It’s Holocaust Memorial Day (HMD) as I write, so here’s an interesting question: Did you hear about the hate-criminal who was caught urinating on a monument at Auschwitz? Probably you didn’t, because the story wasn’t suitable for anti-White, anti-European, anti-Christian propaganda. Quite the opposite. The hate-criminal in question was Jewish, a “19-year-old Israeli” called “Zeev K” (Ze’ev is a common Ashkenazi name in Israel). According to the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA), he was “detained” and “questioned for several hours” in March 2018 after he was “caught urinating on … a monument located near the ruins of the crematoria” at the infamous “Nazi death camp.”
Why did he do it?
The JTA subsequently reported that the teenager was found guilty of “desecrating a monument” and fined “5,000 zloty ($1,350)” by “a regional court in the town of Oswiecim, where Auschwitz is located.” He wasn’t present for the hearing, so maybe he was back in Israel, the nation founded after the Holocaust to protect Jews from the irrational hate of gentiles. But I wonder whether he would be safe there after committing a horrible crime like that. After all, the Polish court found him guilty of desecration, which suggests that there was no excuse for what he’d done. So why did he do it? Why on earth would an Israeli Jew do something so foul and degraded to a “monument” at a “Nazi death camp” where millions of his fellows Jews had been slaughtered in the most brutal and inhumane fashion?
Auschwitz, desecrated in March 2018
If I could read Hebrew, I might be able to find the answer on Israeli websites and blogs. But I can’t read Hebrew. As I pointed out in “Words as Weapons,” it’s very useful for Jews to have a language of their own, almost unknown by gentiles whose own languages are very well known by Jews. That linguistic asymmetry was also present in Yiddish, the Jewish dialect of German that was walled off from gentile scrutiny by being written in the Hebrew alphabet. Down history, it has been much easier for Jews to keep secrets from gentiles than for gentiles to keep secrets from Jews.
Thick goyish skulls
And in the modern West it’s also much easier for Jews to criticize gentiles than it is for gentiles to criticize Jews. Indeed, gentiles simply can’t criticize Jews if they know what’s good for them. The Holocaust is used as an enormous stick to beat an appropriate sense of guilt, humility and obedience into thick goyish skulls. “Look what you evil goyim did to innocent Jews. Now shut up and do as you’re told.” But that only increases the interest of the story about the Jewrinator at Auschwitz, as he might be called. Why did he do it? I can think of several possible motives, none of which cast a good light on Jewish psychology and Israeli culture. Perhaps it was an act of arrogance and bravado, carried out with swaggering entitlement by an obnoxious youth from Israel’s Ashkenazi elite: “The goyim might have to grovel before the Holocaust, but I don’t!” Or perhaps the teenager was being bullied by obnoxious Ashkenazim like that and committed the desecration out of defiance and despair. Perhaps he was drunk or on drugs. Perhaps he’s a rebellious teenager who had simply got sick of Israel’s Holocaust cult and decided to express his contempt for it.
Whatever his motives, the Jurinator at Auschwitz committed a repulsive and self-willed act that raises a disturbing question. If a Jew will do something like that to a Jewish sacred site and concept, what on earth might Jews do to other people’s sacred sites and concepts? And it’s precisely because it raises such questions that the story is Not Good for Jews. That’s why it didn’t receive much publicity. But what would have happened if the desecrator had been a White Christian teenager? I think his life would have been destroyed to set an example to other goyim. It would have been both a Teaching Moment and a Screeching Moment, a chance for Jews to emphasize their power and express their hatred of Whites.
“Hysterical rage, nausea, and heartache”
You can see how eager Jews and other members of the liberal elite are for anti-White Screeching Moments from their reaction to the “Covington Kids” in January 2019. They’ve been outraged by the image of a White Christian teenager “smirking” in the face of a noble Native American elder at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington. Arbeit Macht Frei, or “Work Makes Free,” is the slogan on the gates at Auschwitz. In the Covington affair, it was “Smirk Makes Free” — the teenager’s allegedly racist and white-supremacist “facecrime” set free a torrent of anti-White, anti-male and anti-Christian hate. Before the scandal was revealed to be as fake as the UVA gang-rape on broken glass, lots of liberals had put their hatred of White Christians firmly on the record. A Jewish journalist called Erik Abriss tweeted thus: “I don’t know what it says about me but I’ve truly lost the ability to articulate the hysterical rage, nausea, and heartache this makes me feel. I just want these people to die. Simple as that. Every single one of them. And their parents.”
