• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

General

Alexander Dugin: The Globalists Desperate Move to Kill Trump

July 15, 2024/15 Comments/in General/by Alexander Dugin

The Globalists’ Desperate Move to Kill Trump (arktosjournal.com)

[Hard to believe that Crooks is part of a globalist conspiracy, but…]

Alexander Dugin asserts that the assassination attempt on Trump was predictable and orchestrated by globalists with deep state support, marking an escalation in their desperate bid to retain power amidst the shift to a multipolar order.

The assassination attempt on Trump was quite predictable. There is no doubt that everything was organized by the globalists with the support of that part of the deep state that backs them. The only way to keep the dementor grandfather in power is to kill Trump, who would almost certainly win under the current circumstances. The shooter was immediately taken out by a Secret Service sniper to cover the tracks. Essentially, there was an attempt at a coup in the United States.

The head of Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate, Budanov (recognized as a terrorist in Russia), openly admits that Ukrainian sabotage groups have repeatedly attempted terrorist acts against Putin. In Slovakia, there was an attempt to eliminate Prime Minister Fico, who opposes the support of the Nazi junta in Kiev. Now there has been an attempt on Donald Trump, who, incidentally, is highly critical of Zelensky and his regime. This is the true face of hegemony and the unipolar world: anyone who opposes globalism and stands in its way is first demonized (through cancel culture tools) and then physically eliminated. Murderers and terrorists, criminals, and perpetrators of genocide who serve the globalists are portrayed as freedom fighters and “innocent victims.” Kiev propaganda will surely claim that “Trump shot himself in the ear,” and the globalist media, which is built on cynical and cold-blooded lies, will imply something similar.

God save America and all humanity from this criminal gang of liberals and globalists.

There is no doubt that the responsibility for the attempted assassination of Trump, the leading candidate in the US presidential race, lies with the group around Obama, Blinken, Hillary Clinton, and the utterly senile Biden, who has already warned that “freedom is above democracy,” meaning democracy and its laws are now suspended. In the name of “freedom” (to continue ruling), one can even kill. Liberalism is finally becoming totalitarian with all the accompanying characteristic features, up to and including the direct assassination of undesirable politicians.

The architecture of power in the world is now fundamentally changing — from the sole dominance of the West to multiple poles. This is multipolarity. Trump represents the US as one of the poles — albeit the strongest and most influential — of a multipolar world. Globalists care as little about the US as they do about everyone else. They need planetary power, the absolute power of transnational capital. All countries, including America and Europe, are just tools in the creation of the world government. Trump stands for America and against the world government. Putin stands for Russia, Xi Jinping for China, Modi for India, and Orbán, Fico, Marine Le Pen, and the AfD for Europe. A multipolar world is a system where multiple sovereign nations hold power. In contrast, the globalists seek to dominate the entire planet. They gained significant control with the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Now, as their grip on power weakens, they are desperately trying to hold on. The globalists have finally moved to the tactic of direct terror. This is a fait accompli, not a series of random coincidences. It is time to strike back at the globalist network.

Tucker Carlson told me in a conversation in Moscow that Trump seriously fears being killed by globalists. It turns out he had good reason. The more senile Joe descends into dementia, the more likely it is that they will start killing Trump. They have already started. People have died, and there are injured. God save America and all humanity from this criminal gang of liberals and globalists. If we do not stop them now, they will destroy us all.

(translated by Constantin von Hoffmeister)

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Alexander Dugin https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Alexander Dugin2024-07-15 07:42:052024-07-15 07:42:05Alexander Dugin: The Globalists Desperate Move to Kill Trump

Tweets on the Assassination Attempt

July 14, 2024/12 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

They asked for more help. pic.twitter.com/FjOpEmT6Z2

— Paratrooper Brady 🇺🇲 (@82ndairborneBT) July 14, 2024

So her boss is Alejandro Mayorkas.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-14 08:33:412024-07-14 09:07:05Tweets on the Assassination Attempt

Jonathan Turley on “Rage Rhetoric” and the Assassination Attempt

July 14, 2024/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

In  my previous blog I mentioned the rhetoric on the left that provided a context for the assassination attempt. An article by Jonathan Turley in The Hill has some examples, from BIden and prominent figures in the left media.

