The Cuckoo Cult: Mainstream Christianity Is Now an Implacable Enemy of the White West

Judaism isn’t about worshipping God. It’s about worshipping Jews. And it’s so good at its job that it’s persuaded some Christians to take up Judeolatry too. Thanks to Jewish subversion at the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church went from asking God to lift the “blindness” of the “perfidious Jews” to mandating smarmy prayers for “our elder brothers in the Faith.” And yes, Jews would indeed like to behave like brothers to Christians, in the same way as Cain did when he murdered his brother Abel.

Stonetoss demolishes the concept of “Judeo-Christianity”

Jews have tamed and corrupted American Protestantism too. They’ve convinced millions of Americans to accept the oxymoronic concept of Judeo-Christianity, which has all the coherence and honesty of “carnivorous vegetarianism” or “The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation for the Welfare of Under-Aged Shiksas.” Jews are also hoping to tame and corrupt Islam. The Jewish Chronicle recently ran an article headlined “British Muslims need ‘reform’ version of Islam,” which described the launch of a “new Oxford institute” that “aims to defeat the extremists and enable proper social integration.”

The seeds of race-blind liberalism

The article was written by a Muslim shabbos-goy called Taj Hargey, who earnestly explained to his fellow Muslims that the “philosophical evolution” of Islam “is theologically endorsed, since ijtihad (analytical thinking) is an intrinsic Qur’anic precept, as exemplified by the trailblazing 9th-century Mu’tazilah, who championed rationalism, justice and liberty.” And Hargey welcomed “support from anyone — including fellow Abrahamic adherents — committed to life-affirming and humane perspectives.”

Blatant blasphemy: The violent criminal George Floyd is portrayed as Christ at a Catholic university after his self-inflicted death

Muslims aren’t going to be fooled. Unlike Christianity, Islam resists subversion and doesn’t attack the interests of its own adherents. Hinduism and Buddhism resist subversion too, as we can see from the robust reaction of Hindus in India and Buddhists in Burma to Muslim misbehavior. Hinduism defends Hindu India and Buddhism defends Buddhist Burma. Modern Christianity, in complete contrast, seeks to destroy the Christian West. It’s now a cuckoo cult dedicated to filling the West with non-White predators and parasites. So what’s gone wrong with Christianity? Or was Christianity wrong from the beginning? These famous verses by the Jewish St Paul could be said to contain the seeds not just of race-blind liberalism but of biology-blind transgenderism too:

3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. (Letter to the Galatians) 3:11 There is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all. (Letter to the Colossians)

Traditionalist Christians deny, of course, that those verses encourage race-blindness and transgenderism. But they can’t deny that those verses from the Christian New Testament are much friendlier to such pernicious ideologies than these verses from the Jewish Old Testament:

20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee. (Book of Deuteronomy) 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. (Book of Numbers)

In the Old Testament, the difference between Jews and non-Jews, between male and female, is literally a matter of life and death. In the New Testament, “Christ is all, and in all.” When you compare the Old and New Testaments, you shouldn’t be surprised that Jewish Israel is highly ethnocentric and has big fences on its borders to keep out non-Jewish “infiltrators.” Nor should you be surprised that historically Christian Britain is now heavily enriched with non-Whites and non-Christians. Even leftist newspapers like the Guardian sometimes report the pathologies caused by this ethnic enrichment:

Over 1,000 children in Telford were sexually exploited, inquiry finds

More than a thousand children in Telford were sexually exploited over decades amid the failure of authorities to investigate “emboldened offenders”, an independent inquiry into the scandal has concluded. The three-year independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation (IICSE) found that abuse was allowed to continue for years and children, rather than perpetrators, were often blamed. Issues were not investigated because of nervousness about race, the inquiry’s final report said, and teachers and youth workers were discouraged from reporting child sexual exploitation. (Over 1,000 children in Telford were sexually exploited, inquiry finds, The Guardian, 12th July 2022)

But the leftist Guardian didn’t mention the word “Muslim” or “Pakistani” in that article. It didn’t explain the phrase “nervousness about race.” How could it? If the Guardian were honest, it would have to admit that leftism has worked tirelessly to encourage “nervousness about race” and to deliver thousands of White girls, decade after decade, to non-White sexual predators. You can be sure that the feminists at the Guardian will not be writing hard-hitting articles about “rape-culture” in Telford.

Justin Welby, a perfect justification of Nietzsche’s contempt for Christianity

You can also be sure that no high-ranking cleric in the Church of England will be delivering a fiery sermon in condemnation of the Muslim rape-jihad in Telford. That would mean defending Whites and Christians, and the Church of England has no interest whatsoever in defending Whites and Christians. But the Church has reacted very noisily to the government’s heavily promoted — and worthless — plan to send illegal migrants to Rwanda to have their asylum claims assessed. Justin Welby, the invertebrate Archbishop of Canterbury, contrasted “the weekend of Easter celebrations with his antipathy towards the government’s Rwandan asylum plans.” According to Welby: “Easter is a season of life and hope, of repentance and renewal. And this season is also why there are such serious ethical questions about sending asylum seekers overseas. The details are for politics. The principle must stand the judgment of God, and it cannot.”

Welby is not an aberration

So Welby speaks up loud and clear in support of non-White migrants, some of whom will undoubtedly go on to commit serious crimes against the White British. But what will he have to say about the latest development in the Telford scandal? Nothing, of course. As Andrew Joyce so rightly said of Welby at the Occidental Observer: “At the heart of this disease [of white guilt and globohomo] is the Archbishop of Canterbury and leader of the Church of England, Justin Welby, a man who looks like ten minutes of manual labor would actually kill him. He is the definition of all that is wrong in modern Man.” However, I don’t think that Welby is an aberration. No, he’s the logical culmination of Christian universalism. And here’s an interesting example of that universalism from an Anglican book published in 1893:

Race-blind universalism from the Church of England in 1893

The book itself is called Home Words for Heart and Heath, and collects issues from the Parochial Magazine for St Paul’s in the university town of Cambridge. On the positive side, it’s a good example of how Victorians created even the simplest objects both for endurance and for beauty. I found it an aesthetic treat merely to pick the book up and begin leafing through it. But it wasn’t a treat to come across the engraving of “Little Jack and His Playmates” on a “Young Folks’ Page.” Anglicans in 1893 didn’t know where that kind of race-blind universalism would lead; in 2022, we can see its pernicious consequences all around us. The point of the engraving, taken “from a photograph,” is that the two little boys in the foreground look very similar apart from their clothing and skin-color. It’s a literal embodiment of “Ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” True, the little White boy is taller than the little Black boy, but that goes with his evangelism, as the accompanying text explains:


“There’s not a child so small and weak
But has his little cross to take–
His little work of love and praise
That he may do for Jesus’ sake.”

One is reminded of the well-known children’s hymn in writing of Little Jack, the Boy Missionary. Jack was the son of Captain and Mrs E.C. Hore. He was only eleven weeks old when, in 1882, they started for Africa, in company with a number of other missionaries, including Bishop Hannington. The baby was carried in a wheelbarrow to Mamboia, then back to Zanzibar, and afterwards round a great portion of the African Continent: while he also accompanied his parents on many of their missionary journeys into the interior. He quickly became very popular with the natives, by whom he was known as the “little missionary,” and by his winning ways contributed much, it can hardly be doubted, to the success of his parents’ missionary endeavours. (Home Words for Heart and Heath, 1893, p. 95)

Whites are susceptible to sentimentality: a kitten from Home Words for Heart and Heath

Modern leftists would condemn the engraving and text for racism, paternalism and “white savior syndrome.” But if leftists were honest, they would recognize the Christian roots of a central leftist principle: “We’re all the same under the skin.” Of course, as I pointed out in my article “Rollock’s Bollocks,” the leftist insistence on the oneness of humanity contradicts the leftist insistence on the innate evil of Whites and the innate virtue of non-Whites.

Inversion = Evil

But that contradiction doesn’t weaken leftism: it’s simply an example of what George Orwell called doublethink, or the “power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.” Leftism is about power, not principle, and contradictions are a feature, not a bug, of its hunt for power. Leftism took the dogma of humanity’s oneness from Christianity in order to deny the clear truth that Whites are intellectually, morally and culturally superior to Blacks. After that truth was denied by the oneness dogma, leftism took the next step and began to preach the dogma of White evil and non-White virtue.

In other words, leftism has inverted the truth about Whites and Blacks. And that inversion of the truth is a very clear sign of the true nature of leftism. As Vox Day has said: “Notice how evil always inverts. ‘The Light of the World’ became ‘the Dark Ages’. The revival of satanic darkness became ‘the Enlightenment’. And the enslavement of women to sin and self-destruction became ‘Women’s Liberation’. If you want to discern if something has satanic roots, look for the inversion. Once you spot it, you’ll scent the sulphur soon enough.”

Vox Day is himself a Christian and says that Christianity is vital for the salvation of the West. I think he’s right. But that salvation won’t come from mainstream Christianity or from mainstream Christians like Justin Welby. They are part of what will need to be swept away. Vox Day knows that and writes perceptively about mainstream Christianity and Jewish subversion at his blog. If you’re a regular reader of the Occidental Observer and the Unz Review, I recommend that you become a regular reader of Vox Day too. Christianity is central to the sickness, but will also be central to the cure.

