“Racism is a Crime, Not an Opinion”: Jewish Goyophobia and the War on White


It would sound better in Russian or Chinese: Le racisme n’est pas une opinion, le racisme est un délit – “Racism is not an opinion, racism is a crime.” It doesn’t sound good in French, language of liberty and the Enlightenment. But I’d guess those words come from an outsider who is both Francophone and Francophobe, hating the native White French and eager to destroy their country, culture and lives.

Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme

There are many Francophobes in France and the most successful are Jews, as Guillaume Durocher has described for the Occidental Observer in articles like “Jewish Influence and Ethnic Networking in France.” Just as in Britain, America, Australia and Sweden, Jewish groups like SOS Racisme and LICRA (Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme) have worked tirelessly to close debate, criminalize resistance and punish dissidents. Here’s that line again: Le racisme n’est pas une opinion, le racisme est un délit — “Racism is not an opinion, racism is a crime.” It sounds very Jewish to me, not just for its implicit aggression, but also for its dishonesty. What it really means is this: Le racisme est un délit par la pensée — “Racism is a thought-crime.”

But that would be too blunt, too clearly a statement of totalitarian mindset and liberticidal intent. So the mindset and intent were expressed indirectly instead, with a pretence of respect for freedom of speech. They don’t want to crush opinions, you see, they want to crush crimes. And other crimes automatically suggest themselves: “Sexism is not an opinion, homophobia and Islamophobia are not opinions — they’re all crimes.” The left pretend that we could create paradise if we could just stamp out hate and stop nasty people thinking nasty things. In fact, the left don’t want paradise: they want power. The torturer and ideologue O’Brien put it like this in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949): “It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be.”

Ideology trumps reality

But the left define “error” by reference to ideology, not by reference to reality. That’s as true for real leftists in 2018 as it is for the fictional O’Brien in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Take the question of biological differences between human beings. There is more and more scientific evidence that different human populations followed different evolutionary paths in different environments, whether it was the warmth and humidity of fertile Africa or the cold and thin air of infertile Tibet. And some of us have interbred with other human species: the Neanderthals and Denisovans in Europe and Asia, unnamed archaic species in Africa. In short, reality says that race exists and influences every aspect of psychology, culture and achievement. But cultural Marxism denies this reality. It blames all bad outcomes for non-White groups on White racism, which is an eldritch, unspeakably wicked force occupying the same ideological niche as witchcraft once did. The hostile elite have even created martyr-cults to insist, incessantly and incontrovertibly, that vice and virtue are evenly divided between Whites and non-Whites.

Whites have all the vice and non-Whites all the virtue. What could be fairer than that? In Britain, the chief martyr-cult worships the Black teenager Stephen Lawrence, who was killed by White racists in London. In America, the chief martyr-cult worships the Black teenager Emmett Till, who was killed by White racists in Mississippi. In both countries, far more Whites are murdered by Blacks than vice versa. Worse still, Black-on-White murders can involve prolonged sadism and sexual violence: the White American couple Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were raped, tortured and murdered by Blacks; the White English schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan was raped, tortured and murdered by Blacks. These horrible crimes are unknown to the vast majority of Whites in America and Britain. The martyr-cults of Emmett Till and Stephen Lawrence are designed to reverse the truth about inter-racial violence, not to reveal it. But the American cult is bigger and more influential and its martyrology is regularly aired in the British media.

Ever Mind the Ballads

That’s why Emmett Till recently got an hour of airtime on Radio 4, the BBC’s most prestigious and politically important radio channel. The summary of the broadcast on the Radio 4 website is oddly addicted to ampersands (the symbol &), but that doesn’t disguise the anti-White politics:

The Ballads of Emmett Till

Emmett Till, 14 & black, was put on the train from Chicago by his mother Mamie in August 1955. She got him back in a pine box. His corpse mutilated & stinking. He had been beaten, shot and dumped in the Tallahatchie River for supposedly whistling at a white woman. His killers would forever escape justice.

What Mamie did next helped galvanize the Civil Rights Movement & make Emmett the sacrificial lamb of the movement. From the very first Till’s death was both a call to political action & the subject of songs, poetry & prose. Gwendolyn Brooks, Langston Hughes, James Baldwin, Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell & many more have been drawn to tell his tale-his [sic] is the never ending ballad of a black life that mattered.

His disfigured image from the legendary photograph in Jet magazine is seared into the memories of generations of Black Americans. And now Till has returned to haunt America. Taken up by the mothers and fathers of the slain in the Black Lives Matter movement, the subject of new documentaries, a trio of forthcoming Hollywood films & a new FBI investigation as the search for justice continues. His coffin lies at the heart of the Washington’s new museum of African American history-a secular shrine & symbol of the enduring pain of American racism.

