General

NY Post: Trump supports immigration visas backed by Musk: ‘I have many H-1B visas on my properties’

Trump supports immigration visas backed by Musk: ‘I have many H-1B visas on my properties’

“I’ve always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That’s why we have them,” Trump said by phone, referring to the H-1B program, which permits companies to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations.

“I have many H-1B visas on my properties. I’ve been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program,” added Trump, who restricted access to foreign worker visas in his first administration and has been critical of the program in the past.

President-elect Trump told The Post Saturday he supports immigration visas for highly skilled workers, appearing to side with Elon Musk on the issue.via REUTERS

Musk and other tech barons argued this week that the H-1B visa program is critical to ensuring American companies can find highly skilled labor which may not be easily available in the U.S. labor force and must be expanded.

Trump’s Saturday comments come a day after Musk vowed to go to “war” on the issue, telling one mocking opponent to go “f–k yourself.”

“Stop trying to optimize something that shouldn’t exist,” a line often used by Musk, Mackey wrote. “Let’s optimize H-1B,” he sarcastically added.

Musk fired back: “The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla, and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B.”

Elon Musk vowed he would “go to war” to defend H1B visas.Jack Gruber / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

“Take a big step back and F–K YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend,” he added, paragraphing a memorable line from the 2008 comedy “Tropic Thunder.”

The tech billionaire has been criticized by MAGA diehards including Laura Loomer and Ann Coulter — who say the H-1B visa program has been abused and needs to be sharply curtailed.

And influential voices around Trump have publicly begun turning on Musk as well.

“Someone please notify ‘Child Protective Services’— need to do a ‘wellness check’ on this toddler,” former White House Counselor Steve Bannon jeered at the X boss in a Saturday post to his account on Gettr.

The H-1B program allows highly skilled immigrants into the US workforce, but critics say it has been abused.cristianstorto – stock.adobe.com

Musk said his passion for the issue stemmed from wanting America to remain competitive by attracting “the top ~0.1% of engineering talent” which he said was essential for “America to keep winning.”

What do you think? Post a comment.

Vivek Ramaswamy, who is slated to run the Department of Government Efficiency with Musk, backed Musk and offered a critique of American society.

“American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence,” Ramaswamy wrote on X.

The Counter-Jeethad on X

Despite my optimism about the Trump administration, two big worries: the fanatical Zionism of several of his appointments and the prospective H-1B fiasco being advocated by Elon Musk, David O. Sacks, and Vivek Ramaswamy  — all major players in the incoming administration. As Laura Loomer notes, the H1-B policy advocated by these people is not an America First policy. And, as Greg Johnson notes, it is basically an anti-White policy. The problem, of course, is the official color-blindness which still dominates mainstream conservatism, now in a context of anti-White hate broadcast from the all the moral high ground of the West — particularly the media and academia.

Note that Loomer is Jewish. I agree with Johnson that this is not a problem. We have to take allies wherever we can find them. Jews understand that it’s not about principles but about interests, and the mainstream Jewish community does not see Loomer as compatible with Jewish interests, most likely because she has stood up for White people and Christian Nationslism. Here’s the ADL on Loomer:

On December 8, 2022, Twitter reinstated right-wing political activist, former Congressional candidate in Florida and self-proclaimed “proud Islamophobe” Laura Loomer, where she is verified through Twitter Blue. That day, Loomer posted to Telegram: “This feels so surreal after being totally silenced for 4 years. Now I can return to exposing the truth to millions of people every day, just like I used to.” Loomer has a history of extremist ties, including a close relationship with white supremacist Nick Fuentes, and has tweeted allegations that the GOP rigged her (failed) primary election “because they didn’t want me in office exposing their corruption.”

Extremists and Conspiracy Theorists Reemerge on Twitter

The ADL links to this article on MSNBC:

Laura Loomer, the far-right extremist and proud bigot who failed to win the Republican nomination in a Florida congressional race Tuesday, is as vile as they come. But because Loomer is encouraging her supporters not to vote for the GOP nominee in the general election, she may just be the Democrats’ best weapon to win an otherwise safe GOP seat. Here’s hoping she inspires other MAGA losers to follow her lead.

For those lucky enough to not know who Loomer is, she’s a one-stop shop for bigotry.

For those lucky enough to not know who Loomer is, she’s a one-stop shop for bigotry. She has dubbed herself a “proud Islamophobe” and has backed it up with a slew of hate-filled comments about Muslims being “savages.” On a podcast hosted by a white nationalist, she declared, “I’m going to fight for white people” and added, “I’m a really big supporter of the Christian nationalist movement.” And this 29-year-old — who was gleefully endorsed by Donald Trump when she ran for Congress in 2020 — has been banned by a number of platforms from Twitter to GoFundMe, for her hate speech and conspiracy theories. She can’t even catch an Uber or a Lyft.

