The Ministry of Minority-Worship: Gay Rights and the Goals of Globohomo

The mark of a true prophet isn’t perfect accuracy, but powerful ideas. It’s impossible to foresee the future in every detail, but a true prophet should give us the ideas that explain what he doesn’t foresee. For example, in one way George Orwell got the future completely wrong in Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). In his totalitarian surveillance state, the Party harshly punishes “sexcrime,” which includes “all sexual misdeeds whatever [including] homosexuality and other perversions.”

Raising the rainbow

So homosexuality is a perversion and a serious crime on Airstrip One, the name Orwell gave to the British Isles. But what do the real British find in their own surveillance state in the 21st century? They find that homosexuality is actively celebrated by the thought-police. The cyber-snoopers at GCHQ (Government Communication Head-Quarters) are “the most extremist and invasive in the West,” according to Glenn Greenwald. In 2014, the cyber-snoopers “raised the rainbow flag on the GCHQ flagpole in Cheltenham for the first time to show all our staff that we value our Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) colleagues and are a modern organisation that does not tolerate discrimination in any form.” That last claim is true in one way: GCHQ doesn’t discriminate in its invasion of privacy. It siphons up everything it can on everyone it can, collaborating with the American National Security Agency (NSA) and Israeli cyber-snoopers like Unit 8200. The NSA too actively celebrates homosexuality: in June 2019, which is Gay Pride Month “in much of the US,” it “posted a photo on Twitter of its secretive Maryland headquarters in rainbow colors,” boasting that: “At NSA, talented individuals of all backgrounds, contribute to something bigger than themselves: national security. #PrideMonth.”

Raising the rainbow at the NSA (above) and GCHQ (below)

Orwell didn’t foresee the celebration of homosexuality by totalitarians, but he did explain it. Totalitarian ideologies live by lies and contradiction. For example, the slave-state of North Korea, ruled by a hereditary dictatorship, proclaims itself a Democratic People’s Republic when it is neither democratic, popular, nor a republic. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell wrote of how “the names of the four Ministries by which [the oppressed population is] governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts. The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.”

Defending the death-machine

You could, then, call GCHQ and the NSA part of the Ministry of Morality. While breaking laws against surveillance and trying to destroy freedom of expression and enquiry, they pretend that they’re caring, ethical organizations who defend the oppressed and want to build a better world. In fact, of course, GCHQ and the NSA are defending the death-machine of the military-industrial complex, which has been wrecking nations and slaughtering civilians in the Middle East (and elsewhere) for decades. They’re also defending the traitorous Western governments that first import millions of Third-Worlders, then use the resultant crime, terrorism and racial conflict to justify mass surveillance and harsh laws against free speech.

A caring, compassionate death-machine – Globohomo puts a female face on the horrendously expensive and fault-riddled F-35

This totalitarian system has a name: Globohomo, the alliance between globalist capitalism and minority-worshipping leftism. Globohomo is part of the Jewish Culture of Critique and is intensely hostile to Whites and White traditions like Christianity. That’s why it promotes everything that stops Whites having children (or, conversely, enables non-Whites to have more children). And so Globohomo is very enthusiastic about abortion, feminism and homosexuality. Abortion literally kills White children; feminism works to destroy good relations between White men and White women; and homosexuals are the vanguard for the hedonistic, self-centred and self-destroying behaviour that Globohomo wants to encourage among all Whites. However, although homosexuality and Jewish ideology are at the heart of Globohomo, it doesn’t have the support of all Jews or all homosexuals. For example, the homosexual Jewish libertarian Glenn Greenwald wasn’t fooled in the slightest by GCHQ’s attempt to embrace the rainbow:

This is so very moving. Gay Brits are now just as free as everyone else to spy on people, covertly disseminate state propaganda, and destroy online privacy. Whatever your views on all this nasty surveillance business might be, how can you not feel good about GCHQ when it drapes itself in the colors of LGBT equality?

This is all a stark illustration of what has become a deeply cynical but highly effective tactic. Support for institutions of militarism and policies of imperialism is now manufactured by parading them under the emotionally manipulative banners of progressive social causes. (GCHQ’s Rainbow Lights: Exploiting Social Issues for Militarism and Imperialism, The Intercept, 18th May 2015)

GCHQ and the NSA feed the diseases that they pretend to be trying to cure. Indeed, GCHQ and the NSA are diseased organizations, symptoms of the deeply pathological ideologies that now dominate the West. When a government is spying on its own people, it’s because the government is committing crimes against its own people and fears rebellion against its crimes.

“Very, very good relations with the Jewish community”

The criminal government might be, as in North Korea and China, a native gang of criminals (but it would be very interesting to compare the genetics of the North Korean and Chinese elites with those of the general population). Or the criminal government might be, as in Britain and other Western nations, a criminal gang acting on behalf of outsiders and partly composed of outsiders. Those outsiders are Jews: for example, Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s thuggish and Machiavellian press secretary, told the Jewish Chronicle that Blair “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community,” which wields enormous financial and media power despite its tiny size.

