Demographic Damnation: How Leftism Lies to Open the Borders

If you like books that are both entertaining and intelligent, here’s some advice that’s been good for two centuries and more: read The Monk. Written by a highly gifted teenager called Matthew Lewis and first published in 1796, this greatest of Gothic novels sparkles with wit and wisdom. Among much else, it contains one of the cleverest illustrations of a perennial theme: that evil wins its way by lies. Satan seduces before he strikes, appearing in disguise until he can reveal his true ugly nature.

Enchanted by Evil

The titular monk of the novel, a pious but flawed Spanish abbot called Ambrosio, is seduced by evil to his own damnation. When a false friend summons Satan on Ambrosio’s behalf, the abbot is fooled by a clever disguise. Satan appears as a beautiful seraph with dazzling white limbs and “silken locks.” He is “surrounded by clouds of rose-coloured light” and wafted by delicious perfumes. Ambrosio is “enchanted at a vision so contrary to his expectations” and gazes on “the Spirit with delight and wonder.” (The Monk, vol. 2, ch. 4)

Early edition of The Monk by Matthew Lewis

If Satan had appeared in his true ugly form, Ambrosio would have been repelled and would have left the path to damnation. Instead, Ambrosio is seduced and led further into mortal sin. But when Satan is finally certain of his prey, he casts off all disguise. Summoned by Ambrosio alone, he appears amid “sulphurous whirl-winds” and in “all that ugliness which since his fall from heaven had been his portion.” He is black-skinned, sharp-clawed and menacing, and his hair consists of “living snakes” that writhe with “frightful hissings.” (The Monk, vol. 3, ch. 5)

Rosy visions of racial harmony

Now Ambrosio sees the ugly truth, but it is too late by then. He has been fooled at every step and will shortly be dragged off to damnation. Well, that’s a Gothic novel from 1796, but I can’t help being reminded of modern Western politics. In the recent past, Whites were seduced by the Left with rosy visions of racial harmony and culturally enriched societies. For example, many millions of Whites voted for the well-spoken, mild-mannered Barack Obama in the sincere hope that he would create a post-racial, rainbow America where state-imposed White guilt and state-encouraged Black grievance melted away, and everyone finally “just got along.”

Enter the Church of the Damned

In return for their good-will, those White Obama-voters got Black Lives Matter and an intensification of anti-White pandering, propaganda and crime. The leftist seduction is ending and leftism has begun to throw off its disguise. Whites are no longer being offered post-racial redemption, but accused of innate depravity. In other words, Satan has stopped wafting perfume and started spewing sulphur. At American Renaissance, Gregory Hood has described the shift from seduction to damnation in an excellent essay called “Anti-Racism: The Church of the Damned.” He writes that “Anti-racism is a church with no salvation. To be white is to be counted among the damned, no matter what you do.” White America is under assault by an anti-White “death cult” whose leftist high-priests are “preaching an eternal white guilt that must be eternally expiated.”

That leftist death-cult has risen on a tide of non-White immigration into America and other Western nations. And when the Left was working to open the borders, it lied about what it was doing. For example, Kevin MacDonald has shown how the 1965 Immigration Act that opened America’s borders to non-Whites was the culmination of a decades-long campaign by ethnocentric Jews to dilute (and eventually destroy) America’s White Christian majority. But, just as Satan did not reveal his true nature or intentions to Ambrosio, the bill’s Jewish sponsors did not reveal their true nature or intentions to White Americans.

“The ethnic mix of America will not be upset”

Instead, they used gentile frontmen to shill for the bill and tell lies about the demographic damnation it would work on America. The Irish-American senator Teddy Kennedy responded to critics of the 1965 bill like this:

I want to comment on … what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S.500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge … the charges I have mentioned are highly emotional, irrational, and with little foundation in fact. They are out of line with the obligations of responsible citizenship. They breed hate of our heritage. (See So Much for Promises — Quotes Re 1965 Immigration Act, VDare, 9th August 2006)

Teddy’s brother Senator Robert F. Kennedy issued similar lies, as did a host of other leftists and their right-wing dupes. In 1965 the Left was seducing White America; in 2020, the Left is proclaiming the damnation of White America. Whites are slated for dispossession and persecution as a despised caste by resentful non-Whites with officially approved grudges.

