Judging by reports from the field, the plan seems to be to maintain Israeli control of northern Gaza indefinitely and—if the apocalyptic Messianists have their way—to settle it with Jews, as if nothing has been learned from the bitter experience of the past. We even have a high-ranking theorist of the current catastrophe in Gaza—retired major general Giora Eiland—who thinks that besieging a city or a country is perfectly legitimate under the rules of war, even if innocents who can’t or won’t get out die of starvation or illness.
It seems that his plan for Gaza has now become the government’s plan.
What comes next? I fear that it will be full-scale war with Iran. Reports from early December describe the situation in Beit Lahiya as unthinkable misery—rotting corpses in the ruins, no food, no water, no place to hide, no let-up in the bombings—while mass starvation has taken hold in the south of Gaza, partly because local criminal gangs commandeer the supply trucks that manage to get through the blockade.
Let’s put aside, for the moment, the hard-hearted rationalizations that are all too prevalent among Israelis, such as “It’s all the fault of Hamas,” or “They started it,” or “Our soldiers’ lives come first,” or “Our enemies want only to destroy us,” or “All Arabs are Hamas.” (This last one is common among Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s supporters and very close to his stated view of the Palestinian Authority.) What is striking, and horrific, is the fact that Israel has embraced cruelty and atrocity as a normative mode of waging war. It’s not as if there was no cruelty in the army’s rules of war before October 7, 2023. But since that date a dark miasma has enveloped the collective conscience of this country. If you watch the evening news on the mainstream Channel 2, or listen to government ministers and members of the Knesset, or even if you simply pay attention to accidental encounters with passersby, you usually perceive a blank indifference to the huge civilian casualties in Gaza, in Lebanon, and—in particular—among Palestinians in the West Bank. The government sets the tone; the army, although at odds with Netanyahu, follows suit; the Jewish supremacists marshal biblical texts proving the joys of revenge. For them, and for many others in Israel, tens of thousands of dead Palestinian civilians in Gaza are an acceptable price to pay for a reckless, savage war. …
General
David Shulman: A deadly apathy
Unusual to see a Jewish writer talk of “Jewish supremacists” and the lack of any concern for Palestinian suffering. But the fanatics are in charge, so it’s not going to make any difference either in Israel or the diaspora. The Jewish community always ends up following the extremists because in the end, very few Jews want to cut themselves off from the mainstream.
A Deadly Apathy
A blank indifference to cruelty and atrocity as a normative mode of waging war has infected Israel’s collective conscience.
Marcus Yam/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images
A Palestinian woman whose family is preparing to abandon their home in the West Bank village of Zanuta to escape violence by Israeli settlers, October 30, 2023. The Israeli settlement of Havat Mitarim is on the hilltop in the distance.
New Year’s Resolutions for Indian Immigrants
How Vivek Can Be Less Obnoxious!
1. I will try to be a more humble — or even a little bit humble — and will encourage my fellow Indians to cease producing reams of articles with headlines like these:
— “Indians flying high in Silicon Valley“;
— “Indian talent crucial for America’s tech industry“;
— “Why Indian-born CEOs dominate Silicon Valley”
… lest anyone notice that the tech industry explosion was created by 90% white American men, and 10% white men from places like South Africa, Germany and Poland. Not an Indian, Latin American or Chinese in the bunch. (Though some, I assume, are good people.)
For example:
Google — 2 white men, one from Michigan and one from Russia (Larry Page and Sergey Brin).
Twitter — 4 white American men (Jack Dorsey, Noah Glass, Biz Stone and Evan Williams).
LinkedIn — 1 white American man (Reid Hoffman)
Netflix — 2 white American men (Marc Randolph and Reed Hastings).
Netscape — 2 white American men (Jim Clark and Marc Andreessen).
Apple Computer — 2 white American men, (Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. The adopted Jobs’ biological father was a Syrian immigrant, admitted well before the nation-destroying 1965 immigration act. See below.)
Mozilla Firefox — 2 white American men (Dave Hyatt and Blake Ross).
Oracle — 3 white American men (Larry Ellison, Bob Miner and Ed Oates)
Uber — 1 white American man and 1 Canadian white man (Garrett Camp and Travis Kalanick)
PayPal — 3 white men, immigrants from Germany, Russia and Poland (Peter Thiel, Max Levchin and Luke Nosek).