The assassination attempt of former President Donald Trump left a nation stunned. But the most shocking aspect was that it was not nearly as surprising as it should have been. For months, politicians, the press and pundits have escalated reckless rhetoric in this campaign on both sides. That includes claims that Trump was set to kill democracy, unleash “death squads” and make homosexuals and reporters “disappear.”

President Biden has stoked this rage rhetoric. In 2022, Biden held his controversial speech before Independence Hall where he denounced Trump supporters as enemies of the people. Biden recently referenced the speech and has embraced the claims that this could be our last democratic election.

I discuss this rage rhetoric in my new book, “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.” We are living through an age of rage. It is not our first, but it may be the most dangerous such period in our history.

Some of us have been objecting for years that this rage rhetoric is a dangerous political pitch for the nation. While most people reject the hyperbolic claims, others take it as true. They believe that homosexuals are going to be “disappeared” as claimed on ABC’s “The View” or that the Trump “death squads” are now green lighted by a conservative Supreme Court, as claimed by MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

Others [Robert DeNiro] say that Trump “will destroy the world” unless he is stopped.

I do not believe that the politicians or pundits engaging in what my book calls “rage rhetoric” want actual violence. But they have knowingly created conditions for extremist views and, yes, extremist actions.

The media has been quick to denounce reckless rhetoric from the right while largely ignoring the same language on the left. That included threats against conservative Supreme Court justices before the assassination plot against Brett Kavanaugh.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) went to the steps of the Supreme Court and called out Kavanaugh by name: “I want to tell you, (Justice Neil) Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Again, I do not believe that Schumer wanted Nicholas Roske to go to the home of Justice Kavanaugh to kill him. However, these politicians also know that some citizens will hear this rhetoric as a justification for violent conduct.

Thus, when the president is claiming that the election may end democracy in the nation, it can be heard as much as a license as a warning, particularly when he adds “we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”

We still do not know about the shooter in this assassination attempt. However, we know all too well how unhinged people can find justification in the incendiary rhetoric of our politics. This moment did not occur in a vacuum; it occurred in a time when our leaders long abandoned reason for rage.

We have come full circle to where we began as a Republic. In the 1800 election, Federalists and Jeffersonians engaged in similar rage rhetoric.

Federalists told citizens that, if Jefferson were elected, “Murder, robbery, rape, adultery, and incest will be openly taught and practiced, the air will be rent with the cries of the distressed, the soil will be soaked with blood, and the nation black with crimes.”

Jeffersonians warned that, if Adams were reelected, “chains, dungeons, transportation, and perhaps the gibbet” awaited citizens and they “would instantaneously be put to death.”

Both sides stoked the anger and fears of the public, and violence was seen across the nation.

In our current age of rage, politicians have sought to use the same anger and fear to rally support at any cost.

This is the cost.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage” (Simon & Schuster, June 18, 2024).

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-14 07:54:192024-07-14 07:56:58Jonathan Turley on “Rage Rhetoric” and the Assassination Attempt

German Youth Are Rejecting National Shame (well, perhaps somewhere between 16 and 22 percent of them)

July 13, 2024/7 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Nevertheless, the numbers of young people embracing the AfD is increasing. Notice that non-White migrants are unconcerned about Holocaust guilt—something Jews should be concerned about. And many, especiaally Muslims, are anti-Israel.

From The European Conservative.

For generations of German children, this caustic burden has been placed on their shoulders at a young age and the unfairness of it grows apparent to them when they compare their concentration camp visits to that of their peers with migration backgrounds. In 2009, I visited Dachau with my father. As we approached the architecturally stunning visitor’s centre, there were groups of students milling about. The German kids looked stunned and sat silently or tried to cheer one another up with small talk whispered as though in church. Many students of North African origin may well have been coming from a soccer game. They horsed about and even had time to mock my father’s beard. The demeanour of both groups could not have been more starkly different. This isn’t lost on German teens, who are increasingly feeling that they are getting the short end of the stick in the multiculturalism they have inherited from their parents and grandparents. As they grow older, they see that this double standard is leveraged for political purposes.

