General

Iran Just Fired a Giant Khorramshahr-4 Missile at Tel Aviv

Rocket shell ready to launch. Dangerous weapons of mass destruction of enemies of the country. Image: Shutterstock / travelarium.ph.

Brandon J. Weicher in The National Interest

Israel’s air defenses have always been limited by the amount of ammunition available. Iran understands this, and has tailored its missile capacity to engage in swarming tactics.

Arching into the night sky over Tehran on Wednesday night was a terrifying view that immediately went viral across social media. For days, the Iranian regime had vowed that it would retaliate in spectacular fashion against Israel for daring to initiate its air war last Thursday night against the Islamic Republic.

The system Iran used is believed to have been its Khorramshahr-4 medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), which has been shown leaving Iranian airspace and heading toward Tel Aviv. The Khorramshahr-4 is very different from most of the missiles that Iran has fired at Israel. It has a range of around 1,242 miles, which is more than sufficient to reach Israel from Iran.

The Khorramshahr-4 Missile’s Specifications 

Iran’s Khorramshahr-4 carries a 3,307-to-3,968-pound warhead, which could include either a conventional high-explosive warhead or potentially submunitions for multiple target strikes. This weapon can reach Mach 16 outside the atmosphere and Mach 8 during re-entry, making it a high speed threat—as Western analysts watching the videos of this missile flying in the night sky noted with concern.

There are many things that have been said about the Khorramshahr-4, both by the apparently desperate Iranian regime as well as by many social media users. General Amir Ali Hajizadeh of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) told audiences recently that a single missile could “hit 80 targets” due to its submunitions, implying the potential for widespread impact.

Can the Iron Dome Stop the Khorramshahr-4?

While there is much about the current Israeli-Iran War that is smothered in misinformation, the fact remains that the Khorramashahr-4 IRBM’s deployment is a significant deployment. For starters, it is a real threat to Israel’s air defense systems. The Iron Dome short-range air defense system is likely unable to intercept it. Israel’s David’s Sling system might stand a better chance, but would also experience difficulty defending against this particular Iranian missile. The Arrow Two and Arrow Three high-altitude interception systems would be the most effective, but would struggle to knock down multiple warheads deployed from the Khorramashahr-4 as they make their way to the targets below.

What’s more, the powerful American-made Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system—designed to intercept missiles in their terminal phase, both within the atmosphere and above it—struggle against this Iranian missile. Because the Khorramashahr-4 travels at such high speeds, the missile shortens the reaction time for detection and interception among defending forces, even those as well-equipped as the Israelis are. That means there is a window of less than 12 minutes to respond once the missile is within range of its target.

The Khorramashahr-4’s high-altitude ballistic trajectory makes it a candidate for the aforementioned Arrow Three or THAAD systems, but the relative high speed and potential for late-stage maneuvers complicate targets even from these advanced systems. In fact, the missile’s reported maneuverability allows for it to alter its trajectory during re-entry, potentially evading interceptors like THAAD, which rely on predictive targeting.

Some reports suggest that the Khorramashahr-4 can deploy decoys to confuse enemy radar systems, reducing the effectiveness of the THAAD’s ability to track and accurately intercept the missile. If equipped with submunitions, the warhead could release multiple smaller projectiles, overwhelming defenses designed to intercept single warheads.

Israel’s defenders understandably highlight the advanced capabilities of Israel’s air defenses—which are likely the strongest on Earth. But Israel’s defenses were always limited by the number of systems available, as well as how much ammunition was around. Iran understands this, and has tailored its missile capacity to engage in swarming tactics specifically aimed at overwhelming and depleting Israel’s various Iron Dome capabilities.

Israel’s Air Defenses Can’t Keep Up With Iran’s Barrages

Iran has been effective in depleting Israeli air defenses with their early waves of missile strikes in retaliation for Israel’s initiation of the war last Thursday. What’s more, the Israeli defense industrial base as well as those of its allies, are strained and unable to keep up with current production demands for more Iron Dome-type air defenses and the ammunition that feeds them.

With a major regional war on, this defense industrial capacity is incredibly strained.

In summation, the introduction of the advanced Khorramashahr-4 missile in the ongoing war by the Islamic Republic suggests that Tehran believes it has sufficiently depleted Israeli air defenses, and are now moving to get vengeance for Israel’s attacks.

We don’t yet know if the Khorramashahr-4 launch was largely successful in its strike on Tel Aviv. That is because both Israeli and Iranian sources are doing their level best to obfuscate the facts on the ground, attempting to win more positive coverage for their side. Still, given the capabilities rolled into the Khorramashahr-4 and the fact that Israel is running low on air defenses, it is likely that Iran did some damage—even if it never goes acknowledged by either the Israeli government or the Western media.

The war is far from over—and Israel’s troubles may only be beginning. Israeli intelligence assesses that Iran has around 1,800 ballistic missiles remaining in its arsenal, 400 of which have been fired at Israel since the start of the conflict. If these numbers are to be believed—Iran predictably claims that its arsenal is far larger—then it would seem that this war between Israel and Iran is really a race to the bottom in terms of ammunition and missiles. Both sides are waging a war of depletion.

If that is the case, barring the introduction of the two powers’ global allies into the fray, the war will be won by the side that runs out of munitions first. But the Khorramashahr-4 IRBM should not be underestimated by either Israeli or American security experts. And its introduction into this gruesome fight signals an escalation that many analysts believed was impossible, given the effectiveness of Israel’s early strikes on Iran last week.

About the Author: Brandon J. Weichert

Brandon J. Weichert, a Senior National Security Editor at The National Interest as well as a contributor at Popular Mechanics, who consults regularly with various government institutions and private organizations on geopolitical issues. Weichert’s writings have appeared in multiple publications, including the Washington Times, National Review, The American Spectator, MSN, the Asia Times, and countless others. His books include Winning Space: How America Remains a Superpower, Biohacked: China’s Race to Control Life, and The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy. His newest book, A Disaster of Our Own Making: How the West Lost Ukraine is available for purchase wherever books are sold. He can be followed via Twitter @WeTheBrandon.

Image: Shutterstock / travelarium.ph.

Illegal Immigrant Population Down an Estimated One Million Since January Offers Potential Labor Market Benefits

From the Center for Immigration Studies email list:

Washington, D.C. (June 19, 2025) – A new analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies finds that the number of illegal immigrants in the United States has declined by an estimated one million between January and May of this year. The overall foreign-born population – legal and illegal – also declined during this period, driven by a falloff in the number of non-citizens from Latin America who arrived in 1980 or later, a group that significantly overlaps with the illegal immigrant population. The decline may reflect departures in response to President Trump’s election and increased enforcement. However, the report’s findings come with important caveats.

“The departure of illegal immigrants is certainly good news for Americans, especially lower-skilled workers who will see higher wages,” said Steven Camarota, the Center’s Director of Research and lead author of the analysis. “It may also help draw some of the millions of American men without a college degree who are currently out of the labor force back into jobs.”

Among the findings:

  • Published figures from the survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the number of foreign-born individuals in the labor force declined by 601,000 from January to May 2025.
  • Our analysis of the raw data shows the total foreign-born population, both in and out of the labor force, declined 957,000 from January to May 2025. This is one of the largest declines over a 4-month period in the foreign-born in the last three decades.
  • The decline was entirely among non-citizens. The number of naturalized U.S. citizens in the data did not fall from January to May of this year.
  • In particular, non-citizens from Latin America who indicated they arrived in the United States in 1980 or later show a 1.07 million decrease from January to May of this year and a 1.45 million falloff since December of 2024.
  • It is well established that the post-1980 Latin American non-citizen population overlaps significantly with the illegal immigrant population.
  • Our preliminary estimate is that there are 14.8 million illegal immigrants in the country in May 2025, one million fewer than we estimated in January of this year.
  • There are important caveats regarding these numbers: 1) Though the decline in non-citizens is statistically significant, the decline in the total foreign-born is not. 2) Given recent stepped-up enforcement efforts, it is possible that the decline was due, at least in part, to a greater reluctance by immigrants to participate in the survey or to identify as foreign-born rather than an actual falloff in their numbers. 3) Finally, some of the administrative data necessary to estimate illegal immigrants is not yet available, making our estimate for May only preliminary.

Tucker and Steve Bannon Respond to Israel’s War on Iran and How It Could Destroy MAGA Forever

An important discussion on the deep state, how big business runs the government, how American involvement in Israel’s war with Iran would be the end of MAGA, the  GOP as controlled opposition, opposition to deporting illegals as “neoconfederacy,” the continuing coverup of the CIA’s role in the Kennedy assassination. Touches on Jewish power—AIPAC, the Israel Lobby, and talk about the hate-America attitudes so common on the  left, naming Julia Ioffe and Mark Levin (later they throw in Gavin Newsom). They both understand the reality of Jewish power but won’t be explicit about it. Mainstream conservatism  inching toward the truth.

Tucker [00:00:00] Donald J. Trump gets elected in November on the back of this amazing coalition, unprecedented coalition, different parts of American society, you never thought of anything in common. Trump paints a picture that makes it really obvious that the old structure, left versus right, Democrat versus Republican, is basically BS and a control device, I think. This is my interpretation anyway. So he creates this brand new coalition. New York Times writes almost nothing about it because it’s such a massive threat. But this coalition, which you are… You described earlier and more precisely than anybody by far is the defining fact of American politics and it kind of feels like it’s being blown up over this war in Iran. That’s my observation.

Steve Bannon [00:00:47] I think if you look at the three planks, no forever, stop* the forever wars, seal the border and deport the illegal alien invaders and redo the commercial relationships in the world around trade deals and bring high value added manufacturing jobs back here. They’re trying to shut all three down, right? But the one that they’re obsessed with the most. Which I find strange, is the forever wars. They’ve got to be in the forever war, and particularly in the Middle East. I mean, this is what, and I’m a big supporter of Israel. And I’m telling people, hey, if we get sucked into this war, which inexorably looks like it’s going to happen on the combat side, it’s gonna not just blow up the coalition, it’s also going to thwart what we’re doing with the most important thing, which is the deportation of the illegal alien invaders that are here. If we don’t do that, we don’t have a country. And you just see right now… They’re doubling, tripling out. This is actually potentially a real civil war in our biggest cities, and President Trump has to have our backing. And this came out of nowhere. I mean, the trade deals that you saw, he put together the Liberation Day, but they’ve been thinking about it a long time. I mean Trump’s been talking about this since Lou Dobbs back in the 90s. He lays that out there. It’s very sophisticated. He’s got Scott Besant running around with Lutnick. They’re trying to make these deals. He sealed the border already in the first 60 days. Now we’re really going down and actually having the deportation, see the fight. And then out of nowhere comes a war with Persia. It’s like a shooting war with Persian, a massive shooting war of Persia, and it’s like, how did this happen? And that’s why I’ve been up as a defender of Israel, and someone that’s very pro-Israel. I’ve saying, hey, this is going to be the end of Israel because of the way these decisions have been made. And you have, I think, shockingly today early when we had you on the show. You bring up a point that we have to address, which I think it’s the thing itself. What is it about this apparatus? When you have a coalition that’s like 1932 that’s coming together, like Roosevelt had Harvard professors and crackers and exilocrats and ranchers out west and big city bosses and the Irish and the Italians, and he put it all together and they juggled it.

Tucker [00:02:59] Brooklyn, Butte, Montana, Birmingham, Alabama, and they’re all on the same side. Look, how does that happen?

Steve Bannon [00:03:04] And they govern literally almost all the way to Trump. You know, Reagan took out part of it, Newt Gingrich took out a part of, but it was 50, 60, 70 years. We have the same ability. We have hardscrabble Hispanics on the rear of Grand Valley to South Texas. We have tech bros. We have, you know, economic nationalists. We have economic populists. We have people that want to stop their forever wars. There’s three planks. And right at the beginning of it and it’s on the 10th anniversary of coming down the golden escalator. That was 10 years ago. Sunday and I tell people as many triumphs and tragedies victories and defeats good days and horrible days when we’re winning and sometimes We’re losing those ten years of everything that’s gone on it’s just the preamble for where we are today on the convergence of these crises and now all of a sudden a Shooting war where they’re taking the Nimitz battle group out of the South China Sea and sending three carrier battle groups Now to the North Arabian Sea Red Sea plus Arleigh Burke destroyers and a whole fleet in the Eastern Mediterranean. We’re prepping for a major shooting war. And how did it happen? I think what’s most shocking is what you said. Hey, it was like Iraq. You’re in exorbitantly just drawn and decisions kind of just happen. It’s like, what’s happened over the last 72 hours? How do we even get to this point? How did this actually happen? Who made these decisions when we had the intel out there that this was not like a thing? This was something that was going to happen a year or two from now. Bibi admitted to Bret Baier on Sunday night and so The question before us is not simply the Israel-Persia situation, is what the fuck is going on in this city that just drives this city, whether you’re Barack Obama or Donald Trump. And if we don’t sort it out now, and I mean right now, that’s what we have to have a throwdown. We have to name names, we have the expose it. If we don’t throw it out, throwdown now in the summer of 2025, we’re not gonna have a country. Forget the midterms, forget the next election still. So we have to have this. What the CIA… What happened in Ukraine, what the CIA has done, what DNI is doing, what the Justice Department, what it’s what the FBI, what DIA in the Pentagon, because right now we only have a tenuous grip on those. We have two people at FBI, Cash and Bongino. We’ve got a handful of people over at the Justice Department in a massive 30-some person or 15,000, 20,000 person operation. We have three or four people at DNI with 17 agencies. We’re putting a couple of people in there. At the Pentagon, we got Pete. And a handful of guys and every time a guy steps up or the team steps up to say they want to stop the forever wars, they’re turfed out. He’s lost 10 people since we’ve even got there. Every time Bridge Colby tries to do something, you know, Bridge Colbys on the front page of that he’s an appeaser. So my point is that now we’re getting down to it. With all these converging crises, we have a apparatus. That reports to Wall Street, to foreign investors, to Silicon Valley, in business with the Chinese Communist Party, that’s running the deal. And now’s the time we got, if we don’t lance the bull over this, this country, you’re not gonna, if you can’t turn around with Trump, the Trump team he has, people like you, myself, and they’re blessed to have these apparatuses. If we can’t do this now, it’s not gonna get done. And so that’s why, to me, it’s gone of everything we were doing, stopping the forever wars. Redoing the commercial relationship of trying to bring jobs back, and sealing the border, and sending home the deporting 10 million, which is gonna be massive, almost like a civil war in these big cities, of all of those, and I’ve always said the deportation is the most, to get our sovereignty back, the war we have to have now, the throwdown we have have to now is with the deep state, and we can’t… I think we’ve looked away too often. We just kind of kicking the can down the road, and if we can do it now with Trump, It’s not going to get done.

Tucker [00:06:55] It does feel like Fox News is playing, and I never criticized Fox because they were so kind to me, but they are playing like a central role in the propaganda operation here, it feels like.

