Take Maddow’s hilariously extravagant introductions of Melissa Harris-Lacewell, the half-Black, DEI star performer, who has been given one fabulous job after another, few of which pan out after about a year — and who pretty much created the tampon earrings look. (I’ve been on the liberal patronization beat for some time. For the Box Set, go to: LiberalNoblesseOblige.com.)
General
Rachel Maddow’s Very, Very, Very Special Friend
Ann Coulter is definitely not a fan of the Race Lady. Here’s what she wrote for Thanksgiving, 2023. Takeaways:
You were admitted to Harvard with SAT scores that would have gotten an Asian kid disowned by his parents. People try harder to laugh at your excruciating jokes than they would for a male of any race.
The current article:
To the eternal misfortune of Black Americans, the left decided to take them as pets, then patronize them to death.
I gotta admit, Joy Reid was indeed blindsided when she was fired from MSNBC this week. How could she possibly have seen this cancellation coming? Sure, by the end, she was down to 11 actual viewers nationwide, eight of them in hospital ICUs, their charts indicating coma protocol.
Of her remaining three viewers, one was a gentleman named Nelson, sitting in a Detroit gastropub, who kept screaming at the bartender, “What is this shit? Dude, turn the f-ing channel. Damn! Bitch crazy.”
Data seem to indicate that the remaining two viewers were at a Frontier Airlines departure gate, where “The ReidOut” was being broadcast without sound. It’s unclear whether these two were traveling as a couple or did not, in fact, know each other.
But how was Joy to deduce from all this that her show was in trouble?
Fortunately for Joy, there is no truer Friend-of-Black-People than her erstwhile MSNBC colleague Rachel Maddow, who lives in a town, Cummington, Massachusetts, that is “0.0%” black. (I wouldn’t mention this, except liberals pioneered the art of counting the number of Black faces at any conservative gathering in order to call them racist. Oh, who am I kidding — yes, I would.)
Here are the highlights of Rachel’s self-aggrandizing, on-air tribute to Joy on Monday night:
“[Joy] is leaving the network altogether. That is very, very, very hard to take.
(Do we think three “very’s” is enough? If she really meant it, wouldn’t there be six or seven?)
“In all of the jobs I have had in all of the years I have been alive, there is no colleague for whom I have had more affection and more respect than Joy Reid. I love everything about her. I have learned so much from her. I have so much more to learn from her.”
“(Goddamn it, this may cost me my career but I’m going to speak up for a black person and let chips fall where they may!)”
“Personally, I think it is a bad mistake to let her walk out the door. … ”
(Clarification sought: Did Joy really “walk out the door”? Are we absolutely sure she wasn’t lifted up and dragged to an elevator by security? I guess we’ll have to wait for the Zapruder film.)
In any event, Rachel has spoken. She came down from the mountain with her tablets and made her ass-kissy pronouncement. Perhaps she can take some solace in knowing that one of the Democrats of Color taking over Joy’s time slot, Alicia Menendez, has a father in federal prison.
This is how White liberals talk about Black people, as if there’s a Race Stasi ready to turn them over to authorities if they’re not effusive enough. But Blubberbutt Maddow stands out in a field with stiff competition.
Here are a few standard intros:
“Joining us now is a woman who couldn`t sound stupid if she practiced it for a week, Melissa Harris-Lacewell …”
“Melissa Harris-Lacewell, associate professor of politics and African American studies at Princeton University. You’re wicked smart.”
“Melissa Harris-Lacewell, Princeton professor, MSNBC contributor, of which we are very proud.”
“Melissa Harris-Lacewell, Princeton professor, MSNBC contributor, and one of the smartest people I’ve ever talked to about anything, anytime, anywhere.”
“Every Tuesday, you’ve been doing this to me, Melissa. Every Tuesday my whole adult life.”
She’s such a pro, I can’t believe Rachel forgot to call Harris-Lacewell “articulate.” Black people love that.
For comparison, here’s how Rachel introduces a Qhite guest: “Joining us now is the chair of the Senate Rules Committee, Minnesota Senior Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Senator, it’s great to see you.”
Liberals have leapt way beyond “the soft bigotry of low expectations” and are now showcasing “the suffocating, smug bigotry of wildly, hysterically overpraising average individuals just because they’re Black.” If a straight White male talked to any presentable-looking female on the air like Rachel talks to Black women, he’d end up in HR.
To the eternal misfortune of Black Americans, the left decided to take them as pets, then patronize them to death.
COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER
Forward: ‘Devastating’—What Germany’s election results mean for Jews
The AfD’s rise isn’t just another ripple in Europe’s growing nationalist tide — it carries deeper echoes of Germany’s past. Some of the party’s leaders have ties to neo-Nazi rhetoric and have downplayed the Holocaust. Perhaps most alarming is the party’s growing support among younger voters, many of whom are increasingly disconnected from the country’s reckoning with its role in World War II.
And it isn’t only in Europe where AfD’s rise echoes, Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk have both expressed support for the party. …
Germany’s far-right surge is not happening in a vacuum; it’s part of a broader global trend. At a speech in Munich earlier this month, Vance criticized Germany’s mainstream parties for maintaining a “firewall” against the AfD. Musk made headlines by addressing an AfD rally via video, drawing criticism for lending it legitimacy.
forward.com
Benyamin Cohen
Alice Weidel, co-leader of Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, reacts during an election night rally in Berlin. Photo by Ralf Hirschberger/AFP via Getty Images
Germany’s election on Sunday sent a clear, unsettling message with record turnout and a clear anti-immigration pitch. While the center-right Christian Democrats secured victory, it was the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party that delivered the biggest shock, capturing around 20% of the vote — double its support from 2021, though not as high as some had feared.
“It could’ve been worse,” Meron Mendel, an Israeli-German historian and director of the Anne Frank Education Center in Frankfurt, said in an interview. “But it’s still devastating.”
The AfD’s rise isn’t just another ripple in Europe’s growing nationalist tide — it carries deeper echoes of Germany’s past. Some of the party’s leaders have ties to neo-Nazi rhetoric and have downplayed the Holocaust. Perhaps most alarming is the party’s growing support among younger voters, many of whom are increasingly disconnected from the country’s reckoning with its role in World War II.
And it isn’t only in Europe where AfD’s rise echoes, Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk have both expressed support for the party.
So, what’s behind the AfD’s recent surge? Why is this development particularly concerning for Jews? And how does it tie into broader global trends? Here’s what you need to know.
What is the AfD, and why is it controversial?
The AfD was founded in 2013 as a party initially focused on opposing Germany’s participation in the European Union and rejecting the euro currency. But the party quickly shifted toward nationalist, anti-immigration rhetoric — especially after 2015, when Germany welcomed hundreds of thousands of refugees, mostly from Middle Eastern countries.
Over time, factions within the AfD have embraced far-right ideology more openly. According to Mendel, figures like Björn Höcke, a regional AfD leader, have promoted rhetoric that minimizes Germany’s responsibility for the Holocaust and echoes nationalist themes reminiscent of Nazi-era ideology.
Why are Jews concerned?
For Jews in Germany, the AfD’s surge has painful historical resonance. While the party publicly denies antisemitism and even brands itself as pro-Israel, some of its leaders have undermined Holocaust remembrance efforts. Höcke, for example, referred to Berlin’s Holocaust Memorial as a “monument of shame,” sparking outrage.
Related
But the concern extends beyond rhetoric. Mendel warned of the broader danger to democratic values. “In my view, it’s in the vested interest of any minority, and especially for Jews, to preserve the liberal order,” he said. “So if these values are eroded in the free world, it’s another warning signal for Jews around the world.”
While most German Jews oppose the AfD, a small minority has been drawn to its strong anti-Muslim stance — a sentiment that has intensified in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. “The AfD is trying to position themselves as the only one that protects Jews against Muslims,” Mendel said. “And they have radical ideas: for example, ‘remigration,’ which means to send migrants back to their homelands. And for some Jews, it seems like an attractive answer.”
How did the AfD become so popular?
Several factors contributed to the AfD’s growing support:
Economic anxiety: The German economy has been hit hard by the fallout from the war in Ukraine, particularly the loss of cheap Russian gas. Industries like German car manufacturing have struggled, feeding economic frustration and fueling support for the AfD’s populist messaging.
East-West divide: The AfD has found its strongest support in former East Germany, where feelings of marginalization and disillusionment remain more than 30 years after reunification.
Immigration fears: The party has capitalized on anxieties around immigration, especially among those who feel left behind by mainstream politics. The center-right Christian Democrat party — which won the most votes but must form a coalition government — also campaigned on an anti-immigration platform, an issue which drove many voters to the polls. After the election results were announced, President Donald Trump praised the win by the Christian Democratic party as “a great day for Germany,” and noted that voters were “tired” of a more open immigration stance.
Appeal to young voters: The AfD has gained traction with younger Germans, many of whom don’t have direct family connections to the Holocaust. The party’s social media campaigns have tapped into anti-establishment sentiment and a resurgent nationalism.
Is this part of a larger global trend?
Germany’s far-right surge is not happening in a vacuum; it’s part of a broader global trend. At a speech in Munich earlier this month, Vance criticized Germany’s mainstream parties for maintaining a “firewall” against the AfD. Musk made headlines by addressing an AfD rally via video, drawing criticism for lending it legitimacy.
This growing global network has helped normalize far-right rhetoric and expand the AfD’s platform. By aligning with international voices, the party has managed to soften its image for some voters — despite the continued presence of factions within the party that openly embrace neo-Nazi sympathies.
What’s at stake for Germany and its Jews?
