Baby-Killers for Open Borders: Why Leftists Love Lies and Hate Whites
Kathleen Stock usually writes badly but sometimes thinks well. She’s the British philosopher who was driven out of academia because she refused to accept leftist lies. What was her thought-crime? Inter alia, she denied that schlong-slung slime-bags should be part of sapphic traffic. In other words, Stock rejects transgenderism and doesn’t think that men can be lesbians. She’s right. She’s also right about a new freedom granted to women in Britain. It’s the freedom to murder their babies. Here’s what Stock said about the contradictory leftist arguments that have won women their right to infanticide:
The Victim Strategy and the Omniscient Gambit can’t both be true. Women seeking late-term abortions for healthy babies cannot be disempowered, traumatised wrecks, but also clear-sighted rational actors whose decisions society should respect. If the number of late-term abortions grows after the removal of the criminal deterrent, then presumably the defenders will stick to their respective sweeping stories even so. Women who induce late abortions are too emotionally delicate to withstand judicial scrutiny, but somehow also powerfully agentic. Either way, their personal involvement in the deaths of their babies is no matter for the law. […]
It seems we have here another example of the “Let’s Be Free” people and the “Let’s Be Kind” people teaming up to wreak havoc upon settled moral intuitions. I first noticed the dynamic during the gender wars, and wrote about it then: of gimlet-eyed sexual libertarians taking advantage of the cover provided by mumsy rainbow types with lanyards [the neck-worn name-tags often sported by leftists]. While the former pushed the boundaries, the latter preached compassion to unfortunate minorities and accused anyone who objected of cruelty. […]
And as for full-term abortion here, it seems likely that — having removed the women at the centre of the story from the possibility of prosecution — there will be later attempts to legalise the process fully, removing providers and partners from criminal sanctions too. Indeed, [Stella] Creasy has been trying to do this for some time.
Though decriminalisation is currently being presented by BPAS [British Pregnancy Advisory Service] as a kindness towards damaged and exploited women-children, I predict that institutional memories will be short. After some time has passed, the act at the heart of the debate will be framed once again as a vital freedom for all kickass girlbosses, at which point surrounding prohibitions can fall away. How can it be rational, it will be asked, to punish providers, doctors, or romantic partners for helping with a process that is not actually a crime for the main participant? Not wishing to go against women’s “reproductive freedoms” or indeed their “vital healthcare”, many politicians once again will not know what to say. (“The limits of bodily autonomy,” Unherd, 27th March 2026)
Stock is describing how leftists have no fixed principle except the pursuit of power: “Heads We Win, Tails You Lose.” And power, for leftists, means being able to privilege their pets and punish their enemies. Leftists like Stella Creasy (whose love of open borders I’ll discuss below) have now given women the privilege to murder babies. Murder is, after all, what “full-term abortion” entails even by feminist standards: a fully developed baby, easily capable of surviving outside the womb, is deliberately deprived of life. That’s murder. In effect, leftists want females, as pets of leftism, to be above the law.
Two privileged Blacks, six dead Whites: the triple-slayers Axel Rudakubana and Valdo Calocane
At the same time, leftists want males, as enemies of leftism, to be more and more firmly under the law. In 2026 leftists in Britain have simultaneously granted females the freedom to murder babies and celebrated a “landmark case” in which a man was jailed for eight years for allegedly driving his wife to suicide. Leftists want any bad outcome for women to be the fault of men. That’s why they believe in privilege for females and punishment for males. Or rather, it’s punishment for White males, whom leftists classify as enemies. But leftism gives privilege to non-White males, whom leftists classify as pets. And so leftists apply the law as harshly as possible against White males while granting maximum license to non-White males.
No details of gang-rapists
That’s why Muslim rape-gangs have flourished for so long in towns and cities all over Britain. And it’s why obviously dangerous Blacks like Axel Rudakubana and Valdo Calocane were left free to commit three murders apiece. In 2026 we’ve just seen another example of this leftist double-standard: law for White males, license for non-White males. At the end of March, there was widespread public disorder in the London district of Clapham as large groups of predominantly non-White youths mobbed shops, committed thefts and intimidated shoppers. How did the police respond? By allowing the yoots to express their vibrant culture without interference.