Steve Bannon [00:07:11] It’s the…let’s go back to the Iraq War. I mean, you were there, you saw it. Look at the Iraq war. I promoted the Iraq war. Because of the information you were given, knowingly what they did, if you go back to look at Iraq, it’s not like these things are successful. They’re not successful. They’re unsuccessful. They can’t be successful because, as Lincoln told us, what you need is popular opinion to have your back. And we don’t do enough about educating the American people on what reality is. In fact, they give them the exact opposite. That’s why it’s all, that’s why. This is…the rise of Trump is from two things. The rise of the Trump is the failed Iraq war and from the 2008 financial collapse. You had Buchanan before that. We had Perot before that, we had even Reagan from some populism national. You had these sprouts…you could see people were trying to get there, but they couldn’t. It was those two cataclysmic events, right? . An epic failed war. That we were lied to about everything, the reason we went in. Because remember, first the American people supported it, given the information they were given. Then later, they realized that, hey, not just was the initial predicate for this a lie, all the updates were kind of a lie. All the updates are a lie we really weren’t winning. Until we sent General Kelly to the Anbar province to be the toughest tribe, it was, and it took forever, and what, 8,000 dead, 50,000 wounded? Nine trillion dollars, two trillion, or seven trillion in Iraq and two trillion in Afghanistan. You’re just lied about the entire time. That’s what’s happening here. We’re not being dealt with straight. And I’m just saying on the information that’s put out, the Israeli position on this has changed three or four times. First it was the nuclear bomb, the processing, there was going to be something like last weekend. You had to go now. You had go on Thursday night. It had to happen. Right. And then we find out it’s a year away at earliest. And then it’s a decapitation strike. Then they’re trying to have regime change. That just kind of came up over the weekend and saying, oh, well, since they’re there, we’re there. We have to do it. Understand, they said, this is unilateral. We’re doing our own. But understanding that they needed American air assets on the defense to protect themselves. And this is why the early Burke were rushed in. And this was why American air defense assets have been used nonstop. Now they’re talking about, oh by the way, we really can’t take out Fordow. We can’t take out the. The hidden mountainous, second part of this, we need American combat sorties. We need American tankers to refuel us. We need the bunker busting bombs and we need assets. This thing changes all the time. When Tulsi Gavrid is still out there, as the last thing publicly said by a senior intelligence official, she said in March, they don’t have a program. They haven’t had a program, and Brett Baier asked, that’s what Brett Baier asked asked Bibi on Sunday night, and Bibi said, well, we have new information, new intelligence. Well, hold it. We were told that we gave you exquisite intelligence. You weren’t giving us intelligence. We have to have a total vetting. And by the way, we need to get a vetting on Ukraine. We need to vet [whether] American intelligence was involved because it’s a zero probability that without our satellites, without targeting the information, without fire control information, There’s no chance that the Ukrainians, as courageous as they are… As much valor as they have could have pulled out something so complicated. And so this is right now the fight. The fight has to be we have to take on the deep state, we have name names, and we have to basically take these organizations and take them apart. And then you’re going to unmask everybody in D.C. that’s not really on your side. You’re going to unmask all those people that say they’re conservative and say they are Republicans. When they start protecting this, you’re gonna say, well, hang on for a second. This doesn’t mean we’re a constitutional republic. Trump’s commander-in-chief, this is what a constitutional republic is about. I don’t care if AOC is the president later on or Bernie Sanders or JD Vance, another right-winger. Right now, we have a system that’s like the Pretorian Guard. It’s got its own national security policy. It’s got its own reason for existence. And it doesn’t care who, whether it’s progressive like Barack Obama or an economic populist nationalist like Donald Trump. And so that is the fight we have to take on today.

Tucker [00:11:19] There’s this mad scramble in Washington on the right to invoke Trump’s name and to make the case that, no, no. I represent Trump. He’s on my side. I’m true MAGA. And you wind up with these kind of hallucinogenic scenes where you have people who hated Trump or were never Trump. Mark Levin, you know, hates Trump, which is fine, but he’s like the standard bearer. What makes it even more perverse is that these same people are allied with a deep state that is subverting Trump’s stated agenda, which is negotiation toward peace, both in Ukraine And in the Middle East, Trump has said, we want to get to an agreement with a lasting peace so we can all be richer, safer, and happier. And in both places, his so-called allies who secretly hate him have destroyed that.

Steve Bannon [00:12:08] And most of those guys are almost all of them to a person for the Ukraine War. People in your audience should understand one principal thing. We are farther down the pike in a kinetic part of a Third World War than how World War II started. If you go back from September 1939, the invasion, the start of the European War, not the Asian, but if you start with the invasion of Poland by the Germans, and you go to June of 1941. The invasion of Russia by the Wehrmacht. And you look at that time, which really they called the phony war. You look at the casualties from the Battle of Britain, the Blitz, the fall of France. You look what happened in North Africa early on. Finland, throwing 300,000 Finland. You add it all up. It’s not half of what’s happened between Ukraine and Gaza today and now in Persia. We are much bloodier. This is a much, we’re in a shooting part of the Third World War. The Third World War is not about to start. It has started. And that’s what Trump is saying. What he wants to do is have everybody lay their guns down. Let’s get to the table and figure out a tenuous at least certain, you know, subtle piece that we then use capital and trade and commerce and try to rebuild these countries. And let’s get people back to work and maybe tamp this thing down. Whereas the apparatus is exacerbating the conflict part of it. That’s where we are right now in the summer of 2025. And that this thing is gonna be in the next 200 days, the next two hundred days are some of the most perilous times for the American Republic in its history. Because if we don’t get this sorted, we’re going to be drawn in totally into a conflict as a combatant, as not a supplier of logistics or as an actual combatant or participant. In the situation in Ukraine, what they did in Russia, in the situation of what Israel is right now doing to the Mullahs, as bad as they are and as evil as they are, right? We’re going to get sucked into a shooting war. Of which it’ll be 10 years and the casualties will dwarf anything you saw in World War II.

Tucker [00:14:08] One of the lessons that we never talk about formal war, too, since you evoked the comparison is that the second the shooting war started in Great Britain and the United States, opponents to war went to jail. And Winston Churchill’s entire political opposition went to jail with their wives, with their wives for the duration of the war, and some of them died. That’s been completely…that’s just a fact, and you can call those people whatever you want, and they may have been terrible people, whatever, but they were his political opponents, and he put them in jail. And Roosevelt did, you know, sick the federal government on opponents of the war. So if Lincoln Lincoln did the same and Lincoln did the same that’s exactly right and I love Lincoln.

Steve Bannon [00:14:46] In the Revolutionary War, which not a lot of the same thing happened. That’s called war. This is what happened.

Tucker [00:14:50] Exactly. And opponents of war are invariably described as allies of the enemy, and they’re persecuted. Do you worry about that happening to you? You just said on camera, I don’t want this war, but we’re moving toward a third world  war.

Steve Bannon [00:15:06] Well, I saw a po- look.

Tucker [00:15:07] Are you worried about going back to?

Steve Bannon [00:15:08] I went to prison on a misdemeanor, but it was kind of one of the same things. I wouldn’t testify, I wouldn’t turn…because I said this committee is not legitimate, doesn’t have a ranking member, doesn’ have a minority council, is totally illegitimate, plus he’s got executive privilege. That’s good enough for me. And if I have to fight this and I think it’s gonna go to the Supreme Court, although I’ve served my prison sentence, I’m taking it up to the supreme court because I had a pretty good ruling, not terrible, from the appeals court. A couple of the judges are making arguments about why I should take it further. It’s definitely gonna happen. Look what’s happening to you. I mean, I’ve known you for a long time, and I sit there and I look at what they’re saying about Tucker, I said, what is Tucker saying so bad? He’s kind of laying out these arguments that ought to be debated right now in the halls. Are you a brain moderate? Tom Cotton’s coming out and saying, all these influence and podcasters aren’t, well, let’s have a debate. When we had a debate about the Ukraine, about the funding of Ukraine in the Senate, we beat them. This is why Mitch McConnell had to resign. We, because why? Because the podcaster and influencers are much closer to the MAGA base and can deliver the heat into the House and the Senate. And they know that. I’m all for having a War Powers Act debate right now. Exactly. Let’s have the American people weigh in because you’re gonna see the American people are 90% against forever wars. Even people that support Israel are saying exactly what we’re doing here We thought we had this thing in Gaza. You had to clean up with the Muslim Brotherhood in Hamas next thing You know, we’re dropping we’re bombing that we’re bomb in Tehran and you’re taking income is what’s happened in Tel Aviv over the last 24 hours is pretty shocking because you’re taken these ballistic missiles. What’s Trump’s been saying? Everybody calm down. Let’s get back to the table. I can get actual thing He said I can gather we can take it apart We can blow it up if we want to but I can cut a deal and Witkoff and Trump If you’ve got to talk about two deal makers that are not like diplomats, but guys actually going to get stuff done, I feel more confidence with Steve Witkoff and Donald Trump trying to work something out than continue on the shooting war where, trust me, with a carrier battle group heading over there and all these tankers heading over to the Middle East, we are prepping right now to come in on the offensive side of combat sorties. And that’s a game changer. As bad as it is now that we’re combatant, because we are combatant. Which I say, if they’re unilateral, why do we get sucked in here? Where is that decision? Where you said, hey Steve, decisions just get made, you never know how they get made.

Tucker [00:17:32] They’re organic. There’s never a moment where we stop and we say, do we want to be involved in another Middle Eastern war? You just wind up there. Just like everything in life. You’re just like, how did I get here?

Steve Bannon [00:17:41] But I think that’s why they’re attacking you, because you’re saying hang on a second. Let’s have a national discussion on this right now before we get in, and they don’t want that.

Tucker [00:17:48] But why the viciousness, not toward me, I mean, I’m kind of punched out of society, but like, why is it this topic evokes a cruelty and a dishonesty that no other topic does?

Steve Bannon [00:18:01] There’s never been question out in the open. We’ve never had this debate that you’ve kind of led for the last couple of months and now we’re actually having this debate. They’ve never had people in government like Tulsi Gabbard, like Bridge Colby, like others. And look, I don’t think Bridge is hard enough in the Chinese Communist Party, but his book was amazing and he’s got the pivot to Asia, which we have to get to. If people want to see. How the institutions and apparatuses work, and this is why the Democrats are all institutionalists now, We’re the anti-institutional guys because you see how corrupt they are. You need not look further than CENTCOM. One of the problems we have is that Obama tried it. Obama put his whole presidency on the Nationalist Chinese?? side. We’re going to pivot out of Asia. We’re gonna pivot out Middle East to Asia, the pivot to Asia. Put Joe Biden in charge. After eight years, he had one combat brigade of Marines forward deployed to Darwin, Australia. That was it. No other changes. No other change. Hey.

Tucker [00:19:04] On our… I supported that. That was like the… I despise Obama. I think he wrecked the country. But I don’t think that’s a…that was not a crazy idea to pivot.

Steve Bannon [00:19:12] We’re having this debate. I had Flynn on today after you. We’re have the same debate today. Remember, the carrier battle group that’s over protecting Taiwan in the South China Sea is now en route to the Malacca Straits. The Nimitz battle group is going to the North Arabian.

Tucker [00:19:27] So you’re a former naval officer, give us a sense of the decision-making process that leads to…

Steve Bannon [00:19:33] Well, here’s what, on November, what, 5th of 79, I’m a destroyer officer, navigator on a destroyor in a carrier battle group. We’re doing the changeover from San Diego from, we’re home point. The third fleet to the seventh fleet all takes place in Hawaii, the Hawaiian operator. You do like three or four days of work up because they have a certain different lingo and a different tempo, so you’ve got to get to how they do it. We get called in in the middle of night on the red phone, everybody line up single file and head into Pearl Harbor. We’re pro harbor. As a sea detail is almost impossible to do because it’s so narrow, right? And Honolulu’s up there, so it’s not like World War II. It’s very dangerous. We go in there, we hear the hostages have been taken, and now all of our assets in Korea in the South China Sea and in Japan are heading towards the North Arabian Sea, which the United States Navy had never been at. We had a couple of white painted destroyers in Bahrain, but we were not used to that. So they go we follow a carrier all the way to Korea because you had to be we were a gas turbine. We’re the only ones who could keep over the carrier. 35 knots for like two weeks. Damn. We destroyed the ship. We’ve destroyed the sonar dome. Because you go through a typhoon, you go to some heavy weather. Because we had a treaty at the time with Korea, we would keep a carrier battle group within a 24-hour strike of North Korea. So we have to get there. Once we get there, they peel us off. Us and our squadron of ships, the famous destroyer squadron early births of little beavers, we go to the North Arabian Sea. Why they’re working up for, and that is like a, I tell people, if you haven’t been off the coast of Iran, or Persia as I call it, it’s like the landscape of the moon. This is the most inhospitable place on Earth. The whole, you’ve been, the Straits of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf, the North Arabian Sea, and our carrier battle group stayed. We rotated out after about four months. People stayed and eventually, a couple months later, actually did the failed rest car. We practice every day. You could see every day, they had the lift capacity, the helicopters were practicing. We were actually going to do plain guard against potential Russian fighters in the Persian Gulf, put the radars up, because nobody knew what was going to happen. It was a failed effort. But I tell people, and it turns out the Nimitz is now about to be decommissioned. This may be their last cruise. They were there 50 years ago, is the first time they really got commissioned. And their first assignment was in Gonzo and Camel Station in the North Arabian Sea. These are big decisions the Pentagon makes when they, particularly today, when they decide to take a carrier battle group, strike group, away from the South China Sea in the defense of Taiwan, given how on pins and needles we are there because the Chinese Communist Party are not doing exercises, they’re doing rehearsals for an invasion. To take that out and to take it to the North Arabian Sea is signaling the world that we’re about to do something. And that’s what’s so scary right now. And when you get to your theory. That these decisions you’re just getting inexorably drawn in. Now we have all of our basically air assets that are ready to launch combat sorties on Tehran and whatever else happens, they’re in place. So it just takes, it’s not like you make a decision while it takes us a week to get there. They’re in-place, the tankers are over there. We can do in-tank refueling. So I think in the next 24 to 48 hours, a decision could be made. And that’s why I’m getting more and more vocal, So, not less vocal, that. We need to go full stop right now. We need find out, because there’s too many moving pieces. And moving pieces about exactly what’s going on, what’s the risk. We haven’t had a full debate about this. And I would like to see some voices come forward. I’d like to Tulsi Gabbard come forward and tell us, has anything changed in DNI, which is 17 agencies, including the CIA for this, has anything change from what you told the public at a hearing in March? If it’s changed, let’s just hear it. I would like to have John Ratcliffe go to the sticks, and I think Ratcliff’s a good man. John Ratcliff should go to sticks and say two things. Number one, we had no involvement at all in the Ukraine assault under Russia. Just say it, because he’s kind of been in hiding in that, and then he ought to be open to questions. He’s never criticized.

Tucker [00:23:38] No one ever criticizes John Radcliffe.

Steve Bannon [00:23:40] Well, the reason I think they’re not criticizing John Ratcliffe, and John Ratclyffe’s a good man, but you have to remember John Ratliff was a mayor of a small town in Texas that went to Congress, did a great job. President Trump likes him a lot. He’s got Mike Ellis over there, but they’re two guys, right? We don’t have 10 political appointees, which we should have. If we got two guys running that building.

Tucker [00:24:02] That’s the way the agency’s structured. There’s no civilian control of the DIA.

Steve Bannon [00:24:05] Well, you know better than anybody, but it runs the way it’s going to run. I mean, we sent Pompeo over there as well.

Tucker [00:24:13] It’s an army. It’s a business. It’s government agency. It’s country. It’s literally a venture capital firm and its budget is unknown. Its reach is… And we have no idea what they’re doing. Because the majority of things that they do are not, you know, U.S. Government employees Even the door kickers. No, it’s they’re working through some exile group. They’ve been funding for 30 years.

Steve Bannon [00:24:36] They will also look you right in the eye and lie to you. Because that’s the wilderness of mirrors, right?

Tucker [00:24:43] It’s… Look, look. And they’re smart. Somebody said to me the other day, someone knowledgeable said, the problem with the U.S. Government is like, why can’t we do this or that? And like, if you wanted light rail, you know we couldn’t do it. And this person said, because all the smartest people in government are at CIA.

Steve Bannon [00:24:57] They also, with the inter-agency process, they control the entire process. This is why downsizing NSC was so important. When you have this, we had these detailees that come from all the different departments because NSC should have 30 people, but it had 250. There are 60 political appointees, right? And there’s 280 come from different agencies to do all the different paperwork. They have the interagency process. The CIA controls that process. They control the process of the Pentagon. They control of the DHS. Yep. They control over the Justice Department. They are embedded deep because they’ve been around, you know, they’ve been around so long and they know how to embed deep, right, with the smartest people out there. And so if you don’t get control of that, you’re not going to get control. They’re like a Peturian Guard right now. We have to, we have to lance this. This is like the Roman, late stage of the Roman Empire, when the Pretorian Guard kind of ran the deal and they would put forward every legionary captain that they thought was going to be good for a time. And they are planning right now to thwart President Trump’s a second term, make sure they wait him out, and they’re gonna have a hand-selected person for the third term. And I don’t say this as a conspiracy theory guy. This is just basic facts.

