General

Nick Griffin: Belfast Riots — and the Ghost of Enoch Powell

/6 Comments/in /by

Belfast Riots — and the Ghost of Enoch Powell

What Is Happening in Northern Ireland – and what comes next?

The liberal elite have been very happy to report every event in Northern Ireland which has shown the gradual decline of the old sectarian divisions in the Province since the end of the Troubles. But they have been silent about the protests which followed the gruesome racist attack on Stephen Ogilvy – despite the fact that they are in fact a striking example of the success of post-conflict Northern Ireland.

Because the disturbances in the Lower Newtownards Road area of East Belfast were the first cross-community, non-sectarian, rioting in Northern Ireland since the ‘Hunger Riots’ of the 1930s, when working-class Protestants joined in with violent protests begun by their Catholic neighbours against the deprivations of the Great Depression.

One might think that the controlled media and political elite would celebrate this development but, instead, they are pretending that it didn’t happen. Instead, they are blaming ‘bigotry’ among the loyalists whom they so detest, and muttering darkly about ‘fascist troublemakers’ and Elon Musk ‘stirring up tensions’.

This is of course Standard Operating Procedure for these people, who display their innate bourgeois snobbery whenever working-class whites are driven to forcible protests. These people are so ignorant and passive, goes the unspoken liberal narrative, that they are incapable of thinking or doing anything of their own accord. Any militant action is therefore the result of wicked ‘outside agitators’, rather than a response to the failure of the elite’s own policies.

The contempt that these horrible leftist snobs have for ordinary working-class Brits is multiplied when the unruly peasants are also Protestant loyalists. This too is showing through in the mainstream explanations of what is going on in Northern Ireland.

A big piece in the Guardian today is typical of the approach, with its references to how ‘mobs burned Catholic families from some of the same streets’ in years gone by. This studiously ignore the fact that the wave of ethnic cleansing of innocent Catholics which scarred the city in 1969 came after the first wave, in which the victims were innocent Protestants in West Belfast.

Such deceit might just influence readers on the mainland who know no better, but the moment a commentator tries to sell this narrative to loyalists, he totally destroys the credibility of anything else he has to say. When the aim is to calm things down, this is a very foolish thing to do.

The same report notes that ‘elements of republicanism “monitor and suppress” xenophobic displays’. Let’s unpack this comment. The same newspaper which quotes with approval liberal politicians and police chiefs who condemn violence and seek to persuade the public that it ‘never achieves anything’, is here tacitly approving of ‘elements of republicanism’ – i.e. the IRA – acting to ‘suppress’ anti-immigration protests in areas where their threats and violence still hold sway.

The truth is that the liberals, just like the rest of the elite, have a very selective approach to violence. Quite simply, it’s OK when they – or people who share and support their nation-wrecking agendas – do it.

So, for them, what happened in East Belfast the other night is particularly alarming. As several hundred young men from the little Protestant streets off either side of the Lower Newtownards Road gathered to protest, some twenty to thirty more emerged from the Short Strand.

This is the staunchly Republican enclave down by the River Laggan, whose defence from a huge loyalist mob at the start of the Troubles by a couple of elderly IRA men (one a veteran of the British Army) and a handful of kids, was perhaps the most genuinely heroic of all the actions on the Catholic side in the thirty years of horror.

The group who came out this time were, as usual in such circumstances, all wearing balaclavas and double surgical gloves – the mark of serious operators, or younger ones trained by old hands. What was remarkable was that, instead of provoking a violent response, as they would have done at any time in living memory, these Catholics were welcomed by the larger Protestant crowd.

The non-sectarian mob proceeded to force back the riot police and start burning bins. The large bus which was burnt was actually set on fire by an individual wearing an Irish tricolour balaclava. Then, together, Protestant and Catholic rioters moved up and down the side streets, systematically targeting homes occupied by Africans and Roma.

The same cross-community approach was seen north of the city last night. A crowd of 800 protesters from the loyalist Rathcoole estate crossed into Newtownabbey, with a smaller breakaway group confronting a roughly equal-sized body of riot police and sending them running away in a hail of paving bricks.

This is another new development. Back in the day, the old RUC riot police would have mangled the rioters, even if outnumbered. But the new breed of police officer is a very different beast. All of them are university graduates and, for all their protective gear, fearsome equipment and licence to use violence, they are no longer a match for tough lads off the street.

And, in Newtownabbey, just as in East Belfast, the lads on the street now come from both sides of the old Brothers’ War. A small group of Catholics from neighbouring Glengormley defied the veiled threats from neo-Marxist Sinn Fein and joined the loyalist-dominated protest, and the violence which followed.

In this second night of unrest, literally hundreds of immigrants from groups which have made themselves unwelcome were ‘put out’. Some by actual violence, far more by being told to pack up and leave.

The politicians and MSM are hinting that this is all organised. That it is the work of ‘fascist agitators’ or loyalist paramilitaries. This is simply untrue. Outsiders are making supportive comments on social media, but it doesn’t need outsiders to make people unwilling to share their street with undocumented, tax-gobbling African migrants when they’ve seen footage of one of the same gouging out an innocent man’s eyes and trying to hack off his head.

The loyalist paramilitaries are present, of course, but they have thus far taken no role in the disturbances whatsoever, although that might change if heavy-handed policing angers locals so much that further inaction begins to damage their credibility.

Unlike the leftist violence which follows things such as the killing of George Floyd, the anger spilling out in Northern Ireland is wholly organic. The blame lies primarily not with the rioters, but with the political elite whose policies have turned already poor areas of the province into multi-ethnic tinderboxes.

If they had listened to the warnings and to the very legitimate anger of ordinary people, none of this would be happening. They could still bring peace, simply by acknowledging that piling poverty on poverty, and expecting stressed places to play host to hundreds of mollycoddled, and sometimes very badly behaved, outsiders, were foolish policies which need to be reversed immediately.

Needless to say, they will do no such thing. Which is why the most likely result of the Belfast riots is not just extensive ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the biggest city in Northern Ireland, but also the spreading of similar troubles to the mainland. This is not a recommendation, but it is a prediction.

Belfast will in due course calm down, for the simple reason that the protesting crowds will achieve their objectives. Similar scenes on the mainland, by contrast, are liable to have a very different ending. In Belfast, the unwanted immigrants are present in isolated pockets, when the trouble hits their street, they have no real choice but to flee. In most of England, they are often embedded among far larger immigrant communities, and they have other options.

Why, hello, Mr. Powell, fancy seeing you here…!

Thanks for reading Nick Griffin Beyond the Pale! This post is public so feel free to share it.

This Week in Hate Crimes

/7 Comments/in /by

It’s not okay to be white. It’s deadly.

On Tuesday this week, 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony was convicted of murder for fatally stabbing a competitor at track meet in Texas last year. The killing quickly became national news because Anthony is black, his victim was white and black people were rooting for the stabber.

The events that led to Anthony’s plunging a knife into Austin Metcalf’s heart are these: Driven for some reason to sit in a rival team’s tent, Anthony was repeatedly asked to leave by Metcalf. He refused, and tauntingly dared, “Touch me and see what happens.” Metcalf pushed him, whereupon Anthony knifed him.

For killing a white kid who had the affrontery to 1) ask him to leave a tent he was not supposed to be in, and 2) touch him, Anthony collected more than $600,000 in donations and gained a small group of protesters outside the courthouse, yelling racist abuse at white people.

