• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

General

Marshall Rawson Poised to Win a Seat in Florida Legislature

September 14, 2026/12 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

This piece is hostile to Rawson of course, and traffics in guilt-by-association arguments. But having met him, he is very intelligent, speaks well, and has great political skills. He is in a deep red Florida district. and he has been very forthright in what he believes, so he’s not sneaking in by acting like a mainstream conservative. He is a breath of fresh air in American politics.


TPM: He Marched With Nazis in Charlottesville. Now He’s Expected to Join the Florida Legislature.

by Christopher Mathias
09.14.26 | 9:00 am
Marshall Rawson in videos taken at Charlottesville in 2017. Left: Archived YouTube video; Right: Vice News
The Republican nominee for a seat in the Florida House of Representatives marched alongside neo-Nazis at the deadly 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, a new Talking Points Memo investigation can reveal.

Marshall Rawson — who won an upset victory in Florida’s District 10 Republican primary last month — attended the infamous Charlottesville rally, considered the largest white supremacist gathering in a generation, marching with the League of the South, a racist and antisemitic neo-Confederate group that advocates for the secession of southern states from the U.S.

Video footage reviewed by TPM shows Rawson and his now-wife arriving at the rally and being greeted by name by League of the South members. A photo obtained by TPM, taken at a different point during the violent demonstration, shows Rawson standing near James Alex Fields Jr., the neo-Nazi who a short time later drove his car into a crowd of counterprotesters, killing a 32-year-old woman and injuring dozens of others.

Marshall Rawson arriving at Charlottesville in 2017. (Archived YouTube video)

Rawson, a 34-year-old local GOP activist, handily won the Republican primary on Aug. 18. His primary victory came only eight days after the newspaper Florida Politics published an article detailing parts of his past involvement, which he has acknowledged, with the League of the South. Earlier this year a local blog called Clay News & Views listed bigoted statements Rawson made on X throughout 2023 and 2024 in which the candidate condoned slavery and called for gay people to be executed.

His attendance at Unite the Right, however, has not previously been reported in the press.

TPM’s investigation can also reveal that Rawson’s campaign got a boost from members of the very groups that marched in Charlottesville nine years ago: an analysis of his campaign donations finds that he received upwards of $15,000 from dozens of people with either established ties to white nationalist organizations or well-documented histories of extremist, racist activism.

Finally, TPM can reveal indications that Rawson from 2017 to 2020 operated a pseudonymous social media account on X that he used to advocate public lynchings.

Responding to a detailed list of questions sent by TPM for this story, Rawson emailed the following statement:

“Over the entire span of my adult life, I’ve been very active defending historical monuments from destruction or removal, and I feel that way about almost all monuments, not just those associated with southern history.

“I don’t screen my donors, and I put in tens of thousands of requests for donations by email, text, and phone.  I’ve been extremely transparent about my campaign agenda, and any donation to my campaign is presumably an endorsement of my agenda and not my campaign’s endorsement of a donor’s views or agenda.  Obviously, I’m not privy to any conversation you reportedly had with any donors and cannot speak to those conversations.”

Rawson is widely expected to win the general election this November in House District 10, which encompasses a conservative part of northcentral Florida between Jacksonville and Tallahassee, raising the prospect that an unrepentant white supremacist will attain elected office in one of the country’s most populous states with no pushback from the Republican Party.

The Florida GOP did not respond to a request for comment about Rawson’s involvement with the League of the South, his attendance at Unite the Right, his white supremacist campaign donors, or the post he appears to have made on X advocating lynchings.

The national Republican Party also did not respond to a request for comment.

At a time when the GOP veers ever rightward, Rawson’s story is a glaring example of how explicit white nationalism has established firm roots in one of America’s two major political parties.

Rawson’s involvement with the League of the South was first noted in 2014 by a prolific antifascist researcher named Laura Sullivan. Sullivan — who passed away earlier this year — published an article on her blog, Lady Liberty’s Lamp, detailing how Rawson, then a college student at Shorter University, was appearing at League of the South events while simultaneously interning for then-U.S. Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) in Washington D.C. Rawson, Sullivan documented, was spending his internship posting League of the South propaganda throughout the city, including a “SECEDE FROM OBAMALAND” sticker in the U.S. Capitol building.

Sullivan found another photo of Rawson passing out flyers for a League of the South rally. “IMMIGRATION IS BAD FOR SOUTHERN WORKERS,” the flyers said.

In May 2025, in the early days of his campaign, Rawson published a post on his campaign’s Facebook page acknowledging his involvement with the League. “Apparently, the establishment isn’t happy with the level of success we’ve had on the campaign thus far,” he wrote, predicting that “the radical downtown Gainesville crowd and the spineless establishment ‘Republicans’” would attempt to attack him by citing a “defunct Antifa blog” and “my past League of the South involvement.”

“My advocacy in the League from 2013-2016 consisted exclusively of myself and the organization demonstrating against the unfettered immigration/ ‘gang of eight’ amnesty policies that were hurting local workers, defense of marriage activism that was a response to Federal Activist Judges overthrowing state law, and then later in defense of our historic monuments that were being attacked by woke rioters and weak politicians,” he wrote.

Florida Politics’ article about Rawson last month is based in part on Sullivan’s research. Rawson did not provide a comment about his activism with the League of the South to the news outlet, but did provide one to Main Street Daily News, telling the Gainesville, Florida-based newspaper that he’d only been involved with the League of the South for a few years over a decade ago, and giving a similar description of his activities to the one in his Facebook post.

Rawson has not denounced the League of the South or apologized for his participation in its events. “I am happy to talk about my past advocacy and activism on any issue,” he wrote on Facebook in 2025. “I am also proud of the advocacy work that I have been involved with for the past 13 years.”

It’s hard to emphasize just how extreme the League of the South is.

The group was founded in 1994, two years after Rawson was born, by a group of professors obsessed with reviving the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. They sought a “national divorce” in which the South would finally secede from the rest of America. They were led by Michael Hill, then a professor of British history at Stillman College, a historically Black university in Alabama. In his decades at the helm of the organization, Hill has spoken clearly about the League of the South’s goals, denouncing the “Browning of America” and pledging to spend his life “fighting to restore the South as White Man’s Land.”

“I pledge to be a white supremacist, a racist, an anti-Semite, a homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe, and any other sort of ‘phobe that benefits my people, so help me God!” Hill wrote in a 2016 screed.

High-ranking members serving under Hill have variously praised the system of chattel slavery in the South; organized a celebration of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln; and participated in brawls at racist and antisemitic demonstrations, according to an extensive history of the group maintained by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Although often eschewing explicit Third Reich imagery, the League of the South has frequently collaborated with outright neo-Nazi groups, joining with a neo-Nazi collective called the Nationalist Front throughout the first Trump administration to organize a series of rallies, often marching alongside men carrying swastika flags. In 2018, Hill shared a video online featuring himself and others burning a copy of the Talmud, the primary source of Jewish theology, while sieg-heiling. “We stand for the white race against all our enemies, particularly the Jews,” he said.