Maria Margaronis draws on archive from Washington University St Louis, home to the interviews for the groundbreaking series Eyes on the Prize & rare recordings of the Till family conducted by filmmaker Keith Beauchamp. She travels through landscape & memory across Mississippi & Chicago, listening to historians, poets, writers & Till family members as she grapples with the many layers of meaning & the many, many ways Emmett’s story has been told & retold. These are the Ballads of Emmett Till. (“The Ballads of Emmett Till,” Archive on Four, BBC Radio 4, 25th August 2018 — produced by Mark Burman)

Cultural Marxist Maria Margaronis

Maria Margaronis has also written about Emmett Till for BBC History Extra. Her discussion of the “cheeky Chicago boy” and his murder is more than 2,500 words long. It’s detailed and often florid: “Emmett Till’s story lives on in literature, music, art and film, in commemorations and museums, in activism and the unfinished search for justice. Those streams converge and cross like the rivers of the Mississippi Delta, so that it’s hard to say where one ends and another begins; the waters began to flow at once, and still flow on today.” Margaronis harps on a simple theme of “racism” and “white supremacy.” But she doesn’t find space to mention that Till’s father, Louis Till, was executed for murder and rape in 1945. However, she does find space to plug some fake news:

In a way, Till’s funeral never ended. His story echoes every time the killing of an African-American person by a white man goes unpunished – especially when the victim is young, as Trayvon Martin was when he was shot by a neighbourhood watch volunteer in 2012 at the age of 17, or when the body is left in public view like that of a lynching victim, as 18-year-old Michael Brown’s was in Missouri in 2014. The wound is raw, and regularly reopened. As Till’s mother used to say, “You must continuously tell Emmett’s story until man’s consciousness is risen. Only then will there be justice for Emmett Till.” (The legacy of Emmett Till: the murder that reshaped the American civil rights movement, BBC History Extra, 28th August 2018)


George Zimmerman is not “a white man”

Trayvon Martin was shot by George Zimmerman, a dark-skinned Hispanic who cannot be described by any honest person as “a white man.” Obviously, then, Maria Margaronis has either never seen a photograph of George Zimmerman or is not an honest person. I think it’s the latter. But who is she and why is she so dedicated to promoting the themes of White evil and Black innocence? Well, she’s a “Greek journalist” who is “London correspondent for The Nation, the oldest political weekly magazine in the United States.” Back in June 2016, she wrote an article for The Nation entitled “With MP Jo Cox’s Murder, Britain’s Campaign to Leave the EU Turns Toxic.” The article described how “The demons of xenophobia, resentment, and rage unleashed by Brexit informed the killer’s act.” The month before, she had written an article entitled “The EU Has Turned Greece Into a Prison for Refugees.” The article described how “The grief, frustration, and need that have washed up on these shores is overwhelming.”

Strong circumstantial evidence

And there are lots more where those came from (including praise for Jeremy Corbyn). Maria Margaronis is obviously a highly partisan cultural Marxist with no concern for objectivity, balance or “alternative narratives.” It’s unsurprising, then, that she’s just made an hour-long documentary for the BBC. And I made a prediction to myself when I heard her documentary on Emmett Till for Archive on Four. “I bet she’s Jewish,” I thought (or words to that effect). Well, I haven’t been able to prove it for sure, but the circumstantial evidence for her Jewishness is strong. She behaves like a Jew, looks like a Jew (see above), and is married to an “American”-Jewish writer called Don Guttenplan, who wrote a book called The Holocaust on Trial (2002) about David Irving’s libel-case against Deborah Lipstadt. She called the Jewish Trotskyist Savvas Michael-Matsas an “old friend” in an article for the Guardian supporting him and attacking the pro-White Greek party Golden Dawn as “black-shirted skinheads” who are “driven by fear and hate” and “must not be allowed to win.” She and her husband have a son called Alexander Guttenplan, who was celebrated by The Jewish Chronicle for his exploits on a British quiz-show called University Challenge.

I conclude that Maria Margaronis is very probably Jewish or part-Jewish. She is certainly a dedicated commissar in the War on White, the incessant campaign in politics, academia, the media and popular entertainment to demonize and dispossess Whites while sanctifying and sacralizing non-Whites. I think that Ms Margaronis would heartily agree with the slogan I discussed above: “Racism is not an opinion, racism is a crime.” Someone else who would heartily agree with the slogan is a sociologist in Sweden called Jerzy Sarnecki (pronounced Sarnetski). He has recently done his best to dismiss crime-statistics showing that migrants and their offspring are hugely over-represented as rapists in Sweden and form the “vast majority” of gang-rapists.

In Sweden but not Swedish

According to Breitbart News, Sarnecki has “claimed that the reason for so many migrants being convicted of gang rape was because of discrimination by the Swedish justice system, [saying] that police were more likely to investigate migrant crime.” He thinks that the statistics are corrupted by “an old right-wing conspiracy theory which purports that foreign men are coming to Sweden and raping Swedish women and that the establishment — a politically correct elite — attempts to conceal these crimes.”

