Fifteen Years for Reading This: Authoritarianism, Immigration and Obeying the Tribe

Amber Rudd

Amber Rudd. It sounds like the name of a fish, a variety of apple or a herbal medicine. In fact, it’s the name of a shabbosshiksa, that is, a non-Jewish female who, like Hillary Clinton and Theresa May, is dedicated to serving Jewish interests. Here is the shabbos-shiksa in action:

Amber Rudd: viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail

People who repeatedly view terrorist content online could face up to 15 years behind bars in a move designed to tighten the laws tackling radicalisation the home secretary, Amber Rudd, is to announce on Tuesday. A new maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment will also apply to terrorists who publish information about members of the armed forces, police and intelligence services for the purposes of preparing acts of terrorism.

The tightening of the law around viewing terrorist material is part of a review of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy following the increasing frequency of terrorist attacks in Britain this year “I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, far-right propaganda and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,” said Rudd. (Amber Rudd: viewers of online terrorist material face 15 years in jail, The Guardian, 3rd October 2017)

Amber Rudd promises crackdown on antisemitism and online extremism

Amber Rudd has outlined her intention to clamp down on violent and non-violent extremism, including antisemitism and neo-Nazism. The Home Secretary also told the Conservative Party conference in Manchester that social media companies must “act now, honour your moral obligations” to use new technology to stop radical material appearing on their platforms.

Ms Rudd said: “Violent and non-violent extremism in all its forms — antisemitism, neo-Nazism, Islamophobia, intolerance of women’s rights — these, and others, cannot be permitted to fester. Our values are far, far better than this. And we owe it to ourselves to root this hatred out wherever it emerges. The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one.” (Amber Rudd promises crackdown on antisemitism and online extremism, The Jewish Chronicle, 3rd October 2017 / 13th Tishri 5778)

If Amber Rudd is so concerned about building a “safer Britain,” why does she permit mass immigration from the Third World? For the past fifty years and more, Britain’s liberal elite has imported non-Whites with high tendencies to crime and low tendencies to civilization. The results have included suicide bombing, rape-gangs, honour killings, female genital mutilation, inbreeding and exotic diseases. In truth, Amber Rudd doesn’t want a safer Britain: she wants a more authoritarian Britain. She’s a shabbos-shiksa, after all. She follows a Jewish strategy of importing non-White pathologies in order to justify laws against “extremism.”

Realism is extremism

You’re reading “extremism” right now. The Occidental Observer is an “extremist” website. In other words, it is a realistic website: it details in calm, rational and thoroughly sourced fashion the numerous ways in which, to paraphrase the late great Father Feeney, “the Jewish race constitutes a united anti-White bloc within White society, and is working for the overthrow of that society by every means at its disposal.” I don’t think that, at the moment, anyone would receive “15 years’ imprisonment” for reading the Occidental Observer, but Amber Rudd and her controllers certainly want to frighten people away from politically heterodox sites. And jail time for reading an article like this is certainly what Jewish activists like Moshe Kantor and Jeremy Newmark would like to see. They don’t want any discussion of Jewish power, because power that can’t be discussed is also power that can’t be challenged.

Shabbos-shiksa Theresa May

Free speech isn’t a Jewish value. Censorship, on the other hand, is definitely a Jewish value. So is self-worship. That’s why the Jewish community never tires of sycophancy from the politicians whom it funds and supplies with friendly coverage in the media. Here is the shabbos-shiksa Theresa May doing the goy-grovel:

‘Jewish values will prevail,’ Theresa May tells Rosh Hashanah reception

Theresa May welcomed dozens of Jewish community leaders, volunteers and religious figures to Downing Street today for what was thought to be the first ever Rosh Hashanah reception held at Number 10. The Prime Minister said she wanted to thank British Jews, and show her “personal support and appreciation for everything that you contribute to our country”.

She told guests: “Here today, we have people from all parts of our Jewish community and all parts of our society — from business to the arts, from politics to our public services. We also have some of our country’s greatest philanthropists, leading charities and some of our most outstanding volunteers.” …

Ahead of next week’s announcement on the winning design for the national memorial to the Holocaust, Mrs May said: “Whichever design team is chosen, this national memorial and educational centre will stand next to our Parliament as a permanent reminder of what can happen when a civilised, democratic society allows hatred to go unchecked. It will say to the world: we will never forget. And it will bring our country together in a national mission to fight hatred for generations to come.”

