Featured Articles

Statement on the SPLC indictment

/15 Comments/in , /by

My personal opinion is that the indictment is greatly overestimated in the minds of our adherents.

The indictment is thin soup.  It charges the SPLC with technical (and shaky, weak) violations of bank regulations.  The “crimes” seem highly improbable.  Since when have donors been entitled to a line-by-line breakdown of the activities of the group getting the donation?

Hasn’t it been pretty much common knowledge that the SPLC plants agents in organizations it targets and bribes officers and members of such organizations to steal information so the SPLC can use it to damage the professional careers of members of such organizations?

The SPLC will probably raise several hundred million dollars to defend itself against flimsy charges that will likely be dismissed by the judge.

The indictment will be a financial bonanza for the SPLC.

The indictment conceals the identity of the sleaze-balls who took the bribes which indicates IMO the desire of the government to pull its punches.

It is highly unlikely that we will ever learn the identities of the plants and the bribed informants.

The indictment also fuels cuckservatives’ misleading narrative by claiming that by bribing members of these organizations to provide the SPLC with information with which to harm the careers of adherents, the SPLC was “financing hate.”

In a sane society (not one like ours) the SPLC would be a laughing stock.  The SPLC is a parody of the liberals’ parody of Senator Joseph McCarthy.  For 3 generations liberals have ridiculed McCarthy for “guilt by association.”

The SPLC practices guilt by association on meth (it calls it “links” so as to avoid triggering memories in the atrophied brains of liberals).

The “links” used by the SPLC to smear its targets include geographic guilt by association (“Eric Rudolph comes from an area of North Carolina once known for “racism”), audience guilt by association (“Mr. Smith spoke at Berkeley University and a known neo-Nazi sat in the audience”) and even quotation guilt by association (“Jones denies that he is a Nazi but SPLC research proves that something he wrote was quoted in a Nazi publication”).

The SPLC’s mode of thinking mirrors that of schizophrenics.  Normal people’s brains do not hatch screwball ideas that a shared geographic location, the presence of someone in an audience listening to a speaker or something someone wrote being quoted by someone else as establishing any rational connection.

Schizophrenics think and talk that way.  So does the SPLC.

We should focus on exposing the intrinsic silliness of the SPLC and take a more sober view of this indictment.

Slavery and Colonialism. Are Whites Responsible for the Stagnation of Africa and Blacks in general?

/8 Comments/in /by

One lie makes more noise than a hundred truths.
Georges Bernanos

Let’s be clear from the start: no White person should feel guilty about colonialism and the horrors of slavery. The “decolonials,” the Islamo-leftists, and the Repentance terrorists have lied about the history of these events in order to neutralize with guilt the racial consciousness and survival instinct of the White race, which they are determined to eradicate from the surface of the earth.

Unfortunately, this dirty work of guilt-tripping is often carried out by self-hating Whites, at first sight sincere and well-intentioned, but ill-informed and sometimes motivated by a powerful need to Whitewash a bad reputation or make social and/or financial gains by signaling their virtue to the “progressive” crowd that values emotion instead of reason.[1] As says eminent virologist and Nobel laureate Frank Macfarlane Burnet:

These hypocritical displays of love always accompany “a race for power.” To “save” someone, to whine about their fate, to be moved by the misfortunes of others, is to increase one’s own social value, and thus, to acquire respectability, notoriety, and power.[2]

Racial minorities in general also have a vested interest in blaming Whites for all their ills. As the American evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald has shown, from a strictly evolutionary point of view, the all-out denigration of the White majority gives minorities a definite competitive advantage.[3] Since, in the present circumstances, individualism, pathological compassion, suicidal and punitive altruism are among the greatest handicaps of Whites, the pack of racial predators most adept at smelling the prey mortally wounded by guilt and noble sentiments has no difficulty in imposing itself:

White people are high trust, high empathy and have guilt cultures rather than shame cultures (as do the vast majority of the world), which means they feel moral guilt which is susceptible to being defined in terms of principles (“races are social constructs” and egalitarianism) that can be captured and used against them.[4]

The picture would not be complete without naming the shadowy network of international financiers and Big Business who finance and promote the useful idiots of this war on Whites.[5] Jewish currency speculator George Soros comes to mind but, as shown by the Epstein files, there are other shadowy Jewish billionaires, that are never mentioned anywhere.[6] The ultimate goal of this subset of organized Jewry is to create a worldwide collectivist society of consumers easy to manipulate and control; a society where the notion of belonging to a country or a race will be obsolete; a society where no one will have any identity, other than that of consumer. This future is described as a “global utopia” for the ruling Jewish elite and its non-Jewish vassals, a nightmare for the millions of rootless, acculturated post-national nomads.[7]

In this light, here are the main arguments that Africans and Blacks in general use to gain social benefits or to justify their social marginalization and economic stagnation, both in their adopted country and in their country of origin:

Africa considers that it has been marginalized by historical evolution, says the vice president of Senegal. Its impoverishment is the cumulative result of 300 years of slavery, 100 years of colonization, and, since independence, economic domination, which translates into the exploitation of its resources and the labour of its people at prices that are in a perpetual historical downward trend.[8]

In short, if today’s Africa is going nowhere, it’s mainly because the White slave nations emptied it of its lifeblood before building their industrial revolutions on the profits of slavery and then plundering the continent through colonial exploitation.[9] This is, of course, a fantasy. We will see why, by analyzing the painful questions of slavery and colonialism, highly passionate and explosive subjects that stir up not only Black hatred of Whites, but also, and more important, White hatred of Whites.

Truth About Slavery

The long-standing “ebony trade” was not a diabolical invention of Europe and Whites. When the European slave trade began in the 16th century, it was in fact the Blacks themselves who captured other Blacks to sell them to White slave traders. The latter, with some exceptions, never went inland. They came to the West Coast of Africa (Niger Delta) to buy their slaves from African professionals specialized in this brokerage traffic. “The European slave trade, according to African history specialist, Bernard Lugan, was not an innovation brought in from outside, but the evolution of a trade that had always existed.”[10]

Furthermore, the European slave trade had no negative effect on the demographic development of the African continent. The regions where this trade was most flourishing, Ghana, Dahomey, Togo, and Cameroon, are currently the most densely populated countries in Africa.[11] The current emigration to Western countries of Africans who are relatively well-off compared to their compatriots is far more economically and socially damaging to African countries than slavery ever was.

Moreover, the industrial revolutions of White slave countries were not helped by the profits made by this trade. “Common sense and elementary historical culture allow us to affirm that the Industrial Revolution of developed countries was made possible by their human knowhow, their iron and their coal,” asserts Bernard Lugan in his book, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit (Africa, History Upright).[12]

As corroborated by researcher Pétré-Grenouilleau, the contribution of slave capital to the formation of British national income, for example, rarely exceeded 1%, averaging around 0.11%.[13] Furthermore, in the slave states of the southern United States, there was not even an Industrial Revolution, unlike in the northern states, which had few Black slaves.[14]

Before demanding reparations, Blacks should know that in the United States, a large number of Blacks were themselves Black slave owners. A free Black man named Antony Johnson owned the first legally recognized slave, John Casor, owned by a Black. By 1860, the number of Black slaves owned by free Blacks was nearly 20,000. Thousands of free Blacks that owned Black slaves even joined the Southern Army in the Civil War to preserve the practice of slavery, which they refused to abandon, like their African brethren.[15]

Blacks should also know that many of the slaves in the South were White slaves who were kidnapped out of their homes in Wales, Scotland, and Ireland. Entire White families were also ensnared for generations into debt slavery. The wealth used to finance the construction of American infrastructure was not extracted from Black slaves but from White yeomen and White slaves through taxation, usury, debt slavery, and classic slavery. In fact, those same oppressed, dispossessed White classes are the ones who built the majority of American infrastructure. Black slaves were treated significantly better than White slaves. They picked cotton for their masters in the first century or two of America, then were weaponized as violent golems against White yeomen right up to the present.[16]

The “progressives” are good at burying the Arab-Muslim slave trade, which was far more important and deadly than the European slave trade, because it is vital for the needs of the cause that Whites alone be responsible for this trade. This trade, which began in the 8th century and ended more than 75 years after the abolition of the European slave trade in 1848, caused much more demographic and economic damage to certain African countries than the European trade, because the Arabs literally “emptied” the regions that served as their reservoir of slaves.[17]

White haters also ignore the Arab-Muslim slave trade of White Christians that took place throughout much of European history. Between the 16thtand 18th centuries, for example, Ohio University history professor Robert Davis estimates that more than a million White slaves were captured on the coasts of Europe and on ships pirated by the North African countries (Maghreb).[18] The mainstream media also obscure the fact that the Arab-Muslim slave trade was a major source of wealth for many of these countries.

