Featured Articles

Out of Africa: The Jewish Elephant in the Room 

/12 Comments/in , /by

 A lie produces flowers but no fruits.
African proverb 

“You and I, indeed, all of us, all over the world, are Africans under the skin; brothers and sisters separated by barely two thousand generations. The old divisive concepts of race are scientifically false,”1 notes Spencer Wells, the Boasian anthropologist responsible from 2005 to 2015 for the Genographic project of the National Geographic. Led by Susan Goldberg, its Jewish editor in chief from 2014 to 2022, this popular magazine has become a formidable weapon of globalist propaganda whose sole purpose is to promote mass immigration, multiculturalism, inclusion, egalitarianism, race-mixing, and the negation of the concept of race.2 Although the Genographic project has been shelved, the following views on race and evolution remain consistent under current Editor in Chief Nathan LUMP (non-Jewish) since 2022: 

Based on evidence from the Genographic Project and other scientific research projects, humans of the past and present can trace their origins to a single ancestor living in Africa 60,000 years ago.

It is genetically proven that all humans are 99.9% identical. Human beings do not fall into neat physical categories that some people call “race.” The differences between us — like skin colour and hair texture — evolved as humans adapted to different environments. Yet these differences constitute less than 1/10th of 1% of our genetic makeup.

These opinionated notions are repeated almost verbatim by the many social agents involved in promoting immigration, multiculturalism, miscegenation, and race denial such as the African-born recently arrived Quebecer Éric M’Boua: “[…] it has been scientifically proven that humanity originated on African soil. This makes us citizens of the same land called AFRICA [sic].” In an article published in the Huffington Post Quebec, Mr. M’Boua, whose enthusiasm for race mixing and multiculturalism knows no bounds, backs up his statement with a lecture by Spencer Wells, quoted above, presented on the platform TED Talks, Ideas Worth Spreading. 3 

Is Eric M’Boua right? Has it been proven scientifically that humanity originated in African soil? Can humans of the past and present trace their origins to a single ancestor living in Africa 60,000 years ago? What is the truth of the matter? Where does this notion come from? Why is it important? 

Afrocentrism 

The doctrine of Afrocentrism which originated in the United States during the civil rights movement of the 1960s and the creation of post-modern Black Studies programs in American universities has played a significant role in the promotion of the Out of Africa hypothesis. The author of this doctrine is the African anthropologist, Cheikh Anta Diop. He believed that Africa was not only the matrix of humanity, but that the ancient Egyptians were “Negroes” and that humanity owes them all of civilizations and primary inventions. According to the African history specialist, Bernard Lugan, Anta Diop was also convinced that “whites who could not admit this contribution of ‘Negroes’ had then created modern Egyptology in order to destroy the evidence of Egyptian negritude by eliminating black mummies and highlighting only white mummies.”4 

With his best-selling book, Black Athena. The Afroasiatic roots of Classical Civilization, Jewish author Martin Bernal played a major role in the spread of the African origin of humanity. He claimed that Whites had deliberately obscured the immense cultural contribution of Asia and Africa to European civilizations for racist and antisemitic reasons.5 While his primary political aim was anti-racism and postcolonial revisionism (building on Afrocentric scholars like Cheikh Anta Diop), his Jewish background provided personal motivation and shaped his focus on combating antisemitism and racism.6  

Out of Africa Film 

There is no evidence, at first sight, of a direct or intentional impact of this Jewish-produced film on the notions promoted by the National Geographic. However, the film almost certainly played a significant, positive role in the public’s ready acceptance of these ideas. It indirectly created a specific emotional and intellectual backdrop by presenting Africa as a “lost paradise,” a place of profound beauty, and majesty. The aura and prestige of the Stars Meryl Streep and Robert Redford lent the continent a new kind of romantic legitimacy in popular culture. The title itself—Out of Africa—is a powerful, simple, and positively framed phrase. In 1985-86, it was on everyone’s lips: winning 7 Academy Awards including Best Picture. The term “Out of Africa” entered the cultural lexicon associated with love, loss, beauty, and a return to origins. The film’s core is about a deep, personal, and transformative connection between a European woman and Africa—its land and people; it echoed a theme of “origin” and “return.”7 

Mitochondrial Eve 

But what gave these notions their scientific credentials is the “Mitochondrial Eve” study by geneticists Allan Wilson, Rebecca Cann, and Mark Stoneking published in 1987 by the journal Nature.8 The famous phrase, “We Are All Africans Under the Skin,” was then widely popularized by the Jewish controlled main stream media9. At the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance, the good news was also promoted by eminent scientists such as the Jewish geneticist Axel Kahn: 

The surprise of recent scientific discoveries is indeed that man has no more genes than the donkey or the ox, and even much less than the toad… All men are in fact of great genetic homogeneity, because their common ancestor is young in terms of the evolution of life; he lived over 200,000 years ago in Africa. All the continents seem to have been populated from a population whose groups would have left Africa 70 000 years ago. Skin color, which plays such an important role in racial prejudice, does not reflect genetic divergence so much as a progressive browning of the skin as one moves from the north to the equator. There is more genetic diversity, on average, within individuals of a particular ethnicity than between two different ethnicities, even if they are apparently as dissimilar as Scandinavian or Melanesian populations.10 

Globalists and liberal anthropologists of the Boasian school, such as Spencer Wells, quoted above, have meanwhile become obsessed with this notion.11 The fact that we all came out of Africa the day before yesterday, and that we are therefore all fundamentally similar, makes it much easier to mix populations and races, and to make them accept the world dreamed by John Lennon in his song “Imagine.”  

Fortunately for those who do not like to be tossed around in the dreamer’s washing machine like a basket of dirty laundry, thanks to advances in anthropology and genetics, there are many reasons to believe —until proven otherwise, as science never stands still and is open by definition to revision of established truths—, thanks to advances in anthropology and genetics, that Africa is not the cradle of the major subspecies of mankind: Caucasoid (light skin, originating in Europe, Middle East, North Africa, parts of South Asia); Mongoloid (East Asian features, epicanthic folds, originating in East/Southeast Asia); Negroid (darker skin, originating in sub-Saharan Africa); additional minor groups: Australoid (Indigenous Australians, some Pacific Islanders) and Capoid (Khoisan peoples of southern Africa). 

Multiregional Hypothesis  

According to the multiregional view of paleoanthropologists Alan G. Thorne and Milford H. Wolpoff of the Australian National University, mitochondrial DNA is not the only source of evidence; “Mitochondria Eve is not the first woman to come out of Africa. Fossil remains and artifacts represent more reliable evidence.” As Thorne and Wolpoff state, the principal human races began to evolve well before the appearance of anatomically modern humans Homo sapiens. Contrary to mainstream thinking races did not evolve as a result of modern humans leaving Africa to colonize the rest of the world some 60 000 years ago as promoted by National Geographic. They trace racial characteristics as far back as two million years ago to the extinct human species Homo erectus.12  

Anatomically modern humans evolved from this more ancient form simultaneously in different parts of the world, and it was during this period that the racial characteristics of Homo sapiens emerged 300 000 years ago. Stating that all humanoids originated in Africa means very little, but gives the false impression that all of humanity is an undifferentiated African magma. There is no single recent dispersal for modern humans; humans originated from Africa and then slowly developed their modern forms in every area of the Old World.13  

As noted by Kerry Bolton in his book Babel Inc., this was also the view of eminent anthropologists Carlton S. Coon of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists who stated that today’s races evolved separately, in different continents, over different periods of time: “if Africa was the cradle of mankind, it was only an indifferent kindergarten. Europe and Asia were our principal schools.”14 As geneticist, R.R. Gates states, “isolation has been the great factor or at any rate, an essential factor in the differentiation of races.”15 

DNA sequencing allows us to affirm that Europeans of the Caucasoid subspecies are descended from three strains, none of which is African:  

  1. The Western European hunter-gatherers, the stem population of all Europeans; 
  2. The ancient North Eurasians, whose genes are found in all Europeans and inhabitants of the Near East, notably in the Turks; 
  3. The farmers from Anatolia, whose genomecontainsgenes from the above hunter-gatherers (mainly in Mediterranean populations, but not in Danubian and North-European populations).16 

Evolutionary Surge of Domestication 

Since humans started farming roughly 10 000 years ago, for example, new races emerged that had very little or no resemblance to the originals. In their book, The 10,000 Year Explosion, scientists Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending explain that since the beginning of domestication, evolution has been roaring along 100 times faster than during the Stone Age, that it is “madly galloping off in all directions,” and that “the biological equality of human races” is “about as likely as a fistful of silver dollars all landing on edge when dropped.” 17  

Now, for the second National Geographic idea: 

It is genetically proven that all humans are 99.9% identical. Human beings do not fall into neat physical categories that some people call “race.” The differences between us — like skin colour and hair texture — evolved as humans adapted to different environments. But these differences make up less than 1/10th of 1 percent of our genetic makeup. 

