Wicked Muslims, Innocent Jews: The Deceit and Double-Think of Mark Steyn

My late father simultaneously abhorred Muslims and adulated Jews. Muslims were savage, stupid and very bad for the West. Jews were civilized, intelligent and very good for the West. What more need be said? A lot, I thought. I pointed out that Muslims were in the West because of Jews. My father dismissed this as nonsense. Jews weren’t stupid and Muslims were enemies of Jews. Therefore Jews could not possibly want Muslims in the West.

Reality shmeality

I produced copious evidence to back my claim, but it didn’t alter my father’s views in the slightest. If his subjective logic said Jews opposed Muslim immigration, while objective reality said they supported it, then so much the worse for reality. Muslims were bad, Jews were good. End of story. It should be no surprise, then, that my father was also a big fan of Mark Steyn, the shape-shifting neo-conservative who has recently aired one of his favourite themes:

Islamophobe Mark Steyn

Pre-war Europeans would never have entertained for a moment the construction of mosques from Malmö to Marseilles. But post-war Holocaust guilt, and the revulsion against nationalism and the embrace of multiculturalism and mass immigration, enabled the Islamization of Europe. The principal beneficiaries of the Continent’s penance for the great moral stain of the 20th century turned out to be the Muslims — with the Jews on the receiving end, yet again. (Butcher Bob Out of His Job?, SteynOnline, 15th November 2017)

He then said, with unblushing chutzpah, “It would help to be able to talk about this issue honestly.”

It would indeed, but there is no honesty in what Mark Steyn says about “the Islamization of Europe.” Take the idea that Jews have been on the “receiving end” of Muslim violence in Europe, as though Jews have been its first and worst victims. Steyn himself knows that this is a lie:

In the current issue of the Mark Steyn Club newsletter, The Clubbable Steyn, I recount my visit to Rotherham to meet some of those “raped and exploited white girls”. Actually, I’m not sure the general term “raped and exploited” quite covers the particular horrors inflicted on them — urinated on by groups of Muslim men, dangled over balconies, doused in petrol as their tormentors danced around them with cigarette lighters, etc. (The Mood Music of Mohammed, SteynOnline, 28th August 2017)

Not a Jewish place

How many of those “raped and exploited” girls are Jewish? Apparently none whatsoever. To paraphrase the Jewish Chronicle: Rotherham is not a Jewish place. Nor is Rotherham unique: Muslims have been committing similar crimes all over Western Europe for decades. They have also been beating, murdering and ethnically cleansing ordinary European Whites for decades. And consuming the taxes of ordinary European Whites through their welfare-dependency and their demands on public health services. The European media recently had a feel-good story about “seven-year-old Hassan,” a boy saved by new medical techniques after “losing 80 per cent of his skin to a rare genetic condition.”

The stories did not discuss the enormous cost of the new techniques, but did disclose these facts: a) the boy was “born in Syria, but now living in Germany”; b) owed his condition to “faulty genes inherited from one or both parents.” In other words,    ordinary Germans are paying for problems caused by Muslim inbreeding, which is common in Syria. Genetic diseases that are “rare” among outbred Whites are not rare among inbred Muslims. But are Jews on the “receiving end” of the bill for sick Muslims like little Hassan? No, if Germany is anything like Britain, it’s entirely possible that they make a profit instead: “It’s a little known fact that over 20 per cent of the medicines that the [British] NHS [National Health Service] uses come from Teva, an Israeli company, and it’s rising, heading towards 25 per cent.”

Rejecting repatriation

But Steyn’s big lie about who suffers from Islamization by no means exhausts his dishonesty. Take his claim that “Holocaust guilt” explains Muslim immigration into Europe. Britain was at war with Nazi Germany before the Holocaust began and was a devastated nation by the war’s end. Ordinary Britons rightly felt that they had paid an enormous price to help defeat the Nazis. I can assure Mark Steyn that they felt absolutely no guilt over Nazi crimes.

And how did those ordinary Britons react when mass immigration began after the war? With anger and hostility. They did not want their country invaded, as Britain’s political elite were perfectly aware. In 2013 Roy Hattersley, a former Deputy Leader of the Labour party, asked a damning question in the Guardian: “Should I, in 1964, have called for what a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted — the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants?” His answer was firmly negative. After all, why should proles have any say in what happens to their neighbourhoods, their country and their children’s future?

MacShane’s myopia

It is no coincidence that Hattersley has a Jewish wife, a literary agent called Maggie Pearlstine who has overseen his profitable literary career. His pro-immigration, pro-minority views are taken from the hostile Jewish elite, not from the working-class he pretended to serve in parliament. Those views are shared by Denis MacShane (né Matyjaszek), the Labour MP and bon vivant who represented Rotherham while White working-class girls were, in Mark Steyn’s words, being “urinated on by groups of Muslim men, dangled over balconies, doused in petrol as their tormentors danced around them with cigarette lighters, etc.”

Despite his passionate commitment to feminism and child-welfare, MacShane entirely failed to spot what was happening in his “wonderful constituency of Rotherham.” Why the failure? Well, he was too busy fighting fascism, chairing the “All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism,” and otherwise being, as the Jewish Chronicle put it, one of the Jewish community’s “greatest champions.”

MacShane was jailed in 2013 after he committed fraud to fund his campaigning on behalf of Jews in Europe. I can assure Mark Steyn that if Jews felt that Muslim immigration was bad for Jews, then MacShane would have opposed said immigration long, loud and often. He didn’t. Quite the reverse: he was part of a Labour government that massively and clandestinely increased Muslim immigration. And guess what? The immigration minister who oversaw that massive increase was one Barbara Roche, a Jewish SJW who “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” Perhaps Mark Steyn missed the huge publicity given to Roche’s Islamophilia at the beginning of 2016:

Islamophile Barbara Roche

‘It was clear Roche wanted more immigrants to come to Britain,’ recalled Stephen Boys-Smith, the new head of the immigration directorate. ‘She didn’t see her job as controlling entry, but by looking at the wider picture “in a holistic way” she wanted us to see the benefit of a multicultural society.’ Jack Straw [the part-Jewish Home Secretary] never openly contradicted Roche — it simply wasn’t worth the risk of alienating the Labour Party. So she set to work on a speech, in which she outlined the advantages of reducing controls to immigration and portrayed asylum seekers as skilled labour. She didn’t discuss what she was going to say with Straw. …

‘Well done, Barbara,’ Blair told Roche soon [after the speech]. Despite its controversial content, her speech passed relatively unnoticed. But migrants quickly grasped its importance and passed the news on to their friends and family across the world. Labour was letting more people in, they told them, and — unlike other European countries — Britain would provide benefits and state housing. …

One of Roche’s legacies was hundreds more migrants camped in squalor in Sangatte, outside Calais, where they tried to smuggle themselves onto lorries. News about the new liberalism — and in particular the welfare benefits — now began attracting Somalis who’d previously settled in other EU countries. Although there was no historic or cultural link between Somalia and Britain, more than 200,000 came. Since most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare, the Home Office could have refused them entry. But they were granted ‘exceptional leave to remain’. [Et cetera ad nauseam] (Conman Blair’s cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2million migrants against the rules, The Daily Mail, 26th February 2016)

I assume that Mark Steyn is aware that Somalis are Muslim. A British journalist called Rod Liddle certainly is. In 2009, he was widely condemned for writing that “many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence.” The title of his piece was “Muslim savages update.”

