• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

General

The Forward: Is A String Of Attacks Against Brooklyn Jews Really About Anti-Semitism?

July 23, 2025/8 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Is A String Of Attacks Against Brooklyn Jews Really About Anti-Semitism?

The attacks have triggered fears in those communities that more violence is in the offing. In Crown Heights, many residents interviewed this week, like Zaetz, have a story about an attack or a near miss that didn’t get reported to the police. Jews are being targeted, say residents of these communities, by members of non-white ethnic groups who see Jews as symbols of gentrification in their neighborhoods.

…

What some non-Jewish residents miss is that the issues the assailants may be responding to are things the Jewish community is struggling to deal with as well.

Imani Keith Henry, the executive director of Equality For Flatbush, a not-for-profit that organizes tenants in Brooklyn, said that while many notorious landlords in Crown Heights are Jewish, it’s important to remember that gentrification also impacts poor Jews.

 

Mindel Zaetz’s husband was chased down the street last week by a group of men while he was on his way home from work, just off of Eastern Parkway, the broad thoroughfare that runs through the middle of Crown Heights, in Brooklyn.

“He came home really spooked,” said Zaetz, 29, as she was on her way home from midday shopping. “He said, ‘I’m not going out at night anymore.’ I said, ‘Finally.’”

Out of six attacks on Jews in Brooklyn in the last month and a half, three have occurred in Crown Heights. On Oct. 15, a teenager beat a Jewish man with a stick. On Nov. 19, a high school-age yeshiva student was “sucker-punched” by an assailant. On Saturday, a man was punched without provocation on his way to synagogue. The last incident came amid four attacks on Jewish people — two of them on children — that occurred on the same weekend.

The attacks have triggered fears in those communities that more violence is in the offing. In Crown Heights, many residents interviewed this week, like Zaetz, have a story about an attack or a near miss that didn’t get reported to the police. Jews are being targeted, say residents of these communities, by members of non-white ethnic groups who see Jews as symbols of gentrification in their neighborhoods.

“It’s less of an anti-Semitic thing than they needed a target to respond to this word: gentrification,” said Mendel Turner, 28, a salesman at the Borsalino hat store on Kingston Avenue.

The New York Police Department declined to respond to emailed questions from the Forward, and declined to make any representatives available to answer questions.

The incidents come amid reports about a 37% national rise in anti-Semitic incidents in 2017, according to FBI statistics. Yet the Jewish residents of Crown Heights say what’s happening in their neighborhoods is unrelated to the white nationalism that seems to have fueled numerous incidents of Nazi-inflected vandalism nationally. Indeed, no one who was arrested for perpetrating an anti-Semitic hate crime in New York City in the 22 months leading up to October has been associated with a far right group.

The attacks in Crown Heights are “clearly anti-Semitic,” said the executive director of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, Rabbi Eli Cohen. But, he said, “if someone feels that white supremacists are feeling more empowered, how would that make a young minority kid hit a Jewish person?”

Crown Heights residents are particularly attuned to violence against Jews because of the neighborhood’s history of racial tension. That culminated in violent riots in 1991 after a car escorting the Lubavitcher Rebbe — the leader of the worldwide Chabad movement, headquartered in Crown Heights — hit two small children, killing one. During the rioting, a Jewish man was stabbed to death by a black assailant.

“This is not the eighties over again,” Cohen said, but the attacks have left residents scared and looking for ways to limit their risk.

Zaetz said that she is having her elementary school-age son take the bus to school — a three-block journey he used to do by foot. When explaining her decision, Zaetz said she used the early evening winter darkness as an excuse, lest she scare him.

“I don’t feel threatened when I walked down the streets, but I know this area has changed,” said Shani, 36, who declined to give her last name. Public school children frequently yell “Heil Hitler!” into the front gate of her kids’ school, she said.

Crown Heights residents say that the attacks here are caused by local issues, and need local solutions. They say that rapid gentrification, less intensive policing and other pressures are combining to stoke animosity between Jewish and other minority communities.

Jews are pegged as the representatives of gentrification because, in many poor Brooklyn neighborhoods, they are, says Avi Leshes, a director of economic development at the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce. He pointed to hotly contested development project like one in the Broadway Triangle, in East Williamsburg, from a Hasidic-owned company.

And while the attacks are targeting Jews, it may be because black people identify Judaism as “a form of almost hyper-whiteness,” according to Mark Winston Griffith, executive director of the Black Movement Center, a not-for-profit group that promotes communal organizing in the black community in Crown Heights.

