Featured Articles

Poor Little Oppressed White People

Jamie Kelso is an unlikely manipulator of the masses, but the activist and web-radio host scored a definite coup when he was filmed engaging a group of young people at this February’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). Thus far, the clip has been viewed some 30,000 times on YouTube and has even inspired a convoluted essay by a neoconservative academic.

Kelso’s arguments were sound, based in reason, history, evolutionary theory, and the natural desire to treasure one’s own. He presented a moderate, reasonable case for racialism, one noticeably lacking in the Sieg Heils, Swastika tattoos, howls of “White Power!” and other accoutrements of the far Right one sees on TV.

Not surprisingly, Kelso was denounced as a hater by a moustachioed hipster from Campaign for Liberty. He also elicited some non-sequitur responses about how it was only Democrats who supported lynching and the Ku Klux Klan, as well as bewildered stares from the smartly dressed young women hovering around him. (Even if Kelso was eventually asked to leave, one shouldn’t forget that the crowd was clearly fascinated by what they heard…. Just imagine if they had encountered Jonathan Bowden in full force, and not the unassuming Mr. Kelso.) Read more

The House I Live In

Anyone who wants to know how we got to the point of all this Diversity nonsense and multicultural madness, and where it came from, should watch this short film called The House I Live In. Starring Frank Sinatra, it came out in 1945, and was created “to oppose anti-Semitism and racial prejudice.” It was awarded both a Golden Globe and an Academy Award in 1946.

The plot’s pretty simple. Sinatra, playing himself, heads outside for a cigarette break in the middle of a recording session, where he happens upon a gang of about a dozen young boys chasing and cornering another kid, getting ready to pummel him. Sinatra intervenes, asking what the trouble is. The ruffians explain that they want to beat the kid up because they don’t like his religion. One tells Sinatra “he’s a dirty -” but Frank cuts him off before he can finish the sentence. Read more

Our Rachel

For Patrick Willis, a true lover of Palestine, who decided to take a Rachel poem of mine and turn it into a moving new video: In Memory of Rachel Corrie.

It is hoped that the essay presented below will serve as an introduction to this widely acclaimed video as well as a tribute to Rachel on the 8th anniversary of her death on March 16.

She was called “St. Pancake” by her killers soon after her death. It was a term of derision for a young woman determined to make a martyr of herself. She had gotten herself pancaked. Flattened. Crushed beneath the blades of a bulldozer while giving succor to terrorists.

In the words of Zionist professor Steven Plaut, Rachel is “a sort of Mother Teresa for the radical left and apologists of Islamofascism. She is a martyr-saint for the pro-terror lobby.”

16 March will mark the 8th anniversary of Rachel’s death. It’s a good time to remember her and ask ourselves what she died for. Are the Palestinians any nearer to achieving their dreams of an independent state? Are those who killed Rachel in a stronger or weaker position than they were eight years ago? Read more

The Failures of Enoch Powell

The BBC documentary on Enoch Powell’s 1968 “rivers of blood” speech in Birmingham, currently featured on The Occidental Observer, reminds us of how White loyalism has been systematically defeated since the Second World War throughout the West (though with some recent exceptions in Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, and even Britain). It also reminds us of the tragic failure of our elites to respond to prophetic, principled voices such as Powell’s.

Nevertheless I think Enoch Powell is an inappropriate role model for White activists. Read more

Yegor Gaidar: An Alternative Obituary

When Yegor Gaidar, who with Chubais administered the economic “shock treatment” to the Russian people, died a few months ago, American, Russian, and Jewish financial leaders all expressed their sincere regrets. The official obituaries were all laudatory of the man and his accomplishments, abiding by the traditional sentiment de mortuis nil nisi bonum. The following does not. The distain of the Russian people for Gaidar’s economic and financial policies in the 1990s and a preference for the sentiment veritas omnia vincit compelled alternate obituaries as, for example, the following:

Officially, Yegor Gaidar died unexpectedly on 16 December 2009 of pulmonary edema, provoked by myocardial isochemia, while writing a children’s book in his Moscow home. In November 2006 Gaidar had been found unconscious of an undetermined ailment in County Kildare, Ireland, where he was promoting his new book on economics. He claimed that opponents of the Russian government had poisoned him. Both President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin honored the man and his works.