The media legacy also ignores the inter-European trade in White Christians. It already existed in the time of the Greeks and Romans, and continued throughout Europe until at least the French Revolution. According to historian B. S. Bachrach, in the ninth century, slave traders in the city of Lyon, France, for example, kidnapped and castrated Christian youths for the Muslim market in Spain, with the blessing of the elites and King Louis the Pious, who profited from this illegal trade not only in Frankish territory, but throughout Christendom.[19]

Jewish Role in Slavery

Finally, the forgers of history forget to mention that, like the inter-European trade of White Christians, the European slave trade was a Jewish specialty. The vast majority of slave traders who were not Arabs or Blacks were in fact Jews. They owned the slave ships; the crews and auction brokers were predominantly Jewish, as were a disproportionate number of slave owners, especially in the West Indies, Brazil, and South America. The headquarters of this very lucrative trade were in New Port Rhode Island, which is also the site of the first synagogue in the Western hemisphere. Trading in this human misery was halted on Saturdays to observe the sabbath.[20], [21]

Yet, in the anti-White propaganda film Amistad, director Steven Spielberg, had the typically Jewish nerve (chutzpah) to blame White Christians alone for the European slave trade. As French author Renaud Camus says, what better way, in a doublethink matter, to provide oneself, on the back of Whites, “with a good name and with absolute protection against all criticism: how could anyone criticize virtue, goodness, generosity, equality, fraternity between people from all walks of life?”[22]

This is also a good way for liberals to inflame Blacks by portraying them as being abused and persecuted by White bigots. Such propaganda in the end is obviously designed to arouse racial hatred against Whites not only among Black Americans, but more importantly, among Whites.[23]

To recapitulate, there have been several types of slave trade, in order of antiquity:

  • – inter-African Black slave trade by Blacks (the oldest) ;
  • – inter-European slave trade of Whites by Jews and Arabs;
  • – Arab-Muslim slave trade of Whites by Arabs;
  • – Arab-Muslim slave trade of Blacks by Arabs and Blacks;
  • – European slave trade of Blacks by Jews and Blacks;
  • – Jewish slave trade of Chinese.

And this is without mentioning that indigenous tribes from all continents, Maoris, Amerindians, Africans, and Aborigines also practiced slavery.[24] The only excuse present-day academics have for perpetuating the myth of the noble savage is a willfully blind Europhobia.[25]

Seen from today’s perspective, the universal phenomenon of slavery was an abomination, and the buyers were as responsible as the sellers. But just as it is absurd to judge the past with the values and knowledge of the present, it is also absurd to hold people of today responsible for the acts their ancestors committed when they were not even born. Guilt is not genetically transmitted; a son is not responsible for his father’s crimes; asking for reparations two hundred years after the fact, and only from Whites, makes no sense. The law is not retroactive. Let us not forget either that this trade was abolished for moral reasons by the Whites themselves, to the great displeasure of their African partners who did not at all understand the meaning of this decision.[26]

Many have not yet understood because slavery is still commonplace in Africa and in Israel. Since its destruction by NATO for so-called humanitarian reasons, Libya, for example, has become a hub for this highly lucrative trade. Future slaves are captured by Arab and African merchants as they cross the Sahara on their way to Europe. Chained and put up for sale, or worked to death, their attempt to reach Europe ends badly, to the total indifference of the media. [27] In Israel, where slavery is a God-given right inscribed in the Torah, thousands of women from Ukraine and other Eastern European countries are victims of the sex trade. Migrant workers are forced to sleep in the fields they tend while their bosses hold their passports hostage. Ethiopian women escaping the war-stricken Tigray region are shipped off to Jordan and forced into full-time servitude.[28]

Truth About Colonialism

It is also false to claim, as the Senegalese-born Boucar Diouf does, that the industrialized nations got rich by “pumping” the very substance of the colonies.[29] This preposterous idea, which is widely promoted by the school, media, and Hollywood propaganda that is currently rampant in all Western countries, has crystallized around a book by the West Indian Marxist Frantz Fanon, which the globalists have summarized in a phrase designed to capture the imagination: “The rich man’s cow eats the poor man’s grain.” According to Bernard Lugan, this indictment of the West constitutes the essence of the globalists’ anti-colonialist doctrine.[30]

If the colonialists imported raw materials from their colonies, they did not steal them. In exchange, they built ports, cities, hospitals and roads; they brought new tools and new agricultural plants; they opened up new spaces for cultivation, and all this at a loss because, in the words of Lugan, “the colonial market was useless and cumbersome.”[31]

All the humanist enterprises of the socialist left — the one that today has the nerve to accuse the right of the misdeeds of colonization when it was opposed to it — were, from the European point of view, a monumental failure. In fact, colonial production was excessively expensive for the colonizers, not only because it was bought at a non-competitive price, but also because, by entering into direct competition with metropolitan production, it contributed to the ruin of entire sectors of the economy of the colonizing countries.[32]

In truth, colonization was rather a blessing for the colonized. None of them had invented the sail, the pulley, the wheel, and anything other but a rudimentary form of agriculture. Engineers, agronomists, and doctors greatly improved the social and health conditions of the local populations, so that Africa today is the fastest growing continent in terms of population; soldiers brought peace, missionaries and administrators put an end to famines, constant fighting for territory, mass killings, cannibalism, sacrificial murders, and slavery.[33] In fact, as in the case of the Maori, for example, it was often the colonized who asked the colonizers to assume jurisdiction of the land to save them from constant warfare.[34] To give you an idea of what the English found when they arrived in Africa, here is a partial account addressed to Mr. Walter S. Rogers of the Institute of Current World Affairs:

Dear Mr. Rogers

[…] All of southern Nigeria was a land of oppression, terror and fiendish cruelty, of slave raids, slavery juju, human sacrifice and cannibalism. […] Hundreds of people were tortured to death regularly in Benin’s juju rituals. These blood-stained rituals. These blood-stained orgies went on for centuries, and were only halted in 1897 when the British captured the city. One man who entered the city in the British expedition gave this description:

“Altars covered with streams of dried human blood, the stench of which was awful… huge pits, forty to fifty feet deep, were found filled with human bodies, dead and dying, and a few wretched victims were rescued alive; … everywhere sacrificial trees on which there were the corpses of the latest victims; … everywhere, on each path, were newly sacrificed corpses . On the principal sacrificial tree, facing the main gate of the King’s compound, there were two crucified bodies…”

It is said that the crucifixion idea was all that remained of a Portuguese attempt early in the sixteenth century to convert Benin from juju to Christianity. A Portuguese seafarer had visited Benin in 1485, the first White man known to have done so. Missionaries were sent out later, but the mission eventually had to be recalled because so many missionaries died. Fetish worship and juju rites returned and, in time, Christianity’s only permanent contribution was to give Benin the crucifixion idea for its mass ritualistic murders.[35]

