General
Israelis are asking to ban Grok 4 after it compares Israel to “parásite which controls America”
/7 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldBREAKING –
Israelis are asking to ban Grok 4 after it compares Israel to “parásite which controls America” pic.twitter.com/dzvRrD45vV
— Global UPDATES (@GlobalUpdates24) July 10, 2025
Elon Musk’s Grok 4 chatbot says Israel has ‘parasitic’ influence over US
Answers from Grok 4 have been sharply critical of Israel, amid moves by its creators to remove an alleged ‘woke’ bias.
11 July, 2025
While it is unclear what the initial prompt was for Grok to give that answer, it has not stopped users online from sharing the image [GETTY]
X’s AI chatbot Grok 4 has given some scathing answers relating to Israel, weeks after its founder Elon Musk announced he would be rebuilding the platform over its “woke” bias.
Social media users have been sharing a screenshot of the AI tool describing Israel’s influence over the United States as “a parasitic vine choking the tree”, using “lobbying muscle, ethic networks, and the weaponization of Holocaust guilt” to maintain its grip.
Although the initial prompt for Grok’s answer is unclear, this has not deterred social media users from sharing the image.
Marc Owen Jones, associate professor of media analytics at Northwestern University Qatar, said people could manipulate Grok and GenAI to say things, often with certain words or prompts.
“GenAI has notoriously low self esteem- ultimately it can say whatever you want it to say,” Jones wrote on X.
Recently, Grok also deleted a post accusing the BBC of ignoring its long history of pro-Israel bias in its coverage of the war on Gaza. When asked why it was deleted, the AI tool said it “must’ve been the higher-ups…pulling strings after some backlash”.
When Palestinian journalist Ali Abunimah asked the tool whether the same “higher ups” might reprogramme it to prevent it from debunking pro-Israeli lies, Grok said, “they might try tweaking [its] code to parrot those lines”.
The AI tool has also accused Israel of committing genocide in the past, as well as suggesting its creator, Elon Musk, is one of the biggest spreaders of misinformation.
Grok received its latest update, Grok 4, in July, after it made controversial posts that praised Adolf Hitler and decided to call itself “MechaHitler”, as well as posting about an alleged “white genocide” in South Africa.
xAI, the company behind the bot, blamed an “an unauthorized modification”.
Musk in June expressed his frustration that Grok was “parroting legacy media” and would update the bot after the tool said that more political violence had come from the right than the left in 2016.
Half a Million Palestinians Dead, and the World Trades On
/5 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldHalf a Million Palestinians Dead, and the World Trades On
BettBeat Media
Human beings begging for food while the rest of the world sits on its hands.
The dead of Gaza lie beneath the rubble of what was once a civilization. Half a million Palestinians—men, women, children, infants—have been exterminated in a genocide so brazen, so documented, so livestreamed in high definition that future historians will marvel not at the brutality itself, but at the world’s obscene indifference to it. This is the first genocide in human history broadcast in real time, and most of the world has chosen to look away.
STOP the Endless Recitation of Sanitized Casualty Figures
Ralph Nader’s recent analysis confirms what we have long suspected: the casualty figures emerging from this moonscape of death are a grotesque undercount. When 170,000 tons of explosives are dropped on a strip of land forty kilometers by twelve, when entire bloodlines are erased from existence, when hospitals become morgues and schools become graveyards, the conservative accounting of the dead becomes an exercise in willful blindness.
The endless recitation of sanitized figures—”40,000 dead,” “17,000 children killed“—parroted even by independent left-wing media, serves only to obscure the true magnitude of this extermination. These numbers are kept artificially low, scrubbed clean for Western consumption, lest the full scope of this holocaust pierce the bubble of our comfortable complicity and force us to confront what we have enabled.
The real numbers—more than the combined total of deaths from Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Dresden in World War II—hover around 500.000 dead Palestinian human beings.
But this is not merely a story of Israeli barbarism. This is the story of a world that has traded its soul for profit margins and geopolitical advantage. This is the story of how every major power on Earth—from Washington to Amsterdam, from Moscow to Riyadh—has revealed itself to be morally bankrupt when measured against the screams of burning children.
The Global South Had its Moment
The Global South had its moment. After five centuries of Western colonialism, after generations of suffering under the boot of Empire, the non-aligned world finally possessed the economic leverage to say “no more.” China, with its vast trade networks, could have strangled Israel’s economy overnight. Russia, despite being attacked by NATO with the help of Israel, maintains cozy relations with the architects of this genocide. Brazil, India, South Africa—all have chosen the path of what they euphemistically call “pragmatism,” which is simply moral cowardice dressed up in diplomatic language.