Unofficially, an alternate obituary, representing large segments of the opposition, states that Yegor Timurovich Gaidar died of acute alcoholism. The Russian people did not honor him; they loathed him. Under the tutelage of a team of bright young men from Harvard University, Gaidar in partnership with Anatoly Chubais (Director General of the Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies – Rosnano) administered Jeffrey Sachs’ economic “shock therapy” to the people of the erstwhile Soviet Union. Government officials and bankers (almost all of whom were Jewish) became oligarchs overnight. Ordinary Russians lost whatever meager savings they had managed to accumulate under the Communist regime.

Yegor Gaidar’s acute alcoholism was not a secret to his colleagues, the alternate obituary reports. Boris Nemtsov, for example, once said that Gaidar downed a bottle of whiskey a day. He was drunk most of the time, alienated from his wife and his work. His uncontrolled drinking probably caused his collapse in Ireland. His colleagues in Russia and the West dutifully covered for him, hinting at a sinister poisoning. Another business associate, Petr Aven, President of the Alfa Bank, said that Gaidar began to show symptoms of decline long before his first visit to Ireland.

Nemtsov, this source reveals, half jokingly and half cynically suggested another approach to improve Yegor’s image among the people. He proposed that Yegor appear on Russian TV drinking heavily and munching on a hunk of dark bread so that the people could identify with him and perhaps grow to like him. After all, the Russian people are heavy drinkers and heavy drinking never discredited Boris Yeltsin and Winston Churchill. During the British intervention in 1918 Churchill preferred Armenian cognac. Both remain heroes to the Western democracies.

Chubais, Gaidar’s closest friend, hoped to divert attention from his friend’s alleged poisoning by proposing him for a Nobel Prize for having been a “savior of the motherland.” The idea was not entirely inappropriate, the alternate obit jokes, in that Gaidar’s policies probably did not result in as many deaths as did Nobel’s dynamite. Also, Chubais was concerned that Gaidar’s death might be linked to the injuries and deaths of Aleksandr Litvinenko, Viktor Yushchenko, and Anna Politkovskaya.

Historian Sergei V. Naumov (who is associated with the Don Cassocks All-Russian Orthodox Patriotic Organization “Black Hundred” whose program aims to revitalize Orthodoxy in Russia) suggests that Gaidar’s alcoholism was most probably hereditary by briefly tracing Yegor’s family history:

Yegor Gaidar’s grandmother, Rachel Lazarevna Solomyanskaya, who was married to Arkady Golikov (who wrote under the nom de plume Gaidar) already had a son Timur by an unknown father. Arkady Golikov adopted Timur, but he and Rachel did not live together for long because Golikov, who was mentally unstable and an alcoholic, used to chase Rachel around the apartment with his sabre in a kind of family pogrom. Rachel quickly dropped her famous writer husband and pogromist Arkady (Gaidar) Golikov and left Moscow with her son for far-off Archangel. They never saw each other again, but when Solomyanskaya was arrested in 1938, Arkady, being by then a famous author of children’s books arranged to free her.

Years later Arkady died in the war under unknown circumstances and son Timur eventually graduated from the Nakhimov School. The intelligent Jewish boy knew that with the obscure family name of Solomyansky it would be difficult to make a career. He chose not to take his mother’s name with which he had lived so long, or the family name of his natural father, or the name of his stepfather, but rather in a bold case of chutzpa took his stepfather’s nom de plume — Gaidar.

This bit of cleverness paid off. The son of Rachel Lazarevna was eventually made a rear admiral in the Soviet Navy without ever having commanded a ship. His naval service was spent as an editor on the Red Star newspaper. In the same way he became a member of the Union of Soviet Writers without ever having written a single artistic work. His son Yegor, the recently deceased Gaidar, therefore was born into the highest ranks of the Communist Party nomenclature. He dutifully worked in the offices of Pravda and the magazine Kommunist, on the pages of which he angrily exposed the evils of capitalist market economies. He was not then considered an economist.