Tucker [00:26:04] Totally true. They’re so clever that if you criticize them, they will leak to people that you work for I happen to know. Which is kind of brilliant. If you’re an effective critic of CIA, Joe Kent, I’ve lived this personally, but also Joe Kent is just a wonderful man, a totally sincere man, former CIA contractor, lost his wife in Syria in Obama’s Syria war, and became an opponent of the way things are running. And they, see I played in his primary. And the way they did it was by convincing Republican primary voters that Joe Kent, who’s the single most effective critic of CIA in the United States, was actually working for I mean, like, wow. I tip my non-existent hat in deference to the brilliance of that.

Steve Bannon [00:26:49] This is how brilliant they are. You notice from President Trump the arc that he went through on Friday. You know something’s up when David Ignatius at the Washington Post, which we call the Langley bugle, he’s ahead of the comms. Oh, I’m aware. When Ignatian comes out on Morning Joe and says, Trump is doing such a really magnificent job here, he’s acting like your commander-in-chief, that should be the red flare that goes up and goes, what the fuck? No! So, I mean- It’s two friends-

Tucker [00:27:16] why don’t I have a TV? Because it’s too frustrating to watch. Like, I don’t know a single person who doesn’t like David Ignatius personally, and that would include me, and he’s just such a courtly man. He’s like the Murdochs. He can’t dislike him. He just got elaborate, wonderful manners. He was very nice. But like, he is the spokesman for CIA. And you wonder… The Washington Post is the Langley… It’s unbelievable. …The Langley Bugle. When Louis Joyland West, who was one of the last visitors to Jack Ruby in his before he went insane, was a CIA physician and deeply involved in a lot of really dark, some of the darkest things we’ve ever done. When he died, I went and looked up the Walter Pincus obit from the Washington Post. Walter Pinckes was the CIA. I think Walter Pinces wrote it. And there was no mention in the Washington Post obit that Jolly West worked for CIA. And I just look, oh, my God, this is like… But you wonder, like, do people watching Morning Joe have any idea who these people are?

Steve Bannon [00:28:11] That freaks me out. You know, there’s a great story, you talked about the Kennedy thing today, there is a great story in the book, the guy just came out about the the Kennedy assassination and the House and Senate committees, the Church committee, the biography of the Church Committee came out about a year or two years ago. He talks about when his first forum, Frank Church was going to be one thing, but they got Gary Hart in there who had just been elected. Mike Mansfield, the old head of the, you know, really a guy who knew how to run things, right? Mansfield from Montana, picked both of them. Church to head the committee, but Gary Hart was gonna be assigned to the CIA to find out what went on. So Hart’s seeing Colby and seeing some of the former directors, and they tell him and say, hey, the guy you really gotta see, all of them tell him, say, nice to have dinner, you gotta see Angleton. Angleton runs the deal, and he was the counterterrorism, counter-intell, yeah. Legendary guy, there forever. He goes to, I think, the Metropolitan Club for dinner. And Angleton would take a drink. And Gary Hart’s sitting there kind of working him. And so towards the end of the evening, he can’t get up enough courage to ask, like, the question. So finally, he says, you know, it’s about over, I got to do this, he said, look, Mr. Angleton, I just got a question from the committee. We need to know, did the CIA have anything to do with the Kennedy assassination?

Tucker [00:29:29] He has to Angleton that?

Steve Bannon [00:29:30] Ask Angleton. It’s in the book. Call it. Angleton takes another drink, puts it down and goes, Senator Hart, you were a theology major, were you not? He goes, yes. As a matter of fact, I was a theology major, so you know the New and Old Testament pretty well. He goes well enough. He goes in my father’s house, there are many mansions. Kerry Hart goes, what the fuck, didn’t ask another question. Went back to church in Mansfield, Mansfield goes, okay, shut it down. He goes, no, this is why they came out to see, remember, they had tried to kill guys in the Congo, they even had the cigar in Castro, nothing about the domestic stuff at all. That all got shut down immediately, and they figured, oh, there’s a Lumumba in a.

Tucker [00:30:16] Patrice, the London Congo.

Steve Bannon [00:30:17] In Congo, and they had tried to kill or killed three or four other guys, maybe Deg, Hamasher, who knows.

Tucker [00:30:23] But they definitely deck.

Steve Bannon [00:30:24] They’ve got into all these things that the American people are interested in why are you killing foreign leaders? But they didn’t get to the heart of many mansions. Very hard. Is that I I’m not going any farther on this one, right?

Tucker [00:30:33] And within 10 years, Frank Church is dead of galloping cancer, and Gary Hart is totally destroyed in 1988 through the…

Steve Bannon [00:30:41] The leading presidential candidate at the time. Oh, yeah. With a picture. Get lured onto the monkey business. And then his house, the first time they ever surrounded his house. Oh, I remember.

Tucker [00:30:51] You never forget it at all. And boy, and the Washington Post led the charge. And I’m not for Gary Hart or whatever, but he, by today’s standards… You’re awesome though. Oh. There’s going to be payback. It’s literally unbelievable. But you can’t… How do you have a real country in the middle of that?

Steve Bannon [00:31:06] I don’t understand. Well, you can’t. I think you make the point. Since 1963, we’ve devolved. And that’s why I’m not kidding. As Elon was the special government employee to do Doge to try to get waste, fraud, and abuse, I think because we’re at war now, and the war we’re in is an internal war. It’s an internal with this apparatus that we finally have a leader that will have the back of people that will go in because he wants it taken down. I think he’s getting terrible advice around that. Someone like you not to organize it, but who knows the history of these institutions and quite frankly, where the bodies are buried, have to come in as a special government employee to help get the people on they’re going to organize. We have to go to war against the deep state now. If we don’t go to work the deep-state immediately and have a couple of wins that we can point to and some momentum and put them on their back leg, their back foot in the next 200 days, nothing in America is going to change.

Tucker [00:32:02] And we should be clear about who’s serving its interest. Tom Cotton, who’s the chairman of the Senate Intel Committee, the select committee on intelligence, was one of the primary drivers of secrecy around the Kennedy files. So Tom Cotton I think was born in the 80s. And I like Tom Cotton a lot. I know him. I know his wife who worked at CI, super nice people. But when it came down to it, when Trump gets elected and gets inaugurated in January, Tom Cotton’s… He’s denied this, but he’s lying because it’s true. I know for a fact. Tom Cotton’s running around being like, well, whatever we do, we can’t put people in place, we’re gonna declassify all the Kennedy assassination files. Sixty-two years later, I think Tom Cotton was born in the 80s. Why would he care? It’s not a sources and methods thing anymore. Yeah, what is that? Why would Tom Cotton be so concerned about releasing the Kennedy documents that he’s trying to prevent people from getting jobs on the basis of his belief that they might reveal those documents? What is that? Because that’s disqualifying, he shouldn’t be in the Senate, of course.

Steve Bannon [00:33:01] The Senate, of course. Because he knows that that is the key that can pick the lock. That something happened in 1963. We had a coup d’etat. The country’s never faced up to it. The country understands that like 80 percent something’s dead wrong. They understood at the time the Warren Commission was gun decked. You go back and read this new book even by a New York Times writer, you see what a joke it was, how the FBI stepped in immediately. Jerry Ford was their guy. It was a complete joke. But who is-

Tucker [00:33:27] He’s a made president with

Steve Bannon [00:33:28] Made president with that election. I’m just saying there are no coincidences Jerry Ford of the Warren Commission

Tucker [00:33:34] becomes president without an election. And you’re like.

Steve Bannon [00:33:39] I read the testimony of the Warren Commission. In the Warren commission, in the depository where the gunman sat, right next to him, the guy, I think his name was Willie Davis, he was a worker, of the black guys were up on the top deck pointing afterwards when the shot took place. He was going to go join those guys. He actually sat there and had his lunch right next to where the assassin was. Now, you know, assassins and CIA and Navy SEALs, I mean, their heart’s beating out of their chest before that happens, because they understand it may be the last time they take a breath on Earth is when they fire. So they are really ready to meet their maker, and they’re highly focused. The last thing they’re gonna do on Earth is get that target. That is just these cartons just suppressing by a few feet. This guy’s giving testimony, and it’s unbelievably, they go, well, you were there? Yes, what were you doing? He says, I was eating a. A chicken sandwich, a bag of Fritos, and a Coke. And they’re going, you’re right next to them, and everything’s going, and you’re hanging on the edge of it. And then all of a sudden, Jerry Ford steps in and goes, excuse me, I have a question. Do you have a criminal record? And the guy goes, Excuse me? He goes, Do you ever criminal record. And the guys goes, Well, I was picked up. No, no, no. You’re a felon, right? And the whole conversation drops. I go, Oh, my God, we’re literally at the moment. In literally five, ten minutes before the shot takes place, we have a witness that’s there and you got to ask him, did you hear anything? Did you see anything?

Steve Bannon [00:35:10] And Jerry Ford told us, and as you mentioned with Angleton and the guys a few years later out of nowhere on Watergate, another operation they were deeply involved in, right? He’s made Vice President of the United States.

Tucker [00:35:26] Because the president’s most popular president in American history is undone by a naval intel officer posing as a journalist from the Washington Post. So you wonder, like, a lot of this is taking place in private, and it’s one of the great frustrations as an American is you don’t know what your government’s doing and you have no way to find out. Even when it’s done 60 years ago, you don’t know. But some of it’s taking place totally in public, the Tom Cotton stuff. And it grieves me to say this because I like Tom, and I think he’s smart, really Mark, actually, and a good guy in a lot of ways. But he’s acting on behalf of CIA, not on behalf of the people of Arkansas, obviously. But then there’s Lindsey Graham, who’s like, florid, out in public. Like, there’s no kind of hiding who Lindsey Graham is, and how does… What is that?

Steve Bannon [00:36:09] Ukraine thing, he and Pompeo, how the weekend before the drone assault takes place. He’s in Ukraine saying something’s going to happen. He’s is in France. I mean, if you talk to people over there, it’s like he had inside baseball. He was all jacked up, then good things are going to happened. Pompeo’s in like Odessa giving a talk. I mean what is Mike Pompeo? There’s a middle of a war over there. We’re trying to extract ourselves. What does Mike Pompea in Odessa given some, you know, a rally speech essentially pump these guys up and he’s talking about. Certain things that could happen, or certain positive things that hang in there on this Exactly what President Trump’s counter to. President Trump is trying to have everybody lay down their guns, and let’s, because right now the British papers are reporting there’s a million Russians dead or wounded. There’s 750,000 Ukrainians dead or wounded. I mean, this has been devastating, like World War I type of casualties. President Trump has said they’re going, we need to put the guns down. I need to get people at the table. We need to talk. We’ll even buy your dirt. We’ll buy your rare earths. We’ll put money in, which we oppose, but if President Trump thinks he needs that for a peace deal, we’ll support him. What is Mike Pompeo and Odessa jacking these people up? What is Lindsey Graham over there jacking people up about? These questions have to be asked. We have to ask what part of our government is going against the Commander in Chief and what the Commander of Chief is trying to do. Is it legal for Lindsey to do that? Well, there’s Logan Act. Well, yeah. I called for his arrest or cancel his passport. Do two things. See, don’t lean back in the country. Or arresting, and I’m adamant about this in Pompeo also, because I think there are arguments around the Logan Act that they’re over there countering what the commander in chief’s trying to do, and I think-

Tucker [00:37:46] And I think… And they have security clearances too, which I don’t have, and you don’t, I assume, a security clearance. Not anymore. But why does… I don’t want one right now. No, I don’t either. Because you said… Don’t blame me. But why is Lindsey Graham and why is Mike Pompeo…

Steve Bannon [00:38:03] Have a security clearance. Well, I think you got to ask Mike, because I’m very disappointed in him. I knew him for years. Me too. The guy I know today, the guy I see today is not the guy you knew. And I think people have to… I think they ought to come on when they come on TV, is they ought have the, like, NASCAR drivers, like who’s on the… Whose payroll are they on? Exactly. The American people are… At least ought to be in a Chiron, who they’re taking money from. This is Roku.

Tucker [00:38:27] Well, what’s the deal with Lindsay? Well, let me just say I’ve known Lindsay for 25 years and it’s impossible not to like Lindsey Graham. He’s one of the most charming, funny. He’s just a wonderful person to travel with. He’s the most charm person in the world. I’ll just say that because it’s just true. I like him. If he was here, I would be having fun with Lindsey Graham, but his effect on the United States is so destructive, I don’t understand what that is. What is his motive? You know him well, of course, because you’re…

Steve Bannon [00:38:54] Well, I know, look, I think, number one, he’s very involved in the Pentagon, on our services committee, the Pentagon. The building runs like the building’s gonna run. I mean, it’s a trillion dollar… Why, when President Trump says, we’re gonna go to a hemispheric defense, from Greenland to block the Russian submarines, to Alaska, maybe Canada for the Arctic, because that’s the new great game of the 21st century, to the Panama Canal, because they’re gonna block the Chinese and Russian neighbors and get the Chinese out of the Caribbean, We’ll deal with Venezuela. We’ll have the Central Pacific, which has always been kind of our strategic pivot, the three island chains, and America’s hermetically sealed. You add a golden dome or some sort of ballistic missile. America can live in peace and we can do- It’s been the greatest. And we can expeditionary, not that we’re not engaged in the world, you can do expeditionary forces anywhere you want in the-

Tucker [00:39:41] You can’t put Chinese infrastructure in St. Croix, which they have a lot of, in St Croix which we control. Exactly. So you can’t let the Chinese control your hemisphere. That seems reasonable. And they’ll say to us, okay, get out of Japan, at which point you say, okay. I mean, that seems like logical.

Steve Bannon [00:39:56] This budget is not a trillion dollars going up, right, because right now it’s over a trillion If you add the supplement that’s coming in, the reconciliation bill with the NDAA, you’re over a billion dollars and it’s only going to keep increasing. This is the way the defense contractors make money. They embedded it over there. They kind of run the building right now. You don’t see any pushback by armed services. In fact, every district’s got huge plants, as you know, our industrial policy that we do have. It’s really around arms manufacturing, right? And it’s a high margin business, and we want to sell weapons to the entire world. It’s that system that’s run in the country. Remember, the difference between President Trump’s first term and his second term is what happened under Biden is a massive concentration of power because they didn’t back Lena Kahn or the antitrust people like we have now in President Trump administration, like Gail Slater and what’s happening to the FTC under Andrew Ferguson, taking big tech to court and trying to break them up. Right now! Wall Street, you have big tech, you have big agriculture, you have big pharma, you had the big healthcare industry, you have the defense contractors, you have the concentration of these massive industries that have every lobbyist, every communications expert, all the big law firms on their payroll. If you and I wanted to start today and say, hey, guess what? We want to take on one of the Let’s take on Big Ag. You literally can’t get a great law firm to represent you or a great lobbyist because they’re all hired. By these guys. That con…

Tucker [00:41:25] And they’ll set up regulatory hurdles that are insurmountable. This is the regulatory capital. I’m living that in something that we’re doing on the side. And you just find out that it’s crazy.

Steve Bannon [00:41:37] That concentration of power, regulatory capture and really regulatory merger. We said when we gave China everything after Tiananmen Square, when we game most favorite nation status and WTO and access that the more they get prosperous because they were a backward agricultural country at the time, the more prosperous they get, the more they’ll become like a liberal democracy like the United States. We actually have copied the model of the Chinese Communist Party. They have a handful of state-owned industries, very powerful, merged in. With the central government, an authoritarian government. That’s what we have, and that’s what President Trump, the promise of President Trump is to break that. The American people don’t want it, they hate it. Now, they need the tools to do it, and that why I think this next couple hundred days coming after the 10th anniversary of really President Trump. Because what happened? At the top of the escalator, Trump was in seventh place. Because people didn’t know if he was serious about running or not. He had just gone to CPAC, I think, 90 days before. In the 2015 CPAC. Trump finished seventh in the poll at three and a half percent.

Tucker [00:42:40] I remember.