99 replies
  1. Pip
    Pip says:

    The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
    By Marcus Eli Ravage
    Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928

    Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don’t. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis. You know you do, and I know it, and we understand each other. To be sure, some of your best friends are Jews, and all that. I have heard that before once or twice, I think. And I know too, that you do not include me personally – “me” being any particular individual Jew – when you fling out at us in your wholesale fashion, because I am, well, so different, don’t you know, almost as good as one of yourselves. That little exemption does not, somehow, move me to gratitude; but never mind that now. It is the aggressive, climbing, pushing, materialistic sort you dislike – those, in a world, who remind you so much of your own up-and-coming brethren. We understand each other perfectly. I don’t hold it against you.
    Bless my soul; I do not blame anybody for disliking anybody. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, as you play at it, you make such fantastic and transparent excuses, you seem to be suffering from self-consciousness so horribly, that if the performance were not so grotesque it would be irritating.

    Marcus Eli Ravage – A Real Case Against The Jews

    KAREN BERGER says:

    Our men don’t need to read, as much as they need to organize.
    Go to GAB (to find like minded Whites) and join NJP.
    No more time to waste.

  3. Tez
    Tez says:

    Yeah well Judeasim Christianity and Islam are all Abrahamic faith’s as such is white people shouldn’t be practicing those faith’s. I mean why would I join a cult that wants white people dead. If i wanted to commit suicide I’d fuck off to Switzerland. 😎

    • ruben
      ruben says:

      Yes exactly. There is a big wealth of Medieval European Folklore that carefully warns our people against the Levantines. It should be easy and fun to recreate our own God, or even a pantheon… Whites had religions for dozens of millennia before Charlemagne. We were doing great without christianity. We had Gods who love us! The only thing christianity has going for it is that it makes for efficient taxation of the weak by the strong and I’m sure there is a way to deal with that later.

  4. John D. Alder
    John D. Alder says:

    Is it even possible to reform something that has corruption so deeply embedded in it?

  5. Tyler
    Tyler says:

    Most White Christian Americans (namely, you and I) have been lulled into passivity, not just by liberals but by Jews and LGBT.

    We’re cowards.

    There is no other name for it.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” Most White Christian Americans (…) have been lulled into passivity ” … not the least by Christianity itself .

      Christianity is a sheeple-oriented religion ;
      where the other two salient traits of DNA sheeple ,
      besides cowardice ,
      are political naivete and political gullibility .

      Perhaps as many as one out of three White Christians
      are DNA sheeple .

      • John D. Alder
        John D. Alder says:

        Some say that there is no such thing as a single Christianity but there are many Christianities as they can’t seem to agree on the basics and probably within each denomination you will find among the sheep filling the pews even more versions. Some argue about true christianity but fear to consider that perhaps like all religions it was simply made up and they continue to make it up as they go along. Might as well restart the debate of how many angels can dance on the gead of a pin.

    • kerdasi amaq
      kerdasi amaq says:

      Did it ever cross you mind that it may be something in the water?

      I mean that, literally.

  6. Stan Wood
    Stan Wood says:

    This article ends, without explanation, with the same pretzel logic it condemns. Why should a nihilistic Semitic cult be vital to the salvation of “the West?” Christianity is the original Marxism and the foundation of Political Correctness. Is “the West” a euphemism for the species of hominin commonly referred to as “Whites?” If so, it isn’t logical that a Middle Eastern god or cult of mixed-raced desert dwellers should be vital to ending our extermination; an ongoing genocide engineered by this same tribe of destroyers.

    And speaking of genocidal engineering, it’s evident in many ways that Christianty is designed to weaken and destroy the White race for the benefit of the unholy self-proclaimed Chosen of the Judean God of Genocide; a projection of Judean psychopathy.

    The only way out of the ongoing racial holocaust is for our species to regain our identity. Identifying with Middle Eastern beggars, their racist folklore, and their Semitic Buddhism, is exactly what has brought us under their power.

    Our people need a racial religion or philosophy that meets the higher, purer standards of a race noted for being “white.” We do not need a fictionalized mixed-race Marxist hippie of questionable reputation and harmful dogma, and the scion of our mortal enemies and their God of Genocide, as our idol.

    From its European beginnings in Rome, to today; Christianity is a Marxist, Antifa (anti-nationalist), anarchist death cult. In its Roman Catholic permutation, it created Hell on Earth for millions of White Europeans, for centuries, and works diligently today for the genocide of Whites by ethnic replacement.

    We need to practice our own unique spirituality for healing and repairing our identity. We need to draw from our past mythologies, folklore, and traditions; and from our White collective unconscious. This is the foundation from which we will build something new and better. Semitic religion? Never again!

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      People can theorize and speculate all day and all night. But, in the real world, most of us look at output and results. IOW, what something produces. That cuts through all the useless abstracts, revisionist history, speculation, etc, etc.

      Just ask yourselves, as you examine something, “Is it working?” Think of life in its many components and interrelated parts as the following:

      The marine power plant is the perfect metaphor for life itself. It has many component that are inter-related, must be maintained and operated properly, and like an orchestra conductor, anomalies, impending problems have to be addressed; the sooner and earlier the better.

      Like Jake Holman in The San Pebbles, machinery does not care about what kink of bullshit, self deception, or emotion you generate. All it cares about-and reciprocates-is what you do for it, taking care and seeing to its needs. If something does not work, then get rid of it – that’s the survival maxim.

      Magical thinking is a sign of weak intellectual strength, like a child clutching a teddy bear or a pacifier in later years. Hello Carolyn Yeager.

      N. B. Machinery does not care about your crutches of logical fallacies, your backstop authorities you cite, etc. Just what you can do.

      Buddhism is the practical practice of spirituality. More than any other system of similar provision.

    • milano
      milano says:

      Our people need a racial religion or philosophy that meets the higher, purer standards of a race noted for being “white.” We do not need a fictionalized mixed-race Marxist hippie of questionable reputation and harmful dogma, and the scion of our mortal enemies and their God of Genocide, as our idol.

      It wasn’t about religion for Christ. Everything revolved around “Father” and the Spirit they shared between them. It had and has nothing to do with religion so called? In fact does not the bible make it clear what pure religion actually is:

      Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. James 1:27

      What would we do despise our own father and mother for another in the creation of a religion more to our own liking? But I guess that is what the Jews did yes?

      “I came in my fathers name and you reject me, but if someone else comes in His own name him you will receive.”

      Fulfilling completely the words of Isaiah!

      Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth!
      For the Lord has spoken:
      “I reared children and brought them up,
      but they have rebelled against me.
      The ox knows its master,
      the donkey its owner’s manger,
      but Israel does not know,
      my people do not understand.”

      Woe to the sinful nation,
      a people whose guilt is great,
      a brood of evildoers,
      children given to corruption!
      They have forsaken the Lord;
      they have spurned the Holy One of Israel
      and turned their backs on him.

      Original Marxism and political correctness? A family is a family no matter how big a nation is?

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        Reading you reminds me of a phone call I had with an appointment secretary. He connection was so bad that constant echoes and voice outages made her conversation incomprehensible.

        I really don’t know why I respond to hash and jambulaya. Perhaps it is to defend a concept, thing, person, or idea, etc, from crude and slouching offense.

  7. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    There is a lot of sober truth in this article, and I hope those Christians reading it do read it carefully.

    There are some fine ethno-centric Christians out there who are also savvy to the JQ. As has been said, it is only the 98% of Christians that make the rest of them look bad.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      “Christianity is central to the sickness, but will also be central to the cure.”

      I hear this same oxymoronic view being parroted by far too many on the pro-White alternative right, and I keep waiting for anyone who seriously believes this to explain how it is even remotely possible to un-brainwash the millions of White Christians who have allowed the jews to switch off their racial survival instincts and to fall in ‘love’ with the very same race who works 24/7, 365 to do everything possible to destroy and genocide White Europeans off the face of the Earth?

      I’ve tried to gently bring up the topic of jews and their pernicious, relentless, increasingly impossible to deny or ignore vitriolic hatred for White Europeans and point out their leading role in the Great White Race Replacement agenda with a few marginally “Christian” people I know and the reaction I get from them – even when I make an effort to be gentle and modestly restrained in my choice of words – and these self-hating, self-loathing, white guilt ridden idiots will immediately start foaming at the mouth and blurting out every memorized bible passage that they can remember.

      These White people are suffering from an incurable disease of racially suicidal Christ-Insanity that clearly reflects how effective the jews have corrupted and subverted Christianity and turned it and it’s followers into a cult of cuckoos who are a death cult. These cuckoo’s hate and want to destroy their own race with a passion and fervor that is precisely equal to how the jews view White Europeans.

      So, how can these people be reasoned with? How can they be cured of their brainwashing before we are past the point of no return to normalcy?

      • c matt
        c matt says:

        I won’t argue against mainstream Christianity being infiltrated and brainwashed, but mainstream EVERYTHING has been infiltrated and brainwashed. This incurable disease is not limited to Christians, and prior to the infection Christians were quite ethnocentric.

        How to get everyone back is the question.