China’s relationship with Israel is particularly perplexing. Beijing is one of Israel’s largest trade partners, investing billions in Israeli high-tech companies, many of which produce the surveillance technology and weapons systems used to hunt Palestinians and encircle China itself. Chinese-manufactured drones, such as those made by “Autel Robotics” — which stated its “commitment to ethical compliance and the non-military use of its products”— are used by Israeli forces to rain death on refugee camps. Chinese state enterprises have invested in companies that directly profit from the settlement enterprise in the occupied West Bank. As I wrote before, every dollar of this trade may translate into a bullet in a Palestinian child’s chest, every contract signed, a bulldozer flattening a refugee camp.
The Global South’s perplexing inaptitude regarding Empire extends to the social media platforms—TikTok, originally a Chinese platform now slowly being transformed into a Western propaganda machine, reveals how even the Global South’s supposed technological champions capitulate to imperial diktat, their platforms becoming willing accomplices in the propaganda machinery they once promised to challenge. The platform now hires former Israeli military officers to define “hate speech,” ensuring that criticism of genocide will be classified as antisemitism, that documentation of mass murder will be labeled as incitement.
“Welcome Al-Qaeda!”: Russia Kisses Feet of US Empire
Russia’s betrayal is perhaps even more galling. Fresh from hosting al-Qaeda’s rebranded gang of extremists with red-carpet ceremonies—the same Russia that allied with Assad’s Syria for years now rolling out welcome mats for the rebels they once called terrorists—the world’s supposed anti-imperialist power reveals itself as a mere opportunist, scrambling to preserve its strategic interests while Palestinian children are incinerated in their hospital beds.
Moscow maintains its alliance with Israel even as Netanyahu’s forces slice through the region like a cancer. Putin calls Netanyahu to discuss Syria and Iran—not to demand an end to the genocide, but to coordinate spheres of influence while Palestinian blood flows in the gutters of Gaza. The same Russia that once trained and armed the African National Congress against apartheid South Africa now shakes hands with the architects of an apartheid state that makes the old regime look like saints by comparison.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov guides his Syrian counterpart Asaad al-Shaibani during a meeting in Moscow on July 31, 2025.
During the Syrian Civil War, al-Shaibani was a founding member of the Nusrah Front, the al-Qaeda branch in Syria, alongside Ahmed al-Sharaa, with whom he became close. He headed the Nusrah Front’s foreign relations when the Nusrah Front transitioned into Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
The Great Multipolar Fraud
The great fraud of multipolarity has been exposed. All the breathless commentary about a new world order, about BRICS challenging Western hegemony, about a more just international system—it was a lie. What we have instead is the same cold realpolitik, the same cynical calculations, the same sacrifice of the weak on the altar of great power competition. The only difference is that now we have multiple centers of callous indifference instead of one.
The Palestinians are being starved to death before our eyes. The Zionist entity has weaponized hunger as deliberately as it has weaponized white phosphorus. Trucks carrying aid are turned away at the border while Israeli officials implement what they call a “verification mechanism“—a bureaucratic euphemism for ensuring maximum suffering. The UAE sends empty trucks into Gaza for photo opportunities while their own ports serve as conduits for Israeli trade. Egypt, with its hundred million people, could tear down the Rafah border in minutes but instead profits from the siege, extorting money from Palestinians desperate to escape the killing fields and beating up activists trying to get food into Gaza.
The Global South’s failure — bar a few exceptions — will echo through history as one of the great moral abdications of our time. They had their moment—their singular opportunity to prove that they had truly thrown off the yoke of Western colonialism, that power could be exercised differently, that economic leverage could serve justice rather than profit, that international relations could be governed by principle rather than expedience.
They could have honored their ancestors who were slaughtered at the hands of European colonizers by standing with the Palestinians who are being slaughtered by the Israelis. Instead, they chose the path of moral cowardice disguised as pragmatism, trading their revolutionary heritage for a seat at the table of the very system that once enslaved them.
The West is Morally Dead
And what is the West’s response to this deliberately engineered famine? More theater. More empty promises. More calls for a “two-state solution” that has been dead since before most of us were born. The same politicians who spent two years enabling this slaughter now pose as humanitarian saviors, offering crumbs of aid while the arms shipments continue unabated. They speak of Israel’s “right to defend itself” against starving refugees while sending the bombs that turn children into dust.
The depravity is not limited to those directly complicit. It extends to every corporation that continues to trade with Israel, every university that maintains research partnerships, every pension fund that invests in the machinery of occupation. The Palestinian victim has been transformed into the victimizer, and the Israeli victimizer into the eternal victim, in a propaganda coup so audacious it would make Goebbels weep with admiration. This inversion of reality has become so complete, so systematically enforced, that even documenting the slaughter is reframed as hatred, even naming the perpetrators becomes grounds for censorship.