Steve Bannon [00:42:40] Behind all these guys. At the top of the escalator, he’s in seventh. That night, they do a flash poll, I think, on CNN. He’s first. Why? That talk was in a nomenclature and a vernacular that American people hadn’t heard from a politician about the border, about deportations, about China, about bringing jobs back, about ending the forever wars. Remember, as the campaign went on, he goes to South Carolina. I’ll never forget it. South Carolina. He literally blew up. The entire Bush apparatus, kind of Fox and kind of everybody on the right that had been in there. And when he said it, you could hear the audience gasp and so many commentators came on and said, well, that’s the end of him because…

Tucker [00:43:21] Said that except me because I was the only one at Fox News who I knew I was like yes thank you for telling the truth finally but everybody around you was that he’s finished they hated me for agreeing with them hated me person anyone in a landslide Karl Rove never who was my neighbor and always got along with him again perfectly charming guy sort of very not a good person at all but but smart and you know Carl but after that That was the moment I realized was in that Greenville, South County debate that all that mattered to them was a projection of force abroad. That’s it. Everything else was just…

Steve Bannon [00:43:57] Because they were so shocked he said it and united the fact that he can’t win.

Tucker [00:44:01] That’s when Bill Kristol turned against him was that night. And if you look, you could look it up, check his Twitter feed. The day before, Kristol was like, you know, Trump’s kind of a pig, but he’s our pig. And actually, we can kind of use him and maybe we should make peace with Trump. Bill Kristal said that, who I used to work for for many years. The day after that Greenville debate, he took the position that he has now, which is, you will destroy the country to prevent Trump from exercising power. Like he was a sworn enemy of Donald Trump’s after that when he came out against the Iraq War. How weird. Why…if you hit something, if you killed a child in a DUI, okay, you’re drunk, you accidentally run over a child, there’s no possibility you could meaningfully advance in American life because people would say, we’ve forgiven you, Steve, but you did something that’s so… So irresponsible. It’s just horrible. It was a mistake. It was mistake, but it was horrible. We allowed the architects of the Iraq War who gravely injured the United States, that all these people killed, Americans killed. To continue to advance. They were never held to account for what they did, ever, at all. They became the head of the World Bank. Well, how did we do that?

Steve Bannon [00:45:07] That, the specter of that is what we face over the last 72 hours. This is exactly the same pitch as the Iraq War. Weapons of mass destruction. Oh, I know. You have to get it. So they understand one thing. They think the playbook works. This is why we have to stop it now. If we don’t stop it, now it’s gonna work all the time. They think that playbook of lulling the American people to sleep and tell them there’s these evil people that have to be taken down, or if they’re taken down everything’s gonna be fine after that. And that we face an apocalypse that doesn’t happen, they’re running the Iraq War playbook over again with almost some of the same players, or at least the protégés, right, in the verticals of who those players were.

Tucker [00:45:46] But why does institutional conservatism allow it? If Mike Pompeo shows up at the Republican county of dinner in some state, like he’s treated as… I was in a restaurant with him recently. I was like, oh, Mike Pompea. He’s treated as like a legitimate person. No one has ever… The right does not hold its own people accountable on the most basic level.

Steve Bannon [00:46:07] Well, let me tell you the right, the Republican Party is controlled opposition, okay? Because they’ve never really put in a fight. Let’s go back to the three central tenets of Trumpism, you know, immigration, border and sovereignty, trade and ending forever wars. The official apparatus of the Republican party hates all three of them and doesn’t agree with… Do you think that’s still true? It’s 100%. Look what happened here in the last 24 hours on the immigration side. All of a sudden, they promulgated that. Because of big agriculture’s needs, that we can no longer have raids on farms, raids in hotels, all of it, that had to be counted by President Trump saying, hey, there’s 20 men, illegal aliens. I’m going to get them all out of here. And then today, or this morning, he came out with, we’re going to triple down the raids in sanctuary cities, right? I’m gonna get all these guys out of there. No, there is huge institutional fight led by Fox News, right. Their biggest is the forever wars. But if you look at the Wall Street Journal. And if you look at Fox News on the trade and bringing jobs back from China, they’re very ambivalent about that. They’re talking about the cost of living. I mean, they’ve putting up that, you know, because they’re all free traders, which is the way the country got in the first place. They’re also quite ambivalant on the immigration and mass deportation. Remember, mass deportations, it’s just not the criminals. You have to get, President Trump said today, 20 million. I say it’s 10, came in on Biden’s watch. They all have to leave. But you’re seeing a lot of ambivalence of that, particularly the Republican Party. They’re saying, the Wall Street Journal says, well, no, they add 2%, 1.5 to 2% to GDP, right, because they buy so much stuff. Number two, they’ve driven down wages among particularly low-skilled black and Hispanics. I say this is why we put the coalition together. This is why 39% of black men are voting for us. This is what South Texas is now MAGA territory, because they understand their wages to be driven down. So, I think the Republican Party hates the basic tenets. President Trump’s platform particularly the most one they most hate is ending the forever wars that’s tied to both Wall Street It’s tied the defense industry. It’s also tied to this mentality that we have an American Empire Remember you and I saying hey, we are actually a republic We want to go back to being a republic like the founders are a country when they set the Constitution They look to Republican Rome. That was their source of things not the Roman Empire what we’ve done. In fact, they said I think was General Washington Don’t go over seas looking for monsters to slay, right? We have enough to do here. Let’s do this. And I think that that’s what we’ve gotten so far of track, and we have an American empire. That empire has to be taken apart brick by brick, because all it’s done is to basically destroy the inner workings of the United States, and particularly destroy the very people who are the cannon fodder in these wars, right. And that’s why it’s.

Tucker [00:48:56] Just destroy the nation, drive around the country, just get in your vehicle and drive. And I don’t see how anybody could say things are better now than they were 15 or 20 years ago or 40 years ago. It’s a disaster. And so the empire destroys the country.

Steve Bannon [00:49:10] And you add on top of it the national debt and the trillion dollars every month and the discussions. We have a discussion, Doge goes to a bunch of different places, but they never go to the Pentagon. They’re not really allowed to go to the Pentagon, we have a budget that we’re talking about how do we make these cuts, how do you cut Medicaid, how to cut the food stamp program, which all have to be looked at and done. But it’s sacrosanct. We can’t even talk about defense. We have the trillion dollar defense budget. And I keep saying… Trump’s laid out a strategy of hemispheric defense. It’s very different than post-war where we were everywhere, the American empire and really around the ring of the Eurasian landmass, right? And I said, he’s talking about a hemispherical defense. The budget is totally misaligned with the hemispheres defense, both in the allocation than the Navy taking down big army. But hey, baby, the defense budget is gonna go and you’re not gonna cut a penny out of it because like you, you’re raising your voice. As someone that likes Israel and agrees with Israeli nation, you’re saying that you raise your voice and all of a sudden you’re being eviscerated, that you’re an enemy of the Jewish people, that your an anti-Semite, but not just that, you are an appeaser and he said

Tucker [00:50:18] appease and a pacifist because they understand… Show up at my house and find out how far my pacifism extends. No, it’s slander and it bothers me simply because it does convince people whose opinions I care about and who I care personally and it fractures relationships and it also comes from people I know really well and that Ari Fleischer who I’ve never, you know, respected but I always liked him and I He wrote something, somebody sent me this thing yesterday, and you know, I’m just a carnival barker, and I’m pretending to have my views, and I texted him, and I was like, come on. Like, this is not, you know I may be totally wrong, you of course disagree with me, that’s fine. But you know that I’m sincere, I am totally sincere. Why else would I do this? Of course he didn’t respond to me, but it’s pay.

Steve Bannon [00:51:03] Ari, who every day went to the podium and told us, just another day away from finding weapons of mass destruction. How could they sit there and lie in the nation? Now, I am quite serious. Given, because you’re a product of Washington, D.C., there’s no one better in an emergency. We have an emergency, we have a break the glass emergency, to actually be an advisor to the president, right, in a temporary thing, than you who know the whole… You know the canvas. Not that you were Oreo, but you could sit there in the NSC, in the tank or the tanks of Pentagon, but down where the Kennedy room and actually walk through, this is the apparatus. This is what we have to do. This is where we have do with the FBI, this we have the do with CIA, this rather do with D&I, the Pentagon, and then we have people execute that.

Tucker [00:51:52] Yeah, I would never survive that. But I mean, I don’t come back… I had breakfast alone in the dining room in the Metropolitan Club this morning, which is a place I love. It’s the only person there, just me and the waiters, who I know well and love. And the second I walk outside that building, I’m like, whoa, the vibe in the city is… It’s good. Can you feel that?

Steve Bannon [00:52:10] Ever since, ever since President Trump left in January of 2021, because there was an armed camp then. We had a round of the rest.

Tucker [00:52:18] I had left by then, I was like, I’m…

Steve Bannon [00:52:20] Out. You came to the war room, we had 100 National Guard troops with two Humvees, barbed wire everywhere. It took from the guys at Fox and One America to come up to the War Room. It’s only a five-minute walk up the hill, 45 minutes to get there, you got to go through checkpoints. Ever since that time, and I hate to say with all the positive energy President Trump has brought, it’s still a dark specter. This imperial capital is probably, I tell you why, they understand there’s an internal Civil War here. That one side’s gonna win and one side is gonna lose. Their belief is they’re gonna wait us out. That for all the Tucker Carlson’s and Steve Bannon’s and other people around President Trump are sitting there going, the Bobby Kennedys, right? And other people that know how this apparatus works at every level and are sitting there going we have to do this now, they believe that they will wait President Trump out. And I don’t put a possibility of an assassin, if President Trump is to go too far into this and bring you into that. Do not think they would not think of an assassination attempt. They have no intention of turning over control and power of the most powerful empire in man’s history. It has to be taken from them. And I tell people, we either do it now, if we don’t do it, now, this wave of kind of people that have come together, we’re not gonna be able to do it. And if we do not do it I’m not sure we win another election because I think they’re They’re going to force us into doing either. Not deporting the 10 million, right, and not securing the border, not forcing China and not really cutting tough deals that start to bring real high value-added manufacturing jobs back because Wall Street doesn’t want that. They think our labor cost is too high. They think the environmental cost is to high. They love the slave labor of Lao Weijian. And most importantly, they’re not going to stop the war machine. They’re not gonna stop. And I’m not a passive. I spent eight years of my life as a naval officer. My daughter went to West Point. You fought in Iraq in 2010 under Obama. It’s not that we’re pacifists, we see what we see. And what we now see is a very evil specter over this imperial capital. And one side is going to win, the President Trump rebels or revolutionaries versus his praetorian guard apparatus, and that’s why this fight, to me, is going happen. The next two or three hundred days, we’re going to know if there’s enough momentum our side to actually win.

Tucker [00:54:39] Yeah, there’s a…it’s a spiritual thing and you can…I texted my wife this morning, second this administration is gone, I’m never coming back here and I’m gonna…got here in 1985 and it’s really shocking. You feel that though when you’re here. Yeah, it’s just dark. It’s super dark and where I live normally is very, you know, it is not thriving at all. It’s poor and there are lots of problems and people die of drug OD’s and all that but you don’t feel…a lot of people die with drug ODs but you do not feel this Kind of. We sold our house five years ago. My wife sold it over the phone. And next thing you know, there is a… It was a great, beautiful house, super pretty house, not huge, but beautiful in the District of Columbia. And she sells it to a CIA officer who pays the cash. And the next thing, you know there’s a Ukraine flag flying from my flagpole. I’m not making this up. And my neighbor sent it to me. He’s like, oh, look what happened to your house, a house I really loved. And I was like, wow, that’s just a metaphor. Okay, so let me ask you, you’ve made a couple of allusions, I almost don’t wanna ask you because it’s upsetting, but to the country coming apart, to conflict here, clearly there’s been a rise in violence, this weird Minnesota story, which I’m not even gonna ask you about because I don’t understand it at all, I don’t think anybody does. But I wanna ask about what’s happening in California, it does seem like resisting federal authority on immigration is an act of sedition, more profound than anything I did at Fort Sumter in 1861. This is not resolved. Like, I don’t, what are we watching right now in California with Gavin News?

Steve Bannon [00:56:14] You’re from DC. I’m from Richmond. Yeah, I’m raised in Richmond and I keep telling people I thought we settled this About federal law and and states rights and succession in the mid 1860s We had a civil war to determine the outcome of this. We’ve had that discussion. We had that argument. It’s been settled I said this president Trump in the first term that this whole thing of sanctuary cities and sanctuary states is Absolutely a neo-confederate, you know mentality that you can have Gavin Newsom Have you said that to this neoconfederate? It’s a neocontederate.

Tucker [00:56:49] It is, that’s exactly what it is. I’m stealing that by the way.

Steve Bannon [00:56:53] No, no, no. So good. Jackson, look, he had this thing before the Civil War with Andrew Jackson and John C. Calhoun on tariffs. Remember, the landed aristocracy in South Carolina were some of the richest people. I think Charleston had more what would be equivalent to billionaires at the start of the Civil war than any place on earth.

Tucker [00:57:10] And it shows in the battery down there.

Steve Bannon [00:57:13] Yeah. Magnificent today. It is. John C. Calhoun, as his vice president, was going to stop and go down and defend South He said, we’re not going to do these tariffs. And Jackson said, I’m going to call the army down there. And if Calhoun defying me, I am going to hang him from the first lamppost. I mean, Jackson was a guy who was going take immediate action. What’s happening in California is kind of the equivalent. You’ve had the sanctions. And if President Trump had not sent the troops in and federalized the National Guard… What happened in LA was what we see in all these cities. It would have exploded, been the summer of love of 2025, where there was a lot more rhetoric than actually action. One of the reasons President Trump had Bill Barr and Esper and all these people that wouldn’t execute what he wanted. Now he’s got a team, and that’s why I’m so glad he came out last night and says, I’m doubling and tripling down the rates. My recommendation on the show, the day after this stuff happened over that weekend was President Trump ought to triple the ICE raids. And he ought to go to, you know, he oughta go to schools. Hey, they gotta go, right? They have to go, and it’s not pleasant. We gotta be very humane about it, but you have to have a show of force. And if you need to send in the Army, if you needed to send a Federalized National Guard, we have to do it. California is the rail head of this. That’s why you have break it there. It’s gonna obviously pop up in Chicago and New York, but you had to take, and Stephen Miller said this, and I’ve known Stephen a long time, Andrew and Stephen Millar and Ben Shapiro, Alex Mueller, they all came out of kind of West LA. Right, Ben may have been the Valley, but they’re all West LA guys. Stephen Miller has been saying since the time I knew him, the war for America is gonna be won or lost on the streets of Los Angeles. He said this now for almost 20 years. And this is what, this fight, and this is, what’s so disturbing about the timing. We’re totally focused on that and President Trump actually implementing the deportations of mass deportations. And all of a sudden this thing breaks out in Persia, in the Middle East. And now the whole country is just focused on. It’s almost like a time diversion to get our attention. It does feel that way. Because B.B. Gave it up. There was no, it didn’t have to happen on Thursday night. We were told what was leaked, oh, there’s a bomb and they’re gonna have it and this is something they have to have immediately, immediately, immediately. He comes on Brad Bear and says, well, it’s 12 or 13 months. We’ve heard the 12 or 14 months for 20 years. Maybe it is 12 or 15 months, but that doesn’t mean you have to act on Friday. Why is it Thursday and Friday when we’re in the middle of actually the most important part of this Third World War is the 10 main invaders we’ve had in this country or 20 main according to President Trump, they all have to go. You understand that there’s many bad actors that came in on this, right, that are now sleeper cells in this county. Everybody’s got to go, and we have to do it. That is the… When I talk about Third World war, the central battlefront for the United States of America is internal to the United states of America. This is why we have to focus on this in the timing, because there’s no coincidences, of how all of a sudden we’re asked to do bombing runs in Iran a half a world away, and it sucks up all the media attention that you don’t even … There’s not even a discussion on this, and that’s why President Trump’s coming out and doubling down, and Holman and Stephen Miller, there ought to be three more raids tomorrow, and we’ve got to get the focus back on that. So,

Tucker [01:00:19] How should you deal with…I mean, when Orval Faubus, who was the governor of Arkansas in 1956, presides over the state that refuses to desegregate, after the Supreme Court says you have to desегregate in Brown versus Board. And Dwight Eisenhower, who’s not a liberal, says, you can’t ignore federal authority on a federal issue. This is a Supreme Court decision. And he sends the 101st Airborne to Little Rock to Central High School and says, sorry, you’re gonna desegregation. Now, whatever you think of that… It’s kind of disgusting in certain ways, but it’s also essential to preserving the union. I mean, I don’t understand, like, how can you have your biggest state being like, no, to the federal government? Like what… On a central issue. On a essential issue. On a… Who lives here? Yes. Who takes federal benefits? Who’s actually a citizen? Who has allegiance to this country? Who gets to choose our leadership? Right. In a democratic… This was a

Steve Bannon [01:01:14] This is why this radical neo-Marxist Democratic Party will fight. This is the hill they will die on.