While the AfD didn’t win the election, its rise has already shifted Germany’s political landscape. Mainstream conservatives have begun to show a new willingness to cooperate with the far right, breaking long-standing taboos around engaging with extremist parties.
For many Jews in Germany and around the world, the election results are a reminder that history’s darkest chapters can resurface in new forms. “The wish to get rid of the past was always part of the German discussion,” Mendel said. “But these voices are now coming from the second-largest party.”
Related
Orthosphere: Who is to Blame for the Aliens’ Alienation?
Who is to Blame for the Aliens’ Alienation?
Excerpt:
…
Albert Memmi was a Tunisian Jew who emigrated to France and then bitterly blamed the French because he did not feel at home. Like a fastidious vegetarian recoiling from a chunk of beef on the fork of his carnivorous host, Memmi recoiled, with an indignant sense of injury, from the offensive Christianity and Frenchness of narrow-minded France. But in Memmi’s telling his recoil was not Memmi’s rejection of France. It was instead France’s rejection of Memmi.
“I have not rejected anything; unfortunately it is the nation that has rejected me, that leaves me outside.”*
France was inhospitable to Memmi simply because it was French. Its landscape everywhere bristled with menacing Christian spires; many of its towns bore the dreadful names of Christian saints; men and women under strong suspicion of antisemitism stalked the pages of its history books.
“Whether I like it or not, the history of the country in which I live is, to me, a borrowed history. How could I feel that Joan of Arc is a symbol for me? Would I hear with her the patriotic and Christian voices?”*
No, probably not. And the only solution, in Memmi’s opinion, is that the symbol of Joan of Arc be retired to the museum, and no doubt there problematized by a critical reinterpretation— that the native French no longer hear with her (and through her) those patriotic and Christian voices.
This is of course akin to the iconoclastic purge that recently toppled so many statues here in the United States. Can Robert E. Lee be a symbol for descendants of American slaves? Can George Washington be a symbol for the an immigrant who “borrowed” American history only the year before last? Can sons of the Ganges and Niger hear with Robert and George those patriotic and Christian voices?
No, probably not. And so neither will ancestral Americans if men like Memmi have their way.
No Gauls, please. Enough of Celts, ancient Germans, Slavs, conquering Romans and conquering Arabs! For then, I find myself naked and alone: my own ancestors were neither Gauls, Celts, Slavs, ancient Germans, Arabs, or Turks . . . . I have never been able to say ‘We’ in referring to those historical pedigrees on which my fellow-citizens pride themselves. I have never heard another Jew say ‘We’ without wincing, without vaguely suspecting him of an inadvertent blunder, of complacency or of a slip of the tongue.
* * * * *
So then, is the accusation confirmed? As a Jew, you admit to being stateless and cosmopolitan? Of your own accord, you reject the nation! I do not reject anything! What is confirmed? Do I really suffer from my own refusal or from what other men refuse me?”
Who is to blame for the alienation of the alien? Is the alien to blame because he refuses to change, is perhaps incapable of change? Does the fault lie in Memmi’s prejudice against Christian churches, Christian saints, and the myth of Joan of Arc? Or are the French to blame because they refuse to change—because thy are too prejudiced to make Memmi feel at home by pulling down their churches, renaming their towns, and problematizing the Maid of Orlèans?
It was Memmi’s opinion that the fault lay with the French and their offensive insistence on remaining French in a French France. It was Memmi’s opinion that the French should yield to his insistence on remaining a cosmopolitan Jew and feeling at home anywhere he liked. He was, in fact, like the intolerant vegetarian who insists upon remaining vegetarian wherever he dines, and who cries out in pain if every plate at the table is not heaped with beans and kale.
NYTimes on the German Election
I suppose we should have a look at what our newspaper of record says. Notice the typical German voters in multicultural Germany in the photo below.
5 Takeaways From Germany’s Election
Listen to this article · 6:22 min Learn more
After the Christian Democrats fell out of power in 2021, Mr. Merz assumed leadership of the party and drove it to the right on migration and other issues. He was most comfortable campaigning on the economy, promising to peel back regulations and reduce taxes in a bid to reignite economic growth.
Mr. Merz is tall and sometimes stern, with a dry wit. Polls suggest that only about a third of the country believes he will make a good chancellor. Even some of his own voters said on Sunday that they are not enamored of him. But if he can quickly forge a government, he has a chance to step into a leadership vacuum in Europe as it struggles with the strains on its relationship with the United States under President Trump. …
Musk Did Not Seem to Sway Voters
Elon Musk was shown on a large screen as Alice Weidel, co-leader of the Alternative for Germany party, spoke last month at a lectern, far right, in Halle, Germany.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York TimesThe hard-right Alternative for Germany, or AfD, doubled its vote share from four years ago, largely by appealing to voters upset by immigration. In the former East Germany, it finished first, ahead of Mr. Merz’s party.
The AfD’s vote share appeared to fall short of its high-water mark of support in polls from a year ago, however. Many analysts had been expecting a stronger showing, after a sequence of events that elevated the party and its signature issue.
The AfD received public support from Mr. Vance and an endorsement by the billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk. It sought to make political gains out of a series of deadly attacks by migrants in recent months, including in the final days of the campaign.
But that boon never materialized.
The surprise of the night
Reaction to the recent attacks and the support from Trump officials may have even mobilized a late burst of support to Die Linke, the party of Germany’s far left, which campaigned on a pro-immigration platform, some voters suggested in interviews on Sunday.
Two months ago Die Linke was dying. Sahra Wagenknecht, its most popular member, started a new party last year that was more friendly to Russia and tougher on migration. Many followed her, thinking that she was the future. Die Linke languished at 3 percent.
But Die Linke managed to turn things around in just months, thanks to a new pair of charismatic and social-media savvy leaders and the alienation that many young voters feel with mainstream parties. It surged to what appeared to be nearly 9 percent of the vote and more than 60 seats in Parliament.
Its campaign events started attracting so many young people that they became must-see affairs, as much dance party as political rally.
The party leaders became social media stars. Heidi Reichinnek, who is credited for much of the turnaround, told a crowd on Sunday night that they owed their success to the many volunteers who went from door to door talking to people about pocketbook issues. Ms. Reichinnek told supporters they “did everything right.”
Scholz is out, but his party marches on.
Despite polling predicting his third-place finish, Chancellor Olaf Scholz had insisted until the very end that he would somehow retain his job. He was wrong. His Social Democratic Party won a record-low 16 percent, coming in third place. Though Mr. Scholz will continue as a caretaker chancellor until Mr. Merz is sworn in, he is widely expected to step down from active politics. …
Two views of the German Election: Goodwin and von Hoffmeister
Excerpts from Matt Goodwin: “Ordinary Germans have had enough. Why Germany is moving right
Bad news first:
And now they face one final betrayal. Even though the right-wing CDU and AfD got nearly half the vote and over half the seats in Parliament, the CDU will now refuse to go into coalition with the AfD.
Instead, it seems likely they will go for the “Kenya” coalition, with the left-wing SPD and Greens.
What does this mean?
It means there will be no end to the ongoing immigration crisis.
It means there will be no end to the broken borders.
It means there will be no end to the rocketing energy prices.
And it means there will be no end to fixing the abuse of the welfare state by foreigners.
All in the name of maintaining the firewall that is blocking the AfD, and in turn millions of ordinary Germans, from power —from having their entirely legitimate and reasonable concerns addressed.
The only thing a coalition between the centre-right and the left will ensure is that all the mainstream parties will now fail together.
And as that happens, as the German people are forced to watch yet more shocking failures, more chaos, and more managed decline, in the end only one opponent to alp this will be left standing.
Good news:
The centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) have the most votes and the most seats in the Bundestag, but fewer than in previous victories.
Voters don’t want the left but they also don’t trust the centre-right party which first opened Germany’s borders to millions of refugees, either.
At the same time, astonishingly, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), the national-populists, have doubled their share of the vote and finished in second place.
It is a truly seismic moment in German and indeed European politics, providing further evidence for what we have long argued in this newsletter —that national populism is not only here to stay but reflects an ongoing ‘realignment’ of Western politics which is pushing rising numbers of voters away from the established liberal consensus into the arms of parties that are mainly critical of mass uncontrolled immigration, broken borders, globalisation, and the ongoing destruction of Western nations..
Remarkably, the AfD has achieved this despite enormous opposition. They’ve been labelled fascists. They’ve been derided as Nazis. They’ve had the media all but openly campaign against them. They’ve had every other party condemn them.
Constantin von Hoffmeister: ‘The AfD and the Axe of History”
The figures of the 2025 German federal election slice through the stagnant air like jagged glass, a brutal revelation of a system nearing its own self-inflicted collapse. The CDU/CSU (Christian Democratic Union) limps forward at 29%, dragging its reanimated corpse through the political landscape, the SPD (Social Democratic Party) slumps to 16%, drowning in its own irrelevance, and the Greens — those eco-puritans in love with multiculturalism and decay — cling desperately to 12%. But the real tremor, the subterranean growl of an awakening beast, comes from the AfD (Alternative for Germany), surging to a staggering 20%, its ascent shaking the foundations of a West that has lost its will to live.
Aristotle, the ancient diagnostician of democracy, looms over this spectacle like an unblinking oracle. He saw this coming over two thousand years ago. In Politics, he warned of democracy’s slow suicide, its descent into ochlocracy, the rule of the mob, where plebeian apathy and elite corruption conspire to suffocate the soul of the polis. And now? Germany, the heart of the European project, is gasping in its terminal stage, a civilization devouring itself in the throes of bureaucratic sterility. Aristotle’s nightmare — where democracy degenerates into oligarchic tyranny — has unfolded before our eyes, and the people, battered and betrayed, have turned to the AfD in search of salvation.