Riot-police for White male thought-criminals in Epsom (image from GBNews)
A short time later and short distance away, the police acted quite differently when White men protested about an alleged gang-rape in a town called Epsom. Yes, riot-police were out in Epsom to confront the protestors. The White men were protesting because the police have refused to reveal any details of the “several men” allegedly involved in the gang-rape. As the police explained, detectives “do not have full descriptions of any potential suspects.” You see, detectives don’t yet know the suspects’ shoe-sizes, finger-lengths, average heart-rates and dental histories, so they’re not releasing any details beyond that “several men” are being sought. That’s perfectly reasonable, don’t you think?
Blight, not blessing
Well, you’ll think it’s perfectly reasonable if you’re a leftist, because you’ll guess the very simple reason for the police silence. Namely, that the suspects are non-White and have foreign accents. The White men protesting in Epsom have made the same guess. But those men aren’t non-White, aren’t leftists and don’t think the police silence is reasonable. That’s why the riot-police turned out to confront them. But there were no riot-police for the non-White males in Clapham. Why the contrast? It’s simple. White males threaten leftism, because they have the potential intelligence, organization and fighting spirit to challenge and overthrow the leftist elite. But leftism isn’t threatened by non-White crime and chaos. On the contrary, leftism is enhanced by non-White pathologies, because they harm ordinary Whites and reduce our ability to resist and rebel.
Smarmy leftist Stella Creasy and her Jewish partner Dan Fox
Another bonus for leftists is that non-White pathologies reduce the ability of Whites to have children, because Whites lose money both directly and indirectly through them. But non-Whites don’t have to commit crime or create chaos to be a gross and ever-growing burden on Whites. As Arctotherium and Alden Whitfeld have pointed out in an excellent essay at Heretical Insights, leftist economists have been lying for decades about the benefits of Third-World immigration. In fact, it’s a blight, not a blessing:
[B]ecause immigrants cluster in high-productivity areas, and because their presence drives natives out, immigrant incomes are artificially inflated relative to natives. In Britain, ethnic minorities are overrepresented in London by roughly a factor of three. London’s productivity is about 50% higher than the rest of the country. Were it not for immigration-induced native displacement, white British incomes would be higher and minority incomes lower than observed. Fiscal and income comparisons therefore substantially understate the true cost of immigration relative to natives. (“Moving Targets: The ‘missing’ impact of immigration,” Heretical Insights, 28th March 2026)
This brings me back to the leftist Stella Creasy. It’s no coincidence that Creasy is a fan both of baby-murder and, as I described in “Doom of the Dumb,” of non-White migration. She’s a baby-killer for open borders. She knows that both these things are good for leftism, because baby-murder will harm Whites and open borders will help non-Whites. Like the new Green MP Hannah Spencer, Creasy is herself a White blonde, but their shared hair-color may help explain their hostility to their own race. The value of natural blonde hair goes up as the White share of the population goes down. So what’s not to like for egocentric narcissists like Creasy and Spencer? It’s also significant that Creasy’s “partner” is the publicity-shy Zionist Jew Dan Fox, a former director of Labour Friends of Israel.
Iryna Zarutska ignored a vital rule and was then ignored herself by leftists
And perhaps Creasy and Spencer themselves have Jewish ancestry. An anti-blonde American politician certainly does. He’s a Jew called Brett Smiley. As the mayor of Providence, Rhode Island, he’s overseen the removal of a mural of Iryna Zarutska, the blonde Ukrainian refugee who was horrifically murdered by a Black career-criminal called Decarlos Brown. Now, when a Black woman behaves stupidly and gets herself shot by the police, leftists demand that the world “Say Her Name.” But Smiley could not bring himself to “Say Her Name” when he explained why the mural of Iryna Zarutska just had to go: “The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the misguided, isolating intent of those funding murals like this across the country is divisive and does not represent Providence. I continue to encourage our community to support local artists whose work brings us closer together rather than further divides us.”
They belong behind bars
Like “democracy” and “rule of law,” “divisive” is a favorite term of leftists. But when they use words, they follow the lexical rule laid down by Humpty Dumpty in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass (1871): “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.” What did Brett Smiley mean by saying the mural of Iryna Zarutska was “divisive”? He meant that it revealed the truth about two things that contradict leftist lies and threaten leftist power. First, Black predation on Whites; second, leftist enabling of that Black predation.
Judeo-pol Brett Smiley, yet another elite leftist who belongs behind bars
But Smiley and countless other leftists have never objected to murals of the alleged Black martyr George Floyd. Why not? Because Floyd murals present Whites as vicious villains and Blacks as virtuous victims. In other words, when a mural tells the truth, leftists want it taken down. When a mural tells lies, leftists want it to stay up. Leftists love lies because lying is how they win and maintain their power to privilege their pets and punish their enemies. But sometimes privilege is punishment too. Leftists in Britain have given women the privilege to kill their babies because that’s another way to harm Whites. The agenda is always anti-White because Whites are the only group that can overthrow leftism and put elite leftists where they belong: behind bars.