In that regard, Griffith said, the attacks may be an extension of animosity toward white people in general, who drive gentrification in Brooklyn. He added that the attacks are not on the radar of people involved in social justice initiatives in Crown Heights.

“To the extent that people hear about it, they are probably thinking about it in the national context of anti-Semitic acts, and the larger landscape of hatred that is being painted by Donald Trump,” he said.

In Crown Heights, however, the Orthodox residents — mostly members of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement — have been living in the neighborhood for decades. Indeed, in the late 1960s, the Lubavitcher rebbe spoke out against large numbers of white New Yorkers moving to the suburbs. He called the phenomenon a plague and said those who stayed in the neighborhood would be blessed. His flock remained.

Leshes, Cohen and others also say that police are not as present in the neighborhood as they once were, leading to a culture of permissiveness for would-be assailants.

“We’re seeing that the police department has taken a new approach to policing that is much more hands-off,” Cohen said. “I hear from the cops that they feel that there is a little bit of a sense of lawlessness.”

On Monday, 13 members of Congress from the New York City area released a letter urging the NYPD to do more to combat anti-Semitism and increase crime reporting rates, such as publishing the city’s hate crime statistics in Yiddish. The letter also asked the NYPD to disclose how often its hate crime unit meets with local community leaders, and how much the department spends.

Residents are also frustrated with the city for putting more shelters for people experiencing homelessness in Crown Heights, Leshes said. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration has come under fire in recent years for clustering homeless shelters in central Brooklyn and the Bronx.

However, Jewish community leaders like Cohen are cautious about “explaining away” the anti-Semitic nature of the attacks, worrying that it could detract from the severity of the crime.

“There’s never an excuse for anti-Semitism,” said Yaacov Behrman, a local activist who directs a community drug use prevention program. “But there’s a reason it’s growing.”

What some non-Jewish residents miss is that the issues the assailants may be responding to are things the Jewish community is struggling to deal with as well.

Imani Keith Henry, the executive director of Equality For Flatbush, a not-for-profit that organizes tenants in Brooklyn, said that while many notorious landlords in Crown Heights are Jewish, it’s important to remember that gentrification also impacts poor Jews.

Turner, the hat salesman, said that his parents are finding it increasingly difficult to pay the rent on their apartment, which is not rent-controlled or -stabilized.

“We’re thinking, okay, how are we gonna live here?” he said. “I don’t think people realize that we all have the same concern.”

To stop the attacks, community leaders say they are hoping to see more police patrols. Many of them were meeting Tuesday with the commanding officer of the precinct that covers the southern portion of Crown Heights, said the head of governmental affairs for the Crown Heights Community Jewish Council, Chanina Sperlin.

“I always tell them, they have to put a police officer on every corner,” Sperlin said. “You have to make sure the residents are safe.”

Cohen said that he also wants to know if there is some central source of motivation for these attacks.

“One of the things we need to do is find out if there’s a conversation that we don’t know about, either online or in person, that is focusing on Jews,” he said.

But all are hoping that residents and observers avoid over-simplifying the attacks — and prevent the neighborhood from devolving into the kind of inter-communal enmity that characterized the atmosphere in the early 1990s.

“It comes from a deeper place than: black, Jew,” Turner said.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-07-23 08:11:082025-07-23 08:11:08The Forward: Is A String Of Attacks Against Brooklyn Jews Really About Anti-Semitism?

