Trump Trying to Appease All GOP factions; Bannon: “We’ve got to put our country first'”

NYTimes:

Some MAGA supporters argued that Israel’s targeted strikes of both nuclear sites and top military commanders were part of an effort to ignite a bigger conflict and draw the United States into it. U.S. officials said on Friday that the Pentagon was positioning warships and other military assets in the Middle East to help protect Israel and U.S. troops in the region from any further Iranian retaliation.

“The bottom line is we cannot be dragged into, inexorably dragged into, a war on the Eurasian land mass in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe,” Stephen K. Bannon, a former top adviser to Mr. Trump who remains close to the president, said on Friday on his “War Room” podcast.

On Israel, he said: “Hey, you guys did it. You’re putting your country first. Your country’s defense first. That’s fine, but we’ve got to put our defense first.”

As Israel pummels Iran with waves of airstrikes, President Trump is navigating the divides within the Republican Party over whether the United States should get involved in another foreign conflict.

On one side are the isolationists who fear that Israel could pull the United States into another Middle East war. And on the other are the Iran hawks and Israel supporters who have been calling for just this sort of military action for years.

Mr. Trump appears caught between the two sides, veering back and forth as he tries to distance the United States from Israel’s assault while celebrating the success of the attacks and warning Iran that more is coming.

“This, right now, is going to cause, I think, a major schism in the MAGA online community,” Charlie Kirk, the right-wing activist and podcaster, said Thursday on his podcast.

Mr. Trump had several times this year dissuaded Israel from launching an attack, saying he wanted to pursue a negotiated settlement with Iran. Shortly after the assault began, the White House sent out a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, emphasizing that the United States was not involved in the initial military operation.

“Israel took unilateral action against Iran,” Mr. Rubio said. “We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.”

But in subsequent interviews, the president said he spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel on Thursday, knew the attacks were planned and called the strikes “excellent.” In a post on Truth Social, he wrote Israel has “already planned attacks” that would be “even more brutal.” And the U.S. military helped Israel intercept some of the ballistic missiles Iran fired in retaliation, an American official said.

While running for president, Mr. Trump promised to end wars around the world, and in his inaugural address, he said he wanted to be remembered as a peacemaking president. So far, Mr. Trump’s diplomatic efforts have failed to end the war between Russia and Ukraine, which he had promised to do within 24 hours, or the war between Israel and Hamas.

Over the past several months, the Trump administration had been trying to strike a new nuclear deal with Iran, and the president had urged Mr. Netanyahu to hold off any military actions as the talks continued.

“I don’t want them going in because that would blow it,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House just hours before the attacks.

After Israel launched the missiles, Mr. Trump put the blame on Iran, faulting its leaders for refusing to accept a proposal that would have stopped it from enriching uranium.

“I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,” he wrote on Truth Social on Friday morning. “I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it,’ but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done.”

Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that Mr. Trump had flipped his position on whether Israel should strike Iran. But he said Israel made a calculated gamble that Mr. Trump would go along with the idea.

“They made a bet on President Trump,” he said, adding: “Trump, for a long time — most of the time he’s been in office — has been saying ‘no, we’re negotiating, no, don’t do it.’ The Israelis strike, and today Trump called it excellent.”

For many Republicans, Israel’s military strikes were long overdue amid growing fears that Iran was moving closer to full nuclear capabilities.

“The number of Republicans who do not see a nuclear-armed Iran as a threat to Israel and the world is exceedingly small,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina and a close ally of the president. “The overwhelming majority of Republicans back Israel’s use of military force to neuter the Iranian nuclear threat.”

Another faction of Mr. Trump’s most ardent supporters see it differently. Israel’s strikes and the prospect of U.S. involvement in the conflict, they argue, run counter to Mr. Trump’s “America First” foreign policy agenda.

“The emails are so largely overwhelmingly against Israel doing this, I’d say it’s probably a 99 to one,” Mr. Kirk said on Thursday night of feedback he was receiving from his listeners.

Some MAGA supporters argued that Israel’s targeted strikes of both nuclear sites and top military commanders were part of an effort to ignite a bigger conflict and draw the United States into it. U.S. officials said on Friday that the Pentagon was positioning warships and other military assets in the Middle East to help protect Israel and U.S. troops in the region from any further Iranian retaliation.

