Christopher Donovan: By Our Comments Ye Shall Know White Resistance

The media is as anti-White as ever these days.  I’ve dedicated hours of my life to showing how, on this blog and elsewhere.

But the comments — the Internet postings of the everday nobodies in reaction to stories and blog items — are heartening.

The trend is definitely “pro-White.”

Take the New York Times — whose pro-White comment-censoring I’ve blogged about before.  Here’s a recent item about President Obama’s Black journalists-only off-the-record meeting.

Then check out the comments, starting with No. 1 (“Did Bush have summits reserved for white journalists and bloggers?”).

Here’s a run-of-the-mill crime story out of Pennsylvania.

One commenter says:

EXACTLY!!!! This is just down right shameful on the part of Harrisburg leaders and the Patriot news! If this is a group of white kids that beat up a black couple the feds would be involved. But hey, whitey deserves it…right.

And then people here and in the real world wonder why it’s easy for people to become racist. Gee, I couldn’t imagine why.

There are more like it. Whites are getting restless.  And with the interactivity of the Internet, it’s getting harder and harder for anti-white — often Jewish — media to keep them out.

I am confident that the MSM will remain as brittle as ever in its resistance to whites.  Good.  Let it break.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

24 Comments to "Christopher Donovan: By Our Comments Ye Shall Know White Resistance"

  1. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 14, 2010 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    I entirely agree. The more the media elite disparage the Tea Party Movement, simply because they are predominantly white, the more whites will wake up to the reality around them. I just wonder if it will be in time?

  2. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    October 14, 2010 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    Let it break soon and utterly, never to recover.

  3. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    October 14, 2010 - 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Rupert Murdoch honored by the ADL

    More proof Fox News has a Zionist agenda.

    “I can’t say I have been chosen by God. But tonight I can say this: I am honored to be chosen by His people for this award.”

    ——————

    Speech by K. Rupert Murdoch
    To the Anti-Defamation League
    ADL International Leadership Award Dinner
    New York, New York, October 13, 2010

    Thank you, Abe, for those kind words. And thank you for this award.

    I can’t say I have been chosen by God. But tonight I can say this: I am honored to be chosen by His people for this award.

    I am especially proud that this award bears the name of the ADL. You were founded in 1913 in response to something we cannot imagine in America today: the lynching of an innocent Jew.

    In the century since then, you have fought anti-Semitism wherever you have found it. You have championed equal treatment for all races and creeds. And you have held America to her founding promise.

    So successful have you been, a few years ago some people were beginning to say, “maybe we don’t need an ADL anymore.”

    That is a much harder argument to make these days.

    Now, there’s not a single person in this room who needs a lecture on the evil of anti-Semitism. My own perspective is simple: We live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews.

    For the first decades after Israel’s founding, this war was conventional in nature. The goal was straightforward: to use military force to overrun Israel. Well before the Berlin Wall came down, that approach had clearly failed.

    Then came phase two: terrorism.

    Terrorists targeted Israelis both home and abroad – from the massacre of Israeli athletes at Munich to the second intifada.

    The terrorists continue to target Jews across the world. But they have not succeeded in bringing down the Israeli government – and they have not weakened Israeli resolve.

    Now the war has entered a new phase. This is the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it. The battleground is everywhere: the media … multinational organizations … NGOs.

    In this war, the aim is to make Israel a pariah.

    The result is the curious situation we have today: Israel becomes increasingly ostracized, while Iran – a nation that has made no secret of wishing Israel’s destruction – pursues nuclear weapons loudly, proudly, and without apparent fear of rebuke.

    For me, this ongoing war is a fairly obvious fact of life.

    Every day, the citizens of the Jewish homeland defend themselves against armies of terrorists whose maps spell out the goal they have in mind: a Middle East without Israel.

    In Europe, Jewish populations increasingly find themselves targeted by people who share that goal.

    And in the United States, I fear that our foreign policy only emboldens these extremists.

    Tonight I’d like to speak about two things that worry me most.

    First is the disturbing new home that anti-Semitism has found in polite society – especially in Europe.

    Second is how violence and extremism are encouraged when the world sees Israel’s greatest ally distancing herself from the Jewish state.

    Now, when Americans think of anti-Semitism, we tend to think of the vulgar caricatures and attacks of the first part of the 20th century.

    Now it seems that the most virulent strains come from the left. Often this new anti-Semitism dresses itself up as legitimate disagreement with Israel.