Tuesday in Gaza: Starving Gazans, aid workers and journalists

July 22, 2025/1 Comment/in General/by Patrick Cleburne

On Tuesday in Gaza the IDF seems again to have refrained from major massacres at food distribution sites. However continued bombardment all over Gaza has caused heavy casualties. Reports are still increasing the numbers. Estimates go to more than 80.
Israel blockaded Gaza totally from March 2 and has allowed inadequate food in since May 19. The resultant famine is becoming lethal, and the various international agencies are protesting loudly. An AP story https://archive.is/KKhGy (which reports ‘at least’ 25 dead killed today) notes
“The U.N. World Food Program says… nearly 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition…..
MedGlobal, a charity working in Gaza, said that five children as young as three months had died from starvation in the past three days. “This is a deliberate and human-made disaster,” said Joseph Belliveau, its executive director.”
A Reuters story https://archive.is/2WrJM (which reports 72 IDF victims today) has much famine detail:
…doctors say a wave of hunger that has loomed over the enclave for months is now finally crashing down…More than 800 people have been killed in recent weeks trying to reach food, mostly in mass shootings by Israeli soldiers…United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the situation… a “horror show”. The Norwegian Refugee Council, …said some of its own staff were starving. “There is nothing left,” its director Jan Egeland told Reuters. “Israel is not yielding. They just want to paralyse our work”
AFP stated today https://www.turkiyetoday.com/region/afp-warns-that-its-journalists-in-gaza-risk-starvation-in-agencys-80-year-history-fir-3204549
“Since AFP was founded in August 1944, some of our journalists were killed…but there is no record of us ever having had to watch our colleagues starving to death,”
This evening the IDF responded https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bkmkzb68eg saying there is no famine and the pictures of starving children are from Yemen.
H/T AP: Palestinians carry sacks of flour unloaded from a humanitarian aid convoy that reached Gaza City from the northern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, July 22, 2025.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Patrick Cleburne https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Patrick Cleburne2025-07-22 20:49:042025-07-22 20:49:04Tuesday in Gaza: Starving Gazans, aid workers and journalists

White Papers Policy Institute: The Great Replacement in Washington State

July 22, 2025/3 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Since I live next door in Idaho, this is worrisome.

The Great Replacement in Washington State

By Mike Adams

Washington State, known for its lush forests, vibrant tech hubs, and progressive politics, is undergoing a profound demographic transformation that is leaving one of America’s most unique cultural regions at risk of social and political extinction. The rapid diversification of its population, driven by both legal and illegal immigration, is leading to the crumbling of a once prosperous state. Tax collection is faltering while the state government, the pro-replacement state government, is increasing the tax burden on every day Americans. Large American companies are leaving the state and a staggering 12% of all businesses surveyed in Washington have expressed a desire to relocate to neighboring Idaho or other more affordable (read less diverse) parts of the country.

A state that helped to define the pioneer image and self-made man national character of the American people is at risk if the Great Replacement continues.

Demographic Shifts in Washington

Washington State has experienced a steady decline in its foundational American population (non-Hispanic Whites).. According to U.S. Census Bureau data, in 1970, Washington was approximately 94% White. By 2020, this figure had dropped to 63.8%, with projections estimating a further decline to below 60% by 2040. The state’s Hispanic population has grown significantly, rising from 2.1% in 1970 to 13.2% in 2020, while the Asian population increased from 1.9% to 9.2% over the same period. Additionally, the Black population has grown modestly, from 2.1% to 4.4%, and multiracial or “other” racial categories have expanded due to increased immigration and intermixing.

The growth in Washington’s non-White population is concentrated in urban centers like Seattle, Tacoma, and Spokane, but rural areas are also seeing changes. For example, counties like Yakima and Franklin have seen Hispanic populations rise to over 50% and 54%, respectively, driven largely by agricultural labor migration from Latin America.

This demographic shift is not organic but is accelerated by deliberate policy choices at both the state and federal levels.

Moreover the foreign-born population of Washington has swelled at such a consistent pace that integration has become nearly impossible and ethnic enclaves and isolated communities have begun to form in certain regions of the state. In 1970, the foreign origin population of the state—those born abroad plus second generation immigrants, was about 18.7% and 88% of those immigrants were from Europe, Canada, or another Western country. As of 2023, Washington’s foreign born population has risen to 15.5% with 88% of those immigrants being of non-Western origin. A further 6% of the state’s population are children under 18 with immigrant parents. Today Washington’s population is 21% of foreign origin and 88% of non-Western extraction. A remarkable increase and demographic reversal on the situation in 1970.

State Policies Facilitating Demographic Change

The state’s government, one that has been subject to Democratic leadership for decades, has implemented policies that actively encourage immigration and demographic ‘diversification’. Governor Jay Inslee and the state legislature have very proudly made Washington into a “sanctuary state,” with laws like the 2019 Keep Washington Working Act (SB 5497) prohibiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

This has effectively shielded illegal immigrants from deportation and is likely encouraging further immigration into the state. The state has also embraced programs to resettle so-proclaimed and so-called refugees and asylum seekers. Seattle, in particular, has been a hub for refugee resettlement, with organizations like the International Rescue Committee facilitating the arrival of thousands of migrants from Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. In 2023 alone, Washington accepted over 2,500 refugees, primarily from Somalia, Afghanistan, and Syria, with many being placed in already strained communities like Tukwila and Kent.