Like Steyn and my late father, Liddle is another big fan of Jews and big opponent of Muslims. Apparently he too failed to spot Barbara Roche’s Islamophilia.

Friends of Islam in Ireland and Norway

The Islamophilia was shared by an immigration minister in Britain’s close neighbour Ireland. The minister was called Alan Shatter and this is how his departure from office was covered by the blogger Irish Savant:

Islamophile Alan Shatter

If you read [Shatter’s] valedictory address you’ll find it hard to believe his brief was (cough) Justice and Defence. Because most of the address is given over to his ‘achievement’ in granting Irish (and hence EU) citizenship to a motley collection of 68,000 Third Worlders (=1.5% of the Irish population) in the 28 months he’s been in office. Prior to that the annual average was just a couple of hundred.

So even his attenuated period in office will enable him to look back with satisfaction at the scale of his nation-wrecking. But this is somewhat offset by the glorious own-goal he scored in relation to the public’s perception of Jews generally. Because it’s fair to say he came to be universally loathed for, among other things, his overweening arrogance and willingness to throw everybody and anybody under the bus to save his own skin. To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, even his own friends hated him. (“Rejoice! The rat departs,” The Irish Savant, 7th May 2014)

Fancy that: just like the Islamophile Barbara Roche, the Islamophile Alan Shatter was Jewish. Irish Savant has also chronicled another Islamophile in one of Britain’s neighbours:

Islamophile Erwin Kohn

Meet Erwin Kohn, President of the Jewish Community in Norway and also — and you’ll be surprised by this — Deputy Director of the Norwegian Centre Against Racism. Erwin is a busy boy. In this interview you can hear him say: “Norwegian society is too homogeneous, too white. So there is a job to be done.” And we all know the nature of that job, don’t we, children? Erwin shakes his head wearily. But at least money isn’t a problem. “We have generous funding,” he assures the interviewer. And who provides this funding? Why, it’s the Norwegian Government. You know, the ones sworn to represent the very people being blended out by Kohn’s project.

But despite the size of the task, much good work has already been undertaken. Most of eastern Oslo has by now been enriched beyond recognition by New Norwegians from Pakistan, Somalia and Nigeria. With generous helpings of Iraqis, Kosovars and Albanians. Why, Mohammed is now the most popular boy’s name in Oslo, the nation’s capital. Mind you this has not been an unmixed blessing, not least because an epidemic of rape has coincided with the arrival of the New Norwegians. And the police report that every single rape in Oslo over a recent five year period was attributable to an enricher. Every single one. … As for you Kohn, you despicable back-stabbing nation-wrecking ingrate, I hope that one day you roast in the Seventh Circle of Hell along with your fellow-travelling fifth columnists such as Alan Shatter,Barbara Lerner Specter and Anetta Kahane. (“Norway’s Alan Shatter,” The Irish Savant, 24th March 2015)

Islamophile Anetta Kahane

Barbara Lerner Spectre and Anetta Kahane are Jewish Islamophiles who have facilitated Muslim immigration into Sweden and Germany, respectively. And it’s the same story in every other Western nation. Wherever you find Muslim immigration, you will find Jews facilitating the immigration, suppressing White resistance to it, and profiting from ever-increasing demand for housing, food and medical services.

Islamophobes and airheads

But Mark Steyn has apparently missed all of this. According to him, Jews have played no part in the “Islamization” of the West, being the helpless, hapless and voiceless victims of White European stupidity. Steyn’s readers accept his lies without question. Indeed, some of them go even further than Steyn does: White Europeans haven’t merely been stupid, but actively malevolent in opening Europe’s borders to Muslims. Here are two responses to Steyn’s “Wicked Muslims, Poor Jews!” nonsense:

Edmond Watson • Nov 15, 2017 at 13:09

“The principal beneficiaries…turned out to be the Muslims — with the Jews on the receiving end, yet again.” Makes one suspicious that the deference to Muslims is actually another way for anti-semites to persecute.

Owen Morgan • Nov 15, 2017 at 14:25

I don’t think there is any doubt about it. Britain’s Labour Party is desperate to claim the muslim vote and will indulge almost any amount of anti-Semitism. Even when the offence is so extreme as to incur a mealy-mouthed reprimand, the guilty individual is at most suspended and then allowed back, after a perfunctory and formulaic “apology”. The Liberal Democrats also have persistent offenders.

The Conservatives have less of a problem with anti-Semitism, but they certainly are guilty of appeasement of muslims, one notorious instance being the elevation of failed Parliamentary candidate (and weapons-grade airhead) Sayeeda Warsi to the House of Lords and her appointment to chair the Conservative Party. Despite her manifest unsuitability, she was maintained in the job for two years and was then given a ministerial post for nearly two years more. (Comments on Butcher Bob Out of His Job?, SteynOnline, 15th November 2017)

“Owen Morgan” (a suspiciously goyish name) doesn’t mention that the “weapons-grade airhead” Sayeeda Warsi was in fact a co-chair of the Conservative Party with Lord Feldman, who is Jewish and oversaw the ascent of the part-Jewish David Cameron to the premiership. Both men were, of course, members of Conservative Friends of Israel, which has been described by the Jewish Chronicle as “the biggest lobbying group in Westminster.”

In other words, Sayeeda Warsi’s ascent to high office wasn’t “appeasement of Muslims”: it was a way to ensure that the top of the Conservative party was less White, less male and less Christian. The same is true of Priti Patel, the Hindu shabbos-shiksa who shilled for Israel until her Jewish controller Lord Polak “got too cocky for his own good.”

Islamization is a Jewish project

Britain is not a democracy: it is an oligarchy. The most influential component of this oligarchy is Jewish, and if Jews opposed Third World immigration it would not be happening. That is why mass immigration by Muslims and other Third Worlders has taken place here decade after decade despite being opposed by “most of the country,” as the traitorous philosemite Roy Hattersley put it. The Islamization of Europe is a Jewish project. If Mark Steyn truly opposed Islamization, then he would, like Melanie Phillips, criticize Jewish support for it. Instead, he resorts to what Orwell called doublethink, or “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”

On the one hand, Steyn claims that Jews are “on the receiving end” of Islamization. On the other hand, he has met those who have genuinely been on the receiving end: the “raped and exploited white girls” of Rotherham, not one of whom has ever been reported to be Jewish. In short, Mark Steyn is a liar and a confidence-trickster. Some years ago, as Larry Auster noted with horror, there was an unmistakable note of gloating in what Steyn wrote about Islamization:

Some of us think an Islamic Europe will be easier for America to deal with than the present Europe of cynical, wily, duplicitous pseudo-allies. But getting there is certain to be messy, and violent.