That same year, Hill celebrated the Tree of Life shooting, when a white supremacist opened fire inside a Pittsburgh synagogue, killing 11 Jews. Sharing a video of the massacre online, Hill wrote: “It never gets old! What a great ad for us!”

The League of the South has claimed thousands of members throughout its existence. Back in 2014, Hill was especially excited about a new generation joining the organization. “Southern Nationalism is the cutting edge and the wave of our future for Southern youth,” he wrote on Facebook, posting a photo of a young man in a League of the South polo shirt at an anti-gay marriage rally in Richmond, Virginia.

The new recruit was Marshall Rawson.

Although Rawson claimed to have ended his involvement with the group over a decade ago, Florida Politics reported that he was a featured speaker, alongside Hill, at the group’s 2021 “Florida Freedom Conference.” A dispatch from that conference, published by journalist Tracey Eaton, noted that Rawson was “not a member of the league,” even if his speech articulated talking points perfectly in line with the League of the South’s secessionism.

“Southerners are ridiculed, scorned, and defamed at every turn,” Rawson said in his speech, adding: “Yes, is it OK to be white and of Caucasian origin. Yes, Southerners are a distinct people, a nation.”

On Aug. 12, 2017, while working as a reporter at HuffPost, I watched roughly a thousand white supremacists invade Charlottesville. They were converging on the city to hold a “Unite the Right” rally. It was the coming-out party for the so-called “alt-right,” the insurgent fascist movement emboldened by the rise of Donald Trump — the moment this movement would step offline and into the real world, showing all the power it had accrued.

In the weeks and months leading up to the rally — planned ostensibly to protest the slated removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in a Charlottesville park — organizers were explicit in stating that their actual goal for the event was to take America back for the white man. “August 12, 2017 is going to be the shot heard ‘round the world,” boasted Andrew Anglin, founder of the neo-Nazi website the Daily Stormer. “Thanks to the magnitude of this event, I truly believe, more than I ever did before, that we will eventually win this struggle, and secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. It is our destiny. Next stop: Charlottesville, VA. Final stop: Auschwitz. See ya there, faggots.”

A video posted to YouTube by a man associated with League of the South shows white supremacists arriving at Emancipation Park for the day’s events. “Marshall’s finally here!” the man can be heard saying from behind the camera, as Rawson appears in the camera’s frame.

“Good to see y’all!” Rawson says, before hugging him.

“How ya’ doin’ Mrs. Rawson?!” the man says, leaning over to hug Rawson’s wife, Megan.

Marshall Rawson arriving at Charlottesville in 2017. (Archived YouTube video)

The man then filmed Rawson shaking hands with other rallygoers, including now-former League of the South member Christopher Monzon. In the background of the footage other demonstrators can be seen waving the Reichs- und Nationalflagge, commonly known as the swastika flag, of the German Nazi Party.

The man’s video was originally over eight minutes long when it was posted to YouTube in 2017. Sometime in 2022 the video was edited down to only one minute, removing the footage of Rawson and his wife. But anti-fascist researchers had preserved the original cut, which they provided to Talking Points Memo.

An archived 2022 thread posted on X — when it was still called Twitter — by an anti-fascist researcher going by the name ShermanMarching provides other evidence of Rawson’s attendance at Unite the Right.

ShermanMarching shared that thread with TPM, in which they noted Rawson’s cameo in the viral, Emmy-award winning episode of Vice News Tonight about Unite the Right that aired on HBO. Rawson can be seen in the episode’s b-roll marching at the rally. Rawson is carrying a League of the South flag.

YouTube/Vice News

There is also a photo of Rawson standing near a phalanx of neo-Nazis carrying shields. (The photo — taken by a local photographer — is no longer online, but was archived by anti-fascist researchers.) Among the neo-Nazis near Rawson is James Alex Fields Jr., wearing the uniform of the white supremacist group Vanguard America. Not long after the photo was taken, Fields drove his 2010 Dodge Challenger into counterprotesters, sending bodies flying into the air and killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer. He was later convicted for the attack and sentenced to two life sentences.

Marshall Rawson and James Alex Fields Jr. at Charlottesville. (Used with permission of the photographer)

At least two people associated with the League of the South were arrested that day. Tyler Watkins Davis was arrested for joining the white supremacist mob I saw beat and severely injure DeAndre Harris, a Black counterprotester. (Davis later took an Alford plea in the case, accepting a two-year-prison sentence without admitting guilt.) And member Jim O’Brien was arrested for carrying a pistol without a permit. (O’Brien maintains that he received his citation after the rally ended and that it was unrelated.)

Eight years later, O’Brien would be among the earliest donors to Rawson’s fledgling campaign for Florida House District 10, donating $300.

If Rawson really did end his involvement with the League of the South, as he has claimed, over a decade ago, public records indicate he nevertheless enjoyed the group’s support during his run for public office.

A TPM analysis of Rawson’s campaign donors found dozens of people associated with the League of the South donating to his campaign — as well as many other donors TPM identified as having separate white nationalist or extremist ties.

The League of the South donors to Rawson’s campaign include the group’s Florida chapter leader, Michael Tubbs, a former demolitions specialist in the Army’s Green Berets who pleaded guilty to stealing munitions from a military facility. A federal indictment alleged he had plotted to attack Black and Jewish-owned businesses; he was ultimately sentenced to eight years in prison. He donated $100. Gene Andrews — a League of the South member who works as the caretaker for the childhood home of Confederate Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, one of the early leaders of the Ku Klux Klan — donated $20.

Josh Doggrell, who was fired in 2015 from his job as a police lieutenant in Anniston, Alabama over his involvement with League of the South, gave Rawson’s campaign $100. “I donated money to Rawson’s campaign because I believe he is a fine man and will do a great job as a legislator,” he told TPM in an email. Doggrell — who is now a lieutenant in the Calhoun County Sheriff’s Office in Alabama — wrote to TPM from a Gmail account that used a version of the “Celtic Cross” symbol commonly used by neo-Nazis as its Google profile picture. “I use it because I am a Christian and have Anglo-Celtic heritage,” he explained in a followup email.

Non-League of the South donors include Sam Dickson, a former lawyer for the Ku Klux Klan who became a leading figure in multiple white supremacist groups, including the Council of Conservative Citizens, the National Policy Institute, and the Charles Martel Society. Dickson — who once stated that “Negroes… are hopeless” — gave $1,000 to Rawson’s campaign.

“I was asked to give a donation and I felt he was fighting the good fight and he deserves support,” Dickson told TPM, recounting how Rawson asked him personally for a donation. He’d met Rawson on “multiple occasions” over the years, he explained, including at a conference hosted by James Edwards of the Political Cesspool, a longstanding white supremacist podcast.

Dickson added that Rawson had made it “very clear” to him “that he’s taking a stand against discrimination against white people.”

“I believe that white people, white Christian Americans, European Americans … are entitled to our own nation,” Dickson told TPM, before adding: “Diversity is not a source of strength. Diversity is a source of weakness.”

Andy Strickland, a Florida-based lawyer linked to the white supremacist group Identity Evropa, donated $1,000 to Rawson’s campaign. (In 2017 I met Strickland in Williston, Florida, where he was attending a dinner with white supremacist figurehead Richard Spencer.)