These areas have seen rising crime rates and pressure on public services, yet state officials continue to promote further resettlement. Moreover, Washington’s economic policies incentivize immigration. The state’s booming tech industry, led by companies like Microsoft and Amazon, relies heavily on H-1B visa holders, predominantly from India and China. In 2024, Washington employers sponsored over 15,000 H-1B visas, contributing to the growing Asian demographic. While these workers are often portrayed as essential to economic growth we know that they only displace Americans.

Continues…

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-07-22 13:20:102025-07-22 13:20:10White Papers Policy Institute: The Great Replacement in Washington State

ZeroHedge: Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, ‘Cannot Fathom’ How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’

July 22, 2025/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, ‘Cannot Fathom’ How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says she’ll release more information next week to follow up on her bombshell declassification of documents that show “overwhelming evidence” of the Obama administration laid the groundwork for the years-long Trump-Russia collusion investigation after President Trump won the 2016 election.

“We will be releasing more detailed information about how exactly this took place, and the extent to which this information was sought to be hidden from the American people, hidden from officials who would be in a position to do something about it,” Gabbard told Fox News‘ Maria Bartiromo. “Accountability is essential for the future of our country, for the American people to have any sense of trust in the integrity of our democratic republic.”

“Accountability, action, prosecution, indictments for those who are responsible for trying to steal our democracy is essential for us to make sure that this never happens to our country again,” Gabbard continued.

Gabbard told host Maria Bartiromo; “I really cannot fathom” how special counsels Robert Mueller and John Durham missed evidence of this “years-long coup against President Trump.”

“There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed,” she said, adding “The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out.”

Among other things, Gabbard’s team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that “foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks” on election systems.

At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).

And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump’s 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in “sweeping and systemic fashion.”

Mueller, of course, found ‘insufficient evidence’ that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, while Durham – appointed by Bill Barr (son of the guy who hired Jeffrey Epstein for a teaching job & then oversaw Epstein’s death as AG) – accomplished nothing more than a strongly worded letter about the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia probe.

“I don’t know what excuse there is for those who supposedly investigated this previously, whether it was Durham or others, that they were not able to put together the dots and ultimately show the truth to the American people,” said Gabbard, who then stressed that AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel will need to now gather up evidence and decide whether to press charges. (lol. lmao even)

“There must be indictments of those responsible, no matter how powerful they are and were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people. They all must be held accountable,” Gabbard continued. “For the American people to have any sense of trust in the integrity of our democratic republic, accountability, action, prosecution, [and] indictments for those who are responsible for trying to steal our democracy is essential for us to make sure that this never happens to our country again.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-07-22 08:34:112025-07-22 08:34:11ZeroHedge: Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, ‘Cannot Fathom’ How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’

Monday in Gaza: .“Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint,” the U.N. health agency said “

July 21, 2025/in General/by Patrick Cleburne

On Monday in Gaza, as if ordered (which they probably were) the IDF suddenly stopped the mass culling of Palestinians trying to get food from food distribution points. There were scatted reports of a few deaths, but not the scores reported daily for many weeks.
I think this was probably due to the unprecedented attention the US MSM gave to the weekend slaughter. This has reverberated on: this morning Drudge had no less than 5 stories, some carried on over from yesterday. A new one was Politico‘s story Gaza killings denounced as ‘disgrace to humanity’ by Belgian king https://www.politico.eu/article/gaza-israel-war-belgian-king-philippe/ which added that the EU “top brass’ has said nothing.
Early today the IDF launched a major land and air assault on the central city of Deir el-Balah. Casualty reports are trickling in. UPI in https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2025/07/21/new-Israeli-offensive/4221753087002/ reports (in the text) that 17 were killed at various locations; the Aljazeera report to which this links, no doubt subsequently updated, says
“The Israeli military killed more than 60 Palestinians, including 11 aid seekers, in attacks across Gaz*a”
Getting full information in this kind of event takes time.
The Neocon **Gatestone Institute
* is calling for Aljazeera to be declared a Terrorist Organization, aka shut down. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21773/designate-al-jazeera-terrorist-organization. Of course the Israelis could curb lies by allowing foreign Journalists into Gaza.
The Israeli attitude to independent observers appears in AP‘s wrap
https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-gaza-hamas-war-07-21-2025-01d877899f729d35cb1c9864d449ce53