Tucker [01:01:20] So, but I don’t understand how you can put up with that. How can you put up that? That’s like maybe a little more important than whether Iran gets the bomb.

Steve Bannon [01:01:27] Well, you can’t, and by the way, the American people, the American don’t, I think it’s like 60-40, where they agree with President Trump on these mass deportations. Remember, one of the reasons we’re winning the African-American vote is President Trump does not believe, like the Democratic Party and Kamala Harris, in mass incarcerations. He believes in mass deportation. When I was in prison, the only thing I put up from Danbury was like on the 26th of August, I said, hey, victory’s at hand. I can tell from the prisoners in Danbury, the young Hispanics and blacks who hate the Democratic party, And they particularly hated Kamala Harris. You guys said, look, the Democratic Party is for mass incarcerations to break our families and to make us dependent upon the government. I mean, these guys were smarter than guys going to Yale and the political science department because it’s a lived experience of them. And they support mass deportations because in a place like Danbury, 10% of the prison is bad hombres from these other countries that are the most dangerous criminals, convicts you have in these prisons. People at the street level have our back on this. This is this new coalition, but we have to succeed in this. We have to succeeded in the deportations and getting wages to rise. In fact, I think there was just something in the Wall Street Journal. They said wages for low skilled workers are coming up. Right? Because guess what? You have less non-citizens here competing as a people in their own country shouldn’t have to compete against a non- citizen for a job. This is President Trump’s, the centerpiece. Entire Make America Great Again movement. And that’s why it has to succeed. And everybody now in the official political apparatus is trying to thwart him in this. And this is why it’s so important for him to go. And the deep state is also, remember, one of the reasons that DHS is burning through money, and there’s not as many deportations, you talk to the guys of the White House, you’re talking to the DHS, they’re still playing by the old playbook. In other words, they have to have a deportation order from a court. They go to a guy’s house and make sure there’s no kids around. They take like 20 agents a week to go serve on two people and get them out of here. Well, obviously, that’s the old playbook. You have to get much more aggressive on your deportations. I think Miller and Holman are trying to change the culture over there to actually do it. But even there, the apparatus, the administrative state’s got its own mind of how they’re going to do things. I think this is one of President Trump’s big battles.

Tucker [01:03:41] My last question has to do with like the first principle from which these positions flow, which is there’s a certain segment of our population. I think the majority who think the US government’s job is to help American citizens in America. But there is another very powerful segment, which is most of the US Government that believes the opposite. Ten years ago, I’m on an amtrac train to New York from Washington for work at Fox. And I get a call from a neocon writer called Julia Ioffe, I think is Russian-born, ready for the New Republic. And she says to me, and at this point… I’m like, she thinks I’m in the O’Connor or something, but she’s calling me for like, what do we make of Trump? And she goes, Trump’s calling himself a nationalist. She was like, way offended. And it was just prima facie, like nationalism bad. And I said, well, I’m a nationalist, and she goes she’s not stupid. And she says, you’re a nationalist? I said well, well I don’t know, I think I am. I mean, I like America. I think the US government should work for America. She was horrified, and I don’t think I’ve ever spoken. Why does that idea, which is non-threatening, it’s not a Nazi idea, it’s like a basic idea, it was the founder’s idea that the U.S. Government should act on behalf of Americans. Why is that offensive? So offensive to some people.

Steve Bannon [01:04:50] I’m going to tell my Mark Levin story because I like Mark a lot, and I think he’s one of the smartest guys in the Constitution, although I will say I think we’re opposed on every big topic dealing with President Trump, just saying, because Mark is a neoliberal neocon, and that’s what Fox is, right? Which is different than populism, nationalism, totally different, they’re two different And I’ve always gotten along with Mark. Yeah, and this is why neoliberals, this is my neoliberal, neocons, the whole This is what the Murdex are. They’re much, they’re just the difference, you know, Gore Vidal said, it’s just two sides of kind of the same coin to run the American empire. Because the American Empire is run on neoliberal principles and neocon principles. So Mark, when I kept saying nationalism and populism and nationalism, he calls me up, and as you know Mark, he goes, Bannon, he was, you got to drop nationalism. And I go, this is 10 years ago, 12 years ago when I first joined it at Breitbart, and I go why, he says, it is Americanism. And I’d go, no, Mark, it was actually nationalism, right? And I tried walking through, he goes, no, no no no, it’s Americanism. And then he puts out a book later, I think Americanism, which talks about certain tenets of nationalism, but they don’t want to use that phrase, I think, because of connotations that came from Europe in the 19th century, and then obviously in the 20th century. I said, this is completely different. It is populist nationalism. It is a populist movement that puts America first and American citizens first. That’s the big part of the nationalism they never get to. That is what Unite says. How could they see that as bad?

Tucker [01:06:14] I’m honestly, 10 years in, I’m baffled by it. Like, what’s bad about that? About that.

Steve Bannon [01:06:18] If you mention that word, they get lit up. I have still many people today. People accuse me, oh, in fact, Ben, and Ben Shabrowsman, the smartest guys in the country, Ben said when I was running Breitbart, when he left, whether he left or was on a quarter or fired him is still a matter of debate, still a manner of debate. Ben goes, I turned Breitbart into Trump Pravda, right, with the populist nationalism and away from Andrew’s court tennis. So listen, that is an ideological fight. About nomenclature, which is very important in us going forward, but the tenets of it and what we’re trying to do, I think, is what you’re seeing President Trump do. We have a government apparatus of these people that when institutions carry on year after year after year and pass the baton and they control, and you know many of these these people, most of them come from middle-class backgrounds. They’re not coming just from elite. No, they’re not Rockefellers. Not Rockefell, no, there are some Rockefellas and there’s some NEPO babies, but-

Tucker [01:07:15] but they’re irrelevant.

Steve Bannon [01:07:16] Yeah, mainly just middle-class people strivers, but they’re in control of the greatest most powerful apparatus on earth And you mentioned early today The thought of going into war and actually killing people that’s something that turns certain people and the power of it right now And that’s why I say tell people when you come to Washington you can really feel it’s a spiritual war Yes, because of the dark spectrum that hangs over this town now that spiritual war manifests itself in money and power And you see so many people I’ve seen come here in Congress and people I know that come here and they get corrupted and they corrupted because that basic human nature of being attracted to money and power is very tough and we’re in a situation now that people we admire, people we like, people we’ve known, we have to go to war with them. This war against this apparatus is going to be as brutal as the war we’re fighting in the streets of Los Angeles today to make sure that actually Los Angeles is part of this American Republic, because right now California is not, but the major cities in this country led by Los Angeles and San Francisco are definitely not. They’re a totally different entity. I’m so-

Tucker [01:08:28] I’m sad to hear you say that because the last thing I wanna do was spend my day arguing with Ben Shapiro or Mark Levin. I mean, I agree with those guys on a lot and I know them, of course. I’m not mad at them personally even now. I don’t wanna fight with them. You know what I mean? I wanna fight it with George Soros or something or Gavin Newsom. But I feel like they are making it…this is my read, probably self-serving, but I feel they are make it impossible to sit back in silence as they wreck the country.

Steve Bannon [01:08:58] That fight as important as that is to me is a secondary tertiary fight right now Than the fight that we need you on in the fight. We need you. On you have a unique historical understanding Of the institutions of this town and the smarts We need a handful of smart people around president trump. They’re saying this is the look we put cash and bonjino into fbi We’ve put uh ellis and uh in ratcliffe the cia. We put a handful. Of great people at doj We put Pete and a handful of great people at defense. We put Tulsi and Joe Kent and a handful of people at DNI. It’s not enough. The apparatus still runs the deal. We are hanging on in a very tenuous shape. We need to go to war, like they wanna go to war in Persia, we need to go to a war with them and I mean, take the sword out of the scabbard and throw away the scabard. We have to do that now.

Tucker [01:09:49] If I got anywhere near any kind of institutional power, which I’ve never saw it and I don’t seek now, but if I ever did, you know, I think the Tom Cotton’s and the donors and people like that, I mean, I’d think that would be really… If they put kiddie porn on my computer, I’d get pancreatic. I don’t know, man.

Steve Bannon [01:10:10] First off, just the announcement of that, the intention of that would unmask. Part of this is going through an unmasking, who’s on our side and who’s not on our side, because a lot of people that are pretending to be on our sides are on the opposite side and we can go through a great unmasking.

Tucker [01:10:27] What they fear is sincerity, because I’m hardly the smartest person in D.C., well, not in D. C., but I’m the smartest in this conversation at all. And I don’t think I’m like, you know, have like brilliant, cohesive philosophical ideas or anything like that. I’m just sort of a bumbling middle-aged, you now, hopefully try to be Christian person. But I’m totally sincere. And that’s why they hated MTG, who’s also, you know, marginal. We’ve probably got the same SAT score. You know what I mean? It’s like- She’s not kidding. She’s total, in that kind of, in the chick way, where they get mad and they just start telling the truth. What you see is what you get. Only women do that?

Steve Bannon [01:11:06] No, she, look, she’s central to MAGA. I mean, what do you mean? She’s been… Well, she was written out today by Mark Levin. I know, she and I don’t always agree on everything, but she’s 100% MAGA, it’s not even a question. That shows you the level they’re prepared to go to. No, what you have is, which is tough in this town to get, is actually historical understanding of these institutions. The only other person, and this would be great if you did it, the only other I know that has that is Bobby Kennedy. Bobby Kennedy has that understanding, obviously what his family’s gone through, but he at a very deep level, he knows the interconnections.

Tucker [01:11:43] Friend of mine. Steve Bannon, thank you for taking the time to do this. I am grateful and Godspeed in this city.

Steve Bannon [01:11:52] Thanks, Tucker. It’s amazing. I can’t wait until you get your appointment. Be the first interview on Roar Room after he gets it. I’m not kidding when I get it. Hey, I’ve had longer odds on things than this, so stand by.

Tucker [01:12:08] Thank you.

 

“Bat Crap Crazyy”: Tucker’s summary of his debate with Ted Cruz

We’d like to thank Ted Cruz for taking time out of his busy schedule to read this newsletter. Based on his repeated Morning Note references in yesterday’s Tucker Carlson Show interview, he seems to be a fan. We’re flattered.

Aside from repeatedly plugging this product, the senator offered a plethora of thought-provoking foreign policy insights we think warrant review. A handful of them are below.

How Many People Live in Iran?

Cruz has no idea.

“I don’t know the population,” he admitted during the interview. He also conceded that he lacks knowledge about the country’s ethnic mix and said he’s “not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran.”

Doesn’t that strike you as odd? The United States has an abominable history of taking over Middle Eastern nations that most Americans would probably prefer not to relive. We’re not pulling a Douglas Murray and saying you have to be an “expert” to hold an opinion, but if you’re a United States senator seeking to topple a foreign government, shouldn’t you at least have some basic clue of what the country that government presides over is like?

Cruz doesn’t. Despite that, he wants…

Regime Change

The Texas lawmaker said “a popular uprising from the people” will fuel the execution of the neocons’ true goal: the Ayatollah’s removal. That is a fantasy. The Iranian leader’s decapitation would be directly aided by the United States and serve as the beginning of yet another American nation-building project.

Like it or not, that is simply not something we’re good at. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria offer scarring proof. With those humiliating failures looming in the not-so-distant past, are the American people seriously supposed to trust Washington and the Israeli government that this time will be different? What makes Cruz so insistent that the public should believe that?

Maybe he’s spreading such a ridiculous talking point because he’s under the influence of…

AIPAC

Here’s something we’re really not supposed to say: according to Open Secrets, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other pro-Israel lobbying groups have given the senator nearly $2 million in campaign contributions throughout his time in politics. 

Why do you think they’ve done that? Do they make their gifts out of the goodness of their hearts? Is it philanthropy? Of course not. They cut those checks because they expect Cruz and all of their other Washington servants to use the halls of power to advance their agenda. Serve Israel first, and maybe America second if there’s time left over.

Cruz denied all of this during the interview, saying with a straight face that AIPAC is actually “an American lobby” and that it pushes policies that Benjamin Netanyahu opposes “all the time.” We’d love to hear him name one. In the meantime, we encourage you to watch this clip from Tucker’s 2024 interview with Congressman Thomas Massie for a glimpse into how this system really works.

Think AIPAC funding Cruz’s career might play a role in molding his positions? It’s a deeply reasonable question. But the lawmaker has a way to shut it down. Rather than corruption, he says his stance exists because of…

God

We would never attack the senator or anyone else for their faith. He is a Christian like us.

With that being said, his assertion that the Bible commands America to dump fortunes of taxpayer dollars into the bombing of Iran deserves skepticism.

“Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed,” Cruz recalled learning during childhood Sunday school.

We acknowledge that teaching’s existence. It comes from Genesis. But it’s worth pausing to wonder what precisely it means. Most people we talk to hear that decree as a righteous call to uphold God’s chosen people rather than one to bow down to a 21st-century country’s geopolitical aims, regardless of what they entail. Cruz seems to disagree, arguing the verse’s true demand is for unconditional support of the Netanyahu government.

Does that have any limits? What if the IDF nuked Gaza, as Congressman Randy Fine recently advocated for? Would we still have to support them then? What if they bombed Chicago? According to Cruz, the answer very well could be yes. That’s because he’s…

Obsessed with Israel

Have you ever noticed how often brash accusers are guilty of the precise behavior they claim their opponents display?

Cruz fits that description, accusing Tucker of having an “obsession with Israel.”

To state what we hope is already obvious, we are not obsessed with Israel. We’re obsessed with the United States. It’s where we and our families live, and we therefore see no international agenda as of equal importance to what’s best for this country. America comes first.

Cruz can’t say the same.

“I came into Congress 13 years ago with the stated intention of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States Senate,” he said. “And I’ve worked every day to do it.”

Imagine if a lawmaker expressed that sentiment about a different country. Say, a Congressman shouting his goal of using his office to promote the interests of Rwanda. Or Morocco. Colombia, Armenia, Malta. Wouldn’t that be weird? A dereliction of duty? American voters sent Cruz to Washington, but rather than focusing on them, he’s busy catering to the needs of Israelis?

That sure sounds like an obsession to us. And since he’s so obsessed, he’s completely comfortable with Israel’s intelligence agency…

Spying on Americans

“Friends and allies spy on each other,” Cruz nonchalantly quipped when asked if Mossad spies domestically in the United States. “I assume all of our allies spy on us.”

His message was clear: Sure, the Netanyahu government surveils the American public, but come on. It’s no big deal. They’re our “special ally,” meaning we must applaud them for attacking our country’s sovereignty by monitoring its citizens. 

Of everything the senator said during this sit-down, that quote was perhaps the most alarming. He’s completely fine with a U.S.-funded foreign government spying on the people who pay for it? Including the president?

Ignore Cruz’s propaganda. Israel spying on Americans is a big deal. It’s threatening, insulting, and a betrayal of the taxpayers perpetually doing the Israelis a favor by coughing up their hard-earned money to prop up their rulers.

Don’t share that view? Watch out. He may call you an…

Antisemite!

Cruz ran to X on Wednesday to retweet a post pushing that slanderous attack.

No matter what anyone regurgitating Netanyahu talking points says, opposing the United States sponsoring a war with Iran does not make you an antisemite, a bigot, a terrorist sympathizer, or any of the other nasty names they routinely shriek at people with whom they disagree. Levying that accusation makes them seem unserious and minimizes the historic atrocities that actual antisemites committed less than a century ago.

Take Dave Smith, a Jewish comedian who may disagree with Cruz even more than we do. Is he an antisemite, too? What about Glenn Greenwald, another Jewish American who dares to criticize the Israeli government? Does he hate his own people?

Of course not. They just want to put…

America First

As we wrote on Friday and the media conveniently failed to report, opposing destroying the United States in the name of the Netanyahu political agenda has nothing to do with Israel. It’s about America. We reject the idea of involving the U.S. in an Israeli war for the same reason we would stand against doing so on behalf of any other foreign country. It is not in our national interest.

