More Deceit and Double-Think from Mark Steyn and Company

Do parallel universes exist where history has taken an entirely different course? It’s been a big unanswered question in physics and philosophy for a long time, but I’ve started to wonder whether the Canadian neo-conservative Mark Steyn holds the key. His writing appears in this universe, but he himself appears to be living some or all of the time in an entirely different universe.

Mark Steyn is an important figure in American conservatism — a regular guest on Tucker Carlson and the favorite stand-in both for Carlson and for Rush Limbaugh. As will be obvious in the following, Steyn represents a segment of Jewry opposed to Muslim immigration (and only Muslim immigration) because of Muslim attitudes on Jews and Israel, while at the same time ignoring the much more powerful mainstream Jewish community that is in large part responsible for importing Muslims.

Another example is Stephen Steinlight, a former ADL operative and now a Fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies. Steinlight opposes Muslim immigration because of his concern with Jewish interests. Steinlight believes that present immigration policy no longer serves Jewish interests because the new immigrants are less likely to be sympathetic to Israel and because they are more likely to view Jews as the wealthiest and most powerful group in the U.S. — and thus a potential enemy — rather than as victims of the Holocaust. His animosity toward the restrictionism of 1924–1965 shines through clearly. This “pause” in immigration is perceived as a moral catastrophe. He describes it as “evil, xenophobic, anti-Semitic,” “vilely discriminatory,” a “vast moral failure,” a “monstrous policy.” Jewish interests are his only consideration, while the vast majority of pre-1965 Americans are described as a “thoughtless mob” because they advocate a complete moratorium on immigration (here, p. v).

One can only hope that Steyn does not inherit Limbaugh’s huge radio audience if, as seems quite possible, Limbaugh is unable to continue due to his cancer diagnosis. Again, like the rest of the mainstream Jewish community, Steyn appears to have no qualms about immigration in general. Africans would be fine. Only Muslim immigration is dubious. Because all that matters is what’s good for the Jews.

Jews as powerless opponents of Muslim immigration

That Steyn is living in an alternate, very Jewish universe can be concluded from his confident false assertions about modern Western history. In one interview from 2015 with the highly irritating “Jewish Mother” Laura Rosen Cohen, he used the seventieth anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz to muse on the mistaken policies of powerful European gentiles:

I think they [i.e., the Euro-goyim] drew the wrong conclusion from “Never Again”. The Jews were sort of peripheral to the meaning of that. I think what “Never Again” means to a Continental European is never again, as they saw it, the nationalism that led to war. So their response to 1939—1945 was to undermine their own nationalism. At the time of the European Constitution, so-called, a decade ago, you had these apparatchiks from the European Commission standing up and warning the Dutch and the French that if they didn’t sign on to this Euro-superstate they would be on the path to Belsen and Auschwitz.

In other words, it’s one or the other. You’ve the European Union or you’ve got ovens. That was the lesson they drew — that nationalism was bad, that nation states were bad, that national identity was bad. And, as part of that, they imported the next generation of anti-Semites to Europe. (Remembrance and Appropriation, 30th January 2020, SteynOnline)

In Mark Steyn’s parallel universe, Jews have stood by helplessly as Euro-goyim have misappropriated the Holocaust and used it as an excuse to “import the next generation of anti-Semites to Europe.” Steyn means that Euro-goyim have imported Muslims, of course, and in his universe Jews are obviously horrified but powerless opponents of Muslim immigration.

In the real universe, on the other hand, Jews are highly enthusiastic supporters of Muslim immigration and passionate believers in a Judeo-Islamic alliance against White Christian hate. Here are a few examples of this Jewish enthusiasm for Muslim immigration and the anti-White alliance Jews believe it will create in the West:

In Mark Steyn’s universe it appears that such headlines don’t exist. No, in the Steyniverse, Jews are “peripheral,” with no say in immigration policy and no political influence. That must be part of why Steyn announced in January 2020 that “I have a semi-official policy of sitting out Holocaust Memorial Day, on the grounds that in Europe formal veneration of dead Jews grows ever more fulsome in direct proportion to formal indifference to living Jews, and the extinguishing of what remains of Jewish life on the Continent.”

The highest decoration in France

That’s in “the Continent” of the Steyniverse, of course. In “the Continent” of this universe, real Jews like Dr Moshe Kantor don’t suffer “formal indifference” but receive the very highest state honours:

Powerless Dr Moshe Kantor is honoured by François Hollande 

Dr. Moshe Kantor, President of the European Jewish Congress (EJC), was awarded the Officier de la Légion d’Honneur (Officer of the Legion of Honour) by the President of France François Hollande [in June 2015]. The award is the highest decoration in France, established by Napoleon Bonaparte. For two centuries, it has been presented on behalf of the Head of State to reward the most deserving citizens in all fields of activity.

The award was bestowed on Dr. Kantor at the Elysée Palace by President Hollande for leading the fight against Antisemitism, racism, intolerance and xenophobia, promoting interfaith relations and a more tolerant Europe in his roles at the European Jewish Congress, the democratically-elected umbrella organization representing European Jewry. President Hollande called Dr. Kantor “a man of peace, a man of culture, a friend, and a friend of France.”

“You are an inspiring person in the Jewish world, a great figure of the Jewish People in Europe, heading a major institution, the European Jewish Congress, which today represents 42 communities,” President Hollande said before bestowing the award. “You and the EJC are promoting Jewish culture, interfaith dialogue and tolerance, fighting Antisemitism and racism and preserving the memory of the Holocaust. Because all of these reasons, all of these values — your fight against Antisemitism and for peace, and for your love of France — we honor you here today.” (Dr. Moshe Kantor Awarded Legion of Honour by President Hollande, European Jewish Congress, 30th June 2015)

In the Steyniverse, Moshe Kantor is presumably an unrecognized and unhonoured nobody. In this universe, he receives “the highest decoration in France,” heads the European Jewish Congress, and runs an Orwellian organization called the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) “to monitor tolerance in Europe.” The ECTR, which works hard to crush “xenophobia, antisemitism and racial discrimination,” is a big fan of Muslim immigration but not of free speech. And Moshe Kantor, ignored by important European politicians in the Steyniverse, has their full support in the real universe: the ECTR has recruited the former President of Poland Aleksander Kwaśniewski, the former Prime Minister of Spain José María Aznar, the former Prime Minister of Sweden Göran Persson, the former Speaker of the German Bundestag Rita Süssmuth, and many others.

As I asked in “Moshe Is Monitoring You,” what do European politicians see in this Russian-born billionaire? Mark Steyn sees nothing in Kantor and to the best of my knowledge has never referred to him or his dedicated campaigning for Muslim immigration and against free speech. Like all other Jews in the Steyniverse, Kantor is a nebbish wringing his hands futilely on the margins as he watches goyim make bad decisions that harm Jewish welfare.

A golden scientific opportunity

So come on, physicists and philosophers: what are you waiting for? Mark Steyn appears to hold the key to the question of parallel universes. He should be interviewed closely and, if he gives his permission, become the subject of detailed neurological examination. His writing strongly suggests that he is living in a parallel universe where history has taken an entirely different turn. In his universe, Jews have been powerless bystanders as powerful gentiles have brought Muslims flooding into Europe to be “the next generation of antisemites.” In our universe, by contrast, Jews have overseen and enthusiastically supported the flood, whilst repeatedly hailing Muslims as their “natural allies” against White Christian hate.

But there are two other explanations for Steyn’s writing, of course. He might be living in a parallel mental universe rather than a parallel physical one. That is, he might be crazy or deluded. Or he might simply be a liar whose statements are governed not by any regard for truth or historical accuracy but by the age-old principle of “What’s good for the Jews?” It’s not good for the Jews to admit their central role in the immigration disaster and destruction of Western civilization, so Steyn pretends that they are the victims rather than the villains.

Truth and Integrity or Fame and Success?

I go for the third explanation myself: Mark Steyn is a liar and confidence-trickster operating on the age-old principle of “What’s good for the Jews?” And also on the principle of “What’s good for Mark Steyn?” If he were honest about the Jewish role, he would lose his exalted position among so-called “conservative” pundits. The Jewish writer Larry Auster never had that exalted position precisely because he wasn’t dishonest. Auster admitted the Jewish role in immigration and multiculturalism, and was a severe critic of Steyn’s defeatism, shape-shifting and trickery. Auster chose truth and integrity over success and fame. Steyn has chosen the reverse. So has his side-kick Laura Rosen Cohen, the “Jewish Mother” who contributes a regular commentary to Steyn’s website and who seems determined to embody as strongly as possible the traits identified by Kevin MacDonald as central to Jewish activism — she is aggressive, psychologically intense and highly ethnocentric.

And when I say “ethnocentric,” I mean it. There is one consistently funny thing amid Cohen’s constant failed attempts to be amusing: the way she keeps a special section devoted to “Israel and the Jews,” despite often devoting half or more of the other sections to Jewish topics. And she’s always ready with a would-be amusing put-down for those obsessive and evil anti-Semites who dare to suggest that Jews have any negative influence on the world:

The next round [of Jewish festivities] is not until December, so the plan is to lose the Rosh Hashanah and Sukkot weight in advance of the Chanukah latke and jelly donut season — and well before Passover when, let’s be honest, those delicious and tender gentile children baked into the matzos can really pack on the pounds! (Putting the Infidel in Infidelity (Laura’s Links), 24th October 2019, SteynOnline)

Cohen is referring to the infamous “Blood Libel,” the hate-filled Christian conspiracy theory that Jews kidnapped, tortured and murdered gentile children to use their blood in ritual meals. That’s the sort of ridiculous thing that anti-Semites believe, you see (and I too dismissed the “Blood Libel” as baseless until I read Ron Unz’s fascinating review of work on medieval Jewish occultism by the Israeli-Jewish scholar Dr Ariel Toaff). But as we’ll see below, Cohen herself sometimes echoes fundamental “anti-Semitic” ideas.

“Disgusting, Jew-hating France”

Most of the time, however, she imitates Mark Steyn by either living in a parallel universe or being entirely unconcerned with the truth. In January this year she said “France is a disgusting, Jew-hating, sharia hell hole,”  because the Muslim murderer of an elderly Jewish woman was found insane rather than guilty of murder. Contra Cohen, Jews have enormous power in France and were central to the creation of its ever-growing Muslim population, which inflicts murder, rape and economic parasitism mainly on Whites, not on Jews. As we saw above, France gave Dr Moshe Kantor its “highest decoration.” Other members of the small Jewish minority occupy the highest positions in government, media and academia. If France is a “Jew-hating” nation, it’s difficult to imagine what a “Jew-loving” nation would look like.