Until the shape of the new Europe begins to emerge, there’s no point picking fights with the terminally ill. The old Europe is dying, and Mr. Bush did the diplomatic equivalent of the Oscar night lifetime-achievement tribute at which the current stars salute a once glamorous old-timer whose fading aura is no threat to them. The 21st century is being built elsewhere. (U.S. can sit back and watch Europe implode, Jewish World Review, 28th February 2005)

An anonymous commenter at the London Spectator once gloated even more explicitly, if less elegantly. The author, who calls himself “voidist” writes:

the swedes have been itching like the Germans to have an islamic, jew hating Country….the more islamists you have the more difficult it is for the jews to live in that Country…in Malmo swedes and arabs combined together to haunt and terrorise jewish residents…most of malmo is now jew-free…. unfortunately for the swedes , thier anti-semitism has now back fired…it seems thier arab Brothers have an own Agenda…….and i have booked myself a ringside seat and ordered some Popcorn…who said that the Karma wheel is defunct ? (The Spectator no longer allows links to its comments)

It is ludicrous to suggest, as “voidist” does, that Sweden has imported Muslims to harm its Jewish minority. Muslim immigration there has had the enthusiastic support of Jews based in Sweden like Barbara Lerner Specter and Peter Wolodarski. Accordingly, I suspect that “voidist” is both Jewish and expressing a characteristically warped, deceptive or self-deceptive Jewish psychology. There are certainly many Jews who simultaneously deny any Jewish role in the Islamization of Europe, believe that Jews are suffering first and worst from it, and gloat over the way in which it is harming White Europeans.

Islamophile Peter Wolodarski

In any case, not only are many of the major figures promoting Third World immigration to Europe Jewish as discussed here, there is not one Jewish organization that I am aware of (and yes, Jewish organizations are lavishly funded and highly influential) that does not welcome this invasion.

Mark Steyn is the cheerleader and champion of the gloaters and reality-deniers. His undoubted intelligence and literary talent make him more culpable, not less. Instead of serving the truth, he has served the Tribe. And it is long past time for him to admit his errors and change his ways.

113 replies
  1. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    It should be noted that Islam is a form of “arabicized judaism”. Many of the “rules” in the jewish Talmud are virtually identical to the “rules” in the Koran. Both belief system operate with an air of supremacy of each respective “system”–relegating “outsiders” to inferior status, with special “taxes” levied by each respective system, as well as the supremacists in each group being immune from the equivalent of “justice” when wrongdoing is done to the “outsiders”…

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      “…Islam is a form of “arabicized judaism”

      As are ALL THREE of the (((Abraham-ic))) religions. One is a Race Religion, exclusive to the Chosenites…. and the other two are “goy-traps”.

      • Michael Adkins
        Michael Adkins says:


        We need to take a honest look at the Abrahamic religions and ask what they have done for (and to) our Folk?

        The bottom line in all is money and genetics!

        • Rerevisionist
          Rerevisionist says:

          Imho one of the strengths of Jews, Muslims, and Christians is or was the fact the organisations were supra-national: they straddled nations, and were able to keep an eye on events within their empires, and draw resources from the whole of their regions to be applied where they wanted.
          It’s NOT just money and genetics; there is organisation, too. If there had been a white religion, without the fake ‘yeshua/Jesus’ figure pushed by Jews, Christianity might have been intelligent and Jew-free.

          • Michael Adkins
            Michael Adkins says:


            You’re right, I am breaking one of my own rules. I need to spend more time examining structure.

      • paul-harvey DuBois
        paul-harvey DuBois says:

        I beg your pardon, Christianity is certainly not a “goy-trap”. The Lord Jesus Christ, descendant of King David the Lion of Judah (not of Judea) founded the New Ordinance as a fulfillment of the Old Law. He did not promote the deviationist variety promoted by the Pharisees with their tradition of the Elders or Oral Tradition better known today as the Talmud. In fact Our Lord railed against the Pharisees’ distortion of the written law of Moses. Though, very often Jesus was referred to as ‘Rabbi’ He was not of the Rabbinical tradition and did not promote it. Though born in the town of Bethlehem in Roman Judea, He was not a Judean but a Galilean. Most of the inhabitants of Roman Judea at the time of Christ were descendants of the Edomites and were not Isrealites. He instituted the New Ordinance at a supper with some of His disciples on the evening prior to His death. This supper was not, as some maintain, a Seder meal. The first night of the Jewish Passover was celebrated on Good Friday night after Our Lord had died and was laid in the tomb.
        The Christian Faith is the only religion that can validly promise eternal life. Christianity is a fulfillment of the promise made in the Old Testament by the Most High to send a Redeemer to mankind, a promise which is not recognized in either the Jewish or in the Muslim religion.

        • anarchyst
          anarchyst says:

          The “beginning of the end” of Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants.
          Much Catholic ritual was discarded, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ which exists to this day. The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) do do their “dirty work” for them…
          Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its “universality”. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.
          Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new “Modern Mass” and the New Church, in general…It took a brave Cardinal Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to “push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites.
          In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.
          By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative, but an “actor”, diminishing his status and importance.
          One area where the Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church “dogma” or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations–nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage.
          It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize celebration of pre-Vatican II principles.

    • Olaf
      Olaf says:

      Pinchas Goldschmidt, president of the Conference of European Rabbis, has clearly stated that the muslims are “natural allies” of the jews:

      “What we have is the counter-reaction of old Europe, we have the laws against, limiting religious freedom, in Switzerland against the minarets, in France against the burka, the attempted law in Germany against circumcision, the attempted law in Holland and in Poland against halal or kosher meat. So this is the reaction of old Europe against this new wave of religious expression. […] We see ourselves fighting together with our muslim brothers who want a free, who want a peaceful Europe, who want to integrate like our forefathers did hundred and twenty years ago. And they are our natural allies.”

      AndThe Conference of European Rabbis is the primary Orthodox rabbinical alliance in Europe. It unites more than 700 religious leaders of the mainstream synagogue communities in Europe. It was founded in 1956 on the initiative of British Chief Rabbi Sir Israel Brodie, in order to revive the destroyed Jewish communities on the European mainland. Brodie was supported by the chief rabbi of France, Jacob Kaplan, the chief rabbi of Amsterdam, Aharon Schuster and the British Sephardic spiritual leader, Hacham Gaon. The first conference took place in 1957 in Amsterdam. The Conference of European Rabbis is the primary Orthodox rabbinical alliance in Europe. It unites more than 700 religious leaders of the mainstream synagogue communities in Europe. It was founded in 1956 on the initiative of British Chief Rabbi Sir Israel Brodie, in order to revive the destroyed Jewish communities on the European mainland. Brodie was supported by the chief rabbi of France, Jacob Kaplan, the chief rabbi of Amsterdam, Aharon Schuster and the British Sephardic spiritual leader, Hacham Gaon. The first conference took place in 1957 in Amsterdam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conference_of_European_Rabbis

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        Olaf: Correct. The Jews believe that under the new Caliphate, they will be given positions of power, privilege and respect. They will offer financial services, inventions and innovations of war machines and materiel, and be a big part of the advanced thinking Frontal Lobes of Muslim consciousness. That, and the fact of expecting gratitude and immunity from destruction of Israel, in exchange for destroying the entire Western World and handing it over to the Mudslums.

        Just as the forces in Africa disabled and killed whole populations by gruesome death, cutting off limbs of children in order to force acquiesce and compliance, so the Chews could say to the Islumacysts: “Here it is, the remaining populations are scattered, discombobulated, and unable to mount resistance. They are all whipped and housebroken, slave-ready.

        Of course, it is with ease and facility that Chews could become the equivalent of Marranos, who falsely professed and converted to Catheterolism to be close and destructive to the suckers in Iberia.