Jerzy Sarnecki: in Sweden but not Swedish

Sarnecki is wrong. It’s not a “conspiracy theory”: it’s an accurate portrayal of a highly unpleasant reality. But Jerzy Sarnecki doesn’t care about reality or about the decades of sexual violence inflicted on Swedish women by non-Whites who should never have been allowed to bring their misogyny, anti-White hatred and low average IQs to a peaceful, prosperous First-World nation. Sarnecki is “Swedish” only in the sense that he is based in Sweden. He is Suedophone but Suedophobe, that is, he hates native White Swedes and, like the Swedish-based Jews Peter Wolodarski, Barbara Lerner-Specter and David Schwarz, he wants to destroy Sweden with “diversity.” Like Maria Margaronis, Jerzy Sarnecki behaves like a Jew and looks like a Jew. I can’t prove Jewishness in her case, but I can in his: according to his Wikipedia article, he’s a Jew from Poland. Breitbart News says that he “prominently features in the [Swedish] media as an expert on all things crime-related,” just as the Jewish bureaucrat Sue Berelowitz used to “prominently feature” in the British media “as an expert on all things child-welfare-related.”

Gatekeepers for the goyim

Berelowitz was the “Deputy Children’s Commissioner for England and Wales.” When news of the huge over-representation of Pakistani Muslims in gang-rape and child-prostitution began to emerge here, she did her best to downplay it, spinning the line that abuse happens in “every community.” Like Sarnecki in Sweden, Berelowitz in Britain was playing a classic Jewish role: that of gatekeeper. The Jewish journalist Nick Cohen has openly used the term as he complained about the “new anti-Semitism” on the left. He’s angry that “Labour MPs” failed to maintain their “gate-keeping role” and keep Jeremy Corbyn off the ballot in the Labour leadership election. It doesn’t matter that Corbyn is very popular with ordinary Labour members, you see. He isn’t popular with Jews and that’s what matters to Cohen.

Sue Berelowitz, gatekeeper for the goyim

Cohen thinks that Jews like himself should have had the “gate-keeping role” in Labour instead. After all, they have that role in many other places across the West. Again and again, members of the tiny Jewish minority occupy positions in governments and bureaucracies that enable them to control flows of personnel and information. They give free passage to people and ideas that are “Good for the Jews,” while blocking people and ideas that aren’t. Barbara Roche, the Jewish immigration minister under the traitorous shabbos goy Tony Blair, told the Guardian in 2001 that she “entered politics … to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” As minister, she thought that opening the borders was a good way to meet those ends. That’s why Britain has been burdened with 100,000s of low-IQ, high-crime Somalis, to name only one of the hostile and unassimilable groups that flooded in under Roche and Blair.

Introducing goyophobia

Barbara Roche and Sue Berelowitz are Anglophone but Anglophobe, hating the native White British and wanting to destroy them with “diversity.” But there’s a quicker way of saying terms like “Francophobe,” “Suedophobe” and “Anglophobe.” To the Jews, French, Swedish and British Whites are all goyim or goys, as non-Jews are called in Hebrew. Jews who hate goyim are therefore goyophobes. And goyophobia is by far the most serious and harmful form of prejudice at work in the West today. The most effective vehicle of goyophobia is mass immigration, because it allows Jews to demonize Whites as racist and hate-filled merely for defending their own territory. That’s why rare murders by “white racists” are turned into endlessly promoted martyr-cults while the much frequent murders of Whites by non-Whites are quickly forgotten.

You can see another rare murder being publicized by the Jewish goyophobe David Rosenberg at the website openDemocracy (which is an Orwellian name if ever I saw one). In May this year, Rosenberg was eager to stir anti-White resentment in London by reminding non-Whites of “The racist killing of Altab Ali 40 years ago today.” How many Whites have been murdered, raped, wounded, robbed and defrauded by non-Whites in those 40 years? Rosenberg doesn’t care. Indeed, he scarcely troubles to conceal his gloating at the ethnic and cultural cleansing of Whites in London:

Just east from Whitechapel High Street in the London borough of Tower Hamlets, there is a garden with an ornate entrance. A tubular-framed arch merges with a Bengali-style, orange-coated metal structure. Altab Ali Park is London’s only park named after a Bengali. Previously called St Mary’s Gardens, it was one of several green spaces in Tower Hamlets named after saints. (The racist killing of Altab Ali 40 years ago today, openDemocracy, 4th May 2018)

In other words, a piece of Britain’s Christian past has not merely been erased, but replaced with an anti-Christian, anti-White message. And there’s nothing saintly about Tower Hamlets today. It’s been flooded with Bangladeshi Muslims and become a Third-World colony in a First-World nation (see my articles “Back with a Bangla,” “Whole Lotta Lutfur” and “Truth, Honesty and Faith in Allah”). To the bafflement and distress of liberals, mass immigration has created “third-world village politics” and rampant homophobia at the heart of the British capital. Tower Hamlets is a microcosm of what awaits the rest of Britain if present trends are allowed to continue.

Trends have to end

They won’t be, but we have more to deal with than the relentless rise in the size and hostility of non-White populations in the West. Mass immigration, ethnic cleansing and White dispossession are the physical expressions of an abstract ideology: Jewish goyophobia. We don’t just have to stop and reverse Third-World immigration: we need “to combat” its architects, overseers and apologists (as Barbara Roche might put it). The BBC was founded by Whites, uses White-invented technology, and is funded by a compulsory television licence paid largely by Whites. And guess what? The goyophobe Maria Margaronis is employed by the BBC to broadcast anti-White propaganda, inciting Britain’s non-Whites to yet more resentment, hatred and violence.