But Laura Rosen Cohen doesn’t lie only about France. In November 2019 she was “Kvellin’ Around The Christmas Tree” and commenting that “German Chancellor Angela Merkel goes to Auschwitz probably to get more ideas about how to ruin her country with anti-Semitic poison.” Contra Cohen, Angela Merkel opened Germany’s borders to Muslims in 2015 with the full support of Jews in Germany, which is why she was given the highest of honours by the World Jewish Congress in 2019:

World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder on 28 October honored Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel with the 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award, which recognizes outstanding individuals who work to promote Herzl’s ideals for a safer, more tolerant world for the Jewish people. The award ceremony was held at the Jewish community center in Munich, co-hosted by President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria & WJC Commissioner for Holocaust Memory Dr. Charlotte Knobloch.

Thanking WJC President Lauder, Chancellor Merkel expressed her heartfelt gratitude for the honor of being chosen as the recipient of this award, saying: “It is humbling for me that I, as a German chancellor, can receive the Theodor Herzl Award today. Jewish life in Germany must be supported — and protected.” (WJC honors German Chancellor Angela Merkel with 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award, October 2019)

The righteous shiksa: Angela Merkel is honoured by the World Jewish Congress

Laura Rosen Cohen pretends that Merkel is trying to “ruin her country with anti-Semitic poison,” but the World Jewish Congress knows the truth: Merkel is promoting Theodor Herzl’s “ideals for a safer, more tolerant world for the Jewish people.” When White Christian nations are atomized by Muslim immigration, Jews feel a sense both of relief and of revenge, as I pointed out in “Roche’s Revenge,” a discussion of the highly Islamophilic Jewish immigration minister Barbara Roche.

Immigration-fans Emma Lazarus and Israel Zangwill

But that’s the reality of Jewish behaviour and Laura Rosen Cohen prefers to avoid discussing that. In January 2020 she was kvetching that “Best and brightest immigrant to America from Albania (‘ISIS wannabe’) has his own version of the American dream: beheading infidels with chainsaws. How lovely and patriotic. You know the schmaltzy poem on the statue right, give us your poor, your expert headchoppers, etc.” But who wrote the “schmaltzy poem” attached to the Statue of Liberty? Why, it was the ethnocentric Jewish poet Emma Lazarus (1849-87), who joined the ethnocentric Jewish playwright Israel Zangwill (1864-1926) in the highly successful Jewish campaign to falsely portray America as a “nation of immigrants” and a “melting pot” for all creeds and colors.

“Columbia’s Unwelcome Guests”: a non-schmaltzy view of immigration by the American cartoonist Frank Beard (1842–1905)

“The Stranger at Our Gate”: another non-schmaltzy view of immigration by Frank Beard

But let’s give Laura Rosen Cohen her due. She does very occasionally admit some of the truth about Jewish behaviour. After CNN reported that “The ‘OK’ hand gesture is now a hate symbol, according to a new report by the Anti-Defamation League [ADL],” Cohen commented: “My Idiot People. I just can’t. Nutcases. You are nutcases, ADL OK?? OK????”

I beg to differ. The ADL are not “nutcases.” Instead, they are very successful and ruthless defenders and extenders of Jewish power. And that, of course, includes welcoming Muslims as “natural allies.” When Donald Trump proposed a “Muslim registry” in 2016, the ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt announced: “If one day Muslim Americans will be forced to register their identities, then that is the day that this proud Jew will register as a Muslim.”

Not a nutcase: ruthless Jewish supremacist Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL

Cohen was also wrong when Jewish Democrats in America claimed that in November 2019 “Donald Trump is the biggest threat to American Jews.” She responded with “Stupid Jews gotta keep on stupiding.

Again, no, it’s not stupidity: it’s standard Jewish hostility towards any politician whose rhetoric (if not his actions) promised to defend White interests rather than harm White interests. Cohen plugged the “stupid line” again in December 2019:

President Worst Hitler Ever appears at Israeli-American event, gets completely and utterly love-bombed by Jews, kibbitzes around the whole night, hugs disabled Israeli performers from the Shalva band, has a grand, festive and meaningful Chanukah party at the White House, signs an Executive Order protecting Jewish students from rabid anti-Semitism… and still gets savaged by idiot lefty Jews who just cannot stop stupiding. (A Nickel in the Change Purse, 17th December 2019, SteynOnline)

In fact, “lefty Jews” can’t stop being hostile to White interests and to a president who might potentially advance them. They’re not being stupid: they’re being Jewish. Mark Steyn and Laura Rosen Cohen don’t want to admit this, because the truth is “not good for Jews.” When Steyn quoted from his interview with Cohen in January this year, there was earnest discussion among members of the Mark Steyn fan-club about the causes of anti-Semitism (“Why so often has it been the Jews on the receiving end?”).

Easy to understand, impossible to accept

Of course, no-one suggested that Jews might bear any responsibility for creating anti-Semitism. But someone did say that Jews will always rise again, thanks to their “love of life.” Steyn and Cohen prove that love of lying is also central to Jewish culture. Indeed, the two loves are intimately related. Deceit and manipulation are central aspects of biology precisely because they promote survival. But Jewish lies promote Jewish survival and success at the expense of Whites. And so anyone interested in White survival should find Jewish lies both easy to understand and impossible to accept.

85 replies
  1. Rosa
    Rosa says:

    I read years ago that Steyn was not Jew. Indeed he writes “SteYn” just to differentiate from the usually Jewish “Stein”. He said also once he has (had?) an au aunt, who was (is ?) a Catholic nun.
    Thanks for clarification.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      His Wikipedia biography rejects the view that he is a Jew.
      Hs attack on Muslim immigration and on multiculturalism is more important than his maternal ancestry. A crypto-Jew opposed to the Replacement? you can’t have your kukhn and eat it.

      • lucius vanini
        lucius vanini says:

        YET AGAIN the question arises whether a certain person is a Jew OR White! How White Nationalists can keep asking such a question, keep speculating after they’ve seen the person, and yet keep believing Jews are of another race, is wholly beyond me!

        If anyone told me that Steyn was a non-Jewish citizen of ANY of the European countries (before I’d heard Steyn’s British accent) I’d have believed it; and until today I had no idea he is Jewish. What–am I now to think he’s non-White?!

        When it comes to people who really ARE of another race–blacks for instance (and I mean real blacks, not Jim Crow one-drop-rule octoroons, seven-eighths Caucasian), there is no such need to wonder about their race. Ditto East Asians. Ditto Pacific Islanders. Et cetera.

        Caucasian Jews, the Ashkenazim and the Sephardim–96% of the world’s Jews–meet all the anthropological criteria of “Whiteness” and are of the same ethnic/genetic cluster as we are–a Europeans/Near Easterners Ancestral Cluster (cf. Henn et al, 2012). In fact on the matrilineal side the Ashkenazim are overwhelmingly indigenous-European with roots in prehistoric Europe, while in terms of Y-DNA Jews bear haplogroups shared by many millions of non-Jewish European men–J2, E1b1b, R1b. Hitler was E1b1b, so were Napoleon, President L.B. Johnson, the Wright Bros. Genetic research has shown that Italians and Greeks are among the people most closely related to the Ashkenazim, who are 80% of world Jewry, and that in terms of Y-DNA Middle Eastern Jews are closer genetically to Indo-European groups like the Armenians and Kurds than to their Arab, Semitic neighbors.

        Ah, but the attribution of Whiteness has often been arbitrary and valuation-based, not always rational and scientific. Where Jews have been seen as natural foes of the ethnic majority, as in the Third Reich, they basically HAD to be classified as another race, because how could the good guys (White Europeans) include the bad guys? But in another and equally White Supremacist country, the Confederate States of America–where Jews were not held to be arch-enemies–Jews rose to prominence and, in a society where mixing of races was verboten, married White Christians. Such Jewish Southerners included Abraham Myers, Confederate Quartermaster General; Senator David Levy, “the Florida Fire-eater”, advocate of slavery and secession; Judah Benjamin, at different times Confederate Secretary of War, Secretary of State and Attorney General. The South saw no racial difference in these Southerners, because there wasn’t any, only presumably an ethnic one–and there’s ethnic variation among non-Jewish Europeans too.

        A century and a half later, WNs (excluding myself and a few others, among them Jared Taylor, I presume) classify Jews as non-White and it MUST be because their classification is valuation-based. This constitutes a retrogression and it condemns WNs to the tomfoolery of considering obviously White people non-White.

        None of this has ANYTHING to do with viewing Jewish crimes and skullduggeries in a different light! I have to make such a disclaimer, because virtually all WNs think I’m not acknowledging Jews’ Whiteness so much as WHITEWASHING them. But I regard anyone who helps endanger European heritage as an enemy of Western Civilization–irrespective of his or her race or ethnicity. Macron is a White man, Merkel a White woman, but my acknowledging them as such doesn’t contravene my regarding them as foes, whose politics I will oppose in any way I can. Ditto Soros and Spectre.

        I don’t doubt a single assertion in the above article, which certainly is consonant with so much I know about Jews’ behavior. I merely look at our problem with Jews as a political/cultural conflict, not a racial one as is our trouble with blacks. And I think we need a new anthropology where the Jews are concerned–one with some intelligence.

        I recommend “Jews’ ‘Racial’ Nature” in The European Family Blog.

        • Barkingmad
          Barkingmad says:

          Then why are gentiles who: undergo circumcision by a mohel (as a few, very few, gentiles have done to their boys) + are raised with jewish values + undergo formal conversion studies + are superficially welcomed into a congregation and the whole 9 yards – still not fully accepted by jews? I myself know of a few such cases. And if I know a few, there’s a whole lot more.

          Here’s why, sir: because these white converts’ blood is all wrong, and the real Jews know it. Judaism is the religion of a people, a nation, an ethnic group – however you wish to call it is fine with me. That they travelled to Europe ages ago and mixed somewhat with the locals doesn’t change that fact. What they look like is irrelevant. True Jews know another true Jew.