She urged British Jews to mark Rosh Hashanah with “confidence that together we will keep Jewish people in our country safe and defeat the scourge of antisemitism. And confidence that it is the values that we share — Jewish values, British values — that will in the end prevail. Let me wish you and all your families a sweet New Year.” … (‘Jewish values will prevail,’ Theresa May tells Rosh Hashanah reception, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th September 2017 / 22nd Elul 5777)

I have long suspected that Theresa May has Jewish ancestry. Either way, that article reads like something issued by the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is full of double-think and contradictions. When May grovelled about Jews being some of “our country’s greatest philanthropists,” she was using the term “philanthropist” in a special sense. To her audience of “Jewish community leaders, volunteers and religious figures,” philanthropy means “helping Jews.” As a Jewish commentator on the Talmud says: “… helping a single individual is equivalent to sustaining an entire world. (This is one of the best-known passages in the Talmud, though it is often universalized to refer to ‘a human soul,’ rather than nefesh echat mi’Yisrael, ‘a single soul from Israel.’)”

Don’t wait for hate

May also claimed that Jewish values are British values. If that were true, Israel would have open borders and Jewish politicians would make grovelling speeches to Christians, smarmily insisting that “Christian values are Israeli values.” But Israel has sealed borders and politicians like Benjamin Netanyahu do not grovel to Christians or any other goyim. Instead, they keep goyim firmly in second place. Jewish values are unashamedly supremacist and designed to preserve and extend Jewish power. And just as May’s use of “philanthropist” has a special Jewish sense, so does her use of “hatred.” It doesn’t mean expressing hatred towards Jews, but expressing views that Jews hate.

Jewish values: Rejecting enrichment

That’s why the high-flying Irish journalist Kevin Myers lost his job for pointing out, first, that the two highest-paid women at the BBC were both Jewish and, second, that “Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price.” Myers is a dedicated philosemite and his comments were entirely factual, but that made no difference. He had drawn attention to Jewish power and broken a strict taboo. Mark Gardner, the “communications director” at the Community Security Trust, gloated that “Myers’s squalid example of blatant antisemitic language was swiftly dealt with.”

The “Jewy perviness of Harvey Weinstein”

With Myers and many other victims of the Jewish Inquisition in mind, no mainstream goy would now dare to draw heretical conclusions from the Harvey Weinstein scandal now in the headlines. Weinstein’s abusive behaviour is yet another example of how minority dominance is bad for the White majority — recall how minorities in the Soviet Union tyrannized and slaughtered Russian and Ukrainian Whites. But only a Jewish journalist could have written about “The Specifically Jewy Perviness of Harvey Weinstein” and claimed that the “disgraced film producer is a character straight out of Philip Roth, playing out his revenge fantasies on the Goyim.”

It goes without saying that nearly every one of these women—Rose McGowan, Ambra Batillana, Laura Madden, Ashley Judd, etc.—was a Gentile, all the better to feed Weinstein’s revenge-tinged fantasy of having risen above his outer-borough, bridge-and-tunnel Semitic origins.

Jewish power: Harvey Weinstein with shabbos-shiksa

The article, written by Mark Oppenheimer, indirectly raises some very interesting questions about the consequences of Jewish power. For example, why do Jews like Roth and Weinstein feel “vengeful” towards Whites when they are part of the richest and most successful ethnic group in America? If it’s because Jews nurse historical grudges against Whites, how else is their vengefulness manifesting itself? On one reading, Weinstein is a blatant hypocrite for supporting Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party at the same time as he was molesting shiksas all over the world for decades. On another and more accurate reading, Weinstein’s crimes are entirely consistent with his politics. Liberal elitists like Weinstein and Clinton want power and wealth for themselves, not improved lives for ordinary women.

Divide and Rule

That’s why liberal elitists like Weinstein and Clinton are so strongly in favour of mass immigration from the Third World. Immigration atomizes Western societies and introduces pathologies that justify authoritarian laws and the surveillance state. And authoritarian liberalism is what the Lebanese writer Nassim Taleb would call anti-fragile: the worse it works, the stronger it gets. After 9/11 demonstrated the incompetence of the surveillance state and the clear danger of mass immigration by Muslims, guess what? The NSA’s budget and Muslim immigration both increased. After mass killings by Muslim fanatics in Manchester and London, guess what? The British government has a further excuse to censor “far-right propaganda” that protests against the Muslim colonization of Britain.

But Amber Rudd, the shabbos-shiksa who announced more censorship, wasn’t entirely lying when she made this claim: “The safer Britain I want to help build as Home Secretary is a united one.” She doesn’t want more safety, but she does want more unity. She wants Britain united in obedience to the Tribe. Traitors like Rudd serve Jewish interests and want everyone else to do the same. Ordinary Whites are expected to serve Jewish interests by becoming a dispossessed minority in their own nations.

My response is simple: Non serviam — “I will not serve.” Thanks to sites like the Occidental Observer, more and more Whites are saying the same.

64 replies

Comments are closed.