It remains true that what happens next will define Donald Trump’s presidency. We pray he rebuffs the counsel of Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Lindsey Graham, Miriam Adelson, and anyone else pushing this war.

According to Cruz, that makes us “bat crap crazy.”

NYTimes: How Trump Shifted on Iran Under Pressure From Israel

I thought that this is a very thorough and balanced article. Basically the Israelis trapped Trump because of Netanyahu’s preemptive strike and the power of the Israel Lobby in the GOP and the media, making it politically non-viable to oppose Israel. He dragged his feet and he would have resisted if Israel ‘s attacks were ineffective. Only if the Israeli attacks were successful would he act. Once they were, Trump got on board. He always goes with a winner, however reluctantly in this case.

Israel sees this as a way to end their problems once and for all. And it may be that Trump is increasingly thinking the same thing.

So get ready for a very big war with the U.S.  involved to the hilt.

How Trump Shifted on Iran Under Pressure From Israel

President Trump spent the first months of his term holding back Israel’s push for an assault on Iran’s nuclear program. With the war underway, his posture has gyrated as he weighs sending in the U.S. military.

Listen to this article · 21:31 min Learn more
Smoke from explosions after Israel’s attacks on Tehran on Sunday.Credit…Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times
By the end of last month, American spy agencies monitoring Israel’s military activities and discussions among the country’s political leadership had come to a striking conclusion: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was planning for an imminent attack on Iran’s nuclear program, with or without the participation of the United States.

Mr. Netanyahu had spent more than a decade warning that an overwhelming military assault was necessary before Iran reached the point that it could quickly build a nuclear weapon. Yet he had always backed down after multiple American presidents, fearful of the consequences of another conflagration in the Middle East, told him the United States would not assist in an attack.

But this time, the American intelligence assessment was that Mr. Netanyahu was preparing not just a limited strike on the nuclear facilities, but a far more expansive attack that could imperil the Iranian regime itself — and that he was prepared to go it alone.

The intelligence left President Trump facing difficult choices. He had become invested in a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions, and had already swatted down one attempt by Mr. Netanyahu, in April, to convince him that the time was right for a military assault on Iran. During a strained phone call in late May, Mr. Trump again warned the Israeli leader against a unilateral attack that would short-circuit the diplomacy.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

But over the last several weeks, it became increasingly apparent to Trump administration officials that they might not be able to stop Mr. Netanyahu this time, according to interviews with key players in the administration’s deliberations over how to respond and others familiar with their thinking. At the same time, Mr. Trump was getting impatient with Iran over the slow pace of negotiations and beginning to conclude that the talks might go nowhere.

Contrary to Israeli claims, senior administration officials were unaware of any new intelligence showing that the Iranians were rushing to build a nuclear bomb — a move that would justify a pre-emptive strike. But seeing they would most likely not be able to deter Mr. Netanyahu and were no longer driving events, Mr. Trump’s advisers weighed alternatives.

At one end of the spectrum was sitting back and doing nothing and then deciding on next steps once it became clear how much Iran had been weakened by the attack. At the other end was joining Israel in the military assault, possibly to the point of forcing regime change in Iran.

A part of Tehran that was damaged in Israeli strikes last week.Credit…Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times

Mr. Trump chose a middle course, offering Israel as-yet undisclosed support from the U.S. intelligence community to carry out its attack and then turning up the pressure on Tehran to give immediate concessions at the negotiating table or face continued military onslaught.

Now Mr. Trump is seriously considering sending American aircraft in to help refuel Israeli combat jets and to try to take out Iran’s deep-underground nuclear site at Fordo with 30,000-pound bombs — a step that would mark a stunning turnabout from his opposition just two months ago to any military action while there was still a chance of a diplomatic solution.

The story of what led up to the Israeli strike is one of two leaders in Mr. Trump and Mr. Netanyahu who share a common goal — preventing Iran from getting a nuclear bomb — but who are wary of each other’s motives. They speak often in public about their strong political and personal bonds, and yet the relationship has long been beset by mistrust.

Interviews with two dozen officials in the United States, Israel and the Persian Gulf region show how Mr. Trump vacillated for months over how and whether to contain Mr. Netanyahu’s impulses as he confronted the first foreign policy crisis of his second term. It was a situation he faced with a relatively inexperienced circle of advisers handpicked for loyalty.

This year he told a political ally that Mr. Netanyahu was trying to drag him into another Middle East war — the type of war he promised during his presidential campaign last year he would keep America out of.

And when Israel chose war, Mr. Trump cycled from skepticism about attaching himself too closely to Mr. Netanyahu to inching toward joining him in dramatically escalating the conflict, even bucking the view that there is no immediate nuclear threat from Iran.

As he rushed back to Washington from a Group of 7 summit in Canada early on Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump took issue with an element of public testimony of Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence, that the intelligence community did not believe Iran was actively building nuclear weapons even as it enriches uranium that could ultimately be used for a nuclear arsenal. “I don’t care what she said,” Mr. Trump told reporters. “I think they were very close to having them.”

For Mr. Netanyahu, the last several months brought to an end years of trying to cajole the United States into backing or at least tolerating his long-held desire to deal Iran’s nuclear program a crippling blow. He appears to have judged, correctly, that Mr. Trump would ultimately come around, if only grudgingly.

Beyond the lives lost and destruction wrought, the crisis has also laid bare schisms within Mr. Trump’s party between those inclined to reflexively defend Israel, America’s closest ally in the region, and those determined to keep the United States from getting further mired in the Middle East’s cycle of violence.

Asked for comment, a White House spokesman pointed to public comments made by Mr. Trump about not allowing Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon.

When Mr. Trump met with his top advisers at the wooded presidential retreat of Camp David late on Sunday, June 8, to review the fast-evolving situation, the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe, provided a blunt assessment.

It was highly likely, he said, that Israel would soon strike Iran, with or without the United States, according to two people familiar with the briefing, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a confidential discussion.

Image

John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, provided a blunt assessment of the fast-evolving situation between Iran and Israel at Camp David in June.Credit…Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

Mr. Trump’s advisers had been preparing for this moment. In late May, they had seen intelligence that made them concerned that Israel was going to move ahead with a major assault on Iran, regardless of what the president was trying to achieve diplomatically with Tehran.

Based on that intelligence, Vice President JD Vance and Marco Rubio, in his joint role as secretary of state and national security adviser, encouraged an effort to give the president a range of options so he could make quick decisions if necessary about the scope of American involvement.

Mr. Ratcliffe’s intelligence-gathering efforts went into overdrive. And in the two weeks leading up to the Camp David meeting, Mr. Trump’s top advisers met multiple times to get on the same page about what the menu of potential options might be.

The day after the Camp David meeting, Monday, June 9, Mr. Trump got on the phone with Mr. Netanyahu. The Israeli leader was unequivocal: The mission was a go.

Mr. Trump was impressed by the ingenuity of the Israeli military planning. He made no commitments, but after he got off the call, he told advisers, “I think we might have to help him.”

Still, the president was torn over what to do next, and quizzed advisers throughout the week. He had wanted to manage Iran on his own terms, not Mr. Netanyahu’s, and he had professed confidence in his deal-making abilities. But he had come to believe that the Iranians were stringing him along.

Unlike some in the anti-interventionist wing of his party, Mr. Trump was never of the view that America could live with, and contain, an Iran with a nuclear bomb. He shared Mr. Netanyahu’s view that Iran was an existential threat to Israel. Mr. Netanyahu, he told aides, was going to do what was necessary to protect his country.

Israel had begun preparing in December for an attack on Iran, after the decimation of Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy, and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, opening up airspace for a bombing campaign.

Image

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and President Trump at a news conference at the White House in February.Credit…Tierney L. Cross for The New York Times

Mr. Netanyahu gave Mr. Trump a presentation about Iran in the Oval Office, walking him through images of the country’s various nuclear sites.

Israeli intelligence showed that Iran was making cruder and faster efforts to get to a nuclear weapon, and the weaker the Iranians got, the closer they moved to the bomb. In terms of the enrichment of uranium, Iran was days away from where it needed to be, but there were other components it required to complete the weapon.

The Israelis made an additional argument to Mr. Trump: If you want diplomacy to succeed you have to prepare for a strike, so there is real force behind the negotiations. Privately, they fretted that Mr. Trump would take what they viewed as an inadequate deal with Iran, similar to the 2015 deal negotiated by President Barack Obama, and that he would then declare mission accomplished. Mr. Netanyahu told Mr. Trump that the Iranians would be able to rebuild their air defenses that were destroyed during an Israeli attack in October, adding to the urgency.

After his election in November, Mr. Trump had named a close friend, Steve Witkoff, as his Middle East envoy, and gave him the job of trying to reach a deal with Iran. Mr. Trump, elected on a platform that promised to avoid military entanglements abroad, seemed to relish the idea of coming to a diplomatic resolution.

From the beginning of the administration, the Iranians were putting out feelers from a handful of countries to open a diplomatic path with the new administration. Then Mr. Trump made his own dramatic move: He sent a letter to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

In early March, visitors to the Oval Office or guests on Air Force One were regaled by Mr. Trump about his “beautiful letter” to the ayatollah. One visitor treated to a live rendition recalled the letter’s basic message as: I don’t want war. I don’t want to blow you off the map. I want a deal.

Mr. Trump knew he was wading into dangerous political territory. More than perhaps any other subject, the Israel-Iran issue splits Mr. Trump’s coalition, pitting an anti-interventionist faction, led by media figures like the influential podcast host Tucker Carlson, against anti-Iran conservatives like the radio host Mark Levin.

But inside the administration, despite much hype about disagreements between “Iran hawks” and “doves,” ideological divisions were far less important than they were in Mr. Trump’s first term, when officials like Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson viewed the president as reckless and in need of being restrained from his impulses.

Mr. Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were always deferential to the president’s views, even if Mr. Hegseth, who has a close relationship with Mr. Netanyahu, was more trusting of the Israelis than some of his colleagues.

Image

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in Tehran last year. Mr. Trump wrote a letter to the Mr. Khamenei, with the basic message as: I don’t want war. I don’t want to blow you off the map. I want a deal.Credit…Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times

Mr. Vance warned repeatedly about the prospect of the United States getting entangled in a regime change war, but even those on the team who had historically supported a more muscular stance against Iran backed Mr. Witkoff’s diplomacy. Mr. Trump’s tough-on-Iran national security adviser at the time, Mike Waltz, nonetheless had a close working relationship with the more dovish Mr. Witkoff.

On the intelligence side, Mr. Ratcliffe delivered information without weighing in on one side or the other. And while everyone knew that Ms. Gabbard was as anti-interventionist as they come, she rarely pushed that view on the president.

It called for Iran to ultimately stop all enrichment of uranium and proposed the creation of a regional consortium to produce nuclear power that would potentially involve Iran, the United States and other Gulf states like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Even as Mr. Trump pursued a diplomatic solution, he seemed persuaded by one thing the Israelis had said to him: having credible military options would give him a stronger hand in negotiations with Iran.

Options for taking out Iran’s nuclear sites already existed inside the Pentagon, but after taking office in January the president authorized U.S. Central Command to coordinate with the Israelis on further refining and developing them.

By the middle of February, in coordination with the Israelis, Gen. Michael Erik Kurilla, the head of Central Command, had developed three main options. The first and most minimal was U.S. refueling and intelligence support for an Israeli mission. The second was Israeli and American joint strikes. The third was a U.S.-led mission with Israel in a supporting role. It would have involved American B-1 and B-2 bombers, carrier aircraft and cruise missiles launched from submarines.

There was also a fourth option, quickly discarded, that included, in addition to large-scale U.S. strikes, an Israeli commando raid with air support from American Osprey helicopters or other aircraft options.
Image

People are marching after Israel-Iran attacks in Tehran, Iran on Saturday.Credit…Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times

But as Mr. Witkoff pursued negotiations with Tehran, mediated by Oman, the Israelis grew impatient.

Mr. Netanyahu made a quick visit to Mr. Trump at the White House in April. Among other requests, he asked for the American bunker-buster bomb to destroy the underground nuclear site at Fordo.

Mr. Trump, intent at the time on giving diplomacy a chance, was unpersuaded and in the days after the meeting, his team made a full-court press to stop the Israelis from launching pre-emptive strikes against Iran. The message from Mr. Trump’s team was blunt: You cannot just go and do this on your own. There are too many implications for us. These were tense conversations, but Mr. Trump’s advisers thought the Israelis had absorbed their message.

The president was concerned that Israel would strike out on its own or scuttle his diplomacy if Mr. Netanyahu did not like where his deal was heading. The Trump team also worried about what would happen if Israel launched strikes against Iran but failed to destroy all of its nuclear facilities.

By that point, Mr. Vance was telling associates that he was worried about a potential regime change war, which he considered a dangerous escalation that could spiral out of control.

Mr. Vance had come to view a conflict between Israel and Iran as inevitable. The vice president was open to the possibility of supporting a targeted Israeli strike, but his concerns that it would grow into a more drawn-out war increased as the likely date of a strike approached, according to two people with knowledge of his thinking.

He turned his attention toward trying to keep America out of the conflict as much as possible beyond intelligence sharing. He worked closely with Mr. Trump’s inner circle, including Mr. Rubio, Mr. Hegseth and Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, to figure out contingency plans to protect American personnel in the region.

Image

After his election in November, Mr. Trump named a close friend, Steve Witkoff, as his Middle East envoy and gave him the job of trying to reach a deal with Iran.Credit…Eric Lee/The New York Times

That same day, Mr. Levin, the conservative radio host, met with Mr. Trump and several of his advisers in the dining room adjoining the Oval Office. He had been an influential force in presenting an anti-Iran view to the president. The conversation with Mr. Levin appeared to have made an impression on the president, advisers said.

After that meeting, Mr. Trump told aides he wanted to give the deal talks a bit more of a chance. But his patience was wearing thin.

That Friday, his team scheduled a Sunday meeting in the privacy of Camp David.

Publicly, Mr. Trump was still stressing the importance of giving diplomacy a chance. And while doing so was not intended to deceive the Iranians about the immediacy of a potential attack from Israel, the possibility that it might keep Iran from going on heightened alert was a welcome side effect, a U.S. official involved in the discussions said.

But last Wednesday, there was no indication of any negotiated breakthrough, and by that point Mr. Trump’s inner circle knew the attack would start the next day.

In some private conversations, Mr. Trump questioned the wisdom of the Israeli decision to attack. “I don’t know about Bibi,” he told one associate, adding that he had warned him against the strikes.

Mr. Trump joined his national security team in the White House Situation Room on Thursday evening as the first wave of strikes was unfolding, and was still keeping his options open. Earlier that day he was telling advisers and allies that he still wanted to get a deal with Iran.

The first official statement from the administration after the strikes came not from Mr. Trump but from Mr. Rubio, who distanced the United States from the Israeli campaign and made no mention of standing by an ally, even though the U.S. intelligence community was already providing support.

But as the night wore on and the Israelis landed a spectacular series of precision strikes against Iranian military leaders and strategic sites, Mr. Trump began to change his mind about his public posture.

Image

Smoke coming from an area north of Tehran after Israeli airstrikes in Tehran on Monday.Credit…Arash Khamooshi for The New York Times

When he woke on Friday morning, his favorite TV channel, Fox News, was broadcasting wall-to-wall imagery of what it was portraying as Israel’s military genius. And Mr. Trump could not resist claiming some credit for himself.

In phone calls with reporters, Mr. Trump began hinting that he had played a bigger behind-the-scenes role in the war than people realized. Privately, he told some confidants that he was now leaning toward a more serious escalation: going along with Israel’s earlier request that the United States deliver powerful bunker-busting bombs to destroy Iran’s nuclear facility at Fordo.

As recently as Monday, Mr. Trump held out the possibility that Mr. Witkoff or even Mr. Vance could meet with Iranian officials to seek a negotiated deal. But as Mr. Trump abruptly left the Group of 7 summit in Canada to rush back to Washington, there was little indication that the conflict would be brought to a quick end through diplomacy.

From Israel Hayom: Ritual Child Rape in Israel

‘Bottom of darkness’: Children raped in ritual ceremonies expose the horrors

Multiple women recount organized abuse including ritual ceremonies conducted by people they knew, even close family members – after months of interviews with victims, their families, treatment professionals and experts in Israel and abroad, a disturbing picture emerges with descriptions difficult to read.

