Featured Articles

Trump’s lewd video: An evolutionary comment

/75 Comments/in , /by

What Trump said:

“I’ve got to use some Tic Tacs, just in case I start kissing her,” Trump says. “You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait.”

“And when you’re a star, they let you do it,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

“Whatever you want,” says another voice, apparently Bush’s.

“Grab them by the p—y,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

So now we have a media frenzy, the theme of which is that Trump has shown himself to be a horrible sexist and abuser of women. “Rape culture in a nutshell” as a writer in the Huffington Post would have it.

As usual, it’s a moral indictment. Of course, moral indictments of Trump have been routine ever since he entered the race, often centered on race and immigration. But now the chorus is deafening. So much so that quite a few Republicans (mainly those who never supported him or did so only reluctantly — i.e., the GOP establishment cuckservatives) are now (surprise!) deserting him.

The implicit assumption here is that the women involved are passive, helpless creatures who are being assaulted by the big bad hairy ape. Heaven forfend! Fainting couch feminism at its finest.

Spare me. Read more

On Europe and “the Faith”

/308 Comments/in , , /by

PopeFrancis

“Too often you have not been welcomed…Forgive the closed-mindedness and indifference of our societies, which fear the change of lifestyle and mentality that your presence requires.”
Pope Francis, 2016.

“Europe is the faith, and the faith is Europe…I say again, renewing the terms, The Church is Europe: and Europe is The Church.”
Hillaire Belloc, 1920. 

Over the years my attitudes towards race and religion have unfortunately brought me into conflict with many Christians, some of whom have been very close to me. Closest to home, my wife is an evangelical Christian. Like many of her co-religionists, she believes much of what she is told in church, not only in terms of what is written in the Bible, but also in the social instructions her church issues in order to steer its flock towards a “good” and “moral” Christian life.

My wife and I are opposites in many respects. She is fully aware of my own agnosticism, and is equally aware of my positions on racial, religious and political matters. Possessing an abundance of good qualities as a wife and mother, I don’t think I am doing her a terrible injustice by stating that she doesn’t completely understand the complexities of the subject matter I routinely explore. To her, the thing that matters most is that my attitudes are “good.” It is the “moral” merit of my positions that she is most interested in, and because she is a Christian the question of how “moral” my opinions are is entirely dependent on how closely they fit with the Christian moral worldview  —  as taught to her by her church. Thus, when we discuss this or that aspect of the news she will often ask of my opinions: “Yes, but is that a good attitude to have? Is that displaying forgiveness? Isn’t your heart too hard?” If the discussion continues, it frequently evolves into a debate between (my) facts and (her) moral feelings. Read more

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan: White Genocide by Design (Part 2)

/27 Comments/in /by

europa

 

Is it ‘Goodbye Europe’? . . . Or is there still time?

Though no one has accused him of being Jewish, Count Kalergi emerges as one of the twentieth century’s most outstanding philosemites: more Jewish than the Jews, if it’s possible to imagine that.

In proclaiming that the Jews were now the spiritual aristocrats of the world—that they had supplanted the spineless and “dilapidated”  non-Jewish feudal aristocracy after the French Revolution—Count Kalergi made it clear that the Jews were to rank foremost in any future world government. A future world without Jews at the top of the pyramid, dispensing wisdom and justice, was inconceivable to him. The Jews were to be the movers and shakers, the crème de la crème. They would give the orders, and the rest of the world would bend the knee and obey.

If you think all this sounds a bit like a conspiracy theory, rest assured it is not. Count Kalergi’s principal ideas had impeccable intellectual antecedents. There is nothing “conspiratorial” about cosmopolitanism or internationalism, one world government, and the push toward a “United States of Europe” seen as a stepping stone to one-world government. In an excellent 2-part essay by Canadian writer Clare Ellis, on which I have relied heavily, she speaks in her opening paragraph about “a pan-European economic order that essentially suppresses ethnic European bonds in favour of cosmopolitan ideals,” adding in her second paragraph: “The non-ethnic based European Union was envisioned as the first step toward the eventual unification of humanity under a World Federation in perpetual peace.” Read more

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan: White Genocide by Design (Part 1)

/11 Comments/in /by

kalergi

Go to Part 1

Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz recently remarked that Europe was on the brink of a “cataclysmic event“. What could this be?

On the face of it, Stiglitz appears to be predicting the imminent death of Europe. But this is deceptive. Europe is not going anywhere. It will still be Europe as long as its individual states remain intact. What Stiglitz is predicting is the death of the idea of a future federalist pan-European superstate: a multilingual leviathan with a single currency, the euro, and no border controls between its individual statelets. This continental superstate, the United States of Europe, is seen as an analogue to the United States of America.

Stiglitz makes his gloomy prediction because he is disappointed by Brexit, the momentous decision of the British people to free themselves from the tentacles of the European superstate. Stiglitz fears that other nations in the EU bloc could get similar dangerous ideas. With Brexit, 17 million people said ‘NO!’ to being ruled over by autocratic foreigners in another country, many of them unelected bureaucrats of dubious provenance and with repugnant ideologies.