The Bradford “Pakistani” community is made up overwhelmingly of the Mirpuri diaspora, which occupies self-sustaining ghettoes where they mostly form the majority. The denizens do not mix with outsiders at a social level; they have their own social structures (baradari) which serve to provide a framework for their own governance, independent of the host nation structures.
Many retain their home languages, which are often spoken in their homes – where many wives don’t speak English at all – and increasingly in the streets and public buildings, often demanding state-funded interpreters if English is required. They expect to be provided with translations of official forms and documents.
Almost all females wear the hijab (headscarf), many wear full-length robes (abaya) and an increasing number don religious dress, including the burka and nikab – which is not the traditional dress of their region. Most older males wear the traditional garb of their home country, the shalwar kameez and the takiyah skullcap and sport full-length, untrimmed beards. Increasingly, younger men and boys are adopting this traditional dress, even third generation immigrants.
The baradari members are all Muslims. They practice their religion in their own distinctive buildings (mosques), and ostentatiously celebrate their religious festivals, often with banners and street decorations supplied at public expense. They demand public facilities for prayer and have secured exemption from humane slaughter rules on religious grounds, to produce “Halal” meat.
The religion is intensely misogynistic, where women are treated as second class citizens, with offensive behaviour spilling over into the broader society, where males will ostentatiously refuse to shake hands with females, and demand adherence to their own dress code.
Religious rituals are associated with some questionable personal hygiene habits, particularly those associated with defecation, which have been directly responsible for at least one serious outbreak of communicable disease (dysentery).
And, although blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008, and in Scotland in 2021, there is an active Muslim lobby campaigning for an Islamophobia law which, if enacted, will effectively re-introduce a blasphemy law, applicable solely to Islam, giving the religion a unique, privileged position in the UK.
Notwithstanding the current absence of any specific blasphemy law, communities are known to react violently to perceived slights to their religion, as in the Salman Rushdie affair, the “Lady of Heaven” film protests and the Batley teacher incident, where the teacher in question was forced into hiding.
While demanding tolerance of their own religion, and multiple concessions to their religions sensibilities, they are intolerant of other religions and aggressively anti-Semitic.
Despite being treated as places of worship for tax purposes (to which effect they are exempted from Council Tax), their mosques also act as community hubs and, effectively, their “town halls”, as well as often housing their religious schools, or madrassas. The communities have their own religious courts, which they treat as superior to the host nation courts, especially in terms of divorce and domestic disputes.
The communities support their own micro-economies which operate on a trans-national basis. They have their own banks and financial institutions, and their own financial systems for loans and transferring money, none of which are compatible with Western systems.
Individuals and businesses transfer surplus funds to their home country as remittances, rather than retaining them in the host country, supporting family interests and investments overseas. A substantial number retain dual citizenship and finance elaborate villas in the Mirpur district, to which they retire, so much so that the city of Mirpur is known as “little England”.
Equivalent areas in the British ghettoes lack investment and often present a down-at-heel appearance. Properties are often poorly maintained and untidy, with highly visible litter and refuse accumulations. Gardens are rarely tended, and more often treated as junkyards. Noise is endemic. Shops are cheaply fitted and dirty, their paved areas unswept and weed infested. Council tax default is higher in Mirpuri areas than in stable, white residential areas.
Substantial numbers of Mirpuris moving into a white area can depress property prices by as much as 60 percent. Repairs and alterations to Mirpuri-owned properties are rarely carried out in accordance with building codes and regulations – which are poorly enforced by the local authority.
This does not hamper the sale of properties within the immigrant community but, unless subjected to expensive refurbishment, they are unsaleable on the open property market. This effect means that once properties are acquired by immigrants, that change tends to become irreversible and thus permanent.
Members of the baradari communities are disproportionately represented in certain types of crime, particularly group-based child sexual exploitation (grooming gangs), Class A drug dealing (specifically heroin) and money laundering. Individuals also make up a higher than average proportion of the prison system, and are disproportionately associated with terrorism.
Baradaris themselves, in some instances, are directly linked to organised crime, with involvement not only in child grooming, Class A drug dealing and money laundering, but also in prostitution, large-scale cigarette smuggling, counterfeit goods and immigration fraud. These have assumed the characteristics of crime syndicates not dissimilar to Mafia families.