This is a crazy situation. Does any broadcaster in Israel employ anti-Semites to attack Israel’s Jewish majority and demonize Jews for one or another of the many crimes they have committed against Arabs and other non-Jews? Of course not. Israel isn’t insane and isn’t run by a hostile elite who hate its Jewish majority. So let’s borrow a line from The Sound of Music (1965) and ask: “How do you solve a problem like Maria?” The first step is to point out what she, Jerzy Sarnecki, Sue Berelowitz, Nick Cohen, David Rosenberg and many other Jewish goyophobes are up to. The next step is to ask them to stick their goyophobia where the sun regularly shines. In other words, they need to accept Benjamin Netanyahu’s heart-felt invitation: “I want to tell every Jew in France and in Europe that Israel is your home.” Jews have a home of their own on the shores of sunny Mediterranean. They need to go there and stop wrecking the homes of other people.

33 replies
  1. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    Here are true stories about “icons” of the so-called “civil rights” movement . . .

    There is much more to the “Emmett Till” story that is not widely known. Of course, killing him was wrong, (and made him into a “martyr” of the black “civil-rights” movement). but–it is not generally known that Emmett Till was a strapping young man of about 160 lbs.–NOT a “little boy” as some media types tried to portray him as. He was a known womanizer and attempted to take his cocky “Chicago ways” in dealing with women to the Deep South. He was sent to live with relatives in the South because his Chicago relatives could not handle him. He had a “cocky attitude” and bragged about “getting it on” with white women–not a good idea in the South. . . According to published accounts, Mr. Till did not just “whistle” at a white woman, but grabbed, manhandled and fondled a married white woman. In Southern culture, this was, and still is, the ultimate form of disrespect. Despite Mr. Till’s relatives’ attempts to spirit him “out of town” to avoid retribution by the woman’s relatives and townspeople, his cocky attitude “got in the way”, similar to the way that “young master Trayvon’s” attitude got him killed. Despite being given numerous “chances” to apologize for his behavior, he was defiant to the end. IF he had apologized for his behavior, he would still be alive today. In fact, one of his killers was a black man.
    It is interesting to note that Emmett Till’s father was executed by the U S military for multiple rapes. Maybe “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree” . . .

    Rosa Parks was not the “ordinary” black woman that so-called historians made her to be. She was an organizer for the NAACP and was “planted” in order to advance the cause of black “civil-rights” to which she was successful.
    Approximately a year previous to Rosa Parks’ “bus ride” and refusal to vacate her seat, a REAL ordinary black woman did the same thing. This black woman received NO publicity or support from the NAACP or other black “civil-rights” organizations. You see, she was an unmarried black woman with children. According to the black civil-rights crowd, this would not do. They wanted someone who was “squeaky clean” without any “baggage”. In fact, the “white guy” sitting behind her was part of the “set-up”. He was a UPI reporter, contracted to “stage” the event…not only that, in the photo there is no one else on the bus. Ms. Parks could have sat wherever she wanted.
    Hence, Rosa Parks made (fabricated) history . . .

    Martin Luther (Michael) King was well-known for frequenting prostitutes, beating and abusing them while exclaiming that he “finally felt like a white man”. His own associates have stated as such. He also plagiarized his college papers and doctoral thesis. Of course, this was overlooked because of his status. King was also a communist.

    Jesse Jackson used to brag to his associates on how he would spit in the food of white patrons of the restaurant he worked at.

    There are many more fabrications of history that were used to lend “legitimacy” to the so-called “civil-rights” movement . . .

    More to come . . .

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      Rosa Parks was also selected because she was a light colored mulatta. Her Jewish handlers thought that would make her more acceptable to the white public. For the same reason was the mulatto Barak Obama selected by his Jewish handlers. Everything is carefully planned by these people.

  2. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    “…This is a crazy situation. Does any broadcaster in Israel employ anti-Semites to attack Israel’s Jewish majority and demonize Jews for one or another of the many crimes they have committed against Arabs and other non-Jews?”

    This is also a crazy corollary (with all due respect to the writer of course).

    1) Occupied Palestine [Israel] is the world’s first and only International-Jew-Criminal, Stolen Nation State, Safe Haven, whereas the UK is the ancestral homeland of a (once?) proud Aryan peoples.
    Occupied Palestine is no more a piece of land belonging to Jews the World over than Germany is a piece of land belonging to Third World Freeloaders that have been engineered to invade it by Jews who hate Germans.
    The ugly fact that a Race of Mongrel Psychopaths (Jews) is now the proxy controlling majority in the once cross roads of the earth, does not justify calling those few Arabs, Aryans or other Races,
    who still manage to eek out an existence there while being under the constant onslaught by Jews that are supported with stolen non-Jewish assets,
    when they are in-fact perfectly justified in their dislike of Jews is absurd.
    2) Jewish crimes committed against the, now minority but once majority, non-Jews in O.P. far outweigh the reverse retaliations that the invading Jews have deservedly received from the largely Palestinian, North Africans as a result of the Rothschild engineered hand-over, by the Spineless British Aristocracy, of Palestine to the International Jewish Crime Syndicate.
    If otherwise, how does one account for a once majority population of Arabs and other non-Arabs that have now been reduced to a minority on the land they had inhabited for millenniums?
    3) Telling Jews with core African DNA and a plethora of interwoven mongrelized
    DNA ranging from every corner of the earth that the cross roads of Europe, Africa and Asia from time immemorial is (((their))) home is like telling Aryans that the World belongs to them.

