General

Mark Wauck: What the media isn’t telling us about the Iran war

Interesting Big Picture View Of The War On Iran

All self explanatory. In a sense, the overall theme is that something very big is happening—so big that most people simply can’t wrap their minds around it:

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 @SMO_VZ

4h

BRILLIANT PIECE on IRAN !!!!!

Alon Mizrahi, an Israeli journalist, one of the most worthy Jews in the world:

Actually, Mizrahi’s self descriptionformer Israeli, and an original anti-Zionist Moroccan-Palestinian Jew.

“We are witnessing history. Iran, to everyone’s surprise, is destroying American bases so thoroughly, on such a large scale, and so decisively that the world is not ready for this.

In 4 days, Iran has managed to expand its sphere of military dominance in the region. Iran has destroyed the most valuable and expensive military bases, property, and equipment in the entire world.

The American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia are among the largest military facilities in the entire world. These facilities have cost trillions of dollars over several decades to build. We are talking about the fact that the bulk of the military spending that has been made over more than 30 years has gone up in smoke.

This is the reason for the continuing attacks on the bases—to render them unusable for the future.

We see radars costing hundreds of millions of dollars each being destroyed in an instant. We see entire military bases being abandoned and burned, looted, and destroyed. And I’m telling you, as far as I know, the U.S. has never suffered such destruction in its entire history, except perhaps for Pearl Harbor, but that was just one attack.

No enemy in a conventional war has ever done this to American military forces as Iran is doing right now. It’s hard to believe. The military situation is so serious that censorship is blocking almost all new information about this war. If you’ve noticed, we’re getting less and less information every day.

Yes, I’ve noticed that.

Thirty-five years ago, during the first Iraqi war, we were shown endless footage from Iraq. Back then, smart bombs and cameras were a novelty, but every night we were shown night-time footage. Now we hardly see any videos at all.

Understand this! Supposedly, this is the world’s largest military power, with the world’s largest air capabilities, and on the fourth day of the U.S. offensive, supposedly and supposedly breaking through Iranian defenses, we don’t see any signs of American dominance in the Iranian sky. Where are all the video recordings of our planes flying over Tehran or any other part of Iran, for that matter?

American soldiers can’t even dream of setting foot on Iranian soil. And to understand how desperate this war is, on the fourth day you’re already hearing the most insane proposals and ideas from the Trump administration. They’re proposing sending military escorts for oil tankers leaving the Persian Gulf. What are you even talking about! You want to send American ships into the zone of destruction of thousands of Iranian missiles? NOW no one can get through the Strait of Hormuz.

The Iranians have been preparing for this for decades. They’re flaunting the idea of arming Kurdish militias to invade Iran. What the hell are you talking about? Have you seen a map of Iran!? It seems the Trump administration has never seen a map of Iran! Do you know how vast it is? What does it mean to invade Iran!? Do you think a militia of 10,000 people could invade Iran!? Or even 50,000? Or 100,000? Iran will swallow them up.

The U.S. and Israel have already lost this war. The U.S. and Israel can kill millions of civilians in their homes. They have powerful bombs and can blow up buildings, but they won’t win this war. Iran’s military infrastructure and weaponry is deep underground all over IRAN. Neither the Americans nor, especially, the Israelis have any chance of reaching any of it. They’re in deep shit.

They started something they have no chance of finishing. When this all ends, the U.S. will never return to West Asia. There will be no American presence in the Middle East. I’m telling you this now with certainty.”

Listening to Luke Gromen while writing:

Voting in American elections is like writing letters to Santa Claus for adults. Nobody frickin’ voted for this.

Larry C. Johnson: The US Missile Defense Shortage is Worse than Imagined

The US Missile Defense Shortage is Worse than Imagined

Donald Trump made a bold and provably wrong claim yesterday about the US air-defense missile inventory:

The United States Munitions Stockpiles have, at the medium and upper medium grade, never been higher or better — was stated to me today we have a virtually unlimited supply of these weapons. Wars can be ‘forever,’ and very successfully, using just these supplies (which are better than other countries’ finest arms!). At highest end we have good supply but not where we want to be. Much additional high-grade weaponry is stored for us in outlying countries.

I will now show you conclusively that Trump is gaslighting the public, at least with respect to the PAC-3 MSE missiles. The PAC-3 MSE (Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement) is effectively the primary missile used in the modern Patriot system for most high-priority threats, particularly in current U.S. Army and allied operations as of 2026. The PAC-3 MSE ( Missile Segment Enhancement) began low-rate initial production (LRIP) in 2014, with deliveries starting in 2015 and full-rate production approved in 2018.

Starting in 2015 and continuing through 2020, the US produced between 100 — 300 a year. Let’s use the higher figure… That is 1,800 PAC-3 MSE. In the succeeding four year period, the US produced an estimated 2,200 PAC-3 MSEs (i.e., 500+ per year). In 2025 the US boosted production to 620. Total PAC-3 MSEs produced since 2015 is 4,620.