The racial reality that the “out of Africa crowd of the left” refuses to accept makes it possible, among other things, to determine in each race the length of pregnancy, the weight of a baby at birth, its precocity, its aggressiveness (the crime gene, MAO-A), the size of its brain, its intelligence and chances of success, physiological adaptations (lactose tolerance, altitude and skin pigmentation adaptation) and even its response to certain drugs and its predisposition to suffer from certain diseases (sickle cell anemia, malaria), cancers, or mental diseases such as schizophrenia. These differences are the product of evolutionary pressures—not social constructs.18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 

While we are identical to all other humans in more than 99.9% of the 3 billion elementary bases of which our DNA is composed, this 1/10 of 1% of our genetic makeup is of paramount importance, for it actually contains the blueprint for all our physical, physiological, and psychological differences not only between individuals, but also between races.26, 27, 28 

The above scientific facts are an affront to the cherished idea of the “we are all Africans under the skin” crowd that believes that races are a category of the mind, the human brain hasn’t changed much since modern Homo sapiens appeared 300,000 years ago, and that we are all the same under the skin and in the head.  

The intention is to challenge notions of biological hierarchy and racial prejudice by insisting on our shared origins and our common DNA, but using human evolutionary history and genetic characteristics to justify modern migration policies and social-political decisions is a disastrous category error—mixing paleoanthropological and biological facts with socio-political decisions has led to the present chaotic world we live in. 

The Jewish Elephant in the Room 

It was Jewish liberal pseudoscientist Franz Boas who at the beginning of the 20th century led the assault on the idea that race was the primary source of the differences to be found in the mental or social capabilities of human groups. He professed that race is merely a category of the mind or a social construct not found in nature, and that behaviour is strictly shaped by environment.29  

As a result, by the middle of the twentieth century, educated Americans no longer thought Darwin and evolutionary theory were relevant; they referred to human differences in cultural terms, and believed that all human races were equal. Research on evolution ceased, and the profession of anthropology completely excluded genetic studies on race.  

This fundamental shift away from race as a biological construct was the result of an ideological shift rather than a scientific shift. At the time, America was a racially homogeneous White Anglo Saxon Protestant country. Immigration to the US was restricted to people of European descent. Antisemitism was common. So, the goal of Franz Boas and his Jewish students was firstly to break the immigration laws which stopped their kind from immigrating to America, and secondly, to make the country more Jew friendly as Jews can only prosper and be safe in the world when the respect for pluralism, the accent on tolerance, the emphasis on individual liberties and egalitarianism are the dominant values. But to fit a square peg in a round hole, Boas based his conclusions on incomplete information, inferences, guesses, and unverifiable assertions ranging from the possible to the preposterous. It was a long and challenging road but this fake Boasian science eventually led to the Hart-Cellar act of 1965, a landmark piece of legislation that opened wide the gates of immigration to non-European populations.30 

Likewise, and for the same reasons, prominent Jewish Harvard scientist Stephen Jay Gould had a major influence on the public’s views on immigration, race, and intelligence. In his book The Mismeasure of Man, for example, he falsely claims that evolution could produce people as different as Australian Aborigines and Europeans, but the brains of the two groups, and therefore, their intelligence, could be exactly the same, a notion that has been thoroughly debunked. So, why would Gould say such a thing if it is false? Was he just mistaken? Or, did he commit fraud like Franz Boas to advance his ethnic/ideological agenda? As evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald says in his book The Culture of Critique, one of the prominent themes of Gould’s book was how hereditarian views on intelligence had been used by the “Teutonic supremacists,” aka the Nazis, to discriminate against his race and justify its persecution. Gould’s views on this subject as well as the IQ debates of the 20s and their link to the immigration issue and eventually the Holocaust are the reasons why he falsified his studies. As MacDonald notes, this “illustrates how skill as a propagandist and ethnic activist can be combined with a highly visible and prestigious academic position to have a major influence on public attitudes in an area of research with great implications for public policy.”31 

Then there was the enormous influence of Jewish linguist Noam Chomsky’s theory of language which claimed that “the general principles underlying the structure of particular languages across the world, the rules which determine the form of their grammar, in such languages as English, Turkish, Yoruba, or Chinese, are indistinguishable in their degree of sophistication.” Chomsky’s goal “was to offer a theory of language consistent with the ideological claim that all humans are genetically equal, in order to encourage the integration of non-White races in the West and make Whites feel there was nothing special about their cultural achievements by reducing all languages down to their lowest common denominator.”32  

What about National Geographic? How does it fit in? Well, it belongs to Walt Disney Corporation. It’s Jewish CEO, Robert Iger, is a notorious liberal advocate, like a disproportionate number of his coreligionists and for the same reasons listed above.33 According to journalist Alyssa Rangel of Culture Wars, after the death of Walt Disney and his brother Roy, this family-oriented business was transformed into a progressive, DEI, anti-racist, LGBT-pedophilic oriented stronghold.34  

Moreover, one of the major shareholders of Disney is asset management firm BlackRock. Its Jewish CEO Larry Fink is the interim chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and BlackRock is a WEF strategic partner. Fink has also participated in Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission events. Big Pharma, the Industrial Military Complex, BlackRock and other firms such as Vanguard, State Street, as well as the Open Society Institute of Jewish currency speculator George Soros are broadly aligned with the money-lenders of Wall Street, the City of London, and the UN-related sustainable development goals of Agenda 2030, a vehicle for a globalist “New World Order” aiming to undermine national sovereignty, control populations, and make the richest richer.35 

In short, Franz Boas, Stephen Jay Gould, Martin Bernal, Axel Khan, Noam Chomsky, Suzan Goldberg, Georges Soros, Robert Iger, Larry Fink are all ethnic activists who support a social engineering political agenda rather than a humanitarian one. In fact, advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism, anti-racism, tolerance, and egalitarianism as a model for Western societies, has been the “invisible subject” of Jewish activists in finance, politics, academia, media, and the entertainment business— “invisible,” notes Kevin MacDonald, because the racial interests of its advocates are hidden by their discretion on their racial identity, humanitarian objectives, and the language of science.36  

In the final analysis, Jewish activists are the main advocates of the “Out of Africa” trope. Whether this “Jewish elephant in the room” truly believes in this trope and whether he thinks race is a category of the mind, all humans are truly equal, and open society, mass immigration, and the mixing of racially and culturally incompatible populations are good for mankind is an open question. Judging by their notoriously strong tribal affinities and Israeli policies on immigration, multiculturalism, and race mixing, it can be argued that the Out of Africa theory is one of the many group evolutionary strategies that Jewish power uses in a deceptive way simply because “it’s good for the Jews.”37  

Dr. Jones and the St. Joseph’s County Library: Sorry, Doc, The Problem Ain’t One Board Member — It’s Much Worse

/in /by

The internationally famous Catholic intellectual, Dr. E. Michael Jones, a couple of years ago released an interesting podcast, How The St. Joe County Public Library Enables Genocide In Gaza, in which he discusses — and complains about — the failure of the three-person St. Joseph’s County Board of Commissioners of St. Joseph’s County to appoint a new member of the St. Joseph County Library Board in place of a former eminent lawyer named Alan Feldman. Feldman, in private life a distinguished lawyer at a large law firm, apparently supports retaining a homosexual-promoting book in the children’s section of the library. He, together with the Library Board back in July, rejected requests by parents to move the book to another section of the library. (Apparently the parents were too polite to ask for the complete removal of the book from the library itself, let alone its burning in a public ritual).

This alarming attitude, in the view of Dr. Jones and most reasonable people, would be ample reason for the eminent lawyer’s immediate removal from the Library Board. As well as the removal of the other Library Board members who voted to keep the book in place. Mr. Feldman, however, unlike the other Members of the staggered-term Board, was alone up for re-appointment (or removal) in December of 2023.