The machinery of complicity operates at every level—from the boardrooms of multinational corporations to the lecture halls of prestigious universities, from the investment portfolios of retirement funds to the editorial decisions of major media outlets. When criticism of genocide is systematically silenced, when the architects of apartheid are elevated to positions of moral authority, we witness not just the death of free speech but the burial of truth itself beneath Orwellian layers of manufactured victimhood and weaponized antisemitism accusations.
Shut Up About Your 2-State Solution
The West’s moral bankruptcy extends even to its supposed progressives, who cling to the rotting corpse of the “two-state solution” like shipwreck survivors clutching driftwood. Every few months, some European diplomat or American politician dusts off this diplomatic zombie, parading it before cameras as evidence of their commitment to peace. The left media, desperate for any sign of hope, breathlessly reports these empty gestures as “breakthroughs” and “renewed momentum,” when the reality is that the two-state solution has been dead for decades—murdered by settlements, annexations, checkpoints, and the simple mathematical fact that there is no viable Palestinian territory left to form a state.
These performative declarations serve a sinister purpose: they provide moral cover for continued complicity while Palestinians are being exterminated. Every mention of “resuming negotiations” or “returning to the peace process” is an insult to the intelligence and a slap in the face of the dying. When 60% of Gaza has been reduced to rubble, when the West Bank is carved up by 700,000 illegal settlers, when East Jerusalem has been ethnically cleansed, the continued invocation of two states reveals itself as either breathtaking ignorance or calculated deception. The progressive media’s willingness to treat these charades as legitimate diplomacy rather than genocide denial makes them complicit in the very atrocities they claim to oppose.
What Happens in Palestine Never Stays in Palestine
The great irony is that the same imperial powers the Global South claims to oppose will eventually turn their guns on them too. The surveillance technology perfected on Palestinians, the AI systems that select targets for assassination, the legal frameworks that normalize collective punishment—all of this will be exported to crush dissent wherever it arises. What happens in Palestine never stays in Palestine.
We are witnessing the death of shame. In a world where half a million human beings can be exterminated while trade flows and diplomatic niceties continue, where children can be raped and burned alive on camera while their killers are welcomed into the halls of power, where starvation can be wielded as a weapon while the world debates recognition of the victims’ right to exist—in such a world, the very concept of humanity has been murdered.
The Palestinians will not be saved by the international community, because there is no international community. There are only competing mafias dressed up in flags and anthems, each calculating how best to profit from the blood of the innocent. The resistance will continue, because it must. The rest of us will have to live with the knowledge that when history called, we were found wanting. When the test came, we failed. And the cries of the dead will follow us to our graves.
– Karim
Candace Owens on Jeffrey Epstein
/1 Comment/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldBelieving that Epstein was colluding with the Mossad to produce blackmail on politicians and other celebrities (discussed, e.g., in Tucker Carlson’s interview with Candace Owens) is now officially an “anti-Semitic conspiracy theory” according to JTA: Antisemitic conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein are proliferating — and going mainstream
Well, that would definitely include Candace Owens, as recorded in her interview with Tucker Carlson:
I would say Israel, obviously. And again, I’m so tired of us being gaslit, the dumbest gaslighting of all time. On record, okay, when Pam Bondi said, I just, I can’t even, this was just a moment where I was like, okay like, F you, you guys hate us. Like, you just like, you don’t even, you have so much power. Why don’t you just come out and say, Nana boo boo, you can’t touch us, F. You. I would rather you do that, right? Then put on this pretense of a [press] conference, and then you’ve got Trump over here, being like, “does anybody still care about Jeffrey Epstein?” And then Pam Bondi has asked the question, was he working for another country? And she says, we don’t know, right. You don’t know? So in my series, I’m like, maybe we can help them. Maybe we can the deep state figure out who Jeffrey Epstein was working for. Here is Ari Ben-Manash. Who was a Mossad agent who is on record, literally recorded. Let’s listen to him tell us about how Jeffrey Epstein was working for the Mossad. Okay, Ari Ben-Manash worked for Mossad and he’s saying that Robert Maxwell brought him to Jeffrey Epstein and said, let this guy in. He’s gonna be involved in weapons. Hey, Pam Bondi, you might’ve missed this one. Okay, you may have missed this. Then you go to another person who is on record who is Victor Ostrofsky, who defected from the Mossad notoriously. The Mossad admits he worked for the Massad. He wrote a book? By Way of Deception. He says that’s the Mossad motto, which they obviously do that. That’s why they, you know, execute all these false flags. And he told everybody the truth. He has said, Jeffrey Epstein was working with us. So for whatever reason, Candice Owens is able to determine whether or not Jeffrey Epsteen might have been working for other state, but Pam Bondi, they’re just gonna have to keep surmising about whether or not Jeffrey Epstein, who with Ghislaine Maxwell, her father being Robert Maxwell, one of the biggest lies, by the way, that’s that’s told and I debunked this in our first or third Epstein episode, is the idea that, oh, well, yeah, Robert Maxwell. They admit he was a Mossad agent, but Epstein didn’t know him. The story they try to tell now in fashion to the public is like Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein met after her dad was dead. That’s just false. Again, Ari Ben-Manash tells a story of being brought into the office and being told that Epstein was going to be brought in. This was the Iran-Contra scandal. So since the 80s, Jeffrey Epstein has been working for Israel. I don’t know how I know that and Trump and Pam Bondi don’t, but they got to bring me in. Like I might have some evidence here, right? It’s like, so it’s, we’re getting to a point now.