Sriram Krishnan, Senior Policy Advisor for AI at the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

2,100 words

This year, my best Christmas present was a war over legal, high-skilled immigration on X. On December 23, Laura Loomer tweeted:

Deeply disturbing to see the appointment of Sriram Krishnan as Senior Policy Advisor for AI at the Office of Science and Technology Policy. . . . How will [we] control immigration in our country and promote America First innovation when Trump appointed this guy who wants to REMOVE all restrictions on green card caps in the United States so that foreign students (which makes up 78% of the employees in Silicon Valley) can come to the US and take jobs that should be given to American STEM students. . . . This is not America First policy.

Soon heavyweights like Elon Musk, David O. Sacks, and Vivek Ramalamadingdong weighed in on the side of Sriram. The sports team analogy was duly trotted out: America needs to compete against China, so we need to recruit the very best team members from around the world, by removing the country-caps on H-1B visas, the vast majority of which go to Indians. Winning against America’s global rivals is measured by GDP and corporate profits.

This is a totally disingenuous argument, because H-1B visas are not for recruiting the “best of the best.” We have a different visa for that: the O visa, which is a temporary non-immigrant worker visa for people of “extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics,” including movies and television. About 38,000 of these visas were granted in 2023. If we had a complete ban on immigration and mass deportation of illegals, I would have no problem with O visas.

H-1B visas are very different. Companies seek these for entry-level positions. They have to prove that they can’t find Americans for the job. But this is obviously bogus, because in many cases, companies have fired existing American workers (mostly white), then brought in H-1Bs, mostly from India, to replace them. These H-1Bs work longer hours at lower wages. Many are incompetent. Many have fake degrees. But they cut costs, raise profits, and enrich management. The fact Indian recruiting firms fill companies with fellow Indians is not meritocracy in action. It is Hindu nepotism. Unsurprisingly, Sriram and Vivek are all for it.

The claim that Indian H-1B visas are about bringing in “the best and the brightest” is entirely fraudulent. It is entirely about lowering wages by hiring substandard, cut-rate, corporate coolies. Yet countless prominent and credentialed people, including Elon Musk and Vivek Ramitupyoursnout, will look you straight in the eye, give you a firm handshake, and repeat that lie over and over again. To borrow a line from Matt Parrott, it is as infuriating a shit test as being asked to pretend that Bruce Jenner is now a woman.

The claim that Big Tech has to resort to hiring foreign workers because they can’t find American workers is entirely bogus. There are thousands of unemployed, mostly white American tech workers who are systematically discriminated against racially by major American corporations. White Americans who seek STEM degrees are also systematically discriminated against by colleges and universities. There are thus many thousands of highly intelligent white Americans with STEM degrees who are unemployed, underemployed, and deeply bitter about their lot. And how many more would pursue STEM if they felt it was a viable path?

The tinder was heaped up. All it needed was Laura Loomer’s spark.

Much to my pleasure, Laura Loomer stood her ground and doubled down, going so far as to demand a divorce between Big Tech and the MAGA movement. We don’t need a divorce. But MAGA needs to show Big Tech that it wears the pants in the family. For this alone, I am declaring Loomer—who describes herself as a “Jewish white nationalist”—to be Counter-Currents’ [Non-White] Ally of the Year for 2024. To those of you who are annoyed because Loomer is a Jew, my answer is simple: if Laura Loomer wants to use her Jewish magic to defend white Americans, good for her. The only thing shameful here is that more white Americans aren’t doing the same.

Continue on Counter-Currents

‘57% of European Jews consider leaving’: Europe’s post-Gaza antisemitism surge

Of course, they won’t all leave. Poorer Jews are more likely to leave because they can’t easily escape the blowback from the Gaza genocide. But wealthy Jews will stay. And nothing is likely to change given the role of Jewish elites throughout the West. And zero attempt to justify Israeli unjustifiable actions.

What has happened in Gaza and Israeli’s aggressive actions throughout the Middle East may turn out to be a turning point of Jewish history. Impossible to see Jews as victims but they are still trying:

His solutions included mandatory visits to Holocaust memorial sites and concentration camps for all Austrian youth, support for antisemitism research in academia to combat campus ignorance and a clear institutional and political recognition of October 7 as the largest pogrom against Jews since the Holocaust. …
“It’s essential to remember that European countries’ fight against antisemitism isn’t a favor to Jews or Israel but part of the battle for Europe’s identity and character. The concern over European Jewry’s departure is real and history has shown this would signal Europe’s unraveling.”
Before getting overly optimistic, it’s worth noting that according to the Israelite Community of Vienna (IKG), 1,147 antisemitic incidents were reported in Austria in 2023, 720 of which took place after the October 7 massacre. This marks a 60% increase year-on-year – but Austria’s fight against this horrifying trend is still commendable.
One of the summit’s critical efforts is promoting the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) antisemitism definition. Drafted in Budapest in 2015, it’s a non-legally binding working definition.