Fortunately for the “good guys”, a while ago, the County Board flipped from 2-1 Democratic to 2-1 Republican. The new Republican member was (and is, as she is still serving on the Board) a pro-family Catholic named Amy Drake. Seeing Feldman’s term renewal coming up, Drake licked her chops, reasonably assuming that, now, the County Board was majority Republican, the County Board could replace Mr. Feldman with someone less “edgy” on the homo front. Wrong. According to Dr. Jones, the other Republican on the County Board “stabbed Amy in the back” and voted to continue the eminent Mr. Feldman Esq. for a third 4-year term. (Commissioners reappoint St. Joe County Library’s preferred board member.)

Dr. Jones seemed to imply in his podcast that this betrayal — if in fact it was (there are a number of well known Republican could care less about “pro-family” issues, and we have no way to know what promises were, or were not, made to the unfortunate Amy) was facilitated by the holding — by a Republican group? — of an event discussing the Hamas-Israel situation across town two hours after the start of the County Board meeting (and possibly not before the end of that meeting). Dr. Jones’ suggestion is that this Israel meeting — which apparently turned into a pro-Israel love-fest, to the discomfiture of Dr. Jones — drew all the voters who otherwise would have attended the County Board meeting. This — I guess — reduced the number of “witnesses” to the “backstabbing” of the good Amy. Or something. Whether the presence of those “witnesses’ might have intimidated Amy’s shameless Republican colleague into voting against Mr. Feldman cannot be known. In the event, the local newspapers reported that, aside from one speaker, all the attendees loudly supported Mr. Feldman.

Look, this is all very complicated. And since the Library Board has seven (7) members, what difference would the removal of one member make anyway, at least in the short term? Had the rest of the Board disagreed with Mr. Feldman, they could have outvoted him 6-1 at the July meeting in which they voted to keep the book where it was. In addition, as can be seen from our discussion below, it is not clear that their vote would have meant anything if the library administrators wanted to keep the book there.

Thus, Dr. Jones’ complaints are a bit confusing. However, his podcast does spark the viewer’s interest in whether and how the entire Library Board might be removed and how it was selected in the first place. Then you could ditch the entire damn Board and presumably scour the library for its objectionable books and nix any future “drag queen” hours, the local ADL be damned.

Of course, the doings of a library in St. Joe County may seem like small potatoes, given that the county is relatively small and with little national significance. However, what happened in St. Joe has been occurring around the country. Day after day we read of presumably “red” state small town libraries hosting drag shows and piling up stacks of homosexual books, all of which the locals seem unable to stop.(1) How could public libraries in small-town red areas end up with drag queen hours and homosexual texts that the locals cannot seem to prevent or remove? These are public libraries, after all. Can’t the “public” in those towns simply change the local library management and put a stop to this nonsense?

So maybe it is instructive to look at exactly how Indiana local libraries are set up. Perhaps Indiana is not too dissimilar from other states in this respect. In particular, because it is a “red” state. This may give us a clue to the problem we face nationally.

And indeed it does. Sadly, the problem is far worse that Dr. Jones suggests. It is not the problem of one small-town politician cutting a deal that is unattractive. No, it is an entire structure that has effectively removed local library control from the local community.

Under Indiana statutory law, enacted by the Indiana legislature, so-called “local” libraries may be established by vote of any Indiana county board. So far so good. However, the precise governance of these libraries are set forth in the statute in excruciating, debilitating detail. Not so good.

First, the county board establishes a local library by first establishing a “Library Board” consisting of seven members.

The County Board selects these members. Thereafter, everything is in the hands of the Library Board. The County Board has no further say. In fact, since the library system, once created, is an independent taxing entity (like a local school district), it appears that the County Board cannot even exercise indirect control by reducing county appropriations to the library — since it makes no such appropriations. The sole power the County Board has thereafter is the naming of new Library Board members when the old members’ 4-year staggered terms expire. It can only remove existing Library Board members for some form of “cause,” so, in effect, it has no real “mid-term” removal power, since any removal on the grounds of “homo promotion” will undoubtedly be ruled a violation of free speech by a judge. To replace a majority of the board would, therefore, take many years!

In turn, the Library Board also appears to have very little direct operating power. Its only apparent role in governing the local library is the initial power to name an “administrator” and a number of sub-administrators. Thereafter, the Library Board apparently has no power, other than to open, finance, and/or close physical library facilities and, it seems, to establish an annual library budget and, upon the retirement of the “administrator” or one of the assistants, to hire a new person to replace the departing administrator. Crucially, unlike most businesses, the Library Board may not fire any of these administrators at will. The Board may fire an administrator only for, again, some form of “cause”.

So the crucial decision is the initial hiring of a library “administrator”. Thereafter, the local library in Indiana is essentially a self-guided missile, going wherever the “administrator” wants it to go, County Board and Library Board be damned. Now, presumably in the budget-setting process the Library Board has some trading “wampum” with which it can induce the “administrator” into desired courses of action. But is it a great system where the only oversight is the nuclear-bomb threat of defunding the entire system to punish one administrator?

And the Library Board is not even free to appoint anyone it thinks proper. It may only appoint persons that have a state “credential” as a library administrator from a separate, statewide board — the so-called “Credentials Board”. That board is nominally appointed by the Governor of Indiana. However the appointments must be of a certain number of eminent state officials. The likelihood that the Credentials Board will have any sympathy with “parochial lower-class” local mothers is probably low, given the elite subset of persons from which such officials are usually selected. In fact, the likelihood that they will defer to standards set by the odious American Library Association or other similar organizations is probably very high. This is a major problem.

In addition, to be a library administrator, you need a masters in library science, almost certainly from a masters program accredited by the ALA. Predictably a huge part of the ALA’s current mission statement is that the curriculum, faculty, and facilities (??) must emphasize “diversity equity and inclusion”, ALA Standards for Accreditation of Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies Adopted by the Council of the American Library Association (the Council), November 30, 2023, by request of the Committee on Accreditation (“ALA Accreditation Standards”). Thus, a nationwide system has been established much like the schools of education, which only low-IQ persons who are — or are educated to become — heavily “woke” attend. It appears clear that the uniform product of this “educational” system will be exactly the kinds of people who, even before entering, would support drag queen story hours. And since “diversity, equity, and inclusion” has been defined to mean inclusion of homosexuals and those who commit every kind of sexual perversion, these future administrators will have been brainwashed into thinking that any attempt by “uninformed” parents to block homosexual or similar material from the libraries is a violation of fundamental civil rights — like another Inherit the Wind Scopes Trial, like the Hollywood blacklist!! Unthinkable!! After all, they are the experts. And they learned in school that inclusivity towards homosexuals and transsexuals is a mandatory part, and perhaps the MOST IMPORTANT PART of a library’s mission.

Clearly, with this system in place, each local town is now set up for a major cultural conquest of the unsuspecting inhabitants and the brainwashed janissaries produced by ALA — accredited institutions.

It should be noted that this system is a perfect way to weed the “common people” off the habit of reading books. Instead of hiring a 60-year-old 145 IQ blue stocking Radcliffe graduate bookworm (whom you can’t hire since she would drop dead rather than go through a duller-than-dull MLS program), you will have to hire a 110 IQ MLS graduate who — at that IQ level — probably does not even like books. In fact, books probably bore her to death.

If you were wondering why so many libraries are now stacking CD’s and movies, why all libraries feel it is necessary to host noisy “events” in their main reading rooms all the time, now you know the answer. These drones cannot imagine why anyone would want to sit silently in a completely quiet library reading room and study one book after another. In fact, many library administrators no longer enforce what used to be the longstanding “no talking in the library” rule. Many libraries seek to introduce computers, entertainment equipment and the like while de-accessioning as many of their books as they can. This caters to that part of the community that likewise has no interest in books and, of course, drives away people interested in using the library to study or read books. Gradually, local communities will lose the idea that reading books is even desirable.

For the powers that be, that is a good thing. A populace that is well-read is an enemy to centralized, bureaucratized control mechanisms such as Davos, the UN commission on Climate Change, EEOC, the Bush family….

To add insult to injury, the “only” basis on which the Library Board may select an administrator is the comparative superiority of his credentials! Since the “quality” of those credentials will undoubtedly have been pre-determined by the presumably woke Credentials Board, the Library Board in fact has very little room to name a non-woke library administrator. It might try to do so, but, if push came to shove and a court case were brought by the unsuccessful MLS aspirant where a non-MLS Ph.D. in English Literature, e.g., Dr. E. Michael Jones himself — were selected instead, it is likely that the Library Board would lose. So, if it wished to hire a non-woke administrator, it would undoubtedly have to hide its tracks and create an artificial record supporting the “superior” credentials of the non-woke appointee, as well as the fact that the views of the appointee on pro-homosexual books and drag queens were given no weight. Of course, if such a subterfuge were uncovered later, that could mean big trouble for the Library Board members, since such gaming would probably violate the public meetings and public records laws of Indiana, as it would in most states. See the following story from Tennessee — another ruby red state: “Tennessee librarian fired for not moving kids LGBTQ books to adult section”. My prediction? The town will lose.