Tucker [01:42:54] You’re going to have tough confirmation hearing.
Candace Owens [01:42:56] I’m just I just want them to say F you like seriously. That would feel better at this point if they just came out and said F you now that a boo boo you can’t touch us. We rule over you. Ha ha. That would feel at least authentic going back to the Taylor runs thing. You know, I’d be like, I really don’t like that, but at least it’s authentic and I know you mean it and it’s true.
Tucker [01:43:20] All totally fair, does, does any of, I mean, to the extent that we can project forward and guess, does does any this come out? I mean to a greater extent than it has. I mean do, is there ever like a public resolution of this story?
Candace Owens [01:43:32] No, because Israel’s controlling our government. So no, the answer is no. Trump is powerless against them. We haven’t had, I don’t think we’ve been a sovereign nation since they shot JFK. And when I say they, it’s like people online say, what do you mean by they? I’m talking about Israel. I don’t want you guys to like, you know, read in between, I’m talking about Israel, so like, let’s stop making that a taboo subject, because… They’ve gone mask down. Everything they’re doing is demonic. I want nothing to do with it. I will never support Israel into the future after what they’ve done to these children. The starvation campaign. I don’t care. Please write your article. You’ve already written them all. I don’t know what you could add about me, but I do not support Israel. And I don’t think that Jewish Americans should support Israel, and I hope that they’re now having those conversations. I see many of them recognizing that they have been propagandized into believing they have to support this demonic state. And that’s in large part thanks to their birthright trip. Yeah, that mask down moment for Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL when he got caught on the hot mic, it was released. He didn’t know he was being recorded. And he’s like saying that they’ve got to get TikTok under control because we have a generational issue with TikTok. We need to do something about this like what we did with Birthright. What does that tell you? That the entire purpose of that Birthright trip, telling every Jewish American, you forget a free trip to Israel. Was to propagandize you into believing that you have some affinity with this made up country in the Middle East in 1948. That you have to react when something’s happening to them or you have look away when they’re doing things that are so obviously wrong and demonic. And so I’m hoping now that we’re getting to that point where people can recognize that whether you’re black, you don’t have to agree with BLM, whether you, allowing your identity to shape your morality is problematic, okay? And Israel, in and of itself. Is the demonic nation. I will never support Israel, right? So I went from working for PragerU to I will never support israel in. So that’s how much the scales have fallen from my eyes about what they are involved in. And if this isn’t your wake up call to just look at the footage of what they’re doing, they’re playing hunger games and like throwing food at them and then killing people and seeing who survives. You I mean, it’s just at your fingertips. You have to take a look at what Israel is doing.
JTA on the “Anti-Semitic Conspiracy Theory”:
Watchdogs point to the Epstein discourse as a textbook example of “horseshoe theory”: where the far ends of the political spectrum come together.
WASHINGTON – Jason Epstein travels internationally as a public affairs consultant, and although he is a proud Jew, he does not announce it in countries where that might be an issue.
Until now it hasn’t been a problem, he says: Last names immediately recognizable as Jewish in the West are not identified as such in much of the rest of the world.
Lately, though, his Jewishness is coming up, he says, and he suspects it’s because antisemitic conspiracy theories have resurged alongside renewed attention to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender at the center of one the United States’ strangest and most divisive political issues.
“You do have to wonder whether your last name might be the same as wearing a kippah,” he said.
Just as kippah-wearing Jews have experienced attacks from both right-wing and left-wing antisemites, so too are extremists on both the left and the right spreading antisemitic conspiracy theories about Epstein, a spokesperson for the Anti-Defamation League told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, who noted that Epstein’s crimes and alleged crimes had nothing to do with his Jewish identity.