“The bottom line is we cannot be dragged into, inexorably dragged into, a war on the Eurasian land mass in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe,” Stephen K. Bannon, a former top adviser to Mr. Trump who remains close to the president, said on Friday on his “War Room” podcast.

On Israel, he said: “Hey, you guys did it. You’re putting your country first. Your country’s defense first. That’s fine, but we’ve got to put our defense first.”

But Michael Rubin, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said the Trump administration was just “shouting from the sidelines.”

“Trump will likely keep the U.S. out of conflict and offer mediation, but at this point, he’s just basically treading water,” he wrote in an email. “The big issue will play out in Congress during debates about Israel aid and replenishing Israeli stockpiles.”

NYTimes: The U.S, is defending Israel; explosions in Tel Aviv

An American official, who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing operation, said that the U.S. military was helping Israel intercept some of the ballistic missiles. The official said that American military assets, already in the eastern Mediterranean to help defend American troops in the region, were used to intercept the missiles.

Iranian ballistic missiles struck at least seven sites around Tel Aviv on Friday night, hours after waves of Israeli strikes devastated Tehran’s military chain of command and hit critical nuclear facilities.

Explosions were heard over Jerusalem as missiles streaked overhead, while in Tel Aviv, Israeli television showed images of a damaged building and many mangled and burned cars from one of the impact sites in the area. Three hospitals in the area said they had received about 20 wounded people among them, describing their injuries as light and moderate. Fire officials said several people had been rescued from inside buildings struck by Iranian missiles.

In one area near Tel Aviv, officials said a 70-year-old woman was in critical condition after being pulled from the rubble of a building. A man was seriously injured with shrapnel wounds to the face, officials said. Officials said another man was treated with head injuries, burns and smoke inhalation from a fire. Thirty-four people were taken to hospitals in the area, officials said.

Israel’s strikes in Iran have killed 78 people, including senior military officials, and injured 329 others, Iran’s U.N. ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, told the U.N. Security Council.

Rafael Grossi, the head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog, told the Council that Israel’s strike Friday on Iran’s nuclear site near Natanz had destroyed its aboveground enrichment plant, causing chemical and radiological contamination.

Israel Katz, Israel’s defense minister, said in a statement that Iran “crossed a red line” by firing missiles at populated areas in Israel, warning that “the Ayatollah regime would pay a very heavy price” for its actions.

Some of the explosions above Israel appeared to be from interceptions of Iran’s missiles by Israel’s Iron Dome defensive system. Tracer fire from the ground could be seen streaking above the cities and sirens.

An American official, who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing operation, said that the U.S. military was helping Israel intercept some of the ballistic missiles. The official said that American military assets, already in the eastern Mediterranean to help defend American troops in the region, were used to intercept the missiles.

Early reports from both Iran and Israel were difficult to immediately verify, as both countries claimed that their militaries had inflicted significant damage in the escalating conflict.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps said in a statement that it had struck dozens of targets in Israel “forcefully and with precision,” including military and defense sites, in response to Israel’s attacks on Iran that killed senior commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. The New York Times could not independently verify that claim.Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said earlier that Israel “should anticipate a harsh punishment” for its daylong assault, as some of Israel’s European allies expressed worry that Israel was ratcheting up its military conflict with Iran.

Continues…

If You Thought Service at Home Depot Was Bad Before…

AP Photo/Eric Thayer
Great news! We finally know how to get liberals to oppose riots. Just say, This is helping Trump!

Almost immediately after the mostly peaceful protesters (who are mostly Mexican illegal aliens) took to the streets of Los Angeles to engage in Latin American-style protests — throwing rocks, burning cars, waving Mexican flags, etc. — the media begged the rioters to stop. (Who knew there was something left to burn in LA?)

But since Donald Trump won the 2024 presidential election (mostly on the issue of immigration), Democrats have been trying to turn over a new leaf by pretending to be normal. With the illegal alien riots driving public support for mass deportations from 60% to about 90%, the media are in major damage control mode.

The New York Times editorialized, “protesters will do nothing to further their cause if they resort to violence.” (During Gay Pride Month, no less!) This is a new position for the Times. Throughout the BLM terror, the paper never quibbled with the smashing, the looting, the burning, the maiming, the killing.

Similarly, a much-praised (by MSNBC) article in The Atlantic hectored the once-beloved rioters: “Don’t give [Trump] the pretext he wants.” The advice continued: “As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear, the last thing anyone should do is take to the streets of Los Angeles and try to confront the military or any of California’s law-enforcement authorities.” (“Citizens” is a nice touch.)