But Blair may not have been controlled simply by the money and favourable media coverage that the “Jewish community” could supply. He may also have been frightened of what spy-agencies like Mossad could reveal about his private life and secret homosexual activity. Indeed, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has led the blogger Anonymous Conservative to argue that ambitious politicians and businessmen “happily supplied the material to blackmail themselves” as part of a bargain for success with the Deep State and organizations like Mossad. That’s speculation, but what isn’t speculation is the direct role of Jews in creating the system of Globohomo. In 2007, Britain’s Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks lamented that “Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment.” He described how a “culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others.” And he made a shockingly anti-Semitic claim: “The process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.”

Harvey Milk and other rainbow warriors

But in fact Rabbi Sacks wasn’t anti-Semitic enough. He was right to say that “the process began with Jews,” but he should have added that “blacks, women and gays” (and now Muslims too) “took it up” with direct Jewish encouragement and assistance. Kevin MacDonald and others have described the central Jewish role in civil rights and feminism. For example, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was not merely funded but actually run by Jews for many years. Jewish women have always been hugely over-represented as leaders and propagandists in feminism.

And what about “gays”? Their contribution to the “poison” of identity politics has also been heavily Jewish. In June 2019, on “the anniversary of the Stonewall riots,” the Jewish Chronicle was proud to celebrate “Rainbow warriors: the Jews who fought for LGBT+ rights”:

Frank Kameny – “our Rosa Parks”, according to one gay rights activist – was an early pioneer. Fired from his job with the Army Map Service in 1957 under the terms of President Eisenhower’s executive order making “sexual perversion” grounds for dismissal for federal government employees, Mr Kameny refused to slip away quietly. Instead he attempted to sue the government. … The government’s discrimination against gays, he argued in his brief, represented “an anachronistic relic of the Stone Age carried over into the Space Age”. The Constitution demanded equal treatment for all. …

[I]t was Stonewall that turned “a small movement … into a mass movement”. Few have greater claim to have helped foster that mass movement than Brenda Howard, the so-called “Mother of Pride”. A bisexual Jewish nurse who was involved in both the burgeoning feminist movement and the fight against the Vietnam war, Ms Howard became a leading light in the Gay Liberation Front and the Gay Activists Alliance which were formed in the aftermath of the riots. … Ms Howard was the brains behind the notion that the march should be accompanied by a week-long series of events and, together with two other LGBT activists, is credited with naming the events “Pride”.

One of the early participants in the New York City Gay Pride march was a Jewish teacher from Queens, Jeanne Manford. … Walking alongside her son at the Pride march, she carried a sign “Parents of Gays Unite in Support for Our Children”. The enthusiastic reception she received led Ms Manford and her husband to found PFLAG, Parents Friends and Families of Lesbians and Gays, which today has more than 200,000 members and 400 branches across the US.

Another early straight Jewish ally of the LGBT cause was the popular newspaper columnist and radio host Pauline Phillips. Under the pen name Abigail van Buren, her “Dear Abby” advice column was syndicated to 1400 newspapers and had millions of readers. One of the few celebrities openly sympathetic to them, she became a hero to many gay Americans. …

But it is the name of Harvey Milk – America’s first openly gay elected politician, who was assassinated in 1978 – which is perhaps most synonymous with the cause of gay rights. Although from a secular home, Mr Milk learned from his mother the Jewish obligation of “tikkun olam”; helping to repair the world. As the historian Lilliam Faderman suggests in her recent biography of him, the memory of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising – which occurred days before his bar mitzvah – shaped Mr Milk’s lifelong belief that evil should be resisted even when the odds seem hopeless. …

Other gay Jewish politicians have followed the trail which Mr Milk blazed. In 1986, Barney Frank became the first member of Congress to come out. … Last November, Jared Polis became the first openly gay man to be elected as a governor (also becoming Colorado’s first Jewish governor).

… a young Harvard Law student, Evan Wolfson, wrote his thesis on the legal basis for gay marriage. As the height of the Reagan years, it cannot have seemed much more than an academic exercise. But Wolfson didn’t give up the cause. Twenty years later, he formed Freedom To Marry at the very moment that George W Bush was using opposition to same-sex marriage to bolster his support among evangelicals as he ran for re-election. Wolfson’s message – “Marriage is not defined by who is excluded by it” – helped to reshape the debate.

On 26 June 2013, the Supreme Court struck down the federal bar on same-sex marriage. At the centre of the landmark case were a Jewish couple – Edie Windsor and Thea Spyer – and their suit was pursued by a Jewish lawyer, Robbie Kaplan. Two years later, and two days before the 46th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, the Supreme Court legalised gay marriage throughout the United States. In both cases, the three Jewish justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan – were critical in delivering the 5-4 rulings. (Rainbow warriors: the Jews who fought for LGBT+ rights, The Jewish Chronicle, 27th June 2019 / 24th Sivan 5779)

These Jewish activists were not seeking equality for homosexuals and lesbians: they were seeking worship. Jews want worship for all minorities because they see themselves as the supreme minority, the most oppressed and victimized of all. And so you could also call Globohomo the Ministry of Minority-Worship.

Globohomo Girls

The sacralization of homosexuality is a particularly attractive cause for Jews precisely because homosexuality is unnatural, unhealthy, and historically condemned by Christianity. If the Jewish propaganda machine can successfully turn homosexuals into saintly exemplars of health, decency and style, Jews are reassured about their own vulnerability to the irrational bigotry and prejudice of the gentile majority. Like Muslims, the LGBTQ+ community form a buffer-zone between Jews and that majority, which has a long and lamentable history of unprovoked and inexplicable anti-Semitism.