This is not just another election. It is an insurrection of the disillusioned, the dispossessed, the ones cast aside in the great sacrificial burning of European industry, European identity, and European will. The AfD’s 20% is more than a number. It is a hammer blow to the temple of a senile establishment that clings to power like a parasite to a dying host. Oswald Spengler, always lurking in the shadows of decline, grins from the abyss, his vision of the West’s Untergang — the inevitable sinking into civilizational night — now fully realized in the pale, hollow eyes of Merkel and Scholz’s progeny.
Germany, once a titan of industrial might, now watches its factories shuttered, its energy bills soaring to heights unknown, its streets flooded not with the march of progress but with the quiet desperation of a people abandoned. Unvetted mass immigration further strains an already collapsing system, diluting national cohesion, fueling rising crime, and deepening economic turmoil.
Yes, Zelenskyy Is a Dictator: Tucker Interviews Bob Amsterdam
Jewish lawyer (!) who was arrested by Putin in 2005 and represents the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine, discusses Zelenskyy’s campaign of destruction against the Church—priests and parishioners beaten while the young men are being forced to go off to slaughter. All started by Victoria Nuland, the notorious Jewish neocon who spearheaded the CIA coup of 2014 and continued by the likes of Mike Pompeo. Amsterdam details Zelensky’s unpopularity, his destroying the free press, imprisoning opponents, banning political parties, etc.
Donald Trump just called Zelensky a dictator. Human rights lawyer Bob Amsterdam has worked in Ukraine for the past couple of years and confirms that if anything, that’s an understatement.
Chapters
7 chapters in this episode
00:00:00
1. The Situation Is Dire
00:03:30
2. Bob Amsterdam’s Fight to Defend the Orthodox Church From Zelensky
00:18:49
3. Mike Pompeo’s Involvement
00:24:16
4. Why Is the US Bending the Knee to Ukraine?
00:30:00
5. The Push for Sanctions
00:46:00
6. China’s Role in Undermining the US
00:46:30
7. The War’s Impact on the Middle East
Transcript
Tucker [00:00:00] So thank you. Thank you for doing this. You’re one of the few people who at the end of our last conversation, I thought, I want to talk to that man again because you’re one of the few that I know who has a real sense of what it’s like in Ukraine and has been for the last three years since the war began. How would you summarize the situation in Ukraine right now?
Bob Amsterdam [00:00:19] Dire. Situation is dire. Zelensky is wildly unpopular. There are pressure gangs to take people to the front. People are without hope and the casualties are enormous and the corruption is enormous. And imagine sending your child to the front knowing all of this as you know. I represent the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, so our parishioners go to the front while their churches are being stolen back home. While parishioners, elderly parishioners and priests are being beaten. And you know what I’ve what I’ve always said to people who defend Zelensky is, you know, all his numbers are complete fabrications. If he was popular, if he was trusted, he wouldn’t have destroyed the press. He wouldn’t be jailing and labeling with treason charges, political opponents. And there would have been some control on the corruption in the courts are impossible. It’s a police state. This the SBU, The secret police. Run and intimidate everyone and everything. And yet the Western press has blockaded this story. The dishonesty of some of the people that are reporting from Ukraine is astounding. I’ve never seen anything like it. I’ve been involved with cases involving wars and disputes, but the absolute lying and the games that are our papers are playing. The Wall Street Journal, for instance, barely, barely has an op ed that doesn’t Lord Zelensky. You never get reality about what’s actually going on in the presidential administration. You get no coverage. You know, there’s a law 3894 to destroy the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. No law has been passed like this in Europe since World War Two against the Jews. There’s no coverage. The the argument when I say to the press, how can you do this? How can you not cover people talking about religious cleansing who are members of the Ukrainian parliament? How can you not cover it? They say, well, this church is somehow a Russian thing. We you know, as I’ve told you, we have reached a point where this narrative, the Zelensky narrative, has been accepted and our people simply don’t don’t challenge it. They fall if they fall to it. And it’s it’s really been down to the new administration to put a pin in that balloon.
Tucker [00:03:28] It’s kind of hard to skip over you and your role in all this. I think you’re the only American attorney who’s worked in Ukraine, who I have seen is telling the truth about what’s actually happening there. And for doing that, you’ve been called a Russian stooge of Putin worshiper. Your character has been impugned. Can you just take a couple of minutes, tell us who you are? Why are you representing the Orthodox Church in Ukraine? Are you a Putin puppet?
Bob Amsterdam [00:03:58] Look, for 45 years I’ve done political cases all over the world. We’ve taken on some big enemies. We took on the United Nations pro bono on behalf of an individual worker for the U.N. that they had destroyed. We got two assistant secretaries general disciplined in that in that case that that made history inside the U.N. And we were awarded the global Pro bono award from American Lawyer for doing that case. I represented political opponents of Putin in Moscow. I was arrested in Moscow at 2 a.m., and they tried to load me into a vehicle, get me out of there. I wouldn’t go with you.
Tucker [00:04:50] I just wanna be clear on this. You were arrested by the Putin government at 2 a.m. in Moscow.
Bob Amsterdam [00:04:53] That’s right. And 2005 defending a political opponent to Vladimir Putin. And in fact, you have been banned from Russia ever since. I hold no water for Putin. I represent opponents of the Russian government in various countries, continue to represent political opponents of Putin. It hasn’t stopped the Ukrainians from launching a massive disinformation campaign against me because of my defense of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which is the majority Church of Ukraine, which Zelensky and his gang have been trying to destroy. I am on the legal team of some of the priests that they have illegally jailed. We. Have an individual in London who fled the country because Zelensky had literally sent people to basically I don’t want to use the word liquidate him, but he had to virtually run across a border. This is a member of the Rada who Yarmouk took away his security. He had to run across the border to save his life, and his crime was speaking out against a law to destroy his church.
Tucker [00:06:15] Which back up for one second. So you’re a I think it’s fair to say, broad terms, a Jewish liberal from the Bronx who was arrested by Putin. How did you wind up how did you wind up representing the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine? Why was that important of all the cases you could take, why that one?
Bob Amsterdam [00:06:32] Well, let’s be clear. It’s the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. We are not part of the RC. We are. We share only a canonical link. Our church denounced the invasion. Our church separated itself administratively 30 years ago, and every Ukrainian that’s orthodox has been baptized in our church five years ago. A new church was established in Ukraine. By the Poroshenko administration with the active connivance of the United States government. The State Department of the United States was involved in the establishment of the church. I believe either USAID or some other organizations have funded this state church called the O. C U. This is a basically kind of a CIA operation, if you will, to to set up a church that would be completely free of what they viewed as the dangerous Putin influence. So you have our State Department violating our Constitution, openly engaging in the destruction of religious freedom in a foreign country, doing things absolutely illegal under our Constitution. All in like establishing religion. Yes. All in the name of anti Putin activities. And because I am so very strongly against the present Russian administration, I insisted on traveling to Kiev with a bunch of my lawyers to interview. We were we were privileged to meet with the Holy Synod to to meet with senior members of the church, interview priests, interview lawyers, so I could fully accept the mandate to fight for a church that was being driven out of existence. This is something that’s not supposed to happen in the 21st century. And as a Jew who feels strongly about freedoms from my Christian brothers and sisters, as somebody who feels that religious freedom is the foundation of all our freedoms, Yes. And I believe that to the to the center of my being. I could not believe that the American government, a government for which I signed up for the draft on my birthday when I was 18, when we were still in Vietnam. This government could be funding the destruction of this church. So we’ve studied it. We’ve met with people who were at high levels of the US government who confirmed for me that this was a US government operation and we have done everything we can and we have We have walked into a wall of Ukrainian propaganda inside Washington. And I want to be very clear. I just finished speaking at a religious freedom conference. It was a religious freedom conference that in many ways was managed by the Ukrainian government. There it was Ukraine, Washington, in Washington, D.C.. My team was barely afford it. An allowance to go in. We were we were not allowed in a year ago. This time we were allowed in. They wouldn’t take our we were.
Tucker [00:10:03] Defending a church against a dictator. But you’re not allowed to appear to religion, correct?
Bob Amsterdam [00:10:07] That’s right. That’s correct. And this time, when I went to the Religious Freedom Conference, I was only allowed. They stacked the panel I was on with a a priest from the other church, and they gave me basically five minutes to present my views, which were that, in fact, this this other church, which, by the way, has stolen 1500 of our churches, engaged in mobile.
Tucker [00:10:39] Phone. The buildings.
Bob Amsterdam [00:10:40] The buildings. Yes. Stolen them, stolen them outright, stolen them and and worse, beaten our priests. Beaten our parishioners. And I have this all on video. If you go to save the euro sitcom, you will see the videos of our parishioners being beaten. These are the elderly parents of people at the front fighting for the liberation and protection of Ukraine, being beaten very often by by SBU. That’s their secret. Police wearing death masks with Nazi insignias on their arm. And let me be very clear to you that you will never hear elsewhere. There is a massive right wing movement in Ukraine that has tremendous influence. Our newspapers were warning this warning of this in the late teens, and once the war started, we never heard anything else. It’s as if all these neo-Nazis disappeared. They haven’t disappeared. They’re part of the Ukrainian government. But you’re never allowed to say that because if you say anything like that, you are told that you are a Putinism. And Kasparov is summed it up. He’s basically said, if you criticize Zelensky in any way, you’re a Putin. So the fact that he’s destroyed civil society, he’s destroyed a free media, he jails or sanctions or charges with treason, his opponents we’re supposed to ignore all of that because if we mention it or if I stand on a soapbox to scream that he’s jailing and torturing priests, we are somehow dis entitled to speak. We have this crazy adopted authoritarianism now where we we as a country of institutions, have made a king out of Zelensky. We have we have allowed him to destroy every Ukrainian institution out there that’s independent. And we’ve turned him into a king or demigod. And I will tell you that one of the instruments that was being used to attack me, for instance, was Fara, you know.