And Antelope Hill, a Pennsylvania-based white nationalist publishing house that specializes in translating and reprinting books written by German Nazi Party members, donated $100.

A number of donors to Rawson’s campaign marched alongside him in Charlottesville in 2017. They include Texas-based John Verdier, who took part in the infamous torch march on the eve of the Unite The Right demonstration, when neo-Nazis brandishing tiki-torches attacked students on the University of Virginia campus and chanted “Jews will not replace us!”

Verdier, who recently confessed to organizing a party celebrating the birthday of former Ku Klux Klan leader and neo-Nazi David Duke, donated $250 to Rawson’s campaign. (Reached for comment by TPM, Verdier did not respond to a question about his donation to Rawson, texting instead: “Good luck with your anti-white article.” Speaking recently to the Texas Observer, Verdier denied being a white supremacist. “I just want freedom to live on my own,” he said. “I want to live in a neighborhood with people like me, I just want to be able to send my kids to school with other kids of European ancestry.”)

David Duke’s own daughter, Kristine Duke, appears to have donated $200 to Rawson.

TPM reached out to all of the donors mentioned by name in this section for comment.

All told, dozens of white supremacist donors identified by TPM gave more than $15,000 to Rawson’s successful primary campaign. He won his election against Chase Brannan, a right-wing, Trump-supporting politician and son of the term-limited incumbent Rep. Chuck Brannan, by just over 2,000 votes.

Rawson has repeatedly posted bigoted statements to social media.

In August of 2023, according to Clay News & Views, Rawson on X cheered news that two men in Uganda faced the death penalty for being gay, advocating that such harsh penalties for queerness be brought to America. “This is how you would run the pervs and miscreants out of Florida,” he wrote, adding: “A one-way ticket to no more sexualizing of children and the lgbtq+ agenda in Florida!”

In a series of October 2023 posts, Rawson appeared to defend slavery, writing, according to Clay News & Views, that “God did many ‘racisms’ too.” Responding to a Christian pastor on X who argued that those who condone slavery should not be allowed in church leadership positions, Rawson argued there were biblical justifications for the institution of putting people in chains. “Apparently if you actually knew your Bible (Genesis 24:35 and every other corner of the Bible) you wouldn’t let God into your church either,” he wrote. “The irony of counterfeit Christians today.” (That account of Rawson’s is now protected).

Such Christians, Rawson wrote, have a “straight ticket to Hell.”

Despite these pronouncements under his own name on X, there are indications Rawson may have still felt the need to operate a pseudonymous social media account where he could express even more extreme sentiments. There are several datapoints linking an X account that posted from 2017 to 2020 under the handle “RockOfDixie” to Rawson. Some of the posts from this account compiled by researcher ShermanMarching seem to have since been deleted, and the account’s most recent post is from 2020.

The profile photo for the “RockOfDixie” account on X features a bodybuilder flexing on stage. That exact image can be found in an online gallery of photos from the 2016 National Physique Committee’s Galaxy Championships. The bodybuilder in the image is identified as Marshall Rawson, who finished fourth out of six contestants in the competition.

“RockOfDixie” only has three followers on X, one of whom is Rawson’s wife, Megan Rawson. (Megan did not respond to a request for comment for this story.)

In one post on RockOfDixie, Rawson appeared to advocate for public lynchings.

“Multiculturalism kills and public lynchings worked,” he wrote in 2018.

Rawson did not reply to questions about whether he was behind the account.

There is an argument to be made that there is little daylight between the views of white supremacists like Rawson who descended on Charlottesville in 2017 and the MAGAfied Republican Party in 2026. Rawson, after all, is not the only attendee in that day’s events who went on to win public office.

Judd Blevins, a leader in the white supremacist group Identity Evropa who attended Unite the Right, was elected to city council in Enid, Oklahoma in 2023 even after anti-fascists exposed his participation in the event. (Local progressives eventually mounted a successful recall effort.)

Nick Fuentes, who was only 18 when he went to Charlottesville, has since become one of the most famous and powerful white supremacists of his generation, leading an army of young supporters he calls “groypers.” Fuentes has sat down for dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago; has held private meetings with powerful GOP officials and donors in Texas; and has overseen a wave of groypers infiltrating low-level positions on Capitol Hill. (“We have a generation of rabid, incompetent idiots,” a senior Republican congressional staffer griped to Politico.)

Some of the same neo-Nazis who marched in Charlottesville would go on to be arrested for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. When Trump returned to the White House in 2025, these neo-Nazis were pardoned.

The conspiracy theories and talking points espoused by the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville are now standard GOP fare. It is common for Republicans to talk about the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, or to advocate “remigration,” a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. Stephen Miller, the powerful White House advisor whose worldview was shaped by “alt-right” propaganda, is overseeing an attempt to forcibly expel millions of immigrants from the country.

“Congratulations to Marshall Rawson, our Republican Nominee for Florida House District 10!” the Florida GOP wrote on X after Rawson’s primary win, days after Florida Politics published its article detailing parts of Rawson’s involvement in the League of the South.

“Ready to fight for North Florida and keep our state strong and free,” the Florida GOP wrote. “Looking forward to a BIG win!”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-14 14:06:382026-09-14 14:14:07Marshall Rawson Poised to Win a Seat in Florida Legislature

Haaretz: Israelis unite against a new enemy: ‘NAZA,’ a film no one has seen

September 14, 2026/6 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Like the vast majority of Israelis, I have not yet watched the film, because it is unavailable in Israel. While its evidence may be extraordinary, the Israeli response to it is very ordinary. Every time a film exposes Israel’s actions against Palestinians – from the daily realities of occupation in the West Bank to a genocidal war in Gaza – the Israeli mainstream erupts in outrage, casting itself as the victim of “blood libels.”

Mainstream coverage of “NAZA” in Israel has centered on the IDF’s denial of the film’s allegations, with panelists issuing the same old warnings about damage to Israel’s image abroad. The allegations themselves receive no attention.

“NAZA” has nevertheless offered Israelis a rare moment of unity. When Netanyahu’s Culture Minister, Miki Zohar – who would rather be a commissar – vowed to revoke the filmmakers’ citizenship, left-wing actor Yossi Marshak rebuked him for spoiling it: “Why are you ruining this? Finally, we’ve managed to unite for one minute.”Six weeks before the election, this unity has revealed a divide in Israeli society that runs far deeper than the split over Netanyahu.

Many in the anti-Netanyahu bloc fiercely deny the massacres of Palestinians in Gaza that have taken place since the October 7 attack. At the same time, many in the pro-Netanyahu bloc are comfortable with them, with leaders of that bloc touting in real time the “annihilation” of Gaza. Together, they form a broad mainstream united in rejecting any reckoning with Israel’s actions in Gaza. All that faces them is a tiny minority that acknowledges the mass killings and refuses to move on.

This moment of unity also shines a spotlight on the conspiracy of silence that has engulfed this country over what it did in Gaza. The response to the film exposes a tradition, stretching back to Israel’s founding, of concealing violence against Palestinians, whether in wartime or quieter times.