When the PAC-3 MSE is employed against an incoming threat, a minimum of two are fired. Keep that figure in mind. So how many have we sent Ukraine? According to open source documents, including DOD/DOW budget figures, the the US has transferred 847 PAC-3 MSE missiles to Ukraine. Assuming that the US and Israel have NOT fired any PAC-3 MSE missiles in 2025 and 2026, the US only has 3,773 in its inventory. We know that is ridiculous, but play along with me.

During the 12-day war Iran fired at least 600 ballistic missiles into Israel. In theory, the Patriot system is designed to work against ballistic missiles while Israel’s Iron Dome is designed to defeat short-range counter-rocket, artillery, and mortar (C-RAM) defense, plus capabilities against drones, cruise missiles, precision-guided munitions (PGMs), and some ballistic threats in certain configurations. So let’s assume that the Patriot was fired at 500 of the Iranian missiles — i.e., at least 1,000 PAC-3 MSE missiles were fired. That shrinks the US inventory to 2,773.

In just four days since the start of Epic Fury, Iran has fired an estimated 200 missiles at sites in the Gulf nations and Israel that have Patriot batteries. Conceivably, that means that another 400 PAC-3 MSE missiles have been launched, which shrinks the inventory to 2,373. If Iran fires 60 ballistic missiles per day, and the Patriot system uses 2 interceptors per incoming missile (a common conservative engagement doctrine for high-confidence intercepts against ballistic threats), the inventory would be exhausted after 19 full days, with enough left on the 20th day to handle roughly 46–47 Iranian missiles before depletion (about 19.775 days total, or roughly 19 days and 18–19 hours of sustained operations at this rate). In other words, the US PAC-3 MSE missiles will be exhausted on March 23, 2026.

Note that I am assuming that the entire inventory of US Patriot missiles have been deployed to Israel and US bases in the region. That is a false assumption because there are Patriot missile batteries with a full complement of missiles in other theaters. At present there are three Patriot battalions permanently assigned/forward-deployed to INDOPACOM (e.g., in South Korea/Japan/Guam areas, like 35th ADA Brigade and 1-1 ADA at Kadena); EUCOM has one Patriot battalion assigned (e.g., units in Germany like Baumholder/Ansbach areas, supporting NATO/Eastern flank).

The US Army has 15 Patriot battalions total (14 fully available as of mid-2025, with one in modernization), each typically consisting of 4–6 batteries (a battery is the firing unit with launchers/radars). A Patriot battery (also called a fire unit) typically includes 6–8 launchers (Launching Stations), though configurations vary by operator, mission, and launcher type (e.g., M903 for modern U.S. systems). If we assume that the four Patriot battalions have four batteries each, with 72 missiles per battery, we get a total of 1,152 missiles that must be subtracted from the maximum possible number deployed to the Middle East — i.e., the actual inventory, using the most conservative estimate, is 1,221. That means the US inventory of PAC-3 MSE missiles, using the assumptions above that Iran is firing 60 ballistic missiles per day, the supply of missiles will run out in 10 days. This is why I assert that Donald Trump is out of touch with reality.

Instead of my regular one-on-one chat with Marcello, he hosted a panel today with me, Commandante Farinazzo and Ricardo Amadesi:

Guerra no Irã - Com Larry Johnson, Cmdt. Farinazzo e Ricardo Amadesi

My dear friend Rasheed Mohammed and I chatted for about forty minutes today about the situation in Iran:

{Live} The Intel Report with CIA Analyst Larry Johnson - It's Going Down

My new Iranian friend, Fouad, interviewed me on Monday and posted the video today:

Interview With Larry C. Johnson | By attacking Iran, America humiliated itself

I did a video journey to the homeland of some of my ancestors… Ireland. Gerry O’Neill and I discussed the ridiculous claim that the US could deploy ground forces to Iran:

Larry C. Johnson:

Once a Bipartisan Stalwart, AIPAC Turns ‘Toxic’ in the Illinois Primaries

The intervention of AIPAC supporters in Chicago-area Democratic primaries, including one with opposing Jewish candidates, has made the pro-Israel lobby an issue on the left.

Listen · 8:26 min
Three candidates debate each other on a television set, with images of lit-up buildings behind them.
From left to right, Mayor Daniel Biss of Evanston, Ill., State Senator Laura Fine of Illinois and Kat Abughazaleh at Fox Chicago’s debate last month.Credit…Joshua Lott for The New York Times
The televised debate for an open House seat in the Chicago area was zipping along smoothly, even politely, until the moderator turned from health care, housing and immigration to the knottiest issue of the campaign, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

“It’s dark money,” Laura Fine, an Illinois state senator, said last week, struggling to explain how she had received hundreds of thousands in donations from super PACs tied to AIPAC. “Our campaign does not coordinate.”

One of her opponents, Mayor Daniel Biss of Evanston, Ill., shot back, “Your campaign is bankrolled by AIPAC and MAGA donors.” Then Kat Abughazaleh, a third candidate running to the left of both Mr. Biss and Ms. Fine, jumped in to attack them for what she called “the lying, the bickering over who likes AIPAC more.”