Tucker [00:12:50] A foreign agent registration act.
Bob Amsterdam [00:12:52] That’s right. I’m a journalist in The Washington Post, too. We offered to interview all sorts of beaten priests instead focused on me, tried to make it sound like I was in Putin’s pay and somehow violated Fara when I knew very, very well I had an exemption because I represent the church. It’s been it’s been crazy. I’ve gone into meetings. Firstly, most Democrats, almost all Democrats, but a few, including Dick Durbin, who gave us a very respectful hearing. Almost all Democrats wouldn’t meet with us, which really shocks me because I you know, I’ve been a lawyer for 45 years. I generally get meetings when I need them. None. Republicans, on the other hand, often their staff at least, were willing to meet with us. One senator had the courage to stand up and speak out. And that man, God bless him, is now the vice president of the United States. He was the only one.
Tucker [00:13:55] J.D. Vance was the only one.
Bob Amsterdam [00:13:56] The only one. Absolutely. And he will I will forever be in his debt because he took the destruction of Christ children seriously enough to raise it. And he was outraged that our government was allowing it. He didn’t even go so far. I don’t think he understood that we were, in fact, funding and supporting it. And there is a guy in the Ukrainian government, a mr. Joe Lenski, not Zelensky Yellow Energy, who’s been in charge of the destruction of this church for years. His life. Blood is to destroy this church. He helps. I’m sure he directs the SBU to jail. These priests I work with. Guess who.
Tucker [00:14:39] We are?
Bob Amsterdam [00:14:39] Lansky is young Lansky with a with a Y, and he’s written some very interesting books. I don’t want to get into that. What about what? Just. Just nothing. Everything you can think of against religious freedom. He. He has written about when it was the Soviet Union. Really? Well, he wrote a book about Zionism and clericalism. This is the guy that is heading up their department of Religion, essentially. And freedom. This guy was honored and given an honored position at the Religious Freedom Conference in Washington.
Tucker [00:15:18] With the persecutor of the Orthodox Church, was given a position of prominence at a religious freedom conference.
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:24] You have that right.
Tucker [00:15:25] What conference was I mean, this is.
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:26] The one that was in Washington, a huge conference that went right before the prayer breakfast in Washington.
Tucker [00:15:33] Does anyone say anything other than, you know?
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:35] No, because nobody. The only thing they were worried about. I got a call.
Tucker [00:15:39] What about all the Christians?
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:40] Well, they’re silent. I got a call. Why is it left to you?
Tucker [00:15:45] I mean, this is this. This is the point where I feel like pulling my hair out.
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:49] Well.
Tucker [00:15:49] Why is this your job?
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:50] Well, and let me.
Tucker [00:15:52] Tell Mike Johnson and all these other Christians in the Congress are always talking about how Christian they are.
Bob Amsterdam [00:15:56] Well, I can tell you that because of the smear. And we understand that the Ukrainians gave a $3.6 million contract to a PR firm in Washington to go after my church and me. So I’ve had vicious letters written about me all over the place talking about me as a Russian agent. We have had you who.
Tucker [00:16:22] Are arrested by Putin. Yeah.
Bob Amsterdam [00:16:24] Yeah, we have. We have the Hudson Institute, a reputable institute hosting an event, taking the Ukrainian line. We wanted to get a voice. It was about religion in Ukraine. We weren’t allowed to join.
Tucker [00:16:45] The Hudson Institute.
Bob Amsterdam [00:16:45] We weren’t allowed to join the Hudson Institute because I think the Ukrainian propaganda machine are indirectly sponsoring these things. And what they’re doing is they’re running shows and movies about Russian activities, anti evangelical activities in the Donbass, which I believe are happening and which I completely support. You know, there is no there is no one more than me who will support evangelicals or anyone else who are being oppressed. But to sponsor this type of activity and not mention our church is a scandal to avoid mentioning the majority church of Ukrainians. And never say a word about law 3894 that destroys our church. We will not have a church in six months.
Tucker [00:17:40] Do you know who the State Department worked on this op to create a fake church?
Bob Amsterdam [00:17:46] Yes. Yes. It dates back to 2014. We believe it began with Victoria Nuland, who I mean, this was a big operation because she worked with the ambassador of the United States to Ukraine, amazingly becomes the ambassador of the United States to Greece. And it is, in fact, the patriarch of the Constantinople church that becomes the one who engineers the basically the destruction of our church by taking canonical control away from Moscow and taking it to himself, violating a treaty from the 17th century. So we have the United States and by the way, this was engineered by Secretary of State Pompeo. So this isn’t just a Democrat thing. Secretary of State Pompeo was.
Tucker [00:18:51] Directly to Interior Nuland And Mike Pompeo is very is negligible. Doesn’t there’s no difference at all that I’m aware of. He may be slightly smarter. He’s smarter than she is and therefore more sinister. But they have the same views on everything.
Bob Amsterdam [00:19:03] Well, in any event, Pompeo was involved in in basically having this what’s called in religious terms, a Thomas granted so that Ukraine could establish an auto for this church. This is in 2019. So the church that that is allegedly now a clean church away from Russia is five years old. And that church, which we believe is partially U.S. funded, has engaged in a vicious campaign of harassment, intimidation, coordination with secret police to steal churches, to disrupt events, to break priests. I mean, you have to understand, I have met tortured priest. I have met priests. One priest I met the day after his meeting with me had a heart attack during an interrogation by the SBU. I mean, just try to imagine. Well, U.S..
Tucker [00:20:09] Tax dollars are paying for the torture of priests. I mean, that’s that’s yeah, that’s yeah.
Bob Amsterdam [00:20:13] And I mean, you know, for those who say this is not true, please, please call Mr. Demetric, who is now, thank God, in safety in London and who is a former member of the Rada who will be saying in open court because he’s now fighting bogus extradition charges. He will be outlining all of this in open court about what’s happened to him. And he is just a microcosm of what’s happened in Ukraine. And, you know, it is the the ongoing treason charges. As you know, as I’ve said, I’m now exposed to a criminal investigation in Ukraine, something that even Putin didn’t do. To me, this is all Lansky is doing to me because I’m defending a church. In Putin’s case, I’m defending opponents of Putin. But in Zelensky’s case, I’m defending a church and they’ve opened up a criminal investigation.
Tucker [00:21:13] Would you be able to go to Ukraine right now?
Bob Amsterdam [00:21:16] No. I think the whole reason is to ensure that I don’t spend time with my clients.
Tucker [00:21:24] There’s also the question of violence, which everyone ignores. They’ve committed violence against the church you represent. They’ve also committed a lot of violence. A lot of people have been killed. Noncombatants have been killed by this Lonski government and people I know have been targeted for assassination, including a head of state in Europe. And so I, I don’t know why that doesn’t get any coverage like you would be afraid to go to you. You’re an American citizen. You’re an attorney. You have clients in Ukraine. It’s our client state. And yet you would be afraid to go there.
Bob Amsterdam [00:21:54] Well, let me let me take it a step further. With all of the Farrah stuff that went on and with The Washington Post publishing all this stuff and with Mr. Zelinsky almost literally demanding compliance from the United States under the Democrats, I was hesitating to come home. I mean, the Ukrainians had such a lock on Washington. It is unbelievable. And the Ukrainian Rada demanded that U.S. authorities investigate me because I wrote a letter to the Rada, an open and public letter, saying to every member of the Rada, if you pass a bill that destroys your church, you could be individually subject to sanctions. That is completely within my rights as an American citizen to inform a foreign legislator who is engaged in essentially criminal activities that they need to return to. Religious freedom should not be controversial. And it is on this basis that the Ukrainians were begging our own authorities to get involved.
Tucker [00:23:08] How did the Ukrainians. So I mean, 15 years ago, my whole life, Ukraine, you know, it’s the largest country and the most corrupt country in Europe. It was it was an afterthought. Lots of wheat is grown there, very pretty women. But it’s Ukraine. It’s not central to anybody’s strategy. And all of a sudden you wake up and Ukrainians seem to be in charge of the U.S. government. How did that happen?
Bob Amsterdam [00:23:30] Look, I’m going to be speaking about this on Friday. I think that you have to go back to the Mueller investigation. I think you have to go back to the Russia scare. And I think that a tremendous amount of partizan politics was played out involving Russia. And it instilled a tremendous amount of fear in the United States. And the Ukrainians have developed the most sophisticated propaganda and information campaign I’ve ever seen. I have never seen any country engage in this level of competent, highly sophisticated disinformation that, by the way, they accused the Russians of. There is no day of the week. The Russians have been 10% as effective as the Ukrainians.
Tucker [00:24:24] I will say, knowing the Russians, the very smart lead the world in chess and engineering, But they’re they’re just embarrassing us on the propaganda question. They’re bad.
Bob Amsterdam [00:24:34] They’re embarrassing.
Tucker [00:24:36] They are. They’re bad. I mean, I’m not you know, I like Russia, but I’m not. It’s just a fact. They’re not good at that stuff at all.