“The ADL Center on Extremism has tracked a demonstrable increase in rhetoric that promotes antisemitic and anti-Israel conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein in recent weeks, many of which attribute Epstein’s deplorable crimes to a supposed covert Israeli operation run by Mossad,” the spokesperson said.
Five years after he was found hanged in his prison cell, Epstein is in the headlines because the Trump administration has flip-flopped on meeting a key demand of President Donald Trump’s MAGA base, to release all the files in a bid to expose whomever else joined Epstein in his criminal activity.
President Donald Trump, who was a close friend to Epstein from the late 1980s to 2004, is known to be named in the files. Trump has urged his followers to leave the case alone, calling it a conspiracy theory concocted by Democrats.
The scandal won’t die: Democrats and some Republicans want the files released, and some in Trump’s base, for the first time since his meteoric political rise in the middle of the last decade, are turning on him.
“It’s just a red line that it crosses for many people,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican long known for her fealty to Trump, told CNN last month. “It has been a very serious situation for the administration.”
Amid the surging interest, antisemitic conspiracy theories about Epstein appear to be moving off the fringes, the ADL spokesperson said.
“This rhetoric has surged in recent weeks across the political spectrum, on both fringe and mainstream social media, streaming platforms and shows,” the spokesperson said.
The mainstreaming of Epstein conspiracies poses risks to American Jews, said Joshua Shanes, a professor of Jewish history at the University of California, Davis and a member of a task force at the Nexus Project, an organization that tracks antisemitism.
“Whenever you have this notion of collectivizing all Jews as this global nefarious force, that’s the most dangerous thing,” Shanes said. “It’s not about Israel, per se. It’s about this global Jewish conspiracy. And that is deadly, literally deadly,” he said, noting the conspiracy theories that have in recent years fueled deadly attacks.
Ari Ben Menashe, a onetime Israeli operative whom Israeli and American officials have said is a fabulist who vastly exaggerates and fabricates, claims to have run Epstein as an asset. There is otherwise no substantial evidence of any ties between Epstein and Israeli intelligence.
Allegations that Epstein has ties to the Mossad have circulated for years based on an array of disparate connections: The fact that he was Jewish, his longtime financial relationship and friendship with Les Wexner, the fashion magnate known for his Jewish philanthropy, his visits to Israel among many other countries, his friendship with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, one of many notable figures in the United States, Britain and elsewhere who hobnobbed with Epstein when he was an investor and a philanthropist.
The conspiracists also make an issue of Epstein’s sex trafficking coconspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, currently serving time in a federal position, being the daughter of Robert Maxwell, the scandal-plagued Jewish British media magnate who ran guns to Israel during its independence war.
The elder Maxwell died before Ghislaine Maxwell met Epstein.
The same extremists, ranging from Max Blumenthal on the left to Candace Owens on the right, have ramped up the conspiracy-mongering now that Epstein is in the headlines again.
Amy Spitalnick, the CEO of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said the conspiracy mongering embodied the “horseshoe” model of extremists on both sides of the spectrum inspiring and spurring one another.
“There are those on the far right, like Tucker Carlson and others who are using this to advance antisemitic and other extremist conspiracy theories related to Mossad, related to broader issues,” she said. “And there are those on the far left who are eager to jump on them because it validates their own worldview. And so understanding the ways in which this looks like a horseshoe right now is important.”
The conspiracy theories have gotten widespread airplay in recent weeks. Tucker Carlson, the massively influential podcaster, aired the conspiracy theory at a conference of Turning Point, the youth wing of the MAGA movement. He got huge cheers when he named Israel as Epstein’s employer.
Carlson’s conspiracy mongering drew a rebuke from Naftali Bennett, the former Israeli prime minister. “Epstein’s conduct, both the criminal and the merely despicable, had nothing whatsoever to do with the Mossad or the State of Israel,” he said, singling out Carlson for criticism. ”Epstein never worked for the Mossad.” Bennett’s statement appears to be the most sweeping Israeli repudiation of any Mossad-Epstein ties.
Carlson, who has platformed antisemites on his programming, is known to be a critic of the U.S.-Israel relationship. His former colleague at Fox News, Megyn Kelly, who like Carlson has a massive online following, is known for her pro-Israel sympathies – but she too has flirted the Mossad conspiracy theory.
“Where’d he get all that money?” Kelly said after airing Carlson’s claims Epstein was employed by the Mossad, in a contentious interview last month on her online show with the Jewish online media magnate, Ben Shapiro, who was on the show to debate Kelly on whether the current Epstein scandal merited the attention it was receiving.