Anthony’s admirers claimed to be protesting “white supremacy.” Don’t these white people realize Anthony is black? You can’t ask a black person to move! A minister outside the courthouse denounced the entire justice system as the “final frontier of racism and it’s legalized here.” A potential juror admitted, “I don’t know if I feel right putting a brother in jail.”

One thing you’ll never see is a group of white people rooting for whites who kill blacks — or anyone else for that matter — just because the accused is white. Nobody protested the arrests of Derek Chauvin, Kim Potter, George Zimmerman or Jake Gardner, and two of those were accidents, the other two self-defense.

[Point of law: Lying on your back, having your head smashed into a concrete sidewalk, or being locked in a chokehold so lethal that police are no longer allowed to use it, is not remotely similar to being pushed.]

Gardner, for example, an Omaha bar owner, shot and killed a black career criminal who was choking him to death during a BLM riot. The district attorney, along with his entire homicide department, investigated and concluded the shooting was justified.

But realizing he was white, the Democratic D.A. recused himself and assigned a black special prosecutor to the case. The black prosecutor promptly issued an arrest warrant for Gardner’s arrest, charging him with manslaughter, attempted first-degree assault, making terroristic threats, and use of a weapon to commit a felony.

With a legion of white people rushing to disavow him, evict him, destroy his business, and manipulate the system to ensure his conviction, Gardner killed himself.

In other news this week, a 14-year-old black kid in Indianapolis fatally shot a 23-year-old white man in the head during a carjacking. The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department chief of police (the city’s first female police chief!!!) and deputy chief of police (a black guy, naturally) held press conferences, emoting over the horrible thing that had happened — to the killer.

Chief Tanya Terry, who looks like Janet Reno’s younger, more butch sister, barely mentioned the victim, Brett Scrogham, a serious Christian, who’d been returning from having dinner with his family when he was attacked. Terry began by saying she had “mixed emotions” about his murder — as one does when an innocent man has been shot in the head.

In her telling, the vicious cold-blooded crime was merely a “tragic incident.” Tearing up, she bemoaned the fact that the suspected killer would “face lifelong consequences,” his life “forever impacted and changed by short-sighted, impulsive, and reckless decisions.”

You know, if you think about it, you could say that Scrogham’s life was also impacted, in a way. Finally remembering him, Terry added, “There are victims on the other side of those decisions. And those victims matter.”

Yes, we all remember the “tragic incident” in Minneapolis when police officer Derek Chauvin’s life was forever “impacted and changed.” It’s easy to forget, but there was another victim in that encounter, too.

Deputy Chief Kendale Adams also called the unprovoked attack a “tragedy,” saying it was “a setback for all of us.” Yes, especially Scrogham. He then called on the community to ensure that potential teenage killers feel valued. “I know that those community-based organizations are out there doing this kind of work, and I would like to keep encouraging them to continue to do the work. … we have to do more.” Everybody has to step up and “do more,” except the teenagers who keep killing people.

This is like Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) saying, the day after the Oct. 7 terrorist attack, that she grieved for both “the Palestinian and Israeli lives lost yesterday,” or Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) referring to the 9/11 terrorist attack as a day when “some people did something.”

Sometimes it seems as if, no matter who kills whom, it’s either the white person’s fault or it’s nobody’s fault.

Arktos Journal: Remigration: The Birth of an Occidental Right

/10 Comments/in /by

Remigration: The Birth of an Occidental Right

by Kevin DeAnna

No separate peace is possible.

There is no scenario where America survives and Europe does not. There is no scenario where Europe survives and America does not. This is not some poetic or aspirational claim. Our divided civilization strives for unity, for the restoration of the Roman idea of Imperium, and even the current degraded European Union is a bastardized expression of this dream. Yet that is irrelevant.

This is no time for fanciful dreaming or wishful thinking, even less for misguided pride. We whites are all down bad. Tiresome bragging from Americans about “cucked” Europeans or the Continentals invoking Julius Evola to complain about “negrified” America blinds us from the reality that all Western nations are essentially on the same path to dispossession. The demographic trends may be better or worse in different countries, but they are all leading to the same place. More importantly, we face the same bureaucratic obstacles, the same disingenuous arguments, the same political enemies, and the same moral paralysis among our kindred peoples. No one can indulge in self-satisfaction.

Yet unity is elusive. There are real differences in interests between Europe and America. There is also the uncomfortable fact that if we reclaimed our countries and did recover our identity, pride, and sovereignty, there could even be conflict between us. Questions like America’s territorial ambitions in Greenland or Canada, Europeans’ access to cheap Russian energy sources, or the relevance of NATO divide nationalists in different countries, as do the secessionist ambitions of activists in Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders and other areas. With the war between Russia and Ukraine continuing endlessly and pointlessly, it seems hollow to merely invoke “no more brothers’ wars” and act as if something has been accomplished.

A common agenda uniting all our peoples and providing a plan for practical action in our separate yet united struggles for state power has been sorely needed.

It is needed no longer. That agenda exists in a word. It is Remigration.

Every patriotic movement within the West has a realistic yet radical policy solution that separates serious activists from the cranks and attention seekers. The consequences of Remigration, and the steps necessary to achieving it, force us to build the kind of movement that is needed by giving us a focus, a demand, and a rallying cry. Perhaps even more importantly, it is needed in every Western country, and so patriots have a way to show solidarity without arrogantly asserting domination or superior status over kindred nations.

The Remigration Summit held in Portugal on May 30 was a milestone for three key reasons. First, it assembled serious leaders from parties and movements contesting for power in a realistic way. Second, it managed to appeal to both patriotic vanguards and the larger, softer “national conservative” constituencies that dutifully support the center-right but are ready for a true alternative. Finally, it boasted a significant presence from North America, sending a definitive signal that “European” is not a mere geographic expression but an assertion of immutable ethnocultural identity throughout the world.

Speakers included Björn Höcke from the Alternative for Germany, which is already the most popular party in many areas of the Bundesrepublik despite ludicrous repression, Rocío de Meer of Vox, and Lidewij de Vos of the Forum for Democracy in the Netherlands. These and other figures are part of the political process, in some cases on the verge of real power, yet they did not run for cover from this conference. Martin Sellner, who has done more to popularize the concept of Remigration than anyone else, and Eva Vlaardingerbroek, the Dutch political commenator who is well known in American conservative circles, also lent the conference significant star power. Afonso Gonçalves and his movement, representing the host country, showed that Portugal has joined a continent wide-struggle that it was seemingly absent from since the fall of the Estado Novo.

Such a broad coalition may seem dangerous. After all, when discussing Right and Left, there are many “Rights” based on different national, religious, and ideological foundations, but just one deconstructionist, egalitarian Left. In some ways, that makes the so-called Right much easier to attack, much harder to unite, and much more hesitant to act with unity and courage.

It is thus no small thing that these and other movements could work together, not just because journalists are eager to use guilt by association, but because there are necessarily tensions between mainstreamers and vanguardists. Such conflicts seemed absent in Portugal. This bodes well because there is little evidence that simply planting a flag of an extreme position, without any attempt to build a larger coalition, can lead to the seizure of state power.

The target of our opposition should be the gatekeepers within the center-right that prevent the patriotic masses from rallying to their natural protectors and champions among the nationalist leadership. However, for the gatekeepers to be broken, there must be a tolerant attitude towards all comrades, especially those to our own right, who operate in good faith, while simultaneously not letting ourselves become so marginal as to be irrelevant. It is arguably the most delicate balancing act in politics. The Remigration Summit succeeded.