Yelp — 2 white American men (Jeremy Stoppelman and Russel Simmons)
Zillow — 1 white American man (Richard Barton)
Craigslist — 1 white American man (Craig Newmark)
Pandora — 3 white American men (Will Glaser, Jon Kraft and Tim Westergren)
Wikipedia — 1 white American man (Jimmy Wales)
Zynga — 1 white American man (Mark Pincus)
Must remember to remind my boastful Indian colleagues that Americans have won hundreds of Nobel prizes in the sciences, while India, with more than 4 times the population, has won only five.
Based on the record of accomplishment, if we really want the top talent (and not the cheapest), we ought to be slashing the Indian cap on H1B visas, and hike the cap on Israelis, South Africans, Germans and Russians, currently discriminated against because of the humungous Indian allotment.
2. I will not brag about Indian culture revering nerds like me until just one of the 1.4 billion Indians manages to produce anything as world-changing as Apple computer, created by Steve Wozniak — expelled from one college and a drop-out from another — along with Steve Jobs — a hippie college dropout, who was, by the grace of God, raised by his high school drop-out father, a white male American mechanic.
3. I will not run for president, unless I am a third-generation immigrant, imbued with the cultural values so utterly foreign to my parents and grandparents, but which have made America the greatest country on earth. These include the God-given rights to bear arms, to free speech and to free association, and the revolutionary idea that all men are equal under the law (even those filthy Dalits, whom my fellow Indians are refusing to hire in Silicon Valley).
It’s rather embarrassing that, of the first three people to announce for president as a Republican in this past cycle, two were second-generation Indian immigrants. (The third was Trump.) I and my people have got to temper our enormous hubris.
I will not wait until months after having Ann Coulter on my podcast to fire back at her on Ezra Klein’s New York Times podcast, for saying she wouldn’t vote for an Indian to be president of the United States. I especially won’t employ the pussy claim that I had much better arguments, but held back out of politeness.
[BONUS RESOLUTION FOR JEWISH IMMIGRANTS FROM BRAZIL, LIKE KLEIN: I will not whine that I am “sad” that Coulter won’t vote for an Indian for president — at least until Brazil elects an Indian president (or any non-Brazilian), Israel elects an Indian president (or any non-Jew) and India elects any non-Indian president.]
4. In fact, I will not run for any government office until both of my parents and I were born here.
In particular, if I am Representative Pramila Jayapal, I will get on my knees and give thanks every day that the United States does not have physical appearance requirement for immigrants.
Having been let in for no good reason when I was 16 years old, I will not dedicate myself to forcing my host country to bring in ever more immigrants, specifically Muslim immigrants after 9/11, and illegal immigrants.
I will not do this because it’s utterly gauche — like a dinner guest rearranging your furniture, ripping out the wainscotting, and calling your kids to the dining room to re-name them. Continuing the metaphor, as an Indian immigrant, my qualifications to overhaul someone else’s happy household is that I came from a homeless shelter, rife with leprosy, dengue and typhoid.
5. I will try to remember that I have moved from a country notorious for cheating to a high-trust society (although a little less “high trust” ever since Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act began dragging in people from other low-trust societies, like mine).
Thus, I will not scale the outer walls of my kids’ school during exams and hang from the windows to pass them cheat sheets, as is done in India. I will not purchase advance copies of tests, leading to decades of headlines like these:
— Gangs Are Making Millions Helping Indians Cheat on Exams
— India: Mass cheating unveiled in exam centre, teachers involved
— Mass cheating caught on cam, Sakti collector orders probe
— How exam scandals threaten the future of India’s young people
— India’s elite exams hit by corruption ‘scam’
I will not steal intellectual property, plagiarize someone else’s research or manipulate my own research results, a practice so widespread in my ancestral home that the Office of the United States Trade Representative put India on a blacklist of IP thieves.
I will not pay to have my nonsense “research” published in fake journals with bought-and-paid-for peer reviews, leading a consortium of news organizations (e.g., The New Yorker, Le Monde and the Indian Express), to dub India “one of the biggest global hubs” for pay-to-play publishing.
I will not brag about my culture admiring tools like Steve Urkel in “Family Matters,” when, by all accounts, my culture reveres conmen like Frank Abagnale Jr., in “Catch Me If You Can.”