    Back in 2002 the president of Harvard, Lawrence Summers, put it this way:

    “Where anti-Semitism and views that are profoundly anti-Israeli have traditionally been the primary preserve of poorly educated right-wing populists, profoundly anti-Israel views are increasingly finding support in progressive intellectual communities. Serious and thoughtful people are advocating and taking actions that are anti-Semitic in their effect if not their intent.”

    Mr. Summers was speaking mostly about our university campuses. Like me, however, he was also struck by alarming developments in Europe.

    Far from being dismissed out of hand, anti-Semitism today enjoys support at both the highest and lowest reaches of European society – from its most elite politicians to its largely Muslim ghettoes. European Jews find themselves caught in this pincer.

    We saw a recent outbreak when a European Commissioner trade minister declared that peace in the Middle East is impossible because of the Jewish lobby in America. Here’s how he put it:

    “There is indeed a belief—it’s difficult to describe it otherwise—among most Jews that they are right. And it’s not so much whether these are religious Jews or not. Lay Jews also share the same belief that they are right. So it is not easy to have, even with moderate Jews, a rational discussion about what is actually happening in the Middle East.”

    This minister did not suggest the problem was any specific Israeli policy. The problem, as he defined it, is the nature of the Jews.

    Adding to the absurdity, this man then responded to his critics this way: Anti-Semitism, he asserted, “has no place in today’s world and is fundamentally against our European values.”

    Of course, he has kept his job.

    Unfortunately, we see examples like this one all across Europe.

    Sweden, for example, has long been a synonym for liberal tolerance. Yet in one of Sweden’s largest cities, Jews report increasing examples of harassment. When an Israeli tennis team visited for a competition, it was greeted with riots.

    So how did the mayor respond? By equating Zionism with anti-Semitism – and suggesting that Swedish Jews would be safer in his town if they distanced themselves from Israeli actions in Gaza.

    You don’t have to look far for other danger signs:

    • The Norwegian government forbids a Norwegian-based, German shipbuilder from using its waters to test a submarine being built for the Israeli navy.

    • Britain and Spain are boycotting an OECD tourism meeting in Jerusalem.

    • In the Netherlands, police report a 50% increase in the number of anti-Semitic incidents.

    Maybe we shouldn’t be surprised by these things. According to one infamous European poll a few years back, Europeans listed Israel ahead of Iran and North Korea as the greatest threat to world peace.

    In Europe today, many of the most egregious attacks on Jewish people, Jewish symbols, and Jewish houses of worship have come from the Muslim population.

    Unfortunately, far from making clear that such behavior will not be tolerated, too often the official response is what we’ve seen from the Swedish mayor – who suggested Jews and Israel were partly to blame themselves.

    When Europe’s political leaders do not stand up to the thugs, they lend credence to the idea that Israel is the source of all the world’s problems – and they guarantee more ugliness.

    If that is not anti-Semitism, I don’t know what is.

    That brings me to my second point: the importance of good relations between Israel and the United States.

    Some believe that if America wants to gain credibility in the Muslim world and advance the cause of peace, Washington needs to put some distance between itself and Israel.

    My view is the opposite.

    Far from making peace more possible, we are making hostilities more certain.

    Far from making things better for the Palestinian people, sour relations between the United States and Israel guarantees that ordinary Palestinians will continue to suffer.

    The peace we all want will come when Israel feels secure – not when Washington feels distant.

    Right now we have war.

    There are many people waging this war. Some blow up cafes. Some fire rockets into civilian areas. Some are pursuing nuclear arms. Some are fighting the soft war, through international boycotts and resolutions condemning Israel.

    All these people are watching the U.S.-Israeli relationship closely.

    In this regard, I was pleased to hear the State Department’s spokesman clarify America’s position yesterday. He said that the United States recognizes “the special nature of the Israeli state. It is a state for the Jewish people.”

    This is an important message to send to the Middle East. When people see, for example, a Jewish prime minister treated badly by an American president, they see a more isolated Jewish state. That only encourages those who favor the gun over those who favor negotiation.

    Ladies and gentlemen, back in 1937, a man named Vladimir Jabotinsky [Jab-o-tin-ski] urged Britain to open up an escape route for Jews fleeing Europe.

    Only a Jewish homeland, he said, could protect European Jews from the coming calamity.

    In prophetic words, he described the problem this way:

    “It is not the anti-Semitism of men,” he said. “It is, above all, the anti-Semitism of things, the inherent xenophobia of the body social or the body economic under which we suffer.”