  8. Stoffel Makwassie
    Stoffel Makwassie says:

    Whilst I maintain that the greatest issue facing the White race and Western civilisation is and will always be the Jewish Question, I have to note that the notion of so-called “Christian” Zionism certainly seems to loom larger everyday as the most disturbing facet thereof. The modern Jews (which is not to be confused with the Biblical Israelites) certainly have hijacked mainstream Christianity like they hijacked finance, the media, and academia. However, I want to point out to the author something pertaining to Paul’s Epistles quoted above. Jesus himself said that He had only come to save the “lost sheep of Israel”. Also, when He sent them out, He very specifically told his disciples to go the the same “lost sheep of the tribe of Israel”. Where did His disciples go after he left them? Only to Europe. Ponder on that for a moment. A vibrant, dynamic, racist Christianity informed the nationalism of my Boer ancestors. I think it worked well for Robert E. Lee and his kind, too. It worked for the knights of the SS as well. I might also recommend the book The Sword of Christ by Giles Corey, that was publicised in pdf-format here on TOO the other day.

  9. Martin V
    Martin V says:

    It’s no more productive to call Xtianity an “enemy” than to call Prince Harry an enemy.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      How is it possible to come up with such a denial of reality?

      If Prince Harry were presented with a box that had a red button on it, and told that if he were to press that red button, the White European race would magically disappear from this Earth – and by doing so, he would ‘rid the world’ the world of ‘racism’ – I can guarantee to you that Prince Harry would press that button.

      How can I be so certain, you ask? Simple. When in a position to choose any of the millions of beautiful White females on this Earth to be his wife – and who he could have produced White children with, he decided instead to latch onto an over-the-hill, aging Hollywood mulatto actress and chose to become a Poster Boy to virtue signal his hatred of his own race and his willingness to do his part to help submerge White European genes under the continent of Africa.

      Megan Markle was Prince Harry’s pressing of the red button.

      • Flo
        Flo says:

        Yes, all too true. But you can be sure that vulgar, aging, C-list mulatto had some nifty, well-honed sexual tricks up her sleeve.

        • kerdasi amaq
          kerdasi amaq says:

          Anyway, I’m not sure that the English royal family actually count as white.

          Their lineage from the birth of Queen Victoria is suspect. Understand?

          • Messenger Charles
            Messenger Charles says:

            Oh yes, they are definitely white and Semitic Judahites (not Jews) from the Tribe of Judah and descendants of King David.

            1 Kings 9:5 (KJV) Then I will establish The Throne of thy kingdom upon Israel for ever, as I promised to David thy father, saying, There shall not fail thee a man upon The Throne of Israel.

            Jeremiah 33:17 (KJV) For thus saith The LORD; David shall never want a man to sit upon The Throne of The House of Israel;

  10. Messenger Charles
    Messenger Charles says:

    “These famous verses by the Jewish St Paul could be said to contain the seeds not just of race-blind liberalism but of biology-blind transgenderism too:”

    With respect but Paul was not a Jew. Paul was a Benjaminite Israelite. Jews are not Israelites. Jews are Hamitic Canaanites – The Serpent Seed from The Garden

    I have also re-translated correctly the two verses you quoted:

    3:28 There is neither Israelite Judean nor others of Mankind, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. (Letter to the Galatians) 3:11 There is neither others of Mankind nor Israelite Judean, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all. (Letter to the Colossians)

    “Strictly speaking it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew’. The first Hebrews may not have been Jews at all…”

    — 1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3.

    Were Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel, Jews? – The Beginning:

  11. Poupon Marx
    Poupon Marx says:

    A very readable article. No new information for me but inaccurate in stating the timeline for capitulation of Western Christianity was Vatican II. Why does this get repeated? The Catheter Crutch was subverted long age into and before the Middle Muddle Ages. Catholic Popes, bribery, political intrigues, and no limits on ethics, morals, when market share of wealth and land, control over people was provided. In each of these, Jews had a hand-directly, indirectly. Almost ANY high level operations, decisions, and actions by the nobility and merchant classes had a Jewish connection and relationship. Who founded and operated the Vatican Bank, etc, etc.

    Finally I read that Buddhism and Hinduism restrict and defend their heritage and institutions against Chistrians-usually from Southern Baptist missionaries-and Islam. The ignorance of Buddhism here and in most Western venues is wide and deep, relying on flaccid support and 5th hand information. “Buddhism is too passive”, etc, etc. Where is the New Magic Whitener to erase this shit stain?

    I have not seen Christianity in any collective form in my lifetime that is worthy of continuation. It is the equivalent of baby food and pablum. One must choose to shut down part of the frontal lobes in order to just eat it, must less swallow this amalgam of tripe.

    Nobody, I maintain, has been around and through the various iterations of American Protestantism and Catholics Religions as much as I. Well, let us decamp to Gospel preaching, in the spirit of free inequity and interstitial spumoni.

  12. Poupon Marx
    Poupon Marx says:

    Start listening at 20:40 on the album. The rest of the album is a tonic and palliative for the battered modern White psyche, and illustrates the inversion and perversion of “The Left” in its ranking of the unacceptable toxic.

  13. Dr ExCathedra
    Dr ExCathedra says:

    I have good reason to defend Christianity when it comes under attack from neopagans and Nietzsche fans, but I make it clear that it is only pre-WW2 Christianity (and certainly not all of that). Since the second catastrophic brother war, the all the churches of the West, eventually even the Church of Rome, have turned traitor to the White nations without which they would not have existed. The anti-Christian Enlightenment’s 300 year old war was victorious and somehow liberty, equality and fraternity are now believed by the churches to be an integral part of the Gospel. And then Holocaustianity replaced the robustly counter-Jewish Faith of two millennia. With the result that they are all cheerleaders for the invasion of Europe and North America by the vast hordes of the Third World. For that I will never forgive them.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      “Since the second catastrophic brother war, the all the churches of the West, eventually even the Church of Rome, have turned traitor to the White nations without which they would not have existed.”

      I would agree with you 100 percent – based on your well worded disclaimer.

      However, for those who cling to the idea that Christianity can somehow be cleansed of the jewish subversion of post WW2 poison, I am still waiting to hear an explanation as to how that task can be accomplished.

      Lobotomies would not be a practical explanation.

  14. Scipio Africanus
    Scipio Africanus says:

    Paul’s comments have been decontextualized and then applied to achieve neoliberal multiculturalism. His statement is meant to apply to spiritual matters in that we are all perceived to have intrinsic value in the eyes of God and that we as Christians have in our faith a commonality and should therefore cooperate productively.
    It does not mean that we should destroy ethnicities, races, traditions, history and culture. Subjecting a group to those conditions is anti-Christian. Multiculturalism is by nature against the divine natural order as prescribed by God the creator. In his creation natural organic landscapes give rise to ethnic and racial groups and then cultures that are suited to those people in that environment.
    We need a spiritual foundation in addition to racial identity to combat the dark forces rotting our civilization.
    Authentic Christianity respects different racial and ethnic groups. Even in the United States during the 50s and 60s there was the Polish, Irish, Italian Churches in cities. The Benedictine monastic model respected organic cultures and peoples preserving their integrity by cooperating as need be in the universalistic spirit of Christ. Example the crusades.Germanic Christianity fuses the Indo Aryan aristocratic warrior ethos well with Christianity without distorting the fundamental principles. Let’s return to authentic orthodox Christianity and throw away the Jewish yoke.

    • c matt
      c matt says:

      Precisely – it was Paul who argued that new Christians who were not circumcised need not be so. It is the same Paul that also demonstrates the Spirit distributes His gifts differently, and each person has his role/place. Thus, he was not one to force cultural or ethnic homogeneity. Hardly the grand egalitarian blank-slater into which our current traitorous Christianity has turned him.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Paul’s comments have been decontextualized and then applied to achieve neoliberal multiculturalism. His statement is meant to apply to spiritual matters in that we are all perceived to have intrinsic value in the eyes of God and that we as Christians have in our faith a commonality and should therefore cooperate productively. It does not mean that we should destroy ethnicities, races, traditions, history and culture.

      Given the venue, it is hardly surprising that the plain meaning of words and the ideas and truths embodied in and conveyed by them have gotten little respect and found few defenders in this thread. Nonetheless, however unpopular such respect may be among the many, I am pleased to encounter it, and I tip my hat to a man with the integrity to speak up for it.

  15. Harold Sparks
    Harold Sparks says:

    Coincidentally FTN just did a dive into Vatican II……astonishing what the Jews demand (and get) from Catholics.

    EMJ often covers these issues in his talks as well.

    Personally I have given up on the Christian Church. (But I still believe in God)

    As the writer mentions, the church has been woefully cucked and ruined by corrosive jewish influence.

  16. doug
    doug says:

    In reguards to the killing of the american reporter by isreal.It should be of no surprise that escaping justice is the rule of thumb here.We still have no reason for the sinking and murder of the Uss liberty,only that it was a mistake?

  17. German Visitor
    German Visitor says:

    How to explain all the enthusiasm of young Anglo-
    Americans (“wehraboos”) for the German military
    struggle for survival against the Jewish world po-
    wer of disembodying mindless consumerism?

    They identify with it! They also want a strong
    leader who will finally unite them and call them
    to fight, instead of continuing to lead a meaning-
    less dishonorable dreary existence as “consumers”
    and watching helplessly as the Jews who have sei-
    zed their countries destroy their entire future!