Don’t hold your breath for a national reckoning over the destruction of Gaza. Just ask how many Israelis know what the Nakba actually is.

Almost three years after October 7, Israelis remain trapped in the trauma and horror of that day, unwilling to confront what their own country has inflicted in response. By crying “distortions” over a film like “NAZA,” Netanyahu and his rivals actively distort the reality of the conflict that has shaped Israelis’ lives, both before October 7 and ever since. The question now goes well beyond how long a society can deny its own massacre of tens of thousands of innocent people: it is what kind of society that denial leaves behind.

Hollywood Reporter:

Israeli Army Chief Orders Legal Review of ‘NAZA’ Documentary

Inside ‘NAZA,’ the Bombshell Exposé on IDF’s War in Gaza
Israeli Army Chief Orders Legal Review of ‘NAZA’ Documentary

The chief of staff at the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) has ordered a legal review of the documentary NAZA to assess the possibility of legal action against its filmmakers and those involved with it.

Calling the film “an attack on the State of Israel,” IDF chief Eyal Zamir claimed NAZA defamed the military, though he acknowledged he has not seen the movie in full. He separately ordered an investigation into the leaking of classified material used in its production.

Directed by Oscar-winning Israeli filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor (No Other Land), NAZA is an exposé featuring testimony for 24 former IDF soldiers and military personnel, who outline what they claim is the IDF’s systematic killing of civilians in Gaza. The film premiered at the Venice Film Festival where, on Saturday, it won the Grand Jury Prize. The movie’s title is an acronym used by the Israeli military meaning “collateral damage.”

Comparing the claims made in the film to “blood libels,” Zamir said the Israeli military would use “every tool at our disposal” against it.

Writing on X, IDF Spokesperson Effie Defrin called on Abraham and Szor to allow army representatives to view the full film “so that we can address each of the claims raised in it objectively.”

NAZA was produced by Guardian News and Media, the company that also publishes British newspaper The Guardian. In a statement to Israel’s Haaretz newspaper, a spokesman for the group said it was “disturbed to see the authoritarian response” to the film in Israel and defended the film, saying it was “based on more than three years of investigative journalism…The testimonies it contains are true and we believe they deserve to be heard.” The company said would “robustly defend NAZA – and the team behind it – from any attacks or attempts at censorship.”

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-14 13:54:272026-09-14 13:54:27Haaretz: Israelis unite against a new enemy: ‘NAZA,’ a film no one has seen

Shocking! Sweden Discovers That Deporting Immigrant Gangsters Reduces Crime…

September 13, 2026/21 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Authored by Mike McDaniel via AmericanThinker.com,

Among the things a police career taught me is that a small number—usually single digits—of felons commit most felonies. They’ll draw in other criminals, involve them in their crimes, and when convenient, abandon them to arrest. There is no honor among thieves. And the number of the most prolific felons increases and decreases slightly from place to place, and in relation to the specific type of crime.

In some places, crooks specialize in home or business burglaries. In others, specialization might involve burglarizing vehicles or carjacking.

But one thing is certain: take these small bands of crooks out of circulation, and the number of their crimes in those areas immediately, dramatically plummets. The trick is identifying the crooks and rolling them over on each other. Catch some in the act or with the evidence, and the second part is usually easier than the first. When they’re put away, innumerable people we’ll never know don’t end up as victims.

Of course, these kinds of positive results also rely on prosecutors willing to prosecute and judges willing to keep criminals in jail and hand down realistic sentences. That’s a real issue in blue cities and states.

Now it seems Sweden is discovering this reality, particularly where gang-committed, immigrant crime is involved. And it’s about time too. Reports out of Sweden, which has shown suicidal empathy for third-world barbarians, indicate that hand grenade(?!) attacks have become common. At PJ Media, Stephen Green explains:

So Sweden elected a conservative prime minister four years ago who promised to send criminal migrants back to their home countries, and you’ll never believe what happened next.

Violent crime went down. Way down. Particularly gang violence, according to a new report out this week.

Imagine that.

Graphic: X Post

When he campaigned for the PM spot in 2022, Ulf Kristersson — then a member of the Swedish parliament or riksdag — said of violent acts: “If you commit such crimes in Sweden and are not a Swedish citizen, you should be thrown out of the country.”

Apparently, Swedes got tired of dodging grenades and having their women raped.

By the summer of ’22, escalating gang shootings and even bombings were commonplace in what had once been a country better known for spas than jihads. In total, Sweden suffered 361 shootings, 62 shooting deaths, and 90 bombings. The problem with migrant gangs escalated so quickly that Swedish authorities didn’t bother to record bombings until 2018.

By the last election, even the governing soft-on-crime Social Democrats promised tougher measures, but that wasn’t enough to stop Kristersson from putting together a coalition big enough to oust the SD.

Sweden didn’t bother to report bombings until 2018? That’s terminal suicidal empathy, but the Swedes had enough. They better funded the police, did more wiretapping, and directly focused on stopping gang recruitment among the young.

As it turns out — and again, you won’t be shocked by this — sending foreign criminals home is just as effective as locking up homegrown thugs. But the numbers must be seen to be believed. 

Shootings are down “by 80 per cent since their 2022 peak,” the Financial Times reported on Monday, and Kristersson reduced “the number of asylum seekers to its lowest in four decades.”

It was apparently a huge deal earlier this year when one Swedish paper reported “No shootings in May.”

“The fact that you have headlines saying no shootings at all this month: it says something,” Kristersson told the FT.

Sadly, the national tendency toward suicide may once again assert itself:

Still, Sweden holds another national election on Sunday, and the Social Democrats could very well take power again. “There’s a lot of discussion about the Winston Churchill effect,” Mattias Karlsson, the nationalist Sweden Democrats’ chief ideologue, said.

Having all but won the war, will Swedish voters reject the man who got them this far?

The “Churchill effect” refers to what happened to Winston Churchill after WWII. Without him, England likely would have fallen to the Nazis. He was, during the war, the indispensable man, but once the war was won, he was put out to pasture, and the kinds of political forces that would have lost the war wormed their way back into power.

Having once again discovered the benefits of national sanity, Will Sweden fall back into leftist delusion and defeat? Perhaps there’s a lesson there for our midterms and beyond.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-13 09:38:232026-09-13 09:38:23Shocking! Sweden Discovers That Deporting Immigrant Gangsters Reduces Crime…

Meanwhile In London’s Trafalgar Square…

September 12, 2026/10 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity News,

They put it up…

On Thursday morning, a five-metre tall overweight black woman in a tight blue dress and matching heels was unveiled on Trafalgar Square’s Fourth Plinth and described to the public as a contemporary “everywoman.”

City Hall has called Lady in Blue a symbol of ‘confidence and purpose’. CNN framed the same object as a victory because it is “not another White man.” Ordinary Londoners looking at the thing itself reached a simpler verdict: identity politics on a plinth.

The 16th Fourth Plinth commission is the work of New York artist Tschabalala Self. The figure is bejewelled and mid-stride, with a giant behind.