Another book just as misleading as those by Frantz Fanon and Chinua Achebe mentioned above is King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa by the Jewish-American journalist Adam Hochschild. According to Bruce Gilley, professor of political science at Portland State University, this book—currently used in many schools—is

a vast hoax, full of distortions and errors both numerous and grave […]. Some people might view “King Hochschild’s Hoax,” as we might call it, as an empowering fable for modern Africans at the expense of the White man. But its debilitating effects on Africa, and on the Congo in particular, make the opposite more nearly the case. It is a callous and negligent chicote[36] lash on the backs of all Black Africans, narcissistic guilt porn for White liberals at the expense of the African. The Congolese lawyer Marcel Yabili calls it “the greatest falsification in modern history,” a compliment of sorts, I suppose. […] The photographs of people with severed hands were victims of gangrene, tribal vendettas, or cannibalism having nothing to do with rubber.[37]

Finally, it should be noted that colonization—or, more broadly, conquest, imperial expansion, and the imposition of domination over other peoples—is not a phenomenon exclusive to Europeans. Like slavery, it is a constant in human history, practiced by nearly all-powerful civilizations at one time or another, often in the form of military conquests, the settlement of populations, the imposition of language, religion, or culture, and economic or demographic exploitation—e.g., the Greater Israel project.[38]

Here are a few examples:

  • Several African kingdoms and empires, such as the Kingdom of Aksum (1st–7th centuries) and Kongo (14th–19th centuries, present-day Angola, Congo, DRC), as well as the Empires of Ghana (approx. 8th–11th centuries) and Mali (13th–15th centuries), practiced forms of imperialism: territorial conquests, the imposition of tributes, the administration of conquered peoples, control of trade routes, and sometimes gradual Arabization or Islamization, or even the displacement of populations.[39]
  • The Arabs colonized North Africa (the Maghreb: Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco), the Levant (Syria, Palestine, and Lebanon), Egypt, Mesopotamia (Iraq), present-day Pakistan, Persia (Iran), and Spain, from 711 to around 1492—a period spanning more than 700 years. These expansions took about a century to form an empire stretching from Spain to the Indus River, with Arab garrison towns and a gradual Islamization/Arabization of the local populations.[40]
  • Under Genghis Khan and his successors, the Mongols established the largest contiguous empire in history, stretching from China to Eastern Europe (as far as Hungary and Poland). They conquered China (ending the Jin and Song dynasties), Korea, Central Asia (Khwarezm), Persia, Iraq, and parts of Russia and the Caucasus. The conquests were often extremely destructive (sacking of cities, mass massacres), followed by imperial administration, population displacements, and the imposition of a tribute system. Millions of people were killed or displaced, and entire cultures were upended.[41]
  • The Ottoman Turks, originally from Anatolia, conquered and ruled for centuries: the Balkans (Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Hungary, etc.), where they imposed their administration, the devshirme system (forced recruitment of Christian children for the Janissaries), and fiscal and cultural domination.[42]
  • The Chinese (the Qin, Han, Tang, Ming, and Qing dynasties) engaged in continuous expansion to the south, west, and north, establishing Han settlements in regions such as Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Yunnan. The Han often imposed their culture, administration, and language on the conquered or assimilated peoples.[43]
  • Japan colonized Taiwan (1895), Korea (1910), parts of China (Manchukuo), and the Pacific Islands. It engaged in settlement colonization, exploitation, and cultural assimilation, often through brutal policies.[44]
  • Jewish Zionists have been colonizing Palestine for the past one hundred years in a most cruel and sadistic matter. They engage in theft of land, torture, mutilations, rape, expulsions, and genocide by bombing, starvation, and snipper assassinations of mostly women and children.
  • In short, powerful entities—whether African, Arab, Mongol, Turkish, Chinese, Persian, or Jewish—have almost all engaged in forms of territorial expansion, domination, and, at times, the cultural transformation of the peoples they conquered. Europeans did so on a large scale beginning in the 15th century thanks to their technological advantage in maritime affairs, but they did not invent either war of conquest or imperialism. It is a universal human dynamic linked to the pursuit of resources, power, and security.

It was an obscure Jewish Zionist lawyer from Poland, Raphael Lemkin (1900-1959), who sought, out of hatred for Whites, to demonize and criminalize Europeans as colonialists. Early European and modern colonialism was central to his conception of genocide and the United Nations convention on genocide (1948). Because of Lemkin’s anti-White bias, the European as a colonialist is systematically indicted as “genocidal,” deplores scholar Kerry R. Bolton in his book, The Tyranny of Human Rights. As a matter of fact, any form whatsoever of European expansion is “intrinsically genocidal,” including the age of discovery.[45] Why is European colonialism “implicitly genocidal?” asks Bolton. Is it genocidal

when suppressing indigenous bloodlust, but the wholesale intervention of the UN and its various agencies, often in partnership with global corporations that have a profit motive behind the façade, lauded as “humanitarian work”? The only consistency as usual is that of Europhobia. Prior to European colonialism, the nations of the Americas, Australia, New Guinea, New Zealand, and other non-European lands did not have any conception of race unity, of themselves as a single ethnic bloc, but rather as tribes often contending to the death. Why does UN intervention in Africa become a humanitarian necessity that is somehow of higher morality than the intervention of European colonialism? The answer is that it serves a miscreant aim behind a moral façade.[46]

The Reason for the Stagnation of Blacks and Africa

According to high-level scientists such as William Shockley (Nobel prize winner), Frank Ellis, James Watson and Francis Crick (Nobel prize winners), Chris Brand, Andrew Fraser, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Greg Clydesdale, J. Philip Rushton, Ricardo Duchesne, Charles Murray, Kerry R. Bolton, Richard Lynn, Tatu Vanhanen, and many others, if colored people in general are stagnating it is not because of slavery or colonialism, but mainly because of their low average intelligence quotient (IQ).[47], [48], [49]

With the advent of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technology, it is now possible to accurately predict IQ and to demonstrate racial differences in IQ, thereby vindicating all the above scientists who have been ritually slanderd and expelled from their field for defending the genetic origin of IQ and of race.[50]

The GNP of a country is directly proportional to the average IQ of its people. Below an average IQ of 100 like that of Whites, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to create, manage, and be competitive in a modern society like ours. According to Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, the average IQ of people in sub-Saharan Africa is about 70, while the average IQ of people in the Maghreb, north of the Sahara, is about 85. Asian countries with average IQs of 108, which have also experienced colonization and slavery, such as South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, and Taiwan, are among the most developed countries in the world. Without massive outside help in all matters, Israel, because of its average IQ of 94, could not survive as a modern entity. [51], [52], [53]

Ultimately, as Arthur Kemp states in his book The War Against Whites, there is no basis for the claims of Blacks and African countries allegedly affected by slavery and colonization. The entire reparations and slavery industry is based on lies spread by several nefarious sections of society intent on denigrating for financial, ideological, racial, and psychotic reasons the achievements of Whites. In the end, “this attack is driven by a hatred of Whites, and not by logic or any historical or moral argument, ” asserts Arthur Kemp.[54]

1] Virtue signaling, which is the expression or promotion of viewpoints and emotions that are especially valued within a social group allows the speaker (politician or activist of some kind) to morally supplant his fellow human beings and increase his popularity among a certain crowd that values emotion instead of reason. For a good take on the psychopathic personalities of the narcissistic left see Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Psychotic Left. From Jacobin France to the Occupy Movement, Black House Publishing, 2017.

[2] Citation from Laurent Obertone, La France interdite : La Vérité sur l’immigration, Ring, 2018, p. 378.

[3] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025.