  18. anonym
    anonym says:

    Grown men and women who believe in Jesus is as embarrassing as grown men and women believing in Santa Claus.
    The fact that there’s millions of Europeans who read the incoherent ramblings of psychotic hebrew sheep herders from 2000 years ago, and take it seriously, is hilarious. Everytime a priest opens his mouth there should be people lying on the floor dying of laughter.

    A thousand years down the toilet. That´s what Christianity has given Europe.

    Christianity is just another Jewish attempt at imitating European philosophy and religion. The same way Judaism is a genocidal hodgepodge of Mesopotamian and Egyptian teachings and customs. The same way Marx plagiarized Proudhon and created a genocidal pseudo religion.

    They take sound European concepts and intentions, without understanding them, and make their own distorted version, which, thanks to their salesmanship, ends up replacing the genuine original.

    Some non-superstitious whites may view Christianity as a usable existing organization for uniting Europeans, but considering how fractured Christianity is, and how it leads to even more pointless schisms, it’s a stupid idea. As stupid as using Marxism, neo liberalism or any other Jewish pseudo religion.

  19. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    “Easter is a season of life and hope, of repentance and renewal.”

    Yeah, there is also…

    For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.

    The role of a minister of God is to comfort the afflicted, and to afflict the comforted, and to raise the question of how come your suffering?

    If you don’t know how to do this get out of the pulpit. But unfortunately there appears to be something called Political Correctness!!!

    Christianity, true Christianity apparently is on a collision course with this and who has got the courage to confront that?

    O, and there is also to raise the profound religious questions!!! LIKE CLIMATE CHANGE FOR EXAMPLE!!!!!

    You did know don’t you that there is an enormous amount of information on it covering even heat waves in the Bible? The Old Testament even provides the solution which takes us into the New Testament!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!!!!!

    Cheers and O Easter? Try the words of a great hymn from a great man that England forgot about Charles Wesley:

    O, for a thousand tongues to sing
    My dear Redeemers praise;
    The glories of my God and King
    The triumphs of His grace.

    He breaks the power of cancelled sin,
    He sets the prisoner free;
    His blood can make the foulest clean,
    His blood availed for me.”

    Chandler gets it right to

  20. Fourth Horseman
    Fourth Horseman says:

    I appreciate Langdon’s writings here, but he completely misses the boat on this one. To claim that “Christian” is not “Judeo” is to totally overlook the history: Jesus, Joseph, Mary, the 12 Apostles, the Gospel writers, and “Saint” Paul — all ethnic Jews. The Bible, OT and NT, is a Jewish construction, intended strictly for the benefit of Jews. The “Jesus miracles” are nonsense — obvious fiction intended to sway gullible Gentiles. Paul’s constructed theology, based (perhaps) on a tiny core of historical truth, works directly against Roman rule and simultaneously corrupts its Gentile believers. Langdon needs to read Nietzsche’s “Antichrist”, or if that is too taxing, then Skrbina’s “Jesus Hoax.”

    • kerdasi amaq
      kerdasi amaq says:

      So, are you saying that all these people, including Jesus, hate Him?

      Stop conflating modern-day Jewry with the people of Jesus’ time.

  21. Dorfmann
    Dorfmann says:

    Do Christians value their religion more than their race? Yes. Can any member of any race be a Christian? Yes. Do Christians believe everyone is a child of God? Yes. Does Christianity have irrevocable ties to Judaism? Yes. Did Jesus say to love your enemies, turn the other cheek, and that the meek shall inherit the Earth? Yes. Do Christians believe that the world must deteriorate drastically before Jesus will return? Yes. What more do we really need to know? Of course, it’s pointless to debate Christians on this subject as they have deep psychological needs that transcend rationality. But I hope non-Christian White racial activists understand the threat Christianity poses not only to our race, but to the entire planet itself.

    • joe
      joe says:

      well said. Why would an educated man decide to share the defacing christian world view with third world monkeys, as most of them are from backward latin america, spain, portugal, philippines, africa, etc. The problem is this jewish psyop has been institutionalized throughout the west for centuries and it’s jews that keep proliferating this dark age today, just as they did in the past, telling goys they’re born sinners in total depravity while in the same breath declaring jews as a gods chosen. This is the problem with institutionalizing anything, as the new minds are born into it, while all other alternative philosophies are suppressed. No way does the logical european mind have anything in common with the shallow, emotional mind of the negro/latino/filipino. If you join christianity, you will be opening your mind to the third world of the violent, superstitious negro/latino. The whole thing is the dirtiest trick ever played on the european and shows the power of cultural psyops on society.

    • c matt
      c matt says:

      Do Christians believe everyone is a child of God?

      Creature of God – yes. Child of God – I believe traditional teaching reserves that to the baptized in Christ (hence, the terms “brother in Christ”, “adopted children of God”. Does God desire that all His human creatures become His children – yes, but it is left up to the free will of each person to so choose.

      That still doesn’t mean you can’t have (and protect) nationalities or ethnicities any more than being part of the human race doesn’t.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Of course, it’s pointless to debate Christians on this subject as they have deep psychological needs that transcend rationality.

      Ah, science! Unanswerably profound as ever.

  22. Samer
    Samer says:

    Christianity was the reason for saving the West from Islamic barbarism in the Middle Ages, but today it has become one of the reasons for allowing this barbarism to destroy Western civilization. The time has come to transcend Christianity and move to a new type of spirituality and morality, one that completely departs from the religion that finds its root in the Abrahamic faith, which represents a common denominator between Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Have you ever heard of the Null Hypothesis?

      The null hypothesis states that there is no relationship between two population parameters, i.e., an independent variable and a dependent variable. If the hypothesis shows a relationship between the two parameters, the outcome could be due to an experimental or sampling error. However, if the null hypothesis returns false, there is a relationship in the measured phenomenon.

      Until it is shown that Christianinanity benefits the European Pipple today, in the here and now, and near and far future, any consideration of benefit is NULL.

  23. Frederick Ford
    Frederick Ford says:

    Christianity & conversion religions, in general, is a multiracial, multicultural cult that preceded the eventually downfall of the White race through its message of universal human unity through morality which is still used for international law and universal human rights, Also, religion, unlike race & tribalism, is a joke of a community because religious people who devoutly uphold their so-called community are only doing so for the promise of personal reward and pleasure in the afterlife.

    In fact, the only reason why White people still cling to Christianity despite its racially destructive nature is that in our modern individualistic world, religion is the only supposed bastion of morality and group integrity because all Christians & Muslims only practice and upheld these religions because they provide group morality & reduce individuality. But the predominately selfish motivation for religious piety means that religious people are secretly more selfish than non-religious people that come from non-religious groups who, unlike religious people, only care about the group and only the group due to some unique history or background that said the group has.

    Also, the foundations for religious morality are based on delusional ideas of human unity like humans only hate each other because of perceived differences and that all people are essentially descended from the same humans not to mention that the concept of Heaven and Hell doesn’t even exist because there is no such thing as universal morality hence no universal judgment for said morality and the evidence for this is explained here.

    On a racial level, White people are genetically exceptional compared to Non-WHites so the whole idea that all humans came from Adam & Eve or a common ancestor is also false and the proof for this sie explained here.

  24. Banna jack
    Banna jack says:

    No mention that Justin Welby is a marrano? (ie ethnic Jew).

    What evidence is that that Christianity can be rescued from subversion?

    • Messenger Charles
      Messenger Charles says:

      Yes, Welby is a Jew and a Cultural Marxist = an anti-Christ. The Anglican Communion is wholly gone astray – it’s apostate and reprobate, and well and truly on the wide path to destruction (Spiritual ruin).

      Matthew 7:13 (MCV) Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction (Spiritual ruin), and MANY there be which go in thereat:

  25. joe
    joe says:

    The cross is the new swastika…
    The author, obviously biased in favor of these abrahamic psyops weapons, is not aware that the jews are actually manipulating the gullibility of all the personality disorders who believe in these superstutious absurdities to create a religious crusade, with trumpf and his multi-racial christian nationalists ready to fight against the US Constitution, while pissing on the graves of all the soldiers that died defending her against the the never ending tide of theocrats, totalitarians, communist and monarchies that trash the surface of this endless war planet. Instead of rehashing a brilliant article of the subject, I’ll post the link here:

    • Messenger Charles
      Messenger Charles says:

      If only it was the new Swastika!! It would then have a few redeeming features. However, the ‘cross’ and Calvary has been replaced with Auschwitz and the Red Hammer and Sickle = Zionist ‘Christians’.

  26. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Another great article from TL. Thanks!

    “…the Christian West…is now a cuckoo cult dedicated to filling the West with non-White predators and parasites.”

    Case in point:

    Of course, they’re getting a lot of help from Jewish Supremacy Inc. Or is it the other way around?

    An answer to that question can be found in the fact that this is not happening in any synagogue in Israel, where Jews go to worship themselves.

    • Simon
      Simon says:

      Three vials, each containing the same liquid, made by the same Judean alchemist. All three have ‘poison’ scrubbed off badly and ‘cure’ written in shaky handwriting on top.
      The rest of the piece was very readable. The description of old books was evocative of Wodehouse and Kipling for me. The concluding two paragraphs had me scratching my head. That itch became a bit of a rash when I had a look at Vox.