    A far more fitting inquiring corollary is:

    “…Does any [employer of a town-caller in a Jewish Ghetto] employ [Nazi German, SS, elite paratroopers] to attack [the Jewish Ghetto’s filthy Jewish majority] and demonize Jews for one or another of the many crimes (((they))) have committed against German Aryans and other non-Jews within Poland?”

    The answer to that question is no, but (((he))) probably should.

  3. Right man for the job
    Right man for the job says:

    Other notable/notorious “Swedes” who claim “Polish” heritage like the repulsive ghetto-whiner, Sarnecki: Ulf Adelsohn, Paula Bieler, Mordecai Ehrenpreis, Jerzy Einhorn, Basia Frydman, Mietek Grocher, Alexandra Rapaport, Göran Rosenberg, Vanna Rosenberg, Sara Sommerfeld, Witold Walczak, Leon Weintraub, Peter Wolodarski, and Maciej Zaremba.

    But my favorite all-time name changer is the Englishman “Bud Flanagan,” originally Chaim Reuben Weintrop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7HoMWuXCY4

    Some possible antidotes to the enemy’s poison?

    A. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.
    B. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women
    C. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.

    In three generations, there will be no more gentile dupes for the enemy!

    • Michael Adkins
      Michael Adkins says:

      Right man for the job,

      True enough, but:

      One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.

      Niccolo Machiavelli

  4. Hubbub
    Hubbub says:

    “…or when the body is left in public view like that of a lynching victim, as 18-year-old Michael Brown’s was in Missouri in 2014.” A point of clarification here: Michael Brown was not lynched but shot by a Ferguson, MO, police officer after Brown tried to seize the officer’s gun, and, when he failed, made a rush at the officer in an attempt to overwhelm him. The officer, Darren Wilson, shot Brown several times to stop the ‘Gentle Giant.”

  5. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “Racism is a Crime.”

    We all know where that’s going (given the climate, not to mention the last 50+years, we’re already there), ie; Racism is a Crime – Only Whites Are Racists – Whites Are a Crime. Against Who? Against Humanity, of course! This is a continuation, or one might say the inevitable conclusion of the whole Abolshing Whiteness and Whites are the cancer of the human race.

    Though Jews certainly are out to get Whites. I still maintain that there is a deeper problem. Their real enemy is Reality. That’s why they’re willing to subvert it for their own selfish reasons. They’re not the only ones. All groups, including some Whites, have a reality problem. But ONLY a select group of Whites have shown an intense interest in high-level problem-solving and significant innovation that set us apart from all other races. It’s what used to be referred to simply as – High Culture.

    But that term, and others such as Liberal Education, upset the Original Snowflakes of the Modern Age – The White Middle Class (Right and Left, Religious and Secular, Communist and Fascist) who saw it as “Elitist” and having nothing to do with making money. It was these people who sold us down the river. We’re paying for it now.

    If Asians have a genius for community, Whites have a genius for genius, for intelligence, for symbolic and conceptual thought, and for individuality. It’s our inability to reconcile the differences between individual and group that has caused us all so many problems. Whatever chance we had was destroyed when the Middle Class rose to power in the mid-19th century. They inherited a civilization they didn’t create and didn’t value. So they gave it away. Of course, we will never get it back. The best we can do is stay alive long enough to see if we can’t secure a homeland for ourselves.

    Anyone who thinks a small band of Right-wing Hitler-loving Fascists are going to save the day have not only learned nothing from the last 100 years, they’re insane. To the extent we fail to purge them from our movement we are doomed. God or Nature (whichever you prefer) gave us feet. One way to put those feet to use would be to give these clowns the boot. Hard!

    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      Not to worry Richard B., the middle class in the West is being systematically destroyed. We hoi polloi will sink into a multicultural hodge-podge of drudges and beggars beholden to the 1% for our bread and lives. Of course, as throughout history, there will always be a place for managers and Grima Wormtongue’s.

    • Robert Keith
      Robert Keith says:

      Good point. Re Charlottesville, those morons who chanted the nonsense about not being replaced by the Jews should disappear if they can’t read. The problem with the Jews (one of them) is not their numbers (2 pct of the pop).

      • Maple Curtain
        Maple Curtain says:

        Well, who’s the thickie now?

        They weren’t chanting “Jews will not replace us” because they thought the Jews would become the majority; they were chanting that because they know full well who the puppet masters of the West are.

  6. rerevisionist
    rerevisionist says:

    The BBC was founded as a radio broadcasting company by such people as Rufus Isaacs. It was given a legal monopoly. Probably shareholdings, if they excist, are secret. Whites work for it, but don’t control it. I wish they’d stop, in fact.