The blatantly sentimental and dishonest graphic novel Illegal (2017)

But seduction and lies are still being used by the Left, as you can see in a recent graphic novel for children called Illegal (2017). The title is ironic and comes from a famous quote by the Jewish activist Elie Wiesel about illegal migrants: “No human being is illegal.” Written by two Irish Whites, Eoin Colfer and Andrew Donkin, and illustrated by the Italian White Giovanni Rigano, Illegal tells “the story of [the Black brothers] Ebo and Kwame and their tortuous journey from North Africa to seek a new life in Europe.” In other words, it’s propaganda for open borders and the demographic damnation of Europe. No wonder it won first prize in the category “Best Books for Kids and Teens” at New York Public Library and in the category “Best Fiction for Older Readers” at Chicago Public Library in 2018. Leftists like to think of themselves as sophisticated thinkers, but Illegal panders to their true nature as reality-denying narcissists. In reality, for example, most of those seeking “refuge” in Europe are arrogant young men of prime crime-committing and rape-gang-forming age.

Big-eyed, button-nosed Ebo wants you to help him

In the fantasy of Illegal, however, the hero is a pre-pubescent boy called Ebo, whose “big eyes, chubby cheeks and button nose” might have been drawn straight from a scientific article entitled “How cute things hijack our brains and drive behaviour” (2016). Yes, Ebo does have a tall, strongly built post-pubescent brother called Kwame, but guess what? Kwame is drowned while crossing the Mediterranean and Ebo has to complete his “torturous journey” alone. In short, the graphic novel is blatantly sentimental and dishonest. And it raises an uncomfortable question. Is it a coincidence that two Irishmen are behind such lying propaganda, just as the two Irish Kennedy brothers shilled for the 1965 immigration bill in America?

“Help me, White Saviours!” Ebo’s big eyes gaze upward

Unfortunately, it’s not. As a resentful, anti-WASP minority, Irish Catholics have been useful allies to the hostile Jewish elite in both America and Britain, paralleling the role of resentful, anti-Russian minorities like Georgians and Latvians in the Jew-controlled Soviet Union. The Bolshevik Revolution and its forerunner in 18th-century France are further examples of how the Left issues seductive lies before revealing its true ugly nature. In both France and Russia, revolutionaries promised “Liberté! Égalité! Fraternité!,” then created mass-murdering tyrannies.

Profiting from hate: The smug, self-righteous Irish authors and Italian illustrator of Illegal want to assure you that they are more moral than you

But leftists have shrunk in intellectual stature and ambition since the days of Robespierre and Lenin. Books like Illegal and Ibram X. Kendi’s Anti-Racist Baby are not serious and minutely reasoned in the fashion of Marx’s Das Kapital (1867). Modern leftists have abandoned intellect for emotion, as you can see in Illegal. The images of cute little Ebo are intended to trigger primitive brain-circuits and by-pass the intellect. A team of psychologists explain it like this in a study of cuteness: “Babies are designed to jump to the front of the queue — our brain-processing queue, that is. They get ahead of everything else going on in our minds, which makes them difficult to ignore. They also grab our attention even before we have time to recognise that they are babies. They do it by being cute[,] with their big eyes, chubby cheeks and button noses.”

Ibram X. Kendi’s Anti-Racist Baby

The distressed faces of women and children are also “designed to jump to the front of the brain-processing queue,” which is why leftists use non-White women and children so often in their dishonest reporting on the migrant flood. But I’ve often thought that leftists’ concern for non-Whites is related to their concern for animals and involves the same emotion circuits in the brain. For example, compare the three images below, taken from leftist propaganda-outlets like the Guardian:

Three distressed female faces from leftist propaganda

The images are intended to appeal to the same irrational leftist sentimentality, which takes a maternalistic, de-haut-en-bas attitude both towards human migrants, seen above, and towards “Xita, a Rondon’s marmoset” hit by a car as it fled forest-fires in Brazil in October 2020. And in fact, the migrant woman on the top right, clutching an overweight baby, was also fleeing a fire, this time in a migrant-camp on the Greek island of Lesbos in September 2020.