          That creepy advice-giving harpy Laura Schlessinger (of radio show fame) converted herself and her whole family to orthodox judaism. Gossip is that they never really accepted her and her family so she gave it up. Her mother was not a Jew and so the real Jews let her know in subtle ways that she could never truly be one of them and let her know it. Contrast this with white Christians tripping all over themselves to make nonwhite Christians feel welcome.

          That Christians of the C.S.A. chose and accepted Jews (or any other nonwhite) as their powerful leaders shows that gentiles (whites) everywhere can and do have schit for brains.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          Before they succumbed to political correctness, anthropologists recognized only three races: Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black) and Mongoloid (Asian). We know that Aryans (Indo-Europeans/whites) emerged from the southern Russia about 10,000 years ago. They conquered Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India, and western China. They encountered hunter-gatherers in northwestern Europe and farmers in southern Europe and absorbed both groups. We know them in our own western history as the ancient Greeks and Romans, as well as the Vikings and other white Europeans.

          Palestine, along with the rest of the Middle East, is geographically located at the intersection of three continents and three races — whites, blacks and Asians. It stands to reason that over a period of thousands of years, those races blended together to make up the ancient Jews (Shephardim) and their neighbors. The mixing of races accelerated when Muslims conquered the Middle East and North Africa. They had been settled by white Aryans, but race mixing made the Mediterranean populations “less white” in varying degrees.

          The Ashkenazim originated in Khazaria around 700 A.D. King Bulan adopted Judaism as the official religion, probably in order to avoid taking sides in an ongoing war between Christian Russia to the north and Muslims to the south.

          The ethnic mix of the Khazars was Turkic-Mongol — ultimately a mix of Asian, white and black, with an emphasis on Asian (Mongoloid) characteristics.

          Over the next 1,300 years, intermarriage with whites made this group “more white.”

          The same thing happened with the Shephardim. After the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, Shephardic Jews migrated to North Africa, then joined in the Muslim conquest of Spain.

          When they were expelled from Spain, they migrated into Europe. Many had already settled in England, France, Italy, Germany and Holland. They found their best reception in Turkey and, especially, in Poland. When Poland was gobbled up by hostile powers in the late eighteenth century, most found themselves in Russia. In the meantime, many had settled in the New World.

          Although the Shephardim and the Ashkenazim started out as distinct groups, they eventually merged to a large degree because of the propensity of Jews to marry each other and avoid marrying non-Jews.

          There are still some “darker” Shephardic Jews. But Jews who settled in Rhode Island and New York during the pre-Civil War period — although Shepardic — became almost indistinguishable from both Ashkanazi Jews and from white people in general as time went on.

          So how should we think of the Jews? Not as a race, but as a close-knit tribe with a distinctive racial pedigree that is NOT white, but a mix of different races.

          Jews are not white, but they have a lot of whiteness in them.

          I think that’s the best way to look at them. Furthermore, because of inbreeding and in-group preference, they have particularly “Jewish” characteristics — physical, mental and spiritual.

          Those characteristics are not set in stone. Rather, they are tendencies. Such as the tendency to have a big nose. It takes a little practice, but with work you can develop very accurate “Jew-dar.”

        • Jeff Tupper
          Jeff Tupper says:

          This is a fairly low IQ take. Europeans consider themselves “white”. Jews consider themselves “Jews”. Their identity is that they are not a part of the white tribal group – meaning they are not European gentiles. The reverse is also true: if a white European gentile looks at a secular (meaning biological rather than religious) Jew he could just as easily say “I am a biological jew because I look like the Jew”. Is that true? It’s not he from a different race with a different ancestry and identity. White simply means European identity. Jew means anyone that considers themselves a biological Jew – meaning a descendant of Joseph. That’s why Jews that look like Europeans will wail endlessly about the white man – because they don’t put themselves in the common category “white”.

          Furthermore: Jews will use “crypsis” to hide their jewish identity while engaging in anti-white activism. This is the origin of the “self hating white”. They are not self hating – they are a hostile racial outgroup. This is what jews don’t want people to understand and why goebbels so famously said that you can call a jew anything from a swindler to a thief but if you call him a jew he will panic. Their strategies are predicated on their victims not understanding their true identity because if you understand that it’s jews saying “we whites are horrible” all the time you will start to say “jews hate us and are openly hostile towards us.”

          You’re probably trolling or hasbara but if you can’t figure out this very simply topic then you probably just don’t have the mental firepower to read this blog and get anything from it.

        • HK Wills
          HK Wills says:

          If you consider “caucasian” (from the broadest racial classification system) to mean White, and if Jews can be categorized as “caucasian” then Jews could be considered White. However under that procedure Arabs would also be considered White. Since few Arabs could pass for White (in the European or Indo-European sense) this would level of resolution would obsfucate an important level of distinction and provide less information about a phenomenon: it would be a mistake.

          Genetically Jews are most closely related to modern Arabs:

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      I have wondered if or how much Jewish he is too. When I see Jews mangle the pronunciation or spelling of a German name like Stein, almost always pronounced “Steen” by them when the correct pronunciation is “Shtine” or at least “Stine” would be close, I always assume it’s to distance themselves from their connection to Germany. I guess the only reason “Einstein” is not pronounced “Eensteen” is because the man was already famous when he came to the USA and the Germans obviously know the correct pronunciation of a German name. I’m not sure “Stein” is an exclusively Jewish name. It is not when it’s not just “Stein”. “Manstein” for instance, was an important German WW II General.

      I’m a big fan of Tucker, although I do think he’s stupid when he refers to Communist China or Antifa (a communist organization) as “fascist”. He’s honest (as much as he can be and still keep his job), informative and seems to defend white interests, sometimes at least. Like with Trump, I often wonder if Jews are completely off the radar with them, or are they aware of the dominating influence Jews have on the US, including foreign policy. Is Tucker aware of Professor’s Walt and Mearsheimer’s somewhat famous book “The Israel Lobby”? I think he is, but won’t go there (invite them on his show) because he would lose his job. I also wonder if Trump might someday get to the point where he regrets that Ivanka marred a Jew and his grandchildren will be Jews. He is not a practicing Christian but he is old enough to remember when the US was still a Christian country.

      I believe most (with few exceptions) people that marry Jews generally bow to Jewish influence in their family. Half Jews, I believe, are often more Jewish than not. Despite this, National Socialist Germany had many in their armed forces. I believe the German writer Thomas Mann was a typically patriotic German but he married a Jew. After Hitler came to power, he moved with his wife to the USA, but then he also made anti-German broadcasts during the war. So he was clearly influenced by the fact he married a Jew.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        Peter wrote: “I guess the only reason “Einstein” is not pronounced “Eensteen” is because the man was already famous when he came to the USA and the Germans obviously know the correct pronunciation of a German name. I’m not sure “Stein” is an exclusively Jewish name. It is not when it’s not just “Stein”. “Manstein” for instance, was an important German WW II General.”

        Stein is a German name; Jews who came to Germany adopted German names wholesale, turning them into Jewish names in the jewish-dominated public mind.
        This Steen business is recent, and I really think it came from Fox News, which wants to camouflage Jewish difference and its own huge preference for Israel-US blood brotherhood.
        When I first became aware of the Weinstein brothers, their name was pronounced “Stine”, as is correct. “Winestine.” When his sexual transgressions became the topic, some Fox news hosts started calling him WINESTEEN. (They don’t change the first ‘ein’ but they do change the second ‘ein.’ Doesn’t make sense. Little by little, everyone at Fox was persuaded to use ‘steen’. (There were some holdouts for awhile, but they eventually caved.) However, if your name is simply Stein, you can’t get away with pronouncing it steen, so they don’t try.

        Steen is a Dutch ending and it’s spelled that way. No one who is Jew-aware should go along with the steen pronunciation for stein.

      • Wudubearo
        Wudubearo says:

        The name “Stein” is found in old Icelandic sagas, so it is not only German. It means “stone” in various Germanic languages. I wish I knew for certain Mark Steyn’s ancestry, but I do not. Anyway, “ei” is pronounced as a long “I” in German, and as a long “E” in Yiddish. This explains the humor in that scene of “Young Frankenstein.”

        Some Jews prefer one pronunciation and some the other. If you get it wrong, boy howdy, can they become offended!

        • Peter
          Peter says:

          I’m not so sure that is right. Yiddish was used in Poland and maybe on the edges of the Astro-Hungarian Empire, generally in poorer or backwards areas. Yiddish was not an official language of Germany, probably not Austria either. I’m not sure it was an official language anywhere in Europe. After unification of Germany in 1870, one language was adopted so all Germans could communicate. It’s called Hochdeutsch or High German. Yiddish might be categorized as the equivalent of Ebonics. It was not official or accepted in business, school, government, etc.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Yes they become offended: and then some. Defense Counsel for renowned Toronto personal injury lawyer Neinstein rebuked me for pronouncing his name Ninestine. It was Ninesteen. One for his schizo side fornicating with one of his clients on his office desk, and the other pronunciation for his phrenic side, swearing to matrimonial fidelity.

          The squeaky clean three Judge Ontario Divisional Court, on Appeal, re-hearing my Application for Intervenor Status, to apprise the triers of fact of his disbarment Appeal, of his thrice repeated solicitation of murder of his Senior Legal Secretary M.R. was headed by a Justice, who, earlier as a lawyer, for substantial fees, had spent 18 months splitting that very law firm partnership, unquestionably knowing more of the reasons behind the split than any of us. He must have been absent when they taught those ten minutes on the conditions of recusing yourself, so as to not bring the administration of Justice into disrepute. My ass.

          We lost but added to the conditions under which they had an incredible 1,600 member plaintiff class action brought against them, finally settling for $ 4 million. Without diminishing the five star client testimonials on their web site: naturally.

          [ To repeat myself from many moons ago here: in said Toronto’s law firm adjacent artsy Yorkville, I had much earlier noticed a new car with a personalized license plate. It spelled out SHIKSA; to the quiet snickering of her 55 female colleagues, the meaning of which she was entirely unaware of until a friend and I, while repeatedly questioning her sprung it on her. She had acquired that Yiddish epithet for abomination/outgrowth, during her time of initially consensual sex with this ” divorced/widowed lawyer “. ]

          You may ask yourself, what the hell has the pronunciation of this master fraudster’s name got to do with this: as I do.