Bob Amsterdam [00:24:41] No. And, you know, I fought them and we were quite successful at exposing the false charges against some leading Russian businessmen. So I’ve seen them in action, but I’ve never seen anything as effective at developing the American narrative as the Ukrainian narrative in the United States exerting huge levels of control over media. I mean, we had an interview with The Guardian three, three days or four days after I got back. Very, very, very competent. Reporter took down notes, was in shock at what happened. The Guardian never published the story. This is The Guardian who will publish anything about anybody involving human rights. They wouldn’t publish the story because it went against. There’s two obstacles. One, it goes against the Russia narrative. And two, all of the guys on the ground for the Western press sell books on Ukraine. And I do wonder if there’s a commercial motive in the reporting, because if you look and some of these guys are my friends, but I got to wonder if you look at it, no wonder they’re notoriously blind to what’s going on.
Tucker [00:26:05] Well, there’s some kind of unspoken motive here because none of this makes any sense. I mean, Ukraine is so far outside of our orbit, Ukraine, it’s not one of those countries I thought had any influence over American foreign policy or public discourse at all. And all of a sudden, it you know, you can’t even say. An obvious truth about the country or you get in trouble or in my case, you get fired or whatever. What what does that actually about? What are the deeper interests here? Do you have any clue?
Bob Amsterdam [00:26:32] Look, as I said, no.
Tucker [00:26:33] No other country could do that, no matter how sophisticated their propaganda is or almost nobody.
Bob Amsterdam [00:26:37] I look, I, I have said to myself, because I’ve I’ve done many, many controversial cases in my career. Yeah, but nothing’s ever approached this in terms of the blowback when you’re, you know, you say to somebody like all of these people today that are speaking out about the president’s statement above 4% and they’re saying all that’s crap, that 60% rates.
Tucker [00:27:03] The president said that Zelensky had an approval rating of 4%. Right.
Bob Amsterdam [00:27:07] I’m sorry. So. I say to myself, Mr. Zelinsky can’t argue the numbers because he is in a police state. He has no media, he has no opponents. He just he he just cited for treason. Treason. 2 or 3 of the most important people in Ukraine, including his predecessor, Poroshenko. He’s done everything he can to mobilize forces. To destroy any hope of freedom or opposition. He hasn’t held an election. He is, in fact, under their constitution. Out of time. He should be out of office. He has no constitutional mandate.
Tucker [00:27:52] What is the definition of a dictator? He’s not unelected strongman who has eliminated his opposition. I mean.
Bob Amsterdam [00:27:57] And he’s trying to argue about how popular he is. Well, I’m sorry. You know, there’s this old expression, res ipsa loquitur. It speaks for itself. Yeah. I mean, if you’re popular, you don’t ban the press and jail your opponents.
Tucker [00:28:14] It seems to me I’m having used a drug myself many years ago. He seems like he’s on cocaine to me. I don’t know that I’m no evidence of it. I hear a lot of people say that. Have you heard that?
Bob Amsterdam [00:28:24] I’ve heard it a lot.
Tucker [00:28:25] Or just in.
Bob Amsterdam [00:28:26] Passing? No, I’ve heard a lot. But I have no, I can’t say it. I have no evidence.
Tucker [00:28:31] And I don’t either. I hear it a lot, including from people in Europe who know him. Again, no, but is that is that widely believed in Ukraine, do you know?
Bob Amsterdam [00:28:42] I, I believe it is. But again, you know, I hesitate. I don’t like ad hominem comments. No, no, no.
Tucker [00:28:48] But you look at the guy and you’re like, there’s something wrong.
Bob Amsterdam [00:28:50] Well, except what’s wrong is the resonance he seems to have with everybody in Europe. I mean, if you look at Germany, for instance, and this is another subject that as a lawyer who cares about freedom drives me crazy, which are sanctions. The Ukrainians not only have engaged in this massive propaganda campaign to dehumanize Russia. Now, that’s different than saying Russia engaged in aggressive war, which I agree with. That’s different. They have gone to the next level and tried to make it appear as if peace is somehow a crime, that you cannot make peace with these.
Tucker [00:29:32] Because the Russians are subhuman.
Bob Amsterdam [00:29:34] Exactly. But hold on. It gets worse.
Tucker [00:29:35] Full Nazi propaganda. No one is subhuman. Raw human. But.
Bob Amsterdam [00:29:39] But it gets it gets worse because our government under Biden has led the world in an insane sanctioning campaign. Insane because it is contrary to American interests. What have we done exactly? Number one, we have consolidated Putin’s power. The people who were opposed to Putin in London and other places have had to go back to Moscow because their currency is not working. Their kids can’t go to school. Again, we have the subhuman thing. Number two, we have consolidated the relationship between Russia and China, the very thing that Richard Nixon worked very hard never to do. We have done it. We’ve absolutely built up the economies of all sorts of transit countries. That does that don’t help us at all by having these phony, phony economies come up with.
Tucker [00:30:35] So you’re referring you’re referring to Russian energy shipments. So Russia has a ton of energy. The world needs a ton of energy. But these sanctions make it impossible to conduct straightforward business. So they’re going through what you call transit companies and countries, and they’re doing all kinds of subterfuge to cloak this. But everyone knows that’s happening. That’s what you’re referring to.
Bob Amsterdam [00:30:53] Exactly. And, you know, we are making we’re making India very great today by their engaging in this arbitrage. We’re consolidating shipping’s power. We are working. We are working to empower him against Taiwan. We are doing everything not in America’s interest.
Tucker [00:31:16] So who’s the we here who’s doing this? Like, honestly, honestly, like, what is this? Because it was obvious to me the day Russia invaded, which I didn’t think would happen, and I was opposed to, of course. But the first day this happened, I thought they’re going to get rid of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. That’s exactly what this is. This is all of this seems like an attack on the West to me.
Bob Amsterdam [00:31:36] Well, who who who.
Tucker [00:31:37] Is behind this? Do you have any idea?
Bob Amsterdam [00:31:39] Look, you know, I can only tell you that if you if you study sanctions, there are very few people ever who have said they work what sanctions are. It’s a very cheap way for governments who are not very effective to tell their populace we’re doing something. But what it does is I think Fidel.
Tucker [00:32:00] Castro died in his bed.
Bob Amsterdam [00:32:01] Yeah, exactly. What it does is it empowers the most corrupt all over the world. We are empowering Ukrainian corruption. We are empowering the corruption of our business interests. We are doing everything judicial stablish America’s position. We are giving Putin the armament to get away from the dollar. We’re doing everything for them to establish alternative payment systems. We are building our opponents with a sanction system that violates the rule of law, that denies people their human rights very often, some of the most in. Serious people going. It is the most counterproductive system we’ve put in place. And yet everybody’s going crazy that Elon Musk is trying to engage and I’ll admit, pretty unique efforts to reduce the budget deficit. But nobody’s talking about how our government has propagating, in my view, these these absolutely violative sanctions all over the world that are totally destroying our rule of law and America as a safe haven for those opposed to people like Bolton.
Tucker [00:33:15] Sanctioning people’s children. You didn’t do anything wrong.
Bob Amsterdam [00:33:19] Why would.
Tucker [00:33:21] You know, why would U.S. policymakers be why would Tory one want that? I mean, that just seems cruel.
Bob Amsterdam [00:33:27] And look, let me tell you, I’m dealing with a case in Switzerland. The Swiss are worse than the Americans. I know. Because they’re so scared of the United States enforcement that we literally are defending children who are being attacked by the Swiss. So the whole the whole sanction situation, this whole dehumanizing of people with Russian names that no one is speaking out against because we’re all afraid. We’re all in this. You know, I call it the the authoritarianism of the left that we are all subject to this, you know, wokeism authoritarianism, this this unwillingness to give the opponent a voice.
Tucker [00:34:18] But I thought I mean, I thought this was the key indelible lesson of the 1940s, that when governments decide that some people don’t have human rights because of their genetic makeup, it winds up with mass murder and it’s bad for everybody. And so we’re never doing that again. We’re never going to allow any demagogue or group of demagogues to say that group right there is not entitled to human rights and we’re going to hurt them. I thought that was the lesson. I’m 55. I grew up in a country that remember that.
Bob Amsterdam [00:34:45] Let me tell you something. This law in Ukraine Law 3894 is one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation I’ve ever seen. And it’s not alone. In Estonia, they’re attempting to destroy the Russian Orthodox Church. These Baltic countries that are bulwarks of freedom and democracy are going after those churches, too. And even though those churches are not separate from Russia, and I recognize that and yes, the Russian Orthodox Church has been instrumentalized. I agree. I still say under a rule of law stage, you go after those people who commit offenses. You do not ban a church and it is.
Tucker [00:35:28] You banning people’s religions. Then how are you better than what you oppose?
Bob Amsterdam [00:35:31] Exactly. And yet the Religious Freedom Conference honors the very author of this insane.
Tucker [00:35:40] Letter sponsored this conference.
Bob Amsterdam [00:35:43] It’s you know, all I know is I think the the there’s a chairman who’s a former Republican senator. I think it’s made up of charitable donations. I haven’t I haven’t studied who the sponsor is. I’m sure there’s U.S. government involvement. Mr. Vance, vice president of spoke, spoke very well. I mean, he’s as I as I said before, I mean, he’s he’s set off a revolution in Europe with his speech and which I welcome because I believe he’s identified a tremendous problem in Europe in terms of freedom of speech and the the basic freedoms. Although I you know, I have to say. Working in Georgia, working and knowing what’s happening, entrenched, dangerous, you you cannot minimize the threat of Vladimir Putin. It exists.
Tucker [00:36:37] So you said that you went up to the US Congress and you tried to get the attention of members grievance with the only one who would listen to you out of 100 senators. What about in the House?