6. I will recognize that slavery is strongly frowned upon in the U.S. and strive NOT to bring India’s enthusiasm for the institution to my new country. In particular, I will not use the H1B visa program to bring in dozens of slaves I purchased from their parents in India, including a slew of prepubescent girls to serve as my sex slaves.
That’s what “multimillionaire real estate magnate” Lakireddy Bali Reddy did (it’s easy to be a “multimillionaire” when you’re using slave labor) and, boy, was his face red when an American woman happened to spot a couple of his (dead) sex slaves being carried in rolled up carpets through the streets of Berkeley. For more, see “Adios, America!”
Sure, Mexicans, Egyptians and Koreans also get caught bringing slaves to America, but the prevalence of Indian immigrants in the U.S. slavery racket is hard to miss.
2023: “20-year-old Indian student … held captive for months without access to a bathroom, viciously beaten, and forced to work at three homes by his cousin and two other Indian-origin men.”
2020: “Gilroy couple [Amarjit and Balwinder Mann] charged with enslaving Indian immigrant.”
2012: “U.S. judge grants $1.5 million as compensation [from Indian diplomat, Neena Malhotra] to ‘enslaved’ Indian maid.”
2011: “Rockland D.A.: Family [Rajani, Aman Parveen and Vishal Jagota] Kept Indian Woman As Sex Slave.”
2008: “Varsha Sabhnani … from Indonesia, was convicted with her Indian-born husband … on a 12-count federal indictment that included forced labor, conspiracy [and] involuntary servitude.”
As part of my heroic resistance to slavery, I will not lie about the H1B program, which is nothing but indentured servitude, outlawed in my new country in 1867 by the Peonage Act. No right to quit means it’s serfdom. I will get that as a tattoo.
COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER
BBC staffers reveal editor’s ‘entire job’ to whitewash Jewish war crimes
Hasbara perpetrated by Jews in positions of power throughout the West
From VT Foreign Policy:
BBC editor Raffi Berg has almost complete control of the British broadcaster’s online coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza and is ensuring that all events are reported with a pro-Israel bias, according to a new report published on 28 December by Drop Site News.
“This guy’s entire job is to water down everything that’s too critical of Israel,” one former BBC journalist said.
Drop Site News spoke to 13 current and former staffers who stated that the BBC’s coverage consistently devalues Palestinian life, ignores Israeli atrocities, and creates a false equivalence in an entirely unbalanced conflict.
Another BBC journalist said Berg plays a key role in a broader BBC culture of “systematic Israeli propaganda.”
“How much power he has is wild,” said another journalist.
“There was an extreme fear at the BBC, that if you ever wanted to do anything about Israel or Palestine, editors would say: ‘If you want to pitch something, you have to go through Raffi and get his signoff,” another journalist explained.
In one case, Berg downplayed Amnesty International’s accusation that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Berg chose a headline that stated, “Israel rejects ‘fabricated’ claims of genocide,” to describe the Amnesty report and failed to post the story for 12 hours after it was written to suppress its online reach.
The journalists interviewed by Drop Site also noted that the Amnesty report was not covered on the BBC’s flagship news programs—BBC One’s News At One, News At Six, or News At Ten or its flagship current affairs program, BBC Two’s Newsnight.
“Anyone who writes on Gaza or Israel is asked: ‘Has it gone to edpol [editorial policy], lawyers, and has it gone to Raffi?’” another journalist said.
Raffi Berg, who wrote a book praising clandestine Mossad operations, wields great power to influence perceptions of Israel’s war on Gaza because the BBC news website is the most-visited news site on the internet, with over 1.1 billion visits in May alone.
Israel’s war on Gaza has killed over 45,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, and flattened large swathes of the besieged enclave.
The pro-Israel bias imposed by Berg is evident in the language used to cover the war.
While stories “prominently” used words like “massacre,” “slaughter,” and “atrocities” to refer to Hamas, they “hardly, if at all,” used them “in reference to actions by Israel,” wrote Rami Ruhayem, a Beirut-based BBC Arabic correspondent.
In another case, the BBC published a story with a headline that hid Israel’s responsibility for killing an entire family in a missile strike.