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      There are in particular three areas that Wikipedia is an extremely biased propaganda website and that is Jews, Germans and WW II. It is completely unreliable and often lies in these areas. It is the eternal defender of the Jew, always, and the eternal maligner of the German, particularly in relation to WW II. Wikipedia will call someone a Jew when it’s “good for the Jews” and suggest, or say someone is not a Jew when it’s “good for the Jews”, even if that person is a Jew.

      This short article explains why Wikipedia and the entire internet (to a certain degree) is controlled by the Jews. When the Jewish organization the ADL calls YouTube or Google (both Jewish owned) and tells them to remove something from their website, they do it. This You tube video (the 3rd one) has been deleted again. I viewed it last week and it showed a group of around 20 Jews working in a room, being trained on how to modify Wikipedia articles in the Jews favor. The video said there are many such Jewish groups across the US that volunteer their time to alter Wikipedia articles in their favor.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Video well worth watching for old and particularly new, as well as those getting a sore ass from sitting on the fence too long.

        I recall one of the originals, taped in Israel, featured the specialist on International Law, Dershowitz, exclaiming, in the defense of this gangster state, that ” international law was devised by some liberal do-gooders ! “. We sure couldda used him at Nuremberg to countersue for malicious prosecution and hefty reparations in the other direction: for a change.

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      Steyn’s Wikipedia entry quotes Mark Steyn saying “the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers”.

      Wikipedia also says “Steyn received the Center for Security Policy’s “Mightier Pen” award in 2007″ receiving it at an event that featured a convocation by Jewish scholar and rabbi Yitz Greenberg and remarks by Board of Regents Honorary Chairman Bruce Gelb.

      Wikipedia also says “Mark Steyn was awarded the 2006 Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism for writing which “best reflects love of this country and its democratic institutions”.”

      I immediately recognized the name Breindel from a debate he had with Christopher Hitchens on television years ago, arguing vociferously that historian David Irving’s book “Goebbels” should effectively be banned in the USA. Funny he would have an award associated with democracy named after him, considering his pro censorship position. Watching the debate, I’m not sure someone could be more Jewish than Eric Breindel.

      Wikipedia also says Steyn was a friend of the billionaire publishing mogul Conrad Black who is supposedly a Catholic, but you wouldn’t know it from his other interests. The Jewish Telegraph Agency says “Black’s wife, Barbara Amiel, writes strongly pro-Israel columns in several of his publications. Black himself has taken the unusual step of writing to one of his own publications to decry “indefensible hatred for Israel.” Taki Theodoracopulos, a columnist at Black’s Spectator magazine, wrote in early 2001, “The way to Uncle Sam’s heart runs through Tel Aviv and Israeli-occupied territory.” Black responded in force. “He expressed a hatred for Israel and a contempt for the United States and its political institutions that were irrational and an offense to civilized taste. In the process, I am afraid he uttered a blood libel on the Jewish people wherever they may be,””

      You can read the entire article here:

      In the first comment I made on this article I said I wasn’t sure if Steyn was Jewish. After reading he had a great grandmother that was Jewish and of his close connections with awards, Rabbis, journalists and publishers, all with a very strong pro-Israel and pro-Jewish bias, it appears Steyn’s Jewish great grandmother has had a major impact on who he is.

      • lucas morron
        lucas morron says:

        Mark Steyn is a Christian, as he has stated multiple times. He’s not some sort of Sionist stooge. This whole article as so badly reported and tendentious that I’m thinking Tobias Langdon probably is some agent provocateur looking to stir the pond so that the dumbest nazis of America come out. Steyn has fought courageous battles for freedom of speech and opposed mass migration since before Tobias Langdon knew how to ride a bycicle. I’ve read his stuff for 20 years: he was pretty supportive of neocons and now is sorry for that. That probably is his biggest mistake, not some secret affinity for Rothschild cabals or whatever. He wrote this in the Daily Telegraph: ” I’m not one for philosophical meditations on Zionism. Had I been British foreign secretary ninety years ago, I doubt I would have issued the Balfour Declaration. Nor am I much interested in whose land was whose hundreds or thousands of years back. The reality is that the nation states of the region all date back to the 1930s and 1940s: the only difference is that Israel, unlike Syria and Iraq, has made a go of it. As for the notion that this or that people “deserve” a state, that’s a dangerous post-modern concept of nationality and sovereignty. The United States doesn’t exist because the colonists “deserved” a state, but because they went out and fought for one. Were the Palestinians to do that, they might succeed in pushing every last Jew into the sea, or they might win a less total victory, or they might be routed and have to flee to Damascus or Wolverhampton. But, whatever the outcome, it’s hard to see that they would be any less comprehensively wrecked a people than they are after spending three generations in “refugee” “camps” while their “cause” is managed by a malign coalition of UN bureaucrats, cynical Arab dictators, celebrity terrorists and meddling Europeans whose Palestinian fetishisation seems most explicable as the perverse by-product of the suppression of their traditional anti-Semitism. Americans and Europeans will never agree on this, and the demographic reality – the Islamisation of Europe – will only widen the chasm in the years ahead.” Ready and willing to discuss this issue in Twitter @lucasmorron18 if any takers. I most definitely know a trillion times more about Steyn than the author of this hit piece.

        • Peter
          Peter says:

          It doesn’t matter what he “states” or “identifies as”. I can say I’m black all day long. It doesn’t make it so. Mark Steyn has Jewish blood in his veins and he is very strongly pro Jewish and pro Israel.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          Steyn: “… meddling Europeans whose Palestinian fetishization seems most explicable as the perverse by-product of the suppression of their traditional anti-Semitism…”

          It couldn’t possibly be that the “meddling Europeans” sincerely and rightly believe that the Palestinians shouldn’t have had their land taken away from them. No, I suppose not — according to Steyn.

          I’ve seen Steyn on Fox News quite a few times. He’s good at roasting liberals.

          But I don’t see him as an opponent of The Great Replacement of white people by brown people. Nor do I see him as an opponent of Jewish power.

          I don’t think he has any problem with turning white America into brown America as long as it happens legally, and as long as Muslims are kept out.

          He strikes me as a “proposition nation” civic nationalist who believes that race doesn’t matter, just muh Constitution.

          I don’t see him saying that people make culture instead of the other way around, and that Western Civilization cannot survive in the absence of the white people whose ancestors created most of it.

          “…the Palestinians…might succeed in pushing every last Jew into the sea, or they might win a less total victory, or they might be routed and have to flee to Damascus or Wolverhampton. But, whatever the outcome, it’s hard to see that they would be any less comprehensively wrecked a people than they are after spending three generations in ‘refugee’ ‘camps’… ”

          Right. Give it up, Palestinians. Your cause might be just, but you’re such damaged goods that nothing you do will matter in the end.

          “The reality is that the nation-states of the region all date back to the 1930s and 1940s; the only difference is that Israel, unlike Syria and Iraq, has made a go of it.”

          Setting Iraq aside, I don’t know why Steyn would suggest that Syria has not “made a go of it.”

          Bashar al Assad has offered protection to Christians in his nation and has managed to survive in spite of attacks by Israel and the United States.

          Is Steyn opposed to war with Syria and Iran? I don’t think so.

          Is he opposed to our knee-jerk support for that shining democracy in the Middle East, Israel? I don’t think so.

          Whether he’s a Jew or not (I don’t believe he is), Steyn is not on our side.

  2. Alfred
    Alfred says:

    “The righteous shiksa: Angela Merkel”

    She was a member of East German Secret Intelligence and she is, at the very least, part Jewish.
    Which apparently is not widely known.
    Steyn, to the cognizant, is an obvious one of those, yet the average white person doesn’t know it.
    One thing the way these children of Satan are moving things the earth will be perhaps as Revilo P Oliver suggested, in any event the earth being cleansed of the Evil may not be too high a price to pay.

    No other mythology so reeks of an insane lust to torture, to kill, to destroy, to create only desolation and nothingness. And this spiritual force has characterized the activities of the Jews throughout history: they can only destroy. And the few Jews to whom we should be profoundly grateful, notably Marcus Eli Ravage, Oscar Levy, and Maurice Samuel, have been so candid as to tell us the truth explicitly: “We are intruders, we are subverters.”–”We Jews…today are nothing else but the world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.”–”We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain destroyers forever.”

    This is a cardinal fact that we must take into account in our estimates of the present. It is obvious that the Jews derive great profits from the many forms of subversion–from pornography and the incitement to degeneracy, from class warfare, from wars between nations of our race, from the inflation of counterfeit currencies and the impoverishment of our people, and from many similar activities. (5) But it we consider such things from the standpoint of the race, not from the standpoint of the individual Jew who battens on us, is it not likely that the material profit counts for much less than the spiritual satisfaction? And if we consider some of the Jew’s work, I cannot see how it could conceivably yield a net profit. What monetary gain can they have obtained, or intended to obtain, by spending vast sums to incite the (blacks) to rape, murder, and arson? What profit from destroying civilization in Rhodesia and making that land again a land of savages? What can the Jews in South Africa gain in material terms from their present intensive effort to destroy the white population and make of that country another Rhodesia? Is it not obvious that they could squeeze much more money out of the White population by peaceful parasitism and without inciting the racial hatreds that disrupt the economy and could conceivably bring retribution upon themselves? The only explanation, it seems to me, is that with their race as a whole spiritual considerations are paramount, paramount over profit and even over self-preservation. One can foresee the logical end in a future that may not be too distant: one can see the last Jews dying with exultation on the surface of a planet from which they have exterminated all other human beings, all animal, all vegetation, all life–a planet of which they have made “a desolation of desolations.

    Revilo P. Oliver, late Professor of the Classics, University of Illinois at Urbana

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      My comment on Revilo Oliver will not please many of your readers. I followed all his contributions to “American Opinion” and have several of his publications in characteristic prose. I also corresponded with him, his return letters using both black and red ribbons. Sadly it became clear towards the end that he was “losing it”, his “Auntie-Semitism” (as he put it) becoming increasingly crazy in content. The final sentence quoted here proves my point.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        We all have our opinions. I find Oliver’s opinions more instructive than yours.

        Jews rising up against the Roman Empire and slaughtering their unsuspecting neighbors — a sure loser for them in the long run — is just one example of an apparently infinite capacity for destruction and self-destruction.

        Another is the fact that they have been expelled from different countries well over one hundred times. But it’s “never their fault.”

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          @ Trenchant & Eric
          I believe in free speech and free debate all round.

