‘Science Tikkun’: The Talmudic Control Doctrine of Peter Hotez

Certain Jews continue to emerge into view as the Covid phenomenon grinds onward and upward. Previous essays explored the many Jews active in the pharmaceutical industry and public health agencies, developing, promoting and profiting from covid vaccines and other power plays. I also looked at Jews of the World Economic Forum, an epicenter of beneficiaries of the covid pandemic. Also in the news again recently, Dr. Joseph Mercola topped the list of the “disinformation dozen” identified by the Center for Countering Digital Hate and referenced by President Biden as the greatest threat to global public health, for challenging narratives about covid and vaccines. Previously Mercola called out his defamation enemies, but I identified the real Jewish enemies he failed to name.

Not to say that the vaccine hysteria is some kind of Jewish plot, but it’s no surprise that Jews as an integral part of our elite, are heavily involved. Now we examine one Jew in particular, stepping into the public spotlight to declare that Talmudic doctrine justifies medical tyranny and lockdown control.

Peter Hotez

Dr. Peter Hotez is a longtime proponent and promoter of vaccines and an ardent vaccines-cause-autism denier, even publishing a book whose title denies vaccines caused his own daughter’s autism. Hotez complained when nineteen books questioning vaccines were better sellers on Amazon than his. Now twenty-eight precede Hotez’s book. Hotez has offended many parents of vaccine-damaged children by calling them “a hate group. They are a hate group that hates their family and hates their children.”

Hotez’s essay of late April published in the prestigious science journal Nature, “COVID vaccines: time to confront anti-vax aggression,” displays the author’s militant aggression in the subtitle: “Halting the spread of the coronavirus will require a high-level counteroffensive against new destructive forces.” Hotez rails against “anti-vaccine groups” and states “The bad guys are winning, in part because health agencies either underestimate or deny the reach of anti-science forces, and are ill-equipped to counter it.” Hotez has a solution: “The United Nations and the highest levels of governments must take direct, even confrontational, approaches … and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States.” This is typical of the militancy and violence-promotion of Hotez, who projects his own aggression onto others:

A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures. The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril.

Here Hotez equates people and groups posing legitimate scientific and medical questions about vaccine safety and efficacy with “terrorism” and nuclear Armageddon. He also equates these concerned people and groups with the political right-wing: “Many far-right extremist groups that spread false information about last year’s US presidential election are doing the same about vaccines.”

In his most recent tirade of July 28, “Mounting antiscience aggression in the United States,” published in the journal Public Library of Science, Biology, Hotez develops his anti-right wing theme much more virulently, in fact leading with it in the summary: “There is a troubling new expansion of antiscience aggression in the United States. It’s arising from far-right extremism, including some elected members of the US Congress and conservative news outlets.”

The first of these enemies Hotez identifies is Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green, Republican, who introduced a bill to investigate National Institute of Allergic and Infectious Disease director Anthony Fauci, whose many policy reversals, lies, exaggerations, obfuscations and conflicts of interest are now legendary. Hotez lionizes the man however, blaming Green for her “attempt to humiliate a prominent American scientist.”

Hotez’s partisan divide and conquer diatribe continues with a criticism of a Republican House Select Subcommittee to investigate the origins of the covid pandemic, as allegations emerged of Fauci’s NIAID funding of the Wuhan virology lab. To Hotez, this is heresy, and he says “the hearings took on a sinister tone”—without giving any explanation other than “pointing fingers.” Hotez also gives no data on his accusations that “Fox News anchors promoted fake claims regarding deaths from COVID-19 vaccinations.” Tucker Carlson’s data were taken directly from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS has received a lot of criticism over the years, some of it founded. Some critics have argued for a long time that VARES undercounts vaccine injuries. A report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 concluded that “fewer than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reported” by the VAERS system. Fewer than one percent. So what is the real number of people who apparently have been killed or injured by the vaccine? Well, we don’t know that number. Nobody does, and we’re not going to speculate about it. But it’s clear that what is happening now, for whatever reason, is not even close to normal. It’s not even close to what we’ve seen in previous years with previous vaccines.