‘57% of European Jews consider leaving’: Europe’s worrying antisemitism surge

Combat Antisemitism Movement conference in Vienna brings together local community leaders to warn of growing antisemitic sentiment and come up with solutions as most European Jews consider emigrating

Tamar Sebok, Vienna|12.25.24 | 21:01
“Most antisemites I know don’t think they’re antisemites. They respond just like we do: they hold conferences and believe they’re defending human rights, thinking they’re actually the greatest opponents of antisemitism,” said David Hirsch, a sociology professor at the University of London’s Goldsmiths College and founder of Engage, a movement combating academic boycotts on Israel.
According to him, “fields like the humanities and arts are becoming hostile toward anyone connected to Israel and most Jews. The solution is to shift the discussion to content and facts because this way it’s pretty clear who’s committing genocide and who’s not. You could say each side presents its own set of facts. It’s very hard to sway the public with comparisons between October 7 and Gaza.”
הפגנת נגד ישראל במדריד

Pro-Palestinian rally in Madrid, Spain
(Photo: OSCAR DEL POZO / AFP)
Hirsch, like other speakers from Europe’s Jewish community, attended this month’s “Action Matters” summit in Vienna.
The event was organized by the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), an independent organization operating globally for five years, building connections among mayors and politicians to influence the fight against antisemitism and the European Leadership Network (ELNET), a European organization founded in 2007 to strengthen ties between Israel and Europe.
Typically, such events focus on reporting the rise of antisemitism in Europe. The novelty of this summit was its emphasis on actionable methods to combat this widespread phenomenon that’s breaking records unseen since World War II.
The number of antisemitic incidents has risen by about 400% in some parts of Europe since October 7. “We’re losing the battle,” said Dr. Ariel Muzicant, president of the European Jewish Congress, at the summit’s outset. “57% of European Jews are considering leaving. In a few years, 50% of the communities may no longer exist.”
The event’s significance lies in its target audience. Most summit attendees were non-Jewish members of parliament and city representatives from across Europe who are determined to act against the alarming spread of antisemitism. They came to share their actions and gather new ideas. Among the cities represented were Krakow, Ljubljana, Berlin, Vienna and Malmo.

פרופ' דוד הירש

Prof. David Hirsch
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
In addition to topics discussed with the entire audience, small group discussions addressed curbing antisemitism and boycotts online, in universities and in sports. Yael Arad, chair of Israel’s Olympic Committee, participated in one such discussion sharing her successful handling of the painful issue during the 2024 Paris Olympics.
CAM Director Sacha Roytman Dratwa declared, “We believe in collaborating with a broad spectrum of government officials, mayors, religious and community leaders, diplomats, cultural influencers, educators, artists and business leaders.
“Through this inclusive mobilization of diverse disciplines, we believe we can build a global coalition against antisemitism and achieve strategic, profound and meaningful social change in combating it.”
Why Vienna? CAM Director of European Affairs Oriana Marie Kruger explained: “This is a city doing incredible work against antisemitism and racism. It has a rich Jewish history. We’ve already held summits in Greece and Germany and next year we’ll host one in Paris.”
In Austria, burning the Israeli flag is prohibited and chanting “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is illegal. The event opened with a speech by former president of Austria’s National Council Wolfgang Alexander Sobotka, a well-known fighter against antisemitism.

אוריאן מרי קרוגר, העומדת בראש התנועה למאבק באנטישמיות באירופה

Oriana Marie Kruger
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
His solutions included mandatory visits to Holocaust memorial sites and concentration camps for all Austrian youth, support for antisemitism research in academia to combat campus ignorance and a clear institutional and political recognition of October 7 as the largest pogrom against Jews since the Holocaust.
Israel’s ambassador to Vienna, David Roet, also stressed Austria’s efforts to combat antisemitism: “The same Austria that welcomed Hitler with cheers is now leading the fight against antisemitism in Europe. The normalization of antisemitism and the situation where Jews are the only minority whose claims of racism are dismissed with scorn cannot continue.
“It’s essential to remember that European countries’ fight against antisemitism isn’t a favor to Jews or Israel but part of the battle for Europe’s identity and character. The concern over European Jewry’s departure is real and history has shown this would signal Europe’s unraveling.”
Before getting overly optimistic, it’s worth noting that according to the Israelite Community of Vienna (IKG), 1,147 antisemitic incidents were reported in Austria in 2023, 720 of which took place after the October 7 massacre. This marks a 60% increase year-on-year – but Austria’s fight against this horrifying trend is still commendable.
One of the summit’s critical efforts is promoting the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) antisemitism definition. Drafted in Budapest in 2015, it’s a non-legally binding working definition.