Smirk Makes Free: a study in contrasts
Well, what does it say about Erik Abriss? I think it says that he hates White Christians and wishes them nothing but ill. And it says he has the same psychology and attitudes as the Jewish leaders of a revolutionary organization in the 1960s called Weather Underground. An FBI agent called Larry Grathwohl infiltrated the group and recorded their plans:
They [the leaders of Weather Underground] also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter revolution and they felt that this counter revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing reeducation centers in the Southwest where [they] would take all the people who needed to be reeducated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked, well, what is going to happen to those people that we can’t reeducate that are diehard capitalists and the reply was that they’d have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean kill — 25 million people. I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people and they were dead serious. (see Patriot Larry Grathwohl, 65, Infiltrated Weather Underground, Indicted Bill Ayers, The American Spectator, 24th July 2013)
I don’t think the Weather Underground saw those targets for extermination as “25 million people,” but as 25 million goyim, as Whites from a Christian culture who posed a threat to Jews and needed to be subjugated before Jews could carry out their grand scheme of tikkun olam, “repairing the world.” You can see the same goyophobia in the Jewish feminist Sabrina Rubin Erdely, who created the hate-hoax about gang-rape among “the toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond students” of the University of Virginia.
Kevin MacDonald noted that Jewish radicals during the 1960s often had fantasies of apocalyptic revenge.
Recall Lipset’s (1988, 393) description of the many Jewish “families which around the breakfast table, day after day, in Scarsdale, Newton, Great Neck, and Beverly Hills have discussed what an awful, corrupt, immoral, undemocratic, racist society the United States is.” These families clearly perceive themselves as separate from the wider culture of the United States; they also view conservative forces as attempting to maintain this malignant culture. As in the case of traditional Judaism vis-à-vis gentile society, the traditional culture of the United States—and particularly the political basis of cultural conservatism that has historically been associated with anti-Semitism—is perceived as a manifestation of a negatively evaluated outgroup.
This antipathy toward gentile-dominated society was often accompanied by a powerful desire to avenge the evils of the old social order. For many Jewish New Leftists “the revolution promises to avenge the sufferings and to right the wrongs which have, for so long, been inflicted on Jews with the permission or encouragement, or even at the command of, the authorities in prerevolutionary societies” (Cohen 1980, 208). Interviews with New Left Jewish radicals revealed that many had destructive fantasies in which the revolution would result in “humiliation, dispossession, imprisonment or execution of the oppressors” (Cohen 1980, 208) combined with the belief in their own omnipotence and their ability to create a nonoppressive social order—findings that are reminiscent of the motivating role of revenge for anti-Semitism among the Jewish-dominated security forces in communist Poland discussed above. These findings are also entirely consistent with my experience among Jewish New Left activists at the University of Wisconsin in the 1960s (see note 13). (Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique)
Holocaust Memorial Day takes place only once a year, but it’s the foundation for two other HMDs that run every day of the week: Holy Minority Day and Hate-filled Majority Day. Jews never miss an opportunity to accuse the White majority of hate and to present minorities as sacred innocents who are persecuted without cause. Here’s a story from 2017 that illustrates both themes:
Israel has lodged official complaints after a hotel in Switzerland posted signs telling Jewish guests to shower before using the pool and restricted their access to a kitchen freezer. The Paradies apartment hotel in the Alpine village of Arosa, in eastern Switzerland, has been accused of antisemitism after a guest posted to Facebook a picture of a notice near the hotel pool.
“To our Jewish guests, women, men and children, please take a shower before you go swimming,” it said, adding: “If you break the rules I’m forced to [close] the swimming pool for you.” A second notice, in the kitchen, instructed “our Jewish guests” that they could only access the facility’s freezer between 10 and 11am and between 4.30 and 5.30pm. “I hope you understand that our team does not like being disturbed all the time,” it said.
The story was published by Israeli papers, prompting a harsh reaction from Israeli officials. Israel’s deputy foreign minister, Tzipi Hotovely, described the notices as “an antisemitic act of the worst and ugliest kind”. Jacob Keidar, Israel’s ambassador to Switzerland, reportedly contacted the hotel and later informed Hotovely that the signs had been removed. But she was not satisfied and has reportedly demanded formal condemnation from the Swiss government.
A Swiss foreign ministry spokesman said in an email that the ministry had been in contact with Keidar and had “outlined to him that Switzerland condemns racism, antisemitism and discrimination in any form”. The Paradies manager, Ruth Thomann, who signed the notices, insisted to the Swiss newspaper 20Minutes that she was not antisemitic, and acknowledged that her “choice of words was a mistake”.
She told the Blick newspaper that the apartment hotel currently had a lot of Jewish clients, and that other guests had complained that some of them did not shower before using the pool and had asked her to do something. “I wrote something naïve on that poster,” she was quoted as saying, admitting that it would have been better simply to address all guests with the same message.
