn’t an unpleasant proctological condition: it’s the direct consequence of Jews’ own anti-White activism. In the 1950s and ’60s, Jews in America portrayed Blacks as the gentle, cruelly oppressed and spiritually superior victims of villainous White racism. They then joined Jews in the rest of the West and opened the borders to millions of non-White “natural allies” from the Third World. Jews privileged those immivaders, demonized all White resistance to their presence as evil, xenophobic and unacceptable, and pushed through law after law to stifle free speech and crush White resistance.

Jenrick ♥ Jews

And how have non-Whites rewarded Jews for all that labor on behalf of non-Whites? By deciding that Jews are “Hyper-Whites with Hyper-Privilege,” as I put it at the Occidental Observer in 2019. That’s the Black-and-Brown blowback I spoke of above. Jews should have paid more attention to their own Bible: “Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.” (Proverbs 26:27) Jews intended to harm Whites and gleefully succeeded. Unfortunately, they’ve ended up harming themselves too. That’s why some powerful and influential Jews have stopped their support for non-Whites, as is plain from the behavior of one of Britain’s most dedicated shabbos goyim, a politician called Robert Jenrick. Whatever Jenrick says and does is always designed to advance his own interests, but like all ambitious politicians in the West, he knows that the surest route to personal success is to serve Jewish interests. Like Kamala Harris and the former prime minister Keir Starmer, Jenrick is married to a Jew. He is funded by the Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer and has said that “the Star of David should be displayed at every point of entry to the UK to show” that “we stand with Israel.”

Why did Nigel Farage welcome the “fraud” Robert Jenrick into Reform?

That was while Jenrick was still in the Conservative party. When he abandoned the Tories and joined Reform, it was confirmation that Jews are now in control of Reform just as they are of the Conservatives and Labour. And just as the Conservatives don’t conserve and Labour don’t champion the working-class, Reform will not reform anything in favor of Whites. Instead, they will repeat the goy-grovel and work for Jewish interests. But some Jews have decided that working for Jewish interests now means working against non-White interests. At least, that’s what I conclude from some very interesting comments by Robert Jenrick about English identity:

We’ve ended up in a country where there are millions and millions of people who have a British passport in their bedroom drawer, but who are not culturally British by my standards, are not culturally English either, and are not ethnically English as well. And that is a world away from this country as it was 50 years ago, certainly 100 years ago. And this debate is a perfectly normal one for us to be having. (“Robert Jenrick says ‘millions and millions’ of people in England are not ‘culturally or ethnically’ English as identity row between Reform and Tories escalates,” The Daily Mail, 8^th October 2026)

Shabbos goy Robert Jenrick welcomes Afghans to Britain in 2022

In 2022, the shabbos goy Jenrick openly boasted of welcoming Afghans to Britain. In 2026, he’s decided to pursue Jewish interests by condemning the harm that Afghans and other non-Whites are doing to Britain. He was responding to the shabbos shiksa Kemi Badenoch, the Nigerian narcissist who leads the Cuckservative party in its twilight years. In her speech to the Tory party conference, Badenoch claimed that she was proudly British and that her half-Black children were English. In reality, she isn’t British and they aren’t English. And Jenrick was telling her so in his remarks about English identity. Of course, Jenrick and Badenoch were rivals for the leadership of the Cuckservative party and Jenrick did not take well to losing. That’s part of why he defected to Reform. But only part of why: he mostly defected to serve Jewish interests. And he must have been doing that again when he championed Englishness as an ethnic identity and said that millions of people currently living in England aren’t English.

Roche in a trap

That’s a big shift from the lies of Jews like Barbara Roche, the Labour immigration minister who proclaimed in 2000 that “Britain has always been a nation of migrants.”  In the same speech, Roche denounced William Evans-Gordon (1857-1913), a White politician who supported a successful bill to restrict Jewish immigration in 1905 and spoke of “unsavoury” Polish Jews harming the interests of British Whites. Having denounced him, Roche gloated that “I expect Major Evans-Gordon would be spinning in his grave if he knew that their descendant would not only be Immigration Minister but would be standing before you today making this speech.”

Barbara Roche (left) and Barbara Butch: One zaftig Zionist opens the borders, the other zaftig Zionist plays the victim

As I’ve described before at the Occidental Observer, Barbara Roche began the Mud Flood, opening Britain’s borders to millions of Muslims and other non-Whites. Roche wanted to harm Whites but has ended up harming Jews too. Those Black and Brown “natural allies” of Jews have turned out to be natural enemies. They don’t want Jews to join them in the noble majority of the Global Majority. But Jews and their shabbos goyim will not admit that Jews have engineered their own misfortune. Instead, Jews will  continue to do what they always do: play the victim, blame the goyim, and work only for themselves.

Healing the wounds of the world

That script has often served them well in the past, but only for a time. In the end, the goyim have always rebelled. Another goyish rebellion is obviously brewing now. Charlie Kirk may have been planning to lead it, which may explain why Charlie Kirk is now dead. Assassination is a very old Jewish tradition, after all. But multiple assassinations haven’t brought Israel victory over Iran and I don’t think they’ll bring Jews victory over Whites either.

A Jew and his shabbos goy: Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump

Israel’s war on Gaza has destroyed for ever the Jewish pretence that they’re a noble minority, filled with love for mankind, longing to heal the wounds of the world. The war on Gaza has been an orgy of hate and destruction, not a festival of love and healing. That’s why the “Global Majority” has turned against Jews. When Israel’s war on Iran has wrecked Western economies, Whites too will turn on Jews. As the Jewish Bible long ago warned the Chosen Ones: “Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.” (Proverbs 26:27)

“If Jews love mankind, why do they shoot children for fun?”

[1]  Reductio ad suprem(e)um means “reduction to me-as-supreme.” But what I was really performing in my claim to rulership of the world was a reductio ad absurdum, a “reduction to absurdity” of the concept of the “Global Majority.”

[2]  Interestingly, when I first wrote about the term “global majority” at TOO in September 2024, Wikipedia said that the people in question “constitute approximately 85 percent of the global population.” Now Wikipedia says they “75 percent.” This change implies that Whites are 25% “of the global population.” But they aren’t: they’re about 10% and falling fast. Is the change an attempt to avoid alerting us Whites to our perilously small numbers?