Canadians and Americans were also well represented at the conference, including Daniel Tyrie of the Dominion Society, Cyan Quinn of the White Papers Policy Project, and Jared Taylor of American Renaissance. Greg Bovino, former Commander-at-Large of the United States Border Patrol, was the surprise attendee of the conference, shocking the American mainstream media and prompting another wave of fascist panic. Yet the journalists were self-discrediting. Charging that one of the Trump Administration’s top former officials was a “fascist” at the time when nationalists are frustrated with the president for being too moderate on immigration was not an effective attack. If anything, it buttressed Commander Bovino’s image because it portrayed him as essentially equivalent to Trump himself, a man against whom the usual smears have long since lost their effectiveness.

However, all the conference speeches were just rhetoric unless there is a specific plan to achieve Remigration. On my show Identity Politics, I was surprised by how many viewers asked whether Remigration was even feasible, as if the only way to accomplish it was by kicking in doors and rounding up every individual migrant and non-European by force. In reality, there are detailed policy proposals about ways this can be done. The Institute for Remigration, announced at the conference, is already developing both political and policy strategies for achieving Remigration within our lifetime. The Save Europe Act represents the first practical step for organizing the European masses behind a concrete policy agenda.

Such tangible demands are invaluable. Theory is important, but lost in grand narratives about the West’s sacred destiny is the question of what we are asking ordinary voters and citizens to support. What does “reclaim our nations” mean in real terms? How can it be accomplished? Is it realistic? Now there are answers, as well as evidence to support why it is necessary. Making things concrete and tangible is also a necessary challenge to our own activists. Are you with the Remigration agenda or not? If not, what is your alternative?

European patriots have their vehicle. The only question that remains is whether they can win with it.

If anything, it is America, the superpower of the Occident, that is behind Europe. President Donald Trump has accomplished many things during his second term regarding immigration, some so extraordinary that we simply overlook them. Illegal border crossings have practically ceased, refugee admissions have stopped almost entirely except for white South Africans, and the Trump Administration has begun denaturalizing foreign-born Americans for fraud and abuse. The vastly increased Immigration and Customs Enforcement, now the equal of most militaries, is the first armed government force in many decades that we can say is explicitly on the Right.

Yet American nationalism today is ideologically incoherent compared to many European movements, pulled in a thousand different directions by clickbait and conspiracies. Remigration is a point of unity, and American participation in this conference is a promising sign. Whatever emerges out of MAGA and the Trump coalition must commit to the mass deportations and denaturalizations that will be necessary for America to exist in any meaningful sense within two decades.

There is little time left to save ourselves and our posterity but more hope now than at any other time since the end of the Cold War. The long 20th century will be brought to an end, the century of Identity will begin, and the European peoples will burn away the rot that has morally crippled us since the end of the second great Western Civil War. Let the spark lit in Portugal set alight the conflagration.

The Protocols of the Epstein Firsters. Letter to President Putin

/13 Comments/in , /by

If you don’t want to slip up tomorrow, speak the truth today.
Bruce Lee

Presidential Administration
Staraya Square, Moscow, 103132
letters.kremlin.ru.

Dear President Putin,

I am one of your long-time fans and a great admirer of Russian culture and achievements, but I cannot help wonder why, in your conflict with Ukraine, you have never called out the banking cartels headquartered in “The City” of London and Wall Street, together with their various global financial and economical networks such as the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of International Settlements, the International Money Fund, the World Bank, the European Central Bank, and other Central Banks and corporations dispersed all over the world.[1]

“As Lord Acton warned some 150 years ago,” writes market analyst, author, and former hedge fund manager, Alex Krainer, “The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.”

This fight is now upon us. It might be the ultimate struggle between humanity’s emancipation or our final enslavement. To prevail, we must understand our true enemies and the financial, economic, political and social structures enabling their agenda.

In short, we must not be distracted by myriad marginal issues and false dichotomies like left vs. right, liberals vs. conservatives and so forth. The ultimate culprits, the super-predator threatening humanity are the high-level bankers: a handful of families and individuals who control and manage the present monetary system. We have no choice but to oppose and defeat them.[2]

You are not a racialist, Mr. President, and I know you like Jews, you have many Jewish friends, your mentor and judo coach, the late Anatoly Rachlin, was Jewish, and your Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin is part Jewish. You are rightly the President of all Russians, good or bad, including Jews, but I must tell you right from the start: I do not share your feelings toward Jews. I don’t hate them or mean them harm, but I don’t like them much and prefer to keep my distances.

With few notorious exceptions, I don’t see many Jews vigorously complaining in the streets or in mainstream media about the genocide in Gaza or about the sad state of my country, which is being invaded by Third-World immigrants often with the approval and help of Jewish activists and intellectuals. Many Jews vomit their hatred of Whites and their desire to kill them and cause their disappearance. And many are pushing for measures that benefit them to the detriment of my race.

The “Seal Puppy” Hunt that’s Coming: The Ache of Envy and Other Obstacles to Change

The Jewish Interest in Multiethnic Immigration and Multiculturalism

So, Mr. President, in what I call the “Epstein Firsters” described in this letter, I include all Jews that silently approve or are involved in one way or the other with what the Jewish-led oligarchs, organized international Jewry, and their non-Jewish allies and vassals, are doing to our countries.

The ability to lie to your face, a complete lack of empathy and compassion for non-Jews, which they dehumanize by labelling them as Amalek or “animals,” a lack of scruples, and a predatory drive for dominance are the character traits that define the Epstein Firsters. They are the ones manoeuvring in the background to destroy us.

They want you dead or alive, Mr. President. They want to push you out of power, loot your natural resources, steal your weapons, and dismantle your federation into dozens of smaller countries easy to control. This has been their game-plan all along. Once you are dispossessed, they will try to do the same thing to China. Their end goal is nothing less than a unipolar Jewish utopia ruled from Jerusalem in which all non-Jews will be their slaves.[3]

I have written a few articles on the subject of Jews that were published in The Occidental Observer, the most influential Internet platform on White identity, interests, and culture. In this letter, to give you an idea of where I stand on the Jewish question, I have taken the liberty to include references, notes, and the title and links to some of my articles. I invite you, or your staff, respectfully, Mr. President, to read them, if you find the time during your busy schedule, as they might help you to better understand how I have formed my opinion. And If I’m wrong, I urge you, respectfully, to lead me back in the right direction. I don’t have at my disposal one of the best secret services in the world to help me see through the complexities of this subject, which I am trying to elucidate to the best of my abilities.

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

The Hidden Messages of Schindler’s List

As a White man of European descent, severely threatened by these miscreants, I feel it is my paramount duty, for reasons of self-defence, to defend my race by informing you, Mr. President, if you don’t already know, that all the Western governments that are helping Ukraine’s Jewish government with the taxes of their own citizens, are completely in their power. I am telling you this because I believe you are one of the few leaders capable of defeating the fiends at war with our countries and humanity.

For electoral, financial, ideological, and sometimes dishonest reasons, the leaders of these countries no longer serve their citizens. They serve a foreign country, Israel, and a foreign people, organized Jewry led by the money lenders of “The City” and Wall Street, aka the Epstein class. As such, they are Epstein Firsters.