          Jews have hardly been the only group in world history to attack others, including neighbours and oppressors! What they call “lachrymose” versions of their perennial unpopularity is however combined with a self-righteousness that has been much more comprehensible, but excessive, stiff-necked and purblind since WW2; two examples from the UK are their leaders’ counter-productive insistence on a grotesque “Holocaust Centre” sited to confront Parliament, and David Baddiel’s disingenuous TV programme on “Holocaust Denial”.

          The late Rabbi Hugo Gryn, a survivor of the Auschwitz “family barracks”, once said that Jews never feel secure unless they are supreme; a “solution” that of course perpetuates “problem”.

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      Oliver was a very astute observer of historical events, and of Jewish machinations in particular. His two key books, which everyone should read are: THE JEWISH STRATEGY, and AMERICA’S DECLINE.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        @ Junghans
        The difference between those two cited publications by Oliver is almost palpable. One is a quality collection of erudite essays; the other is a booklet of gross generalizations and monocular simplifications, including his seriously questionable view of Christian origins and a perspective on the Jews as a racially superior historic enemy that leads him to an apocalyptic defeatism. Oliver was a superb classical scholar (and never hid the fact) but his analysis of modern politics mixed acute observation indiscriminately with dubious “data” from worthless sources, all delivered nevertheless in his inimitable style. I should have quoted his phrase more accurately as: “Aunt-Eye Semitism”.

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      Do you have any reliable evidence Merkel is part Jewish, other than reading it somewhere? I have never seen any evidence of this. She is part or half Polish and according to Wikipedia (it’s extremely biased, but sometimes useful) her grandfather was proud of his Polish heritage. There is a picture of him in a Polish uniform. Also, her father was a Lutheran clergyman. Strong evidence she is “not” a Jew. She may appear to be a traitor but unfortunately there are many, perhaps even most Germans are very much like her. If she has been influenced by her family background, and I think it’s possible, it’s that she is part Polish.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        Good comment, Peter. These know-it-alls who call everyone they don’t like a Jew, with no evidence, are a pain. I’ll just say, though, that if Merkel’s grandfather was Polish, he could very well have been Jewish too. Not that we’ll ever know except with a DNA test. I wouldn’t mind the day when all people in public office are required to have one.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        Merkel’s Lutheran pastor father enjoyed special privileges. He owned two cars and could travel overseas whenever he wished. Much of Merkel’s past is destined to remain unclear. Markus “Misha” Wolf isn’t writing memoirs.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Yes, her fink father owned two cars when the average East German had to wait eight years or buy one for an exorbitant price on the tolerated black market. Damned disgrace, worsened by travelling freely when the other 16 million were locked up tight and shot while trying to escape.

          I harbor the same ill will towards Katerina Witt, winner of Olympic gold in skating four years apart.

          My Toronto brother-in-law, originally from Frankfurt, had an old school friend who ended up on the wrong side of the wall on that Sunday, August 13, 1961. He and my sister visited him on the outskirts of East Berlin and were astonished to find him living in a fashionable bungalow twice the size of theirs in Toronto.

          After November, 1989, when East Germany disappeared, my brother-in-law felt free to tell me, that his friend had been given the bungalow as an honorarium by the state for developing a performance enhancing drug that was not then traceable by the Western sports authorities.

          Katerina Witt spoke often of her shopping sprees on the Champs d’Elysees, while her friends were locked up.

          It may be petty, but I hope to never see eye to eye with them. By all means, venture out to win Gold for your country, but then get the hell home and share the fate of all others instead of bathing in privileges.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Surely Merkel’s telltale Jewish roots were established almost to a certainty several years back here at TOO via a number of links corroborating all of Trenchant’s points above. If no one else reposts them, I shall scour my own files.

      • Peter
        Peter says:

        Thank you Carolyn. I will also add that wearing a Polish unifo9rm does not necessarily mean he was disloyal to Germany. Without knowing the circumstances, it’s hard to say. I had an German (Austrian) uncle born in Prague when it was still Austrian. In the interwar years he served in the Czech army and wore a Czech uniform. I saw a picture of him wearing it many years ago. People do what they have to do. When WW II started he wore the German uniform and served in the German army. He was a German.

  3. Panadechi
    Panadechi says:

    Our ruling ideology is like the Coronavirus, it is the pathogen that causes the disease, this pathogen will try to protect its interests and survival. The only solution is to eliminate it, isolate it or become immune to it (vaccine or antibodies), in addition to quarantine the already infected white individuals. The problem is that it has already been transformed into a pandemic in the West, since it was not controlled from the beginning. It is necessary to worry about healthy white individuals and those who are still salvageable, there are cases with no solution among whites and ne time and energy must be spent on them. One of the main toxins of this pathogen is Holohoax, media control, academia, banking and politicians.
    The Ethnic Social Node is the most powerful of all, and it is essential to create ethnic white social nodes, if the white race wants to survive.

  4. Bobby Fischer
    Bobby Fischer says:

    Great article. I’d been hoping that someone would take on that neocon shill: in the days following 9/11, I used to read him near-religiously, and swallowed his lies hook, line and sinker, it shames me to say. It was many years before I discovered that 9/11 was about as ‘Muslim’ as matzo balls and gefilte fish.

    If his audience of dumb patriot goyim ever found out that Israel did 9/11, that huckster would be on the next plane to Tel Aviv.

  5. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    Not discussed by Auster is that animosity generated by Muslim immigration to European, Christian nations, enabled by the authorities against popular will, is channeled towards support for Israel and indifference or hatred towards her antagonists. A win for both the Diaspora and Israel.

  6. Physicist
    Physicist says:

    Newton’s calculus turned the infinite into the whole by adding all the infinitesimal pieces together. Address jewing in the same manner ,the jews spewing out nonsense that is contradictory , is the totality of jews . A meaningless void. The gibberish of super smart jew, can be understood to be a reaction to Newton’s work, a lowly cow couldn’t outsmart the chosen ,we’ll obfuscate that mistake. Hence , the gibberish of warps, i.e. is it the whole or a bunch of infinitesimal parts. Look goy owr nahratif is moe clever than Newton’s work, except it isn’t.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      @ “Physicist”

      Google e.g.: NEWTON & THE JEWS
      esp. Gordon, “Sir Isaac Newton and Judaism”

    • Nicholas
      Nicholas says:

      The “gibberish of the super smart Jew” is not gibberish.

      Gilad Atzmon explained why. It’s because in all times our scholars have been the monks and clergy and while the Western nobility bred only within themselves they thus created inferior lineages. Polar opposite, the Jews interbred between merchant (read Mercantilist or rather more correctly Bankerist) and clerical bloodlines and thus spread the both essentialist and constructivist smartness of the scholars to a much wider social group.

      Atzmon went on to speak about the Palestinians who in a matter of only a few decades have managed what it took Jews centuries. How? By Israel putting most Palestinian leader figures in jail they turned those correctional institutions into Palestinian elite universities and these men wedded daughters of other inmates…

      The super smartness of American Pitbull Terriers who through 170 years of selective breeding of solely Champion or Grand Champion males with the same females have turned into the most fantastic smart and Human loving dogs.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        Studies of the relevant IQ contrast in breeding patterns of Catholic clergy and Jewish rabbis were pioneered by the anti-communist Nathaniel Weyl (Gentile mother), and examined by Richard Lynn, Gregory Cochran and others. Jewish publicist John Entine says that in private discussion many geneticists would not rule out that Ashkenazim had received high intelligence in “recompense” for their brain diseases, and compares them with inbreeding mercantile Parsis.

        Four points: (1) Cochran has an unusual if not unlikely explanation of male homosexuality. (2) The apparently increasing numbers of children on the autism/Asperger spectrum requires explanation, including ethnic aspects. (3) Any Mongol-Turkic element from Khazaria in the Ashkenazi population must be quite small in view of the physical phenotype and most recent DNA data. (4) Time for thorough objective investigation of hybrid depression in human populations, which is of general benefit.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        The myth of the super-smart Jew has been debunked by Ron Unz ( Unz is a Jew.

        According to Unz, 70% of the top performing high school students in America are non-Jewish whites. Only 6% of the top-performing high school students in America are Jews. But Jews make up 25% of the class at Harvard and other elite universities.

        We must learn not to mistake networking and nepotism for superior intellect and competence.

  7. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Moshe Kantor says he wants the Jews in Israel and in the Diaspora to unite in maximum solidarity.
    He is also reputed to be close to President Putin. Is this so?
    Not all Jews want a largely Islamified Europe, but they should be asked to “out” and oppose those who do.

  8. J.D.
    J.D. says:

    I love the Pro-White websites I have found, including this one, even if I don’t understand or necessarily agree with everything on them. Some of these terms and concepts are new to me. Anyway, I have created something that I hope many of you will copy and share with all your Jew loving, Christian friends. It is an attempt at breaking the Jew love that permeates the Evangelical culture.
    Jews: The Cursed of God

    Such a controversial title isn’t it? But it reveals

    the truth about the Jews as declared very clearly by

    God himself. We as Christians ought not say of a

    nation, “You are blessed! You are holy!” when that

    nation is cursed by God and evil. Isaiah 5:20 says,”Woe

    unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put

    darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put

    bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” The fact is

    that Jesus himself pronounced a curse on the Jews. In

    Luke 19:43-44, Jesus declares,”For the days shall come

    upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about

    thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every

    side, And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy

    children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee

    one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the

    time of thy visitation.” Because they rejected Christ

    at his coming, the Jewish race itself was cursed by

    God. This curse was never lifted. How outrageous are we

    if we tell God, “I know better!”, and call them

    “Blessed” which God has called “Cursed”? This curse

    indeed was for all of the Jews. In John 8:39-44, it is

    written,”They answered and said unto him, Abraham is

    our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s

    children, ye would do the works of Abraham.But now ye

    seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth,

    which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.Ye do

    the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be

    not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

    Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would

    love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God;

    neither came I of myself, but he sent me.Why do ye not

    understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my

    word.Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of

    your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the

    beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is

    no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of

    his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” Jesus

    plainly tells us who the real Father of the Jews is:

    Satan. It cannot get any clearer. Of course, those

    very, very few who turn to Christ as Savior are rescued

    from the curse laid on them, but as a whole, the nation

    of Israel is cursed by God, and they love acting the

    same as their Father the Devil, lying often to promote

    their own welfare at the expense of others.