Seeking power, feeding narcissism

Britain is many hundreds of miles from Lesbos, but the Guardian approvingly reported that “Pressure is mounting on the UK government to take in some of the thousands of asylum seekers left without shelter following a devastating fire at Europe’s largest migrant camp on the Greek island of Lesbos.” These mostly adult male “asylum seekers” are from the least progressive and most misogynistic and homophobic cultures on Earth, but leftists don’t care. As I’ve often pointed out, leftists are interested in winning power and feeding their own narcissism, not in understanding the world or improving the lives of their supposed objects of concern.

And how do leftists win power and feed their narcissism? They lie, as you can see above. Teddy Kennedy claimed that “the ethnic mix” of America would “not be upset” by the 1965 Immigration Act. He was lying. Eoin Colfer and friends have portrayed migrants as big-eyed, button-nosed poppets in Illegal. They are also lying. And leftist lies are carrying the West towards demographic damnation just as surely as Satan’s lies carried Ambrosio to literal damnation in The Monk.

24 replies
  1. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    A Satanic Ball is how the late and great Dr. Walter Martin viewed and called this world and he of all people would know.

    As for your monk Ambrosio there is an interesting and important biblical followup in the book of Daniel where we find the words:

    “When the power of the holy people has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.” 12:8

    Reading this brings up a simple question of how bad will things truly become that even the likes of a St. Peter and/or a St. Paul would break their spirits and lives?

    The psychopaths are many as Stefan Verstappen says. Enjoy a little more truth about just how disastrous things have become if that is one has the stomach for it. Start here

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “When the power of the holy people has been finally broken, all these things will be completed.”

      Speaking of which, check this out. It’s a must see!

      Personally, I found it to be side-splitting comedy of the first order, as well as an excellent talk on the subject of psychotic arrogance and pride before the fall. Though it’s clear the good rabbi thought he was doing something else.

      It’s almost a parody. Then again, in an age of absurdities it gets hard to tell the difference between parody and reality.

      It’d certainly be great to see someone from TOO’s talented staff to do an article on this one.

      In any event, it’s exactly the rabbi’s totally unself-conscious sincerity that makes the video so funny. And let’s face it, we could all use a good laugh.

  2. John
    John says:

    Blacks owe Whites reparations.

    Yes, it’s true …

    For all the trillions that mostly White America has spent on welfare, food stamps, and Section 8 housing for Blacks.
    For all the crime that Blacks have committed against Whites and White property.
    For all the prisons that America has had to build to contain Black criminals.
    For all the useless affirmative action and quotas that Whites have provided for Blacks.
    For all the schools and teachers hired for Blacks that have done little good.
    For all the scholarships provided to Blacks.
    For all the civil rights laws that Whites have passed for Blacks.
    For all the courthouses and judges to try Black criminals in.
    For all the drug clinics for Blacks.
    For all the recent Black Lives Matter riots and looting.

    Yes, White Reparations. White are owed it. Now, who will push for it?

  3. Anthony Aaron
    Anthony Aaron says:

    From the closing lines in ‘The Usual Suspects’ …

    “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist.”

  4. JM
    JM says:

    Nailed it with the Irish Catholics. And not before its time. The elephant in the room. The rest is pretty obvious though well stated.

    Where’s the gatekeeper?

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Nailed what, precisely, aside from counterfactual bigotry, certainly as far as the Irish in the USA are concerned?

      Irish attitudes in Britain are another matter—it could hardly have been otherwise, given what the English did to Ireland for centuries—but the question should then be asked why the Brits allowed so many Irish to migrate to Britain, if not to exploit them yet again as cheap immigrant labor. Even if the Irish in Britain did indeed front for the Jews in the past (but did they really? I’ve heard little except shouts of “QED”), the punishment their descendants have gotten—witnessing the wholesale destruction of their limited portion of their native isle—has none of the hallmarks of retributive justice rightly understood.