וולפגנג אלכסנדר סובוטקה

Wolfgang Alexander Sobotka
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
This definition, which includes expressions of hatred against Israel and its right to exist as forms of antisemitism, repeatedly resurfaces as proposed legislation in countries seeking tools to combat antisemitism.
‘There’s no single solution’
What are the main challenges faced by Jews in Europe and what solutions are being proposed? “There’s no single solution,” explained ELNET Executive Director for Germany, Austria and Switzerland Carsten Ovens. “It’s a giant puzzle. The fact we’re bringing policymakers from across Europe here to discuss their country’s challenges and ways to combat antisemitism is the summit’s greatest achievement.”
Kruger pointed to several trends: “Western European countries with colonial pasts have become very antisemitic. In these places, Israel is often called an ‘apartheid state,’ and many antisemitic incidents are tied to Israel. In Eastern Europe, it’s crucial to preserve Holocaust memory and support Jewish historical research but there are fewer Israel-related problems.
“We mainly work with mayors and parliamentarians to change institutional policies, embed strategies to fight antisemitism and we’re already seeing results. In five years, we’ve established significant connections with 400 municipalities across Europe. In the U.S., we succeeded in declaring a ‘Jewish American Heritage Month,’ and we hope to implement a similar day in Europe.”

יעל ארד, יו"ר הוועד האולימפי הישראלי

Yael Arad
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
The use of “anti-Zionism” (as hostility toward Israel is termed here) as an antisemitic weapon greatly concerns participants. It’s harder to combat pseudo-political positions without a pro-Israel consensus than antisemitism, which everyone agrees threatens democracy.
This sensitive issue greatly interests the dozens of parliament members and city representatives gathered in the wood-paneled hall in central Vienna, just a two-minute walk from the opera house — a setting seemingly far removed from the violence of antisemitic incidents.
“Identity politics, intersectionality, the woke movement and Critical Race Theory (CRT) are ideologies or social movements that, while not inherently threatening to Jews, naturally position Jews on the ‘wrong side’ of the equation. The strategic danger lies in their connection to anti-Israel and anti-Zionism,” said Brig. Gen. (res.) Sima Vaknin-Gil, former IDF chief censor and the Strategic Affairs Ministry’s director-general.
“The convergence of these elements could jeopardize the national security of both Israel and the Jewish people.” Vaknin-Gil, now on CAM’s board, directed part of the summit’s discussions.
Proposed measures against the phenomenon include naming and shaming, which works well against institutions or companies slow to respond or organize Israel-supporting audiences at sports competitions. In France, an organization called No Silence already buses fans to every Israeli team game.

קרסטן אובסט, מנכ"ל ELNET בגרמניה, אוסטריה ושווייץ

Carsten Ovens
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
Social media poses a particularly tough challenge. Without financial sanctions, it’s hard to imagine major companies changing their lax oversight policies. Recommendations include creating an independent reporting platform, fines for abusers and “network promotion awards” for supporters from the platforms.
Antisemitism on academic campuses is a critical issue. Student representatives from Germany and Austria shared stories of attacks, the price they pay confronting pro-Palestinian professors and lengthy meetings with university heads that yield little progress.
“They don’t really understand the problem and change is minimal,” said Hanna Esther Weiler, president of the German Student Union and vice president of the European Union of Jewish Students. “We’ve lost friends since October 7. Some Jewish students only attend classes, avoiding cafeterias. Some are considering finishing their degrees in Israel.”
“They ask us for data on campus antisemitism incidents like in the U.S. We don’t have such statistics. We’re asked to dialogue with people celebrating massacres,” she added.
“Recently, at a protest near the Bundestag, someone held a sign saying, ‘Free Palestine from Holocaust guilt.’ We’re exhausted. We need help to strengthen our positive identity and financial support or there won’t be a new generation of young Jewish community leaders.”

סימה וואקנין-גיל

Brig. Gen. (res.) Sima Vaknin-Gil
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)

האירוע בווינה

Event panel in Vienna
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)

ד"ר ג'ושוע קרוג

Dr. Joshua Krug
(Photo: Alissar Najjar)
Dr. Joshua Krug, a Jewish historian and theology expert who completed his degree in New York, lived in Israel and now teaches at Heidelberg University, suggested practical steps: “Be proactive, not just reactive. Ensure university presidents know what Jewish students experience, what it means for them to attend class and whether they feel safe in public campus spaces.”
“Ask what the university is doing about it. Jewish students shouldn’t be told, ‘Better not pass through here; there’s a pro-Palestinian protest.’ Does a Jew feel safe on campus wearing a Star of David? What’s the institution’s long-term strategy — not just a tactical response to the problem?”
“Do they clearly state and enforce antisemitism laws? If not, why? Are those claiming to be pro-Palestinian actually so or are they Hamas supporters? Don’t automatically give them a platform; check their exact position first.”
2024 Mayors Summit Against Antisemitism
(Video: Daniel Edelson)
Get the Ynetnews app on your smartphone: Google Play: https://bit.ly/4eJ37pE | Apple App Store: https://bit.ly/3ZL7iNv
“Jewish life has moved from the public to the private sphere,” Krug added. “Sometimes I want to stand outside with a sign saying, ‘I’m Jewish — ask me anything,’ but that’s no longer possible.”
“Ultimately, it’s up to non-Jews to fight antisemitism. CAM includes many non-Jewish participants. That’s the summit’s true importance: forging ties with politicians, mayors and university heads to implement these proposals.”
  • The author attended the CAM summit as a guest.