“Israel Gaza: Father loses 11 family members in one blast,” the headline stated.
Drop Site notes that when the BBC does mention Israel as the perpetrator, it uses the caveat “reportedly.”
The BBC also uses euphemisms preferred by the Israeli army to hide its soldiers’ war crimes. For example, the BBC describes the forcible transfer or ethnic cleansing of Palestinian civilians as “evacuations.”
Aaron Maté: The US ignores its own terrorist designation of Syria’s ruling Al Qaeda veterans, all while maintaining sanctions that devastate ordinary civilians.
In his memoir of his time as a senior aide to President Obama, Ben Rhodes recalled one of the administration’s top quandaries in Syria.
Back in late 2012, the CIA was waging a multi-billion dollar covert war to help Syrian insurgents topple then-Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. By that point, Al Qaeda had established a powerful franchise in Syria known as Jabhat al-Nusra, which international actors were promptly designating as a terrorist organization.
Yet for a US government seeking regime change in Damascus, adding al-Nusra to the State Department terror list posed a problem. On the ground, Rhodes acknowledged, al-Nusra “was probably the strongest fighting force” against the Syrian government. Moreover, rather than coming into conflict with one another, it was “also clear that the more moderate opposition” favored by the US was in fact “fighting side by side with al-Nusra.” Therefore, Rhodes recalled arguing to his colleagues, designating al-Nusra as a terrorist organization “would alienate the same people we want to help.”
Rhodes and his compatriots ended up losing that debate. Yet while the State Department designated al-Nusra in December 2012, it turns out that the US still found a way to help. By placing Nusra on the terrorist list, the New York Times explained that month, the Obama administration hoped “to remove one of the biggest obstacles to increasing Western support for the rebellion: the fear that money and arms could flow to a jihadi group that could further destabilize Syria and harm Western interests.”
In other words, designating al-Nusra as a terrorist group was a toothless move that helped the Obama administration continue arming the insurgency that the Nusra militants dominated. The notion that US sanctions would force an Al Qaeda-dominated rebellion to abandon its leading fighting force was a fantasy – if not a deliberate ruse — that ensured that US weapons would continue to flow.
And that they did: three months after Nusra’s terrorist designation, the Associated Press reported that the US and its proxy war allies had “dramatically stepped up weapons supplies to Syrian rebels” to help them “seize Damascus.” Despite the Obama administration’s public opposition to Nusra, “there is little clear evidence from the front lines that all the new, powerful weapons are going to groups which have been carefully vetted by the U.S.” Instead, insurgents “including Jabhat al-Nusra” had been seen “with such weapons.” Once U.S. weapons arrived in Syria, the Obama administration quietly acknowledged that it had no way of controlling who would use them. “We needed plausible deniability in case the arms got into the hands of al-Nusra,” a former senior administration official explained in 2013.
With US arms in hand, al-Nusra and its allies captured the Syrian province of Idlib in May 2015. It was from Idlib that al-Nusra – now under the name of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – launched the recent offensive that removed Assad.
And now that HTS, an Al Qaeda offshoot, has finally seized Damascus in December 2024, the Obama administration veterans who now serve under President Biden are facing a dilemma similar to what Ben Rhodes described during that same month in 2012.
On the one hand, the US helped the insurgency that toppled Assad – not only via the CIA dirty war, but also the crippling sanctions that crushed Syria’s economy and the concurrent military occupation that deprived Syria of its oil and wheat. Yet on the other — because of the decision that the Obama team took in December 2012 over Rhodes’ objections — the new Syrian government is a designated terrorist organization. The HTS ruler, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani – now using his given name, Ahmed al-Shara – even has a $10 million US bounty on his head.
In Washington, the decision has been made to give Syria’s ruling Al Qaeda spinoff another helping hand.
After meeting with al-Jolani/al-Shara in Damascus on Dec. 20th, senior State Department official Barbara Leaf announced that the US will suspend the $10 million reward for his capture. In Leaf’s telling, Al-Shara “came across as pragmatic” and offered “moderate statements” on issues including the rights of women and minorities.
The US government’s willingness to engage with al-Shara, a former leader of Al Qaeda – and before that, a former deputy leader of ISIS – underscores that its definition of “terrorism” is entirely dependent on political calculations. The operative standard boils down to whether or not the designated “terrorist” is “on our side”, as Jake Sullivan described al-Qaeda in Syria in a now infamous February 2012 email.