When Olaf Scholz took power at the head of a leftwing SPD/Greens/FDP coalition in 2021, his government prioritised expanding Germany’s culture of remembrance from focusing exclusively on the Holocaust to including Germany’s other historical sins. In May 2024, Claudia Roth, minister for culture and Green party member, introduced an expanded vision in a 43-page document. In this vision, the Holocaust would hold equal footing with German colonialism, the history of immigrant journeys to Germany, GDR history, and Germany’s “culture of democracy.” Rather than alleviating the burden of historical guilt, which Germans feel more acutely than any other nation, the government set about increasing it four-fold. And just as German children for generations have been confronted with memorials to the Holocaust, Roth has called for eye-watering sums of money to build new museums and memorials for her oppressive vision. An Exhibition Centre in Halle for the “life stories of the East Germans” would cost more than €200 million. A further €19.5 million would be spent on a “House of Democracy” in Frankfurt. Most controversial, however, was Roth’s collaboration with the “Initiative of Black People in Germany” (ISD), a non-profit organisation that provided feedback on her proposal. ISD, founded by radical leftist Bafta Sarbo, is a black rights group that has received €1.5 million in funding from the government, even though Sarbo has previously caused controversy by liking a tweet calling for the shooting of a Bild journalist, and for saying in an interview that, “as long as Capitalism prevails, there will be racism.”

Roth cynically attempted to tie hard-left political narratives—social justice, post-colonial discourse, and migrant politics—to Germany’s ‘national shame,’ the Holocaust. Rather than convince the public of the merits of her political positions, she attempted to subjugate every German by force of guilt. Thankfully, her plan was universally lambasted and quickly disappeared from public discussion.

However, leveraging German guilt for cash is a growing industry. Successive Polish governments have demanded wartime reparations in the region of €1.3 trillion from Germany. In 2021, Germany apologised to Namibia for its colonial past and offered a €1.2 billion reparations package. This was challenged in the Namibian court system to stall it so that more money could be extracted, with Al Jazeera pointing out that, as of 2024, Israel had received €82 billion in reparations from Germany with an extra €1.44 billion paid annually in upkeep to Holocaust survivors. Therein lies the issue with Roth’s updated “culture of remembrance.” If all historical grievances are to be given equal footing with the Holocaust, Germany won’t be long going broke. More importantly, young Germans who feel disconnected from the self-flagellation of their elders are tired of being emotionally abused and forced to cough up cash for the crimes of their ancestors.

They have more pressing matters to address, like navigating life in a multicultural nation—something their parents and grandparents never had to do. In 2015, Angela Merkel opened up Germany’s borders to a record 2.14 million immigrants, and defiantly stated, “Wir schaffen das” (we can do it). It was a great line, but since then Germany has become less and less safe. Crime statistics released by the German Department for Justice show that, in 2023, although Germany has a migrant population of only 18.4%, migrants committed 41% of all crime. Strikingly, migrants are responsible for 43.1% of murder, 74.5% of robbery including murder, 46% of aggravated rape, 41.1% of sexual harassment, and 48.6% of public brawls. These figures do not include criminal acts by Germans with an immigrant background. German youth are growing up in a Germany that is unimaginably different from their parents’ and grandparents’ experience. They do not feel safe, and yet their elders brutally enforce the old rules of ‘grin and bear it’ out of a sense of ever expanding ‘national shame.’ It has reached a breaking point.

In April of 2024, a large study found that 22% of German 14–29-year-olds would vote for the AfD in a general election. The numbers had doubled compared to when the same study was taken two years previously. Rather than engage in a bout of soul-searching to understand why young Germans are increasingly attracted to the AfD, the response was predictable. Establishment German politicians brutally clamped down on this dissenting generation with the full authority invested in them as custodians and official dispensers of ‘national shame.’