After a gratuitous insult — Trump “is resolutely ignorant” — The Atlantic credits him with “picking the right fights.” Sure, Trump could have sent ICE agents to Fargo, North Dakota, but instead, he’s “zeroing in on California,” the wily scamp.

Why would ICE agents go to California to arrest illegals? I think it might be because that’s where the illegals are.

Forty percent of all illegals in the entire country live in California. Back in 2006, illegals staged a “Day Without Immigrants” protest in LA — and 1 million to 2 million illegals turned out. It was the largest public demonstration in California history. (Nothing says “well-functioning country” like a million illegals living in a single U.S. city.)

In the Times, Tyler Pager’s “News Analysis” is headlined: “Trump Jumps at the Chance for a Confrontation in California Over Immigration.” Using his special mind-reading skills, Pager announces this “is the fight President Trump had been waiting for.”

In retrospect, it would have been so easy for illegal aliens to checkmate Trump by simply not throwing rocks and bricks at ICE agents, setting cars on fire or trying to seize ICE facilities. Oh well, live and learn.

FDR focused particularly on Pearl Harbor, even as many harbors remained peaceful.

The media are accusing White House adviser Stephen Miller of starting the whole thing by telling ICE to increase deportations from 600 to 3,000 a day. (Forbes: “Stephen Miller’s Order Likely Sparked Immigration Arrests and Protests.”)

Enforcing the law: This is what autocracy looks like.

In fact, 3,000 deportations a day is pathetic. Trump is going to have to average 8,000 removals a day simply to rid us of the 10 million illegal aliens Joe Biden let in — forget the 40 million to 50 million illegals who were already here.

Returning to The Atlantic‘s advice, note the predicate: “As unsatisfying as it may be for some citizens to hear …” Evidently, Democrats find it “unsatisfying” to be told “Don’t riot.”

But do liberals seriously believe citizens are doing the rioting? (Undoubtedly, antifa is there, but those future-suicide cases would show up at a forest fire to throw gasoline on the flames.)

Violence is not only “the language of the unheard,” it’s the language of Latin America. During the Rodney King riots in 1992 — the most destructive riots in U.S. history until the BLM riots in the Year of Our Floyd — one-third of those arrested were illegal aliens. More than half of the arrested were Hispanic.

Welcome to your new country — unless Trump starts deporting 10,000 illegals a day.

First Thoughts on the Israeli Strikes

Yesterday I posted an article saying Trump told Netanyahu to hold off attacking Iran. Israel did it anyway. This says a lot. Israel has never been subservient to the U.S. Indeed it’s the other way around, with the powerful Israel Lobby dominating Congress and often the president, with the result of thousands of American lives and many billions of dollars spent in the region. I should have known that.

Predictably there is the usual chorus of pro-Israel voices in Congress and the media praising the attacks. And as always, the U.S. is in fact deeply involved whether Trump wants it or not. From Tucker Carlson’s daily email:

While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night’s events. Washington knew these attacks would happen. They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can’t now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep.

Carlson, as a leading member of the mainstream anti-war right, also notes the obvious: there is no way this is in America’s interests.

Donald Trump admitted he had prior knowledge about Israel’s attack on Iran on Thursday, telling Bret Baier he knew of the Netanyahu government’s plan to conduct the preemptive strikes and that the assault came as no surprise.

Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night’s events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran. Steve Witkoff was scheduled to participate in the next round of talks on Sunday, but whether that will still happen is up in the air.

“Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, and we are hoping to get back to the negotiating table. We will see. There are several people in leadership in Iran that will not be coming back,” Trump said following the strikes.

It’s worth taking a step back and wondering how any of this helps the United States. We can’t think of a single way.

And, more pointedly:

“From this day forward, it’s going to be only America first. America first.”

That’s a direct quote from Donald Trump’s first inaugural address, and it’s the same sentiment that thrust him back into the White House in January. Now, the world will find out if he really meant it.

Now that Benjamin Netanyahu and his war-hungry government have executed their long-awaited assault, the president faces a legacy-altering decision: to support, or not to support?

We’d like to take this opportunity to state our position as clearly as possible. The United States should not at any level participate in a war with Iran. No funding, no American weapons, no troops on the ground. Regardless of what our “special ally” says, a fight with the Iranians has nothing to offer the United States. It is not in our national interest.