[4] merchantHelios@poa.st, Interesting thoughts from/lit/ on why so much western media is blatantly anti-White.

[5] Kerry Bolton, PhD, Revolution from Above. Manufacturing ‘Descent’ in the New World Order, Arktos, 2011.

[6] Nick Fuentes, “What They’re NOT Telling You About Epstein,” Rumble, 2026.

[7] Gearóid Ó COLMÁIN, “Rothschild’s ‘Slaughter Ships.’ Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe (Part 4 of 11),”Dissident Voice, 2016. Cited by Scott HOWARD, The Open Society Playbook, Antelope Hill Publishing, p. 223.

[8] Bernard Lugan, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit, Perrin, 1989, p. 25.

[9] Ibid., p. 134.

[10] Ibid., p. 136.

[11] Ibid., p. 252.

[12] Bernard Lugan, Mythes et manipulations de l’histoire africaine : Mensonges et repentance, Afrique réelle, 2012, p. 74.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Larry E. Tise, Proslavery: A History of the Defense of Slavery in America, 1701-1840, The University of Georgia Press, 1987.

[15] Philip S. Foner, History of Black Americans: From Africa to the Emergence of the Cotton Kingdom, Oxford University Press. Cited by Arthur Kemp in The War Against Whites: The Racial Psychology Behind the Anti-White Hatred Sweeping the West, Ostara Publications, 2020, pp. 163-169.

[16] Michael Hoffman, They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America, Independent History; 4th edition, May 31, 1993.

[17] Tidiane N’Diaye, Le Génocide voilé, Gallimard, 2017, p. 11.

[18] Robert Davis, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, The Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

[19] Andrew Joyce, “Agobard of Lyon and The Origins of the Hostile Elite,” The Occidental Observer, 2017.

[20] The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, prepared by the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam, Latimer Associates, 1991.

[21] Walter White, Who Brought the Slaves to America? White Publishing, 1966. Cited by David Duke in Jewish Suprematism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question, Free Speech Press, 2002.

[22] Douglas Mercer, The Great Replacement, Countercurrents. This is a Renaud Camus quote. The NEPAD explained, République du Sénégal.

[23] Hervé Ryssen, Satan in Hollywood. Anti-Christian Propaganda in film, The Barnes Review, 2016.

[24] Bruce Gilley, The Case for Colonialism, New England Review Press, 2023.

[25] Kerry R. Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Publishers, 2022, p. 77.

[26] Arthur Kemp, work cited, p. 158.

[27] Nora Adin Fares, ‘Never-ending humiliation’: Recalling horrors in Libya’s migration centres, Aljazeera, March 24 2024.

[28] Shanna Fuld, “Modern Slavery in Israel. The Women victims of human trafficking” The Jerusalem Post, April 8, 2023.

[29] Alexandre Cormier-Denis, « Grand remplacement : réponse à Boucar Diouf et Guillaume Wagner », Nomos-TV, 2019.

[30] Bernard Lugan, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit, Perrin, 1989, p. 249.

[31] Bernard Lugan, « L’empire colonial a-t-il enrichi la France ? », work cited, chapter X, 2012, p. 99-104.

[32] Kerry Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Publishers, 2022, p. 77.

[33] Bruce Gilley, The Case for Colonialism, New English review Press, 2023.

[34] Kerry Bolton, The Parihaka Cuklt, Black House Publishing, 2012.

[35] Notes on Nigeria, Institute of Current World Affairs: https://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DER-42.pdf

[36] Wikipedia: A chicote is a whip made of knotted or braided leather straps, traditionally crafted from hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or buffalo hide. It is particularly associated with the Belgian colonial era in the Congo (the Independent State of the Congo under Leopold II, then a Belgian colony), where it was used to punish forced laborers, prisoners, or “natives” who failed to meet quotas (particularly for rubber).

[37] Bruce Gilley, “The Congo Hoax,” The American Conservative, Apr 17, 2023.

[38] GROK AI on X.

[39] Bernard Lugan, Quand les Africains colonisaient l’Afrique, Éditions du Rocher, 2026. This book explores the forgotten history of millennia-old internal colonization within Africa, which predates the European conquest.

[40] Ibid.

[41] GROK AI on X.

[42] Ibid.

[43] Ibid.

[44] Ibid.

[45] Kerry Bolton, work cited, p. 76.

[46] Ibid., p. 84-85.

[47] Ibid., p. 365 to 381.

[48] Collectif, QI et races : Le Cauchemar des multiculturalistes devant le réel, avec un texte d’Henry Garrett et une présentation des recherches d’Arthur Jensen, J. Philippe Rushton, de Richard J. Herrnstein, de Charles Murray, de Richard Lynn, de Tatu Vanhanen and others, Akribea, 2019.

[49] Charles Murray, Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class, Twelve, 2020.

[50] Spencer J. Quinn, “The Vindication of James Watson,” The Unz Review, April 13, 2023.

[51] Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Praeger/Greenwood, 2002.

[52] Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, Human Intelligence, Political Science, Sociology, Economics, Washington Summit Publishers, 2006.

[53] IQ compared by countries, WorldData info.

[54] Arthur Kemp, work cited, p. 176.

Will Colombia Get a Fanatically Pro-Zionist President?

/3 Comments/in /by

Colombia may soon join the growing ranks of Latin American nations led by fanatically pro-Zionist presidents who view alignment with Israel as a ticket to Washington’s good graces.

Abelardo de la Espriella, the right-wing Colombian presidential candidate known as “El Tigre,” has made his pro-Israel stance a central pillar of his 2026 campaign. Currently placing second in several polls with approximately 27 to 28 percent support, the criminal defense lawyer turned political outsider has pledged to move Colombia’s embassy to Jerusalem, restore diplomatic ties with Israel severed by the Petro government in 2024, and forge a strategic alliance with both Israel and the United States to combat narcoterrorism.

De la Espriella’s pro-Zionist signaling is part of a growing trend of Latin American leaders—most notably Javier Milei in Argentina—showcasing their support for Israel to stay in the good graces of Washington. Should he win the Colombian presidency, it will further reinforce this pattern across the region.

Abelardo Gabriel de la Espriella Otero was born on July 31, 1978, in Bogotá and grew up in Montería in the Córdoba department of northern Colombia. He studied law at Sergio Arboleda University and later earned a specialization in administrative law from Del Rosario University. In 2012, he obtained a master’s degree in law from Nebrija University in Spain.

He founded his law firm, De La Espriella Lawyers, in 2002, with offices in Colombia and the United States. His professional reputation was built on high-profile criminal defense cases, representing celebrities, politicians, and controversial businessmen. He holds dual Colombian-Italian nationality.

De la Espriella spent nearly two decades cultivating a public profile as a media commentator, opinion columnist, and television personality before formally entering politics. At the end of 2024, he launched his political movement, Defensores de la Patria (Defenders of the Homeland), describing it as “the voice of citizens tired of insecurity, corruption, and the complacency of the elites.”

In November 2025, De la Espriella held a mass rally at the Movistar Arena in Bogotá, drawing more than 15,000 supporters. The event featured video messages and appearances from Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R-FL), Argentine political analyst Agustín Laje, and Spanish MEP Alvise Pérez of Se Acabó La Fiesta.

He has been compared repeatedly to Nayib Bukele of El Salvador, Javier Milei of Argentina, and Donald Trump of the United States, a comparison he embraces. In January 2026, he traveled to Madrid to meet Santiago Abascal, leader of Spain’s VOX party, and signed the Carta de Madrid to formally join the Foro de Madrid, an international network of conservative and right-wing populist political leaders. His running mate is José Manuel Restrepo, who served first as Minister of Commerce and then as Minister of Finance under President Iván Duque.