Since January, all parties have supported mass public demonstrations against the AfD and there have been increased efforts to ban the party entirely. After the April study revealed that the mainstream parties were losing the youth vote, they seized on an opportunity to scare the kids straight. In May, a group of upper-middle class youths were caught on camera in a 14-second video singing a viral meme song “Deutschland den Deutschen, Ausländer raus” (Germany for the Germans, foreigners out). The song, sung to the tune of Gigi D’Agostino’s L’amour Toujours, has become a taboo song in recent months, the meekest of pushbacks among young Germans otherwise unable to express their concerns about their daily reality. The youths in the video sang it with the cheeky smiles of kids giggling in the back of church knowing they are risking their parent’s ire. But the political and media blowback was devastating. Germany’s biggest daily newspaper, Bild, led the charge, branding the video a “Nazi scandal” and following up with several articles that hounded those involved, all of whom were later dismissed from their various jobs and studies. What was clearly a group of edgy drunken youths was portrayed as a hardcore Nazi cell at the very heart of German upper society, with several national news outlets, including Welt, firmly laying down the ‘national shame card’ by linking the lyrics of the song to speeches given by Hitler during his extermination of the German Jews. Following universal condemnation from the political establishment, SPD politician and Bundestag president Bärbel Bas called for “perhaps the maximum” legal penalty for the youths, of between 3 and 5 years in prison.

The media and political backlash to the Sylt “Nazis” couldn’t have been more different from the reaction when actual antisemitic extremist Islamists took to the streets to celebrate Hamas’ October 7th attack on Israel. In the days after the attack, Muslim youths in Berlin’s Neukölln district clashed with police and rioted in the streets. Güner Balci, an integration officer for the area, said that ‘large swathes’ of Muslim youth support Hamas and Hezbollah and are members of local Islamist groups. A month before the Sylt incident, approximately 1,000 Islamists called for the establishment of a German caliphate on the streets of Hamburg. Both stories—stories of real and present danger to German democracy and stability—quickly disappeared from headlines without leaving any mark on the collective public consciousness. The message from the media and the political class was clear: German youths face different expectations and punishments because of their history, and those expectations will be savagely enforced.

The cracking of the establishment whip in Sylt had little effect. In the June European elections, the AfD scored 16% of the 16-24 year old vote, a return second only to the CDU/CSU. When state broadcaster Tagesschau polled voters on their chief election priorities, leading concerns were crime, fears about the influence of Islam, too much migration, and a loss of German identity. They would of course have known all of this ahead of time had they just taken a break from flogging the kids to actually listen to them. Unfortunately, it seems the lesson will be hard learned.

In June, German youths were again reminded that they are required to shoulder the negatives of life in multicultural Germany without ever complaining, when a 20-year-old woman was sentenced to prison for insulting a member of the largely migrant group who gang-raped a 15-year-old girl in Hamburg in 2020. The case caused international outcry when nine of the ten defendants received suspended sentences. Psychiatrist Nahlah Saimeh, who reportedly appeared as an expert witness in the case, stated in a 2023 interview with Spiegel that the gang rape could be a means for the rapists to vent their frustration at the social and cultural isolation they felt as immigrants. To add insult to already unforgivable injury, in addition to the 20-year-old girl who will now serve prison time for insulting one of the gang members, Hamburg police are also investigating 140 other threats made against the rapists. Absurdly, dozens of German youths could spend time in prison for insulting migrant rapists who themselves walked free following their heinous crimes. No wonder the kids are turning to the AfD.

Germany has finally arrived in the era of multicultural realism. Young Germans, frightened and uncertain about the future, are demanding that their elders—who only ever lived with abstract ideals of multiculturalism—listen to their very real concerns. Those elders, in turn, are arguing with one another about whether to continue to beat those youths into silence with the old rod of national shame or whether to add four more rods for a more robust beating. Meanwhile, the AfD prospers.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-13 08:39:542024-07-13 08:39:54German Youth Are Rejecting National Shame (well, perhaps somewhere between 16 and 22 percent of them)

Comments on David Brooks’ “The Deep Source of Trump’s Appeal”

July 12, 2024/2 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Comments on an excerpt from  David Brooks in The New York Times: based on James Davison Hunter’s Democracy and Solidarity: On the Cultural Roots of America’s Political Crisis. My comments in bold.

In public discourse, identity politics is more associated with the left. Progressivism used to be oriented around how to make capitalism just; but now in its upper-middle-class form, it’s oriented around proper esteem for and inclusion of different identity groups.

But as Hunter notes, Donald Trump practices identity politics just as much as any progressive. He tells the story of how small-town, less-educated Christians are being oppressed by elites [i.e., our elite that is substantially made up of people of Brooks’s ethnic group]. He alone is their retribution. That story resonates with a lot of people [and is basically true; and it has been true for a long time.].