AIPAC, the hard-line pro-Israel lobbying organization that once commanded bipartisan fealty, has increasingly become a boogeyman in Democratic circles, with scores of candidates distancing themselves from the group. Last month, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, a likely 2028 presidential candidate, said he “never will” accept money from AIPAC.

Nowhere is the divide sharper than in the Ninth District, a crooked finger that stretches from the Chicago lakefront through suburbs north and northwest of the city, a heavily Democratic and highly educated area with many historically Jewish communities. While AIPAC has rarely been involved in a race with dueling Jewish candidates, this one, with Ms. Fine and Mr. Biss, is an exception.

And the differences between them, on AIPAC and on Israel, mirror some of the divisions tearing through the wider Jewish community.

Daniel Biss sitting at a desk and speaking.Laura Fine sitting at a desk and speaking.

Daniel Biss, the mayor of Evanston, Ill., and Laura Fine, an Illinois state senator.Credit…Joshua Lott for The New York Times

Neither AIPAC nor its official super PAC, United Democracy Project, is officially involved in the district, which has been represented by a Jewish Democrat for 61 years, either Sidney R. Yates, starting in 1965, or the now-retiring Representative Jan Schakowsky, elected in 1998.

In the Chicago area, Elect Chicago Women and Affordable Chicago Now — appeared suddenly, spending at least $10.9 million in the Ninth District primary and two other Illinois districts with competitive Democratic primaries.

Both new PACs have ties to groups that work closely with AIPAC. The Biss campaign and J Street, a liberal Jewish organization that is more critical of Israeli leadership under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have called them AIPAC front groups.

Whether the deluge of money funneled from the groups will help the candidates favored by pro-Israel donors, including Ms. Fine, or backfire and drive voters critical of Israel toward one of her opponents, is an open question.

“In the Ninth District, AIPAC is toxic,” State Senator Mike Simmons, a candidate in the race who is critical of Israel, said in an interview.

On Tuesday, Democratic primary voters nominated a fierce critic of Israel, the Rev. Frederick Douglass Haynes III, for a heavily Democratic House seat in Dallas. And Mr. Newsom said this week that the United States should reconsider military aid to Israel, which he compared to an apartheid state.

Illinois’ governor, the billionaire JB Pritzker, was once a major donor to AIPAC, but he said in an interview last week that he “walked away” from the group around 2015, when it began to veer to the right.

“I still believe it is significantly MAGA-influenced,” said Mr. Pritzker, a Democrat.

Image

A person waving an Israeli flag and wearing a MAGA hat standing behind a row of police officers in high-visibility vests.
After years of bipartisan support, Israel is increasingly becoming a dividing line, with Democrats and their voters critical of the Jewish state.Credit…Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

Last month in New Jersey, AIPAC poured funds into campaign ads attacking Tom Malinowski, a moderate Democratic House candidate who supported Israel but said that U.S. aid should not be unconditional. Instead of helping a more pro-Israel opponent, Tahesha Way, the attacks turned voters from Mr. Malinowski to a pro-Palestinian progressive, Analilia Mejia, who won the race.

In Chicago, the group has focused much of its ire on Mr. Biss, a grandson of Holocaust survivors who spent many of his childhood summers in Israel, where his mother was born, and whose nuanced views on the Middle East reflect those of many liberal Jews, said Jeremy Ben-Ami, the executive director of J Street, which is backing Mr. Biss with $100,000.

“This is a guy who can’t possibly be considered anti-Israel — he is the quintessential American Jew,” Mr. Ben-Ami said. “He is at the 50-yard line of Jewish Americans, and AIPAC doesn’t want them anywhere near policy.”

Exactly who is funding the attack ads in and around Chicago will not be known until well after the primaries, when the groups finally have to disclose their donors.

Image

Shown from behind and looking upward, a person waves a Palestinian flag outside an office building.
A demonstrator waves a Palestinian flag outside AIPAC’s office in Washington, D.C.Credit…Daniel Becerril/Reuters

“We don’t want somebody writing a blank check to Netanyahu,” said Patrick Clear, an Evanston resident who voted for Mr. Biss.

Mr. Clear and his wife, Barbara, said they were particularly turned off by the television ads promoting Ms. Fine, paid for by the Elect Chicago Women PAC, whose ties to AIPAC have been widely discussed in local political circles.

“It’s such an anodyne name, and then you see it’s entirely fueled by AIPAC,” Mr. Clear said.

Elect Chicago Women has so far spent more than $5.1 million to back Ms. Fine and $3.4 million to support Melissa Bean, a former congresswoman now running in the Eighth Congressional District. Affordable Chicago Now has spent at least $2.4 million to support Donna Miller, a Cook County Commissioner running in Illinois’ Second District.

United Democracy Project, the super PAC officially aligned with AIPAC, has spent more than $3.1 million in the Seventh Congressional District to support Melissa Conyears-Ervin, the Chicago city treasurer.

In an interview, Ms. Fine said she was “very surprised that there has been so much focus on this.” She said that she has repeatedly asked the groups backing her to reveal their donors, but she is “kind of hitting a wall” because they have not responded.