Globohomo Girls Edwina Currie and Maureen Lipman

This explains why “The website Pink News, run by Benjamin Cohen, aggressively promotes the transgender cause.” It also explains something that once puzzled me: the enthusiastic support of the Jewish MP Edwina Currie (née Cohen in 1946) for the lowering of the homosexual age of consent and the equally enthusiastic support of the Jewish actress Maureen Lipman (born 1946) for the pioneering “queer comedy” of Julian and Sandy, as played by the actors Kenneth Williams and Hugh Paddick on BBC Radio in the late 1960s. When I watched Currie and Lipman at work in the 1990s, I sensed that there was a hidden motive in the way two heterosexual Jewish women were so eager to support homosexual gentile men. But I didn’t understand what the hidden motive was until I read the work of Kevin MacDonald. Then I understood what was going on: Currie and Lipman were part of the Culture of Critique, condemning White Christian society for its mistreatment of saintly homosexuals and celebrating homosexuals for their wit and style.

I also understood why the scripts for Julian and Sandy were written by the Jewish comedian Marty Feldman (1934-82) (in collaboration with the gentile but possibly homosexual or bisexual Barry Took). And indeed, Julian and Sandy were witty and stylish. Kenneth Williams and Hugh Paddick were excellent comic actors who relished playing the parts of two chorus-boys whose promiscuous adventures were conveyed indirectly through the doubles entendres and innuendo of the gay slang Polari. The scripts had to be indirect because homosexual acts were still illegal in Britain at the time the shows were first broadcast. Julian and Sandy were ineffectual, unthreatening, and highly entertaining, and Maureen Lipman credited them with helping to change public opinion and assist decriminalization. And decriminalization was pushed through by the Jewish MP Leo Abse (1958-83), who was accused of child abuse after his death and whom the Times of Israel hails as “The Jewish MP who pried open Britain’s closet door.”

Camping up Christianity

But Julian and Sandy helped kill what fuelled their comedy. By popularizing the gay slang Polari, they rendered it useless as a secret code between homosexuals. They also vulgarized it: snobbish and snooty queers were no longer interested in using verbal pearls that had been cast before millions of straight swine (see the Gospel of Matthew 7:6). And after decriminalization, in the era of queer militancy and “Gay Liberation,” Polari seemed old-fashioned and outdated, hopelessly redolent of the closeted 1940s and ’50s. But what once seemed closeted now seems camp, and “in recent years there has been a resurgence in interest in the language.”

So says the introduction to the Polari Bible, a translation of the King James Bible into the “High Polari” used by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, “an international order of gay and lesbian nuns and monks.” Only it isn’t a “translation”: Polari isn’t a full language, rather a mixture of borrowings from Italian, Romani, rhyming slang, and so on that are used to replace words and phrases of standard English. For example, where the real Bible has “God” and “Jesus Christ,” the Polari Bible has “Gloria” and “Josie Crystal.” The Polari Bible refers to all men by female names and with female pronouns. Similarly, the Lord is “the Duchess”; angels are “fairies”; people don’t walk but “mince,” don’t speak but “screech”; and so on. The effects are cheaply amusing at times, but camp Christianity reminds me of Satanism: it’s wholly dependant on what it perverts and corrupts, without any originality or vitality of its own. In short, it’s parasitic, rather in the way that homosexuality itself is parasitic on heterosexuality. Here are some extracts from the Polari Bible:

Book of Genesis 1:1 In the beginning Gloria created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was nanti form, and void; and munge was upon the eke of the deep. And the Fairy of Gloria trolled upon the eke of the aquas. 3 And Gloria cackled, Let there be sparkle: and there was sparkle. 4 And Gloria vardad the sparkle, that it was bona: and Gloria medzered the sparkle from the munge. 5 And Gloria screeched the sparkle journo, and the munge she screeched nochy. And the bijou nochy and the morning were the first journo.

Gospel of Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Josie Crystal was on this wise: When as her mother Mary was espoused to Josephine, before they trolled together, she was found up the duff of the Fantabulosa Fairy.

Gospel of Mark 1:14 … Josie trolled into Galilee, cackling the gossip of the kingdom of Gloria, 15 And cackling, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of Gloria is at famble: repent ye, and believe the gossip. 16 Now as she minced by the sea of Galilee, she vardad Simone and Andrea her sister chucking a net into the sea: for they were fishers. 17 And Josie cackled unto them, troll ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of homies.

The King James Bible is sublime literature, one of the landmarks of English-speaking culture, and the Polari Bible therefore consists of a long series of descents from the sublime to the ridiculous. You could call it blasphemy as banality, and the cheapness of the enterprise is summed up for me by one repeated grammatical error. The Perl script used to “translate” the sublime original into the camp corruption wasn’t sophisticated enough to adjust indefinite articles, so that “an angel” always becomes “an fairy” (similarly, “an offering” becomes “an parkering,” “an ark” becomes “an bijou arkette,” and so on).