Similar criteria applies to the US definition of “moderate.” After receiving the Biden administration’s endorsement, al-Shara’s government has offered a vision for Syria that hardly reflects the democratic aspirations of the secular, reformist protesters who took to the streets against Assad in early 2011. …
After initially suggesting that there would be quick elections, al-Shara now says that this could take up to four years. For a war-torn country like Syria, some interim period of restructuring before a vote is understandable. But the government that al-Shara is putting in place for this open-ended transition does not resemble Syria’s rich cultural mosaic, and instead HTS’ own brand of sectarianism.
Al-Shara has tapped Anas Hassan Khattab, a former Al-Qaeda commander and Nusra co-founder, as Syria’s new intelligence chief. Back in 2014, the United Nations designated Khattab as a “terrorist” for his critical role in Nusra’s financing and operations. Meanwhile, the only woman appointed to serve in the “transition” government to date has declared that the new system will be based on Sharia law. She also insisted that there will no space for both “secularism” and “those who don’t agree with my thinking.”
The most ominous development is a wave of sectarian violence. Although largely downplayed in Western media, there are widespread reports, documented with video evidence, of militant attacks on Alawite, Christians, and other minorities. Although HTS fighters have reportedly tried to stop such attacks in some areas, this is an inevitable consequence of a sectarian insurgency taking power in a decimated, divided country. As the New York Times notes, HTS’s own ranks “include thousands of radicalized foreign fighters”, complemented by many more in other militias. In a show of gratitude for their critical role in toppling Assad, al-Shara has said that these foreign militants will likely be granted Syrian citizenship.
Continues at Matés Substack.
Israel increases hasbara in effort to change the narrative on its Gaza genocide
Israel has spent millions trying win hearts and minds abroad. It’s about to spend 20 times more.
Israel’s Foreign Ministry will receive $150 million for what’s officially known as public diplomacy, or in Hebrew, hasbara.
Israel’s new foreign minister, Gideon Saar, in a photo from a speech he gave in the Israeli city of Ramat Gan, July 10, 2022. (Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images)
The Israeli government plans to offset wartime spending and an economic slowdown with tax hikes and deep cuts to public services. But the proposed budget for 2025 also includes a massive new allocation: toward pro-Israel advocacy efforts abroad.
Under the new budget, Israel’s Foreign Ministry will receive $150 million, on top of what it gets for its existing activities, for what’s officially known as public diplomacy, or in Hebrew, hasbara. That sum is more than 20 times what such efforts have typically been allotted in past years.
The dramatic expenditure is the result of a political deal that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu struck last month to shore up his governing coalition. Politician Gideon Saar and his New Hope party agreed to rejoin the coalition in return for the funding and the appointment of Saar as Israel’s foreign minister.
The news comes as public opinion about Israel in the United States and elsewhere around the world has been intensely battered as a result of a war that has left the neighboring Gaza Strip in ruins with much of its population facing displacement, disease, and hunger.
Saar doesn’t have a detailed plan for how to spend the money yet, but at the time he signed the coalition agreement with Netanyahu, his office released a statement saying it would be used to influence sentiment in the foreign press and on social media.
Saar’s statement also said he foresees a focus on American college campuses, which have been rocked by pro-Palestinian protests since the war broke out when Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023. The statement noted that its activity will be carried out in cooperation with American Jewish groups and alongside similar efforts by the Diaspora Affairs Ministry.
“Israel’s hasbara efforts and consciousness warfare have for decades not received the critical and life-saving resources and tools they require,” Saar told the Israeli newspaper Maariv. “I am determined to make a change. Every shekel devoted to this cause is an investment, not an expense, and will strengthen Israel and its standing in the world.”
Saar and his team have been holding brainstorming sessions with a wide array of individuals and groups who are involved in pro-Israel advocacy around the world, Jewish Insider reported. Participants include social media influencers, cultural figures, professional hasbara advocates and representatives of various Jewish groups.