  27. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    We know very little about the real identity of the people belonging to various ancient groups. All the theories, controversies and hypotheses have become meaningless now that some deep thinking anthropologists made the stunning (and now so obvious!) point that there is nothing objective about identity. Do we know how they identified themselves in terms of the most important feature: gender identity? NO!
    I am sure this will be a blow to many, including Prof. MacDonald, who have completely neglected the paramount factor of gender identity in their studies. Archeology itself has suddenly become opaque and uninformative and will never be the same since we will never know how those people FELT. How many of the hunters, gatherers, etc were binary, how many cis-gendered, even unbeknownst to themselves? Perhaps not being Christian, Raff was able to discern that this erroneous “dual sexuality”concept was imposed by Christian dogma.
    Luckily for modern Christianity, religious leaders like Welby and many Jewish luminaries are shaping our understanding to erase the meaningless differences between races and ethnicities but they have to do more to correct the error of the sex duality concept. Bergoglio said that the homosexuals are our brothers. But are they not also our sisters, or rather our brother-sisters in constant potential transformation?

    I enclose the link to the article below, but since readers in some countries cannot access this site, I am also pasting the relevant paragraphs:

    “A number of LGBT activists and academics are pushing to bar anthropologists from identifying human remains as ‘male’ or ‘female,’ arguing that it is impossible to know how ancient individuals identified themselves, The College Fix reported on Monday.

    Gender activists have long been pushing to inject modern sensitivities into the academic field, the article said, adding that a tweet from Canadian Master’s degree candidate Emma Palladino, posted earlier this month, has seemingly reignited the debate.

    Palladino, who is seeking an advanced degree in archaeology, argued that transgender individuals “can’t escape” the sex they were born with because archeologists who find their bone one day will assign them the same gender they had at birth. Palladino called the practice of assigning gender to an ancient human “bull***t.”

    Her initial tweet garnered over 10,000 retweets and nearly 60,000 likes. She continued the thread by stating that “gender + queer archeologists and scholars have been working for decades to unpack assumptions that archeologists make bout gender and identity, both today and in the past.”

    Noting that labeling any remains as ‘male’ or ‘female’ is rarely the end goal of any excavation, she stated that “the ‘bioarchaeology of the individual’ is what we aim for, factoring in absolutely everything we discover about a person into a nuanced and open-ended biography of their life,” she argued.

    She concluded by reassuring the LGBT community that even if “some sh**ty archaeologists in the future misgenders” them, that will never change who they were in life.

    Other activists have also been pushing to change the way anthropologists treat discovered bodies, The College Fix, an American conservative news website, reported. It noted that a group called the Trans Doe Task Force seeks to “explore ways in which current standards in forensic human identification do a disservice to people who do not clearly fit the gender binary.”

    The group’s mission statement proposes “a gender-expansive approach to human identification” by examining found bodies based on “contextual clues” such as clothing “culturally coded to a gender other than their assigned sex.”

    University of Kansas Associate Professor Jennifer Raff has also argued that there are “no neat divisions between physically or genetically male or female individuals,” according to the website. Raff suggests that identifying ancient remains only as either male or female is a “duality” concept imposed by Christian colonizers.”

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Whenever I encounter the term “activist”, I am instantly repulsed and go into full reverse mode. I posted on here previously the percentage of this secondary school generation who is “gender confused”. That figure is about 24%.

      This is a world I do not care to live in. Therefore, when and if it impacts me or gets close enough to perceive the stench, I will change countries to a more fit and healthy milieu and culture. I’ve got one foot out of the door now.

      Beyond this dysfunction is the lack of vigor, guts, recognition of the multitude of casualties beset the “White” of the WESTERN World. Most of those effected make a little noise, repeat some tired bromide, and maintain “nice”, impassive continuance, never lowering themselves to the level of their antagonists. Most to the commenters here would rather, I believe, receive a beating from BLM and/or Antifa rather than be seen actively pugilistic. Turn the other cheek, so that the markings and gashes are symmetrical on your face.

      Ever hear of the expression, “Waiting For Godot”? Most Whites are waiting-for someone else to solve and involve toward fixing and gaining relief. Most Whites are cowards and poseurs. Take from an erudite observer:

    • c matt
      c matt says:

      On the upside, if they cannot determine whether particular remains self-identified as male or female, there is no basis to claim gender discrimination existed.

  28. Rolo Slavskiy
    Rolo Slavskiy says:

    The Jewish subversion occurred much earlier at the Nicene council where the Jewish Old Testament became 90% of the religious scripture of Christians and people like Marcion, who spoke the truth about Yahweh, was declared a heretic.

    True Christianity died that day.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      I had an old friend, long deceased, who once said, in response to a pugnacious statement from an “activist” student that force could never stamp out an idea, “Have you met any Albigensians lately?”

      Nowadays, of course, my friend’s concern with the absurdities of corporeal life are a thing of the past, but I suspect that he would share my surprise if the world’s Marcionites and Albigensians had a joint conclave in a standard-size shipping container and there wasn’t any room to spare!

  29. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    I posted a comment several hours ago that did not appear. I wonder if it was rejected because its sarcasm was frowned upon or because it included a link to a site that is considered “Russian disinfo” in the US (and this site wishes to avoid problems) or because it was considered off topic. Whichever of these reasons was the real one, or another I cannot think of, is a perfectly fine exercise of editor prerogative. It would just be so very useful to know to avoid erring in the future

    [there’s more than one moderator. perhaps your comment went into spam or was blocked by wordpress or something.]

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Ariadna-Many have had the same problem with uneven, irrational, willy-nilly, and capricious censorship. Lucius Vannini, the erudite commenter who created the My Western Family Web site, said to me he is finished here after being censured several times. This replicates the Woke and Cancel culture, only watered down somewhat. Oh, the tender hooks and weak tethers of academia.

      You do remember your (and mine) censorship on the old Darkmoon site. You were banned for an innocuous body function reference by the stupid brother of Lashes Darkmoon, the aesthete. And then Lobro, the high intellect Serbian followed. Of course, my crudity and coarseness got me tossed in due course.

      The overall effect, being the error of relatively sheltered people, is to lower the average and mean quality of comments. There is ineluctably going to be a choice being pithiness, asperity versus bland, soft soap, “Minnesota Nice”, with less relevance and usefulness.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Virtually everyone has had a comment quashed from time to time; I’ve had many. Face the fact that others get to make such decisions, and stop your infernal, endless whining.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Since you are not involved in this process, this is no concern of yours, unless of course you chafe at my occasional corrections and pointed critiques of some or your posts. Your comments-and I’ve said this before-are very stylistic, but when examined for content are rather airy, in my opinion.

          The very fact that the Immoderate Modulator allowed your silly post once again indicates how biased and uneven his judgement and discernment is, as it has no intrinsic value except to vent your pique and pap, as if you were a principal of the website owner. I object to anyone who gets preferential treatment without merit.

          If I were to give a costume ball, I would request you come as meringue topping and an emulsified oil slick.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            If I were to give a costume ball, I would request you come as meringue topping and an emulsified oil slick.

            Talk is cheap, yours more than most. Buy the costume, and send it to me with the invitation.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          LOL. I’m whining? And you concern yourself with my comments that are “left for others to decide?” I write to share knowledge, impart my experience, and edify comments that I find in error or deception. This takes time; and when they are not published due to inadequate and low quality subjectivity-as I see it-I respond.

          You should, I believe, mind your own business, and redouble your efforts toward relevance.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        Alan Dershowitz reminds us, during his travails regarding impeachment thresholds and the consistency of advocacy of his former academic law professor colleagues, of his exclusion, shunning, and denouncement have proceeded as he dared to propound a different “narrative” and referenced positions based on the Constitutional writ and derivative law.

        His opinion, based on his shabby treatment and judgement of poor scholarship on the part of his antagonizers has been distilled to this:

        “In a recent column he reminds us that the student movements on campus today are “enabled by weakness and empowered by cowardice.” Only the emotionally weak would accept the idea that students are traumatized by dissenting views. And he believes professors are cowards. Demand faculty support for your protest, and dozens will rush to join.”
        He concludes that these are not times that try men’s souls (which is the opening sentence from Thomas Paine’s The American Crisis). Instead, they are times when we have men without chests (which is a reference to a famous C.S. Lewis essay on The Abolition of Man). Obviously it is time for presidents and professors to grow a backbone and stop some of the silliness on campus

        My opinion, formed and motivating me to abandon the university in 1971, is that the sub-species of college professor (and “teachers” today) has a virtual superscript of “cd” at the end of his or her name, the acronym denoting the word-concept of “coward”. A coward is a liar, and is a being that does not measure up to his own standards, or those widely held by his class or peer group.

        A good example is “diversity of opinion”, touted and proclaimed. In practice, the above mentioned cohort has the least fidelity to this ideal. Which brings up the cross comparison between this site, and the similar if broader in scope Unz Review. The UR has a BROAD tolerance of opinions, sources, styles, and information types. The result is an effervescent and expansive range of knowledge and opinion. It is axiomatic, that in general, the Truth and Veracity of a phenomenon is more likely to be found or discovered in a larger and deeper gold mine in depth and width, which will more likely lead to valued minerals.

  30. Fred Penner
    Fred Penner says:

    I am bone tired of reminding people that Christianity was only recently cucked by the (((Scofield Bible)))

  31. Thaddeus Noble
    Thaddeus Noble says:

    Perhaps we should all step back and consider some uncomfortable possibilities here.