Peaks and troughs of White male achievement

You can contrast that carelessness with the loving detail of the old Biblical engravings added to the Polari Bible (which is now in its seventh edition). One of these engravings shows the Good Samaritan helping the stripped and wounded traveller who has “fallen among thieves” (see the Gospel of Luke 10:30). The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence have added a would-be funny commentary to the engraving:

The Good Samaritan banally blasphemized

The commentary runs: “The small flask of Rohypnol [a rape-drug] which the Good Samaritan always carried on his belt had yet again come into its own.” Again, it’s blasphemy as banality, a cheap snigger at a powerful story, like a teenager spray-painting a penis on Caravaggio’s sublime painting The Taking of Christ (c. 1602). Caravaggio was homosexual, but unlike the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence he was also an adult. And an artistic genius, of course. There are no cheap sniggers in Caravaggio’s portrayal of stories from the Bible. Instead, there’s profundity, beauty, horror, and humility. When Caravaggio placed his own image in his art, he cast himself as the villain: it’s Caravaggio himself who holds up the lantern in The Taking of Christ, and in another painting it’s Caravaggio’s own head that the boy David holds aloft after the slaying and decapitation of Goliath.

Caravaggio’s The Taking of Christ, c. 1602

Caravaggio took Christianity seriously, while the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence snigger at it. That’s why Caravaggio’s art represents one of the peaks of White male achievement, while the Polari Bible represents one of the troughs. And if you know anything about modern Christianity, you won’t be surprised to learn that “trainee priests at a church of England theological college” have used the Polari Bible in a service held to “commemorate LGBT history month.”

Promises, promises

But there’s something else in the Polari Bible that’s highly significant. The preface to the seventh edition asked its readers to “look out for the forthcoming Polari Koran.” On the website for the Polari Bible, an anonymous Sister made a promise way back in 2015 that has never been kept: “The initial translation of the PK [Polari Koran] was done some time ago. … Once the translation is adequately funny (and I have laid a suitable false trail of domain registrations etc.) then I will publish it.”

Four years later, we’re still waiting. The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence know that if they try sniggering at Islam, they will experience the difference between a decadent religion and a religion that still has its teeth. Christianity is decadent; Islam is not. That’s why adolescent blasphemers aren’t scared of Christianity, but are definitely scared of Islam. The Sisters have promised us a Polari Koran, but we can be confident that they won’t deliver. They’re working on behalf of Globohomo, consciously or otherwise, as they try to corrupt and degrade Christianity. But Globohomo hates Whites much more than it loves homosexuals, which is why it imports homophobic Muslims in their millions and then subsidizes their large families.

In other words, the Ministry of Minority-Worship is really the Ministry of Majority-Hate. It doesn’t want to benefit minorities: it wants to harm and dispossess the White majority. Globohomo hates Christianity, which is an excellent sign that Christianity has been good for Whites and the West.

43 replies
  1. Aitch.
    Aitch. says:

    I’ve never understood how a man can derive ‘pride’ from sticking his penis into another man’s rectum. Nor have I ever understood the connection between sodomy and rainbows.

    • Rossi
      Rossi says:

      The connection between sodomy and rainbows.

      The rainbow is related to, and points at the new religion, Noahidism, a.k.a. B’nei Noah movement. That’s kind of Judaism for gentiles. The religion of the future.

      The LGBT movement is related to, and points at the connection it has to the Sabbatean, a.k.a. Frankist, cult and the Dönmeh sect of Judaism. To understand it, read “Redemption Through Sin”, or “Sabbatai Sevi: The Mystical Messiah”.

      • Steelback
        Steelback says:

        The work on the Sabbateans cited I think is that of Gershom Scholem. Scholem was an American Jew who moved to Israel and became a committed Zionist.

        His work was the first to acknowledge the prominent role that the Sabbatean heresy – epitomised by Shabbatai Svi in the 17th and Joshua Frank in the 18thC – played in shaping modern Jewish identity – particularly how Jews should feign assimilation to Western Christian culture.

        Freud and his nephew, Bernays, were both strongly attracted to Sabbatean/Chassidic ideas. The former moulded psychoanalysis based on Jewish mystical ideas about the bisexual orientation of man. The latter used an elite form of mass psychology to entrench a corporation-driven consumerist ethos across the US.

        Both Freud and Bernays were either driven by tickum olam and set themselves an agenda of healing the world – or less charitably they were both engaged in the subversion of Christian culture.

        • Ludwig
          Ludwig says:

          August 31, 2019 at 1:43 am

          “Both Freud and Bernays were either driven by tickum olam and set themselves an agenda of healing the world – or less charitably they were both engaged in the subversion of Christian culture.”

          I’d think the later with a public portrayal of the former.

        • Rossi
          Rossi says:

          That’s right.

          Not just Freud, but Jung also was fascinated with the Sabbateans. His concept of “the shadow” is pure Sabbateanism.

          Another prominent figure was Aleister Crowley. His famous “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law” is a paraphrase of the central Sabbatean idea, that is, “cancellation of the Law is its fulfillment”.

          There is another book I forgot to mention, and it is a good reading, albeit it’s a fiction but it describes the beginning of the Sabbatean madness in a well-written prose, dark and frightening: “Satan in Goray”.

          • NeilC
            NeilC says:

            Crowley took his Do What Thou Wilt from Rabelais.
            Crowley attacked what he called the cult of the dying god and he said Christianity was a Death Cult (which is correct).
            JG Frazer writes much in the Golden bough about The cult of the Dying God, interesting reading

    • Ludwig
      Ludwig says:

      Just more exposure of the talmud contents or preventing the Judensau being removed.