Whatever comes of the planning, the Israeli government will attempt to improve upon its weak record of executing similar, albeit smaller advocacy initiatives in the past. Millions spent on the national effort against antisemitism and the delegitimization of Israel around the world over the past decade have not produced almost any fruit in the eyes of Israeli government officials, according to reporting from investigative journalist Uri Blau in the Israeli digital outlet Shomrim.
“This activity has failed by every conceivable parameter,” Avi Cohen-Scali, the director general of the Ministry of Diaspora and Combating Antisemitism told Shomrim
Nick Fuentes on Trump and Elon
From Nick Fuentes Telegram account. t.me/nickjfuentes
My rough sketch of what Trump and Elon are up to on X is that American elites seem to be gearing up for the emerging great power confrontation with China, a process which has been greatly accelerated by the supply-chain crisis during the COVID recession, the War in Ukraine, growing naval imbalance with China in the Pacific, and the drift of middle powers away from the United States.
To that end— elites seem to recognize that the domestic unrest created by the culture war has become detrimental and that wokeism, in particular the DEI/ESG agenda, is holding back economic growth and creating a competency crisis.
Environmentalism and other concerns are holding back full exploitation of US energy resources which are required to power technologies like cryptocurrency and AI, and which also act as a geopolitical lever against petrostates like Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Venezuela.
Thus, the foreign policy establishment seems to be covertly backing this cultural shift away from Left-Wing wokeism and towards a libertarian “effective accelerationism.”
In short— these guys like Joe Rogan, Sean Maguire, Marc Andreessen, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Elon Musk are NOT ideologically aligned. They are not conservative, traditional, Christian, Right-Wing, nationalist, or sympathetic to pro-White politics.
They are cosmopolitan liberals who have turned against the ideologically leftist elements of the Democratic machine which are holding back the economic power-base of the United States, specifically human capital and energy.
This is why they are feminist, pro-gay, soft pro-trans, pro-immigration, and quite clearly hostile to radical right wing politics.
A brief summary of the MAGA Civil War:
On December 22, Trump appointed Sriram Krishnan as a senior adviser on artificial intelligence. Sriram Krishnan is a naturalized citizen who initially came to the United States from India on a work visa that he obtained through Microsoft.
Previously, Krishnan worked as a general partner at the venture capital firm Andreessen-Horowitz and served as its ambassador to Twitter after Musk’s acquisition, which was partially financed by Marc Andreessen.
Krishnan is the latest Trump appointee drawn from a group of Silicon Valley venture capitalists who call themselves “Little Tech,” mostly in the orbit of Elon Musk and Peter Thiel.
This appointment drew widespread criticism from pro-Trump influencers over previous statements by Krishnan in support of increasing the cap on greencards.
The “Little Tech” or “Tech Bro” faction, including Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, David Sacks, and Sean Maguire, rallied to Krishnan’s defense on X, voicing support for high-skilled legal immigration and accusing his detractors of being motivated by racism.
Yesterday and today, the brand accounts “@ConservativeOGs” and “@ProjectGroyp” were stripped of their verification and features, subsequently their affiliate accounts lost their verification and features like increased character limit.
Earlier today, many of the affiliate accounts under the brand “@ProjectGroyp,” including Dalton Clodfelter, Tyler Russell, Ray, ClassicsGroyp, KaizerRev, Pinesap, and Bookcat, were permanently suspended.
At the same time that the suspensions occurred, Elon posted that “reply spammers” were being nuked as he composed the post. @ProjectGroyp received an email from X saying that the account was unverified for engaging in platform manipulation.
Earlier tonight, Elon posted that, being an H-1B immigrant himself, he would “go to war” against anyone who opposes the H-1B program.
This is an extremely disturbing and unfortunate development.
This is precisely the scenario that I warned everybody about over the last 6 months and what motivated me to declare a second Groyper War on the Trump campaign over the issue of legal immigration and the Middle East conflict. This is also precisely why I didn’t vote for Trump.
It became clear by May and June 2024, at the same time that Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, that two distinct but related monied interests were reluctantly coalescing around Trump to solidify their influence over a government which would almost inevitably change hands in the election.
In May 2024, Miriam Adelson signaled her support for Trump and a promise of +$100 million in exchange for commitments on the West Bank and then in June, on the All In podcast co-hosted by Musk ally David Sacks, Trump committed to a policy of “stapling greencards to diplomas.” Musk went on to contribute nearly $300 million to Trump.