      • Sursum corda
        Sursum corda says:

        Obviously. It was the Jewish citizens of Spain who opened the gates for the Moors and betrayed their Christian neighbors. The Jews are always a fifth column in western societies.

  2. Robert Browning
    Robert Browning says:

    The Pope created Islam to take back Jerusalem from the Jews. The Popes plan was a success. Now the Jews are trying to use the Popes creation to destroy Christianity.

        • Fred Mertz
          Fred Mertz says:

          A Jewish scholar once published a piece to the effect that Jews created Islam to help them fight the Persians. For a time Judaism sought converts but instead turned to creating a friendly religion that would supplement their forces. In the modern west Christianity remains the enemy of Judaism. Islam is dangerous to Judaism in the middle east but can become an asset in Europe and America, like the black population which votes heavily for secularist Democrats not out of secularist enthusiasm but to get the benefits of affirmative action, etc.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          The Pope’s court Jews actually created Islam.

          So-called court Jews at the Vatican, to the extent there actually were any, were a High and Late Renaissance phenomenon. When Mohammed lived (ca. 570–632), Rome had not long since learned, to its deep shock and horror, of the existence of the Babylonian Talmud, and Jewish teachers and leaders were being rounded up and put on trial in the West for rank obscenity and pernicious blasphemy toward Christ and His Blessed Mother. Several such are on record as actually having declared under oath that the Yeshua suffering for eternity in boiling excrement and the Mara who was an infamous whore were two people who had nothing at all to do with Christianity. Quoth these heroic Jewish sages, it was an unfortunate coincidence, no more than that, that the man and woman bore the names they did.

          There’s something else of rather more than marginal interest: In the early seventh century, the Italian Renaissance was still six hundred years in the offing. Ought one to assume, then, that Robert Card’s point is that Mohammed must have been getting secret messages from the papal court of the future in his Arabian desert hideaway?

          The lesson here is that a display of ignorance or bigotry needs to be rather less transparent and ill informed in order to gull even the readily gullible.

  3. T
    T says:

    Steyn’s comment and faux concern, as well as similar expressions made by the ‘conservative’ Jewish commentator Michael Savage, about ‘raped and exploited white girls’ is really quite disingenuous on his part, and a shameless naked attempt at emotional manipulation…just enough emotional manipulation it is hoped perhaps to get young European white males in the UK and elsewhere to fight future and current mideast wars, but nothing else. The non Moslem sub-Saharan black population imported into England for decades, by diktat as well, also has been heavily involved in this same rape and exploitation of young white girls in the UK, yet he says nothing of them. Were the historic founding population of Britain to do what was necessary to actually stop the rape and exploitation of the young white girls, something one would think most persons of goodwill from whatever background would think was a noble thing, ie the immediate halt of the immigration and deportation of the offending groups, both black and Moslem, Steyn, as well as someone like Savage, would no doubt loudly protest, perhaps even violently so…and my suspicion would be they would do that, despite their rhetoric, if it was only the Moslems ‘immigrants’ effected by such actions and no one else.

  4. Ricky
    Ricky says:

    Steyn accidentally revealed the truth about the Holocaust myth – that it is used to slander ALL whites, not just Germans, even those English and Americans who defeated Hitler and the Nazis. The Germans are proxies for all Aryans, and the Holocaust legend has been used to induce guilt in every white person.

      • T
        T says:

        And Trump is a mini ‘Hitler’ proxy for all whites in the United States, whether someone voted for the guy or not.

    • Fred Mertz
      Fred Mertz says:

      1. The Allies had motives other than saving the Jews from Hitler.
      2. Hitler was motivated by ancient Christian calumnies against the Jews.
      If you accept 1 and 2 then it’s easy to see the Holocaust as damning the whole Christian world. And indeed many Jews will say this forthrightly.
      My impression is that Holocaust Deniers are now backing off. David Irving says the Jewish figure of 6 million is about right in view of all the Jews shot as the Germans advanced eastward, while Mark Weber seems to want to change the subject to Palestinians. Zundel is dead, and Cole is out of the Denial business.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        @ Fred Mertz:
        The few, high-profile “Deniers” cited have been replaced by countless numbers of low-profile disbelievers, thanks to internet. I wouldn’t put too much stock in public disavowals. Candor has a price tag too hefty for most.

      • Bennis Mardens
        Bennis Mardens says:

        No, the “Holocaust” number is MUCH lower.
        Keep in mind, 55 MILLION gentiles died in WWII.

        Hitler (and the German people) were motivated by the fact that the Bolsheviks had slaughtered millions of Russians, and Germany was NEXT.

        • anarchyst
          anarchyst says:

          Apologies to those who have previously seen this on other sites. Here goes:
          If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD THEY KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would they build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination? Things do not “add up”…

          Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the German government in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans.

          The establishment of a “homeland” along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. What better way to encourage “emigration” to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

          The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident. TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE “KANGAROO COURTS” THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. A question for you “holocaust ™” promoters–why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth??

          When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”.
          Jewish complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

          A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust”. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment. . .

          If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust” is the only one that counts . . .

          Look at the “commercialization of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren.

          Since the jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland”–Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, whil the jewish boycott (actually the jews’ declaration of war on Germany) started in 1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

          Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures).

          Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. There is a “gas chamber” chimney that is not connected to anything. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these “camps”.

          American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of methylene blue in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the “chimney” for the supposed “gas chamber” does not connect to anything.

          Mr. Leuchter’s was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license”–a law which had never been used before or since. . .

          It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

          I urge those “holocaust ™” believers to check these things out for yourselves–IF YOU DARE. You will not like what you find…

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      “The pics of the Jews shown in the article are revolting. They all look sick and perverted.”

      Because you’ve got your Roddy Piper glasses on. They reveal what’s hidden to many!

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Especially that picture of Erwin Kohn is very revealing. Behind a mask of feigned friendliness, hides a character of cunning, deception, arrogance and contempt. You see this type of expression often on Jewish faces. American congressman Chuck Schumer is another example.

      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        For those who haven’t read this—
        Is an account, originally from Germany, as to how Jews may have micro-evolved as parasites during the millennia of the great cities in the Middle East.
        But in the area of the fertile crescent, the Middle East, the place where for the longest time in observable history humans lived together in city-civilizations, yet another, third group, could develop. The specimen of this group tend to look like beta-males (take Henry Kissinger, does he not look cute and harmless?) where they in fact are parasitic and aggressive. Of course they need to DECEIVE their counterparts, they do not want to let them see their true nature. Their every physical characteristic was selected for this purpose. Their eyes are without any clarity, pale and cloudy, so that you cannot guess their intentions. Their body language is deceitful, the voice intonation and language talent is programmed to hide, instead of reveal their true intentions.

        • Flossie
          Flossie says:

          Not to change the subject, but I’ve always suspected the greedy, deceptive and physically repulsive Ferengi race on that sci-fi TV show (the name of which I can’t remember) were a sly reference to Jewish merchants.

      • Goy Goddess
        Goy Goddess says:

        You make an excellent point. Look at Clement Freud’s face, for example (and that of his grandfather, too). Their faces are intrinsically disturbing and repulsive. One can easily understand why (((they))) were confined to the shtetl for most of recorded history.