  7. Armor
    Armor says:

    I think antigoyism is a better word than goyophobia since it imitates the word “antisemitism” (which is a deceptive word, since it suggests that our criticism of the Jews has nothing to do with their racial attacks against us). Antisemitism is also a useful word for the Jews because it avoids having to say the word “white”. It is only implicitly aimed at White people. The words goyophobia/antigoyism are similarly useful for us, since you could be fined in a French court of law for saying “the Jews”.

    “Jewish groups like SOS Racisme and LICRA (Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme) have worked tirelessly to close debate, criminalize resistance and punish dissidents.”

    The LICRA has long been working with a number of state administrations in the fields of education, justice, law enforcement… Since 2012, the LICRA has had a correspondent in the government, with his own administrative service, called the DILCRAH = Délégation Interministérielle à la Lutte contre le Racisme, l’Antisémitisme et la Haine anti-LGBT (Lutte=struggle, Haine=hatred). (French Wiki).

    The current incumbent is Frédéric Potier. He writes one tweet (@FPotier_Dilcrah) everyday to illustrate his struggle against racism and antisemitism. The content usually comes from the LICRA or from some newspaper. Sometimes, it is an announcement that he has asked for legal proceedings against some racist or homophobic twitter user.

    His last tweet, yesterday, was about the opening of a museum dedicated to the army officer Alfred Dreyfus, who was unfairly sent to a penal colony in Cayenne (French Guiana) in 1894. That is even older than the 1955 murder of Emmett Till. Dreyfus was not executed at all. He was later declared innocent. But the Dreyfus incident shows that some people in France didn’t believe in Jewish loyalty. That is truly abominable.

    Just this year, a number of White people were murdered in France by phony-refugees who were brought in thanks to the efforts of the Jewish lobby to race-replace us all, but I guess Frédéric Potier isn’t interested.

    In short, the government’s DILCRAH has the same objective as the LICRA, which is to brainwash, intimidate, silence, stir up hatred against White people, and facilitate their collective destruction, all in the name of fighting racism and antisemitism.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Unfortunately these words will never catch on. Though I’d love to be wrong about that. If anything they’ll just laugh at those who use them. The only thing that will stop them at this point is force and everybody knows it. That would require that Whites organize. I mean organize. Who sees that happening?

      I sometimes have my doubts about TOO. It’s my favorite site, and it’s hands down the smartest (though it could use a touch of humor; no matter how serious this is we can’t lose that or we’ve lost our humanity and then we’re really lost. Many already are. A point not lost on our many enemies).

      I mean, do any of you know who Schaeffer Cox is?

      He’s a man the F.B.I. (under orders of course; not that anyone had to twist their arm) set up, put in jail, and threw away the key (lot of that going around).
      He never once mentioned Jews. What did he do? He did what Jews fear most. He gave a speech talking about the power of the purse and the power of the sword, how it’s out of the hands of the people who it belongs to, and how we can get it back – non-violently. Not too controversial. It’s certainly done here and TOO does mention Jews and speaks openly about White Interests. It’s in the Mission Statement.

      The problem in SC’s case was enough people were inspired to attract attention. And enough people were listening to raise eyebrows and concerns.

      Whenever you have an articulate, non-violent, but persuasive White man, talking about defending our basic freedoms and how to ORGANIZE to get them back, non-violently, you can rest assured it will trigger Jewish Persecution Mania. And it did. (If they’re going to purge White men from the DNC and castrate most of the White men in the RNC what do you think they’re going to do to a young man like him? They’re going to treat him like “the first born.” And we know what they do to their enemy’s first born).

      They had an informant pretending to be his friend who tried to convince him to go the way of violence. When SC refused – probably sensing something was wrong – they simply said “F it.” and set him up. It was Kangaroo Court from there and now he’s rotting in a prison cell.

      An American Born Citizen Who Separated From His Children for Exercising His Basic Freedoms! For a glimpse into the Orwellian World we live in just look at his Wiki page. And then think about what the MSM is doing regarding the subject of parent/child separation.

      I mean they really Deep Sixed this guy. A well-liked, happily married father of two with no criminal record whose only crime was naively believing that freedom of speech still obtained in The USSA. Make no mistake about it. He was punished, severely, and unjustly, for exercising his basic freedoms. It was merciless. A word Dostoevsky used to describe Jews. And not just Dostoevsky.

      Many were chilled to the bone at what they did to him. Which, of course, was the intended effect. Once again, these evil people succeeded.

      And now we’re back to why I have my doubts about TOO. Not in any finger-pointing conspiratorial sense. Just that this man is us and no one here is talking about him. That’s all. If there’s a reason for this I have missed I’ll be happy to retract my statement.

      Personally, I think SC has been booby trapped. That’s what Jewish Supremacy does. It booby traps people, places, and things. They become not just hot button topics. They’re actually booby trapped.

      And now they are booby trapping us. All of us. Whites walk around the West today booby trapped. Many don’t even know it. But test them and find out.

      The important point of this article is that the desperate attempts to find a terminology that we can use speaks to how bad the situation is. For myself I prefer simply “Anti-White.” But that would only be effective if we were organized. And, again, I just don’t see that happening any time soon.

      Again, I hope I’m wrong. I hope I’m wrong about all of this. Til then, it’s worth pointing out and discussing in one of the few places left where we can exercise one of our basic freedoms.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        If you have anything genuinely substantive and informative to say about Schaeffer Cox, just say it. You will have no trouble getting listeners hereabouts.