      Or a few papers on the theological symbolism in the Judensau.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      A Polari Torah or Talmud would be Auntie Shemi-tic, and the sodomites will never bite the hand that feeds them.

  2. Anthony Hudson
    Anthony Hudson says:

    I would like to thank the author of this information, especially in regard to the beginning and the conclusion. Deep insight on Orwell’s getting the Establishments treatment of homosexuality entirely wrong. But the best bit is the observation that it is majority hate rather than minority love that drives the Deep State. Know your enemy!!!

  3. JRM
    JRM says:

    “Globohomo hates Christianity, which is an excellent sign that Christianity has been good for Whites and the West.”

    Ah, well, here we go again. Another round of “Good Religion, Bad Religion”.

    I will admit the article is well-written, with much to offer in the analysis above about the tolerant mask of a destructive culture.

    That conclusion quoted above, however, is not supported by the arguments above it. The conclusion in fact flies somewhat in the face of previous statements about the toothless Christianity which no longer inspires any fear (or, apparently, even respect).

    Also, the conclusion follows a logic like this: a couple go driving out in a car to spend time in nature. Many miles from home, and after a nice hike through the forest, the couple come back to their car, preparing to leave on the return journey home. The car won’t start. Much fiddling about under the hood produces no remedy. “This piece of junk!” says the wife with disgust. “What do you mean junk? It got us all this way out into the woods, didn’t it?” says the husband.

    • Ludwig
      Ludwig says:

      August 28, 2019 at 11:32 am

      “Also, the conclusion follows a logic like this: a couple go driving out in a car to spend time in nature. Many miles from home, and after a nice hike through the forest, the couple come back to their car, preparing to leave on the return journey home. The car won’t start. Much fiddling about under the hood produces no remedy. “This piece of junk!” says the wife with disgust. “What do you mean junk? It got us all this way out into the woods, didn’t it?” says the husband.”

      Without maintenance on the car or prevention of sabotage it doesn’t make the return trip.

      So it is with cultural and religious life. Not use crying about it being unable to make the distance if you’re not maintaining it or preventing sabotage.
      The real answer is to stand up en mas to jewish privilege!

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        Christianity , which usually but not always includes catholicism , is from the gitgo a self-enslaving religion where the masters are the [ chosenite jews ] — with or without maintenance , with or without sabotage . Christianity is a slave oriented religion ; a religion of sheeplism . Judaism is the warranty for the enslavement of christians .

        It is time for a new religion based on realism//empiricism rather than [ fantasies ] about what the deities want you do — BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE .

      • Aitch.
        Aitch. says:

        I finally installed the TOR browser on my desktop, so I could access the Daily Stormer website, after the jews took it down again the other day. No problems with it so far.

    • SBaker
      SBaker says:

      Homosexuality is a mental disorder (SSAD- same sex affection disorder). We don’t hate sick people, but neither do we assist them in remaining ill. But if we advocate for curing them, we are branded haters. Go figure.
      HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.

  4. anthony aaron
    anthony aaron says:

    How about a polari torah — or a polari talmud?

    It’d be interesting to see just how ‘tolerant’ the sniggering jews would be of that …

  5. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    The question is: What are they doing to fight and free themselves from the Globohomo that seeks to exterminate them? ..

  6. Andrew
    Andrew says:

    I would have to disagree with the last sentence of this article stating that Christianity has been good for whites and the West. The homicidal and racist god that tells the Jews that they are the Chosen People and have a right to to utterly destroy all of their neighbors is the same as the Christian god personified by Jesus. There is no getting around that fact. At no point does Jesus disavow the Jewish Jehovah. So Jews may corrupt, infiltrate, lie, cheat, murder and despoil and non-Jews who call themselves Christians are told to honor the Jews and “turn the other cheek”.

    Christianity is, in the final analysis, a Jewish religion that was imposed on Nordic peoples who had their own gods. Now we look at the magnificent artistic legacy of our non-Jewish white Christian forebears who were inspired by Christianity — Bach, Michelangelo, the builders of the great Cathedrals — and we give credit to Christianity and Judaism instead of to the creators themselves. We give no credit to their non-Jewish white European ethnos, their racial character as a people. That character originated in their ancestors long before there was any Judaism or Christianity.

    No, Christianity is nothing more than a Jewish Trojan Horse that has led us to….what? Where we are today. And where we are today doesn’t look good. We are being replaced in our own countries. And Christian churches are assisting in that process just like the Jews are assisting in that process.

    So we need to take a look at our cultural situation with fresh eyes. We should understand that it wasn’t Christianity, democracy, the Enlightenment, or the republican government that gave us our innate love of freedom, truth, beauty, honor, fairness and justice. Those already existed in us. They existed as ideals in pagan Greece and Rome when those civilizations were still dominated by the Aryans that founded them, and they existed as “folkright” in northern Europe.

    We did not need the dissenting group of Jews who founded Christianity to tell us how to live. This is why I look with suspicion on attitudes about homosexuality that are derived from Christianity and that originated with the Jews.