“I think this is a big problem in our political system,” she said. “It does a disservice to the electorate.”

Mr. Biss said that AIPAC sees him as a threat to their “far right, militaristic approach.”

“I think that it is really important to be willing to stand clearly in support of my values, which are aligned with the broad mainstream of American Jews,” he said, “and against a really hard-line point of view that is inaccurately trying to represent itself as speaking more broadly for the Jewish community.”

I’ve Read 50,000 Epstein Emails and I Need About 50,000 Showers

It’s All About The [XXXXXXREDACTION]

(Please note graphic language in column.)

I’m only about 100,000 pages into the Epstein files, so these are just my preliminary observations, but clearly the Department of Justice abused its redaction pen. One of my own columns, printed in full, appears in the files, sent from XXXXXXXXX, to XXXXXXXXX, with a cc to XXXXXXXX. Or maybe it was XXXXXXXX — I always get those guys confused.

Although the column is available online and wherever fine publications are sold, the DOJ redacted one name from it: “Haley Robson,” an Epstein victim-cum-procurer.

Robson’s name is not a secret. She’s been publicly identified at least since 2009 as an Epstein associate. Ironically, she’s also been one of the loudest voices denouncing the many redactions in the files.

She’s right. Way, way too many names have been X-ed out. I’m guessing the DOJ must have gone through at least 70,000 redactor pens.

The law expressly disallows redactions “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” So why has the Department of Justice blacked out the names of adult men — or women, God help us — sending emails to Epstein that say things like this:

a) “Pussy hunters!!”

Yes, that’s it. That’s all the email said.

b) “Subject: Hi from PB Hi J, Hope you can find a great guy for REDACTED :)) her pussy is getting wet”

Remember the good old days, back when we were outraged about “grabbing pussies”?

c) One email is entirely redacted except … “Has discovered the distraction of pussy, I assume. Well, I say good for him.”

I’m almost certain this wasn’t a reference to some cat lover.

d) “Love whats wrong with you you sound like a dirty old guy!! You’re surrounded by tits all day long… “

No, definitely not about cats.

e) “no one can beat your pussy network”

Thanks to all the redactions, we’re not even sure which banks these guys work for.

f) “I’ll send car pics and updates as they come 🙂 all set for her trip. Photos to come. …her tits are great! ;)”

By the way, her eyes are up here, fellas.

g) “Meet me at class 9:30 so Many hot girls promise … Promise an abundant of young pussy flesh ….. Love A”

Epstein may have been a serial statutory rapist, but give the guy credit: He was always very punctual.

h) “All I need later is to bring REDACTED over and have her pussy;)))”

Okay, but just promise me you won’t objectify her. She’s still a person. She’s got a name. It’s XXXXXXXXXX.

Sure it would be embarrassing to have one’s name attached to these emails, but the law says redactions are permitted only for “clearly unwarranted invasion[s] of personal privacy.”

Perhaps if these emails were being produced in response to a scandal involving, say, the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, then revealing the senders’ names would be an unwarranted invasion of privacy. But this is a case expressly about an international sex ring, the collection of kompromat, and the entire absence of law enforcement.

The names of men joking about their carnal knowledge of Epstein’s girls is precisely why Congress ordered the files released. (Well, that and the possibility of impeaching Trump.)

Not only names, but way too many faces are blacked out. (And I’m ordinarily a big fan of people working in blackface.)

The files include a boatload of photos from Epstein’s private collection, showing men having every kind of sex with young girls. The girls’ faces are blacked out, obviously — but so are the men’s. Ordinarily, showing their faces would be a wild violation of their privacy, but the law clearly states that redactions are not allowed for “embarrassment” or “reputational harm.”

These guys were either Epstein’s co-conspirators or his marks. Even if the girls were of age and the sex was consensual, those photos could still be used for blackmail (and the occasional Christmas card photo).

If we saw their faces, it could explain why it took so long to bring Epstein to justice. It might help answer the peculiarly unresolved mystery of who told Alex Acosta, the U.S. attorney who struck the second plea deal with Epstein, that he “belonged to intelligence”? (Why do we still not know that?)

Shockingly, The New York Times, remembering that it’s a newspaper, has done fantastic work on the files. Only because the paper pursued the matter, did the government un-redact a face in one photo. It showed a Mount Sinai doctor performing surgery on a girl laid out on Epstein’s dining room table — an unheard-of ethical breach. Based on other files, the Times figured out it was Dr. Jess Ting. But, when contacted by the paper, he denied it. After the DOJ unredacted the photo, showing Ting’s bright, smiling face, he stopped returning the paper’s calls.

Only 2.9 million pages to go.

Trump rejects idea that Israel drew US into war with Iran

Note to all you bigots out there: The war on Iran has nothing whatever to do with the Israel Lobby or the American Jewish community and if you say so, you are an anti-Semite. The U.S. had to twist Israel’s arm to get them to participate. The real reason is that Iran is working on obtaining a ballistic missile that could reach the U.S. and could be ready within 10 years time. Obviously, this is an IMMINENT THREAT and requires IMMEDIATE ACTION!!