Happy Kwanzaa! The Holiday Brought to You by the FBI

Hopefully, Kamala Harris’ failed presidential campaign won’t dampen her fond recollection of celebrating Kwanzaa as a little girl, sitting around the Festivus pole with the whole family.

Recalling this annual event in her Kwanzaa video last year, she said her favorite Kwanzaa candle was the second one, representing the value of “I will say anything to get elected.” [Ed: Actually, it stands for “self-determination.”]

One reason Kamala was unlikely to celebrate Kwanzaa (though reasonably likely to celebrate Diwali) is that the holiday was only invented in 1966, when Kamala was 2, by Ron Karenga — and it didn’t exactly sweep the nation. Karenga, aka Dr. Maulana Karenga, was the founder of United Slaves, the violent nationalist rival to the Black Panthers. He was also an FBI stooge.

Liberals have become so mesmerized by multicultural gibberish that they have forgotten the real history of Kwanzaa and Karenga’s United Slaves.

In what was ultimately a foolish gambit, during the madness of the ’60s, the FBI encouraged the most extreme black nationalist organizations in order to discredit and split the left. The more preposterous the group, the better. (It’s the same function #BlackLivesMatter serves today.)

By that criterion, Karenga’s United Slaves was perfect.

Despite modern perceptions that blend all the Black activists of the ’60s, the Black Panthers did not hate Whites. Although some of their most high-profile leaders were drug dealers and murderers, they did not seek armed revolution.

Those were the precepts of Karenga’s United Slaves. The United Slaves were proto-fascists, walking around in dashikis, gunning down Black Panthers and adopting invented “African” names. (I will not be shooting any Black Panthers this week because I am Kwanzaa-reform, and we are not that observant.)

[Coulter flashing her mainstream conservative, anti-racist credentials:] It’s as if David Duke invented a holiday called “Anglika,” which he based on the philosophy of “Mein Kampf” — and clueless public schoolteachers began celebrating the made-up, racist holiday.

In the category of the-gentleman-doth-protest-too-much, back in the ’70s, Karenga was quick to criticize Nigerian newspapers that claimed certain American Black radicals were CIA operatives.

Now we know the truth: The FBI fueled the bloody rivalry between the Panthers and United Slaves. In the annals of the American ’60s, Karenga was the Father Gapon, stooge of the czarist police. Whether Karenga was a willing FBI dupe or just a dupe remains unclear.

In one barbarous outburst, Karenga’s United Slaves shot two Black Panthers to death on the UCLA campus, Al “Bunchy” Carter and John Huggins. Karenga himself served time, a useful stepping-stone for his current position as the chair of the Africana Studies Department at California State University at Long Beach. [We used to say hi to each other on the elevator—Africana Studies is in the same building as Psychology; friendly guy these days.]

The esteemed Cal State professor’s invented holiday is a nutty blend of schmaltzy ’60s rhetoric, Black racism and Marxism. The seven principles of Kwanzaa are identical to those of the Symbionese Liberation Army, another invention of The Worst Generation.

In 1974, Patty Hearst, kidnap victim-cum-SLA revolutionary, famously posed next to the banner of her alleged captors, a seven-headed cobra. Each snakehead stood for one of the SLA’s revolutionary principles: Umoja, Kujichagulia, Ujima, Ujamaa, Nia, Kuumba and Imani. These are the exact same seven “principles” of Kwanzaa.

When Karenga was asked to distinguish Kawaida, the philosophy underlying Kwanzaa, from “classical Marxism,” he essentially said that, under Kawaida, we also hate Whites. (And here’s something interesting: Kawaida, Kwanzaa and Kuumba are also the only three Kardashian sisters not to have their own shows on the E! network.)

While taking the “best of early Chinese and Cuban socialism” (mass murder or the seizure of private property?), Karenga said Kawaida practitioners believe one’s racial identity “determines life conditions, life chances and self-understanding.”

Or as we know it today, “Lesson plan for K-12 students.” (Except in Florida, thanks to miracle governor DeSantis.)

Kwanzaa emerged not from Africa, but from the FBI’s COINTELPRO. It is a holiday celebrated exclusively by idiot White liberals. Black Americans celebrate Christmas.