“The World Health Organization said Israeli forces raided its main staff residence in Deir al-Balah…“Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint,” the U.N. health agency said “

Pic H/T AP Relatives look at the body of Palestinian child Abdullah al-Rantisi, 11, killed by an Israeli military bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Patrick Cleburne https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Patrick Cleburne2025-07-21 18:02:002025-07-21 18:02:00Monday in Gaza: .“Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint,” the U.N. health agency said “

Westering Sun in Aporia: Woke as Managerial Ideology

July 21, 2025/1 Comment/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Excerpts. Missing any analysis of the ethnic aspects of the “hostile managerial regime and its dependent [non-white] clients and  promoted by what “Samuel Huntington described [as] a “concentrated and sustained onslaught” by intellectuals and publicists led to multiculturalism.”
Woke as Managerial Ideology
[…] the system is structured around exploiting the core [white] population for the benefit of a hostile managerial regime and its dependent [non-white] clients.
[…] Though largely unforeseen — and never legitimized by democratic mandate — demographic transformation was swiftly rationalized and sanctified through the ideology of multiculturalism. This was presented as a natural extension of the liberal-rational belief that social life should be governed by neutral principles, procedural justice and abstract equality. In truth, multiculturalism represented the culmination of a worldview that had long pathologized in-group preference and delegitimized ancestral identity. By suppressing traditional language rooted in attachment, loyalty and exclusion, liberal rationalism had already disarmed the West’s native populations in the face of a doctrine that presented demographic upheaval as a form of moral progress.
In the 1990s, multiculturalism became entrenched as the dominant ideological framework across the West. Samuel Huntington described how a “concentrated and sustained onslaught” by intellectuals and publicists led to multiculturalism being formally adopted by the Clinton administration, which made “the encouragement of diversity one of its major goals.” Meanwhile in Britain, Tony Blair’s Labour government oversaw a dramatic expansion of immigration, inaugurating an era of demographic transformation. Other Western nations soon followed.
Advocates of multiculturalism presented it as neutral, benevolent and inclusive. Yet from a Machiavellian or realist perspective, it was anything but neutral. In instrumental terms, it sanctified unassimilated minorities, immigrants, and mixed-race individuals by implicitly identifying them as the future of Western nations. The empowerment of these groups — socially, politically and institutionally — was justified at the expense of native majorities.
While formerly marginal groups benefited materially and otherwise from multiculturalism, they were not its architects. Nor did they possess the political or institutional leverage to establish it as a new paradigm for Western civilization. The task of authoring, enforcing and entrenching multiculturalism as state dogma fell to another group entirely: the managerial regime. […]
[If managers, non-whites and collaborators] are abstracted from the social equation, what remains of Western societies largely amounts to the shrinking mass of the traditional population. This “core” or “host” population then emerges as the universal object of exploitation across the West. Predominantly native, often middle or working class, and still retaining residual loyalties to older forms of nationhood, faith and organic order, this group’s economic productivity funds the regime and supports its clients. Its demographic inertia is invoked to justify mass migration, while its defensive political instincts are pathologized as reactionary or extremist. It bears the brunt of taxation, undergoes cultural and demographic displacement, and faces escalating surveillance and censorship. […]
Multiculturalism remained the dominant ideology of Western societies until the mid-2010s. Around 2016, however, something changed, and a more militant successor emerged: the phenomenon now known as “woke”.
[…] In retrospect, 2016 was an inflection point in Western history. Years of growing frustration over mass immigration, cultural dispossession, and the erosion of national identity culminated in two seismic events: the Brexit vote in the UK, and the election of Donald Trump in the US. These embodied the first major mass resistance from native Western populations against globalism, demographic transformation, and cultural subordination.
These events triggered existential anxiety for the managerial regime and its clients. It became clear that the core population still possessed substantial numbers and latent political power; that democratic processes might enable their resurgence; and that the ideological high ground needed immediate fortification. Managerial elites therefore pivoted to woke ideology as a reactionary move, launching a moral crusade designed to embed their ideological regime as a permanent revolution. Their aim was pre-emptive suppression of native resurgence—crushing dissent from the only quarter capable of challenging their ascendancy.
[BLM and other regime-approved identity movements] neutralized the radical potential of credentialed but increasingly desperate white Millennials—precisely those who might otherwise have spearheaded populist resistance. Woke offered them belonging within an elite-coded moral universe and easy access to social status through virtue signalling, activism and ritual denunciation of working-class whites (now stigmatized as racist, backward, and dangerous). Psychologically rewarding, socially prestigious, and intellectually undemanding, woke was the perfect counterfeit for genuine rebellion.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-07-21 12:04:022025-07-21 12:04:02Westering Sun in Aporia: Woke as Managerial Ideology