Trump rejects idea that Israel drew US into war with Iran: ‘If anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand’

The comments follow remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that ignited questions about who led the charge.

President Donald Trump rejected claims that Israel had pulled the United States into the war with Iran on Tuesday, instead suggesting that he had “forced their hands.”

Trump’s comments came after Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on Monday that the United States entered the conflict because officials “knew that there was going to be an Israeli action” and expected to become embroiled as a result. Rubio’s comments ignited questions about whether Trump was taking his cues from the Israelis.

“Based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they were going to attack first and I didn’t want that to happen,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday during a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand, but Israel was ready and we were ready.”

The president’s claims appeared to contradict reports from the Pentagon to Congress on Sunday that there was no intelligence suggesting Iran planned to attack U.S. forces first.

“If we didn’t do what we’re doing right now, you would have had a nuclear war and they would have taken out many countries because you know what? They’re sick people,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday. “They’re mentally ill sick people. They’re angry, they’re crazy, they’re sick.”

While Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have denied suggestions that Israel steered the U.S. into the conflict, which has rapidly escalated tensions across the region, critics across the political spectrum have continued to question the extent to which the United States’ actions were influenced by Israel.

During the president’s meeting with Merz, the German leader told reporters that the two countries had a shared desire to get rid of the “terrible regime in Iran,” with Trump adding that Germany had allowed U.S. forces land in “certain areas,” though the U.S. was not asking Germany to provide troops.

The meeting followed a joint statement on Sunday by France, Germany and the United Kingdom in which the three countries vowed to “take steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the region.”

While Republican lawmakers largely backed the joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran Saturday morning, rising American casualties and suggestions by Trump that he had not ruled out sending troops into Iran have spurred concern from some about the potential for a drawn-out conflict.

Two Ancient Civilizations, One Modern Rupture: How China is Gradually Turning on the Jews

On February 24, 2026, the Times of Israel published a report that would have been almost unthinkable a decade earlier. Antisemitism has been rising in China, a country previously considered almost free of anti-Jewish hatred, according to a new research study by the Jewish People Policy Institute. Anti-Jewish tropes had moved from marginal online spaces into official media, academia, and state-sanctioned discourse. The phenomenon, JPPI senior fellow Shalom Wald found, had intensified sharply following the Gaza conflicts in 2021 and 2023.

“When the nation with the second-largest population in the world and one of the principal architects of the global information environment permits the dissemination of antisemitic ideas, fuels them, or tolerates them, its conduct resonates far beyond its borders,” warned JPPI president Yedidia Stern. The findings were particularly striking because antisemitism in China was developing without a historical background of Jewish persecution and without a significant Jewish presence in the country. Approximately 2,500 to 3,500 Jews live in mainland China according to the Jewish Virtual Library, with another 3,500 to 5,000 in Hong Kong according to local community organizations.

The Oldest Encounter

Jews have lived in China longer than in almost any country outside the Middle East. Jews have lived in China longer than in almost any country outside the Middle East. According to the Sino-Judaic Institute, the earliest communities arrived during the Tang dynasty, roughly the 7th to 10th centuries CE, settling along the Silk Road trade routes. The most famous of these communities established itself in Kaifeng, the imperial capital of the Song dynasty, where Jews built a synagogue in 1163 and received audiences with the emperor, according to scholar Xu Xin’s research at Nanjing University. A 1489 stone inscription at the Kaifeng synagogue records that Jews entered China during the Later Han dynasty, between 25 and 220 CE, and lists the Chinese surnames adopted by the community, though scholars note this early date reflects community tradition rather than documented evidence.

For centuries, these communities lived in relative peace, experiencing none of the pogroms or expulsions that defined Jewish life in Europe. The Kaifeng community gradually assimilated into Chinese culture, intermarrying and adopting Confucian practices while maintaining fragments of their religious identity.

Shanghai, the Refuge at the End of the World

The modern chapter of Chinese-Jewish relations began in the 19th century, when Sephardic Jewish merchants from Baghdad, led by families like the Sassoons and Kadoories, established vast commercial empires in Shanghai and Hong Kong. They built synagogues, schools, and hospitals. However, there was a dark side to the Sassoons’ economic influence in China. The most consequential and well-documented controversy remains opium.

Jewish merchant David Sassoon entered the India-to-China opium trade in the 1830s after establishing his trading house in Bombay, and by the 1860s David Sassoon & Co. had become one of the largest opium trading firms operating between India and China, competing with established houses like Jardine Matheson and Dent & Co. The family operated its own fleet of clipper ships for fast delivery, according to Stanley Jackson’s biography “The Sassoons”.

While Dent & Co. collapsed in 1867 due to financial pressures including competition and post-Civil War economic disruption, Jardine Matheson remained a major competitor throughout this period and continues operating today. The Sassoons accumulated substantial wealth from the opium trade, though precise profit figures are difficult to verify. The family’s subsequent empire in real estate, banking, textiles and shipping, including significant holdings in Bombay and Shanghai, was built substantially on this initial capital according to historians including Maisie Meyer in “From the Rivers of Babylon to the Whangpoo”.