When the Communist Party of the Soviet Union began to disintegrate, Yegor Timurovich Solomyansky-Golikov-Gaidar quickly reversed course and became an ardent apologist for all the evils of capitalism that he himself had earlier publicized. In his private life he remained a patriot of his people, marrying Maria, the daughter of the renowned Jewish writer Arkady Strugatsky. The offspring of this felicitous marriage, the liberal Masha, is the founder of the My (We), an anti-Putin “orange” movement.”

Thus, to clarify the genealogy: the beloved author of children’s stories was actually Arkady Golikov, a Russian, who assumed the nom de plume Arkady Gaidar. He married Rachel Solomyanskaya, a Jewish lady, and adopted her son Timur from a previous relationship. His real name should have been Timur Solomyanski, but he took the pen name Gaidar from his stepfather to enhance his career. It worked and Timur Gaidar eventually rose from being a Communist propagandist to become a rear admiral in the Soviet Navy. Consequently, Timur’s son Yegor Gaidar is not a blood relative of Arkady the famed author of children’s books. Yegor’s story shows in microcosm how so many non-Russians, through identity theft and name changing, have been passed off as Russian.

The life story of Yegor Gaidar may be seen as that of a typical present-day dissident Russian Jew. He was born into the comfortable higher ranks of the Communist Nomenklatura by virtue of his father having taken the famous name of Gaidar and parlaying it into the rank of admiral in the Soviet Navy. Both Yegor and his father routinely wrote for Communist newspapers and periodicals during the Soviet era, criticizing the capitalist world and glorifying the communists. Today his co-ethnics refer to him as the “savior of the motherland.” Oy vey!

Caveat: Dissidents must always be listened to, but care must be taken to ascertain whether dissidence is truly justified or simply a euphemism for political or personal gain.

Jewish Dissidents Target Putin

Yegor Gaidar

A recent article, A Hidden History of Evil, by Neocon writer Claire Berlinski in the reputable City Journal asserts that — for reasons unknown — the West has deliberately ignored revelations of crimes committed in the Russian Federation since Putin assumed power. Berlinski mentions especially two dissidents currently exiled in England, Pavel Stroilov and Vladimir Bukovsky. Bukovsky is well known for his exposé of the Soviet use of psychiatric hospitals to silence critics of the Communist regime, he himself having been so victimized for years before being exiled to England. Stroilov, on the other hand, belongs to the post-Soviet era and claims to be in possession of documents that put Putin and Gorbachev in a very unflattering, even despicable, light, but cannot elicit any interest in them on the part of Anglo-American government agencies. Both gentlemen are part of a far larger “Putin Must Go” movement with vocal supporters in Russia itself as well as in England and the United States. Read more

Pondering a Pundit: Minette Marrin in the British Establishment

Minette Marrin

The forces promoting the Third World invasion of the West can appear overwhelming. It can seem that White nations have no allies in the mainstream media, the universities, or big business. In fact there are a great many level-headed intellectuals and journalists and, I’m sure, businessmen, who sense that something is wrong. Some of them propose remedies that make sense as far as they go. The fact that they do not go far enough should not blind us to the half full glass.

Here I shall explore possible reasons for this limited vision in the case of one such British commentator, Minette Marrin, who writes for the Sunday Times as well as being a broadcaster and fiction writer. Marrin belongs to the right wing of Britain’s establishment. She sits on the board of the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), a free market conservative think tank that seeks to defend British values of democracy and individual liberty. True, there’s nothing about defending the interests of indigenous Britons. Nothing that deals with the existential crisis facing Britain and the West.  Nevertheless it is better than the effluent that gushes from our universities.

Marrin’s comment displays an openness to concerns about immigration. She is also undecided and somewhat confused on critical issues. Why the confusion? Let’s begin with the positive. Read more