“I suffered painful sodomy, truly felt like I was splitting in two. It’s a terrible experience, but there’s something about these things, perhaps in their strangeness, that’s like… maybe the hardest component is that if you tell people about these things, they’ll think you’re crazy. I remember many types of severe sexual abuse, but there’s something about these ritualistic abuses that makes them the bottom of darkness.”

In direct words and with a clear voice, Emunah (pseudonym, like all victims’ names in this article) describes the severe abuse she allegedly experienced in her childhood. Organized sexual abuse that included “ceremonies” with supposed religious significance. Horrifying ceremonies in which religious people, some from her own family, sacrificed her as an offering for spiritual transcendence or redemption.

Emunah is not alone. More than ten women between the ages of 20-45 with whom we spoke describe a severe phenomenon raising serious concern that in Israel, like many countries worldwide, organized sexual abuse of children is occurring right under everyone’s nose.

“Perhaps the world knows that rape occurs, that incest exists, but this the world doesn’t know,” Emunah said. “These acts have been kept secret for years, perhaps because of their insanity… it was always very, very strange. As if there was an internal logic, but it was so crazy… very strange things happen there, normalized in a ritualistic and orderly manner. There’s a specific time, there’s when to say this verse and when to say that verse, there’s an order as if things are supposed to be done this way…”

Each woman we interviewed during our investigation has a different life story. They come from different areas of the country, from north to south. Each is at a different place in her life. Some are students, others work and manage careers and family lives, and there are also young women barely surviving, clinging to life by their fingernails.

These women did not know each other previously, grew up in different communities, and come from different sectors and religious streams. Yet the ritual abuse stories they describe are similar in ways that compel us to listen and not turn a blind eye. Some were harmed in early childhood educational settings or in girls’ schools, others in their family homes, yeshivas or synagogues. In this article, we present only a very small sample from many hours of interviews and information, and some descriptions in this article are difficult to read. The great fear expressed by everyone who spoke with us is that organized sexual abuse of children continues even today.

“Blessed who releases the bound”

Victim. Sacrifice. Punishment. Correction. Transcendence. Redemption. These are recurring concepts in the testimonies. The prayers, the mutterings, the ecstasy surrounding the victims. The extreme pain, humiliation, and torture. The crushing of personality and soul. Testimony after testimony after testimony from women who experienced organized childhood abuse that included group rape performed within ceremonial and ritual frameworks.

We met these women over the past few months. We spoke with family members of some victims, with treatment professionals, and with experts in Israel and abroad specializing in trauma and dissociation (a range of conditions from emotional detachment to complete disconnection from feelings, sensations, memories, and more). We collected information about organized ritual child abuse – a phenomenon recognized worldwide.

The picture emerging from all gathered information is disturbing and difficult. It requires, at minimum, a deep and meaningful investigation by law enforcement authorities. “It is a religious-national mission to expose this phenomenon and uncover the truth,” a treatment professional in the religious community familiar with details of the phenomenon told Israel Hayom.

Most women we interviewed come from religious Zionist or ultra-Orthodox communities, although Shishabbat received additional testimonies about similar cases in secular society. Therefore, it’s important to emphasize that these findings don’t target any specific sector, but rather direct a beam of light toward suspected crimes of the most severe kind imaginable – crimes committed in a parallel world transparent to sight, though deeply dark and sinister.

“Illustration: Talia Drigues

Several rabbis’ names appeared repeatedly in some testimonies. Multiple complaints filed at different police stations around the country were all closed relatively quickly. Even when suspicions arose previously about a network harming children in Jerusalem, police investigators, at best, lacked sufficient tools or knowledge to properly investigate.

In that case, extensively exposed in 2019 on the TV program The Source, suspicions arose about a pedophile network that harmed dozens of children in the Nahlaot neighborhood. Investigators tended to dismiss it as an “invention,” “exaggeration,” or “panic” by parents and treatment professionals, and closed the case with almost no relevant indictments.

A man named Benjamin Satz was convicted and sentenced in 2013 to imprisonment for committing indecent acts and sodomy against girls and boys aged 5 to 8. Another suspect was acquitted due to reasonable doubt. In practice, dozens of children remained traumatized and required years of emotional therapy.

“Not outsiders in the community”

“I remember a pentagram on the floor, usually in red. When the ceremony was in the forest, the pentagram was marked with a hoe and surrounded by lit candles in a circle. The rabbi would bless, ‘Blessed who releases the bound,’ men around prayed with prayer shawls, sometimes dressed in black, while the rabbi wore a white robe. There were several men and boys around the ages of 16-17 who participated in ceremonies for spiritual transcendence.

“There was one time they asked me to dig a hole and lie in it. Other times, they injected me with something and said, ‘Now you’ll feel better,’ after which my body went limp. They would repetitively read Psalms, like ‘A Psalm of David, the Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want.’ They told me ‘you are special, you are chosen’ and they would insert… I remember a palm branch, Hanukkah candles, a shofar.”

Limor (pseudonym) grew up in a religious-ultra-Orthodox home. Her father, she says, always acted violently toward her and her mother. Throughout the years, she required medical treatment at a hospital and was accompanied by a professional due to injuries caused by the violent abuse she experienced.

According to her testimony, her father was the one who brought her to these “ceremonies.” Being delivered by family members is characteristic of many testimonies we gathered. Limor says sometimes the ceremony took place in a forest, other times in a secluded apartment. There were instances when she witnessed and heard other children being abused. Testimony regarding additional child victims repeats across multiple cases. In many testimonies we documented, women also participate in the ceremonies and abuse.

“Organized rape of children is one of the most horrifying phenomena I encounter,” Dr. Anat Gur said, a psychotherapist specializing in treating women and trauma, head of the Psychotherapy Program for Sexual Trauma Treatment at Bar-Ilan University and the Tel Aviv Rape Crisis Center. “It’s a phenomenon probably much more widespread than we imagine. It exists in many places you wouldn’t expect to find it.”

Boaz (pseudonym), a senior treatment professional in the religious community, agrees, “The abusers are typically not outsiders in the community. One patient told me, ‘Understand, he’s the one who blows the shofar on Rosh Hashanah.’ The shofar symbolizes a channel – the person considered most spiritually worthy blows the shofar because he’s closest to God. And he’s the one telling her she is evil, that he’s helping with her atonement in this lifetime. Do you understand the distortion?”

“Crime without witnesses”

Beyond the women who dared to meet and speak with Israel Hayom, professionals possess information about additional victims who report sadistic ritual abuse during childhood. The content emerging from these accounts shows remarkable similarities. From all gathered information, it appears that in most cases, the sexual abuse began in very early childhood at home, perpetrated by a father, grandfather, or other family member. In other cases, the abuse occurred in educational or therapeutic settings.

“What I’ve observed over the years,” Dr. Gur said, “is that whoever endures these things suffers catastrophic damage. That’s also one of the challenges with exposure – the victims are so shattered that they’re difficult to believe. The more cruel and sadistic the abusers are and the younger the victims, and the more horrifying the abuse, the smaller the chance that perpetrators will face justice, because there’s no one left to testify. The abusers so thoroughly destroy the victims’ souls that it becomes a crime without witnesses, which of course serves a society that continues to abuse or maintain these rituals.”

Dr. Joanna Silberg, an international expert in treating dissociative disorders among children and adolescents and former president of the International Society for Trauma and Dissociation, guided the treatment of 70 children who allegedly fell victim to organized abuse in Israel over five years. In Chapter 14 of her book “The Child Survivor,” she describes the severe symptoms the children suffered “due to multiple forms of abuse – physical, sexual, emotional, and spiritual.”

Dr. Silberg notes several sources for the numerous testimonies about cases of organized abuse in Jerusalem. In one case reported in professional literature, a child abused in Israel and treated in the US described how several men tortured him and recalled an incident where they submerged his head underwater.

“When the ceremony was in the forest, the pentagram was marked with a hoe and surrounded by lit candles in a circle.” Photo credit: Getty Images

Descriptions of sadistic abuse appear consistently across all testimonies we collected, as in Emunah’s story: “There was a ceremony like a circumcision that I underwent. I was 10 or 11. It took place in the settlement’s synagogue. They tied me up, similar to the binding of Isaac, and wounded my genitals.

“My father is there, my mother is there, a rabbi from the settlement. I’m tied to a table, looking at the window and imagining how I could jump through it, how I might tie a rope and rappel down to the stones. I constantly wanted it not to be happening. That’s what characterizes it… I continuously thought about how it wasn’t happening, how I could escape. I kept telling myself I wasn’t there. It’s extremely difficult to understand that I was actually there. That it’s me – the bound child.”

“The youngest and most vulnerable”

Organized sexual abuse occurs, as noted, throughout the world. Researcher Michael Salter defines it as “a conspiracy of several attackers to abuse several victims.”

Rabbi Dr. Udi Furman quotes in his article “Ritual Abuse in Israel” Salter’s definition of ritual abuse as an ideological framing in organized contexts of child sexual abuse, “functioning as strategic practices through which abusive groups instill in victims a misogynistic worldview, violently, to control them.”

“In other words,” Rabbi Furman writes in his article, “ritual abuse occurs when a religious, political, or spiritual authority uses their position of power to manipulate victims’ belief systems and thereby control them.” According to him, “ritual abuse is primarily a strategy employed by groups involved in producing images of child abuse, child prostitution, and other forms of organized abuse, and does not constitute a separate category of violence.”

Rabbi Furman also presents research by Johanna Schröder and additional researchers from Germany, who examined attitudes among 165 adults who testified that they were victims of organized ritual sexual abuse, as well as attitudes of 174 professionals who supported victims of this type of abuse. In 88% of reports from both groups – therapists and victims – identical ideological expression emerged. The ideological content and objectives were also presented in a similar order: “justification of violence,” “justification of sexual exploitation,” and “maintaining power and control,” followed by “maintaining group commitment and ensuring redemption.”

“The researchers conclude that ideologies are primarily means to justify organized sexual violence,” Rabbi Froman said. However, in his article, Froman argues that some reports in Israel suggest ideology wasn’t merely a means to justify organized sexual violence, but formed the foundation of the abuse.

Rabbi Furman references, for example, the Nahlaot case, which “is just one of many similar cases, most occurring in ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods. For instance, a private ultra-Orthodox court writes that ritual sexual abuse is cruel and frequent, accompanied by traumatic, accusatory, and confusing ceremonies. The abuse is carried out by large criminal organizations and/or cults and/or secret organizations, with financial investment and recruitment of assisting personnel. The abuse carries for its perpetrators substantial profits such as satisfaction of deviant urges, commerce and pornography, threats and extortion, and more.”

According to Furman, the court document describes the practice of organized abuse: “From preparing the scene, through recruiting collaborators from educational institutions and transportation drivers, to the ceremonies themselves… The ceremony takes place under the leadership of an important rabbi. After a Torah lesson, approximately every two weeks, parents gather with children for what is called ‘soul correction.’ All couples recite Psalms together, sing verses repeatedly with melody, all while standing without clothes. They stand in a circle, naked, praying, lighting candles. The children are positioned in the middle of the circle, also naked.”

In the document, intended for parents, educators, and rabbis, the ultra-Orthodox court “Shaarei Mishpat” in Jerusalem details numerous methods and actions taken by abusers, aiming to warn and raise awareness of this spreading phenomenon and to protect children. Among other things, the document states that to shield themselves from exposure, abusers deliberately act in extreme ways contrary to logic, “so that even if children tell, they will sound completely delusional.”

Dr. Anat Gur. Photo credit: Efrat Eshel

In a “partial” list, actions are described, including abusers using disguises and masks, alongside sadistic torture such as forcing children’s hands into boiling water, submerging them underwater for several seconds, or threatening them with aggressive animals to frighten them and intensify the trauma effect. Additional mentioned actions include inserting objects and work or kitchen tools into the children.

To humiliate children and instill feelings of guilt and shame, perpetrators show them pictures of themselves naked or give them food while telling them they ate “carrion,” organize mock “wedding” ceremonies between children, force them to eat feces, and stage their burials.

“They collapse all self-trust and ability to resist,” Rabbi Froman said. “The regular and frequent abuse is so destructive that the children despair of ‘normality’ and the abuse becomes their life routine. Psychiatrists have diagnosed a complete ‘personality fracture’ in the normal part, allowing the child to continue functioning normally in school.”

According to Dr. Silberg, in each group, individual participants may have their own motives, such as sexual deviations, bizarre ideological affiliations that include conducting ceremonies, or economic enrichment, for example, through human trafficking for sexual exploitation, or producing images of child sexual abuse. These motives are not necessarily shared by all members.

Dr. Silberg further notes that networks engaged in producing and distributing child pornography, including organized abuse, have been exposed worldwide, and “despite the recurring, almost ideological skepticism, there have been several successful convictions of members of organized abuse networks worldwide.”

Over the years, there have been multiple examples of cases where authorities successfully exposed and convicted members of such networks. According to Dr. Silberg, as well as other researchers, since the development of the internet, and especially the emergence of peer-to-peer networks and the dark web, the phenomenon of sexual assaults on children has intensified significantly.

“These are the youngest and most vulnerable victims in society,” it is claimed. “Live streaming platforms from home allow children to be exploited in front of a camera and videos of the acts to be broadcast worldwide, without leaving traces.”

On the other side of the screen, cyber investigation specialists recognize the high demand among consumers for the most horrific videos, including sadistic abuse of children. In conversation with Israel Hayom, Dr. Silberg emphasizes the extreme difficulty in tracking members of such organizations, as most activity occurs on the dark web.

“I had hoped that in Israel there would be an understanding that this is an international phenomenon and that there would be cooperation between Israeli authorities and other countries,” she said, but in practice, “when a complaint arrives and a case is opened in Israel – the police did not conduct the investigation properly. The investigators treated each case as if it were isolated. If you separate each case and don’t look at the overall picture, you don’t ask where all the dots lead. And perhaps they did their best, and the attackers were simply more sophisticated.”

Dissociation

“I don’t want to go to school, I don’t want to!” Ayala (pseudonym) says, crying. “I never want to again. Ever. I don’t want to! No! No! At school, the teachers are scary. I don’t want them to take me from school. I don’t want to go to that class anymore.”

Ayala’s words blend with tears. In these very moments, she is pulled backward with the memory attack. Although chronologically she is 25 years old, right now she is 9, and nothing can convince her that the danger has passed. Even when her partner reminds her, “You know you’re grown up now?”, trying to bring her back to the present, she remains terrified. Trembling deep in the past.

Like many victims we met, Ayala also struggles with dissociation challenges. This is a survival disconnection mechanism that protects the child’s psyche during abuse, which will be explained later. Ayala grew up in a religious settlement in a family with many children. “In many community settlements, children wander around alone,” she said. After years of sharp deterioration in her mental state, including severe anxiety attacks, self-harm, suicidal thoughts, severe suicide attempts, and ongoing suffering – she developed the clear internal knowledge that she had been raped.

The memories began surfacing in severe flashbacks in which, to this day, she re-experiences the abuse incidents she endured. This too is a known phenomenon that repeats itself in some cases we encountered.

Professor Daniel Brom, a clinical psychologist and the manager and founder of “Metiv,” the Israel Center for Psychotrauma in Jerusalem, listened to a recording in which Ayala is heard during a memory attack, describing how they take her from school to a frightening place, where they beat her, tie her up, and lead her to a place where things happen that cause her pain.

Rabbi Dr. Udi Fruman. Photo credit: Eliora Efrati

“She talks about rabbis who abuse her and control her with statements about having a direct connection with God,” Professor Brom wrote. “The form of conversation is familiar to me as a conversation with a woman with dissociative identity disorder. I have seen such phenomena in the clinic quite frequently. Since 1990, I have repeatedly met children and adults who tell of organized abuse by men who not only sexually abuse, but also film their acts.”

“Silence, conceal, erase, move”

“Some abuse occurred in a building and some in the forest,” Ayala continues, “some in a cemetery and some in a synagogue, in all kinds of unusual places. In the building, you go downstairs and reach a very messy room with many tools, paint cans, and many boards. In the middle of the room is a bed, more like a wooden table. It seems there are more rooms there, because there are incidents where I clearly remember being in one room and hearing a child being abused in another room, and then I know what they’ll do to me.