    Homosexuals have always existed and, short of interference with the human genome or a test that allows people to terminate pregnancies, will always exist for as long as there are heterosexuals to create them by having children. They comprise a tiny percentage of the population, and different cultures have accommodated them in different ways. You can no more turn a heterosexual into a homosexual than vice versa, so the “recruitment” claim is overblown. In the end, homosexuals are a part of the human genome, found in all races, and we need to respect that genome.

    But what does this mean? It means that homosexuals should be accepted, but should not be allowed to sexualize children. The LGBTetc. “community” has allowed itself to be hijacked by the extreme left (Jews) and used as a weapon against traditional values. That is where the problem lies, not in homosexuality per se.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      “The homicidal and racist god that tells the Jews that they are the Chosen People and have a right to to utterly destroy all of their neighbors is the same as the Christian god personified by Jesus.”

      Only if you are a Baptist or born again. I was raised a Lutheran in the 50s before the split. It was made perfectly clear to us that Christians are the chosen people because the Jews broke the covenant and followed a false god.
      John 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil,…” was hammered hard.

    • milan
      milan says:


      I would have to disagree with the last sentence of this article stating that Christianity has been good for whites and the West.

      Really? That hasn’t been my experience with Christ and it certainly wasn’t for people like Finney and many others:

      During the summer of 1853 Oberlin was struck with a severe drought. The hay fields were dried up so there was no feed for the cattle. The cattle soon must die and the harvest fail unless rain comes. Crops had withered, wells dried up, and the parched earth became powdery.
      On Sunday morning the church was filled. Not a cloud was in sight and no one expected a drop of water to fall from the skies that day. The situation was desperate. Finney arose from his chair walked to the pulpit and lifted his voice in prayer.
      “O Lord! Send us rain. We pray for rain. Our harvests perish. There is not a drop for the thirsting birds. The ground is parched. The choking cattle lift their voices toward a brassy heaven and lowing, cry ‘Lord give us water… We do not presume to dictate to Thee what is best for us, yet Thou dost invite us to come to Thee as children to a father and tell Thee all our wants. We want rain! Even the squirrels in the woods are suffering for want of it. Unless Thou givest us rain our cattle must die… O Lord, send us rain! and send it now! For Jesus sake!’ Amen.”
      “In the preacher’s voice,” reports the California minister, “was the plaintiveness of a creature’s cry. I do not know whether any pencil caught more of this wonderful prayer, but all who heard it had to tell of its bold importunity. It had the pathos and power of an Isaiah.”
      Then the pastor-revivalist poured out his soul in a searching sermon, “hewing close to the line,” from the text, “I have somewhat against thee because thou hast left thy first love.”
      “Not many minutes did the sermon go on before a cloud about the size of a man’s hand came athwart the summer sky,” says the California preacher. “It grew fast. The wind rattled the shutters of the old church. Darkness came on the air, joy aroused our anxious hearts as great raindrops pattered on the sun-scorched shingles of the monumental old church. Finney’s lithe figure, tall as a Sioux warrior, ruddy as a David, trembled. His clarion voice choked. God had heard his cry. The sermon was never finished, for torrents of water poured from the prayer-unlocked heavens. The preacher bowed over the pulpit and said, Let us thank the Lord for the rain.”
      He gave out the hymn, When all they mercies, O my God my rising soul surveys, Transported with the view, I’m lost in wonder, love and praise.
      The congregation could not sing for weeping. Then Finney lifted heavenward a prayer of thanksgiving and praise. “I can remember not a word of the closing prayer, but the reverent and relaxed figure, the pathetic voice, the pallid and awe-struck countenance, are vivid as if it was yesterday; the plank sidewalks of the dear old town splashed our garments as we walked home from a short service, of which life’s memory must be lasting.” This is the testimony of the student who sat in the gallery and saw and heard Finney that morning.

      • Andrew
        Andrew says:

        Curmudgeon: I suspect the Lutheran Church has changed quite a bit since you were young. But I could be wrong. Luther gave no quarter to the Jews. Neither did the Roman Catholic Church until Vatican II. Is there a single Christian church out there that would countenance expelling the Jews — which must be done — or countenance their exclusion from an emerging white ethnostate? I doubt it.

        milan: Thanks for that story. I respect your views and your experience.

        • Ludwig
          Ludwig says:

          I suspect if they really knew what is at the heart of “judaism” a relatively large number of christian churches would go along with expelling these evil doers. My 85 year old mother and I were discussing this just today.

          Christian churches have been intellectually hijacked from within by jewish agents and the media like the population at large. Most of the clergy and the members are ignorant, partly due to deception and their gullibility. But I think there’s a growing number who have an inkling of what’s going on but are fearful.

          But most are just plain ignorant of what is really going on and what has been going on for millennia. We need to help them open their eyes and keep people informed. A critical mass of whites need to be reached and convinced. Laying the ground work for any cause we need to work for our survival by making it known. Since we don’t have an official apparatus like the media to bolster our position we are vulnerable because there are still only relatively few of us but over time our numbers will grow.
          If we had more media voices the work would be quicker.

          There are days I’m sanguine and days I’m pessimistic.

          Of course some individuals may be hard nuts to crack due to stubbornness or corruption but we don’t need them and can’t waste resources on them.

          • Andrew
            Andrew says:

            I would be fine with a Christian church that rejected the Jews and the Jewish Jehovah, making a distinction between their god and our god. Christianity rightly cancels God’s Covenant with the Jews — you must be a Christian in order to be saved — but there needs to be greater clarity about the nature of god.

