Editor’s note: There is some kind of processing glitch in our software. I will try to post Tom Sunic’s article in several parts. 

Go to Part 2.
Go to Part 3.
Go to Part 4.

The fundamental mistake made by most American conservatives, both old and new, is to think of communism solely as a violent ideology designed to abolish private property. During the so-called Cold War, they imagined that by mimicking some communist practices they could tone down the very real communist threat and elicit some Soviet sympathy. They should have been more careful what they wished for. The reason why communism fell apart in the early 1990s in the communist East was due to the fact that communist ideologemes, such as the idea of progress, economic equality, and the instauration of a borderless and multiracial society, had been more successfully put into practice in the capitalist West than in the communist East — albeit under a less abrasive name and without resorting to a large scale state terror.

For many Americans, surviving communism is therefore a contradiction in terms given that they have already fully aligned themselves to the System, i.e., “the deep state”, oblivious to its repressive crypto-communistic principles. Unsurviving communism, by contrast, is a destiny of a hapless few who are prepared to live a life of dissent — and also pay a heavy price for their non-conformist views.

Modern day neo-communist BLM and antifascist activists in the US know well that parading with the name of communism could backfire. Their self-ascribed title “antifa” resonates far better in the ears and eyes of the modern media. Many of them, including many of their Democratic party overlords are heirs to a now defunct Homo sovieticus species who once thrived in communist countries of Eastern Europe. The twin brotherhood between former Homo sovieticus and the present Homo americanus has had a very long history irrespective of their often feigned feuds and fake semantic posturing.[i] Given that the US, since its inception, has also been involved in a large number of world-improving projects, not least its century-long messianic virtue-signaling adventures aimed at elevating foreign peoples world-wide to a global City on the Hill, it was to be expected that at some point the communist temptation would gain in popularity in a new garb and hit home in the US. For example, US campuses continue to be the main breeding ground of antifa activists, having now more of their adepts than campuses in Western Europe where, over the last decade, there has been a noticeable recycling to populism and nationalism by many former leftist, but also Jewish authors (Michel Onfray, Alain Soral, Eric Zemmour). In post-communist Eastern Europe, organized antifa groups and their LGBT sidekicks are virtually non-existent, except when temporarily hired and exported by EU or State Department-sponsored NGOs in order to unseat some local populist and anti-globalist ruler. Hatred against antifas in all segments of East European society is understandable given that for many the term antifascism rings the bell of communism. Worth recalling is that words and locutions containing nouns or modifiers related to the word “antifascism” were in surplus in all official communist documents in Eastern Europe, even on marriage certificates, lasting well into the late 1950s. During the Cold War, and without any exception, all East European dissidents were squarely depicted in communist court proceedings as fascist agents.

The brainwashing of young American masses by the word antifascism owes much to the early Bolshevik agitator Leo Trotsky and his collection of essays under the title What is Fascism and how to Fight it,[ii] in which he depicts fascism as the ultimate stage of capitalism and showing how communists in the USA must smash it:

The backwardness of the United State working class is only a relative term. In very many important respects, it is the most progressive working class of the world, technically and in its standard of living…The next historic wave in the United States will be the wave of radicalism of the masses, not fascism. Of course, the war can hinder the radicalization for some time, but then it will give to the radicalization a more tremendous tempo and swing.[iii]

The recent antifa riots in many large cities in USA are also a belated follow-up on riots carried out by antifa “sixty-eigthers” half a century ago all over the West. [iv] They were successful in imposing communist cultural hegemony in higher education and in paving the way, a decade later, for the political takeover by the Left. Sixty-eighters spawned the modern-day antifa. However, neither the psychology of sixty-eighters, nor their modern antifa offshoots can be fully grasped if one loses sight of the world order created jointly by the capitalist US and the communist Soviet Union in 1945, both being part of the common antifascist block. In the final analysis, the entire West, with America at the helm, is unable to repudiate modern antifa activists, let alone declare them a terrorist organisation, unless it first revises its own writing of the history of World War II and overhauls its own system of liberal governance.

Go to Part 2.
Go to Part 3.

[1] T. Sunic, prefaced by Kevin MacDonald, H

The conclusions regarding France and Europe more broadly in Guillaume Faye’s final book Ethnic Apocalypse—like The Culture of Critique and my own book The God that Failed: Liberalism and the Destruction of the West banned by Amazon for said conclusions being “inconvenient” to the Establishment, ie-true—were that yes, the regime has made it inevitable. The conditions imposed upon us have made life intolerable, and Faye states that for Occidental Man to survive and reclaim his homelands from usurpers and aliens that violence has become the natural consequence of the Establishment’s actions. Indeed, the daily indignities and violence visited upon us in our nations is enabled and encouraged by the occupation government’s shock troops, be they hostile aliens or indoctrinated white janissaries. This ranges from so-called petty crime to acts of terrorism and everything in between; they are on the same continuum. The violence, which has been a fixture within formerly peaceful nations for generations now and continues to increase in prevalence and intensity, can be directly attributed to those in power who arrogantly build their Tower of Babel and laugh in the face of decency. Their legion of ready censors work overtime to ensure that anyone who dissents is silenced and destroyed.

Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall after all.

