The Jewish War on White Australia: Refugee Policy and the African Crime Plague, Part 2

Part 1

Reaping the whirlwind of decades of Jewish activism

Australia’s African (and Pacific Islander, and Middle Eastern) crime epidemic is the inevitable result of the successful campaign waged by Jewish activists to end Australia’s White Australia policy. As detailed in my series of essays entitled The War on White Australia, Jewish ethnic activism was pivotal in overthrowing Australia’s longstanding European-only immigration policy. The Jewish academic Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges this, noting that “In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia.”

australian

Jews have likewise been at the forefront of those lobbying for a massively expanded refugee intake for Australia (both in terms of numbers and countries of origin). Walter Lippmann, the Jewish community leader and activist who chaired the committee that produced the first parliamentary report strongly endorsing state-sponsored multiculturalism, also played a critical role, alongside former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser, in shaping Australia’s current refugee policy. That Fraser was such a willing ally of Lippmann is perhaps not surprising given that Fraser’s mother, Una Woolf, was of Jewish descent. In her 2010 biography Malcolm Fraser: The Political Memoirs (co-written by Fraser), Margaret Simons notes that Fraser’s “mother’s father Louis Woolf had been born in New Zealand, the son of a Jewish father who had emigrated from South Africa, and Esther Reuben. Una believed that her grandmother was not Jewish, but the name suggests that the Jewish heritage may have been on both sides of the family.”[i] Thus Malcolm Fraser was, it seems, Jewish enough to qualify as a citizen of Israel. Read more

Call to Action: Help James Edwards Seek Justice

On April 18, 2016, I filed a lawsuit against The Detroit News, Inc., and one of its journalists – Bankole Thompson – in which I allege that they defamed me by falsely stating as a fact that I am a leader of the Ku Klux Klan.

In Mr. Thompson’s article – “Thompson: Jewish leaders fear Trump presidency” – published by the defendants in their newspaper and on their website on March 17, 2016, it was stated, “Of particular note to some in the Jewish community is the unprecedented support the Trump campaign has received among white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan and its leaders like James Edwards, David Duke and Thomas Robb, the national director of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in Arkansas.”

I am not now, nor have I ever been, affiliated with – much less a leader of – the Ku Klux Klan, and the defendants did not engage in any due diligence whatsoever prior to publishing this derogatory misstatement of fact about me: they did not contact me to verify its accuracy and they clearly did not get the false information from a third-party source insofar as no person or organization has ever alleged that I am part of the Ku Klux Klan.

Read more

Time to Subscribe to The Occidental Quarterly

The Summer issue was loaded into subscribers’ area on TOQonline 6/16.
Print journals were mailed 6/15 and will take somewhat longer to arrive than they have in the past.

The Occidental Quarterly
6/16: Summer 2016–Vol. 16, No. 2

The Occidental Quarterly - Summer 2016
(Click image to enlarge it.)

The Occidental Quarterly fills a unique niche  in bringing together scholarly articles on a wide range of topics that are mired in political correctness elsewhere.

There are quite a few reasons for the precarious state of our civilization and our people. But one of the main ones is that we have lost the intellectual and moral high ground to a cultural elite that is hostile to our people and our culture.

A main purpose of TOQ is to change the attitudes of White people so that they will feel confident identifying as White and explicitly asserting their interests as Whites. Politically aware Whites must understand that the elites that dominate culture and the political process in the West are intellectually and morally bankrupt.

The domination of the mass media and the academic world by elites that are hostile to White identity and interests is a major barrier for educated Whites to act on behalf of their interests. White people cower in fear of being called a racist for believing and acting in ways that are absolutely normal and natural for all the other peoples of the world. While other peoples defend themselves, their culture and their borders, societies in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand that have been controlled by Whites for hundreds of years are the only ones to accept their demise as a moral imperative. We view this outcome as the result of competition over the construction of culture in which the legitimate interests of Whites have been compromised.

All of the scientific data are on our side. Increased ethnic diversity is associated with a host of societal ills, including decreased support for social welfare programs and lack of public trust. Those who argue that Western societies have a unique moral obligation to cede cultural and political control to non-Whites completely ignore the legitimate interests of Whites. No one argues that countries like Korea or Uganda have a moral obligation to allow other peoples to swamp the native population.