Thus, even in the initial selection over which the Library Board has nominal power, that power is close to illusory.

So when you work through all this mess, the Indiana library system works like this:

  1. Local counties can decide to establish or not to establish a local library.
  2. Once the county establishes it, the library is run solely by persons selected by ALA-selected candidates

Translation: You set up the library. You pay for it forever. Then, the American Library Association names the guys that run your library and, thereafter, those guys run the library any way they damned well please. Since the Library Association of America now backs every woke agenda on earth, including transgenderism and homosexuality, liberalized race relations, and anything pro-Jewish, so will their hand-picked administrators, and that is why you have the shit you do at your library and why you can’t do anything about it.(2)

You don’t like it? Go fuck yourself.

That is the problem. Not the eminent Mr. Feldman.(3)

Can this be changed at the State level? The Democrats will never change it. How about the Republicans? Well, the big Republicans in most of these states — think the Bushes — are so disconnected from real life they think people complaining about these issues are just lower-class crazies. They probably laugh about such complaints at their country clubs, since the only reason for Republican control of government is tax cuts and increase business subsidies. Didn’t you know that?

Furthermore, these people don’t go to yer grungy public library. They simply buy books they want on Amazon and build de-facto private libraries or use the capacious private libraries at their members-only luncheon clubs (e.g., the University Club in New York City — 100,000 books).

These people don’t use yer grungy public parks — who would do that? When they want fresh air and exercise they go to their country clubs or go yachting on the “Sound” or, perhaps, lake Michigan.

These people don’t go to yer grungy public school. Their kids have private schools and go to private universities.

The super elite don’t even stay in hotels when they travel. They stay in correspondent private clubs, with travel details arranged by subservient ultra-helpful employees of their local clubs.

To make it worse, their businesses — not to mention their political campaigns — probably depend on Jewish financing; they probably know the elites running the Library Association of America and don’t want to piss them off. They may in fact be buddies with the board members. So when someone wants to dismantle the whole set of institutions inhabited by people like them and their financiers, they think that “someone” is out of his friggin’ mind.

So, you want pornography out of your public library? Good luck bro.

As a betting man, my money is still on pornographer “I do it because I hate Christ” Al Goldstein, Al Goldstein — Wikipedia. Certainly not on the mothers of St. Joe’s County. What do you think I am? A sucker?

_______________________

1/ St. Joseph’s County appears to be balanced between two “reddish” rural districts and one urban (read the city of South Bend) “blue” district, consisting of a lot of welfare recipients, homosexuals like “Sec Trans” Buttigieg, and a formerly Catholic college popularly known as “Notre Dame” (of “gipper” fame), i.e., deep blue as the deep blue sea except for the one spot of fiery red periodically erupting out of the house inhabited by Dr. E. Michael Jones.

2/ Why was such a crazy system set up in the first place? Well, Indiana, like most states in the 1920’s, was not a big friend of the Catholic Church. One of the Protestant (statewide) majority’s big beefs with the Catholics was the expansive Index Librorum Prohibitorum put out by the Pope and his Curia,. The Index Librorum might have been a nifty idea had it only prohibited porn and faggotry. Undoubtedly the Protestants would have warmly supported it in those days (not so much these days). Unfortunately, the Index also prohibited works such as “works of David Hume — all”, Les Miserables, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Gallileo’s Diologues— you get the idea. Obviously, the idea of allowing a local Catholic-majority community to induce its local library to throw out half of what the University of Chicago would call the “great books” just to satisfy the Pope was anathema to the ruling Baptists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Seventh-Day Adventists. One can only guess that they devised this centralized system to preserve what, in their view, was the essence of Western Christian Civilization and the American experiment from the foreign Papist dictators and their barbarian adherents in the U.S. Sadly, however, though the Index Librorum terminated in 1962 around the time that the Catholic Church itself committed suicide, the super-centralized library system did not. This gave an opportunity for enormous power to whomever grabbed those centralized levers of “library power”. Inevitably, as always, the centralized system has now been taken out of the hands of 60-year old blue stocking Protestant women and put in the hands of pink-haired lesbians and Jews, for whom the sexual revolution is just beginning. Hence, drag shows at your local library. What a disaster.

3/ The only solution is to get the state legislature to repeal all laws regulating the local libraries and replace them with a simple statute empowering local county boards to establish and run local libraries any way they please, with no credentialing required and at-will hire and fire power over all administrators (and library board members if the county board chooses to create one). That done, the election of a new slate of county board members, mirable dictu, will actually have significance. Until then nothing can, or will, change.

LYDIA BRIMELOW: Alas, Prayers Didn’t Sway Judge Kraus. Now My Family Needs Help

/2 Comments/in /by

No normal American family can stand up to lawfare costs

LYDIA BRIMELOW WRITES: We asked you to pray for a miracle and you did, thank you, but it just wasn’t God’s will.

New York State Judge Sabrina Krauss has denied our motion to dismiss New York State’s lawsuit against Peter and myself, separately from the VDARE Foundation. Now the case will also move forward against us personally. It only took her only one day to decide.

PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

We’ve seen this before. Ultimately, it was the cost of compliance with Discovery demands that forced us to suspend the VDARE.com website, even before we were charged with anything. We couldn’t keep the writers and the lawyers both paid at the same time, and the lawyers weren’t—and aren’t—optional.

This time, the Discovery is aimed at our family as well.

Discovery means endlessly expensive invasive demands, endless document production, and endless legal bills. And that’s the point—this is the “process as punishment” that the NYAG’s own Rick Sawyer bragged about [2:13] to the Anti-Defamation League’s 2022 conference, He said that, although “Hate Speech” i.e. VDARE’s criticism of immigration policy is protected under the First Amendment, he could get around that because “it sucks to be sued, because it’s massively expensive, opening up one’s whole life to discovery, ruining one’s credit and inflicting huge opportunity costs.”

Still, we do not know what miracles might lie ahead. There are appeals pending on the VDARE side. The tide could turn.

But, regardless of our faith, we must prepare for the fight in front of us.

My husband and I are immigration patriots. We have committed no crime. For 25 years, Peter ran VDARE.com in the face of unwavering hostility, educating the public about the negative effects of mass immigration. He is a loving father

and grandfather

For more than 10 years I was the publisher of VDARE.com, raising money in spite of massive censorship and deplatforming and facing every challenge with creativity, resolve and more often than not, with joy. I am a wife, and a homeschooling mother of our three young children.

VDARE.com did not go down out of scandal or abuse, and definitely not from lack of support from our wonderful donors.

It was destroyed by lawfare from New York State Attorney General Letitia James. And I am standing here asking for personal help because the she is now trying to destroy my family and our beliefs.

What we need now is money.

Discovery is expensive. We have $38,500 raised through Givesendgo toward our $50,000 goal.

But so far, we have already paid out about $35,000 on our personal legal bills and the hard part hasn’t even started.

If you have already given: thank you. You have kept us in this fight.

If you can give again: please do. The hardest part is still ahead.

And please, keep praying. Miracles do happen. We just haven’t seen ours yet.

Sincerely,

Lydia Brimelow

Please donate by credit card here or by mail to PO Box 677, Berkeley Springs, WV 25411.

And—Thank You, and God Bless.

 

PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Postcards from the Empire: Dismantle the American Empire

/3 Comments/in /by

There are several less than flattering names for the American Empire that describe it quite well – The Hollow Empire, The Empire of Lies, Globohomo, The Zionist Global Empire among them.

Whatever name one wants to dub it, it is an empire that was never supported by Americans or even voted on, as on all important issues policies are imposed by the ruling uniparty and its institutions of control, manipulation and exploitation. And now, more dangerous than ever as illustrated by Trump’s sickening aggression against Iran, the American Empire is becoming ever more dysfunctional, unpopular and illegitimate, and it needs to be repudiated and dismantled.