Indeed, the former head of the French Situation-Intelligence-Electronic Warfare Office at the Joint Staff for Operational Planning, General Dominique Delaware, who died suddenly in a suspicious way, has shown in two damning articles that the governments and politicians of the galaxy of neoliberal democracies of the West, better known as the “International Community” are led by this rich class of Jews, Mr. President. The banking cartels, organized Jewry, Israel, and their allied governments of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, European Union, South Korea, and Japan, are all united against you toward one goal: global governance and a Jewish-ruled world. [4], [5]

Jewish Control of the US

The following explanations, Mr. President, are by no means complete, not all presidents are covered, but they will show you how power in the US has been under the influence of the Epstein Firsters for a long time.

Teddy Roosevelt (1901–1909)

Many past and present American and European politicians were either Jewish or Jewish puppets, starting with Teddy Roosevelt, who became president in 1901 because of Jewish financial support and voting blocks[6] following the convenient assassination of the passionate advocate of the American system of economics,[7] President William McKinley.

He was an early supporter of Zionism, stating after the Balfour Declaration that it was “entirely proper to start a Zionist state around Jerusalem.” Jewish newspapers universally extolled him upon his death, with the B’nai B’rith Messenger declaring that “Jewish immigrants had no better friend than Theodore Roosevelt.”[8]

Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921)

Then there was Woodrow Wilson, a revolutionary leftist brought to power and totally manipulated by Jews such as Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. banks, Bernard Baruch, Paul Warburg, New York lawyer Samuel Untermyer, Louis Brandeis, the first Jew appointed to the US Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter, not to mention the non-Jewish, “Col.” Edward Mandel House, “an agent” of the international financial interests of the Rothschild banking empire, according to American investigative journalist, Michael Collins Piper. [9]

  1. Wilson famously said when he declared war on Germany on the advice of his Jewish handlers: “The world must be made safe for democracy,” a political system, notes retired professor of philosophy, Thomas Dalton, used by Jewish elites to acquire wealth, control mass media, and influence politicians while remaining hidden from the public. This materialistic and anti-spiritual “judeocratie” elevates “mediocre” and easy to manipulate people, such as the present leaders of Western Europe, to serve Jewish interests at the expense of their non-Jewish citizens. [10]
  2. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law on December 23, 1913, officially establishing the Federal Reserve System, a private bank, as the Central Bank of the United States.[11] Since then, America is an official member of the Central banking Empire of “The City” of London.[12]

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1933-1945)

Like his cousin Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who appointed more Jews to public office than all previous presidents combined, was elected because of Jewish financial and voting support. In 1932, more than 80% of the American Jewish community voted for FDR, a figure that rose to over 90% in the elections of 1936, 1940, and 1944.  This represented a tectonic shift toward the Democratic Party, with Jews constituting only 3% of the population yet making up 15% of his administration.[13]

Jewish voters were deeply impressed by Roosevelt’s occasional criticism of the Hitler regime in the 1930s and his subsequent aid to Britain. The Democratic Party’s embrace of ethnic minorities also appealed strongly to a community that had faced discrimination. A Yiddish joke stated that Jews believed in three worlds: “this world, the next world, and Roosevelt.” [14]

Harry S. Truman (1945-1953)

Then there was Harry S. Truman, who got re-elected because of Jewish and Zionist donations. Although this is controversial, writer Gore Vidal claimed that John F. Kennedy told him that Truman was the first to recognize Israel as payback for a two million dollars Jewish donation.[15]

Truman claimed that he supported Jews and Zionism mostly because he was deeply affected by the Holocaust propaganda that was broadcast by the media and Hollywood at the end of WW2. He expressed shock and disbelief upon first learning of the Nazi atrocities, stating in a 1943 speech that he “couldn’t believe it” and initially doubted Germans he knew were capable of such acts. He later condemned Adolf Hitler as a “cold-blooded, ignorant corporal,” remarking in 1945 that he hoped Hitler had been “drawn and quartered” and was “still burning somewhere.”[16]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)

And with Lyndon Johnson in the White House—who is believed to be personally involved with Israel in the assassination of JFK[17]—we had one of the most Jewish-loving presidents of the United States, after, of course, Donald Trump, who is in a league of his own. [18], [19]

The moment Johnson became president, on the night JFK was killed, he made sure that no one would find out what really happened. All the key people of the Investigative Warren Commission he set up were either enemies of Kennedy or hardline Zionists. He also started reversing all the JFK policies that were harmful to Israeli and Jewish interests.[20], [21]

The Holocaust had a deep impact on his policies toward the Jews and Israel. He was deeply “shaken, stunned, terrorized, and bursting with an overpowering revulsion and incredulous horror” by what he witnessed at the Dachau concentration camp in 1945. He consistently framed his advocacy for Jewish refugees and support for Israel as a moral obligation, famously stating during the Six-Day War that supporting Israel was simply “the right thing to do,” even against Soviet pressure.[22]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

Richard Nixon (1969-!974)

Richard Nixon made numerous anti-Semitic remarks in private Oval Office recordings, characterizing Jews as disloyal, aggressive, and dominant over the media and government. He explicitly told aides that “generally speaking, you can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you” and claimed, “most Jews are disloyal” and “out to kill us.” Yet, despite these private views and telling Henry Kissinger that Soviet persecution of Jews was “not an American concern,” Nixon publicly supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War and appointed several Jews to high-level staff positions, creating a disconnect between his private attitudes and public policy. Like many presidents before and after him, he was after all an Epstein Firster albeit a reluctant one. [23]

Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)

Ronald Reagon, who was not Jewish technically, certainly behaved as if he was. He was not elected solely because of Jewish financial and voting support, but Jewish support did play a significant role in his election.

Like all Post World War II politicians, in varying degrees, Reagan was deeply committed to Jewish causes and Israel because of the Holocaust. As a matter of fact, this is why politicians are so lenient with Jewish misconduct. Jewish victimhood status cemented in the holocaust confers moral capital, recognition, and resources to the Epstein Firsters. They cultivate this status to demand justice, reparations, or sympathy, “effectively ‘thriving’ on the recognition of their suffering,” according to Cambridge University scholars Alex Vandermaas-Peeler, Jelena Subotic, and Michael Barnett. [24]

Reagan consistently described the Holocaust as a comprehensible evil that must be remembered to prevent recurrence, stating, “We must make sure that from now until the end of days all humankind stares this evil in the face.” He expressed being “horrified” by claims that the Holocaust was a hoax, citing his WWII service viewing combat films of liberated camps as undeniable proof that “six million people whose lives were taken cruelly and needlessly” was not propaganda. [25]

He framed the establishment of Israel as a miracle emerging “from the ashes of the Holocaust” and pledged that the security of Israel and Jewish survivors would “never be compromised.” Reagan laid the cornerstone for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in 1988, asserting that the museum’s purpose was to ensure the deaths of the 6 million had “posthumous meaning” so that such evil would “never come again.” [26]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

This is why, he spoke out for Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War, and maintained a strong focus on freeing Soviet Jews throughout his presidency; formalized the strategic cooperation between the US and Israel; rescued Ethiopian Jews in Operation Joshua (1985) and awarded the Congressional Gold Medal to one of the greatest liars of the Epstein Firsters, Elie Wiesel.