The hotel is reportedly very popular with ultra-orthodox Jewish guests because it has been accommodating to their needs, including providing access to a freezer to store kosher food. Thomann told Blick that because the freezer was in a staff room, she had felt compelled to set times when the Jewish guests could access it to ensure staff could enjoy their “lunch and dinner in peace”. (Swiss hotel accused of antisemitism over signs singling out Jews, The Guardian, 15th August 2017)
Reading between the lines, it’s clear that “ultra-Orthodox Jews” were behaving obnoxiously at the Paradies hotel. It’s also clear that the manager was not motivated by hate when she asked them to be considerate of other guests and of hotel staff. But to Israel’s deputy foreign minister, Tzipi Hotovely, a polite request for Jews to stop being obnoxious and start being considerate is “an antisemitic act of the worst and ugliest kind.”
Is it as ugly as urinating “on a monument located near the ruins of the crematoria” at Auschwitz? Obviously not. Tzipi Hotovely is being hysterical, hyperbolic and indifferent to the truth. Indeed, if the story in the Guardian is accurate, she’s speaking the opposite of the truth. Far from being “antisemitic,” the hotel had been “very popular with ultra-orthodox Jewish guests,” because it was so “accommodating to their needs, including providing access to a freezer to store kosher food.” I assume that Jewish guests then began demanding access to the freezer at all hours, regardless of the inconvenience to the staff. Certainly, Jewish guests seem to have been behaving in ways worthy of criticism, but it’s forbidden to criticize Jews. They’re a minority and minorities are always in the right, just as the majority is always in the wrong. As I said above, Holocaust Memorial Day is only once a year, but every day is Holy Minority Day, when minorities of all kinds, from Jews and Gypsies to transexuals and Travellers, are held up as innocent victims of cruel and xenophobic Whites.
Holocaustianity and Heresy
And so Holy Minority Day is simultaneously Hate-filled Majority Day. That’s why the Simon Wiesenthal Centre (SWC) condemned the Paradies in Switzerland as a “hotel of hate” and demanded that its staff be “penalized” for making reasonable requests of misbehaving Jews. The hysteria and over-reaction of the SWC’s reaction are obvious, just as they were when Erik Abriss reacted to the Covington facecriminal with “hysterical rage, nausea, and heartache.” And those are his own words. He knows he’s being hysterical but he doesn’t want to stop. After all, Jewish hysteria and hyperbole have worked very well since the Second War World. They’re at the centre of the Holocaust cult that has long flourished in the United States and begun to slide its tentacles into the public life of all other Western nations.
I don’t think the Holocaust cult is a good thing and I’m sure my heresy is shared by a lot of people in government and the media. But they keep quiet, because they’ve got too much to lose. It would take rare intellectual and moral courage for any important Westerners to stand up in public and raise doubts about any aspect of the Holocaust. They would immediately be accused of hate and “Holocaust denial.” But one doesn’t have to reject the historical reality of the Holocaust to criticize the ideology that has been built around it. The Jewish scholar Norman Finkelstein doesn’t reject the Holocaust, but he does reject Holocaustianity. So, in fact, do large numbers of the Muslims and other non-Whites now living in Western nations. The paradox is that their presence is, in part, a result of Holocaustianity. Whites who criticize Third-World immigration have always been condemned by Jewish groups as Nazis and wannabe genocidalists. If Whites resist mass immigration, they must be itching to build another Auschwitz. So Jewish propaganda has long argued.
Applaud the sentiment, deplore the deed
Jewish propaganda has also argued that all human groups are absolutely equal in their moral, intellectual and civilizational potential. There’s another paradox there, because it’s the higher average verbal IQ of Jews, combined with their ethnocentrism and psychological intensity, that has enabled them to argue so successfully that they are in fact the same as everyone else. Jewish pseudo-scientists like Stephen Jay Gould have told us that race does not exist and that we can’t rank different groups by their average intelligence. It follows, then, that Iraqis are the same as Italians, Somalis are the same as Swedes, and anyone at all can become American. Meanwhile, Israel has rejected Third-World enrichment by building high-tech fences and strengthening its already exclusionary laws of citizenship and national identity. It’s another paradox of Jewish ideology.
But these Jewish paradoxes are not going to survive. Scientific research will soon explode the notion of racial and sexual equality. And mass immigration into Western nations is provoking a populist backlash, not rendering Whites docile and ready to accept the rainbow future promised by the lying liberal elite. Dogmas of human equality and strength-thru-diversity lie at the heart of Holocaustianity, but the dogmas are doomed to die. I don’t agree with what the teenaged Israeli urinator did at Auschwitz, but he created a powerful symbol of defiance all the same. In the most literal sense, he told the Holocaust cult to piss off. I can applaud the sentiment while deploring the deed.