    Christianity is, and was from inception, a JEWISH plan to groom Gentiles into supporting JEWS agendas. Starting literally from birth (baptism), gentile children are force fed pro-JEW propaganda starting with the Old Testament fiction on into the New Testament fiction. Bible schools, weekly Sunday schools, church services, church youth groups, summer bible camps, etc. The pro-JEW propaganda never ends.

    Want to consider fake Christian leaders like Saul / Paul and other JEWS who intentionally fabricated a fake religion to con gentiles into blind support for JEW interests ? Should we talk Crusades X 4 to retake Jerusalem, multi millions in lost gentile lives, trillions of dollars in wasted funds to support their fictional ” Gods Chosen People” support needs.

    It is past time that ALL people need to reassess what Christianity REALLY is and in whose best interest it was actually created for. Certainly not for gullible Gentiles that’s for sure !!

    • c matt
      c matt says:

      For being a crypto Jew supporting cult, it sure picked some odd NT scripture that constantly demonized Jews – “Synagogue of Satan,” “father of lies,” “fear of the Jews,” and all that. It wasn’t until rather recently (in Church time) that “perfidious Jew” was removed form Good Friday prayers.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Quite right! It came with the Holy Week “reform” of 1956, Bishop Annibale Bugnini’s first strike at the ancient liturgy, made possible by the mental incapacitation of Pius XII, who, sad to say, was almost never compos mentis by that time (he died in 1958).

        Bugnini, a Judaizer and secretly a Master Mason, had insinuated himself into Pius’s inner circle and gained his trust. In effect, the pope signed what Bugnini placed before him while often being only half aware of what the document contained.

      • Thaddeus Noble
        Thaddeus Noble says:

        But one very interesting question that always bounces around.

        Most Bibles today, and in the recent past, were printed by JEWISH publishing houses.

        Ponder that one !

        • Messenger Charles
          Messenger Charles says:

          Yes, quite so, and as revealed by this Jew:

          “At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. THE PEOPLE ARE ONLY STUPID PIGS THAT GRUNT AND SQUEAL THE CHANTS WE GIVE THEM, WHETHER THEY BE TRUTH OR LIES.”*

          — The Jew, Harold Wallace Rosenthal, 1976. Aid to US Senator Jacob K. Javitz of NY.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Pondering is fine; checking is better. Checking reveals that Mr. Noble’s claim is somewhat exaggerated.

          Of the most prominent American Bible publishers, one thinks, among others, of Eerdmanns, which was founded 1n 1910 by a Dutch Calvinist named William Eerdmanns. His family continues to own and run the firm. Eerdmanns Publishing still sells thousands of Bibles annually.

          An even bigger firm is Zondervan, founded in 1931 by two Dutch Calvinists of that name who happened to be nephews of William Eerdmanns. Zondervan has for almost a century sold a great many Bible translations, including the KJV and all of the various revised versions of the Authorized Version: RSV, RSVCE, NRSV, and on for another half-dozen sets of initials. What’s more, Zondervan holds the copyright on the New International Version (NIV), which is, for better or worse (I think the latter), the largest-selling English version now available.

          Zondervan was an independent Christian publisher till 1988, when approaching bankruptcy forced it to sell out to HarperCollins, which set up a Christian book division as part of the buyout arrangement. (As it happens, I was working in academic publishing when the buyout took place, and it was big news in that small pond.) Whether HC is a totally judaized firm, I do not know. But it’s reasonable to suspect the worst.

          As for Bible translations meant for Catholics, most of the older ones (i,e,, those not in liturgical use) are still in print. They are published by tiny firms that publish little else and are run entirely by Catholics. Exceptions are the exemplary Jerusalem Bible and the unfortunate New Jerusalem Bible, both of which are exclusive to Doubleday. Doubleday was founded by Frank Nelson Doubleday, a New England Protestant, in 1897. It remained a non-Jewish publisher till it was incorporated within (((Knopf))) about fifteen years ago. The Doubleday imprint is still in use, but the reality is gone.

          I could go on, but the bottom line would remain unchanged: no Christian need buy a Bible from a Jewish publisher, although some, perhaps many, do. Anyone who does not want to contribute to international Jewry should know that there are literally several dozen self-consciously Protestant and Catholic firms who publish nothing but Bible translations and related spiritual and liturgical publications.

      • rubytuesday
        rubytuesday says:

        christians are supposed to persecute the jews. persecution of jews is like making gold. the fire burns the wood to ash, but refines the gold.
        you’ll not understand judaism if you can’t imagine jews proverbaly throwing other jews in the volcano, just to get one up on their adversary.

  32. German Visitor
    German Visitor says:

    Interest in women is (the only!) evidence of healthy masculinity. Some of these emotional cripples like Anglin (I’ve come to despise pronouncing his name) will retort, “Hey, do you want to be at the feet of all these sick bitches?”

    Hey, I’m talking about real women here! Today I wanted to get on the bus, but a young and pretty oriental woman (Georgian?) insisted on letting me go first. She even enlightened me that the bus driver said (when I was long gone that the journey did not lead to my destination, and sat down right next to me.

    Before getting off the bus, I told her, “You are such a pretty lovely diamond, I wish you a long life, only the best man shall have you!” She understood exactly what I meant, our souls were in harmony.

    A man of the same age, who is actually an immature boy, will never express this simple realization because he does not even perceive it.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Your mini-biography is a testament to your sincerity. Delayed and derailed emotional development is tragic. There are a lot of dogs and cats that need a good home. Sounds like you could use (apparently after so many losses) a good compañero, Cabron.

  33. Raeto West
    Raeto West says:

    Tobias Langdon is accurate on almost everything here. Congratulations to him.
    May I just add a bit on a few minor organisations, which I personally took years to understand. There were the ‘ethical’, ‘humanist’, ‘South Place’ (where SPES stands for hope) etc. Their slogan was or is
    “The Objects of the Society are the study and dissemination of ethical principles and the cultivation of a rational religious sentiment.”
    What they meant (I repeat, it took me years) was that ‘ethical principles’ = rubbish from the Talmud; ‘rational religious sentiment’ = any rubbish from the Talmud, where ‘rational’ just means is was written there once; ‘God’ being in fact assumed to be ‘Moschiach’ or some Jew-only thing, Jew being taken to be from some oriental source. All their critical commentary was from material they hated. The was never ever the slightest commentary on Jews.

  34. Annabelle
    Annabelle says:

    I know a Jewish couple where upon the birth of her son converted to Catholicism and raised their son to become a Catholic priest.
    What is hundreds of Jewish women are doing this? What impact on Catholicism?

    • Messenger Charles
      Messenger Charles says:

      @Annabelle, Makes no difference, their son is still a Jew = Serpent Seed is Serpent Seed. The only thing I would add is that he’ll fit into Catholicism very nicely.

  35. Bob
    Bob says:

    Jesus will still be here when all of this has been washed away. He seeks people who can obey. Not racist or extremists. When he told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac… old Abe made moves to sacrifice his son. Later, God sacrificed his own son. I really think cultures like Aztecs and Mayans went soft and that’s how they disappeared. Everyone knows about this guy on the cross 🤡 wouldn’t surprise me if its sometimes suppressed…it’s probably written on pyramids.

  36. kerdasi amaq
    kerdasi amaq says:

    What is really irritating about this “debate” is the inability of the participants to properly distinguish between Christianity and churchianity(faux Christianity).

    Also, it doesn’t seem to occur to them that these “clergymen” that they are railing against could be phonies propounding false doctrine as God’s word for their own political and social objectives. In other words, they could be malicious, malevolent infiltrators sent in to sabotage the religious institutions of which they have gained control.

    True Christianity is unorganised and eschews organised vain rituals which only serve the interests of the priesthood who run them.

    The most annoying people in this “debate” are the Christian-hating Nietzscheans who’s only argument that they can make seems to be the appeal to anti-semitism. Nothing more.

    • Messenger Charles
      Messenger Charles says:

      “True Christianity is unorganised and eschews organised vain rituals which only serve the interests of the priesthood who run them.”

      Spot on! It also eschews VAIN REPETITION!

      Unfortunately many commentators here fail to understand that: 1) God has no religion; 2) The word ‘religion’ cannot be found in the Four Gospels; 3) That Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Anglicanism and Protestantism are not Christian; 4) The term ‘Judeo-Christian’ is an oxymoron conjured up by George Orwell (Eric Blair), I believe.

      My article on the subject: The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:

  37. jay bee
    jay bee says:

    Nice writ. Unfortunately out here in the third dimension my experience continues to be “they have screwed us so hard that we can collectively never escape these goddamned jews”. I live in the bible-belt south. These people are judaized multicult zombies. Left, right, center, secular, religious, athiest, self-styled satanist millennial “rebels”, it doesn’t matter.

    I used to think we were 3% maybe even approaching 5%.
    No. We are 1% at best.

  38. Messenger Charles
    Messenger Charles says:

    Even 1% is probably more people than Yahavah (God) needs. Last time it was only 8 souls:

    Matthew 24:37-39 (KJV) But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be. 38 For as in the days that were before The Flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into The Ark, 39 And knew not until The Flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of The Son of Man be.