Joseph Biden (2021-2024)

Joe Biden’s family is notoriously Jewish by marriage. [27] His administration was staffed with a disproportionate number of Jews belonging to the Epstein class. What former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan, Paul Graig Roberts, says below about the Biden Government is true for most US governments since at least the time of Woodrow Wilson:

In the Biden regime, all powerful positions are held by Jews–the Attorney General (the police), the Secretary of the Treasury (money), the Secretary of State (foreign policy and war). There is not a single White Anglo-Saxon Protestant in the Biden cabinet. What explains that in a country of Gentiles a tiny minority of Jews occupy the power positions in the US government, the power positions in the media, entertainment, Ivy league administrations and faculties, and finance.[28]

Like Ronald Reagan, and Lyndon B. Johnson, Joe Biden is dedicated, one way or another, to the protection of Jews and Israel. As a matter of fact, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump are all Globo-Zionists with strong ties to the Jewish elite and to Israel, the true masters of the United States and the West.

Christian Zionists

Several American high-level politicians and presidents such as Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Ted Cruz, and Mike Pompeo,[29] who served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 2017 to 2018 and under President Donald Trump as the 70th United States secretary of state from 2018 to 2021, are Christian Zionists.

On the strength of the promise God made to Abraham (Genesis 12 :3), “I will bless those who bless you and him who curses you I will curse,” they believe like 30 million American Christian Zionists, “that  if they bless Israel morally, financially, and politically,

God will reward them by favoring America. Blessing Israel for America’s sake has been motivating Christian Zionists to combat antisemitism, donate to Jewish charities, and invest in and visit Israel. But it has also involved many in opposing any peace process, in supporting the continued building of Jewish settlements in the West Bank, in funding those internationally outlawed settlements, and in backing an extreme right-wing Israeli plan to transfer the Palestinians to neighboring Arab states.[30]

They believe, moreover, that they will suddenly be plucked to heaven to be with Jesus when Armageddon the battle of end times erupts (rapture).[31]

Donald Trump’s connection to Isiac Louria’s Kabbalah and the End Time Prophesies

Donald Trump has significant and documented connections to the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, primarily facilitated by his family and political allies. In 1983, Chabad gave him the prestigious Isiac Louria’s Tree of Life award for his outstanding contributions to the Israeli-American friendship.[32] Trump has frequently displayed the award plaque in his offices, notably in Trump Tower, describing it as a “very big award” that means a great deal to him.

Furthermore, he personally engaged in Chabad religious customs, specifically visiting the Ohel (the gravesite of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, in Queens, New York). During his presidency, Trump formalized his relationship with the movement through official acts such as the “Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.,” honoring the birthday of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.[33]

His beloved daughter Ivanka is a Lubavitcher and her husband, Lubavitcher Jared Kushner, has a long-standing friendship not only with Benjamin Netanyhua, but with Nathan Rothschild, Jeffrey Epstein’s presumed employer. In one of his shows, Alex Jones even speculated that Jared Kushner was in fact the Messiah that Jews have been waiting for.[34]

Is this why he revealed his true nature in February 2026 when he suddenly flipped from American Firster to Israel Firster? Does he feel he has an end time role to play by declaring war on Iran? It’s an open question that I would rather not try to answer.

In any case, the Jewish billionaires of the Epstein class and various Jewish lobbies such as AIPAC control all the political parties of the US; Democrat, Republican, left, right, liberal, conservative, green, or socialist, they are all cut from the same cloth.[35] American syndicated columnist Patrick Buchanan encapsulated the US’s emasculation by AIPAC and organized Jewry in his now-famous declaration: “Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory.”[36]

And the situation in Europe is no different. I’ll dive deep into the British situation, Mr. President, because it concerns me most, but you can repeat the same exercise for all European stock nations. Indeed, at the establishment level, France, Germany, the EU, for instance, are as Judaized as Britain.

Jewish Control of Britain

The situation in Britain for the most part is fairly different from the situation in America, but quite similar to the situation in Europe. Jews, who have been in Britain for a very long time, had plenty of time to infiltrate this nation and seize the reins of power.

Indeed, since the days of Oliver Cromwell, Jews have long been powerful in Britain and the leaders of its establishment are often Jewish themselves, like Benjamin Disraeli, the first Jewish Prime Minister of Britain.[37]

In his book, The Jews, social critic, Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953), described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy. He goes on to say that “the Jews, in spite of their small numbers, color every English institution, especially the Universities and the House of Commons.” He further asserted that “the interests of the two races began to diverge before the Great War — nonetheless a formal alliance was maintained through the control of the politicians by Jewish finance — with culmination in the attempt to form an Anglo-Judaic state in Palestine.”[38]

This partnership between rich Jews and the British establishment is confirmed by Leslie Gilbert Pine (1907–1987), a distinguished British writer, researcher, and expert in genealogy, nobility, history, and heraldry. In his book Tales of the British Aristocracy, a work detailing the lives and histories of the British upper class, he states that “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.”[39]

This epoch is dramatized in the very popular TV series Downton Abbey (2010-2015). In short, after the Industrial Revolution, when financial power shifted away from agriculture to manufacturing, down-and-out gentry with ancient titles and large estates, but no money, began marrying the daughters of rich Jews. The 5th Earl of Roseberry, for example, who became Prime Minister in 1894, married Hannah de Rothschild, who was the only child and sole heiress of the Jewish banker Baron Mayer Amschel de Rothschild. And Sir Ernest Cassel’s granddaughter, Edwina Cynthia Annette Ashley, married Lord Louis Mountbatten, a member of the royal family. While not related by blood, Ernest Cassel was a close friend and financial mentor to the Rothschilds, the preeminent Jewish family in Europe.[40]

As shown by Arnold Leese (1878-1956) in his pamphlet, Our Jewish Aristocracy—A revelation, the British elites, who played a major role in the Maidan coup, are indeed completely Judaized.[41] A fact corroborated not only by Hilaire Belloc, H.G. Pine, and the renowned English aristocrat and philosopher, Anthony M. Ludovici,[42] but also by highly regarded author, journalist, and consultant to the British military, Nesta Webster. In her book, Germany and England. A Prelude to War in 1938, her comments on the power of Jews and how they can make or break any man are still relevant today as we all saw with our own eyes during the election campaign of Thomas Massie:

England of 1938 is not the England of 1914 because she is no longer controlled by Britons. Ever since the war the Jewish power has been growing… We are under an invisible Jewish dictatorship but a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life, for no one can escape from it… Already the Jews can make or break the career of any man. As long as the Jews do not hold Germany [my comment: and now Iran, Russia and China] they can never realize their final aim of world domination. [43]

In today’s Britain, most members of the British establishment including royalty are intimately associated with the Epstein class. In 1999, Prince Andrew, for one, gave Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein — the “Jewish Fixer” of the Epstein Firsters, to put it like America Firster Nick Fuentes—[44] an unrestricted access to the Balmoral castle estate. Newly released images and trial evidence confirm the pair were photographed relaxing in the Queen’s private log cabin at Glen Beg, a location previously occupied by Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip.[45] And the new king of Great Britain, Charles III, who was circumcised in 1948 by Rabbi Jacob Snowman, has long had a good relationship with British Jews,” notes journalist Itamar Sharon, in the September 10, 2022, issue of The Times of Israel, “and in recent years has also shored up his bona fides with Israel… Charles himself has abiding ties to British Jewish leaders and institutions, and has shown a keen interest in the stories and lessons of the Holocaust… In 2022, Charles commissioned portraits of seven Holocaust survivors to be displayed at Buckingham Palace for International Holocaust Remembrance Day.[46]