The Mayor’s Press Office posted the official line within hours of the unveiling. “London’s Fourth Plinth is one of the most exciting public art commissions in the world,” it wrote. “Today we welcome ‘Lady in Blue’ by Tschabalala Self – a symbol of confidence and purpose and an excellent addition to Trafalgar Square.”

BBC London went with the house style: “‘Everywoman’ statue unveiled in Trafalgar Square.” The replies under both posts filled up with the same words: eyesore, insult, not representative, politics not art.

Author Laura Dodsworth quoted the official announcement and kept it short.

Self has been consistent about the brief. “My work Lady In Blue will bring to Trafalgar Square a woman that many can relate to,” she said. “She is not an idol to venerate or a historic figurehead to commemorate. She is a woman walking forward into our collective future with ambition and purpose. She is a Londoner, who represents the city’s spirit.”

Self also said she wanted to “direct everyone’s attention to the future” because “I don’t think there are enough monuments that are about our shared future to come.”

To The Art Newspaper she added: “This is a contemporary representation of personhood. Women need to be understood as being persons. Black people need to be understood as being persons. Despite someone’s identity politics, they should be able to be understood as a representation of all human beings.”

Ok, but it doesn’t look very good, does it.

Deputy mayor for culture Justine Simons called it “not a remote historic figurehead but a tribute to everyday women.”

That is of course, only if you’re an obese black woman.

Commissioning group chair Ekow Eshun said the work “transforms the everyday into the monumental.”

Hmmmmm.

The surrounding square contains Nelson’s Column, Landseer lions, Admiralty Arch and the National Gallery. The plinth itself was built in 1841 for an equestrian statue of William IV that never arrived.

Since 1999 it has been reserved for rotating contemporary commissions funded by the Mayor of London, with support from Arts Council England and Bloomberg Philanthropies.

A Greater London Authority decision in 2024 approved more than £1 million of programme spending across 2024-27, covering the 2026 and 2028 commissions, schools awards and engagement. The artist’s fee on these commissions has previously been put at £30,000, with a larger production budget on top.

Sunday Times critic Waldemar Januszczak looked at the maquette in 2024 and said “what you see is what it says on the tin,” adding that it “lacked originality.” Two years later the tin is five metres high and bolted into the ceremonial centre of the capital.

None of this is a surprise. The winner was announced in March 2024. The official language then was already the same: a “young, metropolitan woman of colour,” a “quotidian figure,” a figure designed to “embrace and confound collective fantasies and assumptions surrounding the Black female body.”

The Fourth Plinth is not a neutral empty shelf. It is the most watched public art slot in Britain, and City Hall has used it, commission after commission, to wag a ‘progressive’ finger at the square that used to commemorate a naval victory.

It is ugly on purpose. The bulk, the cartoon stride, the department-store jewellery – all of it is there to occupy the square in a brazen attempt to make Nelson look like an embarrassment. It’s a humiliation ritual.

The public was invited to “have its say” on the 2024 shortlist. More than 10,000 votes were recorded. The decision still sat with the Fourth Plinth Commissioning Group. The Mayor approves the winner.

They didn’t install a sculpture. They installed a cheap catalogue figure in glamour heels, bolted onto the ceremonial heart of the capital, then force-fed to the public as “everywoman” by people who would call an actual English person on that plinth a hate crime.

The latest atrocity replaces Teresa Margolles’s Mil Veces un Instante, the transgender-faces installation that occupied the same stone for two years.

Of course it did.

In 2024 Sadiq Khan unveiled Margolles’s casts of 850 faces, sold as a monument to “marginalised” trans sex workers, after a YouGov poll found 23 percent of Londoners approved and 43 percent disliked it.

A statue of the late Queen Elizabeth II was pushed aside in favour of that.

Taxpayers covered a £170,000 bill. Khan said the work would “encourage discussion about the fight for freedom and equality.”

It didn’t.

Lady in Blue is not the end of the sequence. It is the middle. And if you think this one is bad, In 2028 It comes down and Andra Ursu?a’s Untitled goes up. The official description is a hollow, life-sized person on a horse, covered in a shroud, cast in translucent pale-green resin.

It’s a green blob.

City Hall says the rider and horse “will remain anonymous, their distinguishing features concealed under the folds that drape over them.” The work “hovers at the edge of visibility.” It is, the programme text continues, “a yet-to-be-uncovered or an already cancelled public monument. A ghost of history and a parody of itself.”

No, it’s a green blob.

That emptiness is the point they want you to swallow. The Fourth Plinth was built for an equestrian statue of William IV. The money ran out. Ursu?a’s ghost horse now arrives as a piss take of the monument that was supposed to stand there.

The programme calls it “an artifact of a hyperfragmented, paranoid time when public space, consensus, and community continue to dissolve.” It “aims to contain irreconcilable narratives without attempting to rewrite them.” It is, the text says, “an object that embodies radical acceptance of our deeply flawed present.”

Try to roll your eyes back into place.

They’ve approved a toxic-green Halloween prop on the plinth reserved for a king and wrote a nonsense thesis in the hope nobody will call it junk.

The order is locked in. Trans faces, then the fat black woman, then some ectoplasm.

Zoom out from the blue dress and the rest of Khan’s London clicks into place.

In 2021 the mayor appointed a Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm – a hand-picked panel of campaigners and cultural operators – to review statues, street names and memorials so the city’s monuments might be made to “reflect” a preferred history. Khan said the body was not there to pull statues down. He had already said “there are some slavers that should come down, and the commission will advise on that.” One appointee had previously vandalised a statue with red paint. Another had backed the toppling of Edward Colston.

This week the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination told Britain to fill public space with statues honouring “people of African descent,” rewrite schoolbooks around “reparatory justice,” and treat historic slavery as a live brief for speech and migration policy. Historians pointed out the obvious: Britain banned the trade, paid to dismantle it, and ran the West Africa Squadron that seized slaving ships. The UN document is not interested in that ledger. It wants the square.

While the new figure was being craned onto the plinth, the approaches to the same square were already lined with steel and concrete vehicle barriers. City Hall will not name the threat those blocks are built for. The public does. They went up because “vehicle as a weapon” attacks are now treated as a standing condition of British civic life. Nelson looks down on crash-rated steel. Diversity, we are told, is a strength. The furniture of the square says otherwise.

The same culture machine is now pushing Fabric, the nightclub brand chaired by the man who also chairs Khan’s Nightlife Taskforce, into St Paul’s Cathedral on a four-year “contemporary music” deal. Peregrine Hood of the Nelson Society asked the only question that matters: “Is nothing sacred any more?” Nelson is buried in that cathedral. His column stands a few hundred yards from the new plinth piece. The mayor’s culture team called the Fabric deal “an extraordinary and unexpected coming together of two very different parts of London.”

Even the stations have been enlisted. Transport for London dropped a pitched-roof “calm space” onto the concourse at Ealing Broadway this week and called it equity. Commuters called it a kennel. The network still cannot keep trains clean, cooled and on time. Fare evasion still bleeds nine figures a year. The pod got the press release.