Fast forward to the 20th century, after Kristallnacht in November 1938, as country after country closed its doors to Jewish refugees, Shanghai became one of the last open ports on earth. The city required no visa for entry due to its unusual international administration. Between 1938 and 1941, more than 20,000 European Jews fled to Shanghai, most of them from Germany and Austria, according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. They settled primarily in the Hongkou district, creating a vibrant community of cafés, newspapers, schools and synagogues amid desperate poverty, as documented by the Shanghai Jewish Refugees Museum.

When Japan occupied Shanghai and Nazi representatives, including Gestapo chief Colonel Josef Meisinger, pressured the Japanese army to devise plans against the Jewish population, Japanese officials refused to comply, and the community survived the war intact, according to historian David Kranzler in “Japanese, Nazis & Jews” and Marvin Tokayer in “The Fugu Plan.”

China long celebrated this history. The Shanghai refuge became a cornerstone of Chinese-Jewish goodwill, invoked by diplomats on both sides as evidence of a civilizational bond between two ancient peoples. The JPPI report noted that this positive narrative endured for decades. But in 2024, the report found, the Chinese government began to “uproot” those memories. A nonpolitical musical about the Shanghai refugees was canceled in Beijing. In the city of Harbin, memorial plaques were removed from buildings once belonging to the Jewish community, including the former synagogue, and a small Jewish museum was closed. “Inevitably, the Nazi practice of eliminating all traces of Jewish contributions to Germany comes to mind,” the JPPI report observed.

Sun Yat-sen, the Father of China, and His Jewish Allies

The political entanglement between Jews and the founding of modern China runs far deeper than the refugee story. Sun Yat-sen, the revolutionary leader revered on both sides of the Taiwan Strait as the father of the nation, was an outspoken admirer of the Jewish people and an early supporter of Zionism. On April 24, 1920, Sun wrote a letter to N.E.B. Ezra, the founder of the Shanghai Zionist Association, calling Zionism “one of the greatest movements of the present time” and declaring that “all lovers of Democracy cannot help but support whole-heartedly and welcome with enthusiasm the movement to restore your wonderful and historic nation, which has contributed so much to the civilization of the world.” The original signed letter was re-discovered in the archives of the National Library of Israel in 2021.

Sun’s connection to the Jewish world was not merely rhetorical. His most colorful personal aide was Morris Abraham “Two-Gun” Cohen, a Polish-born Jew from London’s East End who became Sun’s bodyguard, arms buyer, and confidant. According to the Jewish Policy Center, Cohen first encountered Chinese immigrants in western Canada in the early 1900s, defended them against discrimination, and was invited to join Sun’s revolutionary Tongmenghui organization. He trained Chinese-Canadians in military combat, secured weapons for the revolutionary army, and in 1922 traveled to China to serve as Sun’s aide-de-camp.

Cohen rose to the rank of major general in the Chinese National Revolutionary Army, making him the only Westerner to hold such a rank in the Chinese military. After Sun’s death in 1925, Cohen maintained relationships with both the Nationalist and Communist factions. Chiang Kai-shek appointed him de facto Minister of War from 1926 to 1928. During World War II, Cohen refused to evacuate Hong Kong, staying behind to help Sun Yat-sen’s widow Soong Ching-ling escape before being captured and tortured by the Japanese in Stanley Prison Camp. He was later repatriated through a prisoner exchange.

Cohen’s last great act may have been his most consequential for Jewish history. According to the Jewish Press, in 1947, the Republic of China (then holding a seat on the UN Security Council) intended to oppose the UN Partition Plan for Palestine. Cohen used his personal influence with Chinese officials to convince them to abstain, helping ensure the vote that gave birth to the State of Israel. He later helped arm the new state during the 1948 War of Independence.

The Jewish Revolutionaries Who Helped Build the Communist Party

The Jewish connection to China’s political transformation extended beyond the Nationalists. Soviet Comintern agent Grigori Voitinsky, born to a Jewish family, played an important role in the establishment of the Chinese Communist Party in 1921, as documented by historian Hans van de Ven in “From Friend to Comrade.” Voitinsky traveled to China in 1920, met with Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, the future CCP leaders, and helped transform their theoretical interest in Communism into an organized political movement. It was only after Chen’s meetings with Voitinsky that the first communist cells were established.

Mikhail Borodin, born Mikhail Gruzenberg to a Jewish family in Belarus, became perhaps the most influential foreign advisor in the Chinese revolution, as detailed in Dan N. Jacobs’ biography “Borodin: Stalin’s Man in China.” Dispatched by Moscow, he served as Sun Yat-sen’s principal Soviet advisor, brokering the alliance between the Kuomintang and the fledgling CCP that would shape Chinese politics for decades. Borodin reorganized the Kuomintang along Leninist lines, facilitated the admission of CCP members into the Nationalist party, and helped establish the Whampoa Military Academy that trained a generation of Chinese military leaders on both sides of the civil war. When Sun Yat-sen was asked whether he knew Borodin’s real name, Sun reportedly replied “I know. It is Lafayette.”