        Can you adduce any evidence that this site or anyone connected with it, whether as a contributor or a mere commenter, is culpably ignorant of this man’s misfortunes or has acted wilfully to conceal them from others? I didn’t think so.

        In other words, your nagging “doubts about TOO” may be scotching your appetite or costing you sleep, but this isn’t the sort of venue where moral preening can be counted upon to win hearts and minds.

    • Armor
      Armor says:

      Today, Potier, the French antisemitism commissioner, liked a tweet sent by the organization @LeSursautParis.
      “sursaut” means a surge of energy and will power (so as to save ZOG).

      https:// twitter.com/LeSursautParis/status/1039502357598543872

      Here is that organization’s self-description:

      “Conferences-based EU Collective of European ThinkTanks
      assessing Radical Islamism & Populism,
      led by @AJC_Paris @Fondapol @MartensCentre @j_jaures.”

      In short, they are a Jewish organization specialized in international Jewish networking.
      They say Potier will attend a conference next week, together with his two colleagues from Bonn and Brussels:

      – Felix Klein (wikipedia) is Germany’s anti-Semitism commissioner.

      – Katharina von Schnurbein (metapedia) is the European Commission’s Coordinator on Combating Antisemitism.

      Unfortunately, those civil servants are not employed by the EU and the European governments as interlocutors of Jewish organizations. Their real job is to facilitate the exploitation and destruction of White people. They are employees of the Jewish lobby, payed by the states.

    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      @ Armor:
      As I understand it, LICRA has instituted civil proceedings on behalf of two victims of anti-white racism. How do you read this? Merely a tactic to forestall claims of partiality? Thanks.

        • Trenchant
          Trenchant says:

          Hmm, I don’t think LICRA does anything that’s not carefully calibrated to harm whites. In one case the accused, Djender, was of Berber origins (selected because white-presenting?) but LICRA went very easy on this point and his milieu. LICRA’s lawyer seemed relieved at the loss. See? No anti-white racism!

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Among many other things, Armor, thank you for epitomizing so well the essence of the Dreyfusard position, a position that is formally established in France in black-letter law—i.e., public questioning of it is criminally actionable. I think of that law as a trial run for the Holocaust-denial and “hate crime” laws that ever more closely circumscribe “erroneous thought.”

      To return to Dreyfus, I was surprised a few years ago when I looked at Piers Paul Read’s book on the Dreyfus affair. Although far from being a knockout blow for revisionism and truth, it still wandered pretty far into forbidden territory in its plain assertion that the overturning of the sentence and the subsequent apotheosizing of Dreyfus were indicators of Jewish power. I have no idea whether the book was published in France, but on the basis of that observation alone, I would hardly be surprised if it wasn’t.

      • rerevisionist
        rerevisionist says:

        @Pierre de Craon – read http://www.mileswmathis.com/dreyfus.pdf for a piece (by ‘Josh’) on the Dreyfus Affair, viewed as a Jewish media exercise to ‘blackwash’ ‘anti-Semites’ in France. You will find it entirely convincing, I suspect. And a relief from this long-standing BS meme. I wish Mathis would do more for his own publicity. But he remains silent.

      • Armor
        Armor says:

        About Piers Paul Read and Dreyfus, my Google search only returned a French translation of a review of Read’s book by Israel Shamir, who writes: “Can we be certain that [Dreyfus] was innocent? PP Read thinks so”.

        Last week, in a Paris library, the author Adrien Abauzit was autographing copies of his recent book about the Dreyfus Affair (French link). The book title is “L’affaire Dreyfus entre farces et grosses ficelles” = The Dreyfus affair, between farces and obvious tricks.

        The text on the book cover isn’t entirely explicit, but inside the book, from what I understand, the author argues that everything points to Dreyfus being a spy. He says Esterhazy was a strawman paid by “l’Antifrance” to play the role of the official culprit, so as to exonerate Dreyfus.

        So, unless you are a teacher, a journalist, or a well known figure, you can still say that you believe Dreyfus was guilty, but your book may not be published by a big publisher.

        It is safer to be a revisionist about Dreyfus than about gas chambers and 9/11. Even so, the Jews, who like to deconstruct everything in White society, expect us to stick to the official narrative that there was a big goyish conspiracy to frame Dreyfus (or that “antisemitism” played a big part in the judicial error).

        It is absurd to think that a Jew like Dreyfus could only be a French patriot. I guess most Alsatians didn’t mind being reunited with the rest of Germany after the 1870 war. Most of them spoke the Alsatian German dialect. The family of Dreyfus chose to move to Paris. Maybe they thought they would have better opportunities in France. But why would they feel any loyalty to France?

        However, from what I’ve read, what matters is not what Dreyfus did or didn’t do, but how the whole thing was used by l’Antifrance to push their agenda.

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      Thank you Trenchant for the additional documentation. The Jewish attempt to “criminalize racism” is merely another stereotypical way to “normalize the abnormal”. A very Talmudic ploy, for sure.