If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America’s backing. At an absolute minimum, the United States continuing to insert itself in this conflict will further whip up the radical Islamic world’s hatred for the West and fuel the next generation of terrorism. The worst case? Thousands of immediate American deaths, all in the name of a foreign agenda that has nothing to do with our country.

It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States. But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars. 

No matter how many bogus antisemitism allegations neocon ghouls like Mark Levin hurl at Americans who advocate for that path, opposing destroying the United States in the name of the Netanyahu government has nothing to do with Israel. It’s about America. We reject the idea of involving the U.S. in an Israeli war for the same reason we would stand against doing the same thing on behalf of Eritrea, Suriname, Cambodia, or any other random country you could close your eyes and point at on a map. It is not America’s fight. Engaging in it would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first. What happens next will define Donald Trump’s presidency.

Fox News adds that Trump “noted that the U.S. is ready to defend itself and Israel if Iran retaliates. In recent weeks, the U.S. has replenished Iron Dome missiles.”

Trump is likely unhappy with what Israel did but will make the best of it and will defend Israel if it comes to that. As the supreme leader of the most powerful country in the world, he likely thinks everyone else has to listen to him. How’s that working out with the trade deals? China with its stranglehold on rare earth supplies clearly holds the upper hand, so Trump will have no choice but to once again try to save face.

He is encouraging Iran to stand down “before there is nothing left.”

Mr. Trump’s social media post attempted to put pressure on Iran to continue negotiating. “The next already planned attacks,” he wrote, would be “even more brutal.”

He added: “Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.” In his often-used capital letters, he concluded, “JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.”

Israel has already killed top military leaders and nuclear scientists.

So far Iran has done nothing in retaliation and I doubt they have the ability to do meaningful damage to Israel. If so, Israel will be the unchallenged dominant power in the Middle East and will further degrade the Palestinians.

 

Do the New LA Riots Signal the Ethnic Breakup of the United States?

Serious riots broke out in Los Angeles in the second week of June 2025. Supposedly triggered by ICE agents apprehending illegal immigrants, they were, in reality, set off by their arresting extremely dangerous Hispanic criminals, quite independent of their immigration status.

Protests, effectively encouraged by Hispanic Democrat local councillors and other ethnic activists, promptly broke out; police cars were set on fire, rocks were thrown at them from bridges, and public buildings were torched. The left claimed that Trump, who sent in the National Guard to quell the disorder because the state’s Democrat governor had abjectly failed to, incited these riots by enforcing the law and, of course, made them worse by trying to quell them.

I am afraid, in a sense, the leftist media are correct, though, naturally, they don’t want to admit why they are correct. Conservative media outlets have ridiculed the way in which rioters strongly object to being returned to Mexico yet wave Mexican flags and burn the Stars and Stripes. If they think this is a contradiction, then they are misguided. They are not looking at what is happening through the correct lens: the lens of evolutionary psychology; the idea that humans are, in essence, an advanced form of ape.

With this in mind, what is happening is Los Angeles starts to make sense fairly quickly. At the most basic level, chimpanzees operate in troupes — in essence, small tribes — who are held together by relatively recent common ancestry. Numerous experiments have shown that humans and animals can discern genetic similarity and are more likely to cooperate with the genetically similar because doing so raises their “inclusive fitness;” it permits them to indirectly pass on more of their genes if their kin flourish. An ethnic group is a highly extended tribe and a race is a number of related ethnic groups; a highly extended ethnic group. Although the word “Hispanic” is confusing — it sometimes refers to people whose native language is Spanish even if they are completely White — in general it refers to people from Central and South America. They range from totally European to totally Native American. On average, however, they are a “cline” — a mixture of two races; groups genetically separated for many thousands of years — between European and Native American. As Genetic Similarity Theory predicts, they are generally sexually attracted to each other, so we have the Hispanic Cline and they are, on average, half-European and half-Native American.

Due to a combination of factors — proximity to Mexico, the fact that California was briefly part of Mexico, Woke California’s status as a “Sanctuary State” and LA’s as a “Sanctuary City” which is prepared to welcome illegal immigrants — Mexicans have, in effect, established enclaves of the Mexican Nation within Los Angeles. Returning to our discussion of chimpanzees, it is basic, in terms of evolutionary psychology, that you establish territory. The more territory you control then the more access to resources — to food of various kinds — you have and, so, the more likely are to out-compete other troupes, leading to the triumph of your genes. Also (all else being equal), the larger your group is then the more likely you are to out-compete your rivals in wars over territory.