            Jesus, as God in the flesh, seems fine to me, but I still don’t see a clear enough distinction between Him and the Jewish Jehovah.

            The other problem is that Christianity is a religion for ALL people who believe, and that’s fine, but Christian churches have no respect for the need of different peoples to be separated from each other in order to preserve their ethnos and enjoy their own homelands free from invasion by other peoples.

            There is, of course, biblical precedent calling for separation of different peoples (the Tower of Babel comes to mind), but the position of mainstream churches today is that Christianity trumps ethnos, and, while perfectly acceptable in the spiritual sense, that position is both unacceptable and unworkable in the practical sense because multiculturalism must always fail.

            If, as E. Michael Jones insists, God is identical with Logos (reason), then we have no obligation to live in ways that are contrary to reason. On the contrary, our moral obligation is to live in a reasonable way.

            That being said, I do think that we can only survive the current onslaught of censorship and criminalizing of white Identitarians by doing two basic things that would help to protect us: 1) Establish our own church, and 2) establish our own political party.

            It is one thing for the powers that be to attack individuals, quite another for them to attack institutions that are generally accepted as legitimate in Western society: namely, churches and political parties.

            This is something that I believe we need to discuss further.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      The profusion of discourse on [ homosexuality ] is as baffling as the profusion of discourse on the ” jewish question ” in which it is entangled ; and thus it is a complicating factor . Naturally , that profusion of discourse imbibes Babylonian confusions . Toleration of the homo perversion may be reasonable at least until a more comprehensive and definitive understanding ( on true , honest and nonpolitical scientific grounds ) of the perversion is generally available .

      One thing that is virtually certain is that the relentless emulation of the White heterosexual culture with the homosexual culture , by the jews ( the enemy , our masters ) , has the potential to extinguish the White race ; which is why ((( they ))) advocate for those emulations .

    • Neil C
      Neil C says:

      @ Andrew
      I am glad to read your analysis and agree. Those are my feelings about the Church. I am not hating the Church, but I am Roman Catholic so understand, but you put into words what I could not and I am surprised that many do not have this view.

  7. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Jews create Babylon everywhere they go. It seems as if they simply cannot help themselves. All cues taken from Marx and Engels aside, jews seem to be completely unable to not be a thorn in the side of their host nation. Once again, one ponders how much of the globohomo agenda is powered by jewish desire to destroy white civilization through the death by 1,000 cuts scenario, and how much of this worldview jews actually enjoy, which, I do believe, is quite a fair amount. The thing about jews is, this is what they do, but it’s also very much who they are, the two being mutually exclusive and intertwined in an indistinguishable manner.

  8. Tom
    Tom says:

    Mechanically, all this is brought on by state intervention into civil society, specifically by the assurance that all of the costs associated with deviant behaviours will be absorbed by an uncritical and non-judgmentally caring welfare system. Think Portland, Seattle, and San Francisco here as but small examples.
    When deviant behaviours no longer threaten one’s survival, individuals will be more likely to engage in such behaviours. Think hippies here as an example from the last century. Then, as the numbers of individuals engaging in deviance grows, their sheer numbers lend respectability to lifestyles that previously were universally frowned upon. Once Nature is prevented from culling deviance from society and bad behaviours stop threatening survival, the judgment soon follows that bad behaviours can in fact be good behaviours. A moral epiphany (actually an immoral epiphany) soon follows like the one we are experiencing in the present time. All morality is tied to physical survival. Get rid of the gratuitous welfare state and deviance will soon start to disappear.

  9. Emil Tunja
    Emil Tunja says:

    Feels like the jews are accelerating things. At least over here in Swedistan, our (((army))) is totally pozzed. They are attending jewish pride festivals and engage in degeneracy.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      Next year they will be telling you that Óðinn and Ásatrú support homosexuality, and that the Ballad of Thrym exposed Þór as a cross dresser.

    • Hatecrime Hotline
      Hatecrime Hotline says:

      Count your blessings my Nordic chum! At least over there in the land of my paternal ancestors, you have the world’s foremost [genuine] Nationalsocialist movement in the Nordiska motståndsrörelsen, where you can find common cause and a place to experience brotherhood in a traditional community that is actively fighting to put things right, one day. NMR are no longer just a fringe party, but contain all the components of a mass movement. The number of active members is (relatively) small, but the amount of genuine sympathizers is without a doubt huge. If the totalitarian Big Mother state ever begins to contract and dry up (and due to a future severe constraining of public expenditure, no doubt it will), the NMR’s visible active support will increase immensely.

      VERY few other (former) white nations can boast that luxury these days. Stand shoulder to shoulder with your brothers-in-green under the Tyr rune, and keep your chin high.

  10. Wee Willy
    Wee Willy says:

    Even after 10 years plus of wokeness, something inside myself rallied agin the antagonistic comments concerning Feldman, Williams et al; they being of the pre – 80`s English comedy set.
    Williams is a very interesting case; he was right leaning and ashamed of his preferred sexuality ( read `hobby`) – and a great hero of mine.
    I wonder if he realised his part in the battering of of our Christian port cullis ?
    He was without doubt, a strong arm in that movement, aware or not.