  5. Lou
    Lou says:

    Steyn claims to be Christian? He is on the radio, sometimes filling in for Limbaugh. Or was, I dont listen anymore.

    Off topic, found this,
    Does anyone else smell a rat here?


    For someone who was living in such terrible conditions, the jacket is in remarkable condition. Not a stain, not a tear, perfect. This thing has been lying around for over seventy years and nobody recognized what it was? It was priced up at $2 because the person who priced it hadn’t got a clue what it was? Fortunately, the number reveals the whole history of the previous owner who has relatives in America.
    How fortunate that this symbol of ‘horror and hate’ should be found by a Jewish woman. In all the sales of this kind that are held in America one lady of the 2% should find this item that belonged to one of the 2% survivors. The good fortune gets even better. In the words of this lady who had the good fortune to make this serendipitous discovery,
    “There is a reason why I was supposed to be in that house. … There is a reason why I was friends with someone who worked at a Holocaust museum. What are the chances of that? It is difficult to say everything is a coincidence.” What are the chances indeed?

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      “It is difficult to say everything is a coincidence.”

      Not really: Everything is a (((Cohen-cidence))). Easily said. Just rolls off the tongue!

  6. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    Thank you, Mr. Langdon, for this exposé. Having paid no attention to Steyn for years, I didn’t know that he was such a shameless and transparent liar. The many money quotes you cite don’t seem to be the ones that Derbyshire and his other fans at VDARE are fond of repeating. I wonder why.*
    *Facetiousness alert!

  7. JimB
    JimB says:

    “…it is long past time for him to admit his errors and change his ways.”

    That goes for EVERY so-called “good Jew”! A YouTuber I’ve followed for quite some time, Scott Roberts, a fella who’s been banned numerous times for his “anti-Semitic hate speech” and has had to set up multiple sock-accounts as a result, used to have a video up called Put Them On Point (Mythological Good Jew) which was, as you can guess by the title, not well-received by the (((YouTube Warriors))) and was removed. But the video echoed what I myself believe, namely that “good Jews” (honest Jews who are or can be true allies to Whites) are as rare a find as leprechauns. And any leprechaun that you may happen upon in this upside-down Clown World should be tested to determine if they indeed are true leprechauns by putting them on point, just like in actual wartime. See if they’re willing to “take a bullet” to help defend Whites. In 100% of the cases I’ve ever seen or heard about, where there was a “good Jew” (real leprechaun)… none of them — and I mean none!–, upon close scrutiny, could display that “pot of gold”, namely to truly betray their Jewish brethren without some kind of subtle, deceptive, pro-Jewish angle. I can say that about Benjamin Freedman… about “Brother” Nathaniel Kapner… and about any of them, with pure honesty.

      • JimB
        JimB says:

        He’s as “honest” and as “patriotic” as the rest of em when you look closely. And Alex Jones heavily endorses him, so that oughta tell you something.

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      Could we have a concrete example of Freedman or [Milton] Kapner]?

      I looked at a Kapner video some time ago. At the start, the war was jews vs. Whites. So far so good. Later in the video the war had become jews vs. Christians! He can convert to Christianity and become one of us! See how “us” has been redefined from biology to religion. That’s what he means by referring to himself as “Brother” Nathanael. He can be a “completed jew” and be part of the “body of Christ”- voila, he is one of us!

      He cannot convert to White due to certain biological constraints!

      btw- When you call Milton “Brother” you are tacitly approving of his mind f–k.

      btw2- There are way too many in our White movement who push the view that the war is jew vs. Christianity rather than jew vs, White.

      So JimB- is that the kind of shadiness that you have in mind?

      • JimB
        JimB says:

        “So JimB- is that the kind of shadiness that you have in mind?”

        On a second reading of your comment, T.J., I just realized that you weren’t accusing ME of “shadiness” but were merely asking me to clarify whether-or-not my indictment against Kapner had to do with his “Jews vs. Christianity” stance. I sincerely apologize for that! And for taking a tone with you in other parts of my reply to you, although I’m still a bit taken aback that you couldn’t understand why I enclosed “Brother” in quotation marks… Or did I perhaps even misunderstand you there? Either way, please accept my apology if I offended you in any way, brother.

  8. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    Mark Steyn is partly Jewish. Here is what he himself says :

    “…Earlier this year, I chanced to be at a public meeting with the great Caroline Glick of The Jerusalem Post. Afterwards, a gentlemen from the audience casually made some allusion to some or other aspect of the Jewish calendar, at which I looked momentarily befuddled. And so Caroline helpfully explained to him that “Mark’s not a Jew but he plays one on TV.”

    By which she meant that, as I publicly “defend” Israel (which is, in itself, a curious formulation that implicitly accepts its enemies’ framing of the debate – that the issue is the legitimacy of the Zionist Entity) and as I have a suspiciously Jewish sounding name, I’ve been routinely assumed, at least since 9/11, to be a Jew. I’m honored to be so mistaken. And, in truth, even if I weren’t, there’s not much I can do about it. Someone asked me on the radio in Australia, two-thirds into a long, long discussion, about how Jewish I was, and I answered that the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers, both my grandmothers were Catholic, and I filled in a bit of remaining family background for the two or three Aussies who hadn’t yet expired from total boredom…”

    Source : The Skeptical Community, Thu Sep 07, 2006 : Espying the Jew (Just how Jewish is Mark Steyn?).

    So Mark Steyn is 1/8 Jewish. In his phenotype that is visible from his otherwise curious kinky hair (Jews are mixed with African blood).

    There is no fixed rule according to which part-Jews still identify with their Jewish side, but my guess is that 1/2 and 1/4 Jews still feel Jewish, while a change may occur at the 1/8 grade. In Steyn’s case obviously no such change has occurred.

    • Richard McCulloch
      Richard McCulloch says:

      Steyn is probably 1/4 Jewish, not 1/8. Notice that he specifies that “the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers, both my grandmothers were Catholic.” So it is likely that one of he paternal great-grandfathers, his direct eponymous male ancestor from whom he inherits his name, was also Jewish. That would make his paternal grandfather a full Jew who married a Catholic and his half-Jewish father was probably raised Catholic. His mother was a Belgian catholic.

    • Lou
      Lou says:

      I am 1/8, according to jew, I mean you. Great grand dad spoke yid.
      I consider Judaism to be a religion, hence there are no ‘part Jews’ but thats just my op.

  9. Maura Smith-Mitsky
    Maura Smith-Mitsky says:

    What is this? Bash Jews for Islam’s invasion of Europe? We’ll end up with an Islamized Europe in which Jews won’t be safe.

    Can’t dopy European officials make their own mistakes without relying on Jews for guidance? Europeans can’t think for themselves? If not, maybe they need a takeover.

    • Occidental Fan
      Occidental Fan says:

      What is this? Bash Jews for Islam’s invasion of Europe? We’ll end up with an Islamized Europe in which Jews won’t be safe.

      Oh dear. At the moment we’ve got an Islamized Europe in which white gentiles are far more unsafe than Jews. “Rotherham is not a Jewish place.” Just produce a single Jewish organization that opposes mass immigration into Europe and US, rather than supporting it. And of course, unsafe Jews have a nation of their own to find sanctuary in.

      Can’t dopy European officials make their own mistakes without relying on Jews for guidance?