Trafalgar Square was built to mark a country that won a famous battle for British values. The Fourth Plinth is now used to lecture that country and rub in our faces that our history is being erased and replaced one plinth at a time.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-12 13:42:012026-09-12 13:42:01Meanwhile In London’s Trafalgar Square…

In Haaretz: Jewish Academic Activist: What We Can Learn From 100 Years of American Failure to Fight Antisemitism

September 12, 2026/3 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

You’ll be surprised to learn that Israel had nothing to do with getting the U.S. into the war with Iran and that Tucker is completely off base in claiming that it is a war on behalf of Israel. And of course the Great Replacement is a baseless conspiracy theory. And the account of Charlottesville completely ignores the role of the left in instigating the violence. I was surprised by intensity of the anti-Israel rhetoric of Hasan Piker, who has a very large following on the left. If this is the best that Jewish academic activists can do, I suppose you could say that it’s encouraging.

From Skokie to Charlottesville, James Loeffler's new book examines the fraught relationship between hate speech, free speech and Jewish civil rights.

From Skokie to Charlottesville, James Loeffler’s new book examines the fraught relationship between hate speech, free speech and Jewish civil rights. Credit: Ross D. Franklin/AP; Spencer Platt/Getty Images; Evan Agostini/Invision/AP; Stephanie Keith/Reuters. Design by Masha Zur-Glozman

In his new book, James Loeffler traces a century of U.S. battles over antisemitism and free speech. He tells Haaretz how American Jews are caught between Tucker Carlson and Hasan Piker and why Trump’s ‘smothering embrace’ offers little protection

Historian James Loeffler thinks this is a dangerous time for Jews in America. He believes that, caught between the antisemitic MAGA right and left-wing demagogues like Tucker Carlson and Hasan Piker respectively, the continuing reverberations from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Iran war, that Jews are more vulnerable than ever and that the American conversation about antisemitism is a dysfunctional and damaging mess.

Loeffler’s recently published “Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America” is a sweeping journey through a century of antisemitism in America, and the tense waltz between U.S. Jews, civil rights groups, Jew haters, the First Amendment and the courts. Much of the debate swirls around the fact that, grounded in the Bill of Rights and unlike most of the rest of the world, hate speech in the United States enjoys constitutional protection, unless it threatens or incites violence.

The book describes liberalism’s torturous balancing act between free speech and equal protection for minorities, exploring why antisemitism is such a problem for the left and right to define and confront. It also points to the ways recurrent surges of antisemitism in America have been met with contradictions, timidity, exploitation and incoherence.

Related Articles

  • Hasan Piker talks Hamas, anti-Zionism and why Americans are fed up with Israel Etan Nechin
  • Bad, mad and functional: Three ways of thinking about the Jew Eran Rolnik
  • ‘Not a static concept’: Why modern antisemitism defies definition Judy Maltz
The cover of Prof. James Loeffler's new book, featuring an image of white supremacists and neo-Nazis marching in Charlottesville in 2017.
The cover of Prof. James Loeffler’s new book, featuring an image of white supremacists and neo-Nazis marching in Charlottesville in 2017. Credit: Metropolitan Books

It also explores how, in many of the tangible, pivotal moments when American society was put to the test about anti-Jewish incitement or abuse, from court cases to university responses, Jews themselves were not called to testify as victims, or the word “antisemitism” was not even mentioned.

Loeffler warns, too, that the Trump administration’s hyperactive campaign to “defend the Jews” by launching a war on left-wing dissent and liberal academic institutions, while appeasing or ignoring right-wing antisemitism, is an exercise in cynical manipulation which endangers Jews and democracy.

His book advises against being stuck only in the present moment, and to think about how different strategies panned out, and the paths not taken. It’s salutary to read through the breathless accounts of the antisemitic demagogues from the last century and understand the choices faced by their opponents – conflicts that echo today. As much as the past can inform the present, the present is always looming over the past, as Loeffler notes: “Even stories we think we know read differently after Charlottesville and October 7 and Gaza.”
Author, professor and historian James Loeffler.
Author, professor and historian James Loeffler. Credit: Ezra Einhorn

Loeffler is an award-winning historian and serves as the Felix Posen Professor of Modern Jewish History at Johns Hopkins University, and the university’s Jewish Studies program director; he is also a senior fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute.

He is the author of several acclaimed books, including “Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth Century” (2018) and is working on a biography of Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jewish lawyer who coined the term “genocide.” Loeffler spoke to Haaretz over Zoom from his home in Washington, D.C.

Codeword ‘Zionism’

It was striking to read in your book about the evolution of the term “Zionist” over the last century, especially its use in the 1940s by the antisemitic far right. So debates today about the relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism have actually been going on for a century?

“As long as there’ve been Zionists, there’ve been anti-Zionists,” Loeffler says. “Alongside principled opposition to Zionism, there have been bigots, who have also trafficked in the term, but as an epithet for an evil, global conspiratorial power – Marxist, communist, capitalist or some kind of conflation.”

A cartoon that appeared in the Soviet newspaper Pravda saying that Zionism is the same as racism.
A cartoon that appeared in the Soviet newspaper Pravda saying that Zionism is the same as racism. Credit: AP

In his book, Loeffler invites us back to postwar Chicago, and to Father Arthur Terminiello, a Catholic priest nicknamed the “Father Coughlin of the South” who called for a “Christocracy” to save America. In 1945 he announced a crusade to stop what he saw as an imminent global coup by “capitalistic Zionists” united with “Red fascism.”

A year later, Terminiello addressed a large gathering in Chicago and explained his terminology, which sounds startlingly contemporary: “The moment we point to a man and say that man is a communist, or that his name happens to be Ginsberg, then we are considered to be antisemitic…Let us call them Zionist Jews, if you will,” adding that it was necessary to oppose “Every attempt to shed American blood to promote Zionism.” Around him, the crowd dispensed with the niceties, shouting “Kill the Jews.”

“Using this coded language was a way for opportunistic demagogues to attack Jews. Many of those invocations of Zionism back in the 1940s, they really show little interest in Palestine. It simply is a useful code word.”

James Loeffler

[Antisemitism] is particularly dangerous on the right, because of the empirical reality that white supremacy is a violent tradition in America, which consistently produces lots of violent attacks.

James Loeffler

Catholic far-right activist and pastor Arthur Terminiello reading the 1949 Supreme Court ruling which cleared him of disorderly conduct charges from the antisemitic speech months earlier.

Catholic far-right activist and pastor Arthur Terminiello reading the 1949 Supreme Court ruling which cleared him of disorderly conduct charges from the antisemitic speech months earlier. Credit: AP

Since Terminello’s time, Loeffler explains, antisemites of all denominations have adopted the same word-bending strategy, distinct from those who opposed Zionism, as a movement for Jewish self-determination, on principle.

“Today, again, we have both principled positions against Zionism, and also bigoted uses of the term to dehumanize Jews and demonize Israel in ways that go beyond valid and necessary critique.