Digital download subscriptions are only $30/year for four issues; subscriptions by mail are only $60/year. Go to www.theoccidentalobserver.net and click on ‘SUBSCRIBE TO TOQ’.

You will not only find the articles fascinating and informative, you will also be supporting the work of scholars who are part of a community defending our people and our culture with the highest level of integrity and intellectual sophistication.

The (very handsome) cover for the Spring 2016 issue can be accessed by clicking here. This issue will be mailed out around March 21.

Donald Trump, Judge Curiel, and (((Mean Tweets))): The Reality of Ethnic Identification in Multicultural America

Strong ethnic identifications for non-Whites remain controversial in multi-cultural America. On the cuckservative right, such identifications are half-heartedly condemned because they like to imagine that an ideal America should be blind to ethnicity as a way of justifying their non-opposition to massive non-White immigration (“after all, they’re just like us”) and their own lack of identification as Whites — even though this is a sure-fire recipe for White oblivion in the long run.

The intellectual gyrations on the left are even more laughable: They encourage non-Whites to have strong ethnic identifications and to organize to pursue their interests. In fact, such identifications are the key to success in a wide range of fields, certainly including academia, the law, and politics, and there are plenty of well-paying jobs running ethnic activist organizations. Being known as an ethnic activist and being a member of ethnic activist organizations are keys to advancement. For the MSM and the rest of the left, seeing things from an ethnic perspective is a positive virtue for non-Whites. So it’s not surprising  that, as Peter Brimelow notes, Sonia Sotomayor’s “wise Latina” comment was not sufficient to derail her appointment to the Supreme Court and indeed was applauded by the elite media. So making decisions based on ethnic identity is just fine.

Read more

The Jewish War on White Australia: Refugee Policy and the African Crime Plague, Part 1

Rj]g

Originally posted June 6, 2016

In 2005, Andrew Fraser, then Associate Professor of Public Law at Macquarie University in Sydney, wrote a letter to his local newspaper warning that “experience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.” Following publication, Jewish lawyers George Newhouse, David Knoll (then president of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies) and Anna Katzmann submitted a complaint to Australia’s Human Rights Commission on behalf of the General Secretary of the Sudanese Darfurian Union. They argued that Fraser had breached Section 18C of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act and demanded he publish an acknowledgement that he had engaged in “unlawful conduct” and unreservedly apologize “for the hurt thereby caused to the Sudanese people who live in the Parramatta-Blacktown area, promising not to repeat such conduct and retracting on the public record all of the imputations.”

I previously discussed Australia’s notorious Section 18C (and its Jewish ethno-political origins) regarding the case brought against the conservative commentator Andrew Bolt. I also described how, in 2014, former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott abandoned an election pledge to repeal this totalitarian speech code after coming under sustained attack from Jewish activist organizations. The veteran Jewish journalist Michael Gawenda observed at the time how: “The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succor to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA. It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to [Attorney General] Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott.”

The complaint against Professor Fraser was upheld by the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. In responding to the ruling, and noting how Whites are regularly deprecated in the mainstream media and held collectively responsible for crimes against Australia’s Aborigines and others, Fraser observed that: “Apparently, in contemporary Australia, people of White, European ancestry can be identified routinely as the root of all evil while it is forbidden for Whites ever to mention publicly the social pathologies associated with black Africans, even if they are well-known to any informed person and openly acknowledged by reasonable black people themselves.”

The reckoning

A decade after his ominous warning on the dangers of African immigration, Fraser has, not surprisingly, been totally vindicated. The country is in the grip of an African crime plague that has shocked people in its scale and savagery. While African gang violence has been a problem for many years, news of its horrifying extent has been routinely suppressed by politicians and the mainstream media. In March, however, this studied silence was shattered when members of the Sudanese-based “Apex” gang were responsible for a vicious riot which left the streets of Melbourne completely trashed. The riots broke out when “About 200 youths of the Apex and Islander 23 gangs stormed Federation Square chanting ‘fuck the police,’ before gang members started beating and punching each other.” During the riots, “People dining in City Square ran for their lives as gang members used cafe chairs as weapons, running riot from Federation Square to City Square.”