    The world of 2010 is not the world of the 1930s. The threats Jews face today are different.

    But these threats are real.

    These threats are soaked in an ugly language familiar to anyone old enough to remember World War II.

    And these threats cannot be addressed until we see them for what they are: part of an ongoing war against the Jews.

    Thank you for listening. Thank you for this award. And thank you for all you do.

    http://www.adl.org/main_International_Affairs/Murdoch_Soft_War_Israel.htm

  4. Der weiße Engel's Gravatar Der weiße Engel
    October 14, 2010 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    From the comment cited in the article: “EXACTLY!!!! This is just down right shameful on the part of Harrisburg leaders and the Patriot news! If this is a group of white kids that beat up a black couple the feds would be involved. But hey, whitey deserves it…right.

    And then people here and in the real world wonder why it’s easy for people to become racist. Gee, I couldn’t imagine why.”

    The problem here is that comments like these are just a backhanded slap at racism. That’s usually the case with nine-tenths or more of these so-called racist objections in the comments sections. They try to be more Catholic than the Pope; more anti-racist than the anti-racists themselves. It’s clear that Whites like these don’t think they are superior to negroes in any way, nor do they even want to be superior to negroes. No, not at all. Quite to the contrary, they find the very idea of any kind of racial superiority horrifying and Hitlerian. They’ve swallowed racial equality propaganda hook, line, and sinker, and now ASPIRE to equal treatment. They’re fully on board with the system’s attempt to eliminate racial disparities, and are really complaining that it’s not doing so fast enough.

  5. Vapidly Foolish's Gravatar Vapidly Foolish
    October 14, 2010 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    Anti White hatred is the most powerful force in the universe.

    Abolition, emancipation, 13, 14, 15 Amendments, Reconstruction I, Integration, Civil Rights, Reconstruction II, Affirmative Action, Diversity, Multiculturalism, Inclusive Tolerance, Radical Hospitality, etc., all were done TO White Americans, not By us through our consent.

    The Internet is powerful, but not as powerful as the hatred of those who have gained so much from holding tyranny over us. Now that they are seeing Whites rise up on the Internet and threaten their rule of conventional wisdom, don’t you know that they will attack the Internet as a vehicle of extremist and virulent hate speech?

    They will not allow the Whites to have an unsupervised voice. We are living in the last days of the free Internet. If you see something good, save it to your hard drive, because next time you go back, Obama’s ADL may have had it scrubbed.

    This free speech thing will be declared incompatible with global democracy, and it will be as gone as segregation is.

  6. October 14, 2010 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    See the comments to Irwin Stelzer’s How to make immigration work in Britain’s interests – Telegraph (via Inevitablism on a roll at majorityrights.com).

    Many of the comments there are more substantial than the anti-racist variety Der weiße Engel refers to. Anyway, I’m encouraged even by weak comments that reflect defiance.

    Whites usually play dumb when it comes to admitting there are racial double standards, but they all know damn well what those standards are. They know what lines they can’t cross on a public forum without risking a ban from bolshevist moderators. Many are only beginning to realize what’s going on, and they’re trying to stick to concepts they think are within acceptable bounds. When they get slapped down anyway it only helps them realize that concern for White interests is always out of bounds. Then they either stop bothering with comments, or they get more determined, go back, and try to guide others beyond the bounds from inside. Bless their hearts, each and every one.

  7. BMadoff's Gravatar BMadoff
    October 15, 2010 - 3:14 am | Permalink

    “And with the interactivity of the Internet, it’s getting harder and harder for anti-white — often Jewish — media to keep them out.”

    While this is true and is the main reason for the rise in white advocacy, don’t forget that the internet is overwhelmingly in Jewish hands: Google and Facebook are just the most obvious firms. And by coincidence they are the firms most involved in collecting data about you to feed to their Jewish advertising friends. When you use a smartphone a complete profile on you is being fed to advertisers without your knowledge and explicit consent. Using a combination of propaganda stoking people fears of terrorism and privacy-invading software the whole concept of

    So yes, by all means post comments, but take reasonable steps to protect your privacy while doing so. Use anonymity software such as TOR (eff.tor.org) to hide your IP address. Disable Javascript to frustrate attempts to fingerprint your browser (see Panopticlick for details). And protect your computer using encryption software such as Truecrypt (truecrypt.org) which implements the concept of plausible deniability.

    The Jews are not going to stand idly by when they have the means to identify their enemies and the elite power to crush them.