  11. Free Speech Forum
    Free Speech Forum says:

    Something you can do today to spread freedom is to train someone how to use a firearm. You could also go to gun shows and buy guns and ammo to give away as gifts to as many Americans as you can.

    Banning guns won’t be easy if everyone is a gunowner.

    One reason Americans are tolerating tyranny now is that they have food, AC, and beer. Once the guns are outlawed, Communists are elected in 2020 or 2024, or the US Ponzi economy pops and people are starving in the street, Civil War 2.0 could start.

    Time is running out.

  12. SBaker
    SBaker says:

    I read through so many of these comments and see people speaking of perverts using the dialect of same. They are not gay. Either refer to the male homosexuals as coprophiliacs, which is most descriptive of their behavior, or use the normal term of, pervert. Don’t fall for their trap of using their language–why let them set the agenda for normal people. The lifestyle in the male homo population is about fecal-oral transmission of diseases, finding little boys to rape, having deviant encounters in filthy public restrooms, and spreading their mental and physical diseases. Total access to your kids is coming. Just as in Ancient Rome male homosexuals, aka coprophiliacs, were allowed to buy, sell, use, and trade young boys. Dragging civilization back a thousand years is called “gay” progress.
    Thanks to the marketing of deviance by Hollywood perverts, people have simply bought into the vernacular set by the mentally deranged and so-called “gay” lifestyle. Why does what amounts to a man licking/rimming/felching another man’s rear constitute some kind of “gay” lifestyle? This hallmark of deep perversion has been demonstrated over and over as these deviants smear themselves with excrement, rim each other, and seek hookups with other male deviants. Appropriate sanitation is completely lacking in the makeup of male homosexuals and disease vectoring in rampant. But hey, the intelligence of the gay way is here to stay, right? Get a bit more background in the public health implications of such behavior and ask yourself why they are banned from giving blood. Sodom and Gomorrah, then, is no different than Sodom and Gomorrah, now. Do we really want to turn back civilization thousands of years?

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      “” Do we really want to turn back civilization thousands of years? “”

      ” we ” really do not have any say in the matter . The US Supreme Court Justices decided that [ your ] government should legally condone ” gay ” perversions . The oligarch rulers//owners of the US did not object to the Supremes giving legal protection to the perverts . The Vatican did not appear to object to the Supremes marital gift to the gays . The White culture ( ie. people , the largest ethnic group of the US ) has been conquered and is being systematicly swept away with moral degeneracy to clear the path for the grand finale enthronement of the luciferian satanist ILLuminati World Order ( aka NWO/JWO/ZWO ) . Cheers .

  13. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    I will take readers back 39 years: 1980. Richard Gere in ‘American Gigolo’, playing a male prostitute at the service of wealthy older women. This film had the atypical gay-disco scene; and a homosexual black pimp who frames Gere’s character, Julian. The ending is a discovery of love for Julian – with a women! How innocent it seems by contemporary (homo-propagandists) standards.
    What role did Gere opt for next to prove his acting ability was more than a mere prop? A homosexual in a WW2 concentration camp in an award winning stage play, ‘Bent’ by Philadelphia born Russian Jew Martin Sherman; hence the upside pink or yellow triangles, or both, appropriated by militant homosexuals as a badge of honour- common particularly in the early 1980’s.

    By a strange convergence of immigration and rainbow flag wearing pride (shame) paraders in a street in North East London, not far the cinema where I watched American Gigolo’, a niqab masked muslima hangues one of the homo army with the slogan “It’s Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve!”. She is subsequently arrested for this breach of minority hierarchical protocol.
    It’s a wonderful life!

  14. Neil C
    Neil C says:

    Talking of Edwina Currie
    She put Jimmy Saville in place as head of a ”Task Force” to run Broadmoor (Mental Asylum for the criminally insane) in 1988. Many who worked there describe Saville as a psychopath(the in-joke was that Saville should be a patient–The paedophiles gravitated toward him). My sister who is a Nurse Ward Sister met Saville (He infiltrated many hospitals like stoke Mandeville hospital where he abused 60 ppl) she said he was a very creepy guy.

  15. Neil C
    Neil C says:

    In many ways, Orwell was correct about Sexcrime. The Party wanted to subvert the sex instinct. Sexcrime was about destroying the idea of forming a loving relationship. one of the things that stuck with me most was room 101 and Winstons worst fear, they used it to ‘prove’ love was a fantasy by making him say ”do it to her, not me” that is what broke Winston.
    So embracing Homosexuality is right in line with ‘The Party’ in that it destroys the family (Gay parents turns it upside down, a parody of nature). In the Novel Orwell never really deals with Homosexcrime, he is more interested in showing how the family is destroyed. All-natural impulses are destroyed. Newspeak is concerned with narrowing expression, sexcrime with instinct/love, thoughtcrime with individual intellect and dissent.
    Like the Ministry of love contradiction we have homosex is normal, heterosex is deviant. men should become women,women should become men. Degenerate art is beauty, beautiful art is degenerate.
    Charles Saatchi used his wealth to ”make degenerate art-Art” IE Jake and dinos chapman and Tracy Emin.
    Anyway I digress a bit and am a not very good writer, but the Ideas are there.
    Our removal of Waterhouse’s naked nymphs painting was art …ttps://

Comments are closed.