Bob Amsterdam [00:36:50] I. I attended a few meetings, as I said, where I were where I was generally insulted by people. We had very few insulted. Yeah. We had very few congressmen who would meet us. We had some some very courageous lobbyists who we worked for, worked with and still work with, including a Democrat, a former Democrat, Congressman Ron Klink, who because he’s a I think a devout Christian, has, I think really suffered a lot reputationally by working with me. And God bless him for having the strength and courage to to do that, because as he new knows, I mean, we’re completely nonpartizan. We’re not actually lobbying the United States at all. We want people to talk to the Ukrainians and simply explain to the Ukrainians, let this law to ban our church is unacceptable.
Tucker [00:37:56] Especially since we’re paying for it. Have you ever voted for a Republican in your life? Never. You sit here. I just wanted to be clear about that. So you were arrested by Putin and you’ve never voted Republican. So it’s just why people understand where you’re coming from here.
Bob Amsterdam [00:38:11] No, no. I mean, that’s that’s very much where I’m coming from, though. I will say, you know, quite frankly, that I think what’s been dangerous about the past few administrations is that there there breaks with the rule of law, have been wildly pronounced but hidden. Whatever you want to say about President Trump, I think that it’s far healthier Where he does. He does a number of things I disagree with. It’s out in the open and we can address it, attack it if we think it’s wrong, but it’s out in the open. With the prior administrations, it was all hidden from view and it was almost impossible to attack like sanctions, you know, almost impossible to attack, very difficult to deal with. And the this authoritarianism, this denial of the civic space is hugely important. Yes. And it’s it’s what we in the United States have done to ourselves. I really can barely watch CNN. I understand they have serious problems with President Trump. I get it. But there is a whole world out there. And President Trump has made a tremendous amount of waves in that world. Surely, beyond bashing the guy, we can deal with some of the real problems, like my church, which has never been covered by CNN ever, ever that time. I know they.
Tucker [00:39:46] Cover Ukraine all day long, but they’ve never mentioned that the government banned a Christian denomination.
Bob Amsterdam [00:39:51] Never. Not only the majority church of the country. Let’s be clear. And when I went to church, one of my first times in church, but the patriarch of our church insisted that I attend church and.
Tucker [00:40:04] Love you call it our church.
Bob Amsterdam [00:40:07] He he insisted I attend the churches because he wanted me to see the difference between our church and the other church. So I went. I went to church after church. Our churches were full. Our priests were like rush hour traffic on a Sunday. I mean, we’re having multiple services because there are now so few churches because the other church is stealing them. So when you go to the other church, they’re virtually empty. In fact, many of the churches they’ve stolen, they’ve turned into museums. I mean, which.
Tucker [00:40:42] Is like Soviet. What’s going.
Bob Amsterdam [00:40:43] On. And I was in there.
Tucker [00:40:44] Created their banning religion and creating a state church.
Bob Amsterdam [00:40:46] And let me tell you something. I was in the Soviet Union. So I’m you know, I’m older than you. I was in the Soviet trying.
Tucker [00:40:52] To get the Jewish refuseniks out. Correct.
Bob Amsterdam [00:40:54] Beginning just at the beginning. I wasn’t a lawyer then or doing much of anything, but I went because I knew this problem existed. I was a very, very young boy, but my father wanted me to go. I think I was one of the only, only guys. I think I was the first soul traveler to a place called Chechnya of Moldova. This is way back in the 70s and I was interrogated. My first interrogation by the KGB was when I was like 17. So I’ve had a long history in this region. I went to the Louvre when I was I. I studied under Ukraine’s greatest historian, Beaudin. But Churchill, his son, is now a noted a noted speaker and expert on on Ukraine and very pro Ukrainian and a very, very serious person. But I went there at the express direction of his father, and I went to the Louvre to just experience this incredible I mean, the Louvre was incredible. And this has become the scene of these clashes where Zelensky’s government has taken the Louvre, control of the Louvre away from our church and handed it to the Nationalist Church. So there’s this huge nationalism in Ukraine that is the motive behind zelensky’s destruction of my church and its political, our church and the Donbass. The more Russian speaking part of Ukraine, had supported Zelensky, but with the unfortunate aggression against Ukraine, that voter block is denied to him. So he has had to move much further to the xenophobic side of the Ukrainian spectrum to keep his base. And we think that’s that’s primarily some of the politics behind him agreeing to the destruction of our church closely.
Tucker [00:43:05] What may be an unanswerable question. So you were describing the effects of the Ukraine war on the West and on the United States and basically knocking the US from its perch, and that’s causing all kinds of problems, the loss of the US dollar, the alignment, the permanent now alignment between Russia and China. If you were China and you were trying to, you know, assert yourself as a global power, which you have every right to do, in my opinion, but we would subvert the United States, like you would do everything you could like whose interest is being served in this? And it seems like the Chinese interest is being served. So if you’ve our entire media or our political establishment is all in on this thing, that hurts the United States. Is it possible that China has a role in that?
Bob Amsterdam [00:43:45] Look, I’m somebody who, as a young man, studied China and then the Soviet Union. I do not have an animus towards China in terms of seeing them in the in the negative light. I think there was hope for our relationship that’s been kind of destroyed. I think it’s still possible, by the way, to be resurrected, but certainly it is to some extent in China’s interest. But we never understand something that’s fundamental to xpeng survival, which is he is on an economic fault line. He needs GDP growth at plus 5%. Yes. To survive a flourishing relationship with the United States could be in his interests under under a different type of.
Tucker [00:44:40] I think that’s right.
Bob Amsterdam [00:44:41] Relationship. And I think what we’ve done is we’ve almost forced the Russians into becoming an unequal partner to the Chinese.
Tucker [00:44:52] That is exactly.
Bob Amsterdam [00:44:53] Right. The Chinese, of course, have this history of a century of humiliation, suffering under unequal treaties. Now, they are the ones offering unequal treaties to countries like Russia.
Tucker [00:45:06] They are. And that massive Chinese investment in Russia right now is massive. And it’s very noticeable when you go there. Why is this country so prosperous? There’s a war going on. A real war, too. And and the answer in part is because there’s huge Chinese investment in Russia and that’s solidifying a relationship based on mutual benefit. I would say to the point where a camp is utterly broken.
Bob Amsterdam [00:45:28] Yeah, well, never underestimate the root antagonisms of the Chinese Russian relationship. Well.
Tucker [00:45:38] That’s a valid point.
Bob Amsterdam [00:45:39] And show a different administration than the Democrats could possibly engage in some of the behavior that Nixon first developed. It is absolutely contrary to American interests for China and Russia to be one. So we have, from a geopolitical standpoint, a lot of work to do. Yes. Working with the Indians, working with others in terms of trying to figure out how to divide these countries. And and this is why a focus solely on Ukraine to the tremendous cost of our own geopolitical position is so insane. Well, I completely agree.
Tucker [00:46:21] And I travel a lot. So I see the effects, you know, everywhere. So you’ve you’ve mentioned that Europe, for whatever reason, I still think it’s baffling. But is is all in on this completely all in on it. Keir Starmer, just the Prime Minister. Great Britain’s just said that they’re selling some hundred year defense deal with Ukraine. It’s insane. Germany, same thing ish. China, we know is benefiting to some extent. India, you said, is a massive beneficiary of all the stuff. What about the Middle Eastern countries? What about the Arab world and Israel? What what interest do they have here? What connection do they have to the Ukraine war? Any?
Bob Amsterdam [00:46:53] Look, I think there it’s Africa that suffered the most.
Tucker [00:46:58] Yes.
Bob Amsterdam [00:46:59] Simply because their their food supply is exactly terribly impaired. Riyadh. With benefits always from this type of geopolitical issue because they benefit from great relationships with everybody. You know, it’s like this old Turkish foreign policy of, you know, making friends at every border. That’s what they’re doing. As you may be aware, I also represent the Congo, which is now being horribly invaded by Rwanda. And I’ve always wondered why the United States didn’t take a stronger position there. You know, we can’t we have destabilized Africa, the entirety of Africa, with this war. And we have not addressed the fact that so much of our future is tied up in Africa. Yet the entire continent is is being completely destroyed. Talk to people in Zambia or some of these other countries who can’t get food because the costs are now so high. We need to look at this struggle in a far broader sense because.
Tucker [00:48:11] Ukraine is a huge price for fertilizer.
Bob Amsterdam [00:48:13] And basic exports. Yes, absolutely. So geopolitically, the Europeans have only one thing in their mind, which is, you know, they don’t want to see another Munich. And, you know, my argument is this isn’t Munich. It’s Potsdam. We are we we we have there’s been a three year war, hasn’t gone all that well. And we need to have a geopolitical understanding of of where we are and what is in not only America’s interest, but the world’s interests. And Ukraine has to have a generation to survive and grow.
Tucker [00:48:53] Well, exactly.
Bob Amsterdam [00:48:54] So, you know, but all of that is beyond my mandate, which is to try to save the Orthodox the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, so that it can survive for another thousand years.
Tucker [00:49:07] Well, it’s it’s just interesting, though. Well, I’m just asking this question because I know that you represent clients in a bunch of different countries and have for almost 50 years and you travel a lot. But it does seem like this is part of the cost of a world, the West. And this is not true in the East, by the way, but in the West, the only history people know is kind of a half baked, you know, kind of a Twitter version of World War two. And everything is through the same lens. And it’s like, this isn’t Munich. Actually, as you point out, and maybe ignorance is part people are very inflexible in their minds.
Bob Amsterdam [00:49:39] Like, you know, it’s funny, as a young boy, I went to Moscow at that point, sort of a pseudo communist sympathizer as a very young man. And I remember being taken. I could not attend any city without first being taken to the war cemetery. Right. We never talk about 27 million Russian dead. My family would never have survived without Russian troops. And yes, they they visited horrible times on Eastern Europe. Totally true. But that sacrifice saved us. And when we dehumanize them where we are, in a way dehumanizing ourselves, and it should never be the policy of our government to allow any other foreign state to so contaminate our narrative in our discussions. And, you know, quite frankly.