Alongside these political alliances, De la Espriella has staked out a strongly pro-Israel foreign policy platform that doubles as a critique of the sitting administration. De la Espriella’s pro-Israel position stands in contrast to President Gustavo Petro’s anti-Israel posture and as a model for Colombia’s own so-called counterterrorism strategy. His core positions include moving the Colombian Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, following the precedents set by the United States under Trump and Argentina under Milei. He has vowed to fully restore the diplomatic ties that Petro severed on May 1, 2024, calling this an “urgent necessity” for Colombia.

De la Espriella has described a tripartite alliance between Colombia, Israel, and the United States as the central axis of his foreign and security policy. He told Reuters that in his first 90 days in office he would pursue close military and police ties with the United States and Israel. He has repeatedly cited Israel as a global reference point for counterterrorism, intelligence, and defense technology.

When Petro broke ties with Israel, Colombia was negatively affected in military intelligence cooperation and maintenance of its Israeli-manufactured Kfir fighter jets, which had formed part of the Colombian Air Force for 36 years. De la Espriella has pledged to restore this cooperation.

In a November 2025 statement following his meeting with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, De la Espriella declared his position in unambiguous terms. “In my government, I will move the embassy to Jerusalem, because only by strengthening relations and learning from nations that have successfully confronted terrorism will we be able to find the keys to defeating our own ills.” He further stated: “A strategic alliance with the State of Israel and with the Government of the United States will not only make us stronger, but will place us on the right side of history.”

He reinforced this commitment months later in a direct appeal to Colombia’s Jewish community. On April 1, 2026, De la Espriella tweeted his thanks to the Colombian Jewish community:

“Thank you to the Colombian Jewish community for the warm welcome and support you provided us. We will renew a strategic alliance with the State of Israel to confront narcoterrorism with determination. Alongside José Manuel Restrepo, we will defend the Judeo-Christian principles that form the foundation of Western civilization. We deeply recognize and value the Jewish community: their resilience, their legacy, and their steadfastness in the face of adversity serve as an example for nations that do not give up. In my government, Colombia will take a clear step in its foreign policy: we will establish our embassy in Jerusalem and strengthen a direct, firm, and strategic relationship with Israel.”

Beyond public statements and rally appearances, De la Espriella has secured direct engagement with Colombia’s organized Jewish leadership. The most significant formal connection came on March 25, 2026, when he and his vice-presidential running mate José Manuel Restrepo held a formal meeting with the Confederación de Comunidades Judías de Colombia (CCJC), the main umbrella organization of the Jewish community in Colombia, led by executive director Marcos Peckel. At the meeting, De la Espriella pledged to stand by the Jewish community, saying he was ready to defend the Jewish people. Restrepo delivered an explicit statement of support: “I will never hesitate to defend our Jewish people, who are our brother people, the people of God.”

The CCJC has a well-documented history of opposing Petro’s anti-Israel policies. Director Marcos Peckel urged Petro to restore relations in October 2025, calling for the country to “renew dialogue in this new phase of peacebuilding in the region.” Peckel is also a commissioner to combat antisemitism at the Latin American Jewish Congress and a member of the Executive Committee of the World Jewish Congress since 2013.

De la Espriella’s campaign has also engaged with Kehilat Yovel, a messianic Jewish congregation in Bogotá led by Pastor Raúl Rubio, which serves as one of the most prominent pro-Israel civil society organizations in Colombia. Kehilat Yovel is the main Colombian partner of the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), an international pro-Israel NGO, and has co-organized major pro-Israel rallies in Colombia.

These civil society alignments complement a growing pattern of direct engagement with Israeli state officials. The most direct connection between De la Espriella and the Israeli government is his two-hour meeting with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar on November 25, 2025, during Sa’ar’s Latin American tour.

De la Espriella publicly shared a photo of the meeting on his X account and described it as “a cordial conversation of more than two hours, in which I was able to convey the urgent necessity for Colombia to strengthen ties of friendship and cooperation with Israel.”

The relationship De la Espriella seeks to restore has deep historical roots. Colombia and Israel established diplomatic relations in 1957, though Colombia had recognized Israel as early as 1949. The relationship has been characterized by significant defense and intelligence cooperation, most notably the Israeli-manufactured Kfir fighter jets that have formed the backbone of the Colombian Air Force for over 36 years.

Israel Aerospace Industries upgraded Colombia’s Kfir fleet to its latest C-60 standard as recently as 2017, under a multi-year contract awarded in 2007 worth more than $150 million. Colombia has served, more notoriously, as a training ground where Israeli mercenaries like Yair Klein could expand their security operations and create substantial turmoil.

Under Petro, Colombia severed diplomatic relations with Israel in May 2024, banned coal exports to Israel by decree in August 2024, and expelled Israeli diplomats in October 2025. In August 2025, Petro signed Presidential Directive No. 07, institutionalizing pro-Palestinian policies across all Colombian state agencies, a move roundly condemned by the CCJC and international Jewish organizations.

De la Espriella has pledged to undo each of these measures. What he proposes in their place goes well beyond restoration of the pre-Petro status quo. An electoral victory for Abelardo de la Espriella would mark the formal integration of Colombia into the Isaac Accords framework, effectively tethering the nation’s security and intelligence apparatus to the long-term strategic objectives of Tel Aviv.

By positioning himself as a reliable regional proxy, De la Espriella ensures that Colombia follows the trajectory set by Argentina, subordinating national sovereignty to the dictates of an expansive Judeo-American security umbrella designed to cement Jewish supremacy across the Western Hemisphere.

LYDIA BRIMELOW ON THOSE SPLC INDICTMENTS: There’s Never Just One Cockroach

/3 Comments/in , /by

Discovery is going to be delicious.

Lydia Brimelow, former publisher of VDARE.com

PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

It is hard to say how I learned this news—I think my husband Peter was the first person to tell me—because I got a large number of texts and email messages from my friends and supporters almost immediately. This also happens any time the New York State Attorney General Letitia James is in hot water. It’s nice to be remembered.

It’s not what I hoped to be remembered for, but I’ll be reading every word

Quoting from the DOJ Press Release:

“Donors gave their money believing they were supporting the fight against violent extremism,” said Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson. “As alleged, the SPLC instead diverted a portion of those funds to benefit individuals and groups they claimed to oppose. That kind of deception undermines public trust and social cohesion.”

I would argue the SPLC’s very existence undermines public trust and social cohesion. I posted to social media:

 

A twitter user with the deeply charming name CatsWithoutBorders was right to correct me:

The chart pictured above was displayed in the office of Mark Potok, SPLC Editor in Chief of the Intelligence Report, tracking the end of white majorities in the US and Europe. It wasn’t all for money. It was also for hatred of white people. Greed and genocidal ideation are not mutually exclusive. For 25 years, VDARE.com fought against the SPLC and that chart they found so inspirational.

The fashionable reaction among online patriots has been to post their battle scars from the SPLC. VDARE.com has too many to count—but it’s an interesting phenomenon because it highlights just how greedy the SPLC became. Being named as an agent of hate by the SPLC was so common, it practically became a credential on the right—if you weren’t named you weren’t serious.

Every new pin on the SPLC’s Hate Map ginned up fears and opened wallets among the paranoid leftists. And yet it wasn’t enough! The SPLC ginned up hysteria about racism as a fundraising tool. It was extremely effective—so effective in fact, that the demand for racism outstripped the supply. Like an undertaker drumming up business, the SPLC ludicrously labeled Rand Paul, Ben Carson, Majiid Nawaz and other clearly mainstream people as extremists.

According to the DOJ, the SPLC was not content lining their pockets merely with the suffering of the innocent. They also allegedly paid cold hard cash to the scariest “extremists” on their lists.

The SPLC claims the money was not in fact subsidizing their boogey men but a program to pay informants (“field sources”). But even if that were the case, it’s likely not good enough to get them out of charges of wire fraud and money laundering.