[As Ben Stein wrote nearly 50 years ago:

The typical Hollywood writer . . . is of an ethnic background from a large Eastern city—usually from Brooklyn [i.e., they have a Jewish background]. He grew up being taught that people in small towns hated him, were different from him, and were out to get him [i.e., small town people are anti-Semites]. As a result, when he gets the chance, he attacks the small town on television or the movies. . . .

       The television shows and movies are not telling it “like it is”; instead they are giving us the point of view of a small and extremely powerful section of the American intellectual community—those who write for the mass visual media. . . . What is happening, as a consequence, is something unusual and remarkable. A national culture is making war upon a way of life that is still powerfully attractive and widely practiced in the same country. . . . Feelings of affection for small towns run deep in America, and small-town life is treasured by millions of people. But in the mass culture of the country, a hatred for the small town is spewed out on television screens and movie screens every day. . . . Television and the movies are America’s folk culture, and they have nothing but contempt for the way of life of a very large part of the folk. . . . People are told that their culture is, at its root, sick, violent, and depraved, and this message gives them little confidence in the future of that culture. It also leads them to feel ashamed of their country and to believe that if their society is in decline, it deserves to be. (Stein 1976, 22)

It’s still the case today.]

In the 1950s, Billy Graham assumed that his faith was central to American life. By the 2020s his son Franklin considered himself a warrior under siege in an anti-Christian culture.

The problem with this form of all-explaining identity politics is that it undermines democracy. If others are evil and out to get us, then persuasion is for suckers. If our beliefs are defined by our identities and not individual reason and personal experience, then different Americans are living in different universes and there is no point in trying to engage in deliberative democracy [agreed]. You just have to crush them. You have to grab power and control of the institutions and shove your answers down everybody else’s throats. [Exactly. And the left is far ahead in creating an authoritarian culture of the left.]

In this climate, Hunter argues, “the authoritarian impulse becomes impossible to restrain.” Authoritarianism imposes a social vision by force. If you can’t have social solidarity organically from the ground up, then you can impose it from top down using the power of the state. This is the menace of Trumpism [but not the left?? Outrageous]. If you read my recent interview with Steve Bannon, you’ll see that he talks like a character straight out of Hunter’s book. [The Bannon interview deserves separate treatment which I have been putting off. The main message is that Bannon is a true warrior willing to incur great personal sacrifice in pursuing his conservative beliefs—beliefs that are anathema to Brooks and his ilk.]

Democrats are not immune to this way of thinking. In a 2019 survey Democrats were more likely than Republicans to admit to occasionally thinking that we’d be better off as a country “if large numbers of the opposing party in the public today just died.” Democrats were more likely than Republicans to believe that their opponents were “evil” and “un-American.” [ Right. Democrats are far more likely to have authoritarian impulses and always have. Think Bolshevism which was warmly greeted by a generation of Jewish intellectuals and only abandoned when Soviet communism began to lessen Jewish power. As Norman Podhoretz noted, Jews remain the financial backbone of the left and there is no reason whatever to think that they have changed in any fundamental way. Whatever is good for the Jews.]

But in this world, in which politics is seen as a form of total war, Biden looks obsolete. In a nihilistic pseudo-authoritarian world, he’s still one of those old-fashioned liberals who reveres the Constitution and his Catholicism. [Is that a joke?? Brooks just showed that Democrats (and certainly the Biden administration) are far more likely to have authoritarian attitudes like the Biden administration’s clamping down on free speech (a major project of the ADL and hence by inference the mainstream Jewish community) and the Biden administration has openly flouted laws on immigration (aimed  at increasing Democrat votes) and the SCOTUS ruling on student loans in order to bribe the debtors to vote Democrat. And Democrats  oppose the GOP-initiated law that would attempt to ensure that only citizens can vote. Laws and honest voting are for suckers; power at all costs because “we’re the good guys.” And it’s obvious Biden is a figurehead in an administration being run by others. You can’t really blame him for anything.] The ideals that animate him and that he uses to give poetry and lift to his speeches [written by his staff] fail to inspire millions of American voters [at least partly because they are delivered by a gaffe-prone poster boy for the impairments that go along with senility whose only ability is to sometimes read a teleprompter without screwing it up]. A plurality of voters believe that Biden’s age is a bigger problem than Trump’s authoritarianism because they just don’t see the latter as that big a problem.