    Acts 13:44-46

    “And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city

    together to hear the word of God.But when the Jews saw

    the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake

    against those things which were spoken by Paul,

    contradicting and blaspheming.Then Paul and Barnabas

    waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of

    God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye

    put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of

    everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.”

    The message of Christ as Savior was sent first to the

    Jews, but naturally the vast majority of them rejected

    it and still do. They were and are always about the

    Devil’s business, whether rejecting the gospel message,

    stoning Stephen, killing other martyrs for Christ, or

    today gladly taking advantage of American ignorance as

    to their true nature. They would be the Masters of

    America and the World. Too many Presidents have bowed

    the knee to the name of “Jew” instead of the name of

    Jesus. Let us not make the same mistakes. Let us not

    support the cursed, Devil inspired country of Israel

    any longer as a nation or as a Church.

    Are all Jews equally bad? No, there are levels of

    evil. We must always be wary of any who bear the name

    Jew. Anyone who accepts this name is accepting the

    curse of God, and should be accorded as cursed and not

    trusted, regardless of anything that seems meritorious

    about them. No matter what else a Jew does in life,

    they all bear the guilt of Deicide. This can only be

    removed if the Jew believes in Christ, so the vast

    majority of Jews who have ever lived or will ever live

    will be in Hell.

    To reiterate: Are some Jews saved? Sure. A few.

    Comparatively, the number of Jews who believe in Christ

    is very, very low. It is the height of folly to treat

    all Jews as good when only a very small number of them

    actually are. The curse of God remains on all Jews

    until they believe in Christ. As of 2019, only 2% of

    the population of Israel was Christian. This is not a

    nation to bless or support. Let us leave them as Christ

    did, to bear their curse alone. Time and money are

    better spent supporting many better things than Satan’s

    Nation. Never let any of them or their evangelical

    allies swindle you into supporting Israel. Always

    remember John 8:44.

    “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your

    father ye will do. He was a murderer from the

    beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is

    no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of

    his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      @ J.D.
      What a nice thought – almost all the Jews who have ever lived or will ever live will be tortured for ever! No holocaust denial here, folks. Just a lovely endless “Belsen” for all those “men, women and children”. Yum, yum, bring it on, Jesus!
      What about the Chinese, the Aztecs, or the Cosmotheists and non-Jewish atheists? Roman Catholics, Quakers, Salvation Army, JWs – your views better than theirs?
      Romans 11.26.
      You will have to better than to recite these old texts in KJV to disturb Christian Zionists, Christian anti-Zionists, or indeed anyone with a semblance of serious scriptural scholarship.

      • Peter
        Peter says:

        None of those groups made it a part of their religion that Jesus is “boiled in excrement”. Only the Jews wrote that. No one hates like a Jew and that is where their troubles lay.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          How things change when it suits some people!
          Compare Peter Schaefer, “Jesus in the Talmud” (2009), with Geza Vermes, “Jesus the Jew” (2011).

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        Just to clarify that I wasn’t endorsing but ridiculing the grotesque sadism of a religious maniac, who appears to have missed the NT verses where the Lion of the Tribe of Judah says that salvation is of the Jews, and that his Father wants everyone to be saved.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          “…I wasn’t endorsing but ridiculing the grotesque sadism of a religious maniac…”

          Who are you talking about?

          • David Ashton
            David Ashton says:

            Answers to Eric

            WHAT – the change over centuries in opinions among some Jews from regarding Jesus as a mamzer who used magic to lead Israel astray and was therefore hanged to claiming that Jesus was a great Jewish religious leader. Is that clearer for you? Would you like more documentation?

            WHO – Mr. “J.D.” who thinks there is NT support for the notion that almost every Jew who ever lived should be in Hell and presumably tortured for ever, just because they were born Jews (like e.g. Ron Unz). Is that clearer? Or would you like more scriptural comment (not that I personally am a Christian, or a Jew, for that matter).

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            I think the New Testament is pretty clear. If Jews end up in hell, it will be because they have been wicked and have refused to repent and ask for forgiveness for their sins.

            The same applies to other people.

            I don’t believe that Christianity holds that just being a Jew means that you are condemned.

            But if you support the evil that Jews commit — and so many of them do support that evil — then you are an enemy of God. You have sided with the devil.

            I don’t believe in hell as eternal torture.

            Dr. Lorraine Day discusses this in her book, “Who Rewrote the Bible?,” which I highly recommend.

  9. Eric
    Eric says:

    The creation of a credible parallel universe depends upon a lie — a lie, in this case, of omission.

    Fox News viewers don’t know that Steyn is a Jew. They see him as just another white guy who is out to defend Americans, Canadians, Europeans, etc., from fanatical Islamists.

    And — like the other neo-cons who Fox viewers also don’t know to be Jewish — Steyn persuades Fox News viewers that the fight against fanatical Islamists requires American support for Israel, endless wars in the Middle East, and keeping Muslims out of the country.

    Our politics are divided into two universes, neither one of which serves the interests of white Americans.

    Universe Number One is a cultural Marxist-globalist-corporatist-multiculturalist scheme to flood white nations with brown people and breed white people out of existence. It is represented by the Democratic Party.

    Universe Number Two is the same, but uses the clever tactic of creating a scapegoat in order to divert the goyim’s attention away from what is really going on. That scapegoat is Muslims and Islam. This second universe unites the gun-toting, hard-living, Constitution-defending white Christian living in rural Wyoming with his “brother,” the Jew.

    Thus is the white man (a potential Nazi!) defanged. He becomes a committed ally of his destroyer, not understanding that as far as the Jews are concerned, he is just another Palestinian who will be dealt with when the time comes.

    Both universes are antithetical to our white interests. Both are dominated by Jews. And both are based on Jewish self-concealment.

    The Jewish chameleon is “one of us.”

    Even if we know he’s Jewish, well, aren’t most of us “Judeo-Christians”? Aren’t the Jews our elder brothers with the special honor of being God’s Chosen People?

    Remember: If you curse the Jew, you will be cursed by God. If you bless the Jew, you will be blessed by God.

    Oh, and we’ll just kind of forget about the Jews not believing in Jesus and calling for his crucifixion…

  10. Luke
    Luke says:

    I want to congratulate Mr. Langdon for this absolutely brilliant exposure of the galling hypocrisy and infuriating dishonesty of Mark Steyn. I have never liked this guy and have seen through his phony baloney almost from the first day he arrived on the national scene.

    Incidentally, I think the majority of Whites who are fully red pilled on the JQ are familiar with the age old observation that jews, for some bizarre and particularly unsavory reason, seem to have some kind of sick and demented fascination with all things scatological. Steyn fits this stereotype perfectly and whenever he is guest hosting for Limbaugh, I have lost track of how many times I have heard him find some excuse to insert references into his commentary that involve the word ‘diarrhea’. Steyn has an obsession with scatological analogies.

    I used to be a regular listener to Limbaugh’s radio show back during the years when Clinton was polluting the White House, but eventually I came to realize that Limbaugh was nothing more than an overpaid, Judas Goat excuse maker and spin doctor for whoever sat in the Oval Office who had an R next to their name – and it become apparent that the guy was completely devoid of a solid set of principles and he would refuse to hold any Republicrat’s feet to the fire when they would routinely lie to their supporters to get their votes and then immediately proceed to betray their voters once in office and do the exact opposite of what they promised they would do, if elected.

    I mention this because I think it helps explain why Limbaugh and Steyn are such great buddies. Both of these guys are cut from the same bolt of cloth. In Limbaugh’s case, he was an enormous cheer leader and drum banger for the Bush Administration and the blood thirsty, war mongering, mostly jewish neocons, when they lied our nation into going to war in Iraq and he eagerly fell into step with the lying neocons who were trying to buffalo the American public into thinking Saddam had something do with 9-11, when he clearly did NOT. Limbaugh and Steyn and Hannity and the whole stinking neocon controlled talk radio industry helped sell and cheer lead for that war and now, they are suddenly big Trump fanboys? The same Trump who, in the South Carolina GOP debates in 2016 literally ripped Jeb Bush a new one and flatly stated that the Bush White House had LIED about WMDs to justify that war?

    The same wars that Limbaugh, Steyn, Hannity and the rest all helped lie the USA into – which are now universally admitted to be the biggest disaster in American history:

    “The invasion of Iraq, I believe, will turn out to be the greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history.” — Retired Lt. General William Odom, former head of the National Security Agency

    But, instead of apologizing for their role in cheer leading for this disaster – all of these guys now act as if they had nothing whatsoever to do with helping to sell the lies that were told to snooker the American public into going along with it?

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      Excellent observations, Luke. Trump, billionaire extraordinaire, has proven himself to be a FAKE POPULIST of the most mendacious kind. He is going to try to fool his base again this year, and will probably succeed. Look at his fool-them-again state of the union performance! As it stands, one of the few positive things that could come with a second term would be another appointment or two to the Supreme Court. And even then, I wouldn’t put it past him to appoint a “conservative” Jew (or two).

  11. H. L. Mencken
    H. L. Mencken says:

    “But there are two other explanations for Steyn’s writing, of course. He might be living in a parallel mental universe rather than a parallel physical one. That is, he might be crazy or deluded. Or he might simply be a liar whose statements are governed not by any regard for truth or historical accuracy but by the age-old principle of “What’s good for the Jews?” ”

    Studies show that Ashkenazi Jews have a very high frequency of schizophrenia, so the first explanation wouldn’t be at all surprising. And that would also make the second explanation a logical function of the first one.

    Also good point at the end about how Trump is still seen as antisemitic by mainstream Jews despite being “the best president for Israel”. You can do as you please and they will still hate you. That is why any man with integrity won’t make it his mission to please them in the first place. Truman put it best with his famous words:

    “If Jesus Christ couldn’t satisfy the Jews while on Earth, how the hell am I supposed to?”

  12. Olaf
    Olaf says:

    That Steyn is living in an alternate, very Jewish universe can be concluded from his confident false assertions about modern Western history. In one interview from 2015 with the highly irritating “Jewish Mother” Laura Rosen Cohen, he used the seventieth anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz to muse on the mistaken policies of powerful European gentiles:

    I think they [i.e., the Euro-goyim] drew the wrong conclusion from “Never Again”. The Jews were sort of peripheral to the meaning of that. I think what “Never Again” means to a Continental European is never again, as they saw it, the nationalism that led to war. So their response to 1939—1945 was to undermine their own nationalism. At the time of the European Constitution, so-called, a decade ago, you had these apparatchiks from the European Commission standing up and warning the Dutch and the French that if they didn’t sign on to this Euro-superstate they would be on the path to Belsen and Auschwitz.