The overseers of the Empire are like fossils from a long-ago era, still living in a 1945 mindset and still foisting endless propaganda about that “good war” on Americans even as the number of living WWII vets dwindles to a miniscule number. WWII we are told was a battle of “pure good” versus “pure evil,” which is still the cartoonish m.o. of the regime. Washington can’t just have a disagreement with leaders of other countries; no, they have to be given the full uncontradicted Hitler Treatment in order to justify the Empire’s endless militarism.

Traditional American values and morality have been distorted and inverted from an endless overdose of propaganda emanating from the media, the advertising cartel, NGOs, and the government promoting alleged egalitarianism and anti-racism. While those are lofty goals in theory albeit obviously impossible to achieve when it comes to forced “equality,” the actual agenda derives from acute hatred of Whites, Christians, and Western civilization. “Hey hey ho ho, Western civ has got to go” was a cry made famous by the recently deceased Jesse Jackson on college campuses some 40 years ago. At the time it was seen with a mixture of worry and humor, but now the Permanent Cultural Communist Revolution that began in the late 1960s has advanced to the point that every institution has been taken over and is implementing The Great Replacement with the same zealousness that Washington is implementing Israel’s expansionist policies and aims.

Jesse Jackson’s extremist view of Western civilization in the 1980s has become the mainstream left position.

And that’s what stands out now – all the alarm and denunciations of the mysterious, unaccountable “Deep State” have under the horrific second Trump presidential term exposed what it essentially is – the stealth takeover by one country of another.

One of the main reasons Vladimir Putin is despised so much by Western elites is that when he took power from the drunken stooge Boris Yeltsin, he did a lot of housecleaning, including jailing some of the Zionist oligarchs pillaging Russia and causing others to flee the country. Russia had and still has an influential group of pro-Western “Atlanticists” that apparently restrain Putin’s government in some areas, but Putin has been a strong Russian nationalist who took over a country that was plundered and demoralized, and he restored pride to it.

Yeltsin was an easily manipulated stooge, but is Trump any different when it comes to Israel?

American nationalists had, naively as it turns out, hoped that Trump 2.0 would be at least similar to Putin when it came to cleaning house. Many gave him the benefit of the doubt, believing he was too naïve in his first term and thus easily constrained by the “Swamp” he had been elected to drain. Instead, Trump 2.0 is America’s Yeltsin, not a drunk but so chaotic, erratic and vicious that every day more people are questioning whether he’s deranged or whether it’s all part of a continuing act from the beginning — like an actor who built a lot of trust from half the population but who is now throwing it away, as the phrase goes, “with all deliberate speed” whether because of being blackmailed from material in the Epstein Files, or because he was a militant Israel First Zionist all along.

Over 80 years since the end of World War Two and some 75 years since the Korean War, the U.S. still has over 40,000 troops stationed in Germany and tens of thousands distributed in other of its western European colonies; somewhere between 54,000 and 61,000 in Japan, and around 25,000 in South Korea. In all, according to Chat AI, the Empire has U.S. troops stationed in roughly 80 countries, with 750+ bases worldwide.

Read those numbers again. Troops in 80 countries and 750 or so military installations around the world. Besides the tremendous waste of resources needed to support such an undertaking, the U.S. military since WWII has yet to win a war of note. Tiny Grenada doesn’t count, and the “victory” over Iraq in 1991 was followed by another war in Iraq over non-existent “weapons of mass destruction” brought into being by lying neocons who sold them to a naive President Bush. The Iraq war was a disaster in every way and has never officially stopped, as Iraq is still occupied. Besides the thousands of Americans killed, tens of thousands were injured, many horrifically from IEDs, and the number of Iraqi civilians killed was a very high number. But as Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright infamously said regarding the deaths of over half a million Iraqi children from the extreme sanctions placed on that country, “It was worth it.”

Madeleine Albright was a great exemplar of an empire that dehumanizes opponents.

And now the military is unable to defeat Iran. A prolonged, dragged out affair that may end up with Iran flattened, at best will be a draw. And in the meantime, with so much of its ammunition and weapons depleted, what happens if China decides it’s a perfect time to give an ultimatum to Taiwan? Designed to supposedly be able to fight two large wars at the same time, the U.S. military is a trillion-dollar boondoggle that is only increasing anti-U.S. hatred around the world, especially so since Trump began taking orders from war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Empire, like so much of American society, is warped, degraded, immoral, and without positive substance. Trump had another opportunity, most likely the last one the U.S. will have, to be a true patriot and take on the leftist rot within head-on. Instead it turns out he’s a huge part of the rot himself. The Zionist billionaires financing the cultural and demographic ruination of the country, starting with George Soros on down, are protected and there will be no accountability for them or any of the Epstein class during Trump 2.0.

While a few of the worst Antifa types are being charged with felonies, the street armies still have institutional protection in most areas. Some bad illegal alien criminals are being rounded up, but Trump promised to deport all illegal aliens. But the numbers being deported are small, and as soon as the Democrats win back control of the executive branch, the floodgates will once again open.

Same with the many executive orders Trump signed early on. They have symbolic meaning far more than genuine bite. DEI hasn’t been defeated or anything remotely close to it. The advertising and corporate executives, the social media oligarchs, the universities and colleges and Democrat-controlled legislatures across the country are merely biding their time until they can again unleash the same forces that ran amok during the Biden regime.

And if you don’t believe that, have you noticed how the search engines still censor and deplatform non-Zionists and non-leftists, or how the disappearance of White men from advertising and the media continues as before? What was needed was the kind of counterforce that Trump unleashed on Iran, not a military one but a full-frontal attack culturally. Instead it’s the same old same old — except with lipstick applied to the pig. Trump 2.0 will end up as an unmitigated disaster and we’ll be lucky if Trump and the other Zionist and Christian Zionists in his administration haven’t caused WWIII by the time he exits the White House, a not unlikely scenario at all given how the illegal war in the Persian Gulf remains far from being settled in a lasting manner.

The Republican Party is completely useless, nothing more than the Democrats’ partner in crime. A few good exceptions among Senators and Congressmen doesn’t change that. The GOP won’t even pass the SAVE Act despite having majorities in the House and Senate. It’s garbage and the best outcome of the upcoming midterms is that the Democrats win back at least the House and stalemate ensues for the last two years of Trump 2.0, that is if the Great Flip-Flopper finishes his term without being removed.

Voting in the traditional manner is a waste of time. But that doesn’t mean the large and growing bloc of aware patriots should just give up and go back to posting anonymously on social media and do little else.

First of all, the fact that so many have caught on and continue to is the great silver lining of our time. The alternative media continues to grow and thrive despite all the ways the Empire tries to discredit it through shadow banning, siccing paid trolls and disinformation artists to comment sections, and other methods. It must continue to be supported in every way, as the economic destruction caused by Trump’s war is only going to get worse, possibly much, much worse.

Don’t vote for either branch of the uniparty tyranny; the political system has been locked down for a long time. But do vote for independents and third-party candidates when they are on the ballot.

The GOP primary in Thomas Massie’s House district is fast approaching. If you happen to live in his district or close to it, become a volunteer, and wherever you live help him out with a donation. Because of the way Trump, who has no loyalty to anyone but his Zionist sponsors and cohorts, has demonized Massie it makes it even more important that he remain a voice of America First reason in the House.

Beginning third parties and running independent candidacies at the local level is doable. School board runs and town councils are the positions to target. Build from the bottom up while still engaging in the top-down information war.

The Empire needs to be repudiated and defanged. It can’t happen all at once in a dangerous world in which foes have thousands of nuclear weapons along with an unknown number of secret bio-weapons. But the United States is blessed geographically; no country would dare to attack the U.S. unless the present Empire itself continues to take actions that provoke a devastating response.

We need a government and institutions that revere America and its people, that understands George Washington’s admonition against entangling alliances, that treats other nations and peoples with genuine respect.

The amount of awareness and knowledge that now exists is inspiring. In the U.S., it is primarily the aging and ignorant “Judeo-Christians” and the Epstein Class who enable the Empire. The world is exhausted and fed up with U.S.-Israeli aggression. It’s up to Americans to do everything possible to change the country’s trajectory from expansionist Zionist militarism to peaceful co-existence and friendship with all, and that requires dismantling The Empire.

And read my website American Freedom News.us (americanfreedomnews.us), updated daily.

Link to Don Wassall’s Substack.

The Remnant of Hereditary Slavery in Saint-Denis, France

/5 Comments/in /by

The Basilica of Saint-Denis, north of Paris, in the French department of Seine-Saint-Denis in the Île-de-France region, is home to the royal necropolis of the Basilica of Saint-Denis, wihich houses the tombs of numerous Frankish and French sovereigns, from Dagobert I to Louis XVIII – including Charles Martel (as the joke goes, the Arabs were stopped in 732 at Poitiers by Charles Martel, but they returned in 737, i.e., in a Boeing 737).