  39. Autisticus Spasticus
    Autisticus Spasticus says:

    Tracing the genealogy of “wokeness” reveals it to be a product of Christ’s egalitarian sentiments about the brotherhood of man. Kevin MacDonald and his protégé Andrew Joyce have done some phenomenal scholarship on the Jews, but they are both blind to the role Christianity has played, as the progenitor of both liberalism and communism. MacDonald subscribes to a monocausalist explanation for white decline, pinning the blame almost exclusively on the activities of Jews, with whites themselves assuming little to no culpability. I recognise that the Jewish Question and the Christian Question are synonymous, however, and that whites have been complicit in their own downfall by prostrating themselves before an alien religion. In his multi-volume Christianity’s Criminal History, Karlheinz Deschner painstakingly uncovers how the new religion plunged classical philosophy into centuries of near-oblivion, clashing with the established and ancient European wisdom regarding the inequality of men. Spreading first among the slaves and lowest classes of the Roman Empire, the Christian faith came to teach that all men were equal in the eyes of a universal creator, an idea that was totally alien to traditional European thought, which had recognized a hierarchy of competence among men and even among the gods. Opposing the traditions of classical philosophy and scientific enquiry, Christianity introduced the concept of a single, omnipotent “God of History” who controlled all phenomena in the universe, with mankind being the pinnacle of his creation. Since all human beings were “the children of god”, all were equal before their Divine Maker. Faith in the church’s interpretation of supposedly prophetic revelations became more important than scientific or philosophical enquiry, and to question the church’s view of reality was a grave sin, one that could spell death for the blasphemer. In addition to Deschner’s work, I recommend The Darkening Age by Catherine Nixey and On the Historicity of Jesus by Richard Carrier.

    Nietzsche saw that the successful promotion of Christianity relied on a pretence of reciprocal hostility between Christians and Jews. It required making the Jewish cult, when peddled to gentiles, seem non-Jewish and even anti-Jewish. “Was it not a necessary feature of a truly brilliant politics of vengeance, a far-sighted, subterranean, slowly and carefully planned vengeance, that Israel had to deny its true instrument publicly and nail him to the cross like a mortal enemy, so that the whole world (meaning all the enemies of the Jews) might naively swallow the bait?” It would, and indeed did, take many volumes to chronicle the nefarious history of Christianity, from its known beginnings around the middle of the second century to the triumph of a particularly shrewd and aggressive sect in the fifth century. There were hundreds of sects, each with its own bundle of gospels, peculiar doctrines, and adroit theologians, but among them all were innumerable hoodwinked fools who took seriously the purported antagonism of the Jews to the new religion.

    Nietzsche observed that Christianity is anti-Darwinian, its value system having dysgenic consequences. Time and again, computer algorithms identify sub-Saharan faces as non-human, as simian. This is because computer programs are objective. They have no concept of soul equality, since they have not been tainted by Christian axiology. If our people had never been infected with this Levantine poison, it is doubtful that blacks would be classed as human. It is more likely that they would be viewed as an infestation, a hostile species of archaic hominid in competition with us for our beautiful white women. Darwin believed that, if not for Christianity, we would have exterminated them with pitiless indifference. César Tort, arguably the most extreme figure on the Far-Right, proclaims that “Christianity, in essence, means not the number of priests ordained, but the number of niggers loved.” It is for this reason that Christians are unlikely to be motivated by ethno-nationalism, their focus being on God’s eternal kingdom in the hereafter, not on any earthbound nation. Their priority is the salvation of immortal souls, and the importance of genetics will not resonate with them. It’s interesting to note that, while Christianity’s universalism and focus on transcending the material is what has negated explicit racialism within Western culture for so long, universalism is the opposite of postmodernism, which has also undermined racialism. This seems less perplexing, however, when we take into account that Christian universalism, which is explicitly theological in origin, is not the same as the universalism of science that often clashes with postmodernism.

    As if fulfilling Nietzsche’s prophecy in Der Antichrist, the Third Reich was a culture that, for the first time in over a thousand years, rejected the “spiritual syphilis” of Judeo-Christian ethics and adopted a more organic, evolutionarily informed moral code. It was essentially a return to pagan values, and Germans were soon reaping the rewards, becoming the most scientifically advanced nation in the world. In terms of politics and philosophy, they had a very intimate understanding of certain realities which are to this day verboten to acknowledge. Viewed within the context of society as a living organism, a revolutionary concept at the time and one which is consistent with many contemporary findings in evolutionary psychology/biology, the Nazi movement was a healthy immune response to the latest manifestation of subversive exploitation which the Jews had wrought upon their host nations since time immemorial. Nazism identified disease vectors in the body politic and neutralised them, with the SS functioning much like antibodies, developed in response to a deadly bacillus. Mercilessly exterminating this parasite without remorse would previously have been unthinkable, due to Christian moralism. The regime’s days were numbered, however, as the existential threat posed by Jewry had bifurcated, with bolshevism looming in the east and the forces of international finance preparing to attack from the west. In due course they would form a pincer movement to encircle and destroy the one nation that stood in their way. Although this new culture was obliterated while still in an embryonic stage of development, one cannot help but be awed by its unrivalled success in such a short space of time.

    In the ensuing decades, the narrative of the Second World War as a herculean effort to defeat the ultimate manifestation of evil became set in stone. To be the antithesis of Hitler in every conceivable way became the paragon of virtue for all white people, and the memory of the Nazis was used to browbeat any whites who still dared express ethnocentrism into submission. This has cultivated ethno-masochism and pathological altruism in the European peoples on a mass scale, leading to their destruction at the psychological and demographic level. MacDonald has noted the seemingly paradoxical fact that Jews are invariably found promoting ideas, political movements and business practices that cause social decay, in turn fomenting antagonism towards them, yet they insist it is never their fault. Jewish influence in the pornography industry and Hollywood, which disseminates a massive amount of increasingly obvious woke propaganda, is something they admit to quite candidly and with pride. Despite this, many people still have trouble accepting the facticity of Jewish hegemony, not only because they’ve been conditioned since the day they were born to perceive Jews as victims, but because it seems so statistically implausible. Jews are such a minuscule percentage of the global population, so how is it possible for them to be so staggeringly overrepresented in positions of power and influence? To the uninitiated, our vague references to “the Jews” being responsible for such a vast array of social ills, as if they were some omnipresent and omnipotent force, seem like the ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic. But the answer, of course, in addition to their cognitive dexterity, is the unparalleled knack for ethnic networking and nepotism among Jews, which has allowed them to climb to the summit of our society in spite of their numerical inferiority. Few people understand that a Jew being the head of a large corporation, for instance, is enough to make said corporation and its activities de facto Jewish, no matter how many gentiles may toil on the factory floor and in office cubicles.

    Jews in positions of power and influence work tirelessly and ingeniously to advance Jewish interests and peddle their victimology, which is always given centre stage, while their history of subversion and parasitism is never acknowledged. This is the martyrdom aspect, arguably the most quintessential component of the Jewish character, at least according to one uncharacteristically honest Jewish scholar. Meanwhile, the sixty million victims of Judeo-bolshevism are never identified as such. Since 1945, the objective knowledge about Jews, their behaviour, and the intense hatred they harbour for their gentile hosts has been all but expunged from Western discourse. The Jewish Question has long been supplanted by the Anti-Semitic Question, as the world’s most cunning and tenacious race shifted the focus away from their own provocative behaviour and redirected the suspicion onto the hostile reactions of their hosts. Jewish scholars and activists maintain a strict monopoly on Jewish historiography, guarding the discipline fiercely against any intrusion from outsiders. It should come as no surprise, then, that the prevailing narrative is a philo-Semitic one. The fact that the same complaints have been made about Jews in many different cultures over great expanses of historical time, and that they have been banished from more than a hundred different nations, is deemed to be the result of an ancient and irrational prejudice which inexplicably follows God’s chosen people around like a black cloud wherever they go. Jews attribute these accusations to various neuroses within the host population, which the Jews, in typical mercenary fashion, have become adept at “diagnosing” and “curing.” The behaviour patterns and subversive activities which gentiles have consistently noticed among Jews “are not real, but hallucinatory.” Talk about chutzpah.

    Jewish historiography is replete with stories of persecution, which are habitually invoked in nauseating and self-indulgent displays of moral exhibitionism. These stories are frequently severed from any historical context, with the incriminating activities of the Jews prior to their “mistreatment” being omitted entirely. Joyce has described this as the “cropped timeline” phenomenon within Jewish historiography. While some of the more blatantly preposterous Holocaust atrocity claims have dissipated from the collective consciousness thanks to the passage of time, many of them endure in spite of their self-evident absurdity and refutation. This is achieved by artful diversion and confusion tactics that have been perfected over many decades. Following the fall of the Iron Curtain, the four million death toll at Auschwitz was reduced to one-and-a-half million, but this significant revision garnered no attention from the media. This is a modus operandi which we have seen demonstrated repeatedly, most notably during the ongoing coronavirus scamdemic. Whenever the lügenpresse are forced to come clean about something, they give the matter only minimal coverage and hastily move on to something else, giving no time for sustained contemplation. This is a very calculated sleight of hand, one that ensures their admission goes largely unnoticed, and those who do notice are quickly distracted from what has just been disclosed, disrupting the brain’s ability to fully process and retain the information. This cunning misdirection ensures that the lies remain in circulation despite having been formally (albeit briefly) exposed. It will be put down in the official record that a correction was issued, and they are then free to use what I call “the smallprint defence” if they are ever interrogated in the future. “Well technically we *did* admit that we lied, but it isn’t our fault if nobody was paying attention at the time.” As a naturally occurring defect of human cognition, the memory hole makes for an incredibly effective tool, one which the powers that be never miss an opportunity to exploit. When they are obliged to make a concession, they will always do so in a covert manner, with as much subtlety and discretion as the circumstances will allow.