Most vaccines are not accused of killing large numbers of people. The Menveo vaccine, for example, is given to people around the world, often children, to prevent bacterial meningitis. In this country, only one person died from that vaccine in the entire period between 2010 and 2015. One. So, compare that to what’s happening now. In just the first four months of this year, the U.S. government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid-1997 and the end of 2013.

Next Hotez cites three authors to support his thesis that the “far right” and “America First” faction is attacking scientists (including himself) in pursuit of a “modern day authoritarian regime”: Steven Levitsky, Waldemar Kaempffert, and Anne Applebaum. All three are Jewish (Kaempffert I could not confirm, but his origins from New York City, views of “Nazis,” and work at the New York Times are suggestive). This looks glaringly like a Jewish mutual admiration society. A glance at the current President’s cabinet confirms it, as does a look at the President’s primary speech writer. To Hotez though, the threats come from “Experts affiliated with far right-leaning think tanks” and “intellectuals on the dark web.”

Hotez demands two solutions: a letter of support from the President and leaders of federal agencies, and expanded protection for scientists from “right-wing extremists,” including extending “hate crimes” laws to cover the fantasy “attacks” Hotez imagines. His first demand is likely to get fulfilled, given the general pro-vaccine stance of the administration. The second is a measure quite consistent with the anti-free speech attitudes that are now high on the wish list of Jewish organizations and the left generally.

To fully confirm the Jewish embeddedness of Peter Hotez, we refer to his 2017 essay “‘Science Tikkun’: Repairing the World through the Science of Neglected Diseases, Science Diplomacy, and Public Engagement.” Hotez affirms that the Talmudic concept of tikkun olam translates as “repairing the world,” something only the Chosen People are capable of, and something they are obligated to do for the rest of us. Here is how Hotez defines science tikkun:

We define Science Tikkun broadly as an added role for leading U.S. scientists to elevate the profile of their knowledge and findings, and educate leaders in the areas of government, business, religion, the military, the media and other sectors in order to improve the human condition.

One of the ways the world is broken is within the human immune system, and one way that Talmud is going to fix this is through vaccines. Such is the logic of Peter Hotez.

Two years later in 2019 he revisited the concept in another PLoS essay titled “Science tikkun: A framework embracing the right of access to innovation and translational medicine on a global scale.” Here he further explicates the concept of tikkun olam: “According to some religious scholars, the ancient Jewish framework of repairing the parts of the world still left undone after the creation arose some 500 years earlier during the 16th century.” We must forgive Hotez his syntax here, since he is a vaccine promoter, not an accomplished author. He is not saying the creation arose 500 years earlier, but that the Jewish framework for repairing it did. This framework actually assumes the Creator left some aspects of the world un-created or under-created, and only Jews are capable of completing them.

Hotez is open about declaring a term for this new Jewish-completed world. He is concerned about “ensuring that the world’s poor continue to receive access to innovation and technologies in this new world order.” He deploys the term again in a broader summary statement:

The new world order of science and technology gaps engendered from the opposing forces of successes due to global vaccine and NTD [neglected tropical disease] programs versus opposing social determinants of shifting poverty and blue marble health [poor people in wealthy societies], urbanization, war and conflict, and antiscience movements affords us an opportunity to expand our science tikkun definitions. Here, I redefine it as initiatives led by scientists to address the innovation gaps in global health and neglected diseases allowing illness and disease not only among the world’s vulnerable populations but especially among the huge numbers of poor living amid wealth and prosperity. A fundamental tenet of science tikkun is that vulnerable populations have a fundamental right to access innovation. In this context, science tikkun can take on several different dimensions.

It goes without saying that these dimensions allow profiteering off of the world’s poor through corporate techno-science, especially vaccines, and dismissal and suppression of any indigenous natural health approaches, termed by Hotez “antiscience.” This is one example of how people like Peter Hotez are “repairing the world.”