  8. Lasse Karagiannis
    Lasse Karagiannis says:

    The author does not point out, what I believe is the ultimate way to deal with accusations of racism from Jews which immediately forces Jews to backpedal and leave the battlefield immediately, which is to point out the hipocricy and criminality of Jews for not whistleblowing the lethal criminality of Judaism.
    Jews don’t tell that Judaism, which is the religion they take their idenitity from, forbids the Jew to lift the slightest finger to save the Non-Jew from death but this only if the Jew can get away with it without suffering retributions against himself and other fellow Jews. This Halakha is referred to as “Lo moridin lo moalin” and the theological details as well as examples on how the Jew can lie to the police is explained by the much revered in Israel rabbi David Bar Chaim. You can find his very detailed derivation in my playlist “Criminality of Judaism” on youtube if you search for my channel “Lasse Karagiannis”. If you follow the links in the description you will find what so called “Jewish humanists” as well as former Jews and former rabbis have written regarding the mind blowing criminality of Judaism, which is partikularitet interesting because these humanists have been denounced as “liars”, “haters” “self hating Jews”, where the suspicion is thrown out that there is possible an mental illness explanation for these statements by Organized Jewry. ” Judaism contains NOTHING NEGTIVE towards the Non-Jew” is the mantra from these “satanists”. Until now when Non-Jews have quotes the Talmud it has been deflected as so called “fake Talmud quotes” and “antisemetic conspiracy theories”, but now the Goy has video evidence and not some nickle and dime worthy evidence but teachings from a rabbi who studied for 10 years in Israels top elite Yeshiva which is ” Merkatz Ha Rav”.
    What is even more damning is that there is an audio file availible on the internet, you can also find that in my playlist, where the chairman of the body which is the highest in authority within Judaism which is the talmudic High Court of the Sanhedrin – analogous to the pope’s chairman of Catholicism where the chairman explaines what Judaism says about the Moshiach tasks is with respect to the Non-Jews. He explaines that the Non-Jew will be forces to submit and take upon himself to obey the 7 Noahide laws or be put to death, which means that Christians and other “idolaters” will have to denounce their religion and become ” slaves to the Jew” as Judaism teaches.
    Every Jew will then have 2800 slaves according to Judaism which is those people who choose submission under the Moshiach instead of death!
    With this foundation established you have prepared to smash the Jew to pieces when he/she climbs up on high horses and starts speak about racism so called ” antisemitism”.
    Now finish him off with the following notification:
    1. Not lifting the slightest finger to save a human being such as calling 911 is a criminal offense.
    2. Organized incitement/teaching of the mitzvah above is a criminal offense.
    3. Not alerting the authorities regarding organized incitement is a criminal offense.

    Every Jew who has alerted the authorities/ blown the whistle is guilty of a criminal offense as long as the majority of Non-Jews don’t have a clue about the incitement to criminality that is prevalent within Judaism.

  9. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    There is a saying, “The jew does not love ugliness; he hates beauty.” And I think this is pretty much to the point. In Israel, we can see that all of the Babylonian vice and societal destruction that jews inflict and advocate upon the west is not well tolerated, and that’s because Israeli jews understand that these are strategies of nation wrecking. That’s why they turn them upon us, the goyim, not because they love crime filled neighborhoods of foreigners and “no-go” areas in their own ethno-state, but because they can’t stand the thought of a successful, happy, cohesive, and prosperous world of the goyim.

  10. Sophie Johnson
    Sophie Johnson says:

    ‘Does any broadcaster in Israel employ anti-Semites to attack Israel’s Jewish majority and demonize Jews for one or another of the many crimes they have committed against Arabs and other non-Jews?’

    This is the most trenchant point of all points. But is it not convertible into action? Imagine what would happen if we were to write to the Guardian, or to any newspaper, to protest against Nick Cohen’s quite obscene expressions of hatred for any White person who might utter the least criticism of Jews, or indeed, fails to bow to them. Nothing would happen, of course, for no newspaper would publish what we wrote. But we could descend upon the Guardian’s premises and demand the sacking of the git Cohen. That would be one way of letting the public know that Cohen is persona non grata. So why do we White folk not make our public statements against our Jew enemies (and the supporters of those enemies) by means of public protests/demonstrations? We carry the guilt of our own quiescence in the face of their filthy behaviours, Dr Langdon.

  11. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    Washington University is a Jewish controlled propaganda machine. ALL the wealthiest neighborhoods in what they cutely term “The Lou (the midwestern has been toilet called St. Louis) are almost 100% Jewish. They now control the City itself and the County of. Everything is 100% all about them. They control ALL business in the region and ALL municipal governments especially those inhabited by Goys. Everything is now a total guilt trip, white shaming festival. This is all a cover for the Jews so that the Goy in the area remain compliant as the Jews suck the life and income from the area. NOTE: Jews get a lot of bang for their buck living lavishly in it’s finer neighborhoods but are commuters to their East and West Coast USA Stalingrads such as Jew York City. St. Louis is a toilet. Avoid it and don’t even think anything complimentary about it. It was destroyed and De-Catholic-ified decades ago. Now the Goy are prostate and on bended knee to the Hymies that control them.

Comments are closed.