NYTimes’ brief for the defense against DNI Gabbard’s accusations of Obama admin “treasonous conspiracy” against Trump

July 21, 2025/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Gabbard interviewed by Maria Bartilomo

Gabbard Claims Obama Administration Tried to Undermine Trump in 2016

Democrats denounced a report issued by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as politically motivated and error-ridden.

Listen to this article · 5:09 min Learn more
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, during a cabinet meeting this month. Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Friday issued the latest in a series of reports from the Trump administration attempting to undermine the eight-year-old assessment that Russia favored the election of Donald J. Trump in 2016.

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said the information she was releasing showed a “treasonous conspiracy in 2016” by top Obama administration officials to harm Mr. Trump.

Democrats denounced the effort as politically motivated, error-ridden and in contradiction with previous reviews of the assessment.

Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, called Ms. Gabbard’s accusation of treason “baseless.”

sIntelligence agencies and Senate investigators spent years reviewing the work, and concluded that during the 2016 election, the Russians conducted probing operations of election systems to see if they could change vote outcomes. While they extracted voter registration data in Illinois and Arizona, and probed in other states, there was no evidence that Moscow’s hackers attempted to actually change votes.

The Obama administration assessment never contended that Russian hackers manipulated votes.

Russia also conducted influence operations to change public opinion. That included using fake social media posts to sow division among Americans and leaking documents stolen from the Democratic National Committee to denigrate Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee.

Multiple reviews, including a Republican-led Senate report, backed the findings of American spy agencies in late 2016 that Russia was trying to influence the election by damaging Ms. Clinton’s campaign and bolstering Mr. Trump.

Among the Republican senators on the Intelligence Committee that produced the various reports on Russian influence operations was Marco Rubio of Florida, now the secretary of state.

The new report by Ms. Gabbard’s staff conflates those two activities by the Russians and tries to suggest that the Obama administration forced the intelligence community to alter its conclusions.

The findings by Ms. Gabbard’s office highlighted an email from an assistant to a previous director of national intelligence, James Clapper, that said President Barack Obama was seeking a new assessment of the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

Still, it has long been known that Mr. Obama had tasked intelligence officials to review the material they had collected and report what they had learned before he left office. At the time, Obama administration officials said they worried that the intelligence assessment would be buried when Mr. Trump took over for his first term.

A C.I.A. review released this month took issue with the speed with which that assessment was conducted. The C.I.A. then referred John O. Brennan, the agency’s former director, to the F.B.I. for criminal investigation.

The report released on Friday highlighted that there was “no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count,” then contrasted that with the spy agencies’ ultimate conclusion in December 2016 that President Vladimir V. Putin “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”

The report focused on a decision intelligence officials made at the time against producing an article for the president’s daily intelligence briefing that would have said that the Russians “did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”

sBut Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said the new report compared two different things: Russian attempts to hack into voting systems and Russian influence operations meant to sway public opinion.

“This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books,” Mr. Warner said. “We’re talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were.”

The influence operations that the intelligence community reported, and the Senate Intelligence Committee studied extensively, were a different effort, he said.

Mr. Warner noted that as recently as March, the intelligence community reported that Russia had continued its malign influence efforts to sow dissent in the West. The report found that “Moscow probably believes information operations efforts to influence U.S. elections are advantageous,” and that undermining the integrity of American elections was a key goal.

“They acknowledged that Russia’s effort to meddle goes on. That was an assessment under her watch,” he said, referring to Ms. Gabbard.

Mr. Warner said his committee examined the effort to produce the intelligence assessment in December 2016 and found no attempt by Mr. Obama or senior officials to manipulate the findings.

Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades.

David E. Sanger covers the Trump administration and a range of national security issues. He has been a Times journalist for more than four decades and has written four books on foreign policy and national security challenges.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-07-21 10:26:052025-07-21 10:26:05NYTimes’ brief for the defense against DNI Gabbard’s accusations of Obama admin “treasonous conspiracy” against Trump
Page 89 of 255«‹8788899091›»
RSS Feed Logo RSS Feed Logo Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to X
  • Link to Dribbble
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only