      In the fifties and sixties here in the States, on the other hand, most white-collar and many blue-collar Irish Catholics were not anti–WASP establishment, nor were more than a handful sympathetic to the Jews. My earliest boyhood friend’s Irish dad (given names: Francis Xavier) was a lawyer, and it was from him that I first heard the word “shyster” used with (((a specific ethnicity))) in mind. I was in high school in 1960, when JFK was elected president in an election with well-known parallels to last November’s. Kennedy might have gotten one vote from my school’s religious faculty, all of whom were Irish Christian Brothers and, almost to a man, outspoken supporters of Tricky Dick.

      The only area I know of where there has been significant cooperation between Jews and Irish Americans is corporate law, where by the eighties there were so many New York and DC firms with a preponderance of Irish and Jewish partners that they came to have their own moniker: Hebe & Hibe outfits (for Hebrews and Hibernians). Still, the amount of reliable extrapolation that can be done from statistics about lawyers is nothing to write home about.

  5. JM
    JM says:

    LMFAO. You idiots are OTT.

    [mod. it’s useless to deploy such devastating facts and well-argued logic against knuckle-dragging racists, JM. but it’s good of you to try.]

  6. Anthony Kimball
    Anthony Kimball says:

    Fight or die, white man. Those are the ONLY options you have left to choose from. There is no more time left to study and reflect upon these issues. There is only time to act or not act. Which one you gonna select? And just so there’s no misunderstanding, fighting doesn’t mean more talking. More talking is a sure path to racial extinction. Make your decision soon, or it will be made for you.

  7. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “The leftist seduction is ending and leftism has begun to throw off its disguise. Whites are no longer being offered post-racial redemption, but accused of innate depravity.”

    White people *know* that whites are under intense attack at present in all white countries, and mainly from other whites ((and their allies, also hostile to us)), except perhaps whites in Russia and some Eastern European countries who are not anti-white, but, unfortunately, there is a language and prejudice barrier between them and other whites due to historical enmities that prevents us from uniting for common interests, so we end up with Russia making an ally of China rather than with other white nations. One day they will discover that China is not their friend after all.

    Perhaps the whites in the West could have been excused some years ago for not realising that the agenda was ant-white, as at that time the MSM was more subtle and as the article above mentions regarding Obama, the MSM pretended that ‘fairness’ and ‘harmony’ was the aim. Now we can all see that ‘fairness’ is not the aim, and the aim is to discriminate against whites. There can be no denying the agenda any more.

    Even now that the anti-white agenda has been completely revealed, so that even the most politically ignorant MUST now have their eyes fully opened to the agenda, even this did not elicit a HUGE majority for Trump – so huge that even election fraud could not fix it. So, we have to conclude that significant numbers of whites STILL voted Democrat and RINO with their eyes fully opened to the anti-white agenda, and not just the committed far left whites ((and pretend whites)).

    Therefore we have to admit that the misery is self inflicted by whites, and voted for over the decades, by whites. The people who keep saying in social media and comments, ‘we never voted for this (immigration)’ are incorrect – whites DID vote for all the misery they now endure, in free and fair elections, and the recent election in the US was sufficiently free and fair for whites to have given Trump a huge majority, large enough to easily overcome the current fraud. But no, they did not vote Trump with an overwhelming majority, and even in the secrecy of the voting booth, significant numbers who were not actually anti-white lefites, they STILL put an X next to the anti-white candidate.

    The white race cannot survive unless it separates out the whites who want to survive, and are prepared to forget about past wars from hundreds of years ago, and those who want to embrace diversity. We need geographical separation by political type. One way to achieve this (to start the process at least) is to set aside some states to be ‘free stuff’ states, where everyone who moves there gets a free wage for life, provided they stay there. Massive migration would occur and remove significant numbers of bad gene types from the main group. It would be worth the price, even if just in terms of the reduction in crime for the group paying the taxes.

    • Eric Novak
      Eric Novak says:

      By what analysis can the passage of the 1965 Hart-Celler Act or even the nitro booster of the 1990 Immigration Act be attributed to the public? Exactly nobody knew what it was, and even if the public did, they could not possibly predict its mathematical demographic effects. Nobody voted for demographic replacement.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        @Eric Novak See in the article: “The Irish-American senator Teddy Kennedy responded to critics of the 1965 bill like this:….” and then follows the reassurances that Kennedy made.