Of the twenty-six references Hotez lists for this essay, he is the sole author or co-author of twenty-three of them. He clearly doesn’t have a low self-esteem problem.

We don’t need people like Peter Hotez lecturing us about “right wing extremists” and “conservative media” threatening the lives of the world’s poor by questioning vaccine safety. It’s hard to think of an Extremism more of a threat to the world than the concept of tikkun olam being used to rationalize any and all proposals.

Real science would not only allow, but welcome study and debate of the vaccine safety issue. Hotez is part of the extensive cabal working to protect the pharmaceutical industry and global public health infrastructure from scrutiny. Many voices beyond Tucker Carlson have presented their data on vaccine safety, especially now when the CDC’s own data shows extraordinary numbers of deaths (12366 as of July 30) in temporal proximity to covid vaccinations. Vaccine programs have been halted in the past upon evidence of far fewer deaths. Yet Peter Hotez denounces all this as right-wing conspiracy theory, because in his own mind he is uniquely qualified as a member of the Chosen People to fix what is incomplete about the human immune system. He considers it “antiscience” and I am sure “anti-semitic,” to doubt him.

24 replies
  1. James Bowery
    James Bowery says:

    ACE2 coding variants in different populations and their potential impact on SARS-CoV-2 binding affinity


    The susceptibility of different populations to SARS-CoV-2 infection is not yet understood. Here, we combined ACE2 coding variants’ analysis in different populations and computational chemistry calculations to probe the effects on SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 interaction. ACE2-K26R; which is most frequent in Ashkenazi Jewish population decreased the SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 electrostatic attraction. On the contrary, ACE2-I468V, R219C, K341R, D206G, G211R increased the electrostatic attraction; ordered by binding strength from weakest to strongest. The aforementioned variants are most frequent in East Asian, South Asian, African and African American, European, European and South Asian populations, respectively.

  2. Philip Power
    Philip Power says:

    Foreword — Daat Emet
    For a long time we have been considering the necessity of informing our readers about Halacha’s real attitude towards non-Jews. Many untrue things are publicized on this issue and the facts should be made clear. But recently, we were presented with a diligently written article on the subject, authored by a scholar from the Merkaz HaRav yeshiva — so our job was done by others (though we have already discussed some aspects of this issue in the weekly portions of Balak and Matot; see there). Since there is almost no disagreement between us and the author of the article on this issue, we have chosen to bring the article “Jews Are Called ‘Men'” by R’ David Bar-Chayim (in Hebrew) so that the reader will be able to study and understand the attitude of the Halacha towards non-Jews.
    In this article R’ Bar-Chayim discusses the attitude towards “Gentiles” in the Torah and in the Halacha and comes to an unambiguous conclusion:

    “The Torah of Israel makes a clear distinction between a Jew, who is defined as ‘man,’ and a Gentile.”

    That is to say, any notion of equality between human beings is irrelevant to the Halacha. R’ Bar-Chayim’s work is comprehensive, written with intellectual honesty, and deals with almost all the aspects of Halachic treatment of non-Jews. It also refutes the statements of those rabbis who speak out of wishful thinking and, influenced by concepts of modern society, claim that Judaism does not discriminate against people on religious grounds. R’ Bar-Chayim shows that all these people base their constructs not on the Torah but solely on the inclinations of their own hearts. He also shows that there are even rabbis who intentionally distort the Halachic attitude to Gentiles, misleading both themselves and the general public.

    For the English readers’ convenience we will briefly mention the topics dealt with in R’ Bar-Chayim’s article:

    1. Laws in regard to murder, which clearly state that there is Halachic difference between murder of a Jew and of a Gentile (the latter is considered a far less severe crime).

    2. A ban on desecrating the Sabbath to save the life of a Gentile.

    3. A Jew’s exemption from liability if his property (e. g. ox) causes damage to a Gentile’s property. But if a Gentile’s property causes damage to a Jew’s property, the Gentile is liable.