Sing to “Jingle Bells”:

Kwanzaa bells, dashikis sell

Whitey has to pay;

Burning, shooting, oh what fun

On this made-up holiday!

What a lovely day … for a Christmas eviction!

A frosty sunny morning, shortly before Christmas. We are in a remote part of Cavan, not far from the Northern Ireland border with Fermanagh. We are waiting for the agents of a foreign vulture fund to come to the cottage and try to evict Our Host. If you are going to be evicted from the modest home you raised your family in, it’s certainly much more pleasant to have a beautiful sunny day for it.

There are quite a few airplanes, some flying in formation, flying high up. They are either on their way to or from north America.

Don’t worry folks. They tried to evict him, but they failed. They might try again: they will fail again.

This visit would be the third visit by the Irish agents of a foreign bank. The first was the worst: He innocently opens his front door in response to a ring. A dozen guys with masks and East European accents push past him into his house. The leader grabs Our Host’s hand, and forces it back.

“Don’t resist.”

The leader tells him the bank is repossessing the house and takes the keys from him. Confused and intimidated, Our Host agrees to leave his house.

There is one Garda (policeman). He stays outside the house, so he does not witness the assault. His conscience is troubling him: he is sweating and trembling. He knows this is wrong, but he is too terrified of his Sergeant to do or even say anything.

The repossessed cottage stands ón four acres of land, which are NOT repossessed. So Our Host stays in his camper van there for a few days. Then he uses his spare key to get back into the house. He changes the locks, and he is in possession again.

A few weeks later, two pleasant Irish agents call to him. They express surprise that he has moved back in, but are polite and inform him they will be coming back again, this time to evict him. He lets them think that he will cooperate.

Our Host has changed his mind! At first, he was lonely and despondent, and was prepared to roll over, not struggle and allow the bank to respossess the house. Follow the path of least resistance, as they say. The bank knew the details of his personal life, and knew that he was lonely and sad. They knew there was a good chance they could hustle him out his house and he would be too depressed and fatalistic to resist in any way.

Never underestimate the power of a friendly, truthful and encouraging word. One remark can change a whole lifestyle. There’s a publican in Drumkeeran who used to be very fat. One of the lads said it to him: You’re very fat. He started walking immediately, and does 8 míle a day ever since. He’s thin as a rake and in tip top shape. Three simple words made the change.

Our Host consulted with friends and neighbours. Encouraging words and lots of contradictory advice came flooding in. A decentralised legal team, made up of some of the finest lay litigants in the country, offfered suggestions.

Our Host had never put a fence or a gate ón his land. Within a week and with a little help from his friends, there were four shiny new farm gates, all perfectly level. Also rolls of top quality barbed wire. And some cutting of hawthorn to make a living thorn barrier.

They could destroy a gate in a few minutes with an angle grinder. Twenty seconds with a snip through a barbed wire fence. But it is important as a statement: I will make if difficult for you to evict mé.

As well as gates there were signs: Elaborate declarations that there was a fine of 10,000 per minute for all trespass, that this was private property, that all implied permission was withdrawn, that CCTV was operating 24 hours and could be used in a court of law. All this was signed by Our Host in big dramatic writing. Then he nailed them to the big poplar trees lining the boreen.

The Irish agents ring Our Host. He tells them he intends to stay in the property and will contest the eviction through the courts. They are polite. About ten minutes later, they arrive at the property. They make no attempt to climb over the new gate. Our Host strolls down to the gate to talk to them. I follow thirty yards behind, with a recording device.

They start chatting with Our Host. Then they notice mé, walking towards them with a recording device.

“Oh, you have a friend with you today.” They are a little disappointed.

They are also a little bit upset that I am recording them. They politely ask that I stop recording. There is a civil discussion back and forth for a few minutes. Then Our Host signals to me to stop recording.

The conversation is civil and polite. Our Host explains the legal flaws in the repossession order. The two locksmiths listen politely and say that their role is to make a report. They tell him that the bank is keen to negotiate with him.

We part with great friendliness and even mutual handshaking. It is unusual that men in that líne of work are prepared to give their names. But these two men were brave enough to, and let us record them: The Little and Large comedy team of Steven Stacey and Ross Howell.

The bank never rang to start negotiations. Instead, a week later, we noticed a shiny big cop car parked outside the property. The cops get out. They are asked: Is there a problem?

They say they have a report of a trespass. They do not know who made the report, they were just told to go to this location. They stay carefully on their side of the gate. Our Host explains the limitations in the court order and urges them to get a copy of it themselves before acting ón nonsense reports of trespass from foreign banks.

The cops mention that they have never been to this remote location before.

Will Our Host get to stay in his house? So far so good. The cops have seemingly accepted that he is not trespassing and are aware that they must carefully consult the court order before responding to another call from the bank.