“It’s part of the phenomenon of ‘good Jews’ and ‘bad Jews.’ Back in the 1940s, Terminiello, an American antisemitic Christian nationalist, talked about ‘Zionist Jews,’ but he also said there are ‘good’ Jews too. That, too, is a characteristic of antisemitism, and we live with that today: Partitioning Jews into the right kind and the wrong kind. It should sensitize us to the reality of this [coded] rhetorical move to call Jews ‘Zionist.’ It wasn’t just invented by defenders of Israel to attack anti-Zionist speech.

A protestor holding a sign reading "No to Zionism in the Middle East" during a rally against U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, in Istanbul, Turkey, in March.

A protestor holding a sign reading “No to Zionism in the Middle East” during a rally against U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, in Istanbul, Turkey, in March. Credit: Emrah Gurel/AP

“But at the same time, it doesn’t mean that you can use it as a license to repress everything you find offensive or injurious to Zionism. It means you need to have ethical, legal principles consistently applied, to talk about when something is wrongful discrimination, and when it is simply politics.”

Hasan Piker makes ‘fodder for demonization of U.S. Jews’

Hasan Piker, an extraordinarily popular left-wing live-streamer and political commentator who is fiercely hostile to Israel, has campaigned with several Democratic candidates ahead of the midterms.

In August, Piker remarked during a broadcast that if American Jews continue to present themselves as singularly invested in Israel, “eventually someone is going to come around and take action, not against the State of Israel, mind you, but against American Jews.” These comments, among others, have triggered an intense debate about the line between legitimate political speech and incitement.

Where does Piker stand in your historical understanding of American antisemitism?

“The lesson from history and from the law is that the context actually matters. In the abstract, his message about how Jews’ connection to Israel is going to trigger increasing threats is valid, because we know empirically that every time Israel engages in a war, antisemitism rises in Europe and the United States.

“But Piker making that statement as someone who has consistently engaged in demagoguery is a political move that reeks of singling out Jews who identify with Israel, trying to stigmatize them. It’s an ethically irresponsible move.”

Hasan Piker: “In a totally just world, I think that, regardless of your background, any kind of fucking Zionist tendency should be treated in the same way as being a fucking rabid neo-Nazi. You shouldn’t even let someone be the fucking local dogcatcher, okay, if they’ve ever… pic.twitter.com/GEE2Gr9iuQ

— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) September 4, 2026

In a broadcast he made a year ago and circulating again now, Piker opined that “In a totally just world…any kind of fucking Zionist tendency should be treated in the same way as being a fucking rabid neo-Nazi. You shouldn’t even let someone be the fucking local dogcatcher, okay, if they’ve ever exhibited any sort of positive feelings about the State of Israel.”

When do words become incitement? Piker’s comments from August have been understood by some as a ‘warning’ to American Jews that their attachment to Israel means they have a target on their back. That doesn’t seem too far away from legitimizing those people’s violence.

“I agree it is not very far away from the violence that someone might do in the name of that message. But context still matters: It is one thing for a speaker to describe a situation on campus, but it’s different to do it in an interview with Haaretz or a tweet or a Twitch, in which it is being deliberately provocative.

“Our challenge is to call it out when it is destructive, raising the temperature in this country and giving a pass to people to justify their hateful thoughts about Jews who identify with Israel.

Pro-Israel New Yorkers calling on the city to take action against antisemitism in 2019.

Pro-Israel New Yorkers calling on the city to take action against antisemitism in 2019. Credit: Danielle Ziri

“I don’t think Piker is saying: ‘Watch out, American Jews, if we progressives take power, we will enact the flipside of the Trump-era efforts to criminalize pro-Palestinian advocacy – but this time against pro-Israel advocates.’ But I do think he is deliberately provoking, in a way which is not incitement but is certainly going to be fodder for more demonization of American Jews.”

Is “Zionist” recoverable as an identifier that Jews can openly use in America?

“I definitely think it has been damaged, but the word itself is not the problem.”

Loeffler notes in his book that in the Zionist vs. anti-Zionist conflict, “each side’s excesses [reinforce] the other’s intransigence.”

Israeli and U.S. flags are seen alongside portraits of Israeli hostages in front of the pro-Palestine encampment at Columbia University in New York on April 23, 2024.
Israeli and U.S. flags are seen alongside portraits of Israeli hostages in front of the pro-Palestine encampment at Columbia University in New York on April 23, 2024. Credit: Charly Triballeau/AFP

“I’m skeptical that just words themselves can be the magic bullet, or the responsible party for all this. I think that takes the burden off progressives and Zionists to think more clearly and responsibly about how to build coalitions, how to talk through Israel-Palestine, how to differentiate between antisemitism and politics.”

Tucker Carlson: A ‘real and dangerous phenomenon’

In his book, Loeffler goes through the 2021 Sines vs. Kessler trial after the Charlottesville Unite the Right march, which tested the argument that the far right was engaged in a civil conspiracy to commit racially motivated violence; the far-right defense was that they were simply exercising their First Amendment rights.

One defense lawyer even played the jury a YouTube video about the “white genocide” organized by “the international Jewish system” – the far-right belief in the great replacement theory, which posits that liberal Jews are using immigrants to demographically engineer the ‘replacement’ of white Christian America.

White nationalists and neo-Nazis right clashing with police as they are forced out of Emancipation Park after the Unite the Right rally was declared an unlawful gathering in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 11, 2017.

White nationalists and neo-Nazis right clashing with police as they are forced out of Emancipation Park after the Unite the Right rally was declared an unlawful gathering in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 11, 2017. Credit: Chip Somodevilla/AFP

Loeffler notes that “these conspiracy theories migrated from the margins to mainstream conservative discourse…replacement theory became a staple of Tucker Carlson’s Fox News commentary.”

These days Carlson, who is close to U.S. Vice President JD Vance, leads a supercharged obsession with Jews and Israel on the U.S. right, fueled by conspiracy theories and most recently focused on the Iran war.

In your book, you quote Charles Lindbergh, star aviator and Hitler enthusiast, who blamed the ‘Jewish control of American media and government for the prospect of global war.’ He said that in 1938. How different is it from what Carlson has said recently?

“There is a through line in our history, and it’s to do with American reactionary conservative populism. It seizes on images of Jewish power to blame Jews for all of America’s conflicts, for America’s own imperial overreach and overseas entanglements. It recurs in American society.

Tucker Carlson attending a meeting with President Donald Trump and oil executives at the White House in January. Carlson has since fallen out with Trump over the Iran war and Israel.

Tucker Carlson attending a meeting with President Donald Trump and oil executives at the White House in January. Carlson has since fallen out with Trump over the Iran war and Israel. Credit: Alex Brandon/AP

“People reach down to that reservoir of antisemitism, tap into that tradition, pull out that rhetoric. And they know full well that it will resonate because it’s a persistent underbelly of American society.

“I think we are in a very dangerous moment, because the rhetoric from Tucker Carlson and the antisemitic MAGA right is directly connecting sinister tropes about Jews and Zionists being responsible for global conflict and issues that impinge on everyday American life. Most Americans don’t care about foreign policy, but they care about gas prices and the cost of living.

“It is a classic move: taking a real issue about the America-Israel war on Iran, about our defense alliances and geopolitical questions, and turning them into a conspiracy theory. That is a dangerous move.