As a matter of fact, Mr. President, all British Prime Ministers involved in the Maidan conflict are all in the Jewish pocket. [47] Many are either: 1. Jewish, like Baron Richard Hermer, the Attorney General for England and Wales and Advocate General for Northern Ireland; 2. Descended from Jews, like David Cameron and Boris Johnson; or 3. married to Jews, like Keith Starmer. Others, such as Liza May, Theresa Truss, and Richi Sunak identify with Jews and Zionism out of sympathy and/or financial and electoral reasons. The fact of the matter is, none of them would be elected if they were not Epstein Firsters.[48]

This certainly explains why the United States and Britain are two of the most rabid supporters of the Ukrainian war, the Gaza genocide, the Iran war, and the Greater Israel Project. What’s left of the British and American Empires, Mr. President, is British and American in name only. It is now owned by the Jewish-led predatory bankers of “The City” of London and Wall Street, together with their financial and corporate networks. We effectively transitioned from Pax Britannica to Pax Americana to Jewish hegemony and a world of chaos. Will we ever reach Pax Judaica? It’s possible but it won’t do us any good. The world Epstein Firsters want to create is a world for Jews only, as Maurice Samuel says in his book You Gentiles,

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. Beyond all temporary alliances with this or that faction lies the ultimate split in nature and destiny, the enmity between the Game and God. [49]

To sum up, Britain, the United States, and all Western NATO nations, are indeed ruled by Epstein Firsters. These are the people, Mr. President, who are arming and financing Ukraine against you. They are either allies or vassals of the Jewish-led predatory bankers of the Epstein class. Here is a brief list of the weapons they use to conquer your country and the world:

The Protocols of the Epstein Firsters:

  • Work in secret, lie, cheat, embezzle, blackmail, assassinate, bomb, jail, torture, foment, plot, destroy, scare, sanction, block, intimidate, sue, and anything else you can do to weaken those we wish to dispossess no matter what the consequences are on the nations, populations, and individuals that are in your crosshairs;[50]
  • Use the Holocaust and the anti-Semitism weapons profusely, these boogeymen, together with fear, racism and hate speech accusations, are some of our best weapons and shields against our enemies; whenever you want to discredit dissenters you can also use slurs such as “conspiracy theorist,” “Nazi,” “fascist,” and “White supremacist,” or even better, use the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” slur, but make sure you use the “fake” label; you can on top of it evoke “human rights” to bomb a country to ashes;[51]
  • Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World
  • Demonize authoritarian types of government and promote democracy, the ideal form of government for our purposes;[52]
  • To destroy racial consciousness and national sovereignty, endorse and promote liberalism and measures such as multiculturalism, replacement immigration, critical race theory (CRT), diversity, equity, and inclusion policies (DEI), LGBT promotion, and abortion as a form of contraception;[53]
  • The Hidden Messages of Schindler’s List
  • To dumb down populations and their ability to resist, downgrade educational quality to the level of the least competent and promote and encourage consumer goods that target the limbic system, the center of emotion and motivation, with sex, drugs, and Rock and Roll;[54]
  • Work to abolish private property, race, family, and gender binarism; we want to erase all barriers and identities;
  • To weaken the police and other government institutions and businesses, staff them with women and minorities;
  • Take control of all information and media outlets: Hollywood, mainstream newspapers, TV, the Internet, book publishers, etc.;
  • Control any opposition with generous financial and career rewards;
  • Hire important influencers to promote your ideas or to defame your opponents;
  • Create false flags, false pandemics, and false climate emergencies to scare populations and force them to accept laws and policies they would normally refuse;[55]
  • Take control of the economy;[56]
  • To give them a free hand, impose legal immunity for the whole network of banks and corporations;
  • Deindustrialize and transfer all industries to third-world countries where cheap labor is abundant and taxes and regulations are optimal;
  • Make sure an American system of economy, which favors the building of infrastructure (roads, airports, trains, bridges, etc.) and economic prosperity for the “deplorables,” never sees the light of day.[57] Apply and defend the British System, which advocates for minimal government intervention, low tariffs, and reliance on global free markets;[58]
  • Create unbacked credit (money created out of thin air);[59]
  • Extend excessive debt to borrowing nations to extract political leverage or economic concessions;
  • Grab money anonymously and deposit this money in tax havens;
  • Destroy the Middle class by eliminating small community banks, the bloodline of local innovators and small businesses;[60]
  • Promote on-line shopping to further destroy the Middle class.

Ultimate goal of the Epstein Firsters: Destruction of nations and creation of a worldwide collectivist society of consumers easy to manipulate and control with the help of artificial intelligence, Central Bank Digital Currencies, digital identity, [61] and 15 minutes cities; [62] in this kind of society, the notion of belonging to a country or a race will be obsolete; no one will have any identity, other than that of consumer. This future is described as a “Jewish utopia” for the ruling Epstein Firsters, a nightmare for the millions of rootless, acculturated post-national nomads.[63]

Motivation of the Epstein Firsters: The will for power, which is the basic rule of life, with survival.[64]

Respectfully,

Pierre Simon, a concerned citizen journalist of European descent

[1] Stephen Mitford Goodson, A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Humanity, Black House Publishing Ltd, 4th Edition 2019.

[2] Alex Krainer, “Pandemics and the March of Totalitarianism,” Alex Krainer’s Substack, May 29, 2026.

[3] Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon. Those Who Reign Supreme. A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious, and Economic Origins of the New World Order, American Free Press, 2015.

[4] General Dominique Delawarde, Analysis of US/Russian-/Israeli relations, Reseau International, February 22, 2017.

[5] General Dominique Delawarde, USA-Syria-France-Israel: To better understand the Syrian conflict, Reseau international, April 8, 2017.

[6] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[7] Maurice G. Baxter, Henry Clay and the American System, University Press of Kentucky, November 19, 2004.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Michael Collins Piper, “The Making of Woodrow Wilson—An American Hero?” The Barnes Review, March 2010.

[10] Thomas Dalton, PhD, “Democracy Is an Ideal Government for Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Observer, March 25, 2024.

[11] Eustache Mullins, The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. The London Connection, Bankers Research Institute, 1993.

[12] Robert Ingraham, William McKinley. “Principles must always lead,” 2025.

[13] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[14] FDR’s Attitude to Jews in the US, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[15] Information obtained from Grok AI on X.

[16] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[17] Laurent Guyénot, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, Kindle, p. 35.

[18] Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews: The Republican Presidential Candidate Has Jewish Family Members and Friends. Here’s Who They Are,” Tablet Magazine, July 15, 2016.

[19] Adam Green, “Trump’s Kabbala ‘Tree of Life’ Award,” Know More News, YouTube, 2019.

[20] Laurent Guyénot, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, Kindle, p. 35.

[21] Michael COLLINS PIPER, Final Judgment. The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, American Free Press, 2005.

[22] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[23] Ibid.

[24] Alex Vandermaas-Peeler, Jelena Subotic, and Michael Barnett, “Constructing victims: Suffering and status in modern world order,” Cambridge University Press, December 22, 2022.

[25] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[26] Ibid.

[27] Karen David, “Joe Biden’s Very Jewish Family,” The JC News, November 9, 2020.

[28] Paul Craig Roberts, “Are Jews Again Driving the Western World into a Fatal War?” Institute for Political Economy, September 29, 2022.

[29] Edward Wong, “The Rapture and The Real World. Mike Pompeo Blends Beliefs and Policy,” The New York Times, March 30, 2019.