“Today [October 1, 2016] is exactly 100 days since Britain voted to leave the European Union,” Quentin Letts writes in his Saturday Essay for the Daily Mail, revealing how the momentous words of the BBC announcer ‘We’re out’ almost made him freak out when he first heard the good news at 4.40am on Friday, June 24. “I sat on my bed and burst into tears of joy,” he recalls. “Our country had voted to escape the alien prison of Brussels and its anti-democratic Commission. We were free.”

Stiglitz and his kind would not have approved the upsurge of populist sentiment symbolized by Brexit, obviously believing that referenda should only be taken seriously when the votes of the masses coincide with the special interests of the ruling elite.

We are talking here about the clash between two completely incompatible world views: between those who, on the one hand, believe that nations states are important and should retain their sovereignty and border controls, and those who, on the other hand, believe passionately that nation states are not important and should be phased out of existence. The latter group, who wield great influence right now, believe that nationalist sentiments are to be discouraged and that nationalism is an unmitigated evil. To this very powerful elite, in which the Jews happen to find themselves ensconced among the upper echelons, it is cosmopolitan internationalism that matters. Read more

The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement

/47 Comments/in , /by

illegal

In a 2015 essay on ‘Whiteness studies’ I attempted to lay the groundwork and contextualization for a more developed study of the scale and devastating impact of contemporary Jewish intellectual activism in our colleges, universities, and wider culture. In that essay I noted the importance of Jewish activists including Noel Ignatiev, Ruth Frankenberg, Ricky Marcuse, and Terry Berman, who between the mid-1970s and late 1990s engaged in an effort to develop an academic discipline known as ‘Whiteness studies.’ Since its inception, Whiteness studies has occupied a unique space in an increasingly multicultural disciplinary landscape. Unlike Black studies, Jewish studies, or Asian studies, this sphere of academia is not intended to constructively explore the achievements, history, and culture of its scrutinized ethnic group. Rather, the genre exists to subject ‘Whiteness,’ and by implication White people, to a uniquely hostile dialectic consisting of the debasement of White culture, the degradation of White history, and the delegitimization of the European claim to existence. As such, the discipline may be regarded as an act of ethnic warfare, based as it is on the intended conquest of minds and consciences, and eventually, resources and territory.

In all Western countries, Whiteness studies, in both its academic and social justice expressions, remains disproportionately directed by Jews. This is an empirically observable fact. A book could be written on Jewish involvement in this academic “discipline” alone, but it should suffice here for a brief survey of some key examples. These include Syracuse University’s Barbara Applebaum, who has made a career out of advancing notions of ‘White guilt’ and ending what she describes as “White moral innocence.” In a similar vein is Leeds University’s Say Burgin, who teaches a course titled “Why is my curriculum White?,” while University of California’s George Lipsitz, author of How Racism Takes Place, has also written several books on ‘Whiteness’ and White guilt. Jewish feminist Michelle Fine, based at City University of New York, has produced numerous works on “White privilege,” including her book Witnessing Whiteness. Other Jewish academics highly active in the Whiteness Studies field include Lois Weis, David Theo Goldberg, Maurice Berger, Lawrence Grossberg, Jennifer Roth-Gordon, Cynthia Levine-Rasky, Laura S. Abrams, Judith Katz, Melissa Steyn, Paula Rothenberg, and Amy Eshleman. Read more

How the manufactured anti-Semitism crisis is destroying UK Labour

/in , /by

“I can’t believe that!” said Alice.

“Can’t you?” the Queen said in a pitying tone. “Try again: draw a long breath, and shut your eyes.”

Alice laughed. “There’s no use trying,” she said: “one can’t believe impossible things.”

“I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” – Alice through the Looking Glass by Lewis Carroll

Lewis Carroll took us on journey through a fantasy land where nothing was what it seemed and which could only be understood through the eyes of a child. It would take a similarly powerful imagination to make sense of the turmoil unfolding in Britain’s Labour Party.

In order to comprehend the civil war in one of the West’s oldest centre-left parties you have to know two things that must never be openly admitted.  The first is that the entire row has been over an anti-Semitism crisis that was clearly manufactured.

The second point is that the real reason for the dispute; the party’s future as a vehicle for Jewish political power in Britain and reliable friend of Israel, must never be openly discussed at all.  Read more

Another Adventure in Advertising: The Pepperdine Graphic

/40 Comments/in , /by

Our ad company submitted an ad to the student newspaper at Pepperdine University, the Graphic, and, lo and behold, it was approved and published. Now that in itself is a major accomplishment, although I can’t say that I noticed an uptick in subscriptions for TOQ or traffic to TOO. But it was nice to see that it was actually published.

But then it turns out that it was only published because of an oversight — an accident if you will. The head of the Advertising Department, Falon Opsahl, didn’t perform due diligence on the content: “Accidents are not excuses.”

My stomach churned as I scrolled through headline after headline bashing Jews, Blacks and immigrants. The only exceptions were articles that were too busy praising Anglo-Saxon superiority. I felt sick. …

The senior leaders and I made a serious mistake. We don’t advertise anything that propagates racism, sexism or dehumanization. We regret that we failed our own standards.

Pepperdine Graphic Media is a place of representation, where we strive to make all students voices heard and valued, such as in the Race, Faith and Sex special editions.

We must all remember that racism — virulent, active racism — is alive and well. It is heartbreaking and life-destroying. The Graphic staff and I are deeply apologetic and we have learned from our mistake.

Read more