Karl Radek, born Karl Sobelsohn to a Jewish family in Galicia, served as rector of Sun Yat-sen University in Moscow, where he trained Chinese students who would become leaders in both the Communist and Nationalist movements, according to Warren Lerner’s biography “Karl Radek: The Last Internationalist”. Adolph Joffe, born to a wealthy Jewish family in Crimea, was the Soviet diplomat who negotiated the Sun-Joffe Manifesto of 1923, the foundational agreement for Soviet-Chinese cooperation that shaped the trajectory of the Chinese revolution, as recounted in Bruce Elleman’s “Diplomacy and Deception”.

The Coin That Flipped

For most of the post-1949 era, this history produced a distinctly positive Chinese view of Jews. Wald himself wrote in a 2004 JPPI report that the Chinese reflected little or none of the traditional forms of antisemitism, though he warned even then of the risk of a resurgence of “the old canard of a Jewish world conspiracy.” That earlier report found that “many Chinese often tend to see the Jews as a mirror of their own history, they admire Jewish wealth and successes, they respect the great contributions that Jews have made to Western civilization, and they perceive themselves and the Jews as representing the ‘two oldest living civilizations.'”

Since Israel and China first established formal diplomatic relations in 1992, China’s mainstream discourse about Israel was overwhelmingly positive, as analysts noted. A 2014 survey by the Anti-Defamation League found that 20% of Chinese agreed with negative stereotypes of Jews, placing relatively low compared to other countries. r

But the JPPI’s 2026 report identified a sharp reversal. “Philosemitism and antisemitism are two sides of the same coin in China,” the report stated, noting that the same generalizations once used to praise Jews were now being used to vilify them. Admiration for Jewish intelligence and financial acumen had been reinterpreted as evidence of a malevolent force undermining the global order.

The Algemeiner reported that according to the JPPI study, China’s Communist Party leaders had originally supported Zionism. Sun Yat-sen praised the movement in 1920. In 1948, the Communist Party’s People’s Daily praised the founding of Israel. But since then, China’s sympathies shifted dramatically, with Beijing recognizing a Palestinian state in 1988 and more recently moving closer to Hamas and Iran.

The Geopolitical Engine Behind the Shift

The JPPI report identified the current trend as not “homegrown” but driven by strategic geopolitical shifts. Three forces converged. First, China’s escalating rivalry with the United States led Beijing to perceive Jews as having significant influence over American policy, translating hostility toward the United Stats into anti-Jewish rhetoric. Second, China’s growing alignment with Arab and Muslim-majority nations, including Iran, incentivized the adoption of anti-Israel narratives. Third, a broader adoption of anti-Western narratives framed Israel and Jews as extensions of Western power.

The report identified 2021 as the turning point. After the short Gaza war that year, a Chinese UN delegate accused Israel of war crimes, an unusual move. The Algemeiner noted that Wald identified at least three factors driving the shift. Israel, under American pressure, had made Chinese investments in hi-tech and infrastructure more difficult. “The Chinese expressed their resentment quite openly,” Wald wrote. Simultaneously, China was expanding its presence in the Arab Middle East, offering major economic cooperation and long-lasting political ties. And the October 7 attacks and subsequent Gaza war provided the catalyst for a second, stronger, and still unabated antisemitic wave.

The mechanisms of transmission were varied. Chinese social media platforms became fertile ground for propaganda. The Times of Israel report noted the case of blogger Lu Kewen, who claims 15 million followers and quoted from Mein Kampf and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, telling readers to identify Jews by their “long nose.” Another influencer, Su Lin, declared after October 7 that “Hamas acted too softly.” Because China maintains strict control over digital and other media, the JPPI report suggested these ideas were “officially sanctioned” or at least tolerated by authorities.

Since October 7, 2023, social media has been inundated with criticism of Israel and even Jewish influence on U.S. foreign policy. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has refused to accept this shift as organic, instead building a case that foreign governments — China chief among them — are engineering it.” In September 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu escalated a months-long rhetorical offensive against China into one of the sharpest public confrontations between the two countries in recent memory.

Speaking before approximately 250 U.S. state legislators at Israel’s Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem on September 15, Netanyahu directly accused China and Qatar of orchestrating coordinated media campaigns designed to erode Western support for Israel. He likened the effort to a new form of siege, warning that both nations were funding bots, artificial intelligence tools, and paid advertisements across Western social media platforms, including TikTok. He repeated the charge on Israel’s i24News channel, describing a media blockade funded with enormous sums by Qatar and China. The accusations came in the aftermath of Israel’s September 9 strike on Hamas leaders in Doha, which triggered a severe international backlash and deepened Israel’s diplomatic isolation, including a European Commission proposal to partially suspend its association agreement with Israel.