Occurring in the middle of Melbourne’s annual Moomba Festival, this very public and extremely violent riot was impossible to suppress or downplay. News Limited was forced to admit that “South Central Melbourne became more like South Central Los Angeles on Saturday as rioters swept through the CBD terrifying locals and tourists alike.”

riot

The Apex gang was originally founded by Sudanese youths in the south-eastern Melbourne suburb of Dandenong. It quickly metastasized to include young people from Pacific Islander and Middle Eastern backgrounds. As a direct result of Australia’s disastrous Jewish-engineered immigration and refugee policies, this “ethnically diverse” suburb now has crime rates about 40 percent higher than the rapidly climbing Victorian state average.

Nevertheless, according to Mark Dreyfus, the Jewish Federal Labor MP who represents the area (but lives far away in a wealthy Jewish inner-city enclave): “Our community is a wonderful example to others of a modern, diverse, and harmonious society.” This is despite the fact that, following a wave of assaults, stabbings and street brawls involving “youths” in the suburb, police warned residents that: “If you see a large group approaching, get back in your car and go, or walk off — don’t hang around to see what they might do.” Recently two African men armed with knuckle dusters were responsible for three vicious attacks in this “modern, diverse and harmonious society.” In one of the attacks, “without saying a word they punched the victim in the face and head, and stole his mobile phone and an amount of cash.”

Dandenong was recently identified as one of Melbourne’s “crime hot spots” where a web of closed-circuit television cameras will be installed “to crack down on the violent Apex gang, which has been terrorizing the city.” According to the Herald-Sun, “The sophisticated security measures have been in response to a rising tide of violence blamed on the Apex gang, which has been involved in violent carjackings, serious assaults, and home invasions.” Crimes that were once extremely rare in Australia have become daily occurrences. Crime reporter Andrew Rule recently noted that: “A decade ago “carjacking” was something we heard about from South Africa, Miami and Beirut. Now it’s part of the conversation in Australia. The first time I can recall the phrase being used locally it involved young men ‘of African appearance’ forcing female drivers out of cars around Flemington, Carlton and Parkville. Not that anyone said much. It was too sensitive.”

Dandenong: “a wonderful example of a modern, diverse and harmonious society”

Dandenong: “a wonderful example of a modern, diverse and harmonious society”

African gangs have gone on violent, drug and alcohol-fuelled rampages through Melbourne’s once genteel suburbs, aided and abetted by an insipid, politically correct governmental and legal establishment, and a clique of leftwing apologists in the media and academia. Recently, two Apex gang members escaped criminal convictions “after bashing an elderly couple in their beds during a brutal home invasion.” The victims, aged in their 70s, were left “left deeply traumatized after waking to find the young armed intruders in their house” and were “assaulted with weapons during the onslaught.”

Another victim was woken and beaten with golf clubs, while victims of another invaded home were “subjected to demeaning behavior of a sexual nature.” A carjacking victim was repeatedly threatened with being slashed with a knife despite handing over his car, and in a “brazen public attack,” a 16-year-old gang member used a box-cutter to slash the torso of a teenager who refused to hand over his phone on a train. Police have expressed concerns “about attackers taking ‘pleasure’ in bashing victims.” One police officer observed that: “Drugs or money aren’t the driver. It’s purely for the fun. They’re getting off on humiliating their victims.”

In the western suburbs of Sydney a 14 year-old girl was gang raped by up to six African men. One of the perpetrators, a 16-year-old, “claimed to be a member of Blackdanna, a self-proclaimed ‘alliance of all niggas’ in the Blacktown area who share photos of drugs, knives and graffiti online and wear black bandannas.” In another case, a 21 year-old Sudanese refugee embarked on “a three-day rape spree and sliced an elderly woman’s throat” just one month after arriving in Australia. He rewarded Australia’s generosity by immediately setting out “on a drug and alcohol-fuelled campaign of terror on the streets of Dandenong” which included “a string of depraved sex attacks.”

Three Sudanese youths who raped a young mother in her Victorian country home as her children slept in another room “sat whispering and giggling among themselves” as they were sentenced by a magistrate to just 36-month terms in juvenile detention for what the magistrate called “a cruel, callous and degrading attack on a vulnerable young mother for their own sexual gratification.” Another Sudanese refugee claimed diminished responsibility for the “horrific” aggravated rape of a 17 year-old girl when he was just 13, which was followed up with a string of violent crimes and serious traffic offences over the next six years. His lawyer said he could not be held fully responsible for his crimes because of an “intellectual disability and a severe behavioral disorder.” Given that the Sudanese mean IQ is 71, this defense would apply to virtually every Sudanese defendant.