        So there must have been disquiet at the time for Kennedy to feel the need to address it in detail as he did. However, let us be generous and excuse the voters in the 60s, 70s—all the way to Obama’s term where he said all the Democrats wanted was fairness and racial harmony. But, in the recent election there is no excuse possible any longer for not realising that the Democrats are strongly anti-white, and yet STILL a significant proportion of whites voted for them. This is not to suggest that these white people who voted against themselves actually want all the bad things that are coming to them from the way they voted at the last election, but that people are too stupid to vote properly and end up betraying there fellow countrymen by voting for those who hate them and their race to be their rulers. This applies to all Western nations, especially France, where Le Pen had a realistic chance of winning, so a vote for her was not ‘a wasted vote’ as many conservative-minded voters give as an excuse/explanation for continuing to vote for treacherous parties.

  8. pain street
    pain street says:

    That lady with the fat baby, her problem is that her husband left her for someone else and now she needs some government to look after them both.
    Meanwhile her husband has gotten three others pregnant?
    Good luck United Kingdom? Maybe they should all go join ‘Port’ – land?

  9. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “most of those seeking “refuge” in Europe are arrogant young men of prime crime-committing and rape-gang-forming age.”

    Is there a single ‘thank you’ letter in existence from any group representing these immigrants, sent to the white countries receiving them and whose people are now willingly giving them their houses, land and money? (And the majority of white people MUST must be consenting to them coming, as they keep voting for more of it, especially the Germans, as a penance perhaps).

    Of course not, no thank you letters, their attitude is that ‘Allah is forcing the Kaffur to take us in and give us their belongings, Allah be praised for making the enemy hand over their lands to us.”

  10. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    With respect, you seem a bit naive in giving primacy to authors. In the Jewish-controlled money system, publishers are much more significant than the (real or supposed) authors. Consider e.g. Penguin books, and its various rearrangements, which has published only books wanted by Jews, for example to promote world wars controlled by Jews behind the scenes.

  11. Timothy Kelly
    Timothy Kelly says:

    What about the WASP-Jewish alliance? Was the Ford Foundation controlled by Irish Catholics? Were the Quakers Irish Catholics?

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      I sense a logical fallacy- some WASPS were part of a WASP-jewish alliance- therefore there is something wrong with WASPS- all WASPS.

      If say 2% were part of this alliance, should that cast a shadow over the 98% who were not?

  12. john
    john says:

    calling people racist, sexist, homophobic or misogynistic means absolutely nothing it is a modern leftist speech and people in the past did not speak like this. it is cringe.

  13. JR
    JR says:

    Another excellent, clear and accurate article from Mr Langdon, many thanks for your work. The novel is a good parallel of the emotional and shortsighted thinking of leftists.

  14. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    This article probably applied to me about 25 yrs ago during my mentally liberal phase and also having parents from both West Ireland, Galway and South East Ireland, Wexford I would naturally attest to Mr.Langdon’s assertion.
    Useful ‘ejitts’ (idiots) are in bountiful abundance in Ireland: think Saint Bob Geldof, educated by Jesuit Brothers; and U2 lead ‘singer’ Bono.
    Back thirty five years to the ‘Band Aid’ era, the Irish used to proudly boast that per-head of population, for a small nation they (the Irish) were the most exemplary generous.
    My father often recounts the begging bowl being passed around for ‘poor and starving African children’ in the churches in the !930’s and 1940’s.
    Meanwhile, get your times- table wrong and the teachers in Galway would sadistically trash a young child’s open palm. Charity in Ireland’s case does not even begin at home.
    Ask a liberal – in this case Eoin Colfer and Co, would they choose to live adjacent to a refugee centre, mosque; live in an African country, and if not, why not?

  15. TJ
    TJ says:

    I just remembered the self-styled “Comanche Indian” Dr. David Yeagley [“Bad Eagle”] [d 2014]

    Sorry, he was not a Comanch. His achievements are from White genes, not from Injun genes.

    He was White when he felt like it, and injun when he felt like it. . .Yes, he was a conservative who valued White civilization. . .I wonder why.

Comments are closed.