    4. The question of whether robbery of a Gentile is forbidden by the Torah’s law or only by a Rabbinic decree.

    5. A ban on returning a lost item to a Gentile if the reason for returning it is one’s sympathy towards the Gentile and compassion for him.

    6. The sum which a Gentile overpays in a business transaction due to his own error is forfeit; whether a Jew is permitted to intentionally deceive a Gentile is also discussed.

    7. One who kidnaps a Jew is liable to death, but one who kidnaps a Gentile is exempt.

    8. A Jew who hurts or injures a Gentile is not liable for compensation of damage, but a Gentile who hurts a Jew is liable to death.

    9. One who overcharges a Gentile ought not return him the sum that the Gentile overpaid.

    10. A Gentile — or even a convert to Judaism — may not be appointed king or public official of any sort (e. g. a cabinet minister).

    11. One who defames a female proselyte (claiming that she was not virgin at the time of her marriage) is liable to neither lashes nor fine.

    12. The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile.
    13. One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment “love your neighbor” applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.
    14. One who sees Gentile graveyards should curse: “Your mother shall be greatly ashamed…”

    15. Gentiles are likened to animals.

    16. If an ox damaged a Gentile maidservant, it should be considered as though the ox damaged a she-ass.
    17. The dead body of a Gentile does not bear ritual impurity, nor does a Gentile who touches the dead body of a Jew become impure — he is considered like an animal who touched a dead body.
    18. One is forbidden to pour anointing oil on a Jew, but there is no ban on pouring that oil on a Gentile because Gentiles are likened to animals.
    19. An animal slaughtered by a Gentile is forbidden, even if the ritual slaughter performed was technically correct, because Gentiles are deemed like animals. (Daat Emet does not agree that this is the Halachic reason for invalidating a Gentile’s ritual slaughter — but this is not the place to delve into the subject).
    20. Their members are like those of asses” — Gentiles are likened to animals.
    21. Between the Jews and the Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought

    R’ Bar-Chayim’s arguments and conclusions are clear, Halachically accurate, and supported by almost all the existent major Halachic works. It would be superfluous to say that R’ Bar-Chayim fully embraces this racist Halachic outlook as the word of the Living G-d, as he himself pointed out in the “Conclusion” of his article: “It is clear to every Jew who accepts the Torah as G-d’s word from Sinai, obligatory and valid for all generations, that it is impossible to introduce ‘compromises’ or ‘renovations’ into it.”
    On the other hand, we want to make it clear that Daat Emet — as well as any reasonable people who do not embrace Halachic laws as the word of the Living G-d — are repulsed by such evil, racist discrimination.
    In the Hebrew text we have abridged the second part of R’ Bar-Chayim’s article, “Between Jews and Gentiles — In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought,” because, in our view, the Halacha is the law which obligates every religious Jew while concepts of the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and Jewish thought are not binding on anyone, as our rabbis have already written: “And so the Aggadic constructs of the disciples of disciples, such as Rav Tanchuma and Rabbi Oshaya and their like — most are incorrect, and therefore we do not rely on the words of Aggadah” (Sefer HaEshkol, Laws of a Torah Scroll, p. 60a); we have expanded on this issue in the portion of Vayeshev.

    Tzfi’a 3
    Rabbi David Bar Chaim
    Yeshivat Mercaz HaRav

  3. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    Mr Haemers: Loved your article and even more your sarcasm. Hotez “clearly doesn’t have a low self-esteem problem”

  4. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Thank you for this well written piece Karl.

    Btw, I live in NY and since I don’t own a TV., I listen to the radio. Anything Covid is discussed around the clock. Even the conservative stations tout getting the vaccine.

    Hotez states: “We define Science Tikkun broadly as an added role for leading….” Notice “broadly.”

    I am a ‘struggling‘ Christian, I guess you can say, and the Bible fascinates me not only in a spiritual way but also in an historic way. It is also a spiritual answer to satanic bastards such as Hovetz.

    Our great country was of course founded by devout Christians- “In God We Trust.” You see to satanic Jews like Hovets, spirituality is defined as “in Jews We Trust.”