[30] Victoria Clark, Allies for Armageddon. The Rise of Christian Zionism, Yale University Press, 2007.

[31] Hervé Ryssen, End Times Warfare: The Eschatological Beliefs of the Great Religions, The Barnes Review.

[32] Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews: The Republican Presidential Candidate Has Jewish Family Members and Friends. Here’s Who They Are,” Tablet Magazine, July 15, 2016; Adam Green, “Trump’s Kabbala ‘Tree of Life’ Award,” Know More News, YouTube, 2019.

[33] Information obtained by LEO AI.

[34] Hervé Ryssen, End Times Warfare: The Eschatological Beliefs of the Great Religions, The Barnes Review.

[35] Paul Craig Roberts, article cited.

[36] Pat Buchanan: In His Own Words, Anti-Defamation League, 2013.

[37] Anthony H. Ludovici, The Jews, and the Jews in England, Ostara Publications, 2021 (first published in 1938 under the pseudonym “Cobbett.”

[38] Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, Internet Archive, p. XVII.

[39] Leslie Gilbert Pine, Tales of the British Aristocracy, Internet Archive, p. 219.

[40] Ibid, p. 220.

[41] Arnold Leese, Our Jewish Aristocracy—A revelation, Sons of Liberty, 1896. A free PDF is available on the Internet archive.

[42] Anthony H. Ludovici, The Jews, and the Jews in England, Ostara Publications, 2021 (first published in 1938 under the pseudonym “Cobbett.”

[43] Nesta H. Webster, Germany and England. A Prelude to War, 1938, Ostara Publications, pp. 58–59.

[44] The best cogent and articulate analysis of the Epstein files is by America Firster Nick Fuentes: “What They’re NOT Telling You About Epstein,” Rumble, 2026.

[45] Francine Wolfisz, “Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are shown on Balmoral shooting trip in latest photo dump,” Daily Mail, December 20, 2025.

[46] David Israel, “King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews,” The JewishPress.com, September 9, 2022.

[47] Marc Collet, “Britain Is Ruled by Zionists,” Bitchute, October 14, 2022.

[48] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[49] Maurice Samuls, You Gentiles, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2022.

[50] Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, Howard Allen, 1981.

[51] Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024 (5th edition); Holocaust Encyclopedia, Uncensored and Unrestrained, 2025. Sponsored by the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (www.CODOH.com); Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust, Myth & Reality, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024;

Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America, Carroll & Graf Pub, 1993; Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2021.

[52]Thomas Dalton, PhD, “Democracy Is an Ideal Government for Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Observer, March 25, 2024.

[53] Kevin Macdonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Antelope Hill Publishing, 3rd Edition, 2025; Anthony M. Ludovici, The Specious Origins of Liberalism. The Genesis of a Delusion, Ostara Publications, 2015.

[54] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, “Why the West Is Replacing Its White Population. The Post-Fordist Trap,” The Unz Review, May 15, 2026; John Taylor Gatto, Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling, New Society Publishers, 2002.

[55] Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine. The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Metropolitan Books, 2007;

Tim Ball, PhD, The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science, Stairway Press, 2014. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci. Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, Skyhorse Publishing, 2021.

[56] The best book I have read on the subject of banks and how they control the economy and destroy nations is by a French jurist and fiscal lawyer Valérie Bugault, Les raisons cachées du désordre mondial. Analyse de géopolitique économique, juridique et monétaire (The Hidden Causes of Global Turmoil: An Analysis of Economic, Legal, and Monetary Geopolitics), Sigest, 2021. She is very active on YouTube and with automatic translation you have access to her ideas. For French speakers, she also published a small pocket book, which is a synthesis of the above book, Demain dès l’aube… le renouveau (Tomorrow at dawn… a new beginning), Sigest, 2023.

[57] Maurice G. Baxter, Henry Clay and the American System, University Press of Kentucky, November 19, 2004.

[58] American investment banker and former public official with a background in finance and government service, Catherine Austin Fitts, appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show to talk about the global control grid; her February 27, 2026, appearance is titled “Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks’ Role in War.” In this episode, Fitts argues that major banks and central bankers are constructing the infrastructure of programmable money, global digital IDs, and surveillance hardware to merge monetary and fiscal policy, effectively bypassing democratic legislatures.

[59] Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Banking Swindle. Money Creation and the State, Black House Publishing, 2017.

[60] For a good explanation on how bankers start all wars and put small businesses and innovators out of the loop, see this interview of German economist Richard Werner on the YouTube Tucker Carlson channel: “Every Major War Begins Under False Pretenses & the Central Banks Are Behind It. Economist Explains,” May 22, 2026.

[61] Catherine Austin Fitts, “Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks’ Role in War,” The Tucker Carlson Show, Feb 27, 2026.

[62] The most cited and foundational reference on 15-minute cities is the work of Professor Carlos Moreno from the Sorbonne, who coined the term in 2016 and formalized it in a 2021 paper titled “Introducing the ‘15-Minute City’: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities.”  His concept defines a 15-minute city as an urban planning model where all essential services—work, education, healthcare, recreation—are accessible within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from home. Information obtained from LEO AI.

[63] Michael Higger, PhD, The Jewish Utopia, The Lord Baltimore Press, 1932; Gearóid Ó COLMÁIN, “Rothschild’s ‘Slaughter Ships.’ Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe (Part 4 of 11),” Dissident Voice, 2016. Cited by Scott HOWARD, The Open Society Playbook, Antelope Hill Publishing, p. 223.

[64] Anthony M. Ludovici, Who Is to Be Master of the World. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzche, Legare Street Press (first published in 1914 by T.N. Foulis).

 

Haaretz op-ed: Israel doesn’t have to change. You do.

/24 Comments/in /by

After Bondi, It’s Time for the Australian Left to Accept the Jewish Community Just as It Is

A woman stands at a flower tribute at Bondi Beach on in Sydney, Australia.
A woman stands at a flower tribute at Bondi Beach on in Sydney, Australia. Credit: Mark Baker/AP

The Australian left must understand how profoundly the Holocaust shaped the Jewish community’s relationship with Israel and stop treating Zionism with such hostility – lest more Jews be reduced to labels like ‘that Zionist bitch,’ as I was

With the first block of public hearings into the “lived experience” of antisemitism in Australia – part of the royal commission established after December’s mass shooting at a Sydney Hanukkah event – came the testimony of a university student in Canberra whose roommates asked her to move out after October 7 because they were uncomfortable living with a Zionist.

This testimony was utterly unsurprising. My own time at the University of Sydney ended with the campus’ most prominent and promising progressives referring to me among themselves as “that Zionist bitch.” This was in 2018.

The commission has focused heavily on the surge in antisemitism since October 2023. But the intellectual and moral rot surrounding Israel had been building for years in large circles of the progressive left; all the Hamas attack did was allow ideas and attitudes that once lived only on its fringes to go mainstream. And confronting those attitudes at this moment is politically painful.

Of course, the political extremes on the right have also become increasingly emboldened and more active since October 7, as recorded by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. That said, Australia’s main neo-Nazi group – the National Socialist Network, aka “White Australia” – has little public support or influence.

Haaretz Opinions

Read the opinions shaping debate in Israel and beyond

October 7th commemoration in Sydney, Australia, last year.