We can only urge American or English tourists to visit the site for its recumbent figures and their astonishing stone draperies that could be mistaken for real fabrics; it is quite a thing.
We simply warn them that they shouldn’t be surprised to be the only White people there. Because the current events in Saint-Denis are no longer about the Kings of France, and not only because of the French Revolution, but rather because of the demographic revolution.

The big news in Saint-Denis is the election of a Black mayor, Bally Bagayoko.
This election sparked racist reactions, which the mayor complained about; anti-racist demonstrations were then organized in Saint-Denis – without much turnout, the odd thing being that most of the protesters were white (Not so strange after all, rather, it is a classic case of a guilt-ridden white man being subjected to compulsory repentance.).

Bally Bagayoko comes from LFi (La France insoumise), a radical left-wing party that advocates for immigration, racial mixing, multiculturalism, and Islam in France; the LFi is called “an Islamo-leftist party”, a party that aspires to the advent of the 6th Republic (today we live in de Gaulle’s 5th Republic).

Bally Bagayoko just forgot to tell us that he comes from the Soninke slave-owning tribe! He also neglects to mention that the divide between “nobles” (horon) and descendants of slaves (komo) not only persists in Africa (with leaders almost always being descendants of the horon), but that this divide has also been transposed into the Black immigrant community in France.Mr. Bally Bagayoko, the new mayor of Saint-Denis, is of Soninke origin.

We provide below an automated translation of an article by Bernard Lugan on this subject.

Bernard Lugan is a historian and one of our leading Africanists who, for this reason, has notably taught in our military schools, Saint-Cyr and the École de guerre for senior officers. He was excluded because he was deemed far-right.

Before giving the floor to Bernard Lugan, and since the UN has just declared the transatlantic slave trade the most serious crime against humanity, a few quick clarifications on another aspect of the slave trade: the predominant participation of Jews in this trade.

1 – The American reader is probably aware that Newport, the main port for importing slaves into America, was nicknamed Jewport.

2 – Pierre Mendès France, Prime Minister from 1954 to 1955, descended from a Jewish family from Portugal who had settled in Bordeaux (adding “France” to his original name, Mendes), and in Bordeaux, this family was involved in the slave trade.

3 – The involvement of Jews in the Atlantic Slave Trade was so extensive that the first article of the “Code Noir,” a decree by Colbert intended to alleviate the suffering of Black people, was worded accordingly:

“We wish that the edict of the late King of Glorious Memory, our most honored lord and father, of April 23, 1615, be executed in our islands; in so doing, we enjoin all our officers to expel from our said islands all the Jews who have established their residence there, whom, as declared enemies of the Christian name, we command to leave within three months from the day of the publication of these presents, under penalty of confiscation of body and property.”

A quick overview of the Transatlantic slave trade


Atlas of Migrations 2008

Now, to read the Bernard Lugan’s article, his blog is « L’Afrique Réelle»

 *   *   *

Mr. Mayor Bally Bagayoko, what if we talked about hereditary slavery among the Soninke?

Mr. Bally Bagayoko, the new mayor of Saint-Denis, is of Soninke origin. His family comes from the Koulikoro region of Mali. At the forefront of the revanchist, racialist discourse, the question “Where are you from?” has never been asked of him. Yet, it would likely be well received by someone close to La France Insoumise, given its origins in the Maoist and leftist circles of 1968. This question allows decolonial thinkers and the heirs of Foucault, Bourdieu, and Althusser to indict white men. For deconstructionists, this question means that all speech is situated—socially, politically, and historically—and therefore explains discourse and stances. This is what Anglo-Saxons have defined as “standpoint theory.”

So, where are you “speaking from”, Mr. Bally Bagayoko?

The answer is clear: from the Soninke world. A world with a very rich history, dating back to the Kingdom of Ghana, which emerged in the 8th century. A world in which slavery was not simply an economic system, but a comprehensive, imprisoning, and hereditary social structure, as demonstrated, among other things, by the books cited at the end of this overview. According to Claude Meillassoux (1975 and 1986), the Soninke formed a slave society in the truest sense, and Martin Klein (1998) showed that slaves represented between a third and a half of the population in many regions of Western Sudan.

The Soninke belong to the larger Mande group spread across present-day Mali, Mauritania, and Senegal (Soninke, Malinke, Bambara, etc.). Founders of the historical Ghana Empire which lasted from the 8th to the 11th century, the Soninke were essential players in the trans-Saharan trade networks of which the slave trade to the North African world was an important component.

But that is not the main point, because in the Mandé world, and therefore among the Soninké, the slave was not primarily intended for sale outside the ethnic group, tribe, or village, but rather to remain a permanent and dependent member of the family. This is why, in 1905, when colonization abolished traditional African slavery, this colonial legal decision did not end its social persistence; the servile status transformed into clientelism, that is to say, a “modernization” of the practice, which allowed it to survive.

Abner Cohen and Gibril Sankoh (1995) demonstrated that the Soninke were among the first West African migrants to France. However, and this is perhaps the crucial point, the emancipation of former Soninke slaves through emigration was merely theoretical, as social hierarchies persisted. In France, the divide between “nobles” (horon) and descendants of slaves (komo) remained, as it is the marker of a social and identity-based identification from which it is impossible to escape, since it is as definitive as gender. Slavery among the Soninke is thus a long-standing phenomenon, as social hierarchies endure.

Most Mandé societies exhibit a tripartite stratification. The Horon/Foroba are the free men, whether they belong to noble or common lineages. The Nyamakala are the members of the artisan castes. The Jon/Jongo are the slaves, now referred to as dependents. These affiliations are hereditary, except in cases of explicit manumission.

According to Cohen and Sankoh (1995), the Soninke case is one of the most rigid in the Mande world because the status of slave cannot be erased. It is indelible, since the descendants of slaves remain marked, even after their eventual emancipation. Marriages between Horon and descendants of slaves are forbidden, and descendants of slaves are excluded from positions of authority. We are therefore dealing with societies in which slavery has indeed been legally abolished, but in which its reality persists through hereditary ancestry. This status is less pronounced among the Malinke or the Bambara, peoples among whom social mobility is more frequent. But this is not the case among the Soninke.

However, the Soninke system, one of the most institutionalized in the Mandé world, is also found in the diaspora, which largely explains labor relations and electoral clienteles. According to François Manchuelle (2004), the Soninke case is even like a laboratory for the sociology of West African migrations. It would therefore be interesting to see how this reality is articulated around the new municipal team of Saint-Denis, given the strict endogamy that restricts social mobility among the Soninke people. This is all the more relevant since Cohen and Sankoh (1995) have shown that Soninke society is an exemplary case for observing the transition “from slave owners to employers of free laborers.”

Ultimately, Saint-Denis could serve as a laboratory for observing how, once transplanted to France, a former Sahelian slave society transformed into a labor migration society that abandoned none of its deep-rooted structures and traditions. This is a far cry from “republican assimilation”…

Sources

1848 : l’abolition définitive – Assemblée nationale

Décret d’abolition de l’esclavage du 4 février 1794 — Wikipédia

Après la fin de la traite : le lobbying culpabilisant anti-blanc et l’instrumentalisation de l’esclavage – Jeune Nation

Was the Atlantic Slave Trade Really the Gravest Crime Against Humanity?

code-noir.pdf

Nécropole royale de la basilique de Saint-Denis — Wikipédia

About NewPort /JewPort, here is an extract from an article by Claude Timmerman

https://jeune-nation.com/kultur/culture/apres-la-fin-de-la-traite-le-lobbying-culpabilisant-anti-blanc-et-linstrumentalisation-de-lesclavage

“Four to five hundred thousand slaves shipped to the West Indies (the first were Irishmen deported as slaves to the Islands by the British) compared to at least eleven million transported in direct trade to continental America: the future USA on one side, Brazil and Colombia on the other!

In the USA, distilleries produced rum of questionable quality made from molasses, mainly imported from the West Indies, which was used as currency for the purchase of slaves.

The first distillery was founded in Newport at the end of the 17th century, and the port city soon had 22! An industry directly linked to the African slave trade: one only needs to cross-reference the lists of distilling industrialists and those of slave ship owners to be convinced of this.