    The State Department in Washington and the OSS/CIA were the prime movers behind the attack on European nationalism also after the war. Churchill – with his Rotschild connections – and the infamous Coudenhove-Kalergi also seems to have been involved:

    The American Committee on United Europe (ACUE) was an American organization which sought to counter the “Communist threat” in Europe by promoting European political integration. Its first chairman was ex-wartime OSS head, William Joseph Donovan.[1] The structure of the organisation was outlined in early summer of 1948 by Bill Donovan and Allen Dulles by then also reviewing the organization of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).[2] in response to assistance requests by Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi and Winston Churchill.


    The Telegraph had an article already twenty years ago about it, and another one during the Brexit campaign in April 2016:

    It was Washington that drove European integration in the late 1940s, and funded it covertly under the Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy , Johnson, and Nixon administrations. The Telegraph, 27 April 2016. The European Union always was a CIA project, as Brexiteers discover.

    TheTelegraph, 19 September 2000. DECLASSIFIED. American government documents show that the US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and directed the European federalist movement. The documents confirm suspicions voiced at the time that America was working aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into a European state. One memorandum, dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.The documents were found by Joshua Paul, a researcher at Georgetown University in Washington. They include files released by the US National Archives. Washington’s main tool for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee for a United Europe, created in 1948. The chairman was Donovan, ostensibly a private lawyer by then.The vice-chairman was Allen Dulles, the CIA director in the Fifties. The board included Walter Bedell Smith, the CIA’s first director, and a roster of ex-OSS figures and officials who moved in and out of the CIA. The documents show that ACUE financed the European Movement, the most important federalist organisation in the post-war years. In 1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the movement’s funds.The European Youth Campaign, an arm of the European Movement, was wholly funded and controlled by Washington. The Belgian director, Baron Boel, received monthly payments into a special account. When the head of the European Movement, Polish-born Joseph Retinger, bridled at this degree of American control and tried to raise money in Europe, he was quickly reprimanded.The leaders of the European Movement – Retinger, the visionary Robert Schuman and the former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak – were all treated as hired hands by their American sponsors. The US role was handled as a covert operation. ACUE’s funding came from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with close ties to the US government.The head of the Ford Foundation, ex-OSS officer Paul Hoffman, doubled as head of ACUE in the late Fifties. The State Department also played a role. A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth.It recommends suppressing debate until the point at which “adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable”. TheTelegraph, 19 September 2000. Euro-federalists financed by US spy chiefs

  13. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “This “pause” in immigration is perceived as a moral catastrophe. He describes it as “evil, xenophobic, anti-Semitic,” “vilely discriminatory,” a “vast moral failure,” a “monstrous policy.” Jewish interests are his only consideration, while the vast majority of pre-1965 Americans are described as a “thoughtless mob” because they advocate a complete moratorium on immigration.”


    Any obstacle to Jewish Supremacy Inc. is seen as “a moral catastrophe.”

    There’s no pause in Israel regarding immigration from non-jews because it’s unthinkable. And it’s unthinkable because they want to preserve their own.

    They’re insanely self-absorbed and hypocritical.

    Talk about a moral catastrophe. That’s what JSI is, to the world.

    Just look at that quote!

    Just dripping, oozing with hyperbole and melodrama.

    I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again, because it’s worth repeating.

    There’s only one KKK in the world today.

    The Kvetching Kosher Khazars.

    “…confident false assertions…” (great phrase!).

    Absolutely. But not just about Western history. About practically everything.

    If they’re so special when didn’t they create their own civilization?

    Because they couldn’t. They’re lying about that too.

    That’s why they have to lie about Whites 24/7.

    They aren’t the chosen people. Not by us they’re not.

    They are The People Of The Lie!

    They’re really crazy! And the only thing more depressing and exasperating than their moral insanity is the gullible and/or opportunistic goy who go along to get along.

    Boy are they in for a surprise.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “Americans are a thoughtless mob” because they didn’t want to have happen what happened!

      And what is happening now. They’re insane.

      Part of the fun of being alive today is in pointing out the many ways that prove, chapter and verse, just how crazy Jewish Supremacy Inc. is.

      Toward that end, Tobias Langdon’s article was another great TOO contribution.

    • ChilledBee
      ChilledBee says:

      “If they’re so special when didn’t they create their own civilization?”

      That is one of the most sensible and simplest of questions I have ever seen on this site.

  14. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Ah! I forgot to include this.

    It’s from Lance Welton’s article on the Coronavirus over at VDARE and The Unz Review.

    ” if we are all genetically equal in our intellectual capacities then the the only way that a group, such as Ashkenazi Jews, could have been so successful would be through immoral behaviour, providing people with an incentive to persecute them.”

    This is one of the most important sentences, I submit, on exactly why Jewish Supremacy Inc. demands to be placed above criticism, loved unconditionally, and blindly obeyed.

    And the quote fits perfectly with Tobias Langdon’s article.

    What, after all, is so commonly associated with immoral behavior?


    Of course!

    They HAVE to be place above criticism exactly because they are

    The People Of The Lie!

    There’s a reason social ethics developed as it did in the Western world after centuries of struggle, physical, intellectual, psychological, emotional, moral struggle.

    Because unethical behavior destroys cultures and their social-institutions.

    That’s why the extraordinary rise to power of Jewish Supremacy Inc, is in no way a genuine victory.

    It’s a Pyrrhic Victory.

    Nothing fails like their success. Just look around.

  15. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    As I understand, Steyn’s father or grandfather was a Jew, his mother a shiksa. Technically, he’s not a Jew. That said, I personally know several people who fit the same scenario. Most were encouraged by their mothers to attend Judaism classes, where they were not welcomed. I can extend that by saying I have been acquainted with Jewish men, who married gentiles, and have suffered the wrath of the family, particularly the females. As I have posted before, organized Jewry is a monolith, behind that, depending on social status, things become very nuanced, other than the absolute belief in the 6 million. Many Jews in everyday jobs, like trades, have very little in common with Jewish lawyers, politically speaking, because they are in the same boat as the goyim, economically speaking.
    The “Canadian neo-conservative” Steyn, unfortunately, would be a very mainstream Conservative Party member in Canada. The party bears no resemblance to the one that existed 40 years ago, and would be more appropriately named the Republican-lite Party.

    As an aside, when it comes to “the liberation of Auschwitz”, I have asked rhetorically how do you liberate a camp that was evacuated, and the inmates given a choice to stay or leave with the guards? I can almost hear the gears grinding in heads.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      “I have asked rhetorically how do you liberate a camp that was evacuated, and the inmates given a choice to stay or leave with the guards?”

      I’m sorry, Curmudgeon, but I must push back on this incorrect statement. On what is it based? Oh, don’t tell me … Elie Wiesel. [learn the truth about him at

      The Germans never gave their prisoners, for whom they felt responsible, a choice to go free, because of the threat they posed to the surrounding population. I think such a decree was even against the war conventions. Not that the Allies respected it!

      The facts are that everyone had to go with the Germans except the hospital patients and the very elderly who would remain under Doctors’ care, along with a few SS guards. However, you are correct there was no liberation, which was all dramatized later by the Soviet publicists, because there was nothing to liberate. The Red Army simply rushed past it.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      It is most refreshing to observe that your comment, my friend, and Mr. Ryckaert’s farther down the thread share a fundamentally realistic outlook that many of the surrounding comments lack and that Mr. Langdon himself seems little concerned with. That Steyn’s Jewishness is very dilute should surely be the nub of any critique of his behavior, especially a critique based in morals or ethics. Hence, that he is what he is, namely a snake in the grass, must be viewed as a matter of conscious choice—the choice to betray his closest kin for the Jew’s shekel.

  16. Nicholas
    Nicholas says:

    The reason for Illuminati’s – the spiritually illuminated global elite’s – war on Humanity in large by creating all the miseries but more obvious in the war against Libya and other Saharan or neighbouring contries such as Mali, as well as Yemen, Iraq, Syria is for one to create masses of refugees; the Hegelian Thesis.

    George Soros has a major part in the creation of refugees to Europe and knowing that the Illuminati elites have written ALL scriptures for sake of control and having the Book of Revelation and its Koranic equivalent in mind, one can see that they are creating all our miseries for sake of fulfilling scripture and making it look like “God” killed his own children. No parent would do that and if so, what would then be Mother Lucifer’s (read Aphrodite/Venus/Isis/Freya/Kali Durga; a colonizing alien from Costellation Orion or Taurus perhaps, interbred with Humans for six millenia, hybridized and now totally humanoid but with a reptillian possessive mindset) role?

    Aliens – too far stretched? Maybe you’re too short. Answer what is the hegemon if you can.

    So, this “Judeo-Islamic alliance” is partially meant to import Isis extremists into Europe so create terror opportunities and public reactions, the Hegelian Antithesis, to all this and thus have cassus belli for WWIII; global population control in an age where Humanity is waking up and unfolding the power structures; apocalypse.

    Post cataclysmic times which are planned to take decades, albeit they have tried to start WWIII primarily against Iran since late 2011 and failed. ut their comming solution is to microwave us with every GSM mast and smart device, and they can get away with it themselves as the New Age Order (NWO) elites are currently ascending to fifth dimension (vibration) and thus will be over those wave lenghts. So post cataclysmic, these ifluxes of refuges and beautiful mix of Humanity in combination with what the Talmudic-Kabbalist porn industry is doing (and porn is KEY to us since sexuality is our deepest identity and most manipulative force) is to prepare us for sexual hybridization with other species from the Galactic Federation that is led by Mother Lucifer (the god of the Vatican and most clergies no matter religion).

    The governmetality of the Enemy is key to study and Talmud (Ketuboth 11b) and Kabbalah are the two places to start. They are not from here and as Sun Tzu said, the acme of skill is not to imperil the enemy in 100 battles out of 100, but to imperil the enemy without him even knowing. So how does one do that? From within; you plant your seed; Prima Nocte as the English (Pleiadean) nobility did with the Scottish.