      Barbara Roche and Alan Shatter, who oversaw mass immigration by Muslims into the UK and Ireland respectively, are both Jewish. And you might like to read about America’s immigration policies too:


  10. conradcgaarder
    conradcgaarder says:

    I watch Steyn’s videos and especially like his interviews and his music segments. He is intelligent and good natured. I suspect that he understands perfectly well the role Jews have played in the ongoing destruction of the White nation state.
    But I suppose he is very ambitious and what he values most is his contract with Fox. If he ever uttered a word against Jews he would never be seen there again.

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      That’s exactly the same excuse that apologists use for Alex Jones. The old “If he ever uttered a word against Jews…” routine. IT DOESN’T FLY.

      “But I suppose he is very ambitious and what he values most is his contract with Fox.”

      Sure, he values that contract… no doubt. But it’s not what he values most, obviously. What he values most is doing his part to carry out his Tribe’s wishes, to make sure he’s front/center with diversions and obfuscation. Intelligence and “good natured”-ness isn’t an indicator of honesty.

    • HK Wills
      HK Wills says:

      Good natured to a fault. I listen to him regularly when he substitutes for Rush Limbaugh and always find it an unsatisfying experience. While Rush often expresses genuine anger in discussing issues, Steyn displays a seamless equanimity that suggests he is not at all discomfited with the ruinous changes Left has wrought.

      • Flossie
        Flossie says:

        That’s my impression as well, HK. I’ve always suspected that Rush sees things very much as we do, but has to pull his punches in order to remain on the air. Steyn, on the other hand, has always struck me as a genial, quick-witted fellow who has chosen a side — most noticeably anti-Muslim — that he can use to his benefit.

  11. Return of Shawn
    Return of Shawn says:

    So-called Christian charities, both in the U.S. and abroad are also causing the genetic catastrophe in the West. Here, in the Upper Midwest, USA, Catholic charities and Lutheran Social Services exist to help 3rd world immigrants.

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      Both groups receive billions and billions of (((Federal Reserve Notes))), thanks to the White taxpayers.

      We should start a campaign, pointing out this treason, and naming names.

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      And they deserve their share of scorn from us. Most certainly! Those idiots notwithstanding, the very center of the rot which infects the West, those who possess more money than God, those who dominate all forms of msm… those Jewish scum-bags who pose as “white folks” one minute and drop the mask the next, those self-styled “human rights activists”, those faux “humanitarians and anti-racists”, those pontificating hypocrites who declare themselves “Chosen of Yahweh” to establish “peace” world-wide, those psychopathic MURDERERS, are deserving of THE ROPE.
      Sure, there are plenty of our own people involved… but many are misguided fools who’ve grown up just as we have, basted in and smothered with Wiemar-esque mind-rot from birth. The rest are genuine traitors who deserve to swing with their (((Masters))).

    • Alicia
      Alicia says:

      Judging from your comment, dear Maura, Jews are not as intelligent as the Jewish and pro-Jewish elites fooled us the naive Goyim to buy into. Naturally, you will suffer because of the Muslim invasion as your mafia sets the destruction of white countries high over ordinary Jews’ well-being.

  12. ariadnatheo
    ariadnatheo says:

    A much needed discussion of a crisis whose genesis is still well hidden from the general public: the massive Jewish support of uncontrolled immigration into (consequently decreasing) white majority countries. I am not sure if I detect a note of sarcasm in Mr Langdon’s characterization of Jews’ attitude as “Islamophilia.”
    If it is to be taken at face value then I strongly disagree. No “philia” is involved in Jews’ attitude towards any “Goyim.” As Mr Langdon himself said in a previous essay, what makes them tick is “self-interest and goyophobia.”
    The Jews are not pushing for amnesty for illegal aliens in the US out of “Hispanophilia” any more than triple-passporter Barbara Specter and her “landsmen” (as they call each conspiratorially) in Europe are animated by Islamophilia. Their campaign to dilute white nations into disappearance uses whatever other Goyim are handy and it serves two purposes: the first is to destroy the sense of nationhood and the national culture thus precluding any unity in resistance to their wholesale takeover. The second is to create a climate of hatred against these destructive invaders, thus increasing the odds that those nations would more willingly support their judaized governments’ participation in the Jewish wars in the ME.

    I also disagree with the appropriateness of the diagnosis of the Orwellian doublethink,“the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” Jews do not hold two contradictory beliefs in their rapport with the world: they hold one and FAKE the other, much like having “dual citizenship”: one is the tie than binds, the other is the trick that works. The fake view may be split like a forked tongue: some Jewish ‘opinion makers’ deploy themselves to the “left” supporting unlimited immigration, others to the right ranting against it. This is good for the Jews’ image: it works to reinforce the myth of Jews’ ‘vibrant diversity of opinion’ and hide their role in the disaster.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      Yes. … to create a climate of hatred against these destructive invaders,
      It’s Jewish policy to foment hostility: Jews in Poland in 1939 murdering Germans; Jews in Russia assassinating Tsars; Jews in the East End with violence; Jews in South Africa promoting hate between blacks and whites; Jews in Hungary supporting Bela Kun; Jews in the USA promoting wars in e.g. Vietnam; Jews in Ireland promoting hostility between religions and against England and against Germany. Jew in the USA and USSR planning and advertising hostility.
      And of course Jews doing everything they can to deflect attention from their deeds. If ever people(s) get things together and realise Jews are their enemy, and act on that understanding, Jew will be on their way out.

  13. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    In addition, attacks supposedly carried out by Muslim terrorist groups against Jewish targets have all the hallmarks of inside jobs. Charlie Hebdo, Paris, AMIA office and Israeli embassy, Buenos Aires, etc..

    • TGD
      TGD says:

      Multiculturalism has just been raised to a high ideal by the British Royal Family with the official announcement of the engagement of Prince Harry to Meghan Markle, an American actress and a mulatta. How wonderful.

  14. Daniel
    Daniel says:

    I completely understand what you are pointing at here and agree that it does seem like powerful Jews are strongly pushing for third world migration into Europe. But what I don’t understand is – why? What do they stand to gain from turning Europe Muslim? I mean, the vast majority of Muslim are strongly pro Palestine, anti Israel, and anti Jews. Why would Jews want to turn Europe into a place where Muslims have a strong voice against Israel? Can someone please explain to me the logic of this? I just really want to understand what is going on. Thank you.

    • Alicia
      Alicia says:

      Ordinary Jews will not gain anything from third world migration, probably the opposite as the destruction of western societies will be harmful to Jews as well. Alas, there is a number of personas among the powerful Jews that are driven by such a hate for white Goyim that they do not care about third world migration’s impact on people from their own tribe. The main question should be: why do they hate us white Goyim this much?

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      The short answer is that Islam is Reform Judaism, and Jews have always found refuge, from Christian expulsions, in Islam. Israel is a Zionist project, and Muslim leaders have long noted the difference.

    • Karl Nemmersdorf
      Karl Nemmersdorf says:

      The Jewish elite simply want to destroy the historic nations of Europe. Jews don’t differentiate between Whites; they hate them all. If a nation is White, that’s close enough to Nazi to them. The Jewish elite also think they can keep their distance from the Muslims and rule over the ghoulash of peoples that will be the new Europe.