The Top Cop could, of course, just send in a squad of twenty riot cops next week, all with copies of the court order. Any attempt to talk to them would be met with a reference to the court order. They could smash the gate down and smash the door down too and arrest everyone for criminal trespass.

They could find twenty cops nasty enough to do this job, but they would probably have to look for guys who lived a long way away.

A pragmatic decision would be to be to negotiate with our host and get regular payments ón the outstanding mortgage.

Your prayers to your God are appreciated to encourage the bank to make this pragmatic decision. If you don’t believe in God, why not try out the telepathic part of your brain to send good vibrations?

Or you could directly contact the financial masterminds of this attempted eviction. At www.crowe.com. (info@crowe.ie) Or ring them ón + 353 1 4482200. Or drop into their office at 40 Mespil Rd, Dublin 4, near the canal. They have some kind of affiliate in New York also. Be polite and articulate. “I hear you are hiring foreigners to evict little old ethnic Irishmen from their homes up near Dowra. Is that true? Would you consider negotiating with the the guy so he can make payments on the mortgage? I look forward to prompt reply.”

Beir Bua! Nollaig Shona daoibh go leir! [Win! Merry Christmas to you all.]

Dugin: Greater Israel and the Conquering Messiah

From Arktos

A profound shift in the global perception of Israel — and perhaps of the
Jewish people as a whole — is underway. After the catastrophe European
Jews endured under Hitler during World War Two, they evoked widespread
pity, compassion, and sincere sympathy on a global scale. This moral
capital facilitated the establishment of the State of Israel. The
Holocaust, or Shoah — signifying the horrors and persecutions suffered
by Jews — served as the foundation for the universal consensus: after
such suffering, the Jewish people unquestionably deserved their own
state. This sacred status of the Holocaust became a cornerstone of
Jewish identity and moral capital.

The philosophers of the Frankfurt School proclaimed: henceforth, one
must think “from Auschwitz.” This meant that philosophy, politics, and
morality were to take into account the scale of crimes committed by
Europeans (primarily Germans) against Jews. Western civilization and
humanity at large were now called upon to repent.

This framework rested on the image of Jews as victims, elevating them to
the status of a sacral people. Others were urged to repent and never
forget their guilt. Any hint of anti-Semitism, let alone attempts to
revise the sacral status of Jews or the metaphysics of the Holocaust,
was met with legal repercussions.

However, Israel’s increasingly hardline policies toward Palestinians and
neighboring Muslim populations gradually eroded this image — at least in
the eyes of Middle Eastern peoples, who, it must be noted, bore no
responsibility for the crimes of European Nazis. On the contrary, the
Zionists’ dismissive attitude toward the local population provoked
direct protests and, eventually, the anti-Zionist Intifada.

The self-perception of Israelis and Jews in the diaspora also began to
change. A growing tendency emerged to display strength, power, and the
ambition to create a “Greater Israel.” Concurrently, messianic motifs
intensified: the anticipation of the imminent arrival of the Messiah
(Moshiach), plans to rebuild the Third Temple (which would entail
demolishing the Muslim holy site, the Al-Aqsa Mosque), the expansion of
Israel’s territories “from sea to sea,” and the final resolution of the
Palestinian question (even including calls for deportation and genocide
of Palestinians). These ideas found support among figures like Benjamin
Netanyahu and ministers such as Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.
They were openly articulated in works like The King’s Torah by Yitzhak
Shapira, and in the sermons of rabbis such as Kook, Meir Kahane, and Dov
Lior. Strategically, they were outlined as early as the 1980s in an
article by Ariel Sharon’s advisor, General Oded Yinon. Yinon’s plan
proposed the overthrow of all established Arab regimes with nationalist
Baathist ideologies, plunging the Arab world into bloody chaos, and
establishing Greater Israel.

Following a decade of the Arab Spring and particularly after Hamas’
terrorist attack on Israel in October 2023, these plans appear to be
materializing at an accelerated pace.

Netanyahu leveled Gaza, mercilessly killing hundreds of thousands of
civilians. This was followed by an attack on Lebanon and the elimination
of Hezbollah’s leadership. Next came exchanges of missile strikes with
Iran and active preparations for war, including attacks on Iranian
nuclear facilities. Subsequently, there was an invasion of the remaining
Golan Heights and strikes on Syria. A month prior, Bezalel Smotrich
declared that Damascus would become part of Israel, and Ben-Gvir hinted
openly at the demolition of Al-Aqsa. With the fall of Bashar al-Assad,
the last Baathist regime crumbled, plunging the Arab world into chaos.

Greater Israel and the extermination of Palestinians are becoming a
reality before our eyes.

Here is what is critical: the policies of right-wing Zionists are
effectively turning the page on the Holocaust. The moral capital of
victimhood has been entirely expended. Israel used it to fuel its rise
to power — its current formidable and ruthless stature, akin to the Old
Testament grandeur. Jews are no longer pitied; instead, they are either
feared, hated, resented, or admired — but, in any case, acknowledged as
a formidable and ruthless force.