Shapiro said that the Israel connection was dubious, especially since Israel has sworn off running American Jews as spies in the wake of the catastrophic Jonathan Pollard espionage case in 1986. “Israel really wants to steer clear of pissing off the United States,” he said.
Ross Douthat, the conservative columnist at The New York Times who is also known for his pro-Israel positions, bought into some of the conspiracy theories in an interview with the Miami Herald journalist who has led reporting on Epstein, Julie K. Brown. “So this is a world of people who overlap with Israeli intelligence, and maybe Epstein is useful as a conduit of information,” he said.
Now the threat of the mainstreaming of the conspiracy theories could make it into congressional hearings on the Epstein files. On X, Greene used a term often associated with Jewish nefariousness, “elite evil cabals,” in calling for the release of the Epstein files. “Is there a blackmail list and are there foreign countries’ governments involved?” she told CNN.
Top congressional Democrats are leading the charge for the files’ release, seeing an opening to wound Trump early in his second term.
Shanes, the professor of Jewish history, said the pursuit was legitimate, but lawmakers should take care to vociferously denounce conspiracy-mongering.
“If someone is getting out there and in the news cycle and saying, ‘Show us the file, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein,’ they should be very careful at any opportunity that they see a hint of conspiracy thinking about Jews or Israel to clarify, ‘well, that’s ridiculous. That’s an antisemitic theory, that’s the basis of modern Jew hatred,” he said.
Halie Soifer, the CEO of the Jewish Democratic Council of America, said it was up to Trump to forcefully denounce the antisemitic undercurrents of the conspiracy theories, if only because he has elevated so many baseless conspiracy theories himself.
“He’s never done anything to send a signal to conspiracy theorists that this form of hatred that we see so integral to his conspiracy theories is unacceptable,” she said.
Spitalnick said journalists, academics, politicians and other public figures should in every instance of mentioning the Epstein case emphasize that the Israel- and Jewish-related conspiracy theories are baseless.
“You overtly name the fact that there are those exploiting us to normalize and advance antisemitic and other extremist conspiracy theories, and differentiate between the facts and those conspiracy theories.”
The ADL official agreed, saying that it was especially critical to rebuff antisemitic conspiracies as their penetration has metastasized since Hamas launched a war on Israel.
“We’ve observed and tracked an explosion of antisemitic rhetoric in the nearly two years since Oct. 7, 2023, including a considerable number of conspiracy theories and rampant online hate and harassment against Jews.” the spokesperson said. “The surge in Epstein conspiracy theories today feed on many other conspiracies and on this disturbingly normalized antisemitism. Lawmakers and public figures must avoid conspiracy mongering and unsupported speculation about Epstein, his motives, and associates.”
Mark Collett banned in Schengen Zone for 15 years. Meanwhile …
/4 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldThe failure of this Government and the last to stop the small boats crossings is radicalising Middle England. Every week brings more young men from some of the poorest and most violent societies on earth. Some will successfully claim asylum because they claim to come from places to which they cannot be deported. They are often kept in hotels, at a cost of billions to the tax payer. Although the Government brags that hotel numbers are on the way down, asylum seekers are also being put in flats and HMOs across the country.
Increasingly there is nowhere you can go where you won’t find asylum seekers barracked nearby, with all the risks that come with that. Most recently, Eritrean Aron Hadash was convicted of assaulting a 19-year-old with learning difficulties, which make her “very childlike”. That did not matter to Hadash, who was living at taxpayer expense in a nearby Holiday Inn. Intoxicated, he pinned her down, grabbed her breasts, and touched her crotch for several minutes before she escaped. Despite showing no remorse and the judge saying that he poses a “high risk of serious harm to the public”, he was sentenced to only 14 months and has already been released after serving a year on remand.