Tucker [00:50:45] It’s too late.
Bob Amsterdam [00:50:47] Yes, but but, you know, even in terms of using the International Criminal Court the way the way they have where the court has gone to such incredible lengths with respect to this case, again, I’m not in any way denying Russian war crimes. I’m simply saying that there’s a difference between punishing wrongdoers and dehumanizing a nation and a people. And we have allowed this to get into a horrific attack on the people with the sanctions and all of that. That isn’t American and it’s not who we are. And we need to stop.
Tucker [00:51:33] Have there been any media outlets at all globally? Let’s just stick to the United States and Great Britain, English speaking media, who’ve been willing to give you a fair hearing.
Bob Amsterdam [00:51:43] I would say in general, no. We managed to get one op ed from one of our priests in the Times of London, which I’m deeply grateful. We managed to get a couple of stories in The Telegraph, nothing in The Guardian. The Wall Street Journal is completely cut off from us. And I would say reality.
Tucker [00:52:10] Wall Street Journal was completely cut off from reality. The Wall Street Journal is actually every bit as dishonest as The New York Times in my read, but much stealthier about it. And it has this kind of unbreakable relationship with late middle age right wingers that, you know, it uses to spew lies and stupidity and propaganda.
Bob Amsterdam [00:52:29] Well, there’s one editorial writer who interviewed me about the church when I was in Kiev, and I had some hope, but then wrote a crazy story denouncing me and the church, which we managed. See you. Yeah. Yeah. Which we managed to we managed, I think, at the end of many rewrites to get her editorial only. We moved it from terrible to very bad. Who was this? I can’t even remember her name.
Tucker [00:53:00] Some lady writer at the.
Bob Amsterdam [00:53:02] Yeah, but. But who’s written consistently pro-Ukrainian pieces. And one of the things.
Tucker [00:53:06] So, like, how dare you defend a church’s right to exist?
Bob Amsterdam [00:53:09] Exactly. No, but one of the things about the Ukraine beat is it’s very often the same people saying the same things just with different background music. Again and again, in a very propagandistic way, avoiding the hard truths. I mean, these these these press gangs that are grabbing young men and taking them to the front get. Show little coverage. The the fighting inside the presidential administration that we know exists gets so little covered.
Tucker [00:53:44] Some have reached out to me. So it’s pretty clear that is lansky’s in charge. But is he really? You referred a couple of times to Andre Yermak. Yeah. Who was that?
Bob Amsterdam [00:53:53] He is the capo. The capo. I mean, he is. He is the guy that arranges the theft of assets. He is the guy who organizes a lot of the activities of the SPU to go after opponents and go after assets. It’s my privilege to to represent a gentleman named Redeemed. Eventually they they took his assets which involved gas because his crime is supporting the church. He’s he’s a very high level archdeacon in the church and has financially supported the church and by the way was sanctioned by Russia. Yet he’s charged with treason. Why? Because he supports Ukraine’s historic church, mother.
Tucker [00:54:47] Church, the majority church.
Bob Amsterdam [00:54:49] But what’s amazing about them illegally taking his assets is they didn’t deploy them for the benefit of Ukraine. They were gas wells and they shut them. And when his own people said to these these gangsters, you know, run the wells, you’re destroying the wealth of the country. They didn’t. And so, you know, they briefly gave the licenses back. Then they took it back again for political reasons because they charged him with treason. But they don’t care. It reminds me of my my first day as part a privilege to be part of a major legal team in Moscow in 2003. And my my the lead counsel, the Russian lawyer was a very famous Russian lawyer, brilliant, brilliant man named Padma. And I said to him, because the Russian stock market had gone down 50% after they attacked my client at that time, I said to him, Well, surely, surely Mr. Putin will understand that this can’t go on. He took a newspaper. He hit me over the head and he said, Don’t ever say anything that stupid again. They will say, this is Moscow. They will steal the very desk in this court and they’ll keep stealing. The corruption in Ukraine is as ingrained as it is in Moscow. The secret police in Ukraine are using old KGB texts to jail my priests. They are charging them with psycho linguistic crimes.
Tucker [00:56:38] What’s that?
Bob Amsterdam [00:56:39] This is out of 1984 Psycho linguistics. This is basically alleging that what they’re saying has meanings similar to what Putin says and therefore it’s a crime. People are being jailed away from their families for psycho linguistic linguistics. Under Article 161 of the Ukrainian Criminal Code for essentially division causing division, religious division. Now the o. C U. Members or those working for them with swastikas on their arms don’t get charged. But our church, our folks get charged routinely. The Novichok is charged with psycho linguistic crimes. His entire life has been disrupted. His assets stripped from him. Horrific things said about him because when he was a member of the Rada, so therefore privileged communications occurred, he had some disagreements with the government of the day. They are using Soviet texts to go after their own political opponents. And Zelensky, this man that has been virtually treated as a saint by the Europeans, is using the SBU in a manner no different than how Russian leaders have used the FSB or the KGB. No different. Including the arrest and beating of priests. And our papers say nothing. It is it is just a you. You, by the way, sure are the only one, especially here, heroically. That first interview. That first interview changed and saved and delayed the passage of this law till now. And I will be forever in your debt for doing it.
Tucker [00:58:43] You’ve told us something that I didn’t realize, which is that the US government established a fake state church in a foreign country, which is obviously unconstitutional, but also Soviet. I’ve also nurses other trend which I don’t really understand, but it seems equally bad, which is to try and change the culture of the Slavic country. So other countries are traditional. They believe in gender roles, for example, and there does seem to have been and continue to be this effort from the US State Department and maybe others in the US government to kind of change the way Ukrainian society is ordered. Have you noticed this?
Bob Amsterdam [00:59:18] Yes. I mean, I you know, as I’ve said, I had the privilege of listening to Robert Destro, a former, I think deputy secretary in charge of human rights, talk about some of what he saw going on, funding for atheist groups, funding for.
Tucker [00:59:43] Funding for atheist group.
Bob Amsterdam [00:59:44] Funding for atheist troops.
Tucker [00:59:46] And that’s the whole story right there.
Bob Amsterdam [00:59:47] Yeah, funding for all sorts of of groups that that certainly you could wonder if this is in the interest of the United States. I mean, I have nothing against atheists. I don’t know why we would necessarily feel it was incumbent upon us to fund them. But there there is there’s there’s an excellent book written like.
Tucker [01:00:12] That’s actually, if you think about it, outrageous. The whole pretext for this is Russia stages illegal unprovoked invasion three years ago. So we have to defend Ukraine from Russia. Okay. At least that makes a kind of sense. True or not. But why would you want to change the religious beliefs of Ukrainians or the family structure of Ukrainians?
Bob Amsterdam [01:00:29] Like, well, what is their their argument in terms of my church has been, well, your church has some relationship to Russia. So they they continue to make the argument, even though we believe we’ve just proven it, that there is no link. Our link is canonical. It’s through, if you will, the book. And our government cannot control canon law that that is surely outside the purview of of. So anyway.
Tucker [01:00:56] Same argument that a lot of Arab countries made in during the Suez crisis in 56. They had huge Jewish populations and a lot of these you know Morocco and Algeria, you know, thousand year old, multi-thousand year old Jewish populations. And they’re like, let’s see, you’re Jewish. The Jews in this other country, Israel did something we don’t like, therefore we’re blaming you or kicking you. Well, it’s not that because you’ve got the same book that’s not a canonical connection.
Bob Amsterdam [01:01:19] That’s that’s the logic. And and this is being done very scientifically in, in a in a very I would have to say it’s almost a crazed psychosis going on because you have these ultra right folks in Ukraine basically. Now some of the churches have taken Maidan, the locus of the 2014 events, and set up shrines in the OCU churches to Maidan. So they’ve even changed the religion itself. To conform to Ukrainian nationalism.
Tucker [01:02:12] So they’re basically worshiping a CIA coup?
Bob Amsterdam [01:02:14] Yeah. I mean, it’s an icon that they’re they’re exchanging icons. So you’re talking.
Tucker [01:02:21] So this is a state religion you’re describing? Yeah.
Bob Amsterdam [01:02:24] No, no, it is. And and what I what I want to I want to be clear that there was a desire for this within Ukraine for 100 years because there’s this view and I think it’s a true view that that Russia had engaged in Russia, fication, sort of depriving Ukraine of its culture.
Tucker [01:02:45] Right.
Bob Amsterdam [01:02:46] Which we agree with. But our church certainly does not make any demands about stopping anybody from praying in any way they want. We are simply saying, don’t steal our churches, don’t jail our priests and don’t destroy the religion. And, you know, we have experts, Dr. Bremmer, from I think one of the German Catholic universities has spoken out. His Holiness, the pope has spoken out. The U.N. has spoken out. The U.S. mission to the AU is she has spoken out. Human Rights Watch did a special report about our church and what’s going on. This isn’t just me now. When you first had me on, it was just me. Now it’s the Church of England. So we have an entire world condemning the Ukrainian government. And the only people defending it are their friends in Washington.
Tucker [01:03:47] So shameful and disgusting. So but we’re clearly at an inflection point because, as you have said, the vice president states just gave the speech at the Munich Security Conference, the big speech given in Europe in a while. I think it was fair to say in which he advanced kind of reset the terms of the relationship. And so if your. Zelensky, the bottom line is you’re no longer in control of Washington. So where does that leave Zelensky? You know.