On a broader geopolitical note, China is a key member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, an organization that is opposed to U.S. hegemony on the Eurasian plane. China has a strong interest in cooperating with embattled countries like Iran to ensure geopolitical and economic stability in West Asia. For example, China imported roughly 1.38 million barrels per day of Iranian crude in 2025, accounting for over 80% of Iran’s total oil exports and making Beijing effectively Tehran’s only major customer, all routed through a shadow fleet to disguise the oil’s origin and evade U.S. sanctions. With roughly half of China’s total oil imports transiting the Strait of Hormuz and Chinese refiners already cutting processing runs as the February 2026 U.S. and Israeli strikes threaten that chokepoint, Beijing has a direct economic stake in keeping Iran stable and the strait open.

Moreover, China’s military relationship with Iran stretches back to the 1980s, when Beijing supplied Tehran with fighter aircraft, over a thousand tanks, and hundreds of missiles during the Iran-Iraq War, later shifting toward technology transfers that helped Iran build its own missile production capabilities. After Israel’s 12-day war in June 2025 devastated Iran’s air defenses and killed top military commanders, China quietly accelerated its support, delivering HQ-9B long-range air defense systems through an oil-for-weapons barter arrangement, providing access to its encrypted BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system, sharing real-time satellite intelligence on U.S. naval movements, and sending attack drones while negotiating the sales of supersonic anti-ship missiles.

These moves come against a broader backdrop of the Chinese political class becoming increasingly aware of how organized Jewry being the real sovereigns in American foreign policy circles. Chinese officials and state media figures like Dong Manyuan, the former Vice President of the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s own think tank (CIIS), claimed that the United States has been “severely kidnapped” by Jewish-derived political forces. Similarly,  CGTN anchor Zheng Junfeng declared that Jews “dominate finance, media and Internet sectors”, while former Global Times editor-in-chief Hu Xijin claimed that the U.S. campus protests during Israel’s recent Gaza campaign revealed that the “Jewish political and business alliance’s control over American public opinion has declined.” Even bestselling author Song Hongbing, whose Currency Wars sold over a million copies, promoted the theory that Jewish bankers, principally the Rothschilds, secretly control the Federal Reserve and Western governments.

Given these geopolitical realities, it is not in the least surprising that China is allowing and even fomenting anti-Israel and anti-Jewish attitudes through soft-power mechanisms on social media undermine the Judeo-American empire in the information war. All in all, China is capitalizing on the post-October 7 cultural mood swing against Israel to advance its grand strategy of undermining U.S. primacy on the global stage.

Patricia Marins updates the war; on X

@pati_marins64
War Causes $3.2 Trillion Losses in Global Markets and pressure US-Israel The United States is deploying its B-52 bombers to attack Iran, along with more B-2s, in a move that appears aimed at devastating Iran and forcing surrender. Today, missiles and drones continued hitting Israel and U.S. bases, but with one detail: almost no reaction from air defenses, which are likely being conserved to protect assets like airports, energy infrastructure, and military industry.
With daily costs potentially reaching $10 billion and, according to The Economic Times, losses of $3.2 trillion in global markets already reported in the first 48 hours of war, this is generating more pressure to end the conflict. Israel’s central bank governor has announced estimated losses of $17–20 billion. If Israel’s losses are that high, how much are the American ones?
The order is to intensify efforts to end the war quickly. However, the waves of bombings hitting Iran do not seem to have that effect. Iran’s entire military doctrine was built around such scenarios, which is why it has such an extensive network of multi-kilometer underground bases. I see no possibility of the war ending in the coming days for several reasons, including:
1. In addition to their naval strength of hundreds of remaining assets, Iran still maintains a sustained rate of fire, deploying dozens of missiles and hundreds of drones every daqui ;
2. The decentralization of operations. For example, anti-ship missiles are operated by four forces: IRGC, navy, army, and aerospace forces. The same decentralization applies to drones and other military assets, creating resilience;
3. The belief that the US and Israel cannot sustain a long war. Iranians know that, although missile attacks have been reduced, current waves are enough to continue neutralizing most U.S. bases in the region, maintain economic chaos in Israel and Arab countries, and drive losses in global markets;
4. Iranians are certain that no matter how many bombs fall, they will emerge victorious, since there is no way to destroy their nuclear program except by themselves, and the war has virtually suppressed internal opposition movements.
5. The attacks have not sparked internal guerrilla movements or any uprising against the government. On the contrary, the level of violence has increased support for the regime. It’s that old story: if the dose of the medicine is too high, it can have the opposite effect.
Ironically, Iran is heading toward a scenario similar to Ukraine’s, where everyone knows there’s no way to win against the Russians, but the cost keeps getting higher. In fact, when I read Pentagon reports, they remind me a lot of the Russian MoD’s in the early days of the Ukraine invasion. Iranian missiles and drones launched today face almost no resistance from air defenses already depleted in many areas, the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, Iranian naval forces are nearly intact, markets are in panic, and Iran still has dozens of underground military fortresses loaded with missiles and equipment. Anyone who thinks the US and Israel can sustain this war for weeks in this scenario is very optimistic.