Continues…

 

Sins of my father – on William Luther Pierce

/7 Comments/in /by

This article was originally published in Danish on April 23, 2023.

BOOK REVIEW
SINS OF MY FATHER
Growing up with America’s most dangerous white supremacist
Kelvin Pierce
Self-published, 2020.

Reviewed by Povl H. Riis-Knudsen

William Luther Pierce is one of the most important figures in the Nationalist movement in the United States. After drifting around for a while, he joined George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party, which had now been renamed the National Socialist White People’s Party—perhaps not the catchiest name, but it was more respectable than American Nazi Party. There he became editor of the magazine National Socialist World, which was intended to be the ideological torchbearer of the National Socialist movement, but which largely merely offered trivial historical nostalgia.

After Rockwell’s assassination on August 25, 1967, Matt Koehl took over the leadership of the party, and after some time, Pierce and Koehl went their separate ways. Koehl followed Rockwell’s political line to some extent, but gradually gave the movement a distinctly dogmatic, Hitlerist profile that had no chance of success, while Pierce distanced himself from the symbols and slogans of the past without, however, significantly altering his ideological stance. In addition, it was likely a specific case of two alpha males who couldn’t coexist in the same group, possibly combined with the fact that Matt Koehl felt a certain sense of unwarranted inferiority toward Pierce. Pierce held a Ph.D. in physics and had worked for Pratt & Whitney, a job he left to become a full-time Nazi and editor for Rockwell. It was a career change with major consequences. Koehl had no formal education and had made a living doing odd jobs until he was hired by Rockwell, but he was intellectually on par with Pierce, and characteristically, they both pursued the same strategic idea: They both wanted to build a more or less National Socialist society that was self-sufficient and could serve as a powerhouse for the movement and a model for others to follow. And the reasons why they both failed were the same: They were dictatorial; based on their experiences, they had no trust in their members; and they could not distinguish between a free National Socialist local community and a Stalinist labor camp. In short, they were not leaders, but ideologues. Furthermore, neither of them considered what would happen when they themselves were gone. Alpha males do not train potential successors—they fear them. Both left a movement in ruins and without leadership. It is an irony of fate that Matt Koehl was making plans to hand over “Nordland” to Pierce, as he—apparently quite correctly—saw the greatest potential for the future in him. He discussed this in depth with me at the end of June 2002. When, after a long trip through eastern Canada, I called home to the “Nordland” base from Halifax a good three weeks later, Koehl’s first question was: “Have you seen the news?” I hadn’t. “Pierce is dead,” said a clearly shaken Matt Koehl.

Kelvin Pierce is one of William Pierce’s twin sons. After his father’s death, he set out to try to penetrate his father’s worldview and practical political work, not only by studying his father’s many papers left behind, but also through extensive archival research, including declassified reports from the secret services, which clearly show how many resources were devoted to monitoring William Pierce and his followers. For the secret services, this is, just as in Denmark, pure job creation and a successful attempt to demonstrate how necessary it is to provide them with additional resources, while the truth is that, realistically speaking, this group of people poses absolutely no threat to national security—though in the U.S., this is not quite the case for individual citizens.1 Protecting them, however, is simply police work and a rather impossible task for the intelligence services. This project has been quite successful for Kelvin Pierce; perhaps too well, since he has been unable to find a publisher willing to release his quite excellent biography of this man, whom anyone with even a passing interest in politics knows, and whom the media never tires of berating, partly because, under the name Andrew Macdonald, he wrote the 1978 novel The Turner Diaries about a violent racist revolution in the United States. Later, Hunter continued more or less along the same theme. These books are claimed to be the inspiration for all acts of terrorism and all crime on the so-called far right in the United States.

Kelvin Pierce has gone to great lengths to distance himself from his father and his political views, to such an extent that it is sometimes a bit nauseating. Apparently, however, this has not been enough to convince a publisher to release the book. Kelvin Pierce offers many insightful observations and reflections in the book, for example:

I remember being puzzled by the two men in Dad’s office because they didn’t seem to be all that intelligent. Over the years, I would see similar people at Dad’s gatherings. It was as if he were surrounded by weirdos, mostly young men who had nothing better to do than hang out with other small-minded thugs, making themselves feel better by putting down other people.

I must regretfully say that I know these types all too well. I think everyone on the right does, and I am convinced that it is not much different on the left.

Extremist groups attract, in particular, people who are not like most people. If they were, they would be liberals or conservatives. And make no mistake: among these seemingly pitiful existences, there are outstanding activists, computer geniuses, and so on. But of course, there are also the others. It has always been a problem on the nationalist wing to bring together deep thinkers with high intelligence and people with fewer intellectual gifts, belonging to the lowest social group, within the same organization. But that is the challenge. Intelligence is necessary and a prerequisite for a victory to be realized in the form of a better social order, but the musclemen and activists are the prerequisite for a victory to happen at all! The community begins here!

As in all other organizations I have known, the overarching problem was funding. Pierce had a wife who earned money. That was enough for daily life, but Pierce needed money to organize the political work. Voluntary contributions don’t go very far. Most members have no money, and those who do are reluctant to part with it—also because, with their better education and practical experience, they see limited chances that their contributions will yield results in the long run. Revilo Pendleton Oliver, a prominent American professor of classical philology, Spanish, and Italian with strongly national-conservative views, suggested that Pierce write fiction to make money. He did so with The Turner Diaries, which has sold over half a million copies. He also received a large sum of money, which many claim came from Bob Matthews’ criminal activities to support the revolution.2 However, this is an allegation that no one has been able to prove. Matt Koehl was also offered a large sum of money from an unknown source, but he declined.

Pierce used the money to purchase “The Land.” “The Land” was an area of approximately 1.4 square kilometers near Hillsboro in eastern West Virginia. It was indescribably beautiful, far off the beaten path, and thus—unlike “Nordland”—it met one of the basic requirements for a home base for a movement like The National Alliance, which Pierce—like Koehl—transformed into part of a religious movement, The Cosmotheist Community Church. Whereas Koehl created a rather laughable Hitler cult with the Führer in the role of Jesus II, cosmotheism is a continuation of the European pantheistic idea that God is in nature. It is a far more sensible approach to the religious question, but it hardly stands much of a chance in the religious marketplace either. Religions are about selfish salvation for one’s own small, insignificant soul—not about the survival of the people or the race. In the U.S., however, there are tax exemptions associated with being a religion. This is a significant motivation for religious prophets.

Later, Resistance Records became Pierce’s third golden goose. Under this label, CDs were released containing nothing but horrific noise—a foreign body that poisoned and destroyed everything Pierce otherwise stood for—but it was—mirabile dictu—a highly significant source of income, and that says a lot about the audience he had gathered around his movement. Resistance Records was also Erich Gliebe’s ticket into the movement, and Pierce made this former boxer his successor. Poor judgment is an understatement here, and in record time, the entire National Alliance—with annual revenue exceeding $1 million—fell apart, and “The Land” was eventually sold. A sad, but unfortunately not unique, story. I don’t really know of any example of an organization or a form of government run according to the so-called Führer principle that has outlived its creator. Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Salazar, Perón, Pinochet, Koehl, Pierce, and everyone else on that side I can think of. It’s quite thought-provoking.

It is quite clear from Kelvin Pierce’s book that the children had a horrific childhood, and that William Pierce can in no way be described as a good father. Kelvin’s brother Erik thus severed all ties with their father and did not even attend his memorial service. Kelvin, however, clearly retained a certain fascination with him. Now, discipline in America is considerably more strict than here, but Pierce beat the boys excessively whenever, in their attempts to at least establish some contact with their father, they did things they knew would trigger his rage. It’s a bit of psychology for the advanced.