In support of these claims, notwithstanding political correctness, we have the names of ships, captains and shipowners over three centuries and above all the manifests and bills of lading, in other words the official documents of the ships describing their cargoes and attesting to their owners.

In Africa, grain fermentation (particularly that of millet and sorghum, which produces beer known locally as tchouchouta, dolo, or tchapalo, depending on the region) was known and appreciated. A large-scale consumption of American alcoholic beverages, such as rum, quickly developed, paid for with slaves.

The port of Newport then became the North American nerve center of the slave trade with Africa.

The “King of Newport,” Duarte Lopez, also known as Aaron Lopez, ruled the North American slave market there for nearly thirty years, until the mid-18th century, contrary to current mainstream claims, particularly those supported by the latest version of Wikipedia…

We are talking about two to three million slaves imported into the USA during the single period of its activity!

History has recorded the names of the owners of Newport distilleries – where the alcohol produced was exported by the slave ships they outfitted and traded for slaves in Africa – who were clearly involved in the slave trade: Isaac Gomez, Hayman Levy, Jacob Malhado, Naphtaly Myers, David Hart, Joseph Jacobs, Moses Ben Franke, Moses Gomez, Isaac Dias, Benjamin Levy, David Jeshuvum, Jacob Pinto, Jacob Turk, Daniel Gomez, James Lucanan, Jan de Sweevts, Simeon Potter, Isaac Elizer, Jacob Ltod, Jacob Rodrigues, Haym Isaac, Carregal, Abraham Touro, Moses Hays, Moses Lopez, Judah Touro, Abraham Mendes, Abrabam All….

In the 18th century, according to American maritime records, of the 128 recorded slave ships that landed enslaved people in Charleston, 120 belonged to Jewish shipowners from Newport and Charleston. It’s understandable why some, undoubtedly with malicious intent, renamed the city “Jewport”…

Some American rabbis even openly claim that their community played a leading role in the slave trade!

We therefore refer those who believe that our remarks constitute a basic anti-Semitism (to which it is now fashionable to add “compulsive and visceral”) to the following publications:

– In the work of Rabbi Morris A. Gustein: The Story of the Jews in Newport (Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh).

– To the monumental work in 4 volumes by Elisabeth Donan (not translated into French): Documents illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America. (Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1930 – 1935)

– In the work of Rabbi Ralph Lee Raphael: Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History – New York – Behrman House – 1983.

He emphasizes on pp. 14, 23-25: “Jews also took an active part in the slave trade in the Dutch colonies; indeed, the statutes of the congregations of Recife and Mauritius (1648) included a tax (Jewish levy) of five soldos for each Black slave purchased by a Brazilian Jew from the Dutch West India Company.”

And further on:

“This was no less true on the North American continent, where during the 18th century, Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies, where they were exchanged for molasses, which in turn was shipped to New England where it was distilled into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 1770s dominated the slave trade on the American continent.” (portraits below in the order they appear)

Needless to say, these books are now difficult to find, and Google, the LDH or the Licra are not exactly promoting them!”

To find out more

-Cohen, A ; Sankoh, G. S. K., (1995) Slavery, Emancipation and Labour Migration in West Africa : The Case of the Soninke. London.

-Klein, M.A., (1998) Slavery and Colonial Rule in French West Africa. Cambridge University Press.

-Lovejoy, P.E., (1983) Transformations in Slavery: A History of Slavery in Africa. Cambridge University Press (2e édition révisée : 2000 ; 3e édition augmentée : 2011.)

-Manchuelle, F., (2004) Les diasporas des travailleurs soninké (1848 1960). Migrants volontaires. Paris.

-Meillassoux, C., (1975) L’esclavage en Afrique précoloniale. Paris.

-Meillassoux, C., (1986) Anthropologie de l’esclavage : Le ventre de fer et d’argent. Paris.

Bernard Lugan

 

 

 

New Study: Treatment for Gender Dysphoria Sends People Even More Mentally Ill

/1 Comment/in /by

The trans lobby use the same emotionally manipulative argument again and again for putting sexually confused children on puberty blockers and insisting that deluded people be permitted to mutilate their bodies: “They find it so distressing that their body is not aligned with the sex they supposedly feel they are in the minds that they will commit suicide if you don’t give them what they want. Failure to give them what they want will make them so depressed that they simply won’t want to live anymore.”

This argument makes no sense. A man who feels that he is a woman is deluded. To allow him to overtly present as a woman (often not very convincingly) will do nothing to address the psychology behind why he has developed this delusion and this identity disturbance. To “transition” him is akin to accepting the anorexic’s delusion that she is fat and allowing her to starve herself to death accordingly.

If the trans lobby is correct, then all transsexuals – even those who only develop their feelings about this in adolescence – really are “born into the wrong body,” meaning that “gender-affirming” treatment or surgery will make them better psychologically. A new study from Finland has shown that this is nonsense. Consistent with the idea that gender dysphoria reflects underlying psychological problems, gender reassignment has no positive impact on their mental health.

Published in Acta Paediatrica, the new study is entitled “Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adolescents and Young Adults Who Contacted Specialised Gender Identity Services in Finland in 1996–2019: A Register Study.” It is able to take advantage of the fact that Finland has a small population on which it keeps very up-to-date information with every Finnish resident having an identifying number. It looked at every case across the period of Finns who had attended a gender identity clinic before reaching the age of 23 and it then followed their interaction with the medical services until they died or until June 2022. They also looked at whether they had seen a psychiatrist before or after the date of referral to the clinic. This gave them a sample of 2083 people. Each one of these was compared to four people of the same sex who were born in the same year and in the same region. They also looked at whether these people had been referred to a psychiatrist for some condition, usually depression.

The findings were striking. Fifteen per cent of controls had seen a psychiatrist prior to the referral date compared to 45% of those referred. Two years after the referral, 14.6% of controls had seen a psychiatrist compared to 61.7% of those referred. In other words, undergoing gender affirming treatment does not seem to assist the mental health of these people. If anything, it makes it worse.

Among men who wanted to be feminised and who underwent medical reassignment, psychiatric needs rose from 9.6% to 60.7% ,while among those who were reassigned from female to male, psychiatric needs went from 21.6% to 54.5%. Interestingly, these were rather different among people referred to the clinic who were not gender-reassigned, something that few commentators on this study seem to have explored. The males had a previous psychiatric interaction rate of 53% and a subsequent one of 59% while for the females these numbers were 65% and 67%. So, those who did not transition had less previous psychiatrist interaction than those who did and, in the case of males who did transition, this level of interaction was actually lower than that of controls. It was 13.6% for control males and 16.4% for control females.

It is very difficult to work out what is going on and, surprisingly, the authors do not mention the anomaly. They do, however, observe a significant change after the year 2010. Twenty-three per cent of the 1996-2010 cohort had seen a psychiatrist about some other issue before being referred to the gender clinic. However, among the 2010-2019 cohort, this was 48%. One way of interpreting this is that, from 2010 onwards, something changed in the culture leading to mentally unstable people being drawn into gender dysphoria.

It seems fairly obvious that the “trans madness” began around 2010 — when it began to be promoted. This would lead to a certain kind of socially anxious person who had previously suppressed mild “trans” feelings realising that they were a way of gaining status, attention and even power via a shocking new identity. It would also lead to more and more socially anxious people of this kind uber-conforming to the new marker of victimhood and virtue in order to feel that they mattered and were special. In that females are more socially anxious than males, it is no coincidence the female gender dysphoria began to be observed at this point, especially among groups of teenage girls with very high mental instability; the kind that were anorexics a generation earlier.

We can only speculate on why, among men, there is the counter-intuitive finding that controls had higher previous psychiatric interaction than men who were reassigned but this is reversed among those who weren’t reassigned. According to a Finnish psychiatrist with whom I corresponded about this, before about 2010 there were very strict criteria with regard to who could be reassigned. Doctors refused to permit reassignment to those with serious psychiatric problems. The females seemingly came en masse after 2010 and the Finnish medical authorities also became less strict about reassigning people at around this point.

However, the key point is that, at the very least, gender reassignment does not improve the mental health of those who undergo it. They have serious mental health problems prior to it and they seem to have worse mental health problems afterwards. This study demonstrates that trans ideology is based on a falsehood. People with gender dysphoria have psychological problems and responsible doctors should attempt to address these rather than allow such people to mutilate their bodies and even demand that everybody else participate in their fantasy.