    2+2 will always equal 4, why? Because that’s God’s rule. But to the satanic Jews, 2+2 can equal 5, or whatever they want it to equal whenever they want. That’s why Jesus said;
    “You belong to your father, the devil, and want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” ~John 8:44.

    Like many Christians, I at times am a doubting Thomas. But if there is one thing in the Bible that I believe wholeheartedly, it is the Book of Revelation. I absolutely believe that it in some way will happen. And look at the “Russian revolution.“ But it was not a “revolution.” It was a Jewish takeover of a Christian nation. By the time Lenin had died in 1924 over 5 million Russian Christians had been slaughtered. By the time Stalin died in ‘54, over 50 million. These massive genocides were of course carried out predominantly by Jews. And so, what is to stop them from doing it again?

    I believe that this whole covid thing is most likely a massive fraud, but that’s just me. There’s a chance it might not even exist.

    Is it a warm-up to the Revelation? Maybe. It doesn’t seem that covid will ever end; now we have the ‘Delta variant.’ How many more ‘variant’s will be on the way?

    I have a feeling that it might all end when the Jews and their Shabbos Goy-end us!

    • Tim Folke
      Tim Folke says:

      I too enjoyed reading the article, as well as your comment.

      While I do not consider the Bible to be ‘infallible’ and am aware of the many mistranslations (whether by honest error or design I do not know), I also see too many parallels between Revelation and the Covid scenario to shrug it off as coincidence.

      Yeah, I get it. The vaccine was not made for Covid. Rather, Covid was made for the vaccine.

      Stay strong, Brother. It is an honor to live at this critical point in human history.

      • Bobby
        Bobby says:

        Thanks Tim. I enjoy many of your replies to different pieces also.
        Yes, it certainly does seem like ‘covid was made for the vaccine.’
        It is an honor to be alive now. And also an honor to be a part of our cause- thanks to Kevin and all of you.

        The times are also- scary as shit! lol… Yes, we must stay strong Tim. All of us.

        • Karl Haemers
          Karl Haemers says:

          Agreed. We are subject to a medical terrorism. This has long been planned and the necessary perceptions installed long ago. H G Wells and his hypnotic novels with disease themes were some aspects of this installation. Fear of infectious disease is a very useful tool of the Jewish oligarchs.

  5. James J. O'Meara
    James J. O'Meara says:

    “Hotez has offended many parents of vaccine-damaged children by calling them “a hate group. They are a hate group that hates their family and hates their children.”

    Jews always bring a touch of class to any intellectual discussion.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      Ha! Yes, they seem to think their degrading of discourse will go unnoticed. Barbara Loe Fisher of National Vaccine Information Center noticed. This man claims to be an intellectual? He talks like an idiot some times. It must be deliberate incitement. The best response to such trolling is always more facts, more details, more knowledge.

  6. anonym
    anonym says:

    Great… Now they’re turning science into a Jewish pseudo religion, a cabbalistic one no less.

    Like any other Jewish pseudo religion is it based on the psychotic biblical prophesies, and since God’s Chosen People knows what’s holy and unholy, can we expect to be called “immoral”, “unethical” and “evil” when we disagree. And when we point out the many fallacies and factual errors they make, can we expect to be called “unscientific”.

    They have already turned climatology into a doomsday cult and computer science into a neo-gnostic God-man cult (Kurtzweil etc). The “tikkun” delusion is probably even more dangerous than most fear, since it seems that they think that the Jews are God’s assistants on earth, who’s job it is to turn the prophesies into earthly reality. To them its a political program. And, when reading them, especially Isaiah, there’s a lot to be concerned about.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      Great points. We can also expect to be called “anti-semitic” if we disagree with ‘science tikkun’. So be it. I’d be a proud “anti-semite”.

  7. ChilledBee
    ChilledBee says:

    If Hotez is so concerned about ensuring that the world’s poor continue to receive access to innovation and technologies in this new world order – maybe he could first apply this to the Palestinians and see if it bears fruit.

Comments are closed.