Bob Amsterdam [01:04:15] Listen, I you know, the information I got this morning is it’s left him very angry, very addled and working to sort of form a coalition of European leaders around him.
Tucker [01:04:30] Why does he think he gets he has like a moral right to run the US government. It’s pretty cheeky also.
Bob Amsterdam [01:04:35] Well, he seems to think he has a moral right to run the European government. Yeah. And I will tell you, from trying to interact with the EU, he’s right. He’s. He’s running it. I mean, these people in the EU won’t talk to me. And if they talk to me, they won’t listen. I mean, it’s incredible. He has them completely wrapped. I mean, he doesn’t have Orban wrapped, but he has.
Tucker [01:05:02] Well, the Ukrainian government took U.S. tax dollars for trying to overthrow Orban, maybe to kill them. You know, a show. That’s a fact. So that itself, you know, Hungary is in Nieto. So you can’t one naito power cannot attack another Naito power like what is This whole thing has just scrambled the eggs of the world.
Bob Amsterdam [01:05:22] Yeah, I have no knowledge of that. All I can say is that that the information we’ve gotten is that the the meeting that took place and the the reestablishment of more normalized relations between the United States and Russia leading to some discussion has been there’s been a horrible reaction within the presidential administration. And we fear that this will cause further repression of the church.
Tucker [01:05:56] Ken Zelinski with you know, we can debate what his actual approval rating is. But I mean, I would bet my house is not over 50. Can he hang on?
Bob Amsterdam [01:06:07] Look, I bet my house it’s not over 20. I have no idea. Because when you have the secret police, you’ve got power. So I don’t you know, I can’t answer that question. I can just say that if you’re an opponent of Zelensky, this is a moment of fear, because he is clearly doubling down on the repression. And anyone, as opposed to Zelensky, should be in fear because he is he is a man that that is a dictator. I mean, however you want to phrase it, that’s who he is. He is running a police state. Our friends don’t want to say that. But that’s the that’s the reality of Ukraine today.
Tucker [01:06:54] What’s the other word for it? I can’t think of one.
Bob Amsterdam [01:06:56] I, I can’t either. But you never you never see that in any newspaper in the West.
Tucker [01:07:02] So that really bothers me. Look, there are tons of dictatorships around the world. But the West is supposed to be this beacon of freedom and enlightenment, respecter of human rights, etc., etc.. What does it tell you as an American, as a product of the West, that all of our big institutions seem to like this one ski dictatorship? They like it. They I’ve confronted a bunch of people. You think it’s okay to ban a church? Well, that church is pro-Russia. Okay. Well, you say it’s not pro-Russian. I don’t care if it is. You can’t ban other people’s religions, period. I don’t care how much you just like them. I don’t care if it’s Scientology or Kabbalah. I don’t. It doesn’t matter. Hinduism doesn’t matter. You can’t be under people’s religions. And yet I don’t know anyone who’s bothered by it in high position in the West. So what does it tell you about the people in my positions in the West?
Bob Amsterdam [01:07:51] Well, it means that we have become disconnected from, in reality who we are and who we’re supposed to be. Yeah. Well.
Tucker [01:08:00] The diplomatic way of putting it. Yeah.
Bob Amsterdam [01:08:01] Yeah. And it does not bode well for our future as a country.
Tucker [01:08:06] That’s exactly it.
Bob Amsterdam [01:08:07] And that’s what’s frightening to me.
Tucker [01:08:09] You feel that?
Bob Amsterdam [01:08:09] Yes, I feel that. I feel it’s it’s it’s it’s shocking to me how alienated I am representing this church because I’m not accepting the the narrative that’s been accepted by others. And so my firm, myself, we are paying a terrible price, not nearly as bad as our client who faces physical violence and the destruction of their religion. But there is there is no courtroom being given to disputing what’s going on. This guy has he has seemed to have a complete lock on our institutions on on Washington now. We just spoke at the conference. We weren’t able to speak a year ago. Maybe that’s a good sign. We’re going to try to go back on the Hill. I was there a few weeks ago. No member would meet us, but that could have just been the transition. We’re going to go back and try again. But. It really is. The Zelinsky effect is something that needs to be studied because it’s incredibly unhealthy for us. Number one is a democracy. Number two, in terms of our geopolitical reckoning. That’s right. Who we are in the world has to be reassessed. And I listened. I’m actually a Canadian and British lawyer, although I have a master’s in American law, I don’t practice here. And of course, now that I’m a Canadian, we could be at war even though I’m an American as well.
Tucker [01:09:55] We’ll just be a state.
Bob Amsterdam [01:09:56] Yeah, exactly. That’ll be okay. But I will say that that what this presidency is doing is with God’s help opening up, opening up our eyes to what’s been going on. That’s right. And I have to say that as a lawyer, I am deeply in awe. Firstly, you have to hand it to President Trump stamina like I’ve never seen in ten human beings.
Tucker [01:10:27] Unbelievable.
Bob Amsterdam [01:10:28] Secondly, you have to accept that the Justice Department was weaponized. Whoever you are as a lawyer in this country, there is no doubt that the weaponization that took place under the Democrats was severe. I have a lot of issues with what happened regarding January 6th. I’m going to have a lot of issues with what’s going on at the Justice Department and the FBI. But I will say, do not say it is this president who has politicized the DOJ. This is a systemic problem that has been horrifically exploded during the last Democratic presidency.
Tucker [01:11:14] So so last question. I’m not going to ask you your you graduated law school, but thank you. But awhile ago, you said you’ve been practicing for over 40 years. When you graduated law school, I bet there were a ton of people with your attitudes in your class, somewhat similar attitudes about human rights, rule of law, politics, America’s place in the world. Now you’re literally the only one left that I’ve met from your generation. What’s it been like for you with your friends, your court, your peers? People you know, have known your whole life. You come back and all of a sudden, you know, you’re being denounced as a Russian stooge. Like, what effect is that had?
Bob Amsterdam [01:11:53] Well, it it’s interesting. I, I said 20 years ago that there was a there was a terrible danger in the United States to the corporatism of criminal law.
Tucker [01:12:09] Yes.
Bob Amsterdam [01:12:10] We we have we have turned criminal law into the activity of big corporate law firms. In New York. Even today, there are a bunch of small firms that take on difficult cases. Brafman Magnify low. Some of these guys in small firms taking on tough, tough, tough cases that I think of as as real, you know, defenders. But. The corporate titans that are doing the big cases have become entirely focused on compliance. You’re somebody, I’m sure, with with far more resources than a poor guy like myself. But if you engage in transnational business, you know the hassles of even moving $10 across borders. These corporate law firms are making tens of millions off of managing compliance because of and this is a separate story. In my view, this this overregulation. Money laundering allegations, money laundering is the most dangerous crime governments have ever invented. Because because it basically criminalizes activity that very many people never knew was criminal. And you could be charged with money laundering if you’ve engaged in asset or money transfers when you had no idea at the time that it was criminal.
Tucker [01:13:51] They don’t care about rape on a subway platform, and if they did, we wouldn’t have it in a lot of countries don’t have responsibly platforms because that’s horrifying. It’s a violation of the most basic violation of someone’s civil rights. They what they care about is money laundering. I noticed I just read today DOJ was, you know, issuing some statement on money laundering every day. It’s money laundering. It’s because people using their money that they earned in ways that they choose to use it, that’s a massive threat to the people in power.
Bob Amsterdam [01:14:20] Yes, it is. And again, another day I’ll tell you about my use of of human rights law to stop the freezing of assets and freezing of moneys that there’s this compliance. Psychology is a tremendous danger that we foster in our big firms. And that is, you know, so if you ask me after 45 years, how do you feel? It is a sense of tragedy that our basic rights have been withered away in in so many events of emergency. Whenever I hear emergency or crisis, whether it’s Covid, the war on terror, the war on crime, these are all events that chip away at our freedoms. And they’re cumulative. They go on and on, and they further narrow the scope for our activity. And we need a dramatic rethink of all of that in order for us to be free.
Tucker [01:15:26] So when you were a kid near a young lawyer, when you’re in law school, Brandenburg versus Ohio, the big speech cases, those are all very well known, right? Do everybody in your class, do you think someone graduating Yale Law now has any real sense of that?
Bob Amsterdam [01:15:41] You know, I’m giving a speech Friday to over 60 top law students. I’ll know better after that. I think that, unfortunately, we’re raising lawyers to fit in to these corporate firms, this this whole sort of compliance culture. And, you know, I’m probably God help me, probably one of the only lawyers that will applaud the Trump administration for stopping FCPA enforcement. It’s not that I’m in support of corruption and it’s not that I think we shouldn’t come up with a system to stop it. It’s that the FCPA has represented a massive commercial barrier for American business to enter Latin America and Africa. We need to be in those places. And now maybe we’ll have a shot because the compliance barrier simply made it only possible for some of our largest businesses.
Tucker [01:16:46] Well, that’s the whole point. Yes. I was all when the Dodd-Frank. Yeah. It’s like, you know, all the small guys die when the big guys can pay enough lawyers to stay within the law or the regs.
Bob Amsterdam [01:16:56] Yeah, that’s right.
Tucker [01:16:58] Bobby Amsterdam. I’m grateful for what you’re doing and I’m grateful that you exist. And when liberals like you went extinct, everyone made fun of people like you because they’re annoying. And I was jumping up and yelling about rights, but I was one of the only people who felt sad when your whole way of thinking died. Because I felt like we really needed that. And turns out I was right.
Bob Amsterdam [01:17:18] Well, thank you again.
Also available at Barnes & Noble
Also available at Barnes & Noble