I visited Pierce at “The Land” for a couple of days in the summer of 1988. At the time, he was married to Olga, a Hungarian girl who had been a pianist but had lost a few fingers in a meat grinder. That was the end of that career. She and my wife got along well. They were connected by music. My wife thus tried to maintain the connection by writing to her—but she never received those letters. Pierce wasn’t interested in his wife corresponding with others. We only realized this later. It was part of the prison camp’s regulations.

Our conversations were, in a sense, merely elaborative. We already knew each other’s views. At that time, I had resigned from my work with the World Union of National Socialists, where I had been Pierce’s successor, as I found it futile to maintain an organization without members, without funding, and without a publishing operation. On top of that, I had been able to ascertain that the WUNS was being held responsible for every so-called “Nazi” action across the globe, no matter how idiotic it was. I would not lend my name to that. Everything was apparently being directed from my modest office at Ahornvej 11 in Vejgaard.

Ah, if only it had been so. Added to this, of course, was the introduction of Hitlerism as a religion, the change of name to The New Order (never try to abbreviate it!), and blatant inefficiency and poor leadership. The move of the headquarters from Arlington, Va. (which in practice means Washington, D.C.) to the Milwaukee area had taken 10 years. In those 10 years, the movement had practically disintegrated, and the rationale for the move had vanished. The Midwest had been the party’s best breeding ground, but members want to see action. They had been promised an intensification of the work, but saw only that everything was falling apart: Cedric Syrdahl had left in anger, the headquarters in Chicago had been sold, as had the two properties they had owned in Arlington. There was thus plenty to talk about, and Pierce had, of course, also been following these developments. We were in complete agreement on that point.

In 1988, however, there was still hope for “Nordland,” and there were, of course, also things I didn’t feel I could discuss. No matter how much I might disagree with Koehl, he was a friend, and he remained so through all crises—even beyond his death. Pierce also made no secret of the difficulties involved in building a colony on a barren field. He specifically emphasized that it had to be so remote—and, of course, television was forbidden. It was a community that was to remain untainted by the outside world. It was a full day’s drive to what we somewhat misleadingly call civilization. The few residents who were there—and whom we weren’t introduced to—came from the city. It had been quite a shock for them and a reason why many ran away again. “Nordland” was closer to civilization—far too close to the city.

We also discussed The Turner Diaries. I’ve never liked the ending. Nuclear bombs are a bad thing. Pierce basically agreed—he would have written the ending differently if he’d had to write it in 1988. We were shown the main building with its assembly hall, book storage, and office spaces. It certainly had a certain style to it. The facilities were better suited to their purpose than the building at “Nordland,” but there were big plans there as well.

Pierce had a magnificent German shepherd, and a German shepherd is one of the most loyal creatures on this earth. We slept in the guest trailer, and in the morning the dog scratched at the door. I opened the door, and in came Hans—that was the dog’s name—and with a full leap he landed right in the middle of the double bed, and there he stayed. Pierce wasn’t happy when he saw that the dog had been inside with us—and in the bed—but he didn’t say a word. When we said goodbye the next day and drove off, Hans wanted to come along. He simply ran after the car. After a kilometer, I had to stop and make it clear to him that he had to go back. Shepherds are smart animals. Hans understood what I said, and crestfallen, he trudged slowly back along the dirt road, constantly turning around to look for the car. At that moment, it became clear to me that something was very wrong at “The Land.”

If you wish to explore Pierce’s ideas further—and it is certainly worth doing so—please refer to Robert S. Griffin: The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, 1st Books Library, 2001. Regarding Rockwell, see William H. Schmaltz: Hate: George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, Brassey’s, Washington 1999. A later edition is titled For Race and Nation. Also recommended is Frederick J. Simonelli: American Fuehrer: George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, 1999. Matt Koehl did not care for Simonelli’s book. Simonelli goes into greater depth than Schmaltz and has a very thorough set of footnotes at the back that document what he writes. Both are informative, and Kelvin Pierce’s book certainly is as well. One can skip the last chapters if one finds it too distressing. It is hard to imagine that Pierce’s children are 63—and that it has been over 20 years since I had that sad phone conversation with Koehl from Halifax—and that Koehl himself has been dead for nearly 9 years. The wheel of time is relentless.

Notes

  1. See, for example, Stephen Singular: Talked to Death: The Life and Murder of Alan Berg, Beech Tree Books, William Morrow, New York, 1987. ↩︎
  2. See Kevin Flynn, Gary Gerhardt: The Silent Brotherhood. Inside America’s Racist Underground, The Free Press, New York 1989. This is by far the best and most readable book on Robert Matthews and his associates—indeed, on the extreme nationalist movement as a whole. It is absolutely required reading for anyone interested in such movements—or who has an inherent penchant for reading about human tragedies. ↩︎

Glen Allen’s Statement Regarding the DOJ’s Criminal Indictment of the SPLC

/7 Comments/in /by

Glen Allen’s Statement Regarding the DOJ’s Criminal Indictment of the SPLC

By Glen Allen, Esq., FEF President

Friends of FEF,

As many of you know, I was a victim – one of many – of the odious Southern Poverty Law Center’s fraudulent and criminal conduct. In 2016, the SPLC, led by the hateful Hedi Beirich, orchestrated a campaign against me with the aim and successful result of having me fired from the Baltimore Law Department, impairing my family and social relationships, and sullying my reputation as a competent, ethical, and honorable attorney.  I do not use the word “orchestrated” lightly. On the day Beirich and the SPLC attacked me, I was headline news in a dozen newspapers in Beirich’s network of connections, as far away as England and Los Angeles, and the SPLC  put my photograph on the back of its infamous “Hate Map” right between Donald Trump and Steve Bannon with the caption “We’ve stopped Nazis from infiltrating state governments.”  I had news reporters in front of my house.

What was my crime in the reptilian eyes of the SPLC and Beirich?  Just this: certain perfectly legal associations decades prior with Dr. William Pierce and the National Alliance, plus – horrors! —  my attendance at a Holocaust revisionist conference on National Alliance property.  And how did Beirich and the SPLC learn of these aspects of my private life?  The answer is by bribing or otherwise illegally and tortiously inveigling a National Alliance employee to turn over confidential information regarding me and others to the SPLC.

I fought back.  I sued Beirich and the SPLC in federal court, alleging multiple causes of action, including claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). I not only sought redress for my own injuries but challenged SPLC’s tax-favored status as a 501c3 nonprofit. The Maryland District Court, however, dismissed my complaint on the rationale that the facts I alleged – and I alleged in detail the SPLC’s odious and illegal tactics – were not “plausible.”  The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in an unpublished and cursory opinion affirmed.

I mention this history because the Department of Justice this week brought a criminal indictment against the SPLC, accusing it of just the type of criminal activity I described in my complaint. The indictment sets forth numerous incidents of SPLC’s criminal behavior, including its illegal manipulation of the National Alliance employee as set forth in my complaint.

At one level I feel vindicated.  Among the most painful aspects of my SPLC experience was having friends, relatives, and others brush off my complaint as though I were a disgruntled kook attacking a venerable civil rights organization.  No impartial person who investigated the SPLC should have maintained such a view even then, but surely not now.  The SPLC for decades in plain sight has been illegally and criminally profiteering from “hate” that it manufactured.  It is long past time that it be held accountable.  I wish for, and predict, the DOJ’s full success in its litigation against the SPLC and hope that loathsome entity is shut down and its officers and operatives, including Beirich, are put behind bars.

On another level, however, I remain disappointed and frustrated at how our legal system treated me and other SPLC victims, failing to give us the impartial justice to which we are entitled. The system did not rise to the occasion but sank to a shallow and dismissive political Wokism that for many of us will always tarnish our view of the judiciary.