If you are, as an individual, not at the top of your pack hierarchy in the territory that you hold, then you often gang together with other middle-ranking males and you strive outwards to take the territory, and the females, of another group; to expand your group’s territory. Naturally, if the other group returns you to your territory then you are a failure and you will fear having few resources, which, in our prehistoric polygamous mating systems in which females sexually select for status, means that you don’t pass on your genes. So, you must fight to maintain the territory you have eked out and you must fight to maintain your numbers. Trump symbolises the most warlike Europeans — the ethnic enemy of all the different ethnic groups that have come to occupy the  U.S.  So, of course, his going into “Mexican” territory is going to provoke a violent reaction.

That these rioters are patriotically Mexican but hate America and don’t want to return to Mexico is no more a contradiction than settler Americans disliking Native American tribes, not wanting to return to England, and yet seeing themselves as truest form of Anglo-Saxon. You can come up, to solve your cognitive dissonance, with reasons why your country is poor and you are relatively poor and have had to leave: God is punishing our country for its decadence, God has called me to expand his holy nation or even “We Native Americans must take the land back from the Europeans and especially California as it was once part of Mexico.” Their low average IQ will not be part of their explanation for why their country is poor.

From an evolutionary perspective, it is groups who are high in positive and negative ethnocentrism who tend to triumph. Los Angeles has been invaded, in part, because the Europeans were low in negative ethnocentrism. They were individualists who covertly played for status by signalling their concern with the marginalised and runaway virtue-signalling led to their favouring foreigners over their own. They identify with the genetically dissimilar as this allows them to collaborate better with foreigners and treasonously gain power over their own people, as the California governor has. Typically leftist, they are high in Neuroticism and so, bubbling with resentment, they want to see everything which symbolises power — for which they are so ravenous — torn down.

So, Los Angeles becomes a sanctuary city and Mexicans are more likely to take it over if they feel love for their own people and despise the Europeans: hence, they wave Mexican flags and burn American ones, despite not wanting to return to Mexico. Those who see this as a contradiction are missing the point. They must examine the situation via evolutionary psychology.

I suspect that what is happening in Los Angeles is a harbinger of the future: the South Africanization of the United States; its violent break up along ethnic lines as non-Europeans carve out more and more territory.

 

Racial Bias in Juries

Trump said to have told Netanyahu to end Gaza war, attacking Iran off limits for now

With all the talk of war and Israel being ready to attack and pressuring Trump, it’s gratifying to see that so far Trump is standing by his often-enunciated distaste for war.

Trump said to have told Netanyahu to end Gaza war, attacking Iran off limits for now

In call on Monday, US president also reportedly told PM that threats to strike Iran ‘aren’t helping’ nuclear talks; CENTCOM chief says White House has ‘wide range of options’ if negotiations fail

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, speaks alongside US President Donald Trump during a meeting at the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on April 7, 2025. (Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images via AFP)

In a tense 40-minute phone call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, US President Donald Trump told the premier he must permanently end the war in the Gaza Strip, Israeli television reported Tuesday.

Trump reportedly told Netanyahu that the so-called “Witkoff framework,” which would pause the war for some 60 days in exchange for about half of the hostages held by Hamas, will not suffice.

Netanyahu has so far refused to negotiate a Gaza truce-hostage deal that would permanently end the fighting in the Strip — a red line for him and his far-right coalition partners.

Trump also ruled out an attack on Iran as the White House seeks to rein in Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, according to the reports.

Meanwhile, the top US military commander in the Middle East said he has provided Trump and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth with “a wide range of options” for preventing Iran from attaining nuclear arms should talks with Tehran fall through.

Channel 12 reported that there would be no discussions on a strike against Iran until Trump determines that the nuclear talks have failed. The network also cited two sources familiar with the phone call as saying Netanyahu did not receive a clear answer from Trump as to whether the US would give Israel a green light to act alone against Iran, or whether Washington would want to participate in or lead a strike.

According to the network, Trump said he has not completed his efforts in the US-Iran nuclear talks, adding that despite his disapproval of Iran’s latest offer, the door on negotiations has not closed.

Netanyahu replied that a “credible military threat” must be kept on Iran at all times, to which Trump responded that a strike must be “taken off the table for now,” the report added.