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene Exposes the Jewish Billionaire Trio Backing Thomas Massie’s Primary Challenger

/8 Comments/in , /by

In the aftermath of Israel’s Gaza genocide, some of the richest Jews in America have united to crush the one Republican who dared say no to their blank check, turning Kentucky’s May 2026 primary into an existential referendum on whether any anti-Zionist can survive in a Jewish-dominated political order.

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), who resigned from Congress in January 2026, ignited controversy on March 31, 2026, when she identified the billionaire donors backing former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein’s campaign against Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and accused them of prioritizing a foreign country over American interests. (Other TOO articles on Massie.)

“You know who has not been tested? His opponent. His opponent that is literally propped up and funded by three Jewish billionaires,” Greene said during a virtual fundraiser for Massie that also featured former Rep. Ron Paul and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). “Now look, I’m not anti-Semitic, I don’t care what people’s religion are, but these three billionaires that are funding this opponent against Thomas Massie don’t even live in Kentucky, they’re not eve-, they don’t have a home in his district. And their loyalty is to Israel, not the United States of America.”

Greene continued with an urgent call to action: “So I think what’s extremely important for people to understand is you need to donate some money. You need to donate some money on the MassieMoneyBomb.com because this is a fight for America first. This is a fight against a foreign country, against foreign interests, and against foreign money. And it’s that type of foreign money that has already bought off most members of Congress.”

The three donors Greene referenced are the same ones identified by the Washington Examiner: New York hedge fund manager Paul Singer, who contributed $1 million to the anti-Massie super PAC MAGA KY; Florida hedge fund manager John Paulson, who contributed $250,000; and the Preserve America PAC — primarily funded by Nevada casino mogul Miriam Adelson — which contributed $750,000. None of the three donors live in Kentucky.

Massie has characterized the effort as a “DC-funded hit job.” The Massie fundraiser raised over $351,000 in its first 24 hours, driven by more than 3,200 small donors. The MAGA KY super PAC, run by Chris LaCivita — who co-managed Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign — had spent $1.56 million in just 38 days on television and digital advertisements opposing Massie by early August 2025. By late March 2026, CBS News reported total MAGA KY spending had grown to approximately $2.7 million, while a super PAC linked to the Republican Jewish Coalition had directed more than $2.8 million toward the race. RJC CEO Matt Brooks had said earlier, “Like Trump, we are committed to the defeat of Massie.”

The involvement of the Republican Jewish Coalition alongside these massive outside donations makes one thing clear. The effort is not about Kentucky values but about enforcing unconditional loyalty to Israel. Who are these three Jewish billionaires, and what are their political priorities?

1. Paul Singer

Paul Elliott Singer, born August 22, 1944, in New York City, contributed $1 million to MAGA KY — the single largest individual donation to the anti-Massie campaign. Forbes estimates his net worth at $6.7 billion as of 2025. restart

Singer founded Elliott Associates in 1977 with $1 million in seed capital. The firm grew into Elliott Management Corporation, which managed approximately $72.7 billion in assets as of December 31, 2024. Elliott has long been described as a “vulture fund” — its model involves buying distressed sovereign and corporate debt at steep discounts and pursuing aggressive litigation for full repayment. The most notorious example was Elliott’s 15-year legal campaign against Argentina over defaulted sovereign bonds, which ultimately extracted full repayment.

Singer has been among the most significant funders of neoconservative foreign policy ventures. He was FDD’s second-largest contributor from 2008 to 2011, donating $3.6 million to the hawkish think tank focused on Iran policy and pro-Israel advocacy. He serves as Chairman Emeritus at the Manhattan Institute, per the Elliott Management website, and donated more than $1 million to AIPAC’s United Democracy Project in recent election cycles.

Singer describes himself as a libertarian-leaning conservative but has consistently backed interventionist foreign policy. He was a major fundraiser for George W. Bush and heavily funded Marco Rubio’s 2016 presidential campaign. He donated $1 million to the anti-Trump Our Principles PAC during the Stop Trump movement before eventually reconciling with Trump and donating $5 million to his super PAC in 2024.

 

2. John Paulson

John Alfred Paulson, born December 14, 1955, in Queens, New York, contributed $250,000 to MAGA KY. Forbes estimated his net worth at $3.8 billion as of August 2025.

Paulson founded Paulson & Co. in 1994 with $2 million and one employee. He became a household name in finance for executing what author Gregory Zuckerman documented in his book The Greatest Trade Ever — shorting subprime mortgages ahead of the 2007-2008 financial crisis. His firm earned $15 billion that year, with Paulson personally pocketing roughly $4 billion.

Paulson served as one of Trump’s top economic advisers during the 2016 campaign and hosted a record-breaking fundraiser on April 6, 2024 at his Palm Beach mansion — the “Inaugural Leadership Dinner” — that raised $50.5 million for Trump’s presidential campaign, which Trump called “the biggest night in Fund Raising of ALL TIME.” Paulson himself stated: “This sold-out event has raised the most in a single political fundraiser in history.”

Paulson’s Israel-focused philanthropy has grown substantially in recent years. In 2023 he committed $27 million to Hebrew University of Jerusalem to build the Paulson Bar-El Building for Computer Science and Engineering, and in January 2026 his foundation added another $19 million, bringing his total commitment to Hebrew University to $46 million — one of the largest donations the university has ever received. Hebrew University awarded Paulson an honorary doctorate in June 2024 in recognition of his philanthropic contributions.

The most politically charged element of Massie’s campaign involves the late Jewish sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Paulson’s name appears in Epstein’s black book. In a September 2025 Newsmax interview, Massie named Paulson directly: “He’s a hedge fund manager and a major donor to the Republican Party, a major donor to the speaker of the House, a major donor to the president’s campaign, and he’s in Epstein’s black book.”

3. Miriam Adelson

Miriam Adelson, born October 10, 1945, in Tel Aviv during the British Mandate, contributed $750,000 via the Preserve America PAC, of which she is the primary funder. Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index puts her net worth at approximately $40 billion, while Forbes estimates $32–35 billion.

Born Miriam Farbstein to Jewish parents who fled Poland before the Holocaust, she served as a medical officer in the Israeli military before becoming a physician specializing in addiction treatment. She married Sheldon Adelson, the founder of Las Vegas Sands Corp., in 1991 and after his death in January 2021 assumed control of the family’s business and philanthropic empire, including majority ownership of the Dallas Mavericks.

The Adelson family has channeled more than $600 million into Trump’s three presidential campaigns and other Republican causes since 2015. In 2024 alone, Miriam contributed $106 million to Preserve America, her pro-Trump super PAC, eclipsing even the $75 million contributed by Elon Musk to his own PAC. Miriam and Sheldon Adelson were jointly instrumental in pushing Trump to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights during his first term.

At a White House Hanukkah reception on December 16, 2025, Adelson took the podium and publicly encouraged Trump to seek a third term — a move barred by the 22nd Amendment. She told the crowd she had spoken with attorney Alan Dershowitz about the constitutional question and concluded, “We can do it, think about it.” Trump then announced to the crowd that Adelson had promised “another $250 million” if he runs again in 2028, prompting chants of “Four more years.”

The campaign against Massie represents a broader pattern of pro-Israel donor networks targeting anti-war voices within the Republican Party. Massie has been targeted primarily for opposing U.S. military aid to Israel, voting against Trump’s reconciliation bill, and leading the push for full release of the Epstein files.

This is not the first time Massie has faced this pressure. In the 2024 cycle, AIPAC’s United Democracy Project launched an ad campaign against him, announcing an initial $300,000 TV buy on Fox affiliates statewide. UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton declared the group was “shining a spotlight on Tom Massie’s atrocious anti-Israel record.” Massie pushed back, telling supporters that “the AIPAC super PAC just bought $300,000 of ads against me because I am often the lone Republican for freedom of speech, against foreign aid, and opposed to wars in the Middle East.” FEC filings reviewed by The Intercept placed UDP’s total verified expenditure against Massie at approximately $167,000. Voters were unmoved: Massie won his May 2024 primary with roughly 76 percent of the vote, defeating two challengers and declaring on election night, “AIPAC, your smear campaign on this American has backfired.”

May 19, 2026 will deliver the most honest test we have seen. Israel’s ethnic cleansing campaign in Gaza, which the entire world saw via livestream, may have finally produced a growing anti-Zionist current among Republican voters in the United States. The question is whether the growing anti-Zionist sentiment can stand against Jewish billionaire money. Should Massie lose, the defeat will expose a brutal truth: American politics functions as a Jewish oligarch playground where elections are mere theater.