From White Papers Institure: 

Marine Le Pen Takes up the Torch of Enlightenment at Nationalist Conference

…

Le Pen’s arrival was electric. Despite following second behind Vox leader Santiago Abascal and being followed by a dozen or so leaders, it was Marine Le Pen that every head turned to follow. Every phone was recording her, and almost all clapping hands followed her movements. The camera panned to her most often during each speech, and her own speech drew a rapturous applause that can hardly be described in words. The real magic was in the content of her speech, though.

Marine Le Pen waxed poetic about not only Europe but about the entire West. Madame Le Pen has proven that she has a civilizational view of the West that includes Europe, the British Isles, and America among others. She spoke first of how mass immigration was “draining our coffers and filling our prisons” and how the dying liberal order in Brussels was a threat to global peace and stability.

Le Pen spoke not of individuals or atomized persons only in terms of nations and most often in terms of peoples and ethnic groups. Her perception of the world is through a lens of group relations, and she explicitly rejected the deconstructive and destructive view of nationhood that the flailing global order has foisted upon the West.

Of particular note was her assertion that “the migration pact is a programmed demographic submersion of Europe” and her belief that the spirit of the West’s “inventive and conquering” peoples was on the verge of a revival that would see this civilization propelled into a new age of invention. At every turn she asserted that Europe has contributed for more to the world than it has ever taken away and in doing so she has revived a moral confidence that the neoliberal order has spent decades attempting to crush out of Europeans, Americans, and others.

The entire speech was an invocation to move forward and build something new with old Europe. She spoke of technological development, alternative fuels such as hydrogen, of food sovereignty, and of reviving an industrial base.

More than anything Marine Le Pen has proven herself to be the spiritual leader of continental Europe and perhaps the whole of the West. For, Donald Trump may rule in the most powerful nation of the West but it is Marine Le Pen who has taken up a vocal defense of the entirety of European civilization in the old world and the new.

Continues:

Marine Le Pen Takes up the Torch of Enlightenment at Nationalist Conference

But it’s depressing that even with the disaster of present-day France, the polls say National Rally is at around 35 percent. This NYTimes op-ed talks a lot about budgetary problems, but then it’s pretty clear that in the end, it’s all about French identity and fear that the right is eventually going to take over.

In France, malaise is all around: In one recent poll, 87 percent of respondents agreed that the country is in decline. This story is often told in the language of civilizational threat and culture war, amplified by recent conflicts in France’s overseas territories. Fanned by a rising Fox News-style conservative media, the trio of insecurity, immigration and Islam fuels a mounting call to defend a besieged French identity. Even the centrist Mr. Bayrou speaks of a feeling of “submersion.”

…

That’s where Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally comes in. The party is often stereotyped as a protest vote for “left behind” industrial workers, but its appeal is much broader. While the party still trails the left among the very lowest paid, its electoral support has in recent years stretched deep into the middle class. Given that Ms. Le Pen inherited the leadership from her multimillionaire father, the party might not seem like an ideal champion of meritocracy. Yet this promise, to restore the value of individual endeavor, is its pitch today.

Ms. Le Pen is often cast as a defender of the old French social model, and it’s true that her party opposed Mr. Macron’s raise of the retirement age. Yet she takes a far more ambiguous position on welfare provision generally, as her preference for a pension system more dependent on individual employees’ contributions shows. Her party channels the dissatisfaction of many late-career employees forced to work longer, to be sure, but also that of younger voters skeptical about paying into a system that might never reward them. By the same balancing logic, the party tends to oppose budget cuts while also standing against tax rises for consumers and households.

The Party’s signature move is to cast ethnic minorities, immigrants and the undeserving poor as a special drain on resources. Ms. Le Pen’s supporters are galvanized by fear of such populations, according to researchers such as Félicien Faury and Violaine Girard, yet — interestingly — they do not favor broad welfare support, even for whites. Rather, they increasingly identify with values of self-reliance and homeownership. This is less honey-eyed nostalgia for the postwar “golden era” than a 21st-century expression of individual autonomy. It demands a tough call to order, though always for someone else.

For much of France, Ms. Le Pen’s rise is itself cause for pessimism. Her poll ratings for the next presidential election, in 2027, stand at around 35 percent; given France’s fragmented party system, she is on track to receive the highest first-round percentage for any candidate in the past half-century. In last summer’s parliamentary elections, a so-called republican front of left-wing and centrist voters held back her party’s expected victory. Yet warnings of far-right danger are securing diminishing returns.

Perhaps France isn’t headed for disaster. For all its recent anxieties, it remains far from a Greek-style sovereign-debt crisis. If borrowing has risen sharply, the country has transgressed European Union deficit limits for much of the past quarter-century without risking economic meltdown. Productivity and worker incomes remain much better than in neighboring Italy. Social mobility is not especially strong, but wage inequality has tended to fall in recent decades. Even Ms. Le Pen’s triumph is hardly assured; an embezzlement trial may soon see her barred from running for office.

Yet France’s malaise is not simply a product of an overheated culture of complaint or political missteps like Mr. Macron’s rash call for snap elections last summer. The National Rally is exploiting a deeper disaffection with the public realm, as residual elements of the postwar social compact jar with a rising mood of privatization. In some areas, trade unions and social movements stoutly defend welfare and labor rights. But it is less clear that left-wing parties, which today command under one-third of the electorate, can rebuild a wider consensus around a more collectivist model.

This isn’t the only project in doubt. Mr. Macron began his presidency promising to rally both left and right behind a modernizing, liberal agenda. Yet his support has shriveled, a result of cutting social protections without securing broader public buy-in and offering tax breaks for the rich without lessening the debt load. His presidency has revolved around what has been termed a “bourgeois bloc,” appealing to a slice of wealthier voters but failing to offer much for the majority. The exhaustion of this strategy, and the political fragmentation it has caused, could prompt snap elections as soon as the summer.