According to Kan, Netanyahu told Trump that “the negotiations with Iran are futile, Iran is playing you and all it’s trying to do is to gain time.”

“Your statements about an attack on Iran aren’t helping. We’re working on a deal,” Trump was said to have replied, though White House sources cited by Fox News on Tuesday appeared to agree with Netanyahu’s comment.

Both Kan and Channel 12 said Netanyahu’s office declined to comment on the conversation with Trump. On Monday, in a sparse readout of the conversation, Netanyahu’s office said Trump had told the premier that Washington has presented Tehran with a “reasonable proposal” and expects a response “in the coming days.”

On Tuesday, Fox News quoted Trump as saying Iran was “acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago.”

“It’s surprising to me. It’s disappointing, but we are set to meet again tomorrow — we’ll see,” he added, though Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson said the sixth round of talks was set for Sunday in Oman.

A handout picture released by Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization on November 4, 2019, shows the atomic enrichment facilities Natanz nuclear research center, some 300 kilometers south of capital Tehran. (HO / Atomic Energy Organization of Iran / AFP)

US attack plans drawn up in case talks fail

Iran’s leaders, who are sworn to destroy Israel, have publicly denied seeking nuclear weapons, but have stocked up on 60%-enriched uranium — far above what is necessary for civilian uses, and a short step away from weapons-grade. US officials are reportedly concerned that Israel could strike Iran’s nuclear sites with little warning.

Netanyahu has demanded that any nuclear deal with Iran fully dismantle the Islamic Republic’s nuclear facilities and uranium enrichment sites. Speaking to reporters after the phone call on Monday, Trump said Washington would not allow Tehran to enrich uranium on its soil.

The US proposal for a nuclear deal would reportedly allow just that, though, for a temporary period of time. Iran’s parliament speaker said Monday that the proposal did not mention sanctions relief, calling Trump “delusional” for thinking Tehran would accept the offer.

In a statement Tuesday, Iranian parliamentarians accused the US and Israel of laying a “strategic trap” for Iran in the nuclear talks.

Centrifuges line a hall at the Uranium Enrichment Facility in Natanz, Iran, in a still image from a video aired by the Islamic Republic Iran Broadcasting company on April 17, 2021, six days after the hall had been damaged in a mysterious attack. (IRIB via AP)

The White House “has set the goal of talks as imposing its demands and has adopted offensive positions that are diametrically opposed to Iranians’ inalienable rights,” said the statement. “The only acceptable deal is one that permanently lifts all sanctions with the aim of achieving economic benefits for Iran.”

CENTCOM attack plans

Gen. Michael Kurilla, the outgoing commander of the US Central Command, told American lawmakers that he presented the White House with plans for a strike on Iran in case the nuclear talks fail.

During a hearing of the US House Armed Services Committee, the committee’s Republican chair, Representative Mike D. Rogers of Alabama, asked Kurilla whether CENTCOM would be “prepared to respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran” if Trump orders such a strike.

“I have provided the secretary of defense and the president a wide range of options,” said Kurilla.

“I take that as a yes,” Rogers replied.

“Yes,” said the general.

During his testimony, Kurilla said Iran has reached a 40-year low point strategically amid the “tectonic shift” unleashed in the region by the Hamas onslaught of October 7, 2023, which sparked the war in Gaza.

During that time, Syrian rebels ousted their country’s Iran-backed President Bashar Al-Assad, and Lebanon’s Iranian proxy Hezbollah has emerged severely weakened from war with Israel.

“This dealt a massive blow to Iran’s terror network,” said Kurilla. “The Iranian proxies are at one of the weakest levels they’ve been.”

Kurilla noted that the regional conflict saw Israel and Iran come to direct blows for the first time, with Iran launching massive barrages of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel in April and October last year. Israel’s reprisals, which damaged Iran’s air defenses, have reportedly left the Islamic Republic bracing for a strike on its nuclear sites.

 On Thursday, Hamas said it remains open to the ceasefire deal proposed by US envoy Steve Witkoff, but said it requires stronger guarantees against Israeli attacks.

In a televised speech on Thursday, Khalil Al-Hayya, a high-ranking official in the militant group, said Hamas has not rejected Witkoff’s proposal but has submitted amendments with stronger security guarantees.

Hamas wants any deal to include a permanent end to the war in Gaza and a withdrawal of Israeli forces.