At that time, I was highly critical of both developments and raised the alarm. All of it was either downplayed or ignored by pro-Trump influencers who insisted that Trump’s commitments to Israel were fabricated by a “Left-Wing Israeli blog” (that’s Ha’aretz by the way), and that Trump’s immigration remark was an “off the cuff,” “throwaway remark,” which he didn’t really mean.
On the contrary, these were very significant, intentional concessions that were given desperately in exchange for campaign money and completely forfeited any claim to “America First” foreign policy or immigration policy, and it all happened right in the open.
These so-called “tech bros” like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, David Sacks, Sean Maguire, Vivek Ramaswamy, Jacob Helberg, and Marc Andreessen do not share any of our values, as I said repeatedly. Most of them are immigrants, most of them are either brown or Jewish, many of them are gay, and all of them are non-Christian.
They were not conservative on social issues, they are hardcore Zionists, they are not ethnic nationalists, and they always supported legal immigration. And slowly but surely they began to take over Mar-a-Lago after the David Sacks “Little Tech” fundraiser which he hosted for Trump in June.
Throughout the year, pro-Trump shills reassured the base that this was a “dream team,” that these tech moguls came around to Trump because they must have experienced an epiphany and converted ideologically to Trumpism, they downplayed all concerns about this arrangement.
They insisted that any contention between the base and the donors could be resolved “once Trump won the election.” Well, here we are. Trump won the election. And now all of these appointees and donors are threatening to go to war with opponents of H-1B and excise them from the party.
How are you supposed to push back now? They already got your votes. So what now? Your plan is to “pressure” the administration by “speaking out” … where? On Twitter? The platform owned by them? On Rumble? The platform owned by them? Great plan.
Now it’s the Christmas before Trump takes office and Elon is calling for all “racists” who want “DEI for lazy, mediocre white Americans” to be cut out “root and stem” from the GOP and is apparently getting started by banning many of them on Twitter.
What do the Trump shills like Mike Cernovich and Jonathan Keeperman advise now? Go check their Twitter. They say we just better not make Elon mad or insult him and if we “push back” we must do it in between showering praise on Elon. I’m not exaggerating, that’s what they are doing.
And this is just the beginning. Don’t say I didn’t warn you, because I did. This is what happens when you let Jews do your thinking for you and you get swept up in emotions. Our people have been outmaneuvered politically for GENERATIONS because of shit like this.
For now, all we can do is hunker down and ride out another four years.
Rumor has it that this big “AI push” is something being foisted upon Trump by Jacob Helberg, who has his ear. Helberg is the senior advisor to Alex Karp, the hysterical Jewish co-founder of Palantir. Karp is the guy who says his company is responsible for stopping the Far Right in Europe and his biggest fear is being defenestrated by Christian Nationalists for being Jewish.
Palantir is an intelligence contractor which exclusively served the CIA from 2000-2008 and was mostly like created as a mechanism to privatize a CIA program. It was co-founded by Karp and Peter Thiel. Helberg was the first of the tech moguls in 2024 to max out his contribution to the Trump joint-fundraising committee in March, the others soon followed. Helberg was a lifelong Democrat until October 7th when he changed his party affiliation.
Then, it was JD Vance who arranged for the Silicon Valley fundraiser hosted by David Sacks back in June. JD Vance is a lifelong protege of Peter Thiel and his political career started in 2022 when Thiel cut him a check for $15 million to run for Senate and then secured for him the Trump endorsement in the Republican primary.
David Sacks was a key part of the Paypal predecessor Confinity, which was cofounded by Peter Thiel, and later merged with Elon Musk’s payment company to form Paypal. Sacks was an angel investor in SpaceX and Palantir; he also hosted a fundraiser for Vance in 2022 with Keith Rabois, Jacob Helberg’s husband.
Helberg is a Jewish immigrant from Europe
Elon is an immigrant from South Africa
Thiel is an immigrant from South Africa
Sacks is a Jewish immigrant from South Africa
I WAS RIGHT.
YOU WERE WRONG.
APOLOGIZE. NOW.
YOU WERE TRICKED.
YOU FORGOT THE NUMBER ONE RULE OF POLITICS: DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE JEWISH.
Also available at Barnes & Noble
Also available at Barnes & Noble