    The Germans had an intimate understanding of the Jewish character, forged over many centuries of bitter experience, which was completely unfamiliar to Americans. In letters to his wife, General Patton states how it had gradually become apparent to him that many of the Jewish prisoners in the camps had been locked up for good reason, particularly the communists. Patton commented, not long before his suspicious death, that many of the former inmates now under his jurisdiction were very unpleasant individuals. The more time he spent in their company, the more he loathed them. Many of them began telling clearly fabricated atrocity stories almost immediately, with farcical claims about shrunken heads, lampshades made from human skin, and flaming pits where hundreds of babies were burned alive. It has since been established that such claims were fraudulent, but the most fantastical of these stories have been memory-holed as far as the general public is concerned. Still, the remarkable alacrity with which they concocted these morbid fantasies can leave one in no doubt that the Jew is an instinctive opportunist and a born manipulator. One of the most ludicrous assertions was that ten thousand prisoners were being electrocuted simultaneously every day. Such lurid tales of torture and sadism were met with scepticism by Patton, who came to regard many of the DPs (displaced persons) as habitual liars. Shortly before his death, Patton expressed deep regret for having fought on the side that killed millions of German men, women and children in exchange for “the liberation of vermin.”

    When we examine the history and underlying psychology of the Jewish victimhood complex, a shameless tradition of exaggeration and even outright fabrication of persecution begins to emerge, which in turn paints an unmistakably devious picture of the Jewish mind. Considering this, the question “why would anyone be an anti-Semite?” soon becomes “why would anyone be a pro-Semite?” Given their remarkably consistent history of nepotism, political subversion, financial exploitation, white-collar crime, war mongering, compulsive lying, incorrigible arrogance and vicious contempt for gentiles, one would have to be mad to believe their tales of woe. In the Jewish people can be observed the purist distillation of psychopathy, narcissism, and the cult of martyrology. Why, then, are they believed so unquestioningly? Because they have used their unsurpassed wealth, their monopoly of mass media, their unrivalled political influence, and their absolute censorship of any and all dissent to make sure we got the message. The saturation of the gentile mind has been relentless, and Christianity has played a pivotal role in that brainwashing.

    We have failed to instigate a revolt against these criminals among our people because their minds have been stewing in a culture shaped by two thousand years of Christian delusion. To hope that a people imbued with the conviction that a Jew is God will revolt against Jewry is a fool’s errand. As more time passes, it will become clear that the evil in the West not only emanates from the Jewish mass media and our treacherous elites, but also our own people, whose operating systems contain malware implanted since the time of Constantine. The only salvation lies in a Nietzschean transvaluation of values, a complete and total elimination of malware from the psyche of our people until it is restored to that healthy and virile condition before the Christian infection. This is what the Nazis were attempting to do in Germany, a renaissance that was promptly nipped in the bud by those traitorous nations that should have been her allies. The German defeat at Stalingrad set off a cataclysm, and at this point our culture was well and truly finished. With the destruction of the Third Reich, the flame of white civilisation that had burned so brightly for millennia was finally extinguished. The combined effort of whites in America, Britain and France had destroyed tens of millions of their racial comrades in the heart of their ancestral homeland, and for what purpose? To free the dregs of humanity from imprisonment so they could exact their revenge upon those who had recognised them for what they were. 1945 was the year of the total inversion of “Aryan” values into Christian values.

    Thanks to that tremendous betrayal, we live today under the inescapable tyranny of usury, fiat currency, and the international system of interest-based debt slavery. Government abuse of taxpayer money has been an accepted part of life for so long that nobody alive today can remember a time when this was not the norm. Since the founding of the Federal Reserve in 1913, a staggering $48 trillion has been spent on actively undermining the political sovereignty, economic stability and demographic homogeneity of the United States. This is by no means restricted to America, of course. In every white country, the fruits of our own labour are used to finance our destruction. This constitutes nothing less than the most bare-faced betrayal in the history of human civilization, on a scale so unprecedented, utilising methods of subversion and deceit so vile and revolting, that it beggars comprehension. Few dare complain, and many are happy to turn a blind eye and make bank by exploiting the unparalleled opportunities that late-stage capitalism affords them. Technocracy, plutocracy, and the elevation of talentless “social media influencers” to celebrity status are symptoms of a terminally ill civilisation.

    Satoshi Kanazawa made an extremely prescient point in the wake of the 9/11 disaster. Whether one believes that Muslim terrorists, the United States government or the Israeli Mossad were responsible for what took place on that day, Kanazawa saw that Western man has been castrated. He said that we could have dropped multiple neutron bombs and annihilated the nexus of Islamic radicalism in the middle east in a matter of weeks, but we didn’t, because “Western man does not hate his true enemies enough. He can scarcely even recognise them.” How has this come to be?

    Returning again to the role of Christianity in our decline, while few of our people profess to be Christian in the traditional sense of the word, it still plays a major part in secular life. Even the most atheistic nations are fully committed to Christianity’s doctrine of unconditional love for “The Other”, as can be seen in the Nordic countries. It thus becomes apparent that a literal belief in the saviour-on-a-stick is irrelevant, as the value system no longer requires that belief in order to proliferate. Its influence can be seen within a number of franchises that have become pillars of popular culture, which have in turn contributed to the woke agenda. In the Harry Potter series, the villain Lord Voldemort is a shameless caricature of Hitler, obsessed with blood purity (eugenics) and fanatically opposed to the mixing of muggle (untermensch) and magical (white) bloodlines. He refers to the results of this mixing as mudbloods and half-breeds (mischling), terms which are extremely offensive to those who oppose him. In a scene from the seventh film, Voldemort murders a pureblood Hogwarts teacher for her ideological impurity. “She believes that muggles are not so different from us. In her view, the mixing of purebloods with muggles is not an abomination. She would, given her way, have us mate with them.” He expresses incredulity that anyone could permit such an act of defilement, and his followers are visibly disgusted by her mere presence. In contrast, the boy hero is analogous to the Christ child. He never uses the killing curse, for he harbours no hatred in his heart, instead using The Power of Love™ to defeat Voldemort. Most blatantly of all, in the last book, he sacrifices himself and is resurrected, whereupon he deflects Voldemort’s killing curse and forces it back onto him, effectively vanquishing him with his own hatred. Considering that J.K. Rowling is a self-professed Christian and a woke grifter, this is hardly surprising.

    Neo, the protagonist in The Matrix, is an even more obvious example of the “saviour” trope, in a series which is littered with biblical references. His coming is prophesied by mystics, his body is laid out in a cruciform pose during his selfless act of sacrifice, hovercrafts are christened with ancient Levantine names, and perhaps most explicitly of all, the last human city is a Babylonian mix of all races and cultures named Zion. The primary antagonist, Agent Smith, makes evolutionary analogies and thinks of himself as an instrument of sanitation, using terminology that evokes the Nazis. In a monologue dripping with hatred, he refers to the protagonists as a plague, a disease, one that he intends to wipe out. The license plate seen on his black sedan is a reference to a Bible passage (Isaiah 54:16), which reads “behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and bringeth forth an instrument for his work; and I have the waster to destroy.”

    In Star Wars, the forces of the Dark Side are blatantly fascistic. The Emperor’s infantry units are called stormtroopers (a term Hitler bestowed on his Sturmabteilung), who are clad in white suits of armour and helmets not dissimilar to a gas mask, eerily reminiscent of a biohazard team, one that has been tasked with exterminating the “pathogen of rebellion” that is spreading against the “order and purity” of the empire. The Emperor’s elite commanding officers are all smug aristocrats, dressed in black and wearing jackboots, much like the SS. Finally, the emblem of the Galactic Empire is faintly reminiscent of the swastika in its design. In contrast to the homogeny of the Dark Side, the protagonists are diverse, being from multiple races and cultures, a veritable tapestry of intergalactic harmony. The Jedi undergo intensive training to eradicate hatred from their hearts and renounce all worldly attachments. They are expected to lead an ascetic life as an apprentice of the Force, an ambassador for peace, and a defender of freedom (liberal democracy).

    Considering the ubiquity of this sermonizing on the evil of hate, is it any wonder that the white man has, in Kanazawa’s words, forgotten how to hate? Not completely forgotten, however, since he does hate his own kind with a passion. For common humanity, the Nazis are the barometer of evil. Many people have referred to our disproportionately Jewish elites as Nazis, especially amid the insane coronavirus hysteria, despite the fact that the Nazis were opposed to international finance, usury, fiat currency, egalitarianism, multiculturalism, multiracialism, miscegenation, immigration, sexual deviancy, Marxism, consumerism, technocracy, plutocracy, and cultural degeneration. The powers that be are in favour of all these things, yet still the proles continue to make the asinine accusation that our overlords are fascists.

Comments are closed.