“There is a version of this on the left too, which also attributes all of America’s ills to Zionists – such as the theory that Israel has trained every cop in America. But it is particularly dangerous on the right, firstly because of the empirical reality that white supremacy is a violent tradition in America, which, as I show in my book, consistently produces lots of violent attacks. Secondly, the fact that someone like Carlson has a lot of power and influence in society makes it a real and dangerous phenomenon.”

A woman holding a sign that reads "Antisemitism kills" at a solidarity vigil in London in December after the Bondi Beach Hanukkah massacre in Sydney.

A woman holding a sign that reads “Antisemitism kills” at a solidarity vigil in London in December after the Bondi Beach Hanukkah massacre in Sydney. Credit: Thomas Krych/AP

A ‘fractured landscape’ of coalition-building

As you describe in the book, in Skokie in 1978, Holocaust survivor Sol Goldstein helped build an incredibly wide coalition to confront a neo-Nazi rally that planned to march through what it called the “Jew-ized suburbs” of Chicago. That coalition included Catholics, Chinese Americans, Orthodox Jews, Teamsters, war veterans, the Rev. Jesse Jackson, even a representative sent by then-President Jimmy Carter. Could this kind of coalition happen today?

“I would hope it could, but I think it’d be much less likely. That Skokie coalition was the product of a moment where the Holocaust was understood as a uniquely evil phenomenon that was also distinctly un-American and which America had helped to stop, and also a universal evil that didn’t connect to America: it happened over there. These days, antisemitism is not just about an external problem, it’s here. Holocaust memory has also changed, and splintered in lots of directions.

“What I always found striking is that when the mayor of Skokie, a Catholic, is accused of not caring enough about antisemitism, his first response is to say: ‘I just came from the Israel Bonds event in downtown Chicago.’ That consensual liberalism, based on the idea that support for Israel is a good marker for caring about American Jews, that it’s fully compatible with Democratic sensibilities and the Democratic Party – that moment has gone.

Sol Goldstein holding up a German newspaper with headlines questioning the validity of the Holocaust, at a 1978 news conference in Chicago.
Sol Goldstein holding up a German newspaper with headlines questioning the validity of the Holocaust, at a 1978 news conference in Chicago. Credit: AP

“After [the Hamas attack of] October 7, there was a very broad response of solidarity, care, concern among the American public. But we live in a moment where history keeps moving, Israel takes its own actions and the world changed because the war continued.

“There would still be a baseline response to denounce antisemitic attacks. But it is a very fractured landscape: Coalitions are much harder because Israel has changed and American politics have changed. Now, unlike the ’70s, there is a live, ongoing violent conflict – and that prevents us from doing any of the deep coalition-building that we will need to move forward.”

A ‘wild overcorrection’ by the Jewish establishment?

You closely trace how major American Jewish organizations, such as the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee, responded to antisemitism over the past century. But when it comes to the last decade, you mention them far less. Why is that?

“They are less important than they were,” says Loeffler, dating the decline to their ineffective response to the Charlottesville rallies, which occurred just six months after Trump’s inauguration. “I think they felt really flummoxed about how to respond to the rise of the Trump movement: They simply could not muster a clear, forcible response to what should have been very, very easy: Neo-Nazis holding torches and saying they want to kill Jews.”

Since then, and despite Trump’s infamous comments about there being “fine people, on both sides,” he says, parts of the Jewish establishment have made a “wild overcorrection” – jettisoning principle and proportionality while acquiescing to Trump’s overreach, “terming way too much as antisemitism and using it as a weapon.” While the legacy groups behaved in a weak, incoherent and reactionary way, he says, both the left and right jumped into the antisemitism space.

“It began very dramatically on the right with aggressive and destructive anti-antisemitism ‘start-ups’ – groups who marched into campus, capitalizing on Jewish fear and outrage. And then making alliances with parts of the MAGA right. The progressive left has had its organizations too; some of them have got it right, and some of them have been too willing to ignore antisemitism on the left, because of its political inconvenience.”

Are the clashing ways of confronting antisemitism based on a fundamental error – that there is a “cure” to antisemitism?

“In America, we have a general problem of rising racism and intolerance, and religious hatred. We have a general problem about a decline in democracy, and so it’s in that context that we have to fight antisemitism. The search for quick solutions is often quite damaging. It has to be about managing a problem, balancing rights and values rather than a utopian quest based on the contention that we can stamp out all things that we find hateful or that may even harm us, or a stoicism that says, let’s just ignore this problem.”

Instead of falling into “Judeo-pessimism” – that antisemitism is both ineradicable and insurmountable – he sees an imperative to rethink past solutions to hate speech and incitement that no longer work. The cyclical nature of antisemitic surges should push us to look at the contiguities in the history of American antisemitism, including the recognition that, even right now, “It’s not only about Israel.”

President Donald Trump disembarks Air Force One in New Jersey last week. "The Trump right's so-called 'philo-Semitic' embrace doesn't protect Jews," Loeffler says.

President Donald Trump disembarks Air Force One in New Jersey last week. “The Trump right’s so-called ‘philo-Semitic’ embrace doesn’t protect Jews,” Loeffler says. Credit: Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

Do you think the frequent interventions by President Trump and his administration in the loud public debate about antisemitism make Jews more or less protected in America today?

“American Jews are more vulnerable now. The instrumentalization of Jews has not brought us recognition and the protection that we need. Instead, it’s turned us into a political football, and bred even more cynicism and casual bigotry – much of which is not connected to Israel-Palestine. It has turned Jews into a target and convenient scapegoat for all kinds of prejudices.

“It has also lifted us out of context, without really giving Americans a way to understand where we fit in and the conflicts about antisemitism are part of our larger problem about diversity and civil rights in America, when the Trump administration is trying to dismantle all the civil rights and protections we have. It turns Jews into this exception, and that is not good for us.

“The Trump right’s so-called ‘philo-Semitic’ embrace doesn’t protect Jews or equalize them as full members of society. It singles us out, and I don’t want that kind of smothering, selective embrace. Nor do I want Jews to be rebuffed or excluded if they don’t fit in with the ‘right’ political sensibilities.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-12 11:27:512026-09-12 11:27:51In Haaretz: Jewish Academic Activist: What We Can Learn From 100 Years of American Failure to Fight Antisemitism

Drone warfare: Why Iran is tough to beat

September 12, 2026/6 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/iran-s-drone-problem-is-turning-into-something-much-more-dangerous/vi-AA20fO70?ocid=socialshare

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-12 10:03:172026-09-12 10:03:17Drone warfare: Why Iran is tough to beat

Words fail me: Trump. I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States…

September 11, 2026/13 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Trump: So Please raise your right hand: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States

Crowd: I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States…

Trump: I’m going to try and cheat like hell like they do. pic.twitter.com/umehtVKUr7

— Acyn (@Acyn) September 11, 2026

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2026-09-11 06:36:512026-09-11 11:44:14Words fail me: Trump. I pledge to the greatest president in the history of the United States…
Page 6 of 255«‹45678›»
RSS Feed Logo RSS Feed Logo Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to X
  • Link to Dribbble
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only