The communities have their own ethnic shops, where goods are often labelled in their home (foreign) languages, in contravention of UK law. They frequently resort to unlicensed street markets, which also operate outside UK laws. They eat the foods of their home nation, do not drink alcohol, or eat many of the traditional foods of their host nation.
Increasingly, they have their own schools, where religious dress is enforced and religious teaching form a large part of the curriculum. They are taught their own customs and traditions, with scant regard for their host nation, the history and traditions of which they are largely unaware.
They do not patronise the host nation social and entertainment venues, and have little interest in local sporting events, with very few supporting the city’s football team, despite the stadium being located in a high-density Mirpuri-immigrant area.
They have their own cinemas with films shot in their home languages, their own books, newspapers and magazines, their own radio and TV stations, and their own music. They are more interested in their home nation politics than they are those of the host nation, except where sectarian interests are involved.
Within baradaris, intermarriage is forbidden (not uncommonly, on pain of death, as in honour-killing). Despite the known adverse medical effect, and the drain on NHS resources, consanguinity rates are the highest in the world, within the Mirpuri baradari. Furthermore, despite decades of adverse publicity, rates seem to be marginally increasing.
Many of the marriages are arranged, with brides selected from the home country, “mirror” family, with which the immigrant baradari have close ties, and to which they owe their ultimate loyalty. Despite its illegality in the UK, they commonly practice female genital mutilation.
There is considerable evidence that the inflexible nature of endogamy and consanguineous marriage have adverse economic effects on the communities that practice them, hampering institutional development, suppressing female education, discouraging innovative free enquiry, and entrenching economic deprivation.
The wards occupied by the Bradford Mirpuri diaspora are amongst the most economically deprived areas in Britain yet, rather than address one of the more obvious causes (another being the siphoning of potential investment funds into home country remittances), communities prefer to blame racism and other extraneous factors for their misfortune, exploiting a carefully nurtured victim status.
As groups, they form alliances with others of the same ilk, at clan level (quoms), to elect their own politicians (councillors and MPs) on a block vote principle, with the candidates being decided by the elders of the baradari – the selection often being brokered through their mosques.
Voting fraud is not uncommon and the postal ballot system is widely abused, with family heads casting the votes. Candidates are known to canvass and produce election materials in their home languages.
Communities expect successful candidates to act exclusively in their sectarian interests, disenfranchising the indigenous electorates. Local councillors tend to gravitate to licensing and planning committees, where they can control the issue (or refusal) of licences to pubs, night clubs and other places of entertainment, while influencing decisions on the grant of planning permission to commercial premises – and new mosques. Often, the development of a new mosque in an area is used as justifying the closure of pubs and other premises selling alcohol in the vicinity, paving the way for colonisation by the Mirpuris.
At the national level, MPs in the House of Commons tend to concern themselves disproportionately with issues of interest to their electorates, many focusing on Gaza to the exclusion of domestic concerns.
Not for nothing has Patrick Nash observed that Mirpuri baradari kinship groups, “represent one of the most underappreciated threats to democratic governments in the 21st century”. The Mirpuris have only a vague understanding of the notion of democracy and exploit its weaknesses for their own benefit.
Yet these people are in our midst. It would be hard to imagine a more disagreeable community, one which makes few if any concessions to the host nation. And yet, we are supposed to craft “a shared vision of how we want to live together” with these people.
But for those of us on the edge of these ghettoes, who watch with dismay their steady encroachment into the white enclaves, the differences are too great. The is no question of a shared vision – only rejection of these alien communities which have next to nothing in common with us.
And the worst of it is the gaslighting where we are told that “The UK is a thriving, multi-ethnic and multi-faith democracy where most people in towns, cities, and rural areas get on with each other”. When, through bitter experience, we disagree, we are branded “racist” and told to change our ways.
We’re not going to put up with this forever. It is abundantly obvious now that we either implement remigration policies or Britain descends into civil war, and we handle it the old fashioned way.
By Richard North (@ollieparrot)
Read it two days ago. You should expand your good and informative writing just a little and offer it as an article.
I see photographs of those places, don’t want to be anywhere near them. May as well visit Pakistan, and that also doesn’t sound like fun.
Talking of baby-killers, “A baby boy [aged 13 months] died after suffering serious assaults…by a teacher who was in the process of adopting him… [‘Gay’ Mr Varley] denies murder, sexual assault, assault by penetration, inflicting GBH for breaking Preston’s elbow…four counts of child cruelty, 14 counts of making indecent images of a child and a charge of distributing an indecent image of a child” – London, DAILY MAIL, April 21, 2026.