The core question in Hunter’s book is: Can you have an Enlightenment political system atop a post-Enlightenment culture? I’d say the answer to that question is: Over the long term, no.

The task, then, is to build a new cultural consensus that is democratic but also morally coherent. My guess, and it is only a guess, is that this work of cultural repair will be done by religious progressives, by a new generation of leaders who will build a modern social gospel around love of neighbor and hospitality for the marginalized [as they happily commit racial suicide and enter into an era of ever-increasing marginalization and victimization of Whites—an outcome that absolutely resonates with Brooks].

But the work of building that culture will take decades. Until then, we, as a democracy, are on thin ice.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-12 09:03:482024-07-12 11:48:24Comments on David Brooks’ “The Deep Source of Trump’s Appeal”

BBC Chooses ‘Racially Diverse Cast’ To Play Characters In Drama About 1066 Battle Of Hastings

July 12, 2024/2 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

I know this is old hat by now but it’s certainly a good marker of the decay of White culture. The wonder is that William the Conqueror and King Harold aren’t depicted as African with a few White peasant soldiers. We can be thankful for that!

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Modernity.news,

The BBC has chosen a “racially diverse cast” to play the characters in its upcoming historical drama about the Battle of Hastings, which occurred in 1066, leading one historian to decry the “bizarre notion that there were black earls in Anglo-Saxon England.”

The eight-part series King and Conqueror, which is a CBS Studios co-production, will feature numerous non-white characters, including one taking the role of a real 11th-century leader.

Black actor Jason Forbes will play the fictional character Thane Thomas, “with the “thanes” being a layer of nobility in the ethnically homogeneous society of Anglo-Saxon England,” reports the Telegraph.

“(Elander) Moore, of Trinidadian descent, will play the real historical figure of Morcar, an Earl of Northumbria who fought against Viking and Norman invaders, before being subdued by William after the battle of Hastings.”

Historian Dr Zareer Masani, who has worked with the BBC, lambasted the decision, asserting, “Some of us, including people of colour, grew up thinking actors ought to look like characters they played.”

He warned that the BBC’s approach is “hugely confusing and downright misleading,” adding that it was “absolutely crazy that they’ve applied this colour-blindness to a period when Britain was at its least multicultural, before even the Norman Conquest.”

While it’s acceptable to depict Anglo-Saxons as black or mixed race, apparently it’s no longer politically correct to even acknowledge that white Anglo-Saxons existed, given a recent decision by The Cambridge University Press to change the name of its ‘Anglo-Saxon England’ journal to ‘Early Medieval England and its Neighbours.

Referencing that development along with the new BBC drama, Cambridge historian Prof David Abulafia said, “Since the whole series will undoubtedly bear little relation to historical fact, I think we shall have to put up with the bizarre notion that there were black earls in Anglo-Saxon England.”

“All the more so, since we are no longer supposed to talk about ‘Anglo-Saxons’. If they didn’t exist, we can do what we like.”

CBS Studios executive Lindsey Martin said the show would offer “a bold and fresh take on a story that has endured for nearly 1,000 years.”

So bold and fresh that it will be full of people who simply didn’t exist in 11th century England.

No doubt regime historians will now leap to the defense of the show, insisting that it is historically accurate because there might have been a few swarthy looking people knocking around Europe in 1066, and anyone who complains is racist.

As we document in the video above, apparently Sub-Saharan Africans built Stonehenge, while the BBC is still pushing the Cheddar Man hoax to children, insisting that the UK has been ‘diverse’ for thousands of years.

This of course is all part of a social engineering drive to convince everyone that the deluge of mass migration we are now seeing is perfectly normal and should be accepted without a whimper of dissent.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-12 08:14:332024-07-12 08:14:33BBC Chooses ‘Racially Diverse Cast’ To Play Characters In Drama About 1066 Battle Of Hastings

Brands Collude To Silence Dissent

July 11, 2024/10 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

This is an excerpt from a Zerohedge article, “It’s That Time Again: MSM Launches ‘Muh Russia’ Election Narrative As Brands Collude To Silence Dissent.” The rest is on a Wall Street Journal article trying to drum up hysteria on Russia interfering in the 2024 election. We’ve heard that story before.