    • Bellmaximouscattus
      Bellmaximouscattus says:

      I’m a Scot, but the union of the crowns, and more especially the union of Parliaments 100yrs later was the best thing that ever happened to Scotland.
      The Scottish peasants were sick to death of being used as cannon fodder pawns in the intrigues of French and English kings(who weren’t even really French or English, just warring dynasties). They wld both pay our ‘nobles’ in gold and us Scots wld enter meat grinders generation after generation for no practical benefit.
      If it wasn’t for our eventual alliance with England, sealed in religion, we would be to this day just some rocky outcrop on the farthest landmass of Europe, like Portugal. Poverty wasn’t the word for the state of Scotland. But at least Portugal is positioned brilliantly geographically. What surrounded us? Nowt but the deep blue sea.

      Don’t take my word for it, read up on medieval Scotland, we were the most backward nation in Europe.

      But as soon as we had access to the English Empire, we took off like a rocket. It was similar to giving the Japs the secret of electricity, so within two generations they went from technologically nothing, to going toe-to-toe and defeating the world’s biggest county, shocking the world in the process. Because like the Japs, with the Scots, all the ingredients were already there, just waiting to be exploited.

      The houses, monuments and buildings they built then in Edinburgh dwarf the garbage we put up today, which are simply eyesores, and in my opinion are designed to be so, to demoralise us.

      Glasgow became the second city of the Empire. That’s right, ahead of Birmingham, Liverpool, Bristol, Hong Kong, Singapore, Toronto, Cape Town, Bengal, Calcutta and many more.

      Britain could never hold it’s worldwide empire without the fighting prowess of Scots, who even impressed the men of the North West Frontier, and they’d been in that game for three millennia!

      You think Edinburgh would be called the Athens of the North if it stayed a backwards tribal clan society?

      But don’t get me wrong, I LOVE the romance of the Jacobites, and I cry rivers of tears over the destruction of their clan society. I hate how it was done, but I understand why, and whatever this movement eventually coalesces into, the No.1 rule in my book is we MUST stay in touch with *reality* Legends and heroes have their place, but we cannnot be sidetracked into them, it’s what our enemies want.

  17. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    From the Wikipedia article on Mark Steyn :

    “…He has stated that “the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers” and that “both my grandmothers were Catholic…”.

    In that case he must be 1/8 Jewish. The mother of the father of his father was Jewish, which makes him “racially” 1/8 Jewish, but according to Jewish law he is not Jewish. Part-Jews are often “more Jewish than Jews” in their attitudes, but one would expect that 1/8 would be sufficiently diluted to prevent that. Apparently not so in the case of Mark Steyn.

    • HK Wills
      HK Wills says:

      Slippery answer: he says nothing about his male progenitors the implication being that they were not Jewish. He hides behind the Jewish law criteria for establishing Jewishness rather than a biological one; the latter is the only relevant one since Jews are a biological phenomenon.

      As I have noted before the only time I have heard Steyn go ballistic was when one caller on the Limbaugh show made trenchant and informed criticisms of Israel. The rest of the time he is the model of equanimity and good humor.

  18. Barkingmad
    Barkingmad says:

    “[B]ut their comming solution is to microwave us with every GSM mast and smart device, and they can get away with it themselves as the New Age Order (NWO) elites are currently ascending to fifth dimension (vibration) and thus will be over those wave lenghts.”

    They can’t do this. The universe doesn’t reward wickedness in the post-material world.

  19. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Perhaps the energy expended on seeking an Ariernachweiss for writers opposed to Muslim mass-settlement in America and Europe could be better spent in supporting those opponents.

  20. Jud Jackson
    Jud Jackson says:

    Wish I had read this earlier. Great article. I hope you still might be able to answer my question (1) and comment (2)
    1) How Jewish is Mark Steyn? Full on, 50%, 25%?
    2) My wife and I watch Tucker every day and Steyn is on least 3 or 4 days a week. He is a very interesting guest and we do like him. I don’t think we have ever seen even the slightest disagreement between Tucker and Steyn. Could you write a similar article about Tucker?

    • Bellmaximouscattus
      Bellmaximouscattus says:

      This is just an opinion of my own, but I reckon the reason the Fox viewers s have such fanatical love for Tucker(and it is fanatical, or Tuck wld have been well sacked by now) is not just because he sums up articulately what the Fox masses feel, but also because sub-consciously they’re confident he is not Jewish.
      They are so beaten down with Jews dominating every panel discussion and presenter job, to see an obvious non-Jew is like finally, exhaling, a huge weight off their shoulders. They can now just relax without always having this exhausting psychic defences Up to guard them all the time. It’s very tiring to always be on edge/guard that these Jews are always on the look out to manipulate you in any way they can.

      If you take my advice, I’ve watched Tucker carefully, and he is no Jew, so I hope this helps you.

      Mark Steyn is different. Ok. Let’s just be real here. I’ll treat you as an adult, respect you and I’ll presume you won’t grab your pearls in shock, crying out at this info and go running to the ADL for restitution for your hurt feelings.

      The HolocaustTM and the six millionTM is bullish*t. It did’t happen. It was fake atrocity propaganda from WWII that OJ(organised Jewry) decided to take advantage of as a pillar to legitimise the state of Israel.

      Now all the evidence that this didn’t happen is online, it’s easy to find out the truth if you want to. But the heroes for Truth that wrote these books aren’t respected names or are they rich, they did it for nobler reasons.
      But the names of the Jewish or good goyim liars are only respected because the Jewish-owned publishing and media corporations made them respected. Not because they have better arguments.

      Fun fact: there is not one single piece of evidence for the Holocaust that is not circumstantial. It’s all based on ‘eye witnesses’ who could be anyone, and who have been proved liars time & time again countless times during the years, with their bizarre stories of “walls of eyes”, or “geysers of blood shooting out the ground”, or many people’s favourite: “the masterbation machines”.

      So how does this bring us back to Steyn. For TV celebrities, there are all sorts of things they are not allowed to talk about, or even mention(examples available on request). One slip could annihilate a decades old career, ruin them, bankrupt them, make their children homeless and turn them into figures of derision. The stakes for them are uber high, which I don’t reckon many commenters understand.

      So what they do is just censor themselves from looking into any subjects our Jewish masters have deemed verboten, just in case some of it lodges in their brain and a little bit of truth might pop out at an opportune moment.

      But why am I defending Steyn if he acts the way I have described? Because I believe he is on a journey as to what it is that is at the black heart of all of our misfortunes(to use an old fashioned phrase).

      He doesn’t push it as far to the line as Tucker, but I’ve noticed he is beginning to move in this direction. To just come right out and join the alt-right, would be no use to man nor beast. We need men in the mainstream who share our ideas but know how to keep them under wraps. This is so much harder for conservative-minded folks as we train ourselves to follow the truth wherever it takes us, and it is demoralising knowing that our forefathers gave their lives for freedom but we can’t even speak it. For lefties this is easy, everything they say is a lie, and they follow the line that “lying for the cause” is part of the greater good. It might be telling a lie, it might be machine-gunning ‘counter-revolutionaries’ into a pit, the principal is same. Conservatives strive to speak truth, even it it doesn’t seem helpful at the time.

      See:George Orwell, hated to this day because he would’t lie for the Cause. Obviously a natural conservative, tho a socialist economically.

      But I simply don’t see any other way. This is how the Left took over the culture by salami-slicing, and when any conservative stated this might lead to disaster, they were howled down and covered with slime. Rod Drehr’s political truth about lefties is, to paraphrase “you are being absurd, hysterical, that will never happen . . . But when it does, you bigots will deserve it!”

      These frontal assaults and purity tests are the road to defeat. We must learn from the leftists. Obviously our struggle will be harder, as they were facing an essentially decent, tolerant Christian society, we are facing a the opposite, and one which knows all the tricks.

      But we have much greater weapons on our side 1. Truth. And 2. Their own hubris. You can already see this in the upcoming
      American campaign, what with guillotines on their leaflets.

      The seemingly stronger they get, they simply won’t be able to contain their hubris. Never has a truer phrase been spoken than the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

  21. Bellmaximouscattus
    Bellmaximouscattus says:

    I reckon Mark is very much aware of the Jewish role in the West’s collapse. I believe that this decline and fall hurts him spiritually and physically, just as much as any articulate defender of our precious inheritance, it obviously pains him massively to see it all being torn asunder and thrown away.
    But there are two insurmountable obstacles to him striking at the dark heart of the problem: one, he would become persona non grata in a day, and lose his high perch in media land where he does do important work in explaining to the white masses that they are on a fast track to persecution-disposition-genocide.
    Problem two, related to problem one, is losing his position would would beggar him. He has kids to put through school and collage. If it’s a choice of martyring himself just to be REAL, and losing everything, and achieving nothing, or doing what he can, where he can, it’s hard to fault him for this choice. We can’t all be mayrters.
    Also I believe he has a huge Jewish following who he feels something for.
    I didn’t know him in the Clinton 9/11 era, so can’t speak to that, but reading between the lines recently, I reckon he is coming to the realisation that Western civilization’s defence *is* being destroyed by Jews. Not all Jews, but certainly organised Jewry.
    I’ve heard him defend John Derbyshire, what enemy Jew wld do that? As I wasn’t there to see it, I reckon Steyn just got whipped up in manic anger by 9/11, as many decent, honourable patriots did too, and got a bit carried away.
    But remember, Mark’s book was one of the first efforts to push the existential issue of demographics into the public discourse, would he have done this if he was an enemy Jew?
    All TV personality’s have to compromise with evil, even Tucker! Isn’t it better to compromise when you are young and no-one listens to you, than do it when you have a mass audience and responsibility?
    I feel this thread and post is too hard on Mark. If you are a star on TV, there are almost unlimited things you can’t speak about: 9/11, Israel’s role in the 3Kennedy killings over Dimona, the Fed, False flag terror, operation Gladio, the Boston un-Bombing, even the Manchester arena Ariana Grande explosion is extremely suspect to say the least.
    Or if any Yank is watching, and you want to have any doubts you may have, about if governments ever commit killings to order, on famous people removed forever? look up Richard D Hall’s “Exit From Brexit”. You’ll find it online. Breath-taking isn’t the work. These people are psychopaths. Trust me, once you see it, you won’t ever believe any terror event ever again, unless you see it with your own eyes, but even then I wouldn’t be too sure.

Comments are closed.