What’s next in this SPLC saga?  You may be assured that I and other legal minds in FEF’s milieu will be zealously investigating what old claims can be revived and new claims pursued against the SPLC as a result of the DOJ litigation. In the imagery of the old Greek mythology, the SPLC has sown dragon’s teeth and now must deal with the angry warriors its evil deeds have spawned.

Glen Allen, Esq. heads the Free Expession Foundation which is an organization dedicated to defending those who have gotten on the wrong side of our politically correct legal system. Here is their Donation Page.

Upstaging the SPLC: Communist Shapeshifters

/10 Comments/in , /by

Otto Dix, “Portrait of the (“new woman”, “anti-Nazi”) journalist Sylvia von Harden”, 1926

The recent U.S. government indictment of the SPLC may prompt a sigh of relief among White nationalist activists. Its defamatory activities have already caused significant harm to conservative and nationalist scholars, often labeled in SPLC vernacular as “white supremacists” or “antisemites.” Why it has taken the U.S. government so long to investigate the SPLC’s financial dealings remains unclear, especially given that some other agencies have used similar tactics—manufacturing threats to justify their own existence.

The SPLC’s smearing methods were heavily borrowed from standard practices in former communist Eastern Europe, where governments had to keep fabricating “fascists”, “nazis”, or “terrorists” in order to sustain their totalitarian regimes. One may also speculate, given the multiracial profile of the SPLC staff and its associates, that internal rifts may have prompted disgruntled individuals from one racial group to rat out their colleagues of a different color over the misallocated funds. When a money squeeze sets in, race always matters—just as money always talks.

This is nothing new in the left-leaning proto-communist and Antifa scenes. Those who were born and lived in communist states, or those who have studied the psychology of the communist mindset, know deadly well that the greatest enemies of communism, as recent history has amply demonstrated, were often disgruntled communist insiders. This brings to mind the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the early 1990s—caused not by proverbial right-wing insiders or foreign outsiders, but by systemic abuse of state funds coupled with internal ethnic squabbles among communist party members. The breakup of communist Yugoslavia and the infighting in the multiethnic Communist League comes to mind.

The True Non-Believers

The SPLC’s demonization of right-wing and nationalist circles in the U.S. and EU feels like a reenactment of quasi-judicial proceedings in former communist Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union. Whether other anti-hate think tanks or agencies will now come under the Trump administration’s scrutiny remains to be seen. One may gloat over the SPLC’s sudden fall from grace, but questions remain as to whether there will be similar legal efforts and comparable media outcry if other domestic, self-proclaimed anti-hate, anti-fascist organizations come onto the DOJ’s radar screen. The powerful Jewish ADL uses a far more refined name-calling when it comes to vilifying right-wing and nationalist dissenters. Why not examine its sources of funding as well as the methods of its demonology courses it presents at schools and police department? It is, however, very significant that over the past year the ADL and AIPAC have toned down their demonological rhetoric against so-called White supremacists while fully backing Trump’s rhetoric about bombing Iran to oblivion. A raw deal? A quid pro quo? Everybody can take a wild guess.

Nor are right-wing Christians in the U.S. and nationalist figureheads in Europe lagging behind in their sycophancy, as recently shown by the ‘discreet visit’ of French nationalist leader Marine Le Pen to the Israeli Embassy in Paris. The age of mutual Euro-right-wing and Israeli brownnosing is dawning.

The buck doesn’t stop with the SPLC though. Hundreds of other NGOs, especially in the EU—as noted in my previous pieces—are non-governmental in name only, yet depend on substantial state funding, draping themselves in the romantic attire of love, peace, and multiracial tolerance. Their public posturing, much like that of the SPLC, is a carbon copy of earlier Bolshevik agencies in the early Soviet Union. One must repeat, time and again, that some of the most zealous communist henchmen in the Soviet Union and Europe—such as Genrikh Yagoda, Nikolai Yezhov, Lavrentiy Beria, and Béla Kun, along with thousands of their leftist sidekicks—were put to death by their former trusted comrades-in-arms. In Czechoslovakia in 1952, a dozen communist Jews, the early masters of the post-WWII Czech totalitarian system, were executed on charges of treason by their former comrades in arms.  The same upstaging scenario may have been brewing among jealous rank-and-file SPLC members, where everyone thought they could run the money side best on their own..

Historically, the more exotic titles these virtue-signaling agencies carry—such as the lavishly funded SPLC or the UK-based NGO Hope Not Hate—the more prone they are not just to violent proscriptions of right-wing wrong-thinkers but also to constant purges of their own kind. In passing, one should mention the case of Hans-Georg Maaßen, who headed Germany’s powerful domestic intelligence service—euphemistically known as the “Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution “ (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz)—and who was removed from his post in 2018 by Chancellor Angela Merkel following disagreements over the agency’s inquisitorial practices against the manufactured right-wing menace.

I have already written and provided references to the rise of the totalitarian spirit, also suggesting that it is part and parcel of absolute democracy—not its opposite, as many scholars claim. As a brainchild of post-communist multiracial pathology, the SPLC operates in a manner similar to the former intel agency Securitate in communist Romania, the Stasi in ex-East Germany, or the UDBA in communist ex-Yugoslavia. All of those secret service outlets kept hunting down anticommunist wrong-thinkers even if there were none in sight. Ultimately, the paranoid mindset of communist cutthroats  made them terminate each other. The SPLC would have finished the same way, one way or another, regardless of the recent Trump clamp-down.

Here are some personal remarks. When my father, Mirko Sunic,  a former Catholic lawyer, was arrested in communist Yugoslavia in 1984 on charges of having ties with Croat émigrés in the UK, the first to testify against him were our family members! This is a classic mode of the totalitarian mindset—of war of all against all—where self-denial and avoidance of guilt by association by family members becomes the rule, so well-illustrated in Shakespeare’s prose.

There is no such thing as true believers in politics. The SPLC members could have, under different circumstances and with different winds blowing, acted as a loudspeaker of the Right-wing or, for that matter, embraced belief in fearsome extraterrestrials. Furthermore, contrary to widespread belief, Croatia did not turn in 1991 into a right-wing country based on its own decision. Its new diplomatic and intelligence apparatus was staffed entirely by former communist officials. It was, willy-nilly, the ethnic infighting amidst the famed intel agency UDBA that sped up the independence of Croatia. As a high diplomat in newly born Croatia, I was literally surrounded by former Yugoslav diplomats who, in a matter of weeks and months, had converted from ardent Yugo-communist apparatchiks into church-going ardent Croat nationalists. The dread of getting terminated by their former Serbian communist comrades made them welcome extreme right-wing nationalists and expats who were best skilled to protect their rears. The true Croat nationalists did their work out on the front lines—similar to the Ukrainian Azov—still daydreaming their unfulfilled dreams.

No need to reinvent the wheel when discussing the SPLC . Political shapeshifting into the Other is nothing new, as was well described by the Latin poet Ovid two millennia ago. Family disunion or party betrayal will continue whoever comes to rule the US or EU ten years from now or ten centuries down the road. One must be prepared that the communism-minded SPLC or other left-wing NGOs in the US will, under different circumstantial sunsets, become devoted right-wingers or hide when needed—where the sun don’t shine.

The modern Left has always followed the mode of an all-you-can-eat buffet, i.e., dancing to the tune of the dominant ideology. Neither are right-wingers much better, as we learn from Shakespeare’s Richard III. Our own tribe, our ingroups, many of our own people—if our longed-for “White miracle” happens—will quickly resort to mindless vindictiveness and show their egomaniacal racial traits. With permission granted, let us cite again the French-Romanian pagan philosopher Emil Cioran, who warned us to beware of any attachment: “To be free is to rid yourself forever of the notion of reward; it is to expect nothing—neither from men nor from gods.”