Trashing Traumatized Trannies: How Biology-Besting Bullshit Predicts the Resurrection of Racial Realism

Transgenderism is both trivial and tremendous, both empty and epochal. It’s trivial in that it’s an empty and inane ideology powered by sexual perversion and mental illness. And it’s tremendous for the same reason. What do I mean by that? I mean that trivial transgenderism exposes and explodes the hugely powerful system of leftism, which has seized, corrupted and begun to strangle Western civilization. It’s hugely significant that an obviously empty and inane ideology like transgenderism has been able to capture and co-opt so many leftists and leftist institutions.

By biology, not by bullshit

But it wasn’t a hostile takeover, of course. Transgenderism was pushing at an open door. The ideology both embodies and exaggerates all the vices and idiocies of leftism. But now trannies are traumatized, because transgenderism has been trashed in the highest court in the land. The land of Britain, that is, where the leftist Supreme Court has ruled that, for the purposes of law, women are defined by biology, not by bullshit.

Trannies have reacted just as you’d expect, deploying the tactic that has served them so well in the past. That is, they’re wailing once again that they’re the cowering victims of cruel bigots. One veteran tranny told the Guardian that “The fear is back. The fear I had when I first started my transition in 1979, that people will hurt me.” A tranny “spokesperson” told the same paper that “this ruling has brought another wave of fear to the trans community.” An American trans-ally has attacked the prominent trans-skeptic J.K. Rowling and said: “I can’t think of anything more vile and small and pathetic than terrorising the smallest, most vulnerable community of people who want nothing from you, except the right to exist.”

Transwomen are violent male narcissists #1: some signs at the London protest against the Supreme Court ruling

This wailing isn’t going to wash. As Edward Dutton has explained in an interesting but incomplete analysis, trannies are not cowering victims, but narcissistic bullies who are far “more prone to commit violent and sexual crimes than normal men.” But the ruling by the Supreme Court has much deeper significance than either traumatized trannies or triumphant trans-skeptics have yet recognized. Indeed, the ruling has much deeper significance than the leftist judges themselves recognized when they made it. The judges have ruled that woman are defined by biology, not by bullshit. This is an unacknowledged step towards an even more important truth: that Westerners are defined by biology, not by bullshit. In other words, Westerners have to be White or the West has no meaning, just as women have to be female or womanhood has no meaning.

Transwomen are violent male narcissists #2: more signs at the London protest against the Supreme Court ruling

In its essentials — and its evils — transgenderism isn’t new. It’s a reiteration of an older and even more pernicious ideology, that of trans-Westernism. Where transgenderism claims that men can be women, trans-Westernism claims that non-Whites can be Western. In both cases, the claim is empty in its ideology and evil in its consequences. But the harm done by transgenderism is dwarfed by the harm done by trans-Westernism. The consequences of forcing real women to share private spaces with perverted men have been far less serious than the consequences of forcing White women to share public spaces with non-White men.

Tapeworm vs typhoid

On the one hand, you have a handful of rapes committed by translunatics against real women. On the other hand, you have a hurricane of rapes committed by non-White men against White women. That rape-hurricane has been blowing for decades in every Western country invaded by non-Whites, from Austria to Australia. And leftists have done nothing to stop it. On the contrary, they’ve done all they can to assist it, to help it blow harder by opening the borders to more non-White men who will inflict more harm on more White women. If transgenderism is a tapeworm, then trans-Westernism is typhoid. But what works against the tapeworm also works against the typhoid. When transgenderism was trashed at the Supreme Court, it was a sign that the tide is turning against trans-Westernism too.

Rachel Crandall-Crocker, a “Jewish transgender lesbian with Tourette’s syndrome” (left); Rachel with his bestie Vanessa Emma Goldman, pregnancy-fetishist and probable pedophile

And that’s just what you’d expect, because the two empty and evil ideologies run in parallel. Indeed, they have been run in parallel, because they both owe their existence to the energy and activism of Jews, who have been central to these ideologies and see them as two fronts in the same war on Whites and the West. As Kenneth Vinther said in his review of Scott Howard’s The Transgender-Industrial Complex (2020), “the key figures of the transexual agenda — from its pseudoscientific pioneers to the private sponsors and philanthropic benefactors funding its implementation, from the activist organizations and NGOs to the judges and legal activists drafting landmark legal opinions — are Jewish.” The inane and oxymoronic slogan “America is a nation of immigrants,” coined and endlessly repeated by Jewish activists, goes perfectly with the inane and oxymoronic slogan “Transwomen are women.”