  15. Irish Savant
    Irish Savant says:

    The irony is that my views reflected those of Tobias Langdon’s father for most of my life. Jews were the good guys. I look back in awe and mystery at how I bought into this absurdity but buy into it I did. Which goes to show the Jews’ staggering ability to shape the prevailing narrative.

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      Same here, Irish Savant. I remember actually crying during several scenes in Schindler’s List! And feeling shock over the “evil Nazis'” treatment of those “poor, innocent people of God” as far back as the 1970s, when I saw the made-for-TV series ‘The Holocaust’!

      Boy, were we bamboozled…

  16. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    Israel and Saudi Arabia now have a public political alliance, the Saudi leadership state so openly. This alliance probably goes back many years, well before 1948, as an informal and deniable agreement. This is only a guess, as none of us has access to the secret and inner workings of zionism, but I suspect the leadership of zionism cut a deal with the Saudi family that made the survival of the Jewish state dependent upon delivering Europe to Islam. Both sides are sticking to their mutually advantageous agreement.

      • Nick Dean
        Nick Dean says:

        Which says no more, FR, than that one of the 65,000 or so great x14 grandparents of the current King was Jewish. I wouldn’t put much weight on such questionable historical data when in any case it is not an anomaly for the leadership of powerful countries to kow-tow to Jewish power. We only ought to puzzle over the few that don’t such as Mahathir Mohammed and Hitler. Their special qualities are the thing we need to better understand.

  17. PekkaL.
    PekkaL. says:

    Yes, we all know what Jews are doing to us. How many thousands of articles more? Maybe tens of thousands?

    In the meantime our countries are destroyed. In Finland the other week a court ruled that a jussuf (yes, jussuf) did not “rape” a ten-year-old, because the girl did not forcefully say that she did not want it. This is where we are, this is how low we are.

    My dear friends, it is no time to scribble in the internet.

    My comrades, my patriots will take to the streets at 6.12. 2017. It is the Independence Day in Finland.

    It is long past the time that one believes in dialogue. You cannot have any dialogue with such a Beast. They do not want it either, and we all know it.

    No dialogue, no way. Just stand by Your People.

  18. Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins says:


    Could you write a little on the background of the judge (or judges) on the court that made the decision.

    Also, speak up and let us know more about your movement in Finland.

    • Kaukomieli
      Kaukomieli says:

      To Michael Adkins on November 27, 2017 – 9:35 am:
      Since PekkaL. hasn’t replied.
      There is in Finland an association called ‘Demla’, which stands for Democratic Lawyers’ Association. This was apparently established by a bunch of Communists in the 1950’s and now infests the entire judiciary.
      Court decisions are a frequent source of scandal to the majority of internet writers, regardless of political colour. Violent crimes, even homicide and rape, are treated more lightly than “hate crimes,” such as politically incorrect screeds by “right-wing” individuals.
      One correspondent, who used to be a magistrate in Swedish Bothnia, wrote that these Demla birds fly out of universities like flocks of rooks.
      There are presently show trials being conducted in the courts in Finland; one was a grandmother who had written in condemnation of a ‘refugee’ rapist on social media — she was only fined. Another is ongoing to ban the Finnish chapter of the Nordic Resistance Movement.
      Here is another hater, a parliamentarian, who was fined heavily for having written a parody of politically correct speech. His fines were increased by the supreme court on appeal.
      This video is a composition of an interview at the public broadcaster YLE. You do not need to know Finnish to get the drift (the man with the long face is the convicted “criminal,” the interviewer an unofficial prosecutor flinging accusations).
      Yet another example of the rot is the newspaper MV-lehti. Its publisher has been imprisoned in Andorra on an international warrant.
      PS. The event mentioned by PekkaL. is a torchlight parade organized by National Resistance — all patriotic groups are invited — it is not a call to the barricades.

      • T
        T says:

        The guy looks as though he’s been run through the mill. I got a hold of an earlier portion of the video just prior to this clip where the guy fessed up to the entire thing. I ran the audio through an auto-translator and got the below. Must have been pretty serious what he’d done after all.

        The woman interrogator/accuser is gorgeous by the way.

        ‘I confess to spreading the rumor, on orders from Goldstein, that the war is not really with Eurasia, but with Eastasia. That, for years, in fact since the days of our glorious Revolution, I had no faith in our future. I forged government announcements and falsified figures, quoted for agricultural and industrial production. As a result of mental disturbance from my experiences during the atomic wars, I was a willing subject of Goldstein’s influence. I was stubborn and egocentric. When ownlife thoughts occurred to me, I reveled in them. I went into the proletarian zones. I had sex with prostitutes, I deliberately contracted syphilis. It was at this time that I made contact with the Resistance…’

        • T
          T says:

          Under the spreading chestnut tree I sold you and you sold me
          There lie they, and here lie we
          Under the spreading chestnut tree

          On a bit more serious note that video is very remindful of how the recent avalanche of sex accusations are being handled within the US. Mind you, I say this within the context that a woman’s ‘no’ means no and that sexual harassment of any type towards a woman, ie our wives, mothers and daughters, etc, is not to be tolerated. Specifically, what I’m getting at is that via the somewhat sympathetic (to the public) subject of sexual harrasment they are getting their foot in the door and setting a precedent with what amounts to extra procedural/judicial destruction of peoples lives. The accusation is made and with the corporate media and completely nuts radical left acting in conjunction they can attempt to take out entire groups with this method, whether the accusation is true or not. Recall the officer in Ferguson who had done nothing but his job and was let go all the same. In six months are we going to see something similar aimed enmasse at anyone, particularly celebrities, who spoke positively about Europeans in any way in the past, even acknowledging their simple existance, given the same treatment. Look at this ‘it’s okay to be white’ thing and the response its getting…an early run thru perhaps? Or it could be done to people whom at one time said something not super positive about gays, or wasn’t seen to be positive enough towards certain subjects.

          Like most here I’m not in agreement with much of Orwell’s personal politics, but he had a good grasps on much of the mechanics of what’s driving this modern society. A great deal of his most famous of books is reflective of his experience in Marxists circles and the below excerpt is a great description of a radical left ‘social justice warrior’ type. The corporate media has got a lot of useful human capital there to work with.

          Parsons was Winston’s fellow-employee at the Ministry of Truth. He was a fattish but active man of paralysing stupidity, a mass of imbecile enthusiasms — one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on whom, more even than on the Thought Police, the stability of the Party depended. At thirty-five he had just been unwillingly evicted from the Youth League, and before graduating into the Youth League he had managed to stay on in the Spies for a year beyond the statutory age. At the Ministry he was employed in some subordinate post for which intelligence was not required, but on the other hand he was a leading figure on the Sports Committee and all the other committees engaged in organizing community hikes, spontaneous demonstrations, savings campaigns, and voluntary activities generally. He would inform you with quiet pride, between whiffs of his pipe, that he had put in an appearance at the Community Centre every evening for the past four years. An overpowering smell of sweat, a sort of unconscious testimony to the strenuousness of his life, followed him about wherever he went, and even remained behind him after he had gone.

  19. m
    m says:

    Britain was at war with Nazi Germany before the Holocaust began…

    Umm…could someone please explain exactly when the H-word(TM) began, and of what it consisted of? Until one does that, the term is meaningless and should not be used.