SICK BRITAIN – not ONLY Blacks & South Asians.
I don’t suppose that it is a good thing if the left abort and contracept themselves out of existence. The future belongs to those who show up and the future of Britain appears to be becoming an Islamic Republic; unless the Monarch converts to Islam and, then Parliament can kiss its precious British Constitution and its Sovereignty-in-Parliament bye-bye.
As poor old Charles was induced to become patron of the Zionist Community Security Trust and the Holocaust Day Memorial Trust, after taking the Coronation Oath and publicly criticising Muslim attacks on Christians, I don’t think he is likely to affirm the Shahadah just yet, if ever.
Slim hope: a Reform government will give him un-woke advice upon which to act, more in accord with his princely attachment to things English, and the sentiments of his father, grandmother, George V and Queen Victoria. More worried about Diana’s boys.
Mirpur in Pakistan. I must ask our local Pakis if they are from Mirpur too.
We are seeing the early stages of that here in Ireland. Hopefully we can turn things around before too long.
An interesting case here of a white Irish lady judge (Mary Dorgan) allowing a darkie muslim-named chap free on bail for a vicious elbow in the face to a woman in the street. A savage, unprovoked attack on a stranger to him, caught on camera. Why allow this guy out on bail??
There are plenty of Irishmen who get refused bail for the most trivial, non violent offence.
This leniency from feminist judge Dorgan sends a direct signal to darkie men: if you attack white women, we will treat you very gently. Is she mad or bad or both?
Women’s Aid are the feminist outfit (179 staff members!!!) who routinely hype up some case of a white man mistreating a woman. They are totally silent on darkie attacks in general, and this one in particular. The plan is for thousands of Our Gals to ring the Women’s Aid helpline and demand that they issue a statement about this. They squawk plenty about the Irish men misbehaving. Let them complain about darkie men misbehaving – if they are not too scared…
The West is NOT Judeo..Jews always hated the Greco/Roman World..and they continue hating Anglo Aryan West today. Their main religious concepts such as Chosen people, promised lands are antithesis of Western Democracy…Universal human dignity, equality under the law, private property and Civil Secular state without official religion. The Torah/Talmud/Kabbalah/Sohar are all Jewish sorcery esoteric tribal supersticions..the exactv opposite to God/divine nature and Western Values..Jews hate Chrsitianity therefore there is NO such thing as Judeo/Christian civilization..
I had always been opposed to abortion, the killing of babies. However, around 15 years ago, I read that approximately 65% of abortions performed annually in the United States were of babies in the wombs of negro and hispanic women. And of course a certain percentage of US abortions would be of mudsharks aborting their babies of nonwhite men. Consider me to be immoral or amoral, but upon reading those statistics my opposition to abortion melted away right then and there, like a snowball in an operating furnace. Now I consider all these conservative religious white American adamant opponents of abortion to be either out of their minds, or ignorant of the racial statistics regarding abortion. So, does abortion really hurt the white race? I object to abortion of viable undiluted white babies. But those are a decided minority of abortions in the USA. All the rest? Have at it!
Top flight article Tobias! Our ancillary view is the i overarching Jewish depopulation angle by any..all means nesecery* Really..Talmudic and Torah based in a multitude of so called*jewish scriptures- jewish scribery inserted later..we think..—runs rampant in the millenias old hatred of whites,Christians..pagans.. derision of all non Jews that the horrid jewdevils also brainwash the putrid leftwingnuts to..by subterfuge to do. their jewish dirty works for them..Jewish bioethics! Jewish herd controls of Goyim! Preplanned mass starvation by JEWS of Non jews..sadly..old but true news–Retribute Them** Rearm Now**
Of course we firmly agree with Alan..how could we not?- Vis a Vis MARK COLLETTS excellent podcast on the horrific child murder rape by 2 faggots of a little precious white boy….,we sligjtly disagree.Shoot The satanic Malefactor homosexual pair who* legally”..adopted a precious little white boy they summarily man raped to death.Before Christ and the best of Mankind on the late great planet Earth..there you have it. Rearm Now**
Death penalty for calculated crimes like this. I suggest: anaesthetic on brain and decapitation by laser.
Additional concern is that this helpless child was in a process of adoption. I don’t think male homosexuals be allowed to adopt babies or minors at all.
The whole gay “life”-style is s medical, social and moral menace. It is no longer s matter of letting a couple of old queers live together unmolested to run an antiques business or a history magazine.