Brands Collude to Silence

While democracy grapples with this new Russia election malarkey, we can’t forget that free speech threatens narrative control efforts.

To that end, the world’s largest brands, owned by elites, are now colluding to control online speech, according to an interim staff report released on Thursday by the House Judiciary Committee.

The report details a coordinated effort by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA) and its Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) initiative to demonetize and suppress disfavored content across the internet.

The Power Players Behind GARM

The WFA, a global association representing over 150 of the world’s biggest brands and over 60 national advertiser associations, created GARM in 2019. This alliance quickly amassed significant market power, representing roughly 90% of global advertising spend, which amounts to nearly one trillion dollars annually.

GARM’s Steer Team reads like a who’s who of corporate America, including heavyweights such as Unilever, Mars, Diageo, Procter & Gamble (P&G), GroupM, AB InBev, L’Oréal, Nestlé, IBM, Mastercard, and PepsiCo. These corporations not only wield immense economic influence but are now revealed to be leveraging this power to control online discourse under the guise of “brand safety.”

Collusion and Censorship

The Committee report details multiple instances of GARM’s coordinated efforts to influence and censor online content. Perhaps the most notable example is the recommendation for a boycott of Twitter following Elon Musk’s acquisition. GARM members, including Danish energy company Ørsted, were advised to pull their advertising from Twitter, a move that significantly impacted Twitter’s revenue. Internal emails show GARM’s satisfaction with the result, with GARM leader Rob Rakowitz boasting about the impact on Twitter’s financials.

“GARM recommended that its members ‘stop all paid advertisement’ on Twitter in response to Mr. Musk’s acquisition of the company. GARM’s internal documents show that GARM was asked by a member to ‘arrange a meeting and hear more about [GARM’s] perspectives about the Twitter situation and a possible boycott from many companies.” -House Judiciary Committee

Unilever was particularly miffed that Musk released internal communications which became known as the Twitter Files, specifically over the Hunter Biden laptop story:

“Unilever, through GARM, also expressed issues with Mr. Musk exposing the truth about how Twitter, prior to Mr. Musk’s acquisition, censored the Hunter Biden laptop story.”

Spotify and its star podcaster, Joe Rogan, also came under GARM’s scrutiny. Despite not placing advertisements on Rogan’s podcast, GARM pressured Spotify to take action against Rogan for his comments on COVID-19. This included threatening to review Spotify’s entire Trust & Safety policies and pushing for a public condemnation of the platform.

“GroupM knew there was no brand safety concern because it did not buy advertisements on Mr. Rogan’s podcast, but it still sought to silence Mr. Rogan’s views anyway.”

Meanwhile, “On February 10, 2022, Coca-Cola emailed Mr. Rakowitz regarding ‘evaluating Spotify to better access the Joe Rogan Experience’ and noting that the ‘particular issue (misinformation) does not exactly fit cleanly into [Coca-Cola’s] policy.”

Political Influence and Targeting Conservative Media

GARM’s influence extends into the political realm as well. The report notes efforts by GARM and its members to flag a Trump campaign advertisement as misinformation during the 2020 presidential election. This advertisement, which questioned Joe Biden’s debate performance, was scrutinized by Unilever and other GARM members, who pushed Facebook to take action against it.

Conservative news outlets have been particular targets of GARM’s exclusion lists, curated with input from biased organizations like the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) and NewsGuard. These exclusion lists disproportionately flag right-leaning sites such as Fox News, The Daily Wire, Breitbart News, New York Post, and The Federalist as purveyors of misinformation, thus cutting off their advertising revenue and limiting their reach.

Actually insidious…

117,9262,009
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-07-11 06:31:122024-07-11 06:31:12Brands Collude To Silence Dissent
Page 88 of 185«‹8687888990›»
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • A2Z Publications
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Instauration Online
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • National Justice Party
  • Occidental Dissent
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Radix Journal
  • RAMZPAUL
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The European Union Times
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • Third Position Directory
  • VDare
  • Washington Summit Publishers
  • William McKinley Institute
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • X
  • Dribbble
Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only