Increasingly, victims of this African crime plague are circumventing the media blackout by reporting their experiences directly on social media. After a man was assaulted with baseball bats and robbed of his Mercedes in broad daylight by a group of African youths (who later used it in a violent home invasion), it only made headlines because the driver went public. Andrew Rule notes that:

All over town, (non-ABC) radio station switchboards jammed as people called in to tell chilling tales of similar incidents. Of houses being broken into and car keys taken by violent young thugs with no respect for anybody, let alone watered-down Australian laws made toothless by overcrowded jails caused, ironically, by migrant intake outstripping our fragile infrastructure. This was a wake-up from the real world, the one mostly ignored by the myopic civil libertarians of the cardigan Left. Until, of course, the day comes when they, too, become victims of the latest wave of barbarians at the gate.

A Melbourne mother-of-two was killed in November last year after a Sudanese teenager, high on drugs, crashed a stolen car into her while driving on the wrong side of the road after “an out-of-control suburban rampage of carjackings, armed robberies and aggravated burglaries.” The Herald-Sun noted that three high-powered cars were passed between African youths “as they left a trail of traumatized victims across six suburbs.” For taking the life of this woman, the Sudanese refugee, Isaac Gatkuoth, was handed a pathetic 14 month prison sentence. According to police, such crimes now “were typical of a new breed of thugs swept up in gangster culture.” This “gangster culture” has, it should be noted, been overwhelmingly promoted and spread around the world by the Jews that dominate Hollywood. Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton recently dubbed it the “Grand Theft Auto generation,” when attempting to explain yet another surge in Victoria’s crime rates, which included double-digit rises in car thefts, burglary, drug and weapons offences.

Isaac Gatkuoth: enriching Australia with death

Isaac Gatkuoth: enriching Australia with death

These predatory gangs of African youths have also targeted international students from China who are prime targets because they often have “the latest in technology, which can be traded for good money to buy drugs,” and are unlikely to fight back when stood over for their property. In April a group of Chinese students were among the victims of “a citywide rampage” by African youths who raided their townhouse. One of the students was woken by punches in the face by the assailants, some of whom were armed with hammers. A victim recalled that “One or two of them had weapons — hammers. I don’t want to die, I thought about that. I’ve got no idea why they picked here. I now think Australia’s not a safe place. I thought it was safe before, but not now.’’ Groups of up to 20 teens and young men have for months “been terrorising students around the University of Melbourne precinct and other parts of the inner-city in after-dark ambushes.”

As well as terrorizing Whites and Asians, African-on-African crime in Australia has also become a huge problem. The eruption of extreme violence within the Sudanese community, or between Sudanese and Somali youths, is a frequent occurrence. In one case young Sudanese immigrants in Melbourne engaged in deplorable acts of violence including the use of machetes — a weapon still associated with the horrific scenes of the Rwandan genocide — after a beauty pageant held in Springvale, southeast of that city.” Last year the Salvation Army accused Victoria’s police of covering up a violent New Year’s Eve brawl between more than 200 African youths in Melbourne’s CBD. Police did not issue a media release on the brawl and no media outlet reported it.

Melbourne’s Herald-Sun recently revealed that even once apprehended by police, African offenders “are bashing staff and other inmates amid growing tensions between gangs at teen detention centers … where assault rates have climbed by 46 percent.” Andrew Rule, in response to the desperate efforts of the leftist media elite to suppress news of, or make apologies for, the horrifying extent of African gang violence, affirms that we should not pretend that “the rising wave (a statistical fact, not a rhetorical flourish) of violent ethnic gangs in Melbourne and Sydney are as harmless as the conga line of apologists, sycophants, ‘doctors’ wives’ and naive young lawyers who turn themselves inside out to cover for them. … The Moomba riots have highlighted a rise in gang crime that has been allowed to gather strength far too long. Police have talked privately for years of its poisonous effects. Now that particular chicken has come home to roost and it’s the size of an ostrich.”

Conservative commentator Andrew Bolt recently observed that “This level of mass violence — like the terrorism threats and the shootings in Melbourne’s north and Sydney’s west — is relatively new to Australia and demands an explanation.” Decrying the police and media cover-up, he notes how most media reporting of the Apex gang has “studiously avoid mentioning one of the most important things about it — that it is made up predominantly of Africans who are refugees or the children of refugees,” and how there seems to be “a conspiracy to stop the public knowing that our refugee and immigration policies have become a threat, introducing new levels of violence and gun crime to our cities.” This stubborn refusal by the Leftist media elite to be honest “is misleading readers and leaving them unable to conclude the nature of the threat to public safety.”