October 7th commemoration in Sydney, Australia, last year. Credit: Rick Rycroft/AP

Regardless, the commission has heard testimony of Jewish children being confronted with swastikas at school and with peers proclaiming “Heil Hitler.” Swastikas carved into trees. Swastikas spray-painted on the street.

But condemning neo-Nazis is easy. Denouncing swastikas carries no real political risk.

What is much harder – and requires political courage – is confronting the antisemitism that now circulates comfortably in left-wing and even mainstream spaces: the kind that is socially rewarded and popular, but also deniable.

It manifests when Jewish authors cannot secure spots on festival panels for reasons that can always be explained away: The authors of “Ruptured,” a collection of essays written by Australian Jewish women in response to October 7, have been rejected from all but one of the country’s major writers’ festivals.

It manifests when students quietly cut ties with Jewish friends because they’re “Zionists” and must naturally support genocide and ethnic cleansing. In the colleagues who stopped speaking to you after you expressed empathy for the hostages in Gaza.

This is the antisemitism that has flourished in Australia in recent years precisely because it can be so easy to dismiss as happenstance or legitimize as reasonable. But it is neither coincidence nor fair, it others Jews and makes it acceptable to exclude and socially punish them.

The unwillingness of Australian politicians to confront this form of antisemitism was epitomized by the prime minister’s reaction to the Bondi massacre. Getting Anthony Albanese to establish a royal commission after 15 people were shot dead during a Hanukkah event at Sydney’s most famous beach was like pulling teeth. And the reaction to the commission itself has revealed how little has changed exactly where it most needs to when it comes to certain attitudes toward Jews.

In March, the former head of Australia’s domestic spy service, Dennis Richardson, abruptly resigned as special adviser to the commission. Asked why on ABC Radio Canberra, he replied: “To be very blunt, I was being way overpaid for what I was doing.”

Australia's antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal stands next to Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, his wife Jodie Haydon and Governor-General of Australia Sam Mostyn at the vigil in Sydney, Sunday.

Australia’s antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal stands next to Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, his wife Jodie Haydon and Governor-General of Australia Sam Mostyn at the vigil in Sydney, Sunday. Credit: Hollie Adams/Reuters

The mention of money in the same breath as a royal commission into antisemitism was bemusing enough. But the reactions to one post on The Daily Aus – with some comments receiving hundreds of likes – morphed into a twisted display of utter contempt and antisemitic dog whistles.

One of the most popular responses asked: “Why are Jews singled out for special treatment? Shouldn’t it be general racism rather than antisemitism?” Another wondered: “Did he mean he was not agreeing with the Israel lobby on the outrageous new definition of antisemitism and the implications for civil liberties in Australia?” And another suggested he had “probably found out who was really behind Bondi and can’t handle it.”

So far, the commission appears to be deepening resentment precisely among the very people who most misunderstand contemporary antisemitism. Meanwhile, politicians continue to condemn antisemitism in the safest, vaguest and most socially acceptable way possible, avoiding being explicit on the more pervasive manifestations that have become embedded in parts of Australian society.

Demonstrators gather in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, to protest the visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog.
Demonstrators gather in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, to protest the visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog. Credit: Joel Carrett/AP

Years before October 7, when I advocated for Jewish students at council meetings, I was always careful not to wrestle with the criticism they leveled at Israel itself. Instead, I tried to explain how the language they used, demonizing the Jewish state, could affect Jewish students on their own campus. I thought my approach, illuminating the history and plight of the Jewish people, might create an environment in which these young progressives might appreciate and consider my perspective.

It didn’t. I became “that Zionist bitch” to them all.

Now the Jewish Australians who testified to the commission have themselves reported a sharp rise in online harassment and intimidation since going public with their experiences. What does all of this portend? Nothing good.

The Australian left must confront this with an open mind and a willingness to listen to the 86 percent of Australian Jews who believe that Israel’s existence is an essential part of the Jewish people’s future. It must reckon with the fact that Australia is home to the largest concentration of Holocaust survivors per capita outside of Israel. The Australian left must understand how the Holocaust has profoundly shaped the Jewish community’s relationship to Israel and dare to stop treating Zionism with such vicious hostility when most Australian Jews see themselves as Zionists.

If the left cannot muster the compassion to accept its Jewish community just as it is, worse things than Bondi Beach are sure to follow.

Kevin DeAnna and Millennia Woes on the Henry Nowak Murder

/20 Comments/in /by

American Renaissance: Kevin DeAnna and Millennia Woes on the Henry Wauck Murder

Aporia: The Myth of Assimilation

/1 Comment/in /by

Aporia: The Myth of Assimilation

Unpacking the narrative around Ellis Island immigration

Written by Alden Whitfeld and Arctotherium.

Jason Richwine coined the term “Irish Retort” to describe one of the most common tactics deployed in debates over immigration. Raise any concerns about mass immigration today and the response is automatic: “What about the Irish!”

When Irish immigrants arrived in America in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, they were poor, Catholic (as opposed to Protestant) and heavily overrepresented in crime. Nativists panicked then too. Yet over time, the Irish assimilated, climbed up the social ladder, and became indistinguishable from the average American. The implication is clear, though usually left unstated: today’s immigrants will follow the same arc, and any claim to the contrary is just recycled bigotry.

It’s a neat story, rhetorically powerful and emotionally satisfying. The problem is what it leaves out. Careful studies using multi-generational data show that differences in social outcomes are much more persistent than is commonly assumed. What appears to be rapid convergence is often an artifact of looking too narrowly or too briefly. With this in mind, let’s examine how well the story of rapid European assimilation holds up.

To begin with, the story rests on a quiet omission: a very large share of European immigrants didn’t assimilate at all. They went home.

Between roughly 1850 and 1920, return migration was a defining feature of transatlantic mobility. The return rate of European immigrants during this period was 25–40%. In some decades it reached 60–75% (Bandiera et al., 2013). Italians are the canonical case: between 1890 and 1920, more than half returned to Italy (Klein, 1983). This return migration was negatively selected — the poorer and less successful immigrants were the most likely to leave (Abramitzky et al., 2019). What we now remember as “successful assimilation” is partly explained by survivorship bias. America did not lift entire populations into the middle class. It retained those who were already capable of doing well and quietly shed the rest.1

This selection process radically alters how we interpret the observed convergence in outcomes. Abramitzky et al. (2014) show that most European immigrant groups that arrived in the early twentieth century, including the Irish, Italians and Russians, already had above-average incomes in the first generation. (There was often little difference between first- and second-generation outcomes.) It is not difficult to turn a group into a success story when many of its poorest members voluntarily leave.

Average earnings relative to U.S. natives. Source.

Even after accounting for selection, European economic differences did not evaporate entirely. Using a unique three-generation dataset linking immigrant grandfathers in 1880 to their grandsons in 1940, Ward (2020) finds substantial persistence in occupational income across European ethnicities. As this is the first study to use linked grandparent-grandson data, it demonstrates that intergenerational correlations are stronger when measured properly. As Ward notes, his findings cut directly against the “melting pot” narrative in which ethnic differences fade within a generation or two. They don’t.

Persistence of incomes across European ethnicities. Source.

Nor did immigrants simply arrive as blank slates and then absorb American culture. They brought their values, habits and norms with them, and these left durable imprints on the places where they settled. We understand this intuitively when it comes to cuisine: Italians didn’t just eat pasta themselves; they taught Americans to eat pasta.2 But the same logic applies in other domains.

Continues: The Myth of Assimilation – Aporia