  8. BMadoff's Gravatar BMadoff
    October 15, 2010 - 3:15 am | Permalink

    That should read “Using a combination of propaganda stoking people fears of terrorism and privacy-invading software the whole concept of personal privacy is being eroded”

  9. Kratos's Gravatar Kratos
    October 15, 2010 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    Could it be because now USA has a black president, everybody can make claim to not being prejudicial against black people?

    I am not an optimist, but I think it is a mass-scale “I have a black president” syndrome which is allowing people to be at ease with addressing racial issues.

  10. Bon, From the Land of Babble's Gravatar Bon, From the Land of Babble
    October 15, 2010 - 9:07 am | Permalink

    If Obama’s handlers are elected to a 2nd term in 2012, as I believe they will be, expect an all-out War on the Internet.

    Obama will be dragged to the center– as Clinton was in 1996– for the 2012 election, count on it, and run as a ‘healer’ and ‘centrist.’ This strategy worked for Clinton’s gang and it will work for Obama’s as well.

    A lot of American voters, unfortunately, are not very bright, have short term memories, and believe whatever the msm tell them. This will escalate as demographics change–it’s already started in California.

    Believe me, I hope I’m wrong–I think the recent violence in France and Greece is the tip of the iceberg and will spread far and wide as economies collapse and there is a Global Meltdown. It will spread here, starting in California.

    Either way, I expect an escalating War on Freedom of Speech, and the Internet will be The Prime Target–as George Wallace said ‘There isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the Republicans and Democrats’

    I work for a large, urban school district and when I returned in September, I noticed that the district’s T-2 line is now heavily censored–including this site–I’m finding more and more sites each day that I cannot access, including what I consider to be banal news sites, as it violates the district’s policies.

    Where do you think they received the list as to which ‘Hate Sites’ to block? The ADL? SPLC? I’ve been warned by an administrator that all e mail is being scanned and to ‘cease and desist’ at once from using any e mail ports affiliated with the school district.

    And to BMadoff: Thanks for the references, I will check them out.

    This is also very good: http://tinyurl.com/b4666 to use a proxy server and to hide e mail.

    Bon

  11. October 15, 2010 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    Tor is not to be trusted. Who do you think runs the portals that Tor uses to redirect your posts? Guess who is sniffing each packet? Fools, there is NO security. You just have to be a man.

  12. Doug's Gravatar Doug
    October 15, 2010 - 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Sounds like Abe Foxman not only gave the award but also wrote Murdoch’s acceptance speech.

    And BTW Shiva, I agree with you. We have to defend ourselves head-on.

  13. Smoke and Mirrors's Gravatar Smoke and Mirrors
    October 15, 2010 - 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Murdoch’s speech is same speech each ADL honoree gives, with very minor changes. However, that speech isn’t so much for the jews as it is for us. Meaning whites. More roundabout jewish propaganda. Because of course if someone like Murdoch is saying what he does, it must be true. And you don’t want to look or sound like an idiot disagreeing with this guy, do you? Simplifying it, but that’s what the tribe is up to with these awards and speeches. The only “god” Abe Foxman believes in is himself. Well, not quite. He also worships money. And he’s discovered he can make a lot of money for god, and satisfy his inborn, innate jealousy and hatred of the white race, by pursuing, promoting the most racist, anti-white agendas imaginable. He and his cohorts are monsters. Pawns like Murdoch know which side their bagel is buttered on. Although I have heard the rumor many times that Murdoch’s mother is in fact jewish.

  14. TFT's Gravatar TFT
    October 15, 2010 - 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Doug and Shiva, yes, we have to be men and fight head-on, however, you do not understand how Tor works. You have to be careful using it, but you need to actually sit down and research it, learn how it operates. The tribe is actually trying to have it brought down, have the software rendered useless or obsolete. They used the excuse of ‘child porn’ a few years ago to grab some (Tor) servers in Germany. It didn’t do them any good.

  15. Denise's Gravatar Denise
    October 15, 2010 - 10:24 pm | Permalink

    Shiva and Doug – exactly. Head on.

    FYI – Murdoch’s a Jew. Mommy was one Elizabeth Greene. Aussie Jewess. If the hatchling slides out of a Kosher chute – it’s a Jew. Them’s the rules.

  16. BMadoff's Gravatar BMadoff
    October 16, 2010 - 6:09 am | Permalink

    @Shiva and Doug

    Don’t be ridiculous. If it was that easy to crack Tor nobody would use it.