While Bolt’s observations are entirely valid, he is also guilty of misleading his readers and leaving them “unable to conclude the nature of the threat to public safety.” This is because Bolt (at least publically) denies the reality of racial differences and ascribes the dysfunctional behaviour of Africans, Pacific Islanders and Arabs solely to cultural differences — rather than to empirically-measurable differences in traits like intelligence, aggression, and impulse control. The problem for Bolt is simply that Australia is taking in “people from war zones who have a martial culture, few employable skills, and very different religious and cultural values.” For Bolt, if these criminal youths could only be made to embrace Western values they would become fully functional and productive members of society.

Of course, the reality is that no amount of taxpayer money or values education can remedy an African mean IQ deficit of two standard deviations compared to White Australians. Like Australia’s aborigines, African migrants will, with rare exceptions, inevitably impose a lifelong burden on Australia’s welfare and criminal justice systems. This was Andrew Fraser’s essential point back in 2005. In Part 2 of this essay I examine the Jewish role in shaping Australia’s current refugee policies and in creating the Frankenstein’s monster that is today’s multicultural Australia.

Go to Part 2 of 3.

A Smear Campaign against Croatia

 

ZlatkoHasanbegovic_final

Dr. Zlatko Hasanbegović, Culture Minister of Croatia                                                                 

Translated from the French by Tom SunicNote from the translator:

There has been uproar in the mainstream media all over the EU about the appointment of Dr. Zlatko Hasanbegović to the position of Culture Minister of Croatia. Since his appointment in January this year, Croatia’s highly popular Hasanbegović has been accused by prominent international left-leaning scholars, various Jewish agencies, and LGBT advocates of Holocaust revisionism, racism, and of pandering to right-wing and neo-fascist groups in Europe. What follows is my English translation of a commentary on the controversy written by Christophe Dolbeau.

*            *                *

Since January of this year a massive international campaign of defamation and disinformation has been under way against the newly elected government of Croatia and its culture minister Zlatko Hasanbegović. In view of the fact that these assaults are well-organized and neatly synchronized, one could almost imagine being transported back to the agitprop times of the late Soviet comrade Vladimir Ilich Stepakov. By all accounts the leftist intelligentsia does not like to see Eastern Europe, and certainly not Croatia, elect rightwing leaders having zero tolerance for mismanagement and the current climate of social decay. Read more

Project Syndicate: Judeo-Globalism in a Nutshell

Project Syndicate is a prominent op-ed syndication service based in Prague. Its contributors are almost invariably prestigious, including “45 Nobel laureates, 111 heads of state,” and many other influential opinion leaders. I find Project Syndicate a very useful bellwether of global establishment opinion (on a par with The Economist).

Project Syndicate’s influence is difficult to measure, although it claims to reach 476 media outlets in 154 countries. Its stated objective is to spread Western establishment op-eds into the developing world, notably Central and Eastern Europe:

News organizations in developed countries provide financial contributions for the rights to Project Syndicate commentaries, which enables us to offer these rights for free, or at subsidized rates, to newspapers and other media in the developing world. Because no publication is turned down solely on the basis of its inability to pay, Project Syndicate has cultivated strong partnerships with the most respected news media in every country in which it operates. This, in turn, has made Project Syndicate an even more attractive outlet for the world’s most eminent authors, for whom a truly global audience simply is not available elsewhere.

The prominent Jewish “explainer” pundit Ezra Klein, who now heads Vox, once promoted Project Syndicate calling it “The World’s Smartest Op-Ed Page”:

[Project Syndicate is] not just well-intentioned. It’s really, really good. [. . .] Like Tribune Media Services or the Creators Syndicate Group, it syndicates columnists. But within that, it has a sort of unique model: It syndicates experts. Rather than Mark Shields and From Harrop, it’s got Brad DeLong and Nouriel Roubini and Joschka Fischer and Lucian Bebchuk. And it adds new experts on topics relevant to the issues of the day (Bebchuk and Roubini, for instance, are both finance experts who were recently added to Project Syndicate’s ranks). Best of all, you can read it online. For free. It’s like the world’s smartest op-ed page.

Read more