Ashkenazi Jews are highly inbred, which accounts both for their intelligence and their insanity

In the light of that, are you even remotely surprised to learn that “International Transgender Day of Visibility” was established in 2009 by one Rachel Crandall-Crocker, a self-described “Jewish transgender lesbian with Tourette’s syndrome”? Then you shouldn’t be. Edward Dutton hasn’t applied his biology-based analysis of transgenderism to the central role played there by Ashkenazi Jews, who are highly inbred and suffer from some fascinating neurological diseases. The inbreeding and the neuro-diseases are related both to the higher average intelligence of Ashkenazism and to their stronger tendencies toward mental illness and sexual perversion.

Color-blatant casting

At present, the parallels between transgenderism and trans-Westernism are much more likely to be denied than acknowledged, but denial doesn’t delete them. Quite beside the central Jewish role in both, transgenderism and trans-Westernism both exemplify that central principle of leftism: “Preach Equality, Practise Hierarchy.” Although leftists claim to believe in equality, they in fact maintain a hierarchy of privilege and punishment. Those higher in the leftist hierarchy, like Blacks and “transwomen,” get the privilege; those lower in the hierarchy, like Whites and real women, get the punishment. Part of the privilege for the higher groups is the right to maintain their borders against the lower; part of the punishment for the lower groups is the inability to maintain their borders against the higher.

The symbolic celebration of superior Blacks invading the territory of inferior Whites

For example, inferior Whites can’t claim to be Black and invade the territory of superior Blacks. But superior translunatics can claim to be women and invade the territory of inferior women. This also explains why the left regard it as an abomination for White actors to play any non-White role, but an affirmation of equality for non-White actors to play any White role. When non-Whites play Isaac Newton or Anne Boleyn, leftists call this “color-blind casting.” In fact, it’s the complete opposite of color-blind casting — it’s color-blatant casting, because the non-White actors are chosen precisely for their color. It’s a blatant signal that non-Whites are invading and occupying White territory. In a similar way, while leftists insist that women’s roles can be played by translunatic actors, they equally insist that translunatic roles must be played only by translunatic actors.

That’s “gender-blind casting” in action. Again, it’s the opposite of what it claims to be. Leftists follow the rule laid down by Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll’s immortal Alice Through the Looking-Glass (1871): “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.” But what Lewis meant as solipsistic absurdity, leftists maintain as settled axiom. For them, it’s an axiom of politics that they can invent and invert meanings as they please. And what most pleases leftists is power. Another of their central principles is this: “Heads We Win, Tails You Lose.” Nothing is fixed in leftism except the pursuit of power and privilege. For example, take the leftist concept of “kink shaming,” which is the wicked attempt to criticize the sexual practices of the “kink community.” It’s not perversion, it’s preference! Fetishes are fantastic! That’s what leftists loudly maintain. Except when they don’t. Yes, meet “genital fetishism,” which is the derogatory label used by translunatics and their allies against lesbians who prefer pussies to penises. Now, if kink-shaming is wrong and fetishes are fantastic, you would assume that lesbians are fully entitled to valorize vadges and be turned off by todgers.

Biology is back

But you’d be wrong. That’s logic and leftists loathe logic. What matters is always and only advancing leftism, never adhering to logic. Transgenderism is replete with examples of leftist loathing of logic and repudiating of reality. But so is trans-Westernism. It was always and obviously idiotic and evil to claim that a bearded and be-penised bloke can be a woman. But it’s equally idiotic and evil to claim that an Afghan can be American or a Bengali be British. Womanhood is defined by biology, not by bullshit. And so is the West.

That’s why the ruling by the Supreme Court is bigger than it appears. Yes, it’s obviously a sign that the tide has turned against the biology-denying bullshit of transgenderism. Lots of people have recognized that. Far fewer have recognized something else. The ruling is also a sign that the tide is turning against the biology-denying bullshit of trans-Westernism, which rose earlier and will fall later. Realism about sex will be followed by realism about race. As a great White poet once said: Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret — “You can drive Nature out with a pitchfork, but she’ll burst back.” What’s truth for Horace is horror for trannies. And will soon be horror for trans-Westerners too.