    Anyone can run a Tor portal, you, me, the neighbour’s cat. A couple of clicks and you are a Tor portal. As for sniffing, all links except those from the exit portal to the destination site are multiply encrypted, so sniffing isn’t not possible.

    Do your research and quit with the paranoid nonsense.

  17. Spooky's Gravatar Spooky
    October 17, 2010 - 10:12 am | Permalink

    If they come after you for speech it’s time to get it going anyway. Getting a knock at the door for posting on a website is pretty much the last canary in the coalmine. And remember how they burned in the camps.

  18. October 17, 2010 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    @ Spooky
    Canada leads the way
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomasz_Winnicki

  19. Dan's Gravatar Dan
    October 18, 2010 - 1:30 am | Permalink

    Denise, Dame Elizabeth Murdoch (nee Elizabeth Joy Greene) is still among the living, at age 101! Whether she is of Jewish extraction is very murky, as far as I have seen– although, if she were, it would certainly explain an awful lot about her only son!?! Biographies of Rupert (who goes by his middle name– after his maternal grandfather, Rupert Greene– rather than his and his own father’s given name, Keith) claim that Dame Elizabeth’s grandfather was an Irish railway engineer named William Henry Greene who emigrated to Australia. The curious thing about that published claim, however, is that there is a genealogy available on line from a London-based genealogist [http://www.wargs.com/other/murdoch.html], and he was apparently unable to trace Rupert Greene’s ancestry at all!?!

  20. Winkelsteinenberg's Gravatar Winkelsteinenberg
    October 18, 2010 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

    “If they come after you for speech it’s time to get it going anyway. Getting a knock at the door for posting on a website is pretty much the last canary in the coalmine.”

    A totalitarian state is not worth living in. One might tell victims of speech “laws”: get those K points up and then take a good number of the bastards down with you.

    If the First Amendment isn’t worth killing for, then why did we fight all those wars? (I know, I know.)

    Not time to start shooting. But we’re close. At present, everyone is waiting to see if the “economy” “recovers” so they can get a stay of execution, of sorts. But when it becomes clear the economy is ruined and it was Jews who ruined it, beware.

    The best bet of Jews in America is to leave the country. But they won’t; many in Germany in the 1930s didn’t. And certainly none did in, say, 1925. They never learn, and history always repeats itself.

  21. October 18, 2010 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Enough about Murdoch’s “ancestry”: “If it walks like a duck….”, etc. And, at least until Civil War II begins, I don’t expect the ZOG to move against the internet: way too much of (what’s left of) the economy is on the net; taking it down would immediately bring about what Zion fears the most.

  22. October 19, 2010 - 8:36 pm | Permalink

    “At present, everyone is waiting to see if the “economy” “recovers” so they can get a stay of execution, of sorts. But when it becomes clear the economy is ruined and it was Jews who ruined it, beware.

    The best bet of Jews in America is to leave the country. But they won’t”

    It’s shocking for us to be the victim of such an enormous swindle as the recent banksters bailout. But, yet, Americans are longsuffering.

    What truly drives Whites to vengeful fury, the thing that will finally cause the Jews’ most recent entry in their long, lachrymose lamentations about being “irrationally scapegoated” and unceremoniously ejected, run off, chased out at point of pitchfork, tossed out on their colossal schnozzles, in short, pogrommed on yet AGAIN, is their snark, their snotty attitude, their g-d, incessant MOCKING of us.

  23. October 20, 2010 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Amen. Every White man and woman should connect with at least two others and get on the same page. Especially now while there is so much freely available to find out on the net. I do see people getting out of their trance and seeing how we’ve been bamboozled by these people.

  24. Clytemnestra's Gravatar Clytemnestra
    October 31, 2010 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    Internet Freedom is the least of OJ’s problems. The American economy is coming off the track a whole lot faster than anyone anticipated … no doubt aggravated by this administration’s hardcore Marxist programs. I think his handlers underestimated how much of a true believer fellow traveler, Barak Obama is. The economy should have been his first priority; hammering Whites later. Whites tend to be complacent where anti-White legislation is concerned as long as they can pay their bills.

    In any case, America’s economic collapse could come much faster than the ETA of 2030. That’s probably why BiBi Netanyahu is accelerating the building of settlements … to house the expected Jewish immigration from America. So, I am thinking any one who can leave will in the next year or two.

    That will leave the shabbos goy twisting in the wind when TSHTF.

1 Trackback to "Christopher Donovan: By Our Comments Ye Shall Know White Resistance"

  1. on October 14, 2010 at 10:17 am

Comments are closed.