    • anarchyst
      anarchyst says:

      the jewish “holocaust ™” word came into use in the 1960s when jews needed to buttress their failing status–people seeing through their nefarousness and to evoke sympathy in order to “keep the shekels flowing”. The word “holocaust ™” means “consummation by fire” and actually has nothing to do with jews in labor camps. It was a brilliant way to extort money from the rest of the world and to evoke “guilt” on the rest of the world for “letting it happen”…

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      I first saw the word used in 1966 or 1967 (more likely the former) in an extended article in the New York Times Magazine. The article described the term as the way that the growing “scholarly” community assessed the evil Nazi plot to completely erase the Jewish presence from the earth.

      There was a small amount of resistance and hostility to the term from a limited number of Catholic clergy and laymen, who considered its use a brazen assault upon the 1,900-year-old Christian tradition of referring to the Crucifixion as the one true Holocaust. I’m ashamed to admit that I (then twenty or twenty-one) thought their analysis too far-fetched to attend to.

  20. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    Nations can survive Decadence as all civilizations have cycles of rise and fall. The fall of the old dynasties in Turkey, Iran, and China didn’t end those civilizations as people and culture.
    But current Decadence is accompanied with Demodence and Demomise, or demise of native populations. There is NO recovery from that. If France becomes Africanized, it is no longer France and will never regain its true identity and heritage ever again. It will be land of Africans speaking French and colonizing white wombs(infected with jungle fever) to create more black babies. If Australia is repopulated by Hindus, Chinese, Arabs, and Africans, it is no longer Australia as we knew it.

    A nation or community can survive bad(even horrible) ideas or trends. Russia survived communism, even after losing millions of lives. China survived it too despite Mao’s policies having killed millions.
    But Russian remained Russian and China remained Chinese during communism.

    Globalism is more dangerous than communism or bad ideas of the past because it uses decadence to weaken the pride and unity of a people and then drives a stake through the nation’s heart with demographic invasion and replacement.
    To undermine nationalism and morality, globalism feeds the native folks decadence not only as fun but as faith, as something to worship. Notice homomania is not just street celebrations and parades but the new holy symbols in many churches.

    So, what nations face today isn’t just decadence. It is decadence that leads to demomise or demographic demise and demodence, the decaying of an entire people as an identity and culture.
    In the UK, the BBC now regularly feature blacks and non-whites as white historical figures in movies and series.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Correct. That’s why the Jews promote mass non-white immigration into white countries and subsequent racial mixing as the “final solution” to their white problem.

  21. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    A comment (in The Occidental Observer) described blacks and sports, and a hard-to-describe mental outlook, an immediacy ‘grounded in the here and now’, unconcerned with the future or anywhere else in the present, people for whom today really is ‘the first day of the rest of your life’. Leading from that,
    Blacks avoid problems. Whites solve problems. Jews cause problems is my simple formula. And there’s a difference in learning about learning: whites, when a problem (which may be invented by other parties) has been solved, are programmed to stop, relax, be relieved, be calm, breathe a sigh of relief. Whereas Jews seem to be permanently, unendingly, tirelessly on the lookout for divisions and cracks and dislikes, to enlarge and exploit and cause harm.

  22. A. Yell
    A. Yell says:

    Just to be clear there’s no such thing as “Islamophobia”. That is an UNREASONABLE fear of Islam. After 1500 years of invasion, conquest, occupation, murder, rape, pillage and enslavement you don’t have to be a Zionist shill to have an aversion to Islam.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Islamo-“phobia” exists everywhere at the periphery of the Islamic world. It exists in Hindu India, Buddhist Thailand and the Catholic Philippines. Since Islam is an aggressive imperialistic theocratic movement that is hardly astonishing. Modern Iranians who grew desperate with Khomeini’s terror regime despise the fact that Islam was once brought to Iran by Arabs with the sword and many who fled their country reconverted to Zoroastrianism.

      • A. Yell
        A. Yell says:

        Franklin Ryckaert- That’s not “phobia” that’s just self-preservation. It can’t be a phobia if the fear is justified by actual experience. By the actual behavior of the people that you’re afraid of.

    • JimB
      JimB says:

      It always irks me when these Lefties attach a “phobia” to the end of every enemy-group, vice and perversion! As you said, A. Yell, a phobia is an unreasonable fear. I mean, hell, I don’t even “fear” homosexuals! I simply detest homosexuality and am disgusted by homosexuals. No homo-“phobia”.

      But, of course, these rats love to play their reality-twisting word games, don’t they. Like saying that “anti-Semitic” means hatred of jews and pro-White movements are “White supremacist”.

      • A. Yell
        A. Yell says:

        JimB- The proper definition of White Supremacist is anyone dedicated to preserve, protect and defend White people and their civilization from the depredations of Colored people and Jews.
        Just like the proper definition of racism is anything that’s in the best interest of White people.

  23. ilena
    ilena says:

    This article really hit the nail. I wonder what people think about Prince Harry’s upcoming wedding?
    It never ceases to amaze me how the Jews have almost cornered the West into check-mate. I get this stuff; You get this stuff….but most people don’t have a clue on who is behind this psychological warfare or even realize there is a war on for their minds. They’re just gladly being herded over the cliff.

      • ilena
        ilena says:

        An article at Vox (which I never read but I found it thru the search engine) states that Meghan is Jewish on her father’s side. I have looked into the theory Harry is not Charles’ son, but I think Harry looks like both Charles and Diana even though he has red hair. I’m not a fan of this family at all because they get their wealth from the taxpayers and they no longer represent the Indigenous British people. Like most people with public positions they bow down to the Jewish power structure.

  24. Mike
    Mike says:

    I take the point that Mark Steyn is part Jew, up to maybe 99%. Yes, there are areas he doesn’t cover, but………….
    He is good on free speech, he does put the boot into the Clintons and the Democrats, he is absolutely not a left winger.
    Michael Mann PhD, a Jew is suing him, very expensively for libel. Doctor Mann made his claims about global warming; he invented the ‘hockey stick’, which is alleged to prove that it is all our fault. He does not like being called a liar.
    The alleged problem is global warming. The alleged solution, surprise, surprise is Carbon emission trading –  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_emission_trading. The key word is trading. It is not costing mere gigabucks, it is trillions and we get to pay them. Where does they go? Some, a lot(?) goes through the Chicago Climate Exchange – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Climate_Exchange. More passes the European Climate Exchange – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Climate_Exchange. Who runs them? Who are the perpetrators of the world’s largest boondoggle? The ZOG – https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-is-behind-the-climate-change-hoax/ names names; all Jew? They might claim that they are not but they are taking us for millions at the very least.
    Who pays Michael Mann’s hefty legal bills when he sues Mark Steyn? Follow the money.
    War makes for strange bedfellows. Waiting for a white knight to save us is not the answer.

  25. Thomas
    Thomas says:

    Although off topic about Islam and Europe, I remember seeing Steyn recently on FOX news stating that Hitler’s Germany made an illegal war on France. It was France as well as Britain who declared war on Germany in WW2, not the other way around. Germany also built a very expensive defensive wall on their side of the Rhine river across from France; not exactly the behavior of an aggressor. He also made no mention that Britain/France declared war on Germany to guarantee Polish security but did nothing when the USSR invaded Poland from the east and deported huge populations (many jews) into the depths of the USSR (gulag labor no doubt). Incredible duplicity

Comments are closed.