The meek, however, will not inherit the earth, but will go quietly to their destruction along with the entire rotten system. Nature always wins in the end, but at what amount of sheer wreckage and collateral damage? Faye predicts that the civil war will be terribly savage (Selco Begovic is a great resource for the realities of what it might look like having lived through the worst of the conflict in Yugoslavia in the 1990s). If there is to be open conflict, it will be equal parts civil war and revolution. A revolution is, however, what is required.

America as an entity has very obviously lost the will to live; I’ve been feeling this way for a while, but the overturning of the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on account of “prejudice” has solidified it. Nietzsche’s Last Man rules, and maggots crawl over his corpse. He (it?) is dead and doesn’t even realize it. A healthy society would never tolerate a terrorist to live—or have even allowed the Tsarnaev brothers to be in the country in the first place—and though Circuit Court Judge Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson affirms that Tsarnaev will remain incarcerated for life, do we even really expect that at this point? How about the fact that the US re-settled almost five hundred “refugees” over the months of May, June, and July in the midst of the on-going pandemic?

It is as always not my intention to demoralize the reader when publishing my extensive research into the ins and outs of the system and its operations, but rather to illustrate its comprehensiveness and the inextricability of its constituent parts. Most whites still have a mental block where they have some modicum of trust in the system and believe it can be reformed. It cannot. This is actually a major “white pill” to use the parlance of the Alt-Right because the noise does not matter. (As an aside, I’ve never referred to myself as Alt-Right, despite its brilliance as a term, because to me there is no alternative.) The system is not capable of reform and must be discarded.

You must ask yourself: what benefit do YOU get from this system, from America as it is, not as it was. More so, what benefit do your children, your children’s children, the bedrock of your people and your civilization get from this system? None—it is a downward spiral we want no part of. There can be no American nationalism and certainly no conservatism because there is no nation and there is nothing to conserve: America is dead, and I refuse to be trapped in its decaying corpse. I want to live.

We don’t want the assimilation of alien peoples. We don’t want integration. We want our own homelands free from aliens foisted on us by the occupying regime and we want that for all of the other peoples of the world as well. To quote Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “Nations are the wealth of mankind, its collective personalities; the very least of them wears its own special colors and bears within itself a special facet of divine intention.” Let us work to construct a world in keeping with natural law and the universal order of truth. This is to break from enslavement to a system that dehumanizes us and ultimately wants us dead after it’s sucked us dry, discarded as husks, grist for their mills. I reject the premise that this is what progress looks like.

But what of the inevitable urgings that we need to DO SOMETHING? Only a fool wants to be drawn into conflict with the system, and we want to divorce ourselves from this rotten system because of the violence visited against us on a daily basis, not cause more. There may be a universal truth but there is no one-size-fits-all strategy. The future of the West will be decided in the real world at the local level. What works for and resonates with the New Atlantic Nation cannot be replicated wholesale in Texas or Alberta, and why would we expect that? The federated nature of the American and Canadian systems is one of the major reasons we are in the situation we’re in today; the European Union is a useful analog here as well. As for New Zealand, Australia, and the Cone Countries of South America, those are ready-made nations waiting to be re-claimed, just as are those most of those in the EU, though there are some new/old nations waiting to be reborn there as well. Southern Africa is slightly more complicated, but to my mind it seems it could perhaps break down along the lines of a Boer Nation, an Anglo Federation, and possibly an allied German-Namibian micro-state.

The point is this: regardless of what’s coming we need to be prepared. Like a zombie virus, the system continues to animate “our” “societies” post-mortem, but it is in an advanced state of decay, and the final bullet in its brain will be most welcome. It will also signal a monumental opportunity, and everyone should know what it is they want, and what better world they envision. Out of chaos, order, but what order? A California that looks like Mexico and a Quebec that looks like Cameroon, or something else? These are questions everyone must answer for themselves and then get busy building an action plan. Start at home and build outward. Find workable solutions for your community, and if you don’t have a community, then build one. For men, the Mannerbund is a good place to start.

The New Atlantic Nation (New Albion) now has a prospective constitution, a flag, and a historical and ethnic basis. The movement to seize the mantle of our collective—and I stress collective—destiny and leave the dissolving union is growing, but it needs more. Right now there are just murmurs, but in every little corner of the Occident those murmurs are rising into an emphatic shout.

We do not want war and conflict. We want peace, which why we put ourselves out there and speak the truth when telling the truth has become a revolutionary act. The ideal is the Velvet Divorce of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, but if large-scale confrontation is to come to pass, the ideal must then be Slovenia of the Yugoslavian wars—the wars, it must be said, precipitated by the very Establishment trying to crush us today. The violence has been here, and it has been perpetrated against us in terrible fashion for generations. Confiscatory taxation of our wages while we’re on the hamster wheel, alien criminality, intolerable living conditions, suppression of birthrates, censorship, and open warfare are all on the same continuum, the continuum of violence visited against us by the alien occupation government that wants our history, our civilization, our people, and everything good we stand for erased.

What is more important: the survival of your people and civilization, or that of a rapidly-“browning” ideological and contractual project built on faulty premises of human nature at the tail end of the so-called Enlightenment?

We stand on the precipice of history. Do not despair for we have been chosen to re-light the torches and guide our people forward into the future we create, keeping the essence of the past and our ancestors while forging something new, dynamic, and True. This system is the enemy of all peoples, a rotten perversion of nature and a denial of the universal order that originates from the central timeless truths any legitimate system representing its people must be in accordance with. It is to those ends we dedicate ourselves.