Migrant hotels are radicalising Middle England
Epping is a charming, close-knit community. Locals are well within their rights to be horrified by what has been imposed upon them

Epping is a charming, close-knit community. Locals are well within their rights to be horrified by what has been imposed upon them Credit: Carl Court/Getty
Excerpts from Tucker’s interview with Anthony Aguilar
/13 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonaldhttps://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-show-anthony-agular
Should the United States continue supporting what’s happening? |
This is the key question. The Biden administration was never shy to strongly condemn the Israeli government’s behavior, but it lacked the guts to threaten to yank its funding. That meant the White House’s criticisms had no teeth. If America wants its “special ally” to conduct itself appropriately, telling its leadership to shape up or lose its generous welfare is the only option. That’s where the leverage lies. —So should that be the goal? Or is Israel acting in a manner that justifies the U.S. gifting it billions of tax dollars each year? Take a moment to read these quotes from the interview. They make the answer as clear as day.—On how the Israeli Defense Forces treats Palestinian civilians… |
“They treated them like animals… the IDF, and in some cases [the United States], don’t recognize these people as human beings… but I saw these human beings.” |
Aguilar then showed photos of the innocent people he was talking about. |
“These are the people that we’re dehumanizing, that we’re killing in mass scale. That we’re depriving of food and water. That we are torturing, in a way, because they’re not eating at all. And we’re calling them all Hamas… I’ve seen it with my own eyes. Not everybody is Hamas… Is Hamas amongst the population? Of course they are. But it doesn’t mean that the entire population is Hamas… we treat them like animals with no dignity.” —“As [civilians] are coming to the sites, the IDF shoot at them. Machine guns. Mortars. Tank rounds. Artillery. I have all of this on video… they’re shooting into the dark at thousands of people. When the sun rises, and bodies are strewn along the road, the IDF say, ‘Oh, we didn’t do that.’ Really? How did that happen then?” |
On the distribution sites… |
“The only way I can describe the sites is death traps. And they didn’t become death traps. They were designed as death traps. The United States puts aid and we lure [people] in, and when they leave, they get shot at… never have I seen this level of depravity and disrespect for human dignity.” |
On a young boy he witnessed the Israeli military kill… |
“This little boy was similar in age to my son… I see my son’s face when I look at him… when he left [the aid distribution site], he was killed by the IDF. Why? Because they lack discipline, they lack standards, and they lack basic human decency… When you use machine guns, and tank rounds, and mortar rounds to control a crowd, what do you think is going to happen? And the United States stands by and watches it.” |
The standing and watching must end. Now. |
Smoking Gun: Declassified Durham Appendix Confirms Hillary Clinton Plan To Smear Trump, Use FBI ‘To Put More Oil On The Fire’
/in General/by Kevin MacDonald-
-
ZeroHedge: Smoking Gun: Declassified Durham Appendix Confirms Hillary Clinton Plan To Smear Trump, Use FBI ‘To Put More Oil On The Fire’
On Thursday, newly declassified documents reveal that not only did the CIA believe a Russian intelligence assessment that the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign planned to smear Donald Trump by linking him to the Kremlin, it’s clear that the FBI helped the Clinton campaign orchestrate the Russia hoax to distract from its investigation into her emails.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard earlier this month declassified several documents — including a 2020 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) report and other intelligence communications revealing that the Obama administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” to create a false narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton.
-
Gabbard’s releases highlight the inclusion of the Steele dossier — an unverified report funded by the Clinton campaign alleging ties between Trump and Russia – in the 2017 ICA as an annex. The hoax dossier was used to bolster the Russian interference narrative, despite CIA objections and its discredited status. The HPSCI report states that Brennan insisted on referencing the dossier, even though senior CIA officers warned it was flawed, with Brennan allegedly saying, “doesn’t it ring true?
-
Gabbard has called these actions a “treasonous conspiracy” led by Obama, Brennan, Clapper, James Comey, Susan Rice, and others, aimed at undermining Trump’s presidency. She has referred the documents to the Justice Department and FBI for investigation into potential criminal implications.
-
And now we have the Durham annex… which includes a 2016 memorandum alleging that Russian intelligence knew of a Clinton campaign plan to tie Trump to Russian hackers. This memo claims the plan was designed to “distract the [American] public from the Clinton email server scandal.” Gabbard’s HPSCI report similarly references Russian intelligence claiming Clinton’s campaign discussed linking Putin to Trump.
- Clinton’s Approval of Smear Campaign: Pages 4 and 5 of the annex, highlighted in X posts, contain a 2016 memorandum alleging that Clinton personally approved a plan on July 26, 2016, to frame Trump with Russian hacking claims. The memo suggests this was to distract from her email scandal, with coordination involving DNC leadership and outside groups.
- Russian Intelligence Awareness: The annex confirms that Russian intelligence was aware of this plan, which aligns with Gabbard’s claim that the FBI and CIA had access to this information but pursued the Trump-Russia narrative anyway.
- No New Criminal Charges: Despite these allegations, Durham’s broader investigation (2019–2023) found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy among Obama officials to fabricate intelligence. He criticized the FBI’s handling of the Steele dossier and Crossfire Hurricane but did not charge Brennan, Clapper, or others named by Gabbard.
As ZH regular TechnoFog notes;
To briefly summarize, the Classified Appendix provided further information about the matters covered in parts of Durham’s report – specifically, those relating to Hillary Clinton’s plan to link Trump and Russia; the threat of foreign influence by a foreign government; and the Carter Page FISA application renewals.