“I hear children screaming, crying. It’s always a dark place. There are between six and nine men there. They tie me to the bed by my hands and feet, stand in a circle, mutter prayers or blessings, and there’s the rabbi who always leads the situation and tells everyone what to do, and everyone listens to him. There’s a ceremony, and each one of them rapes me.

“Sometimes the great rabbi arrives, and then he leads the ceremony. He speaks with God, and God tells him what to do. He puts one hand on my heart, one hand on my genitals, and it hurts when he talks to God. There are times when I scream, and there are situations where I stop because I know they’ll hit me in the head. There were cases where I didn’t cooperate or cried and knew I deserved punishment. There were various punishments, bizarre things: they put my head in a bucket of water for a long time, beat me with a cable, there’s also a ritual bath and purification, where they clean me thoroughly, and then immerse in a water source and explain to me that I need to be pure.

“There was one time they took out a Torah scroll and opened to the binding of Isaac. One of them read, and they simply did what they were reading to me. They tied me up, put the knife to my neck, and God said to lower the knife. Then there was rape.

“There was an event in the cemetery, and I saw a place with stones that had many words written on them, and then they told me to enter a hole, and they covered me with sand. It’s not clear to me how I remained alive.”

Noya was sexually abused by educational figures who cared for her in early childhood. These people, she says, invited additional men to the setting who participated in ritual abuse. The abusers acted with severe violence and used extreme and strong sensory stimuli, which helped her consciousness to split.

“I always had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder,” she says. “I was hospitalized, had nightmares, and eating disorders. I also had flashbacks of small fragments of moments from the abuse, but I didn’t understand their meaning. In adolescence, dissociative attacks began that looked like epileptic seizures. When I would return home beaten and bruised from abuse, for example, with a head injury or blood from my lips, I said I had a seizure on the stairs.

No one asked too many questions, and at an older age, when the abuse ended, Noya consciously decided to forget. “I told myself nothing happened to me. I had a mantra that I repeated continuously: ‘silence, conceal, erase, move, disguise, turn off, conceal, throw away, disconnect, forget.’ And I really did forget, for several years.”

During those years, Noya fulfilled dreams and established her life–until the difficult memories began to bombard her consciousness. Over the years, and later also in therapy, “figures” that were created during the abuse began to surface, figures that held the difficult memories in her place.

“When there is such massive and extreme abuse, the symptoms are most severe, especially dissociation,” says Silvia, a therapist from central Israel who treats victims of complex post-traumatic stress disorder due to prolonged childhood abuse. “This is a defense mechanism of the psyche that is expressed in disconnection at different levels. It can be disconnection from body sensations, from emotion, from thoughts, and from memories. Dissociation allows the victim to get up the next morning and conduct life as usual – go to school, play with friends, learn, and build her personality despite the massive threat she is under. The mechanism is activated during the abuse as a response to an existential threat or unbearable pain, or as a result of the use of consciousness-altering substances by the abusers.”

Dr. Sagit Blumrosen-Sela, a clinical psychologist specializing in trauma therapy for sexual abuse, dissociative identity disorder, and autism, recognizes in her clinical cases dissociative disconnections and patients coping with dissociative identity disorder (DID). “Today we’re discovering that dissociative identity disorder is more common than previously thought. Many of those affected are not diagnosed – either they hide it, or they don’t acknowledge it to themselves. Many of them are hospitalized and receive incorrect diagnoses. Many psychiatrists are not familiar enough with the phenomenon, and it’s important they understand that these can be patients who lead normative lives, work, study, raise children. There are real gaps between normative functioning and the abysses that aren’t expressed in the outside world.”

An Illustration of the attempted sacrifice of Isaac from the 19th century. Photo credit: Luc/Getty Images

 

According to her, “This is a mechanism created as a defensive response to intense physical or emotional pain, when there is no possibility or it’s dangerous to fight or flee, and parts of the experience are extracted from the accessible stream of consciousness. When the abuse is repetitive, a system of identities may be formed that carries the traumas, while disconnecting the memories and feelings associated with them from normal consciousness.”

Based on testimonies from around the world over the years, there are situations where abusers are aware of the possibility of producing such a disorder in young children. “One patient underwent repeated sadistic attacks, with the abusers intending to cause a split in consciousness, so she wouldn’t remember and wouldn’t tell. When she was an adult, she even met one of the attackers in a mall and didn’t recognize him,” Dr. Blumrosen-Sela said.

As if evil itself has intuition

“There’s an atmosphere of excitement, as if we’re performing the most sacred and elevated act in the world,” Nurit says. “I was very young. In the images, people and verses appeared… I have scars on my genitals. They injured and damaged them. It involved tremendous cruelty, abuse, humiliation, control, and ownership, all disguised as religion and elevated spiritual work. It’s appropriating God to serve urges. This remains central to my traumas. While such specific events may happen once, the abuse itself becomes a way of life… creating enormous internal destruction. So yes, the damage and implications are terrible.”

Through his extensive experience, Boaz has encountered dozens of cult survivors harmed in ceremonies, but also many patients harmed through home-based ceremonies, “typically by fathers or uncles who, chronically over the years, employed ceremonies they invented, incorporating religious texts and content.”

According to him, “This represents consciousness control. The child is forced into a tailored role. If told, for example, they came to repair the world and must therefore suffer, or that suffering must intensify beyond what they’ve already learned to survive, because they are the chosen victim. The child is told that if not they, another family child would be chosen for sacrifice.

“Ceremonies include invented prayers, mutterings, and songs with religious texts. I believe that through these mantras and mutterings, not only does the victim dissociate, but the abuser creates dissociation for himself. Immediately afterward, he can attend synagogue and blow the shofar. There are cases of institutionalized organizations worldwide where techniques for creating dissociation in children follow consistent patterns.

“I think the abusers I encountered through my patients were diabolically sophisticated, but in my opinion, they didn’t learn these methods from some manual—they developed them through intuition. It’s as if evil itself has intuition. In one case, a patient underwent massive abuse that caused physical injury, extreme humiliation, and contempt. Even today, decades later, she believes she’s a creature from another world. Though intellectually she understands this isn’t true, emotionally she feels destined for this role.

“Consider how easy it is to tell a child they were born from the power of impurity and therefore must suffer. These mantras penetrate deeply, especially when a child is abused and brought to the brink of death—certainly psychological death, but in several cases I encountered, part of the abuse involved nearly killing the victim before allowing them to survive. In such states, consciousness transforms, and implanted beliefs become part of one’s very essence, because what creates a stronger bond than nearly dying—and then surviving?”

“Organized, planned ceremony”

As we prepare to part, Eden’s mother shows me a photograph of her daughter with a broad smile and laughing eyes. “Look what a child I lost,” she says painfully. “Write for her sake.”

“When Eden was 25, she began remembering childhood rape,” Corinne, her mother, said. “It was highly unusual. She described it as a group rape conducted like a theatrical performance where everyone played an assigned role. When flashbacks occurred, memories surfaced, and she revealed shocking details. Men from the settlement acting together, conducting group rape with extreme violence, drugs, and nudity. Somehow, afterward, she returned home clean and intact—it’s unclear how. She filed a police complaint that was subsequently closed. She completely broke down from the experience.”

According to her mother, Eden began suffering severe anxiety attacks and reached states classified as psychotic, though she was primarily expressing extreme terror while convinced the main perpetrator would murder her. “She genuinely felt she was being stalked. There’s an entire community here concealing things, and apparently, many people have something to hide, while others either close their eyes or are too weak to act. Eden spoke about six men participating in the rape—such things require secrecy. Fighting an entire community is incredibly difficult. And some people simply cannot bring themselves to believe it.”

Many women we interviewed described ceremonies involving supposed reenactments of biblical stories. The “binding of Isaac” reenactment, for example, appears in five separate testimonies.

Nurit describes: “They tied me up, creating an imitation of the ‘binding of Isaac,’ though it wasn’t exactly the same because I’m female. They took a specific symbol, used it as they wanted, and connected it to a form of circumcision… Nothing in Jewish law requires performing the binding of Isaac this way. Nevertheless, I sensed they were reading texts, reciting passages, conducting a deliberately organized, planned ceremony with a specific process. It serves to legitimize evil.”

Arnon, a senior clinical psychologist who guides trauma therapists, encountered ritual abuse indicators four decades ago and several clear cases in recent years, leading him to “fear this represents some kind of network.”

According to him, “These individuals distort Kabbalistic sources through misinterpretation. I believe they’re psychopaths using Kabbalah to objectify and exploit victims. When ‘Kabbalistic’ forces combine with sexual exploitation desires, that creates an explosive situation. Anyone truly God-fearing should carefully avoid this movement, as they would be fired.

Dr. Sagit Blumrosen-Sela. Photo credit: Courtesy

“I’m certain similar practices exist in secular contexts. Spiritual frameworks can be misappropriated to justify deviations from norms while demanding blind faith. They deliberately choose synagogues, confronting our most sacred spaces. They perform these acts wearing holy garments, pronouncing divine names, exploiting the concept that certain individuals are permitted—even commanded—to behave contrary to normal expectations.

“But the notion that prohibitions don’t apply to specific individuals is completely foreign to authentic religious tradition. What makes this dangerous is that eventually they believe their own justifications when performing these horrific rituals you’ve heard described. These are the most shocking accounts I’ve encountered in my entire life, and I fear they genuinely believe they’re drawing closer to God through these means.”

To rob faith

“For survival, children often bond with their attackers out of necessity,” Boaz said. “It resembles Stockholm syndrome. They believe their abuser’s claim that they serve some cosmic purpose. Part of the catastrophic healing process comes when, after 30 years, a person suddenly realizes, ‘What? I never had a special role? It was simply evil?’ This creates an enormous, potentially suicidal break because it collapses their entire worldview. Their inner faith is completely stolen.

“At school, they pray and discuss divine providence—how everything has a purpose and God manages the world—but He wasn’t there for them. This represents profound mind control, requiring many years of therapy to address this pain. Therefore, any testimony you hear represents merely a fraction of what actually occurred. The spiritual injury is utterly unbearable. Just as sexual abuse damages trust in people, spiritual injury robs a child of faith. In my professional assessment, faith serves a fundamental function in the human soul—and whoever has had that faith stolen will carry that wound forever.”

Noga, who reports she was in a “cult” that conducted organized ritual child abuse until she reached late childhood, explains that “there exists some agreement with the gods. The entire theory revolves around ‘correction.’ The phrase ‘the great correction’ recurs constantly. To achieve the great correction, one must suffer, primarily because suffering purifies and advances redemption…

“The gods I remember are Baal Peor and Ashtoreth. I vaguely recall statues. I remember them saying ‘our lord Peor and our lady Ashtoreth.’ What makes this truly disturbing is that these are observant Jews who meticulously follow Jewish commandments, minor and major alike, not as a performance. They genuinely adhere to Torah commandments according to Orthodox tradition. They express contempt for Reform Jews while simultaneously, in a parallel existence, practicing literal idol worship.

“I had a connection to something I can’t quite explain. I possessed both strong faith and an innocent connection to God, which they exploited. For a child who is spiritually open and connected, it’s easy to implant messages and create twisted distortions.”

Q: What messages?

“Messages stemming from deliberate confusion between fundamental values, between heaven and earth, darkness and light, evil and good. They claim to reach the root of existence through the most defiled, lowest places, supposedly elevating them to holiness, and through this concept they create numerous distortions. They essentially blur boundaries between good and evil, between sexuality and love, and family. Whatever can be mixed and intermingled, they do it. Their ceremonies included cross-gender dressing, like transvestites, extremely promiscuous sexuality involving men with children, men with women, and even within family units.”

“Both religious and national obligation”

Throughout our investigation, we encountered difficult, horrifying, and incomprehensible descriptions. How is it possible that such horrific crimes against children continue for years right under everyone’s noses, particularly law enforcement agencies?

“Even we as treatment professionals have an existential need for denial,” Dr. Gur said. “When you hear that a woman who collaborated with abusers washed the abused child to remove evidence of the abuse, your entire soul screams—this cannot be real.

“Just as the child dissociates, knowing that remembering what happened would make continued existence impossible, we as witnesses must make a choice, consciously or unconsciously, whether we’re willing to believe such horrifying things occur. It undermines our very personal existence, creating a command of silence that operates not just externally, but at a deeply internal level.”

“In religious terms, these represent the most serious offenses possible. Exposing this phenomenon is crucial, particularly apprehending perpetrators and bringing them to justice. Beyond the physical and sexual harm, this involves profound spiritual abuse,” explained a religious figure familiar with victim accounts who is deeply troubled by the information he’s encountered in recent years.

“It’s essential to understand—these constitute the most serious offenses possible within Judaism,” he continued. “From a religious perspective, this is desecration of God’s name. Many ritual victims are delivered to these ceremonies by family members who also sexually abuse them, committing the sin of incest. If perpetrators have religious motivation, they’re engaging in idolatry. Therefore, exposing this phenomenon and uncovering the truth represents both a religious and national obligation, and anyone valuing religion should demand a thorough investigation.”

Alongside the defensive doubting mechanism that naturally arises when confronting the terror of death embedded in victims’ bones, understanding the crushing rocks of silencing, and the satanic chains of threats that bound victims, denying without investigation becomes a privilege we cannot allow ourselves.

The alleged crimes described in testimonies collected by Israel Hayom never reached courtroom discussion or a thorough investigation. Though these serious offenses may lack specific legal formulation, existing legal frameworks—including human trafficking and rape statutes—obligate law enforcement authorities to investigate complaints about monstrous evil that defies description.

Responses

Israel Police stated: “Every complaint received undergoes thorough and professional examination, with investigators working as necessary to identify possible connections between similar cases, according to findings arising during investigation. The subject mentioned in your inquiry is familiar to police and under examination; naturally, at this stage we cannot elaborate further.”

Dr. Naama Goldberg, CEO of “Not Standing By – Assisting Women in the Prostitution Circle,” stated: “Unfortunately, I’ve been hearing similar testimonies for many years describing identical patterns of abuse. Sometimes they’re so shocking that doubts arise regarding credibility. However, since these reports consistently repeat across victims who don’t necessarily know each other and come from different regions of the country, they appear well-founded.

“Moreover, from my professional experience working with crime victims, those who’ve approached me over the years display behavioral patterns consistent with profiles of people sadistically abused in childhood.

“The dissociative elements, time gaps before disclosure became possible, and other factors confirm complainants’ exposure to such harm at early ages. This represents a terrible story that must be heard loudly and clearly, and thoroughly examined by authorities.”

Orit Sulitzeanu, CEO of the Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel, stated: “In recent years, our Association has received inquiries regarding ritual sexual abuse. These violations typically occur in closed communities under the pretext of religious ceremony. Undoubtedly, the conspiracy of silence within religious society often prevents exposure of severe exploitation and abuse cases, making it tremendously important to bring these violations to light, giving words to what’s happening and allowing victims to release their secrets.”

Is This the Behavior of an Ally?

From Tucker Carlson’s daily email:

Donald Trump had a vision.

As the man who righteously ran for the White House on the most anti-war platform of any Republican nominee this century, the president wanted to use diplomacy, not missiles, to deal with Iran. He said so on Thursday.

“I don’t want [Israel] going in because I think [an attack] would blow” America’s opportunity to reach a nuclear deal with Tehran, the president told the press before the Israelis did precisely that.

He also made his wishes clear to Benjamin Netanyahu, reportedly telling the prime minister as recently as last week to stop pushing another war in the Middle East.

So how did Netanyahu react? Did he pause and think that maybe, considering America dumps fortunes of taxpayer dollars into Israel each year, he should show its leader some respect, adhere to his wishes, and not hijack his negotiations by launching a strike before they concluded? You know the answer. He committed an act of war, bombarding the Islamic Republic with dozens of missiles, striking its top nuclear facility, and killing members of its leadership brass. Thanks to that, U.S. troops soon may die, and the chances of America and Iran reaching a deal any time soon feel microscopic.

Regardless of how you feel about Israel, and we happen to think it’s a nice place to visit, it’s hard to see that behavior as the kind of thing a “special ally” of America would do. They went out of their way to spoil our diplomacy, and we paid them to do it. Doesn’t that strike you as backward?