Jewish identity has transformed.

No longer a symbol of humiliation and suffering, Jews are now seen as an
exemplar of dominance and triumphant victory.

Thinking “from Auschwitz” is no longer necessary. Now, one must think
“from Gaza.”

Jewish tradition contains prophecies of two Messiahs: the suffering one
(Messiah ben Yosef) and the triumphant one (Messiah ben David). After
the European Holocaust, the suffering Messiah, sacrificed as a victim,
was emphasized. Now, this foundational gestalt is shifting, and the
triumphant, attacking, and victorious Messiah is taking center stage.

This shift is most pronounced in Israel itself. But it is clearly not
confined to Israel alone. The messianic archetype is changing among Jews
worldwide.

In this context, Donald Trump — a staunch supporter of right-wing
Zionism and a close ally of Netanyahu — comes to power in the United
States. Much of his administration consists of Christian Zionists who
are prepared to provide unwavering support to Israel. Once again, the
capital of compassion has been converted into the capital of aggression.

This is extremely significant — and will only grow more so.

However, one must refrain from hasty conclusions, reactions, and
judgments. The first task is to comprehend this state of affairs, to
weave countless facts, events, and occurrences into a coherent and
non-contradictory narrative.

(Translated from the Russian)

JTA: JD Vance and Musk endorse the AfD. Germany must import more non-Germans

The Foundation for Defense of Democracies is a government-funded neocon think tank. They are rabidly pro-Israel and anti-Russia, and they are very worried about the Trump-Vance administration because of their expressed tendency to oppose war. But of course, as an essentially Jewish entity, they also love non-White immigration. Hence the conflict with Vance. The new DOGE headed by Musk and Ramaswamy should eliminate any government support for the FDD.

JD Vance appears to defend Germany’s far-right AfD party

Vance seemed to back the flagship policy of a party that has unsettled Germany’s Jews.

WASHINGTON — Vice President-elect J.D. Vance joined Elon Musk in appearing to defend the policies of the far-right Alternative for Germany party, and also seemed to take aim at a pro-Israel Washington think tank whose staffer had criticized the party.

Vance was responding to a post on X on Friday by Ivana Stradner, a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies whose specialties include Russia and Ukraine. She said that Musk’s praise of Alternative for Germany, known as AfD, was “SO dangerous” both for Europe and the United States.

Vance responded sarcastically, implying an endorsement one of AfD’s core policies — stricter limits on immigration.

“It’s so dangerous for people to control their borders. So so dangerous. The dangerous level is off the charts,” Vance tweeted on Saturday. “I wonder how much money this person’s employer gets from the American taxpayer?”

AfD, which is known for its anti-immigrant and anti-European Union stances, and whose popularity has been on the rise in Germany, has unsettled the country’s Jews. Some of its members have downplayed the Holocaust.

On Friday Musk, one of the world’s richest people and an influential adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, set off a torrent of concerned comment on Friday when he said on X, which he owns, that “Only the AfD can save Germany.” Musk, who is poised to take a role in Trump’s White House, doubled down on Saturday, tweeting “AfD is the only hope for Germany.”

In addition to working at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Stradner is also a correspondent for KyivPost, which covers Ukraine. While neither organization receives U.S. government funding — though FDD, a nonprofit, gets certain tax benefits — Vance’s jibe at Stradner’s “employer” could rattle Jewish and pro-Israel foreign policy mavens who otherwise have welcomed Trump’s impending return to the White House.

FDD favors a more confrontational posture toward Iran, Russia’s ally in the Middle East. It is independent and nonpartisan, but its leaders have made clear they believe Trump will be more robust than Biden in dealing with Iran in the region.

FDD and the Trump-Vance transition team did not return requests for comment.

Rep. Daniel Goldman, a New York Democrat who is Jewish, took aim at Vance for boosting the party on the weekend of a deadly car-ramming attack on a German Christmas market. The alleged attacker, a Saudi national, posted a range of sentiments online, including some that reportedly backed AfD.

“Yesterday, a right-wing terrorist murdered 5 people in Germany and @JDVance and @elonmusk are endorsing the Neo-Nazi AfD party that inspired him,” Goldman said. “You know what’s dangerous @JDVance? The antisemitism and Neo-Nazi ideology you’re supporting.”

Trump’s selection of Vance as running mate unsettled some in the conservative Jewish foreign policy community because of his isolationist bent. Vance has opposed continued U.S. backing for Ukraine in its efforts to repel the Russian invasion. He has said that Israel is an exception to his desire to pull America back from its involvement in foreign conflicts.

It’s not clear yet what Trump’s Ukraine plans are, other than a desire to quickly broker a peace.