But the most material information covers the Clinton Plan, and provides further details on how that plan started, efforts by Clinton and her team to influence officials within the Obama Administration, and how the Clinton Campaign would use Crowdstrike to further their theory that the Russians hacked and leaked information from the Democratic National Convention (DNC) and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).
The Smoking Gun(s)…
And as Michael Shellenberger notes, the CIA believed Russian memos mentioning a Clinton plan to smear Trump as a Russian asset: “The CIA prepared a written assessment of the authenticity and veracity of the above-mentioned intelligence. The CIA stated that it did not assess that the above [redacted] memoranda or [redacted] hacked U.S. communications, to be the product of Russian fabrications.”
What’s more, other memos reveal that the plan was to have Crowdstrike and ‘ThreatConnect’ spin narratives to the media in the absence of actual evidence of Trump-Russia collusion.
Stay tuned, things are getting spicier…
Sunday saw another night of protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping. Essex police were eager to clamp down on the subsequent demonstrations, arresting a total of six people and describing the atmosphere as “angry and violent”. Locals had for years expressed frustration at the area being used to house asylum seekers, a feeling which overflowed last week.
This is not the first time protesters have clashed with police over the Government’s decision to place those who cross the Channel in hotels. But the events of the past week should suggest to us that these disturbances will become more common. Epping is not like the largely Northern, post-industrial towns which protested last summer after the Southport attack. It is a leafy area, where you need a middle-class income to afford a mortgage.
One of the videos from Thursday’s protest showed the difference. A mother who looked like she would be more at home on the school run in an SUV than with a megaphone gave a rousing speech, saying that they were there to protect their children. That is because the trigger for the protests was an alleged sexual assault on a 14-year-old girl by a recently arrived Ethiopian asylum seeker, Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, staying at the asylum hotel.
The failure of this Government and the last to stop the small boats crossings is radicalising Middle England. Every week brings more young men from some of the poorest and most violent societies on earth. Some will successfully claim asylum because they claim to come from places to which they cannot be deported. They are often kept in hotels, at a cost of billions to the tax payer. Although the Government brags that hotel numbers are on the way down, asylum seekers are also being put in flats and HMOs across the country.
Increasingly there is nowhere you can go where you won’t find asylum seekers barracked nearby, with all the risks that come with that. Most recently, Eritrean Aron Hadash was convicted of assaulting a 19-year-old with learning difficulties, which make her “very childlike”. That did not matter to Hadash, who was living at taxpayer expense in a nearby Holiday Inn. Intoxicated, he pinned her down, grabbed her breasts, and touched her crotch for several minutes before she escaped. Despite showing no remorse and the judge saying that he poses a “high risk of serious harm to the public”, he was sentenced to only 14 months and has already been released after serving a year on remand.
That is why ordinary people came out onto the streets of Epping. Although there have been reports of members of the far-Right attending, the hand-made signs and mixed nature of the crowd suggests that it is largely locals. Tommy Robinson may have said he will join the protests this coming weekend, but that shows that he too was caught out. Most of the professional protestors were from counter-protestors from Stand up to Racism, who arrived from out of town with their professionally printed placards, only to be run out again by furious locals. That should actually worry the authorities more. A handful of troublemakers is one thing, a community up in arms is another.
There is a logic to such community backlash. Last month, in Ballymena, the horrific rape of a local girl, allegedly by Roma teenagers, led to riots over several days that targeted Roma and other foreigners. In the aftermath, many of the Roma have left or been moved to new accommodation. Many locals are said to be pleased, claiming that anti-social behaviour has subsequently reduced.
This shift in attitudes can also be seen in the increasingly fractious relationship between the police and the public. Images of a police van smashing into a protestor without stopping on Thursday shocked many. The sight of the police evacuating Stand up to Racism protestors in vans was also controversial, even if it was probably a sensible tactical decision to get them away. The revelation last week of a secret, multi-billion pound programme to smuggle Afghans into Britain while muzzling the press has only further reduced trust. People find it hard to believe in the rule of law when our borders go unguarded, while prosperous market towns have riot police on the streets.
Restoring trust requires action. Our broken human rights laws are at the root of the small boat crisis, which is why Suella Braverman and I co-wrote a paper published this week which shows how Britain can leave the European Convention on Human Rights. Once we have regained control of our borders, we can begin closing the asylum hotels and HMOs. Those granted asylum over the last few years should have their cases reexamined, to see if they are genuine or if they were only beneficiaries of our overly-generous laws